the outward Calamities that befel the Nation nor the sins of the generality of the People could destroy this Church-State but it continued its Right and exercise unto the Time of Reformation And if it be not so if there be not Causes and Means of the infallible continuance of the Gospel Church-State unto the Consummation of all things the time expresly allotted unto their continuance then was the work of Moses more honourable more powerful and effectual in the Constitution of the Church-State under the Old Testament than that of Christ in the Constitution of the New For that Work and those Institutions which had an efficacy in them for their own infallible continuation and of the Church thereby throughout all Generations must be more Noble and Honourable than those which cannot secure their own continuance nor the Being and State of the Church thereon depending Nothing can be more derogatory unto the Glory of the Wisdom and Power of Christ nor of his Truth and Faithfulness than such an Imagination We shall therefore enquire into the Causes and Means of the continuation of this Church-State and therein shew the certainty of it as also disprove that which by some is pretended as the onely means thereof when indeed it is the principal Argument against their perpetual continuation that can be made use of 1. The Essence and Nature of the Church instituted by the Authority of Jesus Christ was always the same from the Beginning that it continues still to be But as unto its outward Form and Order it had a double State and it was necessary that so it should have from the Nature of the thing it self For 1 The Church may be considered in its Relation unto those extraordinary Officers or Rulers whose Office and Power was antecedent unto the Church as that by vertue whereof it was to be called and erected 2 With respect unto ordinary Officers unto whose Office and Power the Church essentially considered was antecedent for their whole Work and Duty as such is conversant about the Church and the Object is antecedent unto all Acts about it The first State is ceased nor can it be continued For these Officers were constituted 1 By an immediate call from Christ as was Paul Gal. 1.1 2. which none now are nor have been since the decease of them who were so called at first 2 By extraordinary Gifts and Power which Christ doth not continue to communicate 3 By Divine Inspiration and infallible Guidance both in preaching the Word and appointing things necessary in the Churches which none now pretend unto 4 By Extensive Commission giving them Power towards all the World for their Conversion and over all Churches for their Edification Of these Officers in their distinction into Apostles and Evangelists with their Call Gifts Power and Work I have treated at large in my Discourse of Spiritual Gifts The State and Condition of the Church with respect unto them is utterly ceased and nothing can be more vain than to pretend any Succession unto them in the whole or any part of their Office unless men can justify their claim unto it by any or all of these things which concurred unto it in the Apostles which they cannot do But it doth not hence follow that the Church State instituted by Christ did fail thereon or doth now so fail because it is impossible that these Apostles should have any Successors in their Office or the Discharge of it For by the Authority of the Lord Christ the Church was to be continued under Oâ—dinary Officers without the Call Gifts or Power of the others that were to cease Under these the Church State was no less Divine than under the former For there were two things in it 1 That the Offices themselves were of the Appointment of Christ And if they were not so we confess the Divine Right of the Church-State would have ceased The Office of the Apostles and Evangelists was to cease as hath been declared and it did cease actually in that Christ after them did call no more unto that Office nor provided any Way or Means whereby any one should be made Partaker of it And for any to pretend a Succession in Office or any part of their Office without any of those things which did constitute it is extream Presumption It is therefore granted that if there were not other Offices appointed by the Authority of Christ it had not been in the Power of man to make or appoint any unto that Purpose and the Church-State itself must have ceased But this he hath done Eph. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 12.28 2 That Persons were to be interested in these Offices according unto the Way and Means by him prescribed which were not such as depended on his own immediate extraordinary actings as it was with the former sort but such as consisted in the Churches acting according to his Law and in Obedience unto his commands This Church-State was appointed by the Authority of Christ. The Direction which he gave in his own Person for Addresses unto the Church in case of Scandal which is an obliging Institution for all Ages Mat. 18.17 18 19 20. proves that he had appointed a Church-State that should abide through them all And when there was a Church planted at Jerusalem there were not only Apostles in it according to its first State but Elders also which respected its second State that was approaching Act. 15.23 The Apostles being in Office before that Church State the Elders ordained in it So chap. 11.30 And the Apostles ordained Elders in every Church Act. 14.23 Tit. 1.5 1 Tim. 5.17 whom they affirmed to be made so by the Holy Ghost Act. 20.28 The Churches to whom the Apostle Paul wrote his Epistles were such all of them under the Rule of ordinary Officers Phil 1.1 Rules and Laws are given for their Ordination in all Ages Tit. 1. 1 Tim. 3. And the Lord Christ treateth from Heaven with his Churches in this State and Order Rev. 1st 2d 3d. He hath promised his presence with them unto the Consummation of all things Mat. 28.20 chap. 18.20 and assigned them their Duty until his Second Coming 1 Cor. 11.26 with other Evidences of the same Truth innumerable Our Enquiry therefore is Whereon the Continuation of this Church-State unto the end of the World doth depend what are the Causes What are the Means of it whence it becomes infallible and necessary I must only premise that our present Consideration is not so much de facto as unto what hath fallen out in the World unto our Knowledge and Observation but de jure or of a Right unto this Continuation And this is such as makes it not only lawful for such a Church-State to be but requires also from all the Disciples of Christ in a way of Duty that it be always in actual Existence Hereby there is a warrant given unto all believers at all times to gather themselves into such a Church-State and a Duty imposed on them so
3. This therefore is that which he opposeth namely that there was a Deviation in various degrees and falling of from the Original Institution Order and Rule of the Church until it issued in a fatal Apostasie This is that which on the present Occasion must be further spoken unto For if this be not true I confess there is an end of this contest and we must all acquiesce in the State Rule and Order that was in the Church of Rome before the Reformation But we may observe something yet farther in the Vindication and Confirmation of this Truth which I acknowledge to be the Foundation of all that we plead for in point of Church Reformation As 1. That the Reasons and Arguings of the Doctor in this Matter the Necessity of his Cause compelling him thereunto are the same with those of the Papists about the Apostacy of their Church in Faith Order and Worship wherewith they are charged namely when where how was this Alteration made who made opposition unto it and the like When these Enquiries are multiplyed by the Papists as unto the whole Causes between them and us he knows well enough how to give satisfactory Answers unto them and so might do in this particular unto himself also but I shall endeavour to ease him of that trouble at present Only I must say that it is fallen out somewhat unexpectedly that the Ruins of the principle Bulwark of the Papacy which hath been effectually demolished by the Writings of Protestants of all sorts should be endeavoured to be repaired by a Person justly made eminent by his Defence of the Protestant Religion against those of the Church of Rome 2. But it may be pleaded that although the Churches following the first Ages did insensibly degenerate from the Purity and simplicity of Gospel Faith and Worship yet they neither did nor could do so from an Adherence unto and abiding in their Original constitution or from the due Observation of Church Order Rule and Discipline least of all could this happen in the Case of Diocesan Episcopacy I Answer 1. That as unto the Original of any thing that looks like Diocesan Episcopacy or the Pastoral Relation of one Person of a distinct order from Presbiters unto many particular compleat Churches with Officers of their own with Power and Jurisdiction in them and over them unto the Abridgement of the exercise of that Right and Power unto their own Edification which every true Church is entrusted withal by Jesus Christ it is very uncertain and was introduced by insensible Degrees according unto the effectual working of the Mistery of Iniquity Some say that there were two distinct Orders namely those of Bishops and Presbyters instituted at first in all Churches planted by the Apostles But as the contrary may be evidently proved so a supposition of it would no way promote the cause of Diocesan Episcopacy until those who plead for it have demonstrated the State of the Churches wherein they were placed to be of the same nature with those now called Diocesan Wherefore this Hypothesis begins generally to be deserted as it seems to be by this Author Others suppose that immediately upon or at or after the Decease of the Apostles this new Order of Bishops was appointed to succeed the Apostles in the Government of the Churches that were then gathered or planted But how when or by whom by what Authority Apostolical and Divine or Ecclesiastical only and humane none can declare seeing there is not the least footstep of any such thing either in the Scripture or in the Records that remain of the primitive Churches Others think this new Order of Officers took its occasional Rise from the Practice of the Presbyters of the Church at Alexandria who chose out one among themselves constantly to preside in the Rule of the Church and in all matters of Order unto whom they ascribed some kind of Preheminence and Dignity peculiarly appropriating unto him the namâ— of Bishop And if this be true as unto matter of Fact I reckon it unto the Beginnings of those less harmful Deviations from their Original Constitution which I assigned unto Primitive Churches But many Additions must be made hereunto before it will help the Cause of Diocesan Episcopacy What other occasions hereof were given or taken what Advantages were made use of to promote this Alteration shall be touched upon afterwards 2. Why may not the Churches be supposed to have departed from their original Constitution Order and Rule as well as from their first Faith and Worship which they did gradually in many successive Ages until both were utterly corrupted The Causes Occasions and Temptations leading unto the former are to the full as pregnant as those leading unto the latter For 1. There was no vicious corrupt disposition of Mind that began more early to work in Church Officers nor did more grow and thrive in the Minds of many then Ambition with desire of Preheminence Dignity and Rule It is not to be supposed that Diotrephes was alone in his Desire of â—reheminence nor in the irregular actings of his unduly â—ssumed Authority However we have one signal Instance in him of the Deviation that was in the Church with him from the Rule of its Original Constitution For he prevailed so far therein as by his own single Episcopal Power to reject the Authority of the Apostles and to cast them out of the Church who complyed not with his humour How effectually the same Ambition wrought afterwards in many others possessing the same Place in their Churches with Diotrephes is sufficiently evident in all Ecclesiastical Histories It is far from being the only Instance of the Corruption of Church Order and Rule by the Influence of this Ambition yet it is one that is pregnant which is given us by Amâ—rose for saith he Ecclesia ut Synagoga Seniores habuâ—â— quorum sine consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia quod qua neglâ—gentia obsoleverit nescio nisi forte doctorum desidia aut magis superbia dum soli volunt aliquid videri In 1. ad Timoth. cap. 5. It seems there was some alteration in Church Rule and Order in his Time whose Beginning and Progress he could not well discover and trace but knew well enough that so it was then come to pass And if he who lived so near the Times wherein such Alterations were made could not yet discover their first Insinuation nor their subtle Progress it is unreasonable to exact a strict account of us in things of the same nature who live so many Ages after their first Introduction But this he judgeth that it was the Pride or Ambition of the Doctors of the Church which introduced that Alteration in its Order Whereas therefore we see in the Event that all Deviations from the Original Constitution of Churches all Alterations in their Rule and Order did issue in a compliance with the Ambition of Church Rulers as it did in the Papal Church and this Ambition was signally noted
any others that he was pleased to make use of therein For as he took it on himself as his own work to build his Church and that upon himself as its foundation so he employed his Apostles to act under him and from him in the carrying on that work unto perfection But what was done by them is esteemed to be done all by himself For 1 It was immediately from him that they received Revelations of what did belong unto this Church-State and what was to be prescribed therein They never did neither jointly nor severally once endeavour in their own Wisdom or from their own Invention or by their own Authority to add or put into this Church-State as of perpetual Use and belonging unto it as such either less or more any one thing greater or less whatever It is true they gave their Advice in sundry cases of present Emergencies in and about Church Affairs They gave direction for the due and orderly Practice of what was revealed unto them and exercised Authority both as unto the Ordination of Officers and the Rejection of obstinate sinners from the Society of all the Churches but to Invent Contrive Institute or Appoint any thing in the Church and its State which they had not by immediate Revelation from Christ they never attempted it nor went about it And unto this Rule of proceeding they were precisely obliged by the express words of their Commission Mat 28.19 20. This I say is so plainly included in the Tenor of their Commission and so evident from all that is divinely recorded of their Practice that it will admit of no sober Contradiction In what others think it meet to do in this kind we are not concerned 2 The Authority whereby they acted in the Institution of the Church in its Order whereon the Consciences of all Believers were obliged to submit thereunto and to comply with it in a way of Obedience was the Authority of Christ himself acted in them and by them They every where disclaim any such Power and Authority in themselves They pleaded that they were only Stewards and Ministers not Lords of the Faith or Obedience of the Church but helpers of its Joy yea the Servants of all the Churches for Christ's sake And hereon it follows that what is recorded of their Practice in their Institution ordering or disposing of any thing in the Church that was to be of an abiding continuance hath in it the obliging Power of the Authority of Christ himself Wherefore if the distinction that some make concerning the Apostles namely that they are to be considered as Apostles or as Church-Governours should be allowed as it is liable to just exceptions yet would no Advantage accrew thereby unto what is pretended from it For as what they did appointed and ordered in the Church for its constant observation as Apostles they did it by immediate Revelation from Christ and in his Name and Authority so what in distinction from hence as Church Governours they did or ordered they did it only by a due Application unto present occasions of what they had received by Revelation But as they were Apostles Christ sent them as his Father sent him and he was so sent of the Father as that he did stand and feed in the Strength of the Lord in the Majesty of the Name of the Lord his God Micah 5.4 So did they feed the Sheep of Christ in his Strength and in the Authority or Majesty of his Name 5. Christ therefore alone is the Author of the Gospel-Church-State And because this is the only Foundation of our Faith and Obedience as unto all that we are to believe do and practise by vertue of that Church-State or in Order thereunto the Scripture doth not only plainly affirm it but also declares the Grounds of it why it must be so and whence it is so as also wherein his doing of it doth consist 1. Three things amongst others are eminently necessary in and unto him who is to constitute this Church State with all that belongs thereunto And as the Scripture doth eminently and expresly ascribe them all unto Christ so no man nor all the men of the World can have any such Interest in them as to render them meet for this work or any part of it The first of these is Right and Title He who institutes this Church-State must have Right and Title to dispose of all men in all their Spiritual and Eternal Concernments as seemeth Good unto him For unto this Church-State namely as it is purely Evangelical no man is obliged by the Law of Nature nor hath any Creature power to dispose of him into a condition whereon all his Concernments Spiritual and Eternal shall depend This Right and Title to the Sovereign Disposal of Mankind or of his Church Christ hath alone and that upon a treble account 1 Of Donation from the Father He appointed him the Heir of all things Heb. 1.2 3. He gave him Power over all Flesh. Joh. 17.2 Especially he hath given unto him and put into his absolute disposal all those who are to be his Church ver 6. 2 By vertue of Purchase he hath by the price of his most precious Blood purchased them unto his own Power and Disposal He purchased his Church with his own Blood Act. 20.28 which the Apostle makes the Ground of that care which ought to be had of it And this is pleaded as a sufficient Reason why we should be wholly at his Disposal only and be free from any Imposition of men in things Spiritual 1 Cor. 7.23 Ye are bought with a Price be ye not the Servants of men The Purchase of this Right and Title was one great end of the principal Mediatory Acts of Christ. Rom. 14.9 10. For to this end c. 3 Of Conquest For all those who were thus to be disposed by him were both under the Power of his Enemies and were themselves Enemies unto him in their Minds He could not therefore have a Sovereign Right unto their Disposal but by a double Conquest namely first of their Enemies by his Power and then of themselves by his Word his Spirit and his Grace And this twofold Conquest of his is fully described in the Scripture Whereas therefore there is a Disposal of the Persons that are to belong unto this Church-State as unto their Souls Consciences and all the eternal Concernments of them by an indispensible Moral Obligation to a compliance therewithal until men can manifest that they have such a Right and Title over others and that either by the especial Grant and Donation of God the Father or a Purchase that they have made of them unto themselves or Conquest they are not to be esteemed to have either Right or Title to institute any thing that belongs unto this Church-State And it is in vain pretended as we shall see more afterwards that Christ indeed hath appointed this Church-State in general but that he hath appointed no particular Form of Churches or
entertained pleasing Dreams of Thrones Preheminencies Chief Sees secular Grandeur and Power nor framed so many Laws and Canons about these things turning the whole Rule of the Church into a Worldly Empire For such it was that as of all the Popes which ever dwelt at Rome there was never any pretended or acted a greater Zeal for the Rule and Government of the Church by the Laws and Canons that it had made for that End than Gregory the 7 th so if ever there were any Anti-Christ in the World as there are many Anti-Christs he was one His Luciferian Pride his Trampling on all Christian Kings and Potentates his horrible Tyranny over the Consciences of all Christians his abominable Dictates asserting of his own God-like Soveraignty his Requiring all men on the pain of Damnation to be sinful Subjects to God and Peter that is himself which his own Acts and Epistles are filled withal do manifest both who and what he was Unto that Issue did this Power of Law or Canon making for the Honour and Dignity of Church Rulers at length arrive 3. Let the Constitution of the Church by Jesus Christ abide and remain let the Laws for its Rule Government and Worship which he hath recorded in the Scripture be diligenty observed by them whose Duty it is to take Care about them both to observe them themselves and to teach others so to do and we know full well there will be no occasion given or left unto the least Confusion or Disorder in the Church But if men will be froward and because they may not make Laws themselves or keep the Statutes made by others will neglect the due Observation and Execution of what Christ hath ordained or will deny that we may and ought in and for the due Observation of his Laws to make use of the inbred Light of Nature and Rules of common Prudence the Use and Exercise of both which are included and enjoyned in the Commands of Christ in that he requires a Compliance with them in the way of Obedience which we cannot perform without them I know of no Relief against the Perpetuity of our Differences about these things But after so much Scorn and Contempt hath been cast upon that Principle that it is not lawful to observe any thing in the Rule of the Church or Divine Worship in a constant Way by vertue of any humane Canons or Laws that is not prescribed in the Scripture if we could prevail with men to give us one single Instance which they would abide by wherein the Rules and Institutions of Christ are so defective as that without their Canonical Additions Order cannot be observed in the Church nor the Worship of God be duly performed and it shall be diligently attended unto Allow the General Rules given us in the Scripture for Church-Order and Worship to be applied unto all proper Occasions and Circumstances with Particular Positive Divine Precepts Allow also that the Apostles in what they did and acted in the Constitution and Ordering of the Churches and their Worship did and acted it in the Name and by the Authority of Christ as also that there needs no other means of affecting and obliging our Consciences in these things but only that the Mind and Will of Christ be intimated and made known unto us though not in the form of a Law given and promulgated which I suppose no men of sober Minds or Principles can disallow and then give an Instance of such a Deficiency as that mentioned in the Institutions of Christ and the whole Difference in this matter will be rightly stated and not else But to return from this Digression 2dly The Scripture doth not only ascribe this Authority unto Christ alone but it giveth Instances of his Vse and Exercise thereof which comprize all that is necessary unto the Constitution and Ordering of his Churches and the Worship of them 1 He buildeth his own House Heb. 3.3 2 He appointeth Offices for Rule in his Churches and Officers 1 Cor. 12 5. Rom 12.6 7 8. 3 He gives Gifts for the Administrations of the Church Ephes. 4.11 12 13. 1 Cor. 11 12. 4 He gives Power and Authority unto them that are to Minister and Rule in the Church c. which things must be afterwards spoken unto 3dly As unto this Constitution of the Gospel-Church-State the Scripture assigneth in an especial manner Faithfulness unto the Lord Christ Heb. 3.3 4 5. This Power is originally in God himself It belongs unto him alone as the great Soveraign of all his Creatures Unto Christ as Mediator it was given by the Father and the whole of it intrusted with him Hence it follows that in the Execution of it he hath respect unto the Mind and Will of God as unto what he would have done and ordered with respect whereunto this Power was committed unto him And here his Faithfulness takes place exerted in the Revelation of the whole Mind of God in this matter instituting appointing and commanding all that God would have so ordained and nothing else And what can any man do that cometh after the King Hereunto there is added on the same Account the Consideration of his Wisdom his Love and Care for the good of his Church which in him were ineffable and inimitable By all these things was he fitted for his Office and the work that was reserved for him so as that he might in all things have the Preheminency And this was to make the last and only full perfect compleat Revelation of the Mind and Will of God as unto the State Order Faith Obedience and Worship of the Church There was no Perfection in any of these things until he took this work in hand Wherefore it may justly be supposed that he hath so perfectly stated and established all things concerning his Churches and Worship therein being the last Divine Hand that was to be put to this Work and this his Hand Heb. 1.2 3. that whatever is capable of a Law or a Constitution for the use of the Church at all times or is needful for his Disciples to observe is revealed declared and established by him And in this Persuasion I shall abide until I see better Fruits and Effects of the Interposition of the Wisdom and Authority of men unto the same Ends which he designed than as yet I have been able in any Age to observe The substance of the things pleaded may for the greater Evidence of their Truth be reduced unto the ensuing Heads or Propositions 1. Every Church-State that hath an especial Institution of its own giving its especial kind supposeth and hath respect unto the Law and Light of Nature requiring and directing in general those things which belong unto the Being Order and Preservation of such Societies as that is That there ought to be Societies wherein men voluntarily joyn together for the solemn Performance of Divine Worship and joynt walking in obedience before God that these Societies ought to use such means for their own
Church and nothing else But it was the Will of God that there should be all those things in the Gospel Church-State also or else why do men contend about them And if this were the Will of God if they were not all revealed appointed prescribed legalized by Christ where is his Faithfulness in Answer to that Moses But no Instance can be given of any Defect in his Institutions that needs any supplement to be made by the best of men as unto the end of constituting a Church-State Order and Rule with rites of Worship in particular 4. How it is derogatory unto the Glory of the Scripture as unto its Perfection shall be elsewhere declared 8. There is no more required to give Authority obliging the Consciences of all that do believe unto any Institution or Observation of Duty or Acts of Rule in the Church but onely that it is made evident in the Scripture to be the Mind and Will of Christ. It is not necessary that every thing of this Nature should be given out unto us in form of a Law or precise Command in express words It is the Mind and Will of Christ that immediately affects the Consciences of Believers unto Obedience by what way or means soever the knowledge of it be communicated unto them in the Scripture either by express words or by just consequence from what is so expressed Wherefore 9. The Example and Practice of the Apostles in the Erection of Churches in the Appointment of Officers and Rulers in them in directions given for their Walking Order Administration of Censures and all other holy things are a sufficient Indication of the Mind and Will of Christ about them We do not say that in themselves they are Institutions and Appointments but they infallibly declare what is so or the Mind of Christ concerning those things Nor can this be questioned without a denial of their Infallibility Faithfulness and Divine Authority 10 The Assertion of some that the Apostles took their Pattern for the State and Rule of the Churches and as unto divers Rites of Worship from the Synagogues of the Jews their Institutions Orders and Rules not those appointed by Moses but such as themselves had found out and ordained is both temerarious and untrue In the pursuit of such bold Conjectures one of late hath affirmed that Moses took most of his Laws and Ceremonies from the Aegyptitians whereas it is much more likely that many of them were given on purpose to alienate the People by Prohibitions from any compliance with the Aegyptians or any other Nation whereof Maimonides in his Mene Nebuchim gives us sundry Instances This Assertion I say is rash and false For 1 As unto the Instances given for its confirmation who shall assure us that they were then in use and practice in the Synagogues when the Apostles gave Rules unto the Churches of the New Testament We have no Record of theirs not one word in all the world of what was their way and practice but what is at least 250 years younger and later than the writings of the New Testament and in the first of their writings as in them that follow we have innumerable things asserted to have been the Traditions and Practises of their Forefathers from the days of Moses which we know to be utterly false At that time when they undertook to compose a new Religion out of their pretended Traditions partly by the Revolt of many Apostates from Christianity unto them especially of the Eliâ—nites and Nazarenes and partly by their own Study and Observation coming to the knowledge of sundry things in the Gospel Churches their Order and Worship they took them in as their own undeniable Instances may be given hereof 2 Wherein there is a real coincidence between what was ordained by the Apostles and what was practised by the Jews it is in things which the light of Nature and the general Rules of the Scripture do direct unto And it is dishonourable unto the Apostles and the Spirit of Christ in them to think or say that in such things they took their Pattern from the Jews or made them their example Surely the Apostles took not the Pattern and Example for the Institution of Excommunication from the Druids among whom there was some things that did greatly resemble it so far as it hath its Foundation in the light of Nature CHAP. III. The Continuation of a Church-State and of Churches unto the end of the world what are the Causes of it and whereon it depends THAT there was a peculiar Church-State Instituted and appointed by Christ and his Apostles acting in his Name and Authority with the infallible guidance of his Spirit hath been declared But it may be yet farther enquired whether this Church-State be still continued by Divine Authority or whether it ceased not together with the Apostles by whom it was erected There was a Church-State under the Old Testament solemnly erected by God himself And although it was not to be absolutely perpetual or everlasting but was to continue onely unto the time of Reformation yet unto that time its continuation was secured in the Causes and means of it The Causes of the continuation of this Church-State unto its appointed period were two 1. The Promise of God unto Abraham that he would keep and preserve his Seed in Covenant with him until he should be the Heir of the World and the Father of many Nations in the coming of Christ whereunto this Church-State was subservient 2 The Law of God it self and the Institutions thereof which God appointed to be observed in all their Generations calling the Covenant the Statutes and Laws of it perpetual and everlasting that is never to cease to be abrogated or disannulled until by his own Soveraign Authority he would utterly change and take away that whole Church-State with all that belonged unto its Constitution and Preservation 2. The Means of its continuance were three 1 Carnal Generation and that on a twofold account For there were two Constituent Parts of that Church the Priests and the People the continuation of each of them depended on the priviledge of Carnal Generation For the Priests were to be all of the Family of Aaron and the People of the Seed of Abraham by the other Heads of Tribes which gave them both their foundation in and Right unto this Church-State And hereunto were annexed all the Laws concerning the Integrity Purity and Legitimacy of the Priests with the certainty of their Pedegree 2 Circumcision the want whereof was a bar against any advantage by the former Priviledge of Generation from those two Springs and hereby others also might be added unto the Church though never with a Capacity of the Priesthood 3 The Separation of the People from the rest of the World by innumerable Divine Ordinances making their Coalition with them impossible From these Causes and by these Means it was that the Church-State under the Old Testament was preserved unto its appointed season Neither
Example of the Primitive Churches that succeeded unto those which were planted by the Apostles themselves and so may well be judged to have walked in the same way and Order with them And that which we alledge is That in no approved Writers for the space of 200 years after Christ there is any mention made of any other Organical visibly professing Church but that only which is Parochial or Congregational A Church of any other Form State or Order Papal or Oecumenical Patriarchal Metropolitical Diocesan or Classical they know not Neither Name nor thing nor any of them appear in any of their Writings Before I proceed unto the Confirmation of this Assertion by particular Testimonies I shall premise some things which are needful unto the right understanding of what it is that I intend to prove by them As 1. All the Churches at first planted by the Apostles whether in the greatest Cities as Jerusalem Antioch Corinth Rome c. or those in the meanest Villages of Judea Galilee or Samaria were as unto their Church-State in Order Power Priviledge and Duty every way equal not Superior or Inferior not ruling over or subject unto one another No Institution of any Inequality between them no Instance of any Practice Supposing it no Direction for any compliance with it no one word of intimation of it can be produced from the Scripture nor is it consistent with the nature of the Gospel Church-State 2. In and among all these Churches there was one and the same spirit one Hope of their Calling one Lord one Faith one Baptism whence they were all obliged mutually to seek and endeavour the Good and Edification of each other To be helpful to one another in all things according unto that which any of them had received in the Lord. This they did by Prayer by Advice and Counsel by Messengers sent with Salutations Exhortations Consolations supplies for the Poor and on all the like occasions By these means and by the exercise of that mutual Love and Care which they were obliged unto they kept and preserved Vnity and Communion among themselves gave a common Testimony against any thing that in Doctrine or Practice deviated from the Rule and Discipline of Christ. This Order with Peace and Love thereon continued among them until Pride Ambition Desire of Rule and Preheminence in Diotrephes and a multitude of the same spirit with him began to open a door unto the entrance of the Mystery of Iniquity under pretence of a better Order than this which was of the appointment of Christ. 3. It must be acknowledged that notwithstanding this Equality among all Churches as unto their State and Power that there were great Differences between them some real and some in Reputation which not being rightly managed proved an Occasion of evil in and unto them all For Instance 1. Some were more eminent in spiritual Gifts than others As this was a Priviledge that might have been greatly improved unto the Honour of Christ and the Gospel yet we know how it was abused in the Church of Corinth and what Disorders followed thereon so weak and frail are the best of men so liable unto Temptation that all Preheminence is dangerous for them and often abused by them which I confess makes me not a little admire to see men so earnestly pleading for it so fearlesly assuming it unto themselves so fiercely contending that all Power and Rule in the Church belongs unto them alone But 2. Reputation was given unto some by the long abode of some of the Apostles in them Of this Advantage we find nothing in the Scripture But certain it is it was much pleaded and contended about among the Primitive Churches yea so far until by Degrees Disputes arose about the Places where this or that Apostle fixed his Seat which was looked on as a Preheminence for the present and a security for the future But yet we know how soon some of them degenerated from the Church Order and Discipline wherein they were instructed by the Apostles see Rev. chap. 2. and 3. 3. The Greatness Power Fame or Civil Authority of the Place or City where any Church was planted gave it an Advantage and Priviledge in Reputation above others And the Churches planted in such Cities were quickly more numerous in their Members than others were unless men strictly kept themselves unto the force of Primitive Institutions it was very hard for them to think and Judge that a a Church it may be in a small Village or Town in Galilee should be Equal with that at Hierusalem or at Antioch or afterwards at Rome itself The Generality of men easily suffered themselves to be persuaded that those Churches were advanced in State and Order far above the other obscure poor Congregations That there should be a Church at Rome the Head City of the world was a Matter of great Joy and Triumph unto many and the Advancement of it in Reputation they thought belonged unto the Honour of our Religion Howbeit there is not in the Scripture the least regard expressed unto any of these things of place number or possibility of outward splendor either in the Promises of the Presence of Christ in and with his Churches or in the Communication of Power Priviledges unto them Yet such an improvement did this foolish Imagination find that after those who presided in the Churches called in the principal Cities had tasted of the sweetness of the bait which lay in the Ascription of a Preheminence unto them they began openly to claim it unto themselves and to usurp Authority over other Churches Confirming their own Usurpation by Canons and Rules until a few of them in the Council of Nice began to divide the Christian world among themselves as if it had been been Conquered by them Hence proceeded those shameful contests that were among the greater Prelates about their Preheminency and hence arose that Pretence of the Bishops of Rome unto no less a Right of Rule and Dominion over all Christian Churches than the City had over all the Nations and Cities of the Empire which being carried on by all sorts of evil Artifices as by downright Forgeries shameless Intrusions of themselves impudent laying hold of all Advantages unto their own exaltation prevailed at length unto the utter ruine of all Church Order and worship There is no sober History of the rise and growth by several Degrees of any City Commonwealth or Empire that is filled with so many Instances of ambitious seeking of Preheminence as our Church stories are By this Imagination were the generality of the Prelates in those dayes induced to introduce and settle a Government in and among the Churches of Christ answering unto the Civil Government of the Roman Empire As the Civil Government was cast into National or Diocesan or Provincial in less or greater Divisions each of which had its Capital City the place of the Residence of the chief Civil Governour so they designed to frame an Image of
Anâ—yra in Galatia about the year 314 Can. 13. and mention is again made of them in a Synod of Antioch An. 341. and somewhat before at the Council of Neocaesarea Can. 13. and frequently afterwards as any one may see in the late Collections of the antient Canons I verily believe nor can the contrary be proved but that these Chorepiscopi at first were as absolute and compleat in the Office of Episcopacy as any of the Bishops of the greater Cities having their name or denomination from the places of their Residence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not for an intimation of any inferiority in them unto other City-Bishops But so it came to pass that through their poverty and want of Interest their Ministry being confined unto a small Country-Parish perhaps through a comparative meanness of their Gifts or Abilities the City-Bishop claimed a Superiority over them and made Canons about their Power the bounding and exercising of it in Dependance on themselves For a while they were esteemed a degree above meer Presbyters who accompanyed or attended the Bishop of the City-Church in his Administrations and a degree beneath the Bishop himself in a posture never designed by Christ nor his Apostles Wherefore in process of time the name and thing were utterly lost and all the Country-Churches were brought into an absolute subjection unto the City-Church something being allowed unto them for Worship nothing for Rule and Discipline whereby the first state of Churches in their Original Institution sacredly preserved in the first Centuries was utterly lost and demolished I shall add but one Argument more to evincâ— the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches herein namely that they were only particular Congregations and that is taken from the Duties and Powers ascribed in the Scripture unto Churches and the Members or entire Brotherhood of them It was observed before that the Epistles of the Apostles were written all of them unto the Body of the Churches in contradistinction unto their Elders Bishops or Pastors unless it were those that were written unto particular persons by name And as this is plain in all the Epistles of Paul wherein sometimes distinct mention is made of the Officers of the Church sometimes none at all so the Apostle John affirms that he wrote unto the Church but that Diotrephes who seems to have been their Bishop received him not at once rejecting the Authority of the Apostle and overthrowing the liberty of the Church which example was diligently followed in the succeeding Ages Joh. Epist. 3. ver 9. And the Apostle Peter writing unto the Churches on an especial occasion speaks distinctly of the Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 2. See also Heb. 13.24 the body of the Epistle being directed to the Body of Churches Wherefore all the Instructions Directions and Injunctions given in those Epistles as unto the exercise of power or the performance of duty they are given unto the Churches themselves Now these are such many of them as cannot be acted or performed in any Church by the Body of the People but that which is Congregational only It were too long here to insist on particulars it shall be done elsewhere and it will thence appear that this Argument alone is sufficient to bear the weight of this whole Cause The Reader may if he please consider what Representation hereof is made in these places compared together Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. Act. 1.12 23 Chap. 2.1 42 44 46. Chap. 5.11 12 13. Chap. 11.21 22 25 26 28 29 30. Chap. 12.5 12. Chap. 14.26 27. Chap. 15.1 2 3 4 6 12 13 22 23 27 28 30. Chap. 20.28 Rom. 15.5 6 14 25 26. Chap. 16.1 17 18. 1 Cor. 1.4 5. Chap. 5. throughout Chap. 12.4 7 8 9 11 15 18 28 29 30 31. Chap. 14. throughout Chap. 16.10 11. 2 Cor. 3.1 2 3. Chap. 7.14 15. Chap. 8.22 23 24. Chap. 2 6 7 8 9 10 11. Chap. 8.5 Ephes. 2.19 20 21 22. Chap. 5.11 12. Gal. 6.1 Philip. 2.25 26 27 28. Colos. 1.1 2. Chap. 2.3 Chap. 3.16 Chap. 4.9 12 16 17. 1 Thes. 5.11 12 13 14. 2 Thes. 3.6 7 14 15. Heb. 12.13 Chap. 10.24 25. Chap. 12.15 16. In these I say and other places innumerable there are those things affirmed of and ascribed unto the Apostolical Churches as unto their State Order Assemblies Duties Powers and Priviledges as evinces them to have been only particular Congregations CHAP. VI. Congregational Churches alone suited unto the ends of Christ in the Institution of his Church HAving given an account of that State and Order of the Gospel-Churches which are of Divine Institution it is necessary that we declare also their suitableness and sufficiency unto all the ends for which the Lord Christ appointed such Churches For if there be any true proper end of that nature which cannot be attained in or by any Church-state in this or that form it must be granted that no such form is of Divine Appointment Yea it is necessary not only that such a state as pretends unto a Divine Original be not only not contradictory unto or inconsistent with such an end but that it is effectually conducing thereunto and in its place necessary unto that purpose This therefore is that which we shall now inquire into namely whether this State and Form of Gospel-Churches in single Congregations be suited unto all those ends for which any such Churches were appointed which they must be on the account of the wisdom of Jesus Christ the Author and Founder of them or be utterly discarded from their pretence Nor is there any more forcible Argument against any pretended Church-state Rule or Order than that it is obstructive unto the Souls of men in attaining the proper ends of their whole Institution What these ends are was in general before declared I shall not here repeat them or go over them again but only single out the consideration of those which are usually pleaded as not attainable by this way of Churches in single Congregations only or that at least they are not suited unto their Attainment The first of these is Mutual Love among all Christians all the Disciples of Christ By the Disciples of Christ I intend them and them only who profess Faith in his Person and Doctrine and to hear him or to be guided by him alone in all things that appertain unto the Worship of God and their living unto him If there are any called Christians who in these things choose other guides call other Ministers hear them in their appointments we must sever them from our present consideration though there are important Duties required of us towards them also But what is alledged is necessary unto the constitution of a true Disciple of Christ. Unto all those his great command is Mutual Love among themselves This he calls in an especial manner his Commandment and a new Commandment as for other Reasons so because he had given the first absolute great Example of it in himself as also discovered
lies therein To assert this expresly would be to exalt him above Jesus Christ at least to give him power equal unto his though really unto the Institution of the Gospel Church state and the Communication of Graces Offices and Gifts to make it useful unto its end no less than all power in Heaven and Earth be required Some plead that there is no certain Form of Church-Government appointed in the Scripture that there was none ordained by Christ nor exemplifyed by the Apostles and therefore it is in the power of the Magistrate to appoint any such form thereof as is suited unto the publick Interest It would seem to follow more evidently that no Form at all should by any be appointed for what shall he do that cometh after the King what shall any one ordain in the Church which the Lord Christ thought not meet to ordain And this is the proper inference from this consideration Such a Church-Government as men imagine Christ hath not appointed therefore neither may men do so But suppose that the Lord Christ hath appointed a Church-state or that there should be Churches of his Disciples on the Earth let them therein but yeild Obedience unto all that he hath commanded and in their so doing make use of the light of nature and rules of common prudence so as to do it unto their own edification which to deny to be their duty is to destroy their nature as created of God trusting in all things unto the conduct of the promised Divine Assistance of the Holy Spirit if any instance can be given of what is wanting unto the compleat state and Rule of the Church we shall willingly allow that it be added by the Civil Magistrate or whosoever men can agree upon as was before declared If it be said there is yet something wanting to accommodate these Churches and their Rule unto the state of the Publick Interest and Political Government under which they are placed whereon they may be framed into Churches Diocesan and Metropolitical with such a Rule as they are capable of I say 1. That in their Original Constitution they are more accommodated unto the Interest of all righteous Secular Government than any Arbitrary moulding them unto a pretended meetness to comply therewithal can attain unto This we have proved before and shall farther enlarge upon it if it be required And we find it by experience that those Additions Changes and Alterations in the State Order and Rule of the Churches pretended for the end mentioned have proved the cause of endless Contentions which have no good aspect on the publick peace and will assuredly continue for ever so to be 2. It is granted that the Magistrate may dispose of many outward concerns of these Churches may impart of his favour to them or any of them as he sees cause may take care that nothing falls out among them that may occasion any publick disturbance in and by itself may prohibit the publick exercise of Worship Idolatrous or Superstitious may remove and take away all Instruments and Monuments of Idolatry may coerce restrain and punish as there is occasion persons who under pretence of Religion do advance Principles of Sedition or promote any Forreign Interest opposite and destructive to his Government the welfare of the Nation and the Truth of Religion with sundry things of the like nature And herein lies an ample field wherein the Magistrate may exercise his power and discharge his duty It cannot well be denyed but that the present pretences and pleas of some to reduce all things in the practice of Religion into the power and disposal of the Civil Magistrate are full of offence and scandal It seems to be only a design and contrivance to secure Mens secular Interests under every way of the profession of Christian Religion true or false which may have the advantage of the Magistrates Approbation By this device Conscience is set at liberty from concerning itself in an humble diligent enquiry into the mind of God as unto what is its duty in his Worship And when it is so with the Conscience of any it will not be much concerned in what it doth attend unto or observe What is in Divine things done or practised solely on the Authority of the Magistrate is immediately and directly Obedience unto him and not unto God Whatever therefore the Supreme Power in any place may do or will be pleased to do for the accommodation of the outward state of the Church and the exercise of its Rule unto the Political Government of a People or Nation yet these two things are certain 1. That he can form erect or institute no new Church-state which is not ordained and appointed by Christ and his Apostles by vertue of his Authority and what he doth of that nature appoint is called a Church only equivocally or by reason of some resemblance unto that which is properly so called 2. To dissent from what is so appointed by the Supreme Power in and about the State Form Rule and Worship of Churches whatever other evil it may be charged with or supposed liable unto can have nothing in it of that which the Scripture condemns under the name of Schism which hath respect only unto what is stated by Christ himself That which in this place we should next enquire into is what these particular Churches themselves may do by their own voluntary consent and act in a way of Association or otherwise for the accumulation and exercise of a power not formally inherent in them as particular Churches but I shall refer it unto the Head of the Communion of Churches which must be afterwards spoken unto CHAP. VIII The Duty of Believers to joyn themselves in Church-Order UNto some one or other of those particular Congregations which we have described continuing to be the ground and pillar of Truth it is the duty of every Believer of every Disciple of Christ to joyn himself for the due and orderly observation and performance of the commands of Christ unto the glory of God and their own edification Matth. 28.18 19 20. This in general is granted by all sorts and Parties of men the grant of it is the ground whereon they stand in the management of their mutual fewds in Religion pleading that men ought to be of or joyn themselves unto this or that Church still supposing that it is their Duty to be of one or another Yea it is granted also that Persons ought to chuse what Churches they will joyn themselves unto wherein they may have the best advantage unto their Edification and Salvation They are to chuse to joyn themselves unto that Church which is in all things most according to the mind of God This it is supposed is the Liberty and Duty of every Man for if it be not so it is the foolishest thing in the world for any to attempt to get others from one Church unto another which is almost the whole business of Religion that some think
things not Corruptive or Destructive of this Rule do differ from us But saith our Author the sense according to Dr. O. is this that those who are agreed in the Substantials of Religion should go on and do their Duty without regarding lesser Differences Abate that Expression of without regarding lesser Differences which is not mine and supply in the room of it mutually forbearing each other in lesser Differences and be it so that it is my sense at first veiw it looks as like the sense of the Apostle as any man need desire But saith the Doctor this sense is uncertain because it sets no bounds to Differences and supposeth the continuance of such Differences among them which he designed to prevent by perswading them so often in this Epistle to be of one Mind Besides the Differences then on foot were none of the smaller Differences of Opinions but that which they differed about was urged on the one hand as necessary to Salvation and opposed on the other as pernicious and destructive unto it And again pag. 169. Let Dr. O. name any other smaller Differences of Opinions which might be an occasion of the Apostle's giving such a Rule of mutual Forbearance I Answer briefly 1. The sense is very certain because it gives the due bounds unto the Differences supposed namely such as concern not the substantials of Religion 2. It doth suppose the continuance of these Differeâ—ces because the Apostle doth suppose the same if any one be yet otherwise Minded which hinders no kind of endeavours to compose or remove them 3. The Differences intended were not those between them who imposed the Observation of the Law on the Gentiles as necessary unto Salvation and those by whom they were opposed for the Apostle gives no such Rules as this in that Case 4. I do expresly assign those lesser Differences which the Direction here is applicable unto namely those between the blind sort of Jews mentioned before and the Gentile Believers which the Apostle states and applies the same Rule unto Rom. 14. What remaines in Answer unto this second Enquiry doth proceed on Mistaken Suppositions and concerns not the Case under Consideration Pag. 170. He proceeds unto his last Enquiry which indeed is alone pertinent unto his Purpose namely How this Rule hath an Influence on our Case What this Rule is concerning which this Enquiry is made he doth not declare Either the precise Signification of the Rule in this Place or the Direction given with respect unto that Rule may be intended that is the general Rule of our Walking in our Profession of the Gospel or the especial Rule given by the Apostle with respect thereunto in the case under consideration may be so intended If by the Rule in the first sense he understands a Rule Canon or Command Establishing a Church state with Rites and Modes of Worship with Ceremonies Orders and Government no where appointed in the Scripture or of divine Revelation it is openly evident that there was no such Rule then that no such is here intended but that only whereunto the Grace of the Gospel in Mercy and Peace is annexed as Gal. 6.16 which is not such a Rule If he intend by it a Direction that where there are different Apprehensions in Matters of less importance not breaking in on the Analogy of Faith accompanied with different Practises so far as they are necessary from those different Apprehensions the Major Part of those among whom the Differences are should compel the Minor to forbear their Practise according unto their Apprehensions and comply with them in all things on all sorts of Penalties if they refuse so to do it will be hard to find such a Direction in these Words Yet this must be the Rule and this the Direction â—hat can give any countenance unto the Doctor 's Cause But if by this Rule the Analogie of Faith as before described be intended and the Direction be to walk according to it with mutual Forbearance and Love as unto things of lesser Moment then this Rule hath little advantagious Influence into it But then saith the Doctor so far as men agree they are bound to joyn together as to Opinion or Communion I grant it though it be not proved from this Place where such a Communion is required of them regularly and in a way of Duty And 2 Saith he That the best Christians are bound to unite with others though of lower Attainments and to keep within the same Rule No doubt Howbeit the Apostle speaks of no such things in this place but only that we should all walk according unto the same Rule in what we have all attained Yea but 3 This Rule takes in all such Orders which are lawful and judged necessary to hold the Members of a Christian Society together What Rule doth this Who shall appoint the Orders intended Who shall judge of their Necessity Are they of the Institution of Christ or his Apostles Are they determined to be necessary in the Scripture the Rule of Faith if so we are agreed But if by these Orders he intends such as men do or may at any time under pretence of Church Authority invent and impose as necessary making Alterations in the Original State and Rule of the Châ—rch as also in its Worship and Discipline it will be strange to me if he can find them out either in the Rule here mentioned or the Dirâ—â—tion given with reference unto it seeing such a Practice seems to be plainly condemned in the Words thâ—â—selves And it is known that this pretended Power of Rule or Canon making for the Unity of the Church was that which at length ruined all Churches in their State Order and Worship if such a Ruine be acknowledged to have befallen them in the Roman Apostasie He therefore Objects out of my Discourse pag. 171. Let the Apostles Rule be produced with any probability of Proof to be his and we are all ready to subscribe and conform unto it To which he replies This is the Apostles Rule to go as far as they can and if they can go no farther to sit down quietly and wait for further Instruction and not to break the Peace of the Church upon present dissatisfaction nor to gather new Churches out of others upon supposition of higher attainments Answ. 1. Upon a supposition that those who make and impose these new unscriptual Orders are the Church and that as the Church they have Authority so to make and impose them if this be not the Rule of the Apostle I believe some men judge it ought so to have been But 2. The Apostle's Rule is not that we should go as far as we can as though there were any thing of Dispute and Difficulty in the Matter but that so far as we have attained we should walk according to the same Rule 3. He doth not intimate any thing about breaking the Peace of the Church but only what would do so by an Imposition on one another in
much concern'd My Words are Vindic. p. 41. Though many Alterations were before that time introduced into the Order and Rule of the Churches yet it appears that when Cyprian was Bishop of the Church of Carthage that the whole Community of the Members of that Church did meet together to determine of things that were of their common Interest according unto what was judged to be their Right and Liberty in those dayes I thought no man who is so Conversant in the Writings of Cyprian as our Author apparently is could have denied the Truth hereof nor do I say it is so done by him onely he takes occasion from hence to discourse at large concerning the state of the Church at Carthage in those dayes in Opposition to Mr. Cotton who affirms that there was found in that Church the express and lively lineaments of the very body of Congregational Discipline Herein I am not concern'd who do grant that at that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Order and Rule of the Church but that the People did meet together unto the Determination of things of their common Interest such as were the choice of their Officers and the readmission of them into the Fellowship of the Church who had fallen through infirmity in time of Persecution or publick offences and divisions is so evident in the Writings of Cyprian wherein he ascribes unto them the right of choosing Worthy and of rejecting Unworthy Officers and tells them that in such Cases he will do nothing without their consent that it cannot be gain-said But hereon he asketh where I had any Reason to appeal to St. Cyprian for the Democratical Government of the Church which indeed I did not do nor any thing which look'd like unto it And he addes that they have this Advantage from the appeal that we do not suppose any Deviation then from the Primitive Institution whereas my words are Positive that before that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Rule and Order of the Church such things will partiallity in a Cause and aiming at Success in Disputation produce M. Cotton affirms that the lineaments of the Congregational Discipline are found in that Church that there is therein a just Representation of an Episcopal Church that is I presume Diocesan because that alone is unto his purpose It is not lawful to make any Church after the time of the Apostles the Rule of all Church State and Order nor yet to be absolutely determined in these things by the Authority of any man not divinely inspired And yet I cannot but wish that all the three parties dissenting about Church Order Rule and Worship would attempt an agreement between themselves upon the Representation made of the state of the Church of Carthage in the dayes of Cyprian which all of them lay some claim unto although it will be an Abridgement of some of their pretensions It might bring them all nearer together and it may be all of them in some things nearer to the Truth for it is Certain 1. That the Church of Carthage was at that time a particular Church There was no more Church but one in that City Many occasional Meetings and Assemblies in several places for Divine Exercises and Worship there were But stated Churches with Officers of their own Members peculiarly belonging unto them Discipline among them such as our Reverend Author doth afterwards affirme and describe our Parochial Churches to be there were none nor is it pretended that there were 2. That in this one Church there were Many Presbyters or Elders who ruled the whole Body or Community of it by common Advice and Counsel whether they were all of them such as laboured in the Word and Doctrine with the Administration of the Sacraments or attended unto Rule only it doth not appear But that they were many and such as did not stand in any peculiar Relation unto any part of the people but concur'd in common to promote the Edification of the whole Body as Occasion and Opportunity did require is evident in the account given of them by Cyprian himself 3. That among those Elders in that one Church there was one peculiarly called the Bishop who did constantly preside amongst them in all Church affairs and without whom ordinarily nothing was done as neither did he any thing without the advice of the Elders and consent of the People How far this may be allowed for Orders sake is worth consideration of Divine institution it is not But where there are many Elders who have equal interest in and right unto the rule of the whole Church and the Administration of all Ordinances it is necessary unto Order that one do preside in their meetings and consultations whom custom gave some preheminence unto 4. That the people were ruled by their own consent and that in things of greatest importance as the choice of their Officers the casting out and the receiving in of lapsed members had their suffrage in the determination of them 5. That there was no Imposition of Liturgies or Ceremonies or any humane invention in the Worship of God on the Church or any members of it the Scripture being the sole acknowledged Rule in Discipline and Worship This was the state and order of the Church of Carthage in those days and although there were some alterations in it from the first divine Institution of Churches yet I heartily wish that there were no more difference amongst us then what would remain upon a supposition of this state For what remains of the Opposition made unto what I had asserted concerning Congregational or particular Churches I may referre the Doctor and the Reader unto what hath been farther pleaded concerning them in the preceding discourse nor am I satisfied that he hath given any sufficient answer unto what was before alledged in the vindication but hath passed by what was most pregnant with Evidence unto the Truth and by a mistake of my mind or Words diverts very much from the state of the Question which is no other but what I laid down before yet I will consider what is material in the whole of his Discourse on this subject SECT 5. p. 234 He says I affirm that as to the matter of fact concerning the Institution of Congregational Churches it seems evidently exemplyfied in the Scripture for which I referre the Reader unto what is now again declared in the confirmation of it And he adds The matter of Fact is that when Churches grew too big for one single Congregation in a City then a new Congregational Church was set up under new Officer with a separate power of Government that is in that City But this is not at all the matter of Fact I do not say that there were originally more particular Churches then one in one City I do grant in the words next quoted by him that there is not express mention made that any such Church did divide it self into more Congregations with new Officers But this
which hath been various And it is meerly from a spirit of Contention that some call on us or others to produce express Testimony or Institution for every Circumstance in the Practice of Religious Duties in the Church and on a supposed failure herein to conclude that they have Power themselves to Institute and Ordain such Ceremonies as they think meet under a Pretence of their being Circumstances of Worship For as the Directive Light of Nature is sufficient to guide us in these things so the obligation of the Church unto it makes all stated Additions to be useless as on other accounts they are noxious Such things as these are the Times and Seasons of Church Assemblies the Order and Decency wherein all things are to be transacted in them the bounding of them as unto the number of their Members and places of Habitation so as to answer the ends of their Institution the multiplication of Churches when the number of Believers exceeds the Proportion capable of Edification in such Societies what especial Advantages are to be made use of in the Order and Worship of the Church such as are Methods in Preaching Translations and Tunes of Psalms in singing Continuance in publick Duties and the like the things themselves being divinely instituted are capable of such general Directions in and by the Light of Nature as may with ordinary Christian Prudence be on all occasions applied unto the Use and Practice of the Church To forsake these Directions and instead of them to invent ways modes forms and ceremonies of our own which the things whereunto they are applied and made use of in do no way call for require or own as it is with all humanely invented Stated Ceremonies and thereon by Laws and Canons to determine their precise observation at all times and seasons to be one and the same which is contrary to the very nature of the Circumstances of such Acts and Duties as they are applyed unto their use in the mean time unto the general end of edification being as indemonstrable as their necessity unto the Duties whereunto they are annexed is also It is that which hath no warranty either from Divine Authority or Christian Prudence This respect of the Gospel Church-State unto the Light of Nature the Apostle demonstrates in his frequent Appeals unto it in things that belong unto Church-Order 1 Cor. 7.29 33.7 chap. 9.7 chap. 11.14 15 16. chap. 14.8 9 10 11. ver 32 33. ver 40. And the like is done in sundry other places And the Reasons of it are evident 2. But such is the especial Nature and condition of the Evangelical-Church-State such the Relation of it unto the Person and Mediation of Jesus Christ with all things thereon depending such the Nature of that especial Honour and Glory which God designs unto himself therein things that the Light of Nature can give no Guidance unto nor direction about And moreover so different and distant from all that was before ordained in any other Church-State are the Ways Means and Duties of Divine Worship prescribed in it that it must have a peculiar Divine Institution of its own to evidence that it is from Heaven and not from Men. The present State of the Church under the New Testament the Apostle calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 7.11 It s Perfection its Consummation that perfect State which God designed unto it in this World And he denies that it could be brought into that State by the Law or any of the Divine Institutions that belonged thereunto Heb. 7.19 chap. 9.9 chap. 10.1 And we need go no farther we need no other Argument to prove that the Gospel-Church-State as unto its especial nature is founded in a peculiar Divine Institution For it hath a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a perfect consummate State which the Law could not bring it unto though itself its Ordinances of Worship its Rule and Policy were all of Divine Institution And herein doth its Excellency and Preference above the legal Church-State consist as the Apostle proves at large To suppose that this should be given unto it any other way but by Divine Authority in its Institution is to advance the Wisdom and Authority of men above those of God and to render the Gospel-Church-State a Machine to be moved up and down at pleasure to be new moulded or shaped according unto Occasions or to be turned unto any Interest like the Wings of a Mill unto the Wind. All the Dignity Honour and Perfection of the State of the Church under the Old Testament depended solely hereon that it was in the whole and all the particulars of it of Divine Institution Hence it was Glorious that is very excellent as the Apostle declares 2. Cor. 3. And if the Church-State of the New Testament have not the same Original it must be esteemed to have a greater Glory given unto it by the hand of men than the other had in that it was instituted by God himself for a greater Glory it hath as the Apostle testifieth Neither can any man nor dareth any man alive to give any Instance in particular wherein there is the least defect in the Being Constitution Rule and Government of the Gospel-Church-State for want of Divine Institution so as that it should be necessary to make a supply thereof by the Wisdom and Authority of men But these things will be more fully spoken unto after we have declared Who it is who hath divinely instituted this Church State 3. The Name of the Church under the New Testament is capable of a threefold Application or it is taken in a three-fold Notion As 1 For the Catholick invisible Church or Society of Elect Believers in the whole World really related by Faith in him unto the Lord Jesus Christ as their mystical Head 2 For the whole number of visible Professors in the whole World who by Baptism and the outward Profession of the Gospel and Obedience unto Christ are distinguished from the rest of the World And 3 for such a state as wherein the Worship of God is to be celebrated in the Way and Manner by him appointed and which is to be ruled by the Power which he gives it and according to the Discipline which he hath ordained Of the Nature of the Church under these distinct Notions with our Relation unto either or all of them and the Duties required of us thereon I have treated fully in my Discourse of Evangelical Love and Church Peace or Vnity and thither I must remit the Reader It is the Church in the latter sense alone whose Original we now enquire after And I say 4. The Original of this Church-state is directly immediately and solely from Jesus Christ He alone is the Author Contriver and Institutor of it When I say it is immediately and solely from him I do not intend that in and by his own Person or in his Personal Ministry here in the Earth he did absolutely and compleatly finish this State exclusively unto the Ministry of
Church for their Work was to call gather and erect it out of the World But no ordinary Officers can be or ever were ordained but to a Church in Being Some say they are ordained unto the universal visible Church of Professors some unto the particular Church wherein their Work doth lye but all grant that the Church-State whereunto they are ordained is antecedent unto their Ordination The Lord Christ could and did ordain Apostles and Evangelists when there was yet no Gospel Church for they were to be the Instruments of its Calling and Erection But the Apostles neither did nor could ordain any ordinary Officers until there was a Church or Churches with respect whereunto they should be ordained It is therefore highly absurd to ascribe the continuation of the Church unto the successive Ordination of Officers if any such thing there were seeing this successive Ordination of Officers depends solely on the continuation of the Church If that were not secured on other Foundations this successive Ordination would quickly tumble into dust Yea this successive Ordination were there any such thing appointed must be an Act of the Church it self and so cannot be the means of communicating Church Power unto others A successive Ordination in some sense may be granted namely that when those who were ordained Officers in any Church do dye that others be ordained in their steads but this is by an Act of Power in the Church it self as we shall manifest afterwards 2. Not to treat of Papal succession the limiting of this successive Ordination as the only way and means of Communicating Church Power and so of the Preservation of the Church-State unto Diocesan Prelates or Bishops is built on so many inevident Presumptions and false Principles as will leave it altogether uncertain whether there be any Church-State in the World or no. As 1 That such Bishops were ordained by the Apostles which can never be proved 2 That they received Power from the Apostles to ordain others and Communicate their whole Power unto them by an Authority inherent in themselves alone yet still reserving their whole Power unto themselves also giving all and retaining all at the same time which hath no more of Truth than the former and may be easily disproved 3 That they never did nor could any of them forfeit this Power by any crime or error so as to render their Ordination invalid and interrupt the succession pretended 4 That they all ordained others in such manner and way as to render their Ordination valid whereas multitudes were never agreed what is required thereunto 5 That whatever Heresy Idolatry Flagitiousness of life Persecution of the true Churches of Christ these Prelatical Ordainers might fall into by whatever Arts Simoniacal Practices or false Pretences unto what was not they came themselves into their Offices yet nothing could deprive them of their Right of Communicating all Church Power unto others by Ordination 6 That Persons so ordained whether they have any call from the Church or no whether they have any of the Qualifications required by the Law of Christ in the Scripture to make them capable of any Office in the Church or have received any Spiritual Gifts from Christ for the Exercise of their Office and Discharge of their Duty whether they have any Design or no to persue the ends of that Office which they take upon them yet all is one being any way Prelatically ordained Bishops they may ordain other and so the successive Ordination is preserved And what is this but to take the Rule of the Church out of the hand of Christ to give Law unto him to follow with his Approbation the actings of men besides and contrary to his Law and Institution and to make Application of his Promises unto the vilest of men whether he will or no. 7 That it is not lawful for Believers or the Disciples of Christ to yield Obedience unto his Commands without this Episcopal Ordination which many Churches cannot have and more will not as judging it against the Mind and Will of Christ. 8 That one Worldly Ignorant Proud sensual Beast such as some of the Heads of this successive Ordination as the Popes of Rome have been should have more Power and Authority from Christ to preserve and continue a Church-State by Ordination than any the most holy Church in the World that is or can be gathered according to his mind with other unwarrantable Presumptions innumerable 3. The pernicious consequences that may ensue on this Principle do manifest its Inconsistency with what our Lord Jesus Christ hath ordained unto this end of the continuation of his Church I need not reckon them upon the surest Probabilities There is no room left for fears of what may follow hereon by what hath already done so If we consider whither this successive Ordination hath already led a great part of the Church we may easily judge what it is meet for It hath I say led men for Instance in the Church of Rome into a Presumption of a good Church-State in the loss of Holiness and Truth in the Practice of false Worship and Idolatry in the Persecution and Slaughter of the faithful Servants of Christ unto a State plainly Antichristian To think there should be a Flux and Communication of Heavenly and Spiritual Power from Jesus Christ and his Apostles in and by the hands and Actings of Persons ignorant Simoniacal Adulterous Incestuous Proud Ambitious Sensual presiding in a Church-State never appointed by him immersed in false and Idolatrous Worship persecuting the true Church of Christ wherein was the true succession of Apostolical Doctrine and Holiness is an Imagination for men who embrace the shadows and appearances of things never once seriously thinking of the true nature of them In brief it is in vain to derive a Succession whereon the Being of the Church should depend through the presence of Christ with the Bishops of Rome who for an 100 years together from the year 900 to a 1000 were Monsters for Ignorance Lust Pride and Luxury as Baronius acknowledgeth A. D. 912.5.8 Or by the Church of Antioch by Samosatenus Eudoxius Gnapheus Severus and the like Hereticks Or in Constantinople by Macedonius Eusebius Demophilus Anthorinus and their Companions Or at Alexandria by Lucius Dioscurus Aelurus Sergius and the rest of the same sort 4. The principal Argument whereby this conceit is fully discarded must be spoken unto afterwards And this is the due consideration of the proper subject of all Church-Power unto whom it is originally formally and radically given and granted by Jesus Christ. For none can communicate this Power unto others but those who have received it themselves from Christ by vertue of his Law and Institution Now this is the whole Church and not any Person in it or Prelate over it Look whatever constitutes it a Church that gives it all the Power and Priviledge of a Church for a Church is nothing but a Society of professed Believers enjoying all Church Power
which having as they thought unduely enough failed in one or two Instances it became the Destruction of a Church state not only in the Churches where such Mistakes had happened as they surmized but unto all the Churches in the World that would hold Communion with them But in these things we have no concernment Other Notions of Schisme besides those insisted on we acknowledge not nor is any other advanced with the least Probality of Truth Nor are we to be moved with outcries about Schisme wherein without regard to Truth or Charity men contend for their own Interest Of those Notions of it which have been received by men sober and learned we decline a trial by none that only excepted that the Refusal of Obedience unto the Pope and Church of Rome is all that is Schisme in the World which indeed is none at all That which is now so fiercely pleaded by some concerning different Observations of external Modes Rites Customes some more or none at all to make men Schismaticks is at once to judge all the Primitive Churches to be Schismatical Their Differences Varieties and Diversities among them about these things cannot be enumerated and so without any disadvantage unto the Faith or breach of Love they continued to be untill all Church Order and Power was swallowed up in the Papal Tyranny ten thousand times more pernicious then ten thousand such Disputes For a Close unto this whole Discourse concerning the original nature and state of Gospel Churches I shall use that Liberty which Love of the Truth puts into my Possession Churches mentioned in the Scripture ordained and appointed by the Authority of Jesus Christ were nothing but a certain number of Men and Women Converted to God by the preaching of the Gospel with their baptized seed associating themselves in Obedience unto Christs Commands and by the Direction of his Apostles for the common Profession of the same Faith the Observance and Performance of all Divine Institutions of Religious Worship unto the Glory of God their own Edification and the Conversion of others These Believers thus associated in Societies knowing the Command and Appointment of Jesus Christ by his Apostles for that End did choose from among themselves such as were to be their Rulers in the Name and Authority of Christ according to the Law and Order of his institutions who in the Scripture are called on various Considerations Elders Bishops Pastors and the like names of Dignity Authority and Office who were to administer all the solemn Ordinances of the Church among them Unto this Office they were solemnly appointed ordained or set apart by the Apostles themselves with fasting Prayer and imposition of hands or by other ordinary Officers after their decease This was the way and method of the Call and setting apart of all Ordinary Officers in the Church both under the Old Testament and in the New It is founded in the Light of Nature In the first Institution of ordinary Church Rulers under the Law the People looked out and chose fit Persons whom Moses set apart to the Office Deut. 1.13 14 15. And in the Call of Deacons Acts 6. The Apostle uses the same Words or words of the same importance unto the Church as Moses did to the People Acts 6.31 asserting the Continuation of the same way and order in their Call And whereas he who was first to be called to Office under the New Testament after the Ascension of Christ fell under a double Consideration namely of an Officer in general and of an Apostle which office was extraordinary there was a threefold Act in his Call the People chose two one of which was to be an Officer Acts 1.23 Gods immediate Determination of one as he was to be an Apostle ver 24. and the obedient Consent of the People in compliance with that Determination ver 26. The Foundation of these Churches was generally in a small number of Believers But their Church state was not compleat until they were supplyed with all ordinary Officers as Bishops and Deacons The former were of of several sorts as shall be proved hereafter And of them there were many in every Church whose number was encreased as the Members of the Church were multiplied So God appointed in the Church of the Jews that every ten Families should have a peculiar Ruler of their own Choice Deut. 1.13 14 15 For there is no mention in the New Testament of any one single Bishop or Elder in any Church of any sort whatever either Absolutely or by way of Preheminence But as the Elders of each Church were many at least more thenone so there was a parity among them and an Equality in Order Power and Rule Nor can any Instance be given unto the Contrary Of these Churches one onely was originally planted in one City Town or Village This way was taken from Conveniency for Edification and not from any positive Institution and it may be otherwise where Conveniency and Opportunity do require it The Number in these Churches Multiplying dayly there was a necessity of the Multiplication of Bishops or Elders among them Hereon the Advantage of some one Person in Priority of Conversion or of Ordination in Age Gifts and Graces especially in Ability for Preaching the Gospel and administring the Holy Ordinances of the Church with the Necessity of preserving Order in the Society of the Elders themselves gave him peculiar Dignity Preheminence and Title He was soon after the Bishop without any disadvantage to the Church For in those Churches in some of them at least Evangelists continued for a long Season who had the Administration of Church Affairs in their hands And some there were who were of Note among the Apostles and eminently esteemed by them who had eminent yea Apostolical Gifts as to Preaching of the Word and Prayer which was the peculiar work of the Apostle These were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by Clemens Of the many other Elders who were associated in the Rule of the Church it may be not many had Gifts for the constant Preaching of the Word nor were called thereunto Hence Justin Martyr seemes to assign the constant publick Administration of Sacred Ordinances unto one President And this also promoted the constant presidency of one in whom the Apostolical Aid by Evangelists might be supplyed These Churches thus fixed and settled in one place each of them City Town or Village were each of them intrusted with all the Power and Priviledges which the Lord Christ hath granted unto or endued his Church withal This Power is called the power of the Keys or of binding and loosing which hath respect only unto the Consciences of Men as unto things Spiritual and Eternal being meerly Ministerial Every one of these Churches were bound by the Command of Christ to live in Peace and Vnity through the Exercise of Peculiar sincere and fervent Love among all their Members as also to walk in Peace and useful Communion with all othâ—â— Churches in the
differences of lesser Moment whilst the general Rule of Faith and Love is attended unto 4. To be quiet and wait for further Instruction is the Direction given unto both Parties whilst the Differences did continue between them and that in opposition unto mutual Impositions 5. A Church that is really so or so esteemed may break the Peace with its own Members and others as well as they with it and where the fault is must be determined by the Causes of what is done 6. For what is added about gathering of Churches it shall be considered in its proper place But as unto the Application of these things unto the present Case there lies in the bottom of them such an unproved Presumption of their being the Church that is according unto Divine Institution for in their being so in any other sense we are not concerned of their Church Power and Authority by whom such Orders and Rules are made as we can by no means admit of I can more warrantably give this as the Apostles Rule than that of our Author What you have attained unto in the Knowledge of the Doctrine and Misteries of the Gospel walk together in holy Communion of Faith and Love but take heed that you multiply not new Causes of Divisions and Differences by inventing and imposing new Orders in Divine Worship or the Rule of the Church casting them out who agree with you in all things of divine Revelation and Institution He adds from my Words If the Rule reach our Case it must be such as requires things to be observed as were never divinely appointed as National Churches Ceremonies and Modes of worship to which he Replies And so this Rule doth in Order unto Peace require the Observation of such things which although they be not particularly commanded of God yet are enjoyned by lawful Authority provided that they be not unlawful in themselves nor repugnant unto the Word of God Answ. 1. Let the Reader if he please consult the place whence these Words are taken in my Discourse and he will find this Evasion obviated 2. What is intended by this Rule is it the Rule given by the Apostle Who that reads the Words can possibly pretend unto any such conception of their meaning If he understand a Rule of his own I know not what it may or may not include 3. I deny and shall for ever deny that the Rule here intended by the Apostle doth give the least countenance unto the Invention and Imposition of things not divinely instituted not prescribed not commanded in the Word on the Pretence that those who so invent and impose them judged them lawful and that they have Authority so to do He Objects again unto himself out of my Discourse that the Apostles never gave any such Rules themselves about outward Modes of Worship with Ceremonies Feasts Fasts Liturgies c. Whereunto he Replies What then I say then 1. It had been happy for Christians and Christian Religion if those who pretended to be their Successors had followed their Example and made no such Rules at all that they would not have thought themselves wiser than they or more careful for the Good of the Church or better acquainted with the Mind of Christ in these things then they were For that Multiplication of Rules Laws Canons about the things mentioned and others of an alike nature which the Apostles never gave any Example of or Encouragement unto which afterwards ensued hath been a principal means of altering the state of the Church from its Original Institution of corrupting its Worship Administring occasion unto scandal and endless Strifes 2. If the Apostles gave no such Rules themselves it may be concluded safely that it was because in their Judgement no such Rule was to be given Other Reason hereof cannot be assigned for if it might have been done according to the Mind of Christ and by vertue of the Commission which they had from him innumerable Evils might have been prevnted by the doing of it They foresaw what Differences would arise in the Church what Divisions the darkness and corrupt Lusts of men would cast them into about such things as these and probably knew much whereunto the Mistery of Iniquity tended yet would they not appoint any Arbitrary Rules about things not ordained by our Lord Jesus Christ which might have given some bounds unto the Inclinations of men in making and multiplying Rules of their own unto the ruine of the Church 3. Then I say we beg the Pardon of all who concern themselves herein that we scruple the Complying with such Rules in Religion and the Worship of God as the Apostles thought not meet to appoint or ordain But he addes It is sufficient that they gave this general Rule that all Lawful things are to be done for the Churches Peace Answ. What is to be done for the Churches Peace we shall afterwards consider To be done is intended of Acts of Religion in the Worship of God I say then the Apostles never gave any such Rule as that pretended the Rule they gave was that all things which Christ hath commanded were to be done and observed and for the doing of any thing else they gave no Rule Especially they gave not such a large Rule as this that might serve the turn and interest of the worst of men in imposing on the Church whatever they esteemed Lawful as not by vertue of any Rule of the Apostles but in an open Rejection of all they gave it afterwards fell out in the Church This is a Rule which would do the Work to the Purpose of all that have the Reputation of Governours in the Church be it the Pope or who it will For they are themselves the sole Judges of what is Lawful the People as it is pretended understand nothing of these things Whatever therefore they have a Mind to introduce into the Worship of God and to impose on the Practice of men therein is to be done by vertue of this Apostolical Rule for the Churches Peace provided they judge it Lawful and surely no Pope was ever yet so stark mad as to impose things in Religion which he himself judged unlawful Besides things may be Lawful in themselves that is Morally which yet it is not Lawful to introduce into the Worship of God because not expedient nor for Edification Yea things may be Lawful to be done sometimes on some occasions in the Worship of God which yet it would be unlawful to impose by vertue of a general binding Rule for all times and seasons Instances may be multiplied in each kind Therefore I say the Apostles never gave this Rule they opened no such Door unto Arbitrary Imposition they laid no such Yoke on the Necks of the Disciples which might prove heavier and did so then that of the Jewish Ceremonies which they had taken away namely that they were to do and observe all that should by their Rulers be imposed on them as lawful in their Judgement This
Soveraignity over their Consciences was reserved by the Apostles unto the Authority of Christ alone and their Obedience was required by them only unto his commands This is that which I see some would be at To presume themselves to be the Church at least the only Rulers and Governours of it To assume to themselves alone the Judgement of what is Lawful and what is unlawful to be observed in the Worship of God To avow a Power to impose what they please on all Churches pretended to be under their Command so that they judge it lawful be it never so useless or trifling if it hath no other End but to be an Instance of their Authority and then assert that all Christian People must without further Examination submit quietly unto this state of things and comply with it unless they will be esteemed damned Schismaticks But it is too late to advance such Principles a second time He addes from my Paper or as my sense the Apostles gave Rules inconsistent with any determining Rule viz. of mutual Forbearance Rom. 14. But then saith he the meaning must be that whatever Differences happen among Christians there must be no Determination either way But this is direstly contrary to the Decree of the Apostles at Hierusalem upon the Difference that happened in the Christian Churches But they are not my Words which he reports I said not that the Apostles gave Rules inconsistent with any determining Rule but with such a Rule and the Imposition of the things contained in it on the Practise of men in things not determined that is whilst Differences about them do continue as he contends for And 1. Notwithstanding this Rule of Forbearance given by the Apostle expresly Rom. 14. Yet as unto the Right and Truth in the things wherein men are at difference every private Believer is to determine of them so far as he is able in his own Mind Every one is to be fully perswaded in his own Mind in such things so far as his own Practise is concerned 2. The Church wherein such Differences do fall out may doctrinally determine of the Truth in them as it is the Ground and Pillar of Truth supposing them to be of such weight as that the Edification of the Church is concerned in them For otherwise there is no need of any such Determination but every one may be left unto his own Liberty There are Differences at this day in the Church of England in Doctrine and Practice some of them in my Judgement of more importance then those between the same Church and us yet it doth not think it necessary to make any Determination of them no not Doctrinally 3. If the Church wherein such Differences fall out be not able in and of it self to make a Doctrinal Determination of such Differences they may and ought to crave the Counsel and Advice of other Churches with whom they walk in Communion in Faith and Love And so it was in the Case whereof an Account is given us Act. 15. The Determination or Decree there made concerning the necessary Observance of the Jewish Rites by the Gentiles converted unto the Faith by the Apostles Elders and Brethren under the guidance of the Holy Ghost as his Mind was revealed in the Scripture gives not the least Countenance unto the making and imposing such a Rule on all Churches and their Members as is contended for For 1. It was only a Doctrinal Determination without Imposition on the Practise of any 2. It was a Determination against Impositions directly And whereas it is said that it was a Determination contrary to the Judgment of the Imposers which shews that the Rule of Forbearance where Conscience is alledged both ways is no standing Rule I grant that it was contrary to the Judgment of the Imposers but imposed nothing on them nor was their Practice concerned in that erronious Judgement They were not required to do any thing contrary to their own Judgment and the not doing whereof did reflect on their own Consciences Wherefore the whole Rule given by the Apostle and the whole Determination made is that no Impositions be made on the Consciences or Practice of the Disciples of Christ in things relating to his Worship but what were necessary by vertue of Divine Institution They added hereunto that the Gentiles enjoying this Liberty ought to use it without offence and were at Liberty by vertue of it to forbear such things as wherein they had or thought they had a natural Liberty in case they gave Offence by the use of them And the Apostles who knew the state of things in the Minds of the Jews and all other Circumstances give an Instance in the things which at that season were to be so forborn And whereas this Determination was not absolute and obligatory on the whole Case unto all Churches namely whether the Mosaical Law were to be observed among Christians but some Churches were left unto their own Judgement and Practise who esteemed it to be still in force as the Churches of the Jews and others left unto their own Liberty and Practise also who judged it not to oblige them both sides or Parties being bound to continue Communion among them in Faith and Love there is herein a perpetual establishment of the Rule of mutual Forbearance in such Cases nothing being condemned but Impositions on one another nothing commended but an Abstinence from the use of Liberty in the case of Scandal or Offence I had therefore Reason to say that the false Apostles were the only Imposers that is of things not necessary by vertue of any divine Institution And if the Author insinuate that the true Apostles were such Imposers also because of the Determination they made of this Difference he will fail in his Proof of it It is true they imposed on or charged the Consciences of men with the observance of all the Institutions and Commands of Christ but of other things none at all The last things which he endeavours an Answer unto on this occasion lies in those words The Jewish Christians were left unto their own Liberty provided they did not impose on others and the Dissenters at this day desire no more then the Gentile Church did viz. not to be imposed on to observe those things which they are not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ should be imposed on them So is my sense in the places referred unto reported Nor shall I contend about it so as that the last Clause be change for my Words are not they are not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ that they should be imposed on them but they were not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ they should Observe This respects the things themselves the other only their Imposition And one Reason against the Imposition opposed is that the things themselves imposed are such as the Lord Christ would not have us observe because not appointed by himself But hereunto he answers two things 1. That it was agreed