them and will shed abroad his blessing upon your cares as far as shall be necessary for his own glory and the good of the people in whose favour you labour and he himself will one day give you a reward for all those toilsome Labours Although you do not need to be excited to do good yet I take the confidence to hope that you will be some way encouraged in the Duties of your place by the reading of this Work which will more and more discover to you the Justice of it You will see therein the Conduct of our Fathers justified in regard of their Reformation and Separation from the Church of Rome and by consequence you will therein see not only the Right that we have but the Obligation and indispensable Necessity also wherein we are to live apart and divided from that Church and united among our selves in a Religious and Christian Society till it shall please God to make the Causes of that Division cease and joyn again that which men I would say what the Court of Rome and her Council of Trent have put asunder That Re-Vnion is a Happiness that wee will alwayes beg of God with the most ardent Prayers and which we will receive as one of his highest Favours if his hand should bestow it But it is also a thing which it is impossible for us to promise our selves while we shall not see the same desire of a good and holy Reformation which was almost general in our West in the daies of our Fathers to be again revived in the Church of Rome which yet they knew how to stifle with incredible skill An Authour of those Times who himself contributed as much as any other to clude the good effects of that desire has not failed to own it and which is more to own it to be just I do not deny saies he that many at the beginning were not urged by a motion of Piety earnestly to cry out against some manifest Abuses and I confess that we must attribute the chief cause of that Division that at present rends the Church to those who being puff'd up with a vain pride under a pretence of Ecclesiastical power contemned and haughtily and disdainfully rejected those who admonish'd them with reason and modesty And imediately after that same Author reasoning about the means to re-establish a holy peace between the two parties I do not believe adds he that we ought ever to hope for a firm peace in the Church if those who have been the cause of that dis-union do not begin by themselves that is to say unlesse those who have the Ecclesiastical Government in their hands relaxe a little of that great rigour and contribute something to the peace of the Church and unlesse in hearkning to the ardent prayers and exhortations of the greatest part of good men they apply themselves to reform those manifest abuses by the Rule of the holy Scriptures and of the Antient Church from which they have wandred After this manner a man engaged in the Communion and Interests of the Church of Rome spake even in the Time of the Councill of Trent He would indeed after that have us also whom he accuses to have gone too far in the other extream yield something on our side and that we should return as he speaks to our selves but it ought not to be thought strange that he being such a one as he was would lenify by that corrective the confession that he made before and it is enough for us that he has owned the force of the evil and taken notice of the true and only remedy God who holds the hearts of all in his hand kindle in them the love of the true Religion and give us all the grace to look to the Blood that has ransomed the Church and that first Spirit who consecrated it to one onely Jesus Christ her Lord and Husband For it is he only who can re-unite us without me sates he ye can do nothing and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad I pray that the same God who has given you the knowledge of his Gospell would make you persevere in it to the end that he would confirm his love and fear in the souls of my Lords your children who already so well answer the honour of their birth and the cares you have taken for their Education and lastly that he would more and more shed abroad his blessings over your person and over all your house This is that which I desire from the bottom of my heart and that you would do me the favour to believe that I am My LORD Your Lordships Most Humble and Most Obedient Servant CLAVDE The ATTESTATION WE whose names are underwritten certify that we have read the Answer of Monsieur Claude our most honoured Colleague to a Book Intituled The Prejudices c. in which we have found nothing contrary to the Sentiments of the Religion which we profess Signed at Paris the nine and twentieth of November 1672. DAILLE ' MESNARD The Reader is desired to take notice That the word Historical in the Running-Title was inserted without the Translators knowledge or Consent An HISTORICAL DEFENCE OF THE Reformation Against a Book Intituled Just Prejudices against the CALVINISTS THE FIRST PART Wherein it is shewn that our Ancestours were obliged to Examine by themselves the state of Religion and of the Church in their Days CHAP. I. General Considerations upon this Controversy The Division of this Treatise IT is not difficult to understand why those who were possest of the Government of the Western Church in the days of our Fathers and those who have since succeeded them in the Church of Rome have thought themselves so much concerned to oppose the Reformation It would oblige them to strip themselves of that Soveraign and and absolute Authority which they had Usurped and by which they had disposed the Consciences of men to their wills And it would force them to give an Account of that Publick management which they held in their hands and no person is ignorant that that is a thing of all others in the World most intolerable to those persons who have made a Secular Empire of the Government of the Church As those Interests have made them lay hold of all they could to defend themselves so they have raised a new Controversy touching the Right that our Fathers had to reform themselves They demand of us who our Reformers were from whence they came and what Call they had for so Great a Work They accuse them to have been Rebels and Schismaticks who lifted themselves up against the Authority of their Mother the Church and broke the sacred bond of the Christian Communion They have defamed their persons as much as ever they could and have laid to their charge the most wicked manners to the end they might render them odious In fine they have put forward all that they could believe capable of retaining the people in a blind
how to Read What will become of those who have no understanding nor any readiness of mind How can all those People examine all those Points the Discussion of the least of which notwithstanding is evidently necessary to make them rationally determine It is easy to see that all that heap of Objections and Difficulties which the Author of the Prejudices has proposed against the way of the Scripture tends only to lead men to the Authority of the Church of Rome to the end they should subject themselves to that as a Soveraign and Infallible Rule But as the Doctrine of the Soveraign Authority of that Church is not one of those first Principles which the light of Nature dictates to all men since of Thirty parts of our known World there are at least nine and twenty who do not acknowledge it and as they cannot also say that it is one of the first and common notions of Christianity since of all those who profess themselves to be Christians there are Three parts which reject it The Author may freely give us leave if he pleases that we should first demand of him upon what Foundation he would build that Doctrine to make us receive it as a point of Divine Faith I say of Divine Faith for if we should hold it only as a matter of human Faith he himself would see well that we could not believe the things which the Church of Rome should teach in vertue of its Authority otherwise then with a humane Faith since the things which depend upon a principle cannot make an impression in us different from that which the principle has made To the end therefore that I should believe with a Divine Faith that which the Church of Rome shall teach me by its Authority it is necessary that I should also believe its Authority with a Divine Faith Thus far methinks we should not have any Controversy Let us see therefore upon what Foundations of Divine Faith he would pretend to establish this Proposition The Authority of the Church of Rome is Soveraign and Infallible He can only do it by these Three ways The first is by a new Revelation that God should have made to us of this Truth the Second in shewing that it is one of the Articles that is contained in the Revelation of the Apostles and the Third in shewing us the Characters of Divinity and Infallibility impressed upon the Church of Rome even after the same manner as every thing proves it self by the marks that distinguish it and thus it is that we pretend that the Scripture forces the acknowledgment of its own Divinity The first of these ways is nullified since they agree with us that since Jesus Christ and his Apostles there has been no new Revelation and that there must not be any expected The second would be proper and necessarily supposes a recourse either to Tradition or the Scripture for there are but these two Channels in which we can seek for the Revelation of the Apostles But that of the Scripture is forbidden us by the Author of the Prejudices by reason of the unconquerable difficulties which he discovers there It is says he a way full of obstacles and difficulties and even those who profess to spend all their days in the Study of Divinity ought to judge that Examination to be above all their abilities He must therefore content himself with the way of Tradition But before he can make use of that he must be first assured and that with a certainty of Divine Faith that that which that Tradition contains is come down from the Revelation of Jesus Christ and his Apostles or at least that this particular point of the Authority of the Roman Church in the state wherein it is at present must have proceeded from thence that the Apostles must have Transmitted it viva voce down to their Successours and that their Successours must have received it and Transmitted it down to those who descended from them in the same sence and every whit the same as the Apostles had given it to them If he cannot be assured of that Transmission all that he would build upon it will be uncertain and if he cannot be assured of it with a Divine Faith that which he would build upon it will not be more so But how can he be assur'd of that He has no more that living Voice of the Apostles to represent it to us he must rely upon Testimonyes would it therefore be the Roman Church that must assure us But her Divine and Infallible Authority is as yet in Question and while it shall be questioned it remains suspended it cannot be believed any further then with a humane Faith Shall it be the Scripture that must give Testimony to that Tradition But there are so many Difficulties in that way says the Author of the Prejudices That it is Evident that it is not that which God has chosen to Instruct us in his Truths Must we learn it from that Tradition it self But to decide that point whether that Tradition came from the Apostles or no Tradition it self can be yet no other than a humane Testimony I mean that the Successors of the Apostles declare to us that they have received such and such Doctrines from the Apostles viva voce and that they have receiv'd them in the same sence in which the Apostles gave them to them we cannot at the most have more then a humane Faith for them for they are men as well as others Hitherto therefore there cannot be had a Divine Faith concerning the point of the Sovereign and Infallible Authority of the Roman Church and nothing by Consequence that can assure the Conscience and set the mind of man at rest Let us therefore pass over to the third means which is that of examining the Characters of Divinity and Infallibility that may be seen in the Roman Church It is in my Judgment in the sight of this that they give us certain external Marks and we have already seen that the Author of the Prejudices establishes upon this that Authority about which we dispute The most eminent Authority says he that can be in the world is easily discover'd to be in the Catholick Church because though there are Sects that dispute with it the Truth of its Tenets yet there are none that can with any Colour contend with it for that eminence of Authority which arises from its External Marks But without entring here far into the Controversy touching those Marks I say that he is very far from being able to establish such a certainty upon them as we ought to have of a Principle of Religion And this will appear from these three Reasons The First is That the greatest part of those marks are common to false Societies and even to Schismatical Churches which not only are not Infallible but which are actually in Errour as I have shewn in the first part of this Treatise The Greek Church for example in
its greatest contests with the Latin was always a Catholick Church she was of as great Antiquity as the Roman she had an uninterrupted duration from many Ages ago she had her large extent and her multitude as well as the Roman she had a Personal Succession of her Bishops down from the Apostles she gloried in a Conformity to the Doctrine of the Fathers she had her members united among themselves and with her Patriarchs she did no less then the Roman affirm her Doctrine to be Holy and her word to be Efficacious and that her Authors were holy men she has yet at this day her Miracles which she boasts of she had her Prophets and Temporal Prosperity in a word she might propound all that which the Church of Rome alleadges The Aethiopian Church on her side may do it as much and yet nevertheless those Marks no ways conclude a Soveraign and Infallible Authority for them they do not therefore conclude it for the Roman Church The Second Reason is that of all those pretended marks some are disputed with the Church of Rome others are fallaciously attributed to it and others conclude nothing less then that which they pretend We dispute with her her Conformity to the Fathers the Unity of her Members between themselves and with their Head the Holiness of her Doctrine and the Efficacy of her Word It is true that she boasts of these advantages but if we should come to examine them we should find they would have nothing of Solidity in them she fallaciously ascribes to her self the name of the Catholick The Antiquity and Holiness of her Authors Miracles Prophecy and the Personal Succession of her Bishops For before they can make any advantage of those marks they ought to shew that she is a Catholick not only in name but in deed that she has chang'd nothing in the Antient Doctrine nor in the Antient worship that she has in nothing degenerated from her first Authors that she is conformable to her first Christians whose Miracles and Prophecys are beyond all question that her Bishops are the Successors of the Mind and Doctrine as well as of the Sees of the Antient Bishops and unless they do so those marks are an Illusion She produces others which conclude nothing less then that which she should conclude as the Multitude of her Children or the largeness of her extent and Temporal Prosperity which are wordly advantages more proper to denote a corruption then an Infallibility The third Reason is That there are contrary Characters in the Church of Rome which note not only that she has been and that she is yet subject to err but that she has actually err'd and we have propos'd some in the beginning of this Treatise which it may be deserve to be better consider'd No man can therefore establish any thing of certainty upon those pretended external marks and in general that principle of the Soveraign and Infallible Authority of the Church of Rome cannot be a matter of divine Faith on which side soever he takes it nor by Consequence can any of those things be so which depend upon that Authority See here then the Obligation which lies upon those in the Roman Communion to the Author of the Prejudices for having thus Abolish'd all manner of Divine Faith for those things which that Church teaches by her Authority in shutting up as he has done the way of the Scripture with his Obstacles and unconquerable Difficulties he has reduc'd all to meer Conjectures or almost all to humane Testimonies Is it therefore after that manner that he would have us believe Transubstantiation the Real presence Purgatory The Sacrifice of the Mass Is it upon the Foundations of that nature that he would have us to Invocate Saints that we should worship Images That we should adore the Host and receive the Indulgences of the Pope and Absolutions of their Confessors But he has done yet worse for it is not only the Laity and private men from whom he has taken away a divine Faith he has torn it away even from the whole Body of his Church from her Prelats her Popes and her Councils since if this Point of their Soveraign and Infallible Authority is founded upon nothing but Conjectures and humane Testimonies They can neither have a Divine Faith for those Conjectures and those humane Testimonies nor for all those other things which depend upon them Have they a Revelation an immediate Illumination that instructs them There is no more either for the Popes or Councils Should they have it from the Scripture The Author of the Prejudices has told them that it is an Infinite a Ridiculous way to Instruct men in the Truth a path which we cannot know how to find an end of whatsoever Diligence we use But it may be he says that only for the Laity and not for the Clergy Let us see his words Even those says he who profess to spend their whole Lives in the Study of Divinity ought to judge that Examination to be above all their Abilities The Church of Rome the Body of her Prelats the Councils cannot at furthest but be made up of those men who profess to spend their whole Lives in the Study of Divinity and that Examination is above all their Abilities He ought not to say that they can altogether do that which it would be impossible for each one to do in particular For when they go about to decide the matters of Faith by their Soveraign Authority as they pretend that Councils should do each particular man ought to be assured by himself of the Truth and not to refer himself to the knowledge of his Brethren With what Conscience therefore can they exercise their Authority With what Conscience can they decide the points of the Faith and propose them to be believed as points of a Divine Faith With what Conscience can they retain men in their Dependance And with what Conscience can men remain therein The Author of the Prejudices may disintangle this Business with his Church as it shall please him we have no peculiar Interest in it but only to let him see more and more the Truth of that which I have said elsewhere that he does not sufficiently consider what he has wrote Let us grant him that there is no necessity of a Divine Faith for the establishing of that Article of the Soveraign and Infallible Authority of the Roman Church let us yield if he will have it so that he may be contented with the having a humane certainty such as he may have it is clear that whether he takes the way of Tradition or that of the Examination of the External marks we shall find the same Difficulties there thes me Obstacles the same Hindrances the same length that the Author of the Prejudices pretends to have discovered in the way of the Scripture And as the External Marks themselves cannot be otherwise justified then by Tradition it shall suffice to shew what I have
hinder but that she may externally deny the faith of Jesus Christ but that she may intirely lose her love and the communion of our Saviour and the quality of the True Church and by consequence that we should not be bound to separate from her while she should be in that state and till it should please God to re-establish her See here of what force those proofs are which they produce to ground this special priviledge of the Church of Rome upon It is not hard to see that a man of good understanding who would satisfie his mind and his conscience upon so weighty a point ought not to remain there but that he ought to pass on to the other way of clearing that doubt which I have noted which is to judge of the pretension of the Church of Rome by the examination of her Doctrines and her Worship For it is there principally that the characters of truth and infallibility ought to be found and by consequence he must come to the foundation and no further amuse himself with Prejudices As to the second Way by which I have said we might clear this Question Whether it be necessary to the salvation of Christians to be joyned to the Church of Rome it consists in examining whether it be true that God has made her the Mistress of all other Churches whether there is any particular order that binds us indispensably to her For if that be so the Separation of our Fathers must be condemned but if it be not so we must judge of that Church as of all other particular Churches and say that we cannot and ought not to separate our selves from her but when we have just and lawful causes so to do There is no person who does not judge that we cannot pass over lightly a point of so great importance which ought to serve for a general and perpetual Rule to all Christians and that if the Church of Rome would so set her self beyond a state of equality above other Churches it is necessary that she should produce some very express and indisputable Order of God for it But instead of that she does nothing but reverberate the same passages which I have mentioned She boasts her self to be the See of S. Peter and under that pretence she applyes to her self all that she can find in the Scripture in favour of that Apostle and particularly the Order that Jesus Christ gave him to feed his sheep as if the Office of the Apostleship in which Jesus Christ re-established him by those words could be communicated to his Successors or as if the foundation that Jesus Christ supposed and upon which he re-established him in saying to him feed my sheep to wit that he should love him more than the rest was not a thing purely personal in S. Peter and whereof it was not in his power to transmit any part to his Successors nor by consequence to invest them with his Office which was restored to him only upon a supposition of that love or lastly as if the office of feeding Christ's sheep included an absolute and indispensable necessity for the sheep to receive their death when they should give it them under the name of their food It must be acknowledg'd that there never was a higher pretension than this of the Church of Rome for what more could she pretend to then to make Heaven it self depend on her communion and to leave no possibility of salvation to any but those who should be in her communion and under her dependance But it must also be acknowledged that there never was any thing worse established than that pretension They alledge in its favour nothing that is clear and distinct and even the consequences which they draw for it are made after a very strange manner This is in my judgement the Reason why our Adversaries when they treat of this matter do not insist much upon Scripture but fly off presently to the Fathers and the usage of the Ancient Church For by this means they hope to prolong the dispute to eternity and that notwithstanding the Church of Rome shall be alwayes in possession of that Despotical Authority which she exercises over the Churches that remain in her communion In effect the life of a man would scarce suffice to read well and throughly examine all the Volumes which have been composed on one side and on the other upon this Question of the place that the Church of Rome and its Bishops have held among the Christian Churches during the first six Centuries and of the Authority which they had then But to say the truth there is too much artifice in that procedure for that the Church of Rome should be the Mistress of all others and that no one could be saved but in her communion that does not depend upon the order of men but only on that of God and when they should find among the Antients a thousand times more complaisance for the See of Rome than they had that may very well establish an ancient possession and make clear the fact but it can never establish the right of it To establish a right of that nature a word of God an express declaration of his will is necessary for it is a right not only above nature but even above the ordinary and common favour that God gives to other Churches and which by consequence depends only upon God And so it is but a wandring from the way to go to search for the grounds of it in the Writings of Men. It is no hard matter to conceive that those Bishops which were raised to Dignities in the Metropolis of the World and engaged in the greatest affairs might mannage matters so as to ascribe to themselves those rights which no wayes belonged to them nor to imagine that their flatterers and Courtiers might not have offered more incense to them than they ought nor that those persecuted ones who had recourse to their protection might not have helped the increase of their Authority nor that the Princes and Emperors who had need of them might not have given them those priviledges which they ought not to have had that which renders to a just title all that which they alledge in their favour suspected and to no purpose at all Notwithstanding there are moreover evident matters of fact that let us clearly see that the Ancient Church did not acknowledge that Universal Episcopacy that the Bishops of Rome pretend to nor that absolute and indispensable necessity to be joyned to their See to be saved nor that their Church should be the Mistress of all the rest 1. Every one knows that the Bishops of Rome were anciently chosen by the suffrages of the people and of the Clergy of that Church without any other Churches taking part in those Elections which is a mark manifest enough that they did not mean that those Bishops should be Universal Bishops nor that they should have a more peculiar interest in their creation than
the Month of February 1559. to 〈◊〉 to put an end to the differences of Religion by the way 〈◊〉 Council the Protestants had declared to him as they had 〈…〉 that they could have no hopes of any accommodation 〈…〉 of a Council of the Popes That they would submit 〈…〉 a free General and Christian Council not called by 〈…〉 the Emperour and Christian Kings where the 〈…〉 his place not as President and Master but as a Party and submit himself to the judgement of the Council That for that effect it was necessary that the Pope should release them of the Oath by which he held all the Prelates bound to his See to the end that the Prelates and Divines there might give their opinion freely and that all should be judg'd there by the Word of God alone and not by the Roman Constitutions and their pretended Traditions That it was just that their Divines should be heard and that they might declare their opinion in the decision of those differences and by consequence all the Acts and all the Decrees made at Trent remaining as not made that they should treat the things anew That with these conditions they consented with all their hearts and submitted themselves to a Council but not otherwise So that the Emperour seeing well that the Pope and his Court would never agree to those conditions nor consent to any Council at least unless they should be Masters of it further confirmed the Treaty of Passaw and setled the peace of Germany about the matter of Religion leaving to every one the liberty of his conscience This mortally wounded the Pope but elsewhere he comforted himself with hearing that his solicitations with the other Princes to continue the rooting out of the Hereticks by Fire and Sword and every where all the rigours of punishments had a very great effect in France in Spain and in the Low-Countreys Henry the Second dyed the third of June of the same year 1559. The Pope dyed also quickly after to wit the eighteenth of August of the same year His last words were to recommend to the Cardinals the holy Office of the Inquisition for so he called it assuring them that it was the only Pillar of the See of Rome His Memory was very much detested by all the people who immediately after his death burn'd the new Prison of the Inquisition which he had caused to be built broke his Statues and overthrew his Coat of Arms throughout all the City of Rome Pius the Fourth succeeded him and it was under him that the Council of Trent was consummated He followed intirely the Spirit of his Predecessor for he presently moved the Duke of Savoy to turn his Arms against his Subjects of the Valleys of Piedmont to reduce them by force to the obedience of his See and because that in France they had resolved to call a National Council to labour by this means to put a stop to the course of the Reformation against which the fires and punishments practised till that time had done nothing he oppos'd himself vehemently to it and sent to King Francis the Second an express Nuntio to disswade him from that National Council and to exhort him to follow the way of the punishments that he had before practis'd and that of his Arms if it were necessary till it should be provided for by a General Council offering him for that purpose to assist him with all his power and to cause the King of Spain and the Princes of Italy to assist him also The Nuntio faithfully acquitted himself of his charge but the King did yet persist in the design of a National Council and it was resolved in his Council that they should seek for the means to call it in case the Pope should not speedily call a General one This was the resolution of an Assembly held at Fountainbleau in the Month of August 1560. which no wayes pleased the Pope for he saw well that this National Council was a very bad example for Germany where till then his Predecessors had hindred it So that seeing no very good means to ward off that blow and apprehending that other Nations would do the same things he suddenly took up a resolution to assemble his Council at Trent But besides that reason of National Councils which he apprehended he was further carried out to it by divers other motives for he saw that the Reformed Religion had spread it self abroad every where In Spain the Inquisitions were taken up only with condemning and burning them and they had alwayes some new matter for the exercise of their cruelties It was the same in the Low-Countreys England had wholly thrown off the yoke of Rome and embraced the Reformation Scotland had done it as much All Prussia and Livonia had done the same In France the number of the Protestants was very much increased and they had the liberty of their consciences granted them The Duke of Savoy could not compass his design with all his Forces in the sole Valleys of Piedmont Besides that which remain'd fix'd to the interests of the Pope was very much discontented with the conduct of his Court the greatest part of his Catholicks had acknowledged the necessity of a Reformation and they made Harangues about it in the publick assemblies The Princes themselves who the most supported the See of Rome every day encroached upon his Authority and gave him trouble enough He resolv'd with himself therefore to assemble his Council but at the same time also he made it his design to manage it so well that the success should be advantageous for himself To this effect he published his Bull bearing this with it that he took off the suspension that had been made and called it to Trent on Easter day in the year 1563. He sent thither five Legates to preside in his place and after divers delayes in fine the Council was opened by his Order the eighteenth of January 1562. and matters were treated there afterwards after the same manner which they had been treated in before under Paul the Third and under Julius that is to say that the Pope reigned there absolutely and nothing was done there but according to his will His See was exalted there more than before the disorders of the Government of the Church were rather confirmed than corrected there and the Errors and Superstitions and Worship set up by men instead of being reformed were on the contrary established there and passed in the force of a perpetual and indispensable Law Such was the success of this Assembly It would be too long here to relate exactly that which passed there Any may read with pleasure and with profit all the particularities in some of the famous Historians of those times It shall suffice me for the present to say that after the manner that the Popes took there for the governing that Council we ought not to think it strange if they obtain'd their ends and if they alwayes turn'd things to which side
shall be shaken because many in whom grace seem'd to be resplendent shall yield to the persecutors and some of the most firm among the faithful shall be troubled The Church sayes he shall not appear Ecclesia non apparebit She will not therefore have then that visible extension which the Author of the Prejudices would have to be her perpetual mark for all Ages He further acknowledges the same thing in his Epistle to Vincentius where he treats of the state of the Church under the Arians There he teaches in express terms That the Church is sometimes obscured and covered with clouds through the great number of offences that she is then only eminent in her most firm defenders while the multitude of the weak and carnal is overwhelmed with the floods of temptation That under the reign of the Arians the simple suffered themselves to be deceiv'd that others yielding through fear dissembled and in appearance consented to Arianism That indeed some of the most firm escaped the snares of those Hereticks but that they were but few in number in comparison of the rest That nevertheless some of them generously suffer'd banishment and some others lay hid here and there throughout the Earth I pray tell me what visible extension could the Orthodox communion have then which subsisted only in a small number of the firm of whom even the greatest part had suffered exile or lay hid here and there throughout all the Earth I confess that History notes that there were yet some small flocks in some places of the East and of the West who set up their Assemblies apart as at Edessa at Nazianzen at Antioch and in some Provinces of France and Germany but what was this in comparison of the Arian communion which had fill'd the Churches and held Councils as we have so often proved We must therefore seriously profess that this visible extension is a vain and deceitful mark when they would make it perpetual to the true Church as the Author of the Prejudices would make it and that no one could abuse with greater injustice the Authority of S. Augustine than he has done We must profess also that a small handful of the Faithful a little party have right to separate themselves from the whole multitude I mean from a communion spread over all the world which has on its side the Ministry the Pulpits the Councils the Schools Titles Dignities and all that retinue of temporal splendour when it has not the true Faith For the rest that which I have handled in this Chapter about the two former Propositions of the Author of the Prejudices already sufficiently lets us see the falseness of his argument For if he would take the pains to read this Chapter with never so little application he will see all these following Propositions well establish'd there 1. That in General this Author has not compris'd the true Hypothesis of S. Augustine nor the state of his dispute against the Donatists 2. That he can draw no advantage from the divers wayes in which that Father conceived the word Church 3. That the separation which that Father judg'd to be fit to be condemned and wicked under what pretence soever it should be made is wholly different from that which is between the Church of Rome and us 4. That there is not any Christian Society from which one may not lawfully separate ones self in a certain case and manner 5. That that which is disputed between the Church of Rome and us being of this number they must consider the causes and circumstances of it rightly to judge of it and not pretend to convince us of Schism without entring upon any other discussion 6. That according to the principles of S. Augustine the Church of Rome is Schismatical in respect of us supposing that she is in error because it is she that has broken Christian Unity and that we are in respect of her in a passive separation 7. That it is absurd to make that visible extension a perpetual mark of the true Church which way soever they take it 8. That this pretended mark is contrary to the experience of our Age and does not properly agree to any one of these Societies that at this day divide Christianity 9. That it is contrary to the experience of the Ages past and to the Doctrine of the Fathers 10. That it is rejected in the sense of the Author of the Prejudices by the famous Doctors of the Roman communion 11. That it has no foundation in the dispute of S. Augustine against the Donatists 12. That it is even directly opposite to the Doctrine of that Father These are the just and natural consequences that are drawn from the things which I have handled in this Chapter I will examine in the following the other Propositions of the Author of the Prejudices CHAP. V. A further Examination of the Reasoning of the Author of the Prejudices upon the subject of our Separation THe Third Proposition of the Author of the Prejudices is already sufficiently confuted by what I have said He sayes that since our Society is not visibly extended throughout all Nations therefore it cannot be the True Church But we have shewn him that we cannot at this day rationally attribute that visible extension throughout all Nations to any of the Societies that divide Christianity and by consequence that it is a chimerical mark by which we may conclude that there is no true Church in the world since there is none which is not visibly excluded from many Nations We have shewn him also that his pretended mark does not agree either with the experience of the Ages past nor with the doctrine of the Fathers nor even with that of the Doctors of the Roman Church and that instead of having any foundation in the Doctrine of S. Augustine it is evidently contrary to him So that we have nothing to do at present but to go on to the Examination of the Fourth and Fifth Proposition They bear this sense That the Calvinists urge the principle of the Donatists far higher than ever those Schismaticks did For as for them they did not say that there was any time wherein the whole Church had fallen into Apostasy and they excepted the Communion of Donatus whereas the Calvinists would have it that there have been whole Ages wherein all the Earth had generally apostatized and lost the faith and treasure of salvation That the Societies of the Berengarians the Waldenses and Albigenses c. in which he sayes that some of us include the Church could not be that Catholick Church whereof S. Augustine speaks To establish that which he layes to our Charge concerning the entire extinction of the Church he first produces the testimony of Calvin This is sayes he that which Calvin has distinctly declared in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans where after having pretended that the threatning that S. Paul uses against those who do not remain in
Letters of Safe-conduct violated in the person of John Husse and Jerom of Prague They caused in the end a Writing to be Printed containing all these reasons and divers others too long to transcribe to justifie themselves against the calumnies of their adversaries and they published it not only in Germany but in other foreign Countries also Some time after the Pope published another Bull by which he prolonged the holding of the Council under a pretence that he could not agree with the Duke of Mantua and a little after he assign'd it at Vicenza Notwithstanding the prosecutions continued alwayes against the Protestants every where where the Pope had any Authority In Germany the Imperial Chamber committed a thousand injustices and outrages against them In France the flames were kindled in all the Provinces and although Henry the Eighth King of England had thrown off the Yoke of Rome yet he did not fail to appear a good Catholick to put to death without mercy all those who had learned the New Religion The same was done in Scotland in Flanders and in all the Countreys of the Duke of Savoy In the year 1539. the Pope published a Bull by which he suspended the Convocation of a Council indefinitely until it should be his good pleasure to have one held And moreover there was held in this same year an Imperial Diet at Franckfort whither the Emperour sent the Arch-Bishop of London as his Commissioner and decreed with him that to labour to put an end to the differences about Religion he should make a friendly Conference between the most Learned and well meaning persons both on the one side and on the other who without the intervention of the Pope should have nothing before their eyes but the glory of God and the good of the Church and that notwithstanding they should let the Protestants have peace for fifteen months under conditions that were yet harsh enough to them But this Resolution so highly offended the Pope that as soon as he had received the news of it he dispatch'd away a Nuntio to the Emperour who was then in Spain with orders to complain and to hinder by all sorts of wayes that he should not authorize it by his consent The Protestants having sent thither on their parts the Emperour would not for that time declare himself but dismiss'd that business to another season After which he went into the Low-Countreys to appease some popular Sedition there and having there put the matter into debate because he was to give some answer Cardinal Farnese who was Legate there before him opposed him with all his might remonstrating the inconveniencies that might arise from such a Conference and that he had far better referr the cause of Religion to a Council and notwithstanding to sortifie the Catholick League to make the Protestants submit by fair means or foul against whom he made a very long Invective This counsel notwithstanding did not then please the Emperour he appointed a Diet to be held in Germany for the Conference and he invited all the Princes to come in person thither promising publick safety to all which oblig'd the Cardinal Legate to retire in great discontent This Cardinal in his return went into France and obtain'd of Francis the First an Edict against those whom he call'd Hereticks and Lutherans which was afterwards publish'd and executed through his whole Kingdom with extream rigour The Conference was first assigned at Haguenaw a little after at Wormes and the Pope who feared the success thought good to send thither his Nuntio Thomas Campeius with Paulus Vergerius in whom he reposed a great deal of confidence But the Policy of the Court of Rome was too averse to an accommodation to suffer that Conference to proceed far the Emperour therefore at the urgent solicitation of the Pope broke it off by express Letters and referred it to a Diet which he would have held some time after at Ratisbon The Protestants saw clearly to what all these delayes tended and yet nevertheless they did not fail to appear at Ratisbon whither the Emperour came in person and whither the Pope had also sent Cardinal Contarenus in the quality of his Legate This was in the year 1541. Moreover the Emperour caused a Book to be presented on his part to the Assembly which chiefly treated of the Articles of Religion and particularly of those which were in controversie and he declar'd that it was his Will that that Book should be examined and that it should serve as the Theme or Subject of the Conference for which he himself named the Collocutors by the consent of both parties who deferr'd that nomination to him In this Conference the Collocutors agreed upon some Articles and could not agree upon some others as upon those of Transubstantiation of the Adoration of the Eucharist the Sacrifice of the Mass the Celibacy of Priests the Communion under one kind the Sacrament of Penance And the Emperour having consulted the Legate about this to know of him what he should do on this occasion the Legate gave him his answer in writing That after having seen as well the Articles agreed upon between the Collocutors as the others which they could not come to agree about it was his judgement that he ought to ordain nothing about the rest but that he ought to refer all to the Holy See which could in a General Council or otherwise do that which it should judge necessary for the good of the Church and in particular for that of Germany The Emperour took this answer as if the Legate had consented that the Articles agreed upon between the Collocutors should immediately be received by both the Parties and he related it to the Assembly after that manner But there sprung up a kind of division between the Bishops of one side and the Roman Catholick Princes on the other For the Princes would that the Articles agreed upon should be received and that the rest should be referred either to a General or National Council or at least to a General Assembly of the States of the Empire and the Bishops on the contrary who saw that this was the beginning of a Reformation were of opinion that they should reject those Articles agreed upon wherein they said that the Catholick Collocutors had too much given way to the Protestants and that they should change nothing either in Religion or its Ceremonies but that they should refer all to a General or a National Council This dispute therefore having so hapned the Legate feared lest they should upon this meddle with the affairs of the Court of Rome so that he openly declared by another publick Writing that he did not mean that they should receive any Articles but that they should absolutely refer all as well the agreed on as the others to his Holiness for him to determine what he should think fit He published yet farther another Writing by which he very much condemned as well the Catholick Princes as the Bishops
for that they had referr'd that business to a National Council in defect of a General one and he maintained that the Authority of the See of Rome was very much wounded in that reference and that a National Council could not deliberate about matters of Religion In fine after a great many disputes which only serv'd more and more to discover the obstinate resolution that the Roman party had taken up not to suffer a Reformation this Diet ended with a Decree of the Emperour which referr'd the whole affair to a General Council or a National one in Germany or to an Imperial Assembly if they could not obtain a Council and that nevertheless the Execution of the Decree of Ausburg should remain suspended All this pass'd in the year 1541. See here what the success of the Conference of Ratisbon was The year following which was 1542. the Pope assign'd the Council to be held at Trent in the Month of November he sent a Bull to the Emperour in Spain and after to the Kings exhorting them to send their Embassadors thither and he himself deputed thither three Cardinals in quality of Legates he sent thither some Bishops also But this Convocation had not then any effect by reason of the War that was carried on about the same time between King Francis the First and the Emperour And this latter seeing himself to have two Wars upon his hands that with France and the other with the Turks made a new Decree at Spire by which he gave peace to the Protestants but more than that he ordain'd that they should make choice of some Learned and well-meaning persons to draw up a Formulary of the Reformation that the Princes should do the same and that all those pieces being referred to the next Diet they should there resolve with a common consent that which they should judge fit to be kept about the matters of Religion till the meeting of a Council This Decree was made in the year 1544. But the Pope was so netled at this that he wrote to the Emperour in a very threatning style complaining above all things of this that he had not referred that which concerned Religion to the decision of the Church of Rome and that he had favoured those who were Rebels to the Apostolick See Some time after King Francis the First and the Emperour made a Peace and one of the Articles of their Agreement was that they should defend the Ancient Religion that they should employ their endeavours for the Union of the Church and the Reformation of the Court of Rome that they should jointly demand of the Pope the calling of a Council and that they should labour to subdue the Protestants This obliged the Pope to prevent them He therefore again assigned the Council to be held at Trent the fifteenth day of March 1545. and dispatched away his Legates thither but at the same time he resolv'd to use all his endeavours to oblige the Emperour to turn his Arms against the Protestants to oppose them at the same time with the Spiritual and Temporal Sword or to say better to the end that the War might serve him for a pretence to elude the Council For that purpose he made use of the Ministry of his Nuntio and afterwards of that Cardinal Farnese whom he sent to the Emperour as his Legate whose chief pretence was the refusals which the Protestants had propounded anew against his pretended Council He made therefore very powerful solicitations to the Emperour by his Legate with offers to aid him with men and money and even to cause him to be assisted by the Princes of Italy and the Emperour who on his side was very glad to take this occasion to subdue Germany to himself readily accepted of this proposition so that a War was concluded between them but the conclusion was kept very secret till the time of Execution Notwithstanding the better to cover this design the Emperour appointed a Conference of Learned Men to be held at Ratisbon upon the subject of Religion according to his last Decree but he did not fail to cite the Arch-Bishop of Cologne to appear before him who had embraced the Reformation and afterwards excommunicated him and deprived him of his Arch-bishoprick And as for the Conference at Ratisbon which gave some jealousie to the Bishops who were already assembled at Trent it was quickly after broken by the unjust conditions that some Monks who were there as the Commissioners of the Emperour would impose on the Protestant Divines The Council was opened the thirteenth of December of the same year 1545. But in fine after a great many artifices and dissimulations able to have lull'd asleep the most vigilant after a great many contrary assurances given to the Protestants the Emperour sent the Cardinal of Trent in Post to Rome to give the Pope notice that he should make his Troops march with all diligence The Treaty which they had made together was published the eight and twentieth of July 1546. bearing this among other things That the Emperour should employ his Arms and open force to make those Germans who should reject the Council return to the ancient Religion and to the obedience of the holy See and the Emperour soon after openly declared himself as well by the Letters which he wrote to divers Cities in Germany to the Elector of Cologne and the Prince of Wirtemburg as by the answers that his Ministers gave to the Embassadors of those Towns who were with him The Pope on his side presently published a Bull dated the fifteenth of July by which he commanded that they should make solemn Processions exhorting all Christians to put up prayers to God for the happy success of the War which the Emperour and himself had undertaken at their common charges against the Germans who should either profess Heresie or protect it Before this he had wrote to the Switzers Letters dated the third of June by which he gave them notice of the Emperours design praying them to send all the succours they could possibly The Emperour would at the beginning cover this War with another pretence than that of Religion but the Pope would never suffer him to do it So that the Emperour having no further way left to disguise himself began with the proscribing of the Duke of Saxony and the Lantgrave of Hessia and moreover he sent his Army into the field The Protestant Princes on their parts took up Arms also for their just defence The success of this War was not so happy for the Protestants all Germany saw it self soon enslav'd under the Arms of the Emperour and according to all humane appearance the Reformation also had been presently destroy'd if God who never utterly forsakes his Church had not provided for it by his Providence It hapned that the Pope and the Emperour quarrell'd about those temporal interests which were far more prevalent in their minds than that of Religion which fell out because the Emperour would not