Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n apostle_n church_n tradition_n 3,170 5 9.1818 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A25460 Fides Catholica, or, The doctrine of the Catholick Church in eighteen grand ordinances referring to the Word, sacraments and prayer, in purity, number and nature, catholically maintained, and publickly taught against hereticks of all sorts : with the solutions of many proper and profitable questions sutable to to [sic] the nature of each ordinance treated of / by Wil. Annand ... Annand, William, 1633-1689. 1661 (1661) Wing A3218; ESTC R36639 391,570 601

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

sedition or division to requit it will foster Heresie Hereticks do corrumpere sidem and Schisma●●cks or Separatists do disrumpere charitatem the one corrupts the Doctrine of the Church the other falls from her Communion both are fruits of the flesh and they that do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Verse ult The sin of Separation is so infectious that in Scripture we are to separate from them that so do Rom. 16.17 There is a Rule in Divinity that wil make the sin of separation to be great it is this Those sins are the greatest which are most contrary to and do most oppose the greatest of Christian vertues or graces Now they are recorded 1 Cor. 13.13 Now abideth Faith Hope and Charity but the greatest of these three is Charity Now by the Rule distrust in Gods promises or in his power is a great sin it being a sin against hope Heresie or a stout persisting in an errour is a far greater sin for it is a sin against faith and seeks to cover conceal if not to destroy the truth Now Charity is greater then either of these that follows therefore that that sin that destroys the peace of the Church untyes the Ligatures by which the whole body is compact together is the greatest but this doth the sin of Separation a thing by this age of no account yet they wil find it of great moment in the day of their Account It is a sin generally accompanied with the other lusts of the flesh viz. Hatred Varience Emulations Strife Wrath which seldome lurks long in a Corner but in time appears in the field in the habit and acts of Murtherers Ravishers Traytors and all with the voyce of Iacob pretending Godlinesse and conscience as Histories do abundantly show But to answer the Question So long as a Church makes no separation from Christ no separation is to be made from it but to keep in it is the duty and safety honour and happinesse of him that would enjoy the Communion of Saints the forgivenesse of sins the Resurrection of the body unto life Everlasting A Church separates from Christ two ways 1. When she overthrows the foundation of that Doctrine that is laid by Christ the foundation of all truth is already laid and he that goes to overthrow that may be said to turn from it Do we see a society of men whether Nationally or Domestically whether openly or secretly going in that road that thwarteth the foundation or fundamental points of Religion there must be a separation Rev. 18.4 whether it be in the adding to these fundamentals as if they were not sufficient or taking from them as if they were redundant or superfluous This made the Reformed Churches beyond Sea and the Church of England to separate from the Church of Rome which hath both taken from and added to those fundamental Truths whereupon the Church was by the Lord and his Apostles erected and builded Having to the Scriptures added some Books as the Apocrypha makes the Scriptures to be an imperfect Rule and must have Traditions to compleat it That the sense and meaning of the Scripture depends upon the Churches authority That in all matters of Controversie not the Scriptures but the Church must be the Judge They have made five Sacraments more then Christ made They have clearly blotted out the whole body of the second Commandment out of the first Table of the Law in several Books That Infants that die without Baptism are eternally separate from God except they be as it were martyred by which martyrdom they are baptized Baptismo sanguinis with their own blood They teach that men are not justified by Faith alone before God They make Saints and holy men departed assistant in the work of reconciling us to God and therefore maintain they must be prayed unto That the Doctrine of Purgatory must be believed if we would be saved That the efficacy of the Sacraments depends upon the worthiness or intention of the giver That Baptism totally abolisheth Original sin That the real fleshly body of Christ is in the Bread at the Sacrament of the Lords Supper as soon as the Priest pronounceth the words Hoc est corpus meum this is my body if he should say Corpus mea it were no Sacrament They take the Wine or keep the Cup from the Laity in that Sacrament That the wine in that Ordinance must be mingled with water that that Sacrament is profitable not only for the living but for the dead The Priest is not to bless a second marriage They baptize Bells with the very words of Baptism and by that they teach Devils are drove from the Church O Romanists great is your Faith and give them proper names That God-Fathers and God-mothers at the Font by reason of the nearness of their Spiritual Kindred are not to nor must no● marry for the seventh generation That the Pope or Bishop of Rome is the universal Head of the Church and Christs Vicar All which ●enets as they were utterly unknown to the former Bishops of Rome nor heard of in the Church of Christ for many Ages so they are for the present opposed by all the Reformed Churches abroad who have upon that account forsaken her and England hath thrown her off and separated from her and by the Champions of the several Churches hath their separation been defended By vertue of that Catholick truth 1 Tim. 6.3 If any man teach otherwise that is then the Scriptures do and consent not to wholsom words of our Lord Iesus and to the Doctrine which is accord●ng to godliness c. from such separate turn away or withdraw thy self their separation is justifiable What Paul would have Timothy in this place to do he practiseth himself in another Acts 19.9 yet probably in one and the same City was it both done by Paul and to be done by Timothy Saint Paul being in Ephesus some there were that believed his word others not but hardened their heart speaking evil of him and of the Gospel After he had preached three moneths and perswading to the things concerning the Kingdom of God he separated the Disciples he would not have those Believers that had received the Truth to be in any Church-fellowship with those that spoke against it Luther who began to rise up and take his farewell of the Church of Rome Anno 1517. being an Augustian Frier was called an Apostate answered Consitetur se esse Apostatam sed beatum Sanctum qui sidem Diabolo datam non servavit that he had only fallen back from that Covenant and Engagement he had made with Satan Not that there is a separation to be made from all the Doctrine of Rome for she holds many great mysteries of Divinity purely and soundly wherein we must and do all agree with her as Christians but he that is a true member of the Church of Rome as it now stands he must believe that the least coal in Purgatory is very
the practise of the Church was warrant enough for him to follow and obey that custome whatsoever it were and to think it good and that he would believe that the Apostles Creed was made by them such reverence I bear to the Churche tradition they are his Majesties own words untill other Authors should be certainly found out and 2. it is of all humane testimonies the greatest in respect of the Wisdome Gravity Learning Prudence Godliness of those men that lived about the first centuries and were Governours in the Church of Christ but no waies is their authority to be taken or ought to be taken as the ground of a mansfaith and assurance since it is but the testimony of men Quest. 2. Whether the Church hath power to ordain ceremonies upon her members that are not ordained by God For the cleering up of this Question wee shall premise 1. That the Church hath no power to impose any ceremonies that are in their nature impious Exe. 20.18 nor 2ly such as may cumber men and hinder them in the cheerefull execution of the essentiall parts of worship like the Jewish constitutions there is a rule against that Luke 11.46 But if the rulers of a Church impose Ceremonies which are not contradictory to the Canon of faith or rule of the Word they have a power that will defend them in their so doing and no private person in the least ought to speak against the execution of that power In generall what ever may tend or what ever in their judgements will tend 1. To the edification of the Church 1 Cor. 14.26 there is a power given to put that in Execution Let all things be done to edifying Or 2. whatever in their judgements may be comely in the Church they have a Power to put that in execution 1 Cor. 11.13 Iudge in your selves Is it comely that a Woman pray unto God uncovered By this Text whatever is by the Officers judged to be uncomely may be removed and whatever is comely in their judgements by this power may be enjoyned in to the Church Or 3. What may in their judgements be orderly or make for an uniformity they have a power to put that in execution 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things be done decently and in order Now that ceremonies of this nature may be imposed by Church officers upon her members and that lawfully and religiously may be proved in particular by these following Arguments 1. From the Apostles practice in the Church who besides other things as the changing of times and places for their assembling together and touching the administration of the Lords Supper sometimes at midnight and then at daytime we find in particular that Paul injoyned that in the Church women should be covered 1 Cor. 11.6 Which one might think a ceremony that might have been forborn And indeed in imposing of it the Apostle is not authoritative but persua●ive He leaves it to the Officers themselves and to their own judgements A ceremony possibly that gave as great offence to some coy and fine Dames as c. And so be appointed a known Tongue in the Congregation if he had been in England he would have found some to have told him that he took away their Gospell liberty in the time when strange tongues were not an unusuall gift Now from this very action we may conclude the truth of that position now under defence for by the prohibition of the one it should seem to be practised and by enjoyning the other it should seem to be neglected The former might seem a needlesse ceremony what matter were it whether women are covered or no the other might be thought in some sence hurtfull that they might not speak with those tongues which God by his Spirit that bloweth where and when it listeth did furnish them withall in the Church but the Apostles had power and they give the Officers of the Church power to rectifie that errour or in any other that in their judgments should have a tendency to the robbing of the Church of that order that ought to be in it But further 2. From the Apostles Counsells and warnings to the Officers of the Church There are generall precepts given to the Officers of the Churches which are gravidated with this power and demonstrates that they have a commission to impose such ceremonies as they shall think fit for the good of that Church whereof they are Governours Saint Paul not knowing what should befall him at Ierusalem whether he was going from Miletus sent for the Elders of the Church of Ephesus and charges them when he was gone to take heed to the Flock over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers soreseeing that grievous Wolves should enter the flock Act. 20.28 From which precept or caution given by this holy Apostle I may truly argue without offence to any that whatever these Elders thought or in their judgments supposed might tend to the good of their Churches though not particularly commanded in the Word might be injoyned by them and the church of Ephesus was bound to obey them in that particular And a sin that was or would have been in any private person to have murmured grumbled against much lesse oppose the practice of and usage of them So from that precept to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things b● done in decency and in order we may truly draw the same argument that what time was thought fittest what gesture was thought fittest by them to preach in to pray in to receive Sacraments in or to administer Sacraments in what garments what gestures to give or to receive them in might be imposed on the people of that place by the Church governours through vertue of this generall precept Moreover Paul writing to the church of Philippi with it's Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1.1 Among other directions as Bewar● of dogs beware of evill-workers chap. 3.2 comes and desires them chap. 4.8 that whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are just whatsoever things are pure whatsoever things are lovely whatsoever things are of good report Think on these things Now here is such an Epitomy of all good works as none are comparable to it It may be called an abstract of the whole Bible and this written to the Bishops and Deacons let none be offended at the name Bishop I mean no body hurt Shall it be understood that this full pithy Exhortation reached only to their own private capacity as Christians and not to their publick as Deacons without question what in their judgements were lovely and of good report if used in the Church might be commanded by those Deacons to the Church by vertue of this precept as Church officers In that Epistle to Titus Paul shews him the end of his leaving him at Crete chap. 1.5 That he should set in order the things that are wanting c. Concerning the Ordination of Elders the Apostle had given him in charge at the first but let Churches be
Churches constituted for they have no Sacraments this follows upon the former and rises morally from it where there is no Minister or authoritative Officer there can be no Sacraments they being the Seals of the Covenant of grace which is made unto believers either when they are incorporated or confirmed in the body of Christ which is the Church Ephes. 1.23 Thy are also called broad seals of heaven that of the spirit being the private by which the receiver is assured of the pardon of his sins Now to the private Christian did Christ never give the keeping of or the power of delivering those seals The People were never Lord-chancellours of these things whether singly or collectively taken therefore they cannot give nor dispence them to another Iohn the Baptist was called from God immediately to baptize so were the Apostles by Christ who Ordained none nor Baptized none but them while the Church of Christ was constituting God was pleased so to do but after the Baptists death and the Apostles call no such extraordinary acts but all must receive now that power from the hands of the Apostles by Ordination The Church may say to those men when they come to dispence the Seals Peter I know Paul I know Stephen I know Nicanor I know Timothy I know Titus I know but who are you if you say you were or are Ordained by Christ he Ordained none but his Disciples if you were Ordained by his Disciples show it by your Commission wee shal know whether Baptisme be from Heaven that we may believe or from men that we may not be mistaken in it Possibly the peoples Election and deputation is produced for this authority which is to be equally regarded as he who should come with a Commission from a mans own son for the Father to execute the power or Office of Justice of the peace which is to be scorned his Son having no power to grant such Orders or give such Offices The power of Ordination search the Scriptures was never granted to the people neither in the Old nor New testament We find indeed Micha Iudg. 17. having a House of Gods and an Ephath and a Teraphim consecrating one of his sons for a Priest though of the tribe of Ephraim of which tribe Mos●s spoke nothing touching the Priesthood He afterwards Consecrated a Levite to be his Priest verse 12. which was an Office peculiar to the Sons of Aaron not to the Levites in common but who gave Micha the power of consecration how can he consecrate any Priest at all this moved him vers 6. In those days there was no King in Israel but every man did what was right in his own eyes there being no Magistrate or Governour to keep the people in awe An Ephraimite may consecrate and offer Sacrifice and the Worship of God being contemned through the disorder of the times a Levite is forced to wander for a place and assume the Priesthood The want of Government was the cause of this and other evils that followed upon it The self-same cause is the reason of the irregularity that hath lately been in England touching Micha's even Peoples ordination of Priests which power was never given to him nor them In one thing Micha is to have his due applause he would have none to offer Sacrifice in his House a priestly Office before he were consecrated i.e. before he were ordained Priest he had read in the Law what Sacrifices Duties were appointed in the designation of men into that Office his Son nor the Levites not being of that line unto whom by a natural succession the Office belonged he saw a necessity of making them Priests for he must worship God and if they be Priests they must be consecrated he knows nor how or where to procure another ●● therefore takes the Authority to himself of Consecration And truly such Priests as he made and himself that made them and the Worship they gave by him and the gods they worshipped too were suitable to each other Even such are they though in this particular worse who will offer to design or depute any to be their Priest or Minister who are not of that line to whom by a moral Succession that Office onely belongeth by their being deputed and set apart for that Office by the Sacrifice of Prayer and Supplication and with the ceremony of Imposition of Hands by those who have received that power by Apostolical Tradition Possibly he may produce his own Gifts of Holiness Utterance Aptness to teach Courage Zeal with all other Gifts that are possible to qualifie men inwardly for that Office and indeed may shew a Call from God which he supposes ought to be sufficient to testifie that his Baptism is not of men or to demonstrate that he is a man sent from God authoritatively to teach and administer the Sacraments to his Church But the Church values not those in this nature for so Paul was qualified also and Barnabas qualified and called of God for that Office yet God will have them to be constituted authoritative teachers in the sight of the Church by the Laws that were by him appointed for the Church viz. by Ordination or Imposition of hands Act. 13.3 So Stephen Nicanor Philip c. Acts 6. were men of honest report full of the Holy ghost and wisedome yet the lowest Office in the Church cannot they neither do they offer to perform in that Ordination from the Apostles Upon this ground the Church hath reason to deny their Authority and we deny that they have power to administer Sacraments the bread that they brake is not the body of Christ the cup they offer is not the Communion of the blood of Christ shed for the remission of sins they have not received this power of the Lord because not from his Apostles of causing Bread to be by faith beheld as the body of Christ nor Wine to represent the blood of Christ. In a word let us see how or when they received power from the Apostles otherwise they must passe for counterfeits and cheats and the offence so much the more hainous as it 's a counterfeiting the Great Seal of Heaven to bring Christs Spouse and her children in an errour in matters of so g●●at concernment as the Seal of the Remission of their sins but she knows his hand and though they should come with never so much show of humility nay confirm their calling by miracles she is not she will not believe it Christ her Husband hath forewarned her that such should come and charged her not to heed them not follow them but shun them and avoid them 3. Should we Church those segregated Congregations as now constituted we must and are to un-Church all the Churches that now are or that ever have been in the Christian World They taught and teached the contrary they maintained and dyed for the contrary they walk Autipodos to one another there is a great diversity in their walking thus constituted as
or her pleasure openly expound and preach the Gospel that it was no lawfull for a Minister to have humane learning or that it was unl●wf●ll to hear such that it was and would be unlawful for Ministers to prepare themselves to preach by study that it was unlawful for a Gospel-Minister not to have some handy Trade and work in a Mechanick way for his living Ought they not since it was known to have been long used by Gods people before the Law and by his people after the Law to have told that to receive Tythes now was to deny that Christ was come in the flesh why was it not told us that the whole ●●sterity of man whether of Heathens or Christians during their Infancy are pure and holy there being no Originall sin why did not that wise Master builder lay his foundation aright and show us that to enter any into th● Church by Baptism without declaration of Faith and Repentance though born of holy parents was a sin and also if any such thing were done in the name of the holy Trinity wherein consists the essence of Baptisme with the application of the spirit which is not hindred by Infancy yet that they ought to be baptized again Why did they not inform the Church that though God was pleased to receive the Children of the Jews so far into his favour as to give them the outward sign of his Covenant with the Fathers viz. by circumcision yet would not have the Children of Christians to receive the outward sign of his Covenant with their Fathers viz. by Baptism Why did they not inform us that there were none baptized nor none should account themselves baptized except they were plunged or dipped in a River And that any member of the Church might do that why did he not tell us that it was and would be a sin for one to teach his child to say the Lords Prayer or call God father since they had no faith in Christ Why do they not shew us that to be in a place hearing his word with those that were not all holy was a great sin before God and that there should be a parity in the Church of God That no civill Magistrate hath any power at all to be command any thing to be done in the Church of God and that no Christian ought to pray in a set form and therefore that the Lords prayer was not to be used yea was as abominable unto God as Swines flesh unto a Jew as I have read some of them do however we know it is disused by them all Why was it not told us that to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper was either a vain thing or an indifferent thing or to eat it with unholy persons a sinful thing and also that any one that had gifts might administer the same or that the profit of the Sacraments depended upon the goodness or holynesse of him that gave it or did administer them These with a thousand more are the Principles that our Hereticks walke and teach by and if they be true doctrine how long hath the Church been without truth and in matters of greatest concernment as Preaching the word and Sacraments Why did not the Apostles once at least encourage Christians to persevere in Holiness upon the account of Christs comming personally to Reign upon Earth and why would they not tell that it was a decent holy seemly thing to hear a woman Preach It seems strange that neither by word nor by Epistle this was made known that any man might assume the office of the Ministry unto himself though he were not outwardly called as was Aaron why would they not tell us that Ordination was but a toy and was not to continue longer then themselves But what am I doing If these be true Churches and this Doctrine true Gospel the Apostles have been faithlesse and unjust I speak it trembling for no such thing did they ever teach but the contrary we finde them often times in the Scripture handling those very points and laies down contrary conclusions particularly Heb. 5.4 speaking of Priest-hood in generall and of Christs in particular who is the high Priest of the Gospel saies no man taketh this honour to himself but he that is called as was Aaron And that Aaron had an outward call for that Office and was deputed and set apart for that function in a publick way is clear from Ex. 29. and Levit. 9. Rom. 5.12 where the Apostle handling the infectious nature of sin maintains That by one man sin entered into the World and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all had sinned viz. by the sin of that one man I can find here no exception of Infants which if true doctrine the wisedome of God would have discovered in such an apt and proper place And truly that Infants should dye having no sin since death is the wages of sin Rom. 6 23. is a Doctrine that either charges God with unjustice or St. Paul with a falshood or at least a grosse mistake Of Baptizing of Infants we shall speak in it's own place and touching receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper with a mixed Congregation in its propper season and of Dipping when we come to the Font. Touching the peoples Ordination let the Scripture be produced that gives the people power for to set apart a Lay or Mechanick or any person and to constitute him a Church-Officer in the least Let the Scripture be produced that gives a power to a multitude so to do or that approves of a mans assuming to himself the power ministerially to teach Baptize give the Sacrament of the Lords Supper show or produce me that Scripture that gives authority to a Lay-man such a one we count him that is not Ordained by an Ecclesiastick person according to Apostolicall Tradition to bind or lose to cast out of the Church by judicial Excommunication or ●o receive in by authoritative absolution I say again let any of our ●ereticks produce me that Scripture show that text and I here promise them to renounce my Ordination forsake my calling and deny my Baptisme For I am not ignorant that the whole stream of the Scripture goes smoothly in another Channel If these or any of these be Churches then the candle hath never been upon a candlestick the City hath never been upon a hil Kings have never been her Nursing Fathers nor Queens her nursing Mothers except Iohn Buckhold alias Iohn of Layden with his fifteen Wives which Iohn being a Botcherly Taylour was by a mad crew of Anabaptists despisers and otherwise opposers of all government appointed King at Munster in Germany An 1534. where wearing Royall Robes of Embroidered work Spurs of gold Scabbards of gold and two Crowns of gold he had his Chancellours Cup-beares Carvers one holding up the holy Bible and another a naked Sword the handle whereof glistered with gold and pretious stones went before his Botcherly Majesty
that had spoken it in the Psalm the truth had not performed it so exactly in the Gosple 4 According to his pleasure were they spoken and at his good wil were they uttered by them The spirit of prophesie did not always abide upon the most holy Prophet hence Advenit Verbum Iehova The Word of the Lord came is a usual phrase among the Prophets Elisha was a man of God and yet the Lord had hid the Shanamites grief from him 2 Ki. 4.2 When he put it in their mouths then they spoke and not before they were his words for untill he spoke to their hearts their mouthswere shut up end they remained silent till the Word of the Lord came there was neither voice nor hearing in truth what he spoke they uttered and when he was pleased to be silent they were forced to be mute 5. The prophesies did but open a passage for him and the whole of them had a tendency to him the Law in all its Ceremonies and in all its precepts doth but lead us conduct us point out Christ unto us it hath no Language in it but Christ in it's Condemning power it is a harsh School-master to drive us to Christ Gal. 3.24 The Gospel hath the self same end viz. To bring us to Christ he stands as it were between both Testaments the Prophets behinde him Call but to touch the hem of his garment and come under the skirt of his apparel the Apostles before him call upon men to imbrace him in their arms by faith joyfully and he himself in their mouth utters but what he delivered in person Come unto me all ye that labour Mhtth. 11.28 6. They are his words in respect of that power and that Commission he gave to holy men to write and teach them he gave the Apostles power to preach and a Commission to teach all Nations Matth. 28.19 It was he that took the Apostles from their other Callings and gave them authority to teach what ever he had commanded They did nothing untill he gave that power and assoon as they received their authority from him they began that heavy though holy Imployment 7. In regard of the publication and promulgation of them whatever was spoken was spoken in the name of the Lord all was preached in the name of Christ they desired to know nothing more then Christ they called upon men to believe in Christ they baptized in the name of Christ not by their own power or holiness but in the name of Iesus Christ of Nazareth did they work their miracles Acts 3.6 It follows then that the whole Scriptures in what way soever delivered whether by vision inspiration dreams by signs by voice by writing by Urim and Thummim by men or by Angels by Prophets or Apostles for God spoke divers ways to our Fathers Heb. 1.1 All of it and every part of that All is the word of Christ which we must have to dwell in us for the words are Imperative Imperativo praceptionis a duty that we are to avoid then and shun him that would seek to turn us from the Faith of that word here enjoyned The Apostle is pleased to call the Scriptures the word of Christ rather then the word of God for this probable reason At this time these Coloss●ans were infected and in danger to be drawn to the old Rites and Ceremonies of the Jewish Church by self-seeking men who desired them to look back to the word wherein indeed these things were written Col. 2.16 but now since he exhorts them to the studie of the word of Christ he foresees and knows that by the word of Christ they shall learn that all those Ceremonies were but as shadows and since Christ is come not binding for which cause he chooseth rather to call it the word of Christ that those Hereticks might not take any advantage to corrupt them which they might have done if he had said the word of God From this we might draw many inferences we shall at this time collect two one concerning the Ministers of Christ the other to all the Professors of Christ. 1. Concerning the Ministers of Christ. Let them not hereafter be afraid of man nor of the son of man let them be bold to say to any offender Non licet tibi with Iohn the Baptist It is not lawfull for thee Mat. 14.4 Let their faces be strong against the faces of men their foreheads strong against their foreheads that they be not dismayed at their looks Ezekiel 3.8 9. the word is not theirs but the Lords Let the word of God be spoken with boldness Acts 4.31 Christ speaks as one that had authority Matth. 7.29 and he hath given authority and power to his servants to charge men to their duty 1 Tim. 6.17 where God threatens sin they must not be afraid to pronounce punishment The Lord God hath spoken who can but prophesie Amos 2.8 As they are to preach it with Authority so let them study it constantly where shall the Ambassadors of the most High know the will of their great Master but here Till Christ come let them give attendance to reading A Minister must be a man apt to teach 2 Tim. 2.24 And it s this alone that can fit him for that function In these lyeth the substance and matter of their Commission therefore they must be looked into studied upon 2. To all the Professors of Christ to all that name the name of Jesus let them freely hear me touching these two particulars 1. Let none of them trust believe or depend upon any new or immediate Revelation for his happiness there are in this Age many that trust to those raptures of the Spirit as they call them and will have no other word dwell in them then that word that the Spirit within suggests within casting aside and refusing the Scriptures as useless and unnecessary because a word without But I hope you have not so learned Christ. We shall carry a small time upon the search of that Spirit pretended to trying it by the Scriptures the touchstone of truth and we shall see if those breathings of the Spirit be different from the blasts of the Prince of the power of the Ayr that rules in the children of disobedience 1. It doth not those things that the Spirit of God should do not to insist upon particulars there were three general Acts that Christ promised his Spirit at his coming should perform unto Believers and this Spirit that goes abroad in this Age performs none of them as may appear by a rehearsal of the severall acts themselves 1. Was to bring to remembrance what ever Christ had spoken Ioh. 14.26 This was to be his work then and his work with all believers is the same now what Christ hath taught what Christ hath spoken is the Spirit to bring to remembrance which he will send That Spirit therefore that teacheth and puts that in the minds of men which Christ never spoke cannot be that spirit sent of