assured that this is the mind of Theophylact because for confirmation he adds The Lord said The bread that I will give you is my flesh and on these words in Ioh. 6. he saith Note well that the bread which is eaten by us in the Sacrament is not only some figuration of the Lord's flesh but the same flesh of the Lord for he said not The bread that I will give is a figure of my flesh but it is my flesh for by mysterious words it is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost into the Lord's flesh And at the words Vnless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man he addeth When we hear unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man ye shall not have life we must in taking the Divine mysteries or Sacrament hold undoubted faith and not ask what way for the natural man that is who follows human and natural thoughts is not capable of spiritual things which are above nature and so he understandeth not the spiritual eating of the Lord's flesh of which they who are not partakers are not partakers of eternal life because they have not received Iesus who is eternal life for it is not the flesh of a meer man but of God and is able to Deifie us to wit being united unto the God-head That flesh is also verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted as corruptible food but it is a help unto eternal life In these his words we see that he speaks not absolutely as he did seem to speak on Matthew but as he spoke on Mark The bread is not only some figuration and then he saith It is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost And then he saith In taking the Divine mysteries we must hold undoubted faith then they who have not faith undoubted cannot eat that mysterious Sacrament And we must not ask what way to wit as they do now whether the substance of the bread be turned into the substance of Christ's body or whether the substance of the bread is turned to nothing and Christ's body comes into the form of the bread or c. Theophylact is far from asserting any of these waies And when he saith That flesh is verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted he speaks not of the visible bread which experience teacheth to be corruptible but he speaks of the Lord's flesh which we receive by faith In a word then Theophylact speaks nothing of transubstantiation but rather against it and the Papists delude themselves and abuse his words A fourth thing they object out of Theophylact that he asserts the Primacy of Peter when he saith on Joh. 21 He who durst not ask concerning the Traitour but did commit the question unto another now the government of all is concredited unto him And on the margine Porsena addeth Praefectura omnium Petro tributa and it follows as if Christ were saying unto Peter Now I bring thee forth that thou mayest govern the world and follow me and on the margine Praeest Petrus orbi But to expound these words as if Peter were the only governour of the World and the government of the World were wholly concredited unto Peter alone is far contrary unto the words and mind of Theophylact as we have heard from him on Gal. 2. where he asserteth that Paul was equal unto him and on Matth. 16 where he asserteth that all the Apostles were of equal authority Peter therefore was a governour of the world but not the only governour for all the Apostles were as much governours as he in respect of power since the power was given unto them all with one and the same words as Theophylact asserts and whatsoever power they had yet they had no civil power because as we have heard from Theophylact on Rom. 13. all souls even Apostles must be subject unto the Civil Magistrate Neither do the words of Porsena insinuate so much as they would have for Praefectura and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is but a subordinate power and a little jurisdiction yea and for the most part a conjunct power as Praefectus urbis which at Rome were two conjunct and subordinate unto the power of the former So this is all the power which they can bring unto Peter from the words of Theophylact and we may see how in many particulars he differeth from the Tenets of the Romish Church and favoureth them not in the main things wherein they pretend to have his consent 4. Radulph a Benedictine of Flaviak in this Century writ 20 books on Leviticus and 14 books on the Epistles of Paul as witnesseth Gesner In the Preface on Levit. he saith Although it should move us not a little to beleeve that the world was contrary unto the faith and now is subject unto the faith and that the faith was declared by so many miracles and testified by the blood of so many Martyrs yet the singular ground of faith is in the Scriptures when it is clearly seen to be fulfilled in our daies which we know was prefigured and foretold so many years by the Sacraments of the Fathers and Oracles of the Prophets Here by the way note that not only Radulph but many others of the more ancient Fathers do use the word Sacrament for the rites of religion yea and for mysteries and very largely or homonymously Lib. 1. cap. 1. Our Lord Jesus Christ is our Altar because we lay our oblation on him for if we do any good thing we hope that by him it shall be accepted of the Father and therefore the Apostle Peter saith Offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable unto God through Jesus Christ ..... The authority of the Holy Scripture doth furnish unto us matter of holy thoughts Ibid. Scarcely can any good work be perfected without admission of some sin it is therefore to be feared lest when the reward of perfect devotion is expected the punishment of our guiltiness be required of us Lib. 2. cap. 2. That Angel is none other but our greatest High-Priest of whom we speak to wit he was sent by the Father unto men and sent again from men unto the Father to plead the causes of men before the Father he being the Mediatour of God and men Ibid. cap. 4 Whatsoever man can do for himself were no way sufficient to obtain forgiveness unless the immaculate sacrifice of that Just one did commend the repentance of sinners Lib. 5. cap. 3 When ye do any good thing ascribe not the very affection of godliness unto you as if ye could do it of your self for it is God which worketh in us at his good pleasure both to will and to perfect ..... he who ascribeth grace unto himself must necessarily lose grace for which he was not thankfull Lib. 6. cap. 3. He dieth who discovereth his head because while he expects salvation another way then by the grace of Christ he doth
no satisfaction for Pennance onely they shew themselves to the Priests who anoint them with oyl in token of the remission of their sins 15. Onely on Maundy Thursday they do consecrate for the sick and keep it the whole year after and think it more holy that day then any other neither do they fast on any Saturday save onely on Easter-even 16. They have but five Orders as Clerks Deacons Sub-Deacons Priests and Bishops whereas the Romish Church hath nine Orders according to the nine Orders of Angels 17. In their Orders they make no vow of single life alledging the Canon J. N. Priest or Deacon shall not put away my wife as it were for honesties sake 18. Every year on certain days they excommunicate the Church of Rome and all the Latins as Heretiques 19. They excommunicate him who striketh a Priest 20. Their Emperor doth name Patriarchs Bishops and others of the Clergy and deposeth them at his pleasure also he giveth Benefices to whom he listeth and retaineth the Fruits of the same Benefices as it pleaseth him 21. They blame the Latins because they eat not flesh eggs nor cheese on Friday 22. They hold against the Latins for celebrating without consecrated Churches and fasting on the Sabbath days and for permitting menstruous women to enter into Churches before their purifying also for suffering dogs or other beasts to enter into Churches 23. They use not to kneel at their devotion yea not to the body of Christ but one day in the year affirming that the Latins like goats or beasts prostrate themselves on the ground in their prayers 24. They permit not the Latins to celebrate on their Altars and if it chance a Latin Priest celebrate on their Altar by and by they wash it in token of abomination and false sacrifice 25. They condemn the worship of Images as idolatry These are the Articles contained in the said Register But there are many more in the Book of Catholique Traditions published in the French tongue by Th. A. I. C. and translated into English and printed at London ann 1610. out of which I have drawn these Articles 1. All the Apostles were equally universal Pastors and no primacy given to Peter who was never at Rome but when he was martyred 2. To say that the Church is grounded on the stone of Rome is hard and grievous and not far from the Jewish baseness to include the Church within a Town 3. St. John ending his life after Peter had the first place among all Evangelists and Bishops and he never taught that Rome by divine right ought to be the Lady of other Churches 4. But after St. John the Bishop of Rome obtained the first place among the Bishops within the Roman Empire for seeing the Citizens of Rome reigned above other Cities he had been proud and audacious who would have preferred himself before their Bishop especially without Ordinance of a Council 5. The Churches of Italy and others their neighbors by lapse of time gave to the Church of Rome not onely the first place but also superintendence over the Bishops near them in particular to give his advice in matters that happened until a Synod might be held yet never any presidency or power was given to the Church of Rome above other Churches 6. As all the Apostles were equal in Authority so they left behinde them every one diverse Successors of equal Authority 7. He who accuseth the Scriptures accuseth God the Author thereof but God is void of blame and the Scriptures contain the whole matter of faith 8. Those onely are Canonical Books which were contained in the Ark and written in Hebrew before or in Greek after the coming of the Lord. 9. They hold they were the first Nations converted unto Christ and in that regard they are the men who truly and purely maintain the Traditions of the Primitive Church as it was taught them by the Apostles 10. Faith is an assurance of the love of God and he who doubteth cannot approach unto God with confidence 11. The saying of Paul It is not in him who runneth nor in him who willeth prevents two mischiefs One that no man exalt himself for grant that thou runnest or endeavorest yet think not what thou doest well is thine for if thou be not inspired from above all is vain Another that no man deem that he shall be crowned without service 12. Faith is imputed to justification faith sufficeth for all faith absolveth justifieth and maketh partaker of eternal glory for God requireth no other thing but compunction and mourning 13. When we praise good Works we mean not to exalt our selves by them or to put our trust in them but we desire men would give themselves thereunto as to things necessary unto salvation and which every one is bound to exercise according to his power following the commandment of God 14 They communicate under Both elements and they have one fashion for the Communicants in the Church and another for the Sick the Priests with little or no reverence eat the remanent elements which are not eaten by the faithful but for the sick it is kept all the year being consecrate the week before Easter 15. They celebrate the Liturgy in their own Language that the people may understand 16. The Bishop of Rome cannot by his Indulgences deliver any from these temporal punishments which God inflicteth neither ought he to dispense with the fulfilling of all these works of repentance which are possible c. The most part of these last differences are fallen twixt the east and western Churches since the 11. Century and in them all we finde that the differences are either calumnies articulated by the Church of Rome or matters of Discipline or Ceremony or then our Reformed Church agreeth with them 8. The Bishop of Millan had the next place in Italy unto the Bishop of How Millan became subject unto Rome Rome he had eighteen Suffragan Bishops under him twenty two Ordinary Cardinals and divers other Offices of mark he was always named by the King of Lombardie neither he nor any of his Clergy trotted at any time to Rome This was a great moat in the Priests eyes and therefore the Popes ofttimes sought to bring Millan into subjection unto their See but the Millanoyes still kept their liberty At last ann 1059. Ariald Clericus Decumanus conspired with Landulfus Cotta praefatus populi against the Arch-Bishop Wido and made a pretext that married Priests ought to be exautorate Wido assembled all his Bishops and Clergy at Fontanetum with common consent it was denied that Priests should have liberty of marriage Then was great strife in the Town the Nobility defended Wido and the People were for Landulf who sent Ariald to Pope Nicolaus II. accusing the Clergy of Millan and requiring him to send some Judges to try the matter He was glad of the occasion and sent Peter Damian Bishop of Ostia and Anselm Bishop of Luca. So soon as Damian began to talk
would contentiously defend his error by and by it should by these Legates be deferred unto the audience of the other Sisters and if by Letters Canonically written that Sister could be reduced unto the harmony of wholesome doctrine it was well but if not a general Councel might be assembled 2. The Empire was translated from Rome to the East and then it was ordained by 150. Bishops assembling in this City when blessed Nectarius was ordained Bishop of this See after the condemnation of Maximus Ennius who was infected with the contagion of Apolinaris then it was ordained I say with consent of the most godly Emperor Theodosius the elder that as old Rome had obtained from the holy Fathers in former time the first place in Ecclesiastical causes so then new Rome for the honor of the Empire should have the Ecclesiastical precedency after her and should be called as the second Rome so be called and be the second See and should preside all the Churches of Asia Thracia and Pontus and treat of all Church-affairs and determine them by her own Authority And then such Legates Wardens of the Catholique faith as were sent to Alexandria and Antiochia were sent also into this Royal City and likewise from hence unto them for the same ministery that they all might teach the same and differ in no point of truth 3. When the Empire was divided the Bishops were also divided the decrees of the Roman high Priest that were established in their Councels without the Greeks let these Bishops which belong unto him look unto them As for these Councels which in these days they hold how should we imbrace their decrees which are written against our knowledge For if the Roman Bishop sitting in the high throne of his glory will thunder against us and as it were from above throw his commands and will judge of us and our Churches not with our counsel but at his own pleasure yea and will Lord it over us what brotherhood or what fatherhood can be in this who can patiently endure it for then we might be called the very slaves and not children of his Church And if this were necessary and so grievous a yoke were to be laid on our necks none other thing followeth but that the only Roman Church should have that priviledg which they hunt after and she shall make Laws unto all others and she her self be without Law and so be not a pious mother of children but an imperious Lady of slaves To what purpose then were the knowledge of the Scriptures the studies of learning the doctrine and discipline of teachers and the noble wits of the wise Greeks the onely authority of the Roman high Priest which as thou sayest is above all turneth all to nothing Let him be the onely Bishop the onely Teacher the onely Commander and let him onely as the onely Pastor answer unto God for all things that are concredited unto him onely But if he will not have fellow-laborers in the Lord's vineyard and if he be exalted in keeping his primacy let him glory in his primacy but not contemn his brethren whom the truth of Christ hath begotten in the womb of the Church not unto bondage but unto freedom For as the Apostle saith We must all stand before the throne of Christ that every one may receive as he hath done whether good or ill He saith All though he was an Apostle he excepteth not himself he excepteth no mortal He said All he excepteth not the Roman high Priest Nor is it found in any Creed that we should believe specially the Roman Church but rather we are taught every where to believe that there is one holy Catholique Church These things speak I of the Roman Church with your favor which I do reverence as you do but will not follow absolutely nor do I think that she should be followed in all particulars whose authority thou hast propounded unto us as so excellent that we must forsake our own customs and receive her form and change in Sacraments without examining by reason and without authority of Scriptures but we as blinde men should follow her leading us whither she willeth by her own spirit which how safe or honorable it is for us let both the Latin and Greek Sages judge 4. Thou sayest that the Lord said unto Peter alone and not unto all the Apostles Whose sins ye forgive and what thou shalt binde on earth But it is believed that the Lord said that not unto Peter onely but indifferently unto them all with Peter or to Peter with them all Nor did the holy Ghost come down on Peter onely at the Pentecost but the Lord sent him unto them all in a like gift and in a like measure as he had promised therefore we do so acknowledge the power to be given of the Lord and received by Peter that we think the Authority of the other Apostles should not be minced seeing certainly they all equally without any prejudice of another or usurpation as truly meek and lowly in heart did receive the same holy Ghost and by the same holy Ghost did receive the same power of binding and loosing nor can we think that the priviledge was given unto Peter onely which is common unto them all by the Lord's gift therefore we may not take from others which have the same power and ascribe unto one the Authority which is common to them all Let Peter as the twelfth Apostle be honored so that the other eleven be not excluded from the Apostleship which certainly they did receive by an equal and not different dispensation not from Peter but from the Lord himself even as Peter did 5. I grant there have been many heresies in Constantinople but there also were they extinguished as the heresie of Arrius in the days of Constantine the root of them all was Philosophia which was planted in Constantinople and which the learned have abused So heresies have been condemned in the Churches of Calcedon Constantinople Ephesus Antiochia and Alexandria and it was commanded that none should any more plead for these heresies But now in this City are no heresies As for Rome haply no heresies began there because they were not so witty and subtil nor were they such searchers of the Scriptures as some here and as the vain wisdom wherewith some among us were miscarried into heresies is to be condemned so the rudeness of the Romans is to be commended whereby they said neither this nor that of the faith but with an unlearned simplicity did hear others which seemeth to have come either through too much sloth in searching the faith or through slowness of judgement or that they were taken up with the multitude and weight of secular affairs Catal. test verit lib. 15. The Reader may judge of this reply unto these objections and by these particulars understand what the Greeks did judge of the particulars that are omitted It seemeth the Romans would wipe away that jeering blot in the last
Catholick and was ready either presently or at any time shal be appointed to give reasons of this his assertion out of the written word and to answer any objection But the Legate would not heare of Scripture When Luther was gone the Legate wrote a sharp letter unto Frederik requiring him as he tendered his own honour savety or respected the favour of the great high priest to send Luther unto Rome or expell him out of his Dominion The Duke replieth excusing himself that he could not do that with his honour nor with a safe conscience unless he knew a justcause and if the Legate will shew that nothing shall be lacking on his part Nevertheless the Duke began to be timorous un till he sought information from Erasmus and the University of Witembergh they did encourage him unto constancy in Gods cause J. Fox in Act. mon. VI. Leo feareth an innouation in Germany not only by loosing the Another proclamation of indulgences benefit of Indulgences but by contempt of his authority and for remedie of both he confirmeth the Indulgences by a new Bull dated Novemb. 9. Ann. 1518. and therein declares that unto him as the successour of Peter and Vicar of Christ belongs the power to bestow so great a benefite both on the living and the dead and the Church of Rome is the mother and Lady of all Christians and all men must obey her who will not be separate from the communion of the Church This was sent unto Cajetan and he directed severall coppies thereof unto the Bishops throughout Germany adding threats against all who shall think otherwise Then Luther saw that nothing was to be expected from Rome unto him but condemnation therefore he published an appeal wherein he professeth that he would not decline the authority of the Pope in so far as he followeth truth but he is not so free from the common condition of men that he can not erre seing even the example of Peter who was rebuked by Paul testifieth the contrary indeed it is easy for the Pope by his wealth and power to oppresse any man dissenting from him and they who are oppressed must have their refuge to a general Councell which every way is to be preferred before the Pope By this appeall after it was spread and many did judge it reasonable it did quickly appeare how weak the Popes Bull was to quench the fire of Germany Pe. Soave in Histor In the end of this year Luther wrote unto Wenceslaus Linckius saying I send unto thee my proceedings more exactly written than the Lord Legate thinks but my pen is a breeding for higher things I know not whence these meditations do come in my judgement this business is not yet begun so far is it from that the Peers of Rome can hope for an end I send thee my trifles that thou mayst see whither I guesse rightly that the very Antichrist as Paul speakes be reigning in the Court of Rome I think I can demonstrate that he now is worse than the Turks Schultet Annal. VII After the publishing of the foresaid Bull the minds of the Roman Others arise for the truth Court were lifted up again and ere they heard of Luther's appeall as if all were then well presently they fly unto their harvest and send Samson a Franciscan of Millan into Helvetia to sell Indulgences in some places he reapeth abundantly he comes to Zurick where Hulderik or Ulrick Zuinglius opposeth him and preacheth not only against the abuses of the indulgences but confuteth the use of them and the power of the Pope sending them and many did hear him gladly and commended him mightily saith Pe. Soave Here it is to be remembred that albeit Luther was the first who entred into debate with the corrupt Court of Rome yet not he alone Wolfgang Fabritius Capito was born in Haganoa of Alsatia An. 1478. his father abhorring the wicked life of priests took him from the study of Divinity and applied him unto Medicine but after his fathers death he returned unto the subtilties of Scotus in Friburgh of Brisgoia and wearying there he became preacher in Brusella by Spira thence he was called unto Basile An. 1508. where by preaching and disputing he sowed the first seed of the Gospell Likewise John housschine or Oecolamp made such progress in his studies at Heilborn Heidlbergh that Philip the Palsgrave made choise of him to be Tutour of his children about the year 1514. his native town Winsbergh calleth him to be their preacher where he was the admiration of all learned men and in the year 1516. he was called unto Basile and there did concurre with Erasmus in translating the New Testament and the same year was graduat Doctor of Divinity by Capito Also at Strawsburgh Doctour Keisersberger and John Creutser another Doctour of Divinity howbeit they did use the usuall rites yet they preached no other doctrine then afterwards was declared in their Confession An. 1530. so that Strawsburgh was the first town of Germany professing the truth of the Gospell saith Abr. Scultet in Annal. As for Zuinglius his father was wealthy and old and his son very young he thought the fittest way to preserve his riches unto his son was to build a Church in Glarona and addote all his riches unto the priest there of upon condition that his son be the first priest when the boy came to 16 years of age he was sensible of his unworthiness to have the charge of souls therefore he went to the schools in Basile An. 1505. where he heard Thomas VVittenbach teach that the death of Christ is the only price of our redemption and indulgences are but a device of the Pope Then he read the Scriptures diligently especially the New Testament in Greek and finding in the epistle of Peter that the Scripture is not of private interpretation he made it a part of his prayer dayly that God would give him his Spirit to attain the knowledge of the hid mysteries And lest he should be deceived with a fond conceit of his own imaginations he compared the Scriptures and by collationing one passage with another he searches the meaning of the darker places and he read the writings of the antients yet so that he judged they should be examined by the touchstone of Gods word Thus he attained to the knowledge of many things which were not spoken of in these days He was called by Francis à Sickengen a Germane Knight to be his preacher ansd there he read the gospell and the epistle and the Letany in the Germane language not intending any Reformation but that they under his charge might the better understand what they heard Then came unto his hands the Resolution of the questions which Picus of Mirandula had propounded at Rome these he did approove and therefore was suspected and hated by some nevertheless with boldness he spoke against the pardons and openly disputed with Cardinall Matthew Bishop of Sedune before there was any
Church of Christ it is also certain that of old so far as the memory of the Church is extant that the chief authority in the whole Church was given unto the Roman Bishop as the Successor of Peter and possessing of his chaire which may be demonstred by innumerable testimonies of the most antient and grave men both Greek and Latine as Irenaeus Tertullian Optatus Jerom Ambrose Basile Chrysostom Augustin unto whom the Ecclesiastical Histories and Decrees of Councels agree and I think there had never been controversy among us for this point unless the Romane Highpriests had abused this authority unto some kind of domineering and had stretched it through ambition and covetousness beyond the bounds that were prescribed by Christ and the Church but this abuse of the Pontifician power which the flatterers did at first enlarge beyond measure gave occasion to think amiss of yea and to fall off altogether from that Pontifician power which he had by universal consent of the whole church which I think may be recovered if he would return unto the bounds that were prescribed by Christ and the antient church c. Here are fair pretences but no less untrue for the Augustan Confession requires no such obedience nor did Christ prescribe it no nor the vniversal Church as the preceeding part of this history shew clearly was not this the main strife betwixt the Greek and the Latines and did not the African church oppose it neither do any of those named antients avouch it as is cleared in many polemicall treatises In some articles he neither blameth the Confession nor can excuse the Roman Church as on the 12. article he saith From the custom of canonical punishments which were publickly enioyned unto the penitents for a prescribed time indulgences were hatched for when the Bishops saw the diligence or weakness of repentants they might deal the more courteously meekly with them and diminish some thing of the time or of the rigor of the punishments which abaiting of the canonical punishments was called Indulgence and now it is brought into privat satisfactions and from the Bishops it is turned unto the Roman highpriest only that he hath the full power of indulgences concerning the use and exercise of which every one of the best sort hath wished that there were a moderation and correction because they have been the main cause of this renting of the Church here saith he it were to be wished that the Roman highpriests would yeeld somewhat for common peace On the 16 article he saith What is spoken of the Magistrat and civill things is every way to be allowed that lawfull civil ordinances are the good works of God that it is lawfull unto Châ—istians to be Magistrats to ordain punishment by law to warre righteously c. The doubt only remaines of the Office power of the Magistrat in Ecclesiastical things here is excess on both hands some asscribing too little and some too much unto Civil power for some exclude Princes and Magistrats from all medling with Ecclesiastical things and others make all ecclesiastical administration subject unto the power of the Magistrat But in this question that should be without controversy that the power of the Emperour and other Christian Princes is no less or inferior in a Christian Republick then was in old times the power of Kings in the commonwealth of Israel and it is manifest by the Divine Scriptures what was their Office in preserving the Divine law and promoving the Divine worship for by a Divine law the reading of Deuteronomy is commended unto them not only that thereby they should order their privat life rightly and holily but likewise to preserve the Divine lawes in vigor and without violation and the examples of the godly Kings who are commended in the Scriptures declare this clearly who finding the will of God in his law commanded the priests and Levites to restore Divine worship as it is prescribed in Divine law c. Of the processions as they are called on the 22 article he saith The custom of carrying the bread of the Eucharist conspicuously in publick pompe is besides the mind and manner of the antients and seemes to have been begun but lately for those had this mystery in such Religion that they would admit none either to the receiving or beholding it but the believers whom they judged to be members of Christ and worthy of the partaking so great a mystery therefore before the consecration Catechumeni energumeni the penitents and all who did not communicate were set forth by the voice of a deacon and ministry of the door-keepers Wherefore it seemes the custom of Circumgestation may well be omitted c. On the 24 article he saith Whereas they complain of privy Masses it is not without reason if thereby they understand the Masses wherein the priest only takes the sacrament and there is no distribution of the mysteries which when it began in some monasteries was forbidden as is clear in a canon of the Nanneten councel c. The Belgick Index expurgatorius hath not spared other of this mans works as his Scholia on the hymns on that which beginneth Nocte surgentes in the edition at Colen An. 1556. it is in page 48 and in the edition at Paris 1616. in Fol. it is Page 179 it is said Cumsuis sanctis mereamur aulam Ingredi coeli the Scholia say The word mereri is one almost among the Ecclesiastical Writers with consequi seu aptum idoneumve fieri ad consequendum which Mereri what it signifieth appeares by one passage of Cyprian besides many more for where Paul saith 1. Tim. 1. I have obtained mercy and it is usually read misericordiam consecutus sum or as Erasmus translates it misericordiam adeptus sum Cyprian in epist ad Iuiaban reades it misericordiam merui and there be many passages in the Offices and prayers of the Church where this word should be taken in this sense if this notion of that word were held many places which seem harsh would appeare more pleasant and usefull In the next Scholi or anotation he saith These words super hanc petram we should understand Peters confession saying Thou art Christ the sonne of the living God This was the exposition of Augustin and Ambrose followes it elsewhere confessing that it is not the person of Peter but his faith on which the Church is builded and against which the gates of hell shall not prevail sor faith saith he is the foundation of the Church seing it is said not of the flesh of Peter but of his faith The gates of death shall not prevail against it but his confession overcomes hell Hereunto agreeth that of Cyrill I think that the Rock is no other but the unmovable and most sure faith of the disciple on which the Church of Christ is so founded and fastened that it can not fail and abides for ever unvincible by the gates of hell And therefore when Ambrose calles Peter
Writer of the Historie saith lib. 2. there was great contention concerning the Latine Translation and in the end they did conclude that it is to be approved as authentical yet so that they who are more diligent should not be forbidden to quench their thirst out of the Hebrew and Greek Fountains And after that Councel two other Editions were published by Pope Sixtus the V. and Clemens the VIII with infinite alterations as followeth in the 16. Century 11. The Popes did indeavour to take libertie of marriage from the Clergie The single life of Church men is opposed and where they could prevail adulterie and murther of babes was multiplied as is touched In sundrie Nations great opposition was made for Arnulph Bishop of Metensis was the father of Anchises the father of Pipin Britain would not receive this bondage In Creet John a Priest had a wife and therefore was reproved by Pope Vitalian What may I speak of one Greek The Greeks are for the most part married untill this day In the fourth Councel at Toledo Cap. 43. Marriage was approved and Fornication prohibited More of this hereafter 12. Divers Nations then received the faith the Gothi and Suevi in Spain Some Nations hear of Christ forsook Arianism by authoritie of their King Reccared Ghent brake down the Altar of Mercurius whom they had served and began to serve the true God by the preaching of Amand a French-man an 613. who was exiled for reproving King Dagobert of luxurie and venerie Other Flandrians were converted by his Countrie man Aegidius an 649. The sound of the word had been through the world but the Nations persevered not and being instructed but in few persons Paganism continued and the Barbarians disturbing the Realms did also disturb the estate of religion 13. In that Centurie lived sundrie Divines although not equal to their forefathers John Bishop of Alexandria called the Almons an 610. who for Some worthy men his rare example of hospitalitie and bountifulness to the poor is no less worthy to have place amongst good men than he is followed of few He was wont at all occasions to propound unto the people questions out of the Scriptures because multitude of heresies were then on foot and he exhorted the people to propound their doubts unto him If any did presumptuously move curious questions he could cunningly turn to another more profitable When any of the unlearned moved trivial doubts he accepted them calmly and commanded that thereafter such persons should not be admitted to the end others seeing such men checked should be the more wary In the daies of Boniface the IV. John Bishop of Gerunden a Spaniard was instructed at Constantinople in the languages and reading of Scriptures thence he returning into his Countrie did with dexteritie refute the heresie of Arrius and therefore was exiled to Barchinona but after the death of the Arrian King Lemungild he returned and wrote many books Of the same country was Europius Bishop of Valentia worthy of remembrance for godliness of life and sinceritie of faith Then also lived Ildefonsus Bishop of Toledo who as another Augustine is called the Hammer of Hereticks France did never want famous witnesses of the Gospel at that time was the fore-named Arnulph Bishop of Metensis Projectus a Martyr in Aquitania an 610. Eustathius Abb. Luxovien the Disciple of Columban an 624. Modoald Bishop of Trevers Renald the successour of the above-named Amand we have heard of Serenus Bishop of Marsilia where succeeded Projectus who is said to have suffered martyrdom in agro Cameracen an 678. Eustasius a Preacher in Bavier an 640. Lambert Bishop of Tungri was put to death an 658. because he rebuked Pipin for marrying another wife the first being yet alive Dodo the brother of the second wife was the Executioner and shortly thereafter died of vermine Ulfranius Bishop of Senonen hath been a diligent labourer in the Lord's harvest in Frisia an 660. Leodagarius Bishop of Augustodunen suffered death at the command of Theorick King of France because he oft reproved him of tyrannie Victor Bishop of Carthage an 646. writing to Pope Theodore retains the old Titles saying Unto the most blest and honourable Lord his holy brother Theodore Pope the works of your most blessed brother-hood are acceptable unto God c. There he affirmeth that all the Apostles were of equal authoritie and honour 14. Isidorus Bishop of Hispala called the latter did write many books of the Christian faith and the History from Adam untill his own time 624. Isidor Hispalen he hath many errours but in many things is sound In his book de summo bono cap. 28. he saith In the holy Scriptures as on high mountains both the learned find sublimities of knowledge whereunto as Harts they may lift up the steps of their contemplation and the simple men as lesse Wights may find mean things for their capacitie to which they may humbly have refuge the holy Scripture seems unto the babes of understanding to be base in words in respect of the historie but it wadeth more deeply with the more learned opening unto them the mysteries thereof and it remains common to the learned and unlearned Lib. 7. etymolog cap. 9. Peter received his name from the Rock which is Christ on whom the Church is built the Rock hath not the name from Peter but Peter from the Rock therefore the Lord saith Thou art Peter and upon this Rock which thou hast confessed will I build my Church for the Rock was Christ upon which Peter himself was built Lib 8. cap. 5. he noteth it as a fault in the old Catharists that they did glorie in their merits and that they denied forgiveness of sins to the penitent Lib. 6. cap. 19. The Sacraments are baptism and chrism the bodie and blood of Christ Here he nameth but two because the custom was then to anoint them who were baptized De offic lib. 1. cap. 18. Bread because it strengthneth the bodie is therefore called Christ's bodie and Wine because it worketh blood in the flesh therefore it hath relation to Christ's blood these two are sensible but being sanctified by the Holy Spirit are changed into the Sacrament of the Lord's body The Papists now in our daies would gather out of these words Transubstantiation but hereafter God willing it shall appear that neither word nor thing was thought upon in 500. years after that time and Isidore saith Transeunt in Sacramentum And de doctrin fide art 33. saith That marriage is evil or to be compared with fornication and to believe that meat is evil or the cause of evil unto the eaters is not Christian but properly Manichean or Encratitish 15. Agrestin was Clark to King Theodorick and then entred the Abbey Lexovien with all his Wealth he became wearied of the superstitious rites Agrestin and left the Abbey Then he went to Aquileia which for that time was not under the yoke of the Romish Pope and
bold reprover of Kings he became a shameless flatterer of Popes for he is said to have first moved the decree in Gratian. dist 40. cap. Si quis if a Pope carry with him innumerable souls into Hell no man ought to say unto him What doest thou He spoke so and afterwards the Popes did aim at exemption from censure untill they did attain it he had from Rome a power Legantine in Germany neither preached he only unto the Heathens but did corrupt several Provinces where Christ had been preached as Thuringia Argentina c. with Roman Manicheism condemning some meats forbidding marriage of Priests and permitting to have Nuns or Whores urging the worship of images in a word his care was not so much for Christianism as for Papism for he writ unto Pope Zachary saying How few soever Disciples God giveth me in this my charge I cease not to incline them to the obedience of the Apostolick See he caused the Monastery of Eulda to be built in favour of English men and was killed at Borna being suspected of a conspiracy 5. Many did preach and write against him and his superstitions as Adelbert The opposers of his Rites a French Bishop and Sidonius an Arch-Bishop of Bavaria Samson a Scot Bishop of Auxerre and Virgilius an Irish man Bishop of Juvavia as Nauclerus and Aventine do record Boniface dilateth them unto Pope Zachary and as Bern. Lutzenburg in Catol writeth the Pope in a Synod at Rome condemneth them depriveth them of their Priesthood and excommunicateth them before they were heard and when they sought to be heard and plead their cause in a Synod Boniface denied access unto them and said Excommunicated men should not be admitted into a Synod nor have the benefit of the Law So partly by tyranny of the Pope and partly by authority of Pipin Boniface did oppress all his adversaries Catal. test ver ex vita Bonifac. Particularly one Clemens did reprove Boniface 1. That he did so advance the authority of the Roman Bishop seeing all Teachers are equally successours of the Apostles 2. That he condemned the marriage of Priests 3. That he did speak too much for the Monkish life 4. That he had anointed the King of France contrary to the undoubted right of the Merovei 5. That he appointed Masses for the dead and other new Rites unknown in the Church heretofore Aventin Annal. lib. 3. Epist Zachar. ad Bonif. in tom 2. Concil 6. Albine or Alcwin had good knowledge of the Latine and Greek languages Alcwin and his doctrines Charls the Great calleth him his Master in an Epistle written unto him deseptuages sexages Biblioth de la Bigne tom 3. where are some of his works On Ps 51. he writeth thus It is said unto the Father Then wilt thou accept the sacrifice of righteousness that is the most glorious passion of the Son who offered himself a sacrifice for all men that they might attain salvation which the world did not deserve by their works Ibid. When I look on my self I find nothing in me but sin thy righteousness must deliver me it is thy mercy and not my merits that saveth me we are quickned by the mercy of God in the name of our Saviour and not by our merits In his works he often useth the word merite but here we may see in what sence he and others do understand it On the fourth poenit Ps I could defile my self but I cannot cleanse my self unless thou Lord Jesu do cleanse me by sprinkling thy holy blood No good can be in us unless it be thy working grace who hast made us On Ps 118. Thou hast made me to be desirous of thy Commandments make me also able to do help that I may do what thou commendest and give what thou commandest And in another place Free-will abideth as yet in men by nature that in whom God willeth he may be pleased to make free by grace that they have not an evil will for since the first man by free-will was sold under sin the freedom of man is evil because the goodness of the will is taken away from the free-will which goodness none can have of himself unless he have it being helped by the grace of God's mercy without whose help free-will can neither turn unto God nor make any progress unto God He hath the like words in lib. 2. de Trinit cap. 8. On Eccles cap. 1. The Sun Christ inlightneth all things with the splendour and vertue of his spiritual grace in whose punishment is our salvation he ariseth to them who believe in him and he goeth down to every unbeliever Ibid. cap. 3. We should rejoice in this spiritual pleasure of meat and drink not only in the Sacrament but in reading the Holy Scriptures also where we may eat and drink of the Tree of life Ibid. cap. 7. Let us consider the works of God how great and wondrous they are and how in his free mercy he hath chosen one and in his just judgement he despiseth another as it is written of the Twins I have loved Jacob and hated Esau In Praefa lib. 1. de Trinit We should all pray that the Catholick faith which only quickneth mankind and only doth sanctifie may be truly fixed in the hearts of all men by one confession Ca. 1. Although we be thrown down from the joy of blessed felicity into the miserable blindness of this exile for the just punishment of original sin yet we are not so cut off that even in this changable and temporary estate we know not to seek and desire eternity truth and blessedness which is clear in that we have not a will to die nor be deceived nor be miserable whence is this natural instinct that all men would be blessed although this appetite is diversly in the minds of particular persons some think to be blessed in riches The whole divine Scriptures exhort us to be lifted up from earthly unto heavenly things where is true and eternal blessedness unto which it is most certain that none can attain but by the faith of the Catholick peace In Praefa lib. 2. All the authority of the holy books serve unto us to make us believe rightly of God and to love him with all our heart but the sight of man's mind is not able to behold the most excellent light of God's Majesty unless it be inlightned by the brightness of the righteousness of faith and love through the gift of God's grace therefore we should pray for the grace of God that the ey of our heart may be cleansed to see how properly the Trinity is the one and only and true God and how rightly the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit is said understood and beleeved to be one and the same substance Lib. 3. cap. 1. What did the human nature in the man Christ deserve that it should be assumed into the unity of the person of the only Son of God what good will what desire of
leave Then concerning his curses against the King after he hath bitterly expostulated for his menacing and declared that he had sent his Letters unto the Peers and Prelates of the Kingdom and had read them openly in an assembly of the Bishops of France and Lorain at Atiniac and had shewed his Bull unto Lewis King of Germany whereby he was commanded by authority of the Pope to accurse them all who intermeddle with the Kingdom of Lorain he saith I have heard that the like letters as have been directed to our Lord Charls and to the Peers and Bishops of his Kingdom have been also sent unto my Lord Lewis the glorious King and to the Bishops and Nobility of his Kingdom ..... Then he gives him to understand that he had heard it reported by many that the two Kings had agreed to divide the Kingdom which if it be not done sedition shall kindle among the people wherefore since he saw that either the authority of the Pope must be contemned or the agreement of the Kings be violated whence might arise fear of wars he thinks it more expedient to omit so Imperious commands and surcease altogether from attempting any thing therein neither is it my duty saith he to debar any man from the Communion except one who hath willingly confessed his fault or who is convict in judgement unless I would contemn the Canon of the Apostles the practice of the Church and the authority of Augustin Gelasius Boniface c. Whereas the Pope had accused him that by silence and cessation he may seem not partner but authour of the usurpation he biddeth him remember what is written The cause which I knew not I fearched diligently and that God as is marked by Gregory to whose eys all things are open said in the cause of the Sodomite I will go down and see whereby we should learn to try and see the evil before we beleeve it and not punish till it be notoriously known Whereas he would have him abstain from the company of the King and not bid him God speed it seems very hard said he since very many good men both of Ecclesiastical and Secular sort who occasionally have come to Rhemes have openly professed that they had never heard the like practice from any of his Predecessours although in their own times they had seen seditions and wars not among Kings who were united by oath and league but also among brethren yea between father and children And therefore he acknowledgeth this his contempt to be for his other sins since in this he had dealt lovingly with his fellow-brethren of whom some had invited King Charls into the Kingdom of Lorain Moreover that the States of the Kingdom affirm plainly that Kingdoms are not conquered by curses of Priests or Bishops and that they have learned from the Holy Scripture Kingdoms appertain unto God by whom Kings do reign and he gives them to whom he willeth wherefore since the High-Priest cannot be both a King and a Bishop he should leave the care of distributing Kingdoms which as his Predecessours did not attempt against the schismatical nor heretical nor tyranous Emperours in their times so neither can they now bear it who know it to be written in the Holy Scripture We should strive even to death for liberty and inheritance neither are they ignorant if a Bishop excommunicate a Christian without reason that the power of binding may be taken from him but eternal life can be taken from no man unless his own sins do demerit neither can any man be spoiled of the name of a Christian for taking or conquering an earthly Kingdom or can he be ranked with the Divel whom Christ came to redeem with his blood from the Divel's power and therefore if the Pope would have peace let him so seek it that he move no strife for the people think not that they cannot come to the Kingdom of Heaven except they imbrace such an earthly King as the Pope recommendeth as for the Oath said he and falshood and tyranny whereof you write the Peers of the Nation say unto us that ye command not such things as concern your authority yea they have not spared from menacings against you which for the present I will not repeat and I know as they threatned with deliberation so if God suffer them without retreating they will shew it indeed and I know by experience that without regard of admonition or sword of man's tongue unless some other stay arise our King and Nobility of this Realm will not fail to do accordingly to their power and follow forth what they have begun He concludes that Bishops and himself especially should take heed of their behaviour towards the King since it is the Apostles doctrine that all souls be subject unto Superiour powers And with these Letters in the name of Hincmar were other Letters written by common advice of the Bishops of France being assembled at Rhemes and sent unto Pope Adrian who died in the fifth year of his pride and so that strife ceased Ph. Morn in Myster ex Aimoin lib. 5. and out of others Baronius in Annal. ad An. 870. § 38. saith Hincmar did forge many excuses and by shifting did escape the sentence of the Apostolick See till Pope Adrian died 11. JOHN the IX succeeds An. 872 as Onuphrius saith who reckoneth The Pope climbeth above the Emperour not the eight years between Nicolaus and Adrian but others account his succession in the year 876. He hapned on the fittest occasion of ambition among them all for after his inauguration began the contention between Charls of France and Charls of Germany for the Empire The King of France was alwaies aiming at the Kingdom of Italy and promised unto Pope John rich rewards if he attained unto the Empire he would defend the Church from all injury and wholly quit the Territory of Rome John did fear that the other would take his manure in Italy and therefore desirous the Emperour were at a distance rather than to sit in his eye he invited the King of France to come unto Rome and incontinently saluteth him Augustus and by this means saith Sigonius and after him Ph. Morn in Myster the Title Imperator Augustus became the gift of the High-Priest wholly and the years of their Empire were reckoned from their consecration by the Pope Continuator Eutropii saith more plainly Charls the Bald coming to Rome made covenant with the Romans and granted unto them the rights of the Kingdom and revenues out of three Monasteries that is out of Saint Salvator's Saint Mary in Sabinis and Saint Andrew's on Mount Soracte and the Imperial Patrimony out of many other Monasteries he gave them also the Provinces of Samnio and Calabria with all the Cities of Benevento and the Dukedom of Spoleto and two Cities of Tuscia Arisium and Clusium which did belong unto the Duke so that he who before was above the Romans in royality seems now inferiour unto them he
removed also from them the Embassadours of the Empire and his interest in the Apostolical election what more saith he he granted them all that they would even as these things are easily given that are not well conquered nor are hoped to be possessed in time coming And Otho 3. Emp. in diplom said Charls gave what he never had and he gave them as he could for he sought them sinistrously nor had he hope to inâ—oy them peaceably And his brother the King of Germany and his son Charls despised this Coronation and ceased not to invade both France and Italy Here Sigonius de reg Ital. lib. 4. observeth that whatsoever other Emperours gave unto the Popes they expressly did reserve the Princedom and dition of Rome together with the election of the Bishop both which now were renounced and also the authority over the Church-lands which his Successours sought to recover and could not for as Continuator Eutropii saith from this time none of the Kings none of the Emperours could recover the honourable priviledges of the Princely dignity because they wanted either courage or knowledge and through the many contentions and continual divisions of the Kingdom Moreover hitherto the Empire went by succession from the father to the son or nearest in kindred and the consecration of the King of Lombardy by the Bishop of Millan or of the Emperour by the Bishop of Rome was accounted but a solemn rite but Pope John taking this advantage changeth the words to a loftier stile for in the Convention after he had commended King Charls as far as Pope Adrian had reviled him he added Therefore we have chosen and approved him together with the wishes and desires of all our brethren and fellow Bishops and other servants of the Holy Church of Rome and of the honourable Senate and of all the people of Rome and of this gowned Nation and according to the ancient custom we have solemnly advanced him unto the Scepter of the Roman Empire and we have honoured him with the name Augustus Charls was no sooner returned into France but but is opposed in Italy behold the Dukes of Tusculum whose head was Albertus conspired with Formosus Bishop of Portuen and some others against Pope John because he had preferred a stranger above Albertus and many Italians would have had the Empire restored to their Nation They did so vex him that he was forced to send unto Charls for aid craving that he would deliver Italy from the Sarazens and himself from the Tusculans In the mean time Charls had summoned a Councel in France by advice of John Tuscanensis and John Aretin and Angesisus Senen but by Apostolical authority and his own confirmation Thus begun the names of the Popes to be prefixed with the names of Emperours and Kings contrary to the ancient form In this Synod by vertue of an Epistle Decretal of Pope John the Emperour did propound one day and another and the third day to have Angesisus the Pope's Legate Primat of France to the end he might execute the will of the Pope in France to wit call Synods declare and publish the Papal Decrees unto other Bishops and also if need be report unto the Apostolick See their proceedings and other intricate affairs might be dispatched by his mediation with the Apostolick See So far was he besotted with the fatal cup. At that time the French Bishops clearly did perceive how great evils were imminent and by the Clergy of France and they would not condescend unto his temerity but stood to their former liberty Aimoin lib. 5. cap. 32. 33. Ph. Morn in Myster This John was the first who gave pardons or indulgences to them who would fight against the Sarazens When he was demanded by the Bishops of France Whether they who were dead or afterwards might die in that cause should obtain forgiveness for their sins We answer said he boldly with the godliness of Christ who die in these Wars with the godliness of the Catholick faith shall receive the rest of eternal life Ioha Epist 144. Ph. Morn ib. pag. 195. As ready was he to accurse and account as Heathens all them who give not obedience unto him and so they were accounted Martyrs and Saints who did bear Arms with him against whatsoever power At that time Lakold Duke of Cracove Tet waxed in Poland being chosen King of Poland would not acknowledge Lewis King of Germany as his lawfull Superiour but sent unto Pope John professing to hold the Crown from him and made the Kingdom Tributary unto Saint Peter by paiment of money yearly Crantz in Vandal lib. 8. cap. 2. Into the and in Constantinople East also his ambition goeth but by a way directly contrary unto his Predecessours Ignatius being restored by Basilius as we have mentioned and Pope Adrian he pleaseth neither of the two not the Emperour because he would not sway to all his fantasies neither pleaseth he the Pope because he would not quit the Church of Bulgaria and therefore Pope John threatned him with his curse When Ignatius was dead Basilius would have Photius restored and because he was deposed by authority of a Councel and the Pope the Emperour dealt with Pope John that he might be set up again and if John will consent he saith there would be more quietness in the Church but otherwise the schism is like to continue and he promised to prepare a Navy for the defence of the Coast of Latium and Hetruria against the Sarazens and he will cause Photius to renounce the Church of Bulgaria unto the See of Rome Ambition or as Baronius ad An. 878. § 4. speaketh worldly wisdom which is an enemy to God so thrusteth Pope John headlong that contrary to his Predecessours Nicolaus and Adrian he restored Photius who was so far from giving any sign of repentance that in a manifest declaration of their eighth general Councel he set himself directly against it for Photius was scarce set in his chair but he perswaded the Emperour to assemble another Synod at Constantinople where he produced the Letters Where again opposition was made of Pope John whether true or false it 's uncertain Baronius saith they were feigned declaring the late Councel which was called the eighth general to be of no authority and they gave that name unto this Councel Ph. Mornay saith Zonaras described it under this name with all the Acts and Sessions thereof There were present three Legates of Pope John to wit two Bishops Paul and Eugenius and Peter a Cardinal Priest they were so basely intreated as appears in Zonaras that none before them were so contemned It is marked first here were 380 Bishops and in the former were 301. 2. Nicolaus and Adrian were condemned as authours of much mischief but John was advanced above the skies with praise There a Councel condemning a Councel where the Pope's Legates were Presidents and which was confirmed by the Pope 3. The Church of Bulgaria was referred to
all sin so the regenerate in Christ may live in this world without sin which surely belongeth not unto the estate of this present life but unto the blessedness of eternal life But if it be said only that for the beginning of grace which we attain by regeneration we may seem to receive the liberty of will which we lost in Adam although nevertheless the fulness and perfection thereof is to be expected in the life to come why is the most clear truth darkned with so great ambiguity and confusion of words Now how great absurdity is in that which followeth And we have free-well unto good being prevented and helped ........ as if after we are regenerate by the grace of Christ then we begin to have as free-will unto good so free-will unto evil as if by that regeneration when we are prevened and helped by grace we have free-will unto good and when we are deserted of the same grace we have free-will unto evil What reason or consequence of meaning can be here Doth the grace of that regeneration work this in us that from thence we get free-will as unto good so unto evil Further if when we are renewed in baptism we receive in Christ the liberty of will that was so lost in Adam doth then only the grace of God prevence and help us Or doth the same grace as once it helped us that we should be free unto good so leave us once that we are made free unto evil What is this so obscure and almost no preaching of grace Had it not been better to have made use of those sentences of the fore-named Fathers which define this matter fully and clearly Or that this definition had been framed in their words and plainly been declared how this grace of God preveneth and helpeth us that is whether once so great grace is given unto us in baptism which may be sufficient for the whole time of our life or whether it should be implored and gotten daily and whether we have need of it for some good things or for all None of these things appear here and therefore it had been better to have been silent then to speak so fondly of so great a matter For we have need of the grace of God not only for a good work as it is said in this chapter but also for the very beginning of faith without which grace we cannot come unto the Sacrament of regeneration we have need of grace for all and every good thing through every day we have need of it to stir up in us a good will we have need of grace to speak good and wholsom things we have need of grace for all good waies of good works Concerning Can. III. First they exhort Can. III. to keep peace and unity and to shun contention Then they say Behold one may think and say as formerly it hath been thought and said the Apostle said not generally and as they have added without exception Who will have all men to be saved but especially concerning them of whom he had said before For all men for Kings and for them which are in authority that when he saith All he understands all sorts of men even of all condition sex order What unconsequent or contrariety unto the truth is in this exposition Likewise one may say as it is found to be said by some Ancients that the Apostle speaks of whole mankind what ill or danger hath this exposition For he who thinks so doth not think that any man doth resist and go against the will of God whereby he willeth all men to be saved that God cannot do what he willeth and both the one and the other speaking diversly yet do agree faithfully and unanimously that whether the Apostle spoke so or so yet no man is saved but by the gracious mercy of God and none is suffered to perish but in his just judgment Certainly this is manifest in that question that although God will have all men generally and indefinitely to be saved yet in the hearts of some through the bountifulness of mercy he worketh the same in his will that both they have a will to be saved and they are saved to whom the Apostle saith With fear and trembling work forth your salvation for it is God who worketh in you both to will and to do according to his good pleasure but in the hearts of others through the severity of his hid and just judgement he worketh not this saving will but leaveth them to their own will that because they would not beleeve they should be damned in just punishment And this may be said indeed of them which have heard the word of the Gospel but through the hardness of their own unbelief would not receive it But what shall be said of so great a multitude of the wicked who have been from the beginning of the world untill the coming of Christ And them who cannot be denied to be as yet in the utmost parts of the earth unto whom never a Preacher is come who could no way beleeve in him of whom they have not heard nor receive a Preacher seeing none hath been sent unto them Shall such therefore be damned because they have not beleeved who never could hear And nevertheless they shall be condemned for their other sins and especially for original sin wherein all have sinned for it is not written in vain Pour out thy wrath upon the Nations which know thee not and the Apostle saith Rendring vengeance in flaming fire on them who know not God If one should ask of those What hath the will of God done in them who willeth all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth What shall we answer Will not a godly and prudent man chuse rather to be silent Or certainly say with the Prophet and Apostle Thy judgments are a great deep and O the depth of the wisedom and knowledge of God! how incomprehensible are his waies Concerning Can. Can. IV. IV. they say in this new question three questions are propounded First that it is said No man was is or shall be whose nature is not assumed in Christ Of this question we hold thus That the assuming of man's nature by Christ was not of necessity of beginning ex necessitate incipiendi but was only of his power and grace so his flesh descendeth thorow all generations so he is truly born very man of them that what he pleased by shewing mercy and healing and redeeming he might thereof assume and reject what he pleased or not So in that unspeakable mystery of his incarnation he mercifully did assume his elect whom he came to redeem justifie and save and whom he did judge unworthy of that mercy and redemption he left them out of that marvellou susception Let us therefore acknowledge truly that the susception of human nature in Christ hath left unbelievers void of this mercy and that he hath bestowed it only on them that they have common
cause precedes not efficient but deficient that is the forsaking of the chief good and coveting inferiour things when the soul falleth from the love of God and coveteth inferiour things ..... But albeit God is not the cause of our ill will nor any subsisting nature but the affection of the reasonable creature falling from the love of the Creator yet we may not say that he is not the just revenger of our wicked thoughts or eternal Predestinator of just judgment and vengeance which this fellow would by such ambiguities make void Again this man saith There is no predestination of God but of them who are prepared for everlasting blessedness We know surely that this is an errour of this age ..... It is to be marked in the writings of the Prophets that the word predestination is not expressly mentioned yet because things concerning both predestinations appear and are declared most openly the Apostle most confidently useth their testimonies for confirming this doctrine and hath given them to be so understood by the Church teaching us by his authority and example and informing us that we should not contentiously and idly strive for the word predestination in the Oracles of the holy Prophets but by godly and peaceable understanding wheresoever the matter is manifestly declared we should without doubting acknowledge and maintain the predestination of God And if it be asked How shall the World be judged righteously whom the necessity of predestination forceth to perish Far be it that any of us should say it because it is most open blasphemy that God by his predestination forceth any man to sin and to perish by sin But by the judgment of predestination whom continuing in their sins he hath decreed to punish he rather calleth them from their sins and stirreth in them by hearing a wholsom terrour that they fearing may be amended and amending should not be damned It is also most false that the fellow affirmeth that there is no predestination of punishment for if punishment were not predestinate for the Divel and his Angels and all the wicked that are to be punished with them Truth would not say Go into everlasting fire prepared for the Divel and his Angels And where he saith Predestination is alwaies to be understood of the gifts of God's bounty it is also false for it is found and truly understood of the judgments of just damnation Of which damned through their own deserving and the just judgment of God when this man saith Cap. 14. § 4. that they are justly forsaken in the damned mass according to the merit of original sin and they are suffered to live wickedly and are at last to be condemned with everlasting fire even unwillingly and contradicting himself he saith no other thing but that in Divine judgment they are predestinate unto everlasting life for if all that mass be condemned certainly it is condemned in the just judgment of God and without doubt unto everlasting perdition and punishment And it is a wonder how he saith Cap. 14. That God hath predestinate pain unto sinners and hath not predestinate sinners unto pain for when he predestinated pain for them he was not ignorant who were to be punished And when he confesseth saying The foreknowed if God foreknew certainly who were to be punished with these torments what else did he when he prepared most certain pain for every one of them but predestinated them certainly for pain For surely these only shall suffer whom he hath foreknown to suffer and what is it that by unchangeable prescience he hath foreknown them for pain It was not to be feared that what he foreknew to be justly he hath not predestinated to do it justly There is indeed another condition of mens laws who so ordain certain punishments unto delinquents that nevertheless they know not those which do sin thus or which shall be tormented in these punishments and therefore they may appoint and prepare punishments for sinners and know not that the punishments are just and yet not appoint for punishments the sinners whom they know not at all but if they knew certainly the persons which are worthy of those punishments they might justly ordain them for the pain as they appoint the pain for delinquents as in the execution of judgment whom they find guilty of capital crimes they both rehearse unto them the death which is appointed by the Law and by open sentence they adjudge them unto death which is done by a certain knowledge of judgment that they dare appoint as punishment for sinners so sinners for punishments Seeing then both these are rightly and justly done in the Courts of men being informed and directed according to certain knowledge that they discern justly and irreprovably pain for sinners and sinners for pain and yet not any of those guilty persons is compelled unto sin by the Laws nor Judges but only because he who hath sinned is justly punished how much rather may we beleeve certainly that this is done in Divine judgment that because by eternal knowledge he knows the pain which in justice is due for sinners and the sinners to whom it is due seeing he causeth none to sin he predestinates most justly both punishments which he knows to be most just for sinners and sinners who are never unknown unto him but most certainly known by eternal verity for everlasting punishment So and more writeth Florus And the judgment of Prudentius is in the abovenamed history Vsser cap. 11 where among other things he shews that when Aeneas who had been a member of the Carisiac Synod was to be ordained Bishop of Paris Prudentius being called unto his ordination did excuse himself by Letter and sent unto Wenilo Metropolitan of Senonen four articles which if the elect Bishop would not subscribe he did protest that he would no way consent unto his ordination These Articles are First That he confess that as free-will is lost in Adam by merit of disobedience so it is restored unto us by our Lord Jesus Christ and freed now in hope but afterwards really as the Apostle saith We are saved by hope that nevertheless we have alwaies need of the grace of the Almighty God for every good work whether for thinking or beginning or working or perseverantly perfecting and that without that grace we can no way either think or will or do any good 2. That he beleeve and confess that in the most high and secret purpose of God some are by the gracious mercy of God before all ages predestinated for life and some by his unsearchable righteousness are predestinated for pain to wit that whether in them which shall be saved or condemned he hath predestinated that which he foreknew he would do in judging as the Prophet saith Qui fecit quae futura sunt Esa 45. juxta LXX Interp. 3. That he beleeve and confess with all the Catholicks that the blood of Jesus Christ was shed for all men beleeving in him through the world and not for
followed the Emperour in this tumult and received from him a temporal sword that is authority The Pope hath a Sword given him to punish all seditious persons within the City and so he banished some and imprisoned others His Successours have inlarged the petty jurisdiction Stella cler Catol test ver lib. 11. He sate 9 years 30. JOHN the XV was no sooner set in his Chair but Pope Boniface the VII having made monies of his sacriledge levieth an Army and entreth Rome he took Pope John pulled out his eys and thrust him into Prison where as some say he was murthered by Ferracius a Noble Roman and father of Boniface now Pope again Within 11 months Boniface died suddenly and his Corps were drawn by the feet along the streets the people exclaiming against him Platin. John and Boniface sate 15 months and died An. 982. 31. JOHN the XVI was expelled the City by Consul Crescentius When the Consul heard that the Pope was sending his complaint unto the Emperour he was content to reconcile with him So between prosperity and adversity he sate 10 years 10 months Platin. 32. GREGORY the V was advanced by the Emperour no man contradicting saith Alb. Crantz Saxon. lib. 4. cap. 26. The Romans took it ill that the Emperour and Pope were both Germans and in a sedition they set up JOHN the XVII a Greek and by the power of Crescentius whom he had bought with money for he had brought so much money from Constantinople that even constant men might have been allured to wickedness by his gifts but he died with ignominy in the 10 month saith Naucler vol. 2. generat 34. Because he was not lawfully chosen he is not inrolled among the Popes by some Hence is so great variance amongst the Johns following for they who omit the She-Pope and this John call the next John the seventienth whereas others call him the ninetienth and so forth of the rest Gregory staied in Hetruria till John was installed and then did run unto his Nephew Otho who came with all hast into Italy took Rome by force and apprehended Pope John and Crescentius as is before After this Gregory did ratifie quod Otho 3 ex Consilio Principum Germaniae constituit saith Naucler lo. cit that is what the Emperour had ordained by the advice of the German Princes concerning the election of the Emperour in time coming Naucler nameth the persons of the Electers and their places otherwise then I have named them from Platina for he nameth first the Count Palatine of Rhine second the Duke of Saxon c. But Platina speaks probably and it is certain that upon other considerations some Articles were changed afterwards The Jesuit Dion Petavins in Ration temp par 1. lib. 8. cap. 17. saith The report is that Gregory the V did tie the power of electing an Emperour unto the suffrages of certain Princes whom being seven in number either he or some successour is thought to have appointed But it is clear by the History that the Emperour had more power then the Pope at that time both in Italy and Germany and certainly the following Popes have taken occasion by this manner of election to usurp above the Emperours or as in Fascic temp upon this occasion the Eagle did lose many feathers and was at last made totally naked Gregory sate 4 years and died An. 999. Of this Century we see generally that the Popes which were chosen by the Romans were wicked men and as they sought the Chair ambitiously for honour and power so they had no respect to religion even as the Popes following in the next Century and therefore the Emperour had the greater reason to indeavour and could the more readily obtain that order concerning the election of the Popes but it was soon wrested out of his hands as followeth CHAP. III. Of Divers Countries 1. IN this Century diligence decaieth and every vertue fainteth through A description of a miserable age want of established Princes especially in Italy The distressed Pastours in more ancient times did shine in doctrine and holiness when the Church was under persecution or Pastours under correction of Architectonical power but when Priests began to glance in silks and colours and had liberty from subjection unto Princes their lives became odious and filthy their licence brought forth such monsters of men who by avarice and ambition entred into the places of good men and did not discharge their office There was little study of Liberal Sciences few and empty Schools of languages the Clergy and Priests having forsaken their old discipline were given to lucre nor were they respected by their Flocks and only Monks were noted to have some eloquence Nevertheless as it was ordained in Synods of the former Century that Priests and Monks should read the Scriptures and Writings of the Fathers now by reading and preaching the same doctrine by some God did sequester some here and there which did beleeve truly in Christ although in so great fear of tyranny and tumults of War that they durst scarcely speak of corruptions idolatries superstitions and wickedness which at that time were so luxuriant I will not mention divers signs that were seen in Heaven pottending so great evils Great alterations befell in every Kingdom almost the Hungarians oppress Italy and Germany although they were restrained besides many other broils in both those Nations France hath another race of Kings incessant were the Wars in Spain between the old inhabitants and the Moors the Sarazens suffered neither Greece nor Asia to rest in peace Bellarmin in Chronolo speaking of this Century saith Behold an unhappy age in which are no famous Writers no Councels bad Emperours and no good Popes God then providing that no heresie did arise And Baron ad An. 900. § 1. saith A new age beginneth which for rudeness and barrenness of goodness is called The Iron Age and for deformity of evil abounding is Leaden and for want of Writers is called The Dark Age. And ad An. 912. saith more sharply What was the face of the Roman Church how filthy when most lude and potent whores did reign in Rome at whose pleasure Bishopricks were changed Bishops were given and which is most horrible to be heard their Paramours were thrust into Saint Peter's See which are written but to fill up the role of Popes for who can call these lawfull High-Priests which were thrust in without any order by such whores no mention of the Clergy chusing and consenting the Canons were prest in silence what manner of Cardinals Priests and Deacons canst thou think were chosen by these Monsters seeing nothing is more natural then that every one beget others like to himself and who can doubt but that these did consent in all things unto them who had chosen them After this manner he continued bewailing and detesting the iniquity of those times It may justly then be added Since the face of the Roman Church was so blurred and those in
Subjects The Emperour accepteth all these and upon oath promised obedience and was loosed from excommunication only and so was let go in peace as saith the Authour Apolog. de unitat Eccles such as Judas feigned He took his journy to Papia intending as some write to Rome where he was ordered to do pennance The Pope triumphed not a little that he had so vexed the Emperour and sent Legates to compound with and absolve such as were excommunicated for cleaving unto the Emperour But all the Bishops Princes and people of Italy were in an uproar and deriding the Legates said They account not of Hildebrand's excommunication whom all the Bishops of Italy long time before that had excommunicated for simony blood adultry c. and that the King had done otherwise then became him and had utterly stained his glory by submitting his Majesty unto an Heretick And after more ripening of the sedition they were of one mind to cast off the father and to chuse his son though very young to be their King and to elect another Pope by whom he should be Crowned Lomb. Schafnaburgen writes so though a follower of this Pope not of them who had followed Henry but were ready to forsake him and so doth Naucler who addeth that they would have the Acts of the Apostate Pope annulled The Emperour writ unto them that he had done so of necessity and for conserving publick peace Nevertheless the Cities shut their gates against him Hildebrand mistrusting what might befall if God would give unto the Emperour a more quiet Kingdom consulted to displace him and to derive the Empire unto Rodulph a Duke of Saxony who had married the Emperour's sister and to whom the Emperour had given the Dukedoms of Suevia and Burgundy Catal. test ver upon these conditions that he should not meddle with Church assemblies that he would quit all presentations of Bishopricks and not declare his sons to be his Successours as if it were by inheritance Platin. For to effect this Letters were sent thorow Germany to perswade men that Henry was justly excommunicated and that they would consent unto the Pope in chusing Rodulph to be Emperour After these Letters he sent unto Rodulph a Crown with this inscription Petra dedit Petro Petrus Diadema Rodulpho The Reader may consider the truth of both parts of that verse since Peter did neither receive a Diadem from Christ nor can we read that he gave a Crown unto any man and although Hildebrand took upon him to give it it followeth not that Peter gave it unless we may reason in this manner Hildebrand would not submit unto every Ordinance of God nor unto the King as Supream therefore Peter would not submit c. We read that he whom they call Hell's King did proffer to give the Kingdoms of the earth but no other creature before this Helbrand attempted to do the like Now the proud Prelate gave command to the Bishops of Mentz and Colein to cause the election and anointment of Rodulph and to defend him against all opposition And he writ unto the Princes of Germany saying Go on ye holy Princes of the Apostles and what I have said do ye confirm by interposing your authority ..... exerce this judgment against Henry speedily and let all the children of iniquity know that he is not put from the Kingdom by chance but by your doing Naucler vol. 2. generat 36. At this time the Emperour was at Rome and knew not what they were doing in Germany till the Bishop of Strawsburg went with all hast and told him He said he would crave the Pope's leave to return The Bishop answered that is to no purpose for I assure you the Pope hath contrived all these things against you Crantz Saxon. lib. 5. cap. 7. So he goeth away privately he gathereth an Army and marcheth to defend his right and in the mean time he sent unto Gregory putting him in mind of his League and intreating him to stay Rodulph from usurping the Empire or else to proceed against him Gregory being otherwise minded replieth A man cannot be condemned till he be heard Whereupon followed a bloody battel with uncertain victory then they both trusting unto the Pope's favour send to know unto whom he would adjudge the Empire Ere the Messengers were returned both Armies were refreshed and had fought again Then the Pope began to consider that this manner of dealing might not only turn to the great damage of Germany but of other Nations also and thinking to help Rodulph another way he sent Commissions unto the Bishop of Trevers to hold a Councel in Germany and there to determine to which of the two the Empire did appertain by just and publick consideration promising that what they did determine he by the authority of God Omnipotent and of Saint Peter and Paul would ratifie The Emperour would not let them assemble in Councel unless Rodulph do renounce the Title of Emperour The Legates considering that this was contrary to the mind of the Pope return and shew what was required Then Hildebrand accursed the Emperour again and sent his excommunicatory Letters unto all the Nations and deposed Gerebert Bishop of Ravenna for siding with the Emperour and sent another into his See At this time Henry and Rodulph had the third conflict at Elystrum where several Princes were killed on both sides and Rodulph's hand was stricken off and he being deadly wounded was carried unto Mersburg Crantzius calleth it Herbipolis there he called before him the Bishops and other friends and holding up his right hand with groans said There is the hand by which I did swear fealty unto my Lord Henry and by your perswasion I have fought so oft against him unfortunately go ye now and perform your first Oath unto your King for I go the way of my fathers So he died An. 1080. Crantz loc cit Naucler hath more lamentable words The Saxons stand up for another Emperour and again for another Henry was victorious against them both Then the Saxons make recourse unto Hildebrand and accuse the Emperour of the most hainous crimes that malice could devise for they trusted in a well-affected Judge The Emperour hearing of the calumnies seeks peace of the Pope but had no audience Wherefore in the same year he assembleth a Councel at Brixia of many Bishops saith Platin. and Crantz from A Councel against the Pope Lombardy Italy and Germany and accuseth the Pope of Necromancy Perjury and Usurpation and complained of the Church of Rome that the Clergy had preferred their Bishop before him whereas his father had without their election advanced several Popes but now this Pope contrary unto his Oath and promise had thrust-in himself without the knowledge of him who was their Magistrate and King These objections were heard again and with one voice they condemned Hildebrand as one not elected of God but one who had intruded himself by fraud and money a subverter of all order in the Church
just and I suffer for the sins of my youth but ye are not guiltless and because ye do contrary unto your Oath ye shall not escape the hand of the just avenger and your portion shall be with him who betraied his Master They stopped their ears and departed with the Royal Ornaments Alb. Crantz in Saxon. lib. 5. cap. 20. saith Some report these circumstances another way Thereafter they sent him as Prisoner to Ingelheim where he was advertised that they were talking of cutting off his head wherefore he made an escape and went to Leodium as appears in Epist Henrici Regi Celtar in Fascic rer expet There he was entertained honourably by the Bishop and therefore the Bishop Otbert with all his Church was excommunicated by Pope Paschalis who writ also unto Robert Earl of Flanders to pursue Henry with all his followers assuring him that he could not offer better sacrifice unto God Epist Paschalis tom 2. Concil Edit Colon. An. 1551. Otbert was not silent and in the name of the Church of Leodium published an Apology wherein he saith It were Apostolical to follow the Apostle as it were Prophetical to follow a Prophet but as our sins deserve the Apostolical who should pray for the King howbeit a sinner that we may live a quiet and Apostolical life under him is so contentious that he will not suffer us to live in peace Seeing the words both of the Apostle and Prophet do so sound I the daughter do humbly ask my mother the holy Church of Rome Whence comes this authority unto him who is called Apostolical that besides the sword of the spirit he useth another sword of blood against her Subjects Then he shews how far this Pope hath departed from the steps of Gregory the I. both in life and doctrine This Apology is loc cit Also the Emperour writ unto his son unto the Bishops Dukes and other Potentates of the Empire that they would cease from pursuing him and his friends against all equity and piety and at several times he appealed unto the Pope as is evident by his Letters in Fascic rer expetend But Apologies Supplications and Appeals had no place so that in the end the old Emperour was brought to the necessity of begging a prebendary from the Bishop of Spira although he had preferred the Bishop unto that See and had erected a glorious Monastery of the blessed Virgin there he could not obtain so much So he returned privately unto Leodium and died his body lay unburied in an old deserted Chappel five years and then was buried at Spira He had fought 62 battels and was never foiled he died An. 1107. Alb. Crantz writes much to excuse the Son and the Popes and bitterly against the Father yet he hath no particular fault against him but as he speaks simony and contumacy Of the Eastern Emperours it follows in Henry the V. CHAP. II. Of POPES 1. SYLVESTER the II. before called Gerebert had been a Monk in A Pope covenanteth with the Divel Orleance and made a contract with the Divel to advance him unto the Papacy Thence he went to Hispala in Spain where becoming a Doctour he had amongst his hearers Otho the III. Robert King of France Lotharius a man of noble birth afterwards Bishop of Senon and others Robert gave him the Bishoprick of Rhemes the Emperour advanced him to Ravenna lastly by great ambition and aid of the Divel he attained the Papacy saith Platina and others The Emperour for favour of his Master gave unto Saint Peter eight Counties Pisa Senogallia Favum Aucona Fossabrum c. Vsser de stat Eccles cap. 3. ex Gerber Epi. 158. Benno Cardinal of Ostia saith When the 1000. years were expired Gerebert coming out of the bottomless pit of God's perdition sate 4. years and as by the responses of Satan he had deceived many so by the same responses he was deceived and in the just judgment of God he was taken away by suddain death What he saith briefly Platina declares more fully thus Once Sylvester asked the Divel how long time he might injoy the Papacy The answer was ambiguous If thou go not to Jerusalem thou shalt never die After four years and one month he was saying Mass in Lent in a corner of the Rood-Church that was called Ierusalem within Rome and he asked how that Chappel was called They said Ierusalem Then he knew the time was come when he must die wherefore he became sad and confessed his sin before the people and exhorted them to beware of ambition and craft of the Divel and to live holily Then he commanded them to cut his body into pieces and lay it on a cart and to bury it wheresoever the horses of their own accord would draw it The report is saith Platin. that by the Providence of God whereby sinners may learn the hope of forgiveness if they repent in their life the horse stood at Lateran and there he was buried whereas yet saith he by the ratling of his bones and moistness of his tomb is portended the death of the Pope It were a shame to relate these things if they were not the words of their own Writers Platina saith he had it from Mar. Polon Vincentius Belluacensis Laurent Schrader in Monimen Italiae lib. 2. and Galfrid And the same is written by Pol. Vergil de invent rer lib. 5. cap. 8. but he speaks not of the Presage Naucler had all in generat 34. Onuphrius would purge him of this blot and alledgeth that the knowledge of the Mathematicks in these rude daies was taken for Magick But the words of the now-named Authours are more clear it is certain say they that he attained to the most secret things of all Sciences and especially of the Mathematicks but as quick wits can scarcely hold themselves within bounds he entred into Necromancy and it is so thought by many Authours not without great infamy by which Necromancy he made way unto the Papacy He was the first Pope who caused to beat the drum unto the Wars in the holy land as they spoke and published an Epistle with this inscription Wasted Jerusalem unto the Universal Church commanding the Scepters of Kings Gerebert Epist 18. but the expedition was not so soon begun Of all the Popes from Sylvester the II. unto Gregory the VII inclusivè Benno testifieth that they did exceed Jannes and Jambres in jugleries although the height of Antichristian pride be referred unto Gregory the VII and others after him Io. Naucler in volum 2. generat 31. faith The Popes of that time had departed from the foot-steps of Peter ..... and it is horrour to hear what vile things were done by almost 28. Popes immediately succeeding After the death of Sylvester saith Benno was strife among his Necromancing Disciples each contending to usurp the Papacy 2. JOHN the XIX aliàs XVII by the help of the Divel who then gave The election of the Pope is changed the Papal Chair followed the Sorcerer Sylvester saith Bale
president or record of it in writing it is plain that the Apostles left liberty unto every man at his own discretion without fear compulsion or constraint to addict himself unto what seemed good and commendable We know for certain that this diversity of fasting is rife throughout the world so far Socrates Before him Theodoret on Rom. 14. at the words Let every one abound in his own sense saith He speaks not generally but of meat onely he gives liberty unto every one for this Custom continues unto this day in the Churches that one abstains and another eats any meat without scruple neither doth the one condemn the other but this law of concord makes them the more famous and laudable And Eusebius Hist li. 5. c. 26. repeats the Epistle of Iraenaeus unto Victor Bishop of Rome saying Neither is this difference of the day onely but of the maner of fasting some think they should fast one day some two some more some forty and telling the hours of the night and day neither began this variety in our time but long before yet for all this variety they held unity one with another and as yet we retain it for this varity of fasting commends the unity of faith They who before Soter were Bishops of that See I mean Anicetus Pius Higin Telesphorus and Xistus did not observe it themselves nor did they publish any such president unto posterity and though they kept not that Custom they held unity with others who came unto them from other Churches c. Indeed Caranza in Summ. Concil hath a Decree as of Telesphorus to wit We Decree that seven full weeks before Easter all Clerks that is who are called into the Lot of the Lord should fast from flesh because as the life of Clerks should be different from the conversation of Lay men so there should be a difference in their fasting Observe the time is here appointed seven full weeks and it is enjoyned unto Clerks onely nor is any thing forbidden but flesh But how can this Decree stand with the words of Irenaeus or with the practice of Rome in the days of Socrates In the first Council at Orleance and that was about the time of the Nicen and a National is such an Act concerning Priests onely Augustine in Epist 86. saith If you ask my opinion in this I resolving it in my minde do see in the writings of the Evangelists and Apostles fasting is commanded but upon what days we should fast or not fast I do not see it defined by precept of our Lord or his Apostles so he Bellarmin De bon oper li. 2. c. 15. saith It seems a wondrous difference was among the Antients in keeping of Lent Nevertheless Pope Gregory had a precedent for Eusebius Hist li. 5. c. 16. saith Montanus condemned marriage and eating of flesh and also he kept three fasts yearly whereof one was two weeks before Easter It is also to be marked that whatsoever necessity be laid on keeping of Lent yet a man may have a dispensation from his Priest for a small sum of money as the Papal Chancelary directeth 10. Peter Damian Bishop of Oscia wrote a Book De Correctione Episcopi Some fruits of Bishops are noted Papae it is in Catal. test ver lib. 12. There he sharply rebukes the arrogance of Bishops which will live as they list without subjection unto censure albeit the Prophet David did not spurn at the admonition of the Prophet Nathan and Samuel though suffering wrong did not refuse the censure of the people of Israel and albeit Peter was endowed with such graces yet he was subject to the censure of others Act. 1. and when he was rebuked by Paul he did not quarrel but took it in good part because he well understood it was not of malice but in love But saith he now they say I am a Bishop I should not be rebuked by my sheep they must be silent whatsoever be my carriage c. He concludes Therefore let this pernicious Custom be abolished by Ecclesiastical discipline away with this deceitful subterfuge that he who pretends so malepert arrogancy may not enjoy his sin with immunity In an Epistle unto Udalrik Bishop of Firma he reproves the Popes that they do contrary unto that which they are commanded to teach for they should exhort all men unto patience and toleration of injuries and forbid vindictive contentions But now saith he what Bishops should exhort others to do they themselves will not do Christ commands to forgive thy brother seventy times in a day the King may use the temporal sword but a Priest should use onely the sword of the Spirit which is God's Word If for maintaining the faith Priests should not carry iron weapons how then see we armies of them rising against one another for earthly things But so it is fulfilled what the Apostle writes When they preach to others themselves are found to be reprobates 11. About the year 1072. at Nantes in low Bretanny a Letter was Opposition against Gregory VII and description of the Church at that time presented unto a Clerk as directed from hell in it Satan and all that fry gave thanks unto all Church-men because they were not deficient unto his and their pleasures and by negligence of preaching they sent so many souls unto hell as no age preceding had seen so many Mat. Parisi ad ann 1072. Cardinal Benno testifieth that none of Hildebrand's Cardinals would at first subscribe the excommunication of the Emperor Henry and he hath a large Catalogue of Cardinals Bishops and Deacons who left the Pope and would never return unto him so that as he saith the Church was divided the one party pretending the Authority of the Pope and the other accusing them and their Pope that he and they taught and did contraray unto the Scriptures and primitive Church He addes that he and his Successor Turban had presumed to violate the Decrees of Chalcedon namely in baptising and communicating without the Church But saith he as Eusebius alone defending the unity of the Church against Liberius proved him to be an Heretique and by his refusing to communicate with him did binde him with the keys so much more is Hildebrand persevering in this error condemned unto hell by the departing of so many Fathers from the Roman Church and who accurse his Heresies and abuses of the power of binding and loosing Then he hath a large description of Hildebrand and his disciples saying Let the Prophets be astonished at the voice of Peter and his disciples they are men in face and scorpions in tail wolves lurking in sheep-skins killing bodies and dedestroying souls their Religion is nothing but treachery and covetousness they haunt widows and lead women captives who are loaden with sins by occasion of times they give heed to the spirit of error and doctrine of divels which their Master Hildebrand hath received from his Masters Theophylact or Pope Benedict IV. Laurence Bishop of
Scripture so many as are predestinated unto life are they not called Kings and Priests therefore what God hath conjoyned let no man put asunder but rather what divine Authority hath ordained mans will should endeavor to fulfil and they should joyn in hearts who are conjoyned in ordinances let them cherish one another defend other mutually and bear one anothers burthens The wise man saith A brother aiding a brother both shall be comforted but if they bite one another which God forbid both shall come into desolation Let not my soul come into their counsels which say That either the peace and freedom of the Church is hurtful unto the Crown or the prosperity and exaltation of the Crown is hurtful unto the Church for God the Author of them both hath conjoyned them not to destruction but to edification If ye know this how long will ye dissemble the common contumely and common injury Is not Rome as the Apostolical Seat so also the head of the Empire therefore though I would not speak of the Church is it the honor of the King to have an headless Empire I know not what the wise men and Princes of the Kingdom do advise you herein but though I speak imprudently I will not be silent in what I do judge The Chuch of God from the beginning even till these times hath been oft afflicted and oft delivered it is her voice They have often afflicted me from my youth but they could not prevail against me Be sure O King that neither now will the Lord leave the rod of the wicked upon the back of the righteous the hand of the Lord is not shortned nor become unable to help At this time he will deliver his Spouse which he hath redeemed by his blood endowed with his spirit furnished with heavenly gifts and nevertheless enriched with earthly things He will deliver I say again he will deliver but if by the hand of another let the Princes of the Kingdom consider whether this be to the honor and advantage of the King certainly not Wherefore gird thy sword O most mighty and let Caesar recover unto himself what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's Vtrumque interesse Caesaris constat undoubtedly both these appertain to Caesar to maintain his own Crown and to defend the Church the one becometh the King and the other the Advocate of the Church The victory as we trust in the Lord is at hand the Romans are more arrogant then potent for what did ever any great or mighty Emperor or King presume so vile a thing both against Crown and Priest-hood but this cursed and tumultuous people which cannot measure their strength nor think on the end nor consider the event in their foolishness and fury durst attempt so great sacriledge the temerity of the multitude cannot stand for a moment before the King's face c. I will not here add observations Bellarmin de Ro. Pont. l. 2. c. 31. The original of the title â—icar of Christ alledgeth That Bernard did first give unto the Pope the Title Vicar of Christ It was not from the beginning so but the Cardinal mistaketh it Bernard was not the first if Platina do truly report the words of Gregory VII he used this Title before him and according to the language of the Court at that time Bernard giveth this Title unto all Priests even from whom all iniquity procedeth as he speaketh in festo Convers Pauli ser 1. and giveth unto Eusebius both this and loftier Titles for lib. 2. de Consider he calleth him The Great Priest the Prince of Bishops the Heir of the Apostles Abel in Primacy in Government Noah in Patriarchship Abraham in Order Melchisedek in Dignity Aaron in Authority Moses in Iudging Samuel in Power Peter in Vaction Christ here is a rhapsody of glorious Titles and he addeth these passages of Scripture that are wrested to maintain the ambition of the man of sin but whether he speak so in derision or according to his own minde it may be judged by his words following immediately but first see what he And confuted by Bernard at large said a little before What hath the holy Apostle left in legacy unto thee he saith What I have I give thee What is it One thing I know it is not silver nor gold seeing he said Silver and gold have I not If thou happen to have it use it according to the time and not at thy pleasure so use them as not abusing them seeing these in respect of the souls good are neither good nor ill but the use of them is good the abuse ill the care of them is worse and seeking is filthier by whatsoever way thou may have them certainly thou hast them not by title of the Apostle for he could not give what he had not what he had that he gave the care of all the Churches Gave he Lordly power hear himself Not domineering over the people but being an example of the flock And lest you think he said so in humility onely and not in truth the Lord saith in the Gospel The Kings of the earth have dominion but not ye so It is clear dominion is forbidden unto the Apostles Go then and take if thou darest either Apostleship if thou be a Lord or dominion if thou be Apostolical thou art clearly forbidden to do either of the two if thou wilt have them together thou shalt lose them both or else think not thy self to be excepted from those of whom God complaineth saying They have reigned but not by me they were Princes and I knew them not And if thou wilt reign without God thou hast glory but not with God We see what is forbidden now hear what is commanded Who is the greater among you let him be as the yonger and he that is chief as he that serveth There is the model of an Apostle dominion is forbidden and serving is commanded which is commended also by example of the Law-Giver for it followeth I am in the midst of you as he who serveth Bernard there hath many things to this purpose and after he hath mentioned these former Titles and prerogatives he saith I have spoken of who thou art but forget not what consider what thou wast and now art why wilt thou not behold what thou canst not cease to be Indeed it is one thing what thou wast and art and another who thou art â—ecome the one must not be forgot in searching thy self for thou art what thou wast and thou art not less after thou art become such and perhaps more thou wast born that and changed this but not changed into this the former is not cast off but this is added If thou consider what remember thy nature thou wast born a man if thou ask who thou art a Bishop this thou art made and not born which of these thinkest thou nearest or chiefest unto that thou art made or that thou wast born is not that thou wast born therefore I advise thee to
they are letcherous in such a maner that they have not broken any bond of marriage Ibid. cap. 3. It is not possible that any of these whom God hath predestinated unto the Crown can lose their Crown it may be and it hath come to pass that some lose the Crown whom God hath called by a visible calling or which might have been heard by man Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 11. Excepting the Apostles whatsoever other thing afterwards is said let it be cut off neither have any authority therefore albeit after the Apostles there be any holy man how wise soever he be let him not have that authority seeing the Lord speaketh in the Scriptures Ibid. lib. 11. cap. 20. Possibly one will say Since Christ overcame death and ascended into the heavens doth he descend thence again surely he descendeth but invisibly all the world hath heard his descending when a sound was heard from heaven as of the Spirit coming and filled the house where they were sitting did not Christ then descend from heaven Is the substance or Majesty of the Son separated from the Spirit that when the holy Ghost descendeth the Son of God descendeth not also certainly he descendeth not in the form of his manhood yet undoubtedly he descendeth in his uncircumscribed Deity or in the Spirit that he giveth and he descendeth to visit the Nations by his Messengers whom he inspireth 9. Bernard in Epist 56. ad Gaufrid Episco Carnot writeth that Notbert Praemonstratensis did teach that Antichrist was before the doors and to be revealed in the same age Within these few days saith Bernard there I obtained to see this mans face and I learned many things from an heavenly fistule to wit from his mouth Behold what account this Author made of him who spake thus Hen. Oraeus in Nomenclat saith this Notbert was the beginner of the Order of Monks in the Diocy of Magdeburgh Pol. Vergil de inven rer lib. 7. cap. 3. calleth him a Priest of Lorrain and saith that he began that most exact Order after the rule of Augustinians as also in that Chapter and the preceeding he sheweth that sundry others seeing about that time that the Monastical institutions were not observed men becoming always worse and worse and godliness was corrupted by riches quae pietas ut mater illas à principio Ordini pepererat quotidie sunt qui ignaviae suae potius quà m religioni consulant therefore they would reform the Order and added some new Rites for distinction from others of the same Order who were become looser and by these means the number of Orders were multiplied 10. Theodoricus Abbot of St. Trudo at Leodium about the year 1120. said Simon Magus now reigneth at Rome and not Simon Peter and Simony is in place of the Gospel what may we not have if we have money In Catal. test verit lib. 14. are some of his verses concerning the Government of the Church he saith Vt Mopso Nisa corvo datur ecâ—e columba Qualis pullus erit quem fert commixtio talis Hence it appeareth that good men at that time bewailed the wretched condition of the Church 11. Hugo de S. Victore by Nation a Saxon and Abbot of S. Victor at Paris was in great account about the year 1130. His works are extant in three Tomes In one place he saith The Clerks of our time know not the Law nor learn they it but they study vanity ease surfeiting and drunkenness they are often in the streets seldom in the Churches slow to search the faults of sinners and ready to follow the trace of hares they give more bread to dogs then to the poor their beds are better arayed then the altars the barking of dogs and lowing of oxen is more pleasant unto God then the singing of such Clerks their preaching may be dispised whose life is contemned Of our communion with Christ he saith on Iohn 6. The Lord shewing a difference betwixt the bread he gave and which they did eat in the wilderness saith I am the bread of life for he is the bread wherewith an hungry soul is refreshed which is when true faith embraceth him for by faith we love him and by love we are united unto Christ which is our life therefore this spiritual bread is eaten by faith even without Sacramental eating and is profitable unto salvation dayly we have need of this bread while this present life endureth and so said Augustine Why preparest thou thy teeth and stomach believe and thou hast eaten On Chapter 20. he saith Whose sins ye forgive i. e. whose sins are forgiven by you God also forgiveth them this is spoken generally not onely unto the Apostles as some say this is the prerogative of the Apostles but it is spoken and granted unto all their successors On Rom. 3. The written Law is called the Law of works because men under the Law thought that all their righteousness was in the works of the Law but the Law of Faith and Grace is so called because men under Grace set the sum and efficacy of their salvation on Grace onely knowing that as no man is saved by righteousness of his works so none is justified by works of his righteousness for righteousness is not of good works but good works are of righteousness On Chapter 4. If man had not sinned he should have had perfect righteousness which consisteth in the perfect fulfilling of God's commands so that he should have had no lust against reason and he might have loved God with all his heart but after sin and for sin man cannot have this perfect righteousness unto which eternal life is justly due but God of his grace giveth faith unto man and of the same grace reputeth it for that perfection as if he had the perfection of righteousness De Scriptura Scriptor Sacris cap. 1. he saith That Scripture onely is truly called Divine which was from the Spirit of God and written by those who spoke by God's Spirit that maketh a man divine and reformeth him according to the image of God by teaching to know him and by exhorting to love him whatsoever is taught therein is truth whatsoever is commanded is good and whatsoever is promised is blessedness for God is truth without falshood goodness without wickedness and blessedness without misery In cap. 6 7. All Divine Scripture is contained in the Old and New Testaments and when he hath divided the Old Testament into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa and hath reckoned the Books that are in the Hebrew Canon he addeth There be also other Books as Wisdom the Books of Syracides Judith Tobias and the Maccabees that are read indeed but are not rolled in the Canon Catol test ver lib. 15. Likewise De Sacramentis fidei lib. 1. cap. 28. If it be asked What is original sin in us It is a corruption or vice by which in our birth we draw ignorance in our minde and concupiscence in the flesh And cap. 19. In the
words but they have done it wickedly as will appear hereafter 29. Gratian an Hetrurian and Monk of Bononia did out of the Canons The Canon Law of ancient Synods and decrees of Popes and sentences of Fathers and some forged writings of late Monks compile and amass the volume of the Canon Law which they call Decreta and Causae These were afterwards augmented by the Popes adding the Decretals and Extravagants and they are commented by the School-men Gratian took this work in hand in imitation of Lotharius the Emperor who had caused the Civil Laws to be digested into a method and he gathered these books so that by addition substraction or changing of a word or letter one or more he made all to serve the present times For example whereas Augustin de Doctr. Christ l. 2. c. 8. saith In Canonicis Scripturis Ecclesiarum Catholicarum quamplurium authoritatem sequatur inter quas sane illae sunt quas Apostolicae sedes habere epistolas accipere meruerunt Gratian Dist 19. c. In Canonicis hath them thus Inter quas Scriptur as Canonitas sane illae sunt quas Apostolica sedes ab ea aliae accipere meruerunt epistolas 2. In the sixth Councel at Carthage the Can. 165. saith Ad transmarina qui putaverit appellandum à nullo intra Africam in communione recipiatur This Canon speaketh absolutely and was made especially against appeals unto Rome But Gratian repeating it Caus 2. qu. 6. c. Placuit addeth Nisi forte Romanam sedem appellaverit 3. Pope Gregory lib. 9. epist 41. saith Scripsit mihi tua dilectio piissimum dominum nostrum speaking of the Emperor reverendissimo fratri meo Iohanni primae Iustinianae Episcopo pro agritudine capitis quam patitur praecipere succedi But Gratian Caus 7. qu. 1. c. Scripsit repeateth it thus Scripsit tua dilectio me reverendissimo fratri Iohanni pi Iust epis praecipere succedi 4. That common saying Petri successionem non habent qui Petri fidem non habent Gratian considering that hereby the succession of Peter might be called into question De poenit dist 1. c. potest saith Qui Petri sedem non habent Hear what a Papist judgeth of these Decrees Corn. Agrippa sometime Doctor utriusque Iuris in his Book De vanitat scient cap. 92. saith From the Civil Law hath flowed the Canon Law which may seem unto many to be very holy it doth so cover the precepts of covetousness and forms of robbing with the shew of godliness albeit very few things in it belong unto godliness religion or the worship of God besides that some things are contrary and fight against the word of God and all the rest are nothing but chidings pleas prides pomps gain or lucre and the pleasures of Popes which are not content with the Canons prescribed by the Fathers unless they do heap up Decrees Extravagants that there is no end of making Canons such is the ambition meer pleasure of Popes The School of Paris did openly detest and reprove this erroneous intolerable temerity I will not say heresie Out of these Canons and Decrees we have learned that the patrimony of Christ is Kingdoms donations foundations riches and possessions and that the Priesthood of Christ and primacy of the Church is Empire and Kingdom and that the sword of Christ is temporal jurisdiction and power and that the rock which is the foundation of the Church is the person of the Pope and that Bishops are not servants or Ministers of the Church but heads thereof and the goods of the Church are not the doctrine of the Gospel zeal of faith contempt of the world but tributes tithes offerings collects purples mitres gold silver jewels lands beasts authority it belongeth unto the Popes to manage battels break covenants loose oaths absolve from obedience and to make the house of prayer become a den of thieves so that a Pope may depose a Bishop without a cause he may dispose of other mens goods he cannot commit simony he may dispense against a vow against an oath and the law of nature nor may any man say unto him What doest thou yea and they say that for a weighty cause he may dispense against all the new Testament he may thrust down to hell a third part or more of Christian souls Agrippa in that place hath more of the matter and scope of the Canon Law and for instance I will name Dist 40. c. Si Papa If the Pope be found to neglect either his own salvation or his brethrens be unprofitable and slack in his office silent in that which is good hurtful to himself and all others yea though he lead with him innumerable people in troops to the first slave of hell yet let no mortal presume to finde fault with his doings And nevertheless in these Decrees we may finde not a few stops of Antiquity and some part of the doctrine and practise of the primitive Church even then remaining as I have touched in some places and more may be added as Dist 39. cap. 8. If as the Apostle saith Christ be the power of God and the wisdom of God and he which knoweth not the Scriptures knoweth not the wisdom and power of God then the ignorance of the Scriptures is the ignorance of Christ Dist 9. c. he saith from Augustine I have learned to give such fear and honor unto these books of the Scripture onely which now are called Canonical that I believe certainly none of their Authors could err in writing and if I finde any thing in them that seemeth contrary unto truth I doubt not but there is an escape in the Book or the Translator hath not attained the right meaning or that I do not understand it but I do read other books so that whatsoever was their holiness or learning yet I think it not true because they have thought so but because they could perswade me by other Authors or by the Canonical Scriptures or by probable reasons And Dist 8. cap. Si consuetudinem If you do object custom it is to be observed that the Lord saith I am the way the truth and life he saith not I am custom but I am truth and truly to use the words of blessed Cyprian whatsoever be the custom how old soever or common it be it must not in any respect be preferred unto truth and use which is contrary unto truth must be abolished Dist 16. c. Canones These that are called the Canons of the Apostles are known to be forged in the name of the Apostles by Hereticks although some good things be in them yet it is certain that they are not from Canonical or Apostolical Authority And c. Clementis All the Fathers do reckon the book of Clemens that is the travels of Peter and the Canons of the Apostles among the Apocrypha Dist 36. c. Si quis These be the two works of the high Priest to learn from God by reading the Scriptures and by frequent meditation
occasion to speak of it in the third Chapter The See was then vacant two years and three months and the Cardinals at last did submit all their suffrages unto Jacob de Ossa Cadurcensis who afterwards went up unto the Papal Chair and said I am Pope This was 3. JOHN the XXIII who was so desirous of novelties and to leave remembrance of him that he turned Bishopricks into Abbeys and Abbeys into Bishopricks he divided one into two and united two into one he erected new Colledges and destroyed the old he appointed new Scribes and taxes of every Bishop and Priest Pol. Virgil. de inven rer lib. 8. cap. 2. By a Decree he pronounced them Hereticks who say Christ did teach perfect poverty that is to renounce the possession of all goods both in particular and in common for said he it is impossible to retain the use of consuming things and to quit the right of them both in particular and in common This Decree saith Platina doth scarcely accord with sacred Scripture which testifieth in many places that Christ and his Disciples had not of their own and it condemneth all the Franciscans teaching and disputing in their schools against the ambition and avarice of the Clergy and it was made directly against the Decree of Pope Nicolaus the IV. Bellarm. de Ro. pont lib. 4. cap. 14. saith These two Decrees fight not because Nicolaus denieth not that Christ had some propriety although in common but he denieth that Christ lived so always and John denieth not that Christ sometimes had not propriety in particular nor in common but he denieth that he lived so always Thus the Jesuit will have the two to agree although John would purposely condemn the others Decree This John believed that the souls do not enjoy the presence The Pope was an Heretick of God before the day of judgement Bellarm. loc cit testifieth that the Cardinals did resist this opinion and that he repented the day before his death nor was it an error saith he because it was not defined in any Councel Naucler saith Many Divines of approved knowledge and life held that this Pope was an Heretick for holding some errors which they say he recanted coldly at his death and his Successor Benedict did publickly condemn those errors Note here the Pope was an Heretick and the Pope recanted but he recanted coldly Erasmus in Praefat. before the fifth book of Irenaeus saith He was compelled by the Divines of Paris to recant his opinion Bishop Jewel against Harding pag. 668. declareth this ex Massae lib. 18. Pope John taught and professed error and he sent two Preachers to Paris the one a Dominican and the other a Franciscan to maintain the same heresie But one Thomas an English Preacher withstood the Pope and the Pope threw him into prison hereupon the King summoned a Councel unto his Palace in Vintiana Sylva the whole Assembly subscribed against the Pope immediately the King sent unto Pope John and willed him to reform his error and to set the Preacher at liberty and so he did At that time Peter de Corbaria John and Michelin three Minorites did openly teach that St. Peter was no more the head of the Church then any of the other Apostles that Christ left no Vicar upon earth that the Pope hath no power to correct or punish to set up or cast down an Emperor all Priests of whatsoever degree are of equal degree power and jurisdiction by the institution of Christ and it proceedeth from mans authority that one hath more power then another neither the Pope nor all the Church can by coactive power punish any man unless they be authorised by the Emperor At that time the Pope and Emperor were at variance as followeth and when the Emperor went to Rome Pope John was deposed by the Cardinals as a fugitive and the now named Peter was chosen and called NICOLAUS the V. When he was installed Pope John accursed him for those his articles his excommunication is in the Extravagants of Pope John the XXII and beginneth Ad audientiam and Pope Nicolaus accursed Pope John At last Boniface Earl of Pisa brought Pope Nicolaus to Avenion and there shut him up in a Monastery till he died Antonin par 4. tit 11. cap. 7. § 5. Nicolaus had advanced the Minorites and John degraded them the more and declared them Hereticks He sat twenty years His Heirs found in his treasury 25. millions of crowns Io. Naucler 4. BENEDICT the XII sent 25000. florens for reparation of S. Peter's Church at Rome His contention with the Emperor followeth His Epitaph describeth his life briefly Hic situs est Nero laicis mors vipera clero Debius à vero cuparepleta mero He sat seven years and died An. 1342. 5. CLEMENS the VI. took upon him at the first to enrich all his Cardinals with the Bishopricks and Benefices of England Edward the III. was not a little offended and annulled all the provisions which the Pope had given within his Realm commanding under pain of imprisonment and death that none presume to bring from the Pope any such provisions At the same time all the tenths of Templaries were paid unto Edward as followeth Clemens exchanged a fue-duty which the French were wont to pay out of Naples for the City Avenion and so that Kingdom was made free and Avenion was a part of St. Peter's patrimony Boniface the VIII had ordained The Iubilee the Jubilee to be kept every hundred year to the imitation of the ancient Secular Plays in honor of Apollo and Diana now Clemens thought he could have no benefit if it were delayed so long time therefore he ordained that it should be kept every fiftieth year after the maner of the Jews and so it was kept at Rome An. 1350. Though he did change the time yet he would keep the Rites of the Secular Plays 1. In invitation Before the Secular Games Heraulds were sent through Italy to make publication and they cried saying Come see the Plays which none living hath seen nor shall see again So all men throughout the Papal jurisdiction were invited by his Trumpeters and at that time they were exhorted that in respect of the uncertainty of mans life they should not let so gracious an occasion slip 2. The Emperors Claudius and Domitian being desirous to have the glory of the Secular Games did shorten the time of an hundred years so Clemens the VI. and Urban the IV. have done 3 The Heathens promised the remission of sin and there was no wickedness so grievous which the Jubilee promised not to blot away 4. The Emperor went in great pomp and confluence of people so do the Popes 5. In the beginning they were wont to uncover a certain Altar dedicated to Pluto and Proserpina and when the Plays were finished that Altar was covered again with earth So at the Jubilee opened a Gate which they called The holy Gate with a silver hammer and when he shut it again he
small like a tree Then the Spirit of the Lord said unto me It signifieth the condition of the Roman Church Again he saith As I was the same way exercised I saw in the Spirit and behold a man walking in the same habit carrying sweet bread on his shoulders and very good wine by his side and he held in his hands a round stone biting it with his teeth as an hungry man biteth bread but he did nothing then two heads of Serpents came out of the stone and the Spirit of the Lord instructing me said This stone is unprofitable and curious questions wherewith the hungry souls are turmoiled when they leave substantial things And I said What meaneth those two heads He said The name of the one is Vain Glory and the other is Overthrow of Religion It is to be observed that about that time the chief questions in the Schools were Whether the bread of the Mass be turned into the body of Christ or whether the substance of it evacuateth what eateth a mouse when she eateth the Sacrament wherein subsisteth the accidents of the bread whether in Christ's body or by themselves c. Again he saith I saw a clear Cross of Silver like to the Cross of Tolouse but the twelve apples of it were like to vile apples that are cast out of the sea What is this Lord Jesus The Spirit said The Cross is the Church which shall be clear with pureness of life and shril with the clear voice of the truth preached Then I said What meaneth those rotten apples The humiliation of the Church-men which shall come to pass Here he prophecied of the Reformation Possevin in Apparto 2. calleth this Robert An excellent Preacher of the Word Mornay in Myster pag. 427. 6. Marsilius Paravinus wrote the book Defensor pacis about the year 1324. there he debateth the question between the Emperor and the Pope and by the holy Scriptures Laws Canons and Histories Ecclesiastical and Civil he maintaineth these positions Christ is the only head and foundation of Rare Theses in those days the Church He made none of the Apostles to be universal Vicar of the Church nor made he the other Apostles subject unto Peter It is more probable that Peter was never at Rome far less had he his seat there who had no fixed seat as also not any of the Apostles The fulness of power in any man is a manifest lye an execrable title the beginning of many evils and the use thereof should be discharged in a good Councel The authority of the keys is that judiciary power that consisteth in dispensing the Word the Sacraments and Discipline Christ whose Vicar the Pope calleth himself did never exercise temporal authority on earth he was subject unto the Magistrate and so were his Apostles after his ascension and they taught others to obey Princes If a Pope usurp temporal authority Princes should by the Law of God resist by word and deed or they are unjust and sin against God and those who fight for the Pope should be accounted the Soldiers of Satan Unto the Pope belongeth not the election nor confirmation of the Emperor but contrarily the Christian Prince with consent of Clergy and People should name the Pope or if one be chosen in his absence he should confirm him If the Pope go astray or be accursed the Emperor should reduce him into the way and judge him in a Councel When Peter lived he might have fallen and erred neither hath the Pope any priviledge against error That that Christ said to Peter I have prayed for thee is to be extended unto the other Apostles Only the Canon of the Bible is the fountain of truth against which Canon we may not believe either Pope or Church Concerning the sense of Scripture or any Article of the faith we may not believe the Pope and his Cardinals seeing not once have they seduced silly souls into hell The Christian Church is the universality of believers and not the Pope and his Cardinals she is represented in a lawful and general Councel A Councel should be assembled by the Emperor with consent of Christian Princes as anciently it was always The Word of God should be the only rule and chief judge in deciding causes Ecclesiastical Not only the Clergy by Lay men also if they be godly and learned should have voice in general Councels The Clergy and Synagogue of the Pope is a den of thieves c. This book was printed at Basil An. 1522. In another Treatise he saith Good works are not the efficient cause of salvation but causa sine quanon Mornay ibid. pag. 452. He was condemned as an Heretick by Pope John the XXIII Catal. test ver lib. 18. Consider what a Modern could say more of this matter and whether they shew not themselves to be ignorant of antiquity who accuse us of novelty 7. The same positions were held by John de Janduno or Gandanensis at the same time as is manifest by his books printed at Venice and Florence So wrote also Luitpold Bishop of Bamberg namely in a Treatise De Translatione Imperii printed Lutet An. 1540. he saith The Authority of governing the Empire belongeth unto the Emperor so soon as he is chosen and the Coronation by the Pope addeth nothing since Caesar is not his vassal nor feudatory The donation of Constantine is but a fable He was also condemned by Pope John Catal. test ibid. Michael Cesenas General of the Franciscans was bolder saying expresly The Pope is the Antichrist and Rome is Babylon drunk with the blood of the Saints Therefore Antonin par 3. tit 21. cap. 5. reckoneth him among the poor men of Lions For the Valdenses still suffered persecution in sundry Countries and under divers names as the adversaries pleased to brand them Many errors are imputed unto them by the writers of those times but because they did abhor the Pope and his Court they were reviled as we have heard from Arnold de Villanova and sought out to the fire as An. 1302. Nogaret the Father of him who took Pope Boniface the VIII was burnt in Aquitania Clemens the V. caused it to be proclaimed to take up the flag of the Cross against them and destroyed 4000 near the Alps whether they had sled Platin. Others went higher unto the mountains of whom some remained in his days saith Antonin par 3. tit 22. cap. 10. From them were the in-dwellers of Angronia and adjacent parts continuing until the Councel at Trent Trithemius testifieth of many that were burnt in Austria about that time howbeit he believing the reports of malice imputeth many errors unto them yet he testifieth that they abhorred the Mass calling the Hosty a god invented by man the Church of Rome a Synagogue of unbelievers and not the flock of Christ they denied all mens merits intercession of Saints the difference of days and meats c. He witnesseth also that the professore of the same doctrine were innumerable in Bohemia Austria
provide for his own salvation Thuan. Lib. 15. VI. PAUL IV. being 79. years old was crowned with the grumbling of all men they feared his severity saith Onuphry when he knew it he spoke fairly unto the Cardinals and studied by liberality to procure the favour of the people and when he was secured he shewed himself in his colours and began to performe what he had been devising before therefore was hated of all men He made a shew of reforming some abuses in the Court that he might some way satisfy the exceptions of the Lutherans but his shewes made him not so acceptable as his deeds made him odious He deprived many Clerks because they had entred by simony but it was for his own gain and the hurt of many Idem He had most arrogant conceits and thought by his sole authority to prevent all incommodities without the aid of Princes When he spoke with any Ambassadour he often boasted that he was superiour unto all Kings and would not keep familiarity with any he had power to change Kingdoms and was the successour of such as had dethroned Kings Emperours and spared not to say in Consistory at table and elsewhere that he acknowledged no Prince to be his companion but all must be subject unto his foot Pe. Soave lijst Lib. 5. When he heard that liberty of religion was granted in Austria Bavier Prussia Poland c. he thought to overturne all by a generall Councell at Lateran and did intimate it unto the Emperour and Princes not for their advice said he for they must obey but of courtisy he knew this would not please them he would let them see what his See could do when they had a Pope of courage and if Prelates would not come he would hold the Councell with the Prelates of Rome for he knew his own power Ibid. He gave some Priviledges unto the City for which the Romans would give him Divine honour untill they found that it was but a deceitfull bait for he undertook warrs for the Kingdom of Naples whereby he provoked not only the Romanes but all the Princes of Europe except the King of France whom he had persuaded to break his league with the Emperour with new factions and through his fault all Compania and Latium were brought under the command of the Spaniard for Duke d'Alva Governour of Naples chose to invade rather than to be inuaded and he might have taken Rome if he had followed his victory An. 1556 and the treasury of the Church being emptied Paul imposed severely exacted most grievous taxes whereby he procured more hatred and was forced at last to seeke peace Amongst his articles of the league with France it was one to create more French Cardinals that so a French Pope might be chosen after him but in the beginning of the year 1557. he created neither so many nor such Cardinals as he had promised he excused himself that all his clients were no lesse affected toward France than the French were and within few dayes he would create more because he hath a purpose to bring some Cardinals into the Inquisition and so the present number shall be diminished But all that year he was encombred with the warr and when the French Army was recalled he thought to satisfy the Romanes and the Cardinals by an unexpected conceit to wit by degrading his own kindred whom he had advanced with the male contentment of so many and he was earnest in the Inquisition so that many fled into Geneve and into woods Onuphrius an eye-witness testifieth that he tormented many of all estates without difference of age and not without great blame of cruelty When he lay sick he sent for the Cardinals and exhorted them to be mindfull of the Inquisition which is the pillar of Apostolicall authority said he His breath was no sooner gone when the people of the City broke up all the prisons and set them on fire after the prisoners had escaped and the Monastery of the Franciscanes ad Mineruam was hardly saved from violence They had set up in the Capitole his portraiture of white marble when he gave them the liberties but then they threw it down and cast it thorough the streets till it was defaced and broken and would have done so with his body if some had not kept it by power Lastly a proclamation was made that the badges of the Caraffes a family in Naples of which he was descended whither painted or carved should be demolished within Rome under no lesse paine than of treason Jac. Thuan. Hist. Lib. 23. He died August 18. An. 1559. The Cardinals assemble unto the election capitulation was made that the Councell of Trent shall be restored for the necessity of preserving France and the Nether-lands together with the open departure of High-Germany and England Here unto all the Cardinals did sweare and subscribe but all in vain as followes Ch. 5. untill other occasions intervene VII PIUS IV. was not sooner enstalled but he gave out a mandate to burn all books of Lutherans this command was executed in many places Osiand cent 16. par 2. Lib. 3. c. 35. He imprisoned Cardinall Caraffa and his brother Duke of Pallia by whose aid principally he had attained unto the Papacy and some other Cardinals He caused to hang the Duke in Hadrian's tower after he had craved liberty to say once the seven Penitentiall psalmes and beheaded the rest in the new tower And for filling up the number again he created new Cardinals of his own kindred amongst whom was John the son of the great Duke being 14 years old and Mark de Embs whom he made Bishop of Constance so learned that when the Emperour Ferdinand said unto him decet vos esse piscatores hominum the Bishop understood not what he said and answered in Dutch to another purpose Ibid c. 44. The Duke of Savoy would have given liberty unto the Waldenses within his bounds but Pope Impius would not suffer it and did contribute to take armes against them Histor Concil Trid. Lib. 5. In the year 1561. he shewed more than beastly cruelty against the professours of Truth for in Monte alto a towne of Italy he imprisoned 80. men whom they called Lutherans and caused the hang-men cut to their necks as a cook doeth with a hen and left then wallowing in their blood Some suffered with immoveable constancy some were a little dashed when they saw the bloody knife in the hatkster's teeth yet none of them would recant He practized the like cruelty in two townes of Calabria to wit S Sixti Guarda where he hired the Marques of Buciana and gave a red hatt to his sonne to be his executioner Osiand ibi c. 37. 45. ex Henricpe Nigrin He would in time of the Councell have made a Generall league with all the Princes and Estates against the Protestants wheresoever and this he did intend to insnare all the Princes and thought that none of them durst
the French Bishops had foughten a long time The Councel's authority is above the Pope and he might have helped it easily if he had vsed the phrase of the Apostle The care of all the Churches 2 in prejudice of the Councels authority he had permitted in all the decrees a reservation of the authority of the Apostolical See and the craving of confirmation of the decrees And sundry other particulares As also the Centumviral Court of Paris obiected other particulares but all concerning those which were called The articles of Reformation His defense was What could he and sixe Prelats do against 200. and there was a special Act that nothing was done in prejudice of the liberties of France Vidus Faber replied that he and his Colleague had diligently sought that Act but could not find it and in humane affaires not to appear is not to bee But all those obiections were nothing to what the Bishops and Divines and their servants told scurrilously of the contentions and factions of the Fathers and their particular designes and generally This Councel was of more authority then the Councel of the Apostles seing these defined nothing but what seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and this Synod layd the foundation of their decrees visum est nobis In Germany both Papists and Protestants obiected more against the canons of doctrine as they command the Bishop to teach wholesom doctrine of purgatory without any declaration what that doctrine is The Councel was assembled especially for the grievances against indulgences and they had defined nothing but wish moderation according to the antient and approved custom of the Church albeit in the Eastern Churches was never use of those indulgences nor in the Western before Vrban 2. or the year 1095. so far as any man can find and after that untill the year 1300. was litle use of them or but for freedom of the Confessar's iniunctions Likewise the Emperour and the Duke of Bavier sent Letters severally unto Rome craving liberty of the cup and of marriage unto the Priests And the clergy of Germany sent third remonstrance shewing a necessity of granting liberty of marriage by authority of the old and new Testament and the practise of the primitive Church and of the Eastern Church unto this day as it was never more necessary then at this time when amongst fifty priests one scarcely can be found who is not a notorious whoor-monger and it is absurd to permitt whoorish priests and exclude the marryed and to exclude them both were as if you would have none The Pope referred these Letters unto the consideration of the Cardinals and they would not â—eeld March 12. the Pope promoted 19 Cardinals in reward of their service in the Councel unto the Apostolicall See and he would not promote any who had spoken for residence of Bishops or that their institution is De Jure Divino So far Pe. Soave in Hist. Conti. Trident. Likewise Ge. Abbot writting against Hill in Reas 9. shewes out of Declarat du Roy de Navarr that Charles IX sent his Ambassadors and Bishops unto Trent with large instructions for reformation of the clergy but when nothing could be obtained he caused his Ambassadors protest against the Councel and return home So they did and those Bishops came also away and nevertheless amongst the subscribers is mention of 26 French Prelats as if they had subscribed There it is also that after the Massacre in the year 1572. some thinking that to be an opportunity of seeking confirmation of the Synod did propound it but it was refused in all the Chambers The like motion was made An. 1585. and with the same happ The Reformed wrot against the decrees namely Calvin wrote his Antidotum against the Acts under Pope Paul and Chemnitius wrote against them all and calleth them a horrible chaos of monstrous errors Here by anticipation it may be added that the Jesuits were employd as stout champions at Rhems Doway and Lovan to maintain the decrees who carried themselves so happely that for defense of these errors they vented many others that were scarcely heard before lastly Card. Bellarmin as the chief champion and others of that colledge at Rome were commanded by Pope Gregory XIII to bring all the controversies into one body or system That work brought forth by the providence of God a threefold benefit unto posterity 1. A more perfect body of Popish errors then ever was published before 2. A manifest proof of the jarrings and divisions of the Doctors in the Roman Church for albeit they glory of Unity among themselves yet in every controversy almost yea very few excepted the contrary judgement of their Doctors is brought expressely 3. Albeit all the errors of Trent are maintained there exprofesso and many errors are falsly imputed unto Luther Calvin and others yet there the reformed Church is fairly cleared from many errors which other Papists impute falsly unto us and more over somtimes in sifting and stating a question he maintaines what we hold and refutes another and maintaines what he denied in the proper place and by those two meanes he gives testimony unto the truth in all the chief controversies as Jo. Ernest Gerhard hath collected in his Book Bellarminus ORTHODOXIAS testis And about that time came forth another edition of the Decrees at Trent with references upon the margine of each canon unto other books of the Schoolmen where to find those points handled and those references being published by authority of the Court might serve for a commentary without any change of the decrees if it should be challenged even though the reference be contrary to the decree PART IIJ. CHAP. J. Of POPES J. PIVS 5. Was not inferiour unto any Pope in dissembling in some outward things he made a shew of godliness When he was crouned he said unto the Cardd that they should ask nothing from him that were contrary to equity or to the Councel of Trent He brought some of the Court namely the Penitentiaries and procurators of the Chancelery but not the Cardd into some moderation he most severly discharged all selling of Benefices he restrained the wickednes of priests some what he would have all the Jewes dwell at Rome or Ancona he would have expelled all the professed whoores out of Rome but when the Romanes shew him what a part of his revenues he would want he suffered them in a corner by themselves and appointed unto them their own preachers and thereafter some bordellers were married But in the articles of Religion and idolatrous worship he made no Reformation He gave licence unto Charles an archduke of Austria to mary his sisters-daughter and when Joachim-Frederik son of the Electour of Brandeburg married the daughter of his uncle the Pope rageth partly because he was in the Popes judgement an heretick and partly because he was chosen Primate of Germany and administrator of the episcopall Colledge of Magdeburg without licence of the Pope and then had married his
by our Master Christ Jesus we are taught in these words In vain Do they worship mee teaching for Doctrines the precepts of men So without respect of men those did cleave unto the Word of God and did iudge What soever is without the Word either in doctrine or religious worship or in Ecclesiastical discipline can not be accepted of God as service when he requires it not But England upon account that those who had been enured with Popish doctrine and superstitions might be the more easily allured to forsake that doctrine if the rites and discipline were retained and hoping as is hinted in the former part that by time a more perfect Reformation might be attained took this prudential course as it is called trusting especially that bishops and priests might be the more easily enduced to joyn with the Reformation So both in the Confession in King Edwards time and in the articles of the Convocation An. 1564. or according to the English Style 1563. they allowed liberty unto dissenting judgements and made large expressions and capacious words being loath to drive off from the communion any who differing in the branches meet in the main grounds of religion Those things that were retained upon such plausible motives had a twofold influence Such is the nature of humane corruption to wit 1. one superstition draweth-on another as a link of a chain If this may be used why not that 2. what was at first retained by way of toleration condescension was afterwards pressed upon mens consciences by authority that men must conform in practise of rites and to the opinion of Superiors or suffer punishment The first particular exception was made by the Papists against the The Head of the Church and Supream Iudge in al causes title The Head of the Church which was given unto King Henry and The Supream Iudge in causes Ecelesiastical which was given unto Queen Elisabet They excepted against this alwayes but the first that hath written of it was Harding in his pretended refutation of Englands Confession Bishop Jewell answereth him in his Defence of the Apolog. part 6. cap. 11. divis 1. saying Concerning the title The supream head of the Church wee need not search the Scriptures to excuse it For 1. We devised it not 2. We use it not 3. our Princes at this time claim it not Your Fathers first enrituled that noble Prince King Henry VIII with that unused and strange Style as it may wel be thought the rather to bring him into the talk and slander of the world Howbeit that the Prince is the highest Iudge and Governor over all his subjects whatsoever alswel priests as laymen without exception c. He insists at length upon this purpose as also Doct. Fulk against the Rhemists Annotations on Matth. 22. and others I shall add the Answer of Thom. Bilson sometime Warden of Wincester unto the Jesuits Apolog. Lib. 2. where the Iesuit or Philander saith You would have our faith and salvation so to hang on the Princes will and lawes as if there could be no nearer way to religion then to believe what our temporal Lord and Master list He answereth It is a cunning when you can not confute your adversaries at least to belie them that you may seem at least to say somwhat against them indeed your fourth chapter is wholly spent in refelling this position which we detest as much as you Philander replieth You begin to shrink from your former teaching He answereth in name of Theophilus You will never shrink from your former facing Did ever any man on our side affirm the Princes will to be the rule of faith have we not earnestly written and openly taught that religion must not depend on the pleasure of men Have not thousands here in England and elsewhere given our lifes for the witnes and confession of Gods Truth against Princes Lawes and Popes decrees In Spain France and Italy and other places at this day do we not endure all the torments you can devise because we will not believe what temporal Lords and Masters will your conscience knowes it is ttue that we say Why do you then charge us with this wicked assertion from which we be farther off then you For you hold opinion of Popes they can not err we do not of Princes Why do you Father your fancies upon us why do you purposely pervert the question heaping absurdities and alledging authorities against that which we do not defend Philander The oath which yee take yourselves and exact of others induces us thus to think of you for there you make Princes the only supream Governors of all persons in all causes aswell spiritual as temporall utterly renouncing all forrain jurisdictions and Superiority Upon which word mark what an horrible confusion followes If Princes be the only Governors in ecclesiasticall matters then in vain did the Holy Ghost appoint Pastors and Bishops to govern the Church If they be Supream then are they Superior to Christ himself and in effect Christs Masters If in all things and causes spiritual then they may prescribe unto the Priests and Bishops what to preach and which way to worship and serve God how and in what form to Minister the Sacraments and generally how men shall be governed in soul If all forrain jurisdiction be renounced then Christ and his Apostles because they were and are forrainers have no jurisdiction nor authority over England Theophilus VVake you or dream you That in matters of no less weight then your duty to God and the Prince you fall to these childish and pelting sophisms VVhat kind of concluding call you this Princes only bear the sword to command and punish Ergo Bishops may not teach and exhort Princes are not subject unto the Pope Ergo Superiors to Christ They may by their laws establish what Christ hath commanded Ergo they may change both Scripture and Sacraments No forrainer at this this day hath jurisdiction over this Land ergo Christ and his Apostles 1500. years ago might not preach the gospell Philand We make no such reasons Tâ—eop The former propositions are the true contents of the oath we take the later are the very absurdities which you infer upon us fortaking the oath ..... Philan. Do you not make Princes supream Governors of all spiritual things Theoph. you reason as if we did but ourwords since you will rest upon words are not so Philan. What are they then Theoph. We confess them to be supream governors of their realms and dominions Philan. And that in all spiritual things and causes Philan. Not of all spiritual things and causes Philan. What difference between those two speeches Theoph. Just as much as excludes your wrangling we make them not governors of the things them selves but of their subiects which I trust you dar notwithstand Philan. I grant they be Governors of their subjects bur not in ecclesiastical things or causes ..... Theoph. Where we profess that her highness is the only Governor of
jurisdiction and authority of the Church in all things and daily do promote their intended change of the Church Discipline first in bringing us into bondage of a perpetual Dictatura under the Title of Commissioners as the finest cover of their intentions and then into the Antichristian slavery of the Hierarchy that their purposes were discovered by their speeches by presentations of them unto Bishopricks with full authority over their Brethren and several other signs especially by their publick profession in all the Synods lately where it is clear that our Assembly is impeded by their Dictatorship and Lordly Domination which they fear must fall if the Assemblies shall hold and is the main cause of persisting with so hatefull enmity against them for their meeting at Aberdeen because thereby as they judged their almost accomplished enterprize was somewhat retarded It was at that time reported unto the King by these Bishops that Chancelour Seton was upon the Councel of holding the Assembly at Aberdeen wherefore Dunbar was sent down to try him But partly by favour of the Queen and partly by his correspondence with the English Secretary the Trial was not exactly followed and so the Delator John Spotswood then called Bishop of Glascow was disappointed Many other particulars passed that year concerning the Church affairs But for this time to close that Assembly in the beginning of October the King's Will was declared unto a Convention of the Nobility at Lithgow that the six condemned Ministers should be banished out of his Dominions for all their daies and the other eight should be confined some in one place and some in another within the Country remote from their former dwellings and some into Isles severally And a Proclamation was published that if any should hereafter offend in such a high Trespasse they should be punished with all severity and the death due unto Traitours should be inflicted upon them with all rigour and all Ministers were inhibited either in their Sermons or Prayers to recommend the persons that were so sentenced John Forbes went to Middleburgh where he was Minister unto the English Staple Robert Dury was Minister of an English Congregation in Leyden John Welsh went to Bourdeaux where he learned the language so quickly that within one year he was chosen Minister of a French Church And John Sharp became Minister and Professour of Divinity at Dia in the Delphinate where he wrote Cursus Theologicus Symphonia Prophetarum Apostolorum After a year Andrew Duncan and Alexander Strachan purchased liberty to return into their former places Finally because those Assemblies were zealous to keep the Church in purity of Doctrine and free from scandalous Vices they were deserted by some undermined by others and opposed by a third sort and although they were warranted by God's Word and confirmed by the Law of the Realm yet without any repealing Law or just reason that ever was alledged they were in this manner brought to an end AN INDEX Of the Chief Things and Purposes contained in this BOOK In this Index many Particulars are omitted partly for brevity and especially because they may be found by the Names of the Actors and Writers which are in the two Tables at the beginning of the Book A ADam Red a bold Confessor 563. e Aerius his alledged Heresie S 469. The consecrating of Agnus Dei 459. b Albin or Alcuin's doctrine 100 104. Alexander the â—â— King of Scots would nâ—t suffer the Pope's Legate to come into his Realm 447. m Alliance spiritual began 16. m Altars in Christian Churches is a novelty 140 141. Angâ—ls should not be worshipped 178. b. 183. m The first Anointing of the Kings of Scotland 291. Annats 454. Anabaptists began in Germany S. 74. Anselm's doctrine 293. Antichrist is the head of Hypocrites 29. b The Pope was called Antichrist 231. b. 235. b. 248. e. 249 m. See Pope Antiphona began 140. m Appeals from the Pope unto a Councel 547. e. 548. b. 558. m An Apology of a wolf a fox and an ass shrieving one another 476. An Apology of a naked bird clad by other birds 479. The Apostles were of equal authority 364. â— Arnold de Viâ—lanova's answer unto the King of Sicilies doubts in his purpose of Reformation 471. 473. Arnulph Bishop of Orleans his Oration concerning Appeals to Rome 229. Apocrypha Books 27 b. 333. e. 435 e. 437. m The Church Assemblies of Scotland Their lawfulness S. 230 231. Their warrant and members S 382. Their usefulness S. 492 493. The subordination of other Church-Indicatories unto the Assemblies 492. 496. b Order for number of the members thereof S. 545. The privy Conference thereof S. 391. The first day of each S. 478. e At the instance of Ro. Mongomry a charge is given to the Assembly S. 420. e The Books of Register were kept up and some leafs torn S. 456 the Assembly maketh a general Revocaâ—iâ—n of all things done formerly in prejudice of the Discipline and Revenues 487. m. The Assembly appeareth at the Kâ—â—g's command before the Convention of Estaâ—es and protesteth for their Liberty S. 532. A comparison of the former and the latter Assemblies S. 536. The beginning of variance between King James and the Church S. 518. B A Conference at Baden between a Protestant and a Papist S. 318. Baptism taketh away the guilt and not the sin of concupiscence 372. m. They who have not probability that they were Baptized may be Baptized 190. The first Baptizing of Bells 208. m Three Babylons 476. e Bavariâ— becometh Christian 94. m Beda's Doctrine 95. 99. True Believers cannot perish 477. m Bellum Pontificale continued 170. years 248 e Berengarius his Teneâ—s 254. 248. Bernard's Advertisements unâ—o the Pope 322. His Complaints against corruptions and his Faith 334. His Sermon at the Councel of Rhems 341. Beza's Letter unto Jo Knox against the Reliques of Popery S. 376. Bishops and preaching Elders were both one 217. b. 285. m. 354. m. 542 m S 467 471. What was the Office of a Bishop in antient times 471. m. Bishops should be like Shepheards 213. b. They got power in Civil things by Civil Laws 12. m. and â—ft forbidden to meddle with Civil things 143. e. 225. m. They had precedency according to their age or admission 65. m. They should attend their Flock and distribute heavenly Bread 213. b They were taxed of negligence ambition c. 193. e. 194. 210. 222 266 S. 142. They were upon all States Councels and none upon their Councels but themselves S. 166. e. 168. e. They thought it disparagement to Preach 375. e. 549. e. When they prâ—a hed they preached not Christ 82. b. They were disswaded from taking arms 80. b. and yet were Warriors 82. m. They have been partakers of Treason and Conspiracies 113. e. 240 303. 306. e. 307. b. 383. m. 400. m 504. m. 505 m. S 365 367. By advice of Bishops much blood hath been spilt 502. e No Lord Biâ—hops in Scotland before the year 1050