preparation holy according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Furthermore though the faithfull of the new law do succeed in the Couenant established between Abraham and God Rom 9. The words whereof are these I will be God vnto thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 17. neuertheless there cannot be alleadged any one Scripture-testimony to proue that the children of belieuing Parents be sanctified in vertue of the said Couenant for they are not Abrahams seed and heires in their Mothers wombe or as soon as they be born according to promise but after they be made sons of God by faith * Gal. 3. quicunque enim in Christo baptiz ati estis Christum induist is si autem vos Christi ergo semen Abrahae estis haeredes secuÌ„dum promissionem in Christ Iesus through baptism Gal. 3. Moreouer the Couenant was made on condition that euery man child should haue the foreskin of his flesh circumcised or otherwise cut of from the people of God Gen. 17. in consequence of which it is euident that euen in the old law the Male-sex descending from Abraham by corporall generation were not counted de facto indeed children of the Couenant without circumcision in like manner in the new law no man is Abrahams seed childe of the Couenant and Heir of blessednes according to promise that is not Christs afore by spirituall generation in baptism which is christian circumcision and the condition of promised blessednes Wherefore it is a weake imagination of modern sectaries to think that faithfull and holy Parents bring forth sanctified children Besides Isaac and Rebecca were most renouned for faith and holiness neuertheless not euen Caluinists will dare to say that their son Esau was sanctified in his mothers wombe Sithence the Sacrament of baptism is a requisite absolutly necessary vnto saluation according to the common and ordinary way instituted for the obtaining of it a christian woman conceiuing a child shall doe most prudently and christianly during the tyme of trauail to desire of God by dayly prayers and alms-deeds that the fruit of her womb may not be depriued of baptism and God whose power is not confined to Sacraments and whose mercy is aboue his other ordinary workes can be moued at the piety and deuotion of a belieuing Mother to vse a speciall priuiledge to bring the said child to the kingdom of Heauen though naturall causes doe obstruct the baptism therof howeuer Infants of what condition soeuer dying in their infancy vnbaptized with the guilt only of originall treason against the diuine majesty committed by their first Parent are but banisht the court of Heauen no sentence of sensible punishment passeth against them being their consent as to their own (f) According to S. Bernard cited by S. Tho. q. de malo ar 2. a man burnes in the fire of hell in regard of his own will onely But Originall sin is noe product of our own will will was not giuen to the treason so that their banishment is most milde and fauourable compared with the (g) According to S. Gregory Nazian Ora. 40. young babes which through misfortune are not baptis'd neither enjoy the glory of Heauen nor endure the pains of Hell which S. Austin l. de pec mer. remis c. 16. calleth mitissimam damnationem the mildest damnation and that no man may conceiue that S. Austin so nameth the condition of children that dye without Baptism as if he so named it in comparison of the torments those suffer which are punish'd with euerlasting sensible burnings in regard of their actuall personall sinnes â— 5. con Julia. cap. 8. affirmes expresly that his meaning is that children dying vnbaptised are not afflicted with so grieuous pains as that it were better they had neuer been born but Christ saith of the damned in Hell melius esset si natus non fuisset homo ille wherfore according to Christs own saying it were better neuer to be born then to dwell in Hell and hereby appear's that poena sensus sensible pain is not procured by originall sin and indeed the punishment a man incur's through originall sin is a priuation of beatificall vision onely according to S. Thomas in 2. dis 33. q. 12. ar 2. wherefore wheras S. Austin ser 14. de verbis Apostoli saith that children vnbaptis'd are on the left hand and goe into euerlasting fire doubtles he mean's not that they shall be tormented with the euerlasting burnings of Hell Besides perhaps S. Austin aggrauated the punishment of children vnbaptis'd in heat of dispute with the Pelagians that ascribed vnto them eternall felicity without the kingdom of Heauen Howeuer S. Austin in Enchir. ad Laur. cap. 47. ingeniously confesseth that he neither can nor dare define Qua qualis quanta set poena illa parvulorum sine baptismo morientium and names it onely mitâ—ssimam aut leuissimam poenam And doubtless though children that dye without baptism in as much as they be depriu'd of the clear sight of God suffer something of heauiness neuertheless it is not grieuous vnto them being they know that they are not depriu'd of heauenly blessedness in regard of any personall fault of their's again fince that heauiness or sorrow is not Poena sensus a sensible punishment there can be no outward cause thereof banishment of ill Angells and wicked men that haue by their own voluntary act engaged in a rebellion against God their soueraign lord In regard of the absolute necessary dependence that eternall life hath of baptism Christ out of a fauourable prouidence towards all mankinde so instituted this Sacrament that euen (h) According to Tertull. l. de Baptis c. 16. Lay-people can minister baptism lawfully when the necessity thereof vrgeth and cannot otherwise be supplyed which opinion S. Hierom assertes Dial. 1. adversus Lucif and truly the Apostles Ioan. 4. ministred the baptism of Christ while they were lay-men for they were made Priests at the last supper moreouer this doctrine is asserted as an Article of faith by the Council of Florence in the Decree of Pope Engenius priuate persons of what condition or sex soeuer vnclothed with authority by ordination or iurisdiction can both lawfully and validly exercise the administration therof in the occurrence of vrgent necessity occasioned through the absence of Pastors lawfully called therunto applying the true matter and true forme and employing also an intention conformable to Christ and his Church and albeit that setting aside the case of necessity baptism so administred is vnlawfull as to conscience in him that is the Minister therof neuertheless it is valid as to the essence of the Sacrament circumcision performed by vncircumscised Gentills was counted valid and the same reason makes for the validity of Baptism exercised by vnbaptized persons seeing there is parity between baptisme and circumcision as vnto necessary application But to proceed further as to the excellency of this Sacrament of Christ for so it is named properly and therfore
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis
Epis 55. affirm's That infidelity or false faith is inconsistent with the Church of Rome S. Austin Epis 66. auer's that our lord hath plac'd the doctrine of truth in the office and Chaire of the Roman Church and S. Bernard Epis 190. to Pope Innocentius against Abailardus writeth thus We must refer to your Apostle-ship all the scandalls and dangers which may happen in matters of faith for there defects in order to faith ought to be remedied where faith cannot faile for to what Other see was it euer said I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not Although Bishops of Rome that succeed in the Chaire of S. Peter may personally err as priuate Doctours neuertheless none euer did or shall err iudicially or definitiuely that is none of S. Peters successors haue or shall deuiat from the truth in their consistories Courts Councils consultations held concerning matters of faith Religion and generall manners because Christ's prayer I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not protects them Wherfore the ancient Fathers recur'd to Rome and applyed themselues to the Chaire of S. Peter in all matters of controuersy pertaining to Religion and faith namely S. Austin and the Bishops of Affricke vnto Innocentius the first and vnto Celestinus Epis 90 95. S. Chrysostome had recourse to the same Innocentius Epis 1. 2. S. Basil to the Pope in his tyme Epis 52. S. Hierom to Damasus Epis 5. 7 58. and S. Cyprian Epis ad Cornelium expresly affirm's that the cause of all schisms and heresies proceeds from want of obedience to the supream Pastour Nec aliunde saith he haereses obortae sunt aut nata sunt schismata quam inde quod vni Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur From disobeying of lawfull Pastours began the notorious schism of Core Dathan and Abyron who rose vp against Moyses and Aaron whome God had appoynted Chief Rulers ouer them and the rest of the Children of Israël puft vp with proud thoughts of their own abilities and conceipted worthiness they were troubled and grieu'd at the establishing of priesthood in the family of Aaron onely and therefore arrogated to themselues priestly function against the ordinance of God and to the vpholding of their schism coind a new Theology teaching that Moyses and Aaron tooke too much vpon them lifting themselues aboue the people of our lord saying all were alike holy and our lord with euery one of them alike after the same manner all schisms and heresies down from our Sauiour Christ till these dayes haue sprung vp against God's ordinance in euery age some one or other wanton schollar hath drawn Disciples and gathered Accomplices together against the supream Pastour that is the Bishop of Rome and our true Aaron as S. Bernard calleth him l. 2. de consid c. 8. pretending that he tak's too much authority vpon him lifting his own chaire aboue all others seeing that the spirit of God is with euery one of them to teach preach and administer the Sacraments without dependence of him Their intent and aime in rising thus against the supream Pastour of the Church is to persuade the vnlearned that the speciall priuiledges of Pasce oues meas confirma fratres tuos which Christ cōfer'd on S. Peter doe not descend on his successors alone in consequence of which they conceiue it needless to seek to the Bishop of Rome for Confirmation of their new opinions or to value any condemnation in order thereto that proceeds from that Apostolicall Chaire and as all wanton schollars which coyne new notions of Doctrine in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion seditiously rise against the supreame Pastour of the Church so they speake contemptuously of the schooles of orthodox Doctours in regard these be the supream Pastours chiefest consistery and the Churches sanctuary that keeps the Originall Cycli and weights of all Christian doctrine where with they weigh all coyns of new Theologies and such as are found too light are laid aside for the high Priest to condemne and anathematise lest the vnlearned learned be deluded thereby And indeed since the first erecting of scholes Cōnexae sunt saith the learned Canus scholae contemptio haeresum pestes contempt of scholes and heresies are inseperably connected together For example Luther afraid of the originall weights kept in the scholes of Orthodox Doctours sharpned his tongue against all the Vniuersities of those dayes which he called Lupanaria Antichristi the stews or Brodel houses of Antichrist and t' is common alike to all such as coyne or follow new opinions to haue an extream abhorrence from the scholes of Orthodox Doctours But woe to all such wanton schollars as goe out from the rest into seuerall sects for they perish in the contradiction of Core They are clouds without water carried about of winds Trees of Autumne without fruit raging waues of the sea foming out their owne shame and confusion wandring starres to whom is reseru'd the storm of darknes for euer Ep. Cath. Judae because they despise the scholes of Orthodox Doctours rise against the authority of their supream Pastour and cut out of their own braines vnauthorized Models of new sects and Religions As the Prince of darknes by diuine permission transforms himselfe into an Angel of light so he guideth the pencils of Ambitious schollars vnto setting forth false resemblances of true faith The extream wantonness of heady and high mynded Teachers by the crafty dealings of Satan has euen in our dayes turn'd Christianism into great disorder and confusion As the People of Rome through the delusions of Simon Magus were diuided in order to the true Selene some conceiuing her to appeare from one window some from an other and some from as many windowes as darted seeming resemblances of her so very many Christian people especially these of our own nation fince they haue let goe their hold of S. Peters Chaire that is since their falling away from the obedience due to the Church of Rome that first conuerted them to Christianism are of different iudgements as to the true faith deluded by the subtill sleights of new Teachers which according to the seuerall lustes of their high mynds haue diuided them into seuerall sects some be Lutherans some Caluinists some Protestants some Anabaptists some Independēts some fift-Monarke men some Quakers some Deists and some Atheists There are now as many faiths as wills whiles either faith is represented as new Teachers will or as they will so is interpreted and whereas according to one God one Lord and one baptism there is also but one faith men of these dayes are faln away from that which is the onely faith and begin to belieue that there is none at all confounded with the great variety of seeming faiths The ground wherof as t is afore intimated is in regard Non vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad
coÌ„plexans LESVS eos paruulos imponens manus super illos benedicebat Huius caeremoniae meminit Aug. l. 2. de pec merit c. 16. Imposition of hands and the Priests benediction with all after the imitation of Christ Mar. â— Ninthly * Unctionis ex oleo benedicto in pectore scapùlis meminit Aug. ser 206 de Tempore anoiming breast and shoulders with holy oile wherby is signifyed that who euer is haptized is prepared to fight the deuill the world and the flesh Ceremonies employed in administring of baptism that is to say which accompany the doing of the SacrameÌ„t are first the * Nomina Gentilium imponere prohibitum est can 33. Concil Nicaeni naming of the person that is to be baptized a ceremony not at all times practised Secondly (o) God-Fathers and God mothers Tertull l. de baptis c. 18. nameth sure ties because of their engagement in order to such as they chrisen and indeed thereby they are bound to instruct their God-sons and God-daughters in all requisits necessary to christian Religion Trident. sess 24. cap. de reform But their obligation is far less when the children they chrisen abide vnder the conduct of catholick Parents From the Sacrament of Baptism ariseth a spirituall kindred between the God-father or God-mother and the party baptised and again between the God-father or God-mother and the Parents of the party baptised In regard of this spirituall kindred t' is vnlawfull without speciall dispensation for either God-father or God-mother to marry with the party they chrisen and the marriage is invalide Howeuer now since the publication of the Councill of Trent no such spirituall kindred ariseth to the anulling of marriage between the God-father and God-mother And from hence it comes that Fathers and Mothers ought not to baptise their own children if their baptism can be supplyed otherwise neither ought they to be God-fathers or God-mothers of their own children according to the Churches canons can 30. q. 1. ad simina God-Fathers and God-mothers so called in regard of their concurrence vnto the spirituall regeneration by baptism wherby they contract spirituall kindred with the baptised and parents therof only in as much as they vndertake the spirituall conduct of the baptised as to instruction in the rudiments of christian doctrine and therby contract an obligation according to iustice to the performance therof they be named suerties Thirdly blessing of water fourthly immersion or washing of water considered as it is a ceremony only and not as it is the immediate matter of this Sacrament for taken in that sense it is more then an accidentall ceremony being an essentiall part of baptism Ceremonyes employed after baptism is ministred that is to say which be subsequent therunto are first anoynting of the crown of the head in the person baptised with chrism consecrated by a Bishop which ceremony doth signify that the baptised in Christ hath put on Christ and incorporated himselfe into him as to his head Fourthly the putting of a wax candle lighted into the hand of the baptised which is a mysticall representation of the marueilous light of faith the baptised is called vnto Fiftly a white garment which expresseth the innocency and spirituall candor of him that is baptised whose sins though they be as crimson or scarlet by baptism be made white as snow and wool CHAR. VII OF CONFIRMATION THE CONTENTS To lay hand 's on the heads of such as are baptized anointing their foreheads with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross wherein consisteth the true matter and form of sacramentall Confirmation is a function proper to Bishops onely Although the Sacrament of Confirmation is not of so exceeding great necessity as baptism neuerthelesse it produceth an additionall sanctity vnto perfecting the grace that baptism brought forth afore baptism begetteth christian souldiers and sacramentall confirmation improu's and strengthens them in professing Christ As to confirme sacramentally so to consecrate Chrism is an office proper to Bishops onely Episcopall ceremonies practiced in the consecration of Chrism COnfirmation is a (a) The Councils of Florence in the Decree of Pope Eugenius and of Trent sess 7. can 7. define Confirmation to be a Sacrament of the new law Neither matters it that it is not set down expresly in the holy Euangile for according to S. Iohn cap. vlt. IESVS did many things which the Euangelists neuer committed to writing and indeed t' is meer accidentall to a Sacrament that either the iustitution or any essentiall part thereof be expressed plainly in the holy scriptures for before the new Testament was written both batpism and the Eucharist were Sacraments taken in the proper sense Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense the ordinary Minister wherof is a Bishop S. Philip Deacon and disciple of Christ though he did confer the Sacrament of baptism Act. 8. neuertheless he did not lay his hand 's on the heads of those whom he dad baptised anointing their forehead 's with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost wherein is this Sacraments consistency that being an act proper (b) Though a meer Priest has power to baptise and anoint the baptised with the oyle of Chrism consecrated by a Bishop neuertheless he wantes authoritie to signe with the same oyle the forehead of the baptized that function being proper to Bishops when they giue the holy Ghost to the baptized howeuer by speciall priuiledge of the sea Apostolick Abbates that are no Bishops and meer Briests also may minister the Sacrament of Confirmation where there is no Bishop to perform that office and de facto Pope Gregory dispensed as appear's by his own writings l. 5. Epis 26. to the Episcopall function Wherefore when the Apostles that wâ—re at Ierusalem heard that the Samaritans through S. Philips preaching had embraced christian religion and were baptised with all they sent * S. Chrysos in 8. Act. hom 18. Epiphan haer 21. expressè negant S. Philippum cum esset Diaconus dumtaxat fuisse sufficientem muneri imponeÌ„di manus vt Samaritani reciperent SpirituÌ„ sanctum proinde intentio ob quaÌ„ missi fuerunt Petrus Ioannes ad id officium praestandum fuit quod essent Episcopi vnde constat Episcopum esse ministrum ordinarium sacramentalis confirmationis Vnde S. Dionys Eccl. Hierar cap. a. Sacerdotes inquit offerebant baptisatum Episcopo vt eum posset signare diuino Deifico vnguento S. Peter and S. Iohn which were Apostles and Bishops too to lay their hands on the heads of those which were baptised that they might receiue the holy Ghost that is they sent vnto them Bishops to minister the Sacrament of confirmation vnto giuing of sanctifying grace so the * Theodor. in cantica ad illa verba vnguentum effusum nomen tuum dicit baptizatos sub visibili vnguenti specie huius Sacramenti invisibilem
successoribus corum in officio sacerdotali As God in the old law took of his people to be Priests and Leuits that is constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers for the administring of diuine things in the Temple so in the new law he hath ordained diuers degrees or states of Ministers one more eminent then an other for example Bishops Priests Deacons and other Clergy men to (c) The Apostle saith Rom. 4. Let a man think of us as of the Ministers of Christ and the Dispensers of the Misteries of God that is of the Sacraments From whence the Council of Trent infers that it is in the Churches power to dispose appoint ordaine in the dispensing of Sacrament's what she shall think expedient for the benefit of those which receiue them and the greater reuerence of the same Sacraments so that no alteration be made as to the substance thereof dispense diuine Mysteries that is to say the Sacraments in the Church of Christ as concerning Bishops the scripture maketh mention of them as diuinely instituted Act. 20 rake heed vnto your selues and of all the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of God and the name Bishop according to the consenting testimonies of all Interpreters and Fathers signifys an Ecclesiasticall person that by common vsage of speech is called a Bishop (d) According to the Apostles doctrine set down Act. 20 Bishops receiue their power of gouernment in Order to the Church from the holy Ghost wherfore they be Pastores Ecclesiae Pastors taken in the proper sense seing that Church-gouernment is proper to them Again according to the same Apostle 1. Timot. 3. 2 Bishop is cloth'd with power of iurisdiction aboue a meer Priest So that according to diuine right a Bishop is aboue a meer Priest as appears by the Council of Trent sess 21. c. 1. and indeed a Bisphop by vertue of his ordination and character hath power to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation validly in consequence of which he is by diuine dispensation aboue a meer Priest because both his ordination and character haue institution from Christ nor matters it that a meer Priest by speciall priuiledge may be enabled to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation being his ordination and character gine him no such power which is a Church-gouernour invested with superiority ouer meer Priest's in respect both of ordination and iurisdiction Again the scripture nameth Priests as distinct from Bishops 1. Timoth. 5. against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses where doubtless the Apostle meaneth Priest's as wanting Episcopall dignity and ordination both because Timothy exercised authority ouer them as also in regard that in the same Chapter he gaue a command to Timothy whom he had ordained a Bishop afore to cherish and feed those Priests for as much as they were vnder his charge and as substitutes administred the Sacraments vnto the faithfull of the Church vnder him which command cannot be meant in order to Bishops since these are not (e) Aerius made no difference between a Bishop and a Priest which errour wickless the first English Heretick espoused and after him Luther and is now an assertion generally taught by sectaries of these dayes near vnto this heresy is the opinion of certain singular schollars who teach that the ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is the same and although S. Hierom assert's that the primitiue Churches were gouerned by common Counsell of Priests neuertheless he neuer assert's parity between a Bishop and a meer Priest as to the power of iurisdictiou which is the matter in debate between catholick's and sectaries howeuer catholick Bishops confer with meer Priests and embrace their Counsels in the gouernment of their seuerall Churches respectiuely but from thence no man ought to infer equality between Bishops and meer Priests as to unrisdiction for a meer Priest cannot ordaine a Priest or confer the Sacrament of confirmation as meer Priests subject to the iurisdiction and committed to the care of an other Bishop Furthermore the scripture mentioneth Deacons 1. Timoth. 3. Deacons must be chast hauing the mistery of saith in pure conscience and the condition of their office doth euidence plainly enough their inferiority and subordination not only to Bishops but also to meer Priests and the Apostle Act. 6. declares also as much Likewise this catholick assertion doth appeare by the ecclesiasticall Hierarchy instituted by diuine ordination * Trid sess 23. can 6. definit esse in Ecclesia catholica Hieâ—â—rchiaÌ„ ordinatione diuina institutam quae constas ex Episcopis Prasbyteris ministris Et can 2. eiusdem sess dicit anathema negantibus esse in Ecclesia catholica prater Sacerdotium alios ordines majores minores per quos veluti per gradus tendatur in Sacerdotium to consist of Bishops Priests and Ministers Trid. sess 23. can 6. which manifest's a reall difference in the offices of each of them Howeuer the scripture sometimes doth call Bishops * Per impositioneÌ„ manuum Presbyterij S. Timoth. 4. Apostolus noÌ„ intelligit nomine presbyterij Officium dignitateÌ„ siue authoritatem presbyteri vel Sacerdotis sed catum vel collegium presbyteroruÌ„ sic tamen vt nomine presbyteroruÌ„ etiam Episcopos includat quod est iuxta consuetudinem scriptura liquet Apostolum ibi locutum fuisse de Episcopis de illis enim presbyteris loquitur quorum ille erat vnus Nam cap. 2. Epis 1. loquens de eadem ordinations Timothei ait per impositionem manuum mearum proinde ipse Paulus erat vnus ex Episcopis qui ordinauerunt Timotheum Deinde iuxta vetorem Ecclesia morem non simplices presbyteri sedsoli Episcopi manus imponebant Episcopo ordipando vt notut S. Chrysost 1. Concil Nicanum lege Lata sanciuit vt Episcopus non nisi à tribus Episcopis consecraretur ideo in ordinations Episcopi plures Episcopi manus imponunt ordinando vero presbytero vnus sufficit Episcopus by the name of Priests promiscuously for example in the Epistle to Titus the Apostle sayes I left Titus in Creet that be should ordaine Priests in euery Citty that is Bishops for so the Apostle in the same Chapter doth interpret his meaning adding after that appointment these words For a Bishop must be without fault vnreprouable where the particle for doth import a coniunction causatiue which doth euidence that the Apostle vnderstood by Priests Bishops But hence no man ought to infer full parity or equallity between a Bishop and a Priest since the distinction of Bishops from and the preeminence aboue Priests is by continuall vsage receiued and preserued in the catholick Church down from the Apostles to the present times And though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless euery Priest is not a Bishop as euery Cherubin and Seraphin in the celestiall Hierarchy is an Angell this name being common to all alike but euery
Angell is not a Cherubin or Seraphin that being a peculiar Order of Angells distinct from the rest And albeit that S. Hierom and but he alone among all the ancient ecclesiasticall writers doth assert in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius that in the primitiue times a Bishop and a Priest were one and the same thing also that Bishops got superiority ouer meer Priests rather in respect of ecclesiasticall constitution then diuine institution yet no man must argue thence that S. Hierom did deny a Bishop taken in the ordinary ecclesiasticall sense to be distinct from a meer Priest without hauing him contradict what himselfe hath written in sundry other places which were to play the part of an vniust Iudg. Besides it is not consonant at all as to reason that so great a learned Prelate as S. Hierom should be ignorant of bishops superiority ouer meer Priests in regard of iurisdiction and order as to diuine right since Timothy whom all interpreters and Fathers call Bishop was inuested with iudicatory authority ouer meer Priests as doth plainly appeare by the Apostles own words 1. Timoth. 3. Against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses Moreouer S. Hierom doth not deny in the epistle afore alleadged the superiority of Bishops ouer meer Priest's to be grounded in the truth of our lord's disposall for he doth assert only that maiority to proceede rather or more from ecclesiasticall custome then from a true ordinance of Christ for as much as ecclesiasticall constitutions haue rendred the dignity of Bishop's more eminent then it was in primary times adding thereunto preeminence of places in the Church peculiar ornaments and priuiledges to consecrate diuerse thing 's which meer Priest's cannot doe Howeuer S. Hierom doth assert expresly ordination that is power to ordain Priests proper to Episcopall function only in his said Epistle to Euagrius and likewise power to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation in a Dialogue writen against Luciferus But it is conceiued by coniecturall deductions from the writings of S. Hierom that in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius * Credibile etiam est S. Hieron prae oculis habuisse Ioannem Ierosolymae Episcopum qui iniustè afflixerat eum fratrem ipsius voluit deprimere fastum eius Legatur Epis 61. ipsius Hieron he playd the Oratour vsing the figure hyperbole being heartily angry with certain Deacons that ambitiously preferred themselues before Priests or at least suffered themselues to be preferred wherfore to suppress their inordinate ambition and extream insolence he made a parity between Bishops and meer Priest's which doubtless he meant only in respect of the great and maine function in order to the celebration of the holy Eucharist that is equall and common alike to both of them * Est propositio de fide quod sint 7. ordines communiter dicti presbyte ratus Diaconatus c. vt patet ex Concilijs Roma sub Syluestro can 7. Carthag 4. cui interfuit S. Aug. Trid. sess 32. catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine recenset omnes 7. ordines sigillatim As touching the number of ecclesiasticall Orders it is a constant Tenet of catholick faith that there be seuen orders taken in the proper sense viz of Priests Deacons sub-Deacons Acolists Lectours Exorcists and doorekeepers corresponding to as many sundry functions which are exercised in reference to the celebrating of the Eucharist The first is the consecration therof proper to Priest's alone the second administration of the Sacrament which belongeth to Deacons The third is the preparing of the sacramentall matter wherunto Sub-Deacons are ordained the fourth is the presenting of the matter at the Altar and vnto this function doth relate the order of Acolits But the other three orders regarde the disposition of such as be attendants only at the time of celebrating the Eucharist among which some are vnbelieuers and doore-Keepers are ordained to debarre and keeper of such Persons others haue a desire to belieue aright but are not sufficiently enough instructed for the perfecting of these Lectours are ordained Others though they are true belieuers and want no instructions yet in as much as they be possessed with deuills or otherwise vexed by them Exorcists are ordained for their meet help (f) According to Pope Innocent the third and other Orthodox writers before him namely Steph. Eduensis In opus de Sacra Altaris pr. 6. all the functions proper to the seuen orders were represented in the outward actions of Christ And S. Austin and other ancient Fathers affirme that Christ represented the Sacrament of penance in the raising of Lazarus for as much as he commanded the Apostles to vntye the cords that bound him Again S. Austin Comment In Ioan. c. 9. says that the washing of the mans eyes that was blind from his birth in the water of Siloe was a figure of christian baptism And all these seuen ecclesiasticall orders are figured and represented by sundry actions which Christ exercised on earth For example Christ Io. 3. made a scourge of small cordes and droue out of the Temple of Ierusalem those that sold oxen sheep Doues and changer's of money wherby are figured Door-keepers whose office is after Christ's example to shut the Church doores againsT the vnworthy and open them to the worthy Christ Luc. 4. read the Prophesie of Isaias wherin the Order of Lectours is signified their office being to read the holy Prophesies Christ Mark 8. cast out Deuills wherby Exorcists are represented Christ Io. 8. sayes I am the light of the world Wherunto doe relate Acolites the carrying of burning candles to enlighten being their function Christ Io. 13. preparing to celebrate the Eucharist tooke a Towell girded himselfe and powered water into a bason to wash his disciples feet in which action Sub-Deacons be expressed for one office of these Ecclesiasticall Ministers is to prepare water for celebrating of the Eucharist and to wash the Corporalls as is prescribed in the Roman Pontificall Christ Mat. 26. at his last supper distributed to his Apostles the Sacrament of the Euchariste and afterward Io. 13. preached vnto them in these two actions are shadowed deacons whose office is to preach and sometimes to distribute the Sacrament of the Euchariste as doth appeare plainly by the hystory of S. Steuen and S. Lawrence which as Deacons exercised the said actions Again Christ at his last supper did offer the sacrifice of the Euchariste that is of his body and blood which is proper to Priestly function * S PP Aug. Gregor alâ—â— testaÌ„tur Christum actione illa qua suscitauit LazaruÌ„ iussitque eum vinculis quibus erat ligatus ab Apostolis dissolui adumbrasse nostraÌ„ poeniteÌ„tiam potestateÌ„ traditaÌ„ Ecclesiae pro remitteÌ„dis peccatis Et Aug. comment in Euang Ioan. dicit ablutionem oculorum caeci naii ad natatoria Siloe tepraesontasse ablutionem nostri Baptismi In like manner Christs actions expressed in raysing vp of Lazarus and in commanding
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.