hereafter following do testify And here ceasing with the story of Fredericke we will now procede to the raigne of Maximilian his sonne omitting diuers things els incident in the time of this Emperour as first touching the vnbrotherly contention conflicts betwene this Fredericke and Albertus hys brother and Sigismundus his vncle for the dukedome of Austria after the death of Mathias afore mentioned Omitting also to speake of the long and cruel war betwene the Prussians and Polonians with the religious sect of them which were called Tentones fratres sanctae Mariae in the time of Uladislaus Omitting also the strife and variaunce for the dukedome of Millain betwene Fredericus the Emperor Alfonsus Carolus duke of Orleance Franciscus Sfortia And howe the sayde Princedome being after geuen to Sfortia great warres were kindled long continued betwene Sfortia and the Milleners then betwene the Milleners and Uenetians and after betweene the Frenchmen and the Milleners All which tumultes and commotions as not pertinent greatly to the purpose of this story I referre to other wryters where they are to be founde more amply discoursed Thys as more properly belonging to the storye of the Church I thought good not to passe ouer touching such as were condemned suffered the paines of fire for testimony of Christ and his truth Of whom one was Iohn a pastor or a neteheard which was a keper of cattel The other was Ioannes de Wesalia although not burned yet persecuted neere to death vnder the raigne of thys Emperour Fredericus the 3. And first touching thys Iohn the Netehearde Thus wryteth Sebast. Munsterus That the Bishop of Herbypolis condemned and burned for an hereticke one Iohn whych was a keeper of cattel at a towne called Niclas Hausen in Franconia because hee taught and helde that the lyfe of the cleargy was ignominious and abhominable before God An. 1476. Ex Munstero The other was Doctour Ioannes de Wessalia who was complained vpon vnto Dietherus the Archbishop of Mentz by the Thomists vppon certaine articles and opinions gathered out of hys bookes Wherefore the sayde Dietherus fearing else to be deposed againe from his Bishopricke directeth forth commission to the vniuersities of Heidelberg and Colen to haue the mater in examination who conuenting together the yere aboue mentioned called thys Doctour de Wessalia before them making hym to sweare that he shuld present and geue vp all his treatises workes and wrytings what so euer hee had made or preached that being done they deuided hys bookes amongest themselues seuerally euery man to find out what heresies and errors they could His articles opinions were these That all men be saued freely and through meere grace by faith in Christ. Free will to be nothing Onely that we shoulde beleeue the word of God and not the glose of any mā or fathers That the worde of God is to be expounded with the collation of one place with an other That Prelates haue no authoritie to make lawes or to expounde the scriptures by any peculiare right geuen them more then to an other That mennes traditions as fastings pardones feasts long prayers peregrinations and such like are to be reiected Extreme vnction and confirmation to be reprooued confession and satisfaction to be reprehended The primacie of the Pope also he affirmed to be nothing Certaine other articles also were gathered out of hym by his aduersaries but in such sort that they may seme rather to followe their owne malicious gathering then any true intelligence of his minde whereof more is to be vnderstanded in this processe hereafter Thus when Wesalianus was commanded to appear there conuented together first the Archbishop the inquisitor the doctors of Colen and the doctors of Heidelberge with the masters of the same and the Rector of the vniuersity of Mentz the Deane of faculties Bachelers of diuinity and many other maisters of the same vniuersitie Canous doctors with the bishops Chanceller and his councellers besides many religious prelates schollers wyth a doctor of Franckforte the sumner bedels which all met together in the great hall of the Minorites for the examination of this Ioannes de Wesalia Frier Elton the Inquisitor first sitteth in the hyghest place then after him others according to their degree In the beginning of the examination first the Inquisitor beginneth with these wordes Most reuerent father and honorable doctors c. Our reuerent father and prince Elector hath caused this present cōuocation to be called to hear the examination of M. Iohn de Wesalia in certaine suspected articles concerning the catholique faith But something I will say before that may doe hym good and desire that two or three of them that fauoure hym or some other will rise vppe and geue him counsaile to forsake and leaue his errours to recognise himselfe to aske pardon which if he wil do he shal haue pardon if he wil not we wil procede against him without pardone And thus Wesalianus being cited and brought in the midst betwixt 2. minorites being very aged and hauing a staffe in his hand was sette before the Inquisitor Who beginning to answer for hym self with a long protestation could not be suffred to prosecute his Oration but was cutre off and required briefly to make an end and to tell them in fewe woordes whether he would stand to his opinions or to the determination of the church To this he aunswered that he neuer spake any thing against the determination of the Church but sayde that he had written diuers and sondry treatises in the which if hee had erred or were found to say otherwise then wel he was content to reuoke and cal backe the same and do al things that was requisite Then said the Inquisitor do you aske then pardon The other answered why shuld I aske pardon when I know no crime or error committed The inquisitour sayd well we will call you to the remembraunce thereof and proceede to the examination In the meane time others called vppon him instantly to aske pardone Then sayd Wesalianus I aske pardone Notwithstanding the Inquisitor proceeded to the examination reading there two instruments declaring that hee had authority from the Apostolicke sea after this cited the said Iohn to appear to hys examination Thirdly he commaunded him vnder paine of disobedience in the vertue of the holy Ghost and vnder paine of excōmunication of the greater curse from the which no man coulde absolue him but onely the Pope or the Inquisitour except onely at the poynt of death to tell plainly the truth vppon such things as should be demanded of him concerning his faith without ambages and sophistication of wordes And so being demanded first whether he did beleue vpon his oth taken that hee was bounde to tell the trueth although it were against himselfe or any other to this he answered Scio that is I know Thē the Inquisitour biddeth him say Credo that is I beleeue To the
and tyranny of the Prelates denying the Popes authoritie to haue groâ—â—d of the Scriptures neyther coulde they away with their ceremonies and traditions as Images Pardons Purgatory of the Romish church calling them as some say blasphemous occupyinges c. Of these Albingenses were slayne at times and burned a great multitude by the meanes of the Pope and Symon Ecclesiasticus with other moe It seemeth that these Albingenses were chiefly abhorred of the Pope because they set vp a contrary Pope against him about the coastes of Bugarorum For the which cause the Byshop called Portinensis beyng the popes Legate in those quarters writeth to the Archbishop of Roan and other Byshops in this wise VEnerabilibus patribus Dei gratia Rothomagensi Archiepiscopo eius suffraganeis Episcopis Sal. in Domino Iesu Christo. Dum pro spoÌ„sa veri crucifixi vestrum cogimur auxilium implorare potiùs compellimur lacerari singultibus plorare Ecce quòd vidimus loquimur quod scimus testificamur Ille homo perditus qui extollitur super omne quod colitur aut dicitur Deus iam habet persidiae suae praeambulum haeresiarcam queÌ„ haereteci Albingenses Papam suum nominant habitantem finibus Bugarorum Croaticae Dalmitiae iuxta Hungariorum nationem Ad eam confluunt haeretici Albingenses vt ad eoruÌ„ consulta respondeat Etenim de Carcasona oriundus vices illius Antipapae gerens Bartholomaeus haereticorum Episcopus funestam ei exhibendo reuerentiam sedem locum coÌ„cessit in villa que Porlos appellatur seipsum transtulit in partes Tholosanas Iste Bartholomaeus in literarum suarum vndique discurrenrentium tenore se in primo salutationis alloquio intitulat in huÌ„c modum Bartholomaeus seruus seruorum Mâ—sanctae fidei saluteÌ„ Ipse etiam inter alias enormitates creat Episcopos Ecclesias perfidè ordinare contendit Rogamus igitur attentiùs per aspertionem sanguinis Iesu Christi propensiùs obsecramus authoritate Domini Papae qua fungimur in hac parte districtè praecipientes quatenus veniatis Senonas in oct Apostorum Petri Pauli proximè futuris vbi alij praelati Franciae fauente Domino congregabuntur parati consilium dare in negotio praedicto cum alijs qui ibidem aderunt prouidere super negotio Albingensi Alioqui inobedientiam vestram D. Papae curabimus significari Datum Apud Plauuium 6. Nonas Iulij For somuch as mention is here made of these superstitious sectes of Fryers and such other beggerly religions it might seeme not much impartinent being moued by the occasion hereof as I haue done in Hildegardis before so now to annexe also to the same a certayne other auncient treatise compyled by Geoffray Chawcer by the way of a Dialogue or questions moued in the person of a certayne vplandish and simple ploughman of the country Whiche treatise for the same the author intituled Iacke vpland wherein is to be seene and noted to al the world the blind ignoraunce and variable discord of these irreligious religions how rude and vnskilfull they are in matters and principles of our Christian institution As by the contents of this present Dialogue appeareth the wordes wherof in the same old English wherein first it was set forth in this wise doe proceede Wherein also thou mayst see that it is no new thing that theyr blasphemous doyngs hath by diuers good men in old tyme bene detected as there are many and diuers other olde bookes to shew A treatise of Geoffrey Chawcer Intituled Iacke vpland I Iacke vpland make my mone to very God and to all true in Christ that Antechrist and his Disciples by colour of holines walking and deceauing Christes Church by many false figures where through by Antechrist and hys many vertues bene transposed to vices But the felliest folke that euer Antechrist found bene last brought into the church and in a wonder wise for they bene of diuers sectes of Antechrist sowne of diuers countreys and kindreds And all men knowne well that they be not obedient to Byshops ne liege men to kinges neyther they tyllen ne sowne weden ne repen woode corne ne grasse neither nothing that man should helpe but onely themselues their lyues to sustayne And these men han all maner power of God as they seyn in heuyn in yerth to sell heuyn and hell to whom that them liketh and these wretches were neuer where to bene themselfes And therfore Frere if thine order rules bene grounded on Goddys law tell thou me Iacke vpland that I aske of thee and if thou be or thinkest to be on Christes side keepe thy paciens SAint Paule teacheth that all our deedes should be do in charite and els it is nought worth but displeasing to God and harme to our owne soules And for that Freres challenge to be greatest Clerkes of the Churche and next following Christ in liuing men should for charite axe theÌ„ some questions and praye them to grounde theyr aunsweres in reason and in holy write for els their aunswere woulde nought bee worth be it florished neuer so fayre and as mehinke men might skilfully axe thus of a Frere 1. ¶ Frere how many orders be in erth and which is the perfitest order of what order art thou who made thyne order what is thy rule Is there any perfecter rule then Christ himselfe made If Christes rule be most perfite why rulest thou thee not therafter without more why shall a Frere be more punished if he breke the rule that hys patron made then if he breke the heestes that God hymsefe made 2. Approueth Christ any more religions then one that S. Iames speaketh of If he approueth no more why hast thou left his rule and takest an other why is a Frere apostata that leuyth his order taketh an other sect sith there is but one religion of Christ. 3. Why he ye wedded faster to your habites then a man is to hys wife For a man may leaue hys wife for a yeare or two as many men done and if you leue your abitea quarter of a yeare ye shuld beholden apostatase 4. Makith your habite you men of Religion or no If it do then euer as it wereth your religion wereth and after that that your habite is better your religion is better and when ye haue liggin it beside then lig ye your religion beside you and byn apostatase why bye ye you so precious clothes sith no man seekith such but for vayne glory as S. Gregory sayth What betokeneth your great hood your scaplery your knotted girdle and your wide cope 5. Why vse ye all one colour more then other Christen meÌ„ do what betokeneth that ye bene clothed all in one maner clothing If ye say it betokenith loue and charite certes then ye be oft hipocrites wheÌ„ any of you hateth other and in that that ye woole be sayd holy by your clothing Why may not
wherwith heretickes are punished or are wont and are commaunded by canonical sanctions to be vsed and if they be clerkes by degradation doe correcte and punishe and cause them to be corrected and punyshed with all dilligence Furthermore that you do rise vp stoutly and couragiously agaynst such heretickes and the goodes as well of them as of the lay men according to the canonicall sanctioÌ„ made agaynst heretickes and their followers vnder the which we will and commaunde them and their partakers to be subiect And also such persons as shall be infamed of the heresies or errors aforesayd or any of the premisses shall be bounde to purge themselues at your arbitrement but the other which either be witnesses or by their owne confessions or other allegations or probations shal be conuicted of the foresaid heresies or articles or of any the premisses they shal be compelled to reuoke and abiure publikely and solemnly the sayd articles and erroures and to suffer condigne penaunce and punishment yea euen to perpetuall imprisonment if need be for the same And to the intent that they shall not nourish any kinde of heresies hereafter either in word deede or gesture or shall induce other either in worde or deede priuely or apertly directly or indirectly to beleeue the same they shal be forced to put in sufficient suretie Who if it so chaunce that they wil not publikely and solemnly renounce and abiure their articles and errors and take at your handes condigne penaunce though it be to perpetual or teÌ„poral punishment according to your discretion neither wil be coÌ„tented to put in sufficient suretie that they will not hereafter holde nor nourish those erroures and heresies neither wil induce other by word or deed priuily or apertly directly or indirecly or by any other maner of colour to beleue the same that then you shall proceede agaynst them according to the qualty of their erroures and demerites yea and if you see it so expedient as against heretickes as infected with heresie by our authoritie according to the canonical sanctions suâ—marily and simply and plainly sine strepitu figura iudicij of office all appellatioÌ„ or appellations whatsoeuer ceasing and that you punish the same according to the sanctions traditions canonicall yea if neede be in leauing and committing them to the secular power and agayinst such as be superiors or learned doctors laying the censures of ecclesiasticall excoÌ„munication al appellation set aside also innocating if neede shall require ayd of the secular arme The constitution as wel of our predecessor P. Boniface 8. of blessed memory wherein is decreed that no man without hys City or dioces except in certayne cases or in places being one daies iornye distant from thence where he inhabiteth shal be called into iudgement that no man do presume to depute iudges froÌ„ the sea Apostolicke wtout the city dioces where they are deputed to proceede agaynst any or do presume to coÌ„mit their authority to any other person or persoÌ„s or to fetch remoue any man beyond one dayes iorny froÌ„ out his Dioces where he dwelleth or at most two dayes iourny if it be in a generall councell as also all other constitutions of any byshop of Rome touching as well Iudges delegate as persons not to be called to iudgement beyond a certaine number or els any other edict indulce priuelege or exemption generall or special graunted from the Apostolike sea for anye person or persons not to be interdicted suspended or excommunicated or cited vp to iudgement without the compasse of certaine limites or els what soeuer thing otherwise may hinder stop or impeache your iurisdiction power and free proceeding herein by anye meanes to the contrary notwithstanding Dat Constant. the first yeare of our popedome ¶ This bloudy and abhominable commission of pope Martine which I haue copied out of a certaine olde monument remaining in the handes of Maister Hackluyt student in the Temple seemeth to be directed and geuen out to the publike destruction of all faithful Christen men about the latter end breaking vp of the councel of Constance an 1418. By the which the prudent reader hath this to note and consider what labour what pollicie what couÌ„saile what lawes haue bene set what wayes haue bene takeÌ„ what seueritie hath bene shewed how mens power wit and authoritie of the whole world haue conspired together from time to time coÌ„tinually by all maner meanes to subuert and supplant the worde and way of the Lorde And yet notwithstanding man hath not preuayled but all his force deuised pollicies haue bene ouerthrown dispatched and with the councell of Achitophell and Ammon haue bene brought to nought and contrary to the furye of the world the gospell of Christ hathe still increased Neither yet for all this will the Pope cease to spurne and rebell still against the kingdome of Christe and of hys Gospell agaynst which neyther he nor yet the gates of hell shall euer preuayle The Lord of hostes be mercifull to hys poore persecuted flocke Amen Agaynst this pestilent Bull and Inquisition of Pope Martine the great antechrist I thought good here to adioyne and annexe an other contrarye writing of the Bohemians bearing the name and subscription of Procopius Conradus and other Captaynes of the Bohemians which seemeth not long after the death of Zisca to be written agaynst the pestiferous sea of Rome the tenour whereof here followrth A fruitfull and Christian exhortation of the Bohemianes to kinges and princes to stir them vp to the zeale of the Gospell THe almighty God the father by hys welbeloued sonne Iesus Christ may in hys holy spirite open the vnderstanding both of you and of all Christians lighten your hartes with the light of hys doctrin of righteousnes and may make you to continue therin surely established to the end This we desire of you for your saluation all ye honourable wise honest noble men al the Comminaltie ye rich and poore heare and consider with dilligent heede the wordes of this present letter which is sent vnto you from the Country of the Bohemianes It is manifest and well knowne to you and many other citties Kynges princes and Lordes that now a certayne number of yeares there hath ben great discord betwixt vs and you and there haue bene some which haue moued you by letters and prouoked you to make warre against vs and to destroy vs. And as well on your part as on ours many men as wel noble as vnnoble haue foolishly lost their lyues Yet neuer hetherto haue ye in any parte vnderstoode our fayth by our owne confession neither whether we be able to proue the same out of the scriptures yea or no and yet in the meane time kinges Princes Lordes and Citties haue sustayned great dammage And hereof we greatly meruaile that ye do so much trust and beleue the pope and hys priestes which geue you drinke full of poyson and
is said Romanam Ecclesiam non a concilio aliquo sed a diuina voce primatum accepisse that the church of Rome tooke not his primacie by any Councell but onely by the voyce of God And this is to be said although it were true that these titles termes were so giuen to the bishop of Rome in the olde time yet how and by whom they were giuen ye sâ—e Now to trie this matter as ioyning an issue with our aduersaries whether those foresaid titles of soueraigntie were applied in the old tyme of the Primitiue church to the Bishop of Rome as to be called the vicare generall of Christ the hed of the whole church and vniuersall bishop remaineth to be proued Wherunto this in my minde is to be answered that albeit the bishops of Rome of some peraduenture were so called by the names of higher preeminence of that citie of some going about to please them or to craue some helpe at their handes yet that calling 1. First was vsed then but of a few 2. Secondly neither was giuen to many 3. Thirdly was rather giuen then sought for of the most 4. Fourthly was not so giuen that it maketh or can make any generall necessitie of law why euery one is so bound to call them as the bishop of Rome now seeketh to be taken and called and that by necessitie of saluation as the decree of Pope Boniface 8. witnesseth where is said quòd sit de necessitate salutis vt credatur Primatus Ecclesiae Rom. ei subesse That it standeth vpon necessitie of saluation to beleue the Primacie of the church of Rome and to be subiect to the same c. As touching therfore these titles and termes of preheminence aforesaide orderly to set foorth and declare what histories of times doe saye in that matter by the grace of Christ. First we will see what be the titles the Bishop of Rome doth take and chalenge to himselfe and what is the meaning of them 2. When the first came in whether in the primitiue time or not and by whom 3. How they were first giuen to the Romane Bishops that is whether of necessary duety or voluntary deuotion whether commonly of the whole or particularly of a few and whether in respect of Peter or in respect of the Citie or els of the worthines of the Bishop which there sat 4. And if the foresayd names were then giuen of certaine Bishops vnto the bishop of Rome whether all the saide names were geuen or but certaine or what they were 5. Or whether they were then receaued of all Byshops of Rome to whoÌ„ they were giuen or els refused of some 6. And finally whether they ought to haue bene refused beyng giuen or not Touching the discourse of which matters although it appertaine to the profession rather of Diuines then hystoritians and would require a long and large debating yet for so much as both in these diuers other weighty controuersies of Diuinity the knowledge of times and histories must needes helpe Diuines disputing about the same so much as the grace of Christ shall assiste me therein I wil ioyne to the seeking out of truth such helpe as I may And first to begin with the names and titles now claymed and attributed to the sea and Byshop of Rome and what they be is sufficiently declared aboue that is the cheife Preist of the worlde the Prince of the Church Byshop Apostolicall the vniuersall head of the Church the head and Byshop of the vniuersall Church the successor of Peter most holy Pope the vicar of God on earth neither God nor man but a mixt thing betweene both the Patriarche or Metropolitane of the Churche of Rome the Byshop of the first sea etc. Unto the which titles or stile is annexed a triple crowne a triple crosse two crossed keyes a naked sword seauenfold seales in token of the seauenfolde giftes of the holy Ghost he being carried pickbacke vpon mens shoulders after the maner of heathen kynges hauing all the Empire and the Emperour vnder his dominion that it is not conuenient for any terrene Prince to reigne there where he sitteth hauing the plenary fulnes of power as well of temporall things as spirituall things in his handes that all thinges are his and that all such Princes as haue gyuen him any thing haue giuen him but his owne hauing at his will and pleasure to preach indulgencies and the crosse against Christen Princes whatsoeuer And that the Emperour certaine other Princes ought to make to him confession of subiection at their coronation hauing authoritie to depose and that he de facto hath deposed Emperors and the king of France Also to absolue the subiects from their allegeance to their Princes whom kings haue serued for footmen to lead his horse and the Emperour to hold his stirrop that he may and doth geue power to Bishops vpon the bodies of men and hath graunted them to haue prisons without whose authoritie no general Councell hath any force And to whom appellations in all maner of causes may and ought to be made That his decrees be equall with the decrees of Nicen Councel and are to be obserued and taken in no lesse force then if they had bene confirmed with the heauenly voyce of Sainct Peter himselfe ex fra Barth alijs Item that the sayd Byshop of Rome hath the heauenly disposition of thinges and therefore may alter and chaunge the nature of thinges by applying the substance of one thing to an other cap. Quando de transl Epis. tit 7. Item that he can of nothing make something and cause the sentence which before was none to stande in effect and may dispence aboue the lawe and of iniustice make iustice in correcting and chaunging lawes for he hath the fulnes of power And againe dist 40. cap. Si Papa If the Pope doe leade with him innumerable soules â—â— flockes into hell yet no man must presume to rebuke his faultes in this worlde Item that it standeth vpon necessitie of saluation to beleeue the Premacie of the sea of Rome and to be subiect to the same c. These thinges thus declared now let vs see whether these names and titles with the forme and maner of this authoritie and regalitie aboue rehearsed were euer attributed of any in the primitiue tyme to the byshop of Rome For al these he doth chalenge and clayme vnto him by old possession from the time of S. Peter And here a question is to be asked of our aduersaries the Papistes whether they will auouch all these aforesaide titles together wyth the whole forme and tenour of regalitie to the same belongyng as is afore touched or not if they wil let them come foorth with their allegations which they neuer haue done yet nor euer shal be able if they will not or can not auouch them all together in maner as is specified then why doth the byshop claime them altogether so stoutly
beheaded and Secūdulus dyed in prison about the yeare of our Lord 202. as writeth Florilegus This Seuerus the persecutor raigned as the most part of writers accord the terme of 18. yeares who about the latter tyme of his raigne came with his army hether into Britaine where after many conflictes had with the Britains in the borders of the North he cast vp a ditche with a mighty walle made of earth and turues strong stakes to the length of 132. myles from the one side of the sea to the other beginning at Tine and reached to the Scottish sea which done he remooued to Yorke and there by the breaking in of the Northren men and the Scots was besieged and slaine about the yere of our Lord 214. leauing behind him two sonnes Bassianus and Geta. which Bassianus surnamed Caracalla after he had slayne his brother Geta here in Britaine gouerned the Empire alone the space of sixe yeares After whose death he beyng slayne also of his seruaunts as he had slayne his brother before succeded Macrinus with his sonne Diadumenus to be Emperour who after they had raigned one yeare were both slayne of their owne people After them followed Varius Heliogabalus in the empire rather to be called a Monster then a man so prodigious was his life in all glotonie filthines and ribaudry Such was his pompe that in his lampes he vsed balme filled his fishpondes with rosewater To let passe his sumptuous vestures which he would not weare but only of gold and most costly silkes his shoes glistering with precious stones finely engraued he was neuer ij dayes serued with one kynd of meate he neuer wore one garment twise and likewise for his fleshly wickednes some dayes his company was serued at meale with the braynes of Ostriges and a straunge foule called Phenocapterie an other day with the toungs of Popiniayes and other sweete singing birdes Beyng nye to the sea he neuer vsed fish in places farre distant from the sea all his house was serued with most delicate fishes At one supper he was serued with 7000. fishes and 5000. foules At his remooning in his progresse often there followed him 600. chariots laden only with baudes common harlots and ribaudes He sacrificed with young children and preferred to the best aduauncementes in the common weale most light personages as baudes Minstrels Carters and such like In one word he was an enemy to all honesty good order And when he was foretold by his Sorcerers and Astronomers that he should dye a violent death he prouided ropes of silke to hang himselfe swordes of gold to kill himselfe and strong poyson in Iacincts and Emeraudes to poyson himself if needs he must thereto be forced Moreouer he made an high tower hauing the floore of boordes couered with gold plate bordred with precious stones frō the which toure he would throw himself downe if he should be pursued of his enemies But notwithstanding all his prouision he was slayne of the souldiours drawen through the Citie and cast into Tiber after he had raigned two yeres and viij monthes as witnesseth Eutropius other say foure yeares This Heliogabalus hauing no issue adopted to his sōne and heyre Aurelius Alexander Seuerus the sonne of Mammea who entring his raigne the yeare of our Lorde 224. cōtinued 13. yeares well commended for vertuous wise gētle liberal to no man hurtful And as he was not vnlerned himself through the diligent education of Mammea his mother so he was a great fauourer of men wise and learned Neither did he any thing in the common weale without the assistance of learned and sage counsailors It is reported of him to beare such stomacke against corrupt iudges that when he chaunced to meete with any of them by the commotion of his mind he would cast vp choler being so mooued with them that he could not speake and was redy with his two fingers to put out their eyes From his court he dismissed all superfluous and vnneedful seruants saying that he was no good pupil which fed idle seruants with the bowels of his common weale Among his other good vertues it appeareth also that he was frendly and fauourable vnto the Christians as by this act may be gathered For when the christians had occupied a certaine publike place in some good vse belike for the assembling and conuenting together of the congregation the company of the Cookes or tiplers made chalenge of that place to belōg vnto thē The matter being brought before the Emperour he iudged it more honest the place to serue to the worship of God howsoeuer it were then to the dirtie slubbering of Cookes and Skullians By this it may be vnderstand that in Rome no Christian churches were erected vnto this tyme when as yet notwithstanding this fauour of the Emperour no publike house could quietly be obtained for the christians So that by the reason hereof may appeare the decretall epistle and ordinance of Pope Higynus concerning the dedication of churches aboue mentioned pag. 53. to bee falsified And likewise the ordinaunce of Pius his successour concernyng the Altar or Superaltare to be also false For what Superaltare was it like they had in the tyme of Higynus and Pius when as at this tyme which was long after no publike place almost could be graunted them for the Christians to assemble together Of this Alexander Platina writeth that as hee was a great hater of all boasters flatterers so he was of suche prudence that no deceit could escape him and bringeth in a story of one Turinus who had gotten craftily many great bribes and gifts in making the people beleue that he was of great authoritie with the Emperour and that he could helpe them to haue whatsoeuer they sued for Whereof the Emperour being certified caused him in the open market to be fastned to a stake and there killed with smoke where the Crier stood thus crying to the people Smoke he sold and with smoke he is punished Mammea the mother of this Alexander aboue mentioned whom Hierome calleth a deuout and religious woman hearing of the same and the excellent learning of Origene being then at Alexandria sent for him to Antioche desirous to heare and see him Unto whom the foresayd Origene according to her request resorted and after that he had there remained a space with the Emperour and his mother returned againe to Alexandria And thus continued this good Emperor his raigne the space of 13. yeares at length at a commotion in Germany with his mother Mammea he was slaine After whome succeded Maximinus contrary to the mynd of the Scuate only appointed by the souldiours to be Emperour During all this tyme betwene Seuerus and this Maximinus the church of Christ although it had not perfect peace yet it had some meane tranquillitie from persecution Albeit some Martyrs there were at this tyme that suffred whereof Nauclerus giueth this reason For
life by reasoÌ„ of their ignorance or simplicity after their entrance become subtle false deceiuing hipocrites entring together with the rest into poore mens houses yea oftentimes become worsse then the other wherupoÌ„ Mat. 22. wo be vnto you Scribes Phareseis hypocrits which go about c. Therfore they which do this are no true messengers but false Apostles The 3. signe is that the true Apostles if they be reproued suffer the same patiently 2. Cor. 12. saying the tokens of my Apostleship are accomplished among you in all patience sufferance meaning that patience which pertayneth to the maners of the preachers Therfore they which suffer not correction or punishment be no true Apostles but rather shew themselues to be no Christians at all 1. Cor. 12. No man can say that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost Glossa It is meet that christians should be huÌ„bled to the inteÌ„t that they may suffer themselues to be reproued and not to be holden vp with yea and nay And also such men do shew themselues to be carnall and not spirituall at all although they fayne themselues to be spirituall Gal. 3. Therefore am I become an enemye vnto you Notwithstanding the Glossa sayth no carnall man will be reproued although he erre Wher efore those preachers which suffer not coroection seeme not to be true Apostles but false Prophets The 4. signe is that true Apostles commend not them selues 2. Cor. 4. For we dare not ioyne our selues nor yet compare our selues vnto others which commend boast many of theyr actes when God alloweth none of them at all Also true preachers although they be in deede prayse worthy for theyr good desertes In the consciences of men are they prayse worthy not to the outward shew alone 2. Cor. 3. We commend our selues sayth the Apostle to the consciences of all men Then they do not commend them selues in coÌ„parison of other wherfore the glose saith vpon the same place those that deserue no commendation but in comparison of other do chalenge to theÌ„selues other mens desertes and prayse wherefore in the second Epistle of S. Peter the last chapter it is sayd Euen as our welbeloued brother Paule according to the wisedome that God hath geuen vnto him hath written vnto you Glossa The chiefest of the Apostles hath here forgotten his papall authority and also his keies that were deliuered vnto him For he is astonied as it were at the great wisedom geuen vnto his brother Paule For in deede it is the maner of the elect children of God to be more in loue with the vertues of other men then with their owne wherefore in the second chap. to the Philipp is writteÌ„ Let those that are superiors esteeme of themselues in all humility They therefore that do the contrary â—â—ving that their state or doings be better then other mens although they be preachers yet are they no true Apostles in deed but false prophets The 5. signe is that true Apostles neede no letters of commendation nor yet desire to haue themselues praysed of men as in the 2. Cor. 3. chap. the Apostle sayth we neede not the letters of commendatioÌ„ of any man that is to say of false prophets The 6. signe is that true Apostles doe not preach vnlesse they be sent as in the 10. chap. to the Rom. how shall they preach vnlesse they be sent Glossa There be no true Apostles but those that be sent For they haue no neede of Signes which are true witnes bearers but those that be not sent and do preach are false prophets The 7. signe is for as much as false Prophetes haue their authority in their owne names wherfore in the 2. epistle of S. Paul to the Cor. it is written For we dare not boast of our selues or make comparison Glossa That is to say with those that be false prophets not taking their authority froÌ„ God but vsurping the same desirous to beare rule clayming in their owne name their authority And therefore although peraduenture by presumption they say that they are sent of God as all hereticks will say yet notwithstanding vnlesse they shal proue theyr sending either by spirituall prophecy as Iohn Baptist did saying I am the voyce of a cryer in the desert As out of the prophet Esay in the first chapter of S. Iohns Gospell is alledged Or els by myracles as Moyses did which turned his rod into a Serpent and againe from a Serpent to a rod as in the 7. chap. of Exodus they ought for to be excommunicated till such time they cease from preaching Yet notwithstanding a miracle ought not to be a sufficieÌ„t testimony of theyr sending for as much as they be done oftentimes and that of euill and wicked men 1. q. 1. we may perceiue towards the end But miracles ought to be suspected for as much as our Sauiour sayth in the 23. of Mathew Then shall false prophets arise c. Therfore they which do chalenge authority in their owne name for as much as they haue not theyr authority from God they are not true Apostles but false preachers The 8. signe is that false Prophets pretending great wisedome and holynes to be in superstition haue named theyr owne traditions to be religion the which are rather to be counted sacrilege or Church robbery and doe vsurpe vnto themselues the due deserts of other men by boasting and bragging among straunge vnknown people Wherfore the Apostle speaking of false Prophets in the 2. chap. to the Col. sayth According to the precepts of men which hauing a face of wisedome consist in superstition interlaced with humility Glose That is to say mingled with fained religion that it might be called religion when in very deede it is nothing els but sacrilege because it is coÌ„trary to all authoritye that is contrary to God himselfe that any man should desire to haue gouernment of a multitude without publicke commaundement as in Deuteronomiâ—â— 23. chap. Thou hast entred into thy neighbors vineyarde Glose that is to say into the Church of an other Bishop May a man warne admonish others or els correct that congregation which is not lawfull for him to gouern nor yet to take so great a charge vpon him no. And that it is not lawfull to enter into an other bishops Dioces it is apparant because it is not lawfull for the Archbishopp so to doe To this effect appertayneth that which is red 6. q. 3. And also it is written 9. q. 2. through out Therefore those preachers which agaynst God and his diuine Scriptures do call their owne traditions religioÌ„ are not are Apostles but false Prophets The 9. signe is by the authority which they haue For as much as they be no preachers of the gospell or ministers of the Sacraments yet they will liue by the Gospell and not by the labour of theyr owne handes against the text in the 2. Thess. 3. neither haue we
quarta parte summae sayth they were condemned in the extrauagant of Pope Iohn with one Ioānes de Poliaco Their opiniōs saith Antoninus were these That Peter the Apostle was no more the head of the Church then the other Apostles And that Christ left no Uicare behinde him or head in hys Church And that the Pope hath no such authoritie to correct and punishe to institute or depose the Emperour Item that all Priestes of what degree so euer are of equall authoritie power and iurisdiction by the institution of Christ but by the institution of the Emperour the Pope to bee superiour which by the same Emperour also may be reuoked agayne Item that neyther the pope nor yet the Church may punish any man punitione coactiua That is by externe coaction vnlesse they receiue licence of the Emperour This foresayd Michaell generall of the gray Friers wrote against the tiranny pride and primacie of the pope accusing him to be Antichrist and the Churche of Rome to be the whore of Babilon dronke with the bloud of Saintes He sayd there were two Churches one of the wicked florishing wherein raigned the pope the other of the godly afflicted Itē that the veritie was almost vtterly extinct And for this cause he was depriued of his dignitie condemned of the Pope Notwithstāding he stode constant in his assertions This Michaell was about the yeare of our Lord 1322. And left behinde him many fautours followers of his doctrine of whom a great part were slayne by the Pope Some were condemned as William Ockam some were burned as Ioannes de Castilione and Franciscus de Arcatara In extrauag Ioan 23. With him also was condemned in the sayd Extrauagāt Ioannes de Poliaco aboue touched whose assertions were these That the pope coulde not geue licence to heare confessions to whom he would but that euery pastour in hys owne Church ought to suffice Item that pastours and bishops had theyr authoritie immediately from Christ his Apostles and not from the pope Itē that the constitution of pope Benedict II. wherein he graunteth larger priuelegies to the Friers aboue other pastours was no declaration of the law but a subuersion And for this he was by the sayd Friers oppressed about the yeare of our Lord. 1322. After Symon Mepham Archbishop of Caunterbury before mentioned who liued not lōg succeded Ioh. Stretford After whom came Iohn Offord who liued but x. monethes In whose rowme succeeded Thomas remained but one yeare an 1350. And after him Simon Iselyp was made archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Clemēt the vi who sat xvii yeares and builded Caunterbury Colledge in Oxford Which Symon Islyp succeeded the Byshop of Ely named Symon Langham who within two yeares was made Cardinall In whose stede Pope Urbane the 5. ordeined William Wittlesey bishop of Worceter to be archbishop of Caunterbury an 1366. In which yeare William Bishop of Winchester elected and founded the newe colledge in Oxford Agayne in the order of the popes next vnto Pope Clement the 6. before mentioned about the same time an 1353 succeeded pope Innocent the 6. In the first yeare of which Pope two Friers Minors of Franciscans were burned at Auinion Pro opinionibus as mine author sayth erroneis prout D. Papae eius Cardinalibus videbatur i. For certaine opinions as seemed to the pope and his Cardinals erroneous Ex Chron. Wals. Of the which two Friers I finde in the Chronicles De actis Rom. pontificum and in the history of Praemonstratensis that the one was Ioannes Rochetaylada Or rather as I finde in Catal. testium cited out of the Chronicle of Henricus de Herfordia his name to be Hayabalus Who being as he recordeth a Fry or Minorite began first in the time of Pope Clement the 6. an 1345. to preach and affirme openly that he was by Gods reuelatiō charged and commaunded to preach that tho Churche of Rome was the whore of Babilon and the Pope with hys Cardinals to be very Antichrist And that pope Benedict the other before him his predecessours were dāned with other suche like wordes tending much agaynst the Popes tirannical maiesty And that the foresaid Hayabalus being brought before the Popes face constauntly did stand in the same saying that he was commaunded by Gods reuelatiō so to say and also that he woulde preach the same if he might To whom it was then obiected that he had some heretical books and so was committed to prison in Auiniō In the time of his accusation it happened that a certain priest cōming before the Pope cast the Popes Bull downe before his feete saying Lo here take your Bull vnto you for it doth me no good at al. I haue laboured now these 3. yeares withall and yet notwithstanding for all this your Bull I cannot be restored to my right The Pope hearing this commaunded the poore Priest to be scourged and after to be layd in prison with the foresayd Fryer What became of them afterward the foresayd wryter Henricus de Herfordia maketh no mention But I may probably coniecture this Priest and this Friar Rochetayladus or rather Hayabalus were the two whome mine author Thom. Walsingham writeth to be burned at this time in Auinion about the first beginning of this Pope Innocentius the 6. Of thys Roichtaylada I thought good here to inferre the testimony and mention of Iohn Froysayd written of him in hys first volum chap. 211 in these wordes There was sayth Froysard a Frier Minor full of great Clergy in the Citty of Auinion called Frier Iohn of Rochetaylada the which Frier pope Innocent 6. held in prison in the Castell of Baignour for shewing of many meruails after to come pricipally he shewed many things to fall vnto the Prelates of the Church for the great superfluitie and pryde that was then vsed among them And also he speake many thinges to fall of the realm of Fraunce and of the great Lordes of Christendome for the oppressions that they did to the poore cōmon people This Fryer sayd he would proue all his sayinges by the authoritie of the Apocalips by other bookes of holy Saints and prophets the which were opened to him by that grace of the holy ghost he shewed many things hard to beleue many things fell after as he sayd He said thē not as a prophet but he shewed them by authoritie of ancient Scriptures and by the grace of the holy Ghost who gaue him vnderstanding to declare the ancient prophetes to shew to all Christen people the yeares and times whē such things should fall he made diuers books founded on great sciences and Clergy wherof one was made the yeare of our Lord. 1346. wherin was written suche meruailes that it were hard to beleue them howbeit many thinges according there to fell after And when he was demaunded of the warres of Fraunce he said that al that had bene sene was not like that should
is parish Priestes nor their helpers nor yet Uicares wherefore seing they liue so in no order by the sentence of the Apostle we are commaunded to auoyd them 2. Thess. vlt. where he saith we admonish and denounce vnto you O brethren in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that is as the Glose sayth we commaund you by the authoritie of Christ that you withdrawe your selues from euery brother that walketh inordinately and not after the tradition which you haue receaued of vs. c. Looke vpon the common glose of this place and you shall finde that such are to be auoyded till time they amend from so doing c. Besides these articles aboue rehearsed certaine propositions or conclusions were also propounded in the scholes of Paris the same time solemnly to be disputed and defended agaynst the Fryers which in a briefe some of wordes to collect were these First that the begging Friers were not in the state of saluation Secondly that they were bound to labour with theyr handes that could and not to begge Thirdly that they ought not to exercise the office of preaching or to heare the confessiōs of them that wil come to them although being licensed thereunto by the Byshop of Rome or by the Diocesane for somuch as the same is preiudiciall to the ministers and Priestes of the Parishes All these foresayd articles conclusions with the booke set forth by these Paris men This Pope Alexander the 4. condemned to be abolished and burned writing his preceptes to the French K. and also the Vniuersitie of Paris in the fauour of the Friers willing and commaunding the sayd Fryers to be restored to all their priueledges and libertyes in as ample maner as in Pope Gregories tyme before Not long after Pope Alexander the 4. followed Clement the 4. an 1263. and sate 3. yeares Who also gaue the priuiledge to the Friers beginning Quidam temerè c. In which priueledge he condemneth them that say that no mā without licence of his Curate or minister ought to confesse him to the Friers or that a subiect ought to aske licence of theyr ministers so to doe whiche was agaynst the Canon Omnis vtriusque sexus c. made by the Pope Innocent the 3. before recited After this Clement agayn came Pope Martine the 4. an 1281. who renued again the Canon Omnis vtriusque sexus in the behalfe of the Curates against the Friers Then Pope Boniface the 8. began to sit an 1294 viii yeares ix monethes Who taking side with the Fryers gaue to them an other priuiledge beginning Super Cathedram c. In the whiche priuiledge he licensed the Fryers that without licence of Uicares of Churches they shal first present themselues to the Prelates to be admitted by whō if they be refused the second time then they vppon speciall authoritie of this Pope shall be priueledged without eyther Byshop or Curate to preach to bury and to heare cōfessions who soeuer will come to them reuoking all that was decreed by his predecessours before to the contrary notwithstanding By this Pope Boniface a certayne Dominick Frier was made Cardinall named Nicholaus de Teruisio and after the death of Boniface was made also Pope an 1303. surnamed Pope Benedictus 11. Who seing the constituciō of Boniface his predecessor to gender dissension betweene the Prists and Friers made an other constitution beginning Inter cunctas c. reuoking the constitution of Boniface his predecessour Upon which constitution of Pope Benedict Ioannes Monachus make a Glose reuoked also his other Glose made vpon the constitution of Boniface before Again after this Benedictus the 11. folowed pope Clement the 5. an 1335. and sat 9. yeeres who in his generall Councell holden at Uienna reuoked the constitution of Benedictus his predecessor and renewed agayne the former decree of Boniface by a new constitution of his beginning Dudum a Bonifacio 8. c. whiche constitution moreouer was confirmed afterwarde by Pope Iohn the 22. an 1316. which Pope also caused Ioannes de Poliaco to recant Upon this variable diuersity of the Popes one dissēting and repugning from an other rose among the Diuines scholemen in Uniuersities great matter of cōtention as well in the Uniuersity of Paris as the Uniuersity of Oxford about the begging Friers some holding one way some an other way But especially 5. principal opinions to be noted of learned men who thē disputing against the friers were condemned for heretickes and their assertions reproued The first was the opinion of thē which defended that the friers might not by the licence of the Byshop of Rome and of the Prelats preach in Parishes and heare confessions And of this opinion was Guliel de Sācto Amore with his felowes who as is sayd were condemned The second opiniō was this that friers although not by theyr own authority yet by priuiledge of the Pope and of the Bishop might preach and heare confessions in Parishes but yet not without licence of the Parish Priestes Of this opinion was Bernardus glosing vpon the canō Omnis vtriusque sexus afore mentioned The third opinion was that friers might preach and heare confessions without licence of the Parish Priestes but yet the sayd parishners notwithstanding were boūd by the Canon Omnis vtriusque sexus to repeate the same sinnes again if they had no other to theyr own proper curate and of this opinion were many as Godfridus de Fontibus Henricus de Gandauo Ioannes Monachus Cardin Ioannes de Poliaco Which Ioannes de Poliaco Pope Iohn the 22 caused openly in Paris to recant and retract This Ioannes de Poliaco Doctor of diuinity in Paris being complayned of by the friers for certaine articles or assertions was sent for to the Pope where time and place being to him assigned he in the audience of the Pope and of Frierly Cardinals other doctors was straitly examined of his articles To make the story short he at length submitting himselfe to the authority of the terrible see of Rome was caused to recant his assertions openly at Paris His assertions which he did hold were these ¶ The three assertions of Ioannes de Poliaco which he was caused by the Pope to recant at Paris His three assertions Whereof the first was they which were confessed to friers although hauing a generall licence to heare confessions were bounde to confesse agayne their sinnes to their own Parish Priest by the constitutiō Omnis vtriusque sexus c. The second was that the sayd cōstitution Omnis vtriusque sexus standing in his force the Pope coulde not make but parishners wer boūd once a yere to confesse theyr sinnes to their Priest For the doing otherwise importeth a contradiction in it selfe The 3. was that the Pope coulde not geue geuerall licēce to heare confessiōs so but y◠the parishners so confessed were bound to reiterate the same confession made vnto his owne Curate Which be proued by these
or sequester thyngs geuen by Charte or charter when any doth vniustly occupye the same And so if that stand confirmed and ratified by the fayth of the Churche great occasion thereby should be ministred to men so chartered to trust to their temporall chartes and so might grow thereby much libertie and licence to sinne For like as by what supposition euery truth is necessary so by the same supposition euery false thyng is possible as it is playne by the testimony of Scripture of holy Doctours speakyng of necessitie of thynges to come 4. Euery man beyng in grace iustifying finally hath not onely right vnto the thyng but also for his tyme hath right in deede ouer all the good thynges of God The veritie hereof is euidēt by holy Scripture Math. 24. Where veritie promiseth to euery mā entryng into his ioy verely sayth he I tell you he shall set place him ouer all the goodes he hath For the right and title belōgyng to the cōmunion of Saintes in their countrey he meaneth in the kingdome of heauen Fundatur obiectiuè super vniuersitatem bonorum Dei That is Hath his relation as vnto his obiect to all the goodes and possession of God 5. A man can but onely ministratoriously geue any temporall dominion or gift perpetuall as well to his owne naturall sonne as to his sonne by imitation It is euidēt For euery mā ought to recognise himselfe in all his workes and doyngs as an humble seruaunt and minister of God As the wordes of Scripture doth teach vs. Let a man so esteeme of vs as the ministers of Christ. Yea so Christ himselfe did teach his chief Apostles to minister but in their countrey the Saints shall geue vnto their felow brethren the dominion of their goodes vt pater de suis corporibus bonis eis inferioribus in natura accordyng to the wordes of Luke 6. They shall geue you and put into your bosomes a good measure and perfect well filled and heaped vp and runnyng ouer 6. If God be temporall Lordes may lawfully and meritoriously take away the goodes of fortune from the Church when they do offend habitualiter This conclusion is correlatiue with the first Article of our fayth I beleue in God the father almighty c. Where I vnderstand this word may in this conclusion after the maner of autentique Scripture which sayth graunteth that God is able of these stones to rayse vp children to Abraham for otherwise all Christian Princes were heretiques For this conclusiō thus stādeth the reason If God be he is omnipotēt if he be almighty he is able to commaunde the Lordes temporall so to do if he way so commaunde thē may they lawfully so take away such goods c. And so by the vertue of the same principle Christian Princes haue practised the sayd sentence vpon the Church mē heretofore as did William Rufus c. But God forbid that any should beleue hereby my intention to haue bene that secular Lords may lawfully take away what goodes soeuer and by what meanes soeuer by their owne naked authority at theyr pleasure but only by the authority of the church may so do in cases and forme limited by the law 7. We know that it is not possible that the vicare of Christ is able by his pure Bulles c. This is manifest by the Catholique faith for asmuch as the Church doth fully beleue that the abling of any mā ought first to procede and come of God wherfore no man being Christ his vicar hath any power in this matter but onely as vicar in the name of the Lord so far forth as he is enabled of the Lord to notify vnto the church whom God hath enabled Wherfore if any mā do any thing not as vicar in the name of the Lord whom he ought to forethinke to be his author and head It is a presumption of Lucifer for so much as Christ by his Apostle sayth 1. Cor. 3. all our hability or sufficiency cōmeth of God And so consequently it commeth not purely by the ministerie of hys Uicarship that he is inabled but the ablenesse or vnablenesse of him being the Uicar of Christ commeth to hym an other way from aboue 8. A man can not be excommunicate to his hurt or vndoing except he be excommunicate first and principally of himselfe It is euident forasmuch as all such excommunication ought to procede begin originally of his owne sin which is damnified wherupon Augustine sayth De verbis Domini Sermone 51. Doe not thou conculcate thy selfe and man ouercōmeth thee not And moreouer the faith of the church doth teach quòd nulla ei nocebit aduersitas si nulla dominetur iniquitas that is to say No aduersitie shall hurt if no miquitie haue the vpper hand And yet notwithstanding euery excommunication for many causes is also to be reared although that the excommunication of the Churche to the humble man being excommunicated be not damnable but wholesome 9. No man ought but in Gods cause alone to excommunicate suspende c It is cleare for asmuch as euery iust cause is the cause of God whose respect ought chiefly to be wayed and pondered Yea the loue of the person excommunicate ought to surmount the zeale of reuengement and the desire of all temporall goodes whatsoeuer for otherwise he that doeth excommunicate doth damnify himselfe To this 9. conclusion notwithstanding it is congruent that a Prelate may excommunicate in the cause also of man so that his principal respect in so doing be had to y◠iniury done to his God as appeareth 13. quaest 4 Inter querelas 10. No curse or excommunication can binde simply but in case it be geuen out against the aduersary of Christes lawe And it appeareth thus because that God doth bynde simply euery one that is bound who cannot excommunicate but onely for trāsgression of his law Whereunto it is consonant notwithstanding that the censure of the Church doth not binde simply but secondarely in that case and respect as it is denounced against the aduersary of the members of the Church 11. There is no example of Christ which geueth power to hys disciples to excommunicate any subiecte especially for denying of any temporalties but contrary Which is thus declared by the fayth whereby we beleue that God is to be beloued aboue all thynges and our neighbour and enemy are to be beloued aboue all tēporall goodes of this world necessaryly for the law of God cannot be contrary vnto it selfe 12. The disciples of Christ haue no power by any ciuill coaction to exact temporall things by their censures This appeareth by the fayth of the Scripture Luke 23. Where Christ did forbid hys Apostles ciuilly to raigne or to beare any lordship The kings sayth he of the Gentiles beare rule ouer them but you not so And after thys sense it is expounded of S. Bernarde of S. Chrysostome and other holy men which conclusion notwithstanding yet may they exact
assents together Which done he exhorted the Archbishop that for so much as his garrison had bene now long in armour and from home he would therefore discharge the needeles multitude of his souldiers and dismisse them home to their worke and busines and they would together drinke and ioyne hands in the sight of the whole company Thus they shaking hands together the Archbishop sendeth away his souldyers in peace not knowing himselfe to be circumuented before he was immediately arested by the handes of the foresayde Earle of Westmerland and shortly after the king comming with his power to Yorke was there beheaded the monday in Whiâ—sonweeke and with him also Lord Thomas Moubray Marshall with diuers other moreouer of yâ— citie of Yorke which had taken their parts After whose slaughter the King proceedeth farther to persecute the Earle of Northumberland Lord Thomas Bardolph Who then did flie to Barwicke From thence they reincoued to Wales At length within two yeares after fighting against the kyngs part were slayne in the field an 1408. In the which yeare diuers other also in the Northparts for fauouring the foresaid Lords were likewise condemned by the kyng and put to death Among whome the Abbot of Hales for the like treason was hanged The kyng after the sheddyng of so much bloud seeyng himselfe so hardly beloued of his subiects thought to kepe in yet with the Clergy with the Bishop of Rome seeking alwaies his chiefest stay at their hands And therfore was compelled in all things to serue their humour as did appeare as well in condemning William Sawtre before as also in other which coÌ„sequeÌ„tly we haue now to intreat of In the number of whom commeth now by yâ— course of time to write of one Iohn Badby a Tailor and a lay man who by the crueltie of Thomas Arundel Archbishop and other Prelates was brought to his condemnation in this kings reigne an 1409. according as by their owne registers appeareth followeth by this narration to be seene ¶ Iohn Badby Artificer IN the yeare of our Lord. 1409. on Sonday beyng the first day of March in the afternoone The excommunication following of one Iohn Badby Taylour beyng a lay man was made in a certaine house or haull within the precinct of the preaching friers in LondoÌ„ in an vtter cloister vpon the crime of heresie other articles repugnant to the determinatioÌ„ of the erroneous church of Rome before Thomas Arundel Archbishop of Canterbury and other his assistants as yâ— Archbishop of Yorke of London of Winchester of Oxford of Norwich of Salisbury of Bath of Bangor Et meneuensis Episcopi and also Edmond Duke of Yorke Thomas Bewford the Chauncelour of England Lord de Roos the clerke of the rolles a great number of other Lords both spirituall and temporall being then at the selfesame time present Maister Morgan read the articles of his opinions to the hearers according as it is contemed in the instrument read by the foresayd M. Morgan the tenour whereof followeth and in effect is such In the name of God Amen Be it manifest to all men by this present publike instrument that in the yeare after the incarnation of our Lord according to yâ— course and coÌ„putation of the Church of England otherwise in the yere 1409. in the second indictioÌ„ in the third yeare of the Popedome of the most holy father in Christ Lord Lord Gregory xi by that diuine permission Pope the secoÌ„d day of Ianuary in the Chappell Caruariae of S. Thomas Martyr high vnto the Cathedrall Church of Worcester being situate in the said Dioces in the presence of me the publicke Notary and of the witnesses vnder written the foresayd Iohn Badby a lay man of the sayd Dioces of Worcester appearing personally before the reuerend father in Christ and Lord Lord Thomas by the grace of God Byshop of Worcester sitting in the said Chappell for chiefe Iudge was detected of and vpon the crime of heresie being heretically taught openly maintayned by the foresayd Iohn Badby That is that the Sacrament of the body of Christ consecrated by the Priest vpon the aulter is not the true body of Christ by the vertue of the wordes of the Sacrament But that after the Sacramentall words spoken by the Priest to make the body of Christ the materiall bread doth remaine vpon the aulter as in the beginning neither is it turned into the very body of Christ after the Sacramental words spoken of the Priest Which Iohn Badby being examined and diligently demanded by the foresaid reuereÌ„d father coÌ„cerning the premisses in the end did answere that it was impossible that any Priest should make the body of Christ that he beleued firmely that no Priest could make the body of Chrst by such words Sacramentally spoken in such sort And also he said expressely that he would neuer while he liued beleue that any Priest could make the body of Christ sacramentally vnlesse that first he saw manifestlie the like body of Christ to be handled in the hands of the priest vpon the aulter in his corporall forme And furthermore he sayd that Iohn Rakier of Bristoll had so much power authoritie to make the like body of Christ as any priest had Moreouer he said that wheÌ„ Christ sat at supper with his disciples he had not his body in his hand to the intent to distribute it to his disciples and he said expresly that he did not this thing And also he spake many other words teaching fortifieng the heresie in the same place both greeuous and also out of order and horrible to the eares of the hearers sounding against the Catholike faith Upon which occasion the same reuerend father admonished and requested the said Iohn Badby oftentimes and very instantlie to charity for so much as he would willinglie that he should haue forsaken such heresie and opinion holden taught and mainteined by him in such sort against the Sacrament to renounce and vtterly abiure them and to beleeue other things which the holy mother the Church doth beleeue And he informed the said Iohn on that behalfe both gentlie and also laudably Yet the said Iohn Badby although he were admonished and requested both often and instantlie by the said reuerend father said and answered expresselie that he would neuer beleeue otherwise then before he had said taught and answered Wherevpon the foresaid reuerend father Bishop of Worcester seeing vnderstanding and perceiuing the foresaid Iohn Badby to maintaine and fortifie the said beresie being stubborne and proceeding in the same stubbornes pronounced the said Iohn to be before this time conuicted of such an heresie and that he hath bin and is an hereticke and in the end declared it in these words In the name of God Amen We Thomas Bishop of Worcester do accuse thee Iohn Badby being a lay man of our Dioces of and vpon the crime of heresie before vs sitting for cheese iudge being oftentimes confessed
to the relation of these foresayd coÌ„stitutious of that clergy meÌ„ here coÌ„meth in more to be said and noted touching yâ— foresayd Statute ex Officio to proue the same not onely to be cruell and impious but also to be of it selfe of no force and validitie for the burning of anye person for cause of Religion for the disprofe of whiche statute we haue sufficient authoritie remayning as yet in the parliament Rolles to be seene in her maiesties Courte of Recordes which here were to be debated at large but that vpon speciall occasioÌ„ we haue differed the ampâ—e discourse therof to the cruell persecution of the Lord Cobhame hereafter ensuing as may appeare in the defence of the sayd lord Cobham agaynst Nicholas Happeffield vnder the title and name of Alanus Copus And thus referring them for the examination of this statute to the place aforesaid let vs now returne to Thomas Arundel and his bloudy constitutions aboue mentioned The stile and tenour wherof to the intent the rigour of the same may appeare to all men I thought hereunder to adioyne in wordes as followeth * The constitution of Thomas Arundell agaynst the followers of Gods truth Thomas by the permission of God Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all Englande and Legate of the see Apostolicke To all and singuler our reuerend brethren fellow Bishops and our Suffraganes And to Abbots Priours Deanes of Cathedrall Churches Archdeacons Prouostes and Canons also to all persons vicares chaplaynes Clerkes in Parish Churches and to all lay meÌ„ whome and where so euer dwelling win our prouince of Canterbury greeting grace to stand firmely in the doctrine of the holy mother Church It is a manifest playne case that he doth wrong and iniury to the most reuerend councell who so reuolteth from the thinges being in the sayd Councell once discussed and decided And whosoeuer dare presume to dispute of the supreme or principall iudgment here in earth in so doing incurreth the payne of sacrilege according to the authoritie of ciuill wisedome and and manifest tradition of humayne law Much more then they who trusting to theyr own wittes are so bold to violate and with contrary doctrine to resist and in word and deede to contemne the preceptes of lawes and Canons rightly made and proceeding from the kaybearer and porter of eternall life and death bearing the rowme and person not of pure man but of true God here in earth which also haue bene abserued hitherto and of yâ— holy father 's our predecessoures vnto the glorious effusion of theyr bloud voluntary sprinkling out of theyr braynes Are worthy of greater punishmeÌ„t deseruing quickly to be cut off as rotten members from the body of the Church militent For such ought to consider what is in the old testament written Moses and Aaron among hys Priestes that is were chiefe heads amongst them And in the new Testament among the Apostles there was a certayne difference And though they were all Apostles yet was it graunted of the Lord to Peter that he should beare preeminence aboue the other Apostles And also the Apostles themselues woulde the same that he shoulde be the chiefetayn ouer all the rest And being called Cephas that is head shold be as Prince ouer the Apostles Unto whome it was sayd Thou beyng once conuerted confirme thy brethren as though he wold say If there happen any doubt among them or if anye of them chaunce to erre and stray out of the way of fayth of iust liuing or right conuersation Doe thou confirme and reduce him in the right way againe Which thing no doubt the Lord would neuer haue sayd vnto him if he had not so minded that the rest should be obedient vnto him And yet al this notwithstanding we know and dayly proue that we are sory to speake howe the olde Sophister the enemy of mankinde foreseeing and fearing left that sound doctrine of the church determined from ancient times by the holy forefathers should withstand his malices if it might keep the people of god in vnitie of faith vnder one head of yâ— church doth therfore endeuour by al meanes possible to extirp the sayd doctrine feyning vices to be vertues And so vnder false pretences of veritie dissimuled soweth discorde in catholike people to the intent that some goyng one way some an other He in the meane time may gather to himselfe a Church of the malignant differing wickedly from the vniuersall mother holy church In the which Satan transforming hymselfe into an Angell of light bearing a lying and deceitfull ballaunce in hys haÌ„d pretendeth great righteousnes in contrarying the ancient doctrine of the holye mother church and refusing the traditions of the same determined and appoynted by holy fathers perswading meÌ„ by fayned forgeries the same to be nought and so inducing other new kindes of doctrine leading to more goodnes as he by his lying perswasions pretendeth although he in very truth neither willeth nor mindeth any goodnes but rather that he may sow schismes wherby diuers opinions contrary to themselues being raysed in that Church fayth thereby may be diminished and also the reuerend holy misteries through the same contention of words may be prophaned with Paganes Iewes and other infidels and wicked miscreantes And so that figure in the Apos 6. is well verified speaking of him that sate on the blacke horse bearing a payre of balaunce in hys hand by that which heretiques are vnderstand Who at the first appearaunce lyke to weightes or ballance make as though they would set forth right and iust thinges to allure the hartes of the hearers But afterward appeareth the blacke horse that is to say their intention full of cursed speaking For they vnder a diuers shew and colour of a iust ballance with the tayle of a blacke horse sprinkling abroad heresies and erroures do strike And beyng poysoned themselues vnder colour of good rayse vp infinite slaunders and by certayn persons fitte to doe mischiefe do publish abroad as it were the sugred tast of hony mixt with poyson therby the sooner to be taken working and causing through their slight and subtiltyes that errour shoulde be taken for veritye wickednes for holines and for the true will of Christ. Yea and moreouer the foresayd persons thus picked out do preach before they be sent and presume to sow the seede before the seede discreetely be seperate from the chaffe Who not pondering the constitutions and decrees of the Canons prouided for the same purpose agaynst suche pestilent sowers do preferre sacrifice Diabolicall so to terme it before obedience be geuen to the holy Church militant We therfore considering and weying that error which is not resisted seemeth to be allowed and hee that openeth hys bosome to wyde whiche resisteth not the viper thinking there to thrust out her venome And willing moreouer to shake off the dust from our feete and to see to the honor of our holy mother Church whereby one
name for to encrease my beliefe and to helpe my vnbeliefe And for because to the praysing of Gods name I desire aboue all things to be a faithfull meÌ„ber of holy church I make this protestaâ—oÌ„ before you all foure that are now here present couering that all men women that now be absent knew the same that is what thing so euer before this time I haue sayde or done or what thing here I shall doe or say at any time hereafter I beleeue that all the olde law and the new law geuen and ordeined by the couÌ„sell of the three persons of the Trinity were geuen and written to the saluatioÌ„ of mankind And I beleue that these lawes are sufficient for mans saluation And I beleue euery article of these lawes to the intent that these articles ordeined and commaunded of these 3 persons of the most blessed trinity are to be beleued And therfore to yâ— rule the ordinaunce of these Gods lawes meekely gladly and wilfully I submit me with all mine hart that whosoeuer can or wll by authority of gods lawe or by open reason tell me that I haue erred or nowe erre or any time hereafter shall erre in any article of beliefe from which inconuenience God keepe me for hys goodnesse I submit me to be reconciled and to be buxum obedient vnto those lawes of God and to euery article of theÌ„ For by authority specially of these lawes I will thorow the grace of God be vntied charitably vnto these lawes Yea sir ouer this I beleeue admit all the senteÌ„ces authorities and reasoÌ„s of the saynts doctors according vnto holy scripture and declaring it truely I submit me wilfully and meekely to be euer obedient after my cunning and power to all these saynts and Doctors as they are obedient in worke and in word to God to his law and further not to my knowledge not for any earthly power dignitye or state thorow the helpe of God But sir I pray you tell me if after your bidding I shal lay my hand vpon the booke to what entent to sweare thereby And the Archby sayd to me yea wherefore els And I said to him Syr a book is nothing els but a thing coupled together of diuers creatures and to swere by any creature both Gods law and mans law is agaynst it But Syr this thing I say here to you before these your clerkes with my foresayd protestation that how where when and to whom men are bouÌ„d to sweare or to obey in any wise after Gods law and saints and true Doctours according vnto Gods law I will thorow Gods grace be euer ready thereto with all my cunning and power But I pray you sir for the charitye of God that ye will before that I sweare as I haue here rehearsed to you tell me how or whereto that I shal submit me and shew me wherof that ye will correct me and what is the ordinaunce that ye will thus oblige me to fulfill ¶ And the Archbishop sayd vnto me I will shortly that now thou sweare here to me that thou shalt forsake al the opinions which the sect of Lollordes holde and is slaundered with so that after this time neither priuilye nor apertly thou hold any opinion which I shal after thou hast sworne rehearse to thee here Nor thou shalt fauor no maÌ„ nor woman young nor olde that holdeth any these foresayd opinions but after thy knowledge and power thou shalt force thee to wtstaÌ„d al such distroublers of holy church in euery dioces that thou commest in and them that wyll not leaue their false and damnable opinioÌ„s thou shalt put them vp publishing them and theyr names and make theÌ„ knowne to the bishop of the dioces that they are in or to that bishops ministers And ouer this I will that thou preach no more vnto the time that I know by good witnesse true that thy conuersation be such that thy hart and thy mouth accord truely in one contrarying all the seud learning that thou hast taught here before ☞ And I hearing these wordes thought in my hart that this was an vnlefull asking and demed my selfe cursed of God if I consented hereto I thought how Susan sayd Anguish is to me on euery side And in that I stoode still and spake not the Archbishop sayd to me Aunswere one wise or other And I sayd Syr if I consented to you thus as ye haue here before rehersed to me I should becom an appealer or euery bishops espy somoner of al EnglaÌ„d For and I should thus put vp and publish the names of men and women I should herein deceiue full many persons Yea sir as it is likely by the dome of my conscience I should herein be cause of the death both of men and womeÌ„ yea both bodely and ghostly For many men women that stand now in the way of saluation if I should for the learning and reading of theyr beleue publish them therfore vp to Bishops or to their vnpiteous ministers I know some deale by experience that they should be so distroubled diseased with persecution or otherwise that many of theÌ„ I thinke would rather chuse to forsake the way of truth theÌ„ to be trauailed scorned slauÌ„dered or punished as bishops and their ministers now vse for to constrayne men women to consent to them But I finde in no place in holy scripture that this office that ye would now enfeaffe me with accordeth to any Priest of Christes sect nor to any other christen man And therefore to do this were to me a full noyous bond to bee bouÌ„deÌ„ with ouer greuous charge For I suppose that if I thus did many men and women would yea Syr might iustly vnto my confusion say to me that I were a traytor to God and to them since as I thinke in mine hart many men women trust so mikle in this case that I would not for sauing of my life doe thus to them For if I thus should do full many men women would as they might full truely say that I had falsly and cowardly forsaken the truth and slaundered shamefully the word of God For if I consented to you to do here after your will for bonchefe or mischief that may befall to me in this life I deme in my coÌ„science that I were worthy herefore to be cursed of god and also of all his Saynts fro which inconuenience keep me and all christeÌ„ people almighty God now and euer for his holy name And then the Archbishop sayd vnto me Oh thine hart is ful hard indurate as was the hart of Pharao and the deuill hath ouercomen thee and peruerted thee he hath so blinded thee in all thy wittes that thou hast no grace to know the trueth nor the measure of mercye that I haue proferred to thee Therfore as I perceiue now by the foolish auÌ„swere thou hast no wil to leaue thine old errors But
penaunce and paynes limited by the Canons be vnreasonable and vniust for the austerity and rigorousnes which they conteine more then are taxed by Gods law He also doth exemplify of the solemne and publicke deniall of penitentes to be receiued into orders according to the decree of the generall Councell Distinctione 50. cap Ex poenitentibus Also of the seuenfold penitence of a priest committing fornication according to the chapter Praes biter Distinct. 82. And farther sheweth an other example of the penitence of Priestes according to that chater Qui praes biterum c. Whereas the decretall of the generall Counsell sayth that such a one ought to remayne continuing his life in the warres and not to mary And how Innocentius 3. brought in a new founde confession whereby the Priestes do oppresse the simple lay men And that many other things they do compelling them to confesse themselues to blind and ignoraunt Priests in whom is nothing els then pride and couetousnes hauing suche in contempt as are learned and wise Also that the Decretall of Innocentius 3. touching the foresayd auricular or vocal confession was brought in and inuented to intricate intangle mens consciences with sinne to draw thē downe to hell And furthermore that such maner of confession destroyeth the Euangelicall libertye and doth let men to inquire after to retayn the wise counsell doctrine of such as be gods priests which know faithfully how to obserue his precepts and commaundements which would willingly teach the people the right way to heauē For which abuse all Christen men and spicially all Englishmē ought to exciayne agaynst such wicked lawes As touching the Sacrament of order he sayth That al good christians are predestinate and be ordeined of God made true Priestes to offer Christ in themselues and to Christ themselues as also to teach and preach the Gospell to their neighbors as well in word as in exāple of liuing But the worldly shauelings do more magnify the naked bare signes of priesthood inuented by sinfull men then the true perfect priesthood of God grounded by a true liuely sayth annexed with good works Also if it were needfull to haue such shauelinges God knoweth how can make when it pleaseth him priestes without mans working sinfull signes that is to say without either sacramentes or characters to be known discerned of the people by their vertuous life and example and by their true preaching of the law of God for so made he the first made priestes elders before the law of Moyses and so made he Moyses a priest before Aaron before the ceremonies of the law without mans operation at all And euen so hath God made al such as are predestinate to be his priestes But such as be true Christians receiue none such as Priestes but vnlesse they follow Christ and his apostles neither do they beleue that they make the sacrament of the auitar which they affirme to be Gods body when it pleaseth thē least happely God be not with them forasmuch as that they do this thing for couetousnes sake or els to brag of their owne power And therfore such as be simple men will worship that Sacrament in this doubtfulnes with a silent conditiō that is if it be made by Gods authority and to haue their deuotiō to the body of Christ in heauen Also that as such be elders if they be Gods priestes be Bishops Prelates and Curats of their Christian brethren whom they may lead to heauē by the example of their holy conuersariō and by preaching of the gospell although they make no sacrifice to that Antichrist of Rome for their confirmation neither be they dedicated to the world by secular diuine thinges and by consuming the liuinges of the poore as be those secular bishops prelates curates Also that although there were no pope according as the custome of the church is yet Christ which is the hed of his church doth ordeyne such a Pope as pleaseth him and that is whomsoeuer is most humble lowly and best doth the office of a true Priest although he be vnknown to the world And although ther were no such proud bishop aboue all the rest as the church doth vse yet all the priestes might well gouern the church by common asient as once they did before such wordly pride crept in amōgst the Bishops c. And admit that no such Priestes were according to the accustomed vse now of receiuing of order torsure by such a mytred Byshoppe and his tonsure yet Christ knoweth both how to make and chuse such as shall well please him both in conuersation of life sincere preaching of the Gospell in ministring to his people all necessary sacraments And euery holy man which is a minister of Christ although he be not shauen is a true Priest ordeined of God although no mitred Bishoppe euer lay his character vpon him So that the Pope and Prelates doe make more estimation of their Characters as tonsures crownes by them inuented then of the true and perfect priesthood ordeined of God whereas all those that are predostinate are true Priestes made of him As touching the authoritye of the keyes and censures no Christian man ought to esteeme Sathan whom men call the pope and his vniust cēsures more then the hissing of a serpēt or the blast of Lucifer Also that no man ought to trust or put confidence in the false indulgences of couetous Priestes which indulgences do draw away the hope which men ought to repose in God to a sort of sinful men and do robbe the poore of such almes as is geuen to them Such Priestes be manifest betrayers of Christ and of the whole Church and be Sathans own stuardes to beguyle christen soules by theyr hipocrisy and fayned pardons Also forasmuch as those prelates and clergy men liue so execrable a life contrary to the gospel of Christ and examples of his Apostles teach not truly the gospell but only lies and the traditions of sinfull wicked men It appereth most manifestly that they haue not the keyes of the kingdome of heauen but rather the keyes of hell And they may be right well assured that God neuer gaue vnto them authority to make establish so many ceremonies traditions which be contrary to the liberty of the Gospell and are blocks in christen mens wayes that they can neither know nor obserue the same his Gospel in liberty of cōscience and so attayne a ready way to heauen Also that al maner of religious men notwithstanding the chapter Religiosi touching the priuiledges in the Clementines may lawfully minister all sacramēts to the that are worthy the same Forasmuch as the same is a worke of charity which onely the will and ordinance of the pope and his sautors in this case is to hinder and set Item if the Pope shall interdict this our realme that connot hurt vs but much
Wherunto by the cōtentes of this scedule it is not fully answered and therfore you must answere therunto more plainely expresse declare your fayth opinions as touching those poynts in the same bill That is to say whither you hold beleue and affirme that in the sacrament of the aultar after the cōsecration rightly done there remayneth materiall bread or not Item whether you hold beleue and affirme that it is necessary in the sacrament of penaunce for a man to cōfesse his sinnes vnto a priest appoynted by the church The which articles in this maner deliuered vnto him amongst many other thinges he answered plainly that he would make no other declaration or answere therunto thē was conteyned in the sayd Scedule Wherupon we fauoring the sayd sir Iohn with benigne gentle meanes we spake vnto him in this manner Sir Iohn take heed for if you do not playnly answere to these things which are obiected agaynst you within a lawful time now graūted you by the Iudges we may declare you to be an hereticke but the said sir Iohn perseuered as before and would make no other answere Consequently notwithstanding we together with our sayd felow brethren and others of our counsell took aduise and by their counsell declared vnto the said sir Iohn Oldcastle that the sayd holy Church of Rome in this matter following the saying of blessed S. Augustine Ierome Ambrose and other holy men hath determined the which determinations euery catholicke ought to obserue Wherupon the said sir Iohn answered that he would beleue and obserue whatsoeuer the holy Church determined and whatsoeuer god would he should obserue and beleue But that he would in no case affirme that our Lord the Pope the cardinals Archbishops and Bishops or other prelates of the church haue any power to determine any such matters Wherunto we yet fauoring him vnderhope of better aduisement promised the sayd sir Iohn that we would geue him in writing certaine determinatiōs vpon the matter aforesaid Wherunto he should more plainly answere writtē in latin and for his better vnderstanding translated into English wherupon we commaunded and hartily desired him that agaynst monday next folowing he should geue a playne full answere the which determinations we caused to be trāslated the same day to be deliuered vnto him the sonday next folowing The tenor of which determinations here folow in this maner The fayth and determination of that holy Churche vpon the holy Sacrament of the aultar is this That after the consecration done in the masse by that priest that material bread shall be chaunged into the materiall bodye of Christ the materiall wine into the materiall bloud of Christ. Therfore after the consecratiō there remayneth no more any substāce of bread and wine which was there before What doe you answere to this article Also the holy church hath determined that euery christian dwelling vpon earth ought to confesse his sinnes vnto a priest ordeined by the Church if he may come vnto hym How thinke you by this article Christ ordeined S. Peter his Vicare in earth whose seat is in the Church of Rome geuing and graunting the same authority whiche he gaue vnto Peter also to his successours which are now called Hopes of Rome in whose power it is to ordeine and institute prelates in particulare churches As Archbishops bishops curates and other ecclesiastical orders vnto whom the Christian people ought obedience according to the traditiō of the church of Rome This is the determination of the holy church What thinke you by this article Besides this the holy Church hath determined that it is necessary for euery christian to go on pilgrimage to holy places there specially to worship the holy reliques of the Apostles Martirs confessors all sayntes whosoeuer the church of Rome hath allowed What thinke you of this article Upon which monday being the 25. day of the sayd moneth of September before vs and our felow brethrē aforesayd hauing also takē vnto vs our reuerēd brother Benedict by the grace of God Bishop of Bangor by our cōmaundement our counsellers and ministers Master Henry ware officiall of our court of Cant. Philip Morgan D. of both lawes Dowell Kissin Doctor of the decretals Iohn Kempe and William Carlton Doctors of law Ioh Witnā Thomas Palmer Rob. Wombewell Iohn Withe and Robert Chamberlayne Richard Dotington Thomas Walden professors of diuinity Also Iames Cole I. Steuens our notaries appointed on this behalf They all and euery one being sworne vpon that holy gospell of god laying their handes vpon the booke that they shoulde geue theyr faythfull counsell in and vpō the maner aforesayde and in euery such cause and to the whole world By and by appered sir Robert Morley Knight Lieuetenant of the Tower of London and brought with him the foresayde Syr I Oldcastle setting him before vs. Unto whom we gentlye and familiarly rehearsed the actes of the day before passed And as before we tolde him that he both is and was excōmunicate requiring and intreating him that he would desire and receiue in due forme the absolution of the Church Unto whom the said Syr Iohn then and there plainly answered that in this behalfe he would require no absolutiō at our handes but onely of God Then afterward by gentle and soft meanes we desires and required him to make playne answere vnto the articles which were laid against him And first of al as touching the Sacrament of the aultar To the which article besides other thinges he answered and sayd thus That as Christ being here in earth had in him both Godhead manhoode Notwithstanding the Godhead was couered and inuisible vnder the humanity the which was manifest and visible in him so likewise in the sacrament of the aultar there is the very body and very bread bread which we do see the body of Christ hidden vnder the same which we do not see And playnly denyed that the fayth as touching the said Sacrament determined by the Romish church and holy doctors and sent vnto him by vs in the sayd Schedule to be the determination of the holy Church But if it be the determination of the Church he sayd that it was done contrary vnto the scriptures after the church was endowed and that poyson was poured into the Churche and not afore Also as touching the Sacrament of penance and confession he playnly sayd and affirmed thē and there that if any man were in any greuous sinne out of the which he knew not how to rise it were expedient and good for him to go vnto some holy and discreet priest to take counsell of him But that he shoulde confesse his sinne to any proper Priest or to any other although he might haue the vse of him it is not necessary to saluation for so much as by only contrition such sinne can be wiped a way the sinner himselfe purged As concerning the worshipping of
Christenmasse what condites were made what Maiors and shirifes were in London what battails were fought what triumphs and great feasts were holdē when kings began their raigne and when they ended c. In such vulgare and popular affairs the narration of the Chronicler serueth to good purpose may haue his credite wherein the matter forceth not much whether it be true or false or whether any listeth to beleue them But where as a thyng is denied and in cases of iudgement and in controuersies doubtfull which are to be decided and boulted out by euidence of iust demonstration I take them neither for Iudges of the bench not for arbiters of the cause nor as witnesses of themselues sufficient necessarily to be sticked vnto Albeit I deny not but hystories are takē many times and so termed for witnesses of times and glasses of antiquitie c. yet not such witnesses as whose testimony beareth alwaies a necessary truth and bindeth beliefe The two witnesses whych came against Susanna being seniours both of auncient yeares bare a great countenance of a most euidēt testimony wherby they almost both deceiued the people oppressed the innocent had not yōg Daniel by the holy spirite of God haue take thē aside and seuerally examining them one from the other found them to be falsliers both leauing to vs therby a lesson of wholsome circumspection not rashly to beleeue euery one that commeth and also teaching vs how to try thē out Wherfore M. Cope following here the like example of Daniel in trying these your records whom ye inferre against these men we wil in like maner examine them seuerally one frō an other and see how their testimonie agreeth first beginning wyth your Robert Fabian Which Robert Fabian being neither in the same age nor at the deede doing can of himselfe geue no credite herein without due proofe and euidence conuenient Now thē doth Rob. Fabian proue this matter of treason true what probation doeth he bring what authoritie doth he alleage And doth Rob. Fabian thinke if he were not disposed to conceiue of the L. Cobham and those men a better opinion but to be traitors that men are bounde to beleue him only at his word without any ground or cause declared why they shuld so do but only because he so saith and pleased him so to write And if yee thinke M. Cope the word only of this witnes sufficient to make authority speaking against the Lord Cobham and prouing nothing which followed so many yeres after him why may not I as well and much rather take the worde and testimonie of Richard Belward a Northfolke man and of the towne of Crisam who liuing both in his time possible knowing the party punished also for the like trueth is not reported but recorded also in the registers of the church of Norwich to geue this testimonie among other his articles for the foresaid L. Cobham that is that sir Iohn Oldcastle was a true Catholike man and falsely condemned and put to death wythout a reasonable cause c. Ex Regist. Noruic Agaynst this man if you take exception say that one hereticke will hold with an other why may not I with the like exception reply to you agayne say as well one Papist hold with an other and both cōiure together to make and say the worst agaynst a true Protestant Further yet to examine this foresayd Fabian witnes agaynst Sir Iohn Oldcastle as Daniell examined that witnesses agaynst Susanna I will not here aske vnder what tree these adherentes of sir I. Oldcastle conspired agaynst the king subuersion of that land but in what time in what yeare and moneth this conspiracie was wrought Fabian witnesseth that it was in the moneth of Ianuary Cōtrary Edward Hall other our Abridgementers followyng him doe affirme that they were condemned in the Guild hall the xij of December and that their executiō vpon the same was in Ianuary followyng so that by their sentence the fact was done either in the moneth of Decēber or els before so Fabianus mentitus est in caput suum vt cū Daniele dicam or if it were in the moneth of Ianuary as Fabian sayth then is Hall and his followers deceiued testifying the fact to be done in the moneth of December And yet to obiect moreouer against the sayd Fabiā for so much as he is such a rash witnes agaynst these burned persons whom he calleth traytors it would be demaūded further of him or in his absence of Maister Cope in what yeare this treason was conspired If it were in the same yeare as he cōfesseth himselfe in which yeare Iohn Cleidon the Skinner Richard Turmine Baker were burned then was it neither in the moneth of Ianuary nor in the first yeare of kyng Henry the fift For in the register of Cāterbury it appeareth playne that Iohn Claydon was condemned neither in the tyme of Thom. Arundell Archbyshop nor yet in the first nor second yeare of kyng Henry the v. but was cōdemned in the second yeare of the translation of Henry Chichesly Archbyshop of Canterbury the. 17. day of August which was the yeare of our Lord. 1415. So that if this conspiracie was in the same yeare after the witnesse of Fabiā in which yeare I. Cleydon was burned then doth the testimony of Fabian neither accord with other witnesses nor with him selfe nor yet with truth And thus much concerning the witnes of Rob. Fabian Let vs next proceede to Polidore Uirgill whose partiall and vntrue handling of our history in other places of of his bookes doth offer vnto vs sufficient exception not to admit his credite in this And yet because we will rather examine him then exclude him let vs heare a little what he sayth how he fayleth in how many pointes numbring the same vpon my fiue fingers First ending with the life of king Henry 4. hee sayeth that hee raigned 14. 14. yeares and 6. moneths and 2. dayes Angl. hist. lib. 21. whyche is an vntruth worthy to be punyshed wyth a whole yeares banishment to speake after the maner of Apulenis when as truth is he raigned by the testimony of the story of S. Albones of Fabian of Hall of our old English Chronicle and of Scala mundi but 13. 6. moneths lacking as some say 5. dayes Hal saieth he raigned but 12. yeares The second vntruth of Polydore is this where as hee speaking of this sedition of sir Iohn Oldcastle and his adherents affirmeth the same to be done after the burning of Iohn Hus and of Hierome of Prage whych was sayeth he An. 1415. in which yere sayth he Thomas Arundell died Hys wordes be these In eodem concilio damnata est Ioh. Wicliffi haeresis ac Ioan. Hus Hieronymus Pragensis in ea vrbe combusti sunt Quod vbi reliquis consocijs qui etiam tunc in Anglia erant patefit tanquam furijs agitati primùm
For in that that euery one that worketh more meritoriously to the profite of the Church he hath so much the more greater authoritie from God 25. There is not so muche as one sparke of appearaunce that there ought to be one head ruling and gouerning the church in spirituall causes which should alwayes be conuersaunt in the church millitaâ—â— For Christ without anye such monstrous heds by his â—â—ue disciples sparsed through the whole world could better a great deale rule his church 26. The Apostles and faythfull priests of God haue right worthily in al thinges necessary to saluation gouerned the church before the popes office tooke place and so might they doe agayne by like possibilitie vntill Christ came to iudgement if the popes office should fayle Let euery one that is suspected in the foresayd articles or els otherwise found with assertion of them Be examined in maner and forme as followeth IN primis whether he knew Iohn Wicleffe of Englande Iohn Hus of Bohemia and Hierome of Prage or anye of them and how he came by the knowledge of them whither that during the liues of them or any of them they had eyther bene conuersant with them or found any frendship at their handes 2. Item whether he knowing them or any of them to be excommunicate did willingly participate with them esteming affirming the same their participacioÌ„ to be no sin 3. Item whither that after their deathes he euer prayed for them or any of them openly or priuily doing any work of mercy for them affirming them to be either saintes or els to be saued 4. Item whether he thought them or anye of them to be Saintes or whether that euer he spake such wordes and whether euer he did exhibite any worshippe vnto them as vnto saintes 5. Item whether he beleue hold and affirme that euery generall councell as also the Councell of Constance doth represent the vniuersall Church 6. Item whether he doth beleue that that which the holy Councell of Constance representing the vniuersall church hath and doth alow in the fauour of the fayth and saluatioÌ„ of soules is to be approued and allowed of all the faythfull Christians and that whatsoeuer the same Councell hath condemned and doth condemne to be contrary both to the fayth and to all good men is to beleued holden and affirmed for condemned or not 7. Item whether he beleueth that the condemnations of Iohn Hus Iohn Wickleffe and Hierome of Prage made as well vpon their persons as their bookes and doctrine by the holy generall Councelll of Constance be rightly iustly made and of euery good Catholicke man are so to be holden and affirmed or not 8. Item whether he beleue hold and affirme that Iohn Wickleffe of England Iohn Hus of Bohemia and Hierome of Prage were heretickes or not and for heretickes to be nominated preached yea or not and whether theyr bookes and doctrines were and be peruerse or not for the which together with their pertinacie they wre condemned by the holye sacred Councell of Constaunce for heretiques 9. IteÌ„ whether he haue in his custody any treatises smal workes Epistles or other writinges in what language or tongue soeuer set forth and translated by any of these heretickes Iohn Wickleffe Iohn Hus and Hierome or any other of their false Disciples and followers that he may deliuer them to the ordinaries of that place or his commissary or to the inquisitours vpon hys othe And if he say that he hath no such writing about him but that they are in some other place that then you sweare him to bring the same before his Ordinary or other aforenamed within a certayne time to him prefixed 10. Item whether he knoweth any that hath the treatises works Epistles or anye other writinges of the aforesayd Iohn Wickleffe Iohn Hus and Hierome in whatsouer tong they are made or translated and that he detect manifest the same for the purgation of their fayth and execution of iustice 11. Item especially let the learned be examined whether he beleueth that the sentence of the holy Councell of Constance vpon the 45. articles of Iohn Wickleffe and the 30. Articles of Iohn Hus be not Catholicke which sayth that some of them are notorious hereticall some erroneous other some blasphemous some slaunderous some rash and seditious some offensiue to godly eares 12. Item whether he beleeueth and affirmeth that in no case it is lawfull for a man to sweare 13. Item whether he beleueth that at the commaundement of a iudge or any other it is lawfull to take an oth to tell the truth in anye conuenient cause although it be but purging of an infamy or not 14. Item whether he beleueth that periury wittingly coÌ„mitted vppon what cause soeuer whether it be for yâ— safegard of hys owne life or of any other mans lyfe yea although it be in the cause and defence of the fayth be a sinne or not 14. Item whether a man contemning purposedly the rites of the Churche and the ceremonies of exorcisme of Cathechisme and the consecration of the water of Baptisme be deadly sinne or not 16 Item whether he beleue that after the consecration of the priest in the sacrament of the aultar vnder the figure of bread and wyne be no materiall bread and wyne but in al poyntes the same very Christ which was crucified vppon the Crosse and sitteth vpon the right hand of the father 17. Item whether he beleeue that after the consecration made by the priest vnder the onely forme of bread and besides the forme of wyne be the very flesh of Christ and hys bloud hys soule and hys deitie and so whole Christ as he is and in likewise vnder the forme of wine without the forme of bread bee the very fleshe of Christ and hys very bloud his soule and deitie and so whole Christ the same body absolutely vnder euery one of those kinds singularly 18. Item whether he doth beleue that the custome of houseling of the lay people vnder the forme of bread only obserued of the vniuersall Church and allowed by the onely Councell of Constance be to be vsed and not without the authoritie of the Churche at mens pleasures to be altered and that they that obstinately affirme the contrary to this are to be punished as heretickes or not 19. Item whether he beleue that those whiche contemne the receiuing of the sacramentes of confirmation or extreme vnction or els the solemnisation of matrimony coÌ„mit deadly sinne or not 20. Item whether he beleeue that a Christian man ouer and besides the contrition of hart being licensed of a conuenient priest is bound to confesse himselfe only to a priest and not to any lay man be he neuer so deuout or good vpon the necessitie of saluation 21. Item whether he beleue that in the cases before put a priest may absolue a sinner confessing himself and being contrite from all sinnes and enioyne him penaunce for the same
22. Item whether he beleueth that an euill Priest with due maner and forme and with the intentiō of doing doth verily consecrate doth verily absolue doth verily baptise and doth verily dispose all other sacramentes euen as the Church doth 23. Item whether he beleeue that Saint Peter was the Uicar of Christ hauing power to bynde and to lose vppon the earth 24. Item whether he beleue that the Pope being canonically elect whiche for the tyme shall be by that name expresly be the successor of Peter or not hauing supreme authoritie in the Church of God 25. Item whether he beleue that the authoritie of iurisdiction of the Pope an archbishop or a Bishop in binding loosing be more then the authorititie of a simple priest or not although he haue charge of soules 26. Item whether he beleue that the pope may vpon a iust and good cause geue indulgēces and remission of sins to all Christian men being verily contrite and confessed especially to those that go on pilgrimage to holy places and good deedes 27 Item whether he beleue that by such graunt the pilgrimes that visite those Churches and geue thē any thing may obtayne remission of sinnes or not 28. Item whether he beleue that all Bishops may graūt vnto their subiectes according as the holy Canons doe limit such indulgences or not 29. Item whether he beleue and affirme that it is lawfull for faythfull Christians to worship Images and the reliques of sayntes or not 30. Item whether he beleue that those religions whiche the Churche hath allowed were lawfully and reasonably brought in of the holy fathers or not 31. Item whether he beleueth that the pope or any other Prelate for the time being or their vicars may excommunicate their subiect Ecclesiasticall or secular for disobediēce or contumacie so that such a one is to be holden and taken for excommunicate or not 32. Item whether ye beleue that for the disobediēce and contumacie of persons excommunicate increasing the prelates or their vicares in spirituall thinges haue power to agrauate and to reagrauate to put vpon men the interdict and to call for the secular arme and that the same secular arme or power ought to be obedient to the censures by their inferiors called for 33. Item whether he beleue that the pope and other prelates or els their vicares haue power in spirituall things to excommunicate priestes and lay men that are stubberne and disobedient from theyr office benefice or entrance into the church and from the administration of the sacraments of the Church also to suspend them 34. Item whether he beleue that it is lawfull for ecclesiasticall persons without committing sinne to haue anye possessions temporall goodes and whether he beleeue that it is not lawfull for lay men to take away the same from thē by their authoritie but rather that such takers away incrochers vpō ecclesiasticall goods are to be punished as committers of sacriledge yea although such Ecclesiasticall persons liue naughtely that haue such goodes 35. Item whether any such taking away or incrochyng vpō any priest rashly or violently made although the priest be an euill liuer be sacriledge or not 36. Item whether he beleue that it is lawfull for lay mē of whether sexe soeuer that is men and women to preache the word of God or not 37. Item whether he beleue that it is lawfull to al priestes freely to preach the word of God whersoeuer whensoeuer and to whom soeuer it shal please them althogh they be not sent at all 38. Item whether he beleue that all mortall sinnes and especiall such as be manifest and publike are to be corrected and to be extirpate or not Furthermore wee will commaunde and decree that if any by secrete information by you or any other to be receiued shall be founde either enfamed or suspected of anye kind of the pestiferous sect heresie doctrine of the most pestilence men I. Wickleffe I. Hus and Hierome of Prage the archheretickes aforesaid or of fauoring receiuing or defending the foresayd damned men whilest they liued on the earth their false followers and disciples or any that beleeueth their errours or any that after their death pray for thē or any of them or that nominateth them to be amongst the number of catholick men or that defendeth them to be placed amongst the number of y◠saintes either by their preaching worshipping or otherwaies wherin they deserue to be suspected y◠then they by you or some of you may be cited personally to appeare before you or some of you wtout either Proctor or Doctor to answere for them an oth being opēly taken by them as is aforesayd to speak the plain mere veritie of the articles aboue written and euery of them or other oportune as case and circumstance shall require according to your discretion as you or anye of you shall see expediēt to proceed against them or any of them according to these presentes or otherwise canonically as you shall thinke good Also that you do publish solemnly cause to be published these present letters omitting the articles interrogatories herein contayned in the citties other places of your dioces where conueniently you may vnder our authoritie there to denounce and cause to be denounced all singular such hereticks with their abbetters fauorers of their heresies erroures of what sexe or kinde soeuer that do hold defend the sayd erroures or doe participate any maner of way with heretickes priuely or apertly of what state dignitie or condition soeuer he or they be Patriarche Archbishop king Queene Duke or of what other dignitie either Ecclesiasticall or seculare he be also with their aduocates and procurators whosoeuer whiche are beleuers followers fauourers defenders or receiuers of such heretickes or suspected to be beleuers followers fautors defenders or receiuers of them to be excommunicate euery sonday and festiuall day in the presence of the people Furthermore that you dilligently do to be inquired by the sayd our authoritie vpon all and singular such persons both men and women that mayntayne approue defend teach such erroures or that be fauourers receauers and defenders of them whether exempt or not exempt of what dignitie state preeminence degree order or condition soeuer And such as you shal finde in the sayd your inquisition either by their own confession or by any other meane to be diffamed or otherwise infected with the spot of suche heresie or errour you through the sentence of excommunication suspension interdict and priuation of their dignities personages offices or other benefices of the Church and fees which they hold of any church monastery and other Ecclesiastical places also of honours and secular dignities and degrees of sciences or other faculties as also by other paynes and censures of the Church or by wayes and meanes whatsoeuer els shall seeme to you expedient by taking and imprisoning of their bodies and other corporall punishmentes
make the Pope subiect vnto the Church for it is conuenient that the lesse perfect be subiect vnto the more perfect There be also many other testimonies reasons wherof we will now somewhat more entreate If authoritie be sought for sayth S. Hierome for I willingly occupie my selfe in his senteÌ„ces as in a most fertile field the world is greater then a Citie What then I pray you Hierome Is the Pope mighty because he is head of the Church of Rome His authoritie is great notwithstanding the vniuersall Church is greater which doth not onely coÌ„preheÌ„d one Citie but also the whole world Hereupon it followeth that if the Churche be the mother of all faithfull then she hath the Bishop of Rome for her sonne Otherwise as S. Augustine saith he can neuer haue God for his father which will not acknowledge the Church for his mother The which thing Anacletus vnderstandyng called the vniuersal Church his mother as the writers of the Canons do know And Calixtus sayth as a sonne he came to doe the will of his father so we do the will of our mother which is the Church Whereby it appeareth that how much the sonne is inferiour to the mother so much the Church is superiour or aboue the Bishop of Rome Also we haue sayd before that the Churche was the spouse of Christ the Pope we know to be a Vicare but no maÌ„ doth so ordaine a Vicar that he maketh his spouse subiect vnto him but that the spouse is alwayes thought to be of more authoritie then the Vicar for somuch as she is one body with her husbaÌ„d but the Vicar is not so Neither will I here passe ouer the wordes of S. Paule vnto the Romaines Let euery soule sayth he be subiect vnto the higher powers Neither doth he herein except the pope For albeit that he be aboue all other meÌ„ yet it seemeth necessary the he should be subiect to the Church Neither let him thinke himselfe hereby exeÌ„pt because it was said vnto Peter by Christ whatsoeuer thou bindest c. In this place as we wil hereafter declare he represeÌ„ted the person of the Church for we finde it spoken afterward vnto theÌ„ Quaecunque ligaueritis super terraÌ„ ligata eruÌ„t in coelis i. Whatsoeuer ye shal binde vpoÌ„ earth shall be also bounde in heaueÌ„ And furthermore if all power be geueÌ„ of Christ as the Apostle writeth vnto the CorinthiaÌ„s it is geuen for the edifiyng of the Church not for the destruction therof why then may not the Church correct the Pope if he abuse the keyes and bring all thinges vnto ruine Adde hereunto also an other argument A man in this life is lesser then the aungels for we read in Mathew of Iohn Baptist that he whiche is least in the kingdome of heauen is greater then he Notwithstanding Christ sayth in an other place that amongest the children of women there was not a greater then Iohn Baptist. But to proceede meÌ„ are forced by the exaÌ„pâ—e of Zacharias to geue credite vnto auÌ„gels least through their misbelief they be striken blind as he was What more The Bishop of Rome is a maÌ„ Ergo he is lesse then the aungels and is bound to geue credite to the aungels But the aungels learne of the Church and do reuereÌ„tly accorde vnto her doctrine as the Apostle writeth vnto the EphesiaÌ„s Ergo the pope is bouÌ„d to do the same who is lesse then the aungels and lesse then the Churche whose authoritye is suche that worthely it is compared by S. Augustine vnto the Sunne that lyke as the Sunne by his light doth surmount all other lightes so the church is aboue all other authority and power Wherupon S. Augustine writeth thus I would not beleue the Gospel saith he if the authority of the church did not more me thereunto the which is not in any place souÌ„d to be spoken of the bishop of Rome who representing the Church and being minister thereof is not to be thought greater or equall to hys Lorde and maister Notwythstanding the wordes of our Sauiour Christ do specially proue the Byshop of Rome to be subiect to the church as we will hereafter declare For he sending Peter to preach vnto the church sayd go and say vnto the Church To the confirmation of whole authoritye these wordes do also pertaine hee that heareth you heareth me The which wordes are not onely spoken vnto the Apostles but also vnto their succesaurs and vnto the whole Church Wherupon it foloweth that if the Pope do not harken geue eare vnto the Church he doeth not geue eare vnto Christ consequently he is to be counted as an Ethnicke Publicane For as S. Augustine affirmeth when as the Church doth excommunicate he which is so excommunicate is bounde in heauen and when the Church looseth he is loosed Likewise if he be an heretike which taketh away the supremacie of the Churche of Rome as the Decrees of the councel of Coustance doth determine how much more is he to be counted an hereticke which taketh away the authoritye from the uniuersall Church wherein the Church of Rome and all other are conteined Wherefore it is now euident that it is the opinion of al men before our daies if it may be called an opinion which is confirmed by graue authors the the Pope is subiecte vnto the vniuersall church But this is called into question whether he ought also to be iudged of the general Councel For there are some which whether it be for desire of vaine glory or that thorough their flattery they looke for some great reward haue begon to teach new and strange doctrines and to exempt the byshop of Rome from the iurisdiction of the generall Councel AmbitioÌ„ hath blinded them wherof not only this present Schisme but also all other Schismes euen vnto thys day haue had their originall For as in times past the gredy desire ambition of the papacy brought in that pesriferous beast which through Arrius then first crept into the church euen so they do specially norish and mainteine this present heresie whych are not ashamed to begge Of the which number some cry out say the workes of the subiects ought to be iudged by the Pope but the Pope to be reserued only vnto the iudgemeÌ„t of God Others said that no man ought to iudge the high and principall Seate and that it can not be iudged either by the Emperour either by the Clergy either by any king or people Other affirme that the Lord hath reserued vnto himselfe the depositions of the chiefe Bishop Others are not ashamed to affirme that the Byshop of Rome although hee cary soules in neuer so great number vnto hell yet hee is not subiect vnto any correction or rebuke And because these their words are easily resolued they runne straight waies vnto the Gospell and interprete the wordes of Christ not according to the sense and meaning of the holy Ghost
is a member and geue place vnto the greater part and if hee separate himselfe from the consent of the greater part and depart from the vnity of the Church he maketh himselfe a Schismaticke Now to come vnto the second conclusion if it be true as it is in deede that the Pope is vnder the Councell how can the Pope then dissolue alter and transporte the Councell against the will of the same For wyth what countenance can we say that the inferior hath power ouer the superior How can the Synode correct the Pope if the Pope may dissolue the Synode contrary to the will thereof Admit that the Pope be libidinous couetous a sower of war and discorde and a most mortall enemie vnto the Church and the name of Christ how can the Councel reproue him if he haue authority to dissolue the Councel For assoone as euer that the bishop of Rome shall vnderstande that in the Councell they doe intreat or talke of his correction or punishment straightwaies he wil seke remedy by dissoluing the Councel For as Macrobius sayth he that hath liberty to do more then is fit or necessary wil oftentimes do more then is lawfull If so be that the Bishop of Rome may exempt himself from correction by dissoluing or transporting the Councell it followeth that the Councell is not aboue him Therfore we must either deny that which is aforsaid that the Pope is vnder the Councell or els deny that the Pope hath power to dissolue the Councell contrary to the will and determination of the Councell And as this first conclusion is most true so are al other conclusiōs false which seeme to impugne the same Wherfore the seconde conclusion of the diuines is also manifest albeit that some doe admit it in certaine cases and in other some exclude it againe For if we do admit that for certain causes the Pope may dissolue the Councel contrary to the will and determination thereof that is to say to make the Pope iudge of the Councell it were cleane contrary vnto the first conclusion Now it is proued that the Councell is aboue the Pope can not be dissolued by the Pope wythout consent thereof Nowe we must further see whether it be an Article of our faith to beleeue it Which matter hath respect vnto the third conclusion For there haue bene many which all beit they did confesse these two conclusions to be true yet they doubted whether it were a veritie of the Catholicke fayth or no. Therefore this second part must be confirmed And we must see whether it be an article of faith that the Pope be vnder the councel Which being proued it shall also appeare to be an article of faith that the pope can not dissolue the councell without the consent therof Which consequent none of the contrary part hath refused First of al therefore we must inquire what faith is that wee may thereby the better vnderstand what pertaineth thereunto Faith as the Diuines do define it is a firme and stedfast cleauing vnto things beleued by the authority of hym that speaketh If then we beleeue as is aforesayde that the Pope of Rome is vnder the councell some authority doth moue vs therunto so is it the faith of him which beleeueth it but the question is not whether it be an Article of faith onely but whether it be an Article of the Catholike faith Wherefore we must againe enquire what the Catholicke faith is This word catholike is a Greke word and signifieth vniuersal The catholike faith that is to say the vniuersal faith is not so called because that euery man holdeth it but because euery man ought to beleeue it For all men doe not beleue that God is incarnate but euery man ought so to beleue And albeit the many be against this faith yet doth it not cease to be vniuersall For what wryteth the Apostle vnto the Romains If some of them hath not beleued doth their misbeliefe make the faith of God vaine God forbid Verely God is true but euery man is a lyer Therefore to beleue that the pope is vnder the councell is a poynt of the Catholike faith although some thincke the contrary for we are bound to beleeue it for somuch as it is taken out of the Gospell For we are not bounde onely to beleeue those things which are noted to vs in the Crede but also all those things which are cōtained in the holy Scriptures wherof we may not deny one iote And those things whych we alledge for the superiority of the general Councel are gathered out of the sayings of our Sauiour Iesu Christ and the Epistles of S. Paule Ergo we are all bound to beleeue it And to proue that these things are taken out of the gospel the councell of Constance doth witnesse the which groundeth his authority vpon these wordes Dic Ecclesiae that is to say tel it vnto the Church And where 2. or 3. are gathered together in my name c. And whatsoeuer ye shal bind c. with other such like texts Whereuppon Pope Martine the 4. being yet at Constance vnder the licence of the Councell sent out his bulles which do recken vp the Articles wherupon they ought to be examined which had fallē into any heresy amongst the which articles he putteth this article Whether hee doe beleue the sacred generall Councel to haue power immediatly from God and that the ordinances therof are to be receiued of all faithfull Christians which if any man would deny he should be counted an hereticke Wherefore when as the sacred Synode of Constance doth set forth this verity as touching the superiority of the general Councell what should let but that we also shoulde confesse the same to be a verity of the Catholike faith For the catholike church being congregate at Constance receiued that faith that is to say beleued it by the authority of hym whych spake it that is Christ and his Saintes To this purpose also serueth very well the wordes of the synode of Chalcedon written in this maner It is not lawfull for hym that is condemned by the whole Synode to nominate any Byshop The determination pleaseth all men Thys is the faith of the fathers He that holdeth any opinion contrary vnto this is an hereticke And againe it is a rule that it is not lawfull to appeale from the elect and chosen Synode Marke the manifest witnesse of this moste sacred Synode which said that he is an hereticke which holdeth any opinion contrary vnto the Councell But hee is no hereticke except hee refuse the Catholike faith Ergo it was the Catholicke faith to beleeue that it was not lawfull to appeale from the sacred Councel But howe was the same any poynt of the Catholike faith Verely for somuch as the sacred Synode perusing ouer the holy Scriptures hathe receiued thys conclusion out of the woordes of Christ and other holy fathers And like as the Synode of
say in case of faith the bishops ought to iudge vpon Christian Emperours and not Emperours vpon Bishops Neyther doe we admit their petition but vpō most vrgent causes Notwithstanding we heard them paciently and willingly whiles that they did speake euen so long as they would But now if any of our part would speake by and by he is interrupted troubled and letted What honesty is this What modesty or grauitie is it lawful so to do in the councell◠Where is the decree of the Councel of Tholose now become where are our decrees which do not only prohibitie tumultes but also all small bablinges talk They say it is because we contemne them but they are they which not onely conteme the Councell but also resist the same The patriarke spake but one small worde agaynst them that of no euill intent or purpose and by and by they complayned the their liberty was broken but they when as they do inforce the councell when as they forbid the President to speake and will not suffer the ordinances to be read doe not iudge that they doe any thing contrary to the liberty of the Councell They say they are the Councell themselues and yet they intreat the Councell These thinges doe not I vnderstande for if they be the Councell why doe they intreat thēselues If they be not the Councell why do they not suffer the Councel for to speake Why do they not look for an answere of him to whom they make their petitiōs Truely this is to much violence and certes our paence is also to much to suffer such excesse euen in the face of the Church But this doth most of all greeue me and thys do I most maruell at But this doth most of all greeue me and thys do I most maruell at that Panormitan a man of singular wit and doctrine did cōclude without any discussing or deciding of the deputies and without the examination of the 12. men or any rite or order The which except mine eies had behold seene I would scarsly beleue if any other mā should report it vnto me of him Neither do I yet know whether I may sufficiently credite my selfe the matter seemeth so horrible for I do not see by what authoritie his cōclusion doth stande except it be by the authoritie of hys king whom he sayth will haue it to But you most reuerēd fathers take heed that ye bring in no such custome for so it shall come to passe that in all matters a few froward prelates shall haue me to conclude for them And albeit Parnormitan hath proued as he thinketh by strong reasons that the veritie ought to be deferred yet notwithstanding I do require you most reuerend fathers to follow the example of the Apostle who as Arelatensis hath very wel declared would not geue one houres respite vnto Peter when he swarued frō the truth of the Gospel The sayth is speedely to be relieued holpen neither doth any thing sustaine more danger by delayes thē faith doth For heresies except they be rooted out at the first whē they are once growne are hardly taken away Wherfore I desire you speedily to helpe and ayd Hoyse vp your sayles launch out your ores What should we tary looking for either the Prelats or the princes You are now in conflict I ouely desire that you would hasten vnto the victory Regard not the threatnings of those Princes neyther the opprobries of those contumelious persons for you are blessed sayth the Lord whē as men curse you persecute you speaking all euill agaynst you making lyes and slaunders vpon you for my sake reioice and be glad for great is your reward in heauen What is it I pray you that the princes do so much obiect agaynst vs Is not our Lord God able to take vs out of the furnace of hote burning fire and deliuer vs out of the hands of those princes I beseech you most reuerend fathers and louing brethren haue no lesse hope in Iesus Christ thē Sidrach Misach and Abednago had which feared not that old king Nabuchodouosor and let the princes know that the most high ruleth ouer the kingdomes of men and geueth them vnto whom he pleaseth God beholdeth all thinges from aboue he is I say in the midst amongst vs wherefore are ye then afrayd Be of good courage and shew yourselues as a strong wall for the church of God suffer not the sayth to perish vnder your handes The almighty God is present with you He is present that will defend you Feare not them which seeke onely to kill the body Do iustice and equitie and be assured that he wil not deliuer you ouer into the handes of the bachiter and slaunderer Againe I say vnto you show yourselues valiant and stout Defend your mother the Church And vnto thee O thou president I say that thou oughtest rather to please God then man for if thou depart thence without a finall conclusion know assuredly that thou shalt render accompt in the straight iudgment of God and thus without any more wordes he sate downe in his place In the meane tyme many graue and ancient men had exhorted Panormitan that he shuld geue ouer his conclusion The bishop of Burgen was very instant and earnest with him that he should make vanitie and concord amōgst the fathers and went about to make an vuitie with al mē But neither the fathers of the Councell were determined to depart without a conclusion neither Panormitan was minded to aulter his intent and purpose All thinges were disturbed neither did the prelates sit in their seats as they were accustomed but as euerye mans affection led hym Some went to the Cardinall Arelateusis some vnto Panormitan and exhorted them as if they had bene princes or rulers of armies Then Arelatensis knowing the matter to be in danger and that there was no ready way to make a cōclusiō thought to vse some policie to appease the tumult Most reuerend fathers said he we haue receiued nowe letters out of Fraūce which declare vnto me marueilous thinges that there are incredible newes syrong vp there which if you will geue me willing audience I wil declare vnto you By this meanes there was a sodayne silence throughout the whole Councel by this marueilous policie he made al men attentiue to heare When as he saw he had free liberty to speake without either fable or history of any letters sent he opened the whole order of the matter as it is requisite in an Orator came by little and little to the principal poynt saying that Eugenius his messengers filled all France preaching a new doctrine and extolling the authoritie of the bishop of Rome aboue the generall Councels agaynst whom except speedy remedy were founde it would come to passe the man woulde geue credite vnto thē and therfore the sacred Councell ought of necessitie to prouide remedy and of necessitie to conclude vpō the
The tenour of those articles wherof we haue made mention in this our owne writing are in wordes as follow The articles of Iohn Hus to be inquired vpon 1 THere is one onely vniuersall Church whiche is the vniuersitie of the predestinate as shall after be declared 3. The vniuersall Church is onely one as there is one vniuersitie of those that are predestinate 3. Paule was neuer a member of the Deuill although he did certayne actes like vnto the actes of the Church malignant 4. The reprobate are not partes of the Churche for that no part of the same finally falleth from her because that the charitie of predestination which bindeth the same Church together neuer fayleth 5. The two natures that is the Diuinitie and the humanitie bee one Christ. 6. The reprobate although he be sometime in grace according to present iustice yet is he neuer a part of the holy Churche and the predestination is euer a member of the Churche although sometime he fall from grace aduentitia but not from grace of predestinatioÌ„ euer taking the church for the conuocation of the predestinate whether they be in grace or not according to present iustice And after this sort the church is an article of our beliefe 7. Peter is not nor neuer was the head of the holy catholicke Church 8. Priestes liuing viciously doe defile the authoritie of priesthood and so as vnfaythfull Children do vnfaythfully beleue of the seuen sacraments of the keyes of the Church of offices of Censures of ceremonies of the worshippyng of reliques indulgences orders and other holy things of the Church 9. The papill dignitie came and grew from the Emperor and hys gouernement and institution sprang from the emperours gouernment 10. No man can reasonably affirme eyther of himselfe or other that he is the head of any particular Churche or that the bishop of Rome is the head of the Church of Rome 11. A man ought not to beleue that he which is byshop of Rome is the head of euery particuler Churche vnles god haue predestinate hym 12. None is the vicare of Christ or els of Peter vnlesse he follow him in maners and conditions seing that there is no other following more pertinent nor otherwise apte to receiue of God this power procuratory For vnto the office of a vicegerent of Christ is required the conformitie of maners and the authoritie of the institutor 13. The pope is not the manifest and true successor of Peter the Prince of the Apostles if he liue in maners contrary to Peter and if he hunt after auarice then is he the vicar of Iudas Iscarioth And likewise the Cardinalles be not the true and manifest successors of the Colledge of the other Apostles of Christ vnles they lyue according to the maner of the Apostles keeping the commaundementes counsels of our Lord Iesus Christ. 14. The Doctors alledging that if a man which will not be amended by the Ecclesiasticall censures is to be deliuered to the secular powers do follow in this poynt the byshops Scribes and Phariseis that deliuered Christ to the secular power saying it is not lawfull for vs to kill anye man because he would not obey them in all thinges and that such be greater homicides then Pilate 15. The ecclesiasticall obedience is such an obedience as the Priestes of the church haue found out besides the expresse authoritie of the scripture The immediate deuision of humaine works is that they be either vertuous or vicious if a man be vicious and doth any thyng then doth he it vitiously if he be vertuous and doth any thinge theÌ„ doth he it vertuously For like as vice which is called a great offere or mortall sin doth stayne all the doyngs of a vicious man so vertue doth quicken all the doinges of a vertuous man 16. A priest of God liuing after hys lawe and hauing the knowledge of the scripture and a desire to edify the people ought to preach notwithstanding any excommunication pretended of the pope And further if the pope or anye other magistrate doeth forbid a priest so disposed to preache he ought not to be obedient vnto hiâ— For euery one that taketh vpoÌ„ him the order of priesthood receiueth in charge the office of a preacher and of that burden ought he well to discharge himselfe any excommunication against him pretended in any wise notwithstanding 17. By the Censures ecclesiasticall as of excommunication suspending and interdicte the clergy to their owne aduauncement cause the lay people to ayd them they multiply their auarice they defend their malice and prepare the way to Antichrist And it is an euident signe that such censures proceede from Antichrist which in their process they call Fulminationes that is their thunderboltes where with the clergy principally proceedeth agaynst those that declare the wickednes of Antichrist who so greatly for hys owne commoditie hath abused them 18. If the pope be euill especially if he be a reprobâ—â—â— theÌ„ is he with Iudas a very deuill a theefe and the sonne of perdition and is not the head of the holy Church militant nor any member of the same 19. The grace of predestination is the band wherwith the body of the church and euery member of the same is indissolubly ioyned to their head Christ. 20. The pope or Prelate that is euill and a reprobate is a Pastor in name and not in deede yea he is a theefe and a robber in very deede 21. The P. ought not to be called the most holy one for his office sake for then ought a king to be called by hys office the most holy one and hangmen with other such officers also were to be called holye yea the deuill hymselfe ought to be called holy for asmuch as he is Gods officer 22. If the pope liue contrary vnto Christ although he clime vp by the right and lawfull election according to the common custome of men yet notwithstanding shoulde be otherwise clime then by Christ yea though wee admitte that he shoulde enter by the election principally made by God For Iudas Iscarioth was lawfully elect of GOD Christ Iesus to hys byshopricke and yet came not he the same way he ought to do vnto the shepefold 23 The condemnation of 45. articles of Iohn Wickleffe by the doctors made is vnreasonable wicked and naught the cause by them alledged is sayned that is that none of them are Catholicke but euery on of them hereticall erroneous or slaunderous 14. Not for that the electours or the most part of theÌ„ haue consented together with liuely voyce according to the custome of men vpon the person of any therfore that person is lawfully elect or therfore is the true and manifest successors vicar of Peter the Apostle or of any other the Apostles in yâ— ecclesiastical office Wherfore whether the electors haue either wel or euil made their election it behoueth vs to beleue the same by the workes of him that is elected