hath never ben repealed but abideth stablished upon a certaine perpetuall ground that is his promise and covenant of grace made with the faythfull and their seed for ever For which see the Scriptures here cited before and these also which followe Luke 1 54 55 72. c. and 19 9. Act. 16 31. Rom. 4 11 16 17. and 15 8 9 10. Gal 3 8 29. Esa 54 10. Mal. 3 6. Luk. 20 37 38. Hebr. 11 13 16. and 13 8 20. Rev. 14 6. II. And Christ hath confirmed the same when he sent forth his Apostles appointed them †Matth. 28 18 19. and Mark 16 15 16. with Gal. 3 8 29. Gen. 12 3. and 17 4 5 7 12 26 27. with Act. 16 15 31 33. Rom. 4 9 17 and 11.13 16. and 15.8 16. 2 Cor. 1 20. to make all the nations disciples to baptize them into the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost For to make the Gentiles disciples is by the Gospel to bring them unto the covenant of God made with Abraham the Father of manie nations for salvation through the name of Iesus Christ Which covenant is everlasting includeth the faithful their seed So as therefore Baptisme which hath now succeeded and doth seale it in stead of Circumcision is by this appointment of Christ to be administred unto all that be brought comprehended under that covenant of grace and consequently both to such as are of yeeres comming to the faith of Christ and to their children being yet infants And otherwise * Zach. 2 11. Esa 42 6 7. and 49 6 22. Act. 13 46 47. Joh. 10 16. 1 Cor. 1 9 13 16. and 12 13. Ephes 2 11 22. and 3 6. the Gentiles should not with the Iewes be joyned to the Lord and become his people with them and be made coinheriters of the same bodie and joynt-partakers of the same promise of God in Christ by the Gospel as the Scripture teacheth III. Which is yet the more manifest inasmuch as the Scripture speaking both of the Iewes and Christian Gentiles of their Sacraments saith that †1 Cor. 10 1 2. the Iewes of old were baptized and that * Col. 2 11 12. the Christians now are circumcized with circumcision made without hands which the Apostle also calleth the circumcision of Christ and that ‡ with 1 Cor. 12 12 13. and Ephes 3 6. Esa 49 6 22. both Iewes and Gentiles are fellow-heires partakers of the same promise in Christ and of one the same bodie under Christ the head By which againe it is evident that Baptisme is answerable to circumcision succeeding in the place thereof to be the Lords signe seale of his covenant and that Baptisme now is to be administred to the beleevers and their children aswel as circumcision was heretofore IIII. And this was also the †Act. 16 15 33. 1 Cor. 1 16. Apostles practise at the publishing of the gospell through the world to baptize both the householders themselues that beleeved their households also Euen like as ‡ with Gen. 15 6. and 17 26 27. and 21 4. Abraham first beleeved and then was circumcised and all his familie with him And like as * Exod. 12 48 49. And that by the speach of an house familie or houshold children also are implyed therein see Gen. 30 25 30. and 45 18 19. with 46 5 6 7. Num. 3 15. c. Psal 115 12 13 14. 1 Tim. 5 8. Herein therefore Origen sayth well that * Orig. in Epist ad Rom. the Church received Baptisme of Infants from the Apostles And Augustine that †August contra Donatist lib. 4 ca. 23.24 the baptisme of Infants was not derived from the authoritie of man or Councils but from the tradition or doctrine of the Apostles the stranger of the Gentiles which received the faith of the Iewes would keep the Passeover was not onely circumcised himself but all the males also that were his V. Moreover the children of beleevers are holy are Abrahams seed and heires by promise of the kingdome of heauen eternall blessednes And who can then withhold the baptisme of water from them to whom God vouchsafeth the baptisme of his spirit and the blessing of Abraham to an inheritance everlasting in his heauenly kingdome 1 Cor. 7 14. Rom. 11 16. Act. 3 25. Gal. 3 29. Esa 46 3 4. Psal 22 10 30 71 6. 115 12 13 14 15. Luke 1 41 44. Act. 10 47. Rom. 8 9 16. Luke 19 9. Mark 10 13 16. VI. And Baptisme is the Lords signe of his washing awaie of our sinnes receiving of us into the Church and incorporating of us into Christ for salvation by his death and resurrection Whereof the children of beleevers are partakers aswell as they which be of yeeres and therefore can no more be deprived of Baptisme then of remission of sinnes entrance in to the Church ingraffing into Christ salvation by his meanes Rom. 6 3 4. and 5 14 15. Zac. 13 1. 1 Cor. 1 13 16. and 12 13. Act. 4 12. with 16 30 34. and 22 16. Gal. 3 27 28 29. Ephes 2 19. 5 25 30. Tit. 3 4 5 6 7. Rev 1 4 5. Whereupon Origen writeth thus †Orig. tom 2. homil 14. in Lucam Children are baptised for the remission of sinnes Of what sinnes Or when haue they sinned Or how can there be any reason of the laver in children but according to the sense whereof we spake There is none pure from uncleannes no not if their life be but one day upon the earth VII Neyther is there any thing required in the ministration of Baptisme nor was heretofore * Gen. 17 7 12 26. and 21 4. in circumcision whereof young infants are not capable as wel as elder people whereas in the ministration of the Lords supper it is farre otherwise For ‡ and 1 Cor. 1 16. Act. 16 14 15 33. Matt. 28 18 19. with in baptisme the minister is †I speak of the outward agent the agent alone the person baptized whether old or young is onely a patient not an agent but “ in the Lords supper besides the actions laid upon the Minister there are diverse actions required also of the receivers as namely to take to eat to drinke to doe it in remembrance of Christ to shewe forth the Lords death to examine themselues and so to eat of that bread and drink of that cuppe All which actions are required of the receivers of the Lords supper whereby they also are made agents therein and not the Ministers onely But in baptisme it is not so for in it the action is wholly enjoyned and layd upon the baptizer and not upon the baptized So that euen by the institution and administration of baptisme compared with the institution and administration of the Lords supper the trueth of this point yet further is cleared and confirmed unto us †Matth.
to Ieroboam who was of Ephraim as others also doe Salomon Iarchi thus After he came up unto greatnes he sinned in idolatrie and he dyed the house of Ieroboam was cut off and likewise the house of Ahab As touching the Christian writers Mercerus expounds it thus The beginning of idolatrie in Israell was the worship of the Calues Mercerus brought into Israell out of Egypt where Ieroboam had lived an exile Hereupon there followed an other evill the worship of Baal the Sidonian idoll brought in by Iezabel Ahabs wife 1 King 16. What calamitie followed hereupon he sheweth †He dyed in one word See more in the historie The family of Ahab was cut off the land was afflicted with famine which was accompanied with the plague forreigne enemies c. And then againe applying it to Ieroboam After that he sinned by idolatrie for Baal is often the generall name of an idoll he dyed all his dignitie and beauty being lost The house of Ieroboam for the calues that he set up was destroyed according to the word of the Lord by the Prophet Zanchius thus As there is a threefold generation a Bodily when one is borne being conceived by the seed of man Zanchius a Spirituall when one of being the sonne of Adam is born anew by the boly Ghost to be the sonne of God and a Civil when one from low degree is advanced to some dignitie or is freed from hard servitude to happie liberty So there is a threefold death A Bodily when the soule is severed from the body a Spiritual when a man through sinne is bereft of the grace of God which is the life of the soule and a Civill when a man is deprived of his dignitie and power or kingdome or his happy estate Now by the name of death in this place comes properly to be understood the Civill death And that word He dyed respecteth two things both the present estate wherein Israell then was and their future estate now shortly to come When therefore he saith And he dyed shewing the other estate of Israell such as was at that present and such as should shortly follow after he teacheth that the kingdome of Israel for their idolatrie both was so far weakned as it wanted litle of utter ruine that shortly and certainely it should utterly be destroyed Calvin thus After that they sinned in Baal they dyed to wit because God deprived the tribe of Ephraim of that power Calvin wherewith before he had adorned it so as they wanted litle of utter decay For although their kingdome was not yet fallen yet was it come euen to the utmost so as the Prophet might well say they were dead that did now so farre differ from their former estate But where he saith They sinned in Baal it is certaine that this was not the beginning of their idolatrie Ieroboam first made the calues afterward his successour sett up Baal and borrowed that superstition from their neighbours the Sidonians as is thought English notes And accordingly the notes of our English Bibles haue it thus The Ephraimites are not farre from destruction and haue lost their authority Drusius thus That people is sayd to dye which is utterly wasted and destroyed Amos 2 2. And Moab shall dye vvith tumult So in another Prophet †Haba 1 12. Thou art God from everlasting Drusius we shall not dye Others expound it he is dead in sinnes Which I doe lesse approue I had rather thus take it He is dead he hath received divers overthrowes and slaughters he is fallen into grievous calamities which afterward perpetuall exile followed And although corrections be instructions yet when he suffered those so many evils they did not profit him at all So thus I say They could not bring him to life againe Tremellius and Iunius thus He dyed That is he was accounted as dead being of no account Tremel Junius Piscator and of no power or might And Piscator thus He Dyed that is he lost his authoritie so as he did no more make the subjects to tremble as before It is a metaphoricall speach For as the Greek proverb saith The dead bites not Thus haue I set downe particularly the exposition of divers vvriters upon this place that so it might the better appear not onely how these men doe ground their assertions in so vvaightie matters as these are upon such understanding of the Scripture as both Ievv vvriters and Christians of the best are otherwise mynded therein but also that this Scripture being so understood as both Iewes Christians expound it there can no such opinion or conclusions be gathered from it as these men would hereby mainteyne as any may perceiue And that from their owne exposition such consequences vvill not follovv I haue shevved before And if neither from their ovvn nor others exposition hereof what a manner of proof then is this Which if they will not yet obserue in the case of Israell let them but consider it in their ovvne thus as followeth If one applying this Scripture unto them should say N.N. was a teaching Elder and ruled also in the church but when he offended by schisme and false doctrine he dyed that is he lost his dignitie and authoritie being by the Church put frō the ministration of the Teachers office which before he executed vvith good regard in the Church And that the rest of them are dead vvith him in like sort according to the place and estate vvhich they had in the church formerly c. Or If some should so apply this Scripture unto them as they doe to Israel thus vvhen they offended by despising and opposing the governors government of the church by contention confusion breaking avvay from the church offensiuely they dyed and so remayne unto this day dead in their sinnes If then another keeping their ovvne vvords should infer hereupon that therefore the baptisme and other ordinances of God which they in shevv reteyn cannot be unto them the signes and seales of forgiuenes of sinnes and of life eternall and therefore are in their use of them false and deceitfull as be also the ordinances of God as they call them that are reteyned among the beathens Would they now themselues yeeld either that the baptisme and other ordinances of God had among them are but reteyned in shew or that they cannot be unto them the signes and seales of forgiuenes of sinnes and of life eternall or that they are in their use of them false and deceitfull or that they be but as the ordinances reteyned among the heathens c. Or if they or their children should repent and returne to the Lord and his Church againe would they reject the baptisme they haue as false and deceitfull and get them another that might be unto them the signe seale of forgiuenes of sinnes Or vvould they still reteyne a false and deceitfull signe and such as is no better then the
vvill haue the Temple of God spoken off 2 Thes 2 4. not onely to signifie the church of Antichrist the Synagogue of Antichrist the Temple Church and body of Antichrist c. but cannot endure that others should otherwise understand it of the church of God as by his writing reviling assertions may appeare Here therefore for the better clearing understanding of the matter let me aske moreover whether these two propositiōs come to a like end agree the one vvith the other to note out the same thing or not viz. The man of sinne sitteth in the Temple of God And Antichrist sitteth †or in the Church of Rome and other like churches of Christians in the church of Rome If they be alike and accord together in one the cause will be plaine If not let them shevv the difference between these propositions that so the meaning of this Scripture may the better be found out And vvhereas also the terme sitting noteth authority and continuance as ‘ M. Ains Annot on Psal 1 1. and 61 8. 102 13. c. himself othervvhere vvell observeth let him tell us vvithal whether Antichrists authoritie and continuance be in the church of Rome or not according as the Apostle speaketh here of the Man of sin sitting in the Temple of God If he say the authoritie and continuance of Antichrist is in the church of Rome the case againe will thus also be evident If he say it is not there let him then shevv us the Temple of God spoken off by the Apostle vvhere it is Thus tvvo lines keeping directly to the point in question will more clear the matter and better convince both Papist and Anabaptist then tvvo thousand full of shifts errors vvhich doe but the more harden both of them against the trueth though severall wayes But I wil proceed Animad p. 78. The second thing that here he insisteth upon is the word Temple But the Apostles words are the Temple of God unto which he should haue kept as vvill more appeare afterward In the meane time obserue hovv he which euen novv said our reason was unperfitly alledged because of the omission of these vvords as God vvhich perteyning to another point then the question in hand might here therefore so be omitted yet doth now presently himself leaue out such words vvhich as touching the point in question may not be left out at all The particulars follovving vvil shew it more plainly He saith we take it for granted that by the Temple is meant the church so goe on in obscuritie Advert p. 58 59. My vvords were these speaking of the Apostles speach vvhere he saith Antichrist should sit in the Temple of God 2 Thes 2 4. that here by the Temple of God understanding the church of God it will follovv that Antichrist should sit in the church of God and is there to be sought and found not among the Jewes Turks Pagans c. Where first mark that I spake not of the Temple onely but of the Temple of God as the Apostle also doeth Secondly I doe in deed here deriue the reason from this exposition thereof that by the Temple of God is understood the church of God Which if it could be shevved not to be agreeable to the Scriptures otherwhere or that this place would not bear it I haue done But it is so evident that ‘ 1 Cor. 3 16 17. 2 Cor. 6 16. the Scripture thus useth it as euen here in the very next passage this man himself graunteth it Neyther doeth he shew any one place of the Scripture where this phrase of the Temple of God used figuratiuely as it is here doth signify any other thing then the church and people of God And what should I look for of an Opponent that vvould deal soundly and syncerely but that now he should proue that it is not here meant of the Church of God and should also shevv vvhereof it is to be understood and that by the word of God Which till he doe let the Reader obserue his exceptions here how idle they are and to no purpose for the matter in hand As first of all vvhen he saith that the Temple did primarily figure out Christ Joh. 2 19 21. and the Lord God almighty the Lamb is the Temple in the heauenly Ierusalem Rev. 21 22. To vvhat purpose is this will it hereupon follow that therefore by the Temple of God 2 Thes 2 4. vve may not understant the Church of God Or that they vvhich doe so goe on in obscuritie But if in this sense saith he we understand that speach of Paul touching Antichrist then must vve translate the vvords as * August de civ Dei l. 20 c. 19. some auncient Doctors haue done eis ton Naon for the Temple or as if himself vvere the Temple c. Where note first how he speaketh this with an If secondly that he telleth not vvhether himself doe think that it is thus to be understood or thus to be translated or not Which when he resolveth upon for himself and so sheweth it then may it more be considered of In the mean time let the Reader obserue how himself goeth on in obscuritie vvhat he can And for the phrase it self this onely for the present I will here note and leaue it to be observed and considered by the Reader that where Matthevv hath eis to onoma tou patros c. into the name of the Father c. Mat. 28 19. Luke hath for it epi to onomati Jesou Christou ‘ or upon in the name of Iesus Christ Act. 2 37. M. Brigh◠on Rev. 1◠2. en to onomati tou Koriou in the name of the Lord Act. 10 48. And a good writer treating on Rev. 16 2. on those words eis tous anthropous saith They upon vvhō this ulcer there spoken off seizeth are men there fell an ulcer against men as Beza turnes it or into men as the vulgar reads that is on men as Antichrist is said to sit into the Temple for in the Temple 2 Thes 2 4. But the praeposition with an accusatiue case soundeth as if the sores did vex not so much by †sticking in the body as by afflicting it from without which doth more agree to these figuratiue sores c. And whether some such thing likewise may not here be observed about this phrase eis ton naon tou Theou os Theon cathisai to sit as God ‘ or upon See Esa 1◠13. into the Temple of God where the same praeposition case is used or els moreover to note out some very near deep close or inward sitting of Antichrist into or in the Temple of God I leaue to be further considered desiring that the true meaning hereof vvhat can be may be searched and found out for the better ending of these and sundry other questions vvhereunto this vvould giue great light and help As for the * Augustine auncient
and remembred Novv touching the Scripture and question spoken off where the Apostle speaketh of the man of sinne sitting in the Temple of God ‘ Bellar. cōtrov 3 l. 3. c. 13 c. Rhem Test in 2 Thes 2 s 11. Bellarmine and the Papists vvill not haue it understood of the Church of God among Chistians and thus farre M. Ains and his followers agree with them in this place But Bellarmine expounds it literally of the Temple of Ierusalem M. A. expounds * Animad p. 78 82. 93 94. c. it straungly of the Synagogue of Sathan of the Temple of Antichrist and the Divell c. And here novv they differ one from another and both of them from the trueth as far as darknes doth from light The Temple at Ierusalem was destroyed long since and in the new Ierusalem which we expect clearly shortly to come at the conversion of the Ievves to the Christian faith there is no such Temple to be looked for the sacrifices shadovves and ceremonies of the Law being now ceased I saw no Temple therein saith Iohn for the Lord God Almighty and the Lambe are the Temple of it Rev. 21 2 22. So vve may first cashier Bellarmines exposition And then M.A. vvhich is in some respects a great deal more straunge that by the Temple of God the Apostle should meane the Synagogue of Sathan the Temple of Antichrist and the Divell c. Against vvhich if there vvere neyther other Scripture nor any other thing at all but that the Apostle here describeth it by this Name of the Temple of God calleth Antichrists sitting therein as God * 2 Thes 2 7. a mysterie of iniquity it vvere ynough to teach us to advise well and to take far more heed thereabout For is this terme of the Temple of God ever so taken in the Scripture Would the Apostle saith Augustine call the Temple of an idoll or of the Divell the Temple of God Or when he describeth the mysterie of Antichrists iniquity would he teach the Church that the place of his sitting is the Temple of God if he meant that it vvere in deed the Synagogue of Sathan the Temple of Antichrist For that Antichrist should sit in the Temple of Antichrist and Synagogue of Sathan what mysterie is there in it All the world would easily perceiue that these agreed very vvell and most fitly together But for Antichrist to sit in Gods Temple and Christs Church this is in deed a mysterie and a mysterie of iniquity such as men had need open the eyes of their understanding and set their hearts religiously to consider it if they vvould discerne it as it is Which may sufficiently appeare by these straunge expositions and like erroneous courses found among the Papists Anabaptists these men and other such vvhether Popishly or Anabaptistically addicted hereabout And what may we think is it that induceth thē hereunto Is it not first that this is a mysterie of iniquitie which eyther is not readily perceived or not rightly esteemed as it should Is it not vvithall in the Papists that they would turn away the application of this Scripture from the Pope church of Rome and therefore vvould send us to the Temple of Ierusalem to find out this mysterie there Is it not also on another hand in these men vvith the Anabaptists and others like mynded that they cannot endure that the Church of Rome should any way be esteemed the Church of God and therefore wil rather by the Temple of God understand the Synagogue of Sathan and Temple of Antichrist then they vvil admit that the church of Rome should be the Temple and church of God For my self my purpose is not to plead for the corrupt and adulterate estate of the church of Rome or of any degenerate churches at all much lesse for any impietie or iniquitie of the Man of sinne of Antichrist or his hierarchie of the corruptions false worship or superstitions of that apostasie against vvhich I haue heretofore many yeres in prison and now also by the mercy of God this twentie yeeres in exile witnessed and stil doe vvitnesse the trueth of Christ vvhat in me is and in that measure as it pleaseth him to manifest and vouchsafe unto me But my purpose is to shew that difference is to be put betvveen the Temple of God where Antichrist sitteth and betvveen Antichrist himself who as God sitteth therein that so the cause of the Protestants in general and ours in particular may be kept sound and intire both against the Papists and popish corruptions on the one hand and against the Anabaptists and Anabaptistical aberrations on the other Now therefore to speak of the church of Rome in this respect how this terme is used it is taken either particularly or more generally If vve understand it of a parttcular church as the Apostle wrote †Epist to the Romās his Epistle to the church there how shall we soundly deny eyther it to be the Temple of God or Antichrist to be set therein Euen the Papists themselues hold and tell us that the †Anton. Sum. part 3. tit 21. cap. 2. 6. Laterane Church in Rome is the Parish Church of the Bishop of Rome Which is much to be observed about this question And himself saith here as the trueth is that the Tsmple figured every particular church and therefore also the particular Church of Rome Which thing alone might suffice for the controversie in hand And that the more because the Antichristian usurpation opposition exaltation extent of unlavvfull jurisdiction and other such corruptions growen up since the first plantation of that church are rather to be referred to the Bishops of that church then to that particular church it self and doe more fitly and properly apperteyne to those clauses of the Apostles description of Antichrist where he calleth him the man of sinne opposing and exalting himself aboue al that is called God or is reverend sitting as God and shewing himself that he is God c. then to this other clause of the Temple of God whereabout our question is Like as in the Revelation they are to be referred to the Beast not to the church and people of God in and over vvhich the beast tyrannizeth Rev. 11 and 13 and 14 and 17 and 18 chapt If it be understood more generally then may it be applied to all other such Christian churches as synce the prevayling of Antichrist the Pope of Rome are come under his jurisdiction and government Rev. 11 2. and vvherein he sitteth or treadeth thereon though not in his ovvne person in each of them yet by his hierarchie authoritie usurpation and jurisdiction And if we mark it also we shal find that not the Pope onely but the other hierarchicall Prelates Diocesan Provinciall the like haue the Parishes or particular churches perteyning to their jurisdictions vvherein they sit although not in their owne persons yet by their hierarchie and authority Yea euen
Esquilinus Viminalis seuen mountaines As euen †Virgil. Geor. 2. Ovid. de Trist l. 1. Ele. 4. l. 3. Eleg. 7. Propertius c. the heathen Poets describe the situation thereof before ever there vvas a Christian church there 6. That this City hath seuen kings or kinds of government whereof fiue were fallen vvhen Iohn wrote one was then and the other yet to come Rev. 17 9 10. Which also is verified in the city of Rome where the fiue severall sorts of government by Kings Consuls Dictators Decemvirs and Tribunes were done ceased before Iohns time The sixt by Emperours was then when he lived and wrote this the other by Popes vvas not yet come But how should this be found in the church of Rome vvhich was not before Iohns time and therefore could not haue fiue kings or kinds of government thereof then fallen c. 7. That this city this Babylon this woman is that great city which reigned over the kings of the earth in Iohns time Rev. 17 18. And that not the church but the City of Rome so reigned vvhen Iohn vvrote these things all doe acknovvledge 8. Finally that the Lord himself putteth difference betweene this City Babylon and his people therein foretelling that this Babylon shal be utterly burnt vvith fire and throvvne downe with violence so as it shall no more at all be found Rev. 18 2 8 9 18 20 21. c. and yet then calling his people out of her Rev. 18 4. Like as of old came to passe in the type hereof in Babylon of Chaldea both for the wondrous desolation thereof for the calling of the Lords people out from thence Jer. 50. and 51 1 60 61 64. with 50 8 and 51 6 45. Esa 48 20. Zach. 2 6 7. Other moe reasons hereabout might be observed out of these other Chapters of this book of the Revelation as also out of other Scriptures and the event of things some vvhereof are synce come to passe and some remaine yet to be performed But these may suffice to shevv hovv needfull it is vvell to consider vvhat by the great city here spoken off we are to understand and heedfully to distinguish between the church and the city it self IIII Fourthly note here that by the great city is meant not onely the city it self but the vvhole Iurisdiction authority and dominion thereof how far soever extended For as ‘ M. Bright on Rev. 16 19. one well writeth the City is not onely the tovvn or piece of ground conteyned within compasse of the walles thereof together with the Citizens and inhabitants having order government among themselues according to the Lavves and priviledges there had but also the vvhole jurisdiction and government of the City in all places perteyning thereunto Which being observed we may thereby perceiue that the streets of this City reach farre euen to all places under the jurisdiction thereof and comprehend sundry peoples and kinreds and toungues and nations as here is said Whereupon it is fitly compared to the great city Babylon whose dominion and extent of government was exceeding large and great Rev. 14 8. and 16 19. and 17 5. and 18 2 3 4 7 21. compared with Esa 13 19. and 14 6. and 47 5. Jer. 50. and 51. Neyther is it onely compared to cityes but to Egypt also that was a countrey Which comparisons though they haue other peculiar uses and applications yet may also be observed in this behalf Rev. 11 8. And the more seeing that the extent of this City is such as reached euen to Ierusalem where our Lord was crucified as is noted also in this place Rev. 11 8. Where yet obserue further that the Church of Rome being fallen into deep apostasie and having the man of sinne sitting therein as God who hath that city for his throne c. the things that are spoken of this city are also applied to the apostate estate of that church of Rome and the other churches that are under the jurisdictiō of the Prelacy of that Sea wheresoever and of vvhatsoever people kinred toungue or nation they be Which application thereof I doe also acknowledge as it is observed by and according to the vvord of God Rev. 11 8. with Esa 1 10. Jer. 23 14. Ezech. 16 2 46. c. and Rev. 14 8. and 17 and 18 c. with Esa 21 9. and 48 20. Jer. 50. and 51 1 45. c. Ezech. 16 2 35 c. and 23 chap. Zach. 2 6 7. But shal we therefore conclude that by the Temple of God spoken off 2 Thes 2 4. may not be understood the Church of God This is the point to be insisted upon as also whether we can soundly and by vvarrant of the Scriptures deny the Church of Rome though in defection and other Churches in apostasie to be the Churches of God and not to be under his covenant nor to haue his signes and seales thereof nor any of his ordinances remayning among them but that euen the Baptisme there had is an idoll a fiction a lying and deceitfull signe a cursed and detestable Sacrament Which hath ben and yet is a great occasion and mayne ground of Anabaptistrie besides that it hardneth the Papists and others in their errours much the more when the Churches themselues and the ordinances of God though corrupted yet still continued unto and among them are not so acknowledged by us as they ought to be Neyther so onely but are eyther utterly denyed and disanulled or so spoken and accounted off as doth in deed necessarily imply the deniall and disanulling thereof When the Temple of God at Ierusalem was polluted and profaned and that so exceeding sinfully as God gaue it up vvith Ierusalem into the enemies hand yet vvhenas then Nebucadnezar burnt it the Lord tooke upon him the vengeance of his Temple vvith great severity because though it vvas polluted yet it was still the Lords Temple vvhich he accordingly should haue regarded Jer. 50 28 and 51 11. Which should teach all to take heed hovv we esteeme and deale with the churches of God though sinfully polluted and profaned If the Lord were so carefull of the figure shall we think he vvill haue no regard of the figured thing vvhich this man himself here acknowledgeth every particular church to be therefore also the church of Rome But now he saith next that to understand by the Temple of God a particular Church is not answerable to the Temple of God in Israell which was not for one Synagogue but for * Deut. 16 16. the whole nation of the Jevves and for †1 Kin. 8 41 42. Ioh. 12 20. Act. 8 27. the Gentiles that came to the faith through the world Hovv greatly forgets he himself and hovv presently seing that here but a line before he said the Temple figured not onely the catholike or universall Church Ephes 2 21. but also every particular church by proportion 1 Cor. 3 16 17. And may we not
vaine as he doth throughout his treatise For vvhich he may assure himself the Lord vvill not hold him guiltles nor leaue him unpunished if he doe thus persist and vvill not be reclaymed Exo. 20 7. Let him therefore not delay to think on his wayes and to turne his feet into the testimonies of the Lord. Psal 119 59 60. 19. When as heretofore about this question concerning the church of Rome vve annexed somewhat out of the vvritings of M. Iunius against Bellarmine vve expressely signified ‡ M. Clift Advertis p. 20 21. that vve did it not as relying upon the judgment of men in causes of religion but because we knevv that many who are caried with a prejudice against us would stay themselues the more when they should see what M Iunius hath written of this argument Yet as if no such thing at all had ben signified by us †Animad p. 98. this opposite doth not onely passe by it but pretend as if herein we did or vvould stand to his judgment And this also he maketh the more straunge because sometimes some letters of difference haue passed betvveen M. Iunius and us in some other things As if vve could not differ from him in some things and yet like or speak of his judgment in some other This man himself differeth from him in sundry things doth he not therefore like or may he not speak of his judgment in any thing But vvhat vvill he not pretend or except against to haue some shevv of help for himself in such time of need And although it be certaine that in cases of Religion vve should not rely on the judgment of man but on the vvord of God alone as we noted before yet seeing that we knowe but in part and the Word of God is common to all his people and is not come to any person or people alone therefore should we not lightly despise or reject the judgment of others and those also godly learned but with reverence and humilitie regard them specially when they set themselues not onely to shevv their judgment but to bring proof of argument and that also froÌ„ the word of God as M. Iun. doth about the matter in hand 20. Novv therefore that the Reader may see hovv M. Ainsvv setteth himself herein not against us alone but against any other whomsoever and vvhatsoever they alledge hereabout and specially that he may better consider what M. Iunius himself hath written of this matter and how very many things therein of special vvaight and use M. Ainsw hath omitted which are good and needfull to be observed I haue thought it not amisse here again to set dovvn M. Iunius his ovvn words Which alone wil much help the Reader better to discerne the evasions errours abuse of Scripture and other evill dealing into vvhich M Ainsvv runneth on still more and more Besides that the Reader may by this meanes be better informed and directed hovv to discerne and judge of the opinions and differences that are at this day hereabout among whomsoever vvhether Protestants or Anabaptists or any other M. Iunius his judgment of the Church of Rome as may be seen in the second tome of his works in folio Libro singulari de Eccles contra Bellarm. cap. 17 pag. 1018 1019. c. BEing to treat of the Church of Rome we will first open the aequivocation or divers signification of the word before we determine of the thing it self that all men may better perceiue what it is that is at this day called in question among us For very many ar deceived with the homonymie or divers signification of the very word and unawares insnare themselues and others by ignorance of the deceitfulnes in the speach The church of Rome therefore is properly so called or abusiuely by the misterming or abusing of the name both as it is called a church and as it is called the Romane church For as it is called the Romane church sometimes it properly signifieth a company which is at Rome as Paul spaâ—e writing to the Romanes sometimes it signifieth abusiuely all the Churches on the earth that cleaue to the Romane church according to the forme of doctrine and constitution thereof But we will simply treat of the church as it is the Romane church or church of Rome and the things which we shall speak of this church the same may the godly reader by proportion understand of the church so called by abuse of speach Now †All this whole passage he omitteth and all other clauses senteÌ„ces passages that are included in these as it is called a church vvhich thing chiefly is in controversie it is so termed three maner of waies as a subject as an accident growen to the subject and as the subject together with that his accident As a subject it is the simple or single church of Rome As an accident growen upon the subject it is the papacie or the papal hierarchie which they cal ecclesiasticall As a subject compounded vvith his accident it is the church of Rome become papall or under the pope that is to say corrupt as I may so speaâ— by that lawles or unnatural shoot of the Pope springing out of the stoeâ— Now of each of these we will consider so briefly as we can The Church of Rome when it is considered as a subject it hath two parts the pastors and the flock of Christ for which church the Apostle of old gaue thanks to God by Iesus Christ because her faith was published throughout the whole world Rom. 1 8. And for which we also dayly ask of God in our prayers that he would informe it to worship him by his spirit in the Gospell of his sonne to stablish it in the faith Neither doe we deny this subject to be euen at Rome by the mercy of God at this day because we trust there is God calling persons called the calling it self yet in her the meeting of which things together in one giveth being to a church as before we shevved But touching the papacie or the papall hierarchie which they are woont to call Ecclesiastical we say that it is not the church properly but an accident growen unto the church and such as covertly worketh against the life and health of the church That it is not the church properly Here again he omits clauses words passages of speciall waight is proved by the very definition of the papacie and of the church of God For the papacie according to his generall is an order the church is a companie or an assemblie The papacie by his difference is an order positiue humane or from men and naught The church is an assemblie divine or from God by divine authoritie united together vvith reason Now those things which differ both in their generall and in their essential difference and in their necessarie conditions or properties they cannot be one and the same thing And that the papacie is an accident growen upon the
church experience it self speaketh For the subject is before his accident which is contingent and separable The church was many ages when the papacie was not The papacie came to the church contingently beside the being of the church and so may be separated from it as at this time also there are churches where the papacie is not there will be churches still hereafter vvithout the papacie Therefore the papacie is not the church but it is an evill growen up in the church a pestilence a dropsie a gangrene in the bodie deceitfully working against the life and health of it and therefore most dangerously noysomely eating up the liuely and wholesome moysture of the church But of this whole matter we haue spoâ—en in the third controversie and in this fourth we are to speak of it hereafter Therefore concerning the other which remaineth let us se whether the papal Roman church This also he passeth by or that which is of the pope be the church The opinions which are about this matter are divers The popish generation cry out with full mouth that it is absolutely the church Others not beholding a different regard of the papacy from that which is the church deny it to be the church We relying both on the nature of the thing and on the authoritie of the Scripture doe put a difference The nature of the thing doth teach that the church is one thing and that the papacie is another as we spake a litle before The authoritie of the Scripture teacheth the church but it teacheth not the papacie therefore they are divers things For they delude undoubtedly I say they delude which require at our hands one definition of the subject of the accident as of one singular thing or obtrude it on us For thus must we say The papal church as it hath that in it which belongeth to the definition of a church it is a church but as it hath in it the evill growen unto it which we call the papacie in that respect it is not a church but a faultie or defloured a polluted and corrupt church and drawing on to destruction Let us maâ—e it plain by a similitude The body it self is one thing And this he omits the corruption or consumption in the body another thing The body is the subject the corruption or consumption is the evill accident cleaving unto the subject the corrupted or consuming body is compounded of them both There is both the body and the consumption in the consuming body So likewise is a body that is svvolne with the vvater causing the dropsie Both are together and yet so together as eyther one of the two or both together must needs perish If the nature of the body be stronger the consumption ceaseth and the dropsie-water decayeth but if the consumption or dropsie prevaile there is most certain destruction of them both So is the church of God for in it self it is the bodie of Iesus Christ If a deadly disease growe upon it both are then together the body and the disease in the body If the purging medicine of the grace of God for nothing is here naturall be of the more efficacie the disease then is vanquished and decayeth but if the disease prevaile then both of them the body the disease must needs come to an end For such is the condition of the disease it both feedeth it self on the body decaying and destroyeth it self together with the body And this also After this maner therefore doe we esteem of the church of Rome which they cal the papal or popish church There is the church there is the papacie and there is the papal church As there is the church it is the subject of God as there is the papacie there is the disease of man as it is the papall church there is a fight between the church the papacie that will destroy eyther one of them apart or both together If God shal giue it the purging medicine of his grace by meanes whereof the papacie the accidentarie evil decay and perish it is wel but if the papacie that most faultie and corrupt order and deadly accident prevaile it wil bring destruction to both of them both to the church and to it self by the judgment of God And this And this now in the memorie of our fathers and our owne wee see to haue befallen many churches which claue fast unto that Romane church For when it seemed good unto God more clearly to light the torch of the gospell to scatter the papal smokes by his spirit there remayned churches returning by his grace to a better constitution and stronger health and that which was of the Pope departed vanishing away of it own corruption but when as God sent not that purging medicine of his divine grace into the body of any church then the popish corrupt blood got strength more and more which will be to that church deadly destruction unles God of his mercie provide a remedie In the remembrance and conscience of this benefit doe our churches fitly sing vvith the Prophet Blessed be the Lord which hath not giuen us for a praye unto their teeth Our soule is escaped euen as a bird out of the snare of the foulers the snare is broken we are delivered Our help is the name of the Lord c. Psal 124. Wherefore in my judgment they speak preposterously who ask whether the church be in the papacie And these clauses also because on the contrarie it should be asked whether the papacie be in the church For the subject is not in the accident but the accident in the subject whose being is an in-being or to be in a thing as men commonly speak And that the papacie is in the church as the order or estate of apostasie in the house and city of God is as certaine as that of the Apostle is certain 2 Thes 2. that the man of sinne the sonne of perdition sitteth in the temple of God with his whole order or ‘ Or rank in the former translation estate of apostates not on the other side that the temple of God consisteth in that order and number of apostates which is a thing most straunge furthest off But the terme of the papacie taken doubly aequivocally deceiveth them in such sort as here before we shewed concerning the Romane popish church For under the name of the papacie which is an order vitious corrupt they comprehend the subject it self which is annoyed with that corruption not distinguishing aright between these things As therefore if any should deny that to be a bodie which lyeth in a deadly sort swollen with the water of the dropsie And this or should affirme that water vvhich choketh the body to be the body it self should in both these be deceived in his judgment so also are both deceived as well they which deny it to be the church because the papacie is in it as they
to this head another new head wherupoÌ„ it is called papal or popish wherin it may likwise rest with al. The calling is to God alone in the church of Rome there is calling to others with God the calling upoÌ„ theÌ„ There the calling is by the spirit Scripture alone whence it receiveth the ministerie delivereth nothing more then that which it hath received from the Lord here it receiveth a ministerie from the spirit of Christ and of the Pope from the Scripture and the ragged traditions of men there finally the persons things and actions are caried according to the doctrine of the spirit and the Scripture onely here all things are taken and exercised out of the Popes changeable shop and at his beck as they say they stand and fall So all the marks on Gods behalf are in it but for it self on it own part as they say there is no mark intire no marke that is not corrupt by the papall poysonfull sorcerie and the order of all things most miserably perverted For which cause in Lyons in France a certain Frier did merrily preach to the people when he sayd the Hugonots for so they are called in France did consent with the church of Rome in all their articles of saith but there was one shrewd word the word Onely at the crack whereof war was in â—indled for they beleeue onely what the rule of faith hath out of the holy Scriptures but the church of Rome requireth more unto faith then is eyther conteyned in the rule of faith or in the holy Scriptures because such is the authoritie of the church And this also These things being well understood all men will easely perceiue how that Church in respect of God or on Gods part is yet a church but of it self is most corrupt and verie neere to destruction But here doe arise two doubts and difficulties by which the minds of many are troubled The first doubt is what we are to judge of the members of that church The latter what the dutie of them is who are in that church and see the great corruptions thereof To the first question we answer on this manner A threefold judgment had need meet together in this cause And this the first of trueth the second of charitie the third of prudence or wisdome The judgment of trueth is of the common condition of the church by which we judge from the calling of God that as yet she is a church The judgment of charitie is of the severall members of the church by vvhich we presume they be members of the church whiles they be called with the calling from God and are in this way as David calleth it Psal 2. The judgment of prudence or wisdome is that by vvhich we discerne and distinguish persons things actions divine from humane good ones from evill true ones from false and the degrees of these also amongst themselues For as of things and actions so also of persons some are corrupting through ignorance infirmitie or malice wholly or in part others are corrupted euen in the simplicity of their hearts as the Scripture speaketh and of these there are a great number of whom it were ungodly to esteeme that they were not of the church of God Of such as doe corrupt we must take heed Mat. 7. of the corrupted who are corrupted yet still we must haue compassion But the Church verely is not to be judged of the maner of either of these for Christ saith not ye shall not know the church but by their fruits of doctrine and life ye shall know them Mat. 7 20. And without doubt they doe very unwisely who judge of the trueth of a church by the particular life or doctrine of any men who ever they be especially of private men for the calling of God maketh the church not the assenting answer of the men that are in it as on the other side the Church ceaseth not to be a church for the refusall or deniall of men wheresoever the calling of God is Now let us come to the second demaund What is the duetie of those wilt thou say that are in the popish church and see the grievous corruptions of it And some clauses here Their dutie is such as of those children which dwel together with their adulterous mother for God hath used this similitude in Esay and Ieremie as we haue seen before A wise sonne vvill euen from his heart abhorre the sinne of his mother he will with speach and signe call back his mother from evill and he will absteine himself from it and in all things he will cleaue to his father he will stand to his judgment he will obey his will and while he can by reason of his mother he will cleaue unto her next after his father but when and whiles by reason of her he can not doe it with good conscience for the spiritual and bodily injurie of her he will betake himself into the chamber of his father Closet or inner room where also is the church the mother of us all Gal. 4 26. For this is not a good consequent if one depart from this or that church therefore he doth altogether depart from the church He doth but trifle that doth so from a particular conclude universally A part of the flesh if it be divided or cut asunder from another part by a wound received is not straight way to be thought to be separate or cut of from the whole body for it is cut asunder and the mouth of the vvound openeth but neyther part is therefore disjoyned from the bodie A godly sonne therefore ought to cleaue to his father and mother jointly so long as with good conscience he can but because he cannot with sound faith and conscience haue fellowship vvith the unfruitfull works of darknes Eph. 5 11. he rather leaving his mother cleaveth to God his father and our Lord Iesus Christ then that he vvill defile himself with those foule deeds of his mother And these passages following to the end And this did our auncestors religiously whom the popish tyrannie for some ages hath exercised The godly which were at Rome and other where in the Church which they call the Romane church abusiuely first learned to abhorre euen from their soule the sinnes of their mother when once they began to haue right understanding by words and signes they modestly called her back from her naughtie deeds whiles she would beare them they carefully absteyned themselues from all communion of evill yet in all things cleaving to their father from whom in whom by whom and for vvhom are all things standing to his judgment and obeying his will finally they did so long cleaue to their mother next after their father vvhilst by her they could so doe with intire faith and conscience and their owne salvation But when they could not longer with good faith and conscience so doe by reason of the violent tyrannie the spirituall
haue also shevved that euen the church of Rome is the church and Temple of God as Iudah likevvise and Israell of old vvere in the time of their apostasies How much more then should we so esteem of the church of England yea and of the Lutherans vvho haue in so many things novv left the apostasie of the church of Rome and haue received the doctrine of justification by faith in Christ alone vvith many other precious doctrines of truth that are yet still miserably depraved and corrupted among the Papists But hereupon some object and say If they be the church of God none may leaue them it is schisme for any to leaue those that are the churches and people of God and vvhy then doe you not continew Ministers and members there still c. First to this objection I haue ansvvered before pag. 116 c. To vvhich I referre the Reader as also to that which M. Iunius hath written concerning this matter as may be seen here before pag. 184 186. Secondly if this objection were sound then might none leaue the present estate of the church of Rome seeing they are the church and Temple of God as before hath ben declared Yet the men that doe thus object haue many of them left it themselues And M. Iunius shevveth that both these may stand vvel together to esteem it to be the church of God and yet to leaue forsake it in their estate yea that it is our duty so to doe But in deed to note this by the vvay wel may it be that some Protestant writers otherwise of great good judgment haue heretofore the more denied it to be the Church of God because they thought if that were granted it vvould then follow to be schisme for any to leaue it as the Papists themselues are vvoont usually to object But the consequence is not good as is shewed before by the Scriptures and examples both in Iudah and Israell c. Pag. 116. Thirdly in a Church there are tvvo things specially that are still to be respected the faith and the order thereof Col. 2 5. For touching the worship of God therein it may in divers respects be referred to the one or to the other or to both of them Novv for the Faith which is in Christ alone to salvation we acknowledge that they professe it soundly and in the unity thereof vve also hope our selues to be saved with them and therefore albeit they intreat deale yll with us sundry vvaies yet we hold them to be our brethren in the Lord and in the faith of his Gospell But as for the churches order worship and government ecclesiasticall vve hold and professe that they stand yet still greatly corrupted and transgressing the second commandement many waies As namely ‡ Of these more particularly see in the Apologie and other Treatises of ours also in the Treatise here following touching the reformed churches in their Prelacie and inferiour ministerie in their Canons Constitutions and Worship devised and imposed by man especially in the Book of common prayer according to which all the ministers and people of that Church are enjoyned to minister and partake of the holy things of God had among them vvherein are corruptions not a few that are also observed and written against †The Abridgement of the Ministers book of Lincolne Diocesse The Survey of the book of Common praier c by divers of themselues besides the refusal opposition persecution of the trueth vvhich hath now a long time very often many vvaies benshewed unto them c. And yet more specially that the particular churches ministers thereof stand not as the primitue Churches and Pastors did immediately under Iesus Christ the Archpastor as touching their ecclesiasticall constitution but under another spirituall authoritie and Prelacie devised by man neyther haue povver in themselues as now they stand to receiue and practise all the ordinances of God to redresse all errors and corruptions that are manifested unto them by the vvord of God as the Pastors and Churches aforesaid had Which things standing thus hereby may appeare that none can stand Ministers or members of the Church aforesaid in their estate and performe the dueties thereof according to the Lavves and Constitution thereof but they shall sinne and transgresse the second Commandement Which the Lord that is a jelous God accounteth to be hatred of him and hath threatned severely to punish as on the contrarie he hath promised to shew mercy graciously to them that loue him and keep his commandements Exod. 20 4 5 6. compared with Lev. 10 1 2. Deut. 4 1 2. 2 King 10 18 31. 2 Chron. 19 2 3. Luke 19 27. Psal 119 126 127 128. Esa 29 13. and 65 2. Mal. 1 6 14. Mar. 7 4 6 7. c. Col. 2 20 23. Rev. 14 9 12. and 22 18 19. Fourthly which commeth to a like end vvith the former reason but yet vvill make it more plaine there are two things concerning the vvorship and service of God which we ought alwaies carefully to remember and obserue One that we ought to leaue and forsake all the inventions of men and more specially al the mixtures and corruptions of Antichrist the man of sinne in the service and worship of God And this not onely in things concerning the faith but in such also as concerne the order of the church Exod. 20 4 5. with Deut. 12 32. Iudg. 8 27. 1 Chro. 13. 15 2. c. 2 Chron. 33 17. Psal 119 101 113 128. Esa 30 21 22. Ezech. 43 8. Mal. 1 6 14. Matt. 15 9 13 14. Rom. 16 17. Rev. 14 9 12. and 22 18 19. The other is that vve obserue and practise all the commandements and ordinances of the Lord vvhich he hath once for all giuen unto his church vvhether concerning the faith or the order of the church and so consequently the Churches government vvorship ministerie ministration of all every of the holy things of God according to his vvord Exod. 20 6. compared with Deut. 12 32. Matth. 28 20. Gal. 3 15. Jude v. 3. 1 Tim. 6 13 14. 2 Chron. 13 8 12. and 19 8 11. Psal 119 101 128. Esa 30 21. and 33 22. Rev. 14 12. Which two things seeing that in the present estate of the church of England neither ministers nor members can obserue them nor be suffred peaceably so to vvalke hovv can it be but we must needs leaue that estate unlesse vve should still continew in sinne against the Law of God And hovv can that justly be counted schisme vvhich is our bounden duty to the Lord vvherein vve ought to obey God rather then Man Fiftly to make the matter yet more plaine let us put the case that some Kings and States vvould permit the Churches in their dominions peaceably to enjoy the ministerie of the word and the Baptisme of elder people among them but not of children urging those words according to the letter Make disciples
that so they may watch over them as those that must giue account for them unto God Act. 20.28 Heb. 13.17 1 Pet. 5.1 4. V. Neither can the Churches or members thereof be so well instructed governed and edified in faith and mutuall loue as if this order and practise be observed For which see also the Scriptures aforesaid and the like But if the church in any city be more large as often commeth to passe and is usuall in great cities then that it can conveniently and ordinarily meet together in one place then is it to be considered whether it should not be distinguished and distributed into divers particular Churches or parishes Which may everie one of them severally haue their owne peculiar place of meeting together their owne Pastour other ministers Elders and Deacons their ovvn meetings and all publick actions duly orderly performed among themselues for the reasons here before alledged and other the like To vvhich end may also be observed hovv at Ierusalem vvhere the great Synedrion of the Iewes was by the Lord appointed to be yet notvvithstanding there vvere in that one city many Synagogues And all the Synagogues also had their ovvn rulers ministers as may appeare by such other Synagogues as are particularly spoken of in the Scriptures Mar. 5 22. with Luke 4 16 20 31 33. and 12 11. and 21 12. with Mat. 10 17. and 23 34 Luke 13 14. vvith Act. 13 14 15. and 18 4 7 8 17. Here moreover about the estate and distinction of churches are two things carefully to be observed First As did the seuen churches of Asia c. Rev. 1 2 and 3 chap. that all particular churches vvith their Pastors as is noted here before do stand immediately under Iesus Christ the Archpastour vvithout any other straunge ecclesiastical power and authoritie interposed betvveen whether it be of the Prelates as of Diocesan Provinciall or Oecumenicall Bishops or of their unlawfull usurping Synods or any such like invented by men and brought into the church Secondly that notwithstanding the estate distinction aforesaid yet all the churches and ministers of them should be alway ready and vvilling with their mutuall ayde counsel assistance and all lawfull maanes to help comfort advise strengthen and build up one another in the truth vvhich is according to godlines in Iesus Christ Ephes 4.4 16. Rom. 12 3 8. 1 Cor. 12 4 27. Col. 2 5 19. and 4 16 17. Act. 15 2 23. with Psal 12 2 3. Sal. Song 8 1. c.. And so to this end and in this manner may be had a lavvfull and profitable use of Synods Classes Assemblies or Councels for mutual help advise in cases of question controversie and difficulties about religion to as alvvaies it be provided that they doe not challenge or usurpe any unlavvfull jurisdiction or power over the particular churches or their pastours and governours to whom their ovvn povver under Christ the Lord is alvvay to be reserved and to be kept whole and intier according to the vvord of God Like as may be seen in all the churches planted by the Apostles and particularly in those seuen of Asia standing not farre asunder to whom Christ vvrote his several letters directed to the Angels or Pastors of everie of them in particular and not to any one of the churches or Pastors more theÌ„ another as having authoritie over the rest nor to any Diocesan Provinciall or Oecumeniall Bishops set over the churches and Pastors thereof Which kind of Prelacie Office government if it had ben ordeyned by Christ and planted by the Apostles in those churches there had novv ben fit and necessarie occasion specially when Christ vvrote about the corruptions of those churches both to haue blamed those Bishops for neglect of their duetie as he doth the Angels of the particular Churches and to haue directed his letters unto them as being the next chiefest in ecclesiasticall authoritie under him to oversee and governe those churches if then there had ben any such among them by the ordinance of Christ Rev. 2 1.8.12 18. and 3 1.7 14. compared vvith ch 1.4.12.13.20 and vvith the estate and constitution of all other churches planted by the Apostles For vvhich see the Scriptures here beâ—â—â—â— alledged pag. 250. And of this also see more hereafter in the fift 〈…〉 here follovving If any aske to whom then the churches shal be subject if there be no Diocesan or other like Prelates set over them I answer that the churches and all the Officers members thereof are to be subject to the Princes States and magistrates under whom they liue according as the Apostles doe teach us saying Let every soul be subject to the higher powers c. Reâ— 13.1 Submit your selues to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the king as supreme or unto governours as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evill doers and for the praise of them that doe vvell 1 Pet. 2 13 14. vvith Tit. 3 1. The magistrates are under the Lord to be the keepers of both the Tables of the Law of God To whom al persons ought to be subject euen for conscience sake to yeeld obedience unto them yet alwaies in the Lord and not against the Lord by any meanes Deut. 17 18 19 20 Rom. 13 1 7. with Mat. 22 21. Dan. 3 14 18. Act. 4 18 19 20. Rev. 12 10 11. CHAPTER III. Touching the right and power of particular churches VVHether †everie Church haue not right and power graunted by the Lord to chuse their ovvn Pastours other Ministers Elders Deacons and Deaconesses making choise of meet fit persons as also to * use the ministration of the vvord Sacraments Censures and vvhole ecclesiastical administration being careful stil to haue al things done according to the ordinance of God prescribed in his word Mat. 28 18 20. with 〈◊〉 Act 6 3 5. and 14 23. compared with Act. 1 15 23 26. and 2 41 42 46. 11 22. 15 22 25. 1 Cor. 16 3. 2 Cor. 8 19. Gal. 1 1. 1 Tim. 3 1 15. 5 9 10 11 17 â—2 6 13 14. Ezec. 33 2. Lev. 8 2 3 4 5. Num. 8 9. Deut. 1 13 16 18. with Joh. 13 20. 1 Cor. 4 1. 2 Cor. 5 19. Heb. 5 4. Also * Act. 1 2 3 14 15. 15 2 6 23 30 and 20 7 17 18. 21 18 23. Rom. 12 6 7 8. 16 1 2. Mat. 18 17 18 19 20. and 28 18 19 20. 1 Cor. 4 17. 5 ch 10 16. and 11 23 26. and 12 ch Epist to Timoth. Tit. Rev. 2 3 ch with 1 Tim. 6 13 14. I. Because the Primitiue churches planted by the Apostles had this right and power at the beginning as may be seen in the Scriptures here before alledged II. And the Congregation of Israel had of old likewise their right in the election of their officers and other such
4 11.28.32 l. 4. c. 1.4.5.19.22 Which is vvel to be noted for better observation how every church or parish had at the beginning their own Pastor or Bishop and hovv those Bishops were much unlike the Diocesan Provinciall and Oecumenicall Bishops had now a dayes who content not themselues with a parish or particular Church but chalendge by vertue of such office authoritie over whole Dioceses Provinces and the universall vvorld as in the apostasie of Antichrist may be seen And thus much by the way concerning the testimonie of the auncient writers in this behalf Which I leaue to be examined by the Scriptures as is aforesaid II. Secondly vvhere the order is observed vvhich is mentioned in the question here before there may the difference be kept both between the Pastors and Teachers offices and betvveen the offices of the Teaching and ruling Elders Ephes 4 11 12. and 1 Tim. 5.17 vvith Rev. 2.1 and Rom. 12.3 8. 1 Cor. 12.5.8.28 c. Which othervvise is either unknovven of many and so neglected or els is confusedly caried and corrupted sundrie vvaies III. A particular visible church may in the outward constitutioÌ„ there of be considered as a particular visible body Now a particular visible body hath a particular visible head Which also is such as cannot say to the feete or inferiour members I haue no need of you 1 Cor. 12.18 21. vvith Eâ—a 1 5 6. and Rom. 12.3 8. Col. 2.5 and 4.17 Rev. 2.1.8 c. and vvith the Epistles to Timothee and Titus And touching the vvord head thus taken and used in the Scripture for some chief member or members governor or governors or any persons and things vvhich excell or are before others in dignitie office age authoritie time place or any speciall excellencie see Exod. 6 14. 30.23 Numb 1.3 4.16 and 7.2 Deut. 20.9 and 28.13.44 Iosh 23.2 and 2â— 1. 1 Sam. 15 17. 2 Sam. 23 8 13 18. 1 Chron 9.10 13. and 24 4 6 31. Neh. 11 16. 12.7 12 22 23 24. Esa 1 5 6. and 7 8. and 9 14 15. and 29 10. Ezec. 21 26. and â—â— 2 and 40 1. Mic. 3 3 9 11. Ier. 13 21. 1 Cor. 12 21. And note that here I speak onely of particular churches as they are organicall and set in an orderly visible constitution and so of the outvvard order and divers functions set in the church by the Lord himself and that I speak not of the church as it is the mysticall body of Christ nor of the spirituall and quickning head of the church of all the members thereof wheresoever Which is Christ alone and unto whom alone this apperteyneth and to none other vvhosoever besides Eph. 1.22.23 4 15 16. and 5.23 Col. 1.18 and 2.19 1 Cor. 12.12 compared vvith Jer. 33.16 Note also hovv both auncient and later vvriters doe thus use the same word and likewise apply it Chrysostome speaking of the returne of the Bishop vvhen himself was an Elder at Antioch saith Blessed be God that hath restored the head to the body the Pastor to the sheep c. Chrysost homil 20. ad populum Antiochenum Basil vvriting to the church of Neocaesarea upon the death of their Bishop saith The church closeth her eyes the solemne assemblies look heavily the sacred Synedrion Presbytery or Eldership desire their head they that are in dignitie their leader the people their ruler Basil epist 62. ad Eccles Neocasarienâ— Among later vvriters D. Raynolds conferring with Hart saith We teach that * Apolog. Eccl. Ang. confes Helvet c. 17. Christ is the head of the church as he doth quicken it vvith his spirit as he is the light the health the life of it and is present alvvaies to fill it vvith his blessings and vvith his grace to governe it In the vvhich respects because †Ephes 1.22 and 4.15 and 5.23 Col. 1.18 and 2.19 and so the church his body the Scripture giveth the name of head to Christ alone by an excellencie thereof we so conclude that he is the onely head of the church For othervvise vve knovv that in another kind and degree of resemblance they may be called heads who haue anie preeminence of place or government over others As in the Hebrevv text we read ‡ Nehem 11.16 the heads of the Levites for the chief of them * 2 Chro. 31 10. the Priest the head that is to say the chief Priest After the which sort I wil not contend if you entitle Bishops heads of the churches as †In Apolog 2. Athanasius doth †In Regist lib. 4. epist 38. Gregorie vvhen he had named our Saviour Christ the head of the universall church he calleth Christs Ministers as it vvere heads Paul Andrevv Iohn heads of particular flocks yet members of the church under one head Rayn conference with Hart. chap. 1 Divis 2. pag. 20. And M. Iacob in his Attestation vvriteth thus hereabout M. Gabr. Powel maketh it an heresie in the Pope to hold as he doth that in the visible church there ought to be a visible head What doe I heare A visible Body instituted by Christ without a visible head A church and no Pastor A multitude to be governed and no Governour These are straunge assertions whosoever and hovv many soever doe affirme them For I graunt there are not a few others vvhich use so to speak But indeed there is no colour of truth nor reason in these sayings M. Iacobs Attestat ch 7. p. 113. And a litle after again What shall vve think Hath Christ left his body and dear spouse vvithout help vvithout government in such dayly and continuall necessities Or can an ordinarie body be governed vvithout an ordinarie head To use D. Bilsons vvords ‡ Perpet goâ— p. 37â— this vvere an heathenish if not a hellish confusion Ibid. p. 114. He also that vvrote the Manudunction hath the like when he saith A visible church must be considered as an integrall body which for the well being of it exercising those operations which belong unto it and vvhereunto in serveth must become as we say organicall having members of divers ranks some as head mouth and eyes the Pastor Teachers and Elders some as hands the Deacons and helpers c. Manuduct 2. pag. 33. IIII. Here moreover may be considered the order observed in the church of Israell so far forth as it was moral and concerneth particular churches the constitution of the Synagogues vvherein besides the other officers vvas * M. Brou on Rev. 9. and 14. p. 83. 223. M. Ainsw defence of Scrip. pag. 113. one vvhoÌ„ they called SHELIACH TSIBBVR the ambassadour or Messenger of the congregation To which or the like Christ might haue reference wheÌ„ he speaketh of the Angel of each particular church in Asia Rev. 2.1.8.12.18 and 3.1.7.14 And of the terme Angel ascribed to the ministers of the Lord see also Hag. 1.13 Mal. 2.7 where we find the Prophets and Priests in Israell called the
could The Catholike church of Rome as they call it and the universall Bishop thereof I omit as being Antichristian most of all and justly left by the Protestants and Reformed churches Though yet far more in some respects might be pretended for this from the state of Ierusalem the High Priests that vvere for the universall church then for the Diocesan or Provinciall churches and Bishops If any alledge in this behalf as some use to doe the examples of Timothee abiding at Ephesus and Titus left at Crete by the appointment of the Apostle for the oversight and government of those churches c. the subscriptions also of those Epistles vvherein both of them are styled the first Bishops of those churches let these things be observed thereabout 1. That those subscriptions are Apocryphall and not part of the Scripture it self 2. That some Greek copies and the Syriack and old Latin translation also haue not this style or title at all 3. That Timothee and Titus were Euangelists vvho were sent appointed by the Apostles sometimes to one place sometimes to another as they had occasion 2 Tim. 4.5.9 Tit. 1.5 and 3.12 whereas the Pastors Bishops vvere appointed to their peculiar flock and seat Act. 20.17 28. 1 Pet. 5.1 4. Rev. 1.20 and 2.1.8 c. If eyther of these were so particularly employed afterward it helps not the matter 4. The first Epistle of Timothee hath not this in the subscription And in the latter Epistle where the subscription styleth Timothee the first Bishop of the church of the Ephesians there doth Paul in the same Epistle both terme him an Euangelist and exhorte him to doe the work of an Euangelist 2 Tim 4.5 yea and call him from the church of Ephesus which was in Asia to come unto him to Rome which was in Italie 2 Tim. 4 9 21. if the subscription be right Likevvise in the Epistle to Titus vvhere the subscription styleth him the first Bishop of the church of the Cretians there doth Paul in the same Epistle call him from Creta in Greece to Nicopolis in Armenia Tit. 1 5. vvith 3 12. And these things may be observed in those Epistles themselues vvhere these subscriptions are besides that other Scriptures doe also shevve hovv they vvere sometimes in one part of the world and sometimes in another sometimes in Asia and sometimes in Europe doing the duties of their office As that Timothee vvas in Asia in divers countreyes and parts thereof in Phrygia Galatia Mysia Ionia c. And in Europe also in Macedonia Achaia Italie c. And in these countreyes and nations sometimes in one city and with one church sometimes vvith another for divers occasions purposes as namely at Thessalonica at Athens at Corinth at Ephesus at Rome at Philippi c. For al vvhich see these Scriptures Acts 16 ch and 17 14 15. and 18 5. and 19 22. and 20 4. Rom. 16 21. 1 Cor. 4 17. and 16 10 11. 2 Cor. 1 19. Phil. 1 1. and 2 19 22 23. 1 Thes 3 1 2 6. with both the Epistles to Timothee And that Titus likevvise was sometimes in Europe at divers places as at Corinth in Achaia at Rome in Italie in Creta and Dalmatia in Greece c. And sometimes in Asia as at Jerusalem in Iudea at Nicopolis in Armenia c. As is evident by these Scriptures 2 Cor. 8 23 24. and 12 18. Gal 2.1 2 Tim. 4.10 Tit. 1 4 5. and 3.12 vvith the whole Epistle to Titus By vvhich also appeareth that Timothee and Titus were Euangelists so imployed by the Apostle Paul sundry times and in sundry places 5. Besides the church of Ephesus vvas a particular not a Diocesan or Provinciall church as may appeare both by the places vvhere it is particularly spoken off Acts 20 17 28. Ephes 1.1 1 Tim. 1.3 and 3.15 Rev. 1 11.12 and 2.1 by the like estate of the other Churches of Asia written unto by Christ Rev. 1.4.11.12.13.16.20 and 2.8.12.18 and 3.17.14 compared vvith Col. 4.16 And so this toucheth not the point in hand Creta in deed is an Iland wherein were divers cities but in every of them were Elders and Bishops ordeyned as is here plainly expressed Tit. 1 5 6 7. c. And by this Scripture it seemeth that when the Apostle departed from thence all things vvere not yet finished among them vvhereupon he left Titus behind him to set in order the things that were wanting and to ordeyne Elders and Bishops in every city Wherein vvhat other thing did Titus then vvhat any other Euangelist so left there might haue done Which also the Apostle himself might and vvould haue done if he had remayned there longer and yet haue ben an Apostle still though for the time or by that occasion he had ben so particularly imployed there And when this was done there by Titus Paul called him from thence to come unto him to Nicopolis as vve haue noted here before out of the same Epistle Tit. 3 12. 6. Moreover the vvord Bishop or Overseer is sometimes used generally and very largely so as the office of an Apostle is sometimes so called Acts 1 20. 7. And lastly vvhy might not the Euangelists being in an office superiour to the Pastors or Bishops of particular churches haue and supply their place in any Church vvhere they came and remayned yet this be no ground or warrant of Diocesan or Provincial Bishops churches any more then Iames so being at Ierusalem who othervvise vvas an Apostle Act. 21.18 Euseb l. 2. c. 23. l. 3. c. 11. l. 7. c. 18. For the further consideration vvhereof besides that vvhich hath ben said before I will here propound two things in an other †Reasons touching cōmunicating with the Minist of the church of Engl. p. 26. c. treatise mentioned heretofore vvhich as they shal be found to haue waight may giue more light to these and other points sometimes called in question 1. The first is this Whether the Lords ordinance in his church be not such as the higher offices conteyne in them and comprehend the inferior offices so as they vvhich be in the greater offices haue besides their ovvne peculiar function vvhereunto they ought to attend povver and authoritie both themselues to performe the duties of the inferiour offices when there is needfull occasion and to look that they be performed by all such as they are specially layd upon for the better service of the Lord and his church therein As may be observed both by the estate of Israell heretofore in the Priests and Levites c. and by divers things written concerning the Apostles Euangelists Pastors and other Elders in sundry cases For example that the Apostles who were in the greatest ecclesiasticall office ordeyned by Christ under the Gospell had besides the peculiar office of Apostleship the povver also and authoritie of the offices of the Euangelists Pastors Teachers Elders Deacons both to performe them upon just occasion
themselues to see them performed by others as is aforesaid In like sort that the Euangelists besides their own peculiar office and function had in them the povver and authority of the inferior offices of Pastors Teachers and Elders c. And likevvise that the Pastors besides their own peculiar function haue in them the power and authoritie of the Teachers and other ordinarie offices for performance and oversight of them as is aforesaid Also that the Elders besides their ovvne speciall function haue in them the povver and authoritie of the Deacons office for the doing and overseeing thereof as was said before and so forth in the rest For all vvhich see Acts 2 40 41 42. and 4 34 35. and 6 1 6. and 8 14 25 26 35 38. vvith 21 8. and 11 29 30. and 14 7 23. 15 6 22 32 35 36 40 41. and 16 4.40 and 20 7 11 17 28 29 30. 21 18 25. vvith Mat. 28 18 19 20. Ioh. 20 21 22 23. and 21 15 16 17. 1 Cor. 4 15 17 22. and 5 3. and 9.7.16.17 and 10.16 and 12.28 and 16 3.4.10 2 Cor. 1.19 and 8. 16.17.23 Ephes 4.11.12 Phil. 1.1 and 4.3 1 Thes 3.2 and 5.12.13.14.27 Hebr. 13.7.17 1 Pet. 5.1 4. Rev. 2.1 c. 2. The second is this Whether on the contrarie the apostasie of Antichrist be not such as touching the ministerie and government of the church as therein they vvhich be in the lesser and inferiour offices haue power authoritie vvith them to exceed the dueties of the office which Christ hath appointed and to performe the duties apperteyning to the higher offices by meanes vvhereof both Antichrist hath risen up to so great a height and so many orders and degrees of superior and inferior ministers haue ben received stil are reteyned in that degenerate estate and apostasie of the man of sinne as is come to passe As namely when the pastors and bishops of particular congregations came to haue power authoritie over many churches over the Ministers people therein in a kind of resemblance of the extraordinarie offices of the Apostles and Euangelists alreadie ceased vvhen now the foundation was layd Contrarie to that which is written Rom. 17 3 8. Rev. 1 11 12.13 16 20. with 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. Ephes 4 11 12 13. Act. 20 17 28. Phil. 1 1. and 4 3. 1 Pet. 5 1 2 3 4. And that the ruling Elders or Presbyters did the ministeriall duties of the Pastors and Teachers in the particular Congregations Contrarie to 1 Tim. 5 17. Ephes 4 11 12. Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. And that the Deacons also baptise and became ministers of the word in the office of Deaconship vvhich the Apostles did expressely oppose to the duties of that office at the institution thereof Act. 6.2.3.4 So as of these things and the like in that estate it may be said as Christ did in another case From the beginning it was not so Mat. 19.8 These things and the like may be noted about the points questions aforesaid Which being not vvell observed in former ages a way vvas made for the Popes supremacy by the steps of the Diocesan and Provinciall Prelacy whiles each Pastor kept not his place within his bounds under Christ the Archpastor nor the other Officers theirs nor the Churches that order vvherein they vvere set by the Apostles at the beginning Which being novv in this latter age observed and discovered we should set our selues to reject and witnesse against the Antichristian apostasie of the man of sinne and all the aberrations and iniquitie thereof And be carefull on the other hand to returne to the auncient simplicity of the churches of Christ as they were planted in the beginning alvvaies obserueing good order in all things and that vvay of government of the church which is appointed by the vvord of God CHAPTER VII Touching the Teachers office more particularly and the Ministers of the word in generall VVHether there be not tvvo sorts of Teachers or Prophets which the Lord hath giuen for the work of the ministerie or at least a two fold duty and divers function or ministration thereof One of such as are peculiarly appointed to the teaching of particular churches Of whō see here before in the fift Question pag 259. The other of such as doe either †1 Sam. 19 20. 2 King 2 3 5 7 15. and 4 1. and 6 1. and 9 1. with Amos 7 14. Luc. 2 46. and Act. 5 34. vvith 22.3 in the Schooles and universities interpret the Scriptures train up the students in Theologie or doe ‡ Deut. 33 8 10. Nehem. 8 1 8. 2 Chron. 17 7 8 9. Prov. 1 20 21. and 8 1 2 3. and 29 18. Esa 30 10 20 21. and 57 19. and 59 21. Ier. 18 18. Hos 5 9. and 7 12. Amos 2 12. and 7 12 13. Mic. 3 11. Ezech. 22 25 28. and 13 and 14 chap. Jer. 14.13 Mat. 5 1 2. and 9 37 38. and 13 1 2 52. and 22 35. and 23 34. Luke 5 17. Act. 13 1 15. and 15 35. Rev. 11 3. and 18 24. vvith Act. 11 19 24. Rom. 10 14 15 17. 1 Cor. 12 28 29. and Ephes 4 11 12. othervvhere privately and publikly in houses streets ships armies garrisons or other assemblies any where instruct the people in Religion and al duties of godlines commō or speciall as there is just occasion Also vvhether these Teachers should minister the Lords supper is vvithal to be considered and examined by the Scriptures Seeing the Levites in Israell vvere not suffered to come to the Altar or holy things of God no nor to flay the sacrifices unlesse in a speciall case when there were not Priests ynough Num. 18 3. and 3 10. and Levit. 1 6. vvith 2 Chron. 29 34. Which is the more to be noted because the Levites vvere by the ordinance of God joyned to the Priests in the Ministerie of the Lords house and for teaching Israell the Lavv of God c. who yet notwithstanding might not doe all things perteyning to the Priests office Numb 18 2 3. and Ezech. 44 13 14 15 16. with Num. 3 5 10. c. and 16 chap. By vvhich also appeareth that some Ministers may be imployed in some works of the Ministerie vvho yet notwithstanding may not lavvfully do all things that perteine to the holy ministration and to some other Offices appointed thereunto And that the Pastors Teachers now are ansvverable to the Priests and Levites in Israell vvas noted before out of Esa 66 21. compared vvith Ephes 4 11 12. As touching the election or calling of these Teachers I spake here before of the calling of those which are of the former sort as touching their choise to particular congregations as may be seen in the third Question pag. 252 c. Now touching the calling of the Teachers of the latter sort whether they be such as are Professors in Vniversities
sometimes to the Lord himself or to his Ministers and Officers in church or common vvealth for hearing examining deciding giving sentence executing judgment concerning persons and causes civill or ecclesiasticall Gen. 18 25. Exo. 18 13 16 21 22. Deu. 1.16 17. and 16 18. and 17 9. 19 12 17 18. with Num. 35 12 24. Deu. 25 1 2. 2 Sam. 8 15. 2 Chron. 19 5 6. Psa 82 1 2 8. and 122 5. Esa 1 23 26. Ier. 21 11 12. and 22 1 2 3. Eze. 44 15 23 24. Micah 3 1 11. and 4 3. Act. 16 4. and 18 15. 1 Cor. 5 12 13. and 6 1. c. and sometimes to the people for consenting approving executing resting in that vvhich is judged done according to the sentence giuen by the Lord or the Ministers and Governours under him 1 Cor. 6 2 3. with 5 12 13. Act. 26 10. with 22 20. and Act. 21 25. with 15 6 22. and with 16 4. c. 8. Lastly Christs reproving of the Angels Ministers of his churches for suffering evill persons and corruptions among them Revel 2 14 15 20. c. Which necessarily implyeth that the Lord hath giuen an ordinance to his church for the restreyning repressing and abandoning of such Els why should they be blamed for that which perteyned not unto them or vvere not in their povver to redresse and amend The like also may be observed by Christs speach commission giuen to his Apostles and by their execution thereof Mat. 16 19. Joh. 20 22 23 with 1 Cor. 4 1 2 21. and 5 3 4 5. and 2 Cor. 10 4 5 6 8. and 13 2 3 10. 1 Tim. 1 20. And by the exhortations and instructions that are giuen to Timothee and Titus in Pauls Epistles unto them and to the Elders of Israell and the Primitiue churches recorded in the Scriptures both of the old new Testament 3. And for the maner of proceeding if the course aforesaid be rightly observed thus shall matters and persons be orderly and peaceably heard discussed and judged the governours and government according to the ordinance of God regarded and al good meanes used for the churches good and peaceable estate for the preventing and suppressing of manifold evils and for the benefit and reclayming of sinners such as are found to be obstinate in iniquity shal by publik authority be censured and excommunicated and that also with knowledge and assent of the church the exceptions of al if any be brought being heard as is meet and in such cases to be done And so shall the church be purged from evill the holy things of God kept from the pollution and profanation of such wicked persons the sinners themselues made more ashamed being made knowen unto all and avoyded by them till they repent and the rest that remayne shall all heare and learne and feare and commit no more any such evill among them For vvhich also see the Scriptures before alledged and Deu. 4 1 2. and 13 chap. and 16 18. and 19 19 20. 2 Thes 3 6 14 15. 1 Tim. 5 17 19 20. and 6.13 14. 2 Tim. 3 1 5. Rev. 2 14 20. c. 4. Furthermore as in all other affaires of the church so in these also according to the severall nature of them may the benefit of Gods ordinance thus be enjoyed and all things done in order so as none be prejudiced but that every one may performe their duety enjoy their right and liberty and that both the corruptions of the Popish prelacy and the defects of the Protestant reformed churches and al popular confusion disorder and anarchie may be shunned redressed taken away Col. 2 5. 1 Cor. 4 17. and 11 2 16. and 14 33 40. compared vvith 1 Chron. 13 ch and 15 2 13. and the other Scriptures here cited before And because in this matter there hath ben and still is great question and controversie among Christians both Papists Anabaptists and Protestants of all sorts about the understanding of the words of Christ Tell 〈◊〉 unto the church and if he neglect to heare the church let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a Publicane Mat. 18 17. it shall not be amisse here also to inquire further into the meaning hereof Which therefore I wil novv speak off more particularly in the chapter following CHAPT XIX Of the exposition of those words of Christ Tell the Church c. Mat. 18.17 VVHether those words of Christ Tell it to the Church c. Matt. 18 17. may not be applied to the estate of the Ievves as it was when Christ thus spake and to the estate of Christians succeeding aftervvard I. Of the Synedrion or Congregation of Elders And first applying it to the estate of the Iewes whether they may not then be understood of the Synedrion or Congregation of Elders had in Israel for these reasons follovving 1. The like use of the word in other places of the Scripture where the speach is of matters concerning government controversie complaint or pleading about sinne or the like as there is here in this place For vvhich see Psal 82 1. Num. 25 12 24 25 29. with Deut. 19 11 12 16 17. Iosh 20 4 5 6. Mat. 18 17. with 5 22. and vvith 1 Sam. 2 25. Num. 27 1 2. vvith 36 1. and Josh 17 3 4 c. Neyther is it of any waight herein that some excepting say the Elders of Israell were civill governours and dealt in civill causes c. For Israell was the Church of God asvvell as vve Act. 7 38. with Deu. 33 4. and their Elders dealt in causes of sinne and in the matters of the Lord as vvell as ours 1 Sam. 2 25. 2 Chron. 19 8 11. and the question is whether the phrase may be understood of an assembly of Elders whether civill or ecclesiasticall vvhether in Israell or with us Mat. 18 17. vvith 5 22. and Deut. 19 16 17. and 21 20. Psal 82 1. Ier. 19 1. and Christ and the Apostles reason often from the estate of the Governours and people of Israell to ours novv applying the things that are spoken thereof to the kingdome and church of Christ under the Gospell Iohn 10 34.35 36. compared vvith Psal 82 6. Mat. 21 42. vvith Psal 118.22 Act. 1 20. with Psal 69 26. and 109 7. 1 Cor. 5 6 13. vvith Exod. 12 15. and Deu. 17 7. 19 19. 1 Cor. 9 13 14. with Deu. 18 1. c. 1 Cor. 10 1 18. Rom. 15 4. 2 Tim. 3 16 17. 2 Pet. 1 19 20. c. Not to speak of that which the Apostle expressely writeth to the church of Corinth touching the judgments of things perteyning to this life 1 Cor. 6 4 5. 2. The vvord is not Kabal as †M. Iac. Divine Institution of a ministeriall church Argum. 3 Signature Bâ—s c. some haue thought but Ghnedah or Ghnidtah in the Syriack the tongue then used by the Iewes Christ himself Which all graunt is often
the church are not committed to the Elders 19. That the Saints as kings rule the visible Church 20. That the Eldership is not the head in respect of the other brethren as Paul speaketh of the head 1 Cor. 12 21. 21. That the people are Rulers properly and the Governours of the Elders 22. That persons will not accept of the admonitions giuen by the Pastour or other Elders but say if the Church admonish them they will rest 23. That they wil not giue honour to such erroneous government 24. That the Ministers and Officers of the church are forreigne Ministers a forreigne ayde and assistance an unnaturall monstrous and adulterous interposition 25. That ecclesiastical officers haue not offices of authority 26. That the order of Saints or Saintship in the church is an order superiour unto and aboue the order of Officers or of Bishoprick or Eldership 27. That the order of Saints is an order of kings which is the highest order in the church sitting upon the thrones of David for judgement 28. That Suspension is a corruption and devise of men 29. That the Church of Israell had not power to cast out offenders 30. That if there were amongst the Ievves in Christs time a distinct ordinance of excommunication ecclesiasticall it vvas a Ievvish devise without ground of the Scriptures 31. That no good writers use the vvord ECCLESIA for the Congregation of Elders As if the Septuagint were not good vvriters or that this may not be a Synechdochicall speach as there are many in the Scriptures Gen. 3 20. and 9 6. Exod. 20 18 19. with Deu. 5 23. Lev. 9 1 3. in the Septuagint 1 Sam. 8.4 7. c. 2 Sam. 7 7. with 1 Chron. 17 6. Mar. 16 15. Col. 1 23. Iohn 9 22. c. or that GHNIDTAH were not the word used in the Syriack or that it were never used for the assembly of governors 32. That this place may be understood †The Prelates c. of one alone as of the Pastour or Bishop 33. That by these opinions Gods ordinance of the Synedrion Consistorie or Presbyterie is lost and abrogated 34. And the difference between the Synedria or the Councils and the Synagogues annihilated or taken avvay 35 That seeing the Elders are not called ARCHONTES in all the New Testament therefore they are not to rule the church of God 36. That if the Elders be stewards onely over the servants and not Lords over the vvife the church then is not the church to obey or submit unto them And that therefore it is a fallacie a conjunctione divisione to reason thus All the particular members must obey the Elders in their lavvfull instructions their wholsome admonitions severally Ergo the vvhole body or whole flock must joyntly obey the voice of the Elders c. These and other like errours false doctrines and sinfull courses haue ben conceived and urged by divers not all by any one but some by one some by others their toungues being exceedingly divided among themselues about these things By vvhich also may appeare how needfull it is to search out the meaning of this Scripture and carefully to obserue it still looking unto Israell and to the right understanding thereof what we can And this the more considering that †M. Ains his followers c some are so very peremptorie stifly conceited in their opinions concerning these things as they fear not to make schismaticall divisions and notorious scandals thereabout contrarie to the doctrine vvhich vve haue learned of the Prophets and Apostles For vvhich cause they are to be marked and avoyded of all that loue the trueth and seeke their conversion and amendement Rom. 16 17. with 1 Cor. 11 18 19. Gal. 5 19 20. Ephes 5 11. Iude ver 19. CHAPTER XX. Of the maintenance of the Ministers and other officers of the church VVHether it be not the duty of all Churches and of the members thereof every one according to their abilitie to giue maintenance unto their Ministers and as there is occasion to the Elders also that rule the church to the Deacons Deaconesses that serue minister therein 1 Cor. 9 7 14. Gal. 6 6. Rom. 15 27. 1 Thes 5 12 13. 1 Tim. 5 3 17 18. compared with Exod. 20 12. Prov. 3 9 10. Lev. 24 8 9 Num. 18 8 32. Deu. 12 19. and 16 16 17. and 18 1 8. Josh 21 ch 1 Sam. 9 6 7 8. 2 King 4 8 9 10 22 23 42 Luke 8 1 2 3. and 21 1 4. 2 Chron. 31 2 21. Neh. 10 32 39 Esa 30 20 24. Ezec. 44 28 29 30. Mal. 3 8 9 10. 1. Because the Lord hath ordeyned that so it should be 1 Cor. 9 13 14. Gal. 6 6. 1 Thes 5 13. 1 Tim. 5 3 17 18. compared with Numb 18 8 32. Deu. 18. 1 5. and 25 4. 2 Chron. 31 2 21. 2. And thus we shall honour the Lord vvith our substance which hath the promise of blessing from the Lord. Prov. 3 9 10. Ezec. 44 30. Mal. 3 8 12. with Exod. 20.12 and 1 Tim. 5 17. 3. Besides that it is no great thing but our duty to minister unto them in carnall things of whose spirituall things vve are made partakers 1 Cor. 9 11. Rom. 15 27. Gal. 6 6. 1 Thes 5 13. 4. Yea vvho planteth a vineyard and eateth not of the fruit thereof Or who fedeth a flock eateth not of the milk of the flock 1 Cor. 9 7. c. 5. Finally the Apostle teacheth expressely Let the Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour especially they who labour in the word and doctrine For the Scripture saith Thou shalt not mousell the oxe that treadeth out the corne and The labourer is vvorthy of his reward 1 Tim. 5 17 18. vvith Deu. 25 4. 1 Cor. 9 8 9 10. Mat. 10 10. But vvhere any churches are poore and not able to maintaine themselues their Officers or poore among them that there they should be holpen by other churches of better meanes and greater abilitie according to their several estate and occasions 2 Cor. 8 and 9 cha Act. 11 27 30. Rom. 15 25 26 27. Gal. 2 9 10. and 6 10. Phil. 4 10 19. together vvith the Scriptures aforesaid It doth in deed lye also upon Kings and all other Magistrates within their dominions cities jurisdictions to haue special care of the estate of the ministers and churches under them as of all other duties concerning religion apperteyning unto them after the example of Hezekiah king of Iudah and Nehemiah the Prince and other the like 2 Chron. 31 2 21. vvith 29 and 30 chap. Nehem. 10 32 39. and 12 44 47. and 13 10 14. vvith Deu. 17 18 19 20. Yet notvvithstanding this should not hinder the foresaid duty of the churches and people themselues but should rather further it and that not onely in affording help where there is want but also in requiring of such as are able that this
corporall injurie of their furious mother then being ashamed of her shamefulnes and resting silent they betooke themselues into their fathers bosome and his inner roome albeit that she pursued them outragiously least they being ashamed of her should be said to shame her as stumpets are usually woont to doe For vvhich causes I doe humbly beseech God the Father of our Lord Iesus that he would both by his saving calling informe direct and care for his church and whatsoever belongeth to his church that he would also teach every one that is in it his truth the truth of his church and that he would so work as they wisely absteyning from all evils especially from those which the sonne of perdition and author of the apostasie hath brought in and taking heed of the spirit of lyes and the efficacie of his errour they may religiously cleaue unto the Father and his good things in everie of them to their mother next after the father or so far as she accordeth with the Father that increasing in his truth pietie saith and loue they may bestow employ al their studies to the edification of the church the salvation of all and the glorie of that our heauenly Father c. God the Father and the Lord Iesus Christ by that eternall spirit of his eternall truth bring to passe that the wiles of Sathan being driuen away we may al grow dayly in Christ in the church and in the truth of Christ and the Church and that we may more and more confirme one another in loue unfayned to his glory and the common salvation of us all Amen Hitherto M. Iunius who though he be dead yet liveth and speaketh sufficient in this writing for the point in hand Which vvhiles M. Ainsw would seem to ansvver it is straunge but good to be observed how many things of waight he passeth over besides that sometimes he picketh out a sentence here and a sentence there leaveth out vvhat commeth betvven which should help the Reader and more cleare the matter thus being injurious herein both to the living the dead not to speak of the unspeakable abuse of Scripture also into vvhich he falleth still more and more which the Reader shall doe vvell to obserue though I insist not upon the particulars which would be endles and being now purposed here onely to note a fevve things moe vvhich he hath that are merely Anabaptisticall and full of glosing deceit 21. Speaking of the Church of Rome vvhereas he should distinguish betvveen the Temple of God and Man of sinne spoken off 2 Thes 2 4. Animadv p. 98-102 c. he eyther regards not to obserue it or confounds them together as one without distinction or so speaketh of Gods Temple church there as if it were no other then the Divels spoken off Rev. 18 2 3. 16 14. then Sodome Egypt Babylon Rev. 11 8. and 16 19. the lothed of God delivered to Sathan to be seduced deluded damned 2 Thes 4 8.9 11 12. And hovv then is there the people of God the Temple of God the baptisme of God the covenant of God the salvation of God to any in that Church c. Betvveene these things there is no just proportion for what concord hath Christ vvith Beliall or the Temple of God vvith idols or divels 2 Cor. 6 15 16. 22. Speaking of the congregation of Saints that was at Rome in Pauls time he saith not as he might that it is since corrupted adulterate or fallen into defection c. but he saith absolutely it is gone long since and the man of sinne with his worshippers come in the place Pag. 98. So then here againe let him tell us vvhether he thinketh these be the Temple of God the people of God under the covenant of God having the baptisme of God which the Lord hath ordeyned and giuen to his Church or vvhether there be no such there at all though corrupted and abused c. 23. Whereas ‘ See here before pa. 183. M. Iunius spake of Gods church being euen at Rome at this day by the mercy of God because he trusted that there is God calling persons called the calling it self yet in her the meeting of which things together in one giveth being to a church c. M. Ains not having vvhat to ansvver hereunto Animadv p. 98 99 doth very boldly without limitation or restreynt deny that God is there calling as in his church but that the man of sinne sits there as God calling all to worship him and that his calling is by the working of Satan and in all deceiueablenes of unrighteousnes among them that perish 2 Thes 2 9 10 11. All vvhich together saith he giveth being to Antichrists church but not to Christs Animadv p. 98 99. Thus after his manner still he termeth that Antichrists church which the Apostle calleth the Temple of God But omitting this if it be as here he saith hovv then hath there ben or can there be salvation to any in that church since the man of sin sate there vvhich himself thinketh vvas sone after Pauls time Pag. 84. How also should any of that church become Martyrs vvitnesses of the Christian faith against the professed enemies thereof And how should any Ievves or Pagans be converted to the faith of Christ by any of them Or doth he think that no such thing is had or done at all by them Besides if novv an Anabaptist take up M. Ains own vvords and where he speaketh of calling apply it to baptisme had in the church of Rome saying thus as M. Ains doth here I deny that God is there baptizing as in his church but the Man of sin sits there as God baptising all that vvorship him and his baptising is by the vvorking of Sathan and in all deceiueablenes of unrighteousnes among them that perish and the persons baptized are deluded to beleeue lyes 2 Thes 2 9 10 11. All which together giue being to Antichrists baptisme but not to Christs what now wil M. Ainsvv ansvver hereunto but that eyther he shall contradict himself or fall into more errour hereabout to the further hardening of the Anabaptists in their erroneous opinions and courses Pag. 99. 24. That which M. Iunius applieth and fitly to the popish Hierarchie M. Ainsvv applieth to the church of Rome and the whole church there Yea though himself aftervvard acknowledg that the popish ecclesiastical hierarchie consisteth of Bishops Priests and ministers pag. 100. besides whom there are the people as himself also noteth in the other page aforesaid Pag. 99. 25. When ‘ See here before p. 183. M. Iunius for more clearing of the point purposely distinguished between the papacie and the Church shevving the difference between them both in their generall kind and in their peculiar difference namely that the papacie is an order or estate humane evill the church a companie or assemblie Animadv p. 99 c. divine and by
authoritie of God knit together c. M. Ains finding no answer hereunto purposely passeth over divers vvords clauses sentences and vvhole passages vvhich would giue light to the matter in hand and not content herewith makes much a doe about a word a rank of apostates urging it contrarie to M. Iunius his meaning hovv ever it be understood For first although the Translator in this place used two vvords an order or ranck of apostates yet he might see M. Iunius his word was but one signifying an order or an estate of apostates as before he spake of an order or estate of apostasie Which vvord also the Translator here kept and joyned with the other But novv this word of an order or estate so fitly opening the point in question and not leaving such colour of exception or aequivocation as M. Ains seeketh after he leaveth it and taketh hold on the other A sleight and silly course But as himself said erevvhile what vvill not men doe for help in time of need As for the word ranck it also is used in our tongue for an order estate conditioÌ„ estimatioÌ„ c. As in Psa 53 13. where David speaking of Achitophel or the like saith But it was thou a man according to my ranck as the new Translators haue it in the margent for which they haue in the text a man mine equall and M. Ainsw ‘ In Psal 55 14. in his translation and notes O man esteemed of as my self or according to my order or estimation c. vvhere novv obserue these things for the more clearing of this matter 1. That the vvhole church or common vveale of Israel Priests and people vvere not of the same order ranck or estate vvhereof David and Achitophel vvere 2. That the order or ranck there spoken of was to be distinguished from the persons themselues othervvise considered Both vvhich M. Iunius observeth here and M. Ainsvv confoundeth or perverteth what he can 3. That where the other Translators use the word ranck M. Ainsw useth the vvord order cleane contrarie to his dealing here vvhere he leaveth the word order or estate used both by the author and Translator layeth hold on the word ranck And vvhy so That let M. Ains tell us himself unlesse vve should think that he did it because the vvord ranck in our tongue doth sometimes also signifie that vvhich is or grovveth thick together as corne in a field or the like and so is applied to persons or things in this behalf So as thus a ranck of apostates may be understood of a companie of apostates and those also thick together vvhereas M. Iunius about this question putteth difference purposely betvveen an order or ranck and betvveene a companie or assemblie making the one the general of apostasie and the other the general of a church and so shevving that the apostasie and church of Rome are tvvo different things and diversly to be considered Which vvhiles M. Ainsvv vvill not regard as he should but consound or abuse what he can let others judge what vain a doe he maketh hereabout and hovv yll in this behalf he dealeth vvith M. Iunius And this the more seing that also ‘ See it here before p. 184 in the very next sentence to one of them which M. Ainsvv here citeth M. Iunius himself shewed the fountaine and occasion of this deceit how ever M. Ain after his maner passeth over it namely that the terme of the papacie taken doubly and aequivocally deceiveth men in such sort saith he as †here before we shewed touching the Romane popish church For under the terme of the papacie which is a vicious corrupt order they comprehend the subject it self vvhich is annoyed with that corruption not distinguishing aright betweene these things c. Which how true it is found in M. Ain not onely in this passage but throughout his treatise is so evident as I need not stand further to shevv it Every page yea almost every sentence is a vvitnes and demonstration thereof Or if in this place by an order or ranck of apostates we understand also a companie of apostates as in the next clause follovving there is a vvord of number that may be taken to imply so much yet any may perceiue that M. Iunius here speaketh this not of the vvhole church as M. Ains urgeth it but onely of the papall ecclesiastical hierarchie as †Pag 183 c. othervvhere in this treatise he calleth it Which is evident by the very vvords themselues vvhich are these †Pag 183 c. And that the papacie is in the church as the order or estate of apostasie in the house and city of God is as certaine as that of the Apostle is certain 2 Thes 2 that the man of sinne the sonne of perdition sitteth in the Temple of God vvith his vvhole order ‘ Aâ— the other translation had it or rank of apostates and not on the other side that the Temple of God consisteth in that order number of apostates which is a thing most strange furthest off Where marke two things for clearing the point in hand First that M. Iunius expressely distinguisheth between the Church or Temple of God it self and betvveene the man of sinne that sitteth therein with his whole order or estate of apostates Secondly that here by this order or rank of apostates spoken off he understandeth onely the popish hierarchie aforesaid and not the vvhole church or Temple of God it self vvhich he saith were most strange and is furthest off Novv though he speak thus plainly expressely yet M. Ain vvill not regard it as he should but taketh and urgeth it so as he heareth M. Iunius himself say is most straunge and furthest off vvhether from the truth it self “ Advert p 60 65. here p. 171. c. or from the Apostles meaning and so also from his own it commeth to a like end for the point in hand Yea and moreover if this phrase of a rank of apostates be applied as by M. Ains it is to the whole church Priests and people yet we must stil remember the divers consideration of churches “ 1 Kin. 13 28 30 c Hos 5 1 2 c. of their estate in this behalf as both M. Iunius ‘ Se before p. 185. c in this treatise observeth and we haue also noted * before If we looke upon Israell eyther on the ten tribes or on Iudah also when the Kings Princes Priests and people were fallen into apostasie forsaking the Lord ‡ 2 Chr. 33 2 9 10. â—er 1 16.18 5 30 31. and 7 17 18. 44 15 16 17. c. and burning incense to other Gods c. vvill not M. Ains say of them as here he doth of the church of Rome that now the whole church of Israell and Iudah Priests and people vvere a ranck of apostates But will he therefore conclude thereupon as here he doeth that they vvere not then in