nothing though one should cut or wring it therefore 't is like a scabberd which admits of any sword not of steele only but of wood also or lead or brasse Doth then Parrie lye in this or hath the Jesuite lost his shame But yet they teare and defile the Scripture more miserably for thus Lindanus compares those that dispute out of Scripture to men drawing a woodden saw to whom being wearie there is no end of deluding Hosius in his book De expresso Dei verbo throughout it all handles these Positions That it is the propertie of Hereticks to dispute out of the Scriptures That they must not encounter with Hereticks out of the Scriptures That the Scriptures make Hereticks That the expresse word of God being alledged by Hereticks Protestants he meanes against the sense of all other that is of the Popish Church is the expresse word of the Divell We will not speak of other abominable passages which neither Jewes could attribute to Moses his Law nor Mahumetans to their Alchoran without punishment If heretofore such words had been spoken of Sibylla's leaves the Romans had punished them with death Yet for these or the like meritorious words by which they think they have cut off the Protestant sinews one receives a Bishops robe another a Cardinals Hat as a reward from the Pope O say they scoffingly what conferres your Scripture on you But boast not in thy wickednesse Psal 52.3 Pag. 24. the goodnesse of the Lord is powerfull every day But saith the Jesuite this is devised by Parrie Whitaker and such like deformed Reformers That in Popery the Scriptures are as much accounted as Aesops Fables without the Churches testimony That the Pope preferres the Church to the Scripture That in Popery they deny the word of God to be the rule of living and beleeving aright I answer that nothing of this is objected to us in the secular Theme why then doe you passe by things truly objected and accuse Poperie of these things Cover if you be wise the ulcers of your Babylon The first concerning Aesops Fables Brentius objected to Peter Asoto a black Friar anno 1556. Hee doth not obscurely saith hee intimate that hee hath plainly the same opinion of the Scriptures that any other Asoticus hath or hath written of to wit that the Scripture availeth as much as Aesops Fables without the Churches authority To whom Hosius answering anno 1557. saith thus This might be spoken in a pious meaning which any godly man endued with charity and that thinkes no evill might draw out of these words For truly if the Churches authority did not teach us that this Scripture is Canonicall it should have but little weight with us I pray you then how can you denie Poperie to be of this opinion which Hosius so great a pillar of the Romish Church confesseth may be spoken in a pious sense Tell me then what odds is there between these words To have a very little weight and between these To availe as much as Aesops Fables I wonder you touch the other sore Lib. de Concil col 12.13 which the chiefest of your side doe avoid willingly as a rock in the sea Bellarmine hath so touched it that hee equalls the Decrees of Councels in truth infallibilitie and Canonicall authoritie to the Gospels and holy Scriptures and extolls the Pope far above Decrees of Councels How then is the Pope according to Bellarmine not preferred to Scripture As for the third though we know not who objecteth it to you as you utter it yet it is doubtlesse true For according to the same Cardinall of yours the word of God written is but a partiall rule of right living and beleeving But a partiall rule is no rule if you will urge the nature of a rule for a rule in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an infallible rule requiring or admitting of no addition or diminution to this that it may be a rule as the Jesuite knowes a rule to be defined by Basil and Varinus If then in Poperie the written word of God be but a partiall law of good life and faith not onely admitting but requiring also the addition of traditions it followes that this is plainly denied in Poperie which this fellow lies was devised by Parrie to wit that the written word of God is the rule of right living and beleeving 22. Lastly what Irenaeus wrote of ancient Hereticks when Roman Poperie is argued out of Scriptures it is turned to the accusation of the very Scriptures as if they were not right or had any authoritie and because they are diversly taken and because truth cannot be found out of them that want tradition 23. Roman Poperie then so many waies the originall of faith which is beleeved by tearing in pieces and blaspheming is deficient from the faith it overthrows faith both to it selfe and to its friends The Assertion If at this day Irenaeus that most ancient defender of the holy Scriptures against Hereticks did see our present controversies what else would he say think you against Poperie then what he wrote against the traditionarie Hereticks of his time that they cannot abide an encounter when they are convicted out of Scripture but fall upon accusing of the very words of God and that three waies First that they are not of authoritie Secondly that they are diversly spoken obscure doubtfull That finally they are imperfect not containing all truth At last they fix upon traditions which they think to be more perfect then the Scriptures they received from the Apostles All the Popish Masters now these hundred yeers past have after no other way handled this argument then what was the proper way of Hereticks of old For as often as they are convicted by our men out of Scripture do not they disswade any meeting or encounter That it is a vaine thing to draw a woodden saw with us Doe they not fall upon accusing the Scriptures themselves that they have no authoritie but what they have from the Church That they are most obscure and diversly spoken That by reason of their imperfection all truth cannot be found in them Doth not at length all their disputation end in tradition See the disputes and discourses of the Scriptures in Bellarmine Stapleton Lindanus Hosius Valentian and others Poperie then I hope understands whose successors the Scholastick Synagogues and Canonisticall in this part are and what principle of faith which is beleeved hath by unworthy tearing and blaspheming fallen from the faith and hath made the way of salvation unpassable both to it selfe and friends 24. Secondly to shake saving Faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse and to pull it out of mens hearts is to fail from the Faith and to overthrow faith both to themselves and others 25. Saving faith by which we beleeve unto righteousnesse is not onely an assent or knowledge of these things which concerning God and Christ are written in Gods Word but especially a confidence in the promises of the
by faith to this end principally that God may be honoured it is manifest that to beleeve and doe those things which cannot be denied or omitted without offending of God is the worship of God and contrariwise that God cannot be worshipped but by the prescript of his will both the consciences of all men and God himselfe in his holy word doth testifie as In vain doe they worship me who teach the doctrines and commandements of men It is as wicked therefore to number those things which are not expressed in the word of God Isa 29. Matth. 15. amongst those which are necessary to be beleeved and done in matters of Religion as it is unlawfull for any creature to thrust upon God that worship which himselfe never required 4. The Scripture is sufficient Fourthly there cannot be any thing added of men unto this doctrine without great injury and contumely done unto the holy Scripture For if other things besides these that are written are necessary to the perfection of true Religion then doth not the Scripture shew the perfect manner of worshipping God and of attaining to salvation which fighteth with the plain words of Scripture which affirme that God hath opened unto us in his Word as much as he would have us know in this life concerning his will towards us John 15. as Christ saith All things which I have heard of my Father I have made knowne unto you And Paul I have kept nothing backe but have shewed you all the counsell of God Acts 20. And Knowing that thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures from a child 2 Tim. 3. which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through the faith which is in Christ Jesus For the whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improve to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse 5. Other Doctors may erre the Prophets and Apostles cannot therefore they are tied to these Fifthly we are to consider the degrees of them who teach in the Church For therefore is the authority of the Prophets and Apostles far higher then of other Ministers of the Church because God called them immediatly to declare his will unto other men and adorned them with testimonies of miracles and other things by which he witnessed that he did so lighten and guide their minds with his Spirit that hee suffered them to erre in no one point of doctrine our Ministers are called by men and may erre and doe erre when they depart from the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Wherefore the Apostle Paul saith Ephes 2. 1 Cor. 3. That the Church is builded upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles And That hee had laid the foundation and other then that could no man lay others build upon it gold silver precious stones wood hay stubble Now it is manifest that they who may erre ought to be tied unto their doctrine who are warranted by the testimonies of God that they cannot erre Wherefore all other teachers in the Church must not bring any new point of doctrine but onely propound and expound those things unto the Church which are delivered by the Prophets and Apostles The consent of Fathers in this point For these causes therefore doth the whole ancient Church with great consent submit it selfe unto the rule of the sacred Scriptures whose authority yet ought of right to be greater then these mens who both in words and deeds fight against this opinion Basil serm de confess fidei Basil saith That it is a falling from the faith and a fault of pride either not to admit those things which are written in the holy Scriptures or to adde any thing unto them Agust Epist 3. And Augustine For neither ought wee to account of every ones discourses though they be catholike and worthy men as of the Canonicall Scriptures that it may not be lawfull for us without impairing the reverence which we owe to those men to dislike and refuse any thing in their writings if peradventure wee shall find that they have thought otherwise then the Scripture hath as it is by Gods assistance understood either of others Epist 112. or of our selves And If ought be confirmed by the plain authority of the divine Scriptures of those which are called in the Church Canonicall wee must without any doubting beleeve it as for other testimonies by which any thing is moved to be beleeved thou mayest chuse whether thou wilt beleeve them or no. But against these testimonies of the Scriptures and the ancient Church the adversaries of the truth contend that besides the doctrine which is comprised in the holy Bible other decrees also made by the authority of the Church are no lesse unchangeable and necessary to salvation then the Oracles Propheticall and Apostolike And that they may not without some shew and pretence take upon them this authority of decreeing what they list Objections of the Papists 1 Object The Scripture doth not remaine perfect Numb 21. Joshua 10. 1 Kin. 14.19 Jude 9. 14. 1 Cor. 5. Ephes 3. John 21.25 besides and contrary unto the Scripture they alledge places of Scripture in which some writings of the Prophets and Apostles are mentioned which are not come to our hands as The booke of the wars of the Lord The book of the just The booke of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah The prophecie of Enoch and the story of the body of Moses And lastly the Apostle Paul maketh mention of his Epistles which now the Church hath not Hence therefore these men will conclude That the doctrine of the sacred Scripture is maimed and that therefore the defect hereof must be supplied by the Church But first of all concerning the holy Scripture we are to know that so much thereof hath been preserved of God for us as was necessary and profitable for the doctrine and consolation of the Church Furthermore concerning points of Religion though some holy books are wanting as those Epistles of Paul yet it is manifest that all necessary doctrine is contained in those which are extant They alledge That many things were delivered by word of mouth 2 Object Some things delivered by word of mouth Answer both before there were any Scriptures and afterward also by Christ and the Apostles as John 16.12 1 Corinth 11.34 2 Thessal 2.15 and elsewhere But those things which they delivered by word of mouth are the selfe same which they put in writing except some matters of ceremonies as Act. 15.20 1 Cor. 11.34 which maketh not for the adversaries whose traditions most of them repugne the Scriptures They alledge farther the practice and examples of the Apostles 3 Object That the Apostles have decreed against and besides the Scripture Titus 1. 1 Timothy 1 Cor. 11. 1 Cor. 14. 1 Cor. 7. 1 Cor. 6. Answer as if they did make any ordinances or lawes either besides or against the Scripture as when Paul ordaineth many
imparted by the Apostles and every one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proved This reason may be rendred thereof more probable that it was called a Symbole for that the Articles of faith are the square and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of all orthodox or right beleeving Christians ought to agree and be conferred The Symbole is called Apostolick Two reasons why the Creed is called Apostolick Because it containeth the summe of the Apostolick doctrine which the Catechumenes were enforced to hold and professe Because the Apostles delivered that summe of doctrine to their Schollers and Disciples which the Church afterwards held as received from them This selfe same Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of all Christians Why it is called Catholick An answer to a question moved touching other Creeds Here some demand a reason Why after the Apostles Creed other Creeds as the Creed of the Councell of Nice Ephesus and Chalcedon with Athanasius his Creed were compiled and received in the Church Answ These Creeds properly are not others that is quite different in substance from the Apostolick Symbole but are onely a repetition and more ample declaration of this in all which certain words are added as an explication thereof by reason of Hereticks by whom because of the shortnesse thereof this was depraved there is no change either of the matter or of the doctrine but only of the form of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together Other important and weighty causes there were which might compell the Bishops and Doctors of ancient Churches to compose and draw out these briefe compendious formes of confession especially the Church then increasing Four causes why other Creeds were made and received in the Church and heresies growing with and in the Church For instance in few That all both young and old might with more ease bear in minde the main and entire foundation of Christianity comprised in briefe That all might alwayes have in their sight and view the confession of their faith and consolation reaped thence knowing what that doctrine is for which persecution is to be sustained So God in times past made a short summary abstract of his law and promises that all might have it as a rule of life and ground of consolation obvious to their eyes That the faithfull might have a peculiar badge and cognisan whereby to be distinguished both then and in all future ages from infidels and hereticks which with wily glosing sophismes corrupt the writings of the Prophets and Apostles for which very cause also these Confessions were intituled Symboles 4. That there might be some perpetuall rule extant in publike plain briefe and easie to be known whereby to examine all manner of doctrine and interpretation of Scripture to approve and ratifie whatsoever accordeth therewith and refuse and disanull the contrary The Apostolick Creed preferred above other Creeds because 1. The phrase of it is most proper 2. The time most ancient 3. The copy most authenticall Notwithstanding the Apostles Creed far surpasseth the rest in authority 1. Because for the most part it literally consisteth of the proper words and phrases of Scripture 2. Because it is of greater antiquity then other Creeds and was delivered first unto the Church by the Apostles themselves or by their disciples and schollers and since them successively from hand to hand transferred unto us their posterity 3. Because it is the fountaine and originall draught even an authenticall rule of direction to other Creeds which for illustration of this to prevent the fraudulent sleights and forged corruption of hereticks have in universall and generall Synods or Councels been published and authorised by the whole joint-consent of the Church The certainty of this Creed dependeth not on the authority and arbitrement of men or definitive sentence of Councels but on the perpetuall concordance of holy Scripture with them and of the whole Church since the Apostles time retaining and holding fast the Apostles doctrine and testifying to all posterity that they received this doctrine at the Apostles mouthes and the mouthes of their hearers which consent is obvious to any man that daigneth to view it with both eyes and weigh it considerately For certain it is that no Congregation of Angels nor conventicle of men hath any power of instituting new lawes touching the worship of God or new Articles of faith binding the conscience for this is a work proper unto God Neither may we beleeve God for the testimony of the Church but the Church for the testimony of God This doctrine touching the causes and authority of divers Creeds is borrowed out of Ursinus Admonit Neustad de Concordia Burgens written Anno Dom. 1581. where young Divines may if they list reade a large discourse touching the truth and authority of Ecclesiasticall Writers learnedly discussed from 117. page unto the 142. page of the said Tract a briefe Type and Table whereof I have here decyphered THE TABLE The writings touching the doctrine of the Church are 1. Divine that is inspired immediately by God into the hearts of the Prophets and Apostles such as are the Canonicall books of the old and new Testament These alone are simply in their sentences and words full of divine inâ—piration and worthy credit and therefore are the sole rule of tryall unto all others 2. Ecclesiasticall that is written by the Doctors of the Church these are 1. Publick to wit written in the common name of the whole Church which again are subdivided into writings 1. Catholick I meane Creeds and Confessions written in the name and with the full consent of the whole orthodox right beleeving Church received and allowed by the authority thereof such as are The Apostles Creed The Creeds of the Councels of Nice ConstaÌ„tinople Chalcedon Athanasius his Creed 2. Particular namely the Confessions of certain Churches and Councels as divers Catechismes and the Augustanâ— Confession 2. Private that is written in the name and by the advice of some one private man or more as Common places Commentaries and such like ON THE 8. SABBATH Quest 24. Into how many parts is the Creed divided Answ Into three parts The first is of God the eternall Father and our Creation The second of God the Son and our Redemption The third of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification The Explication THe principall parts of the Apostolick Creed are three 1. Of God the Father and our Creation 2. Of God the Son and our Redemption 3. Of God the holy Ghost and our Sanctification that is of the works of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification Ob. 1. Unto the Father is ascribed the Creation of heaven and earth unto the Son the Redemption of mankind unto the holy Ghost Sanctification Therefore the Son and the holy Ghost did not create heaven and earth How our Creation Redemption Sanctification are each appropriated to some one person of the
as we neither reject nor contemne the testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who do often say that the holy Scriptures have not their authority else-where then from the word of the Church 1 Reason The reproach of God For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say that the authority of Gods Word dependeth of the testimony of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why we beleeve that the Scriptures were delivered from heaven be the witnesse of the Church who seeth not that hereby the authority of a mans voice is made greater then the voice of God For he that yeeldeth his testimony unto another so that he is the only or the chiefe cause why credence is given unto the other out of all doubt greater credit is given unto him then unto the other who receiveth his testimony Wherefore it is a speech most unworthy the majesty of God that the voice of God speaking in his holy Book is not acknowledged except it be confirmed by the witnesse of men 2 Reason Our comfort Faith is grounded on approved witnesse therefore not on mans Secondarily whereas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles doth preach of so great matters as the certaine knowledge whereof is so greatly desired of all who are well disposed and the conflicts of doubtfulnesse in all mens minds are so great what full assurance of our faith can there be what sure consolation against assaults or temptations if that that voice on which our confidence relieth be no otherwise knowne unto us to be indeed the voice of God but because men say so in whom we see so much ignorance errour and vanity to be that no man scarcely especially in matters of some weight doth attribute much unto their word except other reason concurre with it 3 Reason The confutation of our enemies Thirdly the truth of God and Christian Religion is plainly exposed unto the mocks and scoffes of the wicked if we going about to stop their mouths doe therefore only desire that we should be credited that our Religion is from God because our selves say so For if they be by no other confutation repressed they will with no lesse shew of truth deny it then we affirme it 4 Reason Witnesses Last of all the Scripture it selfe in many places is against this opinion and doth challenge a far higher authority unto it selfe then which hangeth upon mens words For so saith Christ himselfe I receive not the record of man signifying thereby John 5. that his doctrine stood not no not on John Baptists testimony although yet he did alledge it but as of lesse account that he might omit nothing by which men might be moved to beleeve Therefore he addeth But I say these things that you may beleeve I have a greater witnesse then the witnesse of John And if Christ now being humbled said these things of himselfe then surely shall they be no lesse true of him being in glory and sitting in his Throne Paul saith 1 Cor. 2. My word and my preaching stood not in entising speech of mans wisdome but in plaine evidence of spirit and of power that your faith should not be in the wisdome of men but in the power of God If so be then our faith must not rest no not upon reasons wisely framed by men much lesse shall it depend on the bare word of men Ephes 2. The Church her selfe is said to be built upon the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles If then the confidence and confession of the Church stayeth on the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles as on the foundation the certainty of Scripture cannot hang on the Churches witnesse for so should not the Church be upheld by the testimony of the Prophets and Apostles but by her owne And it is said 1 John 5. If we receive the witnesse of men the witnesse of God is greater If it be greater then the authority of it hangeth not on the record of man but we are to give more credence unto God witnessing the Prophets and Apostles writings to be indeed his voice then unto the Church affirming the same 1 Object That they are true the Church alone doth witnesse Ans The Minor is false Now that it is said of the contrary That by the Churches record alone it doth appeare unto us that the sacred bookes which wee have were written by the Prophets and Apostles whose names they beare in their fore-head and that even unto us they are come uncorrupt this we grant not For God far more certainly testifieth both in Scripture and in the hearts of his Saints that no feigned or forged thing is in these books then it can be by the Church and all the creatures of the world confirmed They therefore who stand upon the Churches testimony alone in this point shew that themselves have not as yet felt or understood the chiefest testimony 2 Object The discerning of books Ans The Minor is false 1 The working of the holy Ghost Furthermore they say That the bookes authenticke or as they terme them Canonicall of both Testaments are discerned from the Apocryphall by the Churches judgement and therefore that the authority of holy Canon doth depend on the Churches wisdome But that this difference of the bookes is not determined by the Churches judgement but being imprinted into the bookes themselves by the Spirit of God is onely acknowledged and approved by the Church this is easily to be understood if the causes of this difference be considered For either in these which are called Apocryphall the force and majesty of the heavenly Spirit doth lesse evidently appeare in the weight and vehemency of word and matter then in others of which it is cleere that they are the heavenly Oracles 2 The certainty of Authors set down in writing by the divine instinct that they might be the rule of our faith or it cannot be determined neither out of these bookes themselves nor out of others which are Canonicall that they were written either by the Prophets or Apostles because either they were not opened by those whom God by certain testimonies hath warranted unto us to be endued with a Propheticall spirit or themselves doe not shew any certain Authours of them or by their form of speech or other reasons it may be gathered that they were not left of them whose names they beare Now as touching either this evidence of spirit or certainty of the authours we build not our judgement on the testimony of the Church but of the bookes themselves And therefore not for the Churches judgement only do we judge some books to be Canonicall and the foundation and rule of our faith and do therefore accept of the doctrine of other some because they agree with the Canonicall but rather for the very cause of this difference which we find in the bookes themselves 3 Object The Church is more
things of chusing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of women to be covered and to containe themselves in silence of not divorcing the husband if he be an Infidell of controversies between Christians But these men remember not that their authority is not equall unto the Apostles authority neither consider they that there is nothing in all these things appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the Word of God contained in writing and that many of those things which they alledge are comprehended in the commandements of the Decalogue More trifling is it that they say the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is read Acts 28.19 that they baptised in the Name of Jesus Christ. For in those places not the forme of Baptisme but the use is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches things offered to Idols bloud and that which was strangled is it lawfull for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be retained a difference between the Apostles by whom God opened his will unto men whereupon they also say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to us and other Ministers of the Church who are tied unto the Apostles doctrine Further as concerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charity commandeth which at all times would have that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they urge that these ordinances are called necessary yet it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessary especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles spake was neither to last continually neither did it bind consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not observed but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were converted from Judaisme to Christ or were to be converted 1 Cor. 10. as Paul doth at large teach To these they adde the examples of the Church 4 Object Present examples whom they say even from the Apostles to these very times to have beleeved and observed some things not onely not delivered in the Scripture but contrary to the Scripture They bring forth the selfe same decree of Jerusalem concerning things offered to Idols and bloud which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath been already said that that constitution was made not that it should last for ever but for a time for a certaine cause even for the infirmity of the Church which was gathered from among the Jewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lye in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrary but doth very well agree with it To these also they reckon the observing of the Lords day We truly as we doe beleeve this to be an Apostolike tradition and perceive it to be profitable and a farre other manner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust upon us under the Apostles name so we doe not put any worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrary unto the Church Even as it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holy day But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeved which yet to call to question wee our selves confesse to be unlawfull as That Infants are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hell Coloss â— That the Sonne of God is consubstantiall unto the eternall Father But they are too impudent if they take unto themselves a licence of hatching new opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture useth somewhere words which are not extant in the Scripture But impious are they and blasphemous if they say the doctrine it selfe which the Church professeth in these words is not extant in the Scripture 5 Object The holy Ghost to teach the Church therefore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which are not delivered in the Scriptures as But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father shall send in my name hee shall teach you all things And When the Spirit of truth shall come hee shall lead you into all truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shall bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you John 14.26 and 16.13 Againe Hee shall beare witnesse of mee Againe Hee will reprove the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of judgement Againe He shall glorifie mee for he shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speak nothing but that which was written in the Gospel and Christ himselfe had before time taught his Disciples so farre is it that he should bring any thing contrary to them For neither can he dissent from Christ nor from himself So also when they alledge that I will put my law in their inward parts Jerem. 31. 2 Cor. 3.3 and in their hearts I will write it And Yee are the Epistle of Christ written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God not in tables of stone but in fleshly tables of the heart they do not mark that the Spirit cannot speak in mens hearts contrary unto these things which be revealed in the Scripture neither would God write any other law in mens hearts but that which is already revealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they go about to build out of that place If you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even the same unto you Phil. 3.15 If therefore say they the Church thinke any thing different from the written word that proceedeth from the holy Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and confirmeth the godly that albeit they did not understand somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of any other judgement in it yet that hereafter they should be taught it of God and should know those things to be true which he had written When as therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reveales any thing diverse from that which is written the rule and mastership of the Spirit in the Church is not taken away but the same Spirit is matched with himselfe that is with the rule of the
day Likewise Galat. 5. â— Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is above the civill power 2 Instance The higher power doth more binde 1 Answer and therefore hath greater force than that to binde men to obey first wee grant that more obedience is due unto the superiour power then to the inferiour as long as it commandeth nothing contrary to Gods word As long therefore as the Ministers propound the word of God unto the Church and for avoiding of offence command such things to be observed as appertain to decency and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoever obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning things different to be observed with putting an opinion of necessity in them and of the worship of God and doe make them necessary when there is no danger of offence to ensue because this charge is contrary to the word of God no obedience is due unto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due unto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would have other powers to obey it But the Ministeriall power is superiour unto the Civill in those things in which it is superiour that is which are of God delivered commanded and committed unto the Ministers that by them they may be declared unto the Church But In matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the civill power is superiour by reason of the authority which God in these matters hath given unto the civill Magistrate and not to the Ministers of the Church 8 Object Fathers and Councels are cited But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alledge the testimonies of Councels and Fathers in confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for us to doe if their sentences had not the force and authority of Ecclesiasticall doctrine But we never bring nor receive the testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind Answer as if without the authority of the holy Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of any points of doctrine Neither yet is there regard had of them in vaine 2. Uses of the testimonies of Fathers in points of doctrine For 1. They which are rightly minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a testimony of lower degree 2. They which attribute more authority unto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the truth are very well refuted by the testimony of them whom they have made their Judges Also they say 9 Object Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. That order and decency in the Church is necessary by the commandement of God according as it is said Let all things be done comely and in order For God is not the authour of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded Answ Of meere particulars there is no concluding A double liberty of the Church in matters of order and God offended But as God commandeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church so hath he given a double liberty in it unto his Church To appoint it That it be arbitrary for the Church to appoint as may be most commodious for it what order shall be in every place and at every time observed To keep or not to keep it being appointed so it be without offence That also after any thing is certainly ordained it may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of every one of the godly if there be no danger of offence For it is necessary that ever a difference be put betwixt the commandements of God by the observing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence 1 Cor. 14.40 Galat. 5.1 Col. 2.16 And the same Apostle who commandeth all things to be done comely and in order willeth us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and that we should be condemned of no man in meat or drinke or in respect of a holy-day Wherefore not they who without contempt of divine things or wantonnesse or danger of offence doe something otherwise in these things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commandement of God concerning keeping order who either would have no order in the Church or trouble that which is well appointed These men find fault also with the obscurity of the holy Scripture 10 Object Obscure things do not suffice without interpretation 1 Pet. 3.16 which they prove both by examples of hard places of Scripture and also out of Peter where it is said That there are some things hard to be understood in the Epistles of Paul And therefore sith that things darkly spoken without they be expounded cannot suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they urge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessary to be received with the Scripture But here above all things they injure the holy Ghost ascribing darknesse and obscurity unto him Answer The Minor is false if they respect the ground who of purpose endeavoured to apply himself in simplicity of speech to the capacity of the common people and the rudest For those things which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessary to be known of all as are the articles of our Beliefe and the ten Commandements they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne even as the 119. Psalme teacheth where the word of the Lord is called a lanterne to our feet and a light to our pathes Againe the entrance into thy word sheweth light and giveth understanding to the simple The word of the Prophet is called a light shining in a darke place To which ye doe well that yee take heed as unto a light that shineth in a darke place untill the day dawne and the day-starre arise in your heart 2 Pet. 1.19 And Solomon affirmeth that hee writeth to give the simple sharpnesse of wit and to the child Prov. 1.4 20. knowledge and discretion Againe that wisedome cryeth without and uttereth her voice in the streets Paul also saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospel 1 Corinth 1.17 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is unknowne to many Answ Yea to the reprobate 2 Cor. 4.3 Isa 65.2 Rom. 10.21 Psal 36.3 Mat. 11.25 not
prophet from the beginning of the Church 〈◊〉 all câ—â—â—â—ty The great and chiefe Prophet which is Christ is a person immediately ordained of God even from the beginning and cradle of the Church in Paradise to all eternity sent of the Father to declare the will of God towards mankinde to institute and appoint a ministery to teach by the Word and Sacraments the holy Ghost working together with him and lastly in the flâ—â—h to preach the Gospel and to make knowne in his flesh by his doctrine and workes that he is the Some consubstantiall and of the same substance with the Father and authâ—â—â— of the Evangelike doctrine giving by it the holy Ghost and kindling faith in the hearts of men sending Apostles and gathering unto himselfe a Church â—â—t of mankâ—â—de of which he may be heard invocated and worshipped Wherefore the Proâ—â—â— call function of Christ is There paâ—â—â—â—â— Câ—â—st 〈…〉 1. To open and declare unto Angels and men God and his 〈◊〉 which could not be knowne but by the Son and by speciall revelarâ—◠〈◊〉 The â—â—m which is in the bosome of the Father hee hath declared him The things thâ— have heard of the Father Mâ—â—◠〈◊〉 5 〈◊〉 1â— 6 10. those speake I to the world Likewise to refine and puâ—â—â—â— the Law and worship of God from corruptions 2. To institute or ordaine and to maintain the ministry of the Gospel to raise up and to send Prophets Apostles and other ministers of the Church to bestow on them the gift of prophâ—cie and to furnish them with gifts necessary to their ministery He that is 〈…〉 11. Christ hath given some Apostles some Prophets and some Doctors c. Therefore said the â—â—sâ—ome of God I will send them Prophets and Apostles c. I will give you a mouch â—â—a wisedome where against all your adversâ—ries shall not be able to speake nor resist So the spirit of Christ is said to have spoken by the Prophets 3. To be through his ministery effectuall in the hearts of the heaters that is to teach us within our hearts by his spirit to lighten our mindes to move our hearts to beleeve and obey the Gospel Hee shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire Then opened hee their understanding Mat. 3 11. 〈◊〉 24 4â— 2 pheâ— 5 â—0 â—â—â—ke 10.9 〈◊〉 â—â— 14 2â— 5 that they might understand the Scriptures Christ gave himselfe for the Church that he might sanctifie it and cleanse it by the washing of water through the word They went forth and preached every where and the Lord wrought with them and confirmed the word with signes that followed The Lord opened the heart of Lydia that thee attended unto the things which Paul spake The Lord gave testimony unto the word of his grace Briefly the parts of Christs propheticall office are these three 1. To reveale his Fathers will 2. To ordaine a Ministery 3. To teach the hearts of men or to be effectuall by his ministery And these three things Christ doth and did performe even from the beginning of the Church and will performe to the end of the world and that by his owne authority power and efficacy and therefore Christ is called the Word Why Christ is called 〈…〉 not onely in respect of the Father of whom in cogitation beholding himselfe and considering the image of himselfe not vanishing but subâ—sting consubstantiall co-equall co-eternall to the Father himselfe hee was begotten but also in respect of us because hee is that person which spake to the Fathers and brought forth the living and quickning word or Gospel out of the bosome of the Father Seven differences between Christ other Prophets By these things which have been now spoken is also understood what difference there is between Christ and other Prophets both of the Old and New Testament and why he is the chief Prophet and Doctor The difference and eminence consisteth in his nature and office Christ 〈…〉 Christ is the very Son of God and God and Lord of all and doth immediatly utter the word of the Father and is the Embassadour and Mediatour sent of the Father Other Prophets are only men and his servants called and sent by him Christ authour of the doctrine they preachers only of it John 1.16 Christ is authour and revealer of the doctrine and therefore the prince of all Prophets Others are signifiers of that which they have received from Christ For whatsoever knowledge and propheticall spirit is in them all that they have from Christ revealing and giving it to them Therefore is the spirit of Christ said to have spoken in the Prophets neither hath hee opened onely to the Prophets the doctrine which he teacheth but also to all the godly John 1.18 Of his fulnesse have we all received that is all the Elect even from the beginning of the world unto the end No man hath seen God at any time the onely begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Christs gifts infinite theirs finite His propheticall wisdome is infinite and perfect and therefore in all gifts he excelleth others even according to his humanity Christ giveth gifts and receiveth not they receive and give not John 10.14 This Prophet Christ appointeth the ministery sendeth and ordaineth Prophets and Apostles he giveth the holy Ghost and gifts necessary for the Prophets Apostles and all Ministers of the word to the performing of their duty He shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you He shall lead you into all truth Christ principally moveth mens hearts they instrumentally Christ himself is not only the authour of the doctrine and erecter and maintainer of the external ministery but also by his own and other Prophets voice and outward ministery hee preacheth effectually to men inwardly through the vertue and working of the holy Ghost Others are only the instruments of Christ and that arbitrary and at his disposition and direction Christs doctrine full and cleere theirs dark defective The doctrine of Christ which being made man he uttered by his own and by his Apostles mouthes is much more cleere and full than the doctrine of Moses and the Prophets of the Old Testament Christ is authorised by himselfe they by Christ Christ therefore hath authority of himself others from him if Christ speake we must beleeve him of him selfe others because Christ speaketh in them These things are expresly proved by these places of holy Writ At sundry times and in divers manners God spake in the old time so our Fathers by the Prophets in these last dayes he hath spoken unto us by his Son Heb 1.1 3.3 John 10.14 Mat. 17.3 Luke 10.16 This man is counted worthy of more glory than Moses inasmuch as hee that buildeth the house hath more honour than the house The spirit of truth which I will send you shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you This
but also our soules Therefore he ought to suffer not only in body but in soule also 2. Christ was to deliver us from the paines and torments of hell Therefore hee of force must suffer them which being so he either suffered them before his death or after death The Papists themselves confesse that hee suffered not after death Therefore it must needs be that he suffered them before death But these paines he suffered not in the body for the sufferings of the body were only externall Therefore he suffered those griefs in his soule 3. It is very convenient that the extremest and most grievous part of Christs Passion which was these dolours of minde should not be passed over without mention in the Creed But if the Article of Descension into hell concerne them not they should be left unmentioned sith that the former Articles treat only of the externall sufferings of the body which Christ suffered without him There is no doubt therefore but that by this Article the ghostly passions or sufferings of his soule are signified This is the true meaning of the Descension into hell and wee are to maintaine and defend against the Papists that which is certain namely that Christ so descended as hath been proved in this discourse Howbeit if any man be able to maintain with sure grounds and proofs that Christ descended in any other sense it is well I cannot Object 1. See D. Tho. Bils Bish of Winchin his Tract touching the redemption of mankind Pag. 154. c. John 19.30 The Articles of faith are to be understood properly and without any trope or figure Answ True except an Article being taken according to the proper signification be disagreeing from other places of Scripture But this Article of Christs descension into hell being taken properly is much repugnant to that saying of Christ It is finished For if Christ fulfilled and finished all the parts of our Redemption on the Crosse there was no cause why he should descend into hell that is into the place of the damned Object 2. The terrours and torments of the soule in Christ went before his buriall But the descension into hell followeth his buriall Therefore the descension into hell concerneth not those torments Ans The Minor of this Syllogisme is faulty in alledging that for a cause which is no cause For in the Creed the descension into hell followeth the buriall not that it was performed after the buriall but because it is an illustration of that which went before touching the Passion Death and Buriall lest any thing should be detracted from them as if it were said He suffered not only in body hee died not onely a bodily death hee was not onely buried but also suffered in soule the extreamest vexations and hellish dolours such as all the reprobate shall suffer for ever The chiefest therefore and weightiest part of Christs passion followeth in good order For the Creed proceedeth from the griefs of the body to the vexation and anguish of the minde and from the visible Passion to the invisible as it were from a lesse to a greater matter and circumstance 2. The fruits and use of Christs descension into hell CHrist descended into hell 1. That we might not descend thither but rather that hee might free us from the eternall paines and torments thereof 2. That he might transport and carry us triumphantly with him into heaven What it is to beleeve in Christ who descended into hell Wherefore to beleeve in Christ which descended into hell is to beleeve that Christ sustained for mee in his soule infernall and hellish paines and torments and that exceeding ignominy which is due unto the wicked in hell that thereby I might not descend into hell and that I might never be forced to suffer them all which otherwise I should suffer in hell eternally but that of the contrary rather I might ascend with Christ into heaven and there injoy with him exceeding happinesse and glory for ever and ever This is the use and profit of this Article of Christs descension into hell ON THE 17. SABBATH Quest 45. What doth the Resurrection of Christ profit us Answ First by his Resurrection he vanquished death that he might make us partakers of that righteousnesse which hee had gotten us by his death a Rom. 4.25 1 Pet. 1.3 1 Cor. 15.16 Again wee are now also stirred up by his power to a new life b Rom. 6.4 Col. 3.1 c. Eph. 1.3 2.5 Lastly the Resurrection of our head Christ is a pledge unto us of our glorious resurrection c 1 Cor. 15.20 21. The Explication THus farre have we continued the Treatise of Christs humiliation It remaineth that wee proceed unto his glorification for which hee rose the third day from the dead For the humiliation of the Mediatour was not to endure for ever but it was enough that he suffered once and died notwithstanding the efficacy and power thereof in preserving and maintaining the blessings issuing and flowing thence with full stream endureth for ever Now in Christs Resurrection two things are especially to be considered the history Two things to be considered in Christs resurrection and the fruit thereof In the history wee are to observe Who rose Who it was that rose from the dead 1. The history and therein to wit Christ both God and man in that body in which he died For this the Word never put off How he rose The manner of his rising which was that he who was verily dead revived from death recalling his soule to his body and gloriously came forth of his Sepulchre on the third day according to the Scriptures and that both by his Fathers and his own force and power I say not the power of his flesh but of his God-head For he was raised of the Father by himself because the Father worketh by the Son The testimonies of his rising The testimonies of his true resurrection Hee shewed himself openly to many women and Disciples the Angels bare witnesse thereunto 4. The fruits of Christs resurrection c. The fruits of Christs resurrection are expressed in these questions following The chief questions of Christs Resurrection are 1. Whether Christ rose againe 2. How he rose 3. For what cause he rose 4. What are the fruits of his resurrection 1. Whether Christ rose again INsidels beleeve that Christ died but beleeve not that he rose from death Neverthelesse that Christ rose again is proved by the restimonies of Angels Women Evangelists Apostles and other Saints who after his resurrection saw him felt him and talked with him And we were to beleeve the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heaven although they had not seen him 2. How Christ rose THe maner of Christs Resurrection is declared by these circumstances following 1. Christ did rise truely and indeed so that his soule did truely and indeed returne unto his body from which it was
they to whom it is given Things indifferent are diligently to be discerned from Gods worship And this is the difference betweene things indifferent or of middle quality and those things which are properly the worship of God Which difference we must diligently observe serve 1. Because when men feigne other worships of God in them they feigne another will of God which is to feigne another God When they therefore so do as erst Aaron and Jeroboam did they are no lesse accused of Idolatry then they who purposely worship another God besides that Jehovah revealed in the Church 2. Because by confounding of the true worship with false worships the true God is confounded with Idols which are worshipped with those worships invented by men 3. Because whatsoever is not of faith is sin And when any man doth a thing as thereby to worship God his conscience not knowing whether God will be worshipped after this manner or no he doth it not of faith but is ignorant and doubteth whether God be pleased or displeased with his worke and therefore he presumeth to do that albeit it may displease God Wherefore he doth not thereby worship but contemne God But because the defenders of worships invented by men alledge certaine places in which the Scripture willeth us to obey the commandements of men and do thence conclude that they have the force and nature of divine ordinances and so of divine worship it is therefore necessary that here we should say something touching humane traditions and their differences Of mens commandements and the authority of Ecclesiasticall Traditions THere are foure sorts of those things which men command Gods ordinances proposed by men The ordinances of God which God will that men propose unto others to be observed but not in their owne name but in the name of God himselfe as being themselves the ministers and messengers not the authors thereof So the Ministers of the Church propound the heavenly doctrine of God to the Church Parents to their Children and Masters to their Schollars so Magistrates propound the Commandments of the Decalogue unto their Subjects The obedience of those Commandements is and is called Gods worship because they are not humane ordinances but divine which are necessarily to be obeyed although no authority or commandement of any creature came thereto yea although all creatures should command the contrary Hitherto appertaine many places of Scripture Prov. 6.20 Deut. 17.2 Exod 16.8 Mat. 23.2 3. Luke 10.17 1 Cor. 4.21 2 Cor. 13.10 1 Thes 4.2 8. 2 Thes 3.14 Heb. 13.14 as My sonne keep thy fathers commandement and forsake not thy Mothers instruction Ye know the commandements we gave you by the Lord Jesus He therefore that despiseth these despiseth not man but God The Scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses seat All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe and doe These and the like sayings will us to obey men as the ministers of God in those things which belong unto the ministery that is which God by expresse commandement hath testified that he will have published and commanded by them they grant not authority unto any to institute new worships of God at their owne pleasure according as it is said Prov. 30. â— 1 Tim. 1.3 4.11 6.2 3 4. 2 Tim. 3.16 17. Put nothing unto his words lest he reprove thee and thou be found a lyar Command some that they teach none other doctrine The civill ordinances of men which are determinations and prescriptions of circumstances necessary and profitable to the keeping of the Morall Commandements of the second Table 2. Civill ordinances of men Such are the positive laws of Magistrates Parents Masters and of all who beare rule over others in the Civill State The obedience of these Laws as touching the generall is the worship of God because the generall thereof is morall and commanded by God himselfe namely obedience towards magistrates and others which beare rule in the Common-wealth But as concerning the speciall of the action or as touching the circumstances it is no divine worship because those works are divine worship which must necessarily be done in respect of Gods Commandement although no Commandement or respect of any creature were adjoyned but these except they were commanded by the Magistrates might be done or omitted without any offence against God but yet notwithstanding such Civill ordinances of Magistrates and other Governours bind the consciences of men that is we must necessarily performe them neither are they neglected without the displeasing of God and therefore by reason of these commandements of Magistrates we are bound also to performe the works injoyned us by these commandements even although we could omit them without giving any offence if we meane to retaine our bedience pure and sound So To carry weapons or Not to carry weapons To pay a lesser or greater tribu e or Subsidie is not in it selfe the worship of God but the obedience which is in these and the like matters due to be rendred unto the Magistrate is Gods worship Therefore if the Magistrare neither command nor forbid either it is free to do either but if he command any one thing he sinneth whosoever doth the contrary although he could keep it never so close neither offend any man thereby The reason is because the generall namely obedience towards the Magistrate which is Gods worship is violated Wherefore these specials and particulars are by an accident made the worship of God to wit by the commandement of the Magistrate Hither belong these Scriptures Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 2 5. Titus 3.1 Ephes 8.1 Coâ— 3.22 23. Whosoever resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God Ecclesiasticall ordinances The Ecclesiasticall or Ceremoniall ordinances of men which are determinations or prescriptions of circumstances necessary or profitable for the keeping of the Morall Commandements of the first Table for they belong either to the keeping and maintaining of order and comelinesse in the Church assemblies and the Ecclesiasticall administration of the Ministery or to externall exercise of godlinesse both publique and private or to avoid the giving of offence unto the weaker and to bring them unto the Church and knowledge of the truth of which kinde are the time place forme and course of Sermons and Prayers and Readings in the Church likewise Fasts the manner of proceeding in election of Ministers in gathering and distributing of almes and such like whereof God hath commnded nothing in speciall The generall also of these Laws as of the Civill is morall if they be rightly and profitably made and therefore it is the worship of God as it is Gods worship to heare the word of God to pray unto God as well publiquely with the company of the faithfull as privately to bestow almes upon our poore brethren to receive the Sacraments But the Ceremonies themselves are not only no worship of God but neither doe they binde mens consciences neither is the
not discerning the Lords body Hebr. 10.29 Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye be shall be thought worthy who hath troden under foot the Son of God and hath counted the bloud of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and hath done despite unto the spirit of grace VII Therefore we dis-approve those other doctrines which teach 1. That Christs bodie is in the bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or under the accidents of bread corporally present by consubstantiation or by transubstantiation 2. That Christs bodie is properly carried in the Ministers hands 3. That it is eaten by the bodily mouth 4. That the Pronoune This doth shew an uncertaine individuum or singularitie or an indeterminate substance 5. That This demonstrates both the bread and also Christs bodie lurking invisibly in the bread 6. That wicked men do properly eat Christs bodie ARTICLE XI Of the Civill Magistrate Translated out of Dutch into Latine I. IN man there is a two-fold government the one belonging to the soule or the inward man making him truly to know God rightly to worship him and at length to attaine righteousnesse and life eternall the other governes the bodie and outward man that he might passe this politicall life amongst men with all modestie and honestie II. And although the holy Scripture chiefly handles the government of the soule and is ordained principally by God to give directions to the soule yet it delivers also many excellent and wholsome precepts concerning the outward government of the bodie And for the better administration of this that mankind might be preserved God hath commanded in his word that among men some should command and have the charge of civill government others should obey and be subject to that government Those by a relation are called Magistrates and Subjects III. The power of the civill Magistrate is no lesse nay more necessary then our daily food then the sun aire or water seeing this terrene life cannot subsist without these for by these naturall things man breathes eats drinks lives and moves as other creatures which enjoy these things in common with man Now that men may not live like beasts but like men that is that they may live with all modestie and honestie before God and men that they may beware of all idolatrie blasphemy or any other abuse of Gods Name also that they may avoid all sort of filthinesse and damages by which either wee our selves or the life fame and possessions of our neighbour may be hurt and that the true knowledge of God sincere worship and feare and that all civill honestie may prevaile and that the publick peace and tranquillitie among men may not be troubled that every one may safely enjoy his owne that honest and necessary contracts may flourish and lastly that all things in the Common-wealth may be done in a lawfull way the civill Magistrate should be very carefull of seeing he is ordained for this end by God therefore they may truly be called beasts rather then men who would remove and overthrow this ordinance of God among men IV. The doctrine of the civill Magistrate consisteth of these three heads First concerning the authoritie of the Magistrate whether it is ordained by God or pleasing to him also of his office right and power as well in ecclesiasticall as politick affaires Secondly of the lawes to which Christian Magistrates are tied Thirdly of the dutie of subjects what they owe to their Magistrates and how far they are to obey them Of each of these what is to be concluded out of Gods word the ensuing Aphorismes will teach V. The Apostle expresly teacheth that the Magistrate is ordained by God in these words There is no power but of God The powers that be are ordained of God Rom. 13.1 4. For he is the minister of God to thee for good By this divine authoritie the Magistrate being guarded let him think how wisely and diligently he must carry himselfe in his office For if hee be so from God that hee is the minister of God surely hee should endeavour with all care that all things be done according to Gods ordinance as well in ecclesiasticall as in politick affaires neither must hee doe any thing wittingly and willingly against it From this ground of divine ordination Moses the man of God and holy King Jehosaphat did so speak unto their Judges and Governours Take heed what ye doe for ye judge not for man but for the Lord Deut. 1.17 2 Chron. 19.6 7. who is with you in the judgement Wherefore now let the feare of the Lord be upon you take heed and doe it for there is no iniquity with the Lord our God nor respect of persons nor taking of gifts Againe if the Magistrate be ordained by God to be his minister hee ought to assure himselfe that he must serve God that he must doe all to his honour and for mans benefit so he doe that according to the prescription of Gods word VI. Therefore that cannot be unpleasing to God which he himself ordained Yea he calls Magistrates by his owne Name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gods because they exercise judgement in stead of God Exod. 22.8 If the thiefe cannot be found then shall the master of the house be brought unto the gods God standeth in the midst of gods Psal 82.1 which Psalme Christ alledgeth John 10.35 If he called them gods to whom the word of God came I have said Ye are gods Besides the Scripture witnesseth that many holy men did exercise the office of the Magistrate as Josuah David Ezechia among the Kings Joseph and Daniel among Princes Moses Josuah Gedeon amongst the Dukes or Judges VII Away then with these fooleries of Anabaptists and other fanaticall spirits saying That in the Old Testament the office of the Magistrate was necessary to Gods people by reason of the imperfection of the Jewish nation but that it s written in the New Testament The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them Luk. 22.25 and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors But it shall not be so with you Galat. 5.16 Againe In Christ nothing availeth except the new creature Also I say unto you Matth. 5.39 Doe not resist the evill VIII For first if the imperfection of the Jewish people did necessarily require a Magistrate surely much more necessary will the having of a Magistrate be to us Christians seeing it is written also of us In many things we offend all But they who offend in many things must needs be imperfect yet wee deny not James 3.2 but that Christians by Gods favour have a great prerogative above the Jewes in respect of the cleare knowledge we have of God and of that grace which is exhibited to us by Christ but in respect of our politick life we have no lesse need of this divine ordination of Magistrates then the Jewes had Besides it is written in the New Testament not in the
as the Egyptians testified by their acclamations to Joseph Gen. 41.43 and the Wiseman saith Prov. 11.1 Rom. 13. 1 Pet. 2.17 My son feare God and the King And Paul Give feare to whom feare is due and honour to whom honour appertaineth And Peter Feare God Honour the King XXIX To this honour succeedeth subjection to wit that godly subjects yeeld to their Magistrate in all just things obedience in the Lord which obedience consisteth in three things 1. That subjects obey all the precepts and commands of the Magistrate 2. That they pay them their due Tributes and Customes 3. That they beare the Civill burthens without murmuring such as conduce to the preservation of the State and defence of the Countrey Of these Paul speaketh Tit. 1.3 Put them in minde that they submit themselves to Principalities and powers that they may be obedient that they may be prepared for every good â—orke And Rom. 13.1 Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Where we must note that he saith to the higher powers for subjects are not subject to a foreigne and strange Magistrate but to their owne as the Magistrate is to command his owne subjects and not strangers or foreigners XXX The Apostles reasons by which he commendeth this subjection to subjects are chiefly six The first is taken from Gods command God so ordained that Magistrates should rule their subjects and subjects should obey their Magistrates but it is not lawfull to resist Gods Ordinance 2. From the contrary wicked and pernicious effect It is most unjust that the creature should resist the Creator but to resist the Migistrate is to resist God for he is ordained to be Gods Minister and Vicegerent 3. From an effect also pernicious The disobedience and contempt of the Magistrate brings revenge and punishment for the Magistrate should be a terrour to the wicked but it is a foolish thing for a man to cast himselfe rashly upon punishment 4. From a profitable effect For it is praise-worthy to obey the Lawes and the Magistrate for he is given to the subjects for their good 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. From the impulsive antecedent cause and the end thereof If the disobedient feare not the punishment of the Magistrate yet they ought to keepe their conscience inviolated which by their disobedience they wrong shamefully and provoke Gods anger against them both temporall and eternall 6. From the adjuncts To whom tribute is due to him obedience cannot be denied the subjects then paying rightly tribute to their Magistrates they ought also to performe due obedience By these arguments of Paul the Subjects through all Churches and Common-wealths should by all meanes be driven to yeeld due obedience to the Magistrate XXXI There is also required in Subjects forbearance in bearing with the blemishes and infirmities of the Magistrates as likewise they ought to pray to God for them for because the burthen of the Magistrate is no lesse dangerous then laborious under which oftentimes they faint and are forced to indure much extremity so that sometimes they have scarce time or place to breathe in therefore it is no wonder if many times he is carried away with humane affections to wit with pride ambition intemperance pleasures sloth forgetfulnesse security anger fury and such like passions to which so much the more then other men they use to be obnoxious by how much more they are urged and assaulted with molestations more then other men It will be then the duty of pious Subjects to beare patiently with these infirmities no lesse then children should patiently indure the blemishes of their Parents Besides they ought to beseech God for their safety and prosperity as the Apostle prescribes I exhort above all things that intercession prayer and supplication be made for all men for Kings and all that be in authority that we may live a peaceable and quiet life in all godlinesse and honesty for this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour XXXII In the saying of Paul which we alledged a little above three questions use to be moved to which we will briefly and succinctly answer The first is on the Subjects part Whether the Pope Bishops and other Clergy-men are contained also under the name of higher Powers The second as also the third are of the Magistrates part Whether wicked Magistrates as were Nero and Caligula or such as are given to Idolatry be worthy of honour Also Whether obedience is to be given to that Magistrate who oppresseth his Subjects with divers wrongs and burthens and so becomes a Tyrant commanding oftentimes that which is repugnant to good manners and honesty against God and his Word XXXIII To the first question it is thus answered Though Bishops Ministers and Pastors in respect of their Doctrine and Function immediately are subject to God yet notwithstanding in respect of the Calling it selfe to wit the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and their diligence in performing of it yea much more in respect of their strength and life the government of their families and possessions by the generall command of the Apostle they are no lesse subject to the Magistrate to his power and jurisdiction then all other Christians Hence we reade in the Old Testament that the Priests and Levites in their Office depended on the Kings beck and pleasure and did all things accordingly as we see in the history of David Solomon Mat. 22.21 Mat. 17.27 Rom. 13.1 Josaphat Josiah Ezekiah In the New Testament saith Christ Give to Cesar that which is Cesars Christ also paid tribute for himselfe and for Peter the Apostle also saith without any limitation Let every soule be subject to the higher Powers The same doth Gregory acknowledge of the Romane Prelates l. 1. Epist 31. and so doth Chrysostome Bishop of Constantinople expound that saying of Paul Let every soule be subject This saith he is injoyned not onely to secular men but also to all Priests and Monks whether he be an Evangelist an Apostle or a Prophet or whosoever hath attained to high places for this subjection is no hinderance to piety S. Bernard also thus writes to Henry Archbishop of Sena or Senon Bern. Ep. 42. who refused to obey the King Let every soule be subject to the Powers If all then yours Who will except you out of this universality He that goes about to except you goes about to delude you Christ both commanded and practised otherwise Give saith he to Cesar what is Cesars and to God what belongs to God what he uttered verbally he performed really Cesars Maker stuck not to pay tribute to Cesar he left this example for you to follow By the Imperiall Law it is thus commanded Let all live according to the Laws although they belong to the house of God l. Omnes C. de leg Const Princip XXXIV From this command and practise of Christ the Bishop of Rome hath freed himselfe by denying tribute or obedience to Cesar nor hath he only
sacred mysteries are written any Divinity which can tie us by any religion to beleeve the things contained in them but such force and amplitude there is in the Church which teacheth us that those bookes are sacred and recommends the faith and piety of the ancient Fathers that no man can oppugne them without grievous impiety Thus he Now he speaks not of the characters papers or parchment of the bookes the trust and authoritie whereof is among the Book-keepers or Stationers but of the Scriptures themselves of whose authoritie we dispute Concerning these hee affirmes both the heads of the Position 1. That there is no Divinitie in them for these words Nor any thing and Nothing are equivalent 2. Except so much as it receives from the Church for this is the meaning of the adversary but there is so much force in the Church We omit other Writers for brevities sake Let the Christian world judge of this Jesuites boldnesse and whether this Position alone be not sufficient to defend the assumption 12. Neither doth he account them authenticall but by the Churches authoritie 13. Yea he beleeves not God himselfe but for the Church The Assertion Here the Jesuite flings away both buckler and speare for he knowes too well that Poperie is held here Both these false and impious Positions have been blabbed abroad by their Triarian and Manipular that is their better and meaner sort of Writers The former by Eckius in his Enchiridion in these words The Scripture is not authenticall without the Churches authority This hee calls in the margine His Achilles for the Catholicks And shortly after Hence it appeares that the Church is more ancient then the Scripture and that the Scripture is not authenticall but by the Churches authority The other by Stapleton against Whitaker Cap. 10. §. 3. lib. De author Script We doe not beleeve God but for the Church Is not this I pray you blasphemously to subject God and his word to the Pope and his Church Neither can so great a blasphemy be eluded by the Jesuites cavills to wit That the Scripture in respect of it selfe hath its owne authentick authority from its owne worth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby it should be credited whose author is the first Truth not the Pope and that the Church as the ground and pillar of truth doth conferre somewhat to the credit of Scripture For this later point was never yet questioned for ought wee know Whether the Church conferres any thing towards the credit of the Scripture But that former assertion of the Sophisters Whether we doe not beleeve God and the Scripture but for the Church that former passage though it be truly said yet it is not truly beleeved in Popery For they detract from the Scripture that internall worth of credit as it was but now shewed out of Andradius denying any Divinitie to be in Scripture And their opinion is still firme That the Scripture is not worthy to be credited either in it selfe or by us but for the Church 14. It makes the Scriptures authoritie depend upon the Popes arbitrement because that authoritie resides in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church The Assertion Here that he might make shew of denying the former he hath cunningly muttered out the later which being added hee saw necessarily that the former would follow For if in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church the whole authority of the Church resides and if in the authoritie of the Church the Scriptures authority resides as the two former Positions have it must necessarily follow that in the Pope the whole authoritie of Scripture resides depends upon his beck Now that this authoritie of the Church resides in the Pope alone as in the head of the universall Church it is the common stile of the Canonists and Sophisters who advance the Pope above Councels Gregory de Valentia a Jesuite of an approved cut or coine tells us plainly that in the Pope as in the head of the whole Church this authoritie resides The Position then remaines and the proofe of the assumption 15. And because the Pope alone or with his Prelats is the Church therefore the Pope and his Prelats beleeve the Scriptures for themselves but they will have the lay-people to beleeve the Scriptures for the Pope and Prelats The Assertion The Jesuites were fools if they should openly speak so but as foolishly do they deny this affirming what they do affirme That we beleeve not either Scripture or God himselfe but for the Church and that the Pope with his Prelats are the Church For from hence it is as needfull to affirm both to wit that the Pope Prelats beleeve the Scriptures and God for themselves because they beleeve not but for the Church which themselves are the Laicks beleeve for the Pope and Prelats because they beleeve for the Church which is the Pope and Prelats This as necessarily followes as if we should prove there be foure Evangelists on this ground that there are twice two Evangelists Therefore not Parrie in affirming but the Jesuite in denying this Thesis lieth and the assumption remaines 16. Thus the faith of Popes Prelats Lay-men concerning the Scriptures stands upon the sandy foundation of humane testimony which indeed is no foundation The Assertion Every one may see that this is the consectary of the former For if the faith of Popes Prelats Mat. 7. Bellar. l. 3. de Justificat c. 2. who are men not gods nor angels stands upon themselves and if the faith of the Laitie stands upon the Pope and Prelats it must needs stand upon humane testimony Now for faith in divine things to stand upon this what else is it but to stand upon a sandy foundation that is upon an unstable movable each houre uncertain and indeed no foundation For in divine things an uncertain faith is no faith when by Bellarmine's own testimony it behoveth true faith to be most certain Neither will that painted shift of the Valentian Jesuite availe him saying That the authoritie of the Church that is of the Pope and Prelats is not purely humane nor purely divine but partly divine partly humane Such indeed was the authoritie of the Prophets and Apostles who wee know were immediatly called and illuminated by God Though they were men yet they spake wrote in the Church by divine inspiration We will give equall authoritie to the Pope and Prelats with the Apostles if they can shew us that they write and speak by the same inspiration If they can produce the word of those that were divinely inspired that is the holy Scriptures otherwise their Decrees are but humane testimonies and sand 17. They accuse the Scriptures of so great obscuritie in things that concerne faith worship and manners that without the Popes interpretation no man can understand them The Assertion The first part is the ordinarie stile of Papists and it is at large defended by Bellarmine That the