Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	apostle_n	scripture_n	tradition_n	2,272	5	9.2110	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29396	The school of the Eucharist established upon the miraculous respects and acknowledgments, which beasts, birds, and insects, upon several occasions, have rendred to the Holy Sacrament of the altar : whence Catholicks may increase in devotion towards this divine mystery, and hereticks find there their confusion / by F. Toussain Bridoul ... ; printed in French at Lille, 1672, and now made English, and published ; with a preface concerning the testimony of miracles.; Escole de l'Eucharistie. English	Bridoul, Toussaint, 1595-1672.; Clagett, William, 1646-1688.	1687 (1687)	Wing B4495; ESTC R9439	58,294	76

THE SCHOOL OF THE EUCHARIST ESTABLISHED Upon the Miraculous Respects and Acknowledgments which BEASTS BIRDS and INSECTS upon several Occasions have rendred to the HOLY SACRAMENT of the ALTAR Whence Catholicks may increase in Devotion towards this Divine Mystery and Hereticks find there their Confusion By F. Toussain Bridoul of the Society of Jesus Printed in French at Lille 1672. And now made English and published With a Preface concerning the Testimony of Miracles Let us view more particulary what Rational Grounds Catholicks exhibit of their belief of a Corporal presence in the Eucharist and so of Adoration Def. of Ador. of the Euch. p. 27. Printed at Oxford 1687. LONDON Printed for Randall Taylor near Stationers-Hall 1687. THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION Concerning the Testimony of MIRACLES IF the Doctrine of Transubstantiation wants the Authority of the Holy Scriptures it cannot be proved to come from Christ and his Apostles by Tradition unless the Fathers of the Primitive Church have conveyed it in their Writings If it has had no such Tradition then the best church-Church-Authority it has to rest upon will be that of the Lateran and Tridentine Synods And if they had no power to make new Articles of Faith this Doctrine is in no good case to recommend it self There are but two ways remaining I think to put it off one is to perswade us that our Learned Protestant Divines have several of them affirmed such things concerning the Real Presence as do amount to what the Papists mean by Transubstantiation and that they have laid down Principles which will save the Adoration of the Host from being an Idolatrous Worship And this is lately attempted with great appearance of Gravity by a certain Oxford Author But if this will not do there is yet another way left and that is to prove Transubstantiation and the Adoration of the Host by Miracles which has been undertaken as by several others so in particular by that Reverend Jesuit whose Collection is here Translated Our hands I perceive are now in about Transubstantiation and the Worship of the Host and the Divines have gone so far in considering all that can be said for these things that 't is pity the Controversy should not be ended all at once to which I think nothing is wanting but to represent our Adversaries Appeal to Miracles and that I suppose cannot be more fairly done than by exposing to our Countrymen what themselves have thought fit to publish in another Language concerning this Argument That nothing else remains is evident by what has been already done on † Discourse against Transubstant Doctrine of the Trin. and Transubstantiation compared in a New Dialogue 2 parts Transubst no Doctrine of the Primitive Fathers our side upon all the other Arguments and that as time will shew more fully beyond all possibility of Fair Reply I had almost forgot the desperate Defence of Transubstantiation which our Adversaries have lately made by fastning it to the Doctrine of the Trinity being for their parts content that both should sink if they could not swim together They are I hope convinced by this time that neither is their Point to be gained so and that we are able to maintain the Catholick Doctrine of the Trinity and at the same time to overthrow the Roman Doctrine of Transubstantiation That they cannot retreat for shelter to the Judgment of any Divines of this Church is now shewn in the Answer to the Oxford Author In short It has been * See Bellarm. de Sacr. Euch. l. 3. c. 23 and Discourse of Eucharist in Answer to the Book printed at Oxford p. 4. confessed by eminent men in the Roman Communion that the Scriptures do not oblige us to believe Transubstantiation and that the Fathers knew nothing of it has been confessed too by a ‡ Historical Treatise of Transubstant Learned Person of that Church now living and which is something more proved also through the First Ten Centuries Now whether Councils can make an Article of Faith of that Doctrine which is neither to be found in the Holy Scriptures nor can be defended by Testimonies of the Ancient Fathers but is in truth contrary to both I am very willing the Representer should determine * A Papist Misrepres and Repr p. 33. who tells us That he is obliged to believe nothing besides that which Christ taught and his Apostles and if any thing contrary to this should be defined and commanded to be believed even by ten thousand Councils he believes it damnable in any one to receive it and by such Decrees to make Additions to his Creed A great deal less than this if it had been said with more sincerity would have served our turn as well If Ten thousand Councils will not stir him in such a case methinks the Fourth Lateran and the Trent Councils the one a Western the other little more than an Italian Synod should not be able to do what Ten thousand Councils cannot do as for the Lateran it is yet a disputable point as * See Peter Walsh's Letter to the Bp. of Lincoln Sect. 22. some of themselves will have us believe whether the Council or rather the Pope only made the Decrees that bear its name and for the Tridentine Synod the World knows how it was from time to time influenced by the Court of Rome so that when the matter comes to be look'd into 't is indeed the Papal Authority that gives to the world this pretended Point of Faith but because certain Popes have miscarried in the Faith to the great discredit of St. Peter's Chair it was necessary that the Popes pleasure should upon all occasions of defining matters of Faith be a little disguised by being conveyed to the Church under the venerable name and Formality of a Council Transubstantiation then has nothing left to stand upon but Miracles which is as much as to say that it stands upon its last legs Bellarmine I find De Sacr. Euch. l. 3 c. 8. reserved this Argument for the last to prove the substantial Presence of Christs Body in the Eucharist I know not whether he thought it the best or no if he did I dare undertake to answer what he thought his best Argument and that by shewing that 't is none at all for if we are to trust the Old Miracles of Christ and his Apostles as without all question we ought to do then we are not to try Doctrines by new Miracles but rather to try the Miracles by the Old Doctrine Which one would think should have been a Rule to all Christians since our Blessed Saviour has warned us not to trust to Signs and Wonders Matth. xxiv 24 25 26. no tho they be Great ones Behold says he I have told you before Which Caution I must confess hath sometimes surprized me with astonishment when I consider what the Conclusion is for which according to our Blessed Lords Prediction Miracles should be pretended viz. to make us believe a