never so well planted there may be some that will be irregular especially where there are Lyars evill beasts and slow bellies of which sort Crete was full of chap. 1.12 And therefore Titus is further charged that what is wanting that may conduce to the Edification of the Church having a respect to the people they should make such as may curb the veay beastlinesse or irreverence in the House and Worship of God We might insist longer on such Texts but these are sufficient to cause the unprejudiced Christian to consent to the truth that we are now pleading for 3. From the power and practice that was in the Jewish Church touching ceremonies not commanded may we draw arguments for holding the same lawfull in the Christian. Did not David bring in Ceremonies Musicians Qâ—iresters Organists Violers Lutinists with many more into the Worship of God which he had no command nor precept of God and though God had his Prophets Priests Messengers there in and about Davids Court yet never gave he one of them Commission in the least to check David for this his chargeable presumption nor to no King nor to no age after him my Christ himself did never mention it neither do we find any of Gods people scruple at it in his time nor after possibly those sons of Belial that rebelled against his sons might for Rebellion is so â—gly-faced that it never durst appear in the World without a Mask generally it takes that of Religion but seeing God was silent what needed they care We have heard some say that Musick might bee under the Law but nor under the Gospell not that I plead for Musick in the least but using it as a sutable Medium to prove the truth it is now under demonstration ignorantly for it was not under the Law nor mentioned in the Law but a pure invention of Davids own He conjecturing that Musick might tend to the ends before specified From the liberty therefore that was given to the Jewish Tabernacle Synagogue or Temple for we may judge there were after Ceremonies brought in as there occurred necessity or conveniency we may argue the power of the Christian Church even in reference to ceremonies whose liberty is by Christs death more large then theirs in all respects and surely not diminished in this 4. From that Decorum that decent Ceremonies of which still we say the Governours are Judges makes the Ordinance of the Church appear withall Let his soul be bound up in the bundle of life and made higher then the Kings of the Earth who declares that he bears a greater reverence to the Ceremonies of the Church of England by being in those places and seeing those Congregations wherein they were not used or spoken against And indeed Reverent gestures grave Vestments decent and comely Deportments may be compared to that cloathing of Gold with which the Kings daughter is habited Psal. 45.13 making them exceeding beautifull in the eyes and ears of the Beholders and more esteemed of her members and reverenced of all that are partakers 5. It is the Doctrine of all reformed Churches Confes. of the Church of Helve Art 25. of Belg. Art 3â— Ausp Art 15. of France Art 32. of the Church of England Art 20. Church of Bohem. Art 15. with this advice that however such Ceremonies had their beginning whether from Bishops or from Councills or of any other the people were not to care for it nor be disquieted but to use them to good because they are good So the Church of Wittemburge Art 35 holds it lawful to appoint days for to hear and preach Sermons and any other Rites not contrary to Scripture So Sueve Art 14. and withall confesses that they reckon no traditions for mens traditions but such as are condemned in Scripture contrary to the Law of God but for such as agree with Scripture and were ordained for the good of men although they be not expressed in the Scripture yet in that they proceed from the commandment of love which ordereth all things to be done in decency they are worthily to be accounted rather of God then of man and closeth up their Article by showing from Scripture that the more willing a man obeys the civill Laws which are not â—repugnant to Religion the more fully he is enduced with the faiâ—h of Christ. In the mouth of these witnesses let this truth be justifyed And Quae non prosunt singula multa juvant Since my writing this going through the Harmony of confessions and other Authours we find the Church willing to show her own power limiting herself in the eyes of her own people in cases of Ceremony viz. 1. She hath no power to impose any thing contrary to the written Word of God 2. Nor none that are insignificant 3. None that are troublesome 4. Nor with any opinion or thought of necessity as to lay salvation upon them 5. Without all conceits of merit as to deserve Heaven by them 6. Not laying them down as parts of Divine worship 7. Or to conceit that the observance of them will make us the more perfect before God If the Church that imposeth those Ceremonies teach not the necessity of their observance directly or exactly by these arguments she may impose what ceremonies she wil according to the doctrine of most of the Protestant Churches in Christendome yea all of them that have declared their opinions upon that Subject Quest. 3. Whether the Church haâ—h power to compel any irregular Person to her Ordinances For the opening of this Question we must note that when the Church is said to compell it is neither to imprison nor to fine those being altogether out of their Verge and dominion excep you imply that the Church-Officer be likewise in civill authority and exercise Jurisdiction in that capacity or if you consider the civill Officer a Church member and in that sence the Church some way may be said to do it We shall consider the Church-Officer abstractly as no civill Officer but in that capacity that he bears toward the the Church and by compelling we hold out or mean no other thing then the utmost of the Churches power and largest extent and the execution of that highest Act of Justice wherein her Lord and Husband hath invested her to free both him and herself from contempt by which she hath authority to command and to punish those who wilfully absent themselves from her service without such reasons as the Church her self shall be satisfied withal for who ever went to hell without a reason And let none quarrel with the word Compel to omit the Grammer of it which holds out the sence before spoken of we finde in the great Supper Luke 14.6 the Master giving a charge to his servants to call his Guests some excused themselves yea all gave reasons for their absence to flesh and blood satisfactory Then they were to go to the Streets and Lines of the City chief places possibly affording Guests sufficient for
constituted these extraordinary calls are no warrant for men in our dayes to assume that office for Christ now and afterwards more plainly appoints them to give power to others for the execution of those things having made it an Ordinance and from them and by them to continue to the end of the world And now as these people have constituted themselves a Church and have in that notion by man or woman received the Ordinances of the Church cast out and took in in the times of a Church long agoe constituted we pronounce them to be no Churches but nurseryes of Faction and prusumptuous Boasters That they are no Churches we shall endeavour to prove so clearly as we hope any indifferent or unprejudiced reader will not long halt between two opinions They appear to be no Churches For 1. They have no Bishops Preists Ministers or Teachers call them what they please deriving their authority from the Apostles of Christ. The Apostles were the masters of our Israel ordained by Christ to preach the Gospel to all Nations and where they Taught they Ordained and appointed Ministers for the Ruling and Governing of that Church and gave them power also to Ordaine others For this cause saies Paul to Titus I left the in Crete the same place now called Candy that thou shouldest set in order things that art wanting and ordain Elders in every City as I had appointed Tit. 1.5 The word Elder in the original is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Presbyters or Priests he must ordain Priests he cals them Bishops v. 7. Titus was therefore left in Crete to Ordain Bishops or Priests in every City that the Gospel might be purely taught and the Sacraments administred Thus holy Polycarpus Saint Iohn's Disciple was placed by him in the Church of Smyrna Ignatius that had his name given ab igne charitatis he was also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as being born of God was the second Bishop of Antioch next Peter For Peter ruled that Church 7. years and afterwards came to Rome An. Christ. 71. The succession of Bishops I would have none offended at the word suppose what other name they will only this is the antient Word from Peter or any other Apostle was a certain sign of a true call into Holy Orders among the Antients Let us suppose a man Ordained by the present Bishop of Canterbury and let it be inquired what power he had to do it he shews it from Abbot Whitgift and so upward for a thousand Years the Records of that Sea being known until you come to Augustin the first Bishop of Canterbury Then ask who gave him power to Ordain for that Office he names you Gregory a holy Catholick Bishop Rome not yet being Antichrist servus Serverum Dei as he called himself He again was Ordained by Pelagius he by Benedictus he by Iohn he by Pelagius the First he by Vigilius he by Sylverius he by Argapetus Anno Christi 535. and so upward for 400. years or more until you come to Alexander the great An. Chr. 121. He was Ordained by Evaristus he by Anacletus he by Clemens he by Cletus he by Linus and he by Saint Peter the Apostle of our Lord the First Bishop of Rome who after he hâ—d ruled the Church of Antioch 7. year in which City the Apostles and Disciples were first called Christians Acts 11.26 came An. 67 in the 14. Year of Nero the Emperours Reign to Rome by whom he was crucified with his head downwards and all the Bishops after him until Elutherius were put to death by Heathen Emperours for he was the first of 13 Bishops that dyed a naturall death It is said of him Est Primus Episcopâ—rum Româ—norum qui non perjit morte violenta By this Bishop Lucius who Reigned in England Anno Christi 180. had some knowledge of the faith and Doctrine of the Gospel Bring this succession down again from Peter to Linus from him to Cletus from him to Clemens and so down for 400 years to Gregory who sending Augustin into England set up his Bishops seat first at Dover then removed it as the Gospel prospered unto London whence he was removed to Canterbury where his continued succession remains unto this day In all those places he taught the Gospel and Ordained Priests or Ministers and gave them power to Ordain others Planted Teachers in Winchester York Carlisle and from these again as from fountains came the Authority of Ordination to water other dry parts of the Nation about them and so from age to age was it delivered untill it came upon the Authours head by unquestionable Authority Now let us ask one of these Mechanicks By whom were you constituted and appointed a Church-Officer to exercise the power of the Keys if you say from Christ we deny it for he Ordained none but his Disciples if from his Disciples show or produce your Warrant for Ordination was given to them and by their hands given to others that the succession might be preserved unto the end of the World So Saint Iames the Apostle sate Bishop in the Church of Ierusalem Evodius was Bishop of Antioch next Peter next to him Ignatius and to Theophilus and downward If we had the Register of the Church of Crete in which place Titus was set to Ordain Elders in every City and then ask one By whom were you appointed to dispence the Word and Sacrament and exercise the power of the Keys by such a one he by him and he by him and so you should fal on Titus himself And Timothy who was Ordained by the same Apostle the First Bishop of the Church of Ephesus had a charge in the Epistle sent unto him to commit the Doctrine to faithful men that they might be able to teach others 2. Tim. 2.2 Which Commitment is by laying on of hands that being the Ceremony for translating the power viz. the Authoritative of Teaching from one person to another as afterwards shall be discovered which Commitment Timothy must not be too rash in but weigh and examine what manner of man he is 1 Tim. 5.22 For a Bishop must be blamelesse sober apt to teach 1 Tim. 3.2 Or if it be a Deacon that Tim. so Ordain the lowest authoritative Office in the Church he must be grave 1 Tim. 3.8 Which Office of Deacon-ship if they use well they may be through their faith in God receive a higher Office called a purchasing to themselves a good degree 1 Tim 3.13 Which may truly bear this construction that good degree though a low one shall make them esteemed of God and esteemed so wel of his Church as to make him a Presbyter or a Bishop for that that Office was made a step to that of the Priest-hood is clear both in gospell and Church-History A Deaconship being only a Probationers place for it and according as the Church gave them a Benegessit for the one they received the degree of the other But what authority had Timothy to
do all this viz. to ordain Bishops and Elders because he himself had the power given unto him by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4 14. at which Ordination or laying on of hands Paul had his hand upon Timothy's head with the Priests or Presbyters 2 Tim. 4.6 suitable to the practice of the Church of God unto this day where there are Clergy-men or Presbyters and these with the Bishop or Superintendent ordain Ministers by Prayer and using the Ceremony of laying on of hands in that time the Bishop laying on first as chief and by that Ordination they have power to ordain others and they others to keep up the Apostolical Succession in the authoritative way of teaching Now let us go to the Church of Ephesus and ask those Elders or Presbyters that were in every City what power and Authority they have to dispense the Word and Sacraments c Since there is a Church constituted by what Authority therefore do you you you The Answer will be I had it from such a one he from him and he from him and he from him and he from such a one and he from Timothy and he from the Presbytery where Paul was present But now we call to mind What Authority had Paul to ordain for Christ ordained none but his Disciples could Paul therefore give that Power to another which he never had himself Is not Paul in this irregular presuming to ordain Timothy a Church-officer he having no such power given unto him by Christ For the understanding of this cast your eye upon Acts 13.1 2. in which place we finde that after Saul or Paul hath given good experience of the truth of his conversion for the Church was at first afraid of him Acts 9.26 we finde a meeting of the Church of Antioch and as they were ministring to the Lord or exercising their Ministry let it be in preaching and praying for the Text will hold it out the holy Ghost calls saying Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away c. These two were called before by God for the Work of the Ministry that the holy Ghost witnesseth in these words for the work whereunto I have called them In a word qualified they were for that work and of their Abilities the Church had sufficient experience but now that that order might not be subverted which in the Church by Christ and his Apostles had been constituted Separation that is a solemn setting of them apart from all other Members by constituting them Church-officers is required by the holy Ghost that in their going thorow the World they might have power to constitute others and also be looked upon by the Church as men sent of God in an authoritative way for preaching of the Word delivering the Sacraments and exercising the power of the Keys not onely by their inward Qualification but by external Ordination that Law being established When a gifted-Brother who boasts of an inward Call can give as good testimony to the Church as Paul is able to do touching his power none but beasts will move their tongues against them and when they can shew their Abilities to the Church to be deserving I dare promise to any that they may have Ordination which Paul though I suppose as well qualified as they after trial received and had and that by especial order the Church it seems being backward by reason of his former being a persecutor and desirous of further trial from God to prevent irregularity or any breach though in so eminently a gifted person of that Law which Christ had appointed in his Church Thus Timothy can make good his Ordination to be Apostolical in each part Bring this line down again By the Ministers and Prophets of Antioch was Paul ordained he ordains Timothy and Timothy again gave this power to other faithfull men sometimes ordaining them Deacons and sometimes Priests and so throughout the famous Church of Ephesus though afterward it languished Rev. 2.9 and whether Timothy be the Angel that that Epistle is sent unto is uncertain but certain that all the Presbyters and Deacons in the Church of Ephesus are able to produce their power as Church-officers from the Apostles who were as before was said the Masters of our Israel and he that would be owned a Church-officer shall be owned by me producing his power from them or deducing that power from them to himself according to that Apostolical way constituted in the Church of Christ and in all the Churches of the Saints But of Ordination by Gods help we shall speak more at large when we come to that Ordinance in particular For the present know that by this succession of Ministers Priests or Bishops were the Hereticks known from Catholicks the antients knew no other division in the Church and whence they derived their power to administer the seales by putting them to show their succession from the Apostles who instituted the way of Ordination to be a standing Ordinance for ever in the Church Thus Ireneus confuted Valentinus Cerdon and Marcion we are able saith he to reckon up those that were appointed Bishops by the Apostles in their severall Churches unto our time he then reckons up such as succeeded Peter and Paul in the Church of Rome to them succeeded Linus who sat eleven years in that Chair to him succeeded Cletus who sat twelve years to him Clemens who sat nine years c. By this Ordination which from the Apostles is received in the Church the publishing of the faith hath come even to us which being able to show consundimus omnes cos qui quâ—quo modo vel per suam placentiam c. we put to silence all that through vaine glory or ignorance broach new Doctrin in the Church for none of the Hereticks can derive their succession from the Apostles nor show how their doctrines were received by tradition from them And indeed the rise both Old and New Hereticks and the time that they were first received and oftentimes the first broacher or Authour of them is known The Doctrine of the Nicholaitans was not for 50. Years after Christ. The Menandrians for 68. The Ebionites in the year 71. were first heard to preach their Doctrine the Millenaries or Fifth Monarchy men did frame theirs An. 108. The Valentinians theirs An. 130. the Manicheans theirs An. 275. the Arrians theirs An. 310. this did almost drown the World The Donatists theirs An. 315. the Photinians theirs An. 350. the Macedenians theirs An. 360. the Pelagians theirs An. 415. the Eutycheans their An. 447 with an infinite number more The Ananabaptists first broke out An. 1520. the wildest Hereticks of all that had gone before them The Ubiquitaries An. 1580. the Arminians An. 1612. All these having their Rise in the Church from their several Patriots after the Apostles had confirmed and declaâ—ed
in and run in It is dangerous to have or to suffer any to stand at the head of that way to call in Passengers from that road which leadeth unto life since men of themselves are apt and prone enough to turn from it and go in the contrary path 5. Religion is the foundation of States and Kingdoms and diversity of foundations will never keep up long a building herein we find those States in Scripture to stand surest whose Kings feared God and they that feared put down all false worship 6. Religion is the band and cord by which the unity of the State is preserved if there be heard diversities of Doctrine and the unity of Faith broken either the people are divided in their affections or among themselves and against their Princes or their Governours Hence proceed burnings emulations strifes envy malice sedition faction Rebellion Innovation treachery and disobedience and infinite more mischiefs Let me add two more 7. Let all diligence be used to keep out or subdue false Religions Satan will keep them in we know by the Proverb Where God hath his Church the Devil will whatever man do to the contrary have his Chappel A toleration seems to bring stones and timber for the enlarging of it and making it a Synagogue 8. The Angels of the Churches of Pergamos and Thyatira Rev. 2. are blamed for tolerating false Religions taking it for granted that there is but one true ziz the Catholick one of them had them tolerated possibly not by Law but by connivance and indulgence who taught the Doctrine of Balaam to eat things sacrificed to Idols and to commit fornication whether natural or spiritual and the Doctrine of the Nicholaitans which God did hate then and yet in this Age it passes for true Divinity with many The other suffered Iezâ—bel who called her self a Prophetess first to teach and then as a proper consequence to seduce our Praedicantiffs do the same and yet plead for a toleration since Paul gave out a Law concerning womens teaching I Tim. 2.12 we finde none but this Iezabel undertaking such an Office It is observable that the Angels of the Church are reproved for bearing with or suffering them so to do and they were the Church Officers Ministers or Bishops by which it seems they had power and authority to restrain and controul them to pull them out of their pulpits and to stop their mouths Whether they were Lords or no let their power and authority speak to do this was Lord-like in my apprehension and not to do it was a ground of Gods accusation Rev. 2.19 20. This Authority was it from heaven or of men If from Heaven then Church Officers have power to controul and put down both Balaam and Iezabel and to stop their mouths and yet not to be accused for Factious If of men then Church-Officers ought to put their power in execution and resist and stop the proceedings of lawless persons command that none hear Iezabel and stop the mouths of all irregular and presumptuous Teachers and not to be accused as busie-bodies and though they be yet let rather men accuse them for performing then God should accuse them for not doing their duty Yet if the Religions be such as do not overthrow the fundamentals of Truth or such as disturb not the Government established in that State Church or Kingdom wherein they be and that the Professor of those Religions be not factious ambitious or pertinarious having no other end in holding their opinions but Gods glory and the satisfaction of their own consciences and willing to be taught and be convinced of their errors diversities of Religions may be tolerated but in private only time may produce a renoâ—ncing of them when violence might harden them God hath his own times of Calling men and let the humble good honest Christian have his time Wise States Kings and Princes for this cause have granted a private toleration The very Turk who is zealous in his Religion grants this it is especially to be granted in times of great infection then indeed a total suppression in private of different opinions might prove and end in a great disturbance both to Church and State but Philosophandum est sed paucis Quest. 8. Wherein consists the Individuality or singleness the Vnity or Oneness of the true Church That the Catholick Church is but one is both asserted in Scripture and believed in our Creed and though it be scattered up and down through the world in every Kingdom Nation People Province Common-wealth Countreys and Dominions that are known in the earth from La Mairs Straits to Greenland from Sancta Creek to S. Ians yet differs no more then one member of the body differs from another the question then is this what is it that like Arteries and Ligatures Sinews and Nerves holds such a vast body together that the Church of God in this place is not a distinct Church of it self from that that is in another but only a part of it differing as a bone in the neck from that in the foot of the self same body one may be preaching or hearing the word in the Country of the Great Mogul another in Iapan and another in Pauls at London and yet he in one and the self same body And as the Sea receives divers names according to the Countreys she runs through though all but one Sea so the members of the Church Triumphant above in heaven and those of the Church Militant beneath make but one body differing only as a mans upper from his lower parts this Unity consists 1. In a consenting of all of them to the truth and doctrine of the Gospel for we know no Church but the Christian what ever is written by the holy Ghost through the Ministery of the Apostles and Disciples the best expositors of the prophets Psalms and Moses whether made in it and to be done or said to be fulfilled in it and done the whole society of the Church whereever they be scattered believes it and readily consents to it as a Canon of faith and manners 2. It consists in the consenting and unity in reference to the Sacraments of the Gospel the same Sacraments for number for nature that one part holds to be profitable for the Souls of men the same doth the other it is true there are many Churches that differ from another in more externall and Ceremoniall points it is the current doctrine of all reformed Churches and of England Art 34. that it is not necessary that ceremonies be alike in all places but may be altered as the People or Officers may teach and think meet but as touching the essentiall and necessary truths as the ends the uses the Author the profit of them all Christians of the Catholick Church hold one and the same thing 3. I consists in the consenting to and unity in holding the utilâ—â—y and necessity of hearing and obeying a Gospell ministery where it is to be had it is a Catholick
they sinned that word that might have been purely and unsported given to the Father through negligence forgetfulness wilfulness might not have been delivered intirely and perfectly to the son but now in writing none of these can alter the age that now is can know if others do corrupt and those that come after may judge of this each having copies by them they are able to discover or iudge of the integrity of another neither can any one corrupt it in the least but it may easily be discryed by his neighbour through the copies or writings of it 3 That helpe might be afforded men against those imperfections that attend the best for through fraile nature cares and troubles of the world sutable comforts confirming truths might not suddenly be thought on now by writing this malady hath a proper cure the word being open and before our eyes we may take up and read such truths as may stay the Soul in her greatest shakeings and comfort her in her languishing distempers 4 That mens faith might be the more confirmed in the truth of it when men see the prophecies that were foretold in the book of Daniel and in the Revelation the fulfillings of the threatnings is against the Jews c. To know that these things are done and to see them foretold so many hundred years before induceth a man more firmely to beleeve them then if it were told him barely from another that his Father or Grandfather said it should be so of which he also might have cause to doubt and the truth of the Speaker even in that particular suspect Quest. 10. Whether men be bound to believe all that is in the Scripture For the dispatching this Question we must distinguish 1. Between the Scripture it self and the persons who writ it is not necessary to salvation to believe that Matthew writ that Gospell that goes under his Name nor that Peter writ his to believe what is spoken or written is one thing and to believe that David writ it is another thing 2. Between the writing it self and the time when or the place whence it was written It is one thing to believe the truth of those Epistles of Paul and another thing to believe that they were written from Corinthus as that to the Romans or that from Athens as that to the Thessalonians or from Rome when Paul was brought the second time before Nero as that last Epistle to Timothy 3. Between the Words written and the meaning or sence of the thing writ It is one thing to believe that Paul writ the words of his Epistles in that order method place as we have them in our Bibles ordered and placed and another thing to believe the sence and the meaning of the thing so written we shall find the writers of the Scriptures in citing of places deviate from the naturall order of the Words given them by the first Author which shews that we are not bound to believe that For instance David declares Psal. 16.8 I have set the Lord always before me because he is at my right hand I shall not be moved which Text Peter having occasion to use Act. 2.25 reads it thus viz. I foresaw the Lord always before my face he is on my right hand that I should not be moved The words being clearly varied but the sence and meaning being the same we are tyed to the one and not to the other which alteration is evident in many places particularly the very next verse both of that Psalm and this Chapter 4. Between an Historical and a saving faith we are to believe all that the Scripture contains and set down that is the sence and meaning of it to be no other then the very will purpose mind and Law of God which we must believe if we would be saved And that it was written by David and sent to the chief Musitian by Matthew by Paul and sent to them from Corinthus that the Epistle to Timothy Ordained the first Bishop of the Church of Ephesus was written from Rome when Paul was brought the Second time before Nero as his second Epistle at the close declares ought to be believed by an Historical faith that not being written by the infallible spirit of God but by the Churches Tradition of whose authority in an Historical way it is but presumption in any man to doubt CHAP. IV. Of Reading We are now come to the prosecuting and enforcing of those directions above named as necessary Antecedents for the Words indwaking The first was to read the Scriptures In the handling of which we shall 1. Prove it is a duty to read 2. Direct how to read 3. Resolve some Questions Sect. 1. THat all are to read the Scriptures is a truth that the Religious Christian will not doubt of and the Hypocriticall dare not deny yet that all might be left without excuse we shall prove that all must do it According to the usuall division of Magistrates Ministers and people or of Old and young which comprehendeth al sorts of persons whatsoever 1. Magistrates are to read it God giving Laws concerning the Ruling of his People to him that should be King â—ver them Commandeth Deut 17 18. that when he sitteth upon the Throne of his Kingdom that he shall write him a Copy of this Law in a book out of that which is before the Priests the Levites and it shal be with him and he shal READ therein all the days of his life The King therefore it not exempted from this duty though he be Lord of all notwithstanding all affairs he must READ therein all the days of his life And the truth is he will be the best Ruler that is best acquainted with this word he will know sin the better which he is to punish Rom. 13.13 the better he be acquainted with the Scripture Rom. 7.7 It is the abundance of the sincere milk of the Word that maketh Kings Queens nursing Fathers and nursing Mothers unto the Church Isai. 49.23 that all that live under them may by their knowledge and discipline grow in all godlinesse and wax strong to every good work sucking from their breasts wholesome doctrine springing from good government and Laws and enjoying the fruit of all in every Act of Justice What God doth in this place require of a King who is Supream 1 Pet. 2.13 he requires the same of all Magistrates and Officers under him that are as Kings in their proper places and Domininions and by the Subjects ought so to be beheld 1. That they be not puffed up by conceit of Earthly greatness Psal. 131 1 2. 2. That they may be impartiall in their Sentences Proverbs 31.5 3. That they may uphold and defend the truth of his worship 2 Kings 23.1 2 3 4. 4. That they may know whom to encourage and whom to punish Rom. 13.3 5. That every thing may be done by them as those that must give an account to the King of Kings and Lord of Lord for
author desires only to be understood chap. 9. Quest. 5. and such infallibillity to be in a Presbytery that the Laws thereof ought not should not be debated in a counsell this also by this oath denyed and that justly To exclude therefore chiefly the Popes authority is his Majesty to be accounted Supream in all causes and over all persons that is hath jurisdiction and power over all men whether Clergy or others not the Pope When God instituted the Church oâ— the Jews the Priests and the Levits had their orders and laws for their spiritual government as clear and open as the Presbytery can plead for in the new Testament yet that Kinâ—s had power over them and made Laws for them and were obeyed of by them is clear to him that not manum sub pallio 3 It is in his Majesties own dominious his jurisdiction is bounded within the limits of his own territories right and dominions All which considered it is no derogation to Christs honour to accept that oath but consequentially a supperiater and upholder of it Thus much of the third and last ordinance we undertook to defend in the beginning which was prayer Laus Deo dedit enim vâ—lle etiam perficere Si quid novisti rectius istis utere si non his utere mecum FINIS ERRATA OF the errours that happened in the printing of this treatise these following are some of these viz. p. 7. l. 16. r. slighting p. 11. marg l. 1â— r. use p. 17 l. 16. r. altered 27. r. fondly p. 18. l. 7. r. Instâ—â—â—â— p. 21. l 25. r. such laws p. 29 33. r. commanded p. 29. l. 7. r. will not p. 33. l. 1. r. regard p. 39. l. 1. r. creature p. 41. l. 36. r compleated p 45 l. 35. r. benâ—â—ecessi p. 53. l. r. persecutâ—on p. 57. l. 10. r. perform without p. 62. l. 33. r. own p. 73. l. 23. r. inlarge p. 81. l. 30. r. Adoption p. 86. l. 6 r. praedicantisses p 104. l. 9 r. Word p. 150. l. 9. r. explanatory p. 107. l. 26. r. intâ—lligentâ—a p. 118. l. 2. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 159. l. 16. r had p. 169 l. 1. r. refute p. 173. l. 17. r. but and 18. r. grand p. 177. l. 3. r. Mâ—tta l. 25 r. were not p. 181. l. 21. r. p. 193. l. 5. r. Some p. 2. 13. l. 26. r. lively p. 252 l. 13. r. concupiscence p. 255. l. 22. r. Bâ—vt Noble p. 266 l. 13. r. feast p. 275. l. 33. r. vigorous p. 277. marg l. 28 r veneras l. 40. r. 111. p. 214. l. 25. serve p. 288. 22. r. sacred p. 294. l. 18. r. bulk l. 25. r. fonts p. 30.7 marg l. 5. r. pleading l. 11. r Offer them p. 328. l. 16. r. sacred p. 294. l. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 361. l. 2. r. Guisel marg l. 3. r. Antiepiscopal p. 37.5 l. r. repealed p. 383. l. 10. r. figurat ea 25. r. per visum marg l. 3. r. 24. permittitur l. 13. r. 23. p. 10. l. 5. r. Reipturis p. 422. l. 10. r. praestat p. 490. l 11. r. Mathew The other faults are left to the Readers charity and inquisition the Author being necessarily detained from the presse A small Coâ—ncell being called and gathered at Spir. March 15. 1629. decreaed severall things against the Catholick Doctrine to maintain the Tenets of the now Church of Rome as the Communion under one kind c Which decree was opposed by severall of the German Princes wht cast in a Protestation against it in writing those that subscribed that were called Protestants whence the pose of the word came to be given to all that protest or declare against the errours of the new Church of Rome Syn. Trip. pag. 51. Thes. 10. His Majesty pag. 5. to M. Hen. His Mâ—jâ—sties Declar for â—ffaiâ—s Eccl. In an indiâ—ect sence she may preach and teach theiâ— neccesity for he that resisteth lawfull commands â—â—neth against Coâ— If Kings and Princes do tolerate such it were best not to let them know it meekness never doing good to their humour If they be suffered by Law they will have lawless meetings as appeared whereever they were Those that reason our no being gospel Ministers because we are not called as the Apostles were may argue that we are not men since we were not made as Adam was From that charity love that burned always in him towards Christ and his Church he was cast to hungry Lyons by Trajan August An. Clâ— 1556. Altare Christia num pag. 8. Ex. â—ren lib. 3. c. 3 â— 5. Those in some points teach one and the same doctrine Epist. con Manich. c. 4 tom 6. Calv. Inst. lib. 4. S. 15. For Act. mon. p. 34 Ex Eus. lib. 3. c. 3. Carnifrira na Prophetarum The broacâ—er of this doâ—t iâ—e was â—ill Hethingâ—on by Trade a Box maker Theâ—e might have been another argumentâ— given for since the wrâ—â—ing of al is they appear no Churches but nâ—sts of wasps Traytors all our Hereticks being of one stamp and carrying Treason in their bosoms ' as appears by their seditious and murtherous and Treasonable attempts in London jan 6. 1660. They being now un Churched by Law I wish it may be my happinesse to be the last in this Kingdome that shal have ever occasion to handle this Question more I know so much of all or most of them this I desire it heartily Gffiâ— Beat. Ma. ad Mat. pag. 18. meaning Tho Bec. a fancy impudent Rebel yet made a S. by the Pope Apolog. par 5 c 13 D. 1. 2. Apolog. c. 1â— Not that Coloss. in the Isle of Rhodes most Geographer is making this to be the City written to not that this Epistle speaking of Laodicea Hierapolis Cities of Nâ—tolia as boâ—dering upon Colos. and near to each other intimates the same these 3. Cities were overthrown together by an Earthquake A.C. 68. Pisc. in loc Terrent He flourished Ann. Chr. 385. An upstart Preacher in the audience of some of the Authors Parish defâ—nding the Contraâ—y Dâ—ctrine did occasion the staâ—ting of this Question next Sabbath and shewing it to be the Doctrine of Devils one gave the Author freely hish and never to hear such Teachers more It is wished the Reader reap the like profit * * Discessuri ab invicem Apostoli normam praedicationis in commune constitu unt Cyp. ex Alst. Chi Symo. c. Iob is said to have flourished Anno 2330. Moses brought the people 〈◊〉 of Aegypt An. 2453. He came out of his afflictions An. 2332. * * April 6. Anno 1654 There was a solemn fast kept at Oxon for rain there being none for a long time together whereby the corn was much in danger before the Churches broke up there was a great and a plentiful shour and moderate rain a great while after whereby the fields did laugh and sing Charity here begun at home * * Witness their
these ends 1. The glory and honour of God that his name might not be abused nor his worship defiled by such obstinate and refractory persons 1 Tim. 1.20 2. For the Honour of the Church that her enemies should not have occasion to triumph and boast that she consists of impure and wicked wâ—etches Christian religion might suffer through the wickedness of such men and therefore the Church disowns them and affirms they are not Christians but heathens 2 Thes. 3.6 3. For the prevention of sin a little leaven will leaven the whole lump one notorious sinner being suffered to go without this Church discipline might infect others which when this is set will not so easily be done he is punished that others might fear and be kept pure One arm may and in some times must be cut off not for hatred to it but being rotten the whole body is in danger the like case is here 1 Cor. 5.6 7. 4. To bring the sinner to the obedience of Christ when such a judicial sentence is pronounced and when the Members of the Church withdraw from him as a leprous person so far as stands with necessity and order and knowing what is done on earth is ratified in heaven the terror of God with him that is not past all sense will so follow it and the shame of men will so fill him that he is brought to his knees craving pardon of the Church for his obstinacy and desiring to be received again into her body is absolved and forgiven and receives the ordinances of the Church and for the future walks more humbly and holily then before which was the fruit of the Corinthians excommunicating that incestuous person 2 Cor. 26.7 8. But if there be any so perversâ— that this Church-censure will not reduce to obedience the Laws of all Christian stares takes that sinners case into consideration that God be not blasphemed and by them he is punished SECT III. To let pass the several wayes that the Church useth to reclaim the sinner which is different according to the Lawes and customes used in several places the sentence of Excommunication is pronounced by the Minister of that Congregation where the offender lives in this or the like form A. B. Having been lately a Member of this Church hath contumeliously and obstinately fallen into the sin of and hath renounced his Fellowship in this Church having reproached the same and the whole Ministration of Gods ordinance therein of all which he hath been tenderly and earnestly admonished sundry times in private and hath been publickly called to repent and turn from his sin And for as much as the Church finds her tender admonitions to be fruitless towards him she is compelled though with great unwillingness and hearty sorrow to vindicate her honour and provide for the peace and safety of her Members by executing that severe chastisement on him which Christ her head and husband hath authorized her to inflict on such rebellious Children who thus do renounce and cast dirt in the face of her that bare them For as much then as the said A. B. doth utterly refuse to hear the Church calling him with much long suffering and tender love to returne to the unity and Fellowship and to make a just acknowledgment and renunciation of his sin of but doth pertinaciously declare both by word and deed his obstinate pâ—rsisting therein Therefore after solemne calling upon God and having his glory before our eyes the credit of the Gospel and the prosperity of his Church I do hereby according to the commanâ—ment of Christ and by his authority committed to me as minister of thy Church and with the consent also of the same solemnity pronounce and declare in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ the said A. B. to be cut off from this Church and body of â—hrist as a most obstinate and impenitent and do leave him to that fearefull judgment and fiery Indignation denounced against such and do warne and beseech you to withdraw from him that he may be ashamed and to lay him aside to be dealt withall when the Lord Iesus Christ shall come Which sentence is nothing but a declaration of that which the sinner is before he be judicialy sentenced by the Church Yet it is to be noted that this casting out of the Church is not absolute save as touching external rights and priveledges of the Church from which Excommunication fully keeps him but as touching internall right he hath unto the same it is only conditional that is upon his persisting in his errour and therefore if the excommunicate will leave his wicked deeds confess his sin be reconciled to the Church whom he hath offended signifying this to his minister he is again to be restored to all the rights and ordinances of the Church and to be absolved from that sentence passed upon him that Satan geat no advantage over him or left he be swallowed up of too much sorrow 2 Cor. 2.7 The sinnes for which the sinner hath this sentence of Excommunication passed on him are not alike in all Churches for according to the laws and orders established in severall Churches crimes sins and offences may be different according to the Constitutions of those Churches that is of those offences which are made against the laws in those places commanded for the honour of the Church though not directly required by the law of God SECT IV. Quest. 1. Whether the Reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope Quest. 2. Whether Kings ought or can be Excommunicated Quest. 3. Whether excommunication debarres from all society of the Church Quest. 1. Whether the reformed Churches are legally excommunicated by the Pope The Bishop of Rome in regard of the separation made from him by the professors of the religion called the Reformed hath passed his sentence of excommunication upon them as Heretical but unjustly Foâ— 1 They are not Hereticks but Orthodox professors they have left that upon which their souls could have no sure hold There is no point that ever Christ taught or the Apostles preched or the primitive Church knew that is denied by the reformed 2 He hath no power to exclude them out of the Church who himself is scarce a member of it he is in the Church only as Antichrist in the temple of God and in as much as he exalts himself above all that is called God 2 Thes. 2.4 viz. all Kings and maâ—itrates in which regard in some measure his Churchship might be denyed 3 The Church of Rome her self is most hereticall if that be Heresy to preach down what God commands to blot out what he hath written to adde to what he hath spoken and dispence with what he hath enjoyned the Church of Rome cannot be found they ought first to cast the beame out of their own eyes and then they can see the better to pull the mote out of ours 4 The Pope or Bishop of Rome hath no authoritative power over the Churches of other
countries The power of excommunication ought to proceed from one who hath authority over that Church from which the party is excommunicated now the Pope what ever power as another Bishop he hath in his own Diocesse there is no power he can in the least lay claim to over other places They being by God put under the goverment of others over whom the Pope or Bishop of Rome hath no power and therefore cannot excommunicate Quest. 2. Whether kings ought or can be excommunicated Untill the days of Gregory the seventh Bishop of Rome the Imperial Crown was never touched with the thunder of excommunication of him it is written hic primus Imperatorem excommunicavit potestatem constituendi Imperatorem sibi arrogavit and indeed after him it was the usual practise of the Romish Bishops to extinguish the light of Imperial Majesty by disobliging subjects from their duty and allegiance to their lawfull princes by letters of excommunication Queen Eilzâ—beth of blessed memory was excommunicated by three Popes successively viz by Pius the fifth Gregory the thirteenth and Septus the fifth but that is no great wonder for her Father Henry the eight was so sentenced before her with all his protestant Children Yet of late the Popes mouth is something stopped that he seldome doomes and his arme in some measure dryed up that he cannot draw out this sword so often as formerly not because he wants will but because he wants no wit knowing that now the world is grown so wise as not to regard his threatnings However there is a generation known by the name of Presbyters or Guiless whose doctrine joyns to the popes in this touching the excommunication of Kings My â—oul never knew Treason but as our Saviour knew sin viz. by speculation only I am affrayd to see the word King and the word excommunication stand together le ts alter phrase and speake of the magistrate and in our discourse we shall unâ—e stand the cheiâ— Magistrate of Genevah since it is mantained by the Patriarch of that see It seemes neither Christian nor rational to bring magistrates under this censure For 1 Grant that the supreme magistrate might be excommunicated for any cause we should find him sentenced for no cause As â—t was a custome of the Bishop of Rome to censure Kings and Emperours at every time he took distate so these Guisels as they stand in opposition to Episcopacy haveing passion and spleen as natural to them as the faculty of breathing should at the fiâ—st supposed offence and they will ever be offended except they be highest divest majesty of its grandeur by their citations irreverent admonitions and frequent yea causeless Excommunications 2 It may open a doore for Treason and rebellion and countenance it by law to make the supreme magistrate by law no better then a Heathen and the Christian Governour no other in his dominion then the gerat Turke in his may provoke Spirits to attempt that which at this time we will not name They distinguish that they may not be mistaken that they excommunicate not the magistrate but â—he Christian cunning gamesters may not another say he kills not or rebells not against the Prince but an excommunicated person cunning executioners we have seen the sad events of such distinctions and the obâ—erver of them deserves to be civily excommunicated or banished or delivered over to the Executioner rather then he should have any opportunity of performing his desires or of uttering his mind in this particular seeing it is so destructive to all peace and order 3 The Church never could be bettered by magistrats excommunication this ordinance is appointed for the preserveing of the Church in peace and for the honour of the Gospel which ends we may know shall never be obtained by this How the Excommunications of the Emperour by the Bishops of Rome did make for these ends both the Emperours and the Popes know what quarrels underminings scandals to religon would be between the incensed King and the furious Guisel is easy to be foreseen 4 The arguments brought to defend this Papal practise are such as have no strength in them Is it not think you a neat knack of a Guisel that he can deliver the magistrate over unto Satan cast him out of the Church as a rotten member and all his subjects must be made behold him no better then a meere Heathen and yet not hurt the magistrate at all nor rob him of that majesty which officially is in him The story of King Uzziah is brought in to Justify their practise mentioned 2 Chro. 26.18 but when the sequele of that History is observed they will find it farre different from Judicial excommunication his being cut off from the house of the Lord was for his leprosie no leper being admitted thereunto and indeed by this Instance it is discovered what was said before for by reason of his naturall leprosie he was not only debarred the house of the Lord but also deposed from his throne which act indeed the Pref. might and we have cause to suspect would do when they have judicially excommunicated the magistrates so that by this meanes they would procure to themselves the power of pulling down one and setting up another That passage of Ambrose toward the Emperour Thedosius is much talked of but when all parts of it are considered it was nothing lesse then Pres. Excommunication That distinction of the Magistrates being but a man is worthily to be delivered over unto Satan he is more then a man We read that he is worth ten thousand mâ—n 2. Sam. 18.3 and when in Scripture it can be produced that 2 wicked Saul and idolattous Iereboam a Murtheâ—ous Manasseth or ungodly Iehoahaz undergoing the 〈◊〉 of the Church of the Iewes they shall have liberty 〈◊〉 against wicked magistrates the Church of the 〈◊〉 otherwise the distinction of good and bad 〈◊〉 amounts to nothing Saul was a wicked Prince but we ought to look upon him as the Lords annoynted and in that regard fear to touch his person or smite him with the tongues Saul must be untouched because he is King must be reviled made a Heathen nay possibly murthered because he is Saul say rebells Now which shall we follow God or man It is true excommunication is an ordinance of God so is the shedding of the blood of them who hath shed blood Gen. 9.6 Why was not Saul put to death then slaying the Lords Priests Kings are in Scripture looked upon with a watchfull eye by God that none harm them is not Saul a prophane wretch a notorious murtherer one forsaken of God Yet who can stretch forth there hand against him and be guiltlesse 2 Sam. 26.9 And though they should deserve stripes yet they are not to be stricken for equity Prov. 17.26 for against him there is no rising up Prov. 30.31 yea who ought to say what doest thou Eccle. 8.4 not excluding a just reproof or admonition for so John the Baptist reproved Herod