Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	act_n	parliament_n	statute_n	2,428	5	8.3537	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A79849	Transcendent and multiplied rebellion and treason, discovered, by the lawes of the land.	Clarendon, Edward Hyde, Earl of, 1609-1674.	1645 (1645)	Wing C4428; Thomason E308_29; ESTC R200392	18,531	28

Consent of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament and in declaring of Lawes which He cannot doe but by the proper Iudges in His severall Courts but in all other things that are not expressely restrained by Law He is free and absolute and the Soveraignty both of Iudgement and Power is in the Person of the King alone As in providing for the present safety against suddaine danger and in levying of Armes suppressing of Tumults and Rebellion convoking of Parliaments and dissolving them making of Peers granting Liberty of sending Burgesses to Parliaments treating with Forreigne States making of Warre League and Peace giving of Honour Rewarding Pardoning c. And in these and the like particulars it is that they would farther limit and restraine the King that He should not governe as He hath done formerly according to his owne judgement and will informed and Regulated by the Advice of his Councell of State and Councellors at Law but according to the judgement and with the Consent of both Houses of Parliament in some Cases according to the judgement and with the Consent of the Parliaments of both Kingdomes and in some other Cases they would assume the Government wholly to themselves and they take up Armes and fight to force the Kings Vote and assent to severall Bills concerning these particulars and so at once wholly to overthrow the Kings Soveraignty Legislative and Gubernative But though others may not yet the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament may rise in a forcible manner and compell the King to governe as they please in some cases and deprive him of his Government in other cases as they please And others in obedience to their Authority and Command may assist in this Warre against His Majesty without Rebellion and Treason This is a false and Treasonable suggestion as Owen's was to corrupt the judgement of the People and to take off the bonds of Conscience towards His Majesty by advancing the Houses of Parliament above the King And the falsenesse and Treasonablenesse thereof will plainly appeare upon the due Consideration of the Kings Superiority to the two Houses of Parliament and of the Relation between His Majesty and the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament and between them and us out of Parliament 1. Touching the point of Superiority between the King and the Parliament the two Houses themselves have long since determined it The Parliament 25. H. 8. declares thus This your Grace's Realme recognizing no Superiour under God but your Grace The Parliament 16. R. 2. 5. affirmes the Crowne of England to have been so free at all times that it hath been in no earthly Subjection but immediatly to God in all things touching the Regality of the said Crowne and to none other Ergo The two Houses of Parliament cannot of Right have or exercise any authority over the Crowne or the Realme over the King or the Subject of England And though some Parliaments called in troublesome times of Faction as now and overswayed by those that were the head of the most potent Faction as at this time have de facto deposed and murthered some Kings yet such instances prove no more claime of Soveraignty in the Parliament over the King then a Robber when he exerciseth an Arbitrary power over a mans person and purse And the Observator himselfe confesseth ingeniously that there was never King deposed in a free Parliament And that the Acts of the Parliament R. 2. were not so properly the Acts of the two Houses as of H. ● and his Victorious Army Nor is it Treason only but impiety also to advance the Parliament the Representative of the people above the King the Representative of God And it is to set up Kings and not by God Hos. 8. 4. Yea and against him too 2. Touching the Relation between the King and the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament we must know this That the high Court of Parliament consists of three integrall parts the King the House of Lords and the House of Commons The King is the Head and the two Houses are the grosse Body subordinate to the King and to be considered alwayes as a part of the Parliament and in a notion under the King as well in Parliament as out of Parliament and they are subjected to the King in Parliament 1. In their persons for the King calls them together and dissolves them And as they have occasion to petition the King in Parliament they confesse themselves his Subjects and directing their Petitions to His Majesty thereby they acknowledge his Soveraignty Majesty being a Ray of Soveraignty Yea the very Legislative Acts wherein consists their Parliamentary Eminency speake them alwayes his Subjects and stile him their Soveraigne And according to the Information of the Iudges in the time of H. 8. The King in Parliament standeth in his highest Estate Royall in respect of the exercise of his Soveraigne Authority and power in making Lawes which he cannot doe but in Parliament Besides in token of his Soveraignty and their subjection the King personally taketh Homage and Oath of Fidelity of the Lords and he Commands the Commons before they Sit and Vote in the House to take the Oath of Supremacy and Allegiance whereby they acknowledge him to be the only Supream Governour in this Realme and sweare to assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities belonging to him his Heires and Successors or annexed to the Imperiall Crowne of the Realme And farther the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament have bound themselves by their Protestation to maintaine and defend with their Lives power and Estates His Majesties Royall Person Honour and Estate So the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament are in the condition of Subjects to His Majesty and they have sworne Fidelity and Allegiance to him and therefore they cannot rise up against the King and compell him as aforesaid without manifest Rebellion and Perjury also 2. In their Votes in passing Bills and making Lawes wherein though they concurre with the King necessarily yet 't is not by equall Authority but by consent only not as joynt Soveraignes but as free Subjects not as enacting with the King but as choosing and preparing and proposing Lawes to be enacted by the King according to the passage in the Oath That the King shall Corroborate such Lawes as the People shall chuse And without this Corroboration by the Royall assent which gives life and motion to our Lawes the Votes of the two Houses of Parliament dye in the wombe where they were Conceived like an Embrio and never see the light 3. Touching the Relation between the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament and our selves out of Parliament we take them to be no other than our fellow Subjects and them with us and us with them to be equally subjected to our Soveraigne Lord the King who is Head both of the Kingdome and of the Parliament and to none other Nor

were taken up His Majesty had Promised that the Forts and Castles should be alwayes in such Hands and only such as they should have cause to confide in Ian. 27. And he accepted of Sir Iohn Coniers to be Lievtenant of the Tower of London in the place of Sir Iohn Byron Feb. 11. And he allowed their Recommendation of the Lievtenants for the severall Counties Feb. 28. And what need then of an Army to defend and secure our Liberties and Religion against Tyrannie and Popery And the truth is this pretended necessary defence and security of our Religion and Liberty against Popery and Tyrannie was only a Colour for the taking up of Armes and a sleight to gaine or rather to entrap and ensnare the People that by the Power of the Kingdome and the helpe of the People they might carry on and compasse their designe against Monarchy and against Episcopacy and the Liturgy And so the present Quarrell is for a not to be pretended to by any Law Liberty against Monarchy not against Tyrannie and for a not knowne or chosen by themselves Religion against Episcopacie and the Liturgie and not against Poperie For therein the King opposeth them and they have no enemy otherwise And this Alteration of Government in Church and State was first attempted in a Parliamentary way then it was carried on by Tumults afterward they proceeded to apparent Treason and from Treason to Treason untill at last they came to the height of Rebellion As the subsequent Discourse will show the● SEVERALL TREASONS BY the Lawes of the Land TO compasse the death of the King and Queene or to intend or imagine it To intend to deprive depose or disinherit the King if it may appeare by word or otherwise To leavy Warre against the King in this Realme or to conspire to leavy Warre against Him And this was high Treason by the Common-Law for no Subject can levy Warre in the Realme without Authority from the King for to Him it only belongeth Cook 3. part Instit. cap. de High Treason Againe if any levy Warre to expulse Strangers to deliver men out of Prisons to remove Councellors or against any Statute or to any other end pretending Reformation of their own heads without warrant this is levying of Warre against the King because they take upon them Royall Authority which is against the King Ibid. Also to detein or hold a Fortresse or Castle against the King And to deteiue or withhold from Him or against Him any his Ships or Ordinance is to levy Warre against the King in the Construction of the Law To encounter in fight and kill such as are assisting to the King in his Warres or such as come to help the King To Plot or doe any thing toward the moving Sedition either in respect of the King or his Army or to give advice or to procure or lend ayd thereunto To succour the Kings Enemies To be adhering to the Kings Enemies ayding them or giving them comfort in this Realme or elsewhere Besides other Treasons mentioned in Mr. Saint-Johns Argument upon the Earle of Strafford as 1. To endeavour to corrupt the peoples judgement and to take off the bonds of Conscience the greatest security of the Kings life as in Owen's case who said that King James being excommunicated by the Pope might be killed of any man and that such killing was not murther but only the Execution of the Popes supream sentence God forbid I said one of better judgement then Owen that I should stretch forth mine hand against Gods Annointed No saith Owen the Lord doth not forbid it you may for these reasons kill the King 2. To endeavour to draw the Peoples hearts from the King to set discord between Him and them whereby the people should leave Him and rise up against Him to the death and destruction of the King as in Sparhawks case Also at the Arraignment of the Earle of Essex the Iudges delivered ther opinions for matter of Law upon two points 1. That in case where a Subject attempteth to put himselfe into such strength as the King shall not be able to resist him and to force and compell the King to governe otherwise then according to his owne Royall Authority and direction it is manifest Rebellion 2. That in every Rebellion the Law intendeth as a Consequent the compassing the death and deprivation of the King as foreseeing that the Rebel will never suffer that King to live or Raigne which might punish or take revenge of their Rebellion and Treason And at the Arraignment of Sir Christopher Blunt That the Subject that Rebelleth or riseth in forcible manner to overrule the Royall will and power of the King intendeth to deprive the King both of Crowne and Life And that the Law judgeth not of the Fact by the intent but of the intent by the Fact How then is not this Rebellion in those who are now risen in forcible manner to overrule the Royall will and power of the King and have put themselves into such strength as the King shall not be able to resist them thereby to force and compell the King in some particulars to governe otherwise then according to his owne Royall Authority and direction and to take from Him the power of governing in some cases as of the Church and of the Militia of the Kingdome And in prosecuting this Rebellion how have they incurred severall Treasons 1. By endeavouring to corrupt the judgement of the People and to take off the bonds of Conscience the greatest security of His Majesty and to draw the Peoples hearts from the King and to set discord between him and them whereby they should leave the King and rise up against him 2. By levying Warre against the King in his Realme 3. By deteining his Forts and Castles from him and his Ships and his Ordinance 4. By encountring in Fight and killing them that assist him and by adhering to the Kings Enemies and giving them ayd and comfort 5. By compassing the death and deprivation of the King Rebels never suffering that King to Live or Raigne which might punish or take revenge of their Treason Now the method observed in this Rebellion was this The Government of the Church being in the King by Law and he governing it by Arch-Bishops Bishops c. A Bill was brought into the House of Commons for the Extirpation of them but it passed not Also the Government of the Militia of the Kingdome being by Law in the King for the effectuall protecting of the Law and his people Sir Arthur Hasterigges brought a Bill into the House of Commons for taking away the Militia from His Majesty and placing it in the hands of Subjects And this Bill was rejected with indignation When they could not compasse their designe by Vote in Parliament they attempt and prosecute it otherwise And whil'st His Majesty was in Scotland they send forth Lecturers and give licence to Pamphleters

are they invested with any Superiority over us but are armed with some priviledges against us that we cannot arrest them or their servants during the Parliament And in case of Rebellion and Treason they are no more priviledged then we out of Parliament So then the Lords and Commons'assembled in Parliament are wholly subjected to the King their Persons to his Person and their Votes to his Vote nor are we in any subjection to them or their Votes nor have they Jurisdiction over us nor are we bound to the observance of them in any case whatsoever and our submission to them at any time is an Act of Compliance only and arbitrary and not of obedience and duty And their Votes and Ordinances in this case at this time are not legall Obligations upon but Traiterous Propositions to and publick Invitations of the people to joyne with them and assist them in their Rebellion and Treason And their partakers doe not so properly obey them having no Authority of Command as conspire with them Thus the Lords and Commons of England being alwaies subjected to the King by the constitution of the Kingdome and of the Parliament it is all one whether a Rebellion be hatched and Acted by them in or out of Parliament and if there be any aggravation 't is when perpetrated in Parliament for such Rebellion leaves a Brand upon that Parliament and is a dishonour to all Parliaments it involves in the sinne the whole Kingdome for the present and is an ill president for time to come and how shall we be ever hereafter liable to change and upon change to intestine divisions and to civill Warre it may be if as this doth so other Parliaments shall challenge to themselves absolute power to alter the established Government of the Church and State and if opposed to take up Armes for effecting it as at this day But though the name of both Houses of Parliament be used to Authorize and countenance this Rebellion yet the Lords and Commons generally doe not concurre in this Action But a great part of the House of Commons and a great part of the House of Lords driven from Westminster by the violence of Tumults and upon the Horror of their proceedings there doe oppose it both by their Declarations and by force of Armes And the Lords and Commons now remaining at Westminster are such as are either professed Enemies to the Established Government of the Church and State or malitious against His Majesty and Ambitious of His Royalties or covetous of the Revenues of the Bishops and Deanes and Chapters or lastly such as live in the Counties neare London and within their Associations and comply with them for their private interests And all that those Lords and Commons can truly challenge to themselves is that they are the Ring-leaders in this Rebellion and Treason and that they have made other their Fellow Subjects their fellow Rebells and Fellow Traitors And let such as take part with those Lords and Commons reflect upon themselves and search their hearts and examine their Consciences whether the like Seditious dispositions and perverse affections and ambitious and covetous desires and private respects did not at first engage them in this Warre and whether in their Houses they have not prevented those Lords and Commons rather then observed and followed their commands all along throughout the whole progresse of their Rebellion and Treasons and so whether their compliance be not a Traiterous Conspiracy with the Lords and Commons at Westminster rather then an act of sincere and faithfull Obedience to the Authority of both Houses of Parliament It is observed by antient Parliament-men out of Record that Parliaments have not succeeded well in five cases 1. When the King hath been in displeasure with the Lords and Commons So essentiall is the King's good will toward his Commons that it was one of the Petitions of the Commons to Ed. 3. That the Arch-bishops and all others of the Clergy should pray for it and many times are the like-Petitions for the Lords Alwaies provided that both Lords and Commons keep themselves within the Circle of the Law and Custome of the Parliament 2. When any of the Great Lords were at variance within themselves 3. When there was no good correspondence between the Lords and Commons 4. When there was no unity between the Commons themselves 5. When there was no preparation for the Parliament before it began And there is at this time a 6th unprecedented and unparallell'd case making the present Parliament not only succeslesse but also pernitious even the disloyalty and Rebellion and Treason of a party of Lords and Commons of Parliament who being assisted by the Anti-Episcopall Anti-Monarchicall Faction about London and throughout the whole Kingdom first violate the Liberty of Parliament by Tumults driving away diverse of the Members thereof then they make themselves Masters of the Militia and afterwards they raise an Army as was pretended for the defence of the Protestant Religion the Kings Authority and His Person in His Royall dignity and to maintain the free course of Iustice the Lawes of the Land the Peace of the Kingdome and the Priviledge of Parliament And being in a Military posture and having the power of the Sword they Declare themselves to be the Parliament of England and assume unto themselves a new Capacity of an absolute Body and independent State and they take upon them Authority Legislative and Gubernative and they passe Votes not in Order to the King to be proposed to him and to be enacted by him but by themselves and they publish them not as Lawes in His name but as Ordinances in their own names and to be put in execution not in a judiciary way as our Lawes are by the Ordinary Ministers of Iustice the Iudges and Iustices in their severall Courts and Countryes but by Creatures of their own making their Committees and Sub-Committees and by their Deputy-Lievtenants and in a way Extrajudiciall and Military And they force us to submit to them either by observing and doing what they enjoyn or by suffering what they impose We shall also have when they can agree upon it the like Modell of Government in the Church The Authority to be derived not from the King but from the two Houses of Parliament and to be executed not by Bishops but by Presbyters and such Church-Officers as the two Houses shall think fit to ordaine And howsoever at first they pretended that they took up Armes for defence of Religion c. yet their proceedings have been only against Religion by Law established and against the King and against Regality it selfe and against the Lawes of the Land Magna Charta and the Petition of Right and so against the Liberty of the Subject and lastly against the Peace and the very Constitution and being of the Kingdom And they fight against them that defend these and oppose their usurped power and new