Selected quad for the lemma: act_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
act_n law_n parliament_n repeal_v 2,928 5 12.0628 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A62025 Reasons of the present judgement of the Vniversity of Oxford concerning The Solemne League and Covenant, The Negative Oath, The Ordinances concerning discipline and vvorship : approved by generall consent in a full convocation, 1, Jun. 1647, and presented to consideration.; Judicium Universitatis Oxoniensis. English Sanderson, Robert, 1587-1663.; Zouch, Richard, 1590-1661.; Langbaine, Gerard, 1609-1658.; University of Oxford. 1647 (1647) Wing S624; ESTC R183228 29,783 44

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

acknowledging a power in the two Houses of Parliament in opposition to the Kings Power Whereas we professe our selves unable to understand how there can be any lawfull power exercised within this Realme which is not subordinate to the power of the King §. IX Of the Ordinances concerning the Discipline and Directory FIrst concerning them all together we are not satisfied how we can submit to such Ordinances of the two Houses of Parliament not having the Royall Assent 1. As are contrary to the established Lawes of this Realm contained in such Acts of Parliament as were made by the joynt consent of King Lords and Commons 2. Nor so onely but also pretend by repeal to abrogat such Act or Acts. For since Ejusdem est potestatis destruere cujus est constituere it will not sink with us that a lesser power can have a just right to cancell and annull the Act of a greater 3. Especially the whole power of ordering all matters Ecclesiasticall being by the Lawes in expresse words for ever annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realm And upon what head that Crown ought to stand none can be ignorant As to the particular Ordinances those that concern the Discipline first 1. If under that title be comprehended the Government also we cannot submit thereunto without consenting to the eradication of a Government of reverend Antiquity in the Church Which notwithstanding the severall changes of Religion within this Realm hath yet from time to time been continued and confirmed by the Publique Laws and Great Charters of the Kingdome then which there cannot be a more ample testimony that it was ever held agreeable to the Civill Government and the Subjects liberty Which also the successive Kings of this Realme at their severall Coronations have solemnly sworn to preserve And the continuance whereof for sundry reasons before upon the second Article of the Covenant specified we heartily with and desire 2. But if the word Discipline be taken as it is in the first Article of the Covenant as contradistinguished unto the Government there is something even in that also wherein we are not fully satisfied viz. the leaving of so much power in so many persons and those many of them of meane quality for the keeping back of thousands of well-meaning Christians from the benefit and comfort of the blessed Sacrament An Austerity for which there appeareth not to us any probable warrant from the World of God But which seemeth rather repugnant as to the generall principles of Christian prudence and charity so to the directions and practice of S. Paul in particular who in a Church abounding with sundry errors and corruptions both in faith and manners having first given order for the excommunicating of one onely person that by shamelesse continuance in a notorious sinne had brought a foule scandall upon the Gospell sufficing himself then with a generall proposall of the great danger of unworthy communicating remitteth every other particular person to a selfe-examination without any order either to Ministers or Lay-Elders to exclude any from the holy Communion upon their Examination As to the Ordinance concerning the Directory in particular we cannot without regret of Conscience during our present judgement and the continuance of the present Lawes consent to the taking away of the Book of Common-Prayer 1. Which by our Subscriptions most of us have approved with a solemne promise therewithall in the publique Service to use the forme prescribed therein and no other 2. Which according to our said Subscription and Promise and our bounden duty according to the Statute in that case provided we have hitherto used in our Churches Chapples and other Oratories to the great benefit and comfort of our soules 3. Which we verily beleeve not to contain any thing which with such favourable construction as of right ought to be allowed to all manner of Writings is not justly defensible which hath not been by learned and godly men sufficiently maintained against such exceptions as haue been heretofore taken thereat and which we are not confident by the Assistance of Almighty God we shall be able to justifie as occasion shall be offered against all Papists and other oppugners or depravers thereof whatsoever 4. Which is established by an Act of Parliament made in peaceable times by as good and full authority as any under heaven can have over us Which doth so weigh with us that as it freeth us from the necessity of giving in any particular exceptions against the Directory or any thing therein contained so it layeth an inevitable necessity upon us of contunuing the forme of Prayer therein enjoyned of not admitting any Directory or other forme to the prejudice thereof till the said Act shall by the like good and full authority be repealed In which Statute there is not onely an expresse Command given to all Ministers for the using of the same but there are also sanctions of severe punishments to be inflicted upon such of them as shall refuse so to doe or shall preach declare or speak any thing to the derogation or depraving of the Book of Common Prayer or of any thing therein contained or of any part thereof with punishments also to be inflicted upon every other person whatsoever the Lords of the Parliament not excepted that shall in like manner declare or speak against the said Book or shall by deed or threatning compell or otherwise procure or maintain any Minister to say open Prayer or to minister any Sacrament in any other manner or forme then is mentioned in the said Book or shall interrupt or hinder any Minister in the use of the said formes as by the words of the said Statute more at large may appeare Which Statute also hath had such an universall powerfull influence into the succeeding times that in all such * Statutes as have been since made against Popish Recusants the refusing to be present at Common-Prayer or to receive the Sacrament according to the formes and rites mentioned in that Book is expressed as the most proper legall character whereby to distinguish a Popish Recusant from a true Protestant In so much that use hath been made of that very Character in sundry Acts since the beginning of this present Parliament for the taxing of double payments upon Recusants THus have we clearly and freely represented our present judgement concerning the said Covenant Negative Oath and Ordinances which upon better information in any particular we shall be ready to rectifie Onely we desire it may be considered that if any one single scruple or reason in any the premisses remaine unsatisfied though we should receive full satisfaction in all the rest the Conscience would also remain still unsatisfied And in that case it can neither be reasonable for them that cannot satisfie us to presse us nor lawfull for us that cannot be satisfied to submit to the said Covenant Oath and Ordinances QUINTIL Quis damnaverit eum qui duabus potentissimis rebus
drawn from the Analogie of other Courts wherein the Kings Power is alwayes supposed to be virtually present under submission we conceive it is of no consequence 1. The Arguments à minore and à majore are subject to many fallacies and unlesse there be a parity of reason in every requisite respect between the things compared will not hold good A Pety Constable they say may doe something which a Justice of Peace cannot doe And the Steward of a pety Mannour hath power to adminster an Oath which as we are told the House of Commons it self hath no power to doe 2. That the high Court of Parliament is the supream Judicatory we have been told it is by vertue of the Kings right of presiding there he being g the Supream Iudge and the Members of both House his Councell Which being so the reason of difference is plaine between that and other Judicatories in sundry respects 1. The Judges in other Courts are deputed by him and doe all in his name and by his authority and therefore the presence of his power in those Courts of ministeriall Jurisdiction is sufficient his personall presence not necessary neither hath he any personall vote therein at all But in the high Court of Parliament where the King himself is the Supreme Judge judging in his own name and by his own authority his Power cannot be presumed to be really present without either the actuall presence of his person or some virtuall representation thereof signified under his great Seal 2. The Judges in inferiour Courts because they are to act all in his name and by his Authority doe therefore take Oathes of fidelity for the right exercising of Judicature in their severall places sitting there not by any proper interest of their owne but only in right of the King whose Judges they are and therefore they are called the Kings Judges and his Ministers But in the high Court of Parliament the Lords and Commons sit there in Councell with the King as Supreme Judge for the good of the whole Realm and therefore they are not called the Kings Judges but the Kings Councell and they have their severall proper rights and interests peculiar and distinct both between themselves from that of the Kings by reason whereof they become distinct h Orders or as of late times they have been stiled in this sense as we conceive i three distinct Estates Each of which being supposed to be the best Conservators of their own proper interest if the power of any one Estate should be presumed to be virtually present in the other two that Estate must needs be in inevitably liable to suffer in the proper Interests thereof Which might quickly prove destructive to the whole Kingdome The safety and prosperity of the whole consisting in the conservation of the just rights and proper interests of the maine parts viz. The King Lords and Commons inviolate and entire 3. The Judges of other Courts for as much as their power is but ministeriall and meerly Judiciall are bounded by the present Lawes and limited also by their owne Acts so as they may neither swerve from the Laws in giving Judgement nor reverse their owne Judgements after they are given But the High Court of Parliament having by reason of the Kings Supreme Power presiding therein a Power Legislative as well as Judiciall are not so limited by any earthly Power but that they may change and over-rule the Lawes and their own Acts at their pleasure The Kings Personall assent therefore is not needfull in those other Courts which are bounded by those Lawes whereunto the King hath already given his personall assent but unto any Act of Power beside beyond above or against the Lawes already established we have been informed and it seems to us very agreeable to reason that the Kings Personall Assent should be absolutely necessary Forasmuch as every such Act is the exercise of a Legislative rather then of a Judiciall power and no Act of Legislative power in any Community by consent of all Nations can be valid unlesse it be confirmed by such person or persons as the Soveraignty of that Community resideth in Which Soveraignty with us so undoubtedly resideth in the person of the King that his ordinary style runneth Our k Soveraign Lord the King And he is in the Oath of Supremacie expresly acknowledged to be the onely Supreme Governour within his Realmes And we leave it to the wisdome of others to consider what misery and mischief might come to the Kingdome if the power of any of these three Estates should be swallowed up by any one or both the other and if then under the name of a Judiciall there should be yet really exercised a Legislative power 4. Since all Judiciall Power is radically and originally in the King who is for that cause styled by the Lawes l The Fountaine of Iustice and not in any other Person or Persons but by derivation from him it seemeth to us evident that neither the Judges of inferiour Courts of ministeriall Justice nor the Lords and Commons assembled in the High Court of Parliament may of right exercise any other power over the Subjects of this Realm then such as by their respective Patents and Writs issued from the King or by the known established Laws of the Land formerly assented unto by the Kings of this Realm doth appear to have been from him derived unto them Which Lawes Patents and Writs being the exact boundary of their severall Powers it hath not yet been made appeare to our understandings either from the Lawes of the Realme or from the tenour of those Writs by which the Parliament is called that the two Houses of Parliament have any power without the King to order command or transact but with him m to treat consult and advise concerning the great affairs of the Kingdome In which respect they have sundry times in their Declarations to His Majesty called themselves by the name of His great Councell And those Lawes and Writs are as we conceive the proper Topick from which the just power of the Honourable Houses can be convincingly deduced and not such fraile Colletions as the wits of men may raise from seeming Analogies and Proportions VIII Of the Negative Oath WE are not satisfied how we can submit to the taking of the Negative Oath 1. Without forfeiture of that liberty which we have sworne and are bound to preserve With which liberty we conceive it to be inconsistent that any obligation should be laid upon the Subject by an oath not established by Act of Parliament 2 Without abjuring our a naturall Allegiance and violating the Oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance by us formerly taken By all which being bound to our power to assit the King we are by this Negative Oath required to swear from our heart not to assist him 3. Without diminution of His Majesties just Power and greatnesse contrary to the third Article of the Covenant by
defenditur Iure mente ROM. 14. 22. Happy is he that condemneth not himselfe in that which he alloweth THE END ERRATA Page 23. marg. read Haeretici pag. 24. l. 12. read Ecclesiasticall p. 24. l. 27. r. declared against Episcopacie p. 26. l. ult. marg. r. Hen. 3. p. 28. 1. 24. r. be inevitably a Such an Oath as for Matter Persons and other Circumstances the like hath not been in any Age or Oath we read of in sacred or humane stories M. Nye Covenant with Narrative pag. 12. a Pactum est duorum pluriúmve in idem placitū consensus L. 1. ff. de Pactis b Whereas many of them have had an oath administred unto them not warrantable by the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme They doe humbly pray that no man hereafter be compelled to take such an oath All which they most humbly pray as their rights and liberties according to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme Petit. of Right 3. c It is declared 16 Ian. 1642. That the King cannot compell men to be sworne without an act of Parliament Exact Collect. pag. 859 860. d Proclam of 9. Octob. 19. Car. a viz. In accounting Bishops Antichristian and indifferent Ceremonies unlawfull b viz. In making their discipline and government a mark of the true Church and the setting up thereof the erecting of the throne of Christ c Let us not be blamed if we call it Parliament Religion Parliament Gospel Parliament Faith Harding confut of Apology part 6. Chap. 2. d Stat. 13. Eliz. 12. e Such jurisdictions privileges superiorities and preheminences spirituall and ecclesiasticall as by any c. for the Visitation of the Ecclesiasticall State and Persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities shall for ever by authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of this Realme An Act restoring to the Crowne the antient Jurisdiction c. 1 Elizab. I. a Art 36. b give advantage to this Malignant party to traduce our Proceedings They infuse into the people that we mean to abolish all Church-Government Remonst 15. Dec. 1641. Exact Collect. pag. 19. The Lords and Commons doe declare That they intend a due and necessary Reformation of the Government and Liturgie of the Church and to take away nothing in the one or in the other but what shall be evill and justly offensive or at least unnecessary and burthensome Declar. 9. Apr. 1642. Exact Coll. p. 135. c Statut. of Carlile 25. E. 1. recited 25. E. 3. d They infuse into the people that we mean to leave every man to his own fancie absolving him of that Obedience which he owes under God unto His Majesty whom we know to be entrusted with the Ecclesiasticall Law as well as with the Temporall Exact Collect. ubi sup p. 19. e That he will grant keep and confirm the Laws Customes and Franchises granted to the Clergie by the glorious King S. Edward And that he will grant and preserve unto the Bishops and to the Churches committed to their charge all Canonicall Privileges and due Law and Iustice and that he will protect and defend them as every good King in his Kingdome ought to be Protector and Defender of the Bishops and the Churches under their Government Vide Exact Coll. p. 290 291. f See Stat. 25. H. 8. 20. 1. E. 6. 2 g See Stat. 39. Eliz. 8. h Stat. 14. E. 3. 4. 5. 17. E. 3. 14 i Stat. 26. H. 8. 3. 1. Eliz. 4. k Supremam potestatem merū imperium apud nos habet Rex Cambd. Whereas by sundry divers old authentique Histories Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supream Head and King having the dignity and royall estate of the Imperiall Crown of the same Stat. 24. H. 8. 12. See also 1 Elizab. 3. a The Lords Commons doe declare That they intend a due and necessary Reformation of the Liturgie of the Church and to take away nothing therein but what shall be evill and justly offensive or at least unnecessary and burthensome Declarat 9. Apr. 1642. Exact Coll. pag. 135. c From whence it is most evident that the Rights and Privileges of the Parliaments and Liberties of the Kingdom are in the first place to be preserved Answ. to Scotish Papers 18. Nov. 1646. page 21. d We observe you mention the defence of the King twice from the Covenant yet in both places leave out In the preservation and c. pag. 39. 46. a maine clause without which the other part ought never to be mentioned pag. 56. a Haeretici nec Deo nec hominibus servant fidem Speciatim hec addo Calvinistas in hac re deteriores esse quàm Lutheranos Nam Calvinistae nullam servant fi●em Iura perjura Lutherani moderatiores sunt Becan 5. Manual Controv. 14. 2. 4. c. b Invent Oathes and Covenants for the Kingdome dispence with them when he pleaseth sweare and forsweare as the wind turneth like a godly Presbyter Arraig of Perfec in Epist. Ded. c By the Covenant both Houses of Parliament many thousands of other His Majesties Subjects of England and Ireland stand bound as well as we to hinder the setting up of the Church-Government by Bishops in the Kingdome of Scotland And that we as well as they stand bound to endeavour the extirpation thereof in England and Ireland Scots Declar. to the States of the United Provinces 5. Aug. 1645. recited in Answer to the Scots Papers pag. 23. d The old formes of Acts of Parliam were The King willeth provideth ordaineth establisheth granteth c. by the assent of Parliament c. See Statutes till 1 H. 4. After that The King of the assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and at the speciall instance and request of the Commons of this Realm hath ordained c. See Statutes 1 H. 4. till 1 H. 7. A forme of such Petition of the Commons see 1 R. 3. 6. Prayen the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that where c. Please it therefore your Highnesse by the advice and assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall in this your present Parliament assembled and by the authori●y of the same to ordaince c. No Bill is an Act of Parliament Ordinance or Edict of Law although both the Houses agree unanimously in it till it hath the Royall Assent Ancient Customes pag. 54. Assemblee de ceux troys Estats est appellee un Act de Parliament car sans touts troys nest ascun Act de Parl. Finch Nomotech fol. 21. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are complete or formally binding without the Kings assent H. P. Answer to David Ienkins pag. 6. e Which if your Majesty shall be pleased to adorne with your Majesties Royall assent without which it can neither be complete and perfect nor Stat. 1. Jac. 1. f Stat. 33. H. 1. 21. g Dominus Rex habet ordinariam jurisdictionem dignitatem potestatem super omnes qui in regno suo sunt Ea quae jurisdictionis sunt pacis ad nullum pertinent nisi and coronam dignitatem Regiam nec à coronâ separari possunt Bracton cited by Stamford lib. 2. cap. 2. h For in our Lawes the Clergie Nobility Communalty are the 3. Estates We your said most loving faithfull and obedient Subjects viz. the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and the Commons representing your Three Estates of your Realme of England 1 Eliz. 3. the State of the Clergie being one of the greatest States of this Realme 8 Eliz. 1. i See Fin●h supra ad lit. d k The Crown of England hath been so free at all times that it hath been in no earthly subjection but immediately to God in all things touching the Regality of the said Crowne 16 R. 2. 5. Omnis sub eo est ipse sub nullo nisi tantùm sub Deo Parem autem non habet Rex in regno suo quia Item nec multò fortiùs superiorem aut potentiorem habere debet quia sic esset inferior suis subjectis Bracton conten 1. Rubr. 36. Cui {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} legibus ipsis legum vim imponendi potestatem Deus dedit Finch Nomotech in Epist. Dedic. to K. Iames l Fons Iustitiae Bracton By War to intend the alteration of the Lawes in any part of them is to levy War against the King and consequently Treason by the Statute of 25 E. 3. because they are the Kings Lawes He is the fountaine from whence in their severall channels they are derived to the Subject Master Saint John's Speech concerning the Earle of Strafford page 12. m Et ibidem vobiscum colloquium habere tractare super dictis negotiis tract vestrumque consilium impensur Writ to the Lords a Every Subject by the duty of his Allegiance is bounden to serve and assist his Prince and Soveraigne Lord at all seasons when need shall require 11 H. 7. 18. Stat. 1. El. 1. 1 Cor. 5. 1. c. 1 Cor. 11. 28. c. * Stat. 23. Eliz. 1. 29. Eliz. 6. 35 El. 1. 2. 3 Iac. 4. 5.