This Deponants Councel that Subscribed the Plea cannot be ready in so short a time to Argue the several Points in Issue the Record being but Read in Court on Saturday last the Defendants having Rejoyned in the Demurrer to the PLEA but two days before Iurat 25 die Maij Anno R. Rs. Carol. sec. c. xxxiiij Coram me George Carew Io. Coell An Exact Account of the Proceedings at the Marshalsea June 10 1682. against Cap Hawley and his men upon Pretence of Piracy acting under Letters Patents for Reprisals against the Hollanders ON the 10th of Iune instant the Commissioners appointed to try Capt. Hawley and his men upon the Stat. of Hen. 8. for Paracy Fellony Being met at the New Hall in the Marshals Court in Southwark The Commission was read by Mr. Tho. Bedford the Register of the Admiralty Sir Tho. Exton as President of the Court gave the Charge Then the Sheriff of Surry brought in the Precepts whereupon the Jurors were return'd and Sworn The Indictment then was delivered to the Grand Jury who found the Bill Unto which the Prisoners pleaded NOT GUILTY Took their Tryal and put themselves upon God and the Country Then Sir Richard Lloyd Council for the King alleadged to the Petty Jury that the Letters Patents for Reprisals aforesaid were made null and void by Treaty of STATE Supercedeas Proclamation and Iudgment of the L d Chancellor upon a Scire facias Yet was so tender of the KING's Honour That he would not suffer the Letters Patents to be read openly in Court but only by the Jurors thmselves privately Whereupon the Council for the Prisoners insisted That there were not Arguments suffered to be made on the Defendants side upon the Atturney Generals Demurrer to the Defendants Plea which consisted of 5 Skins of Parchment the Record being read on Saturday the 20th of May Judgment was given in the Week following before Copies could be made of the Record However Mr. Carew himself persisted at this last Tryal That nothing could affect the Patent but Satisfaction For That by the Laws Statutes of England Letters Patents in this Case which vested an Interest in the Patentees by especial Grant as set forth in his Plea to the scire facias could not be revok'd or taken away without satisfaction first made to the parties that suffered the wrong And that the L d Chancellors Judgment is as avoidable upon a Writ of Error for Mistakes in his Opinion as the Grants in the Letters Patents are avoidable upon Satisfaction made for that no Act of State unless an Act of Parliament can bind the particular Interests of the Subject without Satisfaction and the scire facias being defective the Judgment given upon it is null in it self there being no such Letters Patents as are mentioned in the Scire facias returned by the Sheriffs as aforesaid for Restitution to Carolo tunc Comiti Salop c. Then the matters of Fact being made out by the Dutch men the Master others in the Ship call'd the Schonemaker of Dort against Cap. Hawley and his men That they took the ship by force and possest themselves of the Ship and Lading To which the Prisoners made little Defence save only That they did nothing felloniously or pyratically but acted by Virtue of a Commission and Deputation indorsed upon the back-side of an Authentick Copy of the Letters Patents hereunto annexed which was put into the Jurors hands to peruse who brought them in Not Guilty Werereupon Mr. Ioynes the Marshal immediately arested Mr. Carew Capt. Hawley and his men in a joynt Action for 1000l Dammages by Writ out of the Admiralty upon the Dutch Ambassadors desire at the Suit of Willem de Widt Iohanes van Eich voor Alewyn van Vollenhoven Lodewyck Terwe Iacob van Harrlem Antony Walbeeck Antony van d Santheuvel all Inhabitants of Dort that were the Owners of the said ship and lading but upon Mr. Carew's complaint to the Court then sitting and the Dutch Ambassador also present he was discharged pro tempore But within two days after gave sufficient Bail by two eminent Citizens to answer the said Action both for himself the Capt. and his Company Then some of the most considerable Creditors claiming under Carew's Administration being unsatisfied with these Proceedings caused Mr. Ioynes to be arested by Writ out of the King's Bench for 2000l Dammages to answer the Value of the said Ship and Lading having dispossest the said Cap. Hawly and his men thereof in an extrajudicial way upon pretence of a VVarrant from the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty dated about the 29 of April 1682. who brought the said Cap. and his men Prisoners and put them into the custody of Mr. Lowman the Keeper of the County Gaol in Southwark where they were detained 44 dayes or thereabouts close Prisoners at their own costs and charges and after they were legally discharged wereforced to pay Mr. Ioynes and the Register of the Admiralty several exorbitant Fees amounting to 6l 10 s. a man or thereabouts to procure which Money they were forc'd to fell their Beds from under them For all which the Captain and his men are advised to take their due Course at Law against them for their respective Dammages That is to say Cap. Wil. Hawley Richard Washington Ri. Terret Ierom Hawley Th. Tomkins Iohn Tayler and Glanvil Lamboy ☞ ☞ It s Remarkable That the Dutch Ambassadors are very clamorous at Court upon any Complaint of the Hollanders whose ships and goods are suddenly restored right or wrong although they refuse to appear for the Heirs and Executors of Ia. Pergens of Amsterdam Pet Boudaen of Middleburgh who have got into their hands and Possessions the Effects of Sir W. Courtens Sir Paul Pindars Estates to the value of 138000l owing upon Accounts of Bills of Exchange Moneys lent upon Obligations and Goods exported out of England in Trade of Partners-ship wherein divers great summs of Mony were taken up at Interest and imployed in that Trade and are still standing out and due to divers Orphants and VViddows whose Crys have reached the Heavens and fallen down with Inundations upon their Country for Justice in those Civil matters wherein the States of Holland and Zealand protects the Persons and Estates of the Heirs and Executors of the said Pergens and Boudaen from common Justice under the Pretence of Treaties of Peace and common Alliance between the King and the States General although they never came under the Consideration of any publick Treaty as the spoils and depredations of the Ships Bona Esperanza an Bona Adventura did And that which cannot be mentioned without Grief and Astonishment is that the Complaints of the oppress'd Creditors concerning the civil Causes of Actions depending in Holland and Zealand against Pergens and Boudaen leys before the Secretaries and principal ministers of State at Whitehall for relief without any effectual Answer although earnestly solicited for many years together Dormiat aliquando jus sed
should be satisfied and repayed Yet admitting this Treaty at Breda concluded upon the surprize of Chattam had been duly Inrolled and made a matter of Record in Chancery It was afterwards cancelled disanulled and openly extinguished by Proclamation in the year 1672. And particularly signified to His Majesty by a report upon a reference to five Lords of the Council Table concerning the Debt and Damages mentioned in the Letters Patents aforesaid In these words That the States General having wholly cancelled all past Treaties and Agreements and left your Majesty and your Subjects as free in all iustice and Equity as if they never had been made We therefore humbly presume to report our Opinions to your Majesty that it is now but just and seasonable for your Majesty to insist upon reparation for the Debt and Damages aforesaid This reference was made to the Lord Arlington Lord Ashley Sir Thomas Clifford Sir Iohn Trevor and Sir Iohn Duncomb by Order of Council 22. of March 1671. Now whether a Treaty never Inrolled and afterwards Cancelled by Order of Council and Proclamation should be properly insisted upon in any Judicial Writs is fit for another Court of Judicature or Parliament to resolve It 's granted that after a peace concluded all Temporary Letters of Marque having a bare Authority in themselves are for reasons of State totally Extinguished in regard those Letters of Marque had not an Authority coupled with an Interest A general Letter of Marque or Reprizal as before it 's said is an Act of War A particular or Especial one is a process at Law which is our case Letters of safe conduct usually granted to Foreign Ambassadors and other Persons Upon Emergent occasions are in the nature of a Supersedeas to any Commander that hath a Commission or general Letter of Marque or Privateer so properly called as before nor shall they be interrupted by any Person that hath a speciall Commission grounded upon the Law of Marque and this is consonant to reason of State and the Law of Nations And it is not denyed but that a Truce between Enemies supersedes all Temporary Letters of Marque being Acts of War but not special Letters of Marque or Reprisals which take their rise from Spoyls Depredations committed in times of Peace upon particular men or Companies that becomes a personal injury And the reason is plain for that the Law of Marque and Grants thereupon are consistent with times of Peace and the strictest Amity and Alliance between Sovereign Princes and States Captions thereupon being in the nature of Seizures in a hundred for a Robbery upon a private person before Sun-set which comes to a common Average to prevent a failer of Justice It 's observed that Sovereign Princes holds the Scepter in one hand and the Globe in the other The Sword is carried before them by some Chief Minister of State to shew that Justice is to be duely Administred by Officers that are accomptable for their miscarriages By the Law of England the King can do no wrong He is obliged by Oath to protect His Subjects in their Rights Properties and Estates Therefore His Ministers cannot take them away Yet no man of sence will denie but that the King for a publick good may by due means and ways make void even the Letters Patents in this case of Reprisal that is to say as it 's observed before with Money in the right hand of a Lord Treasurer Dutch Embassador or Lord Chancellor and the Scire-facias in the left hand for the Grantees to shew cause the Money being payed why they should not bring the Letters Patents into Court to be Cancel'd Treaties of State if they be repugnant to the Law of God the Law of Reason or the Laws and Statutes of England ipso Facto they are void in themselves The third Article of the pretended Treaty at Breda concluded in the year 1667. after the Surprize at Chatham says that all Offences Injuries Damages and Losses sustained on either side by the King or the States or their Subjects during this War or at any time before upon any cause or pretence whatsoever should be totally expunged and buried in Oblivion and all Actions at Law concerning the same Now if any forced Interpretation should be put upon this Article so generally Penned that all private differences of meum tuum between particular persons of either Nation should be comprehended in this Article it 's void because it s not in the Power or Prerogative of any Prince to hinder the due course of Law for a particular debt or personal injury Admit that a Hollander were indebted to an English-man before the Treaty at Breda for goods Sold or sent to make Sale of and the Dutch-man should plead specially the Treaty at Breda in Bar to an Action brought for the Money it would not hold good in Law for that it cannot be any ways intended that particular Debts and Actions should fall under the considerations of such Offences Injuries Losses and Damages mentioned in that Article which generally relates to Kings and States As for Mr. Carew his Plea to the Scire Facias and Affidavit annexed speaks sufficiently for his Justification Persisting That no restitution is made for the 151612 l. or any part thereof although Sir James Butler and others are ravishing his Estate from him upon Fore-closures of Equity even for Moneys lent upon account of prosecuting this Cause There was never such a president since the Creation that a particular Interest and Property so Liquidated and Established for satisfaction and reparation under those circumstances according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm wherein so many Families are concerned as the Creditors of Sir William Courten and his Son Sir Paul Pynder and Sir Edward Littleton should be so slighted and contemned The Lord Chancellor well observed it concerned the publique it 's very true it concerns the publick Honour and Interest the publick Justice and Equity of the Nation that the Debt and Damages should be satisfied and repayed There is no Reason of State that particular persons should Purchase a publick Peace at their own Charge or that a private Interest should be Sacrificed for the publick good without satisfaction out of the Publick Purse The Parliament of Paris or Monpilier cannot give Laws to the Parliament of England that enacted if any man should be spoiled by French or others at Sea in peaceable times they shall have the right and benefit of the Law of Marque or Reprizals to recover their Loss Damages and incident Charges which by consent of Nations being once ascertained by a Judicial Act must have its Extent and Execution the end of the Law Satisfaction And this being agreeable to the Laws of God the Laws of Nature the positive Laws of Nations and the Laws and Statutes of England and the King having by His Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England pursuant thereunto commanded and required all Judges of the Admiralty and Officers there
Lex Talionis Or the Law of Marque or Reprizals Fully represented in the Case of Spoyls and Depredations upon the Ships Goods and Factories of Sir WILLIAM COURTEN and his Partners in the East-Indies China and Iapan Whereupon Letters Patents for Reprizals were Granted under the Great Seal of ENGLAND to continue effectual in the Law against the STATES GENERAL of the United Provinces and their Subjects for Recovering of the Sum of 151612 l. with Costs and Damages mentioned in the said Patent Together with three Several PROPOSALS of the Creditors to the KING and their answer in a POSTSCRIPT to the Lord Chancellour's Arguments upon the Scire Facias brought by Sir Robert Sawyer His Majesties Attorney General concerning the Letters Patents aforesaid LONDON Printed in the Year MDCLXXXII To the Right Honourable CHARLES Earl of SHREWSBURY THis following Case being drawn up and Printed by some of the Agents and Solicitors of the Creditors of Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar for satisfaction of several Persons that were earnest to have it Published and Communicated to all the late Members of both Houses of Parliament I obstructed the progress thereof being resolved that it should not go so nakedly into the world without any Title or Dedication and then only to the view of such Persons as are principally Interessed and Concerned therein I am obliged to let Your Lordship and the rest of the Creditors know that I have been in my Quality as Administrator and Assignee both Active and Passive at home and abroad ever since his Majesties Restauration in the pursuit of such our Rights and Properties that cannot be Mortified or Extinguished except Mankind be Exterminated There are Volumes of Examinations and Depositions by me taken from the Servants Officers Factors and Sea-men imployed by Sir William Courten in Discovering Planting and Fortifying the Island of Barbadoes manifesting to all the World that he was the Original Proprietor of that Island and so Confirmed to him and his Heirs by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England in the third year of King Charles the first Yet no Restitution or Reparation could be obtained to this day for the forceable Entries and Intrusions made by James late Earl of Carlisle and his Complices upon Sir William Courten in the said Island There are as many more Volumes of Examinations Depositions Memorials Answers Replications Rejoynders and other proceedings in several Languages by me in the case of the East-India Spoyls and Depredations upon Courten and Pyndar before the values of the Loss and Damages were reduced to a certainty by Letters Patents under the great Seal of England which vested the Interest with an Authority irrevokable in the Grantees for recovery thereof according to the Rules of Law and Common Right Yet no Restitution or Compensation can be obtained for the same There are little less Volumes of Proceedings upon the Civil Actions depending in Holland and Zealand against the Heirs and Executors of Sir James Cats Jacob Pergens and Peter Boudaen for Monies lent upon Bonds and Accompts standing out in Trade Yet all have terminated in contempts of the Law and positive Denialls of Iustice in this Age of ingratitude and forgetfulness Your Grandfather John Earl of Shrewsbury having lent the Sum of five and twenty hundred pounds to Sir William Courten towards his first Expedition into the East-Indies China and Japan upon whose foundation the present great East-India Trade is erected After the Death of Sir William William Courten his Son and Heir together with Sir Edward Littleton and others entred into new Security in the year 1639 for the same Debt being all the ready Money then in your Family Whereupon Francis Earl of Shrewsbury your Father with divers other great Sufferers Creditors of Sir William Courten and his Son as also of Sir Paul Pyndar applied themselves in company with me upon the Kings most happy Restauration for some seasonable relief against the Hollanders and Zealanders that had lived upon the spoyls of all Nations His Majesty being then upon a Treaty of Common Alliance with the States General After eight months debate in Courtens affair came to this Stipulation in the year 1662. That upon restitution of the Island of â—olleron and satisfaction to be made for the Spoyls and Depredations concerning the two Ships named the Bona Esperanza and Henry Bona Adventura All other Losses and Damages of his Subjects and even that of Amboyna should be Mortified and Obliterated that is to say No Soveraign remedy should be given to any of them by his Majesty for the said Damages by Reprizalls which was Mutually Signed and Solemnly Ratified accordingly This Stipulation was pursued by several Memorialls to the States General for the space of two years at the Hague and seconded by divers Orders from the Council Board and several Letters of Recomendation from his Maiesty to the said States under his Sign Manual which proving all innefectual A Complaint thereof being brought before the House of Commons in the year 1664. was there Espoused with vast Royal Aides towards the Protection and Relief of the Complaynants Therefore they are under great mistakes both in matters of Fact and Iudgment of Law that Report the King was either Surprized or Deceived in his Grant or that the States General had not due Notice of Passing the Letters Patents for Restitution to be made to the said Francis Earl of Shrewsbury and others in the said Patent Mentioned and Expressed being grounded upon several Acts of Parliament and the Ancient Law of Marque and Reprizals The Instances whereof once brought home to a Fiat under the great Seal of England becomes a Decree unalterable like the Laws of the Medes and Persians I beg Your Lordships Pardon and Patience in craving Your Honours Serious Consideration upon the said Case and the Creditors Proposals to his Majesty with the Postscript after them in answer to the Lord Chancellors Arguments on Friday the 26 th of May last when his Lordship gave Iudgment for the King upon the Scire-Facias concerning the said Letters Patents wherein Your Grandfathers Debt is included yet further secured by Collateral Covenants from my self respectively to Your Honour and Sir Thomas Meres for another Debt of 2000 l. Contracted in the year 1641 upon the obligation of William Courten Esq Sir Edward Littleton and Iohn Earl of Bridgewater to Elizabeth Viscountess Cambden due to the said Sir Thomas Meres as Executor of Sir Erazmus de la Fountain Executor of the said Viscountess not doubting of Your Dilligence and Indeavours for obtaining thereof by all ways and means that are Honourable and Iust more especially for those Crying Debts due to many hundreds of Orphants and Widows claiming under my Administration whose cause I shall never desert Yet constantly remaining SIR Your Lordships most faithful and humble Servant George Carew Richmond August 2d 1682. The Case between the King and Carew concerning the Letters Patents for Reprisals hereunto annexted against the Hollanders Briefly and
extinguish Letters of Marque and that for the Reason aforesaid The King having the Power of Peace and War Mr. Carew cannot be a good Subject to involve the Publique by executing these Letters of Marque in times of Peace who as I am informed had 30 Ships out in time of War And the Clauses contained in the Patent that no Peace shall extend to the prejudice of the said Letters Patents before satisfaction was a Clause unusual and incerted by surprize and ought not to have been and is in no sort obligatory Wherefore I give Iudgment That the Letters Patents shall be brought into Court to be cancelled and the Enrollment thereof razed ☞ The Argument turns upon his Lordship the King being sole Legislator of Peace and War The Clause of continuance in the Patent hath the force of an Act of Parliament His Lordship would be both Judge and Party and sole Arbiter if a Writ of Error did not lie in the Kings-Bench and finally in Parliament to reverse his Erroneous Iudgment A Copy of the Order in Chancery Veneris 26 die Maii Anno Regni Caroli secund ' Regis tricesimo quarto Inter Dom ' Regem Quer ' Edmund ' Turnor Mil ' Georg ' Carew Ar ' Defend ' Lord Chancellor THe Record of the Demurrer joyned in the Pety-Bag upon a Scire facias brought by Mr. Attorney General on the behalf of His Majesty for revoking certain Letters of Reprizal granted to the Defendents the 19th of May 1665. coming this present day to be argued before the Right Honourable the Lord High-Chancellor of England by vertue of an Order of the 20th instant at which time the Record was read The Defendents Councel desired longer time But upon hearing of Mr. Attorney-General on the behalf of the King his Lordship declared that the matter in debate did concern the Publick and could not admit of any further day to be given to the Defendents And his Lordship having been attended with the Record and duly considered the whole matter is of opinion and doth order That the said Demurrer do stand and that Iudgment be entred up for the King for the revoking the said Letters Patents and doth further order That the Enrollment thereof be vacated upon Record and that the Defendants do forthwith bring into this Court the said Letters Patents and all Exemplifications and Duplicates thereof under Seal to be cancelled Ex. Per George Edwards Deput ' Register On the next morning the Lord Chancellor was pleased in open Court to give order that the Attorney-General should be careful in drawing up the Judgment and that the Clerk of the Pety-Bag should enter it upon the Roll aud exemplifie the whole Record under the Great Seal and send it to the Admiralty-Court to remain there It may be observed That the Scire facias being returned in Easter-Term 1681. and the Plea filed of the same Term and the Demurrer coming in not before Easter Term last the Attorney-General had a whole year to consider of the said Plea which is admitted as to the matters of Fact in all particulars by the said Demurrer and since sworn to be true by one of the Defendants So that the Attorney-General making no Reply insisted only upon the Law The Questions therefore that do naturally arise upon it are Whether the Scire facias be a Legal and warrantable Writ in this Case for the Lord Chancellor to ground his Judgment upon for repealing the Letters Patents without satisfaction so solemnly obtained under the Great Seal of England according to the Laws of the Land or Whether the Plea be not sufficient in Law to support and maintain the Letters Patents until the Debt and Damages be recovered BUt before we come to answer the Lord Chancellor's Arguments it 's absolutely necessary to speak a word or two concerning the Scire facias and the Order entred by the Register that the Defendents should bring the Letters Patents and all Exemplifications and Duplicates thereof under Seal into Court to be cancelled It 's recited in the Record made up pro restitut ' faciend ' Carolo tunc Comiti Salop al' in eisdem Literis Patent ' c. whereas there is no such Patent as is mentioned in the Scire facias Notwithstanding it 's affirmed in the said Order of the 26th of May 1682. That his Lordship had been attended with the Record and duly considered the whole matter and yet in the second Line of the said Record it 's written Carolo tunc Comitis Salop whereas in the Letters Patents for Reprizals it 's mentioned for restitution to be made to Francis Earl of Shrewsbury and others So that the Foundation being bad the Structure must fall to the Ground there being no such Patent as the Scire fas ' recites Whereupon a Distringas is since issued forth to the Sheriff of Mid. to distrain all the Lands and Tenements of George Carew within his Bayliwick until the said Patent Exemplifications and Duplicates thereof under Seal be brought into Court and cancelled which is impossible for him to do being out of his power the said Duplicates and Exemplifications being in the hands of several Persons beyond the Seas with Assignments and Covenants that they shall continue effectual in Law until the Debt of 151612 l. with Damages shall be recovered and received according to the words of the Grant and the King's Declaration Wherefore it would be both Honourable and Just for any Ministers of State in England or Holland to bring the Scire facias in one hand and Money to satisfie the Debt and Damages in the other And without that Quid pro quo under his Lordship's favour the Patent cannot be legally revoked repealed or made void Yet for satisfaction of all Mankind that the Defendents will abide by their Plea they have retained their Councel to give modest Answers to the Lord Chancellor's Arguments as followeth who holds it convenient to begin at the root where his Lordship ended That the Clause of continuance was unusual and incerted by surprize and ought not to have been and is in no sort obligatory 1. The stipulation for extinguishing all other Losses and Damages by the Treaty 1662. from the like Sovereign Remedies 2. The States denyal of making satisfaction for the Spoils and Depredations of those two Ships according to the said stipulation 3. The Services and Sufferings of Courten and Pyndar for the Crown of England so eminently known to all Parts of the World 4. And the great Supplies given to His Majesty in Parliament for the Protection of His Subjects at the very time the said Patent for Reprizals was passing through Sir Heneage Finch's Office when he was Solicitor-General upon the Negotiation of Mr. Gilbort Crouch were four invincible Arguments for the King to pass this Grant of common Right to his Subjects with those two Clauses of a continuando until the Debt 151612 l. wiâ—h Costs and Damages should be recovered and received the King having declared so much
in his Speech to both Houses of Parliament and expressed in the very body of the Patent in these words For relief of Our said Subjects whom We take Our selves in Honour and Iustice concernd to be satisfied and re-paid So that the King declares Himself equally Great and Just. Therefore neither surprized nor deceived in this Grant of Reprizals that had passed the Test of all the chief Officers of State and Trust in the Kingdom whose Judgments are Arraigned by questioning the validity of the said Grant The reasons are very obvious to all Mankind that the Patent ought to be so worded until the Debt and Damages shall be recovered and received for that there is no other remedy for the Subjects relief but such Grants grounded upon the Law of Marque after Justice denied in the Case of a Spoil This Clause of continuance distinguisheth between general and particular Reprizals the one being an Act of War the other a Process at Law and out of the King's Power to obstruct the restitution of this Debt and Damages to the persons interessed and injured otherwise the remedy would prove a Grievance after such vast Expences in ascertaining the Debt and Damages according to the Rules of Law if the Grant should not be obligatory It is in the Power of the States of Holland or the King to satisfie this Debt and Damages to make good the King 's own words and preserve His Honour and Justice entire which ought to be kept Sacred and Inviolable And if the King cannot pardon the least Trespass when sued for reparation in the ordinary Course of Law à fortiori He cannot pardon a Spoil after a Judicial Grant to recover it according to the Laws and Statutes of the Realm General Letters of Marque in time of War are ambulatory and revokable at Pleasure being usually granted to all persons in all Nations that will ask for the same to weaken the Enemy as they did at Oast-End Dunkirk Flushen and Diep in the times of War between Spain and England France and England and Holland and England and those are called Privatters or Private men of War of whom the Lord High-Admiral hath a tenth part of all Prizes And these are the Letters of Marque the Lord Chancellor so often mentions in his Arguments whereof there are hundreds of Precedents in the Courts of Admiralty in England Holland France and Spain which are Temporary Grants and determinable at Pleasure or certain days prefixt under the Seal of the Admiralty By the sacred prescriptions in Holy Writ restitution is to be made double the value of the property injuriously taken which implies the Charge of Prosecution and if the Trespasser be not able to satisfie he shall be Sold for his Theft or kept for a Ransom Upon this ground the old Writs in the Register and F. N. B were made and our Ancestors were so careful for the preservation of every English-mans Right and Property and the encouragement of Navigation and Commerce That Merchants Strangers resident in England and their Goods were Arrested by those Writs for satisfaction of Injuries done at Sea by the People of that Kingdom or Nation that did the wrong whereof they were Subjects But upon the Petition of the Merchants Staplers and others to the Parliament in the 27th of Edw. 3. c. 17. The force of those Writs were taken away and it was ordained and Enacted by the same Parliament That all Persons Spoyled at Sea shall have the Law of Marque without fraud or deceipt that is of taking the value of the Loss and Damage again Bracton Says Quod nihil aliud potest Rex in terris cum sit Minister Dei Vicarius quam solum quod de jure potest Every Man hath a Right to Justice and every Subject of England having a Fundamental property in his Goods and a Fundamental liberty of his Person It is repugnant to the Laws of God Religion and Property to take away our Goods for reason of State without price or satisfaction he is not a Subject but a Slave that suffers his Substance to be taken from him against his Will Infinite are the Arguments that may be used and deduced from the Law of Reason and Natural Justice in the vindication of this Patent However its neccessary to answer the Lord Chancellour Gradatim to his Arguments aforesaid His Lordship was pleased to say That the Chancery had an Admiral Iurisdiction by the Statute 31. Hen. 6. cap. 4. for the speedy relief of Strangers Robbed at Sea by the Kings Subjects His Lordship would here beg the question and have all Mankind to take it for granted That those who Act under this His Majesties Royal Charter and Authority are Robbers and Theeves Notwithstanding the express words in the Patent That it shall be lawful for them to recover the said Debt and Damages although a Peace for General Reprizals concerning the Dominion of the Sea should be concluded It s true the said Statute of Hen 6. provides a remedy for those that have safe Conduct and are Robbed by the Kings Subjects The Lord Chancellour calling to him any of the Judges of either Bench who upon Bill of Complaint shall cause Restitution to be made of Ships and Goods to the parties grieved This Statute may be still in Force but not practicable since the Odious and Arbitrary power of the Admiralty Court was taken away by the Statute of Hen. 8. in the 28th year of his Reign for Tryal of Piracy by Jurors according to the course of the Common Law However the Statute of Hen. 6. recited by his Lordship comes not to this case upon the Scire Facias But it s enacted and ordained by the Statute made in the 20th year of Hen. 6. cap. 1 And several other Statutes of this Realm That all Letters of safe Conduct Treaties and Leagues of Amity and Alliance shall be Inrolled of Record in Chancery or else not to be of any Force or Effect in the Law And the Treaty at Breda being not Inrolled or made any matter of Record in Chancery whereby the Kings Subjects might have recourse thereunto cannot any ways affect this grant to Turnor and Carew And many proper Officers have lost their Heads in former ages for their miscarriages not inrolling in due time such publick Treaties Leagues and Alliances It s also true as the Lord Chancellour observes the Letters Patents to Turnor and Carew were granted in time of War for an injury done to private Persons in time of peace but provided that no Subsequent peace should affect it without a recovery or satisfaction to be made for the Debt and Damages either by force of the Grant or Composition made with the Persons interessed The Fiat passed in the month of May 1665. But the proceedings that brought it to that conclusion continued de die in diem ever since the Treaty of Alliance made in the year 1662. Wherein it was concluded and agreed That the said Debt and Damages so assertained and Liquidated