Babylon the great Whore with all the Kingdoms of Antichrist The subject of it is two-fold 1. The present state of the Church 2. The future state of it The things which are and the things which shall be hereafter Revel 1. 19. The three first Chapters of this Book contain seven several Epistles to the seven several Churches of Asia the other following Chapters are a Prophetical History of the Church of God from Christs Ascension to his second coming The holy Ghost foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impair the credit and authority of this above all other Books wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Book of Scripture First The Author of it is set in the fore-front or face of it The Revelation of Iesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himself to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the several Epistles to the Churches in several styles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. That holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharp two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feet like brass 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven stars 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithful and true witness the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly The Instrument or Pen-man his servant Iohn the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his name at least thrice saying I Iohn Chap. 1. 9. and 21. 1 2. and 22. 8. wheâ—â—â—â— in the Gospel he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the History of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly In the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together vers 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himself the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ Behold I come shortly 4. Of Iohn I Iohn heard and saw all these things 5. The Protestation of Jesus Christ v. 18. Fourthly The matter of the Book doth convince the Authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Prophetical Spirit doth appear the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set down part of the Prophecies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent Testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greek and Latine ascribe this Book to Iohn the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chrysostome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenâ—us To deny then the truth of this Book is contrasolem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sun it self The Chiliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Book but those places have been cleared long ago by the learned as bearing another sense See Dr Raynolds Conf. with Hart c. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingeniously saith one He knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetane at the end of his Exposition of Iude confesseth that he understandâ— not the literal sense of the Revelation and therefore Exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of two and twenty Chapters the best Expositors of it are Ribera Brightman Paraeus Cartwright Fulk Dent Forbes Mede Simonds Foord 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Prophets sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come The Old Testament may convince the Jews which deny the New Testament of this truth Iohn 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 of Isaiah is a large History of his sufferings We have also another Book or Testament more clearly witnessing of Christ The Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiastical and false Canon follow CHAP. V. Of the Books called Apocrypha SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Books of the Old Testament as the Jews do those of the New as if they had proceeded from the Devil Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Books called by us Apocrypha i hidden do belong to the Old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten Word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue Whatsoever Scripture 1. Is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeal and confirm their Doctrine by it that is Canonical and of equal Authority with the New Testament But the holy Scripture of the Old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speaks even of the Books of the Old Testament as is gathered both from the universal all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the New Testament was published 2. Christ speaks not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in general to search it Iohn 5. 39. this famous elogium being added That it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternal life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeal to it and confirm their Doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. and 17. 11. and 20. 43. and 26. 20. the New Testament gives testimony of the Old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiastical Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Books belong Tobit Iudith first and second of the Maccabees Wisdom Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Esther for these neither contain truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custom they were called Canonical yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonical by the name of Apocryphal The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphal the third and fourth Book of Ezra the prayer of Manasses the third
when ye become men ye must put away these childish things Blow at the Root p. 82 83. The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord do prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Ioshua 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands That no man presume above that which is written 1 Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this last place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth That the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsel nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2. The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the Word perfect and compleat unto every work of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true Doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and putting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evil Paul would not have us think that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in ver 15. he not only useth the plural number calling them the holy writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Book but all the sentences and Books of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universal note therefore the Greek words the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We do not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound Doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore much more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae complexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now follows the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speak D Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speak of the state of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speak to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his Church 2. We grant that the Apostles living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospel delivered Viva Voce was no lesse a rule of Faith and Worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We do not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certain Historical and Ceremonial ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of Faith to speak properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be believed as necessary to be known to Salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of Faith 5. What is not in respect of the Matter an Article of Faith may be a Proposition to be believed with a Theological Faith if you look to the manner of revealing as that the Sun is a great light the Moon a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah blear-eyed The Papists do not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councel of Trent Sess. 4. decret 1. saith That the Truth and Discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirm that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Mark 75. Matth. 5. 21. for their errors and superstitions yea at length they affirmed that God gave to Moses in Mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentin Fathers Sâ—s 4. do command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we imbrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councel of Trent refused this he was excluded In the mean space they explain not what those Traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a List and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten Traditions not of the Word committed to writing onely they affirm in general whatsoever they teach or do which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it self is manifest That at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script contro Quaest. 6. c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say That it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may do well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not do well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either Scriptum or Nuncupativum set down in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a Nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemn witnesses The solemn witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Any indifferent Reader will conceive that the Scriptures make most for them who stand most for their Authority and perfection as all the reformed Divines do not only affirming but also confirming that the Scripture is not only a most perfect but the onely infallible rule of faith Titus 1. 2. Rom. 3. 4. God cannot lie and Let God be true and every man a lier that is subject to errour and falshood Every Article of Divine Faith must have a certain and
Epithete The holy Scriptures Rom. 1. 2. 2 Tim. 3. 15. The Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. Some think that Enoch the seventh from Adam wrote but Iude 14. speaketh only of his prophesying which might rather be by word of mouth then writing because our Saviour citing Scripture ever gives the first place to Moses and undertaking by the Scriptures to prove himself to be the Messiah that he ought to suffeâ— began at Moses Luke 24. 27. No doubt if there had been any more ancient then Moses our Saviour would have alledged it because all the Scripture that was before him was to give testimony of him The Author of the Scriptures was God himself they came from him in a special and peculiar manner commonly called inspiration which is an act of Gods Spirit immediately imprinting or infusing those notions into their brains and those phrases and words by which the notions were uttered 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by Divine inspiration or by inspiration of God Prophecy came not of old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved or carried by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. They did not write these things of their own heads but the Spirit of God did move and work them to it and in it 2 Sam. 23. 2. The spirit of the Lord spake by me that is did immediately guide me and tell me what matter to utter and in what words Stephen saith they resisted the Holy Ghost when they did disobey the Scriptures The Holy Ghost by the mouth of David and the mouth of Isaiah spake Acts 1. 16. 4. 25. 28. 25. The Inscriptions of many Prophetical Books and Epistles Apostolical run thus The word of the Lord which come to Hosea Amos Ioel Paul Peter Iames a servant of God and an Apostle of Christ. The Proeme that is set before divers Prophecies is this Thus saith the Lord and the Prophets inculcate that speech The mouth of the Lord hath spoken it because they would take off the thoughts of the people from their own persons and lift them up to consideration of God the chief Author It is all one to say The Scripture saith Rom. 4. 3. 10. 11. 11. 2. Gal. 4. 30. 1 Tim. 5. 10. and God saith Rom. 9. 25. Heb. 4. 3. 8. 5. 13. 5. and the word Scripture is put for God speaking in the Scripture The Scripture saith to Pharaâ—h Rom. 9. 7. and The Scripture hath shut up all men under sin Galat. 3. 22. for which in another place God hath shut up Rom. 11. 32. All other disciplines were from God and every truth whosoever speaks it is from the Holy Ghost but the Scripture in a singular manner is attributed to the Holy Ghost he immediately dictated it to the Holy men of God The efficient principall cause then of the Scripture was God the ten Commandments of which most of the rest is an exposition were written after a secret and unutterable manner by God himself therefore they are called the writings of God Exod. 32. 16. Secondly all the rest which was written though men were the instruments was done by his appointment and assistance Exod. 17. 14. â—sai 8. 1. Ier. 30 2. The Scripture is often attributed to the Holy Ghost as the Author and no mention is made of the Pen-men Heb. 10. 15. The Prophets and Apostles were the Pen-men of the Scripture whose Calling Sending and Inspiration was certainly Divine for whatsoever they taught the Church of God or left in writing they learned not before in the Schools 1 Cor. 2. 13. The Divine Authority of the Word may be defined a certain dignity and excellency of the Scripture above all other sayings or writings whatsoever whereby it is perfectly true in word and sense it deserves credit in all sayings narrations of things past present and to come threatnings and promises and as superiour doth binde to obedience if it either forbid or command any thing 1 Tim. 1. 15. 2 Pet. 1. 19. Iohn 5. 39. Heb. 6. 18. Rom. 1. 5. 2 Cor. 10. 5 6. 13. 3. 12. 12. Gal. 1. 1 12 13. though the things in mans judgement seem unlike or incredible or the Commandments hard and foolish to the carnal minde Hereticks have laboured to prove their corrupt and damnable opinions out of the Scripture and have received some books if not all as Divine The Turks at this day so esteem the five books of Moses as they will kisse such patches of Paper as they finde having any part thereof written in the same Aristaeus an Heathen when he had determined to have disputed against Scripture confesseth that he was forbidden by God in a dream Plato is termed Moses Atticus Moses speaking Greek The holy Scripture in it self is Divine and Authentical though no man in the world should so acknowledge it as the Sun in it self were light though all the men in the world were blinde and could not or would not see it but in respect of us it is Divine and Authentical when it is acknowledged and esteemed so to be The Scripture is the word of God written by holy men as they were inspired by the holy Ghost divinely containing all Divine Truth necessary to salvation for the edification and instruction of Gods Church thereunto and for the glory of God The holy Scriptures are that Divine Instrument and means by which we are taught to believe what we ought touching God and our selves and all creatures and how to please God in all things unto eternal life Robins Essayes 8th Observ. Divines have given almost fourty several Arguments to prove the Scriptures to be the word of God That the Scriptures were from God may appear by several Reasons 1. Intrinsecal taken out of the Scriptures themselves 2. Extrinsecal acts of God and works of providence about them 1. Intrinsecal 1. From the excellency of their matter which is heavenly the divine and supernatural matter contained in it It telleth us of such things as do far exceed the reach of mans reason and which it was impossible for any man to counterfeit and feign and which being told are so correspondent to reason that no man can see just cause to call them into question as the Doctrine of Creation of all things in six dayes the Doctrine of the fall of our first Parents the Story of the Delivering Israel out of Aegypt of the Delivering of the Law and ten Commandments the Doctrine of the incarnation of Christ Jesus of the Resurrection of the dead of the last Judgement of the life to come and of the Immortality of the soul for though this last was taught also by Philosophers yet it is so doubtfully and unperfectly handled by them in comparison of the delivering thereof in Scripture that it is apparent it was another Spirit which guided the teachers of it here then they were guided withall What Angel
and fourth of Maccabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senenfis Bellarmine and so the Councel of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is Whether those seven whole Books with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonical We do not deny but many of these especially Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonical and of infallible truth out of which firm arguments may be drawn that we deny Those Books which the Jews of old and the Reformed Churches now reckon for truly Canonical in the Old Testament are received all even by our Adversaries for Canonical without any exception 2. For the Canonical Books of the New Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the Old Testament whole Books are reckoned by them for Canonical which we hold Apocryphal The reason why these Books at first were added to holy Writ was this the Jews in their later times before and at the coming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Ierusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jews of the dispersion mingled with the Grecians These had written sundry Books in Greek which they made use of together with other parts of the Old Testament which they had in Greek of the Translation of the LXX when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrews receive only the two and twenty Books before-mentioned Hence it came that the Jews delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one Pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greek adulterate corrupted by the addition of certain Books written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. lib. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. Sect. 21. Tertul in Apol c. 19. They are called Apocryphal i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknown by that reason Iudges and Ruth should be Apocryphal but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonical Books but secretly and in private by private persons or because their Authority was obscure and doubtful with the Ancient These Books our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine Inspiration for these reasons All the Canonical Books of the Old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these Books were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jews was Malachi Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and Iohn Baptist came no Prophet Mark begins with the same words almost with which Malachi ended a good argument to prove that the New Testament is next to the Old But these Books were written by such who lived most of them after Malachi 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jews understood but the Fathers affirm and Papists acknowledge that most of these Books were written in Greek Ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonical 2. All the Books of the Old Testament were committed to the Jews and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jews for corrupting the sense of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those Books which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them Ioh. 5. 39. Ezra after the Captivity is reported to have gathered all the Books of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jews should have rejected or not received any Books being Canonical they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirm Yea there should have been some Canonical Books which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jews at that time there was none in the world The Canonical Books of the Old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalms with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3. There are two wayes to know a Book to be Canonical one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certain Testimony of them which did live when the Book was published who did witnesse that the Book was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these Books are known to be Canonical neither of these wayes they were rejected by the Jews who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Books unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their Doctrine All the Canonical Books in general Iohn 5. 39. and 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26 Luke 16. 29 31. and Chap. 24. 25 27 44. The most of all in special Genesis Matth. 19 4 5 6. Exodus Mat. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Ioshua Heb. 11. 30 31. Iudges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Mat. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Mat. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luk. 4. 27. First of Chronicles Mat. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Iob 1 Cor. 3. 19. Psalms Act. 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Isaiah Matth. 1. 23. Ieremiah Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezekiel Mat. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. and 15. 15 16. Hosea Mat. 12. 7. Ioel Act. 2. 12. Amos Act. 15. 16. Ionah Mat. 12. 40 41. Micah Mat. 10. 35. Nahum Rom. 10. 15. Habakkuk Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21. 5. Malachi Luke 1. 16 17. These Books were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their Doctrine Object If they be not Canonical therefore because they are not cited then Nahum and Zephany are not Canonical Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonical because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Answ. They are not therefore not Canonical only because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2. Nahum and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the Books of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. and 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonical but the Apostle applied himself to his hearers who did much esteem their authority Some have well concluded from Act. 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonical Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4. Those Books which contain manifest untruths contrary to the Word of God and the Books of holy
he followeth it for the most part and preferreth it before all the rest Maxima ex parte amplector caeteris omnibus antepono He speaks of the New Testament onely and of that Latine Translation of the New Testament in comparison of all other Latine Translations which were before him as Erasmus Castalion and such like These places may serve to shew that the vulgar Latine is corrupt no Book being entire or free from error Isidore Clarius Brixianus praefat in Biblia a great learned man of their own affirmeth That it hath 8000 places in which the sense of the Holy Ghost is changed Since the Councel of Trent two Popes have set forth this vulgar Edition diversly which of these shall be received as authentical How often do the Papists leave the vulgar in all their controversies when it is for their advantage so to do it is a matter ordinary with them and needless to be proved There is no Edition Ancienter then the Hebrew if the Latine hath been used a 1000 years in the Church the Hebrew hath been used almost 3000 years the Chaldee Arabick Syriack and Greek Editions also have been used above a 1000 years and so should be authentique by the Papists Argument Having spoken of the authority of the Scriptures the Canonical Books and the authentical Editions I now go on to treat of the end of the Scripture its adjuncts or properties fitted to that end and Interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture comes next to be considered of this I have spoken somewhat afore but shall now inlarge my self The end of the Scripture is considered 1. In respect of God 2. In respect of us In respect of God the end of the Scripture is a glorifying of him Iohn 7. 18. 2 Cor. 4. 6. by it we may learn to know love and fear him and so be blessed The glory of God is the chief end of all things Prov. 16. 4. In respect of us The end of the Scripture is 1. Intermediate Temporal Edification which is fitly referred to five principal uses The two first respect the minde the other three the heart will and affections It is profitable for Doctrine it serves to direct to all saving truth nothing is to be received as a truth necessary to salvation but what is proved out of Scripture Where that hath not a tongue to speak I must not have an ear to hear Hoc quia de scripturis non habet autoritatem eadem facilitate contemnitur qua probatur Hieron 2. Reproof or Confutation to refute all errors and heterodox opinions in Divinity By this sword of the Spirit Christ vanquished Satan Mat. 4. 4. 7. 10. by the Scripture he opposed the Jews Iohn 5. 45. 46. 47. 10. 34. by this he refuted the Scribes and Pharisees Mat. 9. 13. and 22. 1. Luke 10. 25 26. 27. Matth. 19. 34. and 21. 12 13. the Sadduces Matth. 22. 29. Thus Apollus convinced the Jews who denied Jesus to be the Christ Acts 18. 28. Thus the Apostles convinced those which urged Circumcision and the observation of the Jewish Law Acts 15. 15. Hâ—reticks are to be stoned with Scripture-Arguments Lapidandi sunt Heretici sacrarum literarum argumentis Athanasius By this Austin refuted the Pelagians Irenaeus the Ualentinians Tertullian the Mareionites Athanasius the Arrians 3. Correction of iniquity setting straight that which is amiss in manners and life 4. Instruction to righteousness Instruunt Patriarchae etiam errantes Basil saith The Psalms are a common Store house and Treasury of good Instruction The Title of the 32 and some other Psalms is Maschil that is A Psalm of Instruction 5. Comfort in all troubles Psal. 19. 8. and 119. 50. and 92. the Greek word for Gospel signifieth glad-tidings The Promises are the Christians best Cordials as Gods Promises are the rule of what we must pray for in faith so they are the ground of what we must expect in comfort All things which belong to the Gospel are comfortable 1. God the Author of the Gospel and revealed in it is the God of all comfort 2 Cor. 1. 3. 2. Jesus Christ the Subject of the Gospel is called Consolation in the abstract Luke 2. 25. 3. The Holy Ghost which breathes in the Gospel is called The Comforter Iohn Chap. 15. 16. 4. The Ministers or Ambassadors of the Gospel are the Messengers of peace and comfort 2. Ultimate and chiefest our Salvation and Life eternal Iohn 5. 39. and 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 15. It will shew us the right way of escaping hell and attaining Heaven It will shew us what to believe and practise for our present and eternal happinesse This was Gods aim in causing the Scripture to be written and we shall finde it fully available and effectual for the ends for which it was ordained by God CHAP. VIII Of the Properties of the Scripture THe properties which the Scripture must have for the former end are these It is 1. Of Divine Authority 2. True and Certain 3. The rule of Faith and Manners 4. Necessâ—ry 5. Pure and Holy 6. Sufficient and Perfect 7. Perspicuous and Plain 1. It s of Divine Authority we must believe it for its own sake It is Divine 1. In its Efficient cause and Original which is God the Father dictating in his Son declaring and publishing by his holy Spirit confirming and sealing it in the hearts of the faithful He wrote the Decalogue immediately with his own finger and commanded the whole Systeme and all the parts of Scripture to be written by his servants the Prophets and Apostles as the publique Actuaries and Pen-men thereof therefore the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the Holy Ghost who did dictate both the matter and words Those speeches are frequent The Lord said and The mouth of the Lord hath spoken 2. In the subject matter which is truth according to godliness certain powerful of venerable antiquity joyned with a sensible demonstration of the Spirit and Divine presence and with many other things attesting its Divine Authority Whence it follows that the Authority of the Holy Scriptures is 1. Infallible which expresseth the minde and will of God to whom truth is essential and necessary 2. Supreme and Independent into which at last all faith is resolved from which it is not lawful to appeal By which singular authority the Scripture is distinguished both from all prophane and Sacred writings and Paul honors it with this Elogie A faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation 1 Tim. 1. 15. A more sure word 2 Pet. 1. 19. the Comparative for the Superlative in which there is no doubting and uncertainty but all things firm As God is Iehovah of himself so is his word Authoritative of it self and is true and to be obeyed whether thou think it Scripture or no. There is no higher authority for thee to appeal to it is above opinions of men conscience and therefore it must
for leaving out that Title in our English Bibles for it is well known that that Title is not given by the holy Ghost but by the Scholiast who took it from Eusebius General is a meer English term and of no doubtfull signification Catholick is both Greek and by their saying of double and therefore doubtfull signification The Syriack Interpreter hath this Inscription of these Epistles as Tremellius sheweth Tres Epistolae trium Apostolorum ante quorum oculos Dominus noster se transformavit id est Iacobi Petri Ioannis For the Syrians doe not esteem the second of Peter nor the second and third of Iohn nor the Epistle of Iude Canonical The Apostles Iames Peter Iohn and Iude have publisht seven Epistles as mystical as succinct both short and long short in words long in sense and meaning Iames For the difference which seems to be between Iam. 2. 21 22. and Rom. 4. 2. and 3. 28. most likely this Book was doubted of in ancient times as Eusebius and Ierom witnesse But yet then also publickly allowed in many Churches and ever since received in all out of which for the same cause Luther and other of his followers since him would again reject it Erasmus assents to Luther and Musculus agrees with them both in his Comment upon the fourth of the Romans both they of the Romish and we of the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonical Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Whiâ—akâ—r against Raynolds with his Preface wherein he writeth that Iames his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himself I think afterwards seeing these words in a later Edition are left out It is no where found in Luthers Works that he called the Epistle of Iames Inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Books he produced Some in the Preface of the German Edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawy if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other Edition from the year 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonical and Apostolical and they answer the Arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the Exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man Iohn Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fâ—rt saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinal denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonical yea which is farre worse he affirmeth that the Author thereof hath erred not only in words but in the sense and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajâ—tan saith Whitaker rejected Iames second of Peter and second and third of Iohn and Iude. It consists of five Chapters Paraeus Laurentius Brochmand and Mr Manton have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholical because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon noâ— to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corinths but to the converted of the Jews dispersed here and there as appears by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolical and was written by Peter 1. Because the Author of it expresly calleth himself Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old-age to confirm them in the Doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jews that the former viz. dispersed by the Roman Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shews an Apostolical spirit 4. It s style and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Author of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a spectator of the Transfiguration in the Mount Chap. 1. vers 16. now Peter together with Iames and Iohn were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his dear Brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of Iohn consists of five Chapters Second and third of Iohn They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonical 1. Their Author cals himself an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiastical Office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that Iohn came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolical Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Iohns and reckon them among the Canonical Books Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Iude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolical first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of Iames. 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it contains as it were a brief summe and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himself an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter Iames and Iohn quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epistles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himself an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well on it Revelation It is called according to the Greek Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast Iohn the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyl but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This Book describeth the state of the Church from the time of Iohn the last of the Apostles untill Christs coming again and especially the proceedings pride and fall of
since Tabitha Kumi Eloi Eloi Lammasabachthani Bethesda Gabbatha Golgotha Aceldama are meer Syriack yet the Evangelists often call it Hebrew because it was the language of the Hebrews Iohn 5. 2. and 19. 13 16. Acts 21. 40. and 22. 2. and 26. 14. The Arabick Translation It is uncertain by whom it was made or when sure it is they had the Scriptures in their own Tongue and it were to be wished that that Tongue were more common and better understood that Religion might be spread amongst the Saracens which for the most part speak that Language In the year 1592. the New Testament in Arabick was first divulged at Rome The Arabick Tongue saith Walter is thought to be a Branch of the Chaldee and Syriack proceeding from both but that it exceeds them in six letters there being eight and twenty in the Arabick Tongue It was in use anciently with the Ishmaelites and Hagarens who drew their original from Abraham and afterward would rather be called Saracens from Sarah It is now used thorow all Asia and Africa Mahumed who descended from the Ishmaëlitish Nation wrote his wicked and blasphemous Alcoran in this Tongue Erpenius who was excellently skill'd in this Tongue saith It is more necessary and excellent then either the Syriack Aethiopick Persian or Turkish Language he extols it for its Antiquity Largenesse Elegancy and Profit The Arabians saith he have many more accurate for Geography then Ptolomy Avicenna and other famous Physicians have written in this Tongue He saith thirty two thousand of Arabick Books were to be had in one Library in Mauritania Ioseph Scaliger Raphelengius Isaac Casaubone Emmanuel Tremellius and Franciscus Iunius all learned men of special note much esteemed this tongue and promoted the study of it as their writings shew Mercer who was most versed in the Hebrew and Chaldee tongues in his old age a little before he dyed thought to have travelled into the east onely out of a desire to learn the Arabick tongue The Latine translations were so many that Augustine saith they could not be numbred That new version of Tremellius and Iunius both is best for the old Testament and that of Erasmus and Beza for the new Testament See in Chamiers first Tome l. 12. c. 1. his censure of all three There is a great use also of the Interlineary version put forth by Arias Montanus for the finding out the sense and genuine signification of all the Hebrew and Greek words Amongst many and divers Latine Translations there was one more common then the rest of the old and new Testament usually called the vulgar because it was of vulgar use and received by many Who was the Author of this Edition it is not manifest Some say it was more Antient then that of Ierome Ierome wrote pure Latine being skilful in the Latine tongue but the vulgar Translation is barbarous in many places therefore Pagnine Maldonate Estius Sixtus Senensis Burgensis Valla Lindan deny it to be Ieromes that was translated from the Hebrew by the Greek and not by â—erome but by some uncertain and unknown Author saith Whitaker Bootius in the Index of his Sacred Animadversions ascribes it to Ierome The Geneva translation for the French and our last translation for the English and Deodate for the Italian are the best which is now set out in English Diodatus noster in eximia Bibliorum Iâ—alicorum versione saith Spanhemius The question betwixt us and the Papists now cometh to be considered which of these Editions is Authentical that is which of it self hath credit and authority being sufficient of it self to prove and commend it self without the help of any other Edition because it is the first exemplar or Copy of divine truth delivered from God by the Prophets and Apostles This in respect of the old Testament is the Hebrew and in some Chapters of Daniel and Ezra the Chaldee and in respect of the New Testament is the Greek all other Editions are but of humane authority This proposition true in it self is yet divers ways opposed by the Papists whose opinions may be set down in three propositions 1. That the Hebrew and Greek Text are corrupt and therefore not Authentical for the fountain is to be preferred before the streams if it come unto our hands uncorruptly The Book of Moses which by Gods Commandment was preserved in the Ark and that very Gospel written by Matthew Those autographs saith Morinus are certainly the rule of all versions The second proposition is That the 70 Translaters were not so much Translators as Prophets who wrote by Divine inspiration so that their translation had been authentique if it had come to our hands and had not perished The third is That the vulgar Translation is of authentique authority and ought so to be received neither may any man presume to reject it upon any pretence They say it hanged between the Hebrew and Greek as Christ did between the two Theeves To these three propositions we oppose three which are most true and shall prevail 1. The Hebrew of the Old Testament and the Greek of the New is the authentique Edition and the pure fountain of divine truth 2. The 70 were not Prophets but Translators 3. The vulgar translations neither is authentique nor perfect neither ought it in any case so to be esteemed Reasons proving that the Hebrew of the Old Testament and the Greek of the New are authentical and pure To prove our first proposition these Arguments may be brought 1. The Hebrew of the Old and Greek of the New Testament are the very Scriptures which came immediately from God the very particular and individual writings both for Character and stile of speech yea the dialect as well as the matter of them is immediately by inspiration from above and written by holy men as they were moved by the holy spirit what Edition therefore is worthy to be compared to this When we speak of the original and authentick Text of the holy Scripture that is not to be so understood as if we meant it of the Autographs written by the hand of Moses or the other Prophets or Apostles but onely of the original or the primogenial Text in that tongue out of which divers versions were derived according to the variety of tongues 2. For a long time before the Birth of Christ the Hebrew was not onely the alone Authentique Copy but the onely Edition which was extant in the world In the days of Moses the Kings of Israel and the Prophets before the Captivity what Edition of Scripture had the Church but the Hebrew what did the Jews read in their Synagogues and in their Solemn Meetings but onely this Hebrew Edition After the time of Christ for the space of 600 years the Hebrew Edition of the Old Testament and the Greek of the New were held Authentique and no other 3. If any thing be erroneous doubtful less emphatical or improper
infallible ground there is none such of supernatural truth but the Scripture Because our Adversaries do contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the total perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their own confession not contained in Scripture and usurp to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And first to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greek word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the New Testament is used onely in these places Matth. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Colos 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Mat. 15. 2 3 6. Mark 7. 3 5 8 9 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and Praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the Vulgar Latin doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word Pâ—ecepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his interlineal Translation doth render it Traditio Beza doth commonly express it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word Instruction Tradition calling mens precepts Traditions the Apostles Doctrine Ordinances or Instructions not that we feared the word Tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the Papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceit of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to do in our last English Translation we use the word Tradition as often as the Vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by fear or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our Translation though never so unjust First We contend not about the name Tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawful 2. All Traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voice many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse only we say That they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not general concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the Authors of Books Divine and Canonical as delivered by tradition but the Divine Truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches Authority The Books of Scripture have not their Authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but win credit of themselves and yield sufficient satisfaction to all men of their Divine Truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the Number Authors and Integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by Tradition 5. The continued practice of such things as are neither expresly contained in Scripture nor the example of such practice expresly there delivered though the Grounds Reasons and cause of the necessity of such practice be there contained and the benefit and good that followeth of it we receive upon Tradition though the thing it self we receive not for Tradition Of this sort is the Baptism of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expresly delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did baptize â—nfants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so do yet is not this so received by bare and naked Tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonat both do confesse That the Baptism of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonat concludes Nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine as Whitaker shews contradicts himself for first he saith That the Baptism of Infants is an unwritten Tradition and after That the Catholicks can prove Baptism of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords-day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practice be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolical hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian Doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called The Apostles Creed a Tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion and distinct explication of those principal Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implied and whence are inferred all Conclusions Theological is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the Rule of Faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it self was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voice or by writing 2. In special it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies Rites expresly contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but only delivered by lively voice of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. In good part for any Rite or Doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the external Government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. and 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vain idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Mat. 15. 3. Mar. 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speak reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastical policy Du Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish Traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any Doctrine was necessary to Salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2.
place part whereof consisteth in the Story part in the Allegory So that the whole sense is contained in them both So for the second example of the Tropological There is not a two-fold sense of that place but one general sense that as the mouth of the Ox was not to be muzled so the Minister of the Gospel must be provided for Likewise of the Anagogical kinde It is not one sense to understand the rest of Canaan another the Kingdom of God But there is one whole sense that as they for their Idolatry were deprived of the Land of promise so we should take heed least by our disobedience we lose the hope of the Kingdom of heaven So we conclude that those are not divers senses but one sense diversly applied The literal sense is the only sense of the place because out of that sense only may an argument strongly be framed wherefore seeing Allegories and Tropes do not conclude they are not the senses of the place and Allegories devised beside the sense prove not though they may illustrate It is manifest that is always the sense of the holy Ghost which is drawn from the very words But we are not so certain concerning any mystical sense unlesse when the holy Ghost himself teacheth us as for example it is written Hos. 11. 1. Out of Egypt have I called my Sonne and Exod. 12. 46. Ye shall not break a bone of him It is evident that the first place is understood of the people of Israel the later of the Paschal Lamb. Who durst have applied those things to Christ unlesse the holy Ghost had first done it and declared his minde and meaning to us viz. That Son in the first place doth not only signifie the people of Israel but Christ also and by bone in the later place not only the bone of that Lamb but of Christ also is understood Secondly To whom the chief Authority to expound Scripture is committed It was decreed in the Councel of Trent That Scripture should be expounded as the Church expoundeth it and according to the common and unanimous consent of the Fathers If the Fathers agree not the matter is referred to a generall Councel If there it be not determined we must have recourse to the Pope and his Cardinals We say also that the Church is the Interpreter of Scripture and that this gift of interpreting resides only in the Church but we deny that it belongs to certain men or is tied to a certain place or succession of men The Ministry of judgement the Lord hath given to his Church 1 Cor. 2 15. and 10. 15. 1 Ioh. 4. 1. Act. 15. 16. 2 Cor. 14. 29 31 32. but the Soveraignty of judgement he hath reserved to himself The holy Scripture knows not the ancient Fathers acknowledge not as long as we have the Scripture there needs not any such standing Judge in the Church These three things Mr Down proves in his not consent of Fathers but Scripture the ground of faith p. 261. to 266. The holy Ghost is the Judge and the Scripture is the sentence or definitive Decree We acknowledge no publick Judge except the Scripture and the holy Ghost teaching us in the Scripture He that made the Law should interpret the same 1 Cor. 1. 12. 1 Ioh. 2. 27. Arguments brought by the Papists for their opinion Object 1. They object that place Exod. 18. 13 26. Answ. Moses was a Prophet indued with singular wisdom adorned by God with extraordinary gifts sent immediately by him and commended by Divine Testimonies to the people the Pope is not so He had chiefest Authority from God over all the Israelites but the Pope hath not so over all Christians Moses his Authority was extraordinary no man succeeded in his place Ioshua was a Captain only or Judge in Civil things Aaron only a Priest to administer in things sacred but Moses exercised both functions Object 2. They urge that place Deut. 17. 9. Answ. Here the Civil Magistrate and the Judge are joyned together as vers 12. If it will follow hence that the Pope must be Supreme Judge in all Ecclesiastical matters the Emperor ought to be as well in Civil 2. The Pope doth not hold the same place among Christians that the high-Priest did among the Jews For he was the chiefest having all the rest of the Priests subject to him but the Pope is one amongst all having collegues many Bishops as at first or a few Patriarchs as after Object 3. Eccl. 12. 11. If the chief Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chief Priest in the New Answ. This one Pastor signifieth neither the High-Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the new but Jesus Christ the high Shepherd for our souls Object Matth. 6. 19. Christ saith to Peter To thee will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven Therefore the Pope hath Authority to expound Scripture Answ. First By the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospel not Authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospel is preached the Kingdome of Heaven is opened to the Beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers Secondly That Authority of the Keys was not committed to Peter only but to the other Apostles also Mat. 28. 18 19. There is a two-fold Judgement 1. Of Discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of Authority as the Parliament judgeth capital crimes If the Papists understand the word Iudge to signifie Discerning as when we judge of meats by the taste every faithful person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discern and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce Decrees definitive and infallible Judgements touching the sense of the Scriptures thereby to binde other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulins Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the general consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a general Councel or to go up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts do teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsâ—y charge us that we allow every private mans Interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith The opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon beâ—ter authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophecy of the Scripture is of any private Interpretation Stapleton saith Iuterpretation is private either Ratione personae when the man is prviate or Ratione medii when it is not taken out of the Context and Circumstances or Ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private Interpretation in regard of
from error as living neerer the Apostles and before the first discovery of Antichrist which was about the six hundred and seven when Boniface the third purchased of that bloudy Tyrant Phocas the title of Universal Bishop and with it the Supremacy over all Churches Erasmus accuratissimus Patrum vetustiorum censor was much exercised in the writings of the Fathers and hath bestowed great pains in restoring and illustrating Ierom Augustine and others of them For the Fathers Ierom among the Latines and Origen among the Greeks were learned in the Hebrew saith Chamier Ierom wâ—s the chiefest among them for skill in the Hebrew Chaldee Greek Latine Tongue and the most diligent searcher of the Jewish affairs he spared no labour cost nor time that he might attain to skill in that Tongue He made use of the Jews for that purpose and the skilfullest amongst them whose labour he purchased with a great deal of money this he often witnesseth of himself five times saith Morinus he made use of them That one labour of his deserveth eternal praise that he translated the Scripture out of the Hebrew into Latine That was a most laborious work of Origens in gathering together divers Editions of Scripture 1. The Greek of Aquila Symmachus the Septuagint and Theodosion into one Volume distinguisht by four Columns called Tetrapla to which he after added two more one in Hebrew the other in Greek Characters and called it his Hexapla at last he joyned two other Editions and then called it Octapla by them one might have compared the several Greek Editions together and with the Hebrew Text. Vide Erasm. Epist. l. 28. p. 1155. It is manifest saith Buxtorf that the most and best of his writings are lost It was said of him Ubi benè nemo melius Ubi malè nemo pejus Quod attinet ad Origenem meacertè nihil interest quid ille senserit quem scio Theologum fuisse aâ—daciorem quam saniorem Chamierus Tomo 2. de S. Trinitate cap. 8. Salmasius Whitaker Sixtus Senensis and others say Origen was skilfull in the Hebrew He wrote so many Books that Ierom saith Quis nostrum tanta potest legere quanta ille conscripsit Vir tantae fuit eruditionis ingenii ut ei parem doctissima Graecia faelicissimorum ingeniorum parens nunquam habuerit Sixtus Senensis Bibliothecae sanctae l. 4. He saith much more there in his commendation Tantum in Scripturas divinas habuerit studium ut etiam Hebraeam linguam contra aetatis gentisque suae naturam edisceret Hieronymus de viris illustribus He lived a little after the year two hundred Augustine for the Latine Church and golden mouth'd Chrysostom for the Greek Church were most famous He is abridged by Theophylact. A Father so ancient so learned so godly so skilfull in the Scriptures saith Rainolds of Chrysostome Augustine for disputations Ierom for the tongues Gregory for Morals Augustine Vir supra omnes qui ante eum post eum huc usque fuerunt mortales admirabili ingenii acumine praeditus omnibus liberalibus disciplinis instructus Divinis Scripturis longè omnium eruditissimus in earum explanatione ultrà quam dici queat incomparabili subtilitate sublimis omnes Latinae Ecclesiae scriptores scribendi labore lâ—cubrationum multitudine superavit Sixtus Senensis Bibl. Sanct. l. 4. Subtilissimus Patrum Augustinus D. Prideaux lectione 4. Gregory Nazianzen the learnedest of all the Greek Fathers and firnamed the Divine D. Featleys Transubstantiation exploded He lived about the year 375. Chrysostomus habet nescio quid submolestae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gregorius Nazianzenus nonnihil affectatae argutiae in verbis in Basilio nihil est quod offâ—ndiâ— Erasm. Epist. l. 24. Reginaldo Polo Irenaeus saith Capellus was almost the Ancientest of all the Fathers whose genuine writings are extant He was Polycarpus his Disciple and lived about the 172 year after Christ. Tertullian was one of the Latine Fathers most Ancient and very near the Apostles â—lourishing in the Reign of Severus the Emperour about two hundred years after Christs Birth and not past one hundred after the death of Iohn the Evangelist Ierom being urged with his authority said De Tertulliano nihil aliud respondeo quam Ecclesiae hominem illum non fuisse In Graecia celebres agnosco Patres Clementem Athanasium Cyrillum Damascenum Montacutius Analect Eccles. exercit 1. Sect 6. Cyprian the Martyr was of great authority amongst all for his holiness of life Dr Hall cals Lactantius the Christian Cicero Ierom cals him Eloquentiae Tullianae Fluvium Epist. ad Paul Tom. 1. and M. Selden de Dis Syris cals him Politissimum Patrum He lived about the year 250. Sententious Tertullian grave Cyprian resolute Hierom flowing Chrysostome divine Ambrose devout Bernard heavenly Augustine Bishop Hals 4th Decade of Epist. Epist. 3. Vide Hieron Epist. ad Paulinum de Institutione Monachi One saith He that looks upon the Fathers Works would think they did nothing but Write he that looks on their Devotions would think they did nothing but Pray he that lookes on their Learning would thinke they did nothing but Reade Bernard was a worthy man in the corrupt age in which he lived but Bernardus non vidit omnia say the Papists Bernardum non admitto utpote recentiorem longè post confirmatam Romani Pontificis tyranidem scribentem ex more errore sui temporis Chamier de Canone lib. 3. cap. 3. cap. 5. Danda venia bonis illis sanctis patribus qui ignorantia linguarum multa saepe aliena à germana Scriptura senserunt pio alioquin attulerunt 3. For Protâ—stant Interpreters Calvin is not onely commended by our own Writers but by the very Papists I would content my self among the new Writers with Mr Calvin who performeth best of all others that which he of himself professeth that a man in reading his Expositions reapeth this benefit that for the shortness he useth he departeth not far from the Text it self Cartw. letter to M. Hildersham Calvin was the notablest instrument that the Lord hath stirred up for the purging of his Churches and restoring of the plain and sincere interpretation of the Scriptures which hath been since the Apostles times Cartw. Reply to Dr Whitgift in defence of the Admonit p. 19. Name me one Papist who preached so often and wrote so accurately upon the holy Scriptures as Calvin Dr Featleys Stricturae in Lyndo-Mastigem c. 14. I so honour the judgement of reverend Calvin that I reckon him amongst the best Interpreters of Scripture since the Apostles left the earth Dr Hals Revelation unrevealed p. 33. Piscator hath done well in his Scholia on all the Bible He follows Iunius for the Old Testament and Beza for the New and in his Aphorisms he follows Calvins Institutions Piae venerabilis memoriae propter eruditionem textualem singularem sanctitatem parem Joan. Piscator
〈◊〉 saith he de Eccles. Different forms of Churches and Church-government in one State must needs lay a foundation of strife and division therein It is no wisedom saith M. Durie in a Letter in a State to reject an approved way of government which all the best Reformed Churches have received all this while and acknowledged to be Gods way and by experience found to be safe sound and instead of it to take up another which it is not yet known what it is nor was ever tried but in two or at the most three Churches and that for the space of a few years The slighter the cause of Separation the greater the fault of Schisme when men hold the same Faith and Orthodox truths yet separate for lesser matters The true Saints in the 7. Churches of the Revelation were never bid go out of them though they were very corrupt as they were out of Babylon M. Vines The first Separatist in the Scripture saith one was Cain Gen. 4. 16. Enforcements to love are clear 1 Cor. 13. 1. That question of Separation in Scripture is dark See M. Gillespy miscel c. 10. and 15. and M. Manton on Jam. 3. 17. Schisma est secessio in religionis negotio vel temeraria vel injusta Cameron de Eocles Schisme is a causelesse separation from externall communion with any true Church of Christ M. Ball against Separation c. 8. Schism is a breach of the unity of the Church D. Field l. 3. of the Church c. 5. We do not leave communion of true Churches for corruptions and sins but only abstain from the practice of evil in our own persons and witnesse against it in others still holding communion with the Churches of Christ. You send me unto such a Book of M. Robinson as himself doth begin to revoke pubpubliquely as being unsound in divers things whereas I refer you unto a later book of his made with riper deliberation and in no part that I hear of publikely revoked His Book which you send me unto being his Iustification of Separation is sick of King Iehorams incurable disease the guts of it fall out day by day yea he openly plucks out some of the bowels thereof with his own hands This is to be observed by them especially who much follow M. Robinson CHAP. XXIII Of Sedition Self-love Self-seeking Slander SEDITION SEdition is a sin whereto people are much inclined It is to leave our present Governours which rule us according to law and follow other Governours who rise up of their own accord to leave a David and follow a Sheba The Israelites raised sedition against David by means of Absalom and Achitophel and proceeded so farre in their rebellion that they brought it to a pitcht field and would not give over till their Captain with twenty thousand more were slain in the battell 2 Sam. 19. Corah Dathan and Abiram stir up a great multitude against Moses and Aaron At another time of themselves they rose against Moses and were ready to stone him because they wanted water At another time they cry to have a Captain and return back to Egypt M. Hobbs in his Rules of government c. 12. reckons up these two among other wilde ones as seditious opinions that the knowledge of good and evil belongs to each single man and saith Legitimate Kings make the things they command just by commanding them and those which they forbid unjust by forbidding them This is to make Subjects beasts and the Magistrate God 2. That faith and holinesse are not acquired by study and naturall reason but are supernaturally infused and inspired unto man which if it were true saith he I understand not why we should be commanded to give an account of our faith or why any man who is truly a Christian should not be a Prophet This opinion is so contrary to Scripture and the judgement of all sound Divines that I need not spend time to confute it See Phil. 1. 29. Eph. 1. 8. Heb. 12. 2. One indeed saith the habits of Faith Hope and Charity are infused after the manner of acquisite God having ordained not to infuse them but upon the means of hearing praying caring studying and endeavouring Some say there are no graces wrought in us but severall actings of the Spirit as the Spirit acteth with us where grace is wrought we need the Spirit to excite and draw it forth but the Scripture is plain for infused habits grace is called a good work in us Phil. 1. 6. the Law written in our hearts God is said to shine into our hearts 2 Cor. 4. 6. we are said to be partakers of the divine nature 2 Pet. 1. 4. See Eph. 2. 10. 1. It is a sin it is plain by Scripture how severely did God punish it in Korah and his accomplices making the earth to gape wide and swallow them up Solomon condemns it saying meddle not with such as be given to change Gal. 5. 20. yea it is a great sin as is evident 1. It is contrary to the light of Scripture in the Law he that cursed that is railed upon or used ill wishes against the Ruler of his people was to be put to death how much more then he that shall rise up against him The Scriptures of the New Testament are full of precepts for duty and subjection Rom. 13. 1. 1 Pet. 2. 13. 14. Give unto Caesar that which is Caesars saith our blessed Saviour Give to every one his due fear to whom fear honour to whom honour belongeth You must needs be subject for conscience sake And the Apostle willeth Titus to put them in minde to obey principalities and powers and be subject to Magistrates and ready to every good work as if a man were unfit for any good work if he be not duly subject to authority The Jesuites are still tampering about Kingdomes Monarchies Common-wealths and temporall States how to bring them into mutinies contentions seditions rebellions and uproars Watsons Quodlibets of Religion and State Quodl 5. Answer to the fourth Article They are like unto Aesops Trumpetter who being taken in war made his lamentation saying that he never drew his sword against any nor shot at any but the enemy answered Thou hast animated others thou hast put courage rage and fury into all the rest Saint Peter and Iude do blame them which despise government and speak evil of them in authority Secondly It is contrary to the light of nature for even among those Nations which never had any divine revelation yet the necessity of duty to Magistrates was alwaies maintained as a thing which they perceived absolutely requisite for the welfare of humane societies seeing without government the societies of men could never continue in a good estate No man could possesse his own goods enjoy his own lands and house live comfortably with his own wife and children or give himself to any profitable calling and endeavour Thirdly It is contrary to those principal vertues by which all men
Saviour even such and such a one they were Types of Christ the great Saviour That saveth us out of the hands of our enemies as that holy man telleth in this Song This is the first Title Jesus and the reason of it and it was his Name by which he was commonly known and called and now known and called a name of infinite sweetnesse to us of infinite honour and praise to him For how much comfort did oppressed Nations receive at the hearing of such a Deliverer How much honour did they shew unto him And therefore when the Apostle telleth us of our subjection unto Christs Authority he ascribeth it unto this Name as shewing us that this is the foundation of his requiring and our yeelding all honour and obedience to him He takes not upon him to be honoured onely because he will be honoured or because he is in himself worthy of it in regard of Excellency but because he hath deserved it at our hands and is perfectly worthy of it in regard of the things he hath done for us Baptism saves representatively Ioshua temporally Ministers instrumentally Jesus principally Christ delivers his people from their spiritual slavery the bondage of sin Satan the Law Death Hell The slavery of sin and Satan is all one the Devil hath dominion over the soul only by sinne our lusts are his strong holds Satan is cast out when sinne is broken 2 Tim. 2. 26. See 1 Ioh. 3. 8. Where he comes to be a Saviour First He breaks all the yokes of sinne Rom. 7. 14 17. 8. 2. He delivers his servants 1. From the guilt of sin whereby the sinner is bound over to punishment Christ hath discharged the debt for us Rom. 8. 1. Gal. 3. 13. 2. From the stain and defilement of sinne 1 Cor. 6. 11. and that partly by repairing the image of God in the soul which sinne had defaced and by imputing all his righteousnesse to them so that the soul stands covered over before God with the beauty of Christ Jesus Revel 1. 5. 3. From the reigning power of sin by his Spirit Rom. 6. Acts 3. 26. Titus 2. 14. 1 Pet. 1. 18. Secondly Christ delivers his people from the yoke of the Law both Ceremonial and Moral 1. He hath totally delivered his people from the ceremonial Law those ceremonies that concerned the publick external Worship of God and their private conversation multitude of observations and some costly 2. He hath freed them from the burden of the Moral Law 1. From it as a Covenant of life they have life by Christ. 2. From the curses of it Gal. 3. 13. 3. The rigor of it 4. As it brings wrath and the Spirit of bondage 2 Tim. 1. 7. 5. From the irritation of it for by accident it provokes a mans corruption Rom. 7. 8. 6. As it increaseth the guilt of sin Christ hath taken all the guilt upon his own shoulders Thirdly Christ sets all his servants free from the yoke of Death and Hell the first and second death this is proved out of 1 Cor. 15. 25 26 54. Ioh. 11. 26. Revel 2. 10. 20. 6. 1 Thes. 1. ult Christ delivers his people from the curse of Death 1. Meritoriously by undergoing death Heb. 2. 14 15. In morte Christi obiit mors he endured the wrath of God due to all Gods people 2. He effectually applies this to his people in the administration of the Covenant of Grace The Papists abuse the name of Jesus four wayes 1. In making it a name of wonder using it idly and foolishly in their talk O Iesus 2. In a superstitious worshipping of the letters and syllables bowing at the sound of the word Vox Iesus vel audita vel visa is worshipped by them They say this is the name which God gave his Son after he had submitted to death for us This name Jesus was given to Christ long before his exaltation It is common to others Iesus the sonne of Syrach and Ioshua Heb. 4. 8. They doe not bow at the Name of Christ or Immanuel or at the mention of any other Person in the Trinity 3. In making it a name of a Sect the Jesuites are so termed from it Vide Bezam in 1 Cor. 2. 21. They should rather be called Ignatians of Ignatius the first author of their Society and Order 4. In abusing it for a charm to cast out Devils The Scripture indeed saith By thy Name but the meaning is by thy power have we cast out Devils They abuse that place Acts 3. 16. His Name hath made this man strong that is say they the Apostles pronounced the Name Jesus and the pronunciation of this name hath a force of driving away Devils or doing other miracles the Name of Christ there is Christ himself or his power The Jews out of the word Iesu make the number of â—16 by the Letters and there they have curses and blasphemies scarce to be named Calverts Annot. on the blessed Jew of Morocco The Arminians say Salvation may be had without knowledge of or faith in Christ Jesus Vide Musaeum contra Vedel c. 9. Act. 4. 12. Some of the ancient Fathers before the rising of the Pelagian Heresie who had so put on Christ as Lipsius speaks that they had not fully put off Plato have unadvisedly dropt some speeches seeming to grant that divers men before the Incarnation living according to the dictates of right reason might be saved without faith in Christ. The Quession is not Whether a Gentile believing in Christ may be saved But Whether a man by the conduct of Nature without the knowledge of Christ may come to heaven The assertion whereof we condemn as wicked Pelagian Socinian Heresie and think that it was well said of Bernard That many labouring to make Plato a Christian do prove themselves to be Heathens The Patriarchs and Jews believed in Christum exhibendum moriturum as we in him Exhibitum mortuum Gen. 12. 3. 49. 10. Psal. 27. 8. 110. Bowing at the name of Jesus is defended by Mountague Orig. Eccles. part 1. pag. 123. And Parre on the Romans seems from Zanchy and Paraeus to justifie it but it is generally disliked by the soundest Divines The second Title by which he is termed is a Redeemer by which is expressed in part the manner how he saved us even by buying us out of the hands of our enemies For to save signifieth to deliver without intimating the means of delivering but to redeem noteth also the way how the deliverance was accomplished even by paying a price a valuable consideration in regard of which the party captived and forfeited to death or bonds should be restored to his liberty and good estate again And this kind of deliverance is the fairest deliverance the only way of procuring deliverance when a person is made miserable by his own default and fallen into the hands of Justice joyned with perfect strength so that there is neither reason
and so are many able Protestant Divines Rivet in Gen. 28. Exercit. 125. and in his Iesuita vapulans Capel in Thes. Theol. Salmur Mr Cartw. against the Rhemists on Heb. 7. 4. and in his necessity of Discipline Mr Dod. Bishop Carleton Dr Prideaux Dr Sclater and Mr. Whateley were for the affirmative The Question saith Mr. Mede on Act. 5. 3 4 5. should not be Whether Tithes are due to the Ministers of the Gospel meaning as a duty of the people unto them but rather Whether they be not due unto God for so is the style of the Scripture All the tithes are mine these I give to Levi and not you There are many other uses for the imploiment of Bona Sacra if they be more then is competent for them and theirs Of Preaching It is in a setled state of things the publick interpretation and application of Scripture by a Minister assigned to the Office to a Congregation assembled for that purpose Or it may be defined A sound explicating of Gods Word with application of it in the way of Power and Office by him who is thereunto called 1. An Explication of Gods Word Nehem. 8. 8. The Levites when they read the Law of God or gave the distinct sense and meaning of the words So must the Minister he is commanded to divide the Word aright See Luke 24. 27 32. 2. Sound or right Explication for there is a depraving of the Scripture 3. With Application Reprove Rebuke Exhort with all long-suffering and Doctrine See 1 Cor. 14. 3. 2 Tim. 4. 2. 4. By Office and Power in him that is called So the general duty which lies on every Christian may be distinguished from the peculiar Office â—â— a Minister private Christians are to teach and admonish one another there is an Exhortation Charitative and Potestative which belongs to him that is called One saith It is an Ordinance of Christ whereby persons have received Gifts from Heaven and are separated to that Office to make known the will of God for the perfecting of the Saints The efficient cause is 1. Supream and principal Jesus Christ. 2. Instrumental persons which have received Gifts from heaven are called and set a part to the Ministery Secondly The material cause of it the Doctrine of Salvation Thirdly The formal making it known and applying it Fourthly The final for the perfecting of the Saints By the Word preached 1. Light shines in unto men Psal. 19. 7. to the end 2. It helps the Saints to mortifie their corruption Psal. 119. 9. 3. By it we conquer the devil Ephes. 6. 4. We overcome the World Iohn 5. It inableth us to perform the duties of our relations Col. 3. 16. to bear all crosses Rom. 5. 4. 6. Fils us with consolation and keep us from being Apostates The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The order 2. The Summe or Scope 3. The Sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetorical and Logical Analysis of the Text. Preaching consists of these Ingredients 1. Right Understanding 2. True dividing 3. Faithful interpreting 4. Zealous uttering 5. Powerfull applying It is not I suppose simply necessary one should take a set Text. Christ when he executed the Office of a Minister here on earth and taught the people sometimes interpreted a place which he took out of the Scripture as Luâ— 4. 17. out of Isaiah sometime without any set Text he spoke those things which were most apt for the edifying of the Church For the most part Christ preached sitting as Matth. 5. 1. Matth. 26. 55. Luk. 4. 16. Iohn 8. 2. so did others who came to great place and dignity in the Church ordinarily preach sitting too and therefore their Churches were called Cathedral because they preached sitting in chairs The Apostles were wont more often to stand as is manifest from Act. 13. and other places Christ sate to shew his great and eminent authority The Apostles stood to shew their respect to Gods people Raynold de lib. Apoc. Whether private persons not in office may preach If they have a Calling either it is Ordinary or Extraordinary if ordinary then they are not only gifted but tried and separated to it That men though gifted without being called to the Ministery and by Ordination set apart for it should take upon them the Office or ordinary exercise of preaching seems repugnant to those Scriptures Rom. 10. 15. Heb. 5. 4. 1 Tim. 5. 22. Christ therefore frequently urgeth this That he was sent from his Father Punishments have been inflicted on those that have medled beyond their Call as Uzziah Three places are alledged for Lay-mens preaching Rom. 12. 6. 1 Cor. 14. 31. Act. 8. 14. for their venting their experiences as they call it For the first place he means those that are by Office Prophets and Ministers or Deacons they must preach not those that have abilities only for then it will follow those that have ability may baptize and rule too The word Gift is used in Scripture for the Office it self or gifted calling Ephes. 4. 8 11. Two things are required to a calling Gifts and Authority Iohn 20. 21 22. For 1 Cor. 14. some think Paul speaks in that place not of ordinary preaching but of prophesying by the Spirit that is by Revelation Mr Cotton tels us these were not ordinary private men but such as had extraordinary Gifts the Gift of Tongues and the like liberty of preaching is not allowed them that want the like Gifts See 1 Cor. 12. 28 29 30. That place Act. 8. may receive answer from my Annotations on Acts. 11. 20. a like place Some learned Divines though they hold none may enter into the Ministery without a peculiar Call yet do say that a private man sufficiently gifted if he have the approbation of the Church may teach publickly they build it on that place 1 Cor. 14. where when the beleevers did meet together they are allowed to prophesie Mr Lyford in his Apology for our publick Ministery and Infant-Baptism Conclus 2. pag. 27 28. proves by three Reasons that the prophesying 1 Cor. 14. was extraordinary and not a standing ordinary Gift in the Church and others are of his judgement as Mr. Norton in his answer to Apolloâ—ius Chap. 11. and vers 30. of this Chapter proves as much The Scriptures lay down these Rules First No man must preach except he be sent take any office upon him unlesse he be approved a Gospel-order is to be preserved the Deacon the meanest order is to be approved A man is not to call himself nor to be a Judge of his own sufficiency Secondly People are admonished to take heed what they hear Mark 4. 24. and whom they hear 2 John 10 11. Thirdly Some will undertake to be teachers though they be never so ignorant of the things they teach 1 Tim. 1. 7. Fourthly Under this pretence false Prophets go forth into the world to corrupt the truths of God and poison the
2. 5. God doth work most mightily with such preaching Ioh. 4. 18 19. Act. 2. 36 37. Reasons 1. Every man through the self-love and hypocrisie that is in his heart is apt to put from himself to others general Doctrines and Reproofs Matth. 21. 41. see 45 46. verses 2. Till mens sins be effectually discovered to them they can never attain to any saving grace Iohn 16. 8. Tit. 1. 13. 3. Practice is the end of knowledge and nothing is perfect till it attain its end If you know these things happy are you if you do them Truths are never fully and exactly known but in the experience and practice of them hence that expression Tast and see CHAP. III. Of Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction and Government THat there is an Ecclesiastical Government distinct from the Civil it is apparent seeing the Church and the State are distinct their Governments must be also distinct Yea the Church may be not only distinct but separate from the State neither the supream nor subordinate powers being incorporate in the Church but meer aliens from it and perhaps enemies to it God hath established two distinct powers on earth the one of the Keys committed to the Church the other of the Sword committed to the Civil Magistrate That of the Keys is ordained to work on the inward man having immediate relation to the remitting or retaining of sins That of the Sword is appointed to work upon the outward man yeelding protection to the obedient and inflicting external punishment upon the rebellious and disobedient Some call it the power of the Keys others Ecclesiastical Discipline others Church-government That there is a Church-power appeareth plainly by Christs giving them the Keys Matth. 16. 18 19. Iohn 20. 23. and also in the titles of Shepherds Governours Rulers and Guides Heb. 13. 7 17. 1 Cor. 12. 28. God hath set in the Church the other things there reckoned are all peculiar to the Church There is a two-fold Ministerial power 1. Potestas ordinis which consists meerly in preaching the Word and administring the Sacraments 2. Iurisdictionis whereby they govern in the Church by binding the Impenitent and losing the Penitent The Object of this spiritual power are religious things in a religious consideration but it is not an absolute supream power The Ministerial power manifests it self 1. In doctrinal decisions of matters of faith 2. In making wholsom ecclesiastical Laws 3. In executing Church-censures But though they have power of declaring Gods will concerning matters of faith and worship to the people yet they cannot make any new Article of faith nor propound any thing as necessary to be beleeved to salvation It is a great Question Penes quos sit potestas Ecclesiastica Who are the subject of this Ecclesiastical power The Community of the faithfull much lesse two or three separated from the world and gathered together into the name of Christ by a Covenant are not the proper and immediate subject of power ecclesiastical Matth. 28. 19 20. Iohn 20. 21 22. 21. 15 16. were spoken to special persons not the whole community The Apostle Act. 20. 28 speaks unto the Presbyters of Ephesus and saith That they were appointed Overseers by the holy Ghost that they might govern the Church of God M. Rutherford saith The Keys were given for the Church but not to the Church Mr. Norton urgeth Act. 14. 23. to prove the power to be in the fraternity it is said there That Presbyters were ordained by Paul and Barnabas in every Church They were ordained in the Churches but not by them He urgeth also Act. 6. that proves nothing but that the election of Officers doth some way belong to the people but that their Authority depends on the people cannot be thence collected Mr. Norton Chap. 5. of that Book saith Quod exercetur nomine Christi recipitur immediatè à Christo. At officium Rectorum exercetur nomine Christi 2 Cor. 5. 20. Here he not only grants but also proves Rectores Ecclesiae esse immediatum subjectum potestatis against which he asserted and argued in his fourth Chapter And after in the same fifth Chapter he saith Multitudo non committit potestatem Ecclesiae Rectoribus tantum designat personas therefore it is not the first and immediate subject of ecclesiastical power which he endeavoured to prove Chap. 4. Excommunication is the greatest and last censure of the Church Iudicium maximum tremendum See Mat. 16. 18. Mat. 17. 18. 1 Cor. 5. This Ordinance is usefull 1. To the whole Church hereby the honour and beauty of the Church of Christ is preserved from the defilement and scandal which such an offence would bring upon it otherwise the evil example would infect 1 Cor. 5. 4. this was typified by the Leper whom God would have shut up in his Tent least the rest of the Congregation should be infected 2. Gods people are hereby made more watchful 3. It is useful to the offender himself for the saving of his soul is the end of it 1 Cor. 5. 3. and that he may not commit the like fault again 1 Tim. 1. 20. The power of Excommunication Formaliter executivè is proper to the company or assembly of Governours and Rulers in the Church derived from Christ to be exercised as Christ shall go before them but with notice to and due regard had of the whole society The Parts of Excommunication are First Admonition 1 Thess. 5. 14. 1. This must be for a sin reprovable 2. For scandalous matters not infirmities which are mourned for 3. Managed with wisdom zeal and love Gal. 6. 1. Secondly Excommunication which is to be executed on men for corrupt opinions Titus 3. 9 10. Revelat. 2. 15. 2. Sinful practices 2 Thess. 3. 6. 1 Cor. 5. 11. It is a Question An Episcopus prasit Presbytero jure divino A Bishop is a man chosen out among the Ministers to have chief Authority in the ordaining of Ministers in a certain Circuit and overseeing them with their flocks The Christian world saw no other Government for fourteen hundred years after Christ. Some urge this for the lawfulness of their Office by Gods Word By proportion of the chief Priests under the Law and of the Apostles under the Gospel The high Priest was set over the other Priests and over the Levites Numb 3. 4. Chapter The twelve Apostles were more eminent then the seventy Disciples and not only exceeded in excellency of Gifts but in amplitude of Authority and power Now say they it is the constant Doctrine of all the Fathers that the Bishops succeeded the Apostles in the ordinary Government of the Church as also the Presbyters succeeded the Seventy Disciples Episc. Dav. Determinat 42. See B. Barlow Antiq and Superiority of Bishops Ierom saith The order of Bishops came in by meer custome of the Church to avoid Schisms which arose for want of Heads but how can that be when it was
against Arius who denied the Deity of Christ. The first Constantinopolitan Councel called by the Emperour Theodosius the elder against Macedonius who denied the Deity of the holy Ghost The first Ephesine Councel called by the Emperor Theodosius the younger against Nestorius who held that there were two Persons in Christ. Fourthly The Chalcedonian called by the Emperour Martian against Eutyches who held that the one Nature in Christ consisted of the Divine and Humane These Councels were celebrated within five hundred years after Christs birth Councels there have been called Ancient because lesse Modern and General because lesse Particular for the first was not till more then three hundred years after Christ nor to the largest appears it that ever any were summoned beyond the bounds of the ancient Roman Empire though Christianity were much far extended Rainold part 2. Plenariis Conciliis quorum est in Ecclesia saluberrima Authoritas Augustin epist. 118. cap. 3. That a Synod be general and lawful three things are necessarily and essentially required 1. The first which concerns the generality of it is That the Calling and Summons to the Councel be general and Oecumenical Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet The lawfulnesse of Synods consists partly in their orderly assembling by lawful authority and partly in their orderly Government and proceedings when they are assembled Crakanth Vigil Dormit c. 19. The nature of Synods is all one when they be Provincial National or oecumenical and they only differ as greater or lesser Their power is not meerly consultatory and swasive but authoritative and to be submitted unto by those for whom their delegation is so farre as their acts are according to the Word of God In Synodo est authoritatis apex totius Ecclesiae unitas ordinis firmamentum Leyd profess de concil A few private men yea one man or woman may counsel advise or perswade M. Hudsons Vindicat. c. 7. It is a Question between us and the Papists Cujus sit congregare Concilia Who hath the power of calling a Councel The Papists generally say the Pope Vide Bellarm. de Concil lib. 1. cap. 12 13. We the Emperour and other Christian Princes The four first general Councels were called by four Emperours as was before mentioned The Pope of Rome out of his own Province hath no right nor authority of calling a Councel The true cause saith Doctor Ames why general Councels were called by the authority of the Emperour was because the Emperour alone not the Pope had universal power It is a Question between us and the Papists Quinam sunt ad concilium convocandi Who are to be called to a Councel The Papists hold only the Clergy may be of the Councel and of the Clergy only Bishops as Judges Men that are famous for wisdom holinesse of life and experience of things men that are inflamed with a zeal to God and to the salvation of men with the love of the truth and peace From Acts 15. 6. 23. it is manifest that not only the Apostles but also the Elders and the people likewise and the whole Church were present and had their voices in this Councel See Acts 16. 4. That famous Paphnutius was a Lay-man A general Councel represents the Universal therefore there ought to be present there some of all kinds and orders of men An Concilia possint errare Whether general Councels may erre Every Assembly which consists of members subject to errour may be seduced But General Councels are Assemblies consisting of members subject to errour for all men are so Rom. 3. 4. Secondly If the determination of General Councels were infallible all Christians were necessarily bound to stand unto them and to submit to their authority Thirdly If General Councels may contradict the one the other they may certainly erre The General Councel held at Laterane under Leo the tenth contradicteth the Councel of Constance in the point of the Councels superiority above the Pope Fourthly That which hath befallen some General Councels may befall any other unlesse they can alledge some special priviledges to the contrary See 1 Kin. 22. 12. Mat. 26. 65. Ioh. 11. 52. Mark 14. 64. Bellarmine saith they cannot erre if confirmed by the Pope De concil lib. 2. cap. 2 3 4 5. That General Councels though gathered and confirmed by the Pope may erre not only in fact as the Papists confesse but also in faith and manners Vide Whitaker controv 3. de Concil Quaest. 6. In eo Pontificii se praebent ridendos nam Papae confirmatio sequitur Concilii decreta non praecedit Cameron The Rhemists bring Iohn 16. 13. Luk. 1. 3. Some urge Matth. 18. 20. for this purpose None amongst them is like to Luke nay all of them gathered together are not like him he was an extraordinary instrument of the holy Ghost Iohn 16. 13. speaks not of the Church but of the Apostles but if it be applicable to the Church yet it belongs only to the Spouse of Christ not that she doth not sometimes erre also even in Doctrine but not deadly she shall not erre in things which are necessary to salvation See Cameron Miroth in loâ— If from this promise an infallibility of judging might be gathered it would agree not only to Bishops gathered together but severed neither only to the Pope of Rome as the Jesuites would have it but also to the Successours of the rest of the Apostles saith B. Davenant That place Mat. 18. 20. means any particular Assembly of the Saints Vide Calv. in loc Act. 15. 22. is also brought This Councel consisted of Apostles which had an extraordinary assistance and illumination of Gods Spirit there is not the like authority of other Councels Panormitan the great Popish Canonist and Lawyer saith Plus credendum est simplici Laico Scripturam proferenti quam toti simul Concilio There is another great controversie not so much as Whitaker hath well observed between us and the Papists as between the Papists themselves An Concilia sint supra Papam Whether Councels be above the Pope Many amongst them and those of great note prefer a General Councel before the Pope but others a Pope before the Councel If Peter himself saith Whitaker in the place before-quoted be sent to the Church as to a certain superiour judgement and tribunal and be commanded to bring the faults and offences of others to it then it follows that the Church is greater and superiour to Peter or any other in authority The Assumption saith he relies in expresse words of Scripture The consequence of the major is evident from the confession of the Adversaries For they say That a Church is represented in a Councel Secondly The Universal Church is called the mother of all the faithful and Christians Gal. 4. 26. The Pope is the Churches son if he be faithful But the son is not above his mother only God and his word is above the Church of God
do not admonish complain of or withdraw themselves from scandalous offenders In a word when many of these things are either in whole or in part omitted that are appointed then is this Commandment broken So that according to the number of duties commanded so must the breaches of this Commandment be numbred in case any of them be wholly or in part neglected Now I come to shew the sins of Commission that is the doing of things contrary to the duties commanded even things that are forbidden Sins of Commission are here of two sorts 1. Direct 2. Indirect The former being simply and of themselves sins the other sins by a consequent and in some respect annexed to them Direct breaches of this Commandment are in regard of performing these Ordinances and in regard of preserving and continuing them For performance here are two things forbidden The tendering of a false worship or abasing of the true False worship is a worship not enjoyned by God for the measure of Gods worship is the manifestation of his will wherefore what agrees not with that as being inconformable to the right rule of worship is worship alone in shew and appearance that is feigned and counterfeit like bad coyn not true and right Now worship is false in regard of the Object and Parts of it For the Object it is false First When the true God himself is intended to be worshipped but under some visible or sensible representation when I say God set forth by any Picture or Image is worshipped or when any such Image is used as a means to derive and convey honour unto him by This was the sinne of the Israelites in the wildernesse for they purposed in their intention to serve that God which brought them out of Aegypt but for the better helping of them in this worship and to stir up their devotion they would set up the image of an Ox a most beneficial creature whose labour did yield them through Gods blessing the best means of maintenance and living somewhat to represent God unto them and to bring his benefits unto their mindes So Aaron professeth when he saith To morrow shall be an holy day to the Lord. This was likewise the sinne of Micah the Ephraimite he made a Teraphim and had an house of Images Teraphim was the Image of a man â—e made this to worship God in and by for he saith Now I know Iehovah will blesse me it must needs be that he purposed to worship that God of whom he did expect a blessing for his worship and his mother had vowed the silver to Iehovah to make a graven and molten Image wherefore this Image vowed to Iehovah must needs be intended to serve Iehovah by This was the sinne of Ieroboam who said of the Calves These are thy gods that did bring thee out of the Land as if he had proclaimed that he intended to do service to the God of their Fathers but he thought it convenient to have him represented to them by these figures and under these Images to have service tendred unto him And therefore David chargeth the Israelites to have changed their glory meaning God who was indeed their glory into a similitude of a Calf that is to have set up an image of a Calf to represent him by and Paul saith the same of the wiser Heathen that they did worship God but not as God but changed the glory of that incorruptible God into the similitude of a corruptible man that is they went about to set out and represent to themselves the glorious maker of all things by sueh base and inglorious pictures as if there could be any proportion betwixt God and a dead Image the workmanship of mans hands which is indeed a great embasing of their apprehension of his Majesty causing them at last to think as meanly of God as of a thing that could be so set forth yea this is the sinne the Prophet so findes fault with in Gods Name saying What similitude will you set up to me and whereunto will you liken me And this is the sinne of the Popish Church which they continually commit and maintain and by which they have so corrupted themselves that they even cease to be the true Church of God and are turned into a company of spiritual adulterers for that Church with the wine of her fornications hath made almost all Nations drunken to whom hath she not conveyed the infection of this foul Idolatry God must be worshipped under the picture of an aged man the holy Ghost under the similitude of a Dove the Sonne of God under the similitude of a man hanging on the Crosse all foul Idolatries for seeing that Christ is God as well as man he is no more to have an Image set up to him then the Father or holy Ghost seeing the Divinity is not representable and the humanity without the Deity is not Christ so that it is nothing but a strong fancy makes men take any picture for Christs picture for seeing his natural physiognomy is wholly concealed in Scripture and no approved story hath acquainted us with it and seeing his Deity is wholly irrepresentible why should any picture drawn by man be called a picture of Christ rather then of the thief that hanged by him It must needs be a very dead devotion that a dead picture can provoke This is the first falshood of worship for the Object when the true God is intended as the Object but under some picture or representation for God represented by an Image is now become an Idol seeing the true God hath disavowed all such representing This is the first kinde of Idolatry Another is When a creature hath these kindes of worship performed to him or any like them which God hath appointed to himself and so becomes the object of worship so Paul to the Galatians defines Idolatry to be a serving of the creature or of those things which by nature are not Gods He useth the word serving which utterly overturns that fond distinction of worship and service mentioned by Papists to shift off the blame of this sinne to serve that which by nature is not God is flat Idolatry Now there are divers creatures which have been and are worshipped with the worship due to God or something like it and coined in imitation of it First Angels which thing began in the time of the Apostles and is by Paul writing to the Colossians condemned as a base will-worship Secondly Saints departed which grew into the Church long after by degrees and was rife since four hundred years after Christ amongst many though not allowed by the authority of the Church-Governours as after it was by building Churches dedicating Altars and dayes and offering Incense and the like to these all which are still in use and practice among the Popish Churches yea are by them maintained as very devout and profitable exercises for what more common then Invocation of Saints with
neither are indeed profitable for the soul this is a false Ministry Such is the Ministry of the Church of Rome where men are appointed to say and sing the Word Psalms and Prayers in an unknown tongue a service unhallowed not ordained of God so when men are appointed and assigned to offer a propitiatory Sacrifice for quick and dead that is as they call it to celebrate Masse for Christ never appointed a sacrificing Ministry in the New Testament nor any other Sacrifice but the Sacrifice of prayers thanksgivings alms and of our selves And this is the first abuse of Church-Discipline The second is When those that are not Ministers are allowed to intermeddle in ministerial functions and actions proper to the Ministers that is to men set apart by a known and publick order to give attendance unto some Ecclesiastical function As for example amongst us once women were admitted to baptize and so if any do take upon him to preach or administer the Sacrament that is not admitted to the order of the Ministery This is a great abuse of Church-Discipline and to joyn with such knowing them to be such is a sinne A third fault in the Church-Discipline for the Ministery is when wicked erroneous scandalous men are let in and suffered to abide in yea or any without due care of trying them for Timothy was to lay hands upon none rashly A fourth fault is when good and able men are either kept out or thrust out for things of no moment And these be the abuses of Church-Discipline in regard of the Ministry The abuses of it in regard of the people follow as First In the Governours publickly when either Excommunication is abused or when too much rigour is used toward the penitent Now Excommunication is abused three wayes 1. When it is put into the hands of too few especially such as have nothing to do with it which was the fault amongst us formerly for the Chancellour or Official or his Deputy as the Deputy of the Bishop took all the matter upon him some Ministers names though not the Pastour to the offender being set to alone as a cipher for fashion sake This being a chief part of governing the Church belongs to the Pastours of the Church Paul did not himself excommunicate but appointed that the Corinthians should excommunicate the incestuous person Indeed he did deliver Hymeneus and Alexander to Satan as it seemeth himself but this was because they themselves were Pastours and so would not excommunicate themselves or taking upon them to be teachers of the Church at large were not to be medled with by any particular Governours of any particular Church But if the Apostles did alone do this in regard of their supereminent Authority it follows not that others may do it now for in this unlimited and supereminent power the Apostles were not to finde any Successours because they had no Successours in the eminency of Gifts without which such Authority must needs prove mischievous in any one mans hands Secondly Excommunication is abused when it is pronounced against men for small and trivial offences to pronounce a man a child of the devil and out of the state of grace because he will not pay a small summe of money for a fee or because he forgets to appear at the Court-day or for such toyes but most of all it is abused when it is pronounced against men for well-doing as it was against the blinde man and as Diotrephes abused it against those that would receive Iohn the Apostle and his Epistles as often heretofore amongst us it was abused against those that refused rashly and unadvisedly to swear when they were willed so to do and against those that went to hear the Word preached abroad when they had it not at home and the like The last abuse of Excommunication is when it is done privately before one or two before the Judge and his man or his mans Deputy so the most solemn Censure of the Church is denounced against a man no man knowing of it So much for the abuse of Church-Discipline in regard of Excommunication now it is also abused in regard of too much rigour to the offendor when upon his repentance he is denied to be received in again to the Church which was the fault of some few men in austerer times or when too much bodily exercise of humillation was cast upon them as a penance to last seven yeers and the like this was to turn sound repentance into an outward form for so soon as ever the penitent did shew sound humiliation and sound purpose of amendment after some convenient time of his trial lest he should be swallowed up of grief he should be taken into the Church again as a member of it Now the private Discipline pertaining to every man is abused 1. By contemning and setting light by the Censures and Admonitions of the Church which if they be rightly passed they are terrible and should not be despised 2. A free conversing with offendors and sinners that are scandalous and having familiarity with them Indeed the natural bonds betwixt Father and Mother Master and Servant Prince and Subject cannot be dissolved by any wickedness no nor by Excommunication but the bonds of familiarity are so far as may be without neglect of duty in regard of these places A Father must keep his child though excommunicated and not suffer him to perish a childe his father and so in the rest but familiarity loving and kinde society even in such cases is to be denied and where these bonds are not so much as may be all society but to converse with them be merry with them play eat and drink with them that are notorious offendors chiefly excommunicate is a great offence against God and endangering of ones self to infection by them Lastly Obstinacy against Church-Discipline and publick or private admonition viz. a refusing to confess ones fault and to shew publick repentance for publick sins private for private is a great disorder which was the offence of the incestuous person at the first for he stood in his sin and cared for no reproof And Paul blames those of the Corinthians that being admonished by his betters had not repented of their fornication drunkenness he must needs mean of publick repentance for their known offences in this kinde because if they had been private he could not have told of them and whether they had in private repented or no how could he tell but yet it is sure there is no true private repentance when men are not willing to shew it publickly in such case On the other side he greatly praiseth them because they had received Titus sent by him for this purpose with much fear and trembling and so consequently with all obedience had submitted themselves to his admonition to do any thing he required for the giving of the Church satisfaction in regard of their offences 2 Cor. 7. 15. These be the sins condemned in this second
of our goods we look that he should bring them home again with thanks so must we give back to God thanks for the use of his creatures though the things themselves are allowed us still to retain them And this also is a notable acknowledgement of his Soveraign Lordship over all creatures and our absolute dependance upon him So when the Disciples returned reporting what great things they had wrought our Saviour gave thanks to his Father saying Luke 10. 21. I thank thee O Father Lord of heaven and earth So when Abrahams servant had found great successe in his journey he bows himself worshipping the Lord and saying Blessed be the Lord God of my master Gen. 24. 27. and after also v. 52. Lastly It is required that we use all the creatures of God moderately proportioning the measure of our use of them to the true ends for which God in nature hath ordained them If a man give his Servant leave to take his key and fetch so much money out of his coffer as will serve to buy such and such things which his Master would have bought he is bound to take just so much and no more to a farthing if he know the Summe if he do not particularly know the Summe as near as he can guesse thereabout and in keeping himself to his Masters direction here he shews that he accounts not himself but his Master the owner of these goods So when the Lord hath appointed meat and drink to strengthen and refresh nature attire to keep the body warm and to adorn men according to the distinction of their places and other like things for like purposes he that is carefull as near as he can to keep himself so within compasse as to use no more of these things then are requisite for these ends so near I say as he can guesse doth behave himself like a servant in the use of these things and by so using them doth give to God the honour of being the Lord and Master of them so temperanâ—e in meat and drink and all such things is a needfull duty for the sanctifying of Gods name in the use of his creatures And so much of the things commanded in this third Commandment Now of the things forbidden herein which all come to two heads 1. The abuse of those holy actions which are sometimes mingled with our common affairs viz. An Oath A Lot 2. Disordered carriage of our selves in our common affairs Of the abuse of an Oath we must speak first It is abused two wayes in regard of the 1. Taking for the 1. Matter of it in the 1. Object or thing sworn by 2. Subject or thing sworn to 2. Manner contrary to 1. Truth by a false Oath 2. Judgement by swearing 1. Ignorantly 2. Rashly or causlesly 3. Irreverently 4. Ragingly 2. Keeping By not performing a lawfull Oath 2. Keeping By performing an unlawfull The first abuse of an Oath is in regard of the thing sworn by and that is double swearing 1. By an Idol 2. By a meer creature To swear by an Idol is a great abuse of an Oath wherein Gods honour is given to his utter enemy which the Prophet condemns in the Jews Ier. 5. 7. Thy children have sworn by them that are no gods that is by false and feigned gods and Ier. 12. 16. he condemneth the Jews for having learned of the Gentiles to swear by Baal and the Prophet Zeph. 1. 5. saith That God will visit that is punish them which swear by the Lord and by Malcham For seeing an oath is a due and true worship of God how should he endure to have it translated to a false god Surely those which swear by them do bear some respect to them in their hearts and make honourable mention of them with their lips which is condemned Exod. 23. 13. Also to swear by a creature is to do more honour unto it then ought to be done to it for seeing an oath is to be taken by the greater as the Apostle saith that is one which hath authority over men to punish them if they swear amisse and that no creature is so much greater then man that he can discern to punish the disorders of his heart in swearing it is a wrong to God to set them in his room when we swear yea when God doth plainly say The Lord liveth Jer. 4. 2. and saith Thou shalt swear by his name Deut. 10. 20. 6. 13. it seemeth to me that this bidding to swear by him forbiddeth to swear by any thing besides him Here two things may be objected First That usual form of swearing which was accustomed by the people of God when they sware to say The Lord liveth and Thy soul liveth 1 Sam. 20. 3. To which we answer That in mentioning this living of the soul they do not swear by it but alone wish well unto it swearing by God and yet mentioning the soul of that party sworn unto for proof of their love and good desires of its welfare is as much as if they had said I swear by God whom I desire also to preserve thy soul. Further the Apostle 1 Cor. 15. 31. may seem to swear by his rejoycing in Christ when he saith By our rejoycing which we have in Christ Iesus our Lord we die daily To this I answer That this is as much as if he had said By Jesus Christ in whom I rejoyce so that Christ is here the sole object of the Oath and his rejoycing is mentioned as an effect of Christs power the more honourably to convey the Oath unto him See Mr Manton on Iam. 5. 12. and M. Lyfords Princip of Faith and good Consc. p. 148. So this is the first abuse of an Oath to swear by a creature or an Idol or false god An earnest protestation may it seems be made by a creature as to say as sure as I live or the like but this must not be conceived as a swearing by them or calling them to bear witnesse to the truth of our speeches There is one main difference between a Protestation and an Oath that we may lawfully protest by a creature but without sinne we cannot swear by a creature Gen. 42. 15. compared with Chap. 43. 3. seems to shew that those words By the life of Pharaoh were but a Protestation Capel of Tent. part 3. c. 5. The second abuse of an Oath is in regard of the thing sworn to and that is double 1. In an assertive Oath 2. In a promissive Oath It is in an assertive Oath when it is trivial of a small light matter of no worth and value neither in it self nor in the consequents of it For seeing an Oath is a calling God to be witnesse and judge of our speech he must not be called to witnesse for meer trifles and toyes and he that so sweareth doth not swear in judgment but rashly and inconsiderately for what is if this be not to take the name of God in vain when the
be added to the natural or else little good will be done and these are two 1. Let them pray often to God to link their hearts together 2. Let them be frequent in performing all holy exercises one with another and specially in praying one with and for another Spiritual exercises breed spiritual affection and nothing is more binding then Religion Religious duties do both expresse and increase the image of God and that is amiable So much for love Now follow trustinesse and helpfulnesse both which we will put together as Solomon doth saying of a good wife Prov. 31. 11 12. That the heart of her husband doth trust in her And again She will do him good and not evil all the daies of his life God did make man and woman for the good each of other her to be his helper and him to be her guide This trusty helpfulnesse must be to each others bodies souls names and states Bodies in the careful avoiding of all things whereby they may bring sicknesses or diseases each on other and the willing and ready providing of all things that may continue health and recover it as attendance physick and the like Souls in shunning all such carriages as may provoke each others passions or other infirmities and using all good means of loving advice and admonition to help each other out of the same Namely in concealing each others infirmities and keeping each others secrets States in joyning together in diligent labour wise fore-cast and vertuous thriftinesse Thus for themselves Now in regard of their families they must joyn together in the planting of Religion amongst them by instructing and teaching them and by reading and praying with them the man as chief the wife as his deputy in his absence also they must oversee the waies of their family by looking what is done by them and seeking to redresse by admonishing and correcting what is amisse In regard of children they are 1. To bear moderate affections toward them Rachel and Hannah immoderately desired them others mutter because they have so many 2. To train them up in the fear of God Solomon who was the tender beloved the darling of his parents makes this the instance of their love in that they taught him wisdome and acquainted him with the Laws of God It was said of Herod that it was better to be his hog then his son 3. To reprove and chasten them for their iniquities Ely a good man came to a fearful end for neglecting this So much for their joint duties Now the several duties of each come to be handled and first we begin with the wife and then proceed to the husband The wife ows in one word subjection and this twofold to the husbands Person and to his Authority To his person 1. By acknowledging her self to be his inferiour God saith to Eve Her desire shall be subject to her husband and he shall rule over her The female sex is inferiour to the male and every woman as a woman is lower and meaner then a man as the Apostle proves because the woman was after the man and for the man and she was first in the transgression therefore she may not use Ecclesiastical Authority not speak in the Church as a Minister But to her husband not as a woman onely but as a wife she is inferiour and bound in conscience to be subject to his power and jurisdiction for this is a word of eternal and constant truth He shall rule over thee which she that will not yeeld to is an enemy to God and nature and cannot be a good wife 2. She is to reverence her husbands person both inwardly in heart and outwardly Inwardly Ephes. 5. ult she must fear him not with a flavish but awful fear that is she must have her soul so disposed to him as to be afraid to offend or displease him She must shew outward reverence also in her gesture behaviour and speech This is subjection to the husbands person Now to his Authority She owes 1. Cheerful obedience to all his lawful commands as the Church obeys Christ. 2. A quiet and fruitful receiving of his reprehensions as the Church also is patient toward Christ. Thus we have heard the wives duty The husbands duties are 1 Wisely to maintain his authority not so much by force as by vertuous behaviour avoiding especially bitternesse and unthriftinesse 2. He must wisely manage his authority The end of using his authority must be the good benefit and comfort of his wife and family for all government is by God ordained for the good of the whole not the pleasure of the Governour The husband must use his authority to edification and hearken to her when she speaks the Word of God as Abraham to Sarah Isa. 11. 6. 2. The things in which he is to use his authority he is to command what is to be done and forbid what is not to be done and reprehend where she offends 3. The manner of using his authority is with three vertues Wisdome Mildnesse Justice 1. Wisdome in commanding nothing but what is useful and weighty and grounded upon good and due reason 2. In his reproofs he must choose fit time when he and she are calm and fit place when none is present 2. Mildnesse or gentlenesse rather perswade then command if he chide her let it be with compassion and without bitternesse 3. Justice in willing allowing of maintenance to her according to his place and means in cherishing what is good and seeking to reform what is evil He must walk in all wisdome and knowledge 1 Pet. 3. 7. he should be an example of judgement gravity holinesse and wisely passe by many imperfections because they are fellow-heires of grace if there be not this wise carriage their prayers will be hindered contentions hinder such duties Thus much for private persons viz. Parents and Children Masters and Servants Husband and Wife Now follow the duties belonging to publick persons which are either in Church or Common-wealth In Church as Minister People In Common-wealth as Magistrate Subject Of Ministers and People The duty of the people 1. They ought to reverence their Ministers for the place in which God hath set them Isa. 52. 7. Rom. 20. 15. 2. They ought exceedingly to love them Gal. 4. 14 15. 1 Thess. 5. 12 13. 3. They must obey their Doctrine taught truly out of the word of God Heb 13. 17. 4. They must yeeld sufficient maintenance unto them 1 Cor. 9. 11. Rom. 15. 27. Gal. 6. 6. 1 Tim. 5. 17 18. The Anabaptists deny that Ministers may receive a stipend so doth Weigelius he cals them Stipendiarios praecones Vide Crocij Ante-Weigel part 2. cap. quaest 2. 5. They must defend them against the wrongs of bad men Rom. 16. 4. The duty of Ministers to their people Their duty is laid forth 1. By Titles as Watchmen Ezek. 3. 1. Labourers Matth. 9. 37. Light and Salt Matth. 5. 13 14. Shepherds
praemittunt quod non est in Hebraeo Grotius Drusius Ammad l. 2. c 34. * Martinius c Grotius reckons the Lamentations among the Poetical Books Mr Caryl on Job 3. v. 2. pag. 334. Singula in â—o verba plena sunt sensibus Hier. Quis libri scriptor fuit incâ—râ—uÌ„ est nec nisi levissimis conjecturis nititur quicquid de ea dici potest Beza Vid. Grotium MenochiuÌ„ Walther in Officina Biblica Ludov. de Tena Isag ad totam Sac. Script The Apostle 1 Cor. 3. 19. proves it to be of Divine Authority * Chap. 1. 1. Ante legem datam floruisse satis iude videtur constare quod vir ob justiciam atque pietatem incomparabilem celeberrimus victâ—mas filiorum nomine totie obtulerit Cl. Selden de jure naturali Gentium l. 2. c. 7. Vide plura ibid. Est liber iste Iobi omnium Sacrorum librorum difficillimus ut qui non modo Theologum verum etiam Hebraeae Chaldaicaeque linguae Poetices Dialectices Rhetorices Astronomiae Physices denique bene peritum interpretem requirat Bez. in epist. ad exposit Merc. Vide Sims Parasc ad Chron. Cath c. 1. The Book of Iob is supposed to have been written before Moses time and the Jews in the Talmud say that Iob lived in the time of Iacob Aben Ezra and Iarchi on Iob 1. say he descended of the sons of Nachor Abrahams brother and generally by most he is held to be more ancient then Moses Mr Nettles Answ. to the Jewish part of Mr Seldens History of Tithes Sect. 2. Iobi liber antiquior est lege quemadmodum docetur copiose à doctis Sixto Senensi Mercero aliisque ut in eo non sit necesse insistere Rain de lib. Apoc. praelect 191. Liber Psalmorum complectitur quicquid utile est in omnibus Scripturis haec sacra poeâ—is est elegantissima Legis Prophetarumque Epitome sola brevitate numero à reliquis discrepans cum commune promtuarium earum omnium est quae nobis necessariâ— sunt Tremel Jun. Opus omni laude majus universae sapientiae divinae atque humanae exiguum quidem sed eo etiam nobilius atque admirabilius compendium ea sermonis elegantia numerorum harmoniae suavitate sententiarum eruditione gravitate ut nihil majus dici possit Erpenius orat de ling. Ebr. dignitate Quisquis Psalmos ita ordine digessit ut nunc habemus eos in unum volumen collectos sive Hezra fuit sive aliquis alius post reditum è Babylone conatus est Psalmos ejusdem authoris aut ejusdem argumenti aut ejusdem temporis colligere conjungere Foord in Psal. 40. According to the Hebrew account the Psalms have 2527 verses Beza Psalmos vario Latinorum carminum genere elegantissimè suavissimè expressos orbi Christiano dedit Melchior Adam in ejus vita Psalterium Buchanin Latinum opus planè divinum ad usum Scholasticae juventutis egregiè elaboratum Graserus exerciâ—â—in c. 9. Dan. a Mr Bolton on Prov. 18. 14. Sententiae verba five dicta graviter paucis concinnata quae in omnium animis haerere in ore versari debent denique speculum sunt totius vitae administrationis nostrae Junius What special prerogatives this Book hath above the rest of Canonical Books see Mr Cawdrey on Prov. 29. 8. b Quod in eum librum collectae sunt omnes scientiae vel quòd sapientia Salomonis hic homines congreget ad ipsam audiendam Martinius The Proverbs were Salomons Ethicks Ecclesiastes his Physicks Canticles his Metaphysicks Proverbia Scripta sunt potissimum pro aetate juvenili Ecclesiastes pro virili Canticum pro senili The Jews compare the three Books of Salomon to the three parts of his Temple they liken the Proverbs to the Porch Ecclesiastes to the Holy Place Canticles to the Holy of Holies Opinor Salomonem in senectute postquam à lapsu resipuisset scripsisse 1. Novem 1ª Capita libri Proverbiorum librum qui Ecclesiastes dicitur ut ex cellatione concipi potest 2. Librum Canticorum ut ex eo libro colligere licet 3. Psalmum istum quasi compendium libri Canticorum Foord in Psal. 45. Liber ille Salomonis disputationem continet de summo bono quod desinit esse conjunctionem cum Deo ac perpetuam Dei â—ruitionem Simps Chron. Cathol parte tertia c Id est summum praestantissimum vide Gen. 9. 25. Est autem haec generalis totius libri inscriptio libri argumentum scriptoremque exponens Argumentum est Epithalamium excellentissimum sive connubiale Canticum quo Schelomo decantavit sacram illam augustissimam beatissimam desponsationem conjunctionemque Christi cum Ecclesia Jun. d Learned men conclude from 2 King 13. 25. that Ionah prophesied first of all the sixteen Prophets Dr Hill in a Sermon on the Lord of hosts Isaiah prophesied 60 years saith Alsted 96 saith Cornelius a Lapide He prophesied with elegancy alacrity fidelity variety e Jeshagneia quasi dicas salus Domini vel Dei quòd prae caeteris plenus sit vivificarum consolationum Non tam Propheta dicendus â—it quam Evangelista Hieron praefat in Isa. Quicquid de Physicis Ethicis Logicis quicquid de sanctarum Scripturarum mysteriis potest humana lingua mortalium sensus accipere complexus est summa prae caeteris Prophetis venustate sermonis urbanae dictionis elegantia Hieron Isaias quem ex regia ortum familia novistis tanta eloquentia librum suum contexuit ut omnes Latinos Graecosve oratores longo post se intervallo relinquat Waser iâ— praef ad Grammaticam Syram Vide plura ib. Iâ— sermone suo discrtus est quippe vir nobilis urbanae eloquentiae nec habens quicquam in eloquio rusticitatis admixtum Unde accidit ut prae caeteris florem sermonis ejus translatio non potuerit conservare Ita universa Christi Ecclesiaeque Mysteria ad liquidum prosecutus est ut non putes eum de futuro vaticinari sed de praeteritis historiam texere Hieron praefat Inter cos vates qui de Messia scripsere perquam disertus est Isaias oratio ejus erudita ubique majestatis plena facilè ostendit qua esset natus origine Vir enim nobilissimus principum consanguinitate clarus artes omnes scientiasque didicerat quibus ingenia ad magnae fortunae cultum excitantur Liber autem ejus non tam vaticinia continere quam Evangelia videtur Res esse pridem gost as non futuras putes Canaeus de Repub. Heb l. 3. c. 7. Admirabiles omnes in scribendo Prophetae sunt parem meriti fidem sed eminet in Isaia sublime quiddam ingeniosum vehemens urbanum quod majore voluptate admirationéque lectorem teneat Maldonat in Joh. 1. Lodov. de Tena Iirmijah celsitudo vel excelsus Domini quod magnalia Dei animo magno atque forti docuerit Or Ramah Iah the reject
in quibus aliquid prolocutus est lingua vernacula Salmasius de Hellenistica ad quartam quaestionem Princeps caput regula divinorum oraculorum salutisere ac necessariae veritatis est Christi Evangelium quo caeteri sacri libri omnes censentur precium accipiunt tâ—m veteris instrumenti quam novi Lod. Viv. de ver Fid. Christ l. 2. c. 9. Parvae interdum in Evangeliis diffiâ—entiae argumentum praebent veritatis ne ex composito videantur scripsisse si per omnia consentirent Chrysostomus Ex omnibus iis qui acta Christi doctrinâ—m literis mandarunt antiquissima illa prima Ecclesia illorum temporum pene aequalis solos quatuor tanquam sacro sanctos â—irmissimae fidei ac veritatis approbavit ac retinuit Matthaei Joannis qui rebus omnibus interfuerunt Marci ex relatione Petri Lucae tum ex Pauli revelatione tum relatu aliorum qui erant cum Domino versati Lod. Viv. de verit fid Christ. l. 2. c. 8. g Sunt sanâ— in â—o quo nunc utimur volumine libri aliquot non ab initio pariter recepti ut Petri altera ea quae Iacobi est Iudae duae sub nomine Ioannis Presbyteri Apocalypsis ad Hebraeos epistola sed ita tamen ut à multis Ecclesiis sint agniti Grotius lib. 3. de verit Relig. Christ. p. 143. vide plura ibid. The Book of Esther and Cantiâ—les were doubted of by some Vide Bellar de verb. Dei l. 1. c. 17 18 19. Joh. 8. See in the Annotat in loc h Vide Calvin in loc Chamier Tom. 1. l. 12. c. 7. Saepe falsissimae sunt Epistolarum Paulinarum subscriptiones Capellus i Vide Scultetum Bezam k Timothy is expresly by the Apostle called an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4. 5. therefore Titus having the same charge in Crete as he had in Ephesus they were both Evangelists Cartw. on the Title of the Epistle to the Romans See him also on the Title of the first Epistle to Timothy l We call them Historical in which is contained an Historical narration of things done â— for although in them there be many things pertaining to doctrine yet the chiefest thred and scope of the speech containeth a narration of an History done hence they are called Historical The Grecians call the Letters sent from one to another 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epistles Wotton on 1 Joh. 1. The holy Ghost styles it a Prophecy Rev. 1. 8. 22. 7. 10. 18 19. See Rev. 1. 19. Ex Lutheranis satis commendari nequit Harmonia à Chemnitio ad stuporem usque dexterrimè capta à Lysero fideliter continuata à Gerhardo dexteritate fidelitate pari consummata ex Pontificiis Jansenius ex Calvinianis Calvinus Waltheri officina Bibl. m Apostle when it is properly taken extendeth it self not only to all the Ministers of God being sent of God but to the Embassadour of any Prince or Nobleman or that is sent of any publick Authority and it is used in the Scripture by a Synecdoche for the twelve that our Saviour Christ appointed to go thorowout all the world to preach the Gospel unto the which number was added St Paul and as some think Barnabas these were 1. Immediately called by God Gal. 1. 1. 2. They saw Christ 1 Cor. 9. 1. 3. They had the field of the whole world to till they were sent into all the world Cartw. Reply to Dr Whiâ—gist in Defence of the Admonition p. 45. Apostolatus â—rat functio quae post fundatas semol Ecclesias successionem non admisit sed cum ipsis Apostolis desâ—â—t Down Diatrib de Autich Vide Lod. Viv. de verit Fid. Christ. l. 2. c. 19. n In Chronica vide Seldenum de jure naturali * Lib. 7. c. 12. o Lib. 2. c. 24. p Lib. 3. c. 1. q Tertullian cals Matthew Fidelissimum Evangelii Commentatorem De serie annorum quibus scripti sunt libri novi Testamenti satis est curiosum animosè contendere Tamen video apud veteres non esse unam eandemque sententiam Chamierus Vide Sixti Senensis Bibliothecam sanctam Walther in officina Biblica Postremus omnium Evangelistarum scripsit ut colligeret quae aliis erant omissa vel brevius perstricta Chamier de Eucharistia l. 11. c. 4. Iohn in his Epistles was an Apostle in his Apocalyps a Prophet in his Gospel an Evangelist In his Gospel he writes more expresly then the resâ— of the Deity of Christ and in the Revelation of the coming of Antichrist q Acta Apostolorâ—â—m sunt Chronâ—â—ca quaedam priâ—nae Ecclesiae in Novo Testamentâ— Sic dicuntur quia râ—s primis Ecclesiae Christianae temporibus maximè ab Apostotis gestas describunt Martinins in memoriali Bibliâ—â— Paulus ad Roman undecim capitibus fidem fundat quinque cap. deinde mores superaediâ—icat Ad Galatas quinque fidem uno sexto mores docet Sic in aliis quoque Epistolis facit Lutherus Tomo 2. In S â— Pauls Epistles this order is kept those Epistles are set first which were written to whole Churches and then those which were written to particular persons In both these sorts the compâ—ler of them seemeth manifestly to have had respect of setting the Epistles in order according to their length Cartw. Ordo Epistolarum Paulinarum respectu scriptionis alius est quam respectu positionis in Bibliis Waltherus in officina Biblica Ludovicus Capellus historia Apostolica illustrata Epistolae Paulinae non temporis ordine locatae sunt ab iis qui eâ—s primi in unum volumen compegerunt sed pro dignitate corum ad quos scriptae sunt Ideo praecedunt quae ad Ecclesias sequuntur quae sunt ad singulos Grotius Câ—a 16. 15. 18 Capellus ibiâ— Acts 20. 2. Capellus ubi supra Capelli historiâ— Apostolica illustrata Inter Epistolas quae sunt ad Ecclesias prima est quae ad Romanam ob urbis ejus majestatem Grotius * The City of Corinth was a famous Metropolis in Achaia notable for wisdome one of the seven Wise-men is celebrated for a Corinthian Tully calleth it Lumen Graeciae a It was famous also for riches and merchandize and for pride luxury lust whence the Proverb Non cuivis homini contingit adire Corinthum Lais there asking a great sum of money of Demosthenes for a nights lodging with her he answered Non emam tanti poenitere b Acts 19. and 20. 16 17. c Bayne See Ephes. 5. 18. See Phil. 4. 16. d 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 honoro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deus q. d. cultor Dei vel honorans Deum Sic 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 à verbo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 magni aestimo in pretio habeo honoro Pasor e Plena roboris lacertorum est tota Epistola singulis ejus verbis mirifica quaedam argumentandi vis latet recondita Scultetus f Duplex dubitatio de
far forth as children transgresse not any of Gods commandments in obeying their parents they ought to obey Rom. 1. 30. 2 Tim. 3. 2. Titus 1. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deut. 13. 13. Ever the blessing or curse of the parents hath a prophetique power joyned with it Flores Regij by King Iames Deut. 27. 16. The punishment which by the Law was appointed to disobedient and rebellious children was a publick shameful death Deut. 21. 18. to 22. Parentis effigiem filo corporis exprimere hoc omnibus cum aliis commune est virtutes patrum tam rarum natis est exprimere quam patribus virtutum suarum ac morum exempla suis relinquere posse Jos. Scalig. Epist. Christoph. Augustino Puteanis Postquam ex parentum consensu vel expresso vel tacito in sua potestate sunt constituti tum patria potestas propriè sic dicta cessat quamvis nunquam cessare possit debitum gratitudinis observantiae pietatis filialis Ames de consc lib. 5. c. 22. The four Cardinal duties of a parent are prayer admonition example correction a Gen. 22. 2. b Gen. 25. 28. Ibid. The childe set at liberty makes the mother ashamed Prov. 29. 15. See Dr. Gouges Domest duties on Ephes. 6. 4. Deut. 6. 7. See 2 Tim. 3. 15. and Master Baxters Saints Rest. part 3. See Dr. Gouge ibid. sect 46 47. Discant hic matres se debere per se suas proles nutrire lactare natura enim hoc illis onus imposuit Hinc Mammillas ubera veluti lagâ—nulas quasdam ad proles nutriendas aptas illis largita est Plin. l. 28. c. 9. scribit lac Maternum esse utilissimum naturae prolis convenientissimum Vide Aul. Gell. l. 12. noct Attic. c. 1. Scribit Lampridius Titum filium Vespasiani Imperatoris toto vitae tempore adversa valetudine laborasse eò quòd à nutrice infirma lactatus esset de Tiberio quoque Caesare fertur quòd fuerit magnus potator quia nutrix ipsius talis erat secundò ex eo quòd filius non lactetur à propria matre sit ut mater filium filius matrem minus amet Vnde naturalem parentum ac filiorum amorem majorem videmus in communi plebe quam in familiis nobilium quoniam ferè nobiles foeminae infantes suos per nutrices lactari curant à Lapide in Gen. 21. 7. Origo vocabuli servorum in Latina lingua inde creditur ducta quod hi qui jure belli possent occidi à victoribus cum servabantur servi fiebant à servando appellati quod etiam ipsum sine peccati merito non est Aug. de civit Dei l. 19. c. 15. Servitus conditionalis usualis See Ephes. 6. 5. Coloss. 4. 22. 1 Tim. 6. 2. Tit. 2. 15. Prov. 10. 26. See Dr. Willet on Exod. 21. Quest. 8. 9. Dr. Gouges Domestical duties on Ephes. 6. 5 6 7 8. Servants must obey their Masters but in the Lord and therefore the Apostle ever joyneth some clause of restraint Col. 3. 22. Ephes. 6. 6. 1 Cor. 7. 15. A servant is not sui juris must do his Masters work is a living instrument in the hand of another 1 Pet. 2. 18. Servus non est persona sed res saith the Civil Law one describes him thus A servant is a person that yeelds himself to the command of a master and submits to his authority to do his will Rom. 6. 16. So the Centurion describes a servant Matth. 8. 9. Psal. 101. 6 7. 1 Tim. 3 4. See Dr. Gouges Domest duties on Ephes. 6. 9. Naamans servants called him Father Deut. 15. 13 14. See Dr. Gouges Domest duties part 2. Without their union of hearts their uniting of bodies and states will be a death Ephes. 5. 25. Love is such a natural property of that relation that God to shew his affections to his Church when he would comfort her saith that he is her husband See a rare example of wively affection Speed in Edw. the first p. 542. 1 Cor. 7. Not beauty wit wealth kindnesse received these things may alter Matrimonial love that is such as beseemeth that neer knot and conjunction Where the bond is closest the love must be strongest His soul must rest it self in her as the onely woman under Heaven for him and hers upon him as the onely man under Heaven for her Prov. 5. 19 20. As if he had said If thou do not love thy wife thou wilt look after Harlots or at least art in danger so to do * Religio à religando Gen. 2. 18. It is not said a help onely for so are the living creatures and therefore called jumenta à juvando but a fit or meet help In the Original it is before him and with a note of similitude as before him that is answering to him Prov. 31. 1. The wives relation-grace is subjection in the Lord the Apostle twice or thrice cals for this subjection and obedience 1 Pet. 3. 5 6. 1. This is there made the great ornament 2. The Apostle shews there the benefit of this subjection The titles and names whereby an husband is set forth do imply a superiority and authority in him as Lord 1 Pet. 3. 6. Master Esth. 1. 17. Guide Prov. 2. 15. Head 1 Cor. 11. 3. 1 Pet. 3. 2. Sarah called Abraham Lord. Ephes. 5. 24. 1 Cor. 11. 7. 1 Cor. 14. 25. Men are commanded to receive them in the Lord to hold them in reputation to know them as over them in the Lord to esteem them very highly in love for their works sake to hold them worthy double honour and to obey them Phil. 2. 29. Ministers must be faithful in their Calling Faithfulnesse is a constant and diligent performing of all the parts of the duty of a Minister from the right grounds and for the right ends sincerely because God requireth and for his glory and the salvation of the people It was a wonderful thing in Paul 1 Cor. 4. 4. that he knew nothing by himself that is no notorious defect in regard of his Ministry He should have Thummim integrity of life as well as Urim light of learning It was said heretofore Stupor mundi Clerus Britannicus The wonder of the world is the Clergie of Britain 1 Tim. 4. 13. Ieroboam made the basest of the people to be Priests 1 Kin. 12. 31. 13. 33. and some would make the Priests to be the basest of the people Prov. 24. 2â— 1 Pet. 2. 17. See Tit. 3. 1. Rom. 13. 5. What one doth for conscience sake he should do willingly A great burden lies on the Magistrate Unicus tantum est subjectus in civitate Magistratus Luth. Psal. 82. 5 10. Zach. 7. 4. Acts 4. 19 20. Iulianus Imperator quamvis esset apostata habuit tamen sub se Christianos milites quibus cum dicebat Producite aciem pro defensione Ecclesiae obediebant ei cum autem diceret eis Producite arma in Christianos tunc