saith he if they that did observe a certain shadow and figure did so greatly reverence the Sabbath Day that they wholly abstained from all work how is it not fitting that those should reverence that day that is honoured of God who love the light of grace and the truth it self 4. Lastly the rule of equity and justice requires the same if we look at what time the Lord hath indulged us for our uses whose large benevolence hath allowed us six whole dayes to overcome the labours of this world and dispatch our own business with Why should it therefore be tedious to us weighing this in an equal ballance for to set apart one whole day for his praise and sincere worship Neither can any one think this an absurd form of arguing who shall but observe Chrysostom arguing in this matter from the duty of servants towards us to our observance towards God he judgeth it ridiculous if we would have our servants alwayes employed in our business and and we give no service to God And we likewise contending for the sanctifying of the whole day do say that it is much more ridiculous if we should reckon those dayes for whole ones which are allowed us to dispatch the affairs of this life in for our use and interpret a day set aside for Gods worship by Divine authority not an entire one but a small part thereof to be dedicated to Divine worship It would be ridiculous yea plainly impious to arrogate to our selves and our affairs what we refuse to bestow on God Chrysostom judgeth it an irreligious thing to consume six dayes in carnal and be unwilling to spend one in spiritual matters So also Leo in the foresaid place How is it not the part of a wholly dissolute Religion whereas one of the seven dayes is consecrated to the honour of God not to preserve it inviolate to God but to make it common But we must not contend with reasons but testimonies for the prejudices of some men who condemn the truth in this matter as novelty and he that shall undervalue the foresaid testimonies of greatest authority will esteem at little reasons although every way valid like the Leviathan that esteemeth iron as straw and brass as rotten wood And therefore I will put an end to this labour And thus far being furnished with the authorities of the ancients I have taught you that they have stood for sanctifying of the whole day which they have judged necessary for the Church How the sacred Exercises of Divine worship performed on that day were so disposed that in performing thereof the whole day was spent by the ancients when I shall speak of the sanctifying of the Lords Day then by the grace of God shall be made manifest CHAP. VII The Ordinance of the Lords day is not to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church Things ordained of the Apostles are Divine WHen the Jews had observed John to use another form of Doctrine than was commonly received and to begin a new Ceremony of Baptisme they ask who he was i. e. by what authority he did set upon these new things and unheard of in former ages that being informed in that thing they might in time consider what they should do So since that we have found out of Scriptures and Fathers that the Lords day was solemnized by the Church under the Gospel insomuch that mens minds are to be masculously applied to the duties of Piety not on the last as under the Law but first day of the week a question is made by what authority Gods Holy Church doth this thing For it was not so kept holy from the beginning from whence even till the happy Resurrection of our Saviour the Lord commanded that the Seventh day in every week should be held holy and for sanctifying the first day of every week divers men seek for a command which they confidently enough cry out is not extant in all the holy Scriptures and divers more other wise Divines of great note do greatly toyle in heaping up arguments whereby to enervate the Divine Authority of this day It is an ordinary thing with sundry of the Papists although some amongst them especially of the School-men do think otherwise who strenuously contend for unwritten Traditions on whose weak authority as on a solid foundation many of their dotages are grounded to reckon up the observation of the Lords Day among this sort of Traditions which cannot be fince the mention thereof doth so often occurr in the Sacred Word of God Whilst the most learned Dr. Whitaker doth studie soberly to prevent as his manner is this errour of the Papists he is scourged of Gretser Yet the learned Vedelius in his notes upon Ignatius doth strongly defend Whitaker against the vain fooleries of Gretser Others contend that the Lords day should be held solemn â—ure divino Lastly Others do acknowledge it received from Apostolical ordination We will by Gods assistance shew that solemn celebration of the Lords day was instituted of God by the Apostles The Holy Scriptures do testifie that the Lords day was observed of the Church while the Apostles were yet alive nor is there much doubt of this observation This is the onely thing as I said of which the question is Whether this solemnity was instituted of the Apostles or of the Church according to that power allowed them by the Lord And if it be ascribed to the Holy Apostles Whether they of themselves and by their own authority or by Divine command have prescribed it to the Church since the observation of the Lords day grew in use with the Church of Christ while the Apostles were yet alive it seems equitable and agreeable to sound reason to take them for the authors of this observation because the chief care of Ecclesiastical Government was by God devolved upon them every one whereof as a wise master-builder laid a foundation upon which their successors builded and all other modern Doctors of the Church how great soever they were gave place unto them Ignatius for that reason saith of himself I do not command as an Apostle And elsewhere in an Epistle Ad Philadelphienses he doth not challenge Apostolical authority to himself Neither would Ambrose claim Apostolical glory to himself which he acknowledgeth is by right due to them whom the Son of God hath chosen and he affirmeth that by how much we are inferiour to the Apostles in time we are so much inferiour to them in merit Chrysostom also confesses that he is far from the Apostles dignity neither doth he account himself worthy to be called their shadow and Christ hath deservedly joyned them to him as individual companions out of the number of all his Disciples or that I may speak with Tertullian lateri suo adlegavit i. made themselves Legates a latere Secondly He hath sent
them out furnished with special authority to gather the Church to lay whose foundations belong to the Apostolical dignity out of the promiscuous multitude of all nations and so they were sent out by Christ to all Nations without any exception for which cause when a Church was planted in any part of the world whither they came they fixed not but removed some other way Thirdly They were endued with that abundance of Grace of the Holy Ghost for the Ministry committed to them by the Lord that they preached the truth of the Gospel infallibly I know sayes Hierom how to esteem of the Apostles in one manner of other Doctors after another that those alwayes taught the truth these in some things did erre as men Whence the Doctrine commended to the Church by the Apostles was alwayes accounted for the rule and Canon of all Christian Religion Fourthly The Apostles at the beginning of the Church by the visible sign of imposition of hands conferred the gifts of the Holy Ghost upon others that were instructed of them in the Doctrine of the Gospel and they were endued with divers other gifts of Miracles by which their call was rendred clear both to themselves and others Matth. 10. 8. And these are the signs by which the blessed Apostle teaches us that he had executed the office of a true Apostle in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12. 2. Deservedly for these causes were they that were elected to the honourable state of Apostolical dignity preferred to other Ministers of the Church not only in the chief eminency of Order but of Power and hence it was that all questions respecting the affairs of the whole Church were propounded to be discussed by the Apostles whom all the Churches consulted in doubtful cases as may be seen Acts 15. 2. 1 Cor. 7. 1. and whatever they determined the whole Church every where embraced which made a conscience of departing a fingers breadth from those things that were committed to them by the Apostles If therefore the solemnity of the Lords Day was celebrated while the Apostles were living which the Scriptures testifie was done as we have seen chap. 2. it must of right chiefly be imputed to their ordination otherwise without doubt the Universal Church had not followed it Baronius thinks that all who are well in their wiâ—â— will say that since it is found that it was done in the Apostles times it could not be ordained and commanded to be kept of any other but of themselves Neither is any thing worthy consideration brought to the contrary except it be because the Blessed Apostles have left no singular command with the Church for the observation of this day although he that shall attend their practise may lawfully deny this since their example and practise hath the force of a precept But who will deny that some things were instituted of the Apostles in the Church whose use while they were alive I pass not for Traditions introduced into the Church when the Apostles were dead was grown out with the primitive Christians of whose first institution or necessary continuation afterwards no precept is extant in the Scriptures yet who will be bold to extenuate the authority of these commands or will affirm that the Church at this day is not obliged to observe them because their observation being mentioned in Scripture is as it were a command by vertue whereof the Church is bound to continue them The thing will be more plain by examples The Apostles ordained Deacons Act. 6. and Elders in every Church Act. 14. 23. In the Ordinations of all Ministers imposition of hands was used but where is there extant an express commanâ— from Christ for perpetuating the ordination of those the institution of these or for the use of this ceremony yet none doubts but that the Apostles in performing of these were acted by a Divine instinct of the Spirit and that the Church at this day is bound to them by vertue of Apostolical institution But that I may briefly shew that the blessed Apostles and no others were the authors of this solemnity that which follows may suffice If it were observed while they were yet living which the Scriptures do evidently enough manifest it is deservedly to be ascribed to their ordaining it for it was either instituted by them and their authority or by some other Doctors of the Church without their consent a third way is not given the latter whereof is absurd and never to be admitted of any exercised in the Christian Faith because the Apostolical authority as formerly we have abundantly enough shewn was supreme in the Church it belonged to them to declare to the Christian flock what was best to be done in all things and not to the Church to prescribe them Statutes and Laws Why therefore did it not appertain to the Apostles the faithful founders of the Church amongst other things to commend this also to the Church and not to the Church to prescribe it the blessed Apostles Moreover the general consent of all Churches in celebrating this festival evinceth the same otherwise they had dissented from one another as in other observations not received from the Apostles but observed for a time by the succeeding Church as in the Feast of the Passover in observing Fasts c. so doubtless it would have happened in celebrating the Lords Day if by Divine authority received from the Apostles its observation had not been used amongst the Christians Thirdly if the Christian Church had ordained that day to be celebrated without the advice of the Apostles either those that turned Christians from Jews or Gentiles had done this but not those to whom the cessation of their old Sabbath was not known but by the Apostles much less would they attempt to do this by themselves or on their own authority Neither will any wise man think that those whom the Apostles invited from Heathenism to embrace the Christian faith were the authors of this Festival because it is not usual with them to Sabbatize after the manner of the Church unless so far as they were instructed to it by the Apostles Fourthly if the Holy Apostles by authority committed to them from Christ had not instituted the Lords Day but had left its observation free to the judgment of the Church then we might on good reason have called the Church the Queen of the Sabbath which yet is a very clear argument of Christs Divinity as the Learned Dr. Paraeus piously for none is Lord of the Sabbath but he that hath instituted the Sabbath c. The Sabbath is of the Lord they God Lastly if its authority did depend upon the Churches institution then it may by it be again abolished when it shall think good but this was never hitherto since Christs ascension attempted because the Lords day being taken away the publick worship of God must of necessity fall Since therefore the observation of the Lords day was used while the Apostles were
profit of the Church From the three foresaid places of the New Testament and testimonies of various Divines and Versions of the Scripture the learned Wallaeus concludes that the use of the Lords day is to be referred to the Apostles And whatever is brought of some in their Expositions to the contrary is solidly by him weighed and refuted Lastly We have shewn in the second chapter of this Treatise that the Lords day was ordinarily solemnized by the Church while the Apostles were living and the preheminence of it above other dayes which the succeeding Church hath consecrated to Gods worship in the third Chapter Since therefore the Holy Scriptures do plainly bear witness of the name and use of this day for the name which the Church ever after used is by St. John expressed Rev. 1. 10. and since it is by the Apostles charge destined to the sacred assemblies of the Church and gathering of almes 1 Cor. 16. And lastly since at the same assemblies the Apostle and Church spent it in hearing the word of God and communicating the Eucharist Act. 20. what man is there that can rightly deny that its authority in the Church was established by the testimony of Holy Scripture of which in the third place we have undertaken to enquire in ch 7th since it is bottomed upon the ordination and practice of the blessed Apostles which are recorded in the Scriptures amongst un-written traditions it cannot be reckoned I deservedly therefore affirm that its observation is commended to us in the Scriptures Because we so often read in the Scriptures that the Apostles and the whole Church of Christ did unanimously hold their assemblies on that day to whom will it not be thought a needless thing to dispute the authority of its institution especially since we read this was done of the Church while the Apostles were alive For it is dangerous either to say or write that the Apostles in some things used a divine inspiration and in others their own prudence and that in those things which are found written If the Apostles in Scripture admonish Christians that they receive no opinion from those to whom they have given no Commandment Act. 15. 24. if they ordained in all Churches what they received from the Lord 1 Cor. 7. 7. if Christians must imitate the Apostles 2 Thes 3. 7. and withdraw themselves from every one that walketh not after the tradition received of the Apostles 2 Thes 3. 6. Surely it seems just to think that the Christian Church in all Nations would not yield to those that obtrude the Lords solemnity upon them unless they knew for certain that this burden was imposed on them of God by the Apostles Lastly if those things be to be done by the Church which it hath learned and heard of the Apostles Phil. 4. 9. why should it not keep holy the Lords Day since the Apostolical Church kept its meetings on that day and who will say that the Apostles do not command us to imitate them when in holy records their example is represented unto us And these are the things with which I am perswaded to believe that the Sabbaths festival by Divine authority which proceeded from God by the Apostles was translated to the Lords day for he onely who is Lord of the Sabbath can change the Sabbath day Mar. 2. 28. Besides this all men know that that is grounded on the word of God which is either expressed in so many words in Scripture or else by virtue of necessary consequence is drawn out from thence and in this later way the best of our Divines affirm that we meet with in Scripture the institution of the Lords day as at large and pithily the famous Mr. D. G. First saith he in the Old Testament a parallel precept occurrs as all know in the Decalogue from which any may know that it seemed just and good to the Divine Majesty to set apart a whole day of the seven for the worship of God Secondly Apostolical practice is a sign of Gods will in this business they observed this day and commended it to be observed by others and if their practice in this particular had been doubtful the perpetual and constant custome of the Church from the Apostles age which illustrates their practice in doubtfuls and confirms it in plain things doth most evidently demonstrate this For although we reject â—n vritten traditions yet may the inviolate custome of all Churches from the Apostles times interpret to us their writings If we could have the interpretation of some place of Paul allowed of in the judgment of all his auditors who would not prefer this far to the Commentaries of all others deeds do as well speak as sayings Since therefore we see this a confirmed practice of all Christians we should be too unjust and hard if we should deny our belief With these same arguments doth that famous and learned Divine teach the Church to defend the truth against its adversaries As in the point of Infant-baptisme we suppress the bawling Anabaptists with these weapons whom we cannot smite with clear testimonies First from a parallel precept about Circumcision Secondly Apostolical practice which since it is somewhat more dark we add the custome of the whole Church from the primitive and heroical times Which things although they will not move the obstinate Anabaptists yet will they prevail with prudent obedient and equal estimators of things The Church alwayes ordained that sacred Baptisme is not to be repeated touching which prohibition we meet with nothing in the sacred Records but because Circumcision into whose place Baptisme succeeded was not repeated because it 's agreeable with reason that regeneration no less than generation should be but once because in the Scriptures examples of once sprinkling only do occurr and lastly because the Orthodox Church of God hath hitherto abhorred Anabaptisme therefore all grant that Baptisme is not to be repeated I will add no more What hath been said declares to them that despise not truth that the Lord made the day on which the Stone which the builders refused was made the head stone of the corner that on it we should rejoyce But since it is not my purpose to handle any questions on this subject but leave them to others to be discussed I will return to my undertaken task namely to enumerate the testimonies of the ancients on this particular by which it will be made manifest that the Fathers were of no other mind because they contended that this day was religiously to be observed and fetch'd the Doctrine wherein they asserted this out of the holy Scriptures To the truth of which thing we will first bring Athanasius Homil. de semente In time past with the ancients the Sabbath was of great account which solemnity the Lord translated to the Lords day neither do we set light of the Sabbath by our selves Where first he with the finger points at the author of the Lords
But yet since it 's no casie thing to obliterate and wholly to eradicate the matter of that Law which commands us to set apart a whole day within the compass of a week and refer it for Spiritual Labour therefore that sly Adversaries by his Emissaries whose wit is ready and that have a mercenary tongue for colouring Impostures changing their opinion at pleasure with the inconstant Ecebolius at the first only desputes after his crafty manner whether such a time be ordained of God These men more boldly than truly acknowledge the authority of time to be received not from Gods but Mens constitution as though the Lords-Day were like the Holy-dayes which were commanded the Romans namely such as the Praetors according to their arbitrary power did proclaim And so its observation should depend upon the civil Magistrate and Churches authority These things thus being handled after these mens will and others not strenuously applying their minds to retard the speedy course of their enterprises reasons are found out with a little ado for errour is a fruitful thing by which men not very religious and observant of piety may at last rush upon the constant sanctification of this time with unwashen hands and feet as the Proverb is and tread it under feet as if it were only instituted of God not for the sake of any Spiritual work but carnal idleness These things courteous Reader have given me occasion more narrowly to search out both the Institution and Sanctification of this time namely whether first it could be shown from the Fountain of holy Writ from whence wise men know we must always judge what is to be defined of every Divine Truth and the ancient practise of the following Church which learned it from the Apostles any part of time weekly be destined to performe the holy exercises of Religion Secondly by what Authority that time is imposed upon the Church Divine or Humane Thirdly in what things the solemn sanctifying thereof consisteth Touching all which what may be shown from the foresaid Fountains the following pages will briefly without prejudice of others judging according to truth by the grace of God inform us These are I say the things of which I have purposed to treat God assisting which before I enter on some things remain of which the Reader studihus of truth is timely to be admonished First of all though there be none of any authority and name amongst the Professors of more pure Christianity who beareth not most clear testimony to the Lords Festival yet in no case must we expect that all things which chiefly make for the illustrating it can be demonstrated out of the papers of the most approved Fathers in one age Nor can any one of right be offended or wonder at this since the reverend authority of the Fathers especially in the controversies that unhappily sprang up in their age is to be attended in weighing whereof they have professedly and openly declared what their mind was but in other things which they have touched upon only by the bye they have not so roundly shewed their judgements Besides we know there is no point of Christian Religion the illustration whereof hath not more and more increased in the Church by progress of time to effect which the succeeding Church was enforced through a certain necessity for sometimes the foolish frowardness of adversaries and sometimes the lewdly-imployed manners of their own men have required this that diverse Canons about some heads of Religion the knowledge whereof formerly increased in the Church should be appointed I believe none will deny that the most profound mystery of the Holy Trinity was known to the Christian Church from its infancy yet in several Councils of the succeeding Church diverse Canons were ordained about it The Reverend Fathers in the Council of Nice ordain that our Lord Jesus Christ is not a Creature and this they did according to Pauls word In the Council of Constantinople all profess they did believe that the Holy Ghost is true God as co-essential to God both Father and the Son In the Council of Ephesus under the Emperor Theodosius the younger the Divinity of the Son is again concluded These mysteries were illustrated by these new constitutions and yet who will be so mad as for that cause to contend they were first then known to the Church when these new Canons were set forth about them which only the Holy Fathers ordained to obviate the frowardness of Hereticks that either denyed er adulterated the received Truth that the Divine verity which the former Church embraced being obscured and held down by the wicked artifices of adversaries might be restored to its ancient vigour But not onely the madness of Hereticks but sometimes also the inordinate manners of Christians have occasioned new Canons ordaining about things formerly known for it was an usual thing for the Fathers to inquire into the manners of those Churches that were commended to their care and when they observed that their Christian people were ensnared in errour or wandring from the path of truth or at least walking not uprightly according to the received rule of piety they straightway used new Canons as medicines congruous to both these evils and so in the Church as in the Commonwealth good Laws grew out of evil manners And although the things that were before ordained were abundantly sufficient to quench those errours newly sprung up or reform their lewd manners yet either the new breaking out of errour or dilating of manners not at all consonant to the holy light of the Gospel and creeping every way like leaven were stopped by the bar of new Canons But thereupon we must not think that the former Church was not bound to the truth which was by a Postliminium established with new sanctions or to manners reformed by their authority Which is easie to be observed in this business of the Lords Day The succeeding Church through the care of the best Emperours having obtained peace established divers things about the Lords Festival which are not now extant in the Doctors of the Primitive Church But who will say that the piety established by new Canons for observing that solemnity was not known to the former Christians whenas even in the Apostles age as it shall afterwards appear from the Scriptures the Lords Day was solemnly used for all the exercises of Religion in which the true manner of keeping it holy doth consist And the Fathers of the succeeding Church ordaining new Canons about its solemnity have not concealed this as is to be seen in the second Council at Matiscon Can. 1. in which they gravely study to set forth the Lords solemnity but to this they were moved by the rash custome of some as they say who exposed the Lords day to contempt In Concil Cabilon held about the year 664. caution is taken for prohibiting Country labours on that day which thing when the Fathers did ordain they confess they did
called did occurr therefore since he tarried there but only for one Sabbath it cannot be said he preached to them on one of the Sabbath◠neither is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as divers observe ever read in the New Testament for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It follows therefore from thence necessarily that Sabbatum should be taken for the whole week and then on one or the first of the Sabbaths will be all one In which sense that phrase occurrs else where as in Mar. 16. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. very early in the morning the first day of the week as in the ninth verse of the same chapter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there the Evangelist expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. one by the first And so the Greek Fathers next the Apostles times interpreted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr Dial. cum Tryph. sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. One of the Sabbaths remaining the first of all the dayes according to number the spaces of all the dayes being run again into a circle is called the eighth and remaineth the first as it is p. 201. Chrysoft Hom. 43. in Act. Apostol expounds one of the Sabbaths by the Lords Day So Hieronymus Nor otherwise Augustine Ep. 86. One of the Sabbaths sayes he was then called that day which now is called the Lords which is more plainly found in the Gospel Some also by breaking of bread understand a private banquet not the Lords Supper of which doubt this seems to be the cause In that age the Christians meeting in the Church did sup together and also received the H. Eucharist and so both tables the common and sacred were joyned together as Chrysostom teaches Hom. 26. in 1 Cor. Upon set dayes they made common tables and when the assembly was ended after communion of the Sacraments they went to eat and drink together And hence it was as Chrysostom thinks that they Acts 20. 7. met to break common bread because when the communion was celebrated the common table followed and Chrysostom affirms in the beginning of that Hom. that the day on which they met was the Lords and that all things that there were done were joyned to preaching But the breaking of bread in the foresaid place is to be expounded of the Holy Eucharist for there were sundry there and Paul took bread not at Supper time but mid-night In that Text therefore the duties of a Christian Sabbath such are an holy assembly breaking of bread or admistration of the Lords Supper preaching of the Word devout Prayers c. are read to be performed of the Church on that day which holy duties were not performed of them on another day otherwise Paul having stayed there the space of seven dayes could not have deserred them to this day especially when he was to depart the day following neither doth Luke affirm the Apostle to have proclaimed this meeting of the Church as extraordinary because he was to depart the day after but he teacheth that the Church met namely as it was wont to break bread and not to take leave of the Apostle and St. Augustine consesses that Pauls departure was the express cause of continuing his speech because he desired sufficiently to instruct them The received custome therefore of the Church and not the blessed Apostles departure from Troas gave occasion to this assembly For he stayed there seven dayes not so much for the Eucharist as waiting for the Lords Day Whence it appears that that Text shews that the Apostolical Church kept solemnly the Lords Day in the publick exercises of Religion But upon what authority the Christians met on that day we will afterwards examine here it 's enough for me only to demonstrate that they did meet on that day The second Text out of which the celebration of the Lords Day is shown is 1 Cor. 16. 1. 2. Now concerning the collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. upon the first day of the week c. The former place taught us that the Apostle Paul did celebrate the Lords Day with the Church this that he commands it to be celebrated by the Church And his practise is not here only recorded but here is mention made of his Apostolical ordination about that thing Where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be taken distributively for upon the first day of every week In which Apostolical command nothing is commanded the Church of Corinth which is not also required of the whole Church of Christ according to the golden rule of Tertullian very profitable for understanding of the Scripture Some things saith he uttered specially are to be understood generally which rule cannot but have place in this Text because what things the Apostle writ to the Church of Corinth the same belong to all that call upon the name of Christ in every place he himself being witness 1 Cor. 1. 2. Moreover who will deny that all who have given their name to Christ are bound to relieve their necessities For you must not think sayes Chrysostom that these things were written to the Corinthians alone but to every one of us and all that shall be after us Let us do therefore as Paul prescribes us and let every one of us lay by him at home on the Lords Day the Lords riches i. to be employed for such use as the Lord hath prescribed and hereupon let it become a low and immutable custome c. Therefore in Chrysostoms judgment the Apostle applies the manner of the Church in collecting almes on the Lords Dayes for the benefit of afflicted brethren which were then at Hierusalem which office of Christian Charity although no brethren liv'd in that place ought not to be omitted of Christians but in Chrysostoms opinion is to be established by an inviolable law for ever as it was done even as it appears by Justin Martyr and Tertullians Apologies in the succeeding Church I only add this Although a general law for making collections on that day to the use of the poor be set down by the Apostle yet they that at this day do it at other times must not be judged transgressors of the Apostles law That kind of collection was not so affixed to the Lords Day as it could not be done on other dayes although a peculiar reason was in it why they did rather on that than another day namely for the Church-assemblies held at that time and no time as Chrysostom witnesseth which we shall see afterwards is more fit to perform that office on than the Lords Day Others again set to another Engine by which they oppose the usual interpretation of the Apostles foresaid phrase and contend that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie every day of the week singulam Sabbatum This they assert not because it 's the probable construction of the Apostles words but that they might
They of Asia contend it must be celebrated on the fourteenth day they of the West on the Lords day only and which is more those acknowledge their opinion received by tradition from John these from Peter and Paul This controversie Eusebius Hist l. 5. explains more at large Who therefore can be brought to believe if the festivity of the Passover was ordained by the Apostles authority that so soon divers Churches that were governed of the very Apostles Scholars would make a departure from so holy a precept and that in celebrating the Lords day all the Churches of Christ through the whole world should follow one and the same rule Why had they not also done the like in the Feast of the Passover if it had been instituted by Apostolical authority It is not likely therefore it was ordained of the Apostles And yet I cannot but wonder at the wit of some men who hold the Passovers festivity which the Scriptures are silent in for divine and yet they repute the Lords day whose observation we meet with in Scripture for Ecclesiastical and humane If therefore the Passovers festivity was instituted of the Apostles no man can justly prefer it to the Lords day ordained of Christ by his Apostles Nor must we judge otherwise of the Feast of the happy Nativity of Christ whose solemnity was anniversary but on what day of the year to be celebrated it 's uncertain Chrysostom although he conjectures Christ was born on the eighth before the Calends of January in December recites divers opinions about this matter but follows his own opinion without condemning of others and permits every one to abound in his own sense till such time as the Lord shall reveal to every one of us what must be holden for certain St. Hierom if so be that Sermon de Nativitate Domini which goes commonly under his name be Hieroms saith Whether the Lord Jesus was born to day or baptized to day a different opinion is carried about in the world and according to the variety of traditions is the sentence diverse In this authors judgement whoever he was it was uncertain what day the blessed Nativity of Christ fell out on The Learned Casaubon Exercit. ad apparat Bar. annal num 68. tells us there were of old divers opinions in the Church about Christs Nativity Some writing that he was born on the sixth of January others on the nineteenth of April others on the nineteenth of May some in the month of September most on the twenty fifth of December Now these divers opinions about these feasts which are taken for chief ones do teach us that they were ordained by no law of the Apostles otherwise in their writings without doubt we should have met with a direct assigning of the time to be set aside for keeping them in Memory as it is observed of the Lords day which yet it 's plain no where can be found Moreover if their ordination had been derived from the Apostles they had either all been equal among themselves or it had been known some way to the Church which amongst them had been of greater authority and right But the contrary appeareth from the most grave Fathers which differ from one another about this thing and therefore one is sometimes preferred before another of them Chrysostom calls the Feast of Christs Nativity the Mother of all Feasts Orat. de Philognio Gregory Nyssen calls it the holy of holies and feast of feasts Gregory Nazianzen judgeth it to be preferred far before all others that are Christs and are celebrated in honour of him Since therefore it is not agreed on amongst the Fathers of the Church of the first institution of these Festivals and their prerogatives none will doubt that their institution was not received from the Apostles Which things being supposed it can be inferred by no necessary consequence that these are to be compared much less to be preferred to the Lords day From all which it appeareth that the observation of the Lords day was far different from that of the Sabbath and other dayes because the Sabbath day amongst Christians had on it no cessation from worldly labours neither was it observed with such solemnity of the whole Church as was the Lords day yea the Sabbath is not read to be observed of the whole Church whenas yet the premises do evince that the Lords day was ever solemnized from the very Apostles age in the Church dispersed through all Nations and we have observed that other Festivals of Christs are not to be compared with much less to be equallized or preferred to the Lords Day CHAP. IV. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords Day its authority depends not on the Constitutions of Emperours when it was at first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on that day the Christians were punished for observing it What it is Dominicum agere BEtter to manifest the celebrity of the Lords Festival I will moreover bend my mind to two things by which in the first place I will demonstrate that the Lords Day all along in the Church from the very Apostles age was consecrated to perform religious exercises on Secondly that on all that day the Church was wont to be vacant from all worldly matters which two things will clearly enough shew its solemnity above all other dayes to which these things agree not amongst men that relish the truth In demonstrating the fiâ—st of these we will prove that the Lords day was alwayes celebrated and will briefly open both the reasons of its solemnity and its names which we meet with amongst the ancients Let it be sufficient to illustrate the first that there is none of any note in the ancient Church who doth not give an ample testimony to this its solemnity Amongst the renowned witnesses of this truth let St. Ignatius come forth who thus charges us Let every lover of Christ celebrate the Lords day which was consecrated to the Lords Resurrection as the Qneen and Prince i. the chief day as Constantine the Great in Euseb de vit ejus lib. 4. cap. 18. of all other dayes Justin Martyr in the end of his second Apology confesseth that on that day which they call Sunday were holden solemn assemblies of all that lived both in villages and cities and he tells us more at large what was done in those assemblies of which afterwards we shall hear more Dionysius Bishop of Corinth when he mentions Clements Epistle to the Corinthians in Eusebius saith he kept holy the Lords day Tertullian reckoneth the Lords day which he calls the eighth namely from the Creation amongst the Christians solemnities The same doth Origen although otherwise he was not at one with himself about the times for performing Religious exercises lib. 8. contra Celsum Eusebius when he speaks of the Ebionites whom he reports did observe the Lords dayes after the same
living it must altogether be ascribed to them as the first founders of the Church Moreover if it should be granted that this solemnity was instituted of the Apostles others ask Whether therefore doth this Ordination lean upon a Divine right We passing by this rather curious than sound Disputation Whether the Ordinance of the Lords day be an institution of God or his Apostles discussed by some doltish and drowsie men do acknowledge with all willingness as the ancients did that it was introduced by Divine authority And although its authority should be granted to be of Apostolical institution it would not thence follow that it is not Divine unless something be ordained in the Church by the Apostles which the Holy Ghost did not inspire them with which will not easily be admitted of any that is in his senses because the postles in all matters delivered those things to the Churches which they received from Christ as St. Paul witnesseth 1 Cor. 11. 23. and according to Christs precept taught men that embraced the Gospel to observe those things which Christ had commanded them Matth. 28. 20. So judgeth Tertullian The Apostles saith he chose nothing which they brought in at their own pleasure but faithfully appointed to the nations that discipline they received from Christ. And why should I believe that the Apostles were less acted with the Divine Spirit in their Sacred Institutions which they imposed upon the Churches than in promulgating the Doctrine of the Gospel For there is nothing Apostolical done by a right that is not Apostolical i. e. Divine and nothing done by them but the Holy Ghost endites it to them and therefore what they did they did by Divine right and that their facts which are certain and not onely their saying or writings are of Divine right cannot be denied The Apostle shews it necessary that he that is a Prophet or spiritual man must acknowledge that they are the Lords Precepts which he hath written to the Churches 2 Cor. 14. 37. Surely nothing was enjoyned the Church by the Apostles which was not first prescribed by the Lord because the Apostles were to teach what they learned of Christ which thing they performed with great faithfulness neither will any one who savours the things of the spirit deny this and yet I acknowledge that some things were instituted of them for a time inasmuch as whose occasions were singular and not to be continued wherefore those ordinations were mutable which yet cannot be affirmed of the Lords Day If there be any of the Fathers therefore who think that the institution of the Lords day was made by the Apostles they are not so to be understood as if they acknowledged it not for Divine but Humane because the same Fathers elsewhere are not affraid to ascribe it to God and Christ and they acknowledge that the blessed Apostles were not the authors of this solemnity but the Holy Ghosts amanuenses i. e. as Leo interprets it who writ their Decrees by virtue of a Divine authority in propounding it to the Church For which cause the most pious Leo hath ordained abstinence from labours on the Lords Day because this seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted thereby and confesseth that that day was abundantly honoured by the Lord. The Lords Day therefore was instituted of the Apostles as the faithful Architects of the Christian Church by extraordinary power which continues not now in the Church and by inspiration of the Holy Ghost that Christians might be obliged not by Humane but by Divine authority to keep holy Convocations and to celebrate the private exercises of godliness on that day Apostolical grace saith Ambrose hath raised up the dead which although it was not the grace of the Apostles but of Christ as the Apostles themselves confess Acts 3. 12. 16. is called Apostolical because it was poured out upon them and by his help they raised up the dead So here the Lords day is called an Apostolical Institution not because it is a mere ordinance of the Apostles as they were Christians but because it was instituted of Christ by those who were endowed with extraordinary power But as I have said this is the onely thing that vexes them that call in question the authority of this institution that there is no place extant in Scripture in which by Divine authority the solemn observation of this day seems to be enjoyned These are men of subtil wits who as the Proverb goes cannot see the wood for trees Whose opinion when I consider that in the Author Oper. Imperf in Matthae comes into my mind where the Priests of old that rail'd upon the people that paid not their tythes are sharply reproved for not reproving those that sinned against God If any of the people faith he offer not his tithes the Priests did so reprove him as if he had committed some great fault because he had not offered the tenth part of any thing though never so little but if any of the people had sinned against God or injured any one or done any such thing none cared for reproving him as though he had committed no fault who had sinned against God and very careful they were of their own gain but careless of the glory of God and salvation of men Whose fault in this thing he accommodates to the Bishops Elders and Deacons of the Church as guilty of this crime Even so must we judge of these men With what heat of mind and earnestness do the very authors of this doubt contend for tythes which they cry out that the Lord hath indulged to the Church under the Gospel by a Divine right whenas yet they cannot produce one plain testimony out of the New Testament for their bestowing on the Ministers of the Gospel but about the Lords Day whose being observed more than once by the Christian Church is plain enough in the Scriptures their faith is wavering nor can they be perswaded to believe that its authority can be demonstrated out of the Word of God Let others judge whether they be worthy Tenths who deny Sevenths if I may say so to God But for their sakes admitting the Law about Tythes I would ask this Whether it 's likely that the most good great and wise God who hath put the seasons of times in his own power Act. 1. 7. would determine any thing certain of a Salary to be bestowed on the administrators of his Worship when yet he left nothing certain in the Church of the time in which his worship should be performed It 's a wise mans part first to determine the work and a fit time to do it in and then the wages where with they that under went it are to be rewarded The Parable Math. 20. relates how the housholder hired Labourers but first he signified what he would have them do and then he agreed with them for a penny a day If therefore they assert that Tythes are allowed
rural works have been slain with Lightning others punished with contraction of their limbs others having their bodies and bones also consumed in an instant by visible fire and on a sudden resolved into ashes have died in great torment as many other terrible judgments have been and to this day are by which it is declared that God is offended at the dishonour of so great a day These tremendous judgments of God do shew that God the avenger of all sin is angry as the Fathers speak at the impious violators of this solemnity But if the holy festival of the Lords Day were not Gods own ordinance his severe anger would not be so hot upon those that are guilty of the violation thereof We therefore of right do esteem the Lords Day above other dayes and that by reason of its solemnity because it was by a positive determination of Christ by the Apostles set apart from other days in the week that it might supply the room of the ancient Sabbath that it might preserve Religion and the external Worship of God both publick lest the disorderly congregating of the people should diminish their faith in Christ and also private that all might be obliged to attend meditations and pious exercises on a certain stated day which otherwise would seldome or never be done by men attending on the world rather than God therefore is the Lords day ordained that they being at liberty from worldly things might give up themselves wholly to Divine matters Lastly It only remaineth that this question may sufficiently be satisfied Whether it be in the Churches power to abrogate the Lords Day and substitute another in its room Surely he that saith that so innocent a custome so long received of the Church and that through authority of God by the Apostles caught not to be troubled with a change seems to be in the right unless any think that now greater authority doth reside in the Church than the Apostles were endued with wherewith it being endued it can change those things which were ordained of the Apostles or unless some greater occasion than the Resurrection of Christ do occurr than which the world never saw a greater miracle And Chrysostom calls the Lords day or the first day of the week Hom. 2. Tom. 6. because of Christs Resurrection the birth day of the whole humane nature Lastly if the custome of the Church from which arguments are not once fetched by the Apostle as 1 Cor. 11. 26. grounded on the word of God be of any right amongst Christians I see not why the Lords Festival celebrared first by them of Hierusalem secondly by them of Troas thirdly by the Galatians and Corinthians fourthly by them of the Isles Rev. 1. fifthly by the Greeks and Latines and lastly by the whole Churh through the world professing Christs name I say why this innocent custome which is attended with no incommodity but much profit happily continued from the very Apostles age hitherto should not be by us derived to our posterity Whilst Julius blames the preposterous irruption of Georgius the Arrian into the Bishoprick of Athanasius he uses this argument It is not fitting that this new manner of canons should be brought into the Church for where is there such an Ecclesiastical Canon or such an Apostolical tradition so we say here It is by no means fitting that a new custome should be introduced against an innocent order so long received by the Church which is neither supported by the Canons of the Church or tradition received from the Apostles None in this found mind can grant that things ordained by the Apostles can be changed of the Church I confess all the ordinances of the Apostles were not of the same kind for some of them pertained to Doctrine some to rites as Wallaeus observes chap. 7. those are perpetual neither any wayes obnoxious to change he must be anathematized that preacheth any other Gospel than what we have received from the Apostles Gal. 1. 8. but these which respect the rites or circumstances of Divine worship are of a double nature for either their causes were singular and such as perpetually should not have place in the Church therefore these ordinances were to be varied because when the cause was taken away the ordinances themselves ceased but other ordinances respecting rites were not to be changed whose occasions perpetually continued in the Church such was the laying on of hands in the ordinations of Ministers and therefore when the causes of ordinances made by the Apostles are changed the ordinations themselves are to be changed but while the cause remains the ordinances also remain unmoved Which things being considered it 's easie to see that the ordinance about the Lords day is not to be varied because no greater cause than what it 's bottomed on can ever occurr for whose sake it should be changed neither hath the Church ever thus far since the Apostles age once attempted this Therefore the foresaid question is superfluous that I may say no worse and altogether unworthy a farther answer especially whenas we know that many priviledges necessary for a Church to be founded were granted by God to the Apostles which were not derived from them to the Doctors of the Church founded for they were personal and could not lawfully be challenged by others which is shewn more at large in the seventh chapter CHAP. XI In what things the sanctification of the Lords day doth consist Where about resting from gainful labours which the Fathers carefully cautioned against that they should not be used on that day A place of Chrysostom Gregory and the Council of Laodicea is explained also a Canon of the Council of Matiscon WE have seen by the judgment of the Fathers that the Lords Day is to be sanctified and that by Divine authority Now it remaineth which we undertook in the third place to be proved to find out in what the solemn observation thereof consisteth The Fathers think that to Christians the Lords day succeeded in place of the old Sabbath and therefore as Hilary speaketh is to be celebrated with the festivity of the Sabbath that is as August Serm. de Temp. 251. even as the ancients observed the Sabbath Now it appeareth by the Scriptures of the Old Testament that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath consisted first in the rest and secondly in the sanctification of this rest and in the observation of these things their records will inform us that the Lords day was solemnized by the ancients As for the rest the Church of Christ hath used it not as necessary of it self to the worship of God but only as an help thereto without which the worship commanded of God could not conveniently be performed of the people For while men are intangled in the affairs of this world they cannot religiously attend as is fitting on the things that pertain to God and his worship The Sabbath was not allowed for idleness but that men
no weight and in very deed is foolish since not the diligence of husbandry but the virtue of the Sun when it seems good to the bestower of fruits doth afford the abundance of fruits because I say such a law is come forth as vilisies the Lords worship and is a decree differing from those that by the Holy Ghost have gotten the victory against all their adversaries we ordain also which seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted of him that all persons cease from labour that day whereon our innocency was restored he speaks of the Lords day and let neither husbandmen nor any others go about any unlawful work on that day For if they who observed but a certain shadow and figure did so greatly reverence the Sabbath day that they wholly abstained from all labour how is it not reasonable for those who honour the light of grace and the truth it self to reverence that day which is of God enriched with honour and on which deliverance from shameful destruction was wrought for us Thus Leo Novel 54. Leon. And so according to that common Proverb The later day is scholar to the former what by too much facility which suited not with the Lords solemnity was formerly granted by them that followed who saw the inconvenience of the former liberty was afterwards amended In divers Councils also it was ordained that no rural labours should be exercised on that day as about the year 413. in one and the same year all servile and rural labours and markets are forbidden Concil Aceratensi 14. Can. 16. in Turonensi Can. 40. in Moguntino Can. 37. in Rhemensi Can. 35. in Conc. Aurelianensi 3. where they think fit to determine of rural work that is concerning husbandry or the vineyard or pruning or reaping winnowing or cutting hedge that coming to the Church they moght more easily attend upon prayer Can. 27. Also in Conc. Narbonensi cap. 4. it 's ordained that they should not yoke oxen In Concil Antisiodorensi Can. 16. It is not lawful to yoke oxen on the Lords day or to exercise other labours Also in Concil Calibonensi Can. 18. We define that none at all presume to work any rural labours on the Lords day that is to plow to reap make sale or any thing that pertains to husbandry But although these things do very abundantly shew that on the Lords dayes we are not to employ our work for gainful labour since as well they were to be punished by the supreme authority of the Prince as by the censure of the Church who did the contrary yet there are some who having no respect either to the worship of God or to the promoting mens salvation do affirm that Christians may on the Lords day safely attend any labours when the duties of the publick service are ended to establish which opinion they first wrest the authority of Hierom and them of the third Council of Orleans Hierom. in Epitaphio Paulae ad Eustochium tells us that the women returning from the Church on the Lords day with Paula were busie about their task and either made clothes for themselves or others In the Council of Orleans they determine that on the Lords day that to be lawful which was lawful before to be done only rural labours excepted Hence some gather that men are to cease from their labours no loâ—â—â—r on the Lords dayes than while collectam faciunt as Hierom there speaks But first let the Reader well weigh whether Hierom in that place may seem to speak of womens labour which they bestowed about their works on other than the Lords dayes and whether revertentes ab Ecclesia in him be the same as if he had said when they are not present at Church they are busie at work Nor doth this sense of Hierom's words want reason especially because Hierom sayes they went only to the Church on the Lords day And in another place Hierom contends that on the Sabbath he speaks to those whom Christ had made free not the Jews men should only do those things which pertain to the salvation of the soul Now if those women had on that day plied their labours they would have done somewhat that had not pertained to the souls salvation which by Hierom's judgment they should not have done And of others Hierom speaks who on the Lords dayes did only attend on Prayer and reading Epist. ad Eustochium de custodia virginit But Hierom sayes not this as if on the Lords day to attend the duties of piety had been only appropriated to the Coenobitae of whom he speaks and other Christians on that day had employed their work oâ—â—â—daily labours from which the Coenobitae ceased No by no means But the Holy Father doth distinguish the works undertaken by the Coenobitae on the Lords day from others which they undertook on the other dayes of the week on which they fell about stated works as he speaks and those being ended they attended on Prayer and reading also which thing they also did every day when they had ended their labours but on the Lords day they were intent on nothing else but the duties of piety Secondly If it should be granted that those women did attend their ordinary works on the Lords day it was proper to them onely and then what we must think of that fact appears out of St. Cyprian who while he affirms that the Aquarians did bottom on no author or will of Christ insinuateth this Doctrine to us namely that the custome of some men is not to be followed unless first we enquire whom they followed whose grave authority we may very fitly accommodate to the aforesaid women We are to consider not only what those women did but upon what authority they did it If they attended on the Lords day their daily works and labours they were invited thereunto neither by the authorities of Christ nor his holy Apostles nor the lawful practise of the Church which restrained Christians from those works And I believe no body of a sound mind will impose as a law on other mens shoulders a certain singular custome confirmed by no law or authority but contrary to the general practice of the whole Church especially when Hierom himself and other grave Fathers do conclude that nothing but the works of piety or of some emergent necessity is to be done on that day as formerly from their writings hath been observed We do with St. Austin commend a custom which is known to usurp nothing against the Catholick faith Thirdly Charles the Great in his Constitutions ordains that on the Lords day women sow not their clothes Now we prefer justly the religious ordinance of a pious Emperour depending upon various authorities of Ecclesiastical Canons to a custome of women confirmed by no antiquity Lastly I 'le only add this What if those silly women believed it to be a work of charity by the
which argument I will point at three things namely first I will shew what Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly secondly whose office it was to do this thirdly I will add something of the place out of which the Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly It is evident out of divers authors that those Scriptures were read by whose reading faith was nourished And that is thought by divers men of great name in imitation of the Jews by whom it was an ordinary thing to read Moses and the Prophets in the Synagogues every Sabbath day Acts 13. 15. and 15. 21. This custome of the Jews omitting ceremonials was not onely profitable to the Apostles who upon that occasion every where preached Christ in the Synagogues out of Moses and the Prophets Act. 13. 15. and 17. 2 3. but also was commended by the Apostles to Christians as often as the Church met namely that the writings of the old Prophets should be read and expounded by the modern Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 29. Origen also witnesseth although he be deceived in giving the cause for which this was enjoyned the Church of the Apostles that the Apostles ordained that the books of Jewish Histories should be read in Churches by the Disciples of Christ So he initio Hom. 15. in Josh Moreover there be some that gather out of 2 Cor. 8. 18. where the Apostle saith of Luke With Titus we have sent our brother whose praise is in the Gospel throughout all the Churches that not only the Scriptures of the Old Testament were wont to be read while the Apostles were alive but also of the Evangelists about the History and Sermons of Christ Where according to them we may not unfitly observe that even at that time the Gospel of Luke was wont to be read in Churches Paul is not afraid to adjure the Thessalonians that when that Epistle to them was finished it should be read to all the holy brethren 1 Thes 5. 27. and he requires the Colossians that they read the Epistle written from Laodicea and that they should cause that which he sent unto them to be read in the Church of the Laodiceans Col. 4. 16. And Eusebius out of Clement relates that Peter ordained that the Gospel of Mark was to be read in Churches So Euseb Hist l. 2. c. 4. and the same author our of Irenaeus asserteth that Matthew set forth his Gospel for the Hebrews in their own tongue while Paul and Peter preached the Word at Rome After the Apostles death the writings not only of the Prophets and Evangelists but of the Apostles themselves were read in the Church-assemblies as I have said from 1 Thes 5. and Col. 4. Justin Martyr saith that the writings of the Prophets and Apostles were read on Sunday in their assemblies Others afterwards confess the same thing Origen when he reckons up the works to be performed on the Christian Sabbath he mentions the sacred reading in their assemblies where also he speaks of Reading and Treatises and in Ex. Hom. 7. he saith The Lord alwayes rains down from Heaven namely when the holy Oracles were read as he afterwards explains it Manna on our Lords day whence he concludeth that the Christians Lords day is to be preferred to the Jewish Sabbath Tertullian confesses that the Church assembled for to remember those Divine things that were read And elsewhere amongst the Lords day solemnities he affirms that the sacred Scriptures were read de Anima c. 9. Cyprian mentions this reading Ep. 33. in which he writes to the Clergy and people of one Aurelius that was ordained a Reader of him to read the Gospel in the Church c. Eusebius acknowledges that both the Old and New Testament was read in Churches Ambros in Epist ad Soror Ep. 33. Aug. de Civitate Dei lib. 22. cap. 8. These things shew that the Scriptures both of the Old and New Testaments were read and in the fifty ninth Canon of the Council of Laodicea it is ordained that only the Canonical books should be read and in the sixtieth Canon they reckon up the names and order of Canonical Books of both Testaments The same provision is made in the 27th Canon of the Council of Carthage apud Zonar That beside the Canonical Scriptures nothing be read in the Church under the name of Divine Scripture Only they add the Books of Tobit Judith and Esther Yet this must not be concealed not only the writings of the Apostles and Prophets but of divers others who were famous for piety and of great authority in the Church were anciently read in the Church-assemblies Dionysius Corinthiacus apud Euseb reports that Clements Epistle ad Corinth was read on the Lords day Hierom. in Cat. Script Ecclesiast witnesseth that Effraemus Deacon of the Church at Edissa came to such renown that after the reading of the Scriptures his writings were publickly read in some Churches The sufferings of the Martyrs were also read upon their Feasts Concil Carthag Can. 50. But the Commentaries in which the Martyrs conflicts were described were only read over on those dayes whereon their memory was annually celebrated witness Zonaras in Concil Carthag Can. 50. And such humane writings as were read in the Church are to be understood chiefly of the Psalms and Songs which were devised of them to praise God by Eusebius mentions these lib. 5. cap. 28. and lib. 2. 17. Afterwards through the Devils subtilty tares sprung up in the Church and under pretence of these writings Hereticks sowed their false Doctrines which the Fathers in Trull Can. 2. observe in the Constitutions ascribed to Clement to which some things sorged and some things repugnant to Faith are annexed which evil that the Fathers might feasonably prevent they frequently ordained that no Books should be read in the publick Church-assembly but the Holy Scriptures much less that it ever should be safe through them that many dreams which they babled out with a rash attempt like old wife's dotages of vain-talking men should be read among the Holy Scriptures as afterwards by use it fell out because as we have seen they ordained that nothing but the Scriptures should be read in Churches Now for the order according to whose rule all reading of the Scriptures among the ancients was disposed we meet with a few things to be observed out of their Records Whether namely in the primitive Church there were selected parts of the Scriptures which they read or as it was familiar with the Jews on their Sabbath-dayes they read the Scripture in order as the Lords dayes returned till they had finished that work this I say is not certainly known onely what parts of Scripture they read they explained the same for the peoples use as the necessity of the present times did require Tertul. apo c. 39. Ambr. l. 5. ep 33. But afterwards it doth appear that there was an order observed in reading the Scriptures St. Austin mentions the order observed by
other interpreting of the law used under the former Temple besides that which the Prophets being extraordinarily called undertook Which opinion being once admitted it will not be easie to avoid the aforesaid incommodities as to any one it will appear by a more narrow search into them Unto whose conjecture we will with their good-leave oppose the authorities both of Jews and Christians in that particular being bottomed upon the Holy Scripture Flavius Josephus whom according to Cunaeus we are to believe next to the Pen-men of Holy Writ pleading the Cause of the Jews against Appion in his Apology which in the famous Cunaeus opinion is learned to a miracle in express words affirms that Moses would have us hear the Law not once or twice or oftner but he commands all men leaving their other works to meet together to hear the Law and perfectly to learn it c. Thus he And if this Ordinance of a weekly meeting to hear and learn the Law was in force in Moses age then was it long before the Babylonish Captivity While Philo Judaeus contends that the Playes and ridiculous spectacles of Fools and Dancers ought to be put away he saith that it was the manner to study Philosophy on Sabbath dayes the Prince going before and teaching what was needful to be done or spoken the rest giving ear Whereupon he also affirms that they now should play the Philosophers upon Sabbath dayes more patrio in their country manner and he acknowledgeth that Oratories in Cities were for Schools of Virtue More credit therefore is deservedly to be given to the Jewes relating their countrey customes than to other mens conjectures of them Among the Christians divers very learned men treating of the Hebrews Common-wealth have taught the same Amongst whom Carolus Sigonius de Rep. Hebraeorum l. 5. c. 10. and Cornelius Bertramus p. 96. The famous Cunaeus to whom the Christian Church is much beholden for his labours in explaining the antiquities of the Hebrews saith that the right observation of Sabbaths consisted in the holiness of all their words and deeds and in Divine worship and Prayers All which doth plainly evidence that they used to read the Law and interpret it to the peoples capacity on the Sabbath dayes otherwise neither their words nor deeds had been noted for holiness or how else could the minds of the Jews have been furnished piously to conceive Prayers on Sabbath dayes without the explaining of the Scripture Yea the Learned Cunaeus confesses that the Levites in the Synagogues did deliver to the people in the Towns of Judaea the chief knowledge of all Laws both of Humane and Divine things and when could the Levites do this with greater profit than on the Sabbath dayes In a word although we deny that at that time the Talmudical interpretation of Scripture was grown in use which we confess the ancient Church of the Jews knew nothing of yet we cannot affirm this of the vocal interpretation of the Scriptures by the Levites But to return to our purpose We find that under the Old Testament the Scriptures were read and opened in the Jews assemblie even the Holy Ghost being witness although some doubt of the period of time at which their interpretation on Sabbath dayes began As for the Churches in the New Testament planted by the Apostles they could not so long as their Peace was disturbed with a storm of Persecutions meet together without very great difficulty for which cause as we said Chap. 1. they had their meetings sometime on the night and sometimes on the day neither again was it safe for them to hold a meeting all the day For which cause Tertullian judges that it was best for Christians if the Lords dayes solemnities could not be celebrated on the day time for persecutions whereof he speaks then ought they to keep them on the night if not with every one of them yet at least with three These things teach us that the Church was not permitted in that age with safety and as often as they list to meet together on the day time to perform the exercises of piety He therefore that requires of us some one example for expounding Scripture twice while the fire of Persecution raged with which that age abounded I desire him to tell me whether the Christians did during that Persecution twice every Lords day keep their meetings For if it were safe for them to meet why may they not as well be believed to meâ—t for interpreting of Scripture and Prayer to God since these duties are joyned by the Apostle 1 Cor. 14. and observed by Cyprian as he faithfully expounded the Scriptures Especially when it was the custom of the Church so often as Scripture was read to interpret the same This we have largely enough shewn out of Justin Origen Tertullian Ambrose Augustine and other Fathers of great authority chap. 4. Since therefore in the Jewish Apostolical and other Churches succeeding the Apostles there followed after the reading of the Scriptures an exposition of them it seems necessarily to follow that if they had liberty to meet on Lords dayes then they used to treat twice out of Scripture of which there is frequent mention in their assemblies And it 's certainly evident from the continual practiâ—â— of the Church that from the very Apostles times prayers and reading were reckoned both together which were celebrated both morning and evening No man therefore can judge it unreasonable to say that there followed an interpretation of those things which were read because reading was used to instruct the people But how could the people be instructed in the Scripture read without an interpretation The Eunucâ— answered Acts 8. 31. that he could not understand what he read except some one should guide him Yea they were wont to Treat out of the Reading or Lesson as was formerly said The calamitous condition also of those times wherein so many cruel persecutions were stirred up required the same Daily exhortations were very needful to the Christians for to bear the Cross of the Gospel patiently Neither must we think that these skilful Pastours who were set over the Church by the Apostles and Apostolical men did not endeavour as often as they could to instruct the People committed to them in the matters of Faith St. Cyprian Ep. 40. professes that he was sore troubled when he could not go to and exhort every one as the Lords and his Gospel Ministry required while he was in his banishment If it were a grief to this vigilant Bishop that because being hindred by his exile he could not provoke all who were commended to his inspection and care by his holy Exhortations to piety and patience certainly when he was with his people if he took care that by a Reader the bare reading of the Gospel was recited to them although he stirred not them up by his Exhortations to practise what they had heard read he would never in very deed have thought
of mind that the State of his Kingdom waxed worse and that he fought with unhappy success against the Goths the source of so great an evil being a little more deeply sought out he reproved the Bishops which sed not with Gospel Doctrines the people committed to them who by their profligate manners stirred up the wrath of a revenging God against him to prevent which evil for the future it was ordained in a Council That the Lords day should be kept religiously The pattern of this most Christian King while the victory in this our age inclineth to the enemies perswades us devoutly to keep the L. day solemnity for which we have â—ought unsuccessfully almost these twenty years against the enemies of our liberty that have roared in the Churches of God to our great sorrow When we count the causes of this will why should we not apply our minds with Gunther amnus to bewail the heynous violation of the Lords day and with the ancient Fathers who observed that the Lords day was not reverently kept ordained That first of all the Priests then Kings and Princes and all the Faithfull should chiefly see to it that the due observation and Religious Devotion of so great a Day now in so great a part neglected be hereafter for a sign of Christianity more devoutly exhibited and that the Christian Magistrates excellency be humbly desired of the Priests that in honour and reverence of so great a Day all may be put in fear that men presume not to keep markets do their own pleasure and works on this Holy and Venerable Day For when this solemnity is either taken away or neglected there is no more hopes of the other parts of Religion than there is of the bodies safety when the head is cut off Neither can there be used a more excellent remedy for curing the other malady than the holy observation of this Festival for the zeal of Religion waxing cold and purity of holy Doctrine being obscured what will be more fit to heal errours and stirr up the languishing strength of zeal than that an entire Worship be offered up both publickly and privately to God on this day while the holy Word of God is piously preached attentively heard the Sacred Mysteries devoutly and according to Christs institution celebrated Prayers poured into the hearts of the Faithful by the Holy Ghost are with all humility offered up to God Sacred Hymns sound in the Church with a godly joy the afflicted members of Christ and the poor provided for bountifully by the rich and those that are sound in mind do mercifully comfort them that are sorrowful These are those exercises of the Lords Day which will uphold Religion when it is falling which if they be religiously observed of the Church every one seeth how great an access will be made from thence to the Christian Religion which we all profess And these are the things Most Holy Church of Christ which in this elaborate Treatise I do not utter foolishly of my self but humbly offer all things to Thee as they are taken out of the Holy Scriptures where they afforded me any light in discussing of this dispute and the lights of purer Christianity not because as sometime Chrysostome Homil. post prioris exilii reditum Thou stand'st in need of my Doctrine which indeed I acknowledge to be but small but that I might testifie my good will to thee and that at length thy natural Sons to whom Religion is both their care and their pleasure may in some sort see what works they are to attend on that Day and from what to abstain and with what authority the institution of this solemnity is supported With Gods assistance I will briefly shew from the Holy Scriptures and Fathers of better credit asserting all these things Thou hast therefore most Beloved Mother the purpose of my mind in sending forth this little work Do thou then of thy humanity to thy friends pardon the mistakes how great soever they be in collecting these things and take in good part the slenderness of my wit which endeavoured according to its power to benefit chiefly thy natural sons that sojourn in Germany which I love upon many accounts This doth he humbly ask of thee Who loves Thee and Thine with a sincere Love in Christ Theophilus Philo-kuriaces Loncardiensis AN INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS BOOK 1. THe Preface in which first is propounded the Scope of this Treatise Secondly is shewn why we meet with more things about the duties of the Lords Day in the later than in the former Councils Thirdly how far the Church at this day may be obliged by the authorities of Provincial Councils that ordain these duties although some things of lesser value be put among their Canons Fol. 1. Chapter 1. That to the solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how they were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath day 1. Chap. 2. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. and Rev. 1 10. are briefly weighed 14. Chap. 3. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The antient Christians observed the Sabbath not as an holy day the differences between the observation of the Lords day and Sabbath How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords days anciently they bowed not the knee on the Lords Day 30. Chap. 4. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords day solemnity the authority whereof depends not upon the Emperours Constitutions When it was first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on the Lords day the Christians were punished for observing it VVhat it is Dominicum agere 52. Chap. 5. The reason of observing the Lords Day It 's called the first day of the week by the Evangelists and Fathers and the Lords day Sunday also and why the Sabbath and Christian Sabbath VVhy the Fathers used so seldome the name Sabbath VVhat Synaxis may signifie with the Ancients 66. Chap. 6. The whole Lords Day is to be sanctified to God and not onely some part thereof 77. Chap. 7. The ordinance of the Lords day is not properly to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church the things ordained by the Apostles are of Divine right 90. Chap. 8. In the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world This is affirmed by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath Mention of a seventh day observed amongst the Heathen The authorities are weighed wherein the observation
meetings in those dayes when they could But the Church being wonderfully increased and daily corroborated in the Faith by the frequent preaching of the Apostles it appeareth by the History of the Apostles travels recorded by St. Luke that the Christians where-ever they lived were wont to meet upon set dayes to handle Religion to prove its truth divers examples are ready in the Acts of the Apostles and their Epistles in which the celebrating of their meetings is usually denoted by these phrases meeting together to hear the word of God Acts 13. 44. coming together to break bread Acts 20. 7. to come together 1 Cor. 11. 20. ministring to the Lord. Acts 13. 2 c. they are said sometimes to meet in the Temple Act. 2. 46. Sometimes other Christians than the Apostles were at the Jews Synagogues because there the Apostles preached Christ to the Jews and therefore other Christians also resorted thither that they might hear the Apostles teaching Act. 5. 12. That the first Christians were sometimes present at the Jews Synagogues on the Sabbath day is granted the Holy Writ being witness hereof Acts 13. 14. also Acts 17. 2. it 's said the Apostle as his manner was went in unto them and three Sabbath dayes reasoned with them out of the Scriptures c. but not to solemnize the Sabbaths after the Jewish manner from whose observation the Christians and that by authority committed to the Apostles from the Lord were far enough off especially when Paul himself could most severely reprove the Colossians and Galatians because some amongst them stood for the Sabbath and other feasts of the Jews but because they then had obtained a good occasion of communing with the Jews being met together that their readings of the Law and Prophets being finished in the Synagogues they might preach the Gospel with more fruit in such a concourse of men which upon other dayes they could not so easily obtain and for no other end as from the alledged testimonies is evident Which things let the Reader seriously weigh with himself For at what time or in what place soever they could speak with the Jews they set upon them and preached the Gospel to them Therefore both on the Sabbaths and other dayes as well in the Synagogues as when they were met other where the Apostles were not wanting amongst the Iews in the office of preaching When they had tarried certain dayes amongst the Macedonians because no fit occasion for preaching the Gospel was offered as the circumstances of that place teach which the Apostles every where greedily sought after they preached Christ on the Sabbath dayes out of the City by a River side to the women which resorted to publick Prayers according to their custome St. Paul hastened to keep the Feast of Pentecost at Ierusalem only because he might have many of the Iews living dispersedly in divers places of the world there gathered together with whom he might treat about Christ and so the preaching of the Gospel by them returning home might be made famous through the world So thinketh Chrysost who sayes What means that haste of his he speaks of Pauls hasting to the Feast it was not for the Feast but for the Multitude Afterwards he sayes He made haste to preach the word It 's granted therefore that the Apostles and other Christians in those first times were present at the Synagogues of the Iews yet although they met with them on the Sabbaths they are not read in the Scripture to meet on the Sabbath dayes apart from the Iews and by themselves Neither do we read that this was done of them with an intention to solemnize the Sabbath or have a worship common to the Iews which was not lawful to be done St. Paul sometimes disputed in Areopagus Act. 17. 19. and the Schools of the Heathen Act. 19. 9. In which the Schoolmasters were wont to explain the names genealogies fables and histories of their gods to observe their Feasts and instruct their Catechetae in their rites Yet no man will thence conclude as Mr. Eaton well observes that because he was present in their Schools he did observe the Heathens feasts and worship their gods In like manner the Apostles must not be said to have observed the Jewish Sabbath although they had divers disputations thereon as the concourse of the Iews gave them occasion Moreover if the Christians had observed the Sabbath then Justin Martyr had satisfied with little ado Trypho the Jew that counselled him to observe the Sabbath For it had been enough for Martyr to have answered the Iew that the Christian Church did observe the Sabbath Yet this he grants not but that blessed Martyr plainly denies that the Jewish Sabbath ought to be observed by the Christians The same do other Fathers against the Iews as we shall see afterwards Lastly we read not that the Apostles were alwayes at their Synagogues For it 's said Act. 19. 9. when the Iews hearts were hardned at Pauls Doctrine first Paul himself departed from them neither is he ever after read to enter into their Synagogues Besides he segregated from them the Disciples that embraced the sounder Doctrine lest as it 's in the Proverb the sick cattel should infect the sound Therefore as long as they conceived any hope of converting the Iews they neither declined their company nor Synagogues But when they observed that they rose up against the sound Doctrine of the Gospel with an obdurate heart they forthwith forsook them neither are they read in Scripture ever after to enter into their Synagogues any more CHAP. II. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. are briefly considered AFterwards when the Christians had no dealing with the Iews we read that they met by themselves in the Apostles age and that on the Lords day to exercise the offices of Piety and Divine Worship But for the period of time in which at first they held these conventions by themselves apart from the Iews there 's nothing occurrs in Scripture and divers dispute about it Passing by whose dispute it plainly appears in the Holy Scripture that the Lords day while yet the Apostles were alive was destined for the publick meeting of the Church There are three Texts of the New Testament namely Act. 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. and Apoc. 1. 10. in which there is plain mention of that dayes celebrity on whose most grave authorites the religious observation of the Lords day by the common suffrage almost of all Divines doth chiefly rest Yet all Interpreters agree not amongst themselves in their Expositions of them and no wonder since to all it is not given presently to hit upon the sense of what is delivered in the Scriptures but to some that
elude if they could the genuine interpretation received every where of the Church But whoever shall weigh with himself the blessed Apostles purpose who did studiously provide that his ordinances should not be a burden to the Churches of Christ which in those dayes for most what consisted of men of an inferiour condition will not easily admit that the Apostle did so ordain that collections should be made daily neither is it like that he should ordain that these should be gathered on every Sabbath properly so called since when the Apostle was present at Corinth the Christians could not meet in one place much less after his departure from them was it safe for them to frequent the Jewes Synagogues on the Sabbath day Let that place Act. 18. 17. be consulted Lastly neither must we believe that the Christian Corinthians did hold their publick meetings on the Sabbath day amongst themselves since they were held on the Lords dayes in every place neither is there extant any testimony in the whole Volume of the Scriptures by which it can be shown that the Christians kept Sabbath-day meetings among themselves or apart from the Jews Therefore the received Exposition of the Apostles words is to be retained namely that the Apostle did ordain in the Church of Corinth yet when they met for Religion weekly as the Lords dayes returned almes should be collected for the poors use and they seem privately to have laid aside what their condition permitted to bestow for the comfort and relief of the poor and that which was thus laid aside they kept with themselves till the first day in the week at what time they deposited it with the Rulers of the Church for the poors use He that shall more considerately weigh the Apostles phrase may well enough see this was his meaning for he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. i. against the first day in every week or when the first of every week comes so as is said amongst the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. Water ready for washing ones hands In like manner the Almes which were privately laid aside of every one were deposited on the first day of the week for the help of the needy and then when the Church met are said to be gathered because their collection was made of those who privately had laid them aside on the Lords day or or first day of the week Le◠admonished his hearers because on the Lords day there should be a Collection toprepare themselves for a voluntary devotion and that every one according to his ability might have fellowship in that most sacred oblation from which testimony one may easily gather that the Christians laid aside by themselves their Collections against the Lords day which then they deposited with the Rulers of the Church to be bestow'd Although Chrysostom thinks that the people reserved their almes laid aside on the Lords day till the Apostle himself came to whom they should be brought in but the former exposition doth more agree with the custom of the Church The third place is Rev. 1. 10. where there is had express mention of the Lords day out of which almost all Writers fetch the custome of the Lords day solemnity from the very Apostles time For the Lords day as we see is expounded by as well ancient as late Interpreters of Scripture to be the first day in the week and some new expositions of that phrase which cannot stand with the signification of the Lords day in the Evangelists themselves and some famous Writers next the Apostles age are solidly resuted by divers and therefore omitting them we set it down for a certain that in the Apostles age that I may use Ribera's words on Rev. 1. the solemnity of the Sabbath was changed into the Lords Day being consecrated by the Resurrection of our Lord. For it 's not once that it appears from Scripture that the Apostolical Church kept solemn the Lords Day by celebrating the Supper preaching the Word and collecting of Alms in which the true manner of solemnizing it doth consist Yea the history of the Apostles travels lets us know that the Christians of that time held not their ordinary meetings but upon the Lords day He that shall teach the contrary confiding in Scripture authority I will freely hear although after the Apostles death the succeeding Church in some places as afterwards we shall see kept their meeting on the Sabbath dayes In the mean time we find that the Lords day in the Apostles age the sacred records attesting the same was solemnly observed Which thing was first to be proved by us CHAP. III. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The ancients observed the Sabbath not as an holy day The differences between the observation of the Sabbath and Lords Day How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Not bowing the knees on the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords Day NOne who will diligently look into the gravest writers of the following ages shall be ignorant that after the Apostles were dead the Church did in all Nations celebrate the Lords Day which that it may more plainly be known to all we must know as I said in the first Chapter when the Apostles were translated to Heaven the number of dayes on which ordinarily the Church-meetings were had received an increase For while the Apostles were alive the Christians ordinarily held their meetings on the Lords dayes only but afterwards the ordinary time for performing the exercises of publick worship was not only weekly but anniversary that came every week this but once every year But here we will not speak of the extraordinary and anniversary festivals that were used by the succeeding Church but of the ordinary time returning every week destined for Religious exercises Where in the first place it will be for the Readers profit to consider that although the use of the Lords day spread abroad through the world in the Church of God yet in some places the Church had weekly her publick meetings on other dayes besides the Lords Socrates acknowledges the Sabbath and Lords Day for feasts returning every week on which meetings were wont to be kept Hist 6. c. 8. And elsewhere when he treats of the sundry rites of Churches l. 5. c. 22. he tells us that the Presbyters and Bishops of Cappadocia Cesaria and Cyprus did interpret the Scriptures on the Sabbath and Lords Day When Sozomen noteth the time of calling the Church together he sayes some met on the Sabbath and the day after the Sabbath Epiphanius in Panario contr Heresi lib. 3. T. 2. acknowledgeth that the Church met upon the Wednesday instead of the Sabbath and Lords Day When St. Austin shews what Christians must do when they see the customes of Churches to vary he confesses that
some do daily partake of the Lords blood and body on the Lords day which all the ancients do witness was done in the Church-assembly and others only on the Sabbath and Lords day and in other places only on the Lords day Hierom acknowledges the Christians did observe Quartam Sabbati Parasceven and the Lords day although he shews they differed from the Jews in the observation of those dayes The testimonies of the Fathers hitherto mentioned do shew that although the use of the Lords day grew every where yet the Church had in some places oftener in others more rarely their weekly meetings whereupon it seemed equal and just to some to ordain other dayes which the succeeding Church proclaimed for publick meetings to be equallized with the Lords day and that chiefly for three causes first the publick meetings of the Church were held on other dayes besides the Lords Secondly the Christians were bound to the same duties of Religion on other dayes appointed by the Church for meetings which were required by the Church on the Lords day Lastly some Feasts the Anniversary namely were more esteemed in the Church than the Lords and these things are confidently enough affirmed that they might shew if by any means they could that the original and obligation of the Lords day and other Festivals is the same both which they set forth to the world for humane but let them look to it to whom they affirm it lest they be twit with that of Ezek. 43. 8. But that the prerogatives of the Lords Day above others may more clearly appear let us by Gods help weigh of what value the reasons are with which they contend for other feasts to be equallized with the Lords day which that it may be done with plainness we will first clearly distinguish the Church-assemblies held on the Sabbath dayes from others which were held on the Lords day relying upon the gravest testimonies of the ancients then by Gods assistance we will shew the peculiar excellency of the Lords Day for the dignity whereof it is superiour to other dayes while others contend against it in vain First we affirm that excepting the Lords there was no other weekly we speak of stated and ordinary holy day with the whole Church next the Apostles We have heard in the first Chapter that the Christians met on the first day of the week and for the allegations in this chapter out of the Fathers and Historians for the observation of the Sabbath they cannot demonstrate that the Sabbath was observed by the Christian Church as an holy day which unless it be first explicated they that peruse the records of the Ancients will haply fall into a troublous matter After the Apostles death Socrates Sozomen Epiphanius Hieronymus Augustine and if there be any more say that the Church in the publick assembly did perform the duties of piety as the Sabbaths came about yet whoever shall say that the Sabbath was neither accounted holy nor equalled to the Lords day will do no wrong to the truth Who will say the Sabbath is holy when in the holy Records a tittle cannot be read of its institution or observation in the Christian Church as is of the Lords day but that the Lords day was instituted of the Apostles indued with extraordinary power and moved by the Holy Ghosts inspiration we will afterwards by the Grace of God inform you Yea let him tell who can that the Christians in the Apostles age met by themselves on Sabbath dayes which thing yet they did on the Lords dayes is apparent enough from the Scriptures but after the Apostles death I deny not that the Christians met together on Sabbath dayes although they accounted not the Sabbath holy and those assemblies were chiefly in use with the Oriental people according to some because the Jews dispersed in the Orient and accustomed to the Sabbatical solemnity could not easily be contented to be plucked from it although they observed the Lords Day which what is it else to do but brand them with Ebionism or as Baronius thinks because certain Hereticks reproached the Sabbath that the God of the Hebrews whom they called Evil rested on that day therefore they fasted on the Sabbath Contrariwise the Catholicks not Judaizing but that they might worship him as God the Father Creator of heaven and earth with a solemn celebrity said that in honour of him the Sabbath as well as the Lords day to the glory of Christ ought to be celebrated Thus they To whom Vedelius in his notes on Ignatius's tenth Epistle numb 6. doth answer Learnedly and Orthodoxly enough Or because the Sabbath hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. a regard of creation as is defined in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles But how much these kind of conjectures are to be valued that are supported with no reasons of any authority or genuine testimonies of the Fathers let others judge It 's without controversie that the Oriental Christians and others did at that time hold assemblies on the Sabbath day although upon what reasons they were chiefly moved to this it is not well enough known by the Writers of that age Yet did they not hold the Sabbath day holy The difference of the Eastern from the Western Church in observing the Sabbath teacheth this while the Oriental people kept holy day on the Sabbath most in the West fasted I say the most of them because they of Millain though in the West and divers others of the West were not attentive to fast on Sabbath dayes but dined soberly Ambrose had a custome to dine on the Sabbath Witness Paulinus Ambrose confesseth this of himself in Augustine Augustine acknowledgeth he dined on the Sabbath without superstitious vacation Ep. 86. Yet the Roman Church and some others and at length every where even they of the East fasted on the Sabbath These things about those who fasted on the Sabbath do not declare that they acknowledged it for a Feast or holy day on which fasting was altogether to be forborn according to the custome of the Church Aug. Ep. 86. and other Authors being witnesses yet that the Lords day was accounted holy at that time is granted of all Moreover the Sabbath was not every where amongst the Christians observed with that solemnity of the Church as the Lords day For the meetings were not held in the same manner on Sabbaths as on the Lords dayes Some things touching both observed out of the Fathers will shew this 1. What things are reported of Historians and others about observing the Sabbath touching gathering assemblies were not used in every Church every where For in the Churches of Rome and Alexandria the manner of meeting on the Sabbath held not Witness Sozom. Hist l. 7. c. 19. and afterwards in other Churches it grew out of use Athanasius Hom. de semente glorieth that he never medled with the Sabbath after the Jews manner namely Tertul.