Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	bishop_n	church_n	jurisdiction_n	5,357	5	9.3309	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43727	Apokalypsis apokalypseos, or, The revelation revealed being a practical exposition on the revelation of St. John : whereunto is annexed a small essay, entituled Quinto-Monarchiæ, cum Quarto Omologia, or, A friendly complyance between Christ's monarchy, and the magistrates / by William Hicks ...	Hicks, William, 1621-1660.	1659 (1659)	Wing H1928; ESTC R20296	349,308	358

thereon and in Rev. 4. the two Gospel Witnesses are said to be the two candlesticks to wit the two churches of Jews and Gentiles with their two Olive branches by their side to wit the two administrations of Law and Gospel which are always pouring out their oyl for light into the ministerial Lamps of these golden candlesticks Here must needs be then much light and truth for these are the two anointed ones that stand by the Lord of the whole earth Zach. 4.2.12 and 14 verses CHAP. II. Verse 1. Unto the Angel of the Church of Ephesus write these things saith he that holdeth the seven Stars in his right hand who walketh in the midst of the seven golden Candlesticks THe general preface to the seven churches and of the whole Book being finished in the first chapter wherein was considered who was the Author of these divine Revelations and that was Christ under divers denominations and similitudes some appropriable only to the divine nature some to the humane clearly notifying That that person that appeared unto John was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Christ God-Man who gave these Divine Revelations unto John some immediately by himself some by his ministring Spirits the Angels for though the greatest part of these Prophesies are given and signified by the instrumentality of Angels yet it may be truly said that Christ doth it for it is a known rule What is done by another at ones Order and command is done by himself Christ he is the Author of those Visions he gives them out to John and John he is the recipient instrument and the subordinate Author and is commanded to write them and make them known unto the churches and in the first place in this second and third chapters John is commanded by Christ to write those premonitions to the seven churches which in their order shall be handled But in the way before I fall upon the particulars it will be worth the enquiry Quest Why John is commanded particularly to write to each church of the seven apart To the Angel of the Church of Ephesus of the Church of Smyrna of the Church of Pergamus c. I answer for divers reasons First They were not guilty of one and the same faults and as their defections were divers and various so ought they to have various and divers reprehensions So likewise their graces and endowments were various so ought they to have divers and various encouragements therein The more obdurate and high-handed sinners ought to have the sharpest and highest reproofs and censures but the more flexible and tender-hearted ought to be dealt with the more tender hand of love and compassion Secondly The several charges are drawn against each particular church and so sent unto them by the hand of their own peculiar Angel Minister or Pastor to shew unto us that they were not to seek for any extrinsecal power or authority over themselves Christ is the common and general admonitor and reprehender of them all each of them are solely and singly under his reprehensive power and jurisdiction The Angel of the church of Ephesus hath only received commands and reproofs that relates to the church of Ephesus so the Angel of Smyrna for the church of Smyrna and the Angel of Pergamus for the church of Pergamus c. The Angel of the church of Ephesus did not receive commands or reproofs to impose them juridically on the church of Smyrna nor Smyrna on the church of Pergamus or on any one of the seven either singly by it self or joyntly with any of the others one two or more They were not to be superintendents or to have a prelatical authority over the rest there was no cathedral then at Ephesus nor in any of the other six the name of Archiepiscopacy and Hierarchycal Supremacy was then unknown in the little well-ordered Christian world or rather Common-weal Bishops then did look no farther with an eye of authority then over their own flocks neither then was it known that a combination of some few churches or rather officers of churches under the name of classical Elders provincial Elders or National Elders should have the sole power and jurisdiction over the rest of the churches of Christ in their vicinity Ephesus then as unto outward authority was Independent Smyrna then was Independent and so were all the rest The churches could then and also now can act consultatively by way of advice by their Elders and Brethren either joynt or singly but not juridically by way of authority over one and another The churches of Christ are all Peers respecting their authority yet in their graces and perfections amongst themselves differing from one and another in glory Christ keeps the sole Legislative power in his own hand and what he communicates thereof unto his churches it is not that they should be lords over their Sister-churches faith but that they may within their due bounds exercise their wholsome admonitions and censures according to the Word of God Christ will not suffer one church juridically to censure another sister-church though corrupt for there is no such authority given them Christ keeps that prerogative in his own hand he reproves and censures the whole seven Asian churches himself but suffers not one or more to do it over the rest And one great reason of this is That if Christ had granted such authority unto one church over others that that church which becomes most potent and most countenanced by the secular powers though most corrupted in doctrine and worship will undertake to censure the soundest and most orthodox churches of all as the Arrians did of old in the times of the sons of Constantine the great and their Successors censure chastise and vex even the soundest and most faithful churches of Christ And the idolatrous apostatized church of Rome under this pretence of having authority over other churches do even fulminate out her direst Anathemas on all other churches though the faithful and undefiled spouses of Christ Be wise therefore ye true spouses of Christ hold fast the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free lest ye subjugate your necks and precious faith unto the idolatries of the spiritual harlot For this very reason Christ gives his particular censures and reproofs to each particular church according to their peculiar failings and errours that one more corrupt church might not undertake to censure that which was less corrupt But if it be demanded how a sound and faithful church of Christ should carry it self towards an erroneous and backslidden corrupted church I answer They are to use all means for their recovery and that in love and charity First They are to advise them and admonish them of the danger of their ways charitably not juridically as a church exercises towards her own members Secondly They are to pray for their healing and recovery out of their spiritual Maladies If all this will not do to their amendment they are to withdraw communion from them and to leave

and some others of suspected credit and of obscure note as Dorotheus Dionisius Eusebius Caius do oppugne it yet Epiphanius was so passionate friend to it that he reckons them among Heretiques that did reject it and Justin Martyr and Ireneus of sounder judgement and of singular piety did not only approve this book as canonical but wrote commentaries on it 2. Whatsoever that Caius was that fathers the Apocalyps on Cerinthus on whose report all his followers were misled yet the relation it self holds not any resemblance of truth for Ireneus Tertullian and Epiphanius who write very largely of the heresies of Cerinthus and his successors yet never mentions that he held this opinion of Chiliasme or the Kingdom of Christ on earth which they could not be ignorant of therefore this story of Caius concerning him and his Apocalyps is Apocryphal and a meer figment on purpose devised by the adversary to lessen the authority of this book see more at large hereof in D. Homes lib. 3. chap. 3. sect 3. Further if Cerinthus was the Author of this book doubtless he would have besprinkled it with some other of his errors that were peculiar to him as that of the creation of the world by Angels denying of the Divinity of Christ and affirming his generation to be only of the seed of Joseph and Mary as is testified by M. Baxter's book of Infidelity treating of the heresies of Cerinthus Carpocrates and their followers page 129. c. But in this book of the Revelation there is not one word to this purpose but rather the contrary strongly confirmed in many places thereof as the subsequent discourse thereon will manifest And lastly If it were granted that Cerinthus held and expected a riotous and luxuriant Millenary which is now disproved yet this of the Apocalyps hath not the least intimation thereof but of a Millenary of rest and joy in a higher and more spiritual key then ever the Church enjoyed on earth heretofore there is great difference between an earthly sensual reigne and to reigne on earth Saints may be on earth and yet be most spiritual so they may have a Kingdom here on earth and yet a most spiritualized and heavenly one which is fully confirmed in the 21 and 22 chapters of this book And so I have answered the first ground of suspecting the divine authority of this Apocalyps Secondly Hierome the great Antagonist of this book writeth that many learned men spake very sharply against this book and the whole matter thereof as not becoming the gravity of an Apostle being only a common history of things shaddowed under dark figures and hard kind of speeches I answer Rather it becomes and savours the excellency and authority of an Apostle being directed to the then seven famous Churches of lesser Asia carrying in it all along the spirit of Prophesie and the very steps sentences and figures of the old Prophets being full of pregnant testimonies of the Divinity of Christ and of this perfecting of the work of our Redemption and Salvation by his continual Intercession and providential acts of gubernation of his Church to the end of the world I confess the book in the figures and expressions thereof is dark and mysterious but that is not strange in prophetical writings as in Daniel Ezekiel c. It seemed good to God to set us on diligence to enquire into the dealings of God with his Church and people and not to over-slip the judgements of Gods providence which are reserved in God's infinite wisdom unto their appointed times of discovery that from generation to generation his people and Church may be comforted and supported unto the end of all Thirdly Dionisius aforesaid Bishop of Alexandria reasons very slightly against the divine authority of this book when he saith That it doth not suit with the gravity of an Apostle to cast up so oft his own name since in his Gospel he never nameth himself but only pointeth it out by some modest marks as these The Disciple whom Jesus loved But here in this Book in his Visions and Conferences with the Angel he hath never done with these kind of words I John This reason moved Dionisius to think that this book was rather set out by some other in his name then by himself I answer This opposition is but weak for he that writes a History or matters of Doctrine as the Gospel is mixed of both he need not often insert his own name for the truth of that depends on its present verity and other apparent circumstances witnessed unto by the spirit of God in miracles and its operations on the hearts of Believers But it is far otherwise with the Writers of Prophesie for that receives authority by the Author who is known to be a Prophet for in every Prophesie that foretelleth things to come we must enquire first who revealed it and then to whom it was revealed that the person being known to be a Prophet and to have divine Revelations we may give credit to it for otherwise who would give credence or faith to any of the Prophetical predictions or books of the Prophets before they saw them accomplished and fulfilled As to instance in the Prophet Jeremiah who maketh mention of his name at least a hundred times and the Prophet Isaiah how oft doth he repeat these words Isaiah the son of Amos And in Daniel's Prophesie we shall find his name more then threescore times repeated yea ye shall find I Daniel about nine times from the seventh to the tenth chapter and Paul when his Apostleship was called in question by some false Brethren and to shew the excellency of his Ministry how often shall you read I Paul an Apostle not of men nor by men but of Jesus Christ And why should it be accounted strange when John mentions not his name above five times in this whole book and with that modesty that none might doubt of the truth of this Prophesie Having wiped off the objections that have cast jealousies and suspicions on these divine Revelations I shall in the next place endeavour to clear the divine authority thereof and add some testimonies for that end and I doubt not but that being cleared there is no true christians but will receive this Book of Prophesies but as the Oracles of God The testimonies are of two sorts either from without or secondly within the said book Those from without are the general consent of the churches of Christ in all ages excepting in the heat of contest amongst some violent persons to the receiving of them into the Canon The Councels of Laodicea the third Councel of Carthage and the Councel of Toletan 5. cap. 16. decreed it to be received as holy and divine Scriptures Secondly it was so received by most of the ancient Orthodox Fathers as Justin Martyr Tertullian Cyril Epiphanius Lactantius Ireneus Augustine and many others and so this book is often quoted by them as of divine authority in their writings I shall

them to their Master who after he hath proceeded on his white horse with offers of peace and reconciliation and they continue obstinate and not turn by repentance he can go forth on his red Horse of wrath and fury and remove his candlestick his church and the glory thereof from amongst them and leave them desolate The first that I read of that extended the wings of his authority beyond his own just limits and boundaries was Victor Bishop of Rome about the end of the second century who hotly contended with Ireneus and others of the Affrican churches to have a Supremacy over them and to impose his Dictates on them and that very pertinaciously about a frivolous controversie the observation of Easter Herein that mysterie of Iniquity did begin to work which in few after succeeding ages came to its full stature To this I shall only add that all ancient and modern history both civil and ecclesiastique do testifie that this Prelacy and affecting of Supremacy over other churches whether it be in one single church person or many combined ones hath not only been very dangerous and prejudicial to the faithful churches of Christ but is and hath been always the very first born of pride and luxury Thirdly Another reason is that Christ writes particularly to each of the seven churches is to shew That Christ hath an equal care and respect to all his churches whiles they continue his though under foul prevarications and backslidings Christ hath bowels of compassion towards them as long as they keep faithful to his name though otherwise in themselves very faulty and he is found to be walking in the midst of them providentially caring for them holding the seven Stars in his right hand and teaching them by his Word if so be he may bring them to repentance Lastly These messages are directed to each particular church out of Christs especial tenderness towards them that they might endeavour to reform their enormities within and amongst themselves That the churches errours and infirmities may not be told in Gath nor published abroad to their reproach amongst their enemies whilst there is any hope of the recovery of backsliders Christ comes with a rod and strokes of a loving and tender hearted father to cure them not to shame and reproach them and therefore Christ directs John to write his messages to the Angels of each particular church To the Angel of the Church of Ephesus Write What is meant by Angel I refer to the sixteenth and last verses of the first chapter But the question is Whether by Angel of the church of Ephesus be intended the chief Pastor or Bishop being as Superintendent or Archbishop over the rest of the Bishops and Pastors of the church of Ephesus Or Whether the Angel of Ephesus were the Metropolitan over the other six Sister churches I answer first to the latter There is no colour at all for that opinion for the reasons but in the former page specified and to add a word Because Christ commands each Angel to reform their abuses within themselves He sends not the Angel of one church to reform another that has no authority over it the Angel of the church of Ephesus is not sent to Smyrna nor Smyrna unto Ephesus nor unto the rest but an extraordinary Officer a Prophet John a man of God is sent unto them all to tell them of their faults and to exercise that authority which Christ hath given and deposited in all his Gospel churches and to each of them in particular for their dealings and recoveries out of their backslidings Indeed any one that hath an extraordinary Spirit and call as John had may exercise that unlimited authority over the churches of Christ but I know not any in these days or since the Apostles times that do pretend unto it but that great and rampant Roman man of sin who is the great and only pretender to that Spirit of Infallibility and yet who more fallible then himself in his judicial sentences doctrines and ways of worship Indeed if he had what he pretends that Spirit of infallibility justly might he assume authority in censuring directing and governing all other churches but before that does appear let himself and others that assumes the like authority with himself hide their faces in shame and confusion for ever Secondly To the first question I answer That those I confess of the Episcopal Interests do hold that the Superscription of the particular church directed to the Angel of the churches of Ephesus Smyrna c. do intend and signifie that they are directed to the chief Pastor or Bishop that is supream Overseer Director and Mediator over all the rest of the Bishops and Pastors of the particular churches within Ephesus Smyrna c. As if this had been written to the Angel of the church of England that is saith the Episcopals to the Archbishop who is the chief Prelate and Bishop over all other the Prelates and Bishops in England Or if it had been directed to the Angel of the church of London Salisbury Exeter c. that is say they to the Bishop of London Salisbury or Exeter c. who is the chief Bishop Pastor and Overseer over all the rest of the Bishops and Pastors within his own Jurisdiction and Diocess I answer first that the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate according to the Latine Dialect Bishops and Pastors or according to our own proper Idiome Overseers and Feeders of the Flock are Synonimas and are but as several denominations of one and the same Office which do arise from divers acts therein For the faculty of over-seeing guidance and direction he is called a Bishop for that of teaching instructing and spiritually feeding his flock in all kinds he is called a Pastor and very often too in Scripture for his rootedness and soundness in faith life and doctrine he is called an Elder so that these are but several names of one and the same office and often applyed in Scripture reciprocally to one and the same person somtimes he is called the Elder of the church somtimes the Bishop somtimes the Pastor to denote unto us that such as guide well their flocks and feed them with the green pastures of wholsome doctrines are most worthy of double honour amongst the Saints but lest herewith they should be elevated above their proper station they ought to eye another Title too which is given them in Scripture they are Ministers that is Servants that attend on Christ and his churches they receive Christ's messages and commend them unto his churches and come again with returns of the churches improvements in obedience and thankfulness unto Christ and for this reason they are here entitled by the name of Angels Messengers Ambassadors or Ministers of Christ and how these humble Titles of Servitors and Messengers will suit and agree to the Lording stomacks of Metropolitans and Lord Bishops or chief Pastors over many

to overturn all its opposites that asserts That true real Grace or as he calls it a real change of the soul is not pre-requisite as the condition unto Baptism Amongst many other arguments of his against M. Blake's dogmatical faith I shall only make use of his fourth and fifth and eleventh arguments page 96. of his Apologie and refer the Reader to that place for farther satisfaction where there are many more arguments both from Authority and Scriptures levied to this purpose and comporting with this Truth His fourth Argument is They that are to renounce the World Flesh and Divel are to be true Believers to Justification but they that are to be baptized are then to renounce the World Flesh and Divel therefore this abrenunciation hath been practised alwaies in Baptisme since the Apostles times as Antiquity testifies His fifth argument is They that are required to believe sincerely in the Father Son and holy Ghost are required to believe to Justification But such are all as come to Baptism Therefore For the major it requires no more proof but to explain what it is to believe in the Father Son and holy Ghost and our Divines against the Papists have enough proved that the phrase of believing in comprehendeth the act of the will as well as the understanding To believe in God is to take him for our God which is to take him for our soveraign Ruler and chief good This none but a sound believer can truly do His eleventh argument If Baptism be solemnizing of the mystical marriage between Christ and the Baptized then true justifying faith is of God required thereto But the Antecedent is true Therefore Therefore it is said that we are baptized into Christ and into one body and the church hath ever held the Antecedent to be true The consequence is evident in that no man but the sound believer can truly take Christ as a husband and head for so to do is justifying faith These three have I only chosen of M. Baxter's 26. arguments to set as an Antithesis unto M. Morice's positions and as an answer thereunto and if I may speak it pace tanti viri an ill case is much disadvantagious to the most learned man and in this that I have set M. Baxter to answer M. Morice is but to set Socrates to answer Plato And I may add one word that whereas it is objected That Judas and Simon Magus faith which was only dogmatical and formal though rotten in the root gives right of admission I answer First It may be granted in foro Ecclesiae for that may be said to give admission to Baptism c. which so qualifieth the person as the church is bound to admit him as being one that seemeth sound in believing for Judas was always reckoned amongst the twelve before his trayterous betraying act of his Lord and Master and Simon is said to have believed also Acts 8.13 Now the church can but give a judgement of charity and not knowing any thing to the contrary cannot deny admission either to Simon or any other that desires it for charity thinketh no evil and hopeth the best of all and it is an old rule de occultis non judicat Ecclesia But secondly This is not an entituling and having right coram Deo a foedere for that alone is saving faith which God in his covenant makes the condition pre-requisite to such a right of admission which is before asserted and proved and that that gives right coram Deo gives a true title also foro Ecclesiae for according to a charitative judgement they are bound to judge that the profession of faith and wills of such as desire admission are both true real and sanctified or else they would not desire it though oftentimes the sequel manifests that they are deceived therein and hereby it is clearly evinced that the church door is wider then the door of heaven and that the number of the church militant does exceed the tryumphant and is far enlarged beyond the limits of the Elect. And herein this shall suffice Observ 5. That false Teachers are most arrogant and pretend highest to gifts and mission The church of Ephesus found it so in their false Teachers and Corinth also 2 Cor. 13.11 who transformed themselves into the Apostles of Christ and who by their own mouths said they were Apostles they would needs get the honour of men of extraordinary spirits and callings as the Apostles were yet on tryal they were found liars they are of Diotrephes-like spirit that would needs have the precedency and be above John himself and the true Apostles Gaudent preesse non ut prosunt sed quia grande aliquid putant preesse insolentius arrogantius principes in Ecclesia locum appertivisse They are like those in Jer. 8.8 who say We are wise and the Law of the Lord is with us while their hearts are full of lies and vanity and as those in Ezek. 13.6 who saying The Lord saith yet have seen nothing but a vain vision and a lying divination But I should here demand why should those false teachers denominate themselves to be Apostles seeing the number is only limited to twelve I answer Some of the ancient Fathers did denominate the first second and third century after Christ the Apostolical times though the Twelve were dead for the purity of their doctrine and being so near the fountain as Church history manifests And our Bishop Jewel offers to joyn Issue with the Papists so far as the fifth century upon the authority of the Fathers as holding the Apostolical doctrine Secondly I answer This Apostolical office was not so much the peculiar faculty of the Twelve as to debar all others from that denomination and though I grant they were Christ's Apostles catexochen yet that does not hinder but others that are sent for so much the word signifies in the Greek in Christ's Embassies unto the world may appropriate that Title unto themselves as Paul very often in his Epistles hath justly vindicated his right unto it and I know not why might not Barnabas with others that were sent upon the same message with Paul and the rest appropriate the same Title and that justly to themselves also for I am of opinion that those are standing perpetual officers in the church which are described in Eph. 4.11 and are to continue it from one age to another until the whole body of Christ mystical the elect are gathered and compleat for so the words strongly enforce and he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come into the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ Now whereas they object that are contrary minded That some Offices in the church were