Church did positively recall all Commissions given to such Committees or Agents as the Clergy of Ireland hath done in this present peace How generall soever a Commission may be yet this exception is alwayes involved therein that nothing that is unlawfull may be done by vertue thereof mandatum si generale sit solum prohibet quae licita non sunt which the law exemplyfieth by this case if a Commission be given to elect any one in generall tearmes to any dignity office or benefice it is to be understood that a fit one be chosen Vnde mandatum de aliquo eligendo intelligitur de eligendo idâ—neo What could be done more unlawfull in the execution of any Commission than what hath beene done by our Committee of Treaty in the execuâ—ion of their commission they rejected the graces our Soveraigne granted unto us for gayning whereof they had a Commission and engaged the kingdome in matters of high concernment for which they had no commission Can that peace be a good peace wherein thereis no securitie for our Religion lives liberties or estates The limitation of our Committee of treaties Commission proved out of the Modell of government by which Magna Charta is to be maintayned and the Church livings granted to the Catholicke Clergy 39. In the very first Article of the Modell of Government I reade thus Inprimis That the Roman Catholicke Church in Ireland shall have and enioy its priviledges and immunities according tâ— the GREAT CHARTER enacted and declared within the Realme of England in the ninth yeare of the raigne of King Henry the second sometimes King of England and Lord of Ireland and ofterward enacted and confirmed in Ireland and that the common-law of England and all the statutes in force in this kingdome which are against the catholicke Roman Religion and liberties of the Natives Marke the resolution to procure the repeale of the penall lawes c and other subiects of this kingdow shal be observed c. That every branch of MAGNA CHARTA all other statutes confirming expounding or declaring the same shal be punctually observed Know yee saith the King in that Charter That we in the Honour of Almighty GOD the SALVATION of the SOVLES of our Progenitors and Successors Kings of England to the ADVANCEMENT of HOLY-CHVRCH and the amendment of our Realme of our meere and free-will have given and granted unto the Archbishps Abbots Pryors c. That the Churches of England shall be free and shall have all her whole rights and liberties inviolable Reserving to all Archbishops Abbots Pryors Templers Hospitlers Earles Barons and all persons aswell Spirituall as Temporall all their free liberties and free customes which they had-in times past and all these customes and liberties aforesaid which we have granted to be holden within this our Realme asmuch as pertayneth to us and our heires we shall observe And all men of this our Realme aswell Spirituall as Temporall asmuch as in them is shall observe the same against all persons in likewise This great Charter which contayneth the immunities of the Church and liberties of the Subject hath beene confirmed by thirty Parliaments in the succession of 18. Kings Edward the third in the 14. yeare of his raigne augmented the same by the addition of five speciall priviledges granted the Church and Clergy and in the 25. yeare of his raigne added a surplus of nine priviledges more And this is it which the Earle of Glamorgan hath in part granted unto us and which our Kings of England have sworne to maintayne unto us Henry the 8. indeed deprived us of the benefit thereof I wish our owne bosome friends at home had not too neerely imitated him In all the articles of peace there is not somuch as once mention made of this GREAT CHARTER though it be the first and prime article the kingdome resolved to insist upon 40. In the six and twentieth Article of the same Modell of Government It is ordered and established that the possessions of the Protestant Archbishops or Bishops Deanes Dignitaries and Pastors in the right of their respective Churches or their Tenants in the beginning of these troubles shall be deemed taken construed as the possessions of the Catholicke Archbishops Deanes Dignitaries Pastors and their Tenants respectively to all intents purposes and that those possessions are intended within the precedent order for setlement of possessions And this publicke order of the kingdome you see is conformable to MAGNA CHARTA for somuch and agreable to the publick Declarations of the kingdome and other acts of Assembly The like limitation of the same Commission is expressed in both our declarations made anno 1642. 41. In our Declaration printed in France 1642. we declared it to be a meanes to reduce Ireland to peace and quietnes among other things that by act of Parliament it be declared that the Parliament of Ireland hath no subordination to the Parliament of England that Poynings act the penall lawes be repealed That all Marks of nationall distrinction betweene English and Irish be taken away by act of Parliament That the Bishopricks Deaneries and all other spirituall promotions of this Kingdome and all Frieries and Nunneries may be restored to the Catholique owners and that Impropriations of tiâ—hes may be likewise restored and that the scity ambits and precincis of the Religious houses of the Moâ—ks may be restored to theÌ„ but as to the residue of their temporall possâ—ssions it is not desired to be taken from the present proprietareis but to be left to them untill that God shall otherwise encline their owne hearts That all Plantations made since a. 1610 may be avoyded by Parliament if the Parliament should hold this act â—ust and their possessions restored to those or their heires from whom the same was taken they neverthelesse answering to the Crowne the rents and services proportionably reserved upon the undertakers 42. In our Remonstrance delivered to His Majesties Commissioners at the towne of Trim 17. March 1642. among many other grievances we desired redresse against the penall lawes of 2. Eliz. imposing incapacities on the Catholiques in places of trust honour or profit both in Church and Commonwealth against false inquisitions taken upon feined titles of the Catholiques estates against many hundred yeares possession against the two impeached Iudges who illegally avoided 150. letters patents in one morning for securing the subjects lives liberties and estates for exempting the Parliament of Ireland from any dependency on the Parliamâ—nt of England and for the power and authoritie of the same Parliament of Ireland against the dismembred Parliament of Dublin against the Continuance of poynings ast the lawes and incapacitie to sit in the next Parliament While our Commissioners the Lord Viscount Gormanston Sir Luke Dillon Sir Robert Talbot and Iohn VValsh Esquire presented this Remonstrance to his Majesties commissioners at Trim 17. March 1642. with hopes of redresse for our grievances and a happy accommodation the Marques of
by his Majestie to the Marques of Ormond his Majestie wrote and sent three other letters vnto him wherof the first was dated December 15. 1644. and continueth what followeth As for Poynings Act I referre you to my other Letter and for matter of Religion though I haue not found it fit to take publique notice of the paper which Brown gave you yet I must commande you to give him my L. Muskery and Plunket particular thanks for it asluring them that without it there could have been no peace and that sticking to it their Nation in generall and they in particular shall have comfort in what they have done and to shew that this is more then words I do herby promisse them and command you to see it done that the Penall Statutes against Roman Catholiques shall not be put in execution the Peace being made and ther remaining in them due obedience and further that when the Irish gives me that assistance which they have promised for the suppression of this Rebellion and I shall be restored to my Rights then I will consent to the Repeale of them by a Law but all those against Appeales to Rome and Premunire must stand all this in Cypher you must impart to none but those three already named and that with injunction of strictest secresie so again recommending to your care the speedy dispatch of the peace of Ireland and my necessary supply from thence as I wrote to you in my last private letter I rest 24. The second letter is dated from Oxford 7. Ianuary 1644. and containeth what followeth The Rebels here agreed to Treat and most assuredly one of the first and chiefe Àrticles they will insist on will be to continue rhe Irish warr which is a point not popular for me to break on of which you are to make a double vse First to hasten with allpossible diligence the Peace there the timely conclusion of which will take off that inconvenience which otherwise I may be subject to by the refusall of that Article upon any other reason Secondly by dextrous conveying to the Irish the danger there may be of their totall and perpetual exclusion from those favours I intend them in case the Rebels here clap up a Peace whith me upon reasonable termes and only exclude them which possibly were not councelable for me to refuse if the Irish Peace should be the only difference betwixt us before it were perfected there These I hope are sufficient grounds for you to perswade the Irish diligently to dispatch a Peace upon reasonable termes assuring them that you having once fully engaged to them my word in the conclusion of a Peace all the Earth shall not make me break it But not doubting of a Peace I must again remember you to presse the Irish for their speedy assistance to me here and their friends iu Scoland Myintention being to draw from thence into wales the Peace once concluded as many as I can of my Protestant armedsubjests and desire that the Irish would send as great a Bodyas they can to land about Cumberland which will put those Northern Counties in a brave condition wherefore you must take speedy order to provide all the Shipping you may as well Dunkirk as Irish Bottomes and remember that after March it will be most difficult to transport men from Ireland to England the Rebels being masters of the Seas So expecting a diligent and particular account in answer to this Letter Irest 15. The third letter is dated at Oxford also february 16. 1644. in the postscript wherof for the letter it selfe we haue not seene it is thus written In case vpon particular mens fancies the Irishpeace should not be procured vpon powers I haue alreadie giuen yow I haue thought good to giue you this further order which I hope will proue needles to renue the cessation for a yeare for which yow may promise the Irish if yow can haue it noe better cheape to ioyne with them against the Scots and Inchequin as aboue yow haue heard where we are to note that his Majestie forseing that the power alreadie giuen the Marques was not sufficient to induce the Irish to a peace enlargeth by his letter dated the selfe same month to witt the 27. of february aboue num 21. mentioned the former power giuen to the Marques and expresseth in particular the points Wherein this power is enlarged namely to the suspension of Poynings act and present taking away of the penall lawes against Papists which by his letter of the 15. th December his Maiestie promised to repeale when he should be restored to his rights and for the present commanded the same penall lawes should not be executed But whatsoeuer the king commanded the Marques to performe by these letters the Marques hath contemned whatsoeuer he hath promised our Committee hath neglected and whatsoeuer he hath actuallie granted they haue reiected Among many obligations by which Mandatorius or a Commissioner or Committee is obliged mandatori to him that giues the Commission that is a principall one that the Commissioner is dilig entlie to obserue the commands giuen him and as he is not to exceede his Commission soe is he not to deuiat from the same wherein how farre the kings Commissioner on his part and our Committee on theire parte haue transgressed we leaue to the censure of those that haue eyes to see and iudgment to discerne To gaine credit in court and to be courted with letters from great ones was more esteemed than the aduancement of Religion king or Conrry vae filii desertores non per spiritum meum c. habentes fiduciam in vmbra Aegipti some of our owne Committee in lieu of solliciting the cause of God of religion king and Contry wherwith the kingdome intrusted them became actiue instruments for the aduerse partie and busie Postilions from one Commander and from one Gentleman to an other to sollicit them to a defection and some of these are knowne to haue receiued priuar letters from great ones with whom to ingratiat themselues what would they not attempt though when matters are well discussed it shall appeare to the world that they proued such bad Proctors as marr-d all the busines and hindred irrecouerablie vnles God streatch forth his helping hand both king and Contry were they soo diligent in promoueing the cause of God intrusted to them by the kingdome they would at least shew themselues soe prouident and carefull as they Would cause these missiues Royall or the substance of them for soe much as concerned the repeale of the penall lawes and suspension of Poyning act to be inserted in the articles of peace that the Contry might haue some consolation and religion some Securitie But if yow marke it well they haue followed the instructions of the aduerse partie against whomthey were imploied and not of the kingdome for which they were imploied referre all things to the king saith the aduerse partie and that is don though
Ormond taking advantage of the time and occasion marched out of Dublin with his forces tooke in Timolin and attempted Rosse where he lost his shipping was frustrated of his expedition and his army so infeebled as he was not able to make any considerable Excursions in halfe a yeare after wherein God shewed his indignation against perfidie and remunerated the innocencie and integritie of the confederate Catholiques by giving into their possession thirty or fourty of the enemies garrisons within few monethes after in so much as the Marques of Ormond was glad to make a speedy cessation with them otherwise they had gone to the very gates of Dublin there being no considerable resistance against them 43. The limitation of their commission according to the 17. propositions propounded unto his Majestie in Aprill 1644. and the 14. additionall propositions thereunto annexed whereunto the 30. Articles of the late rejected peace are answerable is sufficiently explicated in the first part particularlarly § 14. Numb 26. whereunto we referre the Reader The limitation of the foresaid Commission by severall Acts of Assembly 44. Quarto Iunij 1645. It is ordered saith the kingdome then in publicke Assembly upon the question nemine contradicente that the Committee of Instructions shall draw an act that as to the Catholiques of Ireland whether Clergie or Laâ—y all penalties pressures incapacities prejudice and inconvenience laid on the professors of the Roman Catholique Religion by the statute of 2. Elizabeth or any other Act or Law in force in this Kingdome should be taken away and repealed This act was concluded and agreed upon after mature deliberation and serious debate had of this matter by the committees of Instructions whose opinion the Chaire-man reported unto the house at two severall sessions to wit the second and fourth of Iune 1645. It was likewise unanimously ordered by the said Assembly 9. Iunij 1645. That as to the demand made by the Lord Marques of Ormond Lord Lieutenant of Ireland to the commissioners of the Treaty of peace for the restoring of the Churchesto the Protestant clergie the commissioners shall give an absolute denyall thâ— committee of Instructions are to prepare an Instruction to that effect 11. Iunij 1645. the article concerning Ecclesiasticall and spirituall Iurisdiction saith my diurnall received in publicke Assembly a long and learned debate concerning the severall statuts of premunire and provision and concerning excommunications fulminated by Protestant Prelats against Catholiques whereby they were perpetually forced to repaire to the Protestants Tribunall to obtaine absolutions from them or else to be imprisoned by a writ de Excommunicate capiendo also concerning the maine difference betweene our Religion and protestancie in dispensing with mariage within degrees c. much more appertaining to the Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction was then debated and at length generally referred that day unto the comissioners with instructions from the committee of Instructions The Marques of Ormond in his abridgement of concessions reade in assembly 14 Augusti propounded three manner of remedies for that gâ—ievance none pleased the assemby because the cure was worse than the discease tandem 28. Augusti 1645. it was unanimously agreed upon by the Lords Spirituall and Temporall in full Assembly nullo discrepante that the Catholique confederates of Ireland should never submit or be subordinate to the Protestant Clergie or to any their jurisdiction See also for this the councells letter numb 51. 45. What dispensation our committee of the Treatie had to conclude a peace without procuring a repeale of the penall lawes assurances for our Churches and exemption from the Protestant Clergies Iurisdiction we have not read or heard of So great were the pressures suffered by the Catholiques in Ireland by the Exorbitant power of the Protestant Prelates as many of our Cathliques breathed their last in miserable captivitie others were forced to keepe their owne dwelling houses as if they were in restraint to shun the greedy Parators and hapshares whereof some namely Alderman Doud and Alderman Goodwing Mr. Thomas Long Mr. Iames VValsh Mr. Robert Hacket and others continued in such restraint for the space of seaven yeares or thereabouts Alderman Francis Tayler was prisoner in the Castle of Dublin 18. whole yeares if my memorie faile me not and Alderman Patricke Bâ—owne after so many yeares also imprisonment in the Castle dyed in the prison But hereof much more might be said which I am forced to omit Shall we shall we wilfully fall againe into the same servitude and incurre the malediction of Chanaan to be servi servorum fratribus nostris The learned debate in the assembly and convocation house touching this question whether the confederate Catholiques be bound in conscience by vertue of the oath of Association or other tye to make an expresse article with the Protestant partie for keeping in our hands such Chuches Abbeyes c. now in our possession 46 For the negative part it was suggested that if any such article be made his Maiesty will breake off and consent to no peace betweene us and the above specified party to the great danger of the estates lives and liberties of all our party And it was further urged that in not demanding such an article as above his Maiesty will grant us toleration of Religion For the affirmative part it was likewise suggested that without an expresse article Gods patrimony was not secured that however men might be prodigall in the dispensation of their owne goods yet without danger of Gods indignation they ought not to be prodigall in the dispensation of Gods goods that this his Majesties Kingdome of Ireland had beene more securely preserved for him and his Royall issue by preserving the Churches in the Catholiques hands than in suffering the seeming Protestants to posâ—esse the same who indeed have as great an antipathy against the Protestant doctrine established in England as they have against the Catholique doctrine and therefore might be justly feared to so journe in such places where the Churches Church-livings are as Intelligentiers for the Parliament 47. For these reasons and many more the house of Convocation wholly inclined to the affirmative part The integrity of the whole Kingdome in this particular appeares by their act of assembly of the 9. of Iune one thousand six hundred fourty and five above mentioned They debated indeed learnedly for a long time how they might observe that Divine lecture of CHRIST IESUS Give unto Cesar what is due unto Cesar and unto God what is due unto God Some feared if the Catholicke Confederats had demanded an expresse article for their Churches they had not Given to Cesar what was due unto Cesar and therefore thought a negative act that is to say an act of our owne assembly denying to give unto the Lord Lieutenant our Churches might serve the turne others thought they had not given unto God what was due unto God If the kingdome had concluded a peace without an expresse article for conservation of their Churches God
such a Commission to conclude a Peace was given to Glamorgan Yet from hence wee deduce this argument a minori ad maius If Glamorgans peace was cenfured invalid because it was revoked by His Majestie though the revocation was not made untill after hee executed his Commission how much more invalid is the Marques his peace seeing his Commission was revoked and recalled by His Majesty expressely before the Marques put his Commission in execution and implicitly before it was inchoatively attempted to be put in execution That is worthy the observation when our Councell and Committees doubted not of the conclusion and acceptation of Ormonds peace they sleighted and contemned Glamorgan and his peace but when they saw the Clergie and kingdome would by no meanes accept of Ormonds peace then did they begin to looke on Glamorgan and his Peace and to coulour their owne proceedings they would make us believe that in Ormonds peace there was a relation unto Glamorgans Whereupon Glamorgan to fit them in their owne policie told them the Conditions were not observed and that therefore he was not obliged therfore would not stand to the Articles past betweene him and them which hee said to no other end than to affront them that would affront him and let them know comprehenduntur in consilijs quibus cogitant 13. It will peradventure be answered that His Majestie was not then sui iuris at his owne libertie and freedome of will or power when he recalled the Marques his Commission being indeed then in the hands of the Scots Whereunto we reply that his Excellencie the Marques accepted His Majesties revocation proceeding from him as being in pleno iure in his owne full and free libertie and yeelded obedience thereunto notwithstanding a precedent double tie which obliged him to goe forward to wit the signing and sealing of the Articles of peace on the 28. of March before and the receiving of three thousand pounds or thereabouts from the Councell not long before on hopes to conclude such a forlorne peace It s against the rule of justice which requires equallitie on both sides that the Confederate Catholiques should be tyed to stand to the peace made with the Marques notwithstanding any revocation and that the Marques should be fast and loose and at his owne libertie when hee please by accepting the revocation to annull the Peace and by rejecting the revocation to render the same valid and of full force Montrosse in Scotland received Commands from His Majestie being in the same condition with the Scots that hee was when he wrote this revocation of Ormonds Commission to lay downe armes c. whereunto he yeelded obedience supposing His Majestie to be even then sui iuris of which president wee doubt not the Marques of Ormond will make use when hee is disposed upon any advantage to invalid or make void the Articles of the rejected peace That the Marques hath already resolved to yeeld perfect obedience to that revocation is at least indirectly insinuated unto us by the six Agents sent from Kilkenny to VVaterford in the reasons given by them to the Congregation why they concluded the peace where they say that the Lord Lieutenant conceiving that what commeth NOVV from His Maiestie is not his free act is resolved to give no obedience thereunto So as this disobedience is in ordine ad futura mandata looks upon all Commands that shall come after that time namely after the moneth of August last and not on the Commands that came before among which was that revocation of his Commission to make a peace These words expressed in the foresaid declaration recalling Glamorgans Commission makes this matter more dangerous that a messenger saith His Majestie writing to the Parliament be immediatly sent for Ireland to prevent any accident that may happen to hinder His Maiesties resolution of leaving the managing of the businesse of Ireland wholly to the two houses and to MAKE NO PEACE there but with their CONSENT which in case it shall please God to blesse his endeavours in the treatie with successe His Maiestie doth hereby engage himselfe to doe Who knowes but the forementioned messenger hath beene accordingly sent to the Marques commading him even then to make no peace Incidit in foveam quam fecit this declaration is thought to have beene made by Digby and others in Dublin to destroy Glamorgans Peace yet beâ—ng well examined will prove as destructive to the Marques his owne peace §. 4. The invaliditie of the peace proved out of the Marques his Exceeding his Commission and not observance thereof 14. IF he that hath a Commission or command to doe any thing shall exceed his Commission he doth nothing that is valid or firme saith the law whereof in the paragraph more amplie herein we coÌ„ceiue the Marques traÌ„sgressed this coÌ„missioÌ„ namelie in graÌ„ting by the 15 article of the reiected peace an act of obliuion unto al his Maiesties â—ubiects therein coÌ„prehending the Rebellious Scotts and ParliameÌ„taries whereas his CoÌ„mission extends onely as we collect out of the preface of the articles where mention is made of his Commission to the confederat Catholikes nay his Maiestie by his letters dated the 16. th of Februarie 1644. gaue expresse order to the Marques of Ormond to seeke to rene we the Cessation with the Irish for a yeare for which saith his Maiestie yow shall promise the Irish if yow can haue it noe cheaper to ioyne with them against the Scots and Inchequin for I hope by that time my condition may be such as the Irish may be glad to accept lesse or I able to grant more marke I beseech yow the Irish in obedience to his Maiesties desire continued the Cessation for a yeare and a halfe after yet al that while did not the Marques ioyne with them against the Scots or Inchequin To gaine only a yeares Cessation his Maiestie was pleased that the Marques should ioyne with us against the Scots and Inchequin Our Councell and Committees haue not onely consented to a cessation but haue also made a peace and yett haue not obliged the Marques to ioyne with them against the Scots or Inchequin Indeed the Marques and our Committee haue plaid the part of good Chapmen for his Maiestie but theire negotiation cost his Maiestie the losse of England if he by whom kings raigne repaire not the losse 15. In the Diurnals of the Assemblie held in August 1645. I reade that the Marques of Ormond by his letters sent from Dublin to the assemblie then held at Kilkenny and there read 18. augusti 1645. declared unto the Confederat Catholikes that the Rebellions Scots of the North were advanceing forward with theire Army and therfore prayd the said Confederats to send theire armes and forces to gether with six weekes meanes to be ioyned with his forces he prayd also he might be Commander in chiefe of both forces and that the Catholike armies might be subordinat to his Commands The Confederat Catholikes not
preseruing my Protestant Subjects in Ireland by a continuation of the warr haueing moved me to give you these powers and directions which I haue formerly done for the concluding of a Peace there and the same growing daily much more evident that alone were reason enough for me to enlarge your powers and to make my Commands inthe point more positive But besides these considerations it being now manifest that the English Rebels have as farras in them lies given the command of Ireland to the Scots that their aime is at a totall subversion of Religion and Regall power and that nothing lesse will content them or purchase Peace here I think my self bound in Conscience not to let slip the meanes of setling that Kingdom if it may be fully under my obedience nor to lose that assistance which I may have from my Irish Subjects for such scruples as in a lesse pressing condition might reasonably be stuck at by me For their satisfaction I do therefore command you to conclude a Peace with the Irish whatever it cost so that my Protestant Subjects there may be secured and my Regall Authority preserved But for all this you are to make me the best bargaine you can and not discover your inlargement of power till you needs must And though I leave the managing of this great and necessary work entirely to you yet I cannot but tell you that if the suspension of Poynings Act for such Bills as shall be agreed upon between you there and the present taking away of the Penall Lawes against Papists by a Law will do it I shall not think it a hard Bargaine so that freely and vigorously they ingage themselves in my assistance against my Rebels of England and Scotland for which no conditions can be too hard not being against Conscience or Honour 22. Many things are here to be carefullie oberued by the Confederat Catholikes first that this letter or enlargment of the Marques his power was neuer communicated vnto our Councell or Committees though then and after in atctuall treatie with hym for a peace by vertue of a former Commission giuen him by his Maiestie the 24. th of Iune before vntill the same was put into the presse by the Parliament who found the same in his Maiesties Cabinet in the battell of Nasby from the print of London it was sent into France and there sent by accident into Ireland yet the reuocation of the Marques his Commission by the letter of the 11. of Iune aboue mentioned was forthwith and without delay communicated vnto vs by the Marques and soe punctuallie obserued as noe precedent obligation past betweene him and the Confederat Catholikes could induce him to goe forward By which the Confederat Catholikes may with resentment take notice how litle behoulding they haue beene vnto the Marques of Ormond for any graces or fauours shewd them by him though his fauorits haue extolld his imaginarie fauours don the Contry beyond measure 2. Whether the Kingdome haue more cause to conceiue iealousie in this respect against the Marques who as yow may behould in the letter had some Commaunds not to discouer the enlargment of his power till he needs must than against the then supreme Councell who receiuing this letter in Iuly or August 1645. did neuer to this day reueale or publish the same vnto the kingdome whether this was don by them because they were then actuallie concluding a peace in huggar muggar with the Marques and therin resolued to reiect these royall graces of the repeale of the penall lawes and suspension of Poynings act and therfore would not discouer these graces least theire owne remisnes in the cause of God should be likewise discouered or for what other cavse they did it 't were fit to bring into question 3. we are to obserue with what confidence the Marques proceeded with our Committee with whom he doubted not to conclude a peace on more abiect Conditions than the king himselfe did grant vnto them 4. That as Sir William Parsons and the rest of the Rownd-headed priuie Councell of Dublin did suppresse from the Contry the graces sent ouer into the Chtholike Confederats of Ireland the August before the first of these Commotions soe our owne intrusted Catholikes suppressed these other graces granted vnto vs by his Maiestie since these Commotions inimici hominis domestici eius 5. out of all which yow may further obserue the hypocrisie of some great ones in Dublin who to cloake theire disloyall recourse for succours to the Parliamentarie Rebels gaue out that they were forced therunto for theire necessarie defence against the Confederat Catholikes wheras it is is most certaine if the Marques had granted vnto vs what the king commanded him by this letter and not giuen for his owne priuat ends to the kings irrecouerable detriment impediment to the Earle of Glamorgans articles of peace the Catholike Consederats had ioynd with armes and hearts in soe happie a peace and by Gods blessing they had with the hazard of theire liues estates and fortunes together with the aids of forren Catholike Princes and Prelats preuented and preserued his Majestie from the deplorable condition wherin now he is and chased out the of three kingdomes his sworne enemies In a word the Marques and those of Dublin sent vnto the kings Ennemies for succours not to defend themselues as they pretended but to defend theire obstinat disobedience to the kings Commands and their inordinat desires to preserue these pernicions hereticks who are known toside with and sweare for the Parliament wherfor the Confederat Catholikes did discharge theire dutie to God and theire allegiance to theire king in setting vpon such disloyall Refractories wherin they proceeded Like faithfull subjects in a defensiue way endeauouring to maintaine the present grants and graces which theire gratious Soueraigne conferred vpon them and the ancient fundamentall lawes of the kingdome chiefly that of Magna Charta wherin theire religion liberties liues and estates haue beene secured vnto them for defence Wherof millions of noble Catholike subjects in England in former ages haue sacrificed theire liues and fortunes and taken vp armes euen against theire owne soueraignes how much more iustlie might the Confederat Catholikes for defence of the same lawes take vp armes against theire fellow subjects who as they haue rebelled against God by repealing those ancient fundamentall lawes and establishing new destructiue to the Catholike faith soe haue they and still doe rebell against the lords annointed theire liege lord and soueraigne by disobeying his lawfull Commands and attempting the ruin of him and his royall issue But these obseruations on that letter are extrinsecall in the fol. lowing paragraph we will present the Reader with other obseruations that are intrinsecall §. 6. His Majesties Confidence in the sidelitie and assistance of the Confederat Catholikes Parliamentaries iustlie branded by his Majestle for Rebels and theire actions Rebellions 23. Before the forsaid letter of the 27. th of februarie was written and sent
they knew in theire owne soules the king will neuer be able whilst he remaine in his present wofull Condition to grant vs what alreadie he hath commanded to grant vs let nothing be referred to vncertainties but obtaine an actuall execution of these Commands and graces which the king hath alreadie granted vs and which is due vnto vs by our birth right saith the kingdome and that is not don how seuerly the ancient Iurists or Canonists haue censured such kind of Commissioners who vel ex culpa leuissima doe thus neglect or sleight the execution of the Commands giuen and what punishment are to be inflicted on them are expressed in the Canons and schoolemen wherunto we referre the learned Readers 26. Obserue I beseech yow the motiues that induced his Majestie to command the repeale of the penall lawes and suspension of Poynings act the preseruing of his protestant subiects and the kingdome of Ireland from the Scots to encourage his Irish subiects to assist him against the English and Scotish Rebels to represse the rebellion in England and to aduance the kings seruice in Scotland by our friends there The kings Commissioner and ours haue gon the cleere contrarie way to worke and as by Preposterous accelarating this peace they haue giuen a maine impediment to the prosecution of our victories in Vlster and Connaught soe haue they by theire compliance with one an other hindred the succours which the kingdome commanded to be sent for his Majestie by Antrim into Scotland and by Glamorgan into England Note I pray yow the words of the letter of the 27. of februarie for theire the Irish satisfaction I doe therfore command yow to conclude a peace with the Irish what euer it cost A generall command yow see this is which hath noé other modification or restriction than soe as my protestant subiects there may be seoured and my regall authoritie preserued the later part the Irish haue sworne to doe in theire oath of association oath of fidelitie and in theire seuerall protestations and declarations wherunto the doctrine of the Catholike religion which in opposition to all sects maintaineth monarchie and regall authoritie addeth a further obligation The former to witt the securitie of his Maiesties Protestant subiects the Catholike Consederats haue assured in theire seuerall declarations and are readie to giue such further assurance as the law of God and charitie can oblige them to giue in that case adding further that they shal be more secure and safe among the Consederat Catholikes than among the Parliamentarie Rownd-heads who haue spilt most vnnaturallie and barbarously more Protestants blood in England and that causleslie than ouer the Catholikes since these warres haue in theire owne defence spilt in Ireland The Protestants themselues may reade carefullie the Treatie or conference latelie past in Dublin betweene his Excellencie the Marques of Ormond and the fiue Commissioners of the Parliament and glasse theire owne miserie By Protestants we vnderstand such as professe the protestant doctrine established in England an 1562. and comprized in the 39. articles and not any new Parliamentarie Protestants who as they haue demolished the ecclesiasticall hierarchie maintained in the said articles soe haue they as much as in them lay monarchicall gouernment such a brood of vipers which deuoureth both Church and state king and Prelat may not be licenced to cohabit with the Confederat Catholikes Qui enim dicit illis ave Communicat operibus eorum malignis 27. Obserue further that according the forsaid letter the authoritie to coÌ„clude a peace is entirely in the Marques yet hath hiâ— Excellencie euermore assumed to his assistance and ioynd in a manner in the same authoritie with him those of the priuie Councell in Dublin who for the most part of them are knowne to haue either adheared to the Parliament or to haue beene impeached of high-treason by the kingdome they fearing theire heads would neuer suffer or aduise the Marques to condescend vnto a good peace And if my author who liued in Dublin and was an eye-witnes of what he related vnto me may be belieued those very porsons who were knowne to adhere to the Parliament euen those foure who for that cause were once commiâ—ted to the Castle by the Marques haue had in the Ins there priuat Conuenticles together with the lord Chancellour lord lowther and Maurice Eustace who I meane the three last after theire priuat consultation there would repaire to the priuie Councell in the Castle where theire aduise as learned in the lawes was followed in promoueing this Peace and theire aduise was instilled according the infusions receiued in the Parliamentarie priuat Conuenticles soe this inference may seeme more than probable whatsoeuer was don in promouing and concluding this peace was not done according the direction and Commands of his Majestie but according the advise and and Councell of Parliamentarie Rebels The effects proue the veritie of this inference 28. To conclude the king holds it not a hard bargaine to grant vs the repeale of the penall lawes and the suspension of Poynings act soe we freely and vigorouslie engage our selues to his assistance noe other condition of secureing his protestant subiects or preseruing his regall authoritie doth herequire of vs for conferring on vs those two graces which I wish those Gentlemen did take notice of who when they were questioned by the Congregation wherfore they laboured not to obtaine the benefitt of the graces by this letter conferred on vs and to cause the fame to be inserted in the articles of peace excused the Marques of Ormond or rather themselues saying that there were other conditions added in the letter which yow see is not consonant to truth for soe much as concernes these parricular graces other more ample graces might be also granted by the Marques vnto vs if we secured the Protestants and preserued regall authoritie for on those more ample conditions the king commanded him to make a peace with the Irish whateuer it cost and aggrauateth the matter more earnestlie in the conclusion of his letter affirming that to gaine our assistance against the Rebels of England and Stolland no conditions can be hard not being against conscience and honour wherein euermore he supposeth the repeale of the penall lawes and suspension of Poynings act to be neither against conscience or honour or against the securitie of his Protestant subiects nay we shall els where demonstrat it that our kings of England are tyed by the ligatures of promise royall past by thire royall progenitors and solemne oath taken at theire Coronation at least indirectlie to repeale the said penall lawes in asmuch as they haue beene surreptitiously enacted in these later dayes of defection against that Catholike faith which our king by the said promise and oath haue beene obliged to defend and maintaine I must not here passe by that the king commaÌ„ds the repeale or present taking away of the penall lawes without any lymitation or exception the Marques of
Ormond in his briefe of Concessions from which he shrunke in this peace limitteth this generall Commission vnto the penall lawes onely that concernes the exercise of our religion who is herein imitated by the Marques of Clanrichard or rather by the politike Contriuers of his engagment where a promise is made of a reuocation of any penaltie c imposed on vs for the free exercise of our riligion vnto what wofull dayes are we come when subjects doe presume not only to limitat theire kings commands as they please but also vtterlie to reiect them and by that disobedience to be the occasion of his present disasters and hazard of the losse of his kingdomes 29. By which letter and by these other two aboue mentioned the iudicious Reader may obserue what great confidencie his majestie reposeth in the aid and assistance of the Confederat Catholikes aswell at home as abroade in England and scotland by sea and by land and how earnestlie he presseth a speedie dispatch of the peace to that end Be it on them and theire posteritie that haue hindred the same Glamorgans articles do as yet further confirme aswell the kings confidence in our assistance as our alacritie willingnes and earnest desire to comply therein with his Majestie but the same authors who contemned the commands of his Majestie haue also laid obstacles to the assistance promised to his Majestie vpon the conclusion of Glamorgans peace It shal be euer verified what Iohn Dauies sometimes the kings Attutnie left written to posteritic that the Irish gladlie continue obedient subiects without defection or adhering to any other lord or king c and that there is noe nation or people vnder the sunne that doth loue equall and indifferent iustice better then the Irish and will better rest satisfied of the execution therof c farre different I wisse was the Censure of this well experienced lawyer and of many others whose testimonie for the present I omitt concerning the loyaltie of the Irish from the Censure of the present lord Chancellour of Ireland who hauing receiued in his Chamber in the Ins of Dublin from the Councell-table by the hands of a purseuant a printed booke setting forth the kings resolution to come for this kingdome said God forbid his maiestie should come vnto this kingdome for the Irish would massacre him as soone as any other wherunto his sonne sir Edward Bolton now chiefe Baron answered nay father I am confident if his Maiestie came hither that the Irish would lay downe theire armes at his feete and kisse the ground he went on The father admiring at the sonnes confidence in the fidelitie of the Irish the sonne confirmed his confidence by affirming he would lay his head at the stake if they would not doe it This dialoque past betweene the father and the sonne in the presence of the Lady Bolton Bently the Purseuant and R. S. a Cittizen of Dublin who is my author The sonne here proues the loyaltie of the Irish the father shewes his ingratitude towards the Irish that Nation that charitablie entertained him in his flight from England to shun the Censure of the Castle Chamber there who being raised from the lowest ebbe of fortune by Ireland now floateth in the highest spring of posteritie Qui reddit mala pro bonis non recedet malum a domo eius Such as repined at his Maiesties coming into Ireland repined at his happines and adhered in opinion and affection to the Parliament Histories recount and the present damnable Rebellion of England doth confirme more bloodie warres to haue beene raised in England by the English against theire naturall soueraignes and more horrid violence to haue beene offered to theire persons than euer hath beene raised in Ireland against them or offered by the Irish vnto them wherefore what the Chancellour affirmed of the Irish is more applicable to him and to his ill affected Contrymen wherin all Europe may be produced as witnesses who behould the present calamities wherunto the Rebellions Parliament haue reduced him what here might be more particularized concerning the ill-affected of that nation might be also particularized in the ill affected Scots Who are said to haue imbrued theire hands in the blood of many theire owne naturall Princes-from both I abstaine for the honour I beare vnto England the sister of Ireland and vnto Scotland the daughter of Ireland wishing with all the faculties of my soule the occasion of such recrimination among indeered fellow subjects were neuer giuen or being giuen might be totallie taken away Deus aeternetu scis quoniam falsum testimonium tulerunt contra Hibernos §. 7. The Marques of Ormonds Commission recalled as to somuch hy the Earle of Glamorgans Commission 30. Our Diuines and Canonists doe teach vs that the second mandat or Commission doth not indeed derogat vnto the first vnles it make mention therof yet that sometime the second preuaileth and not the first namely because the second is of a more strict obligation as tending to the publicke vtilitie and Commoditie wheras the first conduced to the priuat onely Ormonds Commission granted by his Majestie is in our case the first being giuen 24. Iunij 1644. Glamorgans is the second being giuen the 12. of March 1644. which was full eight months after In this later Commission mention is made of the first thus we giue you power to treate and conclude with the Confederat Roman Catholikes in our kingdome of Ireland if vpon necessitie any thing be to be condescended vnto wherein our lord lieutenant can not be so well seene as not fitt for vs at the present publickelie to owne c. loe mention made expresselie of the first Commissioner and implicitlie of his Commission and by consequence a reuocation as to so much at least of the Marques his Commission yea his Majestie did by his expresse letters signifie vnto the Marques of Ormond that he gaue vnto the Earle of Glamorgan this second Commission therein expressing the ends and causes wherefore he gaue the same and wherfore he would haue the matters and points committed to Glamorgans trust exempted from all other matters comprehended in the Marques of Ormonds Commission and these matters concerned the spiritualtie for example the free and publike exercise of our religion the securitie of our Churches the exemption of the Catholikes from the iurisdiction of the Protestant Clergie the repeal◠of all penall lawes made against Catholikes c. This Commissio◠being granted by his Majestie vpon the neglect of the Marques his obedience to his Majestiès Command requiring him to grant vnto vs the present taking away of the penall lawes and the suspension of Poynings act I admire how his Excellencie attempted to conclude a peace for these matters soe exempted out of his Commission and to referre those matters which were agreed and concluded by his Majesties speciall Commissioner namely the repeale of the penall lawes the free and publicke exercise of our religion c. vnto any new
by act of assembly 26. of Iuly 1644. Where it was declared full and binâ—â—ng without addition they declared perjured who affirme the said Oâ—th admits any equivocation or mentall reservation By observing each branch oâ— this Oath every indifferent man may discover wherein the contrivers of the late rejected peace have violated the same I may not here insist upon all branches take Reader these few notes onely upon some First they have not maintayned the power and priviledges of the Parliament of Ireland as well because they wilfully rejected the suspension of Poynings act and resolved nothing for the repeale thereof as also because they have not established any thing efficatiously to exempt it from any dependency on the Parliament of England Secondly they have not maintayned the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome chiefly MAGNA CHARTA and those other lawes which are ampliations and explications thereof and sseighted the prosecution of those who have been impeached by the whole kingdome for overthrowing the said fundamentall lawes Thirdly they have not defended upheld or maintayned the free exercise of the Roman Catholicke saith and Religion throughout this land forasmuch as they have concluded a peace without procuring a repeale of the penall lawes surrepâ—itiously established since the dayes of heresie against the free exercise of the same Religion Which repeale was graciously condescended unto by his Mâ—jâ—sty in his letters to his Lord Lieuteâ—aâ—â— of the 27. of February 1644. 61. This branch of the Oath was corroborated by act of assembly by our 17. propositions and by our frequent Declarations wherein we resolved never to make a peace without the repeale of these penall lawes Whether Glaâ—â—â—gaâ—s peace were to be deemed valid or invalid it was their part to presse the Kings Lieutenant to comply with his Majesties command for repealing the penall lawes The free exercise of religion intended by those that tooke that Oath was understood to be somewhat more than that which we had before these distempers Ergo by the free exercise of Religion they understood the free exercise thereof in Churches for before these distempers they had the free exercise in privat houses c. This interpretation is confirmed by the act of assembly wherein it was unanimously ordered never to restore any the Churches in our possession By this peace nothing is established to secure us of the free exercise of our Religion either in Churches or privat houses the governement of our Cities and Garisons together with the command of our Armies is given to the enemies so as whatsoever the Assembly hath enacted for keeping the churches would be infallibly fiâ—strated there being nothing to debarre the protestant Ministers to reinvest themselves in the same Churches Wherefore the Clergy proceeded prudently when they resolved that they ought to make a positive act for preservation of their Churches 62. Fourthly they have not according to their oath defended the possessions estates and rights of all those that tooke the oath of association particularly that of their fellow-members the Clergy as above you have heard As for the provision they have made for the seculars lands and possessions in the fourth article its certaine the same is in no sort valid untill it be confirmed by Parliament which when it shall be they doe not know See our observations on the fourth and fifteenth Article Fiftly that the said Councell and Committees have at least indirectly done severall acts to the prejudice of the cause of God is evident by what proofes wee have hetherto produced So as all things being well pondered it s no lesse evident that the severall decrees given by the clergie against such as contrived perfected and approved the said peace is most just and valid qui autem superbierit nolens obedire Sacerdotis imperio qui eo tempore ministrat Domino Deo tuo decreto Iudicis morietur homo ille auferes malum de Israel See above number 46. What may be pressed against the contrivers of this peace out of the first branch of this oath concerning the allegiance and loyaltie due to our Soveraigne and this commonwealth wee willingly omit hoping that God of his mercy will in his owne time produce a happy atâ—onement for the reliefe of this distressed Nation §. 21. That the Excommunications fulminated by the Lord Nuncius and Ecclesiasticall congregation against such as adhere to the late rejected peace is both just and valide 63. We are here to suppose that which faith teacheth us to wit that in Gods Church there is power to excommunicate and that the same power hath beene practised by the Apostles themselves and their successors men constituted in Apostolicall jurisdiction The cause of Excommunication according the received opinion of Schoole-men grounded on the Canons is deadly sinne yea veniall sinne is a sufficient cause Excommunicationis Minoris In consequence to the foresaid Decree of perjurie other decrees were made by the said congregation and particularly one dated the 17. Augusti 1646. imposing upon such cities and townes cessation from Masse and divine office that would admit the publication of the peace On the first day of September following a comminatorie excommunication was set forth against those that would adhere or by any meanes favour the said peace but the evill as yet increasing divisions and factions perpetually multiplying after severall admonitions another Excommunication was published the moneth following wherein I reade thus In pursuance of which decrees being forced to unsheath the spirituall sword wee to whom God hath given power to binde and loose on earth c. doe cum virtute Domini nostri Iesu deliver over such persons to Sathan that is to say we excommunicate execrat and anathematize all such as after publication of this our decree and notice either privately or publickely given them hereof shall defend adhere to or approve the justice of the said peace and chiesely those who shall beare armes or make or joyne in warre with for or in the behalfe of the Puritans or other heretickes of Dublin Corke Yoghell or of other places within this Kingdome or shall either by themselves or by their appointment bring send or give any aid succour or reliefe of victuals ammunition or other provision unto them or by advâ—se or otherwise advance the said peace or the warre made against us These and every of them by this present decree we doe declare and pronounce Excommunicated ipso facto c. 65. The cause of this Excommunication besides the sinne of perjurie above mentioned is contumacie against the decrees of holy Church concurrance to the advancement of heresie and suppression of Religion together with many other causes which may be collected out of what hetherto wee alleaged Sequestrari oportet graviter lapsum saith S. Ambrose ne modicum fermentum totam massam corrumpat Cum excommunicat Ecclesia saith S. Augustin in coelo ligatur Excommunicatus Hoc nunc agit in Ecclesia Excommunicatio quod agebat
statutes repealed whereof mention is made in the Collection of the Irish statutes I finde not this mentioned It is true that 3. and 4. Philip and Mary this statute and all other statutes enacted by Henry the 8. against the See Apostolicke and the Supreme power thereof were repealed though the statutes of such repeales were not recorded among the rest of the Irish statutes which some attribut to the corruption of the collector yet were the same statutes all revived confirmed and amplyfyed in the second yeare of Queene Elizabeths raigne where expresse mention is made of the statutes of the foresaid 28 yeare of Henry the 8. and not onely the grievances by me alleaged out of the same statute but also the Oath of Supremacy there established iterated and confirmed by the statute of 2. Eliz. so farre is it from truth that the foresaid statute was remaineth repealed Which our learned Lawyers that penned our declarations and remonstrances foreseing were therfore carefull to demand that not only the the act of 2. Eliz. in Ireland but also all other acts made against Catholick Religion since the 20. yeare of Henry the 8. should be repealed wherein they suppose the said statuts of Hen. 8. to be in force accordingly the first of our 17. propositions wherein we demanded a repeale of al pâ—nal lawes was propounded in general tearmes abstracting from the statut of 2. Elizab. and all other statuts Our Committee of the treatie should have followed their Instructions in this particular and not limit the revocation of the Oath of Supremacy to that Oath of 2. Eliz. knowing right-well that the other Oath of 28. Hen. 8. is extant in the printed Irish statute but the repeale thereof no where that I could find extant It were more honourable for this good Lawyer to take pen in hand if his joynts be not too stiffe and refute this Survey than to raile against the Author at other mens Table remove a te ospravum detrahentia labia sint procul a te I conclude with the Apostles advise I beseech you brethren marke them diligently which cause division and offences contrary to the doctrine which you have here learned and avoyde them For they that are such serve not the Lord IESVS CHRIST qut their owne bellyes and with faire speeches and flattering deceive the hearts of the simple Laus Deo Deiparaeque Omnia S. R. Ecclesiae Congregationis utriusque Cleri Hibernici judicio subjectasunto FINIS Erratasecundae partis PAg. 11. lin 23. for where reade whence pag. 13. lin he is omited p. 17. lin-21 for can reade and p. 25. lin 31. reade ontayneth p. 26. lin penult for in reade in p. 36. lin 24. who eade which pag. 44. lin 24. reade insufficient pag. 56. lin 26. reade Protestants p. 66. lin 64. reade Religion p. 79. l. 2. for 14000. l' reade 13000. l' p. 86. lin 14. reade yeelded ibid. lin 31. reade Churches yeelded pag. 94. lin 1. reade disease pag. lin 3. 97. reade us 1. Cor. 2. Gal. 1. A zor Instit moral par 3. l. 9. c. 7. â—illiuc to 2. tr 39. cap. 2. See numb 5. §. 5. 6. Glamorgans Câ—mmission Articles letter 27. February The revocation communicated to the Marques before the 29 of Iuly An objection preoccupated Psal 2. 4. Gal. 4. 30. See part 1. sup art 25. 28. Math. 6. 23. Psal 2. 4. Gal. 4. 30. Azor. Instit moral par 3. l. 9. q. 6. quaesito 4. Fillinc trac 39. Cap. 2. Kings letter 27. febr â—udic 9. 14. §. 4. l. diligenter mandati glos in c. sicui Is. 30. A zor instit moral par 3. l. 9. Cap. 6 â—ud v. pag. vlt. of his discourse of Ireland Azor supra Cap. 6. q. 5. et Filline supra Cap pastoralis de rescrip L si procurat § mandati ff mandati artic Glamorgan numb 5. Iob. 20. 16. The first argumeÌ„t proving the insufficiencie of our committees commission 2. Argument L. inter causas ff maudati l. quiae ff de Iurisd omniud l. ult ff de solut l. si quis alicu◠§. morte ff mandati Instiede mandato §. recte 〈…〉 3. Argument 4. Argument 〈…〉 Mr. Andrew Moore for this is my Author who sâ—w the letter 5. Argument 6. Argument 7. Argument 8. Argument 9. Argument Glamorgans peace not secure or honourable The NuÌ„cius urgeth the Councell to expect the Popes peace The CouÌ„ cell promise to complie with the Nuncius No firme peace could be made with Ormond Inhibition untill the King confirme the peace of Rome Pidelitie of the Irish The Church's care that loyaltie he observed to Princes 11. 5. 7. See against this 5. 19. Two Protestation sent by the Lord Nuncius The good peace rejected the worse accepted No reasonable motive to conclude this peace New warning not to conclude a peace Why the protestation was made for a while concealed The treaty of peace not discovered to the Nuncius The NuÌ„cius never assented to Ormonds peace Answers to the necessity No cause of feare More prejudice by this peace than by a warre Scire vos oportet quod nunquam ab aliquibus nostrâ—os homines sinimus â—pprimi sed si necessitas ulla occurrerit praesentaliter vindicamus quiae nostri gregis in omnibus ultores esse debemus praeciput adiutores Leo. 4. habetur c. 23. q. 8. cap. 8. omni timore ac terrore deposito contrae inimicos sanstae fidei adversarios omninm Religionum agere viriliter sludete no vit enim Omnipotens si quilibet vestrum morâ—itur quod pro veritate fidei salvatione patriae ac defensione mortuus est ideo ab eo praemium caleste consequetur idem ibid. cap 9. Seâ— Mercur Apologetic position 1. â—x can extrau commu lib. 1. tit 8. de major obed c. 1. Vâ—i supex lac de Graffijs decision 28. canonib 1. Machaâ— 2. 66. c. 3. 11. 23. c. 4. 20. 34. c. 10. c. 1 Answer 2. Answer See hereafter §. 19. 3. Anfwer The 4. answer The 5. answer 2 Reg. â—â— 26. Matth. 5. 19. Matth. â— 25. Math. 28. 20. Psal 109. 1. Chrysost in c. 1. Matth. Hieâ— â—bid contra Hcluid See hereafter §. 18. 19. 6. Answer 7. Answer 8. Answer L. Sicum l. cum quis 〈◊〉 desolut The 9. Answer The 10. Answer The 11. Answer The 12. Answer A threefold answer * Quibus cum benefeceris pejores â—…fiunt 2. Paral. 20. 17. Infra s 2. See hereafter numb 35 1. Machab 2. 47. Ezech. 13. 10. Act. 4. 5. Infra §. 19. V. Etiaâ—â— Panormitanum c. ult de restitut spoliat Azor 3. p. mor. Inst Cap. super quibusd de verb. signif Cap. caufam quaerelati N. one of the two so dyed Genes 9. Note the uncertainty when the ParliameÌ„t shall be Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction the hands of the Catholique Clergie Of the Supremacy c. * this is not takeÌ„ a way Note the obligation Num. 54. Num. 26 See above num 53. Deut. 17. 18. Matth. 18. 17. 18. 1. Cor. 5. 2 Thess 3. c TT in sup ad q. 21. a. 3. L. de poeâ—â—t c. 14. Tract 50. in Ioan q. 39. in Deut. Flodoar l. 4. hist Rem c. 5 10. 8. ep 41. id ep 22. Leg. 32. ff dâ— legibus Observat on the first art pag. Ierm 34 â—â— Cajetan Salon Aragon Ban. apud Tan. to 3. disput 4. q. 3. dub 3. nu 57. 58. ex S. Tho. 22. q. 60. a. 4. Iorem. 17. 5. Rom. 15. 5. Fol. 67. 427. 429. Irish statuts pag. 260. Declar. printed in France p. 8. n. 6. Prov. 4. 24. Rom. 16. 16. 17. 18.