of the Church all the Churches of Asia together with others adioyning and very bitterly inveigheth against them by his letters Which fact of Victor Irenaeus and other Bishops sharpely reprooved in their letters to the said Victor Which thing Ruffinus plainely testifieth in these words Sed hoc non omnibus placebat Episcopis quin potius è contrario scribentes ei iubebant vt magis quae pacis sunt ageret concordiae atque vnanimitati studeret denique extant ipsorum literae quibus asperius obiurgant victorem velut invtiliter ecclesiae commodis consulentem Yet this his dealing pleased not all Bishops but contrariwise they wrote vnto him bidding him to practise rather that belonged to peace and to studie for concord and vnitie Finally their letters are also extant in the which they sharpely chide Victor as one that respected vnprofitably the good of the Church Thus saith Ruffinus In like manner though with more modestie dissented Anicetus an other bishop of Rome from S. Polycarpe bishop of Smyrna Of which variance thus writeth Eusebius Neque tamen Anicetus Polycarpo poterat persuadere vt suum observandi morem deponeret neque Polycarpus Aniceto persuasit vt consuetudinem Asiaticam vllo modo observaret Neither could Polycarpus perswade Anicetus to keepe the custome and tradition of Asia Now gentle Reader what neede more to be said for the vncertentie of traditions 1 For first these Bishops that thought thus diversly of traditions lived within one hundred yeeres of Christ at what time the Church was in good estate and stained with very few or no corruptions at all 2 Secondly the one side doubtles was seduced with false traditions 3 Thirdly S. Polycarpe and other holy bishops of that age made no more account of the bishop of Rome his opinion or authoritie then of an other mans 4 Fourthly they were so farre from acknowledging him to be the supreame head of the Church that they all reputed them selves his equals and controlled him as sharply for his doctrine as S. Paul reprooved S. Peter for his conversation 5 Fiftly if S. Polycarpe had cause in his time beeing the flourishing age of the Church to doubt of Romish traditions much more have we cause in these latter daies to stand in doubt thereof For now hath iniquitie the vpper hande nowe are corruptions more frequent no we doe errours in every place more abound Let vs therefore follow S. Augustines advise let vs admit nothing rashly let vs examine all doubtfull traditions and doctrines by the touchstone of veritie the holy Scriptures And least any man thinke S. Augustine to be of another minde these are his owne expresse wordes Non audiamus haec dico haec dicis sed audiamus haec dicit dominus sunt certe libri dominici quorum ant horitati vtrique consentimus vtrique credimus vtrique servimus ibi quaeramus ecclesiam ibi discutiamus causam nostram Let vs not heare I say this thou saiest that but let vs heare this saith the Lord for our Lord hath bookes whose authoritie we both admit we both beleeve we both obey let vs there seeke the Church let vs there decide our cause But what neede many words For either popish vnwritten traditions are repugnant to the Scriptures or consonant to the same If they be repugnant then is there great reason to reiect them if they be consonant that must be tried by comparing them to the Scriptures which is the conclusion I defend But the Papists perceiving them selves to be convinced by the Scriptures tell vs plainly that they must have their cause tried by other meanes For so writeth my L. of Rochester in these expresse tearmes Contendentibus itaque nobiscum haereiic is nos alio subsidio nostram oportet tueri causam quam Scripturae sacrae When therefore heretikes he meaneth all not Papists dispute with vs we must vse other helpe in defense of our cause then the Scripture Loe they dare not be tryed by the Scripture Which if a papist had not spoken who would haue beleeved it The Corollarie FIrst therefore since the written Word conteineth in it selfe every thing necessarie for our salvation secondly since no traditions are to be admitted but such as are consonant to the holy Scripture thirdly since Papists load vs with huge numbers of traditions without warrant of the written word fourthly since popish traditions were in old time most doubtfull and vncerten I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the Romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the ninth Motive CHAP. ix Of Popish auricular confession ALthough popish doctours doe wonderfully magnifie their auricular confession perswading the vulgar sort that they can not attaine salvation without the same yet is it in deede a meere invention of man the bitter torment of conscience and the readie way to desperation For manifest probation whereof I proceede in this manner The first Conclusion ALL Christians must confesse their sinnes to God with internall contrition of heart with full purpose to amend their lives and with stedfast hope of remission by the mercie of God through the merites of Christ his Sonne our sweete redeemer Of this kinde of confession the Scripture speaketh abundantly Delictum meum cognitum tibi feci iniustitiam meam non abscondi dixi confitebor adversum me iniustitiam meam domino tu remisisti impietatem peccati mei I have made my sinne knowne vnto thee and mine iniustice I have not hid I said I will confesse to the Lord my iniustice against my selfe and thou hast forgiven the impietie of my sinne Qui abscondit scelera sua non dirigetur quiautem confessus fuerit reliquerit ea misericordiam consequetur He that hideth his offenses shall not be directed but who shall confesse and forsake his sinnes shall attaine mercie Sidixerimus quoniā peccatum non habemus ipsi nos seducimus veritas in nobis non est si confiteamur peccata nostra fidelis est iustus vt remittat nobis peccata nostra If we say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs but if we confesse our sinnes c. That this confession must be ioyned with hope of remission S. Chrysostome teacheth in these words Quid proderunt lachrymae confessio sinulla adsit abolitionis fiducia What shal teares confession availe if there be no hope of forgivenes And that we must adde herevnto amendment of life S. Hilarie teacheth vs when he saith Quid aliud est confessio erroris quam confessio desinendi ab errore What other thing is the confession of errour then to confesse that we will forsake errour So then when we be wayle our sinnes confesse them and purpose to amend our former lives with stedfast hope of Gods mercie through attonement made in Christes bloode wee shall doubtlesse have remission of our sinnes Then though our
estimation in that their Latine vulgata edition vvhich their tridentine councell hath most straitlie charged all chistendome to observe as all papistes now a daies repute the same a stable bulwarke for their purgatorie the wordes are these sancta ergo salubris est cogitatio pro defunctis exorare vt à peccatis solvantur it is therefore a good and godlie consideration to pray for the dead that they may bee cleansed from their sinnes these wordes are so plaine and so easie as not onelie the vvhole church but my lord Bishop yea and euerie scholer that but meanlie knoweth the latine tongue must needes vnderstand the same And consequentlie must needes knovv purgatorie by them if hee can vse anie discourse at all as my lord of Rochester could doe right well vpon these observations then I inferre first that the church of Rome not knowing purgatorie for manie yeares after she had received the scriptures in which purgatorie was so plainlie and effectuallie conteined as they now graunt did not repute the bookes of Machabees for canonicall scriptures and consequentlie did not beleeue purgatorie mentioned therein For this indeed is most true of the old and good church of Rome as Roffensis hath proved against his vvill I inferre secondlie that the church of God never had or can haue other scriptures or other faith then the apostles had and beleeved in their time For the latter church neuer had nor ever shall haue authoritie to coine anie new scriptures or nevv faith The church of Rome therefore taught most wicked doctrine in my L. Bishops time vvhich he well perceiued and acknowledged in his ovvne conscience or els was in that point infatuated become a verie foole according to this saying of the Gospel Confiteor tibi pater domine coeli terrae quia abscondisti haec à sapientibus prudentibus revelasti ea parvulis I giue thee thankes O Father Lord of heaven and earth because thou hast hid these things from the wise and men of vnderstanding and reuealed them vnto babes The 8. Preamble ALbeit the papistes doe reproue others bitterlie when they reiect some authotities though vpon important and grounded reasons yet themselves with all libertie reiect contemne authorities at their pleasures They reiect the fourth booke of Esaias as Bellarminus confesseth They reiect the last clause of the Lords praier as Arius Montanus witnesseth They reiect the 65. canon of the Apostles as graunteth Bellarminus in these wordes Respondeo canonem istum supposititium videri solum n. quinquaginta canones apostolorum ecclesia recipit I answere that this canon is a counterfaite for the church of Rome receiveth onelie 50. canons of the apostles Marke gentle reader that this canon reproveth the practise of the Church of Rome and so the church si dijs placet will not receiue it They reiect the sixt generall councell because forsooth it prescribeth limits to the bishop of Rome and denieth his vsurped iurisdiction That they reiect this solemne and vniuersall councel Bellarminus auoucheth stoutlie but pope Adrian reputed a most graue vvriter by the learned papists received and reverenced the said councell for these are his vvords cited in their ovvne canon lavve Sextam synodum sanctā cum om nibus canonibus suis recipio I receiue the sixt holie synode vvith all the canons thereof Loe the Pope himselfe and their ovvne canon lavv confirme this councel to be of good autoritie Reade the next chapter in the said canon lavy for there is large matter vttered for the approbation of the same They reiect that part of the councell of Constance vvhich Pope Martin vvould not allovv And vvhy vvould not hee allovv that part as vvell as he approued the other parts because for sooth it denieth the Popes authoritie to be aboue the councel but because I vvill not rip vp popish licentious libertie to the bottome I vvill rest vvith recitall of that onelie libertie vvhich Bellarminus vseth in defense of popish masse these are his vvordes Porro epistolae duae quae circumferuntur de hac re Damasi ad Hieronymum Hieronymi ad Damasum supposititiae sunt Furthermore the tvvo epistles vvhich are carried about of Damasus to Hierome and of Hierome to Damasus are counterfaite But the absurdest Epistles Canons and vvritinges that euer vvere or can be are verie authentical vvith them and most currant so they make for our holie father the pope his vsurped iurisdiction For proofe of this point I vvil content my selfe vvith tvvo examples for brevitie sake For by them and the disproofe thereof the reader may haue a sufficient coniecture of the rest The former example is taken out of S. Clements epistle to S. Iames. in this and the other epistles follovving put forth in the name of S. Clement is commended vnto vs auricular confession the sacrifice of the masse the subiection of kinges to bishops the primacie of S. Peter and such like for vvhich respectes the said epistles are currant and authenticall amongst the papistes but magna est veritas praevalet great is the truth and it preuaileth for the verie vvordes of the epistle betray and bevvray the same and make it manifest vnto all the world that it is a counterfait These therefore are the vvordes Clemens Iacobo domino episcopo episcoporum regenti Hebraeorum sanctam ecclesiam Hirosolymis sed omnes ecclesias quae vbique Dei providētia fundatae sunt cum patribus diaconibus caeteris omnibus patribus pax tibi sit semper Clement to lord Iames the bishop of bishops that governeth the holy church of the Hebrevves at Hierusalem as also that governeth all churches founded by Gods providēce throughout the vvorld vvith the fathers and deacons and all other fathers peace be to thee alvvaie Novv gentle reader thou hast heard the vvords and so beholdest no doubt the vanitie thereof for if S. Iames vvere not only bishop of Hierusalem but the bishop of bishops and the governor of all Churches in the christian vvorld as this epistle affirmeth then doubtles vvas S. Iames the pope and supreme head of the church not S. Peter and yet doth the selfe same epistle avouch that S. Peter vvas the head of the church and that S. Peter lying sicke in his bed called S. Clement vnto him and told him that his houre of death vvas at hand and that therefore he appointed the said Clement to be his successour and to sit in his chaire at Rome But S. Iames succeeded Christ himselfe at Hierusalem vvho vvas indeede the head of holie Church and therefore S. Iames should rather be Pope then S. Clement if there vvere indeed anie such pope at all the latter example is taken out of that vvorke vvhich is fathered vpon S. Augustine of true and false repentance vvhich booke because it seemeth to approove confession of sinnes to priests is good and authenticall vvith papistes but as God vvould haue it the selfe
pope hath given this auctoritie to the priest But alas that can not possibly be graunted For this is a constant axiome with the papists par in parem non habet potestatem When two are of equall auctoritie the one can not make a law for or against the other Well since none of these waies can content his holines let vs heare what his owne deare vassals can say in his defense Iosephus Angles vnfoldeth this great difficultie at large when he thus writeth Canus affert tres opiniones prima est S. Thomae D. Bonaventurae quibus adhasit Turrecremata Secunda opinio est Paludani asserentis habere authoritatem absolvendi non à Papa sed à Christo. Tertia est Caietani dicentis iurisdictionem quam habet sacerdos absolvendi Papam nec esse à Christo neque à Papa neque ab ecclesia sed solum ex electione per hoc scilicet quod papa se subiicit illi illumque eligit Est quarta opinio qua tenetur quod quemadmodum in receptione ordinis datur vnicuique simplici sacerdoti potest as iurisdictionis respectu venialis mortalis quae poenitens alias confessus est etiam respectu cuiuscuÌ„que peccatoris in articulo mortis ita datur tunc iurisdictio eidem sacerdoti absolvendi papam Master Canus bringeth three opinions the first is of S. Thomas and S. Bonaventure to whome agreeth Turrecremata The second is the opinion of Paludanus who avoucheth that the Priest receiveth his authoritie not from the Pope but from Christ him selfe The third opinion is Caietans who affirmeth that the Priest hath authority to absolve the Pope neither from Christ nor from the Pope nor from the Church but onely by election to wit in that the Pope submitteth him selfe to the Priest and chooseth him And there is yet a fourth opinion which holdeth that as in receiving of priesthoode power of iurisdiction is given to every simple priest in respect of veniall sinnes and of those mortalls which the penitent nath otherwise confessed and also in respect of every sinner in the point of death so is iurisdiction then given to the said Priest that he may absolve the Pope Thus saith our reverend bishop and worthie fryer Ioseph Out of whose words I note 1 First that since our Lord is the God of peace and not of dissention as recordeth his holy Apostle in many places it must needes follow that this popish doctrine is not of God which is so devided against it selfe and therefore said Caietain truely though vnwittingly and to another ende when he denied the priest to have his authoritie from Christ or from his Church 2 I note secondly that their doctrine is meere opinative as which is onely grounded vpon mans invention 3 I note thirdly that as the priestes iurisdiction is vncerten so is the Popes absolution also as which is consectarie therevnto and consequently that the Pope standeth in daunger of his salvation And so if I be not deceived the obscuritie of this conclusion is made evident The Corollarie FIRST therefore since auricular popish confession is not commaunded by Christ secondly since it was not practised by the Apostles thirdly since it was instituted onely by the positive lawe of man fourthly since the Greeke Church never admitted that lawe fifthly since it is contrarie not onely to the fathers but to popish doctours also sixtly since it bringeth the Pope him selfe to the hazard of his salvation I conclude that it is a sufficient motive for me to renounce the Romish religion as false erroneous and pernicious doctrine Thus much of the tenth and last Motive Peroratio I HAVE in this discourse gentle Reader briefly confuted ten special articles of popish faith and religion 1 First I haue shewed the insufficiencie blasphemie and absurdities of popish pardons 2 Secondly that the Pope both may erre and hath erred defacto not only as a priuate person in priuate opinion but euen as Pope and publike person in iudicial definitions 3 Thirdly that generall councels in these latter daies are nothing els but a meere mockerie sophistical subtiltie to deceiue Gods people withal 4 Fourthly that the Popes dispensations are wicked licentious and intollerable 5 Fiftly that Kings are above Popes that their power is independent that they are subiect to none but to God alone 6 Sixtly that popish dissention is of matters most important and incredible to such as are not wel acquainted with their bookes 7 Seaventhly that the writings of the auncient fathers are to be received with great reuerence yet so as we acknowledge them to be men to haue their errours and to binde vs to their authorities no further then they accord with the holy Scriptures 8 Eightly that all things necessarie for our salvation are conteined in the holy Scriptures and that popish traditions are so vncerten as the best learned papists can not agree therein 9 Ninthly that after this life there is neither merite nor demerite nor satisfaction to be made and that the booke of Machabees can not establish popish purgatorie 10 Tenthly that the specificall enumeration and confession of all our sinnes is not onely not commaunded by the Scriptures but repugnant to the same and impossible to be accomplished by the power of man All which points I have prooued not onely by Scriptures authorities and reasons but euen by the expresse testimonies of best learned papists A thing heretofore never performed by any to my knowledge and yet so forceable against the papists if I be not deceived as nothing can be more My desire was to content all to offend none to confirme the weake to instruct the ignorant to reclaime the seduced and to confound all arrogant disloyall subiects If â—ffect succeede correspondent to my option God be thanked for it who is the chiefe worker of every good act to whome with the Sonne and the holy Ghost three persons and one God be all honour power glorie and dominion nowe and ever AMEN 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sapient 8. 1. Dionys. Arâ—â— pag. de divinis nominibus c. 4 2. Thess. 2. v. 4 5 6 7 8 9. 1 Greg. 9. lib. 1. decret tit 33. cap. 6. Glossa ibid. Gregor ubi supra Glossat lib. 1. decretat tit 7. cap. 3. Gerson de potestat eccles consider 12. part 3. Gerson ubi supra Bellarminus de Rom. Pont. lib. 5. cap. 8 1 2 3 Secundò principalitèr Bernar. ad Gaufridum epist. 125. 3 Robertus Bellarminus lib. 5. de Rom. Pontif. cap. 7. Bellarm. cod cap. Bellarm. cap. codem Bellarm. ubi supra 1 2 3 Prou. c. 8. 15. Rom. c. 13. v. 1. 4 Sylvest de papa para 2. 5 Bellar. derom pontif lib. 5. cap. 7. Luc. 12. 2. Mat. 16. 13. Mat. 23. 3. Mat. 15. 3. Mat. 15. 9. 1. Ioh. 4. 3. Roffensis cont assertion Luther art 18. prope initium Deut. cap. 2. vers 4. 2. Machab. cap. 12. vers 26. Matt. cap. 11. vers 25. Bellar. lib.
THOMAS BELS MOTIVES CONCERNING ROMISH FAITH AND RELIGION Exod. cap. 8. vers 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Printed by Iohn Legate printer to the Vniversitie of Cambridge 1593. And are to be sold at the signe of the Sunne in Paules Churchyard in London TO THE RIGHT HONOVRABLE MY very good Lordes the Lordes of her MaIESTIES MOST HONOVRABLE PRIVIE COVNSELL IF Tertullian right honourable erred montanizing if Cyprian rebaptizing if Origen corporizing if Nazianzen angelizing if Eusebius arrianizing if Hieronymus monogamizing if Ambrose millenizing if S. Paul gentilizing if Augustine retracted many things if Aquinas Navarrus Victoria and many others best learned papists haue often changed their opinions if all this I say be true as true it is indeed it will not I trust for it can not iustly I wote be imputed as blame-worthy that I vpon better advise submit my selfe to my vndoubted Soveraigne most gracious and bountifull Queene Elizabetb that I recognize mine errours that Ireclaime my former vnsoundly conceived opinions as best learned writers have done before me Which alteration he hath mercifully and wonderfully wrought in me qui attingit à fine ad finem fortiter disponit omnia suaviter Our mercifull God I meane who hath of late revealed in time that which in his eternall purpose he ordained before the worlde was made For our good God who according to his common course of proceeding directeth things inferiour by superiour and vseth humane meanes in producing visible externall effects first inclined my heart to peruse more seriously some learned papists before studied and that done to provide and revolve other most renowmed papists which before I had neither read nor seene By meanes whereof God illuminating mine vnderstanding I haue by litle and little perceived the popes owne doctours to impugne his Romish religion and so detested all popish faction As who at this houre God be thanked for it beholde as in a glasse of christall the false erroneous and execrable doctrine of the Church of Rome And because omne bonum est sui diffusivum as saith Areopagita neither can I with safe conscience hide that light vnder abushell which God of his great mercy hath bestowedon me no doubt as well for the benefite of others as of my selfe I haue thought it worth the labour to set downe my chiefest motives by which and through which next vnder God I was perswade to renounce the Romish faith and religion as who per swade my selfe constantly that what soever papist in the whole world shall with an indifferent iudgement peruse the same having are solved mind to embrace the truth when it appeareth that selfe same papist will vtterly renounce with me the false erroneous execrable doctrine of the Church of Rome For I will proove the saide Romish doctrine by Gods holy assistance to be of such qualitie as is already said not onely by scriptures authorities and reasons though such proofes I purpose to vse but which is most forceable against papistes by the evident testimonies of best learned papists and who are of best account even in the Church of Rome And consequently that great learned men of all ages since popery began yea in the very altitude of popedome and in the Church of Rome have approoved holden and defended weighty and important points of doctrine contrary to the doctrine of the Church of Rome Which thing so soone as I once vnderstood my mind and will was by and by alienated from the Church of Rome This rare methodicall discourse my right honourable good Lordes all as in which papistry is effectually confuted and confounded by papistry it selfe I have presumed to dedicate vnto your honours for two especiall consider ations First that so I might exhibite some signe of a gratefull and dutifull mind for your Lordships most honourable countenances and rare great good willes towards me Secondly because this my discourse will not want many potent and mightie adversaries and so stand need of honourable wise and grave patrons for the honest and lawfull approbation of the same The Almighty graunt vnto your Lordships many ioyfull and happy yeres with much increase of zeale in true religion to his eternall glory the faithfull service of her Maiestie and the common good of our native countrey most noble England Amen From Cambridge the third of November 1593. Your Lordships in all dutifull manner THOMAS BELL. The Preface generall to the Christian Reader ALbeit I will not now dispute whether the Bishops of Rome be that Antichrist of whome the Apostle speaketh to the Thessalonians or no notwithstanding the affirmative be the iudgement of sundry great learned men yet dare I and doe I boldly avouch that Bishops of Rome have for many yeres past bene the precursors and fore-runners of that very Antichrist whereof mention is alreadie made which to hold and thinke many weightie and important reasons have mooved me For first who but Antichrist or his precursor will either ascribe or suffer to be ascribed unto him such power of maiestie and titles of Deietic as are proper and peculiar to God aloue And yet is this to be verified of the pope undoubtedlie by the popes owne doctrine and his popish doctors The pope if we will beleeve him telleth us that God when he instituted two great lights in the firmament to wit the Sunne and the Moone signified thereby the autoritie of popes and of kings giving us to understand that the pope is as farre above a king in authoritie as is the Sunne above the Moone in excellencie yea he addeth further that Kings and Emperors have no power to draw the sword against popish bishops priestes as who forsooth are not subiect to their iurisdiction And least I should be thought to father untruthes upon the pope I will which is my wonted manner throughout my whole booke alledge his owne wordes which are these Ad firmamentum coeli hoc est universalis ecclesiae fecit Deus duo magna luminaria id est duas instituit dignitates quae sunt Pontificalis autoritas Regalis potestas sed illa quae praeest diebus id est spiritualibus maior est quae vero carnalibus minor ut quanta est inter solem lunam tanta inter Pontifices Reges differentia cognoscatur To the firmament of heaven that is of the universall Church God made two great lightes to wit ordeined two great dignities which are the authoritie of the Pope and the power of the King but that power which ruleth spiritual things is greater and that which ruleth things carnal is lesser that so great difference may be knowen betweene Popes and kings as is betweene the sunne and the moone The popish glosse in the same place setteth downe precisely how farre the King is inferiour to the Pope in these words Restat ut Pontificalis dignitas quadragesies septies sit maior regali dignitate It therefore remaineth that the pontificality of the Pope is seven fourtie
Apostolicae traditionem approbentur non habent Romanae Ecclesiae authoritatem nec aliter se habent quam sià Concilio sine Lega tis prodijssent paulò pòst Solidam auctoritatem quam in confirmandis fratribus dogmatibus Petrus habet in Legatos transferre non potest If the Legate doe anie thing contrary to instruction given him hee must not be deemed to proceede of power delegate and so there is no cause why the pope shall be thought to approve the decrees The decrees therefore which the Legate shall approove against tradition of the Church of Rome have no authoritie from the Church of Rome neither are they of anie more force than if they had proceeded from the Councell without consent of the Legates The sound authoritie therefore which Peter hath in confirming his brethren and decrees he cannot transferre unto his Legates These are the expresse wordes of Canus that great piller of popish doctrine Out of whose wordes I note first that decrees of Councels bee of no force without consent of the Legates I note secondlie that the decrees of Councels even when they have the consent of the Legates are yet of no force when the Legates condiscend to anie thing against the Popes minde I note thirdlie that the Pope cannot translate or give his authoritie unto the Legate and consequentlie the Pope greatlie abuseth the whole world when he calleth together all bishops in the Christian world and yet will allowe nothing that they doe unles it be the same that hee decreeth in his chaire at home Now that hee never commeth to Councels in his owne person Bellarminus recordeth in this maner Summus Pontifex nunquam interfuit Concilijs Orient alibus per se c. The Pope was never present at the Councels in the East Church in his owne person and why was not the Pope present at generall Councelles in the East Church Bellarminus giveth two reasons the one forsooth because it was not convenient that the heade should follow the members The other because the Emperour would ever sitte in the highest place which our humble Father the Pope coulde not endure Out of vvhose wordes I note two thinges the one that the highest place in Councels was in olde time reserved to the Emperour the other that the Greeke Church did never acknowledge the Popes primacie The second Conclusion IN these latter dayes since the Pope attained his usurped iurisdiction generall Councelles are so destitute of the holie Ghostes asistance though the Papistes never cease to bragge thereof that they decree altogether against the holie Ghost This is manifest by the solemne decrees of the late Councel of Trent as after due examination will evidentlie appeare First therefore the saide Councell decreed flatlie that to be no matrimonie which was approoved Matrimonie by the uniforme consent of the auncient Catholike Church and which is this day perfect Matrimonie by Christes institution These be the wordes of the Councell Qui aliter quam praesente parocho vel alio Sacerdote de ipsius seu ordinarii licentia duobus vel tribus testibus matrimonium contrahere attent abunt eos sancta synodus ad sic contrahendum omnino inhabiles reddit huiusmodi contractus irritos nullos esse decernit presenti decreto They that shall goe about to marrie otherwise than in the presence of the parish Priest or of some other priest by his licence or graunt of the Ordinarie and with two or three witnesses those the holie Counsell maketh utterlie uncapable of Mariage and defineth by this present decree such contracts to be frustrate and of no force By which words and by which decree we see plainelie that this day those persons are made uncapable of matrimonie and their mariage disanulled whom Christ pronounceth capable and whose marriage hee approoved For before this decree of the late Councell of Trent all papistes in the worlde approoved private and secrete matrimonies for true and perfect yea all learned papistes doe confesse constantlie such clandestine matrimonies to be true mariages in England albeit that such contracts be of no force neither in Spaine nor Italie by their religion The reason hereof is because promulgation of the said Tridentine Councels decree was not yet made in England as appeareth by the first Cannon in the eight section dereformatione This constant opinion of all Divines the Councell it selfe acknowledged in these wordes Dubitandum non est clandestina matrimonia libero consensu facta rata vera esse matrimonia quandiu Ecclesia ea irrita non fecit There is no doubt but clandestine and secrete matrimonies made with free consent were perfect and true matrimonies so long as the Church did not disanull the same Yea the Councell of Trent acknowledgeth matrimonie to be one of the seven Sacraments of the newe Testament instituted by Christ and yet accurseth all such as beleeve not the Church of Rome to have authoritie to dissolve the same These be the wordes Si quis dixerit matrimonium non esse verè propriè unum ex septem legis Evangelicae sacramentis à Christo domino institutum sed ab hominibus in Ecclesiam invectum neque gratiam conferre anathemasit If anie shall say that matrimonie is not truelie and properlie one of the seven Sacraments of the Evangelicall law instituted by Christ our Lord but brought into the Church by men neither to give grace accursed be that man And in another place it hath these wordes Si quis dixerit Ecclesiam non potuisse constituere impedimenta matrimonium dirimentia vel in ijs constituendis errasse anathemasit If anie shal say that the Church could not appoint impediments which dissolve matrimonie or that the Church erred in appointing them accursed be that man These bee the decrees of the holie Councell of Trent which as the Papists beleeue had the assistance of the holie Ghost and therefore could not erre Out of which decrees we have first that matrimonie is a contract instituted by Christ himselfe we have secondlie that it is an holie Sacrament with the Papistes Wee have thirdlie that it is now no Sacrament with the Papistes which by Christs institution is a Sacrament in their religion We have fourthlie that matrimonial contractes made without the presence of a Priest are true and perfect matrimonies by Christes law and institution We have fiftlie that such matrimonies to wit clandestine are disanulled and made no matrimonies by the Pope and his Tridentine Councell neither will it help to say as the wiser sort of Papists doeth that the Councell doeth not unmarie persons alreadie married but onelie disableth unmaried persons so as their prohibited marriages cannot be of force For first the Councell pronounceth that to be no Mariage by reason of mans prohibition which without such prohibition should bee perfect mariage by Christs institution as is alreadie prooved out of the said Councell Secondlie that
the spirit of man that is in him These are S Augustines owne words so plaine and effectuall against popish vnchristian foolish and execrable confession as nothing more needeth to be said therein The fifth Conclusion ALbeit Popish auricular confession be so magnified with Papistes that every one is commanded vnder paine of damnation to beleeve the same as instituted by Christ himselfe yet was it not an article of popish faith for the space of one thousand and five hundred yeeres after Christ. This conclusion because it is very important I shal desire thee gentle Reader to ponder deepely with me my discourse Iosephus Angles Valentinus a popish fryer and bishop of Bosana in the second tome of that worke which he dedicated to the Pope himselfe Sixtus Quintus hath these expresse words Ante concilium Later erat haereticum negare necessitatem confessionis negantes tamen non erant haeretici ratio est quia nondum erat ab ecclesia declaratum Before the councell of Lateran it was hereticall to denie the necessitie of confession but yet they were not heretikes that denied it The reason is because the Church of Rome had not yet declared it to be an article of faith Loe these words conteine effectually the exact proofe of this conclusion if they be well marked 1 We must therefore observe first that who soever beleeveth not stedfastly every decree of the Church of Rome in matters of faith is holden of that Church for an heretike 2 We must observe secondly that the councell of Lateran whereof this fryer speaketh was holden in time of Pope Iulius the second and Pope Leo the tenth that is 1500. yeeres after Christ. 3 VVe must observe thirdly that vntill fifteene hundred yeeres after Christ were expyred they that beleeved not popish auricular confession to be ordeined by Christ were no heretikes For so as you see this fryer teacheth and the Pope him selfe graunteth 4 VVe must observe fourthly that the Church of Rome hath no authoritie to coyne any new article of faith 5 VVe must observe fiftly that the Church of Rome hath no new revelations in matters of faith but the very same which it had in the Apostles time both which latter observations their owne deare Canus telleth vs in these words Omnia siquidem fidei dogmata ab Apostolis accepit ecclesia vel scripto vel verbo quoniam ij ministri fuere sermonis nee vllas in fide novas revelationes ecclesia habet For the Church received all doctrines of faith from the Apostles eyther by word or writing Because the Apostles were the ministers of the word neither hath the Church any new revelations in faith Now out of these observations which are evident it followeth necessarily that confession this day ought not to be an article of faith no not in the Church of Rome 1 For first during the time of fifteene hundred yeeres after Christ it was no article of faith in the Church of Rome 2 Secondly the Church of Rome can not make that an article of faith now which was no article of faith in the Apostles time 3 Thirdly the Church of Rome hath no new revelations in matters of Christian faith For so as you have heard hath their owne Melchior Canus avouched Neither will it helpe to say that auricular confession was an article of faith in the Apostles time but not then revealed to the Church For as Canus hath told vs plainly the Church receiveth no newe revelations of faith This doctrine is confirmed by their famous Cardinall Caietan who avoucheth two speciall grounds against popish auricular confession For first although Christ by his opinion instituted confession yet did he make it voluntarie and left it in mans election whether he would confesse or not confesse Againe he telleth vs that the manner of popish confession to wit to confesse secretly in the priests eare was not ordeined by our Saviour Christ. Out of which assertion I inferre a double conclusion against the Papistes The one that confession is not necessarie to salvation For that which is voluntarie as to be a Monke a Nunne a Priest a Iesuite is not necessarie to salvation as every papist graunteth but is as a counsell worke of supererogation The other that popish lawe vrging men to auricular confession is flat against Christs institution And thus I weene I have prooved this conclusion The sixt Conclusion IF Popish confession were ordeined by Christ as the papists falsely and grossely imagine yet would it followe by a necessarie consecution that every Pope should be in daunger of his salvation This conclusion may seeme somewhat strange but I proove the fame By popish doctrine every man and every woman of lawfull yeeres are bound vnder paine of damnation to the said confession and consequently the Pope beeing either man or at least woman as is thought of pope Iohn is strictly bound vnto the same Now syr how our Pope his holinesse shall come to confession and have absolution of his sinnes hoc opus hic labor est And that the reader may fully vnderstand the difficultie herein it is to be noted that no priest can absolve any person from his sinnes over whome he hath not superioritie and iurisdiction but his holines hath both the swords his power is above Kings and Emperiours and over him no mortall creature no not an Angel of heaven hath any iurisdiction at all as holdeth popish faith The Pope then being subiect to none must yet be absolved of some which some must haue iurisdiction over him standeth doubtles in great perplexitie and in no small danger of his saluation Let us therefore find some poore shift to helpe his holines if it may be What if we say that the Pope hath no mortal sinne so is not bound to popish absolution But alas all Popes are not Saints as is prooved and so some must perforce have absolution Let us say that he may absolue himselfe as well as he may graunt pardons to him selfe But alas that implyeth contradiction because so he remaining one and the same man should be both superiour and inferiour to himselfe superiour as he did absolve and inferiour as absolved Let vs say that he voluntarily submitteth himselfe and so receiueth absolution But alas so shall his holines still be inferiour to the silly priest because as S. Paul discourseth to the Hebrewes he that blesseth is greater then he that is blessed Let us say that the Pope giueth to the priest power ouer him for that time onely But alas that would be a rare and strange metamorphosis with an impossibilitie annexed therevnto For first by this meanes the simple priest should be Pope in time of absolution as having then greatest power upon earth Secondly after absolution he that was pope should cease to be pope and he that was not pope should without election or consecration be pope again Which is a thing impossible euen by popish proceeding Let vs say that some other