with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the english-English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
of the Lord and did weigh the things After that when the Bill was brought into the house my name was put in there with several others so I came to be in and what I did was upon these two Accounts First in obedience as I told you to the Lord which was the chief thing And in obedience to that which was then the Supreme Authority of this Nation and therefore I shall mention these grounds very briefly because indeed the things that are controverted here at this time they have been controverted in the Face of the whole world in several Nations and the Lord hath given an answer upon solemn Appeals to these things I shall therefore mention them very briefly because they have been so publique The Declarations and Remonstrances that have passed between the King and Parliament concerning the beginning of the Wars L. Chief Baron Mr. Ca. I would be very loth to interrupt you But I see what course is taken and the peoples eyes are upon you You seek delays and against the course of Prisoners you say you will confess but you do confess the Fact after you have spent the time And all the Witnesses are heard for this that you speak of now you go about to justifie as in the fear of the Lord or any thing of that nature that we cannot allow of but we do allow you to speak and give the heads of what you will say as to the matter of Fact but to hear you make discourses and debates which are a justification of a horrid and notorious Treason we cannot hear it we ought not to hear the maintaining of open Treason cannot hear you to speak that upon your opening which is Treason We are willing that you open the Heads what you have to say we are upon our consciences and to appear before God for what we do and so are you too but remember the Devil sometimes appears in the habit of an Angel of light If you will couch your matter in a few words the Court affords you liberty which is indeed beyond the strict Rules of Law Ca. You say you sit here by the Laws of the Land and are sworn to maintain the Laws We ought not that we should plead to this Indictment for what we did was by an Act of Parliament Court Pray Sir this must not be let fall without reproof or rather punishment Ca. I believe there is no Precedent for it Court Sir We know the act of Parliament as well as you and most of the standers by You go upon a false ground there was no such Act of the Supreme Authority as you pretend to these are but Phantasms of your own brain and must not be suffered these things have been controverted and decided many a time again and again Ca. I desire to have time to speak how it was begun and carried on or else how shall I be able to make my defence or to tell you what are the Heads I wil insist upon I shall declare the grounds upon which the Parliament did proceed L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew If that be your ground the Parliament did it the House of Commons did it I have something to offer not to interrupt you to the then Commons Ca. In my humble opinion for the maintaining of this It was by Authority the supreme Authority by which it was done L. Chief Baron Did you sign this Warrant for the summoning and warning of that Court And did you sign the Warrant for executing the late King Ca. I desire I may go on with my defence L. Chief Baron We would not have you be mistaken You seem to confess the act and now you justifie it you cannot speak any thing for your justification till you confess the fact Ca. I shall speak to that in its time L. Chief Baron You must speak to that first that is matter of Fact whereupon the Jury are to go Ca. There is matter of Law Court You must speak to matter of Fact first Ca. I say this is that I was about to say That the Supreme Authority Court You must speak to the Fact first Whether you did compass c. the Kings death or not that is the first ground if you did not there is an end of the business It is proved against you that you did it if you come to justifie it it must be when you have first agreed the matter of Fact Ca. I desire I may have liberty to proceed either for matter of Fact or Law as I list Court No no you must first speak to the Fact you may be after heard You know in all cases they must begin with the Fact either denying or extenuating For matter of Law in this case must arise from the fact Ca. But I humbly conceive there is a matter of Law in this case and it is matter of Law that is above the jurisdiction of this inferior Court Mr. Sol. Finch I pray that he may be held to the issue Guilty or Not Guilty If he deny the Fact let us relie upon our Evidence and he upon his he cannot come to Law till he hath confessed the Fact The question is Whether you did or not there is the Fact if you have any thing to justifie that follows Ca. I was upon that and going on to shew the reasons and grounds of it Court First you must confess it if you will shew the reasons why you did it Ca. I told you there was some things I did Coun. What are those some Ca. I do acknowledg that I was there at the Court. Coun. Did you sign the Warrants for summoning that Court and for Execution of the King Ca. Yes I did sign them both Coun. Then say what you will L. Chief Baron Now go on Ca. In the Year 1640. there was a Parliament called according to the Laws and constitutions of this Nation and after that there was some difference between the King and the Parliament the two Houses of Parliament Lords and Commons and thereupon the King did withdraw from the two Houses of Parliament as appears by their own Declaration The great Remonstrance printed in 1642. and thereupon the Lords and Commons did declare L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew The Court are of opinion not to suffer you to go on in this they say it tends not only to justifie your Act but you cast in Bones here to make some difference You talk of the Lords and Commons you have nothing to do with that business your authority that you pretend to was an Act of Parliament as they called themselves and that where there was but 46 Commons in the House and but 26 Voted it Ca. I say that the Lords and Commons by their Declaration Mr. J. Foster Hold your hand a while Sir not so fast you go to raise up those differences which I hope are asleep new Troubles to revive those things which by the grace of God are extinct you are not to be suffered in this it is not the singling
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
such a Priviledge that no man shall ever be called to account for any thing spoken in Parliament if he be not called to account by the House before any other Member be suffered to speak Lord Ch. Bar. That is the House will not determine but that doth not extend to your Case you are not charged here criminally for speaking those words that have been testified against you but for Compassing and Imagining the Kings death of which there are other Evidences and this but an Evidence to prove that Scot. My Lord I never did say these words with that aggravation which is put upon them I have a great deal of hard measure as to say I hope I shall never repent I take God to witness I have often because it was spoken well of by some and ill by others I have by prayers and tears often sought the Lord that if there were iniquity in it he would shew it me I do affirm I did not say so Mr. Baker My Lord I omitted something which was this I had occasion to speak with Mr. Scot whilest Richard's Parliament was sitting and among other discourse insisting upon some things that Richard had done saith he I have cut off one Tyrants head and I hope to cut off another Scot. My Lord This is but a single witness Mr. Soll. Gen. I suppose he meant Rich. for he was a Tyrant Lord Ch. Bar. Speak on Mr. Scot whatever you have to say Sc. If that he laid aside as an impertinency I have the less to say L. Ch. Bar. The next thing you have to do is to answer to the fact whether you did it or did it not Scot. I say this Whatever I did be it more or less I did it by he Command and Authority of a Parliamentary Power I did sit as one of the Judges of the King and that doth justifie me whatever the nature of the fact was Lo. Ch. Bar. We have had these things alledged before us again and again The Court are clearly satisfied in themselves that this act could not be done by any Parliamentary power whatsoever I must tell you what hath been delivered that there is no power on earth that hath any coercive power over the King neither single Persons nor a Community neither the people Collectively nor Representatively In the next place that which you offer to be done as by Authority of Parliament it was done by a few members of the House of Commons there were but 46 there at that time and of these 46 not above 26 that voted it at that time the House of Lords was sitting who had rejected it and without them there was no Parliament there was a force upon the Parliament there was excluded seven parts of eight Supposing you were a full House of Commons and that without exception there was not Authority enough and it is known to you no man better that there never was a House of Commons before this time that this foul Act was made for erecting that High Court of Justice as you call'd it assumed that Authority of making a Law you cannot pretend to act by Authority of Parliament and because you would excuse it you did it by Authority of Parliament whether it were good or no If a man do that which is unlawful by an unlawful Authority the assuming to do it by that Authority is an Aggravation not an Extenuation of the Fact It was over-ruled I think my Lords will tell you That they do not allow of that Authority at all either to be for Justification or Plea Scot. My Lords I humbly pray leave to say that without offence to the Court every person whereof I honour This Court hath not Cognizance to Declare whether it were a Parliament or no. Lo. Ch. Bar. That was objected too and we must aquaint you That first of all it is no Derogation to Parliaments That what is a Statute or not a Statute should be adjudged by the Common Laws We have often brought it into question whether such and such a thing was an Act of Parliament or not any man may pretend to an Authority of Parliament If forty men should meet at Shooters Hill as the Little Convention did at Westminster and say We do declare our selves a Parliament of England because they do so shall not this be judged what is a Statute and what not It is every days practise we do judge upon it the Fact is so known to every body they did assume to themselves a Royal Authority it hath been over-ruled already it hath been the mistake of many the vulgar acceptation of the word Parliament A Parliament consists of the King Lords and Commons it is not the House of Commons alone and so it is not by Authority of Parliament It is not unless it be by that Authority which makes up the Parliament You cannot give one instance That ever the House of Commons did assume the Kings Authority Scot. I can many where there was nothing but a House of Commons Court When was that Scot. In the Saxons time Court You say it was in the Saxons time you do not come to any time within 600 years you speak of those times wherein things were obscure Scot. I know not but that it might be as lawful for them to make Laws as this late Parliament being called by the Keepers of the Liberties of England My Lords I have no seditious design but to submit to the providence of God Court This is notorious to every man This we have already heard and over-ruled L. Finch That that I hope is this That Mr. Scot will contradict that which he hath said before that is That he hopes he should not repent I hope he doth desire to repent Mr. Scot for this we must over-rule it as we have done before there is nothing at all to be pleaded to the Jurisdiction and this point hath been determined before Scot. The Parliament informer times consisted not so much of King Lords and Commons but King and Parliament In the beginning of the Parliament in 1641. the Bishops were one of the three Estates if it be not properly to be called a Parliament a legislative Power though it be not a Parliament it is binding If two Estates may take away the third if the second do not continue to execuâ—â— their trust he that is in occupancy may have a title to the whole I do affirm I have a Parliamentary Authority a legislative power to justifie me Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot what you speak concerning the Lords Spiritual is nothing to your Case be it either one way of other it was done by an Act of Parliament with consent of the King Lords and Commons though you will bring it down to make these Commons have a legislative Power I told you it was over-ruled before We have suffered you to expatiate into that which was a thing not intended by many of my Lords that you should have any such power to expatiate into that which is
I did it ignorantly not knowing what I did I shall not deny the matter of Fact but as to that I pleaded Not Guilty before it was in relation to that which I was ignorant of the Law of the Nation I have not been bred to it I humbly desire your Lordships to consider that what I did was done ignorantly not knowing the Law Counsel What was that Smith I do confess that I sat in the Court I do not remember that I signed or sealed both the Warrants being shewed him adds My Lord I confess the hands are like mine but whether they be so or no I know not Counsel Then we will prove it Is the Seal yours Smith I do not know Counsel Do you confess you were in the Painted Chamber the 29th of January Do you remember any thing of that Smith I do not certainly know that Counsel My Lord he hath said enough Shall the Jury doubt of that which he believes Smith I do not remember that I did write it Counsel My Lord we press it no farther he hath confessed enough Smith My Lord what I have don I beseech you consider I did it in ignorance not knowing the Law there were those about me that were able to call me who were then in Authority whom I dared not disobey if so I had been in danger also Counsel My Lords we have done be pleased to direct the Jury upon these several Evidences and Confessions Smith I beg one word I must declare this I can speak it seriously That from the first to the last of these unhappy Wars I have been a Man of trouble and sorrow I have been as many wiser Men have been run upon Error My Lord I know not what I have done I pray that this Court will be pleased to be a Mediator for me that I may have his Majesties favour and that this Petition may be received on my behalf He then delivered his Petition to the Court. I can rejoice for that happy settlement that is again in the Nations and declare chearfully my humble submission to that Government and desire the Lord will bless and prosper his Majesty and the Parliament in these Nations My Lord I rendred my self according to the Proclamation I shall say no more Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen you of the Jury These Prisoners that stand before you at the Bar that is Mr. Harvy Pennington Marten Millington Titchburn Roe Lilburn and Mr. Smith there are eight these are Persons who by the Act of Indempnity are to be tried for their Lives for the Treasons they have committed but no Execution is to be until the Parliament have further considered the Matter that is before us and you are to find the Matter of Fact What Mercy they shall find hereafter that is to be left as I told you to the consideration of the Parliament we are to proceed according to Law and Justice They are all Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our late Soveraign Lord Charles the First of most glorious memory And for that that hath been opened to you there are so many Overt Acts which are as so many Evidences to prove that Indictment which is the compassing and imagination of their Hearts to put the King to Death If any one of these be proved that is alone enough to prove the Indictment which is the compassing and imagining of the Heart that is the Treason the other are but Evidences If any thing burst forth from the Mouth or from the Hand as here it is these are Evidences of the imagination of the Heart for this you have heard by the confession of all of them that they did enough to find the Indictment they have all of them confessed their sitting upon the King in that traiterous Assembly which they called the High Court of Justice There is one of the Overt Acts expresly laid down in the Indictment they took upon them an Authority to consider how to put the King to death and that they did put the King to death but they were mistaken as some of them said that the actual murdering of the King was not their meaning But if they did that which tended towards it they are all guilty of Treason it is all one to you if they be guilty of any of these either Sitting Sentencing or Signing they are guilty and all of these except two are guilty of all these The Matter is clear and pregnant there is something hath been said by many of them with a great deal of expression of sorrow they did confess all but one the Fact and that which tended to their defence was ignorance but that doth not at all concern you It will be taken in its due time into consideration the several deportments of them all that is for another Judicature Your business is to find the Matter of Fact only this let me repeat unto you There is Mr. Harvy who hath pleaded several Matters which are not proper for you expressing his sorrow and penitence We shall not trouble you with that because they are for the consideration of another Court We ought all to have a tender compassion ought to be sorry with and for them that are sorrowful The like of Alderman Pennington Marten hath done that which looks forward more than backward I could wish with all my heart he had looked more backward that is to repentance of that which is past than obedience to that which is to come it is a trouble to repeat those things which he said himself and truly I hope in charity he meant better than his words were Millington he hath done the like with the rest confessed the Fact put himself upon Mercy wholly and said He was over-awed by the present Power This I repeat not as any thing to you who are to consider only Matter of Fact For Alderman Titchburn he hath spoken very fully and truly very conscienciously upon the whole Matter acknowledges his ignorance his sorrow his conviction in point of Conscience and I beseech God Almighty to incline his heart more and more to repentance They that crucified Christ to use his own words through ignorance found mercy Colonel Roe He confesses the same wholly and casts himself upon the King's Mercy and he thought it a blessed thing that the King was restored again and submitted wholly to mercy and so did Mr. Lilburn he said he went to his Chamber and mourned the day the King was beheaded I am very glad he had so early a sense of it William Smith He did it ignorantly he was not guilty thus far that was he was led on even like one silly Sheep that follows another by what relation I have heard of the Person at that time he was not thought fit to be of the Privy Council There is nothing more to say to you the Fact is confessed by them all It is so clear you need not go from the Bar. After a little consultation between the Jurors they returned to their places
speak with his Parliament I rising up one told me I must not be heard for the President was to give Judgement and said there was an order that none should speak in Court Mr. Downes did move and they did adjourn the Court and I was glad I got out Cromwell laughed and smiled and jeared in the Court of Wards I hope your Lordship will be pleased to consider I was no Contriver no Soldier that put the force upon the House that erected the Court None of the Law-makers or did any thing maliciously against the King My Lord I was looked upon with an evil eye for regarding the King's friends in the Country Gray he told me the King would not die I hope he will not said I. The next day on Monday I went to the House they were labouring to get hands for his Execution at the Door I refused and went into the House saith Cromwell those that are gone in shall set their hands I will have their hands now That night I went to the Lord Grays and he said I am afraid they will put him to death I said so also My Lord I have been a great sufferer I was drawn in trapan'd into it since being a friend to the Kings friends I am almost ruined in my estate I beseech your Lordships make the best interpretation I hope you will believe I was no Contriver I humbly lay hold upon the Kings mercy and favour I came in upon the Proclamation I pray that this Honourable Court will prefer my Petition to the King and both Houses of Parliament which the Court then received William Heveningham My Lord in 1648. we were under a force under the tyranny of an Army they were our Masters for a malicious and a traiterous heart I had not I do absolutely deny the signing the Warrant for summoning the Court and also that Warrant for execution of the King at the time of sealing I had that Courage and Boldness that I protested against it Counsel We do not question him for that but for sitting in the high Court of Justice and that upon the day of the sentence do you deny that Heveningham My Lord I cannot say positively Counsel If you deny the matter of fact it must be proved Heveningham I cannot say positively but it may be I might Counsel Either say positively you did or else let the Witnesses be call'd Heveningham Truly my Lord I think I did but my after-actions Lord Chief Baron Mr. Heveningham that shall be considered Counsel My Lord to sit upon the day of Sentence was high Treason in it self and is an evidence of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death Hev I shall lay hold of the Declaration I came in upon the Proclamation I pray your Lordships to interceed for me to the King and both Houses of Parliament I pray the mercy of this Court L. C. B. You of the Jury they have all confessed and therefore you may go together Simon Meyne My Lords I have forgot my Petition it is at my lodging I desire I may send it at night John Downes and Peter Temple prayed the like favour L. Ch. B. Do send them they shall be received The Jury having consulted together a certain time they went to their places Clerk Gentlemen are you agreed of your verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall say for you Jury Our Fore-man Clerk John Downes hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner how say you is he guilty of High Treason whereof he stands indicted and hath been arraigned or not guilty Forem Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper What Goods and Chattels c. Forem None to our knowledge And the like verdicts at the same time passed in the same manner against Vincent Potter Augustine Garland Symon Meyne James Temple Peter Temple Thomas Waite and William Heveningham Potter I hope I may be freed from Irons I am in pain and a man of bulk L. Ch. B. We can give no order in it we must leave it to the Sheriff Potter I begg it of you my Lord. L. Ch. B. We must leave it to the Sheriff Mr. Heveningham You must withdraw from the Bar. Clerk Officer bring down VValler Fleetwood Hacker Axtel Hulet Penington Marten Millington Titchborne Roe Lilburne Smith and Harvey and set them to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Hardress VValler hold up thy hand thou hast been Indicted and found guilty of High Treason what canst thou say why judgment should not pass on thee to dy according to Law VValler My Lords I am now it seems Convicted by Law and so adjudged Your Lordships the other day on my desire told me I might have liberty to speak upon my trial I must now beg the like upon a condemned person L. Ch. B. You are Convicted not Condemned Waller My Lords I was the first that pleaded Guilty I bless God that he gave me a heart to do it I find most peace in the doing of it and since there is nothing left but hopes of Mercy I humbly submit it to your Lordships to hear me in this sad condition that that may make me seem more capable of mercy I have my Lords been so unhappy to have been transplanted out of my Country these thirty years I have been but once these eleven years in England this must needs make me a stranger L. Ch. B. I must not hinder you because it is for mercy that you plead but consider with your self whether it will not be better to give it in a Petition I leave it to you we can do nothing in point of Mercy but Judgment Waller Onely this My Lord whether I am not the more capable of your mercy L. Ch. B. That you may understand it the Act of Indempnity of Parliament hath excepted you yet upon some qualifications we are to proceed according to Law that is to go to Conviction and Judgment The Act sayes that after Judgment there shall be no execution but that it shall be suspended till a further Act of Parliament to be passed for that purpose so that in the mean time we are to proceed no further then Judgment That which concerns Mercy is referred to another place If you please to say any thing to satisfie us or to go by way of Petition it must be left to you but what you say for mercy is nothing to us Waller I humbly thank your Lordships for this clear and noble dealing and withall I would beg that these people that are witnesses of my shame and guilt may know that it was a force and temptation upon me I shall not insist much I have said that I did plead guilty which was most safe to my own Conscience yet I should make it appear that I did appear more to preserve the King from Tryal and Sentence then any other Lord Finch Sir Hardress Waller I have heard of late of your sorrow which I was glad to hear of because you are my kinsman both by your Father and Mothers side and also my
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
themselves an Authority to make Laws which was never heard before Authority to make Laws What Laws a Law for an High Court of Justice a Law for lives to sentence mens lives And whose Life the Life of their Sovereign upon such a King who as to them had not only redressed long before at the beginning of the Parliament all Grievances that were and were imaginable taken away the Star-Chnmber High-Commission-Court and about Shipping such a King and after such Concessions that He had made in the Isle of Wight when He had granted so much that was more than the People would have desired When these few Commons not onely without but excluding the rest of the Commons not onely without but excluding the rest but rejecting the Lords too that then sat when these few Commons shall take upon them this Authority and by colour of this their King Soveraign Liege Lord shall be sentenced put to Death and that put to Death even as their King and sentenced as their King put to Death as their King and this before His own Door even before that Place where He used in Royal Majesty to hear Embassadors to have His Honourable Entertainments that this King shall be thus put to Death at Noon-day it is such an Aggravation of Villany that truly I cannot tell what to say No story that ever was I do not think any Romance any Fabulous Tragedy can produce the like Gentlemen If any Person shall now come and shroud himself under this pretended Authority or such a pretended Authority you must know that this is so far from an Excuse that it is an Height of Aggravation The Court of Common-Pleas is the Common Shop for Justice in that Court an appeal is brought for Murther which ought to have been in the King's Bench the Court gives Judgment the Party is condemned and executed in this Case it is Murther in them that executed because they had no lawful Authority I speak this to you to shew you that no man can shroud himself by colour of any such false or pretended Authority I have but one thing more to add to you upon this head and that is which I should have said at first If two or more do compass or Imagine the King's Death if some of them go on so far as to Consullation if others of them go further they sentence and execute put to Death in this Case they are all Guilty the first Consultation was Treason I have no more to add but one Particular a few Words As you will have Bills presented against those for Compassing Imagining Adjudging the King so possibly you may have Bils presented against some of those for Levying War against the King Levying of War which is another Branch of the State of 25th of Edward the Third It was but Declarative of the Common Law it was no new Law By that Law it was treason to Levy War against the King But to levy War against the Kings Authority you must know is Treason too If men will take up Armes upon any Publick pretence if it be to expulse Aliens if but to pull out Privy Councellours if it be but against any Particular Laws to reform Religion to pull down Enclosures in all these cases If Persons have assembled themselves in a Warlike manner to do any of these Acts this is Treason and within that Branch of Levying War against the King This was adjudged in the late Kings Time in Berstead's case Queen Elizabeth's Henry the Eighth's former Times King Jame's Time much more 〈◊〉 men will go not onely to Levy War against the King but against the Laws all the Laws subvert all the Laws to set up new Laws Models of their own If any of these cases come to be presented to you you know what the Laws are To conclude you are now to enquire of Blood of Royal Blood of Sacred Blood Blood like that of the Saints under the Altar crying Quousque Domine How long Lord c. This Blood crys for Vengeance and it will not be appeased without a Bloody Sacrifice Remember but this and I have done I shall not press you upon your Oaths you are Persons of Honour you all know the Obligation of an Oath This I will say that he that conceals or favours the guilt of Blood takes it upon himself wilfully knowingly takes it upon himself And we know that when the Jews said Let his blood be on us and our seed it continued to them and their Posterity to this day God save the King Amen Amen His Lordships Speech being ended Thomas Lee of the Middle-Temple London Gentleman was called to give in the Names of his Witnesses The names of the Witnesses then and there sworn follow William Clark Esq James Nutley Esq Mr. George Masterson Clerk George Farringdon Hercules Huncks Dr. William King Martin Foster John Baker Stephen Kirk Richard Nunnelly John Powel John Throckmorton John Blackwel Ralph Hardwick Thomas Walkley Gentleman Holland Simpson Benjamin Francis Colonel Matthew Thomlinson Griffith Bodurdo Esq Samuel Boardman Robert Carr Esq Richard Young Sir Purbock Temple John Rushworth Esq John Gerrard John Hearn Mr. Coitmore Mr. Cunningham Mr. Clench Willinm Jessop Esq Edward Austin Darnel Esq Mr. Brown Thomas Tongue John Bowler Mr. Sharp Mr. Lee. Robert Ewer John King Edward Folley Mr. Gouge Anthony Mildmay Esq The Grand Jury returned the Indictment Billa Vera. Court adjourned to the Old-Bailey 10th of October The 10. of October 1660. SIR John Robinson Knight Lieutenant of his Majesties Tower of London according to his Warrant received delivered to Mr. Sheriff the Prisoners hereafter named who were in several Coaches with a strong Guard of Horse and Foot conveyed to Newgate and about nine of the Clock in the Morning delivered to the Keepers of that Prison and thence brought to the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily London where the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer were in Court assembled and where their Indictment was publickly read by Edward Shelton Esq Clerk of the Crown Sessions-House in the Old-Baily 10. October 1660. THE Court being Assembled and Silence commanded the Commission of Oyer and Terminer was again read After which Sir Hardress Waller Collonel Thomas Harrison and Mr. William Heveningham were brought to the Bar and commanded to hold up their Hands which Sir Hardress Waller and Mr. Heveningham did but Harrison being commanded to hold up his Hand answered I am here and said My Lord if you please I will speak a Word Court Hold up your hand and you shall be heard in duetime Mr. Harrison the course is That you must hold up your hand first And then he held up his hand The Indictment was read purporting That He together with others not having the fear of God before his Eyes and being instigated by the Devil did Maliciously Treasonably and Feloniously contrary to his due Allegiance and bounden Duty sit upon and condemn our late Soveraign Lord King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory and also did upon
Harrison Will you give me your Advice Court We do give you Advice The Advice is there is no other Plea but guilty or Not guilty You shall be heard when you have put your self upon your Trial. Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Tho. Harrison You do deny me Councel then I do plead Not guilty Clerk You plead Not guilty Is this your Plea Th. Harrison Yes Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison I will be tryed according to the Laws of the Lord Clerk Whether by God and the Countrey Lord chief Baron Now I must tell you if you do not put your self upon your Countrey you have said nothing Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison It is to put my self upon what you please to put me upon Court If you understand you are not every man you are versed in Proceedings of Law you know you must put your self upon the Trial of God and your Countrey if you do not it is as good as if you had said nothing Th. Harrison You have been misinformed of me Court You have pleaded Not guilty That which remains is you must be tried by God and the Countrey otherwise we must record your standing Mute Clerk How will you be Tried Th. Harrison I will be tried according to the ordinary course Clerk Whether by God and the Countrey You must speak the Words Th. Harrison They are vain words Court We have given you a great deal of Liberty and Scope which is not usual It is the course and proceedings of Law if you will be tried you must put your self upon God and the Countrey Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison I do offer my self to be tried in your own way by God and my Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk William Heveningham hold up your hand How sayest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted and art now arrraigned or Not guilty Will. Heveningham Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Will. Heveningham By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Sir Hard. Waller then presented his Petition to the Court directed To the King's Majesty and the Parliament which was received but not at this Court read And then the three Persons aforesaid were dismissed Clerk Bring to the Bar Isaac Pennington Esq Henry Marten Esque Gilbert Millington Gentleman Robert Tichbourn Esq Owen Roe Esq and Robert Lilburn Gentleman Who were called and appeared at the Bar and being commanded severally held up their hands The Indictment was read again as to the former Persons Clerk Isaac Pennington Hold up thy hand How sayest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Isaac Pennington Not guilty my Lord. Clerk How will you be tryed Isaac Pennington By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Henry Marten How sayest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Hen. Marten I desire the benefit of the Act of Oblivion Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Court You are to understand the Law is this the same to you and every one You are to plead Guilty or Not guilty If you will demand the benefit of the Act of Oblivion it is a confession of being Guilty Hen. Marten I humbly conceive the Act of Indempnity Court You must plead Guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten If I plead I lose the benefit of that Act. Court You are totally excepted out of the Act. Hen. Marten If it were so I would plead My name is not in that Act. Court Henry Martin is there Mr. Sollicitor Gen. Surely he hath been kept close Prisoner indeed if he hath not seen the Act of Indemnity Shew it him Mr. Shelton opening the Act. Court How is it written Clerk It is Henry Martin And then the Act was shewed to the said Mr. Marten Hen. Marten Henry Martin My name is not so it is Harry Marten Court The difference of the Sound is very little You are known by that Name of Martin Hen. Marten I humbly conceive all Penal Statutes ought to be understood Literally Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten I am not Henry Martin Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Court Be advised The effect of this Plea will be Judgment Here Mr Sollicitor Gen. cited somewhat Parallel to this in a Case formerly of Baxter where the Name was Bagster with an S and adjudged all one being of the same sound Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten My Lord I desire Council There will arise Matter of Law as well as Fact Court You are Indicted for Treason for a Malicious Trayterous compassing and Imagining the King's Death If you have any thing of Justification plead Not guilty and you shall be heard for if it be Justifiable it is not Treason The Rule is Either you must plead Guilty and so confess or Not guilty and put your self upon your Trial there is no Medium Hen. Marten May I give any thing in Evidence before Verdict Court Yes upon your Trial you may give any thing in Evidence that the Law warrants to be lawful Evidence Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Court Understand one thing because I would not have you mistaken you cannot give in Evidence the Misnomer but any thing to the matter of Fact Hen. Marten I submit and plead Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Hen. Marten By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Gilbert Millington Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted and art now arraigned or Not guilty Gilb. Millington My Lord I am an ancient man and deaf I humbly crave your Lordships pardon to hear me a few words I will promise it shall be pertinent enough Mr. Sol. Gen. Impertinent enough he means Court You must plead either Guilty and so confess it or Not guilty and then you shall be heard any thing for your justification Clerk And you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington I desire I may Court There is nothing you can say but Guilty or Not guilty All other Discourses turn upon your self Clerk And you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington You might enlighten me in some scruples Does my pause trouble you much I should not be long Court Your particelar case cannot differ from others Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington There are some things in the Indictment that I can say Not Guilty to There are others that I must deal ingenuously and confess them Clerk Are you Guilty in Manner and Form as you are indicted or Not guilty Gilb. Millington Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Gilb. Millington By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Robert Tichbourn Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted
these Sacred Persons that the Sons of Violence should never approach to hurt them For My Lord the very Thoughts of such an Attempt hath ever been presented by all Laws in all Ages and all Nations of the World as a most unpardonable Treason My Lord This is that that brought the two Eunuchs in the Persian-Court to their just Destruction Voluerunt insurgere saies the Text and yet that was enough to Attain them And so My Lord it was by the Roman Laws too as Tacitus observes Qui deliberant desciverunt To Doubt or Hesitate in a Point of Allegiance is direct Treason and Apostasie And upon this Ground it is that the Statute upon which your Lordships are now to proceed hath these express Words If a man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of the King c. Kings who are God's Vicegerents upon Earth have thus far a kind of Resemblance of the Divine Majesty that their Subjects stand accountable to Them for the very Thoughts of their Hearts Not that any Man can know the Heart save God alone but because when the Wicked Heart breaks out into any open Expressions by which it may be judged 't is the Thoughts of the Heart which makes the Treason the Overt-Act is but the Evidence of it My Lords This Care and Caution is not so to be understood as if it were the Single Interest of One Royal Person only The Law doth wisely judge and foresee that upon the Life of the King depends the Laws and Liberties the Estates and Properties the Wealth and Peace the Religion and in Sum the Glory of the Nation My Lords This Judgment of the Law ha's been verified by a sad Experience for when that Blessed King whose Blood we are now making Inquisition for was untimely taken away Religion and Justice both lay buried in the same Grave with Him and there they had slept still if the miraculous Return of Our Gracious Sovereign had not given them a new Resurrection My Lords My Lord Coke in his Comment upon this Statute ha's one Conceit which is somewhat strange I am sure it is very new he seems to think that it would have added to the Perfection of this Law if there had been a time limited for the Party to be accused But certainly the work of this Day has quite consuted that Imagination For here is a Treason that has so long out-faced the Law and the Justice of this Kingdom that if there had been any time of Limitation in the Statute there would have been no Time nor Place left for Punishment And if this Treason had but once grown up to an Impunity it might perhaps have drawn the Guilt of that Innocent Blood and with it the Vengeance due to it upon the whole Nation The Scope of this Iudictment is for the Compassing the Death of the King the rest of the Indictment as the Vsurping Authority over the King's Person the Assembling Sitting Judging and Killing of the King are but so many several Overt-Acts to prove the Intention of the Heart We are not bound under favour to prove every one of these against every particular Person who is Indicted for he that is in at one is guilty in Law of all rest as much as if he had struck the Fatal Stroke it self Nay under favour if we can prove any other overt-Overt-Act besides what is lai'd in the Indictment as the encouraging of the Souldiers to cry out Justice Justice or Preaching to them to go in this Work as Godly and Religious or any other act of all that Catalogue of Villanies for which the Story will be for ever Infamous this may be given in Evidence to prove the Compassing and Imagining the King's Death The conclusion of this Indictment alledges the Fact done to be to the great Displeasure of Almighty God and to the great Disgrace of the People of England A Truth so clear and known that it can neither be heightned by any Aggravation or lessend by any Excuse As for the Fact it self with the Manner of it I shall not need to open it at large for these things were not done in a Corner every true English Heart still keeps within it self a bleeding Register of this Story only my Lords in the way to our Evidence with your Lordships favour this I think may be fit to be said First for the year 1648. for that was the Fatal year of this King and beyond that year we shall not now enquire I say whatsoever in the Year 1648. could have been done by a Parliament to save the Life of a King was done in this Case They opened the way to a Treaty in spight of the Army and while these Sons of Zerviah who were too hard for them were engaged in Service in the Remoter Parts they hastened the Treaty as much as was possible the Debater upon His Majestie 's Concessions were Voted a good ground for Peace notwithstanding the Remonstrances of the Army still flew about their Ears and notwithstanding the Oppositions of a fearful and unbelieving Party of the House-of Commons whom the Army had frighted into an Awful and a Slavish Dependance upon them And when nothing else could be done for Him they were so true to the Obligations they lay under that they resolved to fall with Him and did so For the Army who saw the Treaty proceed so fast made as great hast to break it They seize upon the blessed Person of our Sacred King by Force and bring Him to London and here they force the Parliament shut out some Members imprison others and then called this wretched little Company which was left a Parliament By this and before they had taken upon them the Boldness to dissolve the House of Peers they pass a Law and Erect forsooth an High Court of Justice as they call it a Shambles of Justice appoint Judges Advocates Officers and Ministers sit upon the Life of the King Now they Speak out and Expound their own Declarations and tell us what that was which before they had demanded in obscure Terms when they called for Justice against all Delinquents Now they speak plainly what they mean and call this blessed King this glorious Saint the grand Delinquent Haec Acies victum factura Nocentem est My Lords When they had thus proceeded to appoint their Judges Officers and Court then they call this Person their onely Liege Lord and Soveraign to the Bar and by a formal Pegeantry of Justice proceed to Sit upon Him Arraign Try Sentence Condemn and Kill I had almost said Crucifie Him whom they could not but know to be their King And all this against the clearest Light the sharpest Checks and most through Convictions of Conscience that ever men resisted And yet in this moment of time such was the Majesty and Innocene of our Gracious Soveraign that the People followed Him with Tears in their Eyes and Acclamations in their Mouths God save the King even then when the Souldiers were ready to fire upon
so unnatural and Devilish to destroy his Father But we do find amongst the Romanes such a Fact was committed and then they were at a loss to punish it The way was this that they found out the Offendour they sewed into a Mail of Leather so close that no Water could get in when they had done they threw him into the Sea by this denoting the Offendour was not worthy to Tread upon the Ground nor to Breath in the Air nor to have the benefit of any of the four Elements nor the use of any of God's Creatures and so he starved Gentlemen Parricide and Regicide differ not in Nature but in Degree Parricide is the killing of the Father of one or a few Persons Regicide the Killing the Father of a Countrey What Punishment then is suitable to this Offence Gentlemen The Prisoner at the Bar is accused of this Offence and now to be Tried by you but before we enter upon the Evidence I must with the leave of the Court inform you That though the Indictment contains many Circumstances and Gradations in the Treason yet the Imagining and Compassing the Death of our late Sovereign is the Treason to which we shall apply our Evidence this being both by the common-Common-Law and by the Statute of the 25th of Edward the 3d. the Principal Treason to be enquired of And the other Circumstances in the Indictment are but so many matters to prove the overt-Overt-Act The Consultations the Assuming Power to Try and Condemn the King The Assault upon him and the Fatal Blow that was given him are but so many Demonstrations and open Acts proving the first Treasonable Design of the Heart It will be enough for you and so my Lords will tell you if we prove the Treason it self which is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King though we fail in some of the Circumstances laid in the Indictment I do not speak this as if we should fail in any but it is not necessary to prove them all if we prove any you are to find the Prisoner Guilty I am not willing to hold your Lordships too long in the Porch but desire to descend into the Body of the Business and so we shall call our Witnesses and doubt not but to prove that this Man at the Bar was the first and not the least of these Offendours Mr. George Masterson was called Mr. Harrison When I was before your Lordships yesterday I offered something very material in reference to the Jurisdiction of the Court but you told me according to the Rule I must Plead Guilty or Not Guilty and what I had to offer should be heard in its proper place I now desire to know whether it be proper now to deliver my self before you proceed to the calling of Witnesses for I would go the best way and would not willingly displease you Lord Chief Baron What was promised you yesterday God forbid but you should have it But I think it will be best for you to hear the Evidence and then what you have to say you shall be fully heard Mr. Harrison I am content Whereupon George Masterson Stephen Kirk Francis Hearn William Clark Robert Coitmore and James Nutley were called and sworn Councel Mr. Masterson Whether did the Prisoner at the Bar sit in that which they called the High Court of Justice to sentence the King or no Pray tell my Lords and the Jury thereof and what else you know of the matter Mr. Masterson Upon the Oath I have taken my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner Th. Harrison sit in that which they called The High Court of Justice upon the 27th day of January in the year 1648. to sentence the King Councel Was it the day the Sentence was passed against the King Mr. Masterson It was the day of the Sentence the 27th of Jan. 1648. Councel Can you say any thing else Mr. Masterson I do Sir further remember that when the Clerk of the Court as he was called read the Sentence against the King and said It was the sentence of the whole Court I saw the Prisoner at the Bar together with others stand up to my apprehension as Assenting to it Councel Was there not direction that all should stand up as Assenting Mr. Masterson I do not know that but when the Sentence was read several of them did stand up and he among the rest as Assenting to the Sentence as the Spectatours understood Councel Mr. Clark What do you say to the same Question Mr. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I remember I saw the Prisoner at the Bar sit several times in the Court of Justice as they called it particularly on the 23d and 27th of January 1648. as I took notice of it in a Book Councel Was that the day of the Sentence Mr. Clark Yes my Lord. Coun. What say you to that of the rising of those persons in the Court Mr. Clark I remember they all rose but I did not take particular notice then of the Prisoner Councel Mr. Kirk You hear the Question Did you see the Prisoner at the Bar in Westminster-Hall sitting upon the Bench in that which they called the High Court of Justice when the King stood Prisoner at the Bar there Mr. Kirk My Lord I did see the Prisoner at the Bar sit several days in that which they called the High Court of Justice I was there every day of their sitting Councel Do you remember he was there on the 27th of Jan. 1648 Mr. Kirk I do Sir Councel Tell the Jury what was the Work there Mr. Kirk It was Sentence I did take the Names of all those Gentlemen that did appear in the Court on that day the 27th of Jan. 1648. and amongst the rest I took a Note of that Gentleman's Name as being present Councel Whereas these Gentlemen Mr. Masterson and Mr. Clark have declared that as Assenting to the Sentence they all stood up Did you see them stand And whether by Direction or no Mr. Kirk As for the Direction I know nothing of it but the Members then present in the Court after Sentence was read as far as my Eyes could perceive stood up unanimously I suppose as Assenting to the Sentence Court Mr. Nutley Did you know the Prisoner at the Bar Have you seen him sit in Westminster-Hall at any time upon the Bench when the King was brought as a Prisoner to the Bar Mr. Nutley My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner at the Bar several days sit there amongst the rest of the Judges as a Judge I suppose To the best of my remembrance he sate there four days together Court Was he there upon the day of the Sentence Mr. Nutley I did take Notes My Lord that day in the Court and I find he did sit that day Court Do you know any thing more of the Prisoner at the Bar Mr. Nutley Thus much I know concerning the Prisoner at the Bar my Lord. The first
the Hand-writing of the Prisoner at the Bar The Instrument being shewed him Mr. Farrington I did not see him write it my Lords but I believe it to be his for I have often seen his Hand-writing It is his hand so far as possibly a man can know any Person 's hand that did not see him write Mr. Harrison I desire to see the Instrument Which being shew'd to him he said I believe it is my own Hand Councel That 's the Warrant for summoning that Court that he owns his hand too Court Shew him the other Instrument That being for Execution of the Sentence Mr. Harrison it being shew'd him I do think this is my hand too Councel If you think it the Jury will not doubt it That 's the Bloody Warrant for Execution And we desire they may be both read Mr. Harrison My Lords do these Learned Gentlemen offer these as being any Records Councel No but as your own hand-writing Mr. Harrison If you do not read it as a Record I hope your Lordships will not admit of any thing of that kind against me Councel He knows that a Letter under his hand and Seal may be read in a Court We do not offer it as a Record but prove it by Witnesses that it is your hand-writing Court You have Confessed these to be your hands Whether they are Records or no whether Papers or Letters they may be read against you You signed the Warrant for Convening together those which you called The High Court of Justice and you signed the other Warrant for putting the King to Death You do Confess these two things We do not see what further Use may be made of them Court You might observe how the Indictment was for the Imagining Compassing and Contriving the King's Death To prove that there must be some Overt-Act and a Letter under the Partie's Hand is a sufficient Overt-Act to prove such Imagination to that end these are used Mr. Harrison I do not come to be denying any thing that in my own Judgment and Conscience I have done or Committed but rather to be bringing it forth to the Light Court Sir you must understand this by the way this you must take along with you That these are read not as any thing of Authority in themselves or as used to any other purpose but as an Evidence of the Fact against you Take that along with you The two Bloody Warrants for Trial and for Execution of His Majesty were here read the later of which is as followeth At the High Court of Justice for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart King of England Jan. 29. 1648. WHereas Charles Stuart King of England is and standeth Convicted Attainted and Condemned of High Treason and other High Crimes and Sentence upon Saturday last was pronounced against him by this Court to be put to Death by the severing his Head from his Body of which Sentence Execution yet remaineth to be done These are therefore to will and require you to see the said Sentence executed in the open street before White-hall upon the marrow being the 30th day of this instant Moneth of January between the hours of ten in the Morning and five in the Afternoon of the same day with full effect And for so doing this shall be your sufficient Warrant And these are to require all Officers and Souldiers and other the good People of this Nation of England to be assistant unto you in this service To Colonel Francis Hacker Colonel Hunks and Lieutenant-Colonel Phayre and every of them Given under our Hands and Seals Sealed and subscribed BY John Bradshaw Lord President Jo. Hewson Per. Pelham Thomas Grey Oliver Cromwel Edward Whalley John Okey Jo. Danvers Mich. Livesey Jo. Bourchier Hen. Ireton Thomas Maleverer Jo. Blakestone Jo. Hutchinson Will. Goff Thomas Pride Hen. Smith Peter Temple Tho. Harrison Isaac Ewer Val. Wanton Simon Meyn Tho. Horton Jo. Jones Jo. Moor. Hardress Waller Gilbert Millington Geo. Fleetwood Jo. Alured Rob. Lilburn Wil. Say Rich. Dean Rob. Tichbourn Hum. Edwards Dan. Blagrave Owen Roe Will. Puefroy Adrian Scroop James Temple Aug. Garland Edmond Ludlow Hen. Marten Vincent Potter Will. Constable Rich. Ingoldsby Will. Cawley Joh. Barkstead Anth. Stapeley Greg. Norton Tho. Challoner Tho. Wogan Jo. Ven. Greg. Clement Jo. Downs Tho. Wayt. Tho. Scot. Jo. Carew Miles Corbet Mr. Wyndham Gentlemen of the Jury We have done our Evidence and you must know Gentlemen that the principal Point of the Indictment is for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of his late Majesty of Glorious Memory There lies the Treason So saies the Statute of the 25th Ed. 3d. It hath nothing of Killing the King there but of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King The going about it that 's the Treason as hath been learnedly opened to you The rest are but Overt-Acts If there be such an Imagination or Compassing the Death of the King once declared though no fruit at all follow it is Treason Here certainly you have a very full Evidence given We shew you a Consultation this is one Overt-Act which would do the work if there were nothing else I must tell you and that with Submission to my Lords the Justices if they had advised and gone no further that had been Treason in the Letter of the Law They Convened and met together and suppose then they had absolved and acquitted him do you think they had absolved themselves from Treason With reverence be it spoken if they had acquitted him they had been guilty of Treason Assuming a Power to put the King to Death is an overt-Overt-Act declaring such an Imagination You see this Prisoner was no ordinary Actour in it his Hand is in at all Games Taking of Him Imprisoning of Him bringing Him to London and setting Guards on Him You see also his Malice Let us Blacken Him for they knew His Innocency would Shine forth unless it was blackened by their Imputations He Sate many times as your hear and Sentenced Him and Assented to that Sentence by standing up and likewise by Concluding the Catastrophe of that sad beginning of Sufferings his making a Warrant for his Execution and accordingly you know what did follow I think a clearer Evidence of a Fact can never be given then is for these things Here the Spectatours Hummed Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen This Humming is not at all becoming the Gravity of this Court. Let there be free-speaking by the Prisoner and Counsel It is more fitting for a Stage-Play then for a Court of Justice Mr. Harrison It is now time my Lords to offer what I have to say Have these Learned Gentlemen offered what they will say Councel We have no more till he hath given us occasion not for Evidence of the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords The matter that hath been offered to you as it was touched was not a thing done in a Corner I believe the sound of it hath been in most Nations I believe the Hearts of some have felt the
had not the blood of English-men that had been shed Councel Me thinks he should be sent to Bedlam till he comes to the Gallows to render an Account of this This must not be suffered It is in a manner a new Impeachment of this King to justifie their Treasons against His late Majesty Mr. Solicitour General My Lords I pray that the Jury may go together upon the Evidence Sir Edw. Turner My Lords This man hath the Plague all over him it is Pity any should stand near him for he will infect them Let us say to him as they use to write over an House infected The Lord have Mercy upon him and so let the Officer take him away Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison We are ready to hear you again but to hear such Stuff it cannot be suffered You have spoken that which is as high a Degree of Blasphemy next to that against God as I have heard You have made very ill use of these Favours that have been allowed you to speak your own Conscience cannot but tell you the Contradiction of your Actions against this that you have heard as the Opinion of the Court. To extenuate your Crimes you may go on but you must not go as before Mr. Harrison I must not speak so as to be pleasing to men but if I must not have liberty as an English-man Court Pray do not reflect thus You have had liberty and more then any Prisoner in your Condition can expect and I wish you had made a good use of it Keep to the Business say what you will Mr. Harrison My Lords thus There was a Discourse by one of the Witnesses that I was at the Committee preparing the Charge and that I should say Let us blacken Him The thing is utterly untrue I abhorred the doing of any thing touching the Blackning of the King There was a little Discourse between the King and my self The King had told me that He had heard that I should come privately to the Isle of Wight to offer some injury to Him But I told Him I abhorred the thoughts of it And whereas it is said that my Carriage was hard to Him when I brought Him to London it was not I that brought Him to London I was commanded by the General to fetch Him from Hurst-Castle I do not remember any hard Carriage towards Him Court Mr. Harrison You have said That you deny that of Blackning which the Witness hath sworn and somewhat else touching the King in His Way to London that the Witness hath sworn to also The Jury must consider of it both of their Oaths and your Contradictions If you have nothing more to say which tends to your Justification We must direct the Jury The end of your Speech is nothing but to infect the People Mr. Harrison You are uncharitable in that Justice Foster My Lords This ought not to come from the Bar to the Bench if you sally out thus about your Conscience If your Conscience should be a darkened Conscience that must not be the Rule of other mens Actions What you speak of that Nature is nothing to the Business If you have any thing to say by way of Excuse for your self for matter of Fact you may speak but if you will go on as before it must not be suffered Mr. Harrison The things that have been done have been done upon the Stage in the sight of the Sun Court All this is a Continuance of the Justification and Confession of the Fact We need no other Evidence Councel He hath confessed his Fact my Lords The matter it self is Treason upon Treason Therefore we pray Direction to the Jury Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison I must give Direction to the Jury if you will not go further touching the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords I say what I did was by the Supreme Authority I have said it before and appeal to your own Consciences that this Court cannot call me to question Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison you have appealed to our Consciences We shall do that which by the Blessing of God shall be just for which we shall answer before the Tribunal of God Pray take heed of an Obdurate Hard Heart and a Seared Conscience Mr. Harrison My Lords I have been kept six Moneths a Close Prisoner and could not prepare my self for this Trial by Councel I have got here some Acts of Parliament of that House of Commons which your Lordships will not own and the Proceedings of that House whose Authority I did own Lord Chief Baron This you have said already If you shew never so many of that Nature they will not help you you have heard the Opinion of the Court touching that Authority They all unanimously concur in it Gentlemen of the Jury You see that this Prisoner at the Bar is Indicted for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of Blessed Memory In this Indictment there are several things given but as Evidences of it they are but the Overt-Acts of it The one is first that they did meet and consult together about the putting the King to Death and that alone if nothing else had been proved in the Case was enough for you to find the Indictment For the Imagination alone is Treason by the Law But beause the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is secret in the Heart and no man knowes it but God Almighty I say That the Imagination is Treason yet it is not such as the Law can lay hold of unless it appear by some overt-Overt-Act Then the first Overt-Act is their Meeting Consulting and Proposing to put the King to Death The second is more open namely their Sitting together and Assuming an Authority to put the King to Death The third is Sentencing the King And I must tell you that any one of these Acts prove the Indictment If you find him guilty but of any one of them either Consulting Proposing Sitting or Sentencing though there is full Proof for all yet notwithstanding you ought to find the Indictment You have heard what the Witnesses have said and the Prisoner's own Confession Witnesses have sworn their sitting together and that he was one One swears he sate four times another twice some several times There are several Witnesses for this as Mr. Masterson Mr. Clark Mr. Kirk and Mr. Nutley And then you have another thing too which truly the Prisoner did not speak of Witness was given against him That he was the Person that Conducted the King this was before that which he would have to be done by a Legislative Power and that is another Overt-Act If a man will go about to Imprison the King the Law knows what is the sad Effect of such Imprisonment That hath often been adjudged to be an Evidence of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King That man the Prisoner at the Bar it hath been proved to you did Imprison the King and it appears by his own
word is or otherwise They broke the oath of Supremacy which was That the King was the Supreme Governour of these Nations They swore that they would maintain and keep all Priviledges Immunities Preheminencies annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm there is difference between some Crowns and Imperial Crowns An Imperial Crown it was that which was not to be touched in the Person We do not speak any thing of the absoiute Power of the King for you see he cannot Judge concerning the Death of his Father but by Lawes When you swore this Allegiance all those Members of break all this at once This would be so far from having any colour of Authority that he that justifies it justifies it against the light of Conscience and Laws You say you did it by Commandment from them He that doth a Command by such an Authority it is his guilt Our Law-Books say That if a Court at Common-Law exceed their Jurisdiction in that Case he that obeys that Command is punishable In the Court of Common-Pleas if there be an Appeal there for Murther it is only proper to the Upper Bench and therefore if the party be condemned sentenced and executed thereupon the Executioner in that Case is guilty of Murther for obeying that Authority which was indeed no Authority And therefore whereas you would go about to justifie the Fact because you did it by Command of that Authority that is an Aggravation That when men shall assume an Authority which is a Devil at the noon-day appearing without Vizors I say shall assume an Authority never heard of before If men will countenance their Acts by obeying of them it is an Aggravation We have already Declared this in the Case of the Prisoner yesterday We are all satisfied in the Law in that Case It is so clear a Point in Law that my Brethren here and we did over-rule it yesterday in the like Case and so We must now and I hope that all do concur in this Opinion that hath been delivered Lord Finch I hope all do concur in this opinion delivered by my Lord Chief Baron You shelter your self under a Command of the House of Commons But let me tell you and all the Word That if the House of Commons let it have been never so compleat had given a Command it had been a thing no ways justifiable the Justification is an Aggravation Scr. My Lord I do see that every thing I speak though it be for clearing of my self from your ill opinion I see it is taken in an ill sence I humhly beseech pardon for the Expression if I erre I will crave your Lordships pardon But my Lord I say this If I have been misled I am not a single person that have been misled My Lord I could say but I think it doth not become me to say so That I see a great many faces at this time that were misled as well as my self But that I will not insist upon I say this That I hope an Error in Judgment shall not be accounted Malice or an Error of the Will Truly my Lord I never went to the work with a malicious heart I humbly desire your Lordships to take notice of it That I never bore any malice at all against his late Majesty L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop have you done Scr. My Lord I do beseech your Lordships to take notice That an Error in Judgement is not an Error in the Will L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop I am very glad to hear you say so But let me tell you what the Law saith The Law in this Case treates the malice If a man do an act of this nature that may be some kind of excuse to God but towards man you are to look to the Fact the Law implies the malice If there be any thing you will say in the Extenuation of your offence we will be very glad to hear that may tend to your help Scr. My Lord There is one Evidence comes in against me that I must confess that I am very sorry to see and my Lord there was a saying it is by my Lord Mayor Elect Truly he is a worthy Gentleman but I desire the Lord may forgive that which he hath spoken Truly my Lord I did never intend any thing in this neither can I directly remember that I spake those words directly as my Lord Mayor Elect doth spake I do believe my Lord Mayor cannot very well remember them himself for he saith So far as he can remember I must confess that when I was there and had appeared according to the Proclamation that such discourse somewhat like it was raised not of my procuring I did not procure the Discourse I never intended the Justification of the Fact but it was my ill success that I should meet with that worthy Gentleman to have so much discourse with him L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop my Lord Mayor Elect saith no further then this So far as he remembers and the words that you should say were these That some are of one opinion and some are of another Scr. Vpon the death of the King My Lord I mnst confesse to you that somewhat I said to him but I cannot own that I said those words My Lords He is a worthy person I do not desire to spake any thing to degenerate in the least kind from him it is but his yea and my no there was nobody there L. C. Bar. Have you any thing more to say for your self Scr. My Lord if your Lordship do over-rule it so that I may not have Councel I have little more to say L. C. Bar. You have heard the sence of the Court in that particular you cannot have Councel allowed you as to the matter you have pleaded Scr. I have done but only this My Lords I know not whether it be seasonable to mention it I came in upon the Proclamation and My Lord by means of these unhappy words that have been reported of me in the House of Commons whereas before I was no excepted person I came to be excepted and upon the very last day of passing that Act never was excepted before the very last day I beseech you take notice of this L. C. Bar. Mr. Scroop That is a thing that is not before us but there will be a proper time to consider of it in another place that is nothing to the Tryal have you any more to say Sir Scr. No My Lord Will your Lordship please to let me speak a word to the Jury L. Ch. Baron If you speak to the Court the Jury will hear it Scr. Truly my Lord This I do perceive that I am under a very great prejudice as to this fact It hath been the case of many Gentlemen besides my self I desire that these Gentlemen would take my case into consideration as they would their own and I desire that the Lord would give them direction that they may do that which is according to Justice and Mercy that is all I
Treason and my Lord had this been in times of peace and had His Majesty been no Prisoner now he was under the power of an Army this had been great Treason but he being a Prisoner not by my means for I was no sword-man what can a man that knows himself innocent being a Prisoner desire more than a speedy Tryal so that making the Tryal more speedy cannot be said to be done trayterously A Tryal doth follow imprisonment as naturally and necessarily as the shadow doth the body If any man shall desire and be instrumental in bringing him to a Tryal which might acquit rather than condemn him and so humbly pray proceedings according to Justice this will have I hope a better name than Treason I am much beholding to His Majesty and this honourable Parli for the penning of the Act of Indempnity which I hope my L. you will give me leave to take notice of Court Open as much as you will of it Cook My Lords the words that I would make use of are in the beginning Treason Murder and other Felonies that are spoken of they are said to be counselled commanded acted or done in the preamble which is as the Key to open the mind and meaning of the Law-makers it is said that all persons shall be pardoned for all excepting such as shall be named and in such manner as they shall be excepted and then it comes provided that this Act shall not extend to pardon such and such persons and by name I am one and it is said all which persons for their execrable Treason in Sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign Lord Charles the First of glorious memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to his late Majesty according to the Laws of England and are out of the said Act wholly excepted and foreprized There is not any thing offered against me upon the two 1st great words which are Sentencing and signing that which I have to do to endeavour to clear my self is this being instrumental in taking away the life of his said Majesty first I humbly offer this to the Juries consideration That where the Parliament doth begin to fix the treasonable part there I hope and no otherwise this honourabe Court will fix it if it had been the Intention that Counsellors advisers and such as spoke their minds sometimes in the business you know that was Epidemical many words were spoken which cannot be justified whether naturally it would not have followed that all such persons for their counselling advising or being instrumental are left to be proceeded against as Traytors I hope you will take that into consideration concerning the words or being instrumental observe it is not said or being any otherwaies instrumental but Sentencing signing or being instrumental if therefore the word Instrumental be not of a general comprehensive nature then all this evidence which hath been given in against me being before the Sentencing and signing will fall to the ground that this is the legal genuine and Grammatical sense cannot be any otherwise than as particular as if it were the Sentencer signer Executioner which if it had been so nothing of the Evidence would have reached me My argument is this such a use is to be made of an Act of Parliament that no word may be frustrate and insignificant but if this Interpretation shall be put upon it sentencing signing or being any way instrumental then the words Sentencing and Signing need not have been if Instrumental will carry the words Sentencing and signing then these words will carry no force atall especially my Lord when there is no need of any retrospect at all if it be so I know not how far it may look back there is no necessity of putting any comprehensive generality upon this word instrumental but that the plain natural sense will be this That those that did sentence and Sign and those that were instrumental in taking away his life that is those that did abet and comfort that person unknown or justifie or countenance him which is after the Sentencing and not before in the legal sense Next I conceive that a Councellor cannot be said to do any thing vi armis It is said that by force and Arms I did abet c. it is Rhetorical to say that words may be as Swords but legal it is not unless there be something vi armis in the Grammatical sense instrumental in taking away the Kings life it is not said instrumental in order to take away the K. life or instrumental in advising to take away the K. life but instrumental in taking away the K. life My Lord The next thing is that there cannot be any thing to be said to be done by me first not falso because in that sense it must have the operation of mendacity that there must be a lie told in it I did nothing but what I was required to do to set down such and such words I did not invent nor contrive them I heard nothing of it till the tenth day of Jan. My Lord for malitiose that I did not any thing maliciously I hope it will appear in this what I then spoke it was for my Fee it may be called avaritia but not malitia for the Law will imply a malice but when there is no other express ground or reason why the thing was done but here was an express ground to speak for my Fee I hope the Jury will take that into consideration Then Secondly I was not Judicial in the Case I was not Magisterial as any Officer but ministerial As touching examining of witnesses it is a great mistake the Court had power to give an Oath I might be there but I had no power to give an Oath but whether I might ask any question I do not remember but that I should give an Oath that is a falsity then my Lord for proditorie I hope there is nothing at all that appears to the Jury so that there was no malice nor trayterous intention in the thing There are some matters of Law which I desire your Lordships will give me leave to speak to and that your Lordships will be of Counsel with me I would offer something concerning his Majesties gracious Declaration from Breda to the Parliament I was then in Ireland I did put in a Petition to the honourable Commissioners before any exception was that I might have the benefit of that Declaration I did lay hold of it My Lords there are two things in that Declaration that I would offer His Majesty saith that for the restoring of the Kings Peers and people of the Kingdom to their just rights and liberties He will grant a free and general Pardon to all excepting such as shall be by Parliament excepted and within three or four lines after it is said a free Parliament though I do not in the
least question the Legality of this Parliament yet my Lords to this particular purpose whether the Parliament that was to except ought not to be a Parliament that was to be called accoring to his Majesties Writ according to the Laws of the Kingdom I humbly conceive it will bear that though His Majesty is pleased to confirm this yet it is not such a Parliament that was to except that I offer to your Lordships My Lords that that I would humbly make hold to put for my self because it is the priviledge of one in my condition is this There is my Lord many Lords the Earl of Essex the Earl of Southampton and others that were adjudged in the 44 of Eliz. 3. institutes they did trayterously and maliciously conspire to take her Majesty Prisoner and to remove her Counsellours from her which were found guilty and suffered accordingly the reason is That because thereby if it had been done they had despoiled her Maje of her Regal Government the case is instant in Philip who was a nominative King that it was not Treason to have attempted any thing against him My Lords his Majesty being a Prisoner without any hand of mine I giving advice according to what was dictated to me to bring him to that tryal whereby he might have been acquitted and so set at liberty I hope that will not be said as instrumental My Lords I humbly shall offer but two words 1. to honourable Court then to the Jury the words of 25 E. 3. and so the exposition of the learned Judges have been from time to time that there shll be no semblable Treasons made by presumptions or strains of wit but those Treasons specified there It is said if a Husband do kill his Wife or a Wife kill her Husband a Master should kill his Servant or the Servant should kill his Master that that shall be petty Treason a Child did kill his Father though that was looked upon as a great sin yet the Judges do not presume that to be Treason because it was not in the very words this being an extraordinary Case to write a thing after another doth not appear there was a malicious heart in him that did write There hath been the Act of Parlia that doth call these Courts Tyrannical and Unlawful Courts but my Lords a Tyrannical and Unlawful Court is a Court de facto though not de jure if a Court be not a just and lawful Court it cannot be said but that it is a Court we say a Thief is a true man though morally he is not so this was a Court Officers attending on them some said they had Authority therefore for one to come and act within his Sphere not to act out of that nor to do any thing but what he had a prescript form appointed him I hope that will not be found to be within the letter of the Law I have been told how true I cannot tell that there have been some votes in the honourable Parliament that those that did only counsel or advise those were not to be looked upon as Traytors I have been told so that those that did only speak as Councel for their Fee who were not the contrivers of it the Parliament did not intend they should be left to be proceeded against Court That Letter that was sent from the Commons to the King at Breda they speak first of the violation that was put upon the Parliament and of the base horrid Murther of his late Majesty It is said that the Parliament I conceive they meant of the remaining part they were not guilty but some few ambitious bloody guilty persons who contrived the same and others misled by them Cook The other matter of Law is this I say that I do hope that though that order which I was about to produce concering my acting that if it may not in a legal sense any way be said to be an Act of the Parliament and Commons yet it may be said to be such an order to bear out those that did Act according to it because there was then no other authory de facto otherwise it were not lawful for any man to exercise his profession during such a Power I hope Councellors might then exercise their profession aswel as others My Lord though I should suffer my self in this case I should be loth the honourable profession of the Law should I think I was in my Sphere acting as a Counsellor Now Gentlemen of the Jury that which I have to say to you is an evidence concerning matter of life it must be so clear that every one that hears it may understand it It is called an evidence because it is evident it is one reason why Prisoners for their lives are not allowed Counsel for matter of fact because the evidence is and ought to be so clear and plain that every one should be satisfied both Jury and standers by and it is a proper word to say the Prisoner is convicted that is as much as his mouth is stopped and therefore I say truly as I hope I may speak it to you without offence as Jeremy in another Case when some of the people would have had them put him to death as for me behold I am in your hand do with me as seemeth good and meet unto you 26. Jer. 14 15. ver saith he But know ye for certain that if ye put me to death ye shall surely bring innocent blood upon your selves I hope you will not willingly be Guilty of any such thing I must leave it to your consciences whether you believe that I had an hand in the K. Death when I did write but only that which others did dictate unto me and when I spoke only for my Fee and this I would be bold to say though the argument is not so directly confessed that humane Justice I do first say as this my principle and opinion is that as every man ought to pay his moral debts so all political debts there is a debt due to human Justice so political if the Lord should have suffered me to have been drunk and kill'd a man for which I ought to have died in stead of speaking for my self I would have rather intreated the Jury to have found me Guilty I think these things ought to be answered political debts when I was in Ireland and had opportunity of going away if I thought I had been Guilty I might have done it my name is put into his Majesties Proclamation It is true I was a prisoner three or four months before so that I could not render my self to what end should that Proclamation mention my name it was laid I obscured my self but I did not humane Justice doth never punish so much for expiation as for prevention The judgements of the learned Aquinas Grotius and Amesius and many others that if a man doth kill a man commit any thing worthy of death though he doth repent never so much yet that others may
confesso was afflicted with the delays how angry he was when he was interrupted Is it not proved to you that he was at first against the thing and said it was a base business when he was engaged in it said that he was a Servant of the people of this Kingdome what doth he do at last when the thing had gone far he speaks that which is the only truth which I have yet heard from him He must dye and Monarchy then must perish with him from which Event good Lord deliver us Sir Edward Turner My Lord the substance of the defence that the Prisoner hath made at the Bar with much skill and cunning may be referred to two heads The first to the Statute of the 25 of Edward the 3. The second to the late Act of Oblivion for the first my Lord he saith that his fact is not comprized within that Statute saith he I did never conspire or imagine the death of the King nor did believe that would be a consequent of their actings It was expresly proved that himself did say that the King must die and Monarchy with him but Gentlemen though he had said true that it had not been proved or that he did not believe that would be a consequent yet my Lord I must tell you that every step of this Tragedy was Treason the summoning themselves that was Treason every proceeding upon that was Treason the summoning of their meetings in the Painted Chamber coming into Westminster-Hall every person as instrumental those that came to act the least part in that Tragedy were every one guilty of Treason what saith he I acted as a Councellour for my see It was that see that Judas had the 30. pieces of silver that made him hang himself He goes further and tells you there must be no semblable Treasons this is clear the conspiring and imagining the death of the King that 's the Treason that is mentioned in the Act Treason by the Common Law though this be not named the killing of the King yet all these proceedings are demonstrations to you there was a Secret Imagination to kill him Then to the Act of Oblivion his Argument is That because the Act saith that if they had Sentenced signed or been Instrumental in the death of the King that they should be excepted but it is not said or otherwise Instrumental that therefore this should refer to subsequent not precedent Acts that 's a strange Exposition take it Grammatically it hath the most large construction Instrumental more large than if they had said or otherwise for it doth comprehend every thing There having been so full an answer already I will be short I will not meddle with his civil debts but with his Political If a man kill another though he doth repent the Magistrate must do Justice in terrorem Though he doth repent I hope in God he doth so The Magistrates your Lordships must do Justice in terrorem I desire that Justice may be done upon that man He said it was no Treason to demand Justice against the King because he did but demand it I hope he will think it no unkindness in me to desire judgement against him because it is just Mr. Wadham Windham As I understand the Prisoner at the Bar the chief argument which he shelters himself under was his profession which gives a blast to all of us of the long robe I will not mince his arguments saith he here was a Court I was appointed Sollicitor and saith he for men to practise before those that have not a proper Judicature it is not Felony Murther or Treason I would not willingly mince his Argument and that I was appointed and the words dictated to me and a Councellor carrying himself within the compass of his profession is not answerable but if he will exceed his bounds his profession is so far from sheltring him that as it hath been opened it is very much an aggravation it is the duty of a Councellor to give Counsel if a man shall come to me and ask counsel and I shall counsel him to kill a man am not I accessary to that murder Words by his argument will not amount to Treason if the fact follows I am as guilty as if I did the fact in point of Treason it is all one as if I had done that very act If Mr. Cook did advise that Act or was instrumental he is as much a Traytor as the man in the Frock that did the Execution for his profession truly my Lord I do not think that a Counseller is always bound to know the patent of him that sits as Judge that will not be his Case here was no ordinary Warrant of Law to carry on Justice Grotius saith in case of necessity for carrying on Justice there may be many things allowed I pray where did Mr. Cook read of such a Court as a High Court of Justice there was never such a High Court of Justice read of in the Law then as this was a mock Court so under good favour it was a mock Jurisdiction Was there any Law under Heaven to put the King to death is it not out of the compass of all Courts whatsoever to do it and under good favour my Lord this is but to shelter a mans self under colour of Justice to do the most execrable Treason in the World I have no more to say to you Lo. Ch. Bar. I would repeat the Evidence and your answer to you if you have any thing new speak to it Cook This is new it was said by one that if there had been no charge there had been no sentence given in the Case I say that the Indictment or Charge is no part of the Tryal by the Statute of Magna Charta The Peers of the Land shall be tryed by Peers but are indicted by the Countrey I conceive by what they have said they do make me causal of the Kings death It is said in the Indictment there was a power I say this I did not assume any power it cannot be said if Council be come in to an unlawful power that he takes the power but stands with respect at the Bar. At Assises Judgement passes the Clerk of the Assises he is not instrumental in taking away life for that which Mr. Starkey should say that I should say The King must die and Monarchy with him I humbly beg that the Jury would take notice of what Mr. Nut. said that I told him there was no intention of taking away the Kingslife and besides it is but a single witness I hope there must be two witnesses in point of Law to convict a man of High Treason Lo. Ch. Baron Mr. Cook you said right but even now that if there was any thing in matter of Law which the Court knows of which may be of advantage to you they are of Council to you and so they ought to be Cook I think your Lordships L. Ch. Bar. I shall repeat the whole Evidence and
more unless he was present and see it but you owned the Charge and there your name is that besides the two Witnesses there is your own actions to prove it When two Witnesses shall swear it is like your hand and you own that Charge I must leave it to the Jury you say you did this after command the words were dictated to you the words were conceptis verbis appointed and ordered by the Court but the pressing was yours he stands upon delays let it be taken pro confesso demanding Judgement these were your words another man may dictate a thing but you are not forced to speak it you urged it owned it you demanded not in the name of the Court but in the name of all the People of England you say further that your demanding Justice is not within the Statute as I said before what can be the effect of demanding Justice but that the King should die upon those premises you say further that it was in behoof of the King as you would urge it to do the King a Courtesie in asking the King might have Justice but you did not name what Justice it was but you did him a Courtesie truly the King was but a little beholden to you for that request all the world knows what that demanding of Justice was it was to have the Kings head cut off you went as far as you could it ended with you when you demanded Justice that is as far as you could you cut off the head S. Paul when the Witnesses laid down the clothes at his feet he said I killed Stephen the Martyr You say further that in all Tragedies the Accuser or Witness the Jury the Judge and executioner are the only persons and you are none of these you are only of Council if Justice was not done what was it to you you said you did not assume a power there was only Eloquence required in the Councel it hath been truly said that this is a great aggravation to be of Councel against the King you said his Majesty was then a Prisoner and accused Counsel cannot be heard against the King you undertake to be Counsel against the King in his own person and in the highest Crime if the Council at the Barr in behalf of his Client should speak Treason he went beyond his sphere but you did not only speak but acted Treason you said you used not a disrespective word to the King truly for that you hear what the witnesses have said you pressed upon him you called it a delay you termed him not the King but the Prisoner at the Bar at every word you say you did not assume an authority it is an assumption of authority if you countenance and allow of their authority you say you do not remember you demanded Judgement against the King that is fully proved against you you your self asked the question whether you did say against the King he did not remember but others positively that you demanded Judgement against the King and Prisoner at the Bar you said that before Sentence there was not an intention to put the King to death to that Mr. Starkey swears that you expresly said the King must die and Monarchy with him and this before the sentence whereas you say this is but one witness that there is to be in Treason two witnesses but that there should be two witnesses to every particular that is an Evidence of the fact that is not Law if to one particular that is an Evidence there be one witness another to another here are two witnesses within the meaning of the Statute two witnesses to the Indictment compassing and imagining the Death of the King being accompanied with other circumstances this one witness if you believe him is as good as twenty witnesses because other overt acts are expresly proved by several witnesses You say next for the drawing of the Charge in right reason it ought to be counted for the service of the King First you do acknowledge and truly very ingenuously that in the time of peace to bring him to the Bar not being a prisoner is Treason you say it according to the Law and that you delivered the charge for the accelerating of the Charge and that it was not done by you traiterously you say the King was a Prisoner before and you say what hands he was in in the hands of men of power and violence it had been your duty to have delayed it not accelerated it that there might have been some means of prevention of that bloody act that followed if you knew that to be Treason to make him a prisoner Subjects do not use to make Kings Prisoners but Death follows You urge in the next place the Act of Indemnity and that you are not excepted for that you have made as much of it as the matter will bear yet you must consider First as a rule in Law that where they are general words when they come to be explained by the particulars you shall not include them within the general Mark the very words they are these Provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to pardon discharge or give any other benefits whatsoever unto such and such among whom you are named nor any of them nor to those two persons or either of them who being disguised by Frocks and Vizards did appear upon the Scaffold erected before White-Hall upon the thirtieth of January 1648. All which persons these are the words First It shall not extend to you then it comes All which persons for their execrable Treason in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being Instrumental in taking away the Precious Life of our late Soveraign Lord CHARLES the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to His late Majestie according to the Laws of England and are out of this present Act wholly excepted and foreprized First as I told you before and as it was very well said by Master Sollicitor admitting the reason had been mistaken and that you had not been comprehended in the reason you are excepted out of the body provided it shall not extend c. Many times Laws do make recitals which in themselves are sometimes false in point of fact that which is the Law is positive words the other words are for the reason Excepting all which that is Master Cook which persons are excepted not for doing of it but for his execrable crimes in being instrumental It is clear without that if it were not so we say when a Sentence is or such a one or such a one the third Or makes all disjunctive Here are three Or 's first in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument then comes this or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign c. this Or doth clearly exclude the other two or instrumental not only in point of death but further being neither a Sentencer Signer or being
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
that blessed be God the house is purged and the Lords will be shortly pull'd out and the twenty eighth day of January which was the day after the King was sentenced at Saint James's his Chappel you took for your Text the 149. Psalm the 6 7 8 and 9 verses whereof these words were part To bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron there in the middle of that Sermon having spoken before of the King you said you did intend to preach before the poor wretch upon the 14 of Isaiah the 18 19 and 20 verses speaking of all the Kings of the nations Thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch c. he saith further you said look upon your lesser Bibles and you will find the title is The Tyrants fall There is another witness that is one Bowdler a few days before the Kings death at S. Sepulchres there you fell upon the old comparison all along you compared the King to Barabbas and that a great many would have Christ crucified and Barabbas released all along comparing the King to Barabbas One more and that was Ryder he heard this text He shall call his name Emanuel you fell to speak of news what shall become of the King and you said the King was Barabbas and a great many would rather have Christ crucified than Barabbas And then Mr. Walker he saith that after the King was first brought to his tryal he heard you say this I have prayed and preached this twenty years and now may I say with old Simeon Lord now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace for mine eyes have seen thy salvation he mentions that you made use of the other comparison of the Major and the Bishops man and inferred from thence that the King and Prince c. were not excepted out of the Scripture where it is said Whosoever sheds mans blood c. you have heard all this witnessed against you what have you to say for your self Peters These are but single witnesses Lord Chief Baron The statute is two witnesses for Treason but not two to one individual thing though there are several witnesses have proved the same thing about Barabbas and our Saviour Bind their Kings with chains c. and of your other actions there is a whole Jury of witnesses two witnesses expresly we agreed upon the Kings death and we resolved to set the King aside Pet. I do not know the witnesses Lord Chief Baron One is Sir Jeremy Whitchcot the other is Doctor Young you shall do well if you have any thing to say to invalid these witnesses to speak to it else the Jury will be sent together to deliver up their verdict Peters My Lord if I had time and opportunity I could take off many of the witnesses but because their testimony is without control I cannot satisfie my self I have no skill in the Law else I might have spoke for my self I do not know what to say more unless I had more time and counsel Mr. Soll. Gen. If the prisoner can say no more here is this in it here are five places where he did consult about the Kings death at Windsor at Ware in Colemanstreet in the Painted Chamber and in Bradshaws house and four witnesses to prove this there are two witnesses to his comparison of the K. and Barabbas and two witnesses to his text of binding their K. inchains c. proof that he hath been in action in New-Eng that he came from it with that intent and then went to Holland that he had been in arms that he called the day of his Majesties tryal a glorious day resembling the judging of the world by Saints he prays for this in the Painted Chamber preaches for it at Whitehall S. James's Chapel Sepulchres what man could more contrive the death of the King than this miserable Priest hath done the honour of the Pulpit is to be vindicated and the death of this man will preach better than his life did it may be a means to convert many a miserable person whom the preaching of this person hath seduced for many come here and say they did it in the fear of the Lord and now you see who taught them and I hope you will make an example of this carnal prophet The Jury went together and after a little consultation settled in their places Cl. Are you agreed in your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our foreman Cl. How say you is the prisoner at the Bar guilty of the Treason whereof he stands indicted or not guilty Foreman Guilty Cl. And so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Look to him Keeper Coun. We desire Mr. Cook may be brought to the Bar and that they may both have their judgement pronounced Cl. John Cook hold up thy hand what hast thou to say why the Court should not pronounce judgement for thee to dye according to Law Cook I have a few words matter of Law First there is no averment in the Indictment that J. Cook mentioned in the Act of Indempnity is the same with the John Cook mentioned in the Indictment and that I am the John Cook mentioned in both L. Ch. Bar. This will not help you in this case you have owned and have pleaded by the name of John Cook Cook The second is this that the overt acts should be particularly expressed in the Indictment L. Ch. Bar. This cannot be alledged in arrest of judgement the Jury have found you guilty of compassing and imagining the death of the King by the statute of 25 Edw. 3. and this cannot help you Cook I say it was professionately L. Ch. B. That hath been overruled already we have delivered our opinions the profession of a Lawyer will not excuse them or any of them from Treason and this hath been overruled and is overruled again Cook I humbly conceive that the remaining part of the House of Commons were to be Judges whether there was a force or not L. Ch. B. This is all past and overruled Cook Then I have no more Cl. Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand what hast thou to say for thy self why Judgement should not pass against thee to die according to law Peters I will submit my self to God and if I have spoken any thing against the Gospel of Christ I am heartily sorry Silence Commanded L. Ch. Bar. You are both persons of that ingenuous and liberal education as I hope I shall not need to tell you what it is to die you have had a great a deal of time to think of it you could not but think of this issue of your doings long ago and therefore I shall spare my labour of telling you what it is to die and of that eternity that you are to enter into only give me leave in a few words in relation to both of your professions to say something to shew the nature and hainousness of this offence the murther of the King if you were not
actually guilty of putting the King to death nay admitting in charity you had no intent to go as far as you did you are by the laws of Christ and this Nation guilty of high Treason in that you that are a Lawyer know very well and I speak it that you may lay it to your heart in the convictions of your conscience I must say to you as Joshua said to Achan my son give glory to God and confess and it would become you so to do you know very well it is the law of this Nation that no one house nor both houses of Parliament have any coercive power over the King much less to put him to death you know as you cited very well that the imprisoning of the King is Treason You know both of you this is an undoubted truth the rule of Law is that the King can do no wrong that is the King can do no wrong in the estimation of Law he may do some particular Acts as a private person but he can do little prejudice in his own person if he would hurt any it must be by Ministers in that case the Law provides a remedy if he doth it by Ministers they must answer for it The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown what is that It is not to do what he will no but it is that he shall not be punished in his own person if he doth that which in it self is unlawful Now remember this when you took the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy I presume you both did so what was your oath of Supremacy It was this that the King was the only Supream Governour of these Realms it goes farther as he was Supream Governour so he was the only Supream Governour that excludes Coordination you swear farther that you will to the utmost of your power defend the King against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever truly you that were a Lawyer when you had thus sworn your fee could be no excuse against what you had sworn to We know that the King in his politick or natural capacity is not only salus populi but salus Reipublicae The Law hath taken care that the people shall have justice and right the Kings person ought not to be touched the King himself is pleased to judge by the Law you see he doth by Law question the death of his Father he doth not judge it himself but the Law judges it Mr. Peters knows very well he subscribed the 39. Articles of Religion look upon them that were made in 1552. and upon those Articles that were confirmed in 13. Elizabeth the King is there acknowledged to have the chief power in these Nations the medling with the King was a Jesutical doctrine This I speak not that the King should or ought to govern but by the Fundamental laws of the land they that keep within the bounds of the law are happy you that are a Lawyer know this in point of law and you that are a Divine know this in point of Divinity You both know the truth of it and when you have thought upon it I hope you will reflect upon that horrid crime the shedding of Royal Blood You see he had granted all those grievances of the people taken them away secured them for the future and at this very time when this horrid act was done you see he had granted all at the desire of the people he had made those concessions such as were it not in respect of others more than those that treated themselves they thought was more than could be expected by the Nation You that had a hand in the Kings death it falls upon you the guilt of it because you were some of those instruments that assisted those persons that broke the Treaty prepare your selves for that death which you are to die it is a debt which we all owe to nature if in this case there is something of shame comes to you it is that you must take as part of the reward of your sin The only work I have now to do is to pronouce the Judgment and this is the judgment of the Court and the Court doth award That both of you be led back to the place from whence you came and from thence shall be drawn upon a hurdle c. and the Lord have mercy upon your souls Cl. Cryer make proclamation Cryer O yes c. All manner of persons c. and all Jurors and witnesses are to appear at this place to morrow morning at seven of the Clock in the morning upon pain of 100. l. a piece So God bless King Charles c. 15. Octo. 1660. at the Sessions House in the Old Bailey The Tryal of William Howlet Memorandum that the Bill of Indictment against William Hewlet alias Howlet was found at Hickes-hall 12 Octob. instant Proclamation of the Court being made Clerk of the Crown SET William Hewlet alias Howlet to the Bar which was done accordingly Cl. William Hewlet alias Howlet hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason in the County of Middlesex by the name of William Hewlet alias Howlet for that thou c. How sayest thou art thou guilty of the High Treason whereof thou hast been Indicted and art now arraigned or not guilty Hewlet I am not guilty my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be tryed Hewlet By God and the Country Cl. God send thee a good delivery Set him aside Octob. 15. 1660. Clerk of the Crown Set Axtell to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Daniel Axtell hold up thy Hand Axtell Pray my Lord let me have Pen and Ink. L. Ch. Bar. Give Mr. Axtell Pen and Ink. Cler. Daniel Axtell these men that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. if you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Do you know how many you have liberty to challenge because I would not have you misinformed 35 you may challenge peremptorily and no more Axtell I thank you Lordship L. Ch. Bar. Unless you have any particular cause if so you may challenge more Axtell I confess I am wholly ignorant of the law John Kirke John Smith Thomas Morris Ralph Halsell John Sherecroft Francis Beale Robert Cromwell John Gallyerd John Shelbury George Rithe were called and by the Prisoner challenged Thomas Bide Charles Pitfield Robert Sheppard William Dod Thomas Vsman William Maynerd George Plucknet Samuel Harris John Nicoll of Hendon Henry Marsh Thomas Bishop Thomas Snow in all 12 were admitted and sworn of the Jury Cler. of the Crown If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Cl. Daniel Axtell hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner you that are sworn and harken to your charge you shall understand that the prisoner stands Indicted c. K. Council May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are Sworn of this Jury The High Court
by law that the right of the Militia was in them and your Lordships will remember in several Declarations and Acts that was mutually exchanged between his Majesty and Parliament and my Lord that was the Authority the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament raised a Force and made the Earl of Essex Ceneral and after him the Earl of Manchester of the Eastern Association and after that Sir Tho. Fairfax Lord General of the Forces by this Authority I acted and this Authority I humbly conceive to be legal because this Parliament was called by the Kings Writ chosen by the People and passed a Bill they should not be dissolved without their own consents that the Parliament was in being when the Tryal was and a question whether yet legally Dissolved In the fourth place they were not only owned and obeyed at home but abroad to be the chief Authority of the Nation and also owned by Foreign States and Kingdoms sent Ambassadors to that purpose under them did all the Judges of the Land Act who ought to be the Eye of the Land and the very light of the People to Guide them in their right Actions and I remember the Judges upon Tryal I have read it of High Treason Judg Thorp Nicholas and Jermin have declared it publickly That it was a lawful justifiable thing by the Law of the Land to obey the Parliament of England My Lord it further appears as to their Authority over the People of this Nation petitioning them as the supreme and lawful Authority and My Lords as I have heard it hath been objected that the Houses of Lords and Commons could make no Act. Truly my Lord if you will not allow them to be Acts though they intitle them so call them so and obeyed as so by the Judges Ministers and Officers of State and by all other persons in the Nation yet I hope they cannot be denied to be Orders of Parliament and were they no more but Orders yet were they sufficient as I humbly couceive to bear out such as acted thereby And my Lord the Parliament thus constituted and having made their Generals he by their Authority did constitute and appoint me to be an Inferior Officer in the Army serving them in the quarters of the Parliament and under and within their power and what I have done my Lord it hath been done only as a Souldier deriving my power from the General he had his power from the Fountain to wit the Lords and Commons and my Lord this being done as hath been said by several that I was there and had command at Westminster-Hall truly my Lord if the Parliament command the General and the General the inferiour Officers I am bound by my Commission according to the Laws and Customs of War to be where the Regiment is I came not thither voluntarily but by command of the General who had a Commission as I said before from the Parliament I was no Counsellor no Contriver I was no Parliament-man none of the Judges none that Sentenced Signed none that had any hand in the Execution onely that which is charged is that I was an Officer in the Army if that be so great a crime I conceive I am no more guilty than the Earl of Essex Fairfax or the Lord of Manchester Judg Mallet You are not charged as you were an Officer of the Army Axtell My Lords That is the main thing they do insist upon my Lord I am no more guilty than his Excellency the Lord General Monck who Acted by the same Authority and all the People in the three Nations and my Lord I do humbly suppose if the Authority had been only an Authority in Fact and not Right yet those that Acted under them ought not to be questioned but if the Authority commanded whatsoever offence they committed especially that that guided me was no less than the declared Judgment of the Lords and Commons sitting in Parliament they declared that was their right as to the Militia and having explained several Statutes of Henry the 7th wherein the King having enterchanged Declarations with the Parliament the Parliament comes to make an Explanation on that Statute and my Lord it is in Folio 280. wherein they do positively expound it and declare it as their allowed Judgment To clear up all scruples to all that should take up Arms for them saith the Parliament there as to the Statute of 11. of Henry the 7th Chapter the first which is printed at large comes there to explain it in general and comes here Folio 281. and gives this Judgment It is not say they agreeable to Reason or Conscience that any ones duty should be known if the Judgment of the High Court of Parliament be not a Rule or Guide to them In the next place this is the next Guidance Rule and Judgment of Parliament upon the Exposition of this Statute and as they have said in several places was it not too much to take up your Lordships time they are the proper Judges and Expounders of the Laws The High Court of Parliament have taken upon them to expound the Law and said that we Lawyers will give the meaning of the Text contrary to what they have expounded the meaning under their hands in the same Declaration his Majesty is pleased to quit that Statute upon which I stand Indicted the 25th of Edward the Third where they do my Lord expound that very Statute in the Declaration made in 1643. Folio 722. I come to the declared Judgment wherein they did positively say that the persons that do Act under their Authority ought not to be questioned as persons Guilty Folio 727. that is the Exposition that the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament doth make upon the statute Councel My Lord this is an Argumentation of Discourse in justification of his proceedings we desire to know what he will answer as to the Plea Axtell My Lords I have this further to say that if a House of Commons Assembled in Parliament may be Guilty of Treason for the truth is if I Acted Treason that Acted under the Authority of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and of the Commons in Parliament then doubtless they must begin the Treason if the House of Commons who are the collective body and Representation of the Nation all the people of England who chose them are guilty too and then where will there be a Jury to try this concerning the Commons alone I have been over ruled L. ch Bar. If you have any thing to say to the Lords and Commons answer to your charge your charge is nothing of the Lords and Commons but what you Acted when the house was broke and Forced Coun. You cannot but know that there is nothing charged against you for which you can so much as pretend an Authority of the Lords and Commons you know before you could do this Horrid Murther you were the persons that destroyed the Lords and Commons both indeed you Ravel in a
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
were the subsequent overtacts to prove the same Axtell I hope you will not think it much to give me some more freedom for my own defence for life My Lord I must needs say though there was a force on the Parliament I am not to justifie it I was no Lawyer no Statesman no Councellor but a Souldier and if the General who had a Commission from the Lords and Commons and that some years before and after the King's Death be not guilty of Treason what I did was by command from my General and though I am charged with being in Arms in Westminster-hall and at such and such a place yet it was not a Voluntary Act for I was bound to obey my General I do humbly pray that I may have your Lordships Judgment in this point I must say it was from the sense of their exposition of the Law and of the Statutes and from the Authority that every one took up Arms for and served them and obeyed either the one General or the other I say it was under this very Authority and this must needs acquit me from all the guilt that is laid upon me L. ch Bar. You put your self upon the Judgment of the Court upon this which you call a point in Law First it is manifest that there is no excuse at all for Treason no man by his Commission can warrant the doing of an Act which is Treason you must take notice of the Authority whether it be good or no your Commission was not to put the King to Death but on the contrary to preserve the Kings life The Lords and Commons what they did we do not meddle with the Reason and Ground of what they did was the preservation of the Kings Person as well as the maintenance of the Laws and Liberties of this Nation they made Protestations Declarations and Oaths for the preservation of the King's Person and you could not but take notice of those things Now whereas you go about to shroud your self under the Lord Fairfax he had no such Power and therefore you can challenge no more then he had and to what you say concerning the Judgment of the Parliament there will be a great deal of difference between a particular Case and a Declaration of Lords and Commons there is nothing you have said that hath any thing of Force and God forbid you should make use of it But I must tell you you could not but notoriously know all those Transactions that were in the Army what the Army had done that they came up with Swords in their Hands and turn'd out whom they would you saw what the Lords and Commons had done that the Treaty was ready for his Birth And then you come up with your Mermidons with Force and Arms and Exclude the greatest part of the Members and then the Lords were laid aside it is true the Lords were not wholly dissolved but they would not suffer them to Sit nor Act at all and this was apparent to the Nation If men under colour and pretence of such things Namely that a few persons for so they were but an Eighth part of the House of Commons permitted to remain and of that Eighth part which was but 46 in the whole there were but 26 that Voted that Act which you say you obeyed but you say you obeyed the General you were not to obey the General in this Case for the Facts that you have committed are not charged as Acts of War you are not charged for bringing the Souldiers in but for those Violent Actions that you were guilty of there you made the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice Execution Execution you sent officiously for a Hang-man to come down to you your Commission gave you no power for this the Death of the King you know how it was designed you know the Act for the bringing in of that Commission as they call'd it to sit in justice was after the House of Commons was reduced to a very small Number and some of those dissenting too what you did Act under that Authority if you can justifie it in the Name of God say so but do not Engage the Nation in those things which they abhorred and by the mercy of God are laid asleep Mr. Justice Foster You begin at the wrong End you ought as all men ought to do First to answer the matter of Fact and not to put in these long dilatory Pleas till you have answered the matter of Fact whether those things charged on you be true or not then if you have any thing further to say for your self by way of excuse it will be the time to speak and not before Axt. May it please your Lordships I humbly conceive I am upon that method to the first part of the witness they accuse me for commanding my Souldiers in Westminster-hall then I must prove my Authority which I have been about to do and declared the Judgment of Parliament L. ch B. The Court have heard you with a great deal of patience and that which is not at all to the business Axtell I only refer this as to the Authority I humbly conceive you will give me leave to insist upon this and how far I may improve it for my own defence here is the Commission by which my Lord Fairfax acted and that after the King's Death and I acted by the same Authority he did I had not been at Westminster-hall but on the command of the General Court Doth that Commission Authorize you to cry Justice Justice and to look up and down to get Witnesses against the King is that in your Commission Axt. I am to serve and obey all my Superior Officers that is my Commission if I do not I die by the Law of War Court You are to obey them in their just commands all unjust commands are invalid If our Superiors should command us to undue and irregular things much more if to the committing of Treason we are in each Case to make use of our passive not active Obedience Axt. Under Favour it is not proved that I did either Compass or Imagine the King's Death that is matter of Fact Court Let us try that Axt. My Lord I did nothing but as a meer Souldier I had Authority from the General I would leave this before your Lordships and the Jury that what I have done hath been by Authority of the Genetal L. Hollis Sir a word to you If you could satisfie the Court that you had received a Commission from the General to do those things with which you stand charged it were something then were it proper for you to plead it and the Court to judg Pray take this along with you the General gave you no such command what you are charged with in the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that by such and such overt acts as making your Souldiers cry out Justice and Execution for being active and forward in sending for the
the contrary I leave it upon the consciences of the Jury to weigh it carefully how I could be guilty of Compassing or Imagining the Death of the King when nothing is charged against me to be either of Counsel Sentencing or Signing or to be at the Execution only one man as I told you before he spoke something wrathly and that he had suffered much and therefore he is come over now and saith I should send for the Executioner which I never knew of or had any hand in sending for how much validity that hath I leave to the Jury if it were so it is not treason for words may make a Heretick not a Traytor I speak that by way of preface I do humbly conceive that these being only noted words Execution and Justice the King not so much as named nor any thing done to it by me I say I conceive it doth not amount to Treason by the Law and besides it is against the Law of the great Judg the Judg of Judges all of us that are now and are to come shall stand before him to receive our deserts I say it is against the Law of God to make me an Offender for a word for a word I have heard the Judges say that the Laws of England are grounded upon the Laws of God and the Laws of England are Laws of mercy not of rigour My Lord if a man shall be destroyed in his Life in his Posterity for a word admit the thing had been so I leave upon the consciences of my Jury before the presence of Jesus Christ and before whom they and I must come to be rejudged again at the Tribunal and besides it is only words and words uncertain and Sir Edward Cook saith he must declare plain truth in matter of Treason nothing must be taken for Evidence that may be a presumption or inference or strain of wit I hope upon this consideration that the word Justice fixed upon me by two Witnesses may be taken up at second or third hand from the People or Souldiers by chastising them for the Tumult Then my Lord in the next place these words were never put in writing and so not Treason then my Lord there was never an overt act done by me for that Act of Indemnity that his Majesty and both Houses of Parliament passed wherein they were pleased the very last to except me I wonder'd when I came to be excepted of that number I do come back to the place where I left and that is the overt act My Lord I would only bring it in in this place when I was excepted by the House of Commons one of the twenty I was excepted thus not extending to life I went up and down free at noon day I did not hide my self ingaging a person that was one of his Majesties Servants to do me a courtesie he promised me he would do it and contrary to his promise he was pleased to bring the Kings Warrant to carry me to the Tower and after that I came to be excepted with that black Catalogue of excepted persons and to be brought to the Tryal of the Law Now my Lord I return to that overt act as it was but words uncertain and they may be words repeated from the third or the fourth hand for they were not put in writing according to that Act of Indemnity which I understand the meaning of to be thus That for their Execrable Treasons in Sentencing Signing or otherwise Instrumental they are excepted out of this Act and to be Tryed according to the Laws of this Nation I understand that to be Instrumental to be Instrumentally the Executioner of the King I never had any hand in that Upon the whole this is the Fact that is proved by two Witnesses they heard me say Justice and Execution which must relate to the Execution of Justice which by the Law of God is not Treason especially when there was not the word King for a word to take away and destroy so many my Life Wife Children and many Fatherless that are under the Charge of the Prisoner at the Bar is very sad the words I do not grant but upon such probabilities as I have said I might repeat them I will Justice you I will Execution you and then the words were not written I say as Sir Edw. Cook said they may make a Heretick but not a Traytor the other part of the Evidence is this that I was there with Souldiers at Westminster-Hall I must say if that be Treason to be guided by Judgment of Lords and Commons in Parliament I must say if that be Treason to take up Arms for a Parliament upon such Grounds and Expositions of the statute which they have made and published by their own Authority if I am Guilty under the General then the Parliament would be guilty of Treason L. Ch. Bar. That you have spoke to I am loath to interrupt you Axt. I thank your Lordships for informing me but I was commanded to be there by my General if I had not gone I must have dyed I did only stand there for preservation of the peace in no other sense if the General order me to be at such a Rendezvous I must be there if I disobeyed he would have condemned me by the Law of War The next thing against me material are these two things that is that I should send one Elisha Axtell for the Executioner I must say it is most Admirable such things should be laid to my charge I hope your Lordships and the Jury do observe he told you he suffered much and a poor man under his extremities and losses and sufferings perhaps might start some unadvised words and being now sent over may ascertain it But doubtless this Elisha Axtell being in Ireland if by command it had been so would have been sent over truly I must say I had no hand in the business it was left wholly to them amongst themselves and what ever was done or whatever was said it was said and done by them I never was acquainted with any thing of that nature he said he heard I should send Elisha Axtell for an Executioner if hearsays may be Treason it will be a hard Lesson and my Lord Sir Edw. Cooke saith there must be two witnesses here is but one It comes from such a man my Lord as the providence of God but I will say no more as to that but pray the Jury will take notice of it L. Ch. Bar. You need not doubt of it it shall be taken notice of this of Burden Axt. Now my Lord I have but two or three words more the Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third it doth intend private persons my Lord here is my Commission L. Ch. Bar. It is owned you had it from your General Axt. My Lord his Majesty is pleased to say in his Gracious Letter We do by these presents declare That we do grant a free and General Pardon to all our Subjects of
there may be a favourable construction made of it I humbly leave it with you I did my Duty to pray for the King but had no malice to act willingly against him Clerk Henry Marten Counsel He did both sign and seal the Precept for summoning the Court and the Warrant for Execution sat almost every day and particularly the day of Sentence Marten My Lord I do not decline a confession so as to the matter of Fact the malice set aside maliciously murderously and traiterously Counsel If you have any thing to say to that we will prove it L. Ch. Baron That I may inform you in it there is malice implied by Law malice in the Act it self that which you call malice that you had no particular intention or design against the King's Person but in relation to the Government that will not be to this present business if it should extenuate any thing that would be between God and your own Soul but as to that which is alledged in the Indictment Maliciously Murderously and Traiterously they are the consequences of Law If a Man meet another in the Street and run him through in this case the Law implies malice though but to an ordinary Watchman there is malice by the Law in the Fact if there was no such expressed personal malice as you conceive yet the Fact done implies malice in Law Mr. Solicitor General My Lord He does think a Man may sit upon the death of the King sentence him to death sign a Warrant for his Execution meekly innocently charitably and honestly Marten I shall not presume to compare my knowledg in the Law with that of that Learned Gentleman but according to that poor understanding of the Law of England that I was capable of there is no Fact that he can name that is a Crime in it self but as it is circumstantiated Of killing a Watchman as your Lordship instanced a Watchman may be killed in not doing his Office and yet no murder Lord Chief Baron I instanced that of a Watchman to shew there may be a malice by Law though not expressed though a Man kill a Watchman intending to kill another Man in that case it is malice in Law against him so in this case if you went to kill the King when he was not doing his Office because he was in Prison and you hindred him from it the Law implies malice in this It is true all Actions are circumstantiated but the killing of the King is Treason of all Treasons Justice Foster If a Watchman be killed it is murder it is in contempt of Magistracy of the Powers Above the Law says that contempt adds to the malice Counsel We shall prove against the Prisoner at the Bar because he would wipe off malice he did this very merrily and was in great sport at the time of the signing the Warrant for the King's Execution Marten That does not imply malice Ewer sworn Councel Come Sir you are here upon your Oath speak to my Lords and the Jury you know the Prisoner at the Bar very well you have sometimes served him Were you present in the Painted Chamber January 29. 1648. at the signing the Warrant the Parchment against the King Ewer The day I do not remember but I was in that Chamber to attend a Gentleman there I followed that Gentleman looking at Mr. Marten I followed that Gentleman into that Chamber L. C. Baron After what Gentleman Ewer Mr. Marten my Lord I was pressing to come near but I was put off by an Officer or Souldier there who told me I should not be there I told him I was ordered to be by that Gentleman My Lord I did see a Pen in Mr. Cromwel's hand and he marked Mr. Marten in the face with it and Mr. Marten did the like to him but I did not see any one set his Hand though I did see a Parchment there with a great many Seals to it Sir Purback Temple sworn Counsel What do you know of that Gentleman in his carriage of this Business Sir Purback Temple My Lords I being present in Town when that horrid Murder was contrived against the late King there came some Persons of Honour Servants to the late King to my Father's House Sir Edward Partridge to engage me to join with them to attempt the King's escape In order whereunto they told me nothing would tend so much to his Majesty's Service as to endeavour to discover some part of their Counsels for that it was resolved by Cromwel to have the King tried at the High Court of Justice as they called it the next day and desired me if possible to be there to discover their Counsels whereby the King might have notice and those that were to attempt his escape In order whereunto the next day by giving Mony to the Officer of the Painted Chamber I got in by day light in the Lobby to the Lords House I espied a Hole in the Wall under the Hangings where I placed my self till the Council came where they were contriving the manner of trying the King when he should come before them and after the manner of praying and private consults amongst themselves when their Prayer was over there came news that the King was landed at Sir Robert Cotton's Stairs at which Cromwel run to a Window looking on the King as he came up the Garden he returned as white as the Wall returning to the Board he speaks to Bradshaw and Sir Henry Mildmay how they and Sir William Breerton had concluded on such a Business Then turning to the Board said thus My Masters He is come He is come and now we are doing that great Work that the whole Nation will be full of Therefore I desire you to let us resolve here what answer we shall give the King when he comes before us for the first Question that he will ask us will be By what Authority and Commission do we try him To which none answered presently Then after a little space Henry Marten the Prisoner at the Bar rose up and said In the Name of the Commons and Parliament assembled and all the good People of England which none contradicted so all rose up and then I saw every Officer that waited in the Room sent out by Cromwel to call away my Lord such a one whose Name I have forgot who was in the Court of Wards Chamber that he should send away the Instrument which came not and so they adjourned themselves to Westminster-Hall going into the Court of Wards themselves as they went thither When they came to the Court in Westminster-Hall I heard the King ask them the very same Question that Cromwel had said to them Mr. Solicitor Gentlemen the Prisoner at the Bar confesses his Hand to the Warrant for Executing the King you see by his Servant how merry he was at the sport You see by his Witness how serious he was at it and gave the foundation of that Advice upon which they all proceeded and now he
honest and humble Confession and shall give no evidence against him to aggravate the Matter L. Ch. B. Your Petition is accepted and shall be read Robert Titchburne My Lord when I first pleaded to the Indictment it was Not Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted My Lord it was not then in my Heart either to deny or justify any tittle of the matter of Fact My Lord The Matter that I was led into by ignorance my Conscience leads me to acknowledg But my Lord if I should have said Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted I was fearful I should have charged my own Conscience as then knowingly and maliciously to act it My Lord it was my unhappiness to be call'd to so sad a Work when I had so few years over my head A Person neither bred up in the Laws nor in Parliaments where Laws are made I can say with a clear Conscience I had no more enmity in my heart to his Majesty than I had to my Wife that lay in my bosom My Lord I shall deny nothing After I was summoned I think truly I was at most of the Meetings and I do not say this that I did not intend to say it before but preserving that Salvo to my own Conscience That I did not maliciously and knowingly do it I think I am bound in Conscience to own it As I do not deny but I was there so truly I do believe I did sign the Instrument And had I known that then which I do now I do not mean my Lord my Afflictions and Sufferings it is not my Sufferings make me acknowledg I would have chosen a red hot Oven to gone into as soon as that Meeting I bless God I do this neither out of fear nor hopes of favour though the penalty that may attend this acknowledgment may be grievous My Lord I do acknowledg the Matter of Fact and do solemnly profess I was led into it for want of years I do not justify either the Act or the Person I was so unhappy then as to be ignorant and I hope shall not now since I have more light justify that which I was ignorant of I am sure my Heart was without malice if I had been only asked in matter of Fact at first I should have said the same I have seen a little The Great God before whom we all stand hath shewn his tender mercy to Persons upon repentance Paul tells us Though a Blasphemer and a Persecuter of Christ it being done ignorantly upon repentance he found mercy My Lord Mercy I have found and I do not doubt but mercy I shall find My Lord I came in upon the Proclamation and now I am here I have in truth given your Lordship a clear and full account what ever that Law shall pronounce because I was ignorant yet I hope there will be room found for that Mercy and Grace that I think was intended by the Proclamation and I hope by the Parliament of England I shall say no more but in pleading of that humbly beg that your Lordships will be instrumental to the King and Parliament on that behalf Counsel We shall give no evidence against the Prisoner he says he did it ignorantly and I hope and do believe he is penitent and as far as the Parliament thinks fit to shew mercy I shall be very glad Owen Rowe I have not much to say I never had any ability therefore my Lord it was never my intent upon my Plea as was said before to deny any thing I have done for I was clearly convinced that I ought to confess it before and I do confess against my self that I did sit there several times and to the best of my remembrance I did sign and seal the Warrant for his Execution and truly my Lord it was never in my heart to contrive a Plot of this nature How I came there I do not know I was very unfit for such a Business and I confess I did it ignorantly not understanding the Law so was carried away hidden in the Business not understanding what I did therefore my Lord I humbly intreat this honourable Court that you will consider of it and look upon me as one that out of ignorance did it and if I had known of my Act I would rather have been torn in pieces with a thousand Horses When I heard of the Declaration and gracious Pardon of his Majesty I confess I went to my Lord Mayors laid hold of it and I thought my life as secure as it is now in my own hands But I do wholly cast my self upon the King's Mercy and as I have heard he is a gracious King full of lenity and mercy so I hope I shall find it I was never against Government it is a blessed thing that we have it I hope all the Nations will be happy under it I shall submit to his Majesty and Government I can say no more I was not brought up a Scholar but was a Tradesman and was meerly ignorant when I went on in that Business I do humbly intreat your Lordships that you would as tenderly as may be present my case to the King whom I rest upon and leave all to your Lordships wisdom and discretion to do what you will concerning me Counsel We accept his Confession and do hope he is penitent before God as well as before the World Robert Lilburn Be pleased to give me leave to speak a few words I shall be ingenuous before your Lordships I shall not wilfully nor obstinately deny the Matter of Fact But my Lord I must and I can with a very good Conscience say That what I did I did it very innocently without any intention of Murder nor was I ever Plotter or Contriver in that Murder I never read in the Law nor understood the Case throughly What-ever I have done I have done ignorantly L. Ch. B. Because you shall not be mistaken in your words God forbid that we should carp at your words the word Innocent hath a double acceptation Innocent in respect of Malice and Innocent in respect of the Fact Lilburn The truth is my Lord I was for the withdrawing of the Court when the King made the motion to have it withdrawn and upon the day my Lord that the King was put to death I was so sensible of it that I went to my Chamber and mourn'd and would if it had been in my power have preserved his life My Lord I was not at all any disturber of the Government I never interrupted the Parliament at all I had no hand in those things neither in 1648 nor at any other time I shall humbly beg the favour of the King that he would be pleased to grant me his Pardon according to his Declaration which I laid hold on and rendred my self according to the Proclamation Counsel We shall say nothing against him Henry Smith My Lord I shall not desire to spend your Lordships time what I have done
Countrey-man I was glad to hear of your great penitence for that horrid crime and I would have been glad to have seen it now advise with your self whether you do your self any good in speaking to extenuate when you know there is no man against whom there are such circumstances of aggravation as against you consider whether a publick penitence would not be more proper Waller I beseech you report me both to his Majesty and Parliament and receive me into your grace as being penitent truly penitent To say so now were a small thing for the fear of the punishment may procure it but I have been more penitent when no eye hath seen me but God when I never imagined to be questioned for this sin then my heart hath yerned in the business but I shal not trouble your Lordships God holds forth Mercy his Majesty holds forth Mercy the Parliament holds forth Mercy My Lords let me say something to you though it be but a word of the violence and force of temptation you may have been under it or may come to it Christ himself was under it we find that faithful Abraham by the power of a Temptation delivered up his wife to commit Adultery which scarce a Heathen would we finde that valiant Peter denied his Master righteous Lot committed incest None abhors this fact more then I do I have done it so long beforehand I need not be afraid to speak it in the face of the Judge of all men that is all I shall say I rendred my self three times I had as much opportunity to make my escape as any person whatsoever Lord Chief Baron It is understood Sir Hardress Clerk Isaac Pennington hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition as the former what canst thou say for thy self why judgment c. Pennington My Lord I have said what I have to say and shall not trouble your Lordships any further Clerk Henry Marten hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Marten I claim the benefit of the Proclamation Clerk Gilbert Millington hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Millington I shall not trouble you with long discourses I will say no more but this I have made a publick resentment of my sorrow for this offence formerly and many times I shall now desire no more but humbly beg that I may have the benefit of the Proclamation and pray his Majesties most gracious Pardon Clerk Robert Tichborne hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c Tichborne My Lord I will not trouble you with any repititions I have made my humble request before I leave it with you Clerk Owen Roe hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Roe My Lord I have no more to say then I said before Clerk Robert Lilburn hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Lilburn I shall refer my self without further trouble to the Court my Lord I beg the benefit of the Proclamation Clerk Thomas Waite hold up thy hand Thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Waite I can declare no more than what already my heart is sorry for what I have done I beg the benefit of the Proclamation Clerk Edmond Harvey hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Harvey My Lords I have no more then what I have said before Clerk John Downes Hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Downes I shall not trouble you any further I shall desire the benefit of his Majesties Proclamation Clerk Vincent Potter hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Potter My Lord I do not know Law I understand it not I am not in a condition to speak what I would have willingly spoke I desire that God would have mercy and I look for mercy from God and wept Clerk Augustine Garland Hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Garland I humbly desire your Lordships charitable opinion of me notwithstanding what has been objected against me I humbly refer my self to the Parliament Clerk George Fleetwood hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Fleetwood My Lord I have already confessed the fact I wish I could express my sorrow and wept Clerk James Temple hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. I. Temple My Lord I can say no more I beg the benefit of the Proclamation Clerk Simon Mayn hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Mayne I have told you before my Lord I have no more Clerk Peter Temple hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Peter Temple My Lord I came in upon the Proclamation and I humbly beg the benefit of it Cl. Tho. Waite hold up thy hand thou art in 〈◊〉 same condition what canst thou say for thy self Waite My Lord I refer it to your Lordships Clerk Francis Hacker hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Hacker My Lord. I have nothing to say but what has been before your Lordships Clerk Daniel Axtel hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Axtell May it please your Lordships my case differs from the rest of the Gentlemen L. Ch. B. I would be loth to hinder you but I must tell you that what hath been over-ruled must not be spoke to if you have any thing against the Indictment matter of Law go on Axtell I have one thing more that I did not then mention L. Ch. B. If it tend not as an exception to the Indictment it is not to be heard Axtell My Lord then I shall apply my self to that point I humbly conceive my Lord that my overt acts were not sufficiently set down in the Indictment as might be sufficient in Law to attaint me of high Treason I do not remember that the Overt act that was applyed to me in evidence was charged in the Indictment I have onely that exception because of the insufficiency of that point In the next place my Lord there is not the right additions to my name there are many persons of the same name I am arraigned by
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended