Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n become_v place_n zion_n 15 3 9.9475 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A43727 Apokalypsis apokalypseos, or, The revelation revealed being a practical exposition on the revelation of St. John : whereunto is annexed a small essay, entituled Quinto-Monarchiæ, cum Quarto Omologia, or, A friendly complyance between Christ's monarchy, and the magistrates / by William Hicks ... Hicks, William, 1621-1660. 1659 (1659) Wing H1928; ESTC R20296 349,308 358

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

when they call themselves so and that they are not of the true christian church but of the Synagogue of Satan See more hereon cap. 2. vers 9. Behold I will make them that they shall come and worship before thy feet and they shall know that I have loved thee These words contain a promise to the church of Philadelphia that Christ would make those enemies of hers the blaspheming Iews to come and worship before her feet that is would make them to submit to the Scepter of Iesus Christ and to worship him in the presence of Philadelphia which for her purity and soundness may pass for a type and figure of the true church of Christ before whom these carnal formal Iews shall fall low and worship Object But if it be demanded Whom shall they be made to worship I answer First God in Christ whom they have blasphemed and dishonoured the sole object of Divine worship which Philadelphia and the true church do honour and obey Secondly They shall civilly worship and reverence Philadelphia and the true church for the honour that Christ hath put upon her and so will think it an honour indeed to come under the same profession worship and discipline with the christian church And when I have done this saith Christ they shall know that I always loved thee and that thou wert most dear unto me Now this Prophesy and promise was never fulfilled unto Philadelphia in the full extent thereof only we read of some few of the malignant Iews given by Christ to the church of Philadelphia and others of that age but how this promise was fulfilled in the Latitude thereof it cannot enter into my understanding to comprehend For when ever did those perverse Iews that for their notorious malignity against Christ and the truth were justly called the Synagogue of Satan come and worship or bow down before the feet of Philadelphia Or when did they submit to the worship of the the churches of Christ only but in some first fruits and that before this was written to Philadelphia And when did the Iewish Sinagogue of Satan even to this day ever since become the true church of Christ more then some few scattering persons that were converted to the faith inconsiderable to the fulfilling of this promise Or when did ever God make it it eminently appear to them that the christian churches were the only beloved people and societys in the eye of God above all others in the world Seeing those things were never yet acomplished according to the fulness of this promise surely there is yet a time to come when there shall be a more universal call of the Iewish Synagogue into holy Philadelphia or the christian church then ever yet have been to this present day A Note hence will rise Observ That God will not only make the natural obstinate Iews but also their true counterpanes the nominal seeming Christians to come and bow before the true Spouse of Christ before the latter day This is confirmed from this verse wherein it is promised by Christ that the obstinate Iews should come in and worship before the feet of the church of Philadelphia but towards Philadelphia in the latter this was never as yet performed in the extensiveness of this Scripture as is above manifested therefore as yet to come to pass before the feet of the true Philadelphia the holy church of Christ And not only the natural Iews shal come in submit and joyn to the holy church of Christ but al formal birth christians shall also either come in and worship before this true church or else shall at least wise reverence this true holy church as the only beloved of Christ for the glory of the Lamb will be upon her and the Nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it and for her greater honour the Kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it Rev 21.23 And it is but just that God's true church and people should have a day too as well as their adversaries had theirs We know how that the great and lofty ones of the world have put all possible reproaches and afflictions on the Saints of God and churches of the purest judgment but yet the time is at hand that they shall be convinced and shall know the Saints to be the only beloved of God and the great interest and stay of Kingdomes and then the greatest Monarch will be glad to take hold on the skirt of a Jew to come under the protection of this holy church for their God is the Lord of Hosts Quest. And if any one ask when this shall be Answ When the fulness of the Gentiles shall come in and all Israel shall be saved Rom. 11. When Christ shall appear again for the restoring of his Kingdome then the Kingdome and Dominion and the greatness of the Kingdom under the whole Heaven shall be given unto the people of the Saints of the Most High Dan. 7.27 then shall all come and worship before Philadelphia the glorious new united christian church of Jews and Gentiles And this shall be the true Sion the dwelling place of God's glory whereunto all Nations shall flock and worship before it and become one with it or otherwise shall be made bow unto the Iron Scepter of Christ whereby he will make all the Nations of the earth to submit to his Soveraigne Authority and fall and worship before his feet Rev. 19.15 Vers 10. Because thou hast kept the word of my patience I also will keep thee from the houre of temptation which shall come upon all the world to try them that dwell upon the earth That for which Philadelphia is commended for by Christ is for keeping the word of his patience This hath either respect to Christ or unto the church as if Christ had said because thou hast kept the word of my patience that is the word and doctrine which with a great deal of patience I have taught the world and with a like patience Preached it from time to time or else the effect being put for the cause Because thou hast kept the word of my patience that is the word of my Gospel which enjoineth and worketh patience Either or both of these senses may aptly be raised and entertained from these words without any prejudice unto the truth and intention of the Spirit in these words or 2. as respecting the Church of Philadelphia This word as it was the word of Christ's patience which he taught patiently the word is for many generations so it was received and kept by her with patience and constancy for which she had the reward of being kept from the hour of temptation Quest But whither was Philadelphia so saved and kept from the hour of temptation that fell upon all other her Sister churches that she was so freed that she was not touched by it Answ It is not probable that Philadelphia went free when the ten days of persecution under the Emperours
the conquering Saints 181 182 In whose power is it to remove false Teachers 196 VVhether the power of the Keys be singly in the Officers and Presbytery or joyntly in the Officers and Brethren together 198 How will it stand with the Justice of God to cut off innocent Infants with their Parents in his wrath and judgements that have never done good or evil 204 How comes Infants dying Infants to be saved that have not faith And whether the Parents faith is the condition of their salvation 205 c. Whether we may merit by our works 208 237. How are the Saints Co-partners with Christ in his Imperial Reign and Kingdom 212 Is it not in the power of Saints to recover themselves out of sin without going to Christ by faith 223 Whether true Saints may finally fall away from grace 223 241. Whether perfection may be had in this life 225 Whether Christ creates war and sends the sword into the world 233 Whether the Saints of God for their iniquities may be blotted out of the Book of Life 241 VVhether it be lawful to pray that God would blot out any name or person out of his Book of Life 242 Whether the Civil Magistrate hath authority over the Church 250 251 Whether Magistrates may not suppress errors being well advised by a Learned Assembly of Divines 851 Whether the Magistrate be not subordinate unto Christ as Mediator to make Laws for him to rule next and immediately under him in his Church 252 VVhen shall the Jews and Gentiles be gloriously united into one Church 261 VVhether Saints may be said to be saved in the hour of Temptation and yet suffer in it 262 VVhether the tryumphant State of the Church shall be here on earth or in the supernal Heavens 276 313 VVhether the Imperial Reigne of the Saints shall be after the general Resurrection or before 277 VVhether Christians may not be over-hot and Zealous in matters of Religion And whether a moderate temper would not be more advantagious therein then an over-furious one 285 VVhether we are to buy of Christ his Graces by way of contract or not 295 How is Christ said to love those whom he bitterly chastiseth 302 VVhether does Christ always use a spiritual force for the reclaiming of his back slidden people 304 VVhether Christs Kingdom and the Fathers be all one 310 Whether the Saints as Saints may justly expect by vertue of promise in the Word the Rule and Dominion under Christ on Earth at this present time 335 Whether the Saints in order to the obtaining of the Rule and Dominion may oppose the Supreme Magistracy they live under 335 337 VVhether Heathenish or Antichristian Magistrates may be opposed 338 339 VVhether the Saints Imperial Reign be far off or near at h●nd 341 342 VVhether it be not lawful for Saints to put to a helping hand in pulling down the Powers of the world that uphold Babylon and the VVhore thereof 346 347 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Or PRAECOGNITA THE REVELATION OF Iohn the Divine CHAP. I. VER I. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto him to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant John THis Book hath for Title 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Revelation of John the Divine And here in the Entrance I shall take leave to insert some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or preliminary discourses and questions which are necessary to be discussed before I enter upon the Exposition of the Body of this Book Quest 1. Whether this Book of the Revelation of John be of Divine Authority 2. Whether John who in the Title of this Book is named John the Divine the Author thereof be the same with John the Apostle and Evangelist the beloved Disciple of Christ or some other person 3. In the last place I shall give a compendious view and taste of the scope and designe of the whole Book 1. Concerning the Divine Authority of this Book I should say very little or nothing unto it well knowing how dangerous it is to move Foundation stones or to question the Authority of any of the Books of God received reverently in the Churches of Christ from age to age as the Canon and Rule of their Faith and Manners If it were not that the Adversary of old took advantage by this artifice to hinder the growth and cast prejudice on many of the Truths of God and to weaken the comforts of his Saints mainly cherished and supported by the Prophesies in this Book The occasion of the first doubting of the Divine Authority of this Book Hence rose in that it favoured the pretended Heresie of the Chyliasts or Millenaries and their adversaries endeavoured to father it rather on Cerinthus the Heretick then the Apostle John thereby if possibly they might not only enervate its Testimony but quite shut it out for ever out of the number of the Canonical Books of God that it might never do the Chyliasts any service more Vpon this ground Hyrome was the first that did most publiquely call its authority into question about the year of Christ 400. and that in pure opposition unto the Millenaries the followers of Justin Martyr Tertullian Ireneus Lactantius and others of good credit and authority in the Church of Christ in that judgement Secondly it became suspected as Erasmus witnesseth who in this particular and concerning other Divine Books also was very unstable in his own Judgment in that some of the ancient Greek primitive Christians did not receive the Revelations as of Divine Authority and this Hierome himself also testifies But on what slender grounds this came to pass I shall presently consider And though it is granted that some ancient Greek Christians did not receive it yet it was by others of the same age and of the far abler parts judgement and integrity numbred amongst the Books of God and acknowledged to have the publique stamp of his Spirit on it There was one Caius or Gaius as Eusebius witnesseth in the fourth book of his History who saith That this Book was written of one Cerinthus an Heretique who held among many other errors That after the resurrection of Christ his Kingdom should become earthly and sensual wherein the flesh should be satisfied again in all manner of concupiscences for the term of a compleat millenary of years Dionisius of Alexandria takes up this report from this Caius an obscure person and as is thought was one of the heretical Alogi who denied as Epiphanius testifies the Word of God and on the false report of this Caius Dionisius doubts of the Divine Authority of this Book But Hierome takes up the same slender ground from Dionisius and doth object it strongly But I answer it seems Hierome would admit of any slender testimony to the invalidating of the Authority of this Book because this book was the great Fortress of his adversaries the Chiliasts yet however though Hierome
and some others of suspected credit and of obscure note as Dorotheus Dionisius Eusebius Caius do oppugne it yet Epiphanius was so passionate friend to it that he reckons them among Heretiques that did reject it and Justin Martyr and Ireneus of sounder judgement and of singular piety did not only approve this book as canonical but wrote commentaries on it 2. Whatsoever that Caius was that fathers the Apocalyps on Cerinthus on whose report all his followers were misled yet the relation it self holds not any resemblance of truth for Ireneus Tertullian and Epiphanius who write very largely of the heresies of Cerinthus and his successors yet never mentions that he held this opinion of Chiliasme or the Kingdom of Christ on earth which they could not be ignorant of therefore this story of Caius concerning him and his Apocalyps is Apocryphal and a meer figment on purpose devised by the adversary to lessen the authority of this book see more at large hereof in D. Homes lib. 3. chap. 3. sect 3. Further if Cerinthus was the Author of this book doubtless he would have besprinkled it with some other of his errors that were peculiar to him as that of the creation of the world by Angels denying of the Divinity of Christ and affirming his generation to be only of the seed of Joseph and Mary as is testified by M. Baxter's book of Infidelity treating of the heresies of Cerinthus Carpocrates and their followers page 129. c. But in this book of the Revelation there is not one word to this purpose but rather the contrary strongly confirmed in many places thereof as the subsequent discourse thereon will manifest And lastly If it were granted that Cerinthus held and expected a riotous and luxuriant Millenary which is now disproved yet this of the Apocalyps hath not the least intimation thereof but of a Millenary of rest and joy in a higher and more spiritual key then ever the Church enjoyed on earth heretofore there is great difference between an earthly sensual reigne and to reigne on earth Saints may be on earth and yet be most spiritual so they may have a Kingdom here on earth and yet a most spiritualized and heavenly one which is fully confirmed in the 21 and 22 chapters of this book And so I have answered the first ground of suspecting the divine authority of this Apocalyps Secondly Hierome the great Antagonist of this book writeth that many learned men spake very sharply against this book and the whole matter thereof as not becoming the gravity of an Apostle being only a common history of things shaddowed under dark figures and hard kind of speeches I answer Rather it becomes and savours the excellency and authority of an Apostle being directed to the then seven famous Churches of lesser Asia carrying in it all along the spirit of Prophesie and the very steps sentences and figures of the old Prophets being full of pregnant testimonies of the Divinity of Christ and of this perfecting of the work of our Redemption and Salvation by his continual Intercession and providential acts of gubernation of his Church to the end of the world I confess the book in the figures and expressions thereof is dark and mysterious but that is not strange in prophetical writings as in Daniel Ezekiel c. It seemed good to God to set us on diligence to enquire into the dealings of God with his Church and people and not to over-slip the judgements of Gods providence which are reserved in God's infinite wisdom unto their appointed times of discovery that from generation to generation his people and Church may be comforted and supported unto the end of all Thirdly Dionisius aforesaid Bishop of Alexandria reasons very slightly against the divine authority of this book when he saith That it doth not suit with the gravity of an Apostle to cast up so oft his own name since in his Gospel he never nameth himself but only pointeth it out by some modest marks as these The Disciple whom Jesus loved But here in this Book in his Visions and Conferences with the Angel he hath never done with these kind of words I John This reason moved Dionisius to think that this book was rather set out by some other in his name then by himself I answer This opposition is but weak for he that writes a History or matters of Doctrine as the Gospel is mixed of both he need not often insert his own name for the truth of that depends on its present verity and other apparent circumstances witnessed unto by the spirit of God in miracles and its operations on the hearts of Believers But it is far otherwise with the Writers of Prophesie for that receives authority by the Author who is known to be a Prophet for in every Prophesie that foretelleth things to come we must enquire first who revealed it and then to whom it was revealed that the person being known to be a Prophet and to have divine Revelations we may give credit to it for otherwise who would give credence or faith to any of the Prophetical predictions or books of the Prophets before they saw them accomplished and fulfilled As to instance in the Prophet Jeremiah who maketh mention of his name at least a hundred times and the Prophet Isaiah how oft doth he repeat these words Isaiah the son of Amos And in Daniel's Prophesie we shall find his name more then threescore times repeated yea ye shall find I Daniel about nine times from the seventh to the tenth chapter and Paul when his Apostleship was called in question by some false Brethren and to shew the excellency of his Ministry how often shall you read I Paul an Apostle not of men nor by men but of Jesus Christ And why should it be accounted strange when John mentions not his name above five times in this whole book and with that modesty that none might doubt of the truth of this Prophesie Having wiped off the objections that have cast jealousies and suspicions on these divine Revelations I shall in the next place endeavour to clear the divine authority thereof and add some testimonies for that end and I doubt not but that being cleared there is no true christians but will receive this Book of Prophesies but as the Oracles of God The testimonies are of two sorts either from without or secondly within the said book Those from without are the general consent of the churches of Christ in all ages excepting in the heat of contest amongst some violent persons to the receiving of them into the Canon The Councels of Laodicea the third Councel of Carthage and the Councel of Toletan 5. cap. 16. decreed it to be received as holy and divine Scriptures Secondly it was so received by most of the ancient Orthodox Fathers as Justin Martyr Tertullian Cyril Epiphanius Lactantius Ireneus Augustine and many others and so this book is often quoted by them as of divine authority in their writings I shall
sacrificing the Saints which they term heretiques or schismatiques and troublers of their peace and union but when you meet such a fiery persecuting spirit in any that pretend to Christ judge of it whence it is by these Scriptures Gal. 5.20 Col. 3.12 13. So great hath been the malice of false Prophets and false Teachers ever against the true Saints that they have never rested till they have got their blood shed It was the Pope and his false Prelates and Priests that first filled all Europe with blood it was the same cursed progeny that brought so many precious souls to the stake and faggot in Queen Maries days otherwise of her self as History testifies of nature good enough Quere But it may here be queried for what things ought we to suffer with patience and constancy and not to faint under the burden thereof I have partly formerly answered this question in the ninth verse of the first chapter I shall here add one word more for the rectifying the judgment and keeping the conscience undefiled herein First Know that every soul is strictly obliged to observe all the Laws of God whether Moral Natural or Positive and to undergo all sufferings whatsoever rather then to dishonour God by the breach of the former or neglect his worship by the contempt of the latter We are not only bound under persecutors to keep the conscience undefiled in not committing gross sins as Idolatry c. but also we are obliged to perform all our positive christian duties though we suffer for it as we find that Daniel gave a testimony in this case though to the hazard of persecution to extremity and would not forbear his three times a day solemn prayers and that upon his knees in his chamber and his windows open towards Jerusalem though he knew his enemies might by that means surprize and accuse him and cause him to be cast into the Den of Lions yet did he hold himself bound daily to the Law of outward Worship though the looking to Jerusalem was but a ceremony ordained by God upon Solomon's prayer 1 Kings 8.9 Also the Macchabean Worthies did not think that persecution did or could discharge them from the strict observing even of the Ceremonial Law of not eating Swines flesh but for it endured all extremity of torments as the Story relates and for it are justly ranked among the Worthies of the old Testament who lived and died in faith Heb. 11. So jealous is God not only for the preservation of his Moral Laws but even of those Ceremonial and Ritual Laws that after he hath discovered his Will about them and commands them they forthwith become morally positive Laws and obligent until their repeals from the same authority are manifested and cleared Therefore by this Judge what a lax and loose Religion does Hobbs his Leviathan prescribe unto us to submit to any Religion that the chief or soveraign Magistrate shall dictate to us and that it is not christians duty to suffer for any Article but for that that Jesus Christ is the Messias so subjecting almost the whole will of God in morals and positives unto the will of man But as to this let us like true christians pray Libera Domine nos a malo Verse 4. Nevertheless I have somwhat against thee because thou hast left thy first love We have heard the vertues and graces of the Church of Ephesus and how she had a just and honourable approbation for them yet notwithstanding there is a tang in the end which shows some defection in her and after all her commendations there is a Nevertheless follows close in the heels thereof with somwhat to be said against her just as it is often said of the good Kings of Israel in the book of Kings That they walked and did uprightly in the sight of God as David the King but withal there is added a but But they departed not from the sins of Jeroboam that made Israel to sin Hence by the way Note Observ That the purest churches and the best christians are not altogether exempted from stains but have their spots and blemishes as well as resplendent graces It was the Spouse condition in Cant. 1.5 where she describes her self and saith I am black but comly O ye daughters of Jerusalem as the Tents of Kedar as the Curtains of Solomon Let us out survey the first churches and christians to elucidate and confirm this truth and seeing they stood neerest the light even the Sun of Truth and his Twelve illustrious radiating Signs his Apostles in my judgement they are to be reputed the soundest and the purest yet see whether we read not of their Maculae or spots as well as of their shining graces The church of Corinth was a famous church yet she had her failings contaminating the holy feasts and their Agapees with surfetting and drunkenness and besides the foul errors of false Apostles as denying the Resurrection c. The church of Galatia was not much inferiour in her wantonnizing after liveless ceremonial fancies and pressed them as necessary with Christ unto salvation and when Paul opposed them herein for whose sake they once were ready to pull out their eyes to do him good yet now for crossing their capricious whimsies is become their greatest adversary The churches of Ephesus Pergamus c. had their several encomiums for their graces yet there were some things chargeable on them for waxing cold in their first love for admitting the Doctrine of Balaam Nicolaitans Jezabel c. If we descend from bodies collective to individual persons we shall find the same lot befal unto all consider Noah Job David Peter c. but I desire not to rake up the faults of the Saints which are not left upon record to encourage to sin but to be presidents of the grace of God and as examples for encouragement unto repentant sinners Because thou hast left thy first love Some difficulty seems in these words whether by first love be intended Christ whom the church of Ephesus had left Or that first ardent affection and zeal which she bore to Christ at her first conversion The latter Interpretation to me is clear Because the church of Ephesus had not withdrawn her self from the faith of Christ as is evident by the two precedent verses for it was for Christ's sake and his truth that she had suffered much both from wicked persons and wicked teachers therefore as long as her faith was sound she could not be said to have left Christ as her first Love and taken a new love or new object of her faith But that for which she is charged as faulty is that she hath left her first love that is her first zeal and fervent affections which she bore to Christ and his Ordinances at her first conversion and this is plain from the next verse where she is commanded to repent and to do her first works From hence observe Observ That it is frequently seen that many true and faithful
opens and shuts there is such an excellent Image erected like the first part of that in Dan. 2.32 Whose Head was of fine gold his Breast and Arms of silver It was a notable and noble saying of Constantine the Emperour unto the Pastors and Bishops of his time Vos est is in Ecclesia sed ego extra Ecclesiam Episcopus Though he was the great champion of the church and the christians temporal Saviour yet he would not meddle with opening or shutting in Christ's church nor extort the Key of David or Christ's out of their hands to whom Christ left it for what is done by them is done by Christ as by his delegated power what they binde in earth is bound in heaven and what they loose on earth is loosed in heaven Christ will not suffer any to weild his Keys but those to whose hands he hath committed them according to his own method and way of directions who uses them contrary to this they will find them Scorpions in their hands ready to bite and destroy them instead of healing and curing Remember the example of Uzziah and tremble 2 Chron. 26.16 Was it not the downfal to Popery when Spiritual men turned Layicks and Bishops became Princes And on the other side Secular Princes handled the Spiritual Keys opened and shut as they pleased made Laws Edicts and Rules unto the church which was Christs and his churches prerogative only What undid our late Episcopal hierarchy in England but mixing sacred things with profane making Christ's and Caesar's Laws all one The Bishop he was made a temporal Lord to act in the Parliamentary and civil affairs of the Nation and in requital hereof the supreme Magistrate he is made supreme Head of the church to enact what Laws he pleaseth as in reference to the church and to open and shut to whom he wil by his high courts of Delegates and high commission c. such a church such a head a civil church a civil head such a church such laws such officers such keys such pow-Ar all prudentials and all of the present worlds wisdom and fabricating and therefore not strange that the fabrick lasted no longer but fell wit●in few ages after the first structure thereof And is it not now to be feared that the church amongst us may be lulled asleep as in the lap of Constantine by over-much indulgence and temporal honours cast upon her and her Ministers Though I am not an enemy to their just maintenance and temporal comforts yet I am jealous of them that all is not Lamb-skin that appears so about them but that somwhat if not too much of the Foxes tayl lies undiscovered within What means else the bleatings of the cattle I mean their pressing after preferments extraneous as to their churches as Heads of Universities State-chaplains great Parsonages Commissioners and Tryers c. and so by reason of the want of Christ's own Key do often open to persons against whom Christ hath shut and shut against some to whom Christ hath opened So fallible are men that open with the wooden key of their own Politiques the Lord deliver our Soveraign Magistrate from the snares of these spiritual Machiavilians or Machiavilian Doctors that do teach the Magistrate to lay his Politiques as rules to Christ's church that would have him open where Christ shuts and shut where Christ opens It is equally dangerous unto both Magistrate and Minister to move or act out of their own proper spheres but acting in their own Orbs the one in his Civil Government and State the other in his Spiritual policy and church so both becomes gracious and honourable in their respective governments and dominions Quest. But what Shall not christian Magistrates do nothing in the church or execute no part of their Authority therein which God hath given them for the good of the church I answer First The Magistrate may exercise his authority for the good of the church in several respects First In protecting encouraging and countenancing the church in the service of Christ and defending their liberty therein and so become Nursing Fathers unto the church Secondly As Christ does approve and command obedience from all to Magistrates and their Laws as for God's sake Rom. 13. So Magistrates should approve and command Christ's Laws and Government to be observed of all within their respective boundaries and jurisdictions Thirdly If any proves turbulent seditious or factious in the church under pretence of liberty and so become a peace-breaker in the Commonweal the Magistrate may restrain him by his civil power Fourthly If any church member become a blasphemer an idolater an open delinquent against the first Table or transgressor of the second the Magistrate may chastise him for it over and above the censure of the church not as required thereunto by the church but by vertue of his own civil Laws that equally reaches all persons that transgress them whether Ecclesiastiques or others 2. But secondly in the Negative I answer That Magistrates have nothing to do nor are competent Judges as Magistrates of controversal points opinions doctrines or of things meerly relating to the church Christ never endued the Magistrate with such a power Therefore the argument is very prevalent a Negative That they have no such power The church alone under Christ is endued with that power of trying doctrines suppressing errors in opinions and judgements according to the rule of the Word Now to whom this rule was given the foresaid power was given but the rule was committed to the church only and not to Magistrates Mat. 18. therefore the said power of trying doctrines and suppressing errors was committed only to the church and not to Magistrates Object But may not Magistrates suppress errors and use their authority to that end when they are thereunto well advised by a Learned Assembly of Divines or able Ministers of the church Answ The Ministers of Christ if they be such advisers herein do first betray their trust and calling in their Master's service into the hands of the Magistrate plainly acknowledging that their Lord and Master hath not provided an Armory sufficient in his House and Kingdom to overthrow errors as well as means for their discovery Is not this to run for carnal weapons whilst they lay by those made by God spiritual ones and mighty through God to pull down Powers Principalities and all the works of darkness Secondly If Magistrates act thus upon the advice of others they must not only see with other mens eyes and act upon an implicite faith but do also hereby become but the executioners of their Assemblies Decrees What more doth the Popish Princes when they execute the Edicts of the Romish conclave And what otherwise did Pilate when he became the executioner of the Priests sentence upon Christ in crucifying him A Sea-mark to all to take notice on this account Thirdly Magistrates as Magistrates are not to suppress errours because Christ hath other Laws Ordinances and Ways to suppress them