when we apprehend the reason of the Law that is when we bring the reason of the Law to our own reason that we may perfectly understand in as our own ibidem and therefore we use to say in argument that reason will that such a thing be done or that reason will not that such a thing be done Noy max. f. 1. for as Ployd f 34. our Law hath reasonable constructions in all things As if I be bound to perform the Covenants in such an Indenture it shall be intended all the Covenants or that my Feoffees shall make an Estate it shall be intended all my Feoffees Lex est summa ratio Coke com 97. b. the Law is the chiefest reason that is an artificiall and legall reason warranted by authority in Law ibid. 62. a. and therefore Littleton saith Semper quaere de dubiis quia per rationes pervenitur ad legitimam rationem Alwaies enquire of doubts for by reason you shall come to a lawfull reason for reason is radius divini luminis and by the reasoning and debating of grave learned men the darkness of ignorance is expelled and by the light of legall reason the right is discerned and thereupon judgment given according to Law which is the perfection of reason Coke com f. 232. b. Nay the Common Law it self is nothing but reason which is to be understood of an artificiall perfection of reason gotten by long study observation and experience and not of every mans naturall reasons for Nemo nascitur artifex No man is born an Artist This legall reason is summa ratio And therefore if all the reason that is dispersed into so many severall heads were united into one yet could he not make such a Law as the Law of England is because by many successions of ages it hath been fined and refined by an infinite number of grave and learned men and by long experince grown to such a perfection as the old rule may be verified Neminen oportet esse sapientiorem legibus No man ought out of his own private person to be wiser then the Law which is the perfection of reason Co. com f. 97. b. And though the Jurisdiction of the Court of Parliament is so transcendent that it maketh enlargeth diminisheth repealeth and reviveth Lawes Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiasticall Capitall Criminall Common Civill Martiall Maritine and the rest Coke comm f. 110. a. yet cannot a Parliament confirm any thing which is against Law and reason And therefore if a Town hath customes which are against Law and reason and their customes be confirmed by Parliament Danby chief Justice in such case saith M 5. E. 4. f. 40. 41. That such confirmation shall not extend to such customes For a thing used meerly against Law and reason is not custome notwithstanding the usage as the Law saith and therefore the Act of Parliament which confirmeth their customes is referred to that which is not for they are not customs and therefore shall be void Ployd f. 399. b. vide ibidem plura Quod est contra rationem est illicium Coke com f. 97. b. what is contrary to reason is unlawfull And therefore Tenant in Franck-marriage shall do fealty to the Lord before the 4th degree passed for it should be inconvenient and against reason that a man shall be Tenant of an an Estate of an Inheritance to another and yet the Lord shall receive no manner of service of him and therefore he shall do fealty for all service ibid. And all positive Lawes which are contrary to the Lawes of nature and the Law of reason lose their force and are no Lawes at all Such was that of the Aegyptians to turn weomen to Merchandizes and Common-wealth affaires and to keep men within doors And such was the Law of the Thracians who accounted stealing very commendable and idleness an honest thing Finch Nom. l. 75. Quod est inconveniens contra rationem non est permissum in lege Whatsoever is convenient and contrary to reason is not permitted in the Law Coke com 178. a. If a man be seised of lands in Fee-simple and hath issue two daughters and the eldest is married and the Father giveth parcell of the lands to the Baron with his Daughter in Franck-marriage and dieth seised of the remnant which are of the greater value by the year then those lands given in Frank-marriage In this case the Baron and the Feme shall have nothing for their pur-party of the said remnant unless they will put their lands given in Frank-marriage in hotch pot with their remnant of the land with the Sister And if they will not do so then the younger may hold and occupy the same remainder and take to her the profits only for if the other partner should have nothing of it is given in Frank marriage of this a thing would ensue an inconvenience and a thing against reason which the Law will not suffer and therefore if the Baron and Feme will not put their lands in Frank-marriage in hotch pot they shall have nothing of the remnant because it shall be intended by the Law that she is sufficiently advanced to which advancement she agreeth holdeth her self content Littleton ibidem Mutata legis ratione mutatar lex Coke l. 7. f. 7. The reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is changed As though by the Common Law a man cannot distrain for rent or service in the night 12 E. 3.17.11 H. 7.5 accord yet for damage-feasant a man may distrain in the night for the necessity of the case for otherwise peradventure he shall not distrain at all for before the day they may be taken or strayed out of the ground 10 E. 3. f 37. In the Statute of Winchester it is provided that in Cities or great Villages which are inclosed the gates ought to be shut from the setting of the Sun to the Sun rising and since that Statute if in such Village or City inclosed any murther or manslaughter be done in the day or in the night and the Offender escape such City or Village shall be amerced which Act changed the reason of the Law for at the common Law if a man was slain in the night and the Offender escape there it was not any default in the City and Village but now if they do not guard their Gates strongly according to the Statute by which the Offendor escapeth then it is a default and negligence in them 3 E. 3. tit Coronae 290. So if divers commit a robbery by the Statute of 13 E. 3. those of the hundred ought to apprehend all the Felons and though they apprehend any of them that is not sufficient to excuse them for the words of the Act are that they shall answer for the bodies of the Offenders but now by the Statute of 27 Eliz. c. 13. it is provided that none shall have an action upon the said statute if not that the party robbed so soon as he can
the obligation is good and the Obligee may declare upon a Solvendum to himselfe 4. E. 4. 29. for contraria non possunt simul esse in eodem subjecto Arist 5. Phys contraries cannot be together in the same subject Omnis privatio presupponit habitum every privation presupposeth an habit Coke com f. 341. b. and l. â0 f. 86. b. To many purposes a Parson hath in effect but an estate for life and to many a qualified fee but the entire fee and right is not in him and that is the reason that he cannot discontinue the Fee-simple that he hath not nor ever had for every privation presupposeth an habit From authority and example ARgumentum ab authoritate firmissimum est in lege an argument from authority is the strongest in Law Coke com 254. a. our Book cases are the best proofes what the Law is and after the example of Littleton Booke cases are principally to be cited for deciding the cases in question and not any privatâ opinion according to the rule Nulla hominis authoritas tantum apud nos valere debet ut meliora non sequeremur si quis attulerit no mans authority ought to prevaile so much with us as that we may not follow the better whosoever shall alledge it as Littleton here rejecteth the opinion of Newton and followeth the better authorities in Law Coke com f. 383. a. And whereas by the Civil Law as Sir John Davis observeth every Doctors opinion is vouched and cited of them as good authority it must needs breed distractions of opinions and variations according to which sense the logicall axiom is to be taken locus ab authoritate est infirmissimus Boethius An argument from authority is most weake and prevaileth little or nothing in resolving the question as the Poet pressely Nil agit exemplum litem quod lite resolvat to cleere a quaere example stands for nothing whereas our Law arguments are deduced from the strength of cases apt to the purpose and presidents of former times founded on the discourse of reason and consideration of the wisest and sagest Judges and are no inartificiall arguments as ipse dixit or teste me ipso but are drawn out of the termes and bowells of the issue by arguments and conclusions of reason Nullum exemplum est idem omnibus Coke com 212. a. 317. b. No example is the same to all and therefore it is the best meanes in all assurances to take counsell of learned and well experienced men and not onely to trust without advise to presidents for as the Aphorisme holdeth in the state of a mans body nullum medicamentum est idem omnibus no salve is the same to all so doth the rule in the estates and assurances of Lands no example or president is the same to all Periculosum existimo quod virorum bonorum non comprobatur exemplo Coke com f. 81. b. I deeme it dangerous that is not approved by the president of good men and therefore it appeareth how safe it is to be guided by judiciall presidents Littera scripta manet Coke com f. 115. a. A written word remaineth and therefore a record or sufficient matter in writing is a good memoriall whence it is said when we will by any record or writing commit the memory of any thing to posterity tradere memoriae and for this reason it is that regularly a man cannot prescribe a custome against a statute because it is matter of record and is the highest proof and matter of record in Law yet a man may prescribe against an Act of Parliament when by prescription and custome it is saved by an other Act of Parliament Nihil in lege intolerabilius est eandem rem diverso jure teneri Coke l. 4. f. 93 in Slades case There is nothing more intollerable in law then that the latter judgement should contradict the former and therefore 37. H. 6. f. 22. Aske said such Charters have beene allowed in the time of our Predecessors who were as sage and learned as wee and Markham 5. E. 4. f. 41. It is good for us to doe as it hath been used in former times and not to keepe one way one day for one party and another day the contrary for another party The former presidednts are enough for us to follow So 11. E 3. Title Formedon 22. It was holden that ancient formes and manner of presidents are to be maintained and observed and 34. Ass Pl. 7. That which hath not been according to usage shall not be permitted and in 2. E. 3. 29. The ancient forme and order is to be observed and 39. H. 6. 30. The opinion of Prisât and all the Court was that they would not change their use notwithstanding that their opinion was to the contrary and 4. E. 4. 44. All the Justices said we cannot change the course hath been before for it should be inconvenient and it is said 3. E. 4. 1. That the course of Courts maketh a law And therefore all the Justices in ancient times and from time to time being as well in matters of forme as in deciding of doubts and questions and as well at the common law as in construction of Acts of Parliament have given great regard to the ancient presidents and judgements of the preceding judges as Ployd f. 99. b. It was advised by the Court according to the book of 7. H. 4. That an accessary shall not be arraigned as an accessary to one principall untill the other principals may be attainted because it did seeme the better way to the Court to pursue the same order that the Sages before had used And so here in Slades case in respect of the infinite presidents which the Secondary of the Prothonotaries of the Kings Bench did shew to the Court it was resolved before all the Judges of England in the Exchequer chamber that though an action of debt lyeth upon a contract yet the Bargainer may have an Action of the case or an Action of debt at his election Coke ibidem Mos retinendus fidelissimae vetustatis quae praeter consuetudinem morem majorum fiunt neque placent neque recta videntur frequentia actus multum operatur The ancient manner of the most faithfull antiquity is to be retained and what are contrary to the custome and use of the Elders doe neither please nor seem right and the frequency of acts worketh much Coke l. 4 f. 74. and therefore it was there resolved by the chief justices Popham Anderson and by Pyriam chiefe Baron and other justices that the ancient and usuall elections of Mayors Bayliffs c. by a certaine selected company of the principals of the commonalty and Burgesses commonly called the common councell c. were good and well warranted by their Charters and by their lawes also Multa ignoramus quae nobis non laterent si veterum lectio nobis fuit fâmiliaris Coke l. 10. 73. We are ignorant of many things which would not be
of the Law when one thing is provided for in the words that every other thing in the like kind shall be provided for in the same words And so when the words of a Statute enact one thing they enact all other things which are in the semblable degree As whereas the Statute of 9 E. 3. c 31. ordaineth that in an Action of Debt against Executors he that commeth in by distresse shall answer the said Act shall be extended by equity to Administrators for whosoever of them commeth in first by distress shall answer by the equity of the said Act because they are in the like degree So the Statute of 4 H. 4. c. 8. giveth an especiall Assise to him who is disseised and ousted of his land by force against the Disseisor and it is enacted that he shall recover against him double damages And so it is in an Assise of Nusance to turn the course of the water from the Mills of the Plaintiff with force it was adjudged that he should recover double damages and yet he was not put out of his land neither was there a disseisin but the Nusance was to the damage of his Frank-tenement and so by the equity of the said act the Plaintiff recovered double damages because the Nusance was in the like kind So the Statute of Gleucester giveth an Action of Wast c. against him who holdeth for life or for yeares and by the equity of it a man shall have an action of Wast against him who holdeth for a yeare or for twenty weeks and yet it is out of the words of the act because it is in the like degree and the cases which are of such degree in our Law are infinite Ployd f. 165. a. And there is another sort of equity which abridgeth and taketh from the letter and is a correction of the generall words Ethie 30. l. 10. and is defined by Aristotle to be ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã a correction of a Law wherein it is any way wanting because of the generality of it which also in our Law is of much use As when an act of Parliament is made that whosoever shall do such an act shall be a Felon and be put to death and yet a man non sarae memoriae or an Infant of tender age who hath no discretion doth it they shall not be Felons c. or if a Statute be made that all persons who shall receive or give meat or drink or other aid to one who shall do a felonious act shall be accessory to the Offence and be put to death yet if one doth such an act and commeth to his wife who knowing it receiveth him and giveth meat and drink unto him she shall not be accessory nor Felon for in the generality of the said words of the Law he of non sanae memoriae nor Infant nor a Wife shall not be included and so equity correcteth the generality of the Law in those cases and the words generall are by equity abridged so the Statute of Champerty W. 2. l. 49. Arti. super Chart. contra probatos men generally do receive Lands and Tenements while the thing is in plea yet M. 16. R. 2. accord it was said by the whole Court in a Writ of Champerty that if I bargaine any lands before any Writ brought and after the Writ purchased I deliver Seisin That the Writ of Champerty doth not lye because it shall not be intended that the Bargain was made for such cause and that by equity for when he bargained and promised the land upon just consideration before any action brought against him it was his act to perform it notwithstanding the action And Costle promoter of the King brought an action of Extortion H. 21. H. 7. 16. against an under-Sheriff grounded upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. c. 10. which ordaineth that neither the Sheriff Goaler or Ministers nor any of them by colour of their Office shall take any thing profit c. of any person for fine fee or ease of prison but for the Sheriff 20 d. the Bayliff 4 d. and the Goaler 4 d. supposing that he had taken 20 d. above the same limited upon the Statute and upon demurrer it appeared upon evidence to the Court that all under Sherifs of the same county have used from the time whereof memory doth not run to have of every prisoner in their ward for suspition of Felony when they are acquitted twenty pence called the Bar fee and the twenty pence supposed to be taken were taken from the person named in the count being acquitted for a Bar-fee and the opinion of the whole Court was that it was out of the raise of the Statute though it was within the words of the Statute for that the sum of a Bar-fee was assigned to the Sheriff at the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court in respect of his labour and charge he had with the prisoners and for his attendance and for his ministry when the prisoners are brought to their delivery and so that payment was with reason and good conscience which the intent of the makers of the act was not to take away and so equity did put an exception to the generality of that text of the Statute Law So the Statute of W. 2. c. 4. ordaineth that where a man rat or dog escapeth alive out of a Ship neither the Ship nor any thing that is within it shall be adjudged wrack but all the things shall be saved and kept by the view of the Sheriff c. in the hands of those of the Towne where the things were found so that if any one can prove that they are his within a yeare and a day they shall be restored to him and whosoever doth otherwise shall be awarded to prison and remaine at the will of the King and render damages yet if the goods within the Ship be such things as will not endure for a yeare and a day the Sheriff may sell them and deliver the mony taken for them to the Towne to answer for it and that by equity though it be against the words of the said Act. So the Act of 2. E. 6. c. 14. Which giveth to the King all Lands and Tenements by any assurance conveyance given assigned or limited to find any preacher to have continuance for ever c. if the words of that act should be taken generally they give to the King al the houses and glebe Lands of all Parsons and Vicars but equity putteth in that text the exception of Parsonages and Vicarages because it was not the intention of the makers of that Act Ployd f. 466. vide ibidem plura There is another excellent use of equity which consisteth in guiding the grounds and maxims of of things which seem to crosse and thwart one another for as Sir John Doderidge English Lawyer f. 209. it is scarcely possible to make any second rule of Law but that it shall faile in some particular
quae quidem diaturnitate temporis efficit L. 1 de repub f. 2. ut nonnulla toleranda esse videantur que contra jus boni aequi esse videantur we are to yeild something to custome which certainly by long continuance of time doth effect that some things may seem to be tolerated which seem to be against the rule of right and equity so Moses tolerated and suffered the Jewes libello repudii by a bill of refusall to forsake their wives though the indissoluble bond of matrimony was ordained of God and this dispensation as our Saviour saith was permitted for the hardnesse of their hearts because their hearts through inveterate custome were hardned against that divine ordinance Consuetudo more utentiam approbata vim legis obtinet Bract. l. 3. c. 1. Coke l. 4. f. 21. Consuetudo est altera lex a custome approved by the manner of the users obtaineth the force of a Law and is another Law Arist 1. R. for those things are done by custome as the Phylosopher saith which therefore we doe because we have often done them and when a reasonable act once done was found to be beneficiall and agreeable to the people then did they use and practise it often and so by the reiteration and multiplication of the same became a custome and so being without interruption time out of mind practised for the quiet by the approbation of the people obtained the vigor of a law for as Bo. princep legum Sod de repub l. 1. c. 1. pulus morum magister the Prince is the master founder of laws ordinances and the people of manners and customes Just l. 1. tit 2. which accordeth with the description of Justian quod quisque populus sibi jus constituit id ipsius proprium civitatis est what every people ordaine to be a Law to themselves that is a proper and municipall Law of the City Cicer. in La. Maxima est vis consuetudinis saith the eminent Legist of Rome the force of custome is very great in so much that as by the Law of nature consuetudo est altera natura so by the Law of Nations consuetudo est altera lex for as Coke l. 5. Epist ad lectorem of his own knowledge professeth that at this time all Kingdomes and common Wealths are governed by Laws and that every Nation hath his peculiar and approved Customes which are the most usuall binding and firmest Lawes so as it is said per varios casus artem experientia fecit it may be said per varios usus legem experientia fecit Co. com f. 97. b. There are particular Customes and generall Customes particular Customes are such as are used in some certain County City Towne or Lord-ship and generall Customes are such as are used throughout all England which are the common Law of England In his preface for as Davis the common Law of England is nothing but the common Custome of the Realme and Coke the common Law is nothing else but a common opinion generally received and Finch the common Law is a Law used by prescription throughout the Realme of England Finch Nomot f. 75. Ployd f. 95. a. The common Law is nothing else but common use and the mirror of Justice c. 1. l. 9 The Law is ancient uses warranted by Scriptures and is called the common Law Dav. pref because given to all in generall and to conclude this point with this definition which seemeth to me to include all Custome is a reasonable act iterated multiplied and continued by the people L. 1. R. c. 3. de temps dont memoire ne court time out of minde Aristotle saith injustum est apud omnes praeter consuetudines patrias quicquam agere all Nations hold it unjust to doe any thing against the Customes of the Country which is a principle in our Law that Custome is another Law Ennig Frag. and that we may say with the ancient Roman Poet as he sung of the Romans Moribus antiquis stat resque Britanna virisque The state of England standeth on the ancient Law And though it be jus non scriptum and onely written in the memory of man yet as Sir John Davis it doth far excell our written Lawes namely our Statutes or Acts of Parliament which is manifest in this that when our Parliament have altered In his preface and changed any fundamentall point of the common Law those alterations have been found to be so inconvenient for the Common-Wealth as that the common Law hath been in effect restored againe in some points by other Acts of Parliament in succeeding ages as it is a fundamentall principle of the common Law Quod haereditarium jus omne per feodum simplex transit that all estates of inheritance are fee-simple which the Statute of 13. Ed. 1. de donis conditionalibus intended to limit and to give every man power to create a new estate in taile and establish a perpetuity of his Lands so as the same should not be aliened or letten but during the life of tenant in taile whereupon these inconveniences ensued purchases defeated leases evicted and other estates and grants made upon good consideration avoided creditors defrauded of their just debts and offendors enboldened to commit capitall offences c. who therefore were first barred by common recoveries and then docked by fines 15. E. 3. 14. by Herb. Coke l. 4. Ep. ad lectorem So the Statute of non-claime of 34. E. 3. is against a main point of the common Law whereby ensued the universall trouble of the Kings Subjects and therefore was it altered by the Statute of H. 7. c. 24. Coke ibidem 32. So by the grounds of the Law Lands were not devisable before the Statute of 32 34. H. 8. concerning which dayly experience teacheth us that many subtile and intricate questions arise concerning the construction of Wils to the ruine of many and hindrance of multitudes Coke ibi And it is a politick axiom that the alteration of any fundamentall point of the common Law which is ratified by use and experience is most dangerous and therefore we ought to vote and resolve with all the Earles and Barons in Parliament holden in the twentieth yeare of H. 3. against the Bishops who would have introduced the civil Law Nolumus leges Angliae mutare we will not change the Lawes of England To which purpose I add the asseveration of Cicero ante nostram memoriam terterum morem Frey Cil. de repub ac majorum instituta retinebant excellentes viri before our memory excellent men did retaine the custome of the ancient and the institutes of their elders Optimus legum interpres Consuetudo Co. l. 2. f. 81. a. The best expounder of the Law is custome If land holden by grand Serjanty be aliened without licence it is forfeited by the Common Law because the service of the body cannot be transferred to another 14 E. 3.
land of the Tenant is void Dyer 199. b. Custome that the Tenant shall be amerced if he do not put his Cattell in the Pound of the Lord 21 H. 7. 20. Malus usus est abolendus Lit. Sect. 212. 9. Co. com f. 141. a. An evill use is to be abolished for every use that is evill is against reason for vertue is an habit consentaneous to reason Arist 6. Eth. c. 13. in consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est consideranda In customes the long continuance of time is not to be considered but the soundness and solidity of reason and for that reason the Brechon Law in Ireland was by Lionell Duke of Clarence wholly abolished because it was not a Law but a lewd custome and absonant to reason for by that Law Bastards did equally inherit with legitimate Sons which is contrary to the divine Law and the Lawes of Nations which is grounded on naturall reason So coke l. 4 f. 38. b. Two Lords of two severall Mannors had two Wasts adjoyning parcels of their Mannors without inclosure or separation yet the bounds of both Mannors were well enough known by certain marks In which Wasts the Tenants of both Mannors had reciprocally Common because of vicenage of time whereof the memory of man did not run to the contrary But yet in this case one may inclose against the other and by it take away the Common for cause of vicenage because the Tenants of one Mannor could not put their beasts in the Wasts of another Mannor and that the Cattell of the Tenant of one Mannor did stray into the wasts of the other Mannor and therefore the enclosure is lawfull onely to prevent the escape of the Cattell malus usus abolendus Consuetudo tollit legem coke com f. 31. b. Custome taketh away the common Law as by the custome of Gavelkind the wife shall be endowed of the Moyety so long as she keep her self sole and without child which she cannot wave and take the Thirds for her self The customes of Gavelkind and Borough-english are against the maxime of descent of Inheritance 35 H. 6. 26. a. And the Customes of Kent The Father to the Bough and the Son to the Plow is against the Maxime of Escheats And that the Lessee in tail shall enter notwithstanding the Feoffment of his Father with Warranty is against the Maxime of Discontinuance and there are many other customes which are contrary to the particular grounds of the Law and yet are reasonable for they may have a reasonable beginning and are neither prejudiciall to the Common-weal nor to the present interest of any particular person Davis Rep. f. 32. a. b. Custome and Prescription cannot take away an act of Parliament Coke com f. 113. a. Dr. Student l. 1. c. 26. f. 47. A custome or prescription of this Realm against the Statutes of the Realm prevail not in Law But as Coke com f. 115. a. There is a diversity between an Act of Parliament in the Negative and in the Affirmative for an Affirmative Act doth not take away a Custom as the Statutes of Wills of 32 H. 8. do not take away custom to devise lands as it hath been often adjudged Moreover there is a diversity between Statutes that be in the Negative for if a Statute in the Negative be Declarative of the ancient Law that is an affirmance of the Common Law there as well as a man may prescribe or alledge a custome against the common Law so a man may do against a Statue for as our Author saith Consuetudo privat communem legem As the Statute of Magna charta provideth that no Leet shall be holden but twice in the year yet a man may prescribe to hold it oftner and at other times for the Statute was but in affirmance of the common Law So the Statute of 34 E. 1. provideth that none shall cut down any Trees of his own within a Forrest without the view of the Forrester but insomuch as this act is in affirmance of the common Law a man may prescribe to cut down Trees in a Forrest without the view of the Forrester vide ibidem plura Consuetudo licet sit magnae authoritatis nunqâam tamen praejudicat manifestae veriti coke l. 4. f. 18. a. Custome though it be of great authority yet doth it never by prejudice hinder the manifest truth As that the Plaintiffs bring an action in London for that the Defendant called the wife of the Plaintiff Whore and the Defendant by an Habeas corpus removed it into the Kings Bench and it was moved to have a Procedendo to remand it because that the Action was maintainable in London for the same words but not at the common Law and the Procedendo was denied by the whole Court for such a custom to maintain actions for such brabling words is against the Law and custome though it be of great force yet doth it never prejudice the manifest truth Coke l 6. f. 6. b. In Sir John Moulins case the question was Whether a Mannor was holden of the King and though that divers Offices Licences of Alienations and other Records were shewn by which it appeared that the Law had alwaies so taken it that the said Mannor was held of the King in Capite acd that custome is the best Interpreter of the Lawes yet in so much as by construction of Law upon the Letters Patents it appeared that there was no immediate Tenure of the King the Offices c. should not alter the true Tenure that originally did appear to them as Judges of Record and though custom be of great authority yet doth it never prejudice the truth ibidem Consuetudo debet esse certa nam incerta pro nullis habentur Davis f. 33 Custome ought to be certain for incertainties are esteemed for nothing in the Law and it must be as Littleton ex certa causa rationabili usitata for there are three essentiall qualities of a custome reason ableness usage and certainty A Writ Dum fuit infra aetatem was brought against an Infant the Tenant pleaded custome that when the Infant was of such an age that he could count twelve pence and measure a yard of cloath that his Feoffment shall be good It was adjudged void for the incertainty 13 E. 3. Fitz. dum fuit infra aetatem 3. In trespass for Trees carried away the Defendant pleaded custome that the Tenant of the Mannor which first came to the place where c. shall have the Windfalls there that custome was void also for the incertainty vide ibidem plura Consuetudo semel reprobata non potest amplius induci Davis f. 33. b. A Custome must have continuance without interruption of time whereof c. for if it be discontinued within the time of memory it is gone As if a Copyholder be leased of the Lord of the Mannor for life or for years according to the course of the common Law it shall never
their Predecessors but excuse themselves and answer for their proper fact and demeanor for it is a common erudition that the Defendant in his answer and bar ought either to traverse or confess and avoid the Plaintiff vide ibidem plura Yet in Treasons and Felonies one shall be punished for anothers offence and by our Law and not without good reason the Sons of them which are disloyall Subjects and Traytors to their Prince are barred from the Inheritance of their Ancestors that their Fathers infamy may alwaies accompany them and that their life should be a punishment to them and their Fathers fault a continuall corasive and that is done because their Fathers Ulcers are feared in them and that being bred and brought up of naughty Parents they will be prone to do the like and this penalty is used in the nature of a medicine that by suffering shame he may be deterred from crime and therefore as Coke com 5. f. 391. l. by his attainder of Treason or Felony is the blood so stained and corrupted that his Children cannot be Heires to him nor to any other Ancestor And therefore where the Tenant is outlawed of Felony it is in the Lords election to have a Writ of Escheat supposing that his Tenant was outlawed of Felony or that he died without Heir for by the attainder the blood is corrupted 48 E. 3. 2. But it seemeth by Nichols case that the party attainted ought to be dead before the land can escheat for according to Dyer and Brian in the Kings case after the attainder and till Office be found the Fee-simple shall in facto be in the person of the attainted so long as he shall live for as he hath a capacity to take lands of a new purchase so he hath power to hold his ancient possessions and he shall be Tenant to a Praecipe and if he died before Office found and the land be held of the King the land shall go to the King in nature of a common Escheat Ployd 477. Nichols case but in case of Treason the King shall be presently after the attainder in actual possession without Office found by the Statute of 33 H. 8. c. 20. If the Father purchaseth land and his eldest Son is attainted of Felony and dieth the next in degree of descent and worthiness of blood unto the Son attainted shall not have the land but it shall escheat to the immediate Lord of whom the land is held for the blood is corrupted otherwise it had been if he had died in the life of the Father having no Issue Dyer 48. An account is brought against two the one entreth into an account and it is sound against him it shall bind both 44 E. 3. 18. One is imprisoned in the Marshalsey and a stranger breaketh the Prison and the prisoner escapeth the Marshall shall be charged for the whole debt If I have a way over the lands of twenty men and one of them stoppeth the way in his land I shall have an action against all those over whose lands the way was 33 H. 6. 26. by profit A rate is put upon a Town for the fees of a Knight of the Parliament The Beasts of him hath paid his part are taken for the residue he shall not have a Replevin but the beasts shall be sold to pay his duty 11 H. 4. 2. In quo quis delinquit in eo de jure est puniendus Co. com f. 233. b. In what one offendeth in the same by right he is to be punished As if any Keeper kill any Deer without warrant or fell or cut any Trees or under-woods and committeth them to his own use it is a forfeiture of his Office for the destruction of the Deer is by a mean the destruction of the Venison And so it is if he pull down the Lodge or any house within the Park for putting of Hay into for feeding of the Deer or such like it is a forfeiture and the reason why the Office shall in such and the like case be forfeited because in what one offendeth in that he shall be punished Dispensatio mali prohibeti est de jure Domino regi concessa propter impossibilitatem providendi de omnibus particularibus dispensatio est mali prohibiti provida relaxatio utilitate seu necessitate pensata Coke l. 11. 88. a. The dispensation of a prohibited evill is by right granted or allowed to the King because of an impossibility for providing for all particular things and a dispensation is a provident relaxation of an evill prohibited recompensed with profit and utility As where an Act of Parliament which generally prohibiteth a thing upon penalty which is popular or where it is onely given to the Queen may be inconvenient to divers particular persons in respect of the person place or time c. therfore in such causes the Law hath given power to the Queen to dispense with particular persons But when the wisdome of Parliament hath made an Act to restrain pro bono publico the Importation of any forrein Manufactures to the intent that the Subjects may apply themselves to the making of the said Manufactures c. and by it maintain themselves and families Now for private gaine to grant the importation of them to one or divers against the said Act is a Monopoly and against the Common Law and against the end and scope of the Act it self vide ibidem plura in the case of Monopolies Coke l. 5. f. 28. Cawdrys case By the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor a Bastard be a Priest but the King by his Ecclesiasticall power and jurisdiction may dispense with both these because they are mala prohibita and not mala in se The King by a clause of non obstante may dispense with the statute-Statute-law and that if the Statute saith that dispensation shall be meerly void 2 H. 7. Grants 73. Finch f. 82. Coke comm f. 120. a. A party or Minister disabled by reason of any corrupt Contract c. by the Act of 13 Eliz. which is an absolute and direct Law cannot be dispensed withall by any Grant c. with a non obstante as it may be when any thing is prohibited sub modoâ as upon a penalty given to the King Coke l. 4. f. 35. b. in Bozums case when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as if the King granteth a protection in an assize or Quod impedit with a non obstante of any Law to the contrary that grant is void for by the common Law a protection doth not lye in any of these cases 39. H. 39. But when the King may lawfully make a grant but the common Law requireth that he may be so instructed that he be not deceived there a non obstante may supply it as when the King
at Westminster to the Church of S. Peter at Rome within three hours that then the Obligation shall be void the Condition is void impossible and the obligation standeth good And so it is of a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall go as is aforesaid the Feoffment is absolute and the Condition void because it is a Condition subsequent for there is a precedent Condition and a subsequent Condition If a Condition subsequent to a Feoffment in fee be impossible the state of the Feoffee is absolute but if the Condition precedent be impossible no state or interest groweth thereupon As if a man make a Lease for life upon Condition that if the Lessee go to Rome as aforesaid that then he shall have fee the Condition precedent is and therefore no Fee-simple followeth Coke ibid. The statute appointeth that in re-disseisin the Sheriff shall go to the place and there shall take the Inquest If then the re-disseisin is of severall lands in divers Counties so as he cannot be at all at once it is sufficient to take the Inquest at one of them because of the impossibility 40 Ass 23. If a man be bound by recognizance or Bond with Condition that he shall appear the next term in such a Court and before the day the Conuzee or the Conuzor dieth the Obligation is saved And in all cases where a condition of a Bond or Recognizance c. is possible at the time of making of the Condition and before the same can be performed the Condition becometh impossible by the act of God or of the Law or of the Obligee there the Obligation is saved But otherwise in case of a Feoffment as if a man maketh a Feoffment on condition that if the Feoffor shall appear in such a Court the next term that then it may be lawfull for the Feoffor to re-enter and presently after the Feoffor dieth the estate of the Feoffee is become absolute And the reason of this diversity is because the estate of the land is executed and setled in the Feoffees and cannot be returned back but by matter subsequent viz. The performance of the Condition But a Bond or Recognizance is a thing in action and executory and whereof no advantage can be taken untill there is a default in the Obligor Coke com f. 260. a. vide ibid. plura Vltima prioribus derogant Reg. I. C. Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant Coke l. 11 f. 62. 63. The last Laws derogate and abrogate the first which are contrary Though the wisdome of the Judges and sages of the Law have all wages suppressed subtle and new inventions in derogation of the Common Law and will not change the Law that hath been used 38 E. 3. 1 so as if it be not altered by Parliament it remaineth still yet as Cato said Vix ulla lex fieri potest que omnibus commoda sit And as Sir Edward Coke rerum progressui ostendunt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint It is impossible for any Law to be which may be commodious to all and the progress and proceeding of things shew and present many things which at the first could neither be presaged nor prevented From whence it proceedeth that no Law can be so absolute but that may in some particulars prove defective and amendable and yet as Ployd f. 369. that Law is reasonable which provideth for the multitude though some especiall persons lose by it which hath been the occasionall cause of the alteration of the Common Law in many points Yet the Common Law hath no controller but the high Court of Parliament and the wisdome and custome of this State hath alwaies had such regard and respect to the Common law that they would by no meanes change it but by the great Councell of Parliament wherein all things are transacted not onely by the prudency of the Prince but by the cheifest and sagest Senators of the whole Nation and that not upon the consultation and declaration of one or two hundred but as Fortescue by more and three hundred elect men by which number the Senate of Rome was ruled who alwaies have been cautious and vigilant not to introduce any forrein Law as Sir John Davis in his Preface observeth That in the Parliament of Merton when motion was made by the Clergy that Children borne before marriage might be adjudged legitimate The great and wise men of England made answer with one voice Nolumus leges Angliae mutari And again in 11 R. 2. when a new course of proceeding in criminall Causes according to the form of the Civill Law was propounded in that unruly Parliament Answer was made by all the States That the Realm of England had not been in former times nor hereafter should be ruled by the Civill Law And therefore for the most part Magna Charta which is the foundation of other Acts of Parliament and other ancient Statutes are but the affirmations and declarations of the Common Law And that whereas the words of the Statute are generall the construction thereof shall be according to the reason of the Common Law Coke com 81 b. 282. b. So cautious have our grave and prudent Senators been not to subject the common-law to any mutations unless for necessary and impulsive causes reasonably arising from the publick mischeifs and inconveniencies which happen in the Common-weal through the injurious abuses of the ancient and former Lawes upon which grounds other Lawes were constituted for the remedy of such mischeifs and inconveniencies which did abrogate the former from whence grew this ground Leges postertores priores abrogant To illustrate this by examples It is regularly true that Statutes in the affirmative shall not take away precedent acts affirmative unless it be in speciall cases As the Statute of Wills 32. 34 H. 8. doth not take away a custome to devise lands as often hath been adjudged So it is enacted that the King shall have Wreckum Maris per totum regnum yet this shall not take the wreck from one who hath wreck by prescription unless the prescription had been per totam Angliam Coke l 5. in Sir Henry Constables case So the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 13. enacteth that if one âath a Benefice of the value of eight pounds and taketh another and is inducted the first is void doth not take away the Law which was before that if one who had a Benefice with cure did accept another the first is void only that in that case no lapse shall incur without notice Coke l. 4. in Hollands case and in this point is the Statute nothing else but a confirmation and affirmance of the Law before ibid. So the Statute of 23 Eliz. that inflicteth the penalty of twenty pounds by the moneth hath not taken away the Statute of 1 Eliz. which hath given the forfeiture of twelve pence for every Sunday and Holy-day but both shall be paid the twelve pence onely to
the poor and the twenty pounds to the Queen and therefore doth the Statute of 3 Jac. c. 4. give a more speedy remedy for the said twelve pence yet shall they not be punished but upon one of them Yet when the latter affirmative Statute is contrary to the precedent Statute in matter the former abrogateth the latter as by the Statute of 33 H 8. c. 23 it is enacted that if any person being examined before the Councell of the King or three of them shall confess any Treason misprision of Treason or Murther or be to them vehemently suspected he shall be tried in any County where the King pleaseth by his Commission and after by the Statute of 1 2 P. M. c. 10. it was enacted That all trialls hereafter to be had for any Treason shall be had according to the course of the Common Law and not otherwise That latter act and though the latter words had not been had abrogated the first because they were contrary in matter But that doth not abrogate the Statute of 34 H. 8. c 2. of the triall of Treasons beyond the Seas notwithstanding the words are in the negative because it was not contrary in matter for it was not triable by the Common Law Dyer 132. Stanf. 89. 90. So the Statute of 1 E. 6. of Chanteries being in the affirmative doth alter the Statute of H. 2. c. 41. which giveth a Cessavit cantaria also in the affirmative for the one is contrary to the other in matter vide plura Coke l. 9. f. 63. a. But whensoever Lawes are contrary in quality that is where the first is a materiall or express affirmative and the latter an express or materiall negative and when the first is a materiall or express negative and latter affirmative there the latter Law doth abrogate the former As the Statute of 5 E. c 4. which prohibiteth every person to use or exercise any craft mystery or occupation unless he hath been an Apprentice for seven years doth alter the Common Law by which any one may in any manner worke in any lawfull Trade without any service precedent for without an Act of Parliament no man can be restrained to worke in any Trade Coke l 11. f. 54. a. in the Taylors of Ipsiches case And to conclude to this Argument with the generall ground given by Sir Edward Coke l. 1. 11. f. 67. a. That for that Acts of Parliament are established with such gravity and wisdome and the universall consent of all the Realme they ought not through any strained construction out of the generall and ambiguous words of a subsequent Act be abrogated as where the Statute of 16. R 23 c. 5. enacteth that all the Lands and Tenements of any one attainted in a Praemunire shall be forfeited to the King in the case of one Prudgion Pasch 21. Eliz. being tenant in taile of certaine Lands and Tenements who was attainted of a Praemunire the question before all the Judges of England was whether the estate taile was a bar or no and it was resolved by all the Justices that those generall words had not repealed the Statute de donis conditionalibus but that onely he shall forfeite them for his life and that the issue in taile should inherit vide ibidem plura Lex non patetur fractiones divisiones Statuum Coke l. 1. f 87. a. The Law will not suffer fractions and divisions of estates As if a man make a lease for life upon condition that if he doth not pay twenty pounds that another shall have the Land that future limitation is void Ployd f. 25. c. M. 18. H. 8. 3. And if after the Statute of 1. R. 3. before the Statute of 27. H. 8. A man had made a Feoffment to the use of one for life or in taile and after to the use of another for life or en-taile and after to the use of another in fee they in the Remainder might not make a Feoffment nor grant their estates by the generall words of that act for then there should be a fraction and division of estates which the Law will not suffer vide ibidem plura in Corbets case Coke l. 3. f. 32. b. If a man be seised of a Mannor to which a Leet waife or stray or any other hereditament which is not of any annuall value is appendant or appurtenant there by a devise of the Mannor with the appurtenances those shall passe as incidents to the Mannor for in that the Statute enableth him by expresse words to devise the Mannor by consequence it enableth him to devise the Mannor with all incidents and appendants to it and it was never the meaning or the intention of the makers of the Statute that when the Devisor hath power to devise the principall that he shall not have power to devise it that was incident and appendant to it but that the Mannor c. shall be dismembred and fractions made of things which by legall prescription have been united and annexed together Ibidem for the Law will not permit such factions in Estates Coke com f. 147. b. If a man hath a rent-charge issuing out of certaine Land and he purchaseth any part of the Land to him and his heires the whole rent-charge is extinct because the rent is entire and against common right and issuing out of every part of the Land and therefore by purchase of part is extinct in the whole and cannot be apportioned Coke com 309. b. If the reversion be granted of three acres and the Lessee agree to the said grant for one acre this is good for all three and so it is of an Attornement in Law if the reversion of three acres be granted and the Lessee surrender one of the Acres to the Grantee this Attornement shall be good for the whole Reversion of the three Acres according to the grant Apices juris non sunt jura Coke com f. 2 83. b. nimia subtilitas reprobatur in Lege Coke l. 4. 4â b. The Law of England respecteth the effect and substance of the matter and not every nicity of forme or circumstance and too much subtility is reproved in the Law As it was alledged for an exception in the Enditement that the Enditement was taken before I. S. Coronatore in comitatu praedicto and not de comitatu praedicto or comitatus praedicti and every Coroner of one County is a Coroner in every County of England but not of every County but it was not allowed for the Coroner in the County c. shall in all reasonable intendement be taken for the Coroner of the County and so it is used in the Writ de coronatore elegendo ibidem vide plura Coke l. 5. f. 120. 122. It is a rule in Law that Enditements ought to be certaine but there are three manner of certainties the first is to a common intent and that sufficeth in Bars which are to defend the party and excuse him the second is to a generall
seised by word assigned Dower to the Feme which she accepteth yet was it adjudged that that refusall of the estate of inheritance and acceptance of her Dower in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of her So 13 Ric. 2. Joynt-tenancy a Charter of Feoffment was made to foure and seisin delivered to three in the name of all and after the Seisin delivered the fourth commeth and vieweth the Deed and saith by word that he will have nothing in the Land and it was adjudged that that agreement by word in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of him and Thorp 35 Ed. 3. Disclaimor said that in such a case the Tenement remained in all untill a disagreement in Court of Record So if there be Lord and Tenant by Deed enfeoffeth the Lord and a stranger and maketh Livery to the stranger in the name of both if the Lord by word disagreeth to the estate it is nothing worth but if he enter into the Land generally and take the profits that amounteth to an agreement to the Feoffment but if he enter into the Land and distrain for his Seignory that act amounteth to a disagreement of the Feoffment and shall devest the Frank tenement out of him 10 E. 4. 12. by all the Justices But if Lands be given to Baron and Feme and after by the Statute of 32 H 8. the Baron alieneth the Land to the use of him and his heires and after deviseth it to his wife for life the wife enters claiming by word the estate for life this is a good agreement to the estate for life and a good disagreement to the estate of inheritance Dyer 351. b. And if A. maketh an Obligation to B. and deliver it to C. to the use of B. this is presently the Deed of A. But if he offereth it to B and he refuseth it in pais by it the Obligation shall lose his force Dyer 167. The same Law is of the gift of goods and chattels and if the goods be delivered to the use of the Donee the goods were in him presently but he may refuse them in pais and by it the property shall be determined ibidem SECT III INclusio unius est exclusio alterius Coke l. 11. f. 50. a. b The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another As when an act of Parliament giveth a power and interest to one certain person by that expresse designation of one all others are excluded although such a statute be in the affirmative As where the statute of 31 E. 3. c. 12. it was provided that error in the Exchequer shall be corrected and amended before the Chancellor and Treasurer and therefore it could not be corrected before any other and the generall Rule is put that when any thing is to be done before any person certain by any statute it cannot be done before any other and yet the statute of 31 E. 3. is in the affirmative Ployd 106. b. in Stradlings case So whereas by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 9. forcible Entry is designed to the Justice of Peace to make restitution by it others be excluded though the statute be in the affirmative and therefore neither Justices of Oyer or Terminor or of Goal-delivery c. shall do it Dallisan 3 Eliz vide ibid. plura And this is true in all acts which are the introduction of a novel Law as the above said acts are but where acts of Parliaments are no introductions of a new Law it is otherwise So the act of 35 Eliz. doth not exclude those to whom the Forfeitures are limited by the act of 23 Eliz because by it they are not given to a new person but to the same person to wit the Queen and is but an act of addition to give more speedy remedy As the statute of W. 2. c. 9. in a VVrit of Mesne giveth more speedy proces and in the end fore-judger whereas the proces at the Common Law was but Distresse infinite yet the Plaintiff may take which proces he will either at the Common Law or upon the statute because they are both in the affirmative Coke l. 11. f. 64. a. And also in many cases the designation of a novell person in a latter act of Parliament shall not exclude another person that was authorized to do the same thing by an act precedent As by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 16. after Office found he who found himself grieved might within a moneth after traverse take the Tenements to farm that then the Chancellor Treasurer or other Officer shall demise to him to farm untill c. 13 E. 4. f. 8. and yet by the statute of 1 H. 8. c. 16. he hath liberty by the space of three monthes and after by the statute of 32 H. 8. c. 40. the Master of the Court of Wards by advice of own of his Councell is authorized to make a Lease of Land in VVard or an Ideot And though the latter act design another person yet it is not the first altogether taken away for before any Lease made by the Master of the VVards the Chancellor and Treasurer may do it and so e contrario as Stanf. holdeth Prerog f. 69. a. b. VVhere he maketh mention of this Rule âeges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant vide ibidem plura Coke com f. 210. a. If the Condition upon a Mortgage be to pay to the Mortgagee or his heires the money and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dyeth the Lessor is not to pay the money to the Executors but to the Heire for in this case designatio unius personae est exclusio alterius Consensus tolliâ errorem Coke com f. 37. a. Consent taketh away error As Dowment ad ostium Eclesiae ex assensu patris seem to be good albeit the wife be within the age of nine years But without question for the same reason a Joynture made to her under or above the age of nine years is good ibidem Coke com f. 125. b. a. If a Venire facias be awarded to the Coroners where it ought to be to the Sheriff or the Visne cometh out of the wrong place yet by assent of the parties and so entred of Record it shall stand for all consent taketh away error ibidem Coke l. 5. f. 36. b. Dyer 367. in Bainhams case Coke l. 5. f. 40. a. b. in Dormers case A common Recovery is not to be resembled to a judgement or proceeding at the common Law for by usage and custome it is become a common assurance and conveyance of Lands and because it is done by mutuall consent errors are not to be allowed for consensus tollit errorem If the Demandant and Tenant consent that two of the foure in a Writ of Right shall be Esquires where by the Law they ought to be Knights and well because by consent Tryall of Villenage was altered from the naturall tryall by consent Pleader of a Feoffment upon condition without deed and
Melancton in his Logick addeth another ground and principle which exceedeth the Phylosophers apprehension to wit principium patefactionis divinae the principle of divine revelation which our Law also holdeth to be the prime principle and ground of all the rest for as Prisot a principal Justice of the common Pleas saith 24. H. 8. 46. 1. we ought to give credit to all such Laws as are taken out of the holy Scriptures for that it is the common Law upon which all Lawes are founded and from which all other Lawes doe proceed and therefore may be called divine Lawes as they are conjoyned with the morall Law and have divine authority as also humane Lawes as men by their knowledge doe judge all humane affaires It followeth that we now inquire of the manner of considering the grounds and rules of our Lawes which is by the extraction of them out of the roote and fountaine of other Acts and Sciences for as reason is the mother of the rules and grounds of all Acts and Sciences so are they by the same reason united and cemented together as that the grounds and rules of one Science are adjuvant and auxiliary to another which the Author hath fully expresly demonstrated in the preamble and frontispice of the first Book of this treatise to which he referreth the Reader And to which may be annexed the method which also may be called a manner and forme of considering concerning which the Judges and Sages of our Laws doe dissent and vary whether any or what manner of method is to be used in the sustemes and digests of our Lawes for the antique and neoterique reporters and writers of our Lawes respect more the matter then the method And Sir Edward Coke being advised by King James at some opportune time to reduce the common law into a more commodious method Coke l. 4. Ep. ad lectorem did much doubt of the fruites of his labour if he should undertake it and so doth Sir Francis Bacon freely professe that though he could have digested the rules of our Lawes into a certaine method and order yet doth he of purpose avoid so to doe but Sir Henry Finch hath endeavoured In his preface to his rules and maximes of the Law and fairely proceeded in reducing not onely the body of our Lawes into a compendious method but also the grounds and rules of the same into an Academicall order for which rarity he hath merited this Elogy rara avis in lege rubicula Haecque alter cantipotior sententia visa est Order being the ornament of all things and method the best art of memory to which purpose Sir John Doderidge asserteth that if there be any way extant Dod. E. Law 253. to purge the English Lawes from the great confusions of tedious and superfluous reiterations wherewith the reports are infested it may be brought to passe by the way of grounds and rules or by none for by rules and exceptions all Sciences are and have been published put downe and delivered and whereas Galene proposeth three wayes reasons and methods of teaching and learning the one way by composing and proceeding from the parts to the whole and the other by resolving the whole into parts and the third by defining which by explication of the nature of the whole examineth every particular appertaining to the whole This third and latter may aptly be applyed to the grounds and rules of Sciences as in Physick to the Aphorismes of Hippocrates and more especially to the grounds and rules of the Law which by the newer Civilians is taken for a definition who accordingly do define a rule to be a short definition or a sentence whenas indeed many like cases are concluded in a short delivery not by the expression of the particular cases but by the assignation of the same reason and is nothing else but a compendious oration Br. in regulas juris f. f. 15. 346. wherein many things are breifly and absolutely delivered and declared and so doe the Greeke interpreters call a definition ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which also may be orderly disposed into a Methodicall and an Alphabeticall Table fit and convenient both for the speedy finding of that we would seek and wish for which the Author in the Table of this treatise hath accurately observed And besides hath been diligent to reduce them into a more artificiall order by drawing the grounds and rules of our free and Municipall Laws from the Springs and Heads of the liberall Arts and Sciences and by that meanes hath brought them into a more convenient forme and method which he ingenuously acknowledgeth to have borrowed of Sir Henry Finch and Mr. Noy quia ingenuum duxi profiteri per quos profecissem and to which according to his slender skill he hath added a copious amplification seriously upon mature deliberation conceiving that all the Grounds and Principles of our Lawes may be placed disposed and contained under some of those Heads and consequently every particular case under the generall and severall grounds in every one of them for as Sir Edward Coke principium est quasi primum caput Coke com f. 345. a. a principle is the prime Head from the which many cases have their beginning and originall and therefore hath the Author disposed as many particular and severall cases under every generall and severall Heads as he could conveniently collect and accumulate having learned of the said Author that there is no particular case in the Law so sterill but that the Student at one time or another may make use of it for the defect of which Sir Francis Bacon taxeth the Civilians in his preface to his Maximes which though the Author hath not compleated yet hath he endeavoured so to doe and made way for others to effect it Et sit nobis voluisse fat But now Gentlemen the Author turneth his stile towards you who are the coronides of his labors and lucubrations and to whom they are devoted and directed for yee are legum nostrarum alumni fed and nourished with the teates and traââates of the Law and therefore ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã as proper and idoneous auditors of the Grounds and Principles thereof and did forbeare to commende them to the Rabbies and Papinians of our âawes for that were to instruct Minerua or to submit them to the Judgement of illiterate Lozels for they would contemne what they did not conceive so as he may say of these writings as Caius Lucilius did of his quod ea que scriberet neque ab indoctissimis Cicer. de oratore l. 2. neque a doctissimis legi velle quod alteri nihil intelligerent alteri plus fortasse quam ipse de se that those things which he should write would not be read of those were most learned nor of those were not learned at all because these understood nothing and the others perhaps more then himselfe sic Pro captu lectoris habent sua fata
deteriorem nequaquam Cok. Com. 141. a. The Church exerciseth the Office of a minor can make its condition better but not worse for it is the cheifest reason which makes for Religion And therefore in all cases a Parson or Vicar of the Church for the benefit of the Church hath a qualified fee but in many cases to doe any thing to the prejudice of the Church he hath in effect but an estate for life As a Parson Vicar c. may have an action of Waste and in the Writ it shall be said ad exheredationem Ecclesiae So the Parson that maketh a Lease for Life shall have a consimili casu during the life of the Leasee and a Writ of Entry ad communem legem after or a Writ ad terminum qui preterijt or a quod permittat in the debet which no man can maintaine but Tenant in Fee-simple or Fee-tayle vide But a Parson cannot make a discontinuance for that should be to the prejudice of his Successor to take away his Entry and drive him to a reall action but if he dye the Successor may enter notwithstanding the discontinuance And if a Parson make a Lease for years reserving rent and dyeth the Lease is determined neither will the acceptance of the Successor make it good vide 5. Prelatus Ecclesiae suae conditionem meliorem facore potest sine consensu deteriorem vero nequaquam sine consensu Coke Com. fol. 103. a. As neither Bishop nor Parson cannot disclaim or devest any fee is invested in his house or Church But an Abbot or a Prior with his Covent or a Bishop with his Chapter or a Parson with his Patron and Ordinary may passe away any Inheritance for the wisdome of the Law would not trust one with the Inheritance of the Church which alwayes maketh for religion and the good of the Church 6. Dies dominicus non est dies juridicus Ployd 265. The Sabbath day is no day for Law As upon a Fine levyed by Proclamations according to the Statute of 4. H. 7. C. 24. If any of the Proclamations be made on the Sabbath day all the Proclamations be erronious for the Justices must not sit upon that day but it is a day exempted from such Businesses by the Common-Law for the Solempnity of it to the intent that the people may apply themselves that day to the service of God No Plea shall be holden Quindena Pasche because it is alwayes the Sabbath but shall be Crastino quindenae Pasch Fit Nat. fo 17. f. Upon a Scire facias out of the Common Bench an Error was assigned because the Teste of the Scire facias was upon a Sunday And it was adjudged Error because it was not Dies Juâidicus Dyer 168. No sale upon a Sunday shall be said to be sale in a Market overt to alter the property 12 E. 4 8. Although Sunday is not Dies Ju idicus and that no judiciall Act ought to be acted on that day yet ministeriall Acts as to arrest or serve Process are allowed for otherwise peradventure they should never be executed and God forbid that things of necessity should not be done on that day for bonum est bene facere die Sabathi but this distinction and exception is taken away by a late Act made in the long Parliament of England yet did that Parliament in case of necessity once sit upon the Lords day which is the high Court of Justice and from which there is no appeale By the Statute of Magna Charta Cap. 14. no spirituall Parson shall be amerced according to his spirituall benefice but according to his Lay fee Fitz. Nat. br f. 76. b. And that in favour of Religion 7. Omnia quae movent ad mortem sunt deod inda Coke l. 5. fol. 110. b. any unreasonable thing killing a man by misadventure is forfeited to the King and every thing moveing with it is forfeited also to the King As if a man being upon a Cart carrying Faggots and as he is in binding them together falleth downe by the motion of one of his Horses in the Cart and dyeth of that both that and all the Horses in the Cart and the Cart it selfe are forfeited 8. E. 2. 307. A man falleth from a stack of Corne and dyeth it is forfeited 2. E. 3 140. If any Horse strike one and I âlien my Horse and he dyeth my Horse is forfeited because the forfeiture shall have relation to the stroke given Ployd 260. b. Kâllaway 68. b. but it is not forfeited untill the matter be found on record and therfore it cannot be by prescription and the Jurors that find the death must also finde and apprize the goods Coke l. 5. fol. 11. b. And therefore are they called Deodands quasi deodanda that is Elâemosynas eroganda to be disposed in Almes and workes of Charity 17. E 4. 2. and for that reason doth the King grant them to his Almoner to the intent they should be disposed of by him accordingly Actus dei nemini facit injuâiam Cok. Com fol. 148 So much is the reason of the Law ruled by Religion as it will not permit the Act of God to prejudice any one as if Tenant for another mans life granteth a Rent-charge to one for one and twenty years cesty que vie dyeth the Rent-charge is determined and yet the Grantee during the years may have a Writ of Annuity for the Arrearages incurred after the death of cesty que vie because it determined by the Act of God Cok. lâb 8. fol. 72. Hales Case An Office is found that the Heir is in ward who after he was of ful age tendreth his Livery and was admitted to it the Heir within three moneths which is the usuall time to sue out his Livery bargaineth part of his Lands by Deed inrolled and within the three moneths dyeth the bargaine was adjudged good and that the Heire should have no prejudice because the suing of his homage and suing out of his Livery without default in him was become impossible by the Act of God Impotentia excusat lâgem and is all one as if the King had taken the Homage of the Heire when the Heire made his tender vide ibidem pâuâa Coke lib. 8. fo 63 a. If an House fall by tempest or other Act of Gâd the Lessee for life or years hath a speciall interest to take Timber for the builâing of the house againe if he will for his habitation but if he pull downe the house he shall not have Timber to builde it because it is his own Act and the Lessor shall have an Action of Waste Coke lib. 1. 98. a. If a Lessee Covenanteth to leave the Wood in as good plight as it was at the time of the Lease and after the Trees are subverted by Tempest he is dischar ed of his Covenant causa qua supra Cok. l. 5. fol. 86. a. Bâunfeilds Case If the Defendant in debt dyeth in Execution the Plaintiff shall have a new
but supposalls As in a Pormedon one claimeth by descent from I. S. or a Mortdancester as sonne and Heir of I. S. yet in another Formedon he may claime from I. D. and shall not be estopped No more shall a recitall make an Estopple for they are not materiall as 33. H. 6. 10. b. where A. reciting that he is seised in fee of the Manner of D. granteth a rent out of it to B. this shall not estoppe A. to say that he had nothing in that Mannor Finch nomotec f. 32. Neither shall counts and declarations abate so long as the matter of Action is fully shewed in the Declaration and the writ as by the Statute of 36. E. 3. c. 15. it is provided And therfore in Demurrers it is alledged that the matter contained in the count is insufficient in Law and so of a plea and accordingly in the raigne of Queen Eliz. provision is made that after demurrers the Judges shall give Judgement according to the right of the cause and matter in Law without regarding any imperfection defect or want of forme in any Writ Retorne Plaint Declaration or other pleadings or course of proceedings whatsoever which Sir Edward Coke stiles an excellent and profitable Law Coke Com. 304. b. All which are more fully contained in the late Act of 11. Mar. 1649. by which it is enacted that no judgement shall at any time or times be arrested or stayed in any Court of Record for want of any matter of forme or defect whatsoever except only for matter of substance which shall be found or shewed pulickly to the Jude or Judges sitting in the said Courts of Record to be in the declaration Plea replication or other proceedings after apparance And besides in common recoveries no formall errors shall be allowed to reverse them unlesse they be substantiall and materiall as by the statute of 23. Eliz c. 4. it is provided that for the avoiding of the danger of assurance of Land and for the advancement of common recoveryes that not any common recovery shall be avoided for any want of forme in wordes and not in matter of substance so much doth the Law respect matter of substance before matter of form circumstance Coke c. f. 40.2 From the predicaments of action and passion Idem non potest esse agens paciens 14 H. 8. 31. b. nihil agit in seipsum Arist 1. de gener no man can do an act to himselfe No man can sue himself and therfore when a man having right to Land hath the freehold cast upon him by a latter title he shal be said to be in of his ancient title because there is no body against whom he may sue but himselfe and he cannot sue himself Lit. A man cannot present himselfe to a benefice or make himselfe an Officer 13. H. 8. 32. No man can summon himsele 8 H. 6.29 And therefore if a Sheriff suffer a common recovery it is error because he cannot summon himselfe Dier 188. But when two Sheriffs are the one may summon the other with speciall direction in the Writ that the other shall summon him 14 and 15. Eliz. If a Sheriff be Conusee of a Statute he cannot execute a liberate himselfe 9 E. 4. 33. Plaintiffe and Defendant Exception and Actor and Reus are relative opposites and cannot be properly in one and the selfe same action except in some speciall cases as in a writ of detinue where garnishment is required there the Defendant is to become actor against the garnishee 3 H. 6. 18. so in a quare imâedit where the Defendant maketh title to have a Writ to the Bishop the defendant is become actor 20 H. 6. 29. In a Replevin upon an avowry made the avowant is become actor 3 H. 6. 19. a. 23. H. 6. 45. a. 12. E. 4. 10. a. So in a Quod deforceat the demandant or Plaintiff shall defend his estate against such recovery as shall be pleaded against him and become defendant and may vouch ac si tenens esset in priori brevi by the statute of W. 1. A Sheriff who is demandant may execute all processe till it come to the Venire facias otherwise if he be Tenant 20. E. 4. 7. A Sheriff is Plaintiffe for he may take pledges himselfe and execute a Replevin against himselfe 5. H. 7. 2. The Sheriff is in seisin of a Baly-wick of a liberty he shall command himselfe as Bayliff of that liberty to execute that processe 8 E. 3. 21. F. B. N. f. 4. E. There is a Writ of prohibition in the Register directed to the Sheriff to inhibit himselfe that he hold not plea in the county upon a sorreine Plea pleaded or the Mise joyned to be tried by grand assise Actori incumbit onus probandi stabilitur praesumptio donec probetur in contrarium the burden of proving lieth on the Plaintiff and the presumption is confirmed untill it be proved to the contrary Cok. l. 4. f. 70. There is a bargainor and a bargaince if this bargainor contend to avoid the bargaine by reason of the non enrolement within six months he must make manifest proofe thereof or else it will be presumed that it was inroled within the six months omnia praesumantur legitime facta donec probentur in contrarium Coke com f. 233. b. As whereas the feoffee giveth or granteth to the feoffor the deed pol such grant is good and the property of the deed shall appertaine to the Feoffor and when the feoffor hath the deed in his hands and pleadeth it in Court it shall be rather intended that the feoffor commeth unto it by lawfull meanes then by a tortious meane For all things are presumed to be lawfully done untill they may be proved to the contrary A. and B. Tenents in common of a Mannor A. purchaseth a frank tenement mixt with the demesne Lands which were not certainly knowne B. brings a writ de partitione facienda of the Mannor onely and judgement given that partitio fieret and a Writ to the Sheriff accordingly It is held by the Justices that A. must shew the bounds of the franktenement purchased for the Jury shall be discharged if in conscience they make partition de tanto quanto praesumitur dignoscitur per praesumptiones verisimilia of so much as shall be presumed and knowne by presumptions and likelihoods Dier f. 266. Pendente lite nihil innovetur Let nothing be innovated hanging the suit Coke com 344. b. if hanging the quare impedit against the Ordinary for refusing his Clark and before the Church was full the Plaintiff brought a quare impedit against the Bishop and hanging the suit the Bishop admitted and instituted a Clark at the presentation of another if judgement be given for the patron against the Bishop the patron shall have a writ to the Bishop and remove the incumbent that came in pendente lite by usurpation for hanging the sute nothing is to be innovated Qui semel actionem
renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest n. f. 139. a. As a Retraxit is a bar of all other actions of the like or inferior nature for he which once renounceth his action can no more renew it It is a generall rule that non-suite before appearance is not peremptory in any case for that a stranger may purchase a writ in the name of him who hath cause of action and regularly a non suit after appearance is not peremptory but that he may commence an action of like nature againe for it may be he hath mistaken something in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaken the day or the like But yet for some speciall reasons non-suit in some actions is peremptory as in a quare impedit if the Plaintiff bee non-suit after apparance the Defendant shall make a title and have a Writ to the Bishop and this is peremptory to the Plaintiff and is a good bar in another quare impedit and the reason is because the Defendant had by the judgement of the Court a writ to the Bishop and the incumbent which commeth in by that writ shall never be removed which is a flat barre as to that presentation and for the same law and upon the same reason so it is in the case upon a discontinuance Coke com f. 139. a. vide ibidem plura Actio personalis moritur cum persona a personall action dieth with the person Went. off of executors f. 1. 97. As if a keeper of a Prison suffereth one in execution to escape and dieth no action lyeth against his Executors If Lessee for yeares doth wast and dieth an Action of wast lyeth not against his Executor or Administrator for wast done before that time Coke com f. 53. b. so if the tenant doth wast and he in the reversion dieth the heire shall not have an Action of wast for the wast done in the life of his Ancestor nor the master of an Hospitall or a parson for wâst done in the life of the predecessor ibidem The Lessor covenants to pay quit rent during the terme and dieth his Executors shall not pay it because it is a personall covenant in the Lessor onely Dier 114. Yet if there be three copartners and they Lease the land and one of them die and hath issue and the Lessee commit wast and one of them die and hath issue the Aunt and the issue shall joyne in an Action of wast and the issue shall recover one moyety of the Land wasted and the Aunt the other notwithstanding that actio injuriarum moritur cum persona But in favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in indifferent and favourable things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth Relatio tunc fieri non debet si per eam actus destruatur Reg. I. c. Decius 363. Quando dispositio referri potest ad duas res ita quod secundum relationeÌ una vitiatur secunduÌ aliaÌ utilis sit tunc facienda est relatio ad illam ut valeatdispositio semper ita fiat relatio ut valeat dispositio C. l. 6. f. 76. b. a. A relation then ought not to be when by it an Act is destroyed As in the statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. concerning Wills whereof is provided that every person having any Mannors Lands c. holden in capite shall have full power c. to dispose by his last will in writing or otherwise by any Act or Acts lawfully executed in his life two parts of the same Mannor c. for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debt or otherwise at his will and pleasure any Law statute c. those words or otherwise at his wil pleasure have reference relation only to the last wil not to the acts executed for otherwise none might have devised two parts but onely for the advancement of his wife and preferment of his children or payment of his debts which is not the intention of the Act but that he may devise two parts to whom he will so that the third descend and it was in vaine to referre those words or otherwise at his will and pleasure to Acts executed for he can do that without any authority given to him by that act And therefore when the disposition may be referred to two things so as according to the relation one of them may be destroyed and according to the other shall be commodious then the relation is to be made to that that the disposition may be of force and alwayes the relation is so to be that the disposition may availe in Sir G. Cursons case So Coke l. 3. f. 28. b. Butler and Bakers case relation is a fiction in law to make a nullity of a thing from the beginning to a certaine intent which in truth had being and the rather for necessities sake ut res magis valeat quam pareat As if a man make a gift in taile to Baron and feme and afterwards grants the reversion of those Lands and since the Baron dies and the feme to have her dower waiveth and disagreeth to the estate taile now in regard of her it is a nullity of the estate from the beginning and to such an intent the Law faineth that the estate was onely made to the baron but as to the grant of the reversion that is a collaterall Act and her refusall shall not have such relation for she may be endowed though that estate stand and so no necessity and therefore without necessity ut res magis valeat the Law will not faine any nullity but in a destruction of a loyall estate vested the law will never make any fiction vide ibidem plura So relation shall make things have been as if as if they never had been 1. H. 7. 16 The husband disagreeth to a Feoffement made by his wife it is void from the beginning so that he may plead ne infeosse pas so 14. H. 8. 10. A devise is that the Executors may sell land c. when they sell all meane charges made by the heire in the interim shall be avoided by relation to the time of the death of the Testator so 14. H. 8 18. I disseise A. to the use of B. the dissiesee releaseth to mee and then B. agreeth with the disseisee this agreement by relation shall be as if he had agreed before the release and so shall defeat it Jurors alien their Lands away between the teste of the Writ of attaint and judgement yet they shall be charged to the King for the estreptment by relation 22. E. 3. 16. Caufe of Assise brought for rescuing a distresse taken for rent and then an Office is found which entitleth the King who seiseth the Land and then an Ouster le maine is sued the Assise is gone for ever because the King shall be said to be in possession at the time of the rescous
diversi desiderantur actus ad aliquem statum perficiendum plus respicit lex actum originalem when to the perfection of an estate or interest diverse Acts or things are required the Law hath more regard to the originall Act vide ibidem Lamperts Case When a man seised of Lands in Fee-simple or Fee-taile generall taketh a Wife to the perfection of her Dower two things are requisite lawfull matrimony and the death of her husband and if baron and feme levy a fine the feme is barred of her Dower because that the intermarriage and seisin are the fundamentall causes of Dower and the death of the baron onely the execution of it for the beginning is the principal part upon which all others are founded and therfore in such case if baron and feme grant a rent by fine out of the Land or make a lease for years rendring rent to the baron and his heires and then the feme recovereth Dower shee shall hold that charge with the rent and with the terme and the opinion of Ployden in Stowells case 373. is not holden for Law as appeareth by Dyer f 72. and in Damports case Dyer 224. it was adjudged to the contrary 2. H. 4. and now common experience without contradiction is against it and so Littleton in his Chapters of conditions f. 83. holdeth that if the Feoffee upon condition taketh a wife the Feoffee may enter for the condition broken and the reason is for that the Law hath a principall regard to the originall and fundamentall cause and yet it may be said that the title of dower is not consummate untill the death of the husband and peradventure the feme might die before the Baron vide ibidem plura So things are construed according to that which was the beginning thereof as one maketh me sweare to bring him mony to such a place or else he will kill me and I bring it him accordingly this is fellony in him 44. E. 3. 14. b. So if he make me sweare to surrender my estate unto him and I doe so afterwards this is a disseisin to mee 14. Ass Pl. 20. One imprisoned till he bee content to make an obligation at onother place and afterward he doth so being at large yet he shall avoid it by duresse of imprisonment 21. E. 4. 68. b. Outlawry in trespasse is no forfeiture of Land as outlawry of felony is for though the not appearing is the cause of the outlawry in both yet the force of the outlawry shall be esteemed according to the hainousnesse of the offence which is the principall cause and foundation of the processe 3. E. 3. 84. A man and feme sole have a villaine and afterwards enter-marry and the villaine purchaseth Land they shall not have lands by intierties but by moieties joyntly or in common as they had the villaine in the beginning Coke l. 5. f. 47. a. In Littletons case upon the generall pardon of 35. Eliz. Whether upon a bill exhibited in the Star-chamber before the Parliament and processe awarded returnable after the Parliament the suit shall be said to be hanging by bill before the returne or serving of the processe and it was resolved that it was because the bill is origo caput sectae the bill is the beginning and head of the suit Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est origo rei inspici debet Coke com f. 298. b. whereof he saith you shall make great use in the reading of our bookes A disseisor hath issue and entreth into religion by force of which the tenements descend to the issue in this case the disseisee may enter upon the issue because the discent of the issue was by the Act of the father and not by the act of God and the Law respecteth the originall Act which is his entry into religion whereas a descent doth not take away entry unlesse it commeth by death Littleton ibidem An escrowe is delivered by a feme sole if she marry or die yet by relation to the beginning it shall be good 14. 4. H. 2. Lessee for yeares is bound to I. S. to make him the best estate he can and afterwards the reversion falleth to him the Lessee shall be discharged of the Bond if he grantteh the estate he had at the bond making 12. H 8. 5. A stranger abateth after the death of the father the son dieth his wife shall not have dower for this abatement shall relate to the death of the father 21. E. 4. 60. An attainder by Act of Parliament hath relation to the first day of the Sessions 35. H. 8. b. Presentment tempore belli is not good to gaine possession from the right patron though the induction was tempore pacis Coke l. 2. Binghams case and l. 11. f. 99. b. And such an usurpation shall be construed to be in time of War A blow given by one at the time of non sanae memoriae though the party die when he is fanae memoriae it is not capitall Ployd D. Hales case So if a man of non sanae memoriae giveth himselfe a mortall wound and becommeth sanae memoriae and dieth he shall not be felo de se Coke l. 1. Shellies case f. 99. b. A man buyeth certaine beasts in Market which were stolen and selleth them out of the market and the Vendee giveth him a Crowne in earnest and afterwards they are brought into the Market and agreeth to his bargaine and payeth all his mony and also payeth toll for the beasts the property is not changed for the bargaine shall have relation to the first communication Dier f. 99. b. Tenant for life upon condition that if the Lessor die without issue the Lessee shall have see the Lessee entereth into religion and the Lessor dieth without issue the Lessee is dereyned he shall never have fee because at the time of the performance of the condition the fee could not vest in him Ployd f 489. a. In case of attainder by verdict for felony it shall have relation to the time of the fact done 30. H. 6. 5. Lands given in franke-marriage reserving a rent the reservation is void untill the fift degree is passed 26. Ass Pl. 66. One hath a Rent charge going out of his wifes Land the grantee leaseth to the husband and his heires the husband shall not have it but it shall inure to him by way of extinguishment onely as seised in right of his wife 14. H. 8. 6. The wife endowed by the heire is said to be immediately in by the husband and if the husband were a disseisor and the heire in by dissent yet the disseisee may enter upon the wife Littleton The executor refuseth the Administrator may have an action of trespasse for the goods taken out of the possession of the Executor supposing they were taken out of his possession 38. H. 6. 7. A Recovery without an originall is void and judgement given in Chancery without originall is void and an outlawry
without an originall is voide Kel f. 19. b. A remainder is limited to the King and before the inrolement of the deed the King granteth it over and then the deed is inrolled this will not make the grant good Coke l. 3. f. 29. An executor assigneth auditors to one who was accountant to the testator and his auditors find him in arrearages the Action of debt shall be brought in the Detinet onely and hath respect to the beginning 11. H. 6. If I have a villaine for yeares as executor and the villaine purchaseth land the executor entreth the land shall be to the use of the testator and assets in his hands because the villaine which was the cause of it was to such use Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Causa origo est materia negotii Cok l. 1. Shellies case f. 99. b. vide As if a servant hath an intent to kill his Master before the execution of his intent departeth out of his service being out of his service executeth his intent and killeth him which was his Master it is petit treason for the execution respects the originall cause which was the malice conceived when he was his servant vide ibidem plura I. S. buildeth a shop on the wast of a Mannor of which the Queene was seis'd the Queen granteth the Mannor to the Earle of Leicester and he never entreth nor taketh rent I. S. dieth and his sonne entreth there is no descent against the patentee because there was no disseisin against the Queene Dyer 266. b. Yet when the law giveth power and authority to doe any thing Exception the law adjudgeth of the thing by the act subsequent not precedent Coke l. 8. f. 146. b. As the law giveth me power or license to enter into a common Hostlery or Taverne or to the Lord to distraine or to the owner of the soile to distrain for damage feasant or to him in the reversion to view if wast be made and to the commoner to enter into the land to see his beasts but if he that entreth into the Hostlery or Tavern maketh trespass or if the Lord that distraineth for rent or damage fesant beat or slay the distress or if he that entreth to see wast breaketh the house or remaineth there an whole night or the commoner cut downe trees in these cases the Law shall judge by act subsequent that they entred to that purpose and shall be trespassors from the beginning for acta exteriora indicant intoriora secreta the outward acts shew the inward secrets and with what minde and with what intent he did enter So if a purveyor take my beasts for the hostle of the King by force of his commission it is legall but if he sell them in Market then the first taking is injurious Coke l. 9. f. 11. a. Tenant in taile hath issue two daughters and dieth and the elder entreth into the whole and after entry maketh a feoffment with warranty which is a lineall warranty for the one and collaterall for the other the law judgeth by the act subsequent that the entry was not generall for them both but that it was onely for her selfe and that it shall be a warranty to commence by disseisin for the one moiety Quod initio vitiosum est tractu temporis non convalescet Reg. I. Civ Quod initio non valet tractu temporis non convalescet Coke com f. 35. a. That which in the beginning is vicious or invalid cannot by tract of time bee made good or valid as tenant for life of a carve of land the reversion to the father in fee the son and heire apparent endoweth his wife of this carve by the assent of the father tenant for life dieth the husband dieth this is no good endowment ex assensu patris because the father at the time of the assent had but a reversion expectant upon a free-hold whereof hee could not have endowed his own wife Ployd f. 432. b. A. possessed of an horse selleth the horse upon condition that hee shall pay him at Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast he selleth the horse to another and at the feast the first buyer faileth of payment whereupon A. reseiseth the horse yet the second buyer shall not have him because at the time of the second contract A. had no interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which was not sufficient to make the contract good A. seised of Lands in see maketh a lease for twenty yeares rendring rent to begin presently and the same day he maketh a Lease to another for the same terme the second lease is utterly void so as if the first Lessee surrendreth his terme to the Lessor or loseth the same by breach of condition or forfeiteth it by making a feoffment upon entry of the Lessor the second Lessee shall not have his terme because the Lessor at the making of the second lease had nothing in him but the reversion ibidem A feoffement to the use of the husband for life the remainder to I. S. the remainder to the wife for her joynture this is not a joynture to bar dower because it did not take effect immediately after the death of her husband Hut Rep. f. 50. An infant or a married woman makes a will and publisheth the same and afterwards dieth being of full age or sole notwithstanding this both Wills are void 10. Eliz. 344. Noy Max. f. 4. A lease for life the remainder to the Major and commonalty of B. whereas there is no such it is void though the King doth create such a corporation during the particular estate so a remainder limited to John the son of I. S. having no such son and afterwards a son is borne to him whose name is John during the particular estate it is void Doder Que malo inchoata sunt principio vix bono peraguntur fine Those things which have a bad beginning can hardly have a good end Coke l. 11. f. 78. As a man seised of Lands in fee by deed upon good consideration granteth the Land after his death to the Queene her heires and successors such grant is not made good by the generall words of the act of 18. Eliz. because it was void in the beginning and with it accordeth 38. H. 6. f. 33. The Abbeffe of Sions case and the Earle of Leicesters case Ployd f. 4000. a stronger case then it vide ibidem plura Magdalen Colledges case Coke l. 4. f. 90. a. If a son and heir apparent of a Baron reteyne a Chaplaine and giveth to him his letters under signe and seale and after his father dieth and this Chaplaine purchaseth a dispensation this retainer and those letters will not serve him in that they were not availeable at the beginning vide ibid. Dâuries case Coke câm f. 352 b. If a fine be levied without any originall it is voidable but not void but if an originall be brought and a retraxii
b. a. If Tenant for years of Land granteth a rent-charge to another for the life of the grantee the grantee shall not have an estate of Frank-tenement in the rent in that he cannot have an estate of Frank-tenement derived out of the Chattell reall but he shall have the rent during all the years though the Lessee had forty years in the Land for terme of life is greater then years and therefore the Grantee shall have all the rent for all the years if he shall live so long And f. 525. b. An Executor cannot devise a terme to another which he hath as Executor for so soone as the Executor is dead the terme is to the use of the first Testator and his Executors have it as Executors to the first Testator and to his use and not as Executors of the last Testator nor to his use for the Executors have them by relation as immediate Executors to the first Testator A. Covenanteth with B. and his Executors to make a lease of white acre before Michaelwas and the Covenantee dyeth before and A. maketh a lease to his Executor the lease shall be to the use of the Testator and assets in the Executor for the Covenant which was the cause of the Lease came to the Executor in right of the Testator and to the same use shall the lease be Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Cessante causa cessat effectus Ployd 268. Sir John Radcliffs case the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth An office was found that after the decease of Robert Earle of Sussex and Mary the Countesse his mother certaine Lands did descend to Sir John Radcliff Knight as Son and Heire male of the body of the said Robert engendred and the body of the said Mary and Sir John Radcliff Knight was then of the age of eighteen years before the finding of the office and the Lands were holden of the King and Queene by the tenth part of a fee of Knights service in Capite And when Sir John Radcliff became of full age he prayed his livery but the Court of wards required of him for the Queene the valew of his marriage but it was alleaged that because he was made Knight before the title of the Wardship accrewed and the Wardship was due to the Lord in respect of his imbecility to doe the service of a Knight and that the making him a Knight did admit him able to doe the service of a Knight his body ought not to be in ward for defect of such ability for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth and that if his person was not in Wardship no marriage nor value for it shall be due to the guardian and so was it adjudged by the Court contrary to Magna Charta c. 4. which was said to be made for the advantage of the Lords vide ibidem plura Coke Com. 312. a. Cessante causa vel ratione legis cessat lex The cause and reason of the Law ceasing the Law also ceaseth as at the common Law no aid was grantable of a stranger to an avowry because the avowry was made of a certaine person and now the avowry being made by the Statute of 21. H. 8. upon no person therefore the reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is also changed and consequently in an avowry according to that act aid shall be granted to any man vide ibidem plura Coke Com. f. 76. a. Cessante causa cessat causatum As if the Lord after he hath the Wardship of the body and the Lord doth release to the infant his right in the signiory or the signiory descendeth to the infant he shal be out of ward both for the body and the Land for he was in ward in respect he was not able to doe those services which he ought to doe to his Lord which now are extinct for the cause ceasing the thing caused ceaseth and there must be a tenure continuing or no Wardship So if the Conusee in a Statute merchant be in execution and his Land also and the Conusee release to him all debts this shall discharge the executiân for the debt was the cause of the execution and of the continuance of it untill the debt be satisfied therefore the discharge of the debt which was the cause discharged the execution which was the effect Coke Com. f. 76. a. So if the heire female within the age of fourteen years be in ward and after the age of fourteen years expired the Lord by the Statute of W. 1. c. 22. hath two years more to tender her a convenable marriage but if the Lord marry her within the two years her husband and shee shall prefently enter into the Lands for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Coke ibidem 7 5. b. The King granteth an office to one at will and ten pound fee during life pro officio illo now if the King put him from his office the fee shall cease 5. E. 4. 8. b. The executor or husband after the death of the wife guardian in socage shal not retain the Wardship for the guardian hath it not to his owne use but to the benefit of the heire and the executor or husband hath not that affection which the testator or wife had which was the cause that the Law giveth them the Wardship 7. Eliz. 293. b. If a stroke be given the first day of May and the King pardon him the second day of May for all felonies and misdemeanors the party smitten dyeth the third day of May so as this is no felony till after the pardon yet the felony is pardoned for the misdemeanor is pardoned and therefore all things pursuing are also pardoned 13. E. 401. If two coparceners make a lease reserving a rent they shall have this rent in common as they have the reversion but if afterwards they grant the reversion excepting the rent then they shall be Joyntenants of the rent Finch mono. f. 9. It is no principall challenge to a Juror that he hath married the parties mother if shee be dead without issue for the cause of favor is removed 14. H. 7. 2. The King disparking the Parke the office of the keeper is determined and all such offices as are presumed in Law to be for the commoditie of the King as well as the Patentee and if one granteth a Stewardship of a mannor and dismembreth that mannor the office is determined if a corporation granteth the office of a towne-clark and surrendreth their patent to be renewed all their offices are determined Huttons Reports Upon a divorce the woman shal have the goods given in marriage not being spent for the goods were given in advancement of the woman and therefore it is reasonable that shee should have them in that the cause and consideration of that gift is now defeated for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Dyer f. 13. p. 61. Coke l. 5. f. 59. b. Vaughans case The originall cause of the amercement being pardoned the
amercement is pardoned vide ibidem The husband and wife make a lease by Deed the husband dyeth the wife accepteth the rent if the Lessee lose the Deed of the Lease the wife shall avoid it 15. E. 4. 17. Coke l. 1. f. 2. Buchuâsts case If the Feoffor make a Feoffment with warranty the Feoffee shall not have the Charters unlesse by expresse grant but the Feoffor shall have all the Charters and Evidences which are materiall for the maintenance of the title of the Land and upon which he may maintain his warranty paramount but if the warranty be determined he shall have them no longer Ployd f. 382. a. Nevills case The King grants to two for their lives and the life of the survivor of them the Sheriff-wike of Chester and one of them was attainted of high Treason all the Office was forfeited because the Office was entire and could not be severed ibidem The King granteth the Office of the keeper of a Parke to two and the one faileth in discharge of his duty the whole fee shall determine so it is if an annuity be granted to two for Counsell and one of them refuse because the Office and Grant is entire and cannot be severed and the cause ceasing but in one the whole annuity shall cease Exception Dyer 320. Pl. 13. An Arbitrement was between two of diverse things and among others there was one article that one party should have yearly for the space of six yeares twenty shillings toward the keeping and honest education of A. B. and A. B. dyeth before the fourth year of the sixth yeare yet the payment of the 20 s. shall not cease during the six years which is a certaine terme and is a duty to the party himselfe towards the finding of A. B. Dier 141. Pl. 44. King Ed. 6. granteth to the Lady Mary his Sister the Mannor of D. for terme of her life according to the Tenor and effect of the last Will of H. 8. which was that shee should have it so long as she was unmarried afterwards she granted a rent charge out of that Mannor after which grant K. E. dieth by whose death the reversion came to her being Queene and afterwards shee married Philip King c. and it was doubted whether the rent charge should remaine or no. Davis 3. a. b. In ancient times a great part of tenements were holden of their Lords by Socage which was that the Tenants ought to come with their sokes by certaine daies by the yeare to plow and sow the demesne of the Lords and because such workes were made for the livelyhood and sustenance of their Lords they were quitted of all other services and after such services were changed into monies by consent of the Lords though the Lords did alien their demesnes and had no lands to plow or sow yet payed they their rents yearely to the Lords so the Church and religious houses after the procuration of Victualls was reduced to a certaine sum did pay it to the Ordinary yearely though he made no visitation so as the rule The cause ceasing the effect also ceased held not in those cases So Coke l. 4. in Capels case it was resolved that where a man held certaine land by rent for Castle-guard though the Castle was ruined or decayed yet the rent remained and pro doth not import a condition as in the case of an annuity granted pro consilio impendendo but a full and perpetuall recompence and satisfaction Vide Davis plura ibidem In jure non remota sed proxima causa spectatur Bacon Max. f. 1. 2. In the Law the next and not the remote cause is respected For it were infinite for the law to judge of the cause of causes and therefore judgeth of acts by the immediate and next cause as Bar. Empsons case f. 2. An annuity is granted pro consitio seu impendendo and the grantee committeth treason whereby hee is imprisoned that the grantor cannot come unto him for counsell yet the annuity is not determined by this non fesans for the law looketh not on the remote cause to wit the grantors offence which was the cause of the imprisonment but excuseth it because his not giving of counsell was compulsory and not voluntary in regard of the imprisonment which was the immediate cause So if a parson maketh a Lease and be deprived or resigneth the successors shall avoid the Lease for the law regardeth not the cause of the deprivation or the resignation which is the act of the party but the act of the Ordinary in the admission of the new incumbent 2. H. 4. 3. 26. H. 8. 2. A foeffment in fee upon condition that the Feoffee shall enfeoff over and if the feoffee bee disseised and a dissent case and then the feoffee bindeth himselfe in a statute which statute is discharged before the recovery of the Land this is no breach of the condition because the land was never lyable to the statute and the possibility which was the remote cause that it should bee lyable upon the recovery the law doth not respect Coke l. 2. Winningtons case This rule faileth in covenous act where the law taketh heed to the corrupt beginning and also in criminall acts where the law principally regardeth the first motive vide ibidem plura Nihil magis consentaneum est us iisdem modis res dissolvatur quibus constituitur Reg. I.C. and Bracton Nihil tam conveniens est naturali aequitati unumquodque dissalvi eo ligamine quo ligatum est Cok. l. 2. f. 53. a. There is nothing more agreeing to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same meanes it was bound As no estate can be vested in the King without matter of record so no estate can be devested out of him without matter of record Ployd f. 553. Walsinghams case and 180. Nevils case 12. H. 7. and many other bookes for nothing is so convenient to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same band it was tied and Coke l. 4. f. 57. b. In case of attainder and office the King is entitled by double matter of record and therefore the party grieved ought to avoid it by double matter of record and not by single travers or Monstrans de droit but is driven to his petition vide ibidem plura But when a man avoideth the Kings title by as high a matter of record as the King claimeth though the King be entitled by double matter of Record he may have it by way of Plea as one is attainted of treason by Parliament an office findeth his lands by which the King seiseth them the party may alledge restitution by Parliament and a repeale of the former Act 4. H. 7. 7. b. Finch Nomot 12. Coke l. 5. f. 26. a. Indentures being made for declaring of the uses of a subsequent fine recovery or other assurance to certaine persons and within a certaine time and to certaine uses are but
shewing any license of alienation to discharge himselfe for the purchase of those Lands Exitus acta probat acta exteriora indicant in teriora animi secreta Coke l. 8. f. 146. b. when entry authority or license is given any one by the Law and he doth amisse he shall be a trespassor from the beginning as the Law giveth authority to any one to enter into a common Hostlary or Taverne to the Lord to distraine to the owner of the soile to distraine for Damage-feasant to him in the reversion to view whether wast be made to the commoner to enter into Land to see his Cattell but if he which entereth into a Taverne doth trespasse as if he import any thing or if the Lord who doth distraine for rent or the owner for Damage-feasant work or kill the distresse or he who entereth to see wast doth breake the house or remaine in it one whole night or if the Commoner cut downe a tree in these cases the Law shall adjudge him to enter to that intent and purpose and because the act which demonstrated it is a Trespasse he shall be accounted a Trespassor from the beginning so if a purveyor take my Cattell by force of commission for the hostle of the King it is lawfull but if he sell them in Market the first taking is tortious 18. H. 6. 19. b. Coke l. 9 f. 59. Lambes case Any one shall be convict of a publication of a Libell if he knowing it to be a Libell write but a copy of it unlesse afterwards he can prove that he delivered it to a Magistrate to examine it Coke Com. f. 100. a. The mesne is to acquit the Tenant of any manner of services that any Lord paramount will have or demand of the Tenant and if the Tenant be distrained without default of the mesne yet if the mesne doth not afterwards put his own beasts into the pound instead of the beasts of the Tenant the distress shall be said to be in his default and the Tenant shall recover his damages and costs vide ibidem plura Destinata tantum pro factis non habentur Dod. E. Lawyer f. 143. Things destinated to an end not being applyed thereunto alter their nature and become of another consideration as if a man cut down my Timber Tree and square it of purpose to make a Beam for an house I who am the true owner may seise the same but if it be laid in the building it may not be seised by the owner although the building be not perfected for now it becometh parcell of the house or building but if a man prepare all materialls for building upon his Land and is ready to build therewith but dyeth before it be erected those materialls shall go unto the Executor or Administrtaor and not unto the Heire who should have had them had they been layen in the buildings and it may not be seised by the owner although the building be not perfected for now it becometh parcel of the house or building but if a man prepare all materials for building upon his Land and is ready to build therewith but dieth before it is erected those materials shall go unto the Executor or Administrator and not unto the Heire who should have had them had they been layen in the building because they were destinata tantum quae profactis non habentur intended onely which are not taken for acts Qui adimit medium dirimit finem Coke Com. f. 161. a. Sometimes the Law respects the beginning and sometimes the end and sometimes the means to the attaining it As to turne a streame is running to a Mill is a disseisin to the Mill it selfe and to disturbe one from entring and manuring his Land is a disseisin of the Land it selfe so rescous and replevin is a disseisin to the Lord because by them the Lord is disturbed from comming to his Rent and so also is enclosure because the Lord cannot breake downe Gates or breake downe the enclosures to take a distresse and all these are disseisins after an actuall seisin had and when the rent is behinde otherwise not any of them Finis sinem litibus imponit Ployd f. 357 a. Many times in our Law the name and denomination of a thing is drawn from the finall cause as a Fine used for the assurance of Land dicitur finis quia finem litibus imponit because it putteth a period and end to suits Dod. E. Lawyer f. 143. and therefore as Ployd f. 357. a. Fines have been of very long antiquity and as Long as any Court of Record hath been and were at the common Law the more stronger assurance because they carry in themselves the end of the Law which is repose for the Law hath no other end but repose for it was ordained to cease contention and to make peace as the Statute of 17. E. 1. sheweth that therefore they were called Fines quia finem litibus debent imponere imponunt and therefore in the commencement of a Fine there is concord and peace haec est finalis concordia and the chiefe cause is by which it maketh peace because it bindeth all strangers unlesse it be those which have defect if they enter not their claime within a yeare and a day and Brown said that a Fine for its haughtinesse and for the peace and repose that it bringeth it may be termed finis Legis fructus Legis exitus Legis effectus Legis the end of the Law the fruit of the Law and the effect of the Law and after the Plea of non-claime of Fines was made no bar by the Statute of 34. E. 3. c. 16. because the people in those troublesome times of Warrs could not attend to know the Fines and make their claimes Fines did lose their force and were in effect but Feoffments of Record which was the occasion of great contention among the Subjects of the Realme whereupon the Statute of 4. H. 7. was enacted to reforme them as by the preamble appeareth by which five years after Proclamations made upon the Fine are given to him that right hath to make his claime or pursue his action whereas the common Law gave him but a yeare and a day and also if a Fine be levyed without Proclamations or without so many as the Statute requireth then the Statute of non-claime doth extend to such a Fine Coke Com. 262. a. by which Statute the antient strength of Fines is renewed and made to be as they were heretofore the finall end and conclusion of all strifes and debates as the Statute phraseth it From the effests EVentus est qui ex causa sequitur dicitur eventus quia ex causa evenit the event of a thing is that which followeth the cause and it is called an event because it cometh from the cause Coke l. 9. f. 81. b. Agnes Gores case Who did secretly put poyson into an electuary which one Martine the Apothecary had made with an intent to
part which agreeth not with the whole Ployd f. 161. a. And therefore every part of a deed ought to be conferred with the other and one entire sense thereupon to be made as if I release all actions and stay there all actions are gone but if I say further which I have as Executor to I. S. there the generality is restrained So 17. E. 4. f. 22. The King granteth to Garter King of Heralds ten pounds for the terme of his life if he had stayed there he had had it absolutely for terme of his life but where he faith further by reason of his Office by it hee hath restrained the generality vide ibidem plura in Throgmortons case so as if he be removed from his Office he shall lose his annuity Parte quacumque sublata integrante sive necessaria tollitur totum the substantiall or necessary part of any thing being taken away the whole is destroyed Coke l. 3. f 41. in Ratcliffs case As none can be procreated but of the father and the mother and ought to have in him their two bloods which bloods commixed in him by lawfull marriage constitutes and makes him heire so none can be heire to any unlesse he hath in him both the bloods to whom he shall be made heire and therefore the heire of the halfe blood shall not inherit because hee wanteth one of the bloods which make him inheritable for the blood of the father and mother are but one blood inheritable and both are necessary to the procreation of an heire and therefore if there be Baron and Feme Donees in speciall taile and the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue and the Feme die the issue shall not have the Land because the father is attainted for he ought in his lineall conveyance to make himselfe heire as well of the part of his father as of the part of his mother Dier f. 332. b. And that bar and forfeiture is made by the Statute of 26. H. 8. c. 13. which provideth that every offender convict of high treason shal forfeit to the King c. All his Lands c. saving to every person all his right title interest c. so as the issues in taile are barred by that statute because the heire is disabled and cannot make himselfe heire in his lineall convâyance as well to the father as mother Coke l. 9 f. 140. a. upon which reason Britton saith that if one be attainted of felony by judgement the heires engendred after the attainder shall bee excluded of all manner of succession of inheritance as well of the part of the father as of the part of the mother because at the time of the generation of him the fathers blood was corrupted et ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius Coke l. 3. f. 41. vide plura From the circumstances of time and place MOmentum instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus neque pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Ployd 110. b. The distinction of a moment cannot be discerned or observed in the actions of men who cannot doe any thing without the space of time yet as Ployd f. 258. b. in Madam Hales case in things of instant there is a priority of time in the consideration of the Law as in a felon of himselfe the forfeiture shall have no relation but to the time of his death and the death precedeth the forfeiture and notwithstanding the forfeiture commeth at the same instant when he dieth yet in consideration of Law one shall bee said to precede the other though both shall be said to come at an instant for every instant hath the end of one time and the commencement of another and so in the death of a Felon of himselfe the death and the forfeiture commeth together and at the same time and yet there is priority to wit the end of his life is the beginning of the forfeiture and yet the forfeiture is so neere the death that there is no meane time betweene them but are conjoyned for a moment or instant is one indivisible thing in time which is not time nor part of time to which notwithstanding the parts of time are conjoyned vide ibidem plura and in the case between Fulmasten and Steward fo 110. So Fulbeck in his Pandects L. 1. f. 9. b. The existence of a moment cannot possibly be discerned and therefore is not so much as the twinckling of an eye yet the Law doth operate without compass of time in an instant but man never for every act of man must have space longer or shorter but the nature of such instants as the law doth imagine is such and so suddaine that as the Civilians omnom respuunt moâam and the reason is because in the operation of the law that which is imagined to be done is dicto citius presently done and whereas the act of man is mixed with the act of Law though in regard of the same thing the act of Law is momentary yet the act of man must needs beare some delay as those things by the civill law which are taken from the enemies doe incontinently become his who doth seise and take them the law doth give them unto him presently yet there must be a time to take them that the Law may give them So if a Lease be made to A. for the life of B. and A. dyeth C. entreth into the Land and enjoyeth it as occupant the Law because it will not have the freehold in suspence doth imagine that it was presently and immediately in him after the death of A. and that he entred presently but if we respect the entry as the Act of man we must needs conceive that he had some time to enter into the Land and by his entry which is an act of motion to gaine the free hold ibidem Quae incontinenti fiunt in esse videntur Coke l. 8. f. 77. a. Those things which are done in an instant seeme to be in esse or in being in Staffords case as a particular estate and the increase of a particular estate ought to take effect by the same deed or grant or ây two deeds delivery at the same time which is all one in effect for those things which are done in an instant and at the same time seeme to be in being And the particular estate and the increase of the estate upon it is but one grant to take effect out of the same root and though that it vesteth at severall times yet when it vesteth it hath the vigor and force of the same grant 27. H. 6. f. 7. So l. 2. f. 71. a. A condition cannot precede an estate but ought to be in the said conveyance or comprised in another deed delivered at one and the same time as the books are agreed in 17. Ass 2. and 34. Assise for the above said reason vide ibidem S. Cromwels case But Coke com f. 236. putteth
place and it is not materiall whether any person be there or not and if one place be as notorious as another the Lessor hath election to demand it at which he will and if the Lessor demand it at a place which is not notorious or at the back doore of the house and in pleading alledge a demand of the rent generally at the house the Lessee may traverse the demand and upon the evidence it shall be found for him for that it was a void demand Ibidem and Coke com 201. and 202. b. a. But if a rent be reserved upon the demise to be payable at a place out of the land he that shall take advantage for non-payment of the rent ought to demand the rent at the place where it is limitted to be paid and therefore the opinion in Kelwellies case Ployd f. 70. that he in the reversion may enter for the non payment of such rent without any demand made was utterly denied by the whole Court Ididem and Coke com 202. a. But if there be no place appointed where the rent is to be paid there the rent is to be tendred on the Land Coke 210. a. b. Because it issueth out of the Land but otherwise it is in such a case of a Feoffment or Mortgage for it is not sufficient for the feoffor to be upon the land there ready to pay the money to the feoffee at the day set but he must seek the feoffee if he be then in another place within the Realme of England and so it is if a man be bound in an obligation of twenty pound upon condition that he pay to the obligee at such a day 10. l. that then c. The obligor ought to seek the obligee if he be in England and at the day appointed tender the ten pound otherwise he shall forfeit the twenty pound Coke com ibidem and therefore as he adviseth it shall be good and a sure way upon such a feoffment or mortgage to appoint a speciall place where the money shall be paid and the more especiall it is the more better it is Coke com f. 211. b. And so is it also upon an obligation Ployd f. 71. a. and b. If the obligee be in his own house and the obligor come to him there and tender the mony he shall not be a trespassor for his comming there for in that by the taking of the obligation the obligee was assenting that the obligor should pay him the ten pound by necessity of reason he ought to be assenting to come to him to offer unto him the 10. l. for to come to his person precedeth the offer which he was assenting to therfore ex consequenti he shall not punish him for that thing to which himselfe was agreeing But if he had entred into the house of another man there he shall be a trespassor to the said man if the same man will take him so vide plura ibid. Kedwellies case Exception Though a common person in reversion cannot enter for non-payment of rent without demand yet if the King make such a Lease for yeares rendring rent with such a condition ut supra the King shall take advantage of the condition without any demand because the law which alwaies observeth decorum and conveniency appointeth the subject to attend upon his soveraigne and in such case to make the first act though it be in case of condition which trencheth upon the destruction of his estate But if the King granteth the reversion over his grantee shall not take advantage of the condition without demand for it is a personall prerogative annexed to the person of the King and not in respect of the nature and quality of the land Coke l. 4. f. 23. A So the King maketh a Lease for yeares rendring a rent payable at his receipt of Westminster and after the King granteth the reversion to another and his heires the grantee shall demand the rent on the Land and not at the Kings receipt at Westminster for though the law without expresse words doth appoint the Lessee in the Kings case to pay it at the Kings receipt yet in case of a subject the law appointeth the demand to be on the land Coke com f. 201. b. and Coke l. 4. f. 72. 73. Burroughs case vide ibidem plura Circumstantia loci est testis veritatis certitudinis Ployd 393. a. The place is materiall and is a circumstance and witnesse of truth and certainty As if a man will plead the Letters Patents of the King bearing date at Westminster and indeed they did beare date at another place it seemes in 38. H. 6. by Choke f. 34. by Littleton f. 36. and by Redsham Moile and Prisot f. 37. That for the variance of the place it failed and the Plea shall be adjudged against him So if the King give authority to one to arraigne one upon indictment taken against him at Dale in such a County when indeed the indictment was taken at another place in the same County he cannot arraigne him for the place declareth the certainty what indictment the King intended for it may be there were two indictments of the same matter and thing and the one of them taken in one Village the other in another and by it the expresment of the Village declared the certainty of it Dier 105. a. An outlawry was reversed because it was ad comitat Lancaster ibidem tent and did not say at Lancaster or such certain place to which ibidem might be referred Ployd f. 191. a. The place must be shewne by the Plaintiff where the things were done because the visne should come thence if the things be traversed as H. 6. E. 4. 11. Brooke lieu 55. The place ought to be shewn in the count in debt upon an obligation where the obligation was made and M. 39. H. 6. 32. Brook lieu 45. If an attornement be alledged the place ought to be pleaded where it was made and in such like things of effect that may be traversed the place ought to be shewne where the thing was done for the certainty of the triall and f. 149. b. the place ought to be shewne where the attornement was made if the attornement bee pleaded 15. H. 7. 24. Coke l. 6. f. 47. Dowdales case when the place is materiall as when it is parcell of the issue there the Jurors cannot find the point in issue in any other place for by especiall pleading the point in issue is restrained to a certaine place but when the place is named onely for conformity and necessity and when it is parcell of the issue as in the case of 10. Eliz. 271. in debt against the heire he pleaded rieâ by descent generally in that case the Plaintiff cannot reply in such generall manner for then no triall can be had of it but in case for conformity and necessity of a triall he ought to name a certaine place as there he did in the Parish and
the writings are so is the chests and the box they are in because the Charters and Writings are the more worthy Noy Max. f. 7. 11. H. 4. 30. If one be instituted and inducted the tryall shall be by the Jury by reason of the induction because the realty as the more worthy is to be preferred 22. H. 8. 27. 43. E. 3 13. A Lease is of a Chamber and a Bed rendring rent in debt for the rent the Defendant shall not wage Law for the rent because the Chamber is magis dignum 21. E. 4. 3. An adulterer taketh away a mans wife and putteth her into new clothes the husband may take the wife with her clothes 11. H. 4. 31. A base mine where there is royal ore shall be the Kings for the worthinesse of the ore Ployd 318. A villaine shall make free Land to be villaine Land but villaine Land shall not make a Freeman to be a villain for the body of a man is more worthy then Land and therefore the Land shall follow the nature of the person 3. Eli. 238. So the Kings Land which he hath in his naturall capacity shall be demeaned according to the priviledge and prerogative of his body royall If a man be condemned in trespasse or re-disseisin and is in execution for the fine of the King or if he be outlawed of Felony his body shall not be in prison at the suite of the party for that the King hath an interest in his body who is magis dignus A majori digniori fieri debet denominatio Coke Com. f. 355. b. As Husband and wife are joynt Executors the Writ shall be executoribus non executricibus 22. H. 6. 30. A convenient proportion of Gold and Silver ore shall give the name to be a Mine royall Ployd f. 323. The grant of the Office of the Kings Tennis-Court the Play of the House is included in the grant because that onely giveth the name Coke l. 8. f. 45. in Woods case Dyer 314. Where speech is of a will it shall be intended of the last will for the will and the last will are taken for all one Quod in minori valet valebit in majori what is of force in the lesser shall be of force in the greater Coke com f. 260 a. As if a man in prison shall not be bound by a Recovery by default for want of answer in Court of Record in a reall action which is matter of Record a multo fortiori a descent in the Country which is matter of deed shall not for want of claime binde him that is in prison specially seeing he could not goe out of prison to make his continuall claime and the argument a minori ad majus doth ever hold affirmatively and the argument a majori ad minus doth ever hold negatively for it is also a rule quod in majori non valet non valebit in minori what is not of force in the greater shall not be of force in the lesser Magis minus non diversificant speciem Arist 2. Top. the greater and lesser doth not make the species and essence of things to differ the reason why great woods of the age of twenty one years are exempted from the payment of tithes is not because they are part of the free-hold or inheritance and that men use not to pay their tithes out of their free-hold but out of those things which spring out of their free-hold as out of corne grasse fruite and the like for the greatest Tree is no more part of the freehold then the lowest bramble and are both equall part of the ground wherin they grow do take a like sustenance and nourishment from the same neither do they differ as they are Trees one from the other secunduÌ magis minus but that the one Tree is a great Tree and the other a small shrub for the greater and the lesser doe not diversify the species But the cause of the provision in England by the Stat. of 45 E. 3. Ployd f. 470. b. why great Trees of the age of twenty one years doe not pay tithes is for that the one yeeldeth more profit to the common wealth and are Timber and serve for any use for building and therefore the cutting downe of them is made more penall then the other as in the like case by the Civill Law whosoever privily cutteth downe or barketh a Vine an Olive or a Figtree and doth any other unlawfull act whereby any fruitfull tree or any Timber tree doth perish and decay it is theft and is punished in the double value of the hurt which is done and if he be tenant of the ground who hath done it he loseth his hold because the Law respecteth the necessary use of them Ridleys view of the Law f. 207. Actus repugnans non potest in esse produci Reg. I. C. A repugnant act cannot be brought into being Ployd f. 355. a. Any man who is a legall owner of Land may give it unto any person in what manner and at what time he pleaseth so that his guift be not contrary to Law or repugnant As if an entaile be made upon condition that if the Donee alien that then it shall remaine unto another that is repugnant and therefore void for when he hath aliened it to a stranger then it is contrary to the alienation of a remainder over by it Coke l. 1. f. 84. a. Corbets case upon an estate the proviso was that if tenant in taile c. be resolved c to procure or attempt any act by which the estate taile may be barred and determined that then the uses and estates to him limited in respect of such person so attempting shall cease as if he were naturally dead the said proviso was adjudged repugnant and contrary to Law for the death of the tenant in taile is not the ceasing of the estate taile but the death of the tenant in taile that hath no issue of his body vide ibidem plura A Feoffment in fee of two acres unto two men Habendum one acre to one and the other to the other this Habendum is void for the contrariety for the Premisses give him an interest in both acres and the Habendum eâcludeth him from one 2. P.M. 153. In a trespasse de domo fracta muris ejusdem domus fractis the Defendant cannot pleade guilty to the breaking of the house and justify the breaking of the Walls for the house and the walls are all one and cannot of the same thing both justify and pleade not guilty for the one is contrary to the other and according to the rule cantraria allegâns non est audiendus 21. H. 7. 21. He is not to be heard who alledgeth contrarieties an obligation is made solvendum nunquam this Solvendum is void for the contrariety and the thing presently due 21. E. 4. 36. A. is bound to B. Solvendum eidem A. the Solvendum is void for the contrariety and
feoffment be made to a man and a woman and their heirs with warranty and they inter marry and after are impleaded and recover in value moyeties shall not be between them for though they were sole when the warranty was made yet at the time when they recovered and had execution they were husband and wife at which time they cannot take by moyeties Ployd 483. Nichols case So if a reversion be granted to a man and a woman and their heires and before attornement they inter-marry and then attornement is made they in this case shall have no moieties No more if a Charter of feoffment be made to a man and a woman with a letter of Attorney to make livery and they inter-marry and then the livery is made secundum formam chartae they shall have no moiety Coke com f. 187. a. Although at the common law a man during the coverture could neither in possession reversion or remainder limit an estate to his wife yet a man now may by the statute o 27. H. 8 Covenant with others to stand seised to the use of his wife or make a feoffment or other conveyance to the use of his wife for by it the estate is executed to such uses for an use is but a trust and confidence which by such a meane may be limited by the husband to the wife but a man cannot covenant with his wife to stand seised to her use because they are one person in Law And if cesty que vie doth devise that his wife shall sell his land and make her Executrix and dyeth and she take another husband she may sell the land to her husband for she doth it in anter droit and her husband shall be in by the devisor Coke com f. 112. a. If a free man marry a woman which is a neife she shall be free for ever although the husband dyeth and she surviveth because they are but one person in law unlesse there be some speciall Act made by the wife afterwards as devorce or cognisance in Court of record F. N. B. f. 78. g. If an english man marry an alien borne she shall be a Denizen for the same reason Abri of Ass by Brooke Demzen Iâ the husband and wife âaile goods to one they shall not joyne in an Action of Detinue for it is the bailement of the husband onely and void as to her The husband may have an Action of trespasse for taking away his wife F. n. b. f. 53. b. A man may have an Action at the common law de muliere abducta cum bonis viri if she hath attained to the age of consent and hath actually consented to the marriage because it is not properly a marriage till she doth consent 13. E. 1. c. 35. Yet Brooke 4. 47. E. 3. trespasse f. 420. rather thinketh that it shall be intended a good marriage till she doth disâssent but where the marriage is compleat though the wife is dead or divorced at the time of the Action brought the action is maintainable but the word rapuit must be in the writ as well as abduxit 43. E. 3. and therefore it will not lie against a woman because one woman cannot ravish another 43. E. 3. 23. Fulb. l. 1. f. 79. Hereupon it is that the wife can never answer in any Action without her husband and if upon an Action of trespasse the wife cometh in upon a cepi corpus and the husband doth not appeare she must be set at large without any mainprise till her husband doth appeare but he appearing may answer without her and therefore a protection cast by the husband serveth for the wife also Finch Nomot f. 41. If tenant in taile enfeoff a woman and die and his issue within age taketh her to wife he shall be remitted for he cannot sue a Formedon in this case unlesse he will sue against his wife because by the enter-marriage he is seised in her right ibid. Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis Coke l. 6. f. 53. b. and l. 4. f. 118. b. If a noble woman marry an ignoble man she ceaseth to be noble as when a Barronesse marrieth under the degree of a Baron by such marriage her dignity is determined but that is to be understood of a woman hath attained her nobility by marriage of a Duke Countesse or Baron and if such an one marry with one is ignoble she loseth her dignity to which shee hath attained by the marriage with one of nobility but if a woman be noble by descent as a Dutchesse c. though she marry one under the degree of nobility yet her birth-right shall remaine for it is annexed to her blood and it is a Character indelebilis ibidem And if a Dutchesse marry with a Baron of the Realme she remaineth a Dutchesse and loseth not her name Coke com f. 16. b. Vir est caput mulieris Bracton Coke com 1 2. a. The husband is the head of the wife for God saith Ployd f. 305. hath divided reasonable creatures into two sexes male and female and the male is more soveraine and the female more base as Aristotle l. 1. Polit. Mas est praestantior deterior vero faemina and therefore doth the female change her sir name into the name of her husband and also men for the greater part are more reasonable then women and have more discretion to guide things then women have and therefore Aristotle in the same place saith mas ad principatum aptior est natura quam faemina the man is more apt by nature to rule then the woman and as the woman is not so apt to governe in high matters so is shee not in things of a lower degree and therefore saith Bracton l. 2. c. 15. Omnia quae sunt uxoris sunt ipsius viri non habet uxor potestatem sui sed vir all things which are the wifes are the husbands and the wife hath not power of her selfe but her husband for all personall things shee hath are meerly his and at his disposing and as the office of an executor f 210. are so setled in the husband upon the marriage as any other that were his own before so as if goods be given to a Feme-covert and another the joynture is severed and the husband and the other are tenants in common and the executor of the husband shall have all the goods that were given to the wife 21. H. 7. 29. All the reall Chattells of the wife are also the husbands for as Hoberd f. 4. Radfords case though the lease were at the first the wifes and that the husband was possessed in her right so as though he had purchased the Fee-simple the Lease had not been extinct yet by the inter-marriage he had full power to alien it and if he survive the wifâ he is to enjoy it against her Executors or Administrators vide Ployd 191. But where the wife hath a terme for yeares the husband cannot devise it to another
husbands because it is possible for the husband to have got it and whose soever the Cow is his is the Calfe also Swinwood f. 18. And if the issue be borne within a month or day after marriage between parties of a full lawfull age the child is legitimate Coke Com. f. 244. a. And in the legall understanding of the common Law he is said to be haeres who is ex justis nuptijs procreatus borne of lawful matrimony haeres legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and he is a lawfull heire whom marriage demonstrated so to be Coke ibidem f. 7. b. Coke l. 7. f. 44. a. One who is engendred in avowtry during the coverture is a mulier by the temporall and common Law though a bastard by the spirituall Law Jus sanguinis quod in legitimis successionibus spectatur ipso nativitatis tempore quaesitum est Reg. I. C. The right of blood which is regarded in lawfull successions or inheritances is found in the very time of the nativity and therefore jus primogeniturae the tight of the elder Brother-ship in the cause of inheritance is principally to be respected because it is in the eldest Son and his issue per modum substantiae and that which is in any person per modum substantiae is inseperable from him and cannot be extended to any other besides it is against the Laws of proximity of degrees that those which are in a remote degree should be preferred before those of the next degree and therefore in all common weales for the most part proximity of blood hath been preferred of which we have a notable example confirmed by the act of Lycurgus the judicious Law-giver as when Eunonus King of the Lacedaenonians had two Sons Polydectes the elder and Lycurgus the younger and Polydectes deceased leaving no Son living at the time of his death the Scepter of the Kingdome was seated in the hands of Lycurgus afterwards when Polydectes Widdow had brought forth a Son Lycurgus did willingly and peaceably yeeld to him the Scepter which act of Lycurgus agreeth fully with our Laws whereby it is ruled that if a man have a Son and Daughter and the Son purchaseth Land and dyeth the Daughter entreth and after the Father begetteth another Son of the same Wife this Son shall have the Land 19. H. 6. b and is also ratified by diverse examples in the successions of our Kings I will instance onely in one and the most illustrious one King Edward the third being deceased Richard the second the Son of his eldest Son obtained the Kingdome and was preferred before John Edmund and Thomas the sons of the same King wheras any of them was more worthy and fit for the Scepter yet is it granted that in succession of regall dignity jus primogeniturae is not constantly observed because in that case the good of the common-weale and commodity of the people is politically to be respected and as the Civilians the good estate of the Kingdome and Subjects is more to be heeded quam sangninis series then the pedigree of blood and so Solomon the younger Brother was advanced before the elder by the hand of David his Father and Roboam preferred Abias his younger Son yet this must be done cautiously and with a good conscience and intention and probably for the utility of the State otherwise it will neither please God nor man yet in the disposing of private estates the Law of Primogeniture is more strictly to be observed because by it confusion and dissention is avoyded which from the contrary doth proceed as is intimated by Coke l. 3. f. 40. b. Wherein our Law excelleth which preferreth the elder Brother and his issue before the younger Brother and his issue in case of descent and that jure sanguinis by his birth right as he is most worthy of blood and therefore as Coke in his com f. 14. a. The male and all descendant from him shall inherit before the female and among the males the eldest Brother and his posterity shall inherit Lands in Fee-simple as heire before any younger Brother or any descending from him whereas by the Civill Law the inheritance is divided among the males Lutleton l. 1. c. 1. There be three Brothers and the middle Brother purchaseth Lands in Fee simple and dyeth without issue the elder Brother shall have the Land by descent so also it is if the youngest purchaseth Lands in Fee and dyeth without issue the eldest shall have it jure sanguinis because he is the worthiest of blood Little So if a man enfeoffe another upon condition and the condition is broken and then the Feoffor dyeth without issue his wife privement ensaint and the Brother of the Feoffor enter for the condition broken and after a Son is borne he shall avoid the possession of the Uncle and may lawfully claime the inheritance 9. H. 7. 25. And 9. H. 8. 23. It is said that after two or more descents the heire afterwards born claiming by descent may enter into Land but he shall not have a Writ of account for the meane profits And though Littleton in defence of the custome of Gavelkind by which the issues may equally inherit alledgeth the reason that every Son is as great a Gentleman as the eldest Son is yet as Sr. Edward Coke com a. f. 14. saith Gentry and arms doth not descend to all the brethren alike for the eldest jure primogeniturae shall beare as a badg of his birth-right his Fathers armes without any difference because he is more worthy of blood but all the younger brethren shall give severall differences additio probat minoritatem and the addition demonstrateth and proveth the minority of the issue but by the Statute of 31. H. 8. A great part of Rent is made descendible to the eldest Son according to the course of the common Law for that by the meanes of that custome diverse antient and great families after a few descents came to very little or nothing according to the simile of the Poet In plures quoties rivos deducitur amnis Fit minor ac unda deficiente perit A Flood deduced into little streames Coke ibid. Soone groweth lesse and falleth by that meanes But in cases of purchase it is otherwise a. 15. E. 4. If a man devise land to a man and his heire and the devisee dieth having issue a daughter his wife privement enseint with a son who is afterwards borne the daughter shall enjoy the Land in perpetuum And 9. H. 6. 23. It is said that if the remainder cannot vest at any time when it falleth it shall not vest in him is borne afterwards where another hath entred before 2. Eliz. 190. Pl. 18. If a lease for life be made the remainder to the right heires of I. S. and I. S. is then alive the inheritance passeth presently out of the Lessor but cannot vest in the heire of I. S. for then living his father he is not in rerum natura for non
and a Law was that thereby there might be certainty of titles and a peaceable possession without contradiction and as a Civilian saith ut sit finis litium that there might be an end of suits and therefore were the Statutes of limitation made within which the demandant that bringeth the action must prove himselfe or some of his Ancestors to be seised and in antient time the limitation in a Writ of right was from the time of H. 1. after that by the Statute of Merton the limitation was from the time of Henry the second and by the Statute of Westminster the first the limitation was from the time of Richard the first but because that limitation of the writ of right was for so long time passed the limitation of a writ of right was changed by the Statute of 32. H. 8. and reduced to threescore years next before the Teste of the Writ and so of other actions Coke com f. 115. a. vide ibidem plura And afterwards another Act was made 21. Jacob. that for the avoiding of suits all writs of Formedon in Descender Formedon in Remainder and Formedon in Reverter for any Mannors c. shall be sued and taken within twenty years and that after the twenty years expired none such or any of their heires shall have any such writ and that no person that hath right or title of entry into any Mannors c. shall thereunto enter but within twenty years vide ibidem cap. 6. plura But it is to be observed that time of limitation is twofold first in writs that is by diverse acts of Parliament the second is to make a title of inheritance and that is as hath been said to pleade a prescription de tempore cujus contrarium memoria hominum non existit Coke com f. 14. 15. which is by the common Law And this also accordeth with the rule of Bracton Longa possessio sicut jus parit jus possidendi tollit actionem a vero domino l. 2. f. 52. Long possession as right begetteth a right and taketh away an action from the true Lord and owner And so in antient times if the disseisor had been long in possession the Disseisee could not have entred upon him neither could the Disseisee have entred upon the Feoffee of the Disseisor if he had continued a yeare and a day in quiet possession and though the Law be now changed yet at this day the Disseisor dying seised being an act in Law barreth the disseisee of his entrance upon the heire and for that many advantages follow the possession and tenant the law taketh away the entry of him that would not enter upon the Ancestor who is presumed to know his title and driveth him to his Action against the heire that may be ignorant thereof Coke com f. 237. b. And for the above said reason the law yieldeth diverse utilities and advantages to the possessor for it is better to be a possessor then to complaine of others who are possessors because it imposeth the burden of proving on the Plaintiff so as if he can prove nothing he which possesseth shall be acquitted neither can possession be avoided but by possession Ployd 137 b. As if I make a lease for years of the lands of my wife and die the lease is not void before entry made by the wife for possession must be avoided by possession and such possession must be gained by entry But if my father die and his land descend to me a Lease for yeares made before my entry is good because I have possession in law and none hath possession in deed but if a stranger abate a lease made by me after is void for the stranger hath possession indeed before my entry upon him Ployd ibid. If an Executor bring an Action of trespasse for goods taken out of his possession it is not needfull to shew the Testament but if hee not ever was possessed of them but doth demand the thing then hee ought to have shewn the testament Ployd f. 46. a. And regularly it holdeth true that when the naked right of Land is released to one that hath jus possessionis and the other by a meane title recovereth the land from him the right in possession shall draw the naked right with it and shall not leave a right in him to whom the release is made as if the heire of the disseisor being in by descent is disseised by A. and the disseisee release to A. now hath A. the meere right to the land but if the heire of the disseisor enter into the Land and regaineth possession that shall draw with it the meere right to the land and shall not regaine the possession onely and leave the meere right in A. but the recontinuance of the possession the meere right is therewith vested in the heire of the disseisor Coke com 266. a. If a woman possessed of a terme for yeares take an husband and the wife dieth though during the life of the wife the terme was not devested out of the wife yet by her death it is vested in the husband and it is given to him by Act in law because it is a thing in possession and not in Action Pl f. 192. b. In pari causa possessor potior haberi debet Reg. I. C. In aequali jure âelior est conditio possidentis Coke l. 4. f. 90. a As the Lord who is allowed but three Chaplaines retaineth six by his letters testimoniall at one and the same time and all the six are prefeâred to six severall plurallities the three which are first promoted are warranted by the statutes and yet the retainer was not according to the statute for in aequali jure melior est conditio possidentis In equall right better is the condition of him who is in possession ibidem If a man purchaseth severall lands at one time which are holden of several Lords by Knights service and dieth the Lord who first seiseth the ward shall have him because they are in aequali jure and there is no priority betweene them which if there were the elder Lord shall have him Perk. f. 6. If ten Mannors be conveyed to two severall persons by one deed which of them happeneth to get the Deed first may detaine it Two Attorneys are retained conjunctim divisim joyntly and severally the plea of him that first pleadeth shall stand because they are in aequali jure to plead If there be two joynt-tenants and one of them taketh all the profits of the land or all the rent the other hath no remedy Coke l. 2. f. 68. a. So the release of all Actions personall by one barreth the other but otherwise it is if the personalty be mixed with the realty and if there be two joynt-tenants Lords and the tenant holdeth by Knights service and the tenant dieth his heire within age and one Lord seiseth the Ward and the other distraineth for the services he that first seiseth or distraineth shall bind the other And
enrolled enfeoff the King without any consideration the King shall be seised to his owne use as having such prerogative in his person that he shall not be seised to the use of any other 28. H. 8. 7. Dier Bokenghams case by Knightley Cok l. 2. f. 71. b. It is not unjust but equall that the bargain or shall annex such a condition to the State of the land as he pleaseth for cujus est dare ejus est disponere he that hath power to give hath power to dispose ibidem Coke l. 7. f. 6. Calvins case The King by his letters patents or the Parliament by thier votes may grant denizations without limitations or restraint or else limited denizations as to an alien and the heires males of his body 9. E. 4. f. 7. in Bagots case or to an alien for terme of life as to John Fenell 11. H. 6. 3. Or else upon condition whereof I have seen diverse presidents for who hath power to give hath power to dispose ibid. Modus dat domationi Fleta Ployd f. 25. a. The mannor of the gift which the donor limiteth maketh a law to the donee for though in the preamble of the Act of W. 2. there be but three estates limited to wit especiall taile franke-marriage and generall taile yet may the donor make other tailes by his limitation for his will is a law as to the taile and so heires males of the body of the donee and taile to the heires females of the body of the Donee and all other tailes are within the purview of the Act for the will of the donor is the effect of the stature and from it it followeth that the alienation of the donee shall not bind the issues nor the donor And the second wife shall not be endowed neither can the donee charge the land with a rent-charge or other encumbrance neither shall the land be forfeited for felony and all these are included in the first purview to wit that the will of the donor shall be observed and are but consequences and explanations of the first purview vide ibidem plura But if a gift bee repugnant or contrary to law Exception as a gift made upon a condition unlawfull or impossible it is void and of no effect to gain any thing by the making of it in our law As if the condition be to kill a man Ployd f. 34. b. Or if an obligation be made to save one harmeless for killing a man Ibid. f 64. b. these conditions are void So a feoffment made that the feoffee shall not alien the land is void because it is contrary to law for by the law tenant in fee-simple hath power to alien to any man for if such a condition should be good then the condition should oust him of all the power that the law hath given him which is contrary to reason Littleton The like law is upon a devise in fee upon condition that the devisee shall not alien the condition is void And so it is of a grant release or confirmation or any other conveyance whereby a fee-simple doth pass for it is absurd and repugnant to reason that he that hath no possibility to have the land revert to him should restrain his feoffee in fee-simple of all his power to alien And so it is if a man be possessed of a lease for yeares or of an horse or of any other Chattells reall or personall or give or sell his whole interest or property therein upon condition that the Donee or Vendee shall not alien the same the same is void because his whole interest and property is out of him so as hee hath no possibility of a reverter and it is against trade and traffick and bargaining and contracting betweene man and man and against reason that he should oust him of all power given him for regulariter non valei pactum de re mea non alienda a contract or condition that I shall not alien that which is my owne doth not hold and suiquum est liberis hominibus non esse liberam rerum suarum alienationem it is unjust that freemen should not have liberty to alien their owne estates But these are to be understood of conditions annexed to the grant or sale it selfe in respect of the repugnancy and not to any other collaterall thing Coke com f. 223. a. But before the statute of quia emptores terrarum A man might have made a feoffment in fee and added further that if he and his heires did alien without licence that he should pay a fine it had beene good then and then the Lord also might have restrained the alienation of the tenant by condition because the Lord had a possibility of reverter and so it is in the Kings case at this day because he may reserve a tenure to himselfe If A. be seised of black Acre in fee and B. enfeoffeth him of white Acre upon condition that A. shall not alien black Acre the condition is good for the condition is annexed to other land and ousteth not the feoffee of his power to alien the land whereof the feoffment is made and so no repugnancy to the State passed by the feoffment and so it is of gifts or sales of Chattels realls or personalls Coke ibidem But if a feoffment be made upon condition that the feoffee shall not infeoff I. S. c. This is good for he doth not restrain the feoffee of all his power and in this case if the feoffee infeoff I. N. of intent and purpose that he shall infeoff I. S. some hold that this is a breach of the condition for Quando aliquid prohibetur fieri ex directo prohibetur per obliquum for when any thing is forbidden to be done directly it is also forbidden to be done collaterally or obliquely Coke ibidem b. And a gift in taile that is made upon condition that the donee nor his heires shall not alien in fee in taile or for terme of anothers life is good to all those alienations which amount to any discontinuance of the estate taile or is against the statute of W. 2. but as to a recovery the condition is void for that is no discontinuance nor against the said statute Neither is a collaterall warranty or lineall with assets in respect of the recompence restrained by the said statute no more then a common recovery is in respect of the intended recompence Ibidem If a man make a feoffment to Baron and feme in fee upon condition they shall not alien this is good to restraine them by feoffment or alienation by deed because it is tortious but to restraine their alienation by fine is repugnant void because lawfull ibidem Voluntas reputabitur pro facto Bract. the will shall be esteemed for the deed If no place be limited where money is to be paid in the condition of a Bond and the Obligor at or after the day of payment happen in the company of the obligee and offereth
to tender him the money and the other shifteth away to prevent him it seemeth in this case he shall be excused because he hath done his endeavour 8. E. 4. 1. by Catesby One was indited quod burglariter fregit intravit ecclesiam nocte ad depraedandum bona parochianorum in eadem existentia and good though he took nothing away for his will was to have taken Dier f. 99 and 58. A man giveth a juror money to embrace him though the verdict pass against him he shall be punished for this 28. H. 6. 12. A man carrieth his sick father into a croft whereby he dyeth it is felony An Harlot hid her child with leaves in a thicket and a Kite striketh it and killeth it it is felony A Bull Beare or Dog accustomed to doe hurt of which the master and owner well knowing doth not tie him up but suffereth him to goe at large and being so at large he killeth a man this is held by Fitzherbert to be felony in the owner of the Beast for thereby the owner seemeth to have a will to kill vide Wilson office of Coroner f. 11. And by the civill law if a man be bitten of another mans dog the owner of the dog is chargeable unto him that is hurt because he did not tie up his dog and musle him Fulb. Pand. f. 76. For it is a rule in the civill law voluntatem pro facto reputari A wife after the death of her husband being a copy-holder came into the Court and challenged her right of Frank-bank and prayed to be admitted but the steward refused to admit her yet was it adjudged an admittance in law So if a tenant alien and the feoffee tendreth his services and giveth a fine and the Lord refuseth the Lord shall be compelled to avow upon him and so continuall claime amounteth to an entry Huttons rep f. 18. And therefore the deniall to doe any thing is a breach of covenant as if a man be bound to doe an act when I request him and I doe request him and he will not doe it he hath forfeited his band 15. E. 4. 21. 34. H. 8. 23. Exitus plerumque in maleficiis spectatur non voluntas the act and not the will in evill facts is respected and considered though in ancient times the will was so materiall in felonious attempts that it was taken for the fact it selfe and so adjudged as one intending the death of another man woundeth him so grievously that he leaveth him for dead and afterward flyeth and the man wounded revived it was then adjudged to be felony in so much as his will appeared to have killed him 1. E. 3. with which Bractons saying accordeth in maleficiis spectatur voluntas non exitus but this law is not now in force for he must be dead indeed before it be adjudged felony and though the will be wanting the evill deed is alway censured for felony As if I hurt another onely with an intention to beat him and he dieth it is felony So upon the malicious words of a woman two men fought and the one killed the other the woman in this case was arraigned for the death of the slaine man Three men goe together to diffame one and one of them killeth a man the other two are principalls though they had no such will and intention Non efficit conatus nisi sequatur effectus non efficit affectus nisi sequatur effectus Coke l. 11. f. 98. b. A conation and an affection hurteth not unless the Act and effect ensue As those who have Offices of trust and confidences shall not forfeit them by conations and intentions to doe Acts although they declare them by express words unless the Act it selfe ensue As if one who hath the custody of a Park shall say that hee will kill the game in his custody or that hee will cut downe the trees in the Park yet doth hee neither kill the game or cut downe the trees that is no forfeiture sic de similibus for in all such cases there ought to be such a fact or a negligence which amounteth to as much to wit as to the destruction of the game If a Bishop Arch-Deacon or Parson c abateth all the trees it is a good cause of deprivation 9. E. 4. 34. If a Prior make dilapidation it is a good cause to deprive him 29. E. 3. 16. 20. H. 6. 36. But if it be but a conation or enterprise without any Act done in none of these cases it is cause of deprivation for in these cases voluntas non reputabitur pro facto the will shall not be reputed for the deed So a conation or an enterprise cannot be the cause of the disfranchisement of a Citizen or Burgesse for he may repent before the execution of it and then no prejudice will ensue but the matter which shall be the cause of a disfranchisement must be an Act or a deed against the trust and duty of his freedome or to the prejudice of the publike good of the City or Burrough vide ibidem plura in James Baggs case Affectus punitur licet non sequatur effectus Coke l. 9. f. 56. 57. in the Poulters case The affection or will to doe a thing is punished though the effect followeth not Though a Writ of conspiracy doth not lie unless that the party be indited legitimo modo acquietatus for so are the words of the writ yet false confederacy among diverse persons shall be punished though that nothing was put in ure as 27. Ass Pl. 44. Two were indited of confederacy either of them to maintaine the other though the matter was true or false and though nothing was supposed to be put in ure yet the parties were put to answer to it for that such a thing is forbidden by the law And in the next Article of the same book enquiry shall be made of conspirators and confederators which confederate among themselves c. falsely to endite and acquit and of the manner of their alliance and betweene whom which proveth that confederation to endite and acquit is punishable by the law though that nothing was executed And it is holden 19. R. 2. title briefe 726. A man shall have a writ of confederacy though as they do nothing but confederate together and shall recover damages and may be indited for it also Also the usuall commission of Oyer and Terminer giveth power to the Commissioners to enquire de omnibus coadunationibuâ confederationibus falsis alligantiis coadunatio is an uniting them together confederation is a combination between them and falsa alligantia is a false alliance one with another by obligation or promise to execute any unlawfull Act which the law punisheth before any fact is executed to the end to prevent the unlawfull act quia quando aliquid prohibetur prohibetur illud per quod pervenitur ad illud for when any thing is forbidden that also is forbidden by which
suerum cum averijs Abbot Conventus renounceth all the Common which he hath used to have of his Cattle with the Cattle of the Abbot and Covent and that release of Common was there taken void because he did not shew to whom he renounced the common yet there was a full intent for he had common in the Land of the Abbots and he had intent to release it to him but for the incertainty it was void And a Lease was made to Baron and Feme and the reversion of the Land that the Baron held was granted and it was held void notwithstanding the intent because it missed of the certainty of the particular estate H. 13. E. 3. Fitz. grants 63. And so where there were Lord and tenant of three acres and the Lord granted the signiory which he had out of one Acre it was held void in 17. E. 3. notwithstanding the intent because his intent did not agree with Law and so where a man holdeth of one by Castle garder Homage and Fealty and he granteth to another all his services it was held in 31. E. 1. that the Castle-garder cannot passe because he did not grant such a Castle but reserved it and therefore he who hath not the Castle cannot have the Castle guarder so his intent in granting al the services could not make all to passe because it was not according to Law and so the Law ruleth the intent and the intent not the Law Ployd ibidem in Throckmortons case Coke l. 1. f. 84. b. A man giveth Land to M. and 1. his Sisters and to the heirs of the bodies of them lawfully begotten by which they had a joynt estate for life and severall inheritances and the Donor intending that neither of them should break the Joynture but the Survivor should have all per jus accrescendi added this clause sub hac forma that shee that should longest live should have all the Land but because his intent is contrary to Law for this cause if the Joynture be severed by fine the Survivor shall not have the part so severed by the said clause which he hath inserted of his conceit and his own imagination contrary to Law and reason ibidem But in Wills the intent shall be observed and onely thought of because the Testator had no time to order all things according to Law by presumption but is suddenly made oftentimes and so the diversity Ployd f. 162. b. And therefore Ploy f. 414. a. The intent in devises maketh estates to passe contrary to the rules of the common Law in deeds and other gifts As if I devise Land to one A. for life whereas there is not any such the remainder in fee he in the remainder shall take the Land though there be no estate precedent And 34. E. 3. one had issue a Son and Daughter and deviseth Land devisable to one for life upon condition that if the Son disturbe tenant for life or his Executors of their Administration that then the Land shall remaine to the Daughter and dyeth the Daughter after the death of the tenant for life bringeth a Formedon in remainder against the son alledgeth that the tenant had disturbed the Tenant for life and the Executors and the Tenant traversed it upon it issue joyned and the condition took the fee out of the Son and put in the Daughter by allowance in Law in performance of the intent of the Devisee though the remainder did not vest when the first estate took effect Ployd ibidem Coke com f. 322. a. b. If a man lease Lands devisable for life c. the reversion by his testament in fee c. and dyeth and then the Tenant maketh wast the Devisee shall have a writ of Wast although the Tenant never attorned because the will of the Devisor made by his will shall be performed according to the intent of the Devisor and if the Tenant will never attorne then it shall never be performed and therefore he shall have an action of wast or distraine without Attornement Littleton for it is a maxime of the common Law ultima voluntas testatoris est perimplenda secundum veram intentionem sufam Coke ibidem for if a man devise his Tenements to another by testament Habendum sibi in perpetuum and dyeth and the Devisee entreth he hath a Fee-simple causa qua supra and yet if a feoffment had been made to him by the Devisor in his life of the same Tenements Habendum sibi in perpetuum and livery and seisin upon it made he shall have an estate onely for terme of his life Littleton Ibidem Coke com f. 9. b. Though by the common Law an estate of inheritance may not passe without these words Heires yet in devise it may as if a man devise twenty acres to another and that he shall pay to the Executors for the same ten pound he hath a Fee-simple by the intent of the Devisor albeit it be not the value of the Land 21. E. 3 16. So if a man devise Lands to give or to sell or in feodo simplici or to him or his Assignes for ever in all these cases a Fee simple doth passe by the intent of the Devisor but if the devise be to a man and his Assignes without saying for ever the devisee hath but an estate for life if I devise Land to one sanguini suo it is a Fee simple but if it be semini suo it is an estate tayle ibidem Exception Coke l. 1. f. 85. 86. in Cârbets case It was ruled by all the Justices that such an estate which cannot by the rules of the common Law be conveyed by act executed in his life by advice of counsell learned in the Law such an estate cannot be devised by the will of man who is intended in Law to be in ops consilij as if I devise Lands to one by will in perpetuum he hath a fee for such an estate may be conveyed by estate executed but if I devise further that if the Devisee doth such an act that then another shall have his Lands to him and his Heires that is void because such limitation if it was by act executed is void for as Dyer f. 33. pl. 12. A man cannot devise an estate in fee to one and if he doe not such an act his estate shall cease and another have it for when he hath disposed the estate in fee he hath not power in the same will to devise it to another and f. 4. pl. 7. when the intent of man who maketh a testament doth not agree with the Law the intent shall be taken void as if a man devise his Land to H. in fee and that if he dye without heir that M. shall have the Land this devise is void because one Fee-simple cannot depend upon another in law the same law is if the devise be to the Abbot of Saint Peter de W. where the foundation is to the Abbot of St. Paul
Coke com f. 25. a. A devise cannot direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rules of the Common Law as if a man devise Lands to one and the heires males of his body and hath issue a Daughter who hath issue a Son the Son shall not inherit as heire male because he must convey the descent from the heires males for though a devise may create an inheritance by other words then a gift can yet can it not direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rule of Law and no intent of the devisor appeareth that the Son of the Daughter should against the rule of the Law inherit vide Ployd f. 414. b. So if a gift be made to a man and the heirs females of his hody and hath issue a Son who hath issue a Daughter this Daughter shall never inherit vide ibidem plura Prâximus sum egomet mihi Ployd f. 545 a. It is the naturall order to karve himselfe before he karve another and charity beginneth at home And therefore in legacies it is reason that the Executors shall have preferment of satisfaction before others and the Law maketh allowance to them before any others because as Lit. faith they represent the person of the Testator and Coke com f. 209. b. The Executors doe more represent the person of the Testator then the heire doth to the Ancestor for though the Executor be not named in Mortgage yet the Law appointeth him to receive the mony but so doth not the Law appoint the heire to receive the mony unlesse he be named and therefore if the Obligee maketh the Obligor his Executor it is a release in Law and if the Obligor make the Obligee his Executor the Action is gone for they are as it were the same person in law whence the law maketh allowance to them before any other For if a man devise to A. 20 l. and to B. 20 l. and to C. 20 l. and maketh his executor and dieth having goods only to the value of 20 l. now it is in the election of the executor to which of those three he will pay the 20 l. and if he pay it to one the other cannot contradict it neither hath he any remedy for his legacy so by the same reason if one of the three be made executor to the testator the law saith he may and will retaine the 20 l. in satisfaction of his legacy and the law alloweth of it for it is reason that he be next to himselfe and have regard to himselfe before another And this is the reason of the case in 12. H. 4. f. 21. where in debt upon an obligation against the heir he pleaded that the Plaintiff was executor to Lancestor which deed he put before them and administred certaine goods and Chattels to the value of the debt and more and retained the same summe with him in the name of payment and demanded judgement if Action And Hull said that if he did not retaine the same to himselfe and might have retained it and did not he shall be barred for a man is bound to be next to himself and this was the opinion of some of them for which he pleaded there that he adminstred no goods after the death of the Testator vide ibidem plura in Paramers case And for the same reason doth the law in all reciprocall acts respect mutuall recompence and consideration for if there be no consideration why should they be made Doct. and St. and it is supposed there was error in such Acts because there is no consideration of profit for every one is next unto himselfe ad suum lucrum satis sapit is sufficiently wise to project his owne emolument And therefore have considerations a great effect in lawes and customes for consideration is the beginning of all customes the grounds of all uses the reason of all rights and the causes of all duties For without consideration nothing is wrought by any conveyance no interest transferred no right removed nor duty accrued and no custome hath continuance As if the Lord of the Manner prescribe that every one who passeth the highway which lyeth in his Mannor shall pay 12. d. to him for his passage this is void and not upon good consideration but if he prescribe to have a penny of every one that passeth such a Bridge which the Lord of the Mannor doth use to repaire this is a good prescription Calthrope Copy-holds f. 35. and 36. And therefore is consideration described by Dier f 336. to be the cause or occasion of a meritorious recompence either in deed or law for all contracts and bargaines have quid pro quo contractus est quasi actus contra actum and must have quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. And so it is in exchanges annuities pro consilio impendendo or service rents services and tenures for dâmeanes of Lands as Frank-almoigne Homage-auncestrell for warranty and acquittall commons for cause of vicinage or service Devise of a woman causa matrimonij praelocuti so the manner of a gift to doe such a thing or to make such a thing Considerations are either executory or executed and in considerations executory the recompence failing the Feoffment or grant ceaseth as a feoffment to instruct the feoffor in one mistery or Art if the Feoffor dieth before instruction the heir shall re-enter 21. E. 3. Grant of an Office and for the executing it a fee if the office be determined the fee is determined M. 5. E. 4. 7. and 20. E. 4. If a woman give land causa matrimonii prelocuti and he will not marry her she shall have a writ to recover the land Ployd f. 58. a. If a man make a lease for yeares rendring rent the lessee needeth not pay any rent if the Lessor had nothing in the land at the time of the lease because he had not quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. If I grant an annuity pro consilio impendendo if he wil not give me councell I must stay my annuity Ployd 144. b. An usuall and accustomed attendance of a corodian upon the Soveraigne of a monastery upon festivall daies determineth the corodie it being a reward for attendance Exchanges not executed by each party at the first is defeasible 9. H. 4. A portion of rithes granted by indenture for ever without cavillation or contradiction and an annuity granted for the aforesaid portion So to have a way for my life and I grant an annuity of 20 s. without limitation the annuity shall endure but during my life Dier 336. 337. Where no consideration is expressed there the consideration may be averred Dier 146. Vellies case A rehersall of a consideration past whether it be true or false shall not dissolve the gift as because he served me in the Wars beyond the Seas although it be false it is not materiall Bracton in modis donationum and so in the case of the King Dier f. 337. If A. enfeoff B.
so long as he hath no understanding Lastly he that by his own vicious act for a time depriveth himselfe of his memory and understanding as he is that is drunk Coke com 147. a. Coke l. 4. 124. b. And for the three first sorts of mad men the Law is that they shall not lose their lives for felony or murder because they want reason and understand not what they doe neither can the punishment of a mad man who is deprived of reason and understanding be an example to others And therefore as Ployd f. 19. a. If a man of non sanae memoriae kill another although he hath broken the words of the Law yet he hath not broken the Law because he had not any memory nor understanding but meere ignorance which cometh unto him by the hand of God and therefore it is called unvoluntary ignorance to which the Law imputeth the act done because no default iâ in him and therefore he shall be excused in that he is ignorant by compulsion and such an act is called and termed ex ignorantia to wit in that involuntary ignorance is the cause and God provided a speciall remedy that he who doth such a thing by such ignorance shall not be punished for it as Deut. 19. if a laborer be at labor with an hatchet and the head of the hatchet flyeth off and killeth another that such a laborer shall not be put to death because he did it by un-voluntary ignorance but if a man breake the Law by un-voluntary ignorance there he shall not be excused As if at man be drunk and kill another this is Felony and he shall be hanged for it and yet he did this by ignorance for when he was drunk he had neither memory nor understanding but because that ignorance came unto him by his own act and folly and he might resist this ignorance he shall not be priviledged by it because he is voluntarius daemon Coke com f. 247. and as Aristotle saith is worthy of double punishment because he hath dâubly offended to wit in being drunke to the ill example of others and also in doing of the act and this act is called and said to be done ignoranter to wit that he is the cause of his owne ignorance and so there is a diversity of a thing done ex ignorantia ignoranter Ployd ibidem And Coke com f. 247. a. Omne crimen ebrietatis incendit detegit and what hurt or ill soever he doth in his drunkennesse doth aggravate it and that as well in case touching his life his Lands his Goods or any other thing concerneth him Coke l. 4. f. 125. Also for the same reason non compos mentis cannot commit petit treason as if a wife non compos mentis slay her husband as appeareth 12. H. 3. Tit. forfeiture 33. But in some cases non compos mentis may commit high Treason as if he slay or offer to slay the King this is high Treason for the King is caput Reipub the head and safety of the Common-wealth and from the head good health is conveyed to all and for this cause their persons are so sacred that none ought to offer them violence but he shall be reus laesae majestatis guilty of high Treason Coke l. 4. f. 124. b. And likewise for the same reason many are the priviledges which the Law giveth to one who is not compos mentis and his heires as if an idiot or non compos mentis maketh a Feoffment in person and dyeth his heire within age he shall not be in ward and if he dyeth without heire the Land shall not eschcate but if he make a Feoffment by Letter of Attorny although the Feoffor can never avoid it yet as to others in judgment of Law the State was void and therefore in such case if the heir be within age he shall be in ward and if he dyeth without heires the Land shall escheate and that is the true reason of the bookes in 7. H. 4. 5. and 7. H. 4. 12. And so is there a great diversity between an estate made by the person of a mad man and by his Attorny Coke l. 4. 125. Also an idiot in an action brought against him shall appeare in proper person and he that can plead best for him shall be admitted 33. H. 6. 18. otherwise it is of him who becometh non compos mentis for he shall appeare by his guardian if he be within age and by an Attorny if be be of full age Coke ibidem f. 124. b. So if a man of non sanae memoria âath cause to enter into tenements and a descent is had in his life during the time he was of non sana memoriae and then dyeth his heire may enter upon him is in by descent Littleton and though Littleton there saith that the Ancestor who had the same title could not enter during his life yet in case of a bar of his right he may As if a man of non compos mentis be disseised and the disseisor levieth a fine in this case at the common Law though the yeare and the day be passed yet he that was non compos mentis shall not be bound by it but that he might well enter Coke l. 4. f. 125. vide ibidem plura But if an Idiot or a non compos mentis by accident or qui lucidis gaudet intervallis maketh a Feoffment in fee he shall in pleading never avoid it by saying that he was an Idiot c. at the time of the Feoffment because it is a maxime in the common Law that no man of full age shall be received in any Plea by the Law to disable himselfe contrary to the opinion of some that he may avoid his own act by Entry or Plea and others that he may avoid it by Writ and not by Plea and others as Fitzherbert in his Writ of dum fuit non compos mentis that he may avoid either by Plea or by Writ but Littleton here is of opinion that neither by Plea Writ or otherwise he himselfe shall avoid it and herewith the greatest authorities of ouâ Books doe agree and so was it resolved in Beverlyes case Coke l. 4. Though this Maxime holdeth not in criminall causes as before hath been said Coke com f. 247. Yet doth not the Law leave one who is non compos mentis destitute of remedy in this case but that upon an office found for the King the King shall avoid the Feoffment of him who is of non compos mentis for the benefit of him whose custody the Law giveth to the King and all that he hath for the King is bound by the Lawes to defend his Subjects and their Goods and Chattells Lands and Tenements as Fitzherbert saith N. B. 232. and therefore the King of right ought to have and to order him his Lands and Goods and this was by the common Law as appeareth by Britton f. 16. who writ in the fifth yeare of
flyeth to the wall or to some other unpassable place to save his life and upon the pursuit of the other he killeth him this is man-slaughter in his own defence 3. E. 3.284 From morall Philosophy NExt in order succeeedeth morall Philosophy the exact knowledge of which as Picolonomy Inductio ad libros Civil Philos cap. 6. cannot be comprehended without the precognition of the naturall and therefore hath the precedency for the morall faculty doth instruct men to avoid vices and to cure the maladies of the mind which cannot be compleatly accomplished without the naturall contemplation of the affections of the soul it is called Ethica by the Phylosopher or institutions of manners by which the oblique manners of men are rectified and their Enormities regulated and certainly from such exorbitances of manners originally proceeded the institutions of Lawes and from whence as Doderidge all Laws are in generalty derived for in the primary age which may rather be named the Iron then the golden age when men lived like beasts Dod. English Lawyer f. 250. the one praying on the other according to the censure of the Philosophicall Poet. Quod praedae obtulerat fortuna cuique ferebat Sponte sibi quisque valere vivere doctus What fortune offered for a pray each one Layd claime to it learned to live alone And serve himselfe Then were Laws first excogitated to suppresse the barbarous Savageness of such humane beasts and to reduce them to a more civill association as the Venusine Poet rightly Jura inventa metu injusti fateare necesse est Tempora si fastosque velis evolvere mundi If we revolve the Annalls of mans time From the worlds birth we must confesse and find That Laws were founded for feare of the unjust Seeing then Laws were introduced from the depraved judgements and corrupt manners of men who will not acknowledge that the science by which they are formed and the principles deduced from it are requisite and materiall to the fundamentall knowledge of the Law From which Fountaine our Law doth draw these grounds and maximes Illud possumus quod jure possumus Reg. I.C. We can doe that which by right we can doe for as Boetius potentia non est nisi ad bonum ability and power is not but to good for the power to have liberty to doe wrong is not by such liberty augmented but diminished potentia injuriae est impotentia naturae the power to doe injury is the impotency of nature as to decay and dye is no power but in respect of the privation and diminution in the thing is rather impotency as the Angells and Saints confirmed in glory and cannot sin are more powerfull then man who through his impotency can sin So a King ruling royally and with whom whatsoever shall please him hath the power of a Law and may doe what evill he lift is more impotent then he that doth all according to the rule and square of Law and therefore doth the Law give this rule Illud Rex solum potest quod de jure potest Coke l. 3. 99. f. 123. l. 1. 11. f. 7. Solum Rex hoc non potest quod non potest injuste agere The King onely can doe that which by right he can doe and the King can onely not doe this that he cannot doe any thing unjustly as 4. E. 4. 15. the King can be no disseisor he can be no wrong doer so if the King granterh and releaseth the services to the tenant and his heires that shall not extinct the tenure in all for necessity of the tenure and the King cannot by his charter alter the Law and therefore it shall be expounded as neere to the intention of the King as may be and that is to extinguish all the services but it onely which is incident inseperably to every tenure and that is fealty for it the King cannot doe by Law Coke l. 9. f. 123. a. And Coke l. 11. f. 72. a. The King shall not be exempt by construction of Law out of the generall words of Acts made to suppresse wrong because he is the Fountaine of Justice and common right and the King being Gods Lievtenant cannot doe wrong and with it accordeth 13. E. 4. 8. in the case of Alton woods l. 1. f. 41. So Lands were given to Henry the seventh and the heires males of his body and the question was whether the King in regard that he was not expresly restrained by the Act of 13. E. 3. de donis conditionalibus post prolem masculam sussitatum might alien or no and it was adjudged he could not alien but was restrained by the said Act for it were an hard argument to grant that the Statute which restraineth men to doe wrong and evill shall permit liberty to the King to doe it Ployd f. 246. Signior Barklys case Coke ibidem vide plura Potestas regis juris est non in juriae cum sit author juris non debet inde injuriarum masci occasio unde jura mascuntur Bract. l. 2. The Kings power is of right and not injury and as he is the author of right there ought not from thence to arise occasion of injury from whence rights proceed As if one who intendeth to sell his Land and by fraude conveyed it by deed enrolled to the King to the intent to deceive the purchaser and then he selleth the Land to another for a valuable consideration maketh conveyance accordingly in this case the purchaser shal enjoy the land against the Queen by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queen be not excepted yet the act being general made in suppressing of fraud shall bind the Queen So if tenant in tail be seised of Land the remainder over in tail or in fee and he in the remainder knowing that tenant in tail will alien the Land and by recovery bar his remainder to the intent to deprive the tenant in tail of his birth-right and power that the Law hath given him to bar the remainder and of intent and purpose to deceive the purchaser granteth his reversion to the Queen by deed enrolled and then tenant in tail for a valuable consideration alieneth the Land by common recovery and dyeth without issue the purchaser shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. the words of which are that every conveyance c. made c. to the intent and of purpose to deceive a purchaser t. shal be deemed onely against such purchaser c. to be utterly void vide ibidem plura in Magdalen Colledges case l. 2. in Cholmlys case f. 51.52 And the King hath a prerogative above all his Subjects that where by fraude or salse suggestion he is deceived that he in that case shall avoid his owne grant jure regio 22. E. 3. 47. in the Earle of Kents case Stanf. pr. regis 84. a. As the King can neither doe himselfe injury nor others And
therefore the Law favoureth right and construeth all things according to right from whence proceedeth the ground Constructio juris non facit injuriam Coke com f. 183. a b. The construction of right or Law doth no injury As though it be a maxime in the Law that every mans grant shall by construction of Law be taken most strongly against himselfe yet is it so to be understood that no wrong be thereby done for it is another maxime in the Law that the construction of the Law doth no injury and therefore if tenant for life maketh a lease generally this shall be taken by construction of Law an estate for his own life that made the Lease for if it should be taken for the life of the Lessee it should be a wrong to him in the reversion and so it is if tenant in tail maketh a Lease generally the Law shall contrive this to be such a Lease as may be lawfully made and that is for terme of his own life for if it should be the life of the Lessee it should be a discontinuance and consequently the State which should passe by construction of Law should work a wrong Ibidem When two are in one house or tenement and one layeth claime by one title and another by another the Law shall adjudge him in possession that right hath to have the house or tenement Littleton Coke com f. 206. a. b. It is a generall rule that whensoever the words of a deed or of the parties without deed shall have a double intendement and the one standeth with Law and Right and the other is wrongfull and against Law the intendment which standeth with Law and Right shall be taken As if tenant in Fee-simple maketh a Lease of Lands to B. to have and to hold for terme of life without mentioning for whose life it shall be deemed for the life of the Lessee for it shall be taken more strongly against the Lessor for an estate of a mans owne life is higher then for the life of another but if tenant in tail maketh such a lease without expressing for whose life this shall be taken for the life of the Lessor for the reason abovesaid and also because the Law which abhorreth injury and wrong shall never so conster it as it shall work a wrong and in this case if it should be for the life of the Lessee the estate should be discontinued and a new reversion gained by wrong ibidem Where tenant in tail maketh a Lease to another for terme of life generally and after releaseth to the Lessee and his heires albeit between tenant in tail and him a Fee-simple passed It hath been adjudged that after the death of the Lessee the entry of the issue in tail was lawfull which could not be if it had been a Lease for the life of the Lessee for then by the release it had been a discontinuance executed Coke com f. 42. b. The Law more respecteth a lesser estate by right then a larger estate by wrong as if tenant for life in remainder disseâse tenant for life now he hath a Fee-simple but if tenant for life dyeth now is his wrongfull estate in fee by judgement in Law changed into a rightfull estate for life Coke com f. 41. c. If a man retaine a servant generally without expressing any time the Law consters it to be for one yeare according to the Statute 23. E. 3. C. 1. And for the same reason what is contrary to right and good manners is void in Law according to the rule of the Civilians Contra jus bonos more 's conventiones hominum non valent which accordeth with the ground of the common Law quod contra legem fit proinfecto habetur whatsoever is done contrary to to Law or right is accounted not done Coke l. 3. f. 74. quod vide As if a man maketh a Feoffment in fee upon condition he shall not alien this condition is repugnant and against Law and the state of the feoffee absolute Coke com f. 206. b. A Feoffment to A.B. his Heires and assignes with proviso that he shall not alien to no person is void but that he shall not alien to I.S. is good for upon the matter he hath given the Land to him and his Assignes except to I. S. Ployd f. 77. a. So if a man maketh a Feoffment in fee upon condition that the feoffee shall not take the profits this condition is repugnant and contrary to Law and the State is absolute Ibid. If a man be bound with a condition to enfeoff his wife the condition is void and against Law Ibidem A man giveth Land to two sisters and the heirs of their bodies under this forme that she which lived longest should hold the Land wholly which is void because it is contrary to Law for if the joynture be severed by fine the survivor shall not have the other part 8. Ass Pl. 33. Coke l. 1. in Corbets case So if a man maketh a Lease upon condition that if the Lessor granteth the reversion he shall have fee if the Lessor granteth the reversion by fine he shall not have fee because it is repugnant to Law 6. A. 2. Pl. 28. Pletingtons case The Testator maketh a Lease of his house and certain implements in it for years rendring Rent to him and to his Heirs and Assignes The Executors received the Rent continually after the death of the Testator The question was whether it was Assets or no and by the Judges adjudged no assets because the whole rent appertained to the heire Dier 360 b. An obligation taken by the Sheriff colore officij of any one in their custody by course of Law with a condition then for the appearance at the day mentioned in the processe is void because it is against the Statute of 23. H. 6. Coke l. 10. in Beawsages case vide ibidem plura And it is commonly holden that if the condition of a bond be against Law the bond it selfe is void Coke com 206. b. But herein the Law distinguisheth between a condition against Law for the doing of any act is malum in se and a condition against Law because it is either repugnant to the State or against some maxime or rule in Law and that common opinion is to be understood of conditions against Law for the doing of some act is malum in se As if a man be bound upon condition to kill I. S. the bond is void for an unlawfull condition is not of effect to gaine any thing by doing of it in our Law Ployd f. 34. b. But otherwise it is in a Feoffment upon condition for a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall kill I. S. the Feoffment is good and absolute and the condition void Ployd Brownings case 135. And though all Feoffments upon conditions repugnant to Law are void in bonds it is otherwise for a bond upon such conditions is good As if a Feoffee be bound in a bond that the Feoffee
and his Heires shall not alien the bond is good yet he may notwithstanding alien if he will forfeit his bond that he himselfe hath made So a bond with condition that the Feoffee shall not take the profits is good so a bond upon condition to enfeoff his wife is good though it be against a maxime in Law Coke com f. 206. And if the husband be bound to pay his wife mony the bond is good Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sertitur effectuum Reg. I. C. Coke l. 4. 31. a. The let or impediment availeth not which taketh not his effect from the Law as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor dyeth seised or if the Land be recovered from him by verdict or erronious judgement in these cases untill the Land is recovered or the judgment annihilated by the Law the land is not demisable and yet after the land be re-continued it is grantable againe by copy but if copy-hold lands be forfeited to the Lord or escheate and before any new grant made those lands be extended upon a Statute or Recognisance acknowledged by the Lord or if the wife of the Lord in a writ of dower hath that land assigned to her though those impediments be acts in law yet for that that those interruptions are legall the lands shall never after be granted by copy ibidem The words of an Act of Parliament must be taken in a lawfull and rightfull sense as where by the Statute of Gloucester it is forbidden that the husband shal not alien the lands he hath in right of his wife whereof no fine is levied in the Kings court those words are to be understood where no fine is lawfully levied in the Kings Court and therefore a fine levied by the husband alone is not within the meaning of that Statute for that fine should worke a wrong to the wife but a fine levied by the husband and wife is intended by the Statute and that is lawfull and worketh no wrong for generally the rule is non praestat impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum so the Statute of W. 2. c. 5. Ita quod episcopus ecclesiam conferat is construed ita quod episcopus ecclesiam legitime conferat Coke com f. 361. b. Nullam iniquam in jure praesumendum Coke l. 4. f. 71. No injurious thing is to be presumed in the law for the law so abhorreth injury that it granteth writs of anticipation to prevent them quia timet because a man feareth them and that before any molestation distresse or impleading and there are six sorts of such writs first a man may have his writ of Mesne before he be distrained 2. a Warrantia Cartae before he be impleaded 3. a Monstraverunt before any distresse or vexation 4. an Audita quereta before any execution sued 5. a Curia claudenda before any default of inclosure and is a ne Injuste vexes before any distresse or molestation Coke com f. 100. a. And such an Antipathy there is between the Law and injury that no injury is to be presumed in the law and as Coke l. 10 f. 56. a. Odiosa in honesta non sunt in lege praesumenda in facto quod se habet ad bonum ad malum magis de bono quam de malo praesumendum est odious and dishonest things are not presumed to be in the law and in a deed or action which hath in it both good and evil it ought to be more presumed of the good then of the evill as there in the case of the Chancellor of Oxford it was resolved that covin and fraud shall never be intended or presumed in the law unlesse it be expresly averred and in the case of Tier and Meriell Trin. 10. Jacob. That if no fraude be found by the Jurors the Judges shall not adjudge a Feoffment fraudulent and that though the Jurors have found circumstances and presumptions to intitle the Jurors to find fraude it is but evidence to the Jury and not any matter upon which the Court may adjudge fraude and the office of the Jurors is to adjudge upon the evidence concerning matter of fact and upon it to give their verdict and not to leave matter of evidence to the Court to judge which doth not appeare to them as if A. bring an action of the case against B. upon trover and conversion of Plate and Jewells and the Defendant pleadeth not guilty now it is good evidence to prove the conversion that the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to deliver them and he refused it and by it it shall be presumed that he hath converted them to his use yet notwithstanding that is but evidence and if it be found by a speciall verdict that the Plaintiff requested them of the Defendant and he refused it that is not matter upon which the Court can adjudge any conversion for the conversion ought to alter the action of detinue into a trespasse upon the case which a denier cannot in law make for in every action of Detinue there is alledged in the count a request and a refusall yet it is good evidence and hath allwayes been allowed to prove a conversion that the Plaintiff demanded the goods and the Defendant refused to deliver them Coke l. 10. In the case of the Chancellor of Oxford vide ibidem plura Nomen non sufficit si res non sit de jure aut de facto the name of a thing is not sufficient if the matter and substance be not of right or deed Coke l. 4. f. 107. b. Pope Vrbane at the request of Ralph Baron of Greystack founded a Colledge of a Master and six Preists resident at Greystock and assigned to every one of his Preists five markes by the year besides his Bed and Chamber and the Master forty pounds by the yeare and this certified in the Book of first fruits and tenths Rectoriam Collegium of Greystock and the said Colledge was in being five years before the Act of 1. E. 6. And it was resolved by all the Judges that such a reputative Colledge was not given to the King by the Act of 1. E. 6. because it had no lawfull beginning nor the countenance of a lawfull beginning for the Pope cannot found or incorporate a Colledge within this Realme nor to assigne or license others to assigne temporall livings to it for it ought to be done by the King and no other for the name doth suffice if the matter be not of right or deed Dier 81. Quando duo jura in una persona concurrunt aequum est ac si essent in diversis Reg. I. C. Ployd f. 368. a. when two rights concur meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons As if one hath an estate for the life of A. the remainder to him for the life of B. the remainder to him for the life of C. and he is disseised and the disseisor levieth
a fine with proclamations now by the present right he hath five years by the first favant and if after these five years A. doth dye he shall have other five years for the next remainder by the second savant which giveth them as to other persons which have a future right and if after those five yeares B. doth dye he shall have other five years by the other remainder for saith he it is the text of the civil Law when two rights meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons Ployd ibidem vide ibidem plura in the Lord Zouches case Exception Coke l. 7. Calvins case f. 14. b. This rule holdeth not in personall things that is when two persons are necessarily and inevitably required by Law as in the ease of an alien borne there is for in the case of an alien borne you must of necessity have two severall legiaries to two severall persons and no man will say that now the King of England may make a League with the King of Scotland and that because in the Kings person there concur two distinct Kingdomes it is all one as if they were in severall persons vide ibidem f. 2. Coke l. 4. f. 118. a. Though a Bishop when he is translated to an Arch-Bishoprick or a Baron be created an Earle now he hath both those dignities and as it is commonly sayd when two rights concurr in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons yet the Act of 21 H. 8. was alwayes construed strictly against Non-residence and Pluralities as a thing much prejudiciall to the service of God and the instruction of his people and therefore within that Act an Arch-Bishop shall have no more Chaplaines then as an Arch-bishop or an Earle then as an Earle for though they have diverse dignities yet is it but one and the same person to whom the attendance and service shall be made and if a Baron be made Knight of the Garter or Warden of the Cinque Ports he shall have but three Chaplaines in all Et sic de similibus quia difficile est ut unus homo vicem duorum sustineat because it is an hard thing for one man to undergoe or sustaine the Place and Office of two persons Coke l. 4. In the case of the death of one within the Verge the Coroner of the houshold of the King and the Coroner of the County shall joyne in the Inquiry and if one be Coroner of both he shall well execute this authority Quilibet potest renunciare juri pro se introducto Coke Comment f. 99. a. Every man may renounce or refuse a Law made or brought in for himselfe as a man seised of lands may at this day give the same to a Parson Bishop c. and their successors in frank-almoigne by the consent of the King and the Lords mediate and immediate of whom the Land is holden for every one may renounce a Law brought in for himselfe and f. 223. b. The Statute of 32. H. 8. giveth power to tenant in tail to make a lease for three lives or twenty one years yet if a man make a gift in tail upon condition that he shall not make a lease for three lives or twenty one years the condition is good for the Statute doth give him power to make such leases which may be restrained by condition and by his own agreement for this power is not incident to the estate but given to him collaterally by the act according to that rule in Law Quilibet potest c. Coke l. 10. f. 101. a. In the Act of 23. H. 6. c. 10. the words upon reasonable sureties of sufficient persons are added for the security of the Sheriff and therefore if he will take but one surety be it at his perill for he shall be amerced if the Defendant appeareth not and for it the Statute doth not make the obligation void in such case for the said branch which prescribeth the forme requireth that the obligation shall be made to the Sheriff himselfe c. by the name of their office and that the prisoners shall appeare in which clause no mention is made of the sureties so as the intent of the Act was that for that it was at the perill of the Sheriff to leave it to his discretion to take one or more for his indemnity and peradventure it may be better for him sometimes to take one that is sufficient then two others and though the sureties or surety have not sufficient within the same County as the Statute mentioneth yet the obligation is good enough for those words of the Act as to that point are more for counsell and direction of the Sheriff then for precept and constraint to him and that for the safety of the Sheriff for if the Defendant cannot find two sufficient sureties having sufficient within the same County the Sheriff is not bound to let him to bail and this resolution agreeth with the ancient rule to wit Quilibet potest c. An Orphant in London exhibited a bill in the Court of request against another for discovery of part of his estate Phesant prayed a prohibition upon the custome of London but it was resolved that he might sue in what Court he would and wave his priviledge there 19. C. B. R. But this case extendeth not to any thing that is against the Common-wealth or common right Coke com f. 166. a. Summum jus summa injuria Ployd 160. b. The rigor of the Law is the extremity of injury if a man make a lease of a messuage so as he may make his profit of his houses there within he cannot abate the houses or make wast of them by the opinion of the book H. 17. E. 3. f. 7. for the intent was not such though that the words seem otherwise and sayd to pursue the words is Summum jus which the Judges ought not to doe but ought rather to pursue the intent And for the same reason the Executors of Tenant for life shall have reasonable time to remove his goods after his decease and a man shall have reasonable time wherein he shall purchase a Writ of Journys accompt Finch Nomot Jus descendit non terra 20 H. 6. 5. The right descended and not the land and Coke Inst f. 345. a. b. There is a right which includeth an estate in esse in Conveyances which he in reversion and remainder hath and hath jus in re and may be granted to a stranger with attornement or released to him in possession as if Tenant in fee-sample maketh a Lease for yeares and releaseth all his right in the Land to the Lessee and his heires the whole estate in Fee-simple passeth and also the release to him in possession with the reservation of a rent is good and there is another right which is called a bare meere and naked right and jus adrem when an estate is turned to a right
remotissime vana which by the intendement of the Law never cometh into act Coke l. 2. f. 5. 2. n. b. in Sir Hugh Chomleys case vide ibidem plura And hereby the way may pertinently be observed that a possibility cannot be released as if before judgement the Plaintiff in an action of debt releaseth to the baile in the Kings Bench all demands and after judgement is given this shall not bar thee to have execution against the baile because at the time of the release he had but a meere possibility and neither jus in re or jus ad rem but the duty is to commence after upon a contingent and therefore could not be released presently So if the Conusee of a Statute release to the Conusor all his right in the Land yet afterward he may sue execution for he hath no right to the Land till execution but onely aâ possibility and so have I known it adjudged Coke com f. 265. b. So if A. grant to B. that if he doe such an act he shall have an annuity of twenty pounds during his life before the Act done he cannot release the annuity Coke l. 1. in Albanys case Lex semper dabit remedium the law so favoreth right that it will suffer things against the principles of Law rather then a man to be without his remedy As a man who is outlawed may bring an action to reverse it an outlawry there is no Plea 4. H. 7. 40. The Tenant shall have a replevin against the Lord that did wrongfully distraine though the beasts be come back to himself because he can have no action of trespasse against him for that prisall and shall recover damages for the tortious prisall F. n. b. f. 69. H. A man after judgement is passed against him shall plead against the King a Charter of pardon or any such thing done in the meane betwixt the verdict and the judgement because against the King he can have no Audita querela 11. H. 7.10 otherwise it is against a common person And therefore is it a principle in Law cuicumque aliquis quid concedit concedere videtur id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest Coke l. 11. f. 52. a. Which Ploydon thus expresseth that it is held as a maxime in 2. R. 2. in trespasse that if any man hath interest to any thing by the grant and assent of another and the party who hath such interest cannot have the principall thing without doing the other thing that he may doe the said other thing and justify it because it is a meanes to come to his profit for there it is holden That if one grant to me all his Trees growing in his Woods I may cut them down and carry them through all his Land and though his Grasse be spoiled with the carriage he shall not have a Writ of trespasse of it for Trees are such things that if they be not carryed by Carts he cannot have them nor make his profit of them But if one sell all his Fish in his Pond and the Vendee dig a trench so as the water may run out that by such meanes he may take the Fish an action of trespasse will lye against the Vendee because he might take the Fish by Nets or other Engines but if there had been no other meanes to take them it had been otherwise and to come to the banks to fish he may well justify it for without it he cannot take them by any meanes so as a man shall alwayes justify the necessary circumstance where he hath title to the principall thing Ployd f. 15. 16. a. vide ibidem plura in Renigers case So when a Lessor in the Lease except the Trees and after hath an intention to sell them the Law giveth to him and to those who will buy them power as incident to the exception to enter and shew the Trees to those who will have them for without entry they cannot view and without view they cannot buy Coke l. 11. f 52. in Lisords case So 19. H. 6.29 A man seised of a mese in a Burrough c. devisable deviseth it to his wife in taile and that if his wife dye without issue that his Executor may sell it and it dispose for his soule in this case the Executor may by the Law enter into the house to see whether it be well repaired or no to the intent to know at what valew he may sell the reversion And the Law giveth power to him who will repaire a Bridge to enter in the Land and to him who hath a Conduit within the Land of another to enter into the Land for it to mend as cause shall require as it is resolved in 9. E. 4.35 Coke ibidem vide plura And Coke l. 5. f. 12. a. If a man hath Mines hidden within his Land and leaseth his Lands and all his Mines in it there the Lessor may dig for them for quando aliquis quid concedit c. and this accordeth with 9. E. 4.8 that if a man lease his Land to another in which there is a Mine to wit an hidden Mine he cannot dig for it and if he doe it is wast but if he lease his Lands and all the Mines in it it is otherwise for the reason aforesaid vide ibidem plura in Saunders case If tenant at will soweth Corne on the ground and the Lessor out him he shall have free entry egresse and regresse to carry it away for when the Law giveth any thing to any one it giveth implicitly whatsoever is necessary for the taking and enjoying of the same and the Law driveth him not to an action for the Corne but giveth him a speedy remedy to enter into the Land and to take and carry it away and compelleth not him to carry it at one time or to carry it before it be ready to be carryed and if the Lessee be disturbed of this way the Law doth give unto him he shal have his action upon the case and recover his damages for whensoever the Law giveth any thing it giveth a remedy for the same Coke com f. 56. a. If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Lord purchaseth the tenancy in fee the mesnalty is extinct but whereas the tenant held of the meane by five shillings and the mesne of the Lord by twelve pence so as he hath more in advantage by foure shillings he shall have the foure shillings as a rent-seck yearly of the Lord and yet he shall distraine for it for seeing the mesnalty is extinct the Law reserveth the distresse to the rent for quando lex aliquid concedit c. And therefore if a man maketh a Lease for life reserving a rent and bindeth himselfe in a Statute and hath the rent extended and delivered unto him he shall distraine for the rent because it cometh to him by course of Law Multa constituuntur in lege ne curia Domini Regis deficeret in Justitia
of England I have been too copious in the exemplification of this ground by so many notable cases drawn on by the variety and curiosity of them they being exorbitant from the beaten tract of the common Law from which for the better effecting and doing of right the Law deemeth it convenient and necessary to swarve and deviate and that in favorem juris et recti To add one example more if an obligation be made beyond the Seas and it beareth date at Burdeaux in France where shall it be sued answere is made that it may be alledged to be made in quodam loco vocato Burdeaux in France in Islington in the County of Middlesex and there shall it be tryed for whether there be such a place in Islington or no it is not traverseable in that case Coke com 261. b. Executio juris non habet injuriam Reg. I.C. Hobaât f. 266. The execution of the Law hath no injury As if a man bringeth an action upon a false surmise in a proper Court he cannot bring an action against him and charge him with it as a fault directly and ex diametro as if the suite it selfe was a wrongfull act for the execution of the Law hath no injury So Coke com f. 161. a. It is regularly true that a man shall not be punished for suing of Writs in the Kings Court be it of right or wrong ibidem And therefore 11. Eliz. a man brought a Writ of forger of false deeds the Defendant though he be found guilty could not have a scandalum magnatum and lay the charge contained in the action to be the scandall for no punishment was ever appointed for a suite in Law although it be false and upon vexation vide Dyer f. 285. Pl. 37. And so we rule it every day that if a man be imprisoned upon a formall suit though there were no just cause of suite yet if he give a bond for his release he shall not avoid it by duresse because it is incarceratio legitima Hob. 1. l. And though every thing by nature is good and as Saint Paul saith The Law is good if a man use it lawfully yet the abuse of the Law is the fact and therefore on the contrary part if you charge me with a crime in a Court that is no way capeable of the cause I shall have an action for it and lay that very complaint to be the slander as Coke l. 4. f. 14. b. Wood exhibited a bill in the Star-Chamber against Barkeley and inter alia charged him that he was a maintainer of Pirates and Murderers c. B. brought an action of the case against W. and counted that the said W. had exhibited a bill in the Star-Chamber containing inter alia that the said B. was a maintainer of murderers and pyrates c. and it was resolved that for any thing contained in the bill which was examinable in the said Court no action lyeth although the matter was meerly false because it was in course of Justice but for the said words not examinable in the said Court an action upon the case lyeth for that could not be in course of Justice vide ibidem plura And if a man sue me in a proper Court yet if his suite be utterly without ground of truth and that certainely known to himselfe and thus as the Civilians it be done animo injuriandi I may have an action upon the case against him for the undue vexation and damage that he putteth me unto by his ill practise though the suite it selfe be legall but I cannot complaine of it as it is a suite and therefore the sixteenth of E. 3. Fitz. deceipt 35. A Conusee of a Statute sued execution against his deed of defeasance whereupon the Conusor had an action of deceipt against him and his Assignee in the nature of an Audita querela yet though he was imprisoned upon the Statute could he not bring an action of false imprisonment if he had paid the mony before the day limited by the defeasance because he was imprisoned by course of Law 43 E. 3.33 And if a man sue me and hanging that suite commenceth another against me to this I have a Plea in abatement which proveth this latter suite unjust and vexatious but if he discontinue the former he may bring a new action 43. E. 3. for as Coke com f. 130. a. It may be he hath mistaken some thing in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaking the day or the like Likewise I hold I may have an action of the case against him who sueth me against his release or after mony duly paid yea though it be upon a single obligation Hob. ibidem But in these cases these two cautions are to be observed that the new action be not brought before the other be determined because till then it cannot appeare that the other was unjust 2. R. 1. And for this reason a Writ of conspiracy lyeth not untill the Plaintiff is acquitted The other is that besides the thing done amisse there must also be a damage either already suffered or else inevitable and therefore 19. H. 6.44 If a man forge a bond in my name I can have no action of the case yet but if I be sued I may for the wrong or damage though I may avoid it by Plea but if it were upon a recognizance or fine I shall have a deceit presently before execution for Quae incontinente aut certo fiunt in esse videntur and 43. E. 3. 10. deceit against one who procured a Formedon by collusion vide ibidem plura in Waterers case And this rule faileth in a Writ of Replevin against the Lord as if the Lord distraine for rent and the tenant bringeth a Replevin whereby the Lord is disturbed of the meanes to come to his rent this is in Law a disseisin Coke com f. 161. a. Nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria Coke com f. 147. b. No man shall take advantage of his own wrong as if B maketh a lease of one Acre for life to A. and A. seised of another Acre in fee granteth a rent-charge to B. out of both Acres and doth wast in the Acre which he holdeth for life B. recovereth in wast the whole rent is not extinct but shall be apportioned and yet B. claimeth one Acre under A. and so it is if A. had made a Feoffment to B. in fee and B. had entered for the forfeiture the rent is not wholly extinct but must be apportioned and the reason hereof is for that is a maxime of Law that no man shall take advantage of his own wrong And therefore seing the wast and the forfeiture were committed by the act and wrong of the Lessee he shall not take advantage thereof to extinguish the whole rent and the whole rent cannot issue onely out of the other Acre because the Lessor hath one Acre under the estate of the Lessee and therefore
Which giveth a Writ of Formedon in the remainder against the pernors of the profits was made for oppression of covin for the Feoffment made to persons unknown to defraud them who had right to the Land was a great covin and deceite in Law and therefore a Scire facias to execute a remainder shall be maintainable against pernors of the profits Ployd f. 59 b. in Wimbishes case So in Twins case l. 3. f. 82. It was resolved by the whole Court that Statutes made against fraud shall be liberally and favorally expounded to suppresse fraud because fraud and deceite abound more in these days then in former times where you may finde in Pennyfoots case and diverse other cases to that effect and purpose Quod alias bonum justum est si per vim vel fraudèm petatur malum injustum est Coke l. 3. s 78. a. what otherwise is good and just if it be acquired by force or fraud is evill and unjust and as Ploydon saith Covin may alter the marter though the title be good and covin to have recovery may be as well where the title is good as where it is faint and bad And therefore the Book is M. 15. E. 4.4 If a feme have cause of dower and is of Covin that the tenant shall be ousted by A. against whom shee recovereth and hath execution that her estate shall be adjudged against the Disseissee by disseisin and shall not hold it but shall be a Disseiseresse and yet the title of recovery is good and true but the Covin is the cause of it Ployd f. 59. Coke l. 3. f. 78. a. So if issue in tail who hath good cause to have a Formedon in the Descender upon discontinuance be of Covin that A. shall disseise B. against whom he doth recover he shall not be remitted although his title is good but shall be adjudged a Disseisor by reason of the Covin M. 10. H. 8. And in 19. H. 8. Where one disseised tenant in taile by Covin to the intent to enfeoff the issue in taile within age who had no cognisance of the Covin and he enfeoff him he shall not be remitted by the better opinion notwithstanding his good title and the covenous intent is the cause onely Ployd f. 51. 54. And so is it there holden by six Justices Coke l. 3. f. 78. in Fermors case And the reason there given is because he that is in by him that made the Covin shall be in the same plight as he that made the Covin and yet infants are much favored in Law It was found by office that one F. that had good cause of action of ad terminum qui praeterijâ against an infant in by descent caused one H. to disseise the Heire by Covin against whom he recovered by his Writ of Entry ad terminum qui praeterjit whereupon this Office found the King of whom the land was holden had restitution to the Land during the nonage of the heires notwithstanding the plea and averment of F. in maintenance of his title so as though the title was good yet if covin was practised by him who had title to come to it he shall not be remitted Ployd f. 48. b. 41 Ass 28. For the common Law so abhorreth fraud and covin as all acts as well judiciall as others and those who of themselves are just and lawfull yet being mixed with fraud and deceit are in judgment of Law injurious and unlawfull Coke l. 3. f. 78. a. And so Coke l. 4. f. 113. a. in Adams case A man deviseth Tenements to superstitious uses and to good and charitable uses as to teach a Grammar Schoole yet because the good and charitable uses were mixt with superstitious uses and nothing in certaine was limitted to a good use in such case the commixture of the evill use with the good use infecteth the good use as a little poyson commixed with a great quantity of Wine or as truth mixed with covin turned the goodnesse of the one into the naughtinesse of the other And 19 H. 8. 12. If a man make a disseisin with the intent to make a Feoffment with warranty although he make the Feoffment twenty moneths after yet it is a warranty commenceth by disseisin Ployd f. 51. So if one make a gift in taile to another and the Uncle of the Donor disseise the Donce and maketh a Feoffment with warranty and the Uncle dyeth and the warranty descendeth upon the Donor and then the Donee dyeth without issue the Donor bringeth a Writ of Formedon in reverter and the Tenant pleadeth the Feoffment with the warranty the Demandant shall avoyd it because it commenced by disseisin and yet the disseisin was not immediately made to the Donor but to the Donee but by it his reversion was devested and yet warranties are much favoured in Law It is a rule in the Civill law Neminem ex suo dolo calliditate relevari that no man is releived by his fraud and deceite And it is an erudition in the common Law Fraus dolus nemini patrocinari debent Fraud and deceit ought not to be patronized in any Coke l. 3. f. 78. b. There is dolus bonus and dolos malus say the Civivilians dolos bonus is when a man doth devise any plot to entrap a theef or offendor and this cannot properly be called fraude but solertia and cunning and such a kind of cunning is practised in war-fare by which more victories are atcheived then by maine force as Tacitus plura consilio L. 1. An. quam vi geruntur But dolus malus is a subtile devise used to the deceiving another or the Law and this deceit doth not in out Law escape punishment but affordeth a double remedy against such who endamage others by deceit either a Writ of deceite or action upon the case As if I. present one to a Church being Patron and one T. disturbeth me and another in my name purchaseth a Quare impedit without my knowledge against the said T. and after causeth the Writ to be abated or I non-suite in the action I may have a Writ of deceit against him 55. E. 3. Quare impedit 37.20 H. 6.20 And an action of the case is maintainable against him who sueth an originall in the name of the Plaintiff against his will 7. H. 6.45 So if any one forge a Statute Merchant in my name and sue a Capias thereupon whereby I am arrested and had in execution a writ of deceit lyeth against him 19. H. 6.44 So if the guardian of an infant vouch one by covin who is not sufficient or pleadeth a bad plea whereas he might have pleaded a better the infant shall have a writ of deceit against him and recover the full value in damages 9. E. 4.34 A writ of deceit was brought against an Attorny for acknowledging satisfaction whereas his Master was not in truth satisfied 11. H. 6.34 In a Praecipe quod reddat if the Sheriff returne the
enfeoffed him long before the judgment in fee absque hoc that he was seised at the time of the judgement or any time after whereupon issue was taken and the Jury found the Feoffment and further sayd That it was made by covin to defraud the Plaintiff and other Creditors and it was judged for the Plaintif vide ibidem plura and fol. 166. Fraus praesumitur si insolitae clausulae apponantur Reg. J. C. and Coke l. 3. f. 81. Clausulae insuetae semper inducunt suspicionem As there in Twins case A Deed of gift was in part adjudged fraudulent because an unusuall clause was inserted in it and for that the Deed contained that the gift was made honestly truely and bona fide vide ibidem plura Dona clandestina sunt semper suspiciosa Coke l. 3. f. 81. Gifts in secret are alwayes subject to the suspition of fraud which there in Twins Case was one of the reasons alledged to prove a Deed of gift fraudulent to wit that it was made in secret And so in Burrels case l. 6. f. 72. the assignment of a Lease was taken to be fraudulent because it was delivered in a secret manner to a person of meane quality And for the same reason by livery and seisin in one County the Lands in another County will not passe Noys Max f. 3. Jus fraus nunquam cohabitant simul Coke l. 10 f. 49. a. Right and fraud never cohabit or dwell together As a Recovery cannot be sayd to be by collusion where tenant in taile is in the Recovery whether he be tenant in Deed or tenant in Law as a Vouchee For the Law hath made all the reversions and remainders as incidents to his estate subject to his pleasure and he hath right and power to bar them all ibidem And Coke l. 8 f 132 b. Covin cannot be alledged in doing of a lawfull act As in a Writ of Dower against a disseisor if the Tenant plead in abatement of the Writ entry by the disseisee the demandant shall not be received to aver the entry to be by covin to abate the writ because the entry is congeable and lawfull and mixed with no wrong as it is holden in 15. E. 4. f. 4. and if a disseisor or an abator endow a feme who hath title of dower it is good because it is a lawfull act Coke l. 5. f. 30. b. Fraus meretur fraudem Ployd f. 100. and the Poet Fraus est concessa repellere fraudâm Fraud and subtilty deserveth fraud and subtilty and it is a lawfull deceit to repell a deceit As in 19 E. 4. f. 27. In appeale of many who pleaded not guilty a Venire facias was awarded against them all and the Court perceiving that the prisoners were in opinion to sever in the challenge of the whole pannell of subtilty to stay the tryall at that time and that every prisoner would challenge as many as they might without danger to wit twenty and that every of them shall have his entire number of twenty so that one shall not be excluded of his number by the challenge of the other and that there was but a small number of men of sufficiency then in the City to be sworne so as by that subtilty the tryall should be stayed for the present The Court agreed that the first pannell and the Tales should be divided and made severall for every one of the prisoners And accordingly said to the prisoners We perceive your subtilty well enough which deserveth little favour of the Court and therefore tell us whether you will agree in your challenges for if you will not the Clarke shall sever the pannell and then they all agreed in their challenges and after the inquest was full evidence was given and there found and one subtilty prevented and repelled by another And this fraud by the Canonists is called Benus dolus of which they have this rule Frangenti fidem fides frangetur eidem To him who breaks his faith no faith is to be shewne And instance in the example of Salomon who did use such cunning betweene the two Harlots in searching out who was the true and naturall Mother of the childe Fulb. 2. l. f. 23. Vendens eandem rem duobus falsarius est Reg. I.C. Coke l. 1. f. 45. a. A man selling the same thing to two is a falfe dealer and therefore in the grant of the King it is dishonourable for him to grant the same possession to one that he or his Progenitors had granted to another for he that selleth the same thing to two persons is a deceiver Fraudis interpretatio non semper ex mente duntaxat sed ex consilio quoque desideratur Reg. I. C. Dolus circuitu non tollitur Coke l. 11. f. 74. a. nec purgatur Bacon Max. f. 3. The interpretation of fraude is not allwayes to be gathered out of the mind but also from the councell and consent and crafty dealing and deceite is not taken away nor purged by the circuity of shifting it from one to another and though covenous acts be conveyed through many hands and mediations yet the Law taketh hold of the corrupt beginning and proceeding As if I make a Feoffment of Lands held in Knights service to I. S. upon condition that within a certaine time he shall enfeoff I.D. which Feoffment of I. D. shall be to the use of the wife of the first feoffor for her joynture c. this Feoffment is within the Statute of 32. H. 8. Bacon ibidem So if one who hath an intention to sell his Land by fraud conveyeth it by deed enrolled to the Queen with an intent to deceive the purchasor and after selleth that Land to another for a valuable consideration and maketh a conveyance accordingly in this case the purchasor shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queene be not excepted yet the act being generall and made for the suppression of fraud shâll bind the Queen and whosoever maketh the Queen who is the Fountaine of Justice to be an Instrument of covin and fraud and upon it obtaineth Letters Patents such Letters Patents are void or if the Queen be indeavored to take away another mans right and to that end a man obtaineth Letters Patents they shall be repealed though such covin and fraud be not contained in the grant made to the Queen but appeareth onely by averrement dehors for fraud and deceite is not taken away or diminished by the subtility of alienations Coke ibidem in Magdalens Colledge case Non facies malum ut inde fiat bonum it is the Law of God thou shall not doe evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 5. f. 30. b. lib. 11. f 7. 4 a. What hath been said of truth and falsity may be said of good and evill and are so semblable that an apparent good is often mistaken for that which is reall Jun. s 14. Fallit enim vitium
specie virtatis umbra Vice fairely enbellished with virtues shape And shadow doth often men delude H. 7. f. 2. As Richard the third did many whose virtues as Sir Francis Bacon histerizeth it were feined and affected things to seek his ambition and not true qualities engendred in his judgement and nature But though as Matchevill saith such vertuous shews and shadowes are sufficient to please and delude the people yet the Law Divine and the Law Humane which dimaneth from the Divine is able and doth distinguish between good and evill and as the great Legist of Rome imperat honesta prohibet contraria commandeth that which is good and honest and inhibiteth that which is evill and impious and so doe the Justices and Judges of the Law for as Bodin saith Eodin M. hist f. 50. Qui in litibus versantur Judiciorum communione omnia mala norunt nec mala duntaxat siditiam bona sinc quibus illa constare percipi nullo modo possunt bonorum autem malornm finibus omnis humana prudentia continetur Those who are versed in suits of Law by the participation of Judgements know all evill things and not onely evill but also good things without which they can no way consist or be perceived but in the limits and bounds of good and evill all humane prudence doth consist and therefore by the Law as the same Legist saith are proposed and appointed praemia virtutibus supplicia vitiis rewards to virtues and punishments to vices and is so severe in the censure of vice and evill that it will not permit any one to doe evill that good may come thereof As the Law will not permit a Creditor who is not Executor to take and retaine the goods of the Testator to pay and satisfy himselfe though the payment of his debt be a good and honest thing for by that meanes if the goods of the Testator be not sufficient to satisfy all the Creditors the rest shall be barred and if the Law should give him that power it should be the cause and occasion of wrong and the Law of God saith you shall not do evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 5. f. 30 b. And therefore doth our Law terme such an one an Executor of his own wrong and so in 17. E. 3. 59. The Friers Carmelites who had then no habitation obtained of one I. M. who was seised of ten Acres of Land of the Bishop of Winchester to have those acres of Land for their habitation and because the said I. M. could not grant to them those ten acres by reason of the Statute of Mortmaine the said I. M. and the Carmelites by covin between them to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine granted the said ten Acres to the King his Heirs and Successoers by which the Signiory of the Bishop should be extinct to the intent that the King shal grant it over to the Friers Carmlites which was done accordingly and for that it was by covin contrived before to take the Bishop from his Signiory which was an evill act it was adjudged that the Charter shall be repealed and the Friers Carmelites should be constrained to render their Charter to be cancelled for though the Friers Carmelites were of the profession of religion and had no habitation before so as it seemed a work of piety and charity to provide an habitation for them yet you shall not doe evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 11. f. 74. a. Contra jus na urale est malum pro bono reddere Ployd f. 405. b. It is against the Law of nature to render evill for good As it was a Law in a City that strangers who did goe or clime up to the Walls of the City should be punished with death but it happened that strangers innocently passing by the City heard a noise that the Enemy would suddenly assault and sack the City whereupon the strangers more reddily then the Citizens got upon the Walls and defending the City now the debate whether they should dye as the Law commanded and it was answered not because it is against the Law of nature to render evill for good vide ibidem plura Beneficium nulâi obtrudiâur Pap. f. 212. The Law doth not obtrude or doe good turnes to one whether he will or no and therefore an alien borne shal not have medietatem linguae unlesse he request it So Damages ex incremento are allwayes to be assessed ex petitio ne quaerentis and so are costs ex incremento and upon a Writ of Error because in the beginning of the judgement it was said ideo ad petitionem quaerentis consideratum est and not ideo consideratum est ad petitionem quaerentis and the words were displaced the Judgement was reversed for the words misplaced will not supply this defect for if the usuall forme should not be observed all would fall into a confusion and in as much as the words are misplaced it is as if they had not been put in at all and therefore void like unto the case put in Walsinghams case in Ploydon where an averrment misplaced is as if it were none vide ibidem plura in Goods case Malum quo communius eo pejus an evill thing the more common it is the worser it is Coke l. 4. 109. b. For as the more common a good thing is the better it is so the more common an evill thing is the worser it is for contrariorum contraâia est ratio for as the true service of God which is in publick Churches is better then that which is in private Churches for the generall good that by it may accrew so all superstitious uses which are in publick Churches are worse then those which are in secret Chambers for the generall prejudice which may accrew by them vâde ibidem plura Theft in the beginning in most Nations was not punished with death but with satisfaction or some lessor punishment the Pretors of Rome did punish a theef paena quadâupli with a foure fold satisfaction and the Jewes with seven fold or if his goods would not amount to so much with all the goods in his house Pro 6. 31. The Misians did punish petit Larceners with whips but if a thing of good value be taken away they must render the nine fold or else be put to death Fulb. Pard f. 80. But when the malice of men did increase an iniquity did abound that as the Poet in facinus jurasse putes and that many turned the crime of stealing into a trade of living and did not gaine their lively-hood with their hands by working but with their fists by fighting and stealing as the Comedian facitely ventri pugnae dant ventri suo the detriment to the republick and community of the offence made it capitall so as though the offence and the punishment being compared that Law may seeme unjust yet as Metsner faith Cum nullam aliud supersurit remedium
that he had an intention to kill another person Ployd Com. f. 474. b. So if an impoisoned apple be laid in a place to poison I. S. and I. D. cometh by chance and eateth it this is murder in him that laid it because in the ministration of it he had a malitious intent of death which is still connexed to his person because he was the originall founder of his death But if a man lay venome in diverse parts of his house to kill Rats and a person cometh and eateth it and dyeth of it it is not felony in him because he was void of any malitious intent to hurt any reasonable creature but otherwise it is if he had ministred it to kill a reasonable creature and another reasonable creature had been slain by it that he intended not and he shall be punished for it because he had an evill intent vide ibidem plura in Saunders case And if a man perswade another to kill himself and he be present when he doth so he is a murderer for his evill intent Bac. Max. f. 60. If I discharge a Caliver with a murtherous intent at I.S. and the peece breaketh and striketh into my eye and killeth me I am felo de me because I had a murtherous intent and yet had no intention to hurt my selfe ibidem Res profecto stulta est nequitiae modus Coke l. 11. f. 86. b. In the case of Monopolies it is a foolish thing verily to imagin any meane in iniquity As the sole trade of any mechanicall Artifice or any other monopoly is not onely a damage and prejudice to those who exercise the same trade but also to all other Subjects for the end of all those Monopolies is the private gaine of the Patentees and though provisions and cautions be added to moderate them yet it is meer folly to think that there is any measure in mischeife or wickednesse Ibidem Excessus in requalibet jure reprobatur communi Coke l. 11. f. 44. a. Excesse in every thing is disallowed in the common Law for all vertuous actions consisteth in the meane and vicious in the excesse and extreame and the Law advanceth that is good and virtuous and suppresseth what is evill and vicious Some Courts may fine and not imprison as the Court of the Leet and some can onely amerce as the County Court Hundred Court and Court Baron and some Courts may fine imprison and amerce as the case shall require as the Courts of Record at Westminster or else where for no Court can fine and imprison but a Court of Record F. N. B. 37. b. Yet all Amercements and Fines which be in the excesse are contrary to Law as Magna charta c. 14. Excessive Amercements are against Law Nullus liber homo Amercietur nisi secundum quantitatem delicti no Free-man may be amerced but according to the quantity of his offence if Fines of the Copy-holder of a Mannor be uncertaine the Lord cannot exact expressive and unreasonable fines and the Copy-holder may deny to pay it and the reasonablenesse of the fine shal be determined by the Justices c. Quam rationabilis debet esse finis non definitur sed omnibus circumstantijs inspectis pendet ex justiciariorum discretione how reasonable the fine shal be is not defined but all the circumstances being inspected it dependeth upon the discretion of the Justices If tenant in dower hath villaines or tenant at will which are rich and they by excessive tallages and fines make them poore or exuls it is adjudged to be contrary to Law and to be wast 13. H. 3. Title Wast 135. F. N. B. 178. b. because it is ad exhaereditationem to the dis-inheritance of him in the reversion So excessive distresses are prohibited by the common Law 41. E. 3. f. 26. For the act de articulis super Chartas non capietur gravis districtio extendeth to the King onely So excessive and outragious aid is against Law as appeareth by the Statute of W. 1. cap. 35. Plus peccat author quam actor Coke l. 5. f. 99. the Author offendeth more then the actor The Statute of 5. Eliz. c. 9. hath two branches the first is against procurors of perjury and that is in matter depending in suit by Bill Writ Action or Information so as the procurement of perjury upon enditement is out of that branch the second branch is a purview against those who commit perjury by his or their depositions in any Court mentioned or being examined in perpetuam rei memoriam though that clause be generall and not restrained by any words to such particular suites by Bill Writ Action or Information as the first was yet in good construction that branch shall have reference to the first and shall be expounded by it otherwise the party who suborneth perjury and procureth him who committeth the perjury shall passe without punishment which shall be contrary to reason and the intention of the makers of the Act and some say that the author offendeth more then the actor and therefore was Flowre who was endited upon the Statute of 5. Eliz. for perjury in giving false evidence to the grand inquest upon an enditement of Riot by the Judgement of the Court was discharged of that enditement ibidem Peccatum peccato addit qui culpae quam fecit patrocinia defensionis adjungit Coke l. 5. f. 49. b. He addeth offence to offence who adjoyneth a Patronage of defence to a fault he hath committed As he who doth wrong and at the first confesseth the fault and obeyeth the commandment of the King by his Writ shall not be amerced and therefore pendenter facit praecepto legis obtemperat he doth wisely who obeyeth the precept of the Law but every one who doth wrong and being commanded by the Writ of the King quod juste sine dilatione reddat c. that he justly and without delay restore c. and he unjustly maintaineth the wrong of Record in the Court of the King and with great delay constraineth the demandant by the course of Law addeth offence to offence in his unjust Patronage of the defence of it and therefore shall be amerced Excusat aut extenuat delictum in capitalibus quod non operatur idem in civilibus Bac. Max. f. 314. In capitall causes in favorem vitae the Law doth excuse or extenuate the fact of the offendor except the malice of the will and intention appeareth but in civill Trespasses and injuries the Law doth rather consider the damage of the party wronged then the malice of him which was the wrong doer As the Law maketh a difference between killing a man upon malice fore-thought and upon present heat but if I give a man slanderous words whereby I damnify him in his fame and good name it is not materiall whether I use them upon suddaine choler and provocation or of set malice but in an action upon the case I shall render damages alike So if a man be killed
by misadventure as by an Arrow at Butts this hath a pardon of course but if a man be hurt or maimed onely an Action of Trespass lyeth though it be done against the parties will and he shall be punished in the Law as grievously as if he had done it of malice Stanf. 16.6 E. 4.7 So if a Chyrurgion authorized to practise do through negligence of his cure cause the party to dye this Chyrurgion shall not be questioned for his life yet if he do onely hurt the Wound whereby the cure is cast back and death ensueth not he is subject to an Action of the Case for it Stanf. 16. So if Baron and Feme commit Felony together the Feme in regard of the subjection of her will to her husband shal neither be principal not accessary but if they joyn in committing a Trespass upon land or otherwise the Action may be brought against them both So if an Infant wanting discretion or a mad-man kill another he shall not be impeached thereof but if they do him any corpârall hurt he shall be punished in Trespass 35 H. 6. 11. So in Felony if the principall dye or be pardoned the proceeding against the accessory faileth But in a Trespass if one commandeth his man to beat you and after the Battery the Servant dyeth yet you may have an Action of Trespass against the Master 17 H 4.19 Aestimatio praeteriti delicti post facta nunquam crescit Bac. Max f. 32. In penall Lawes and Facts the Law considereth the degree of the offence not as it standeth at this time when it is committed but for any circumstance or matter subsequent the Law doth not extend or amplifie the same As if a man be wounded and the Percussor is voluntarily let to go at liberty by the Goalor and after the party wounded dyeth yet it is no Felonious escape in the Goaler 11 H. 4.12 So if one conspire the death of one who after cometh to be King not being within the Statute of 25 E. 3. this is high not high Treason but otherwise it is in civill and common cases vide ibidem Plur. Ipsae etenim leges cupiunt ut jure regantur Co. l. 2. f. 25. In omnibus quidem maxime tamen in jure aequitas est Reg. I. C. In all things but especially in the Law there is equity and the Lawes themselves desire to be ruled by equity For inasmuch as no Legislators can foresee all things which may happen it was therfore convenient as Ploydon saith that that fault should be reformed by equity And is either an amplification or diminution of the Law and no part of the Law but a morall vertue which reformeth the Law for dirigens and directum are diverse things and equity is not a Law but the emendation of the Law and therefore the Lawes themselves desire to be ruled by equity As whereas the Debtor after he is become Bankrupt may prefer one and defraud others the Act of 13 Eliz. c. 7. hath appointed certain Commissioners of indifferency and credit to releive the Creditors of the Bankrupt equally and that there shall be an equall and rateable proportion observed in the distribution of the Goods of the Bankrupt among his Creditors having regard to the quantity of their severall debts so that one shall not prevent the other but all shall be in aequali jure and so we see in many cases as well at the Common Law as upon the like statutes such constructions have been made for as Cato said Ipsae etenim leges cupiunt ut jure regantur and therefore is it holden 35 H. 8. Title Testaments V. de plura in Herberts case lib. 7. Bro. 19. A man holdeth three Mannors of three severall Lords by Knights-service every Mannor being of equall value he cannot devise two Mannors and leave the third to descend according to the generality of the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. of Wills for then it shall prejudice the other two Lords but by equall construction he cannot devise but two parts of every Mannor and so as equality shall be observed among them and so at the Common Law an equality is required as in 11 H. 7. 12. b. a man is bound in an Obligation and his Heirs and he hath Heirs and hath lands of the part of his Father and part of his Mother both the Heirs shall be equally charged vide ibidem plura Co. Com. f. 10. a. If partition be made between Parceners of lands in Fee simple and for novelty of partition one granted a rent to the other generally the Grantee shall have a Fee-simple without this word Heirs because the Grantor hath a Fee-simple in consideration whereof he granted the rent Ipsae etenim leges c. And Co. Com. f. 271. a. b. when a Feoffment is made to a future use as to the performance of his last Will the Feoffee shall be seised to the use of the Feoffor and his Heires in the mean time for the Lawes desire to be ruled by right and equity And reason would that seeing the Feoffment is made without consideration and the Feoffor hath not disposed of the profits in the mean time that by construction and intendment of Law the Feoffor ought to occupy the same in the mean time And so it is when the Feoffor disposeth the profits for a particular time in presenti the use of the Inheritance shall be to him and his Heires as a thing not disposed of Co. ibidem Co. l. 5. f. 100. a. The Commissioners of Sewers by the Statute of 6 H. 6. c. 5. and 23 H. 8. c. 5. ought to tax all equally which are in danger to be endamaged by not repairing the Banks and not him onely who hath land adjoyning to the River for otherwise the rage and force of the water may be so great as the value of the land adjoyning shall not serve to repaire the Banks and therefore the Statutes will have all who be in the same perill and are to receive commodity by it to be contributory and the statutes require equality which well standeth with the rule of equity for equitas in Bracton est quasi aequalitas and though the Owner of the Land next adjoyning to the River was bound by prescription to repaire the banks of the River yet the Commissioners ought not to charge him only with all but to take all those which have lands in danger for otherwise it may that all the country shall be surrounded before that one person onely can repaire the Banks vide ibidem plura In Fooks case Coke l 7. f. 123. b. When the King granteth any Land without the reservation of any Tenure or without any thing from thence to be rendred or the like that land by the operation of Law shall be holden of the King in Capite by the service of Chivalry according to the rate and proportion of land that affereth to one fee of Chivalry and so of more more and of lesse lesse for the
Act in Law respecteth equity and will never charge any one with more or lesse then in reason and equity it ought For as Bracton saith jus respicit aequum If two four or more being severally seised in land joyn in a Recognizance all their lands must be equally extended An house that hath Copyhold and other lands usually occupyed with it is let for yeares with the lands appertaining yet the Copyholds passe not without speciall naming for then it were a forfeiture of them for the Law construeth all things according to equity and constraineth a generall Act if there be any mischief or inconvenience in it Finch Nomot f. 54. So a Corody granted to one and his Servants to sit at his Messe he cannot bring a Servant that hath some stinking and noisome disease And if Estovers be granted out of a Mannor the Grantee shall not cut down Fruit-trees So a Common granted to one for all his Beasts he shall not have Common for Goats and Geese nor other Beasts not Commonable Finch ibidem It is no Trespasse for a man to beat his Apprentice which is but reasonable correction for equity moderateth the strictnesse of the Law Finch Nomot f. 57. No more is it to carry away a mans Wife against his will to a lawfull end as to sue a divorce against her husband or to have the Peace of him before a Justice of Peace So if the Lessor commeth upon the ground it shall be intended that he came to see if Wast were done for equity turneth all to the best and maketh every Act to be lawfull when it is indifferent whether it be lawfull or not Finch Nomot f. 57. And if the Disseisee come it shall be taken that he meant to be remitted And in an Action of Trespasse if two Issues be joyned triable in two Counties as one in London and another in Middlesex without saying which of the Issues it should try this shall be taken to try the Issue in Middlesex onely for so the Venire facias is lawfull and not in both Counties which is against Law and therefore it is a discontinuance in the City of London and no discontinuance Finch ibidem And such a desire hath the Law to be ruled by equity as that it will feigne a thing in shew and colour whereby the reall right and equity of the thing may more certainly be found according to the ground Lex fingit ubi subsistit aequitas The Law faigneth where equity subsisteth Coke l. 10. f. 90. a. As the reason why the Law will give a colour in a Writ of Entry Sur-disseisin Writ of Entry in nature of Assise Trespass c. is that the Law which preferreth and favoureth certainty as the Mother of quiet and repose to the intent that either the Court shall adjudge upon it if the Plaintiff demurr or that a certaine Issue may be taken upon a certaine point requireth that the Defendant when he pleadeth such a speciall Plea that yet notwithstanding the Plaintiff may have right the Defendant shall give colour to the Plaintiff to the end that the plea shall not amount to the generall issue and so to leave all the matter at large to the Jurors which shall be full of multiplicity and perplexity of matter and though the colour be but a fiction yet the Law feigneth where equity subsisteth So f. 40. a. Common Recoveries are fictions in Law and for the equity that in them is transacted they are not onely allowed by the Common Law for the intended recompence but warranted by statutes for their equitable use And therefore the statute of 7 H. 8. c. 1. reciteth that divers as well Nobles as Commons have suffered Recoveries against them of divers of their Mannors for the performance of their Will for assurance of Joyntures to their Wives c. The same act in approbation of common recoveries giveth remedy to such recoveries in divers cases And in Dr. Student c. 26. it is determined that common recoveries do bind as well in conscience as in Law for semper in fictione legis subsistit aequitas And by the statute of 23 Eliz. c. 4. it is provided that for the avoiding of danger to common assurances in lands and for the advancement of common recoveries that not any common recovery shall be avoided by any want of form in words and not in matter of substance vide ibidem plura in Mary Portingtons case So Co. l. 11. f. 51. a. If one disseise me and during the Disseisin he cutteth down Trees Grass or the Corn and then I re-enter I shall have an Action of Trespasse against him vi armis for the Trees Grass and Corn for after my regresse the Law as to the Disseisor and his Servants supposeth that the Frank-tenement hath alwaies continued in me but if my Disseisor make a Feoffment in fee gift in tail lease for life or yeares and after I re-enter I shall not have trespasse vi armis against them who come in by Title for this fiction in Law that the Frank-tenement hath continued alwaies in me shall not have relation to make him that cometh in by Title to be a wrong doer vi armis for in a fiction of Law alwaies equity existeth vide ibidem plura And by these cases it appeareth that equity hath a vigorous use in the exposition of the Common Law But this bright Star more cleerly shineth and sheweth forth its lustre in the construction of Statutes for as Co. Comm. f. 24. b. equity is a construction made by the Judges what cases out of the letter of the Statute yet being within the same mischief or cause of the making of the same shall be within the same remedy that the statute provideth and the reason hereof is for that Law-makers could not possibly set down all cases in expresse termes and Co. Com. f. 271. b. when Lands and Tenements are conveyed upon confidences uses and trusts if any question groweth upon them they are to be ruled and decided by the Judges of the Law for they are within the intendment and construction of the Lawes of the Realm Rhet. l. 1. c. 3. And therefore Aristotle well adviseth Legislators and Makers of Lawes ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã to design and determine of things and to leave as little as may be to the descretion of the Judges But as Co. lib. 6 f. 40. b. Rerum progressus ostendânt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint The progresse and proceeding of things do declare and shew many things which at the beginning could not be heeded or provided for and therefore is equity required to replenish and fill up those chincks and deserts which seem to be in the letter of the Law which is therefore accordingly thus defined Aequitas est verborum legis directio sufficiens cum una res solummodo cavetur verbis ut omnis alia in aequali genere iisdem caveatur verbis Equity is a sufficient direction of the words
case whence springeth this often used assertion Non est regula quin fallit for as Cato saith vix ulla lex fieri potest quae omnibus commoda sit sed si majori parti prospiciat utilis est there can scarce any Law be made which shall fit all men but if it provideth for the greater part it is profitable and therefore the ordainers and interpretors of Laws respect rather those things which may often happen and not every particular circumstance for the which though they would they shall not be able by any positive Law to make provision and for the like reason Mr. Ploydon saith that Law is reasonable that provideth for the multitude though that some persons loose by it f. 369. b. By reason whereof they doe permit the rules actions and propositions of the Common Law upon discourse and disputation of reason to be restrained by exceptions which are grounded upon two causes the one is equity the other is some ground or rule proposed wherein for conformities sake and that no absurdity or contradiction be permitted certaine exceptions are framed which doe not onely knit and conjoyne one rule of reason to another but by meanes of their equity temper the rigor of the Law which upon some certaine circumstances in every of the said rules might happen and fall out omnia bene aequiparat as Bracton saith Nomot f. 14. But as Sir Hen. Fi. saith this crossing and encountring of one ground and maxime with another if the greatest difficulty we finde in the arguing of our cases but to help this we are to prefer those and those are to prevaile that carry the more excellent perfect reason and equity with them and Sir Francis Bacon saith it is a point worthy to be observed generally in the rules of the Law that where they encounter or crosse one another in any case it be understood that the Law holdeth worthier and which rules are of more equity or humanity but now to give you some examples of them which allwayes doe illustrate Coke com 183. It is a maxime in the Law Quaelibet concessio fortissime contra donatorem interpretanda est every grant shall be taken most strongly against himselfe as if Lands be letten or a rent granted an estate for life passeth for that is most strongly against himselfe which is to be understood that no wrong be thereby done for there is another rule in the Civill Law ea est accipienda interpretatio quae vitio caret and a maxime in our Law that legis constructio non facie injuriam the interpretative construction of Law shall wrong no man and therefore if tenant for life maketh a lease generally it shall be taken for his own life or else it should worke a wrong to him in reversion and so it is if tenant in taile should make a lease generally for otherwise it should worke a discontinuance and a wrong vide ibidem So if tenant in fee maketh a lease for life without mentioning for whose life it shall be deemed for the life of the Lessee and shall be taken more strongly against the Lessor but if tenant entaile maketh such a lease for life without expressing for whose life this shall be taken for the life of the Lessor because otherwise it would work a wrong Coke Com. f. 42. a. So if an Executor grant all his Goods and Chattells the goods which he hath as Executor will not passe because it may be a devestation and a wrong yet against the trespassor he shall declare quod bona sua cepit 10. E. 4.1 So it is a rule verba ita sunt intelligenda ut res magis valeat quam pereat words are so to be understood that the matter may prevaile rather then perish as if I give Lands to I. S. and his Heires rendring five pounds yearly to I. S. and his Heires this implyeth a condition to me that am the Grantor yet were it a stronger exposition against me to say the limitation should be void and the Feoffment absolute Bacon Max. f. 15. If the Chancelor dyeth before his servants priviledge discussed in bank 35. H. 6. 3. 172. b. yet it shall be allowed contrary to the rule sublata causa tollitur effectus but there is another rule actus legis nulli facit injuriam the act of the Law prejudiceth no man and for that reason the Court shall not prejudice him where no folly was in himselfe It is a ground qui male agit odit lucem and therefore the Law countenanceth more things done in the day then in the night as the party hath all the day till night to pay his rent and if it be a great sum he must be ready as long before the Sun set as the mony may be told for the other is not bound to tell it in the night and a man must not distraine in the night time for rent behind yet is there another ground in the Law quod necessarium est licitum and therefore when there is a necessity of doing things they may be done in the night time as an arbitrement made and delivered in writing the last day after the Sun set is good enough for judgements and arbitrements require long advice so may goods be distrained for in the night for damage feasant and a man may be arrested in the night for otherwise peradventure he shall not doe it at all It is a ground in the Law nihil agit in seipsum no man can doe an act to himself yet if one of the Chapter enfeoff the Deane and Chapter by that he he himselfe shall take by his own livery because the Law in that case cannot doe otherwise so a feme tenant in Socage may endow her selfe and an Executor pay himselfe It is a ground in the Law certa debet esse natratio counts and declarations must be certaine yet things which containe a necessary implication are good enough for it is another ground non refert quid ex aequipollentibus fiat it mattereth not what is done by equippollent or words which amount to such a sense as in an Ejectione firmae c. In a count of a lease made by tenant for life it sufficeth to say that the Lessor is yet seised without the alledging of his life expresly because it amounteth to the same sense by necessary implication So in an information upon the Statute of usury and he counts that the Defendant took per viam medium corruptae mutnationis by the way and means of corrupt borrowing whereas it should be accomodationis plaudingo and yet good enough It is a ground qui facit per alium facit per se things done by another are as it were done by himselfe yet is there another rule that corporall and personall things cannot be done by another as suite of Court cannot be done by another 7. H. 4.9 Otium est mater omnium vitiorum Coke l 11. f. 53. b. As all vertue consisteth in action so vice
consisteth in idlenesse for idlenesse is the mother of all vices and as Coke there saith principally in young men who ought in their youth to learne profitable sciences and trades which are profitable to the weale publick of which they may reape the fruites in their old age for jeunesse oisense vilesse disettense if in our youth we be idle in our old age we shall be indigent and for that reason the common Law detesteth all Monopolies which prohibit any one to work in any Lawfull trade and that appeareth in 2. H. 5. b. A Dyer was bound that he shall not use his Diers craft for two yeares and there Hull said that the obligation was against the common Law and that by God if the Plaintiff were here he should goe to prison untill he had made fine to the King and so for the same cause if an husbandman be bound that he shall not till and sow the ground the obligation is against the common Law And therefore the act of 5. Eliz. c. 4. that prohibited any person to use or exercise any craft mistery or occupation unlesse he had been an Apprentice for seven yeares doth not make provision onely to the intent that the artificers may be skilfull but that young men shall not be idle in their youth but trained and brought up in lawfull sciences and trades and so by the same reason the common Law doth not prohibit any person to use many Arts and Misteries at his pleasure for nemo prohibitur plures negotiationes sive Artes exercere untill it was prohibited by the Act of Parliament 37. E. 3. 6. That all Artificers c. are bound every one to one mistery and that none use other mistery but that he hath chosen but because that restraint of free trade was prejudiciall to the weale publick at the next Parliament it was enacted that all people should be so free as they were before that Ordinance by which it appeareth that without Act of Parliament no man can be in any manner restrained to worke in any lawfull trade Non negligentibus sed impotentibus succurrendum Reg. I. C. Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniant Ployd f. 357. b. The Law helpeth and releiveth those are impotent not those are negligent As if you disseise me of my Land and then A. bringeth a Writ of right against you and you joyn the mise upon the meer right and you make default after the mise joyned he shall recover to him and his Heires for ever quit of you and your Heires for ever and if I doe not lay my claime within a yeare a day I am barred for ever for the Law succoureth those that are watchfull and not sleepy so as non-claime by a yeare and a day upon a recovery by default where finall judgement is given was a good Bar by the common Law 5. E. 3.222 by Hor. A descent cast during the Coverture where the wife is disseised barreth her not of her entry after her husbands death but if a feme-sole be disseised and then taketh an husband there a descent during the coverture taketh away her entry for it was her folly to take such an husband that entred not in time Littleton 95. Negligentia semper habet comitem infortunium Coke l. 8. f. 133. a. Sa. Turnors case An Executor of an Administrator ought to execute his office and administereth the goods of the dead lawfully truly and diligently Lawfully in the payment of all dueties debts and legacies in such precedency and order as they ought to be paid by the Law truly to convert nothing to his own use and ought not by any practise or devise to bar or hinder any creditor of his debt but ought truly to execute his office according to the trust reposed in him And diligently as in the case at bar for when the Administrators which had judgement for one hundred pounds for sixty pounds and the Plaintiff offered a release or to acknowledge satisfaction and he deferreth it to the intent that the Judgement shall stand in force by which the Plaintiff shall be defrauded of his due debt and the Administrators to convert the goods of the debt to their private use let the agreement be precedent before the recovery or subsequent since the recovery it is all one as to the creditor who is a third person for he is defrauded as well by the one as the other and the creditor who is a stranger shall loose his debt which is by the Law due to him and if any prejudice accreweth to the Administrators in this case it is in his own default for the Plaintiff would have released to them or acknowledged satisfaction but they defer it to the intent to bar the Plaintiff of his just and true debt and negligence hath allwayes misfortune or ill luck for her companion Ibidem Coke l. 2. f. 26. b. If a creditor upon a commission upon a Statute of Bankrupt either by obstinacy doe refuse or by carelessnesse neglect to come before the Commissioners within the time limited and to crave the benefit of the Act he looseth the benefit thereof for the Law releiveth those which are vigilant and not dormant for otherwise a debt may be concealed or a creditor may absent himselfe and void the proceedings of the Commissioners and every creditor ought to take notice of the commission it being a matter of record Coke l. 4. f. 10. b. in Bevills case it was said that the Act of 32. H. 8. c. 2. by expresse words extendeth onely to actuall possession and seisin and not to releive those which for so long time had neglected to have actuall seisin of their services and namely of suite which ought to be made twice every yeare and it was said that it was crassa supina negligentia which that Law did not intend to releive for as it is commonly said vigilantibus c. Ibidem Coke l. 4. f. 82. b. in Sir Andrew Corbets case who deviseth Lands to R. C. and others to have and to hold to them and the survivor of them untill such time that the summ of eight hundred pounds c. was received out of the issues rents c. for the preferment of his Daughters it was resolved though the Devisee had notice of the devise yet if a stranger had occupied the Land the Devisee ought to take notice at his perill for vigilantibus c. and none by the Law in such case is bound to give him notice as in the case of arbitrement 1. H. 7.5.8 E. 4.1 ibidem And this is the reason of a lapse incurring for want of presentment or of a warranty barring for lack of entry or of descents barring for want of claime and a title to tenant in courtesy is lost for lack of entry and that Statutes of limitation do bar actions One seised of Lands devisable deviseth that his Executors shall sell his Land and distribute the profits for the use of the poore and dyeth If a
Court of Record for albeit the Grantee bringeth a Writ of Annuity he may distrain and discharge the person but if he bring a Writ of Annuity and therupon appeare and Court this is a determination of his election in Court of Records albeit he never proceed any further as if the Wife be endowed ex assensu patris if she after her Husbands death bringeth a Writ of Dower at the Common Law and Count albeit she recover not she shall never claim her Dower ex assensu patris because she hath determined her election So if the Grantee bring an assise for rent and make his Plaint he shall never after bring a Writ of Annuity and if he distrain and avow the prisall of the Distresse in a Court of Record it is a determination of his election before any judgment gâven according to the rule Electio semel facta placitum testatum non patiter regressum Co. Com. 220. a. But otherwise it is where a man hath election to have severall remedies for a thing is meerly personall or meerly reall from the beginning as if a man may have an action of debt or an action of account at his pleasure and appear to it and after is non-suit yet may he have an action of debt afterwards because both actions charge the person the like Law is an assise and a Writ of Entry in the nature of assise ibidem W. brought an action of the case against F. and declared that the Defendant had sued out a Fieri facias upon a judgment given against him for the Defendant and by virtue thereof took Goods of the Plaintiff to the value of the Damage and so made his return pro defâctu emptoris and that the Defendant well knowing this to the intent to trouble vex and charge him did afterwards sue out another Fieri facias to the same Sheriff and delivered it to be exexecuted who did thereupon levie the money of other Goods of the Plaintiff and paid it over to the Defendant whereby the now Plaintiff was double charged whereupon the Defendant pleaded not guilty and it was found against him and it was adjudged for the Plaintiff because he was twice vexed and disturbed and that wilfully by the Defendant who had first one execution inchoate which he ought to have followed we all knowing it and not to have taken another but if he had been ignorant and had not known of the Goods first taken he had not been lyable to the other action Hob. 37.3 Waterers case Euilibet in sua arte perito est credendum omnes prudentes eos admittere solent qui probantur ab iis qui in sua arte bene versati sunt Arist 1. Topic. c. 6. Co. l. 7. f. 19. a. The reason of the wisest man which professeth not the Lawes of England in cases which concern the Lawes of England is not to be beleived but the legall and profound reason of such who by diligence study and long experience and observation are so learned in the Lawes of this Realm as out of the reason of the same they can rule the case in question in this sense this rule is to be taken that we are to beleive every one in his art and all wise men are wont to admit those things which are approved by them are well versed in their own Art Coke l. 4. f. 29. a. Agnes was contracted to Bunting and after married Twede Bunting libelleth against Agnes in the Court of Audience upon the said Contract and upon the proceedings of which Libell it was decreed that the said Agnes should undergo marriage with the said Bunting and thereupon it was pronounced decreed and declared the said marriage with Twede to be null And though that Twede being de facto husband of the said Agnes was neither party to the said Suit nor to the sentence in the Spirituall Court which dissolved the marriage between him and the said Agnes but rhe said Agnes only yet the sentence against the Feme onely being onely declaratory was good and shall bind the Baron de facto and in regard that the Cognisance of marriages appertain to the Ecclesiasticall Court and the same Court had given sentence in this case the Judges of our Law ought to give faith and credit to their proceedings and sentence although it be contrary to the reason of our Law and to think that their proceedings are consonant to the Law of the holy Church for we are to beleive every one is skilfull in his art vide ibidem plura Coke l. 5. f. 7. in Caudries case Quod quisque norit in hoc se exerceat Co. l. 9. f. 13. a. Let every one exercise himself in that which he hath knowledge and skill It is the wisdome of the Law to refer things to persons in which they have knowledge and shall be expert and therefore the Law will not constrain the Jurors which have no knowledge in the Law to take upon them Cognisance of the points in Law or in cases which concern Life Member or Inheritance Frank tenements Goods and Chattels but to leave them to the consideration of the Judges nor the Judges to give their opinion of questions and doubts in Law upon a suddain but in all cases to have the truth of the case and upon conference and consideration to adjudge according to the Law Coke l. 8. f. 130. a. The intent of the act of 5 Eliz. c. 4. was that no man should take upon him any Art Mystery or any Occupation but such in whom is science and knowledge and therefore the statute intended that he that used any Art Mystery or any occupation at the time of the act might use the same art or mystery for every one is to exercise himself in that art which he knoweth And it was said that the Brewers should have science and skill in brewing good and wholesome Beer for it greatly conduceth to the health of men Ployd f. 128. b. Alwaies our Predeceossors for the sense of latine words have consulted with the Grammarians and others who have knowledge therein and that sense which the Grammar warranted they have allowed as 9 H. 7. 14. One was bound in an Obligation upon the condition that he should pay five pounds in fine Gold and the Obligation was puri auri and there it appeareth that the Masters of Grammar were sent for to give their counsell what was latine for fine Gold vide ibidem plura Coke l. 11. f. 10. b. Matters in Law shall be put in issue to be tryed by the Country for sicut ad quaestionem facti non respondent judices ita ad quaestionâm Juris non respondent juratores As the Judges do not answer to the question of fact no more do the Jurors answer to the question in Law and if the Jurors take upon them the Cognisance of the Law and find the speciall matter mistake the Law the Judges of the Law shall give judgment upon the speciall matter according to
the Law without having regard to the conclusion of the Jurors who ought not to take upon them the judgment of the Law for quod quisque novit c. Ploâd Câm Amie Townsdens case 5 H. 17. Carus case c. Coke Com. f. 3. b. If an office either of the Grant of the King or subject which concerneth the Administration proceedings or execution of Justice or the Kings revenue or the Common-wealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill and science to exercise or execute the same the Grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and uncapable to take the same pro commodo regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable of the same to serve the King and his people ibidem An Infant is not capable of the Office of a Stewardship of a Mannor either in possession or reversion ibid. and the Civill Law Impubes ab omnibus officiis civilibus debet abstinere Coke l. 11. f. 87. a. The case of Monopolies a Patent made to Sir Edward Bury for the making of Cards was void because he had no skill in making them though the Patent was to him and his Deputy yet if the Grantee himself be inexpert he cannot make a Deputy who is skilfull to supply his place Quia quod per me non possum nec per alium for what I cannot do by my self I cannot do by another Imperitia culpae adnumeratur Reg. s e. Imperitia maxima est mechanicorum poena Co. l. 11. f. 57. a. Ignorance and unskilfulness is accounted a fault and is the greatest punishment of Artists and Mechanicks As 7 E. 3. 65. b. If he that taketh upon him to work be unskilfull and ignorant it is sufficient punishment to him for if any man take upon him to work and doth it amiss an action of the case lyeth against him Ignorantia Juris non excusat The ignorance of the Law doth not excuse Dr. Stud. l. 2. c 46. Ignorance of the Law though it be unvincible that is to say that they have done that in them is to know the truth doth not excuse as to the Law for every man is bound at his perill to take notice what the Law of the Realm is as well the Statutes as the Common Law for all Statutes are made in Parliament and Burgesses are the representatives of the Commons and therefore is alone as if all the Commons had been there present An Infant of the years of discretion may be a Felon and a Trespasser according to the civill Rule Pupillus qui proximus est pubertati capax est furendi injuriae faciendae An Infant who is next to the age of puberty that is of fourteen years is capable of stealing and doing injury though he be ignorant of the Law but that is by the old Maxime of the Law for the eschewing of Murthers Felony and Trespasses Dr. Stud. l. 2. c. 46. vide ibid. plura Coke l. 1. f. 177. a. b. Anthony Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish because the said Robert had said and openly published that certain lands which lawfully appertained to the said Mildmay were lawfully assured for the terme of a thousand years to Ja. Talbot and Olyff his wife and that they of the interest of that term were lawfully possessed and so for slandring his estate and title shewing all in certain and how he was prejudiced by the said speaking brought his Action And Standish in his plea justified the words upon which the Plaintiff demurred and it was adjudged for the Plaintiff although de facto the said Talbot and Olife had a limitation of those lands by the Will of Sir Henry Sharington in writing for a thousand years which was the occasion that the said Standish being a man not learned in the Law affirmed and published the same yet for that he had taken upon him the knowledge of the Law and interposed himself in a matter not concerned him judgment was given against him for Ignorantia juris not excusat If the Clark mistake Debt for a Detinet in a Writ his ignorance of the Law doth not excuse 20 E. 4. 21. But the Civilians have a Rule In paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur the Law doth help the party according to his age or ignorance in criminal penal causes which accordeth with the grounds of our Law as if an infant of tender years kill a man it shall not be Felony because he had no scretion or understanding and so it is if a man dedi non sanae memoriae kill another it is not homicide because he hath no memory nor understanding and this as Ploydon saith is properly said to be done ex ignorantia where unvoluntary ignorance is adjudged the cause of the act Ployd f. 19. a. Coke l. 6. f. 54. a. A Capias was awarded against a Countesse by the Court of Common Bench that the Sheriff or his Officer by his warrant without any offence may execute it for they ought not to dispute the authority of Court but they ought to execute the Writs to them directed and to it they are sworn and though it was objected that it appeared by the Capias that shee was a Countesse against whom by Law no Capias in such case lyeth ignorantia juris non excusat and principally the Sheriffs and other Ministers of Law and Justice except in some cases as in cases of contempt yet it was resolved that the Sheriff and his Ministers ought not to examine the judiciall act of the Court but they ought to execute the Writ ibidem in the Countesse of Rutlands case so Dyer fo 60. quod vide Ignorantia facti excusat Coke 2. f. 3. b. in Mansers case the ignorance of the deed excuseth as if an illeterate man be bound to seale a deed he is not tyed to doe it if not any be present to read it if required and also to expound it if it be written in Latine c for ignorantia facti non excusat quae est vel lectionis vel linguae the ignorance of the deed excuseth whether it be of reading or of the tongues Doct. and Stud. l. 2. c. 47. If a man buy an horse in open Market of him that hath no property in him not knowing but that he had right he hath good right to the horse and his ignorance shall excuse him but if he had known the seller had no right the buying in open Market had not excused him So if a man retaine another mans servant not knowing that he is retained by him the ignorance excuseth him both from the common Law and the Statute of 31. Ed. 33. and the penalty thereupon to wit paine of imprisonment if any one retaineth one servant without licence or reasonable cause and so hath the
Statute allwayes been expounded that they who were ignorant of the first retainer should not run into any penalty of the Statute So whosoever retaineth one is a ward to another not knowing that he is ward also if homage be due and the tenant after maketh a Feoffment and the Lord not knowing of the Feoffment distraineth for the homage his ignorance shall excuse him of his damages in a replevin though he cannot avow for the homage but if he had known the Feoffment he should have yeelded damages ibidem If a resignation be made by an imcumbent to a Bishop the Bishop is bound to give the Patron notice or otherwise he shall not have the advantage of the lapse and if the same Bishop dye his Successor shall be bound in the same manner although the resignation was not made to him for he shall have advantage by reason of the avoidance of the said resignation then he is bound to do that thing his successor should do upon the pain of a Quare Impedit for it is intended that the books of resignation to the successor remain with him Calloway 18 H. 7. f. 49. f. by Frowick If a Patron who is a Lay-man present his Clark to the Ordinary and he is not well lettered it is lawfull for the Ordinary to refuse him and of it to give notice to the Patron for to present another before there shall be a collation by Lapse because the Patron could not have Cognisance whether he be a Clark or no but if a Patron be a spirituall man and present one not well lettered and the Ordinary refuse him he shall not give notice of it to the Patron because it is intended that a Clark may have Conusance of the sufficiency of another before he presentted him to the Bishop ibidem by Frowick So when a man doth an act as to enter into Land seise goods take a distresse or such other he must by the Law see at his perill that it be lawfully done Doctor and Student ibidem As if a Servant cometh with his masters horse to Towne where by custome goods may be attached for debt and upon a Plaint against the servant an officer of the Towne attached the masters horse thinking it to be the Servants that ignorance excuseth not ibidem So if the Sheriff by a replevin deliver other beasts then were distrained though the party that distrained shew him they were the same beasts yet an action of Trespasse lyeth against him for he shall be compelled by Law as all Officers commonly be to execute the Kings Writ at his perill according to the tenor of it and to see that the act that he doth be lawfully done ibidem But some say if upon a Summons in a praecipe quod reddat the Sheriff by information of the Detendant summoneth the tenant in another mans Land thinking it to be the tenants Land there he shall be excused for he doth not seise Land but onely summoneth the tenant on the Land and that upon the information of the Demandant and though he be ignorant that that is the Land yet that sufficeth to the Sheriff as to his entry for the summoning as they say though it be not the tenants Land Ibidem SECT VII From the Politicks THe last Fountaine from whence the law deriveth grounds is the politicall Science which of all therof as Plato is ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã as Ar. ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã the Queen and Regent for shee prescribeth certain Laws by which they may be soundly taught and gloriously published and graciously ministreth to them her protection and shee is the Lady and Mistresse of all humane actions for though other Sciences and especially the Ethicall instructeth men how to live well and happily yet many Egregious Philosophers which professe the protection of that Art and Science are observed to live loosely and vitiously and as Cicero alios esse pecunia Cupidos gloriae non nullos multos libidinum servos some to be coveteous of Gold others ambitious of glory and many to serve their lusts so as if they were not restrained by the Scepter of this Science by which Magistrates and Laws are ordained to curbe those who will not be adduced for the love of virtue to doe that which is right and just and formidine paenae for feare of punishment to fright and force them into ãâã more vertuous and civill manner of living ãâã magisterio as Camerarius fully vita communis ãâã ur constituitur jure legibus ut societates hoâ num quae res publicae vocantur in terris conserventuâ ânâ by whose magisteriall rule the lives of all men are so ordered and disposed by right and Lawes that the societies of men which are called republicks may be preserved on the earth Without doubt therefore many principall and royall grounds of the Law must spring and grow from this soveraign Science from which the Law receiveth its constitution and confirmation as the grounds ensuing will manifest Salus populi prima lex esta Lâx 12. tabularum and Coke l. 11. f. 113. b. Salus populi suprema est lex the health and welfare of the people is the prime and cheifest Law that is the prime and principall scope to which all our actions ought to tend is the publick good of the people and Common-weale and therefore doth our Law favour things for the Common-weale and as Dyer f. 36. Pl 40. In cases which sound for the good of the Common-weale a man may justify the doing of a wrong As in time of War a man may justifie the raising of Bulwarks in another mans soile and so may he justifie the raising of an house that burneth ââr the safeguard of the houses of the Neighbors So if the Sheriff pursue a Felon to an house and for to have the Felon he breaketh the door of the house he may justifie it because it is for the Common-weale that such Felons should be taken but it is otherwise in particular cases as if the Sheriff break the house to arrest one in the house by vertue of a Capias in debt or trespass he shall be punished for that was a particular case and not for the good of the Common If the Lessor have Villains and one or divers of them commit felony and that the Lessee pursueth them as Felons by which he exileth them of the Mannor he is not punishable in wast but if the Villains slander him for which he doth them exile it is punishable by Knighâly Fisher-men may justifie their comming upon land adjoyning to the Sea to dry their Nets though it be anothers ground for fishing is for the Common-weale and sustenance of all the Realm 8 E. 4. 18. b. and upon this reason the Civilians say Si piscator ligat navem ad arborem dominus eam incidere non potest If a Fisher-man tyeth his Ship to a tree the Master of that soil cannot cut the tree And for this reason the King before the Statute
lands of the Grantor H. 13 E. 4. f. 6. So if the Title appeareth to the King upon Plea of other parties the Court of Office shall adjudge it for the King though he be not party to the Issue Ployd f. 243. b. vide ibidem plura And as the Common Law cannot bind the King no more can private Customes and therefore the custome of that if one pawn Goods that he that hath the pawn shall hold them whose soever they be untill the mony for which they were pawned be paid unto him shall not bind the King where his goods were pawned by a stranger So sale of goods made by a stranger ân Market-overt shall not alter the property nor bind him M. 3. H. 6. 28. And if a man have wrack of the Sea if the Goods of the King be wracked he shall gain no property by it against the King And so it is of Prescription to have goods waved or estrayed M. 35 H. 6. 27. Ployd ibidem vide plura Nullum tempus occurrit regi Ployd f. 243. No Prescription of time runs against the King As if right of entry descend to the King and the Disseisor dieth seised it shall not take away the entry of the King M. 35. H. 6. 27. So if a Villain alien his land the Lord may enter when he pleaseth Coke com f. 41. b. If Tenant for life or Tenant in Dower grant over his or her estate and the Grantee dieth there shall be an Occupant but against the King there shall be no Occupant because nullum tempus occurrit regi Coke l. 6 f. 29. b. At the Common Law if any one had usurped upon the King and his Presentee had been admitted instituted and inducted for without Induction the Church is not full against the King yet the King may have a Quare Impedit and by it he shall remove the Incumbent for no act of the Bishop or any other can bar the King of his right nullum tempus c. vide ibidem plura Ployd 243. a. Coke l. 7. f. 28. If Title to present by Lapse be devolved to the Queen and the Patron presenteth a Clark who is admitted instituted and inducted and dieth the King hath lost his Title to present by Lapse for the King had but unam unicam presentationem hac vice which cannot be extended to the second avoidance and the statute de prerogativa regis quod nullum tempus occurrie regi is to be understood when the King hath a certain permanent interest and not when he hath an interest specially limited vide ibidem plura in Baskerviles case All which proceed from the Prerogative the Common Law giveth the Prince which is so large Nom. f. 85. Davis in his Preface as Sir Henry Finch saith that you shall find that to be Law almost in every case of the King that is Law in no case of the Subject And therefore Sir John Davis confidently averreth that the Common Law doth excell all other Lawes in upholding a free Monarchy which is the most excellent form of Government exalting the Prerogative Royall and being tender and watchfull to preserve it And yet maintaining all the ingenuous libertie of the Subject Davis ibidem But though the Common Law allow so many Prerogatives to the King yet shall he not hurt others by them As if a Bridge be repairable by the Subject and is in decay the pardon of the King shall not excuse him who ought to do it because others to wit the Subjects of the Realm have an interest in it So if one have Jewels in pawn for ten pounds and he that putteth them to pawn is attainted the King shall not have the Jewels unless he pay ten pounds for his Prerogative will not prejudice another Ployd f. 487. a. b. So the Earle of Kent had the return of certain Cattell in Replevin in 13 R. 2. and the Proprietor of the Cattell was attainted There it is holden that the Earle of Kent shall retaine the Cattell against the King untill he is satisfied for the thing and the Prerogative of the King will not discharge them of the return because the Prerogative will not give prejudice to another vide ibidem plura in Nichols case Rex est caput salus reipublicae a capite bona valetudo transit in omnes Coke l. 4. f. 124. b. The King is the head and safety of the Common-weale and as from the head health is conveyed to the body so from the King safety is conveyed to the Common-weale which is the body of the Kingdome for from him Justice is distilled to all by which all men are preserved in peace and safety as Ployd f. 242. b. All justice tranquility and repose is derived from him as the Fountain of it and therefore by Bracton he is called Author juris L. 3. c. 9. the Author of right by whom right is separated from injury equity from iniquity that all subject to him may live honestly that not one should hurt another and that to every one what is his be by a right contribution restored And by Homer ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã Gods Schollars and by a more divine Poet Gods themselves especially because they sit on Gods own Seat when they minister justice to the people Dixi quod dii estis and that the Rules of Justice be their principall Lesson Which like the Sun in the Firmament to which Justice is rightly resembled he is to communicate to all the Creatures of his Common-weale And as the King is the Sun and Fountain of Justice so are the Judges and Professors of the Law but Conduit Pipes to convey the streames of his Justice throughout all the Kingdome L. 4 Ep ad l. A. Chron. 19.6 7. Whereupon Sir Edward Coke hath this observation from the divine Text videte Judices Take heed you Judges what yee do for yee judge not for man but for the Lord who is with you in the Judgment wherefore let the fear of the Lord be upon you take heed and do it for there is no iniquity with the Lord our God nor respect of persons nor taking gifts And so saith he must every Judge be just without respect to give every man his own Protectio trahit subjectionem subjectio protectionem Coke l. 7. f. 5. Calv. case Protection draweth subjection and subjection protection Legiance is the mutuall Bond and Obligation between the King and his Subjects whereby Subjects are called his leige Subjects because they are bound to obey and serve him and he is called their leige Lord because he shall maintain and defend them And as there ought to be a mutuall connexion of dominion and fidelity between the Lord and Tenant ita quod quantum debet domino ex homagio tantum illi debet dominus ex dominio as Glanvil saith so that how much the Tenant oweth the Lord by homage and service so much doth the Lord owe the Tenant by his power and
is an Accessary Ployd 175. But if it be to kill I. S. and he killeth I. D. mistaking him for I.S. then he is no accessary because it is different in substance And if I bid I. S. to steal such things out of an house without breaking of the house and yet he breaketh the house I am accessary to the Burglary But if a man bid one rob I. S. as he goeth to Sturbridge Faire and he rob him in his house he is not accessary for the variance is of substance Ployd ib. 175. Quando aliquid mandatur mandatur omne per quod pervenitur ad illud Coke l. 5. f. 115. b. when any thing is commanded every thing is commanded whereby we may come to it Whereas a Writ of Estrepment will lye in an action of Wast because he cannot receive more damages then are contained in the Count and can assign no Wast after the Writ purchased if a Writ of Estrepment commeth to the Sheriff by virtue of it he may resist those which will make waste and if otherwise he cannot yet it is lawfull for him to imprison them and to make Warrants to others to do the same and if it be necessary he may take a Posse commitatus for his aid though the words of the Writ onely be that he shall personally go to the Messuage and altogether take order that no wast or estrepment of the said Messuage be according to the foâm of the statute whilest the said plea hangeth indiscussed because when any thing is commanded every thing also is commanded by which we may come to it Quando aliquid prohibetur prohibetur id per quod pervenitur ad illud Col. 9. f. 57. a. then any thing is forbidden that also is forbidden by which we come to it As confederation and combination among men uniting themselves together either by obligation or by promise to execute any unlawfull act is punishable by Law before the unlawfull act be executed and the Law punisheth the combination and the confederacy to the end to prevent the unlawfull act and therefore the usuall commission of Oyer and Terminer giveth power to the Commissioners to enquire of all combinations confederacies and false allegiancies and false allegiance is a false binding of anyâ one to another by Obligation or promise to execute an illoyall act Boni judicis est lites dirimeâe expedit reipub ut sit finis litium propter communem omnium utilitatem Coke l. 5. f. 73. b. It is the part of a good Judge to cut off strifes and it is profitable to a Common-weal that there be an end of Suits for the common good of all in Williams case When a Chappell is not private to the Lord and his Family but is publick and common to all the Tenants of the same Mannor who may be many and of great number there no action upon the case lieth against the Vicar who ought and is bound by prescription by himself or some other to celebrate Divine Service in his Chappell c. for then every one of his Tenants may also have an action upon the case as well as the Lord himself and so infinite actions for one default but it is the part of a good Judge to break and put of suits and strifes c. and it is profitable to the Common-wealth that there be an end of suits for otherwise great oppression may be under the colour and pretext of Law For as Coke l. 6 f. 9. a. If there should be no end of suits then a rich and malicious man will by actions and suits infinitely vex him who hath right and in the end because he cannot attain to any end compell him to redeem his charge and vexation and to leave and relinquish his right vide ibidem plura And therefore Coke l. 9. f. 73. b. Accords with satisfaction are much favoured in Law for the interest of the Common wealth that there may be an end of suits and Coke com f. 306 b. every plea ought to be tryable for without tryall the case will never come to an end which would be discommodious to the republick And therefore doth the Law shun circuity of actions and such actions as are needless and may be saved and as Coke l. 5 f. 31. Circuitus est evitandus As if he that hath ten pounds issuing out of certain land disseiseth the Tenant of the land In an assise brought by the Disseisee the Disseisor shall cut off the rent in the damages insomuch as if the mean profits of the land were at the value of thirteen pounds the Disseisee shall recover but three l. 3 H. 6. 18. and the Disseisor shall cut of all the damages he hath expended in repairing the houses 14 E. 3. 92. and if Rent-service happen during the Disseisin it shall be cut off 9 E. 3. 8. and the reason of the cutting off in such case is because that otherwise the arrearages of the rent-service charge or seck shall be revived and therefore to avoid cercuity of action the arrearages during the Disseisin shall be cut off in damages Coke com f. 265. a. If there be Father and Son and the Father be disseised and the Son living the Father releaseth to the Disseisor all his right which he hath or may have in the same Tenements without clause of Warranty and then the Father dieth the Son may lawfully enter upon the possession of the Disseisor because he had no right in the land in his Fathers life but the right descended to him after the release made yet if there had been a Warranty annexed to the release then the Son should be barred for the Warranty may rebutt and bar him and his Heires of a future right which was not in him at that time and the reason wherefore a Warranty shall bar a future right is for avoiding of circuit of action as he that made the Warranty should recover the land against the Ter-tenant and he by force of the Warranty to have as much in value against the same person ibidem Upon the grant of a Ward with Warranty the Defendant in a Writ of right of Ward may rebutt the Plaintiff by that Warranty and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action Finch f. 55. In an action of Waste upon a lease of yeares by Deed and in the same Deed the Lessor granteth to the Lessee that he shall not be impeached of waste the Lessee may plead this in an action of waste and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action When a Father enfeoffeth his Son and Heir with Warranty and dieth now the Son in a Praecipe brought against him may vouch the Feoffor of his Father for the Law will not suffer him to vouch himself and when he cometh in as Voucher then to deigne the Warranty for the circuity of Voucher Malificia non debent manere impunita impunitas continuum
affectum tribuit delinquendi minatur innocentes qui parcit nocentibus Coke l. 4. f. 45. a. Evil doings ought not to go unpunished because impunity ministreth a continuall affection of offending and he threatneth the innocent who spareth the Delinquent And Aristotle Pol. 7. Actiones justitiae sunt necessariae in civitate licet non eligibiles Though the actions of Justice that is the sentences and punishments of evill and condemned persons are not secundum se of their own nature eligible yet are they necessary in a City that the City may be the better ruled and saved for as Solon there are two things and tyes by which a Common-wealth is contained and preserved praemium poena reward and punishment and it is truly said Etsi meliores sunt quos ducit amor tamen plures sunt quos corrigit timor Thoughâ they be the better persons whom the Love of goodness vertue draweth yet there are more whom the fear of punishment doth deter and correct and therefore the wisdome of our Law doth abhor that greater offences should pass unpunished So as that if a man be convict either of verdict or by confession upon an insufficient Indictment and no Judgment upon it given he may again be indicted and arraigned because his life was never in jeopardy and the Law wanteth his end which provideth that no evill Deeds should pass unpunished Coke l. 4. f. 45. a. for as Coke saith l. 5. f. 53 b. Oderunt peccare mali formidine penae The wicked to offend themselves refrain And from the same are scar'd for feare of pain And therefore by the Common Law is the offence of felony so severely punished and though the Judgment against such a Malefactor in that he shal be hanged by the neck untill he be dead yet implicitively he is punished First in his wife that she shall lose her Dower Secondly in his Children that they shall become base and ignoble Thirdly that he shall lose his Posterity for his blood is stained and corrupted that they cannot inherit to him or to any other Ancestor Fourthly that he shall forfeit all his Lands and Tenements which he hath in fee or in tail or for term of his life And fifthly all his Goods and Chattels And the reason was that men should fear to commit Feloây ut poena ad paucos metus ad omnes perveniat that the punishment might be inflicted on few and the feare may come to all But some Acts of Parliament have altered the common Law in some of these points as by the Statute De donis conditionalibus lands in tail were not forfeited neither for Felony nor for Treason but for the life of Tenant in tail And this Law continued in force from the thirteenth year of Edward the first untill the twenty sixth year of Henry the eighth when by Act of Parliament Estates in tail are forfeited by attainder of high Treason but as for Felons the Statute De donis Conditionalibus doth still remain in force so as for attainder of Felony Lands and Tenements in tail are not forfeited but onely during the life of Tenant in tail but the Inheritance is preserved for the Issues but being attainted of high Treason or Petit treason the wife shall not be received to demand her Dower but in certain cases specially provided for Ployd f. 195. Coke com f. 392. a. b. And now the wife of a person attainted of misprision of Treason Murthâr or Felony is dowable by the Statute of 5 E. 6. c. ãâã c. in that case made and provided which is more favourable to the women then the Common Law was Coke ibidem Receditur a placitis Juris potius quam injuâiae delicta maneant impunita Bac. Max. f. 51. The Law will dispence with some grounds of the Law rather then crimes and wrongs should be unpunished quia salus populi suprema lex the safety of the people is the supream Law and the safety of the people is contained in the repressing of offences by punishment It is a positive ground that the accessory in Felony cannot be proceeded against untill the principall be tried yet if a man by subtility and malice set a mad man by some device to kill one and he doth so now forasmuch as the mad man is excused because he cannot have any will or malice the Law accounteth the Incitor as principall though he be absent rather then the Crime shall go unpunished 13 Eliz 1. So it is a ground in the Law that the appeal of Murther goeth not to the Heire where the party murthered hath a wife nor the younger brother where there is an elder yet if the wife murther the husband because she is the party Offendor the appeal leapeth over to the heire and so if the Son and Heir murther his Father it goeth to the second brother Ed. 4 M 28. 6. Stanf. l. 2 f. 60. But if the Rule be one of the higher sort of Maximes that are regulae rationales and not positivae then the Law will endure rather a particular Offence to escape without punishment then violate such a Rule As it is a Rule that penall Statutes shall not be taken by equity And the Statute of 1 E. 6. enacteth that those that are attainted for stealing of Horses shall not have their Clergy The Judge conceived that this should not extend to him that should steal but one horse and therefore procured a new act for it in 2 E. 6. c. 33. for it is not like the case upon the Statute of Gloucester that gââââh an action of waste against him for term of life or years and yet if a man hold for a year he is within the Statute for penall Lawes are taken strictly and litterally onely in the point of defining and setting down the fact and punishment and in those clauses that concern them and not in generall words which are but circumstances and conveyances in the putting of the case and so note the diversity for if the Law be that for such an offence a man shall lose his right hand and the Offendor hath his right hand cut off in the Wars he shall not lose his left hand but the crime shall rather pass unpunished vide ibidem plura Nemo punitur pro alieno delicto Coke com f. 145. b. No man is punished for another mans fault And therefore the Defendant in a Replevin cannot claim property by his Bayliff or Servant and the reason is for that if the claim fall out to be false he shall be fined for his contempt which the Lord cannot be unless he maketh claim himself for no man shall be punished for anothers fault Dyer f. 66. pl. 14. It is the Law of God that every one shall bear his own burthen and receive judgment according to his proper fact and merit whether it be good or evill As whereas the Plaintiff chargeth the Defendants with an escape made and suffered by them they ought not to accuse
granteth a lease for life or yeares he hath the reversion in him which he may lawfully grant but the Law requireth in this case that he be not deceived in his estate and to grant the possession of the Land whereas he hath but a reversion and therefore when he granteth the Land notwithstanding that it be in lease for life or for yeares of Record or otherwise the grant is good When the words of a grant are not sufficient ex vi termini to passe the thing granted but the grant is utterly void there any non obstante cannot make the grant good vide ibidem plura Davis f. 75. In the case of Commendams By our Law what is wrong and malum insert and against the Law of God cannot be dispensed with and therefore 11 H. 7. 12. a. It is said that the King cannot dispense with any that doth nusance in the High-way and if he doth it that such a dispensation is void 8 H. 6. 19. The King cannot grant that if a man doth a trespasse to me that I shall not have an action against him or that a man shall be his own Judge and therefore it is often said in our Books that the prerogative of the King shall doe no wrong to the Subject 13 E. 3. 8 So though the King may dispense with a Statute which prohibiteth an indifferent thing to be done yet he cannot change the common Law by his Patent 37 H. 8. Patent 110. And as to the Pope it is often said in the Bishop of St. Davis case that the Bulls of the Pope cannot change the Lawes of England Notwithstanding the word non obstante was first invented and first used in the Court of Rome which as Sir John Davis observeth f. 69. b. was a mischeivous precedent to all the common Weales of Christendome for the temporall Princes perceiving that the Pope dispensed with his Canons in imitation of him have used their prerogative to dispense with their penall Lawes and Statutes and whereas before their Lawes were religiously observed as the Lawes of the Medes and Persians Davis f. 77. The Law which ordaineth that the first benefice shall be void by the acceptance of the second may be dispensed with and so is it of the Law that ordaineth that when a man is made a Bishop that his other Benefices shall be void as Thrining saith 11. H. 4. 213. b. For those Laws were made by Ecclesiasticall policy and therefore the same policy may dispense with those Laws permissio non est officium legis quia lex ad fert necessitatem Reg. I. C. permission is not the office of the Law for the Law bringeth necessity As by the Statute of W. 2. Lands were permitted to be entailed and usury also by many Statutes yet can they not properly be termed Lawes and Statutes Confessus in judicio pro judicato habetur quodam modo sua sententia damnatur Coke l. 11. f. 30. He who confesseth in the Court of Justice is holden adjudged and in a certaine manner is condemned by his own mouth or sentence And therefore the Attainder in confession is the strongest attainder may be for the vehement presumption it hath of truth for it should be absurd to say that he hath not done such a Felony since the party himselfe hath confessed it to the distruction of him and all his off-spring And the case of confession is a stronger case then guiltinesse by verdict for though he be found guilty by verdict yet may he be innocent and therefore at the common Law he may have his Clergy and make his purgation but if he had confessed the offence upon record he shall not have his Clergy at the common Law because he could not make his purgation when the Court findeth his confession on Record for in the intendement of the Law he cannot contrary his expresse and voluntary confession in Court vide ibidem plura In praesentia majoris cessat potentia minoris Manhood in Ployd f. 498. a. In the presence of the greater power the lesser power ceaseth All the Justices agreed that the Ordinary the Patron and King ought to agree in making an impropriation and the Ordinary is the principall aagent in it in that he hath the spirituall jurisdiction and the act of appropriation is a thing spirituall and what the Ordinary of the Diasis might doe that the Pope used to doe in the Realme as supreame Ordinary and was a long time suffered so to doe and did use to make appropriations without the Bishop which were taken to be good and the Bishop never contradicted but accepted them as good for in the power of the greater the power of the lesser ceaseth and in all Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction his authority was taken as absolute and did bind the Bishop as his inferior in all acts now such authority and jurisdiction as the Pope used within this Realme was acknowledged by the Parliament 25. H. 8 and other Statutes to be in the King and that he might lawfully doe all that the Pope was accustomed and used to doe within this Realme and from him it descended to his Son Edward who as superame Ordinary did make the appropriation of his own authority and jurisdiction without the Bishop and did put these words in his Charter authoritate nostra regia ecclesiastica qua fungimur vide ibidem plura Vectigal ab origine ipsa jus caesarum est patrimoniale lex imperatoria Custome from the beginning is the right and patrimony of Caesar and Emperors and are called vectigalia a mercibus evectis invectis from Merchandizes exported and imported for custom is a prerogative and benefit to which Kings and Princes are by the Law of Nations intitled And as the Law Nations were before Kings so Kings were made by the Lawes of Nations ex jure gentium originem suam traxerunt Baldus and as soone as they were made Kings presently the Law of Nations did annex the prerogative of custome to their severall Crownes so saith Baldus cum creatus fuerit Rex omnia regalia ei conceduntur competit omnibus regibus jus imponendi vectigalia when a King was created all royall incidents were granted to him and the right of imposing customes appertained to all Kings Wherein the rules of our Law as Davis observeth f. 12. are agreeable with those of the imperiall Law for we also say that custome is the ancient inheritance of the Crowne of England and that inheret sceptro and is as ancient as the Crowne it selfe and is due by common right and by prescription and not by the grant and benevolence of Merchants or by Act of Parliament Dier 165. b. And whereas by the imperiall Law Primaria vectigalium causa ac ratio fuit ut plana tutaque mercatori praetereunti itinera praestarentur Plin. l. 19. c. 4. The first cause and reason of customes was that plaine and safe voyages should be exhibited and assured to the Merchants and in our
shall give notice of the said felony to some of the Inhabitants of any Village or Hamler next the place where the robbery was done and that if in their pursuit they take any of the Offenders that shall excuse them though they do not take all See there in that Statute the reason of the alteration Co. l. 6. f. 50. a. b. At the common Law a man that had once the benefit of the Clergy shall have it another time and so in infinitum which was remedied by the Act of 4 H. 7. So as the burning in the hand was not to other purpose but to notifie to the Judge whether he had had his Clergy before or no ibid. So if one be attainted at the Common Law for forging false Deeds the King cannot pardon it yet the King may pardon the corporall punishment in case of forgery in the Star-chamber because all Suites in the Star-chamber are but informations for the King though the Suit be exhibited by the party ibidem So before the Statute of 18 Eliz. c. 7. the King might in case of Inditement of Man slaughter pardon the Imprisonment 15 H. 7.9 but not in an appeal but after the Statute of 18 Eliz. by which it is provided that after Clergy allowed and burning in the hand the Prisoner shall presently be enlarged and delivered out of prison It was resolved that that Act did extend as well to the case of appeal as to the case of Inditements otherwise the party shall lawfully be discharged of his punishment and yet remain in perpetual prison ib. vide examen legum Angliae f. 29. Cessante ratione legis câssat lex Coke com f. 70. b. The reason of the Law ceasing the Law it self ceaseth As he that holdeth his land by Escuage when the King maketh a Voyage royall into Scotland to subdue the Scots then he that holdeth by the service of one Knights fee ought to be with the King conveniently arrayed for the War for forty daies c. yet needeth he not go with the King himself if he will find another man and this seemeth to be good reason for it may be he is languishing so that he cannot go nor ride Also an Abbot or another man of religion or a Feme-sole which hold by such services ought not go in proper person Littleton ibidem Quia multa In jure communi propter rationabilem causam omittenda sunt for many things for a reasonable cause are to be omitted If the King give lands to an Abbot and his Successors to hold by Knights service this had been good and shall do homage and fine a man but there was no wardship or releif or other incident belonging thereunto but if the Abbot and his Heirs had conveyed the land to a natural man and his heirs now the wardship releif or other incident belonged of common right to the King So if the King give lands to a Mayor and Comminalty and their successors to be holden in Knights-service the Patentee shall do no homage neither shall there be any wardship or releif onely they shall find a man but if they convey the land to any naturall man and his heirs now marriage homage ward releif or other incidents belong hereunto for the reason of the Law being changed the Law its self is changed and the immunity which was in respect of the body politique by conveyance over ceaseth Coke ibid. Qui rationem in omnibus quaerunt rationem subvertant Theophrastus Coke l. 2 f. 7.30 who do seek reason in all things overthrow reason As if a man make a Lease of Indenture for life of lands in severall Counties and maketh livery of seisin in one County and divers daies after he maketh livery in the other County yet an intire rent shall issue out of the land in both Counties and yet the livery by which the Estate passed was made at severall times and therefore it may be argued that presently by the first livery the rent issued out of it But the Law shall not adjudge by parcels in subversion of the intent and agreement of the parties but after all Acts are made in performance of the originall contract and agreement of the parties the Law shall adjudge upon all as done at one and the same time So if a man make a Charter of Feoffment with warranty and deliver the Deed to the Feoffee and after at another time make livery secundum formam chartae yet the Warranty is good and yet it may be objected that when the Deed was delivered no estate passed to which the warranty may be annexed nor no estate was in the Feoffee by which the Deed might enure and so by nice construction upon the distinction of time the warranty shall be subverted but the Deed which comprehended the warranty took effect presently by the delivery of the Deed before livery and seisin and therefore the sentence is true that who do seek reason in all things subvert reason ibidem SECT II. A Verbis legis non est recedendum Coke l. 5. f. 118. b. we ought not to go from the words of the Law Edriches casc A. deviseth rent with distress to B. for the life of C. the heire leaseth the land for life to D. the remainder to E. in see the rent is behind in the life of D. D. dieth C. dieth B. distraineth for the arrearages of E. in remainder and resolved that he shall be charged by the second branch of 32 H. 8. c. 37. which giveth a distress for the arrearages upon such lands out of which the said rents were issuing in such manner and form as if Cestuy que vie had been living And the Judges said that they ought not to make any interpretation against the express letter of the statute for nothing can so express the intent of the makers of the act as their direct words themselves for Index animi seâmo and it shall be perilous to give scope to make construction in any case against the express words when the intent of the makers appeareth not to the contrary and when no inconvenience upon it shall arise for we ought not to go from the words of the Law vide ibidem plura Coke l. 10 f. 105. a. b. If in an Assise so many of the Recognitors make default that there be not twelve the Justices of Assise cannot award Tales de circumstantibus for though the Justices of Assise are named in the said Act of 35 H. 8. as well as the Justices of Nisi prius yet insomuch as the said Act doth not give power to Justices of Assise or Nisi prius but where the tryall shall be by twelve men in any Writ of Habeas Corpora or Distringas with Nisi prius and it cannot be in an Assise for Assisae capiamur in proprio Comitatu and can never be taken by Nisi prius in proprio commitatu and no exposition can be made against the express words for that shall be viperina expositio quae
Dower and distraineth the tenant albeit the grant of Mesne was to acquit him against the Lord and his heires onely yet because she continued the State of her husband and the reversion remained in the heire this grant of the acquittall did extend to his wife for Qui haeret Quoties in verbis nulla est ambiguitas ibi nulla expositio contra verba ipsa fienda est Coke l. 7. f. 24. a. So often as there is no ambiguity nor doubt in the words there no exposition against the expresse words is to be made If A. by Deed granteth rent out of the Mannor of D. to have and receive it to him and his heires and further granteth by the same Deed that if the rent be behind that the grant shall distraine in the Mannor of S. both the Mannors are charged the one with the rent the other with the distresse for the rent the one issueth out of the Land and the other is to be taken upon the Land for here a rent is granted expresly to be issuing out of the Mannor of D. and the parties have expresly limited out of which Land the rent shall issue and in which the distresse shall be taken and the Law shall not make any exposition against the expresse words and intention of the parties when it can stand with the rule of Law for where there is no ambiguity in the words there is no exposition to be made contrary to the expresse words ibidem in Calvins case Exception Yet as Mr. Ploydon saith f. 18. b. The words of the Law of nature of the Law of the Realme and the Law of God will yeild and give place to some acts and things done against the words of the same Laws and that is when they are infringed to avoid greater inconveniences or for necessity or by conpulsion For inconvenience It is a rule in the Law that factum unius alteri nocere non debet no mans deed ought to hurt another but there is another maxime that it is better to suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience which is to be preferred before it Coke com 152. b. As if there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Tenant holdeth of the Mesne by five shillings and the Mesne holdeth over by the service of twelve pence if the Lord purchaseth the Tenancy the Mesnalty is extinct because when the Lord hath the Tenancy he holdeth of the Lord next parament to him and if he should hold of him that was Mesne then he should hold the same Tenancy immediately of two Lords which should be inconvenient and the Law will that we rather suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience Littleton so as the rule is regularly true res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet what thing is acted among some must not hurt an other but with this exception unlesse an inconvenience should follow Coke ibidem So it is a Maxime in the Law that a warranty of a collaterall Ancestor if it descend upon him shall bar the heire as if A. disseise B. of Land and selleth the Land and the Alienee obtaineth a warranty of the Ancestor collaterall to the Disseissee after whose death the warranty discendeth upon the Disseissee the Disseissee by descent of the warranty upon him is barred for ever in Law Doctor and Student l. 2. c. 501. but though they all offended in obtaining of the said collaterall warranty yet such an offence is not to be considered in the Law for the inconvenience that thereupon might ensue for it is holden for an inconvenience as Coke saith Com. 152 b. That any of the Maximes of the Law should be broken though a private man suffer losse for that by infringing of a Maxime not onely a generall prejudice to many but in the end a publick incertainty and confusion would follow lex citius tolerarâ vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum and Law will sooner suffer a private injury then a publick evil neither in such cases is there any remedy to be had in the Chancery or in conscience for it was resolved in Beverlys case Coke l. 4. f. 124. a. That against an expresse maxime of the common Law no man shall have releife in Chancery for it should be in subversion of a principle or ground of Law Doctor and Student ibidem vide ibidem plura So Ployd 18. b. It is against the Law of nature and the Law of reason to beate the person of any man in any cases yet when a man is mad and of non sanae memoriae and doth much evill a man and his Parents also may take him binde him and beate him with rods and may justify it 22. Ass Pl. 56. And by the Statute of Mar. it is generally prohibited that none shall drive any distresse out of one County into another and yet it is adjudged that if one hold Land of a Mannor in another County that the Lord may distraine and drive the distresse of the Land holden of the Mannor in the County where the Mannor is and that is in avoidance of the inconvenience for it should be a great damage to the Lord if he should not drive the distresse to his owne mannor for the avoidance of which the Law is not offended although the words of the Law be broken M. 1. H. 6. Pl. f. 3. A man priviledged in some Court is sued in London and the Action is actionable no where else yet upon a supersedeas the Court shall surcease Finch Nomot And wee see also that necessity in all Lawes shall be a good excuse and that all Lawes give place to necessity according to the common proverbe necessitas non habet legem necessity hath no Law And therefore in a precipe quod reddat the tenant shall excuse his default by a flood of water and yet every default is abhorred in our Law because it is a contempt of the Court but because by perill of death he could not come the necessity of the chance in such case in regard there was no default in him shall excuse him M. 38. H. 6. 11. So the words of the Law of God may be infringed by necessity without offence to God and therefore in the old Law by the Law of God it was prohibited that none should eate of the shew bread and yet it appeareth that David for necessity of famine did eate the said bread and yet he did not breake the Law as our Saviour Christ declareth in the Gospell so the Apostles of our Saviour did pull the eares of Corne of other persons and did eate them and that for necessity of famine Ploydon f. 19 a. So if a man steale victualls to satisfie his present hunger this is no Felony nor Larceny Stanford because it is for the conservation of life And if diverse be in danger of drowning by the casting away of some Boats or Barge and one of them get to some Planke or on the Beats side to keep him above water and
another to save his life thrust him from it whereby he is drowned this is neither se defendendo nor by misadventure but is justifiable Bac. Max. f. 25. So if diverse Felons be in a Goale and the Goale by casualty is set on fire whereby the prisoners get forth this is no escape nor breach of prison 15. H. 7. 2. by Keble So if a man have right to Land and doth not make his claime for feare of force the Law alloweth him continuall claime which shall be as beneficiall to him as any entry 12. H. 4. 20. Lit. So where Baron and Feme commit a Felony the Feme can neither be principall nor accessary because the Law intendeth her to have no will in regard of the obedience and subjection shee oweth to her husband Stanf. 26 2. E. 3. 1â0 Cor. Fitz. So one reason why Embassadors are used to be excused of practises against the State where they reside unlesse it be in point of conspiracy which is against the Law of Nations and Society is because it doth not appeare whether they have it in Mandatis and then they are excused by necessity of obedience Bacon Max f. 26. So if I be tenant for yeares of an house and it by the Act of God or a stranger be over-throwne by great tempest or by sudden floods or invasion of Enemies in all these cases I am excused in wast 42. E. 3. 6. 19. E. 3. by Fitz. wast Ployd f. 9. b. Any man in his defence or a Champion upon tryall may kill others and that is for the necessity of the salvation of his life in his defence and by the common Custome of the Realme the Hostelers shall be charged with the Goods of the Guests lossed and taken out of their houses yet if their houses be broken by the Kings enemies and the goods of the guests lessened or embezelled they shall not be charged with them because they could not resist them ibidem So for necessity the funerall expences shall be first paid by the Executors Broh executor 162. So a man may milk a Cow that he hath by return irrepleaible and that is for necessity Finch Nom. I. S. 35. Davis 122. 1. Nihil magis est justum quam quod necessarium est Nothing is more just then what is necessary So the King by his Prerogative for the necessary charges of the Crown may decree Imposts and Impositions payable upon Merchandizes contrary to the petition of right and property Though a man may not be punished for an act he doth by necessity of obedience yet if the act be unlawfull he is not the less to be blamed or if it be not necessitas culpabilis As those which releived Sir John Oldcastle with provision were not punished because they did it pro timore mortis for feare of death Steel in the C. of M. H. Coke com l. 5. f. 40. b. Necessitas saepenumero vincit communem legem Necessity for the most part overcommeth the common Law As if two Joynt-tenants be of land to them and the heires of one of them they shall not joyn in a Writ of Right But two Joynt tenants and the heires of one of them in a Writ of Advowson shall joyn in a Writ of right of Advowson And the reason of the diversity is because that in the first case they have severall means and remedies as it is agreed in 46 E. 3. 21. But in the other case if Tenant for life shall not joyn with him that hath the fee neither the one nor the other shall have any remedy and therfore in this case necessity overcometh the Law ibidem Coke l. 10 f. 61. a. Illud quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum necessitas inducit privilegium quod jure privatur Bract. f. 247. that which is not otherwise lawfull necessity maketh lawfull and necessity introduceth a priviledge which is deprived by Law As if a Bishop granteth an Annuity-out of his Bishoprick that is restrained by the Statute of 1 Eliz because it is a diminution of its revenues and depauperation of its successors But if a Bishop grant an Office to one only that is not restrained by the statute of 1 Eliz. because such Grants are for necessity for if the Bishop should not have power to grant such Offices of service and necessity for the life of the Grantees no sufficient persous would serve them in such Offices or at the least would not discharge it with such alacrity if they had no estate for their lives but that their estates did depend upon uncertains as the death or translation of the Bishop Bacon Max. f 17. Privilegium non valet contra rempublicam The necessity of priviledge prevaileth not against the Common wealth for publick necessity is greater then private and therefore in all cases if the act be against the Common-wealth necessity excuseth it And accordingly the Law imposeth on every Subject that he prefer the urgent service of his Prince and Country before the safety of his life As in a tempest if those in a Ship throw over their Goods they are not answerable But if upon command they have Ordinance and amunition to releive any of the Kings Townes they cannot justifie the throwing of them over ibidem So in the case of Husband and Wife if they joyn in committing Treason the necessity of obedience doth not excuse the wife as in felony because it is against the Common-wealth 13 H 8.16 by Shelly So if a fire be taken in a street I may justifie the pulling down of the Wall or House of another mans to save the row from the spreading of the fire 12 H. 10 by Brook 22 Assise pl. 66 But if I be assailed in my House City or Town and distressed and to save my life set fire on my house which taketh hold upon other houses adjoyning I am subject to their action of the case because I cannot rescue my own life by any thing which is against the Common wealth but if it had been but a private trespass as the going over anothers ground or the breaking of his inclosure when I am pursued for the safety of my life it is justifiable 6 E. 4. 7. But necessitas culpabilis excuseth not as to kill one se defendendo is not matter of justification because quarrels are presumed not to grow without some wrong and the Law supposeth the party not to be without some malice and therefore it putteth him to sue out his pardon of course and punisheth him with the loss of his Goods Bacon Max. f 28. Compulsion also is a good excuse in our Law against the words of the Law And therefore whatsoever I do by duresse is not my act but may be avoided according to the rule Actus me invito factus non est meus actus An act done against my will is not my act as when I am compelled for fear of imprisonment to make a Bond or a Deed such a fear sufficeth to avoid
may have a Quare impedit against another if shee be disturbed of her presentment by turne so cannont Joyn-tenants or tenants in common F. N. B. 34 I. For equality of partition among Coparceners a rent granted shall be a Fee-simple without the word heires Coke com f. 10. a. Coke com 102. a. Homage ancestrell is a speciall Warranty in Law and the Lands generally which the Lord hath at the time of the Voucher shall be lyable to execution in value whether he hath them by descent or purchase but in the case of an expresse warranty the heire shall be charged onely with such Lands as he hath by descent from the same Ancestor so in this case Firmior potentior est operatio legis quam dispositio hominis Lease upon condition that if it happen that the Lessee make any wast in or upon the Premisses it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and the Lessee suffereth the house to fall in default of covering and reparations Dyer and Wash said that the Lessor might re-enter for such wast is punishable by the statute of Gloucester for destructionem facere in domibus Dyer 281. b. and so it is if he suffer wast to be done by a stranger Doct. Stud. l. 2. c. 4. yet if the Tenant had been bound in an Obligation that he shall do no wast he shall not forfeit his Bond by the wast of a stranger for greater is the operation of the Law c. A man is seised of three Mannors of equall value and taketh a wife and she taketh one entire Mannor for her Dower which is charged with a rent she shall hold it charged otherwise it is if she had recovered her Dower by a Writ of Dower and had had a third part of each assigned to her Inutilis labor sine fructu non est effectus legis Non licet quod dispendio licet Sapiens incipit a fine Et lex non praecipit in utilia Coke com f. 127. b. The Law commandeth no vain chargeable and unprofitable things As a Villain by the Law shall not have an appeal of Mayhem against his Lord for in an appeal the Mayhem man shall onely recover damages and if the Villain in this case recovereth damages against his Lord and thereupon hath execution the Lord may take it that the Villain hath in execution from the Villain and so the recovery void inutilis labor stultus and unprofitable labour is foolish and idle which the Law prescribeth not Coke com f. 197. a. Tenants in Common of an Hawk and an Horse shall joyn in Assise for otherwise they would be without remedy for one of them cannot make his plaint in an Assise of the Moyety of an Hawk or Horse because the Law will never inforce a man to demand that which he cannot recover as the Moyety of an Hawk or an Horse or any other entire thing for Lex neminem cogit ad vana in utilia Coke com f. 319. b. If a Lease be made for term of life the remainder to another in tail the remainder over to the right Heirs of the Tenant for life and Tenant for life granteth his remainder in fee to another by his Deed the remainder shall presently pass without any Attornment for none can atturn but himself and it were in vain that he should atturn upon his own Grant for quod vanum est lex non requirit Coke l. 5. 84. a. Where a man is in custody of the Sheriff by process of Law and after another Writ is delivered to him to take the body of him who is in custody presently he is in his custody by force of the second Writ by judgment of Law although he make not an actuall arrest of him for to what purpose shall he be arrested of him who is and was before in his custody for the Law prescribeth no fruitless things Actus legis nemini facit injuriam Coke com 178. a The Act of Law doth injury to none As if the land out of which a rent-charge is granted be recovered by an elder Title and thereby the rent-charge is voided yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the rent-charge is avoided by course of Law So if Tenant for another mans life grant a rent-charge by Deed to one for one and twenty years Cestuy que use dieth the rent-charge is determined yet may the Grantee have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cestuy que use because the rent-charge did determine by the act of God and course in Law which wrong no man ibid. Coke l. 5. f. 87. a. If the Defendant in debt dieth in execution the Plaintiff shall have a new execution by Elegit or Fieir facias because otherwise the Plaintiff should lose his debt without any default in him and the act of God and the act in Law will not prejudice any one Trewgrijard being a Burgess of the Parliament who was taken upon an Exigent post capias and yet upon his Writ of priviledge of Parliament the Sheriff let him go at large for the King and the Realm hath an interest in the body of every Subject and the Common-wealth shall be preferred yet the party of the Parliament may be taken in execution again after the Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced in his execution by the act of Law which doth no man wrong neither is the Sheriff chargeable because his Office consists chiefly in the execution and service of writs and is sworn to do it Dyer 60. Lex plus respicit acta sine verbis quam verba sine actis Coke l. 3. f. 26. The Law respecteth more acts without words then words without acts As at the Common Law if lands be given to Baron and Feme in taile or in fee and the Baron dieth there the Feme cannot devest the Frank-Tenement out of her by any verball waiver or disagreement in pais as if before any entry made by her she saith that she waiveth and altogether disagreeth to the said state and that she never will take or accept of it yet the Frank-tenement remaineth in her and she may enter when she pleaseth and waive it in Court of Record for the Law more respecteth Acts without words then words without Acts and therefore if she entreth and taketh the profits although she say nothing it is a good agreement in Law And so it is adjudged in Mich. 34 E. 1. Avowry 232. That if a man take a distress for one thing yet when he cometh in Court of Record he may make an Avowry for what thing he pleaseth a multo fortiori when a Frank-tenement is vested in him it cannot be devested by nude words in pais and with it accordeth 17 E 3. 6. 17. Where the Baron alieneth his lands and retaketh the estate to him and his wife in taile the Baron dieth the Lord of whom the land was holden by Knights-service supposing that the Baron died sole
his own Art 329 330 Cui licet quod majus non debet quod minus est non licere To whom it is lawfull to do the greater its lawfull for him to do the lesse 120 Cujus que rei potissima pars principium est The beginning is the principall part upon which all other things are founded 6 Cuique naturale est illud quod procreavit tueri it is naturall to every one to defend that he hath gotten 163 D. DE ullo quod est sua natura indivisibile nullam partem habebit uxor pro dote sua sed satisfacietur ad valentiam Of that which of its nature is indivisible the wife shall have no part for her Dower but shall be satisfied according to the value 159 Da tua dum tua sunt post mortem tunc tua non sunt Give yours whilest they are yours for after death they are not yours 25 Derivativa potestas non potest esse major primativa The derivative power cannot be greater then the primative 73 Debile fundamentum fallit opus A weak foundation faileth the work 84 Destinata tantum pro factis non habentur Thing destinated only are not taken for things done 89 De fide officio judicis non recipitur questio sed de scientia sive error sit ju is aut facti There is no question to be made of the Office and faith of a Judge but or his knowledge whether it be error in Law or in fact 378 Divisio est oratio qua totum in partes distribuitur Division is an Oration by which the whole is divided into parts 133 Dispensatio mali prohibiti est de juâe domino regi concessa propter impossibilitatem pââvidendi de omnibus particulâribus The dispensation of a prohibited evill iâ of right granted to the King for the impossibility of providing for all particulars Dispensatio est mali prohibiti provida relaxatio utilitate seu necessitate pensata Dispensation is a provident relexation of a prohibited evill recompenced by profit or necessity 385 Dies dominicus non est dies juridicus The Sabboth day is no Law day 5 Distingue tempora concordabis-leges Distinguish the times and you will agree the Lawes Divinatio non interpretatio est quae omnino receditae litera It is a divination and not an interpretation which altogether leaveth the letter 425 Dilationes in lege sunt odiosae Delaies in Lawes are odious 326 Dispositio de interesse futuro est inutilis The Grant of a future interest is vain and void 470 Dona cloudestina semper sunt suspiciosa Close gifts are alwaies suspitious 291 Dormit aliquandâ jus morietur nunquam A Right sleepeth sometimes but dieth never 425 Dolosus versatur in universalibus generalibus A Deceiver is conversant about universalls and generalls 21 Dominium a possessione caepisse dicitur Dominion is said to have its beginning from possession 178 E. EAdem simili ratione suadente idem jus statuendum est The same and the like reason perswading the same Law is to be determined 117 Ecclesia fungitur vice Minoris meliorem potest facere conditionem deteriorem nequaquam The Church exerciseth the Office of a Minor and can make its condition better but not worse 4 Electio semel facta placitum testatum non patitur regressum An election once made and the plea testified doth not suffer regresse or going back 305 Eventus est qui ex causa sequitur dicitur eventus quia ex causa evenit The event is that which followeth the cause and therefore is called an event because it cometh from the cause 41 Exitus acta probat finis non pugna coronat The end proveth and crowneth the work 87 Execuâio juris non habet injuriam The execution of the Law hath no injury 267 Exitus nonnuquam in maleficiis spectatur non voluntas The end sometimes in evill acts is respected and not the will 194 Expressum facit cessare tacitum That which is expressed causeth that which is implyed to cease 447 Expressio eorum quae tacite insunt nihil operatur The expression of those things which are implied work nothing 445 Extra terretorium dicenti non paretur impune He that obeyeth one prescribing Lawes beyond his jurisdiction shall not go unpunished 374 Excusat aut extenuat delictum in capitalibus quod non idem operatur in civilibus That doth excuse and extenuate an offence in capitall causes which doth not work the same in civill causes 304 Exteriora acta indicant interiora animi secreta The outward acts shew the inward secrets of the mind 88 Ex verbo generali aliquid accipitur Out of a generall word something may be excepted 22 F. FActum unius alteri nocere non debet the deed of one ought not to hurt the other f. 428. Factum a Judice quod ad ejus officium non pertinet ratum non potest esse an act done by a Judge which doth not appertaine to his office is not allowed f. 375 Facinus quos inquinat aequat an offence equalleth those are infected with it f. 57. Festinatio Justitiae est noverca infortunij the festination of Justice is the step mother of misfortune f. 327. Finis rei attendendus est fines mandatorum domini regis per rescripta sua diligenter sunt observanda the end of the thing is to be heeded and the end of the mandate of the King by his Writs are diligently to be observed f 87. Fortior potentior est dispositio legis quam hominis the disposition of the Law is more strong and powerfull then the disposition of man f. 459. Finis finem litibus imponit a Fine putteth an end to suites f. 90. Frustra expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur in vaine is the event expected where no effect followeth f. 92. Frustra feruntur leges nisi obedientibus in vaine are Lawes to be made unlesse to those who are obedient f. 365. Frustra fit per plura quod fieri potest per pauicora in vaine is that done by more which may be done by fewer f. 134. Fraus dolus nemini patrocinari debent Fraude and Deceite ought not to Patronise any one 229. Frustra est potentia quae nunquam venit in actum vaine is the power which never cometh into Act 254. Frangenti fidem fides frangatur eidem to him that breaks his faith let faith be broken f. 293. Fraudis interpretatio non semper ex mente duntaxat sed ex consilio quoque desideratur the interpretation of fraude is not allwayes collected out of the minde but also from the councell and consent f. 293. Fucatus error nuda veritate in multis est probabilior sed saepenumero multis rationibus vincit veritatem painted error in many things is more probable then naked truth and oftentimes with many reasons overcometh truth f. 136. Furiosus suo furore punitur a mad man is punished by his madnesse f.
233. G. GEnerale nihil ponit generale nihil certi implicat a generall thing determineth or implyeth nothing certainely f. 17. Generalibus specialia derogant speciall things derogate and diminish geneâall things 18 Generalibus semper specialia insunt speciall things are alwayes contained in generals f. 19. Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae sunt specialiter comprehensa a generall clause is not extended to those things which are specially comprehended f. 20. Clausula generalis non refertur ad expressa a generall clause is not referred to those things which are expressed f. 21. Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae antea sunt specialiter comprehensa a generall clause is not extended to those things which before were specially comprehended f. 21 Generalia sunt praeponenda singularibus generall words are to be put before particular f. 22. Grammatica falsa non vitiat chartam false Grammer doth not destroy a deed f. 13. H. HAeres est alter ipse filius est pars patris the heir is another selfe and the Son is part of the Father f. 165. Haeres non tenetur in Anglia ad debita antecessoris reddenda nisi per antecessorem ad hoc fuerit obligatus praeterquam debita regis tantum an heire is not bound in Englaâd to pay the debt of his Ancestor if he be bound thereunto unlesse the debts of the King onely f. 173. Haeâes legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant he is a lawfull heire whom marriage demonstrateth so to be f. 169. I. INclusio unius est exclusio alterius the inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another f. 466. Illud quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum that which otherwise is not lawfull necessity maketh lawfull f. 132. Illud possumus quod jure possumus we can doe that which by Law we can doe f. 241 Idem non potest esse agens patiens the same thing cannot be an agent and a patient f. 45. Ignorantia juris non excusat ignorance of the Law doth not excuse f. 332. 334. Ignorantia facti excusat ignorance of the fact excuseth f. 334. Ignoratis terminis ignoratur ars the termes being not understood the art is not understood f. 8. Impossibile est unum corpus duobus locis esse simul it is impossible for one body to be in two places at one and the same time 160 Impersonalitas non concludit nec ligat impersonality doth not conclude or binde 11. Impotentia excusat legem impotency excuseth the Law 223 Infans ab omnibus civilibus officijs debet abstinere an infant ought to abstaine from all civill offices 332 Imperitia culpae annumeratur Imperitia maxima est mechanicorum paena ignorance and unskilfullnesse is accounted a fault and is the greatest punishment of Artists and Mechanicks 332 Inter arma silent Leges Lawes are silenced by armes 412 In praesentia majoris cessat potentia minoris in the presence of the Major the power of the minor ceaseth 394 Injuria illata in corpus non potest remitti injuries made upon the body cannot be remitted 274 In pari causa possessor potior habetur In aequali jure melior est possessio possidentis in an even and equall cause and right the possession of the possessor is the better 182 Infinitum in jure reprobatur infinity is rejected in the Law 187 In omnibus quidâm maxime tamen in jure aquitas est In all things but especially in the Law there is equity 306 In eo quod plus est semper inest minus the lesse is allwayes in that which is more 418 In omnibus fere minori aetati succurritur in all things almost the Law favoreth infants 241 In criminalibus praestant accidentia in criminall acts accidents prevaile 531 In republica maxime conservanda sunt jura belli in a common wealth the Lawes of War are principally to be preserved 408 In ambiguis casibus semper prasumitur pro rege in doubtful cases it is alwayes presumed for the King 403 In favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in favorable and indifferent things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth 49 In obscuris secundum magis similius est judicandum vel quod plerumque inspici solet in obscure sayings we ought to judge according to that which is most likely and which is wont to be 28 In distjunctivis sufficit alterum esse verum in disjuntives it is sufficient if one of them be true 12. In quo quis delinquit in eo de jure est puniendus in what one offendeth in the same by right he is to be pânished 394 In jure non remota sed proxima causa spectatur in the Law the next and not the remote cause is respected 79 In omnibus stipulationibus id tempus spectatur in quo contrahimus in all contracts the time is respected in which we doe contract 101 In omnibus obligationibus in quibus dies non ponitur praesenti die debetur nulla temporis designatio praesens denotat in all obligations in which the day is not set the debt is due presently and no designation of time denoteth the time present 101 Inutilis labor fine fructu non est effectus Legis an unprofitable labor and without fruite is not the effect of the Law 462 Interpretari concordare Leges Legibus est optimus interpretandi modus to interpret and agree the Lawes with the Lawes is the best manner of interpreting 436 Ipsa etenim Leges cupiunt ut jure regantur the Lawes themselves desire to be ruled by equity 306 307 Jura naturalia sunt immutabilia the Lawes of nature are immutable 160 Jus descendit non terra the right doth descend and not the Land 253 Judex bonus nihil ex arbitrio faciat nec proposito domesticae voluntatis sed juxta Leges jura pronuntiet a good Judge ought to doe nothing of his owne fancy nor according to the purpose of his domestick will but according to Law and right 365 Judicandum est legibus non exemplis we ought to judge by Lawes and not examples 366 Judicis est judicare secundum allegata probata it is the part of a Judge to judge according to that is alledged and proved 366 Judicium non a suo Judice datum nullius est momenti a judgement not given by his Judge is of no force 373 Jurisdictio est potestas de publico introducta cum necessitate jâris dicendâ jurisdiction is a power introduced by the publick for the necessity of doing right 337 Jus sanguinis quod in legitimis successionibus spectatur ipso nativitatis tempore quaesitum est the right of blood which is respected in lawfull successions is found in the very time of the nativity 169 Justum non est aliquem ante natum mortuum facere bastardum qui toâo tempore suo pro legitimo habebatur
It is not just to make any one a Bastard who all his time hath been taken for legitimate 13 L. LEX est summa ratio The Law is the chiefest reason 4â7 Lex neminem cogit ad impossibilia The Law compelleth none to impossibilities 450 Leges non veâbis sed rebus sunt imposiâae Lawes are not imposed on words but on thiâgs 425 Lex citius tolerare vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum The Law will sooner suffer a private losse then a publick evill 429 Lex non praecipit inutila The Law prescribeth no unprofitable things 462 Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant The latter Lawes abrogate the former which are contrary to them 452 Lex non paetitur fractiones divisiones statuum The Law doth not suffer fractions and divisions of Estates 456 Lex plus respicit acta sine verbis quam verba sine actis The Law respecteth more acts without words then words without acts 464 Lex semper dabit remedium The Law will alwaies give a remedy 257 Lex fingit ubi subsistit aequitas The Law feigneth where equity subsisteth 309 Legis constructioâ non facit injuriam The construction of the Law doth no injury 316 Lex non requirit verificari quod apparet Curiae The Law doth not require that to be verified which appeareth to the Court 137 Lex respicit naturae ordinem The Law respecteth the order of nature 144 Licet tenenti vetus oâus reficere non novum facere it is lawfull for the Tenant to repair an old work but not to make a new one 85 Locus ab authoritate est infi missimus An argument from authority is most weak Locus pro solutione reditus aut pecuniae secundum conditionem demissionis aut obligationis est stricte observandus That place for the payment of money or rent according to the condition of a Lease or Obligation is strictly to be observed 108 Longum tempus longus usus qui excedit memoriam hominum sufficit pro jure Long professions and long occupation which doth exceed the memory of man sufficeth for a right 178 Lubricium linguae non facile in penam est trahendum The nimblenesse and lubricity of the Tongue is not easily to be brought into punishment 278 M. MVlta conceduntur per obliquum quae non conceduntur de directo many things are granted by the bye which are not directly granted 471 Manifesta probatione indigent manifest things neede no proofe 138 Mala Grammatica non vitiat chartam sensus abbreviationis accipiendus est ut coniessio non sit inanis false Latine doth not distroy a Charter or Deed and the sense of abbreviations is so to be taken that the grant be not void 13.14 Mandata licita strictam recipiunt interpretationem sed illicita latam extensam lawfull commandes receive a strict limitation but unlawful large and extended 385 Malesicia non debent manere impunita offences ought not remaine unpunished 387 Malitia mutat legem malice changeth the Law 299 Malum quo communius eo peius an evill the more common it is the worse it is 207 Malitiae vitium connexum est personae committentis malitiam the vice of malice is connexed to the person who committeth the malice 301 Malus usus est abolendus an evill use is to be abolished 352 Magis minus non diversificant speciem more and lesse doe not diversify the species 123 Mandatumita regulatur in superioribus sicut in privatis a voluntate mandantis a commandement is regulated according to the will of the Commander as well in higher as inferior and private things 380 Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum it is a miserable servitude where the Law is wavering 28 Majorum praecepta justa an injusta non sunt contemnenda the precepts of the ancients whether just or unjust are not to be contemned 129 Monumenta quae nos recorda vocamus sunt veritatis vetustatis vestigia 129 Mos sidelissimae vetustatis retinendus est quae praeter consuetudinem majorum fiunt neque placent neque recta videntur frequentia actus multa operatur the manner of most faithfull antiquity is to be retained and what are made contrary to the custome of our Ancestors do neither please neither doe they seeme right and the frequency of an act worketh much 123 Modus dat legem donationi the manner giveth a Law to the guift 190 Modus conventio vincunt legem the manner and agreement overcome the Law 35 Mutata forma prope interimitur substantia rei the forme being changed the substance of the thing is destroyed 85 Multa transeunt cum universitate quae per se non transeunt many things passe with the universality which of them selevs doe not passe 23 Multa ignoramus quae nobis non laterent si veterum lectio nobis fuerit familiaris we are ignorant of many things which would not be hid from us if the reading of the ancients were to us familiar 129 Multa constituuntur in lege ne curia domini regis deficeret in justitia many things are ordained in the Law least the Court of the Lord the King should faile in Justice 260 Mutata legis ratione mutatur lex the reason of the Law being changed the Law also is changed 400 Mavult princeps domesticos milites quam stipendiarios bellicis exponere casibus a prince desireth rather to imploy in military affaires domestick Souldiers then Aliens and Stipendaries 409 Multum potest in rebus humanis occasio plurimum in bellciis occasion and opportunity prevaile much in humane things but most of all in Marshall affaires 411 Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium the multitude of those which erre do not patronise an error 151 N. NAturalis possessio ad prescriptionem sufficet Naturall possession is sufficient to prescription 179 Naturae vis maxima the force of nature is very great Negativum nihil implicat A Negative implyed nothing 132 Nemo tenetur prodere seipsum No man is bound to betray himself 331 Nemo tenetur turpitudinem suam detegere No man is bound to bewray his own filth and shame 222 Negatio destruit negationem ambo faciunt affirmationem A double negative maketh an affirmative 12 Nescit generosa mens ignorantiam pati A generous mind cannot suffer ignorance 13 Nemini vim facere videtur qui suo non alieno utitur He seemeth to do injury to no man who useth his own and not anothers 25 Nemo redditum invito domino recipere potest No man can receive the rent without the Lords consent 25 Nemo potest plus juris in alium transferre quam ispe habet No man can grant more right then he hath 24 Nemo videtur rem omittere cujus propria non fuit No man doth seem to lose that in which he hath no property 24 Nrcessitas saepenumero vincit communem legem Necessity oftentimes
sublata tollitur totum The substantiall part of any thing being taken away the whole is destroyed 95 Paci sunt contraria vis injuria Force and injury are contrary to Peace 275 Parium eadem est ratio There is the same reason of equals 115 Periculosum existimo quod bonorum virorum non comprobatur exemplo I esteem that dangerous which is not approved by the example of good men 127 Per divisionem melius materia imtelligitur By division the matter is better understood 133 Permissio non est officium legis quia lex ad fert necssitatem Permission is not the Office of the Law because the Law imposeth a necessity 397 Pendente lite nihil innovetur Nothing is to be innovated hanging the suit 47 Plus peccat author quam actor The Authour offendeth more then the Actor 203 Plus vident oculi quam oculus Two eyes see more then one 364 Possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem esse haeredem A possession of the Brother of a Fee-simple maketh the Sister to be heire 185 Potestas regis Juâis sit non injuriae cum sit author Juris non debet inde injuriarum nasci occasio unde jura nascantur The power of the King is of right and not injury and seeing he is the Author of right there ought not from thence to arise the occasion of injury from whence right doth proceed 243 Praelatus ecclesiae suae conditionem meliorem facere potest sine consensu deteriorem nequaquam sine consensu A Prelate may make the condition of the Church better without consent but not worse without consent 4 Principio dato sequntur concomitantia Things accessary are of the nature of the principall 58 Propâia res est quae solius est sive uni soli convenit It is a proper thing which is one mans and belongeth to one man onely 23 Proprietas temporis fiâgenda est secundum subjectam materiam The property of time is to be feigned according to the subject of the matter 103 Protectio trahit subjectionem subjectio protectionem Protection draweth subjection and subjection protection 365 Privilegium non valet contrarem publicam A priviledge is of no force against the ommonwealth 432 Prohibetur ne quis faciat in suo quod lae dat in alieno sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas It is forbidden that no man doth that in his own which may do hurt in another and so use your own that you do not hurt anothers 273 Prâximus sum egomet mihi Every one is next to himself 213 Q. QUalis causa talis effectus such as the cause is such is the effect 74 Quae incontinenti fiunt inâsse videntur What things are done in an instant seem to be in being 90 Quaelibet concessio fortissine contra donatorem interpretanda est Every Grant is to be taken strongest against the Grantor 316. 437 Quae rerum natura prohibentur nulla lege confirmata sunt What things are prohibited by nature are confirmed by no Law 142 Quae libet haereditas naturaliter quidem ad haeredes descendit nunquam autem naturaliter ascendit Every inheritance doth naturally descend to the Heirs but never doth naturally ascend 164 Quando charta continet generalem clausulam posteaque descendit ad verba speciala quae clausulae generali sunt consentanea interpretanda est charta secundum specialia when a Charter containeth a generall clause and then afterwards descendeth to speciall words the Charter is to be expounded according to the words speciall 18 Quando verba statuti sunt specialia ratio autem generalis generaliter statutum est intelligendum When the words of the Statute are speciall and the reason generall the statute is generally to be understood 22 Quando diversi considerantur actus ad aliquem statum perficiendum Lex plus respicit actum originalem When to the perfection of an Estate divers acts are required the Law more respecteth the originall act 61 Quando jus domini regis subditi concurrunt jus regis praeferri debet When the right of the King and the Subject meet together the right of the King ought to be preferred 361 Quando duo Jura in una concurrunt persona aequum est ac in diversis When two rights meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall 369. 250 Quando aliquid prohibetur prohibetur id per quod pervenitur ad illud When any is forbidden that also is forbidden by which one may come to it 386 Quam longum debet esse rationabile tempus non definitur in lege sed pendet ex discretione Iusticiariorum How long a reasonable time ought to be is not defined in the Law but dependeth upon the discretion of the Judges 103 Quando aliquid mandatur mandatur omne per quod pervenitur ad illud When any thing is commanded that is commanded by which one may come to it 386 Quilibet potest juri renunciari pro se introducto Every one may renounce the Law which was brought in for himself 251 Qui rationem in omnibus quaerunt rationem subvertunt Who seek reason in all things overthrow reason 422 Qui hae et in littera haeret in cortice He that sticks in the letter sticks in the bark or the outside 425 Qui facit per alium facit perse What one doth by another he doth by himselfe 318. 52 Qui sentit onus sentire debet commodum He that beareth the burthen ought to receive the profit 90 324 Qui non habet in aere luat in corpore ne quid peccetur impune He that hath no money let him be punished in body least any offence be committed without punishment 87 Qui adimit medium adimit finem He that taketh away the medium or mean destroyeth the end Qui male agit odit lucem He that doth evill hateth the light 104 Quicquid non discutitur justitia non putatur Quicunque aliquid staâuerit parte inaudita ultera aequum licet statuerit haud aequum erit What is not discussed nor tryed is not reputed Justice and whosoever shall decree any thing the other party being not heard though he decreeth that is right yet hath he not done that is equall 372 Quicunque jussu Judicis aliquid fecerit non videtur dolo malo fecisse quia parere necesse est He that doth anything by commandment ot the Judge seemeth that he hath not done any thing deceitfully or amisse because he must needs obey 374 Qui ex damnato coitu oriuntur inter filios non computantur who are born of unlawfull and damned copulation are not accounted among Sons 176 Qui semel actionem renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest He who once renounceth his action can no more receive it 447 Qui timent cavent vitant VVho feare are wary and shun dangers and damages 322 Quod per
by discontinuance disseisin abatement c. and of this right is the saying to be understood that the right descendeth and not the Land which may be released to him in possession and this right is also called jus proprietatis as if a man be disseised of an Acre of Land the disseisee hath jus proprietatis and the Disseisor hath jus possessionis and if the Disseisee release to the Disseisor he hath jus proprietatis possessionis Coke com 266. a. but the reservation of a Rent upon such a release is voyd as if the disseisee release to the disseisor of Land reserving a rent the reservation is voyd Coke com 144. b. Neither can a bare right a right of entry or a thing in action be granted or transferred to a stranger by the ancient maxime of the Common Law Coke com f. 166. for that thereby is avoyded great oppression injury and injustice but if a bare right happen to be forfeited to the King he may grant the same by his Prerogative Frustra est potentia quae nunquam venit in actum Vaine is the possibility which never commeth into act Coke l. 2. f. 501. There is jus proprietatis possessionis possibilitatis and the right of possibility which dependeth upon the death of a man hath a necessary and common intendment to wit necessary in regard that all the issues of Adam must dye for statutum est omnibus hominibus semel mori and common because the death may happen at such a time that the contingency may take effect and this necessary and common possibility is called potentia propinqua which may come into act and is not therefore vaine or voyd in Law as in 15 H. 7. 10. If Lands be given to a marryed man and a marryed woman and to the heires of their two bodies ingendred this is a good estate in tail for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that one shall dye before the other so as the marryage may ensue but in the same case there shall not be possibility upon possibility and therefore if land be given to one man and two women there the Law shall not intend that first he shall marry one and then that shee that he shall marry shall dye and that he shall espouse the other and therefore in this case they have severall inheritances at the beginning as if Land be given to two barons and their femes and the heires of their bodies engendred in this case the Law shall not expect second marriages and therefore in this case they shall have joynt estates for life and one baron and feme one moyety in tail in common with the other baron and feme of the other moyety and so severall inheritances and with it accordeth 24. E. 3. 29. for otherwise there should be possibility upon possibility and if a man give Land to baron and feme there is an apparent possibility that they shall have issue but if after they be divorced causa praecontractus so as the possibility is dissolved the Law shall never expect the second marriage for by the divorce they have but an estate of Frank-tenement 4. H. 7. 16. 17. And a woman may enfeoff a married man causa matrimonij prae locuti for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that the Feme of the Feoffee shall dye before the Feoffee So in the common case of a lease for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. the remainder is good for the necessary and common intendement vide ibidem plura in Lampets case Coke l. 10. f. 50. b. For the Law respecteth the right of possibility and will have nothing to be void that by possibility may be good As a mesnalty is given in tail reserving a rent this is good for the tenancy may escheate to the donee and then the doner shall distraine for all the arrearages 1. H. 4. 2. A man hath issue a daughter and leaveth his wife privement enseint the wife may detaine the Charters of her husbands Lands from the Daughter for the possibility it may be a Son shee goeth withall 41. E. 3. 21. b. But if A. be indebted to B. in two hundred pounds and delivereth goods to him to sell to pay his debt in the best manner he can and he is proferred two hundred pounds for them and refuseth and after selleth them for an hundred pounds A. shall answer the residue of the debt notwithstanding this possibility 18. E. 4. 5. But the possibility must be propinque and a common possibility as death or dying without issue or coverture or the like but if it be a remote possibility the Law doth judge it vaine because it shall not be intended by common intendement to happen as a remainder to a corporation which is not at the time of the limitation and remainder is void though such a corporation was after erected during the particular estate for that was potentia remota 9. H. 6. 24. For as Ployd f. 345. a. b. It is a principle in Law that all gifts be it by devise or otherwise they ought to have a donee in esse and not in posse who hath capacity to take them given when it ought to vest as devise of Lands in fee and so of goods if the devise dye before the devisor neither his Heire or Executor shall gaine any thing by this Will vide ibidem plura in Brets case So if a lease be made for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. if at the limitation of the remainder there be not any such I. S. but during the life of tenant for life I. S. is borne and dyeth his heire shall never take as it is agreed in 2. H. 7. 13. And so in 11. E. 3. 46. the case was that upon a fine levied to R. he granted and rendred the tenements to one I. and F. his wife for their lives the remainder to G. the Son of I. in tail the remainder to the right heires of I. and at the time levied I. had not any son named G. but after he had issue named G. and in praecipe against F. it was adjudged that G. should not take the remainder in tail because he was not borne at the time of the fine levied but long after by which another who was right heire of I. S. was received for when I. had not any son named G. at the time of the fine levied the law doth not expect that he shal have a Son named G. after for that is potentia remota a remote possibility But if the remainder had been limited by a generall name as to the right heirs of I. or primogenito filio such a remainder might have been good for the common possibility But if a remainder be contrary to Law the Law shall never adjudge a grant good by reason of a possibility or expectation of a thing which is contrary to Law for that is potentia
Quare Impedit 54. but at this day it is remedied by the act 1 E. 3 c. 12. by which it is declared that because that many people may be grieved for it that Lands and Tenements held in chief of the King as all those which hold by grand Serjanty are and alien without leave have been held as forfeited hereafter in such case let a reasonable fine be taken So since that Statute at all times when Lands holden by grand Serjanty have been aliened without licence a fine hath been taken and no seisure ever made for the forfeiture and therefore no forfeiture to be taken for Custome is the best Interpreter of the Law vide etiam L. 10. f. 70. b. Consuctudo manerii est observanda Co. com f. 63. a. consuetudo loci est observanda Brac. l. 2. f. 76. l. 4. f. 28. The custome of the Mannor and the custome of the place is to be observed for there are different customes in many Mannors and places and the customes of one Mannor in some particulars commonly varieth from another And these diversities of customes have grown by reason of the severall Nations who have had government over this Kingdome Britans Romans Saxons Danes Normans which have left part of their Language and part of their usage which difference of usage and custome is to be observed in every place and Mannor for what a Copyholder may or ought to do or not to do the custome of the Mannor must direct it and if there be no custome to the contrary wast either premissive or voluntary of a Copyholder is a forfeiture of his Copyhold Co com f. 63. a. If a Copyholder for life surrender to another in fee it is no forfeiture for that passeth by surrender to the Lord and not by Livery And Copyhold Estates shall not have the collaterall qualities that the estates of the common Law have without especiall custome for the custome of the Mannor is to be observed Coke l. 1. f. 22. a. 23. a. vide ibidem plura f. 28. b. Coke l. 6. f. 67. a. In a common recovery which is had by agreement and consent of parties of acres of land the acres shall be accounted according to the customable and usuall measure of the Country and not according to the Statute De terris mensurandis made in the 33 of Ed. 1. Sir John Buntings case 1 Eliz. So if a man bargain and sell so many acres of wood they shall be measured according to the usage of the Country and that is according to twenty foot to the Rod and not according to the said act for the custome of tho place is to be observed 47 E. 3. 18. Coke l 10. 140. a in Kighleys case It was resolved cleerly that the severall Commissioners of Sewers throughout England are not bound to pursue the Lawes and Customes of Romney Marsh but in case where any particular place within their Commission have such Lawes and Customes as Romney Marsh hath there they may pursue them for the custome of the place is to be observed Consuetudo vincit communem legem coke l. 4. f. 21. Custome overcometh and mastereth the common Law and will not alwaies be ruled by its grounds for a custome and usage of time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary may create and consolidate Inheritances Coke comm f. 185. b. If a man be seised of an house and possessed of divers Heir Looms that by custome have gone with the house from Heir to Heir and by his Will deviseth away the Heir-looms this devise is void for the Wil taketh effect after his death and by his death the Heir looms by ancient custome are vested in the Heir and the Law preferreth the custome before the devise 1 H 5 Executors 108. And so it is if the Lord ought to have an Heriot when his Tenant dieth and the Tenant deviseth all his goods yet the Lord ââall have his Heriot for the reason aforesaid And it hath been anciently said that an Heriot shall be paid before a Mortuary wherein the Lord is preferred because the Tenure is in him Co. ibidem Ployd f. 36. b. Whereas the Statute of 1 R. 2. c. 12. doth ordain that the Warden of the Fleet shall not suffer any one who is in execution to go out of Prison by main-prize bail or baston yet it is taken by equity of the said Statute thât if any other Goaler who lets such a one in execution to go out of prison with mainprize bail or baston that it shall be said to be an escape But notwithstanding that it extendeth to all other Goalers so fully as though it had been expressed by plain words yet those of London use to let such go at large with baston in any place within their jurisdiction and shall not be judged an escape in them and the reason of that is not because the statute in equity doth not extend to them but the reason of it is their prescription in that point and all their customes and prescriptions are confirmed by the Statutes by which they may prescribe against the equity and words of the statute which are contrary to their customs and prescriptions as against the statute of Silva caedua and to hold Leet at other times then the statute appointeth and such others ibidem Obtemporandum est rationabili consuetudini tanquam legi coke l. 4. 38. b. Littleton Sect. 170. consuetudo ex certa causa ratienabili usitata privat communem legem We ought to obey a reasonable custom as a Law and a custom used upon a certain reasonable cause depriveth or over cometh the common Law but a custome introduced against reason is rather an usurpation then a custome coke comm f. 113. a. and it is a Maxime in our Law that all customs and prescriptions which be against reason are void coke comm f. 140. a. As if the Lord of a Mannor prescribe a custome in generall that every Tenant in his Mannor that marrieth his Daughter to any man without the licence of the Lord shall pay a fine and have paid a fine to the Lord for the time being this prescription is void for none in such case ought to pay fines but Villains vide ibidem plura So if the Lord of a Mannor do prescribe that for the time being he hath used to distraine Cattell were upon the demeans of his Mannor for Damage-feasant and the distresse to retain till fine were to him for damages at his will this prescription is void for it is a Maxime in Law Aliquis non potest esse judex in propria causa no man can be a Judge in his own case ibidem 141. a. And therefore a Fine levied before the Bayliffs of Salop was reversed because one of the Bayliffs was a party to the fine because he cannot be a Judge and a party coke ibidem So a custome that the Lord shall take for Heriot the beast of a stranger levant and couchant upon the