said Honour of Wallingford And that the like process sutes and pleas should be for ever holden received and should be used in the said Honour of Newline otherwise Eweline as at the first day of the same Parliament were used or exercised in the said Honour of Wallingford And that the said late King Henry the 8th should have to him his Heirs and Successors for ever the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever appertaining to the said Honour or Castle or reputed or taken to be any part of the possessions or parcel or member of the said Honour and Castle from thence for ever to be severed and divided from the aforesaid Dutchy And that the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford from thence for ever should be named and called the Castle and Mannor of Wallingford And also that the said Castle and Mannor of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever which then should be belonging or appertaining to the said Mannor or reputed or taken to be any part parcel or member thereof and all manner of Liberties Franchises Privileges Royalties and Jurisdictions before that used within the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever should be united annexed knit adjudged deemed accepted reputed and called part parcel and member of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm in the aforesaid County of Oxford And further it was enacted by Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That all and singular person and persons who then held any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and of the most excellent and undoubted Prince Edward the Son and Heir apparent of the said late King Henry the 8th as of the said Honour of Wallingford or of any other Lordships or Mannors being parcel or member of the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever after should hold their said Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors as of the aforesaid Mannor and Castle of Wallingford or of the said Lordships or Mannors being parcel and members of the said Honour of Wallingford parcel of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm by the said Rents Sutes Customs and Services as they and every of them held payed or did before the making of the said Act of Parliament and not by more or other Rents Sutes Customs or Services Saving to every person and persons Bodies Corporate Politick their Heirs and Successors and to every of them other than the most excellent and undoubted Lord Prince Edward which then was and his Heirs and to any other who from thence for ever should happen to be the Kings Eldest Son and new Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom of England All such Right Title Interest Possession Fees Offices Annuities Rents Commons and all other Commodities and Hereditaments whatsoever which they or any other of them lawfully held had could or ought to have had if the said Act of Parliament had never been made And further It was Enacted by the Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That the aforesaid Excellent and undoubted Prince Edward which then was and every other who from henceforth for ever should happen to be Eldest Son of the King and next Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom should have hold and enjoy for ever annexed united and knit to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall for and in full Recompence of the aforesaid Honor Castle of Wallingford and other the premises in the said Act before mentioned to the said Honor of Wallingford then before belonging as part and parcel of the said Dutchy of Cornwall The Manor of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in the County of Cornwall amongst other things in such manner and form and of such like Estate as the sayd Excellent and undoubted Prince before the making of the same Act of Parliament had held or enjoyed the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all the premises parcel of the said Honour And that all and singular the aforesaid Manors with all and singular their Appurtenances then amongst other limitted and assigned by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and every of them from thence for ever should be reputed deemed adjudged accepted and taken by authory of the same Parliament as part parcel and member of the said Dutchy of Cornwall in such and the like manner and form to all purposes and intents as the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and the members and parcels of the same were before the making of the same Act any Act Law Custom or use to the contrary notwithstanding As by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late K. Hen. the 8th made amongst other things it more fully appeareth And whereas before until the time of the making of the aforesaid Act of Parliament made in the afores Parliament of the afores late K. H. the 8th The aforesaid Honour Castle of Wallingford members parcel thereof were part parcel and members of the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third with the common assent aforesaid and Authority of his Parliament aforesaid as before is said made and as in the aforesaid Charter are mentioned and above recited and the aforesaid excellent and undoubted Prince Edward in the aforesaid Act made in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th before the time of making of the aforesaid Act made in the Parliament aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th had and enjoyed in the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and other the premises parcel of the same Honour in such manner and form and of such estate as is enacted and limited in the aforesaid Charter and Grant aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Edward the third in the year of his Reign the 11th aforesaid by the Authority of Parliament made as before is said And the aforesaid Castle of Wallingford with the Hamlets and Members thereof And the aforesaid Honour of Wallingford with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third as before is said made specified are one and the same and not others or divers By vertue of which the said late Prince Edward eldest Son of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and Duke of Cornwal was seised of the aforesaid Manors of West Tannton Trelowia Landalph with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee as parcel of his Dutchy of Cornwal aforesaid according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and he thereof so being seized the aforesaid late
possession then held made the aforesaid Edward Fowler was seized of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee Tail And so thereof being seized the issues and profits thereof all his life took and had and the same to the uses and intents in the Testament of the said John Barton the Elder above expressed applyed and converted And that the aforesaid Edward so thereof being seised afterwards that is to say the 28 th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th the 32. at Buckingham aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seized After the death of which Edward Fowler The said Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. descended to the said Gabriel Fowler as Son and Heir of the body of the said Edward Fowler lawfully begotten By virtue of which the aforesaid Gabriel into the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcell c. with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten the reversion in Fee simple thereof to the right Heirs of the said John Barton the Testator expectant unto the uses in the said last Will of the said John Barton the Testator expressed to be performed and the aforesaid Gabriel Fowler the issues and profits thereof to the uses and intents in the said Testament of the aforesaid John Barton the Testator to be performed limitted received disposed and converted from the time of the death of the said Edward Fowler within 5. years next before the first year of the Reign of King Edward the 6 th that is to say untill the 4 th day of May in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8 th the 37 th By colour of which aforesaid premises and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the said King Edward late King of England the 6 th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the year of his Reign the first begun and from thence continued untill the 24 th day of the same November then next following then and there holden concerning Colleges Free Chapels Chauntries Fraternities Guilds and other spiritual promotions made and provided The aforesaid late King Edward the 6th immediatly after the Feast of Easter next following after the making of the said Act of Parliament was seised of and in the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other things in the said Testament as is aforesaid given and appointed in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England if the Law so in this case requireth and that afterwards the said late King dyed of the said Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture so seised if the Law of England so requireth without Heir of his body begotten after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th If the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the Messuage aforesaid and of the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. amongst other in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law this requireth and he said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. dyed so hereof seised if the Law of England in this case requireth without heir of her body issuing after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary if the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said Lady the Queen that now is was of the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other seised in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law of England so thereof requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oaths aforesaid That after the aforesaid Act of Parliament aforesaid in the year of the Reign of the late King Edward the 6th the first made The aforesaid Gabriel Fowler occupied the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture with the appurtenances parcel c. continâ—ed and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail if the Law of England in this case requireth it having issue of his body lawfully begotten one Richard Fowler and so thereof seised continued the occupation aforesaid if the Law of England requireth it and afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18 th at Buck. aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seised if the Law of England requireth By colour of which the Messuage aforesaid and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. descended if the Law requireth to the aforesaid Richard Fowler as Son and Heir of the said Gabriel By colour of which the said Richard Fowler afterwards and before the time in which c. into the Messuage and 6. Acres of Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten if the Law of England this requireth and the said Richard Fowler of the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. so being seised if the Law of England this requireth The said Richard after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 10th day of March in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 33th at Buckingham aforesaid By his writing bearing date the same day and year with the Seal of the said Richard sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed for a certain sum of money in the said writing specified if the Law of England this requireth enfeoffed Francis Dayrell and Edward Dayrell Gen. of the Messuage and 6. Acres aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. amongst other To have to the said Francis and Edward their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which the said Francis and Edward in the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid parcel c. entred and were thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of Engl. this requireth so being thereof seised if the Law of Engl. this requireth The said Francis and Ed. afterwards before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say
Patents had given and granted to the abovesaid VValter and to one Elizabeth then his Wife The aforesaid Mannor of Charleton with the appurtenances in the said County of Somerset To have and to hold to the said VValter and Elizabeth and the longer liver of them The late King Henry the 8th for that that the said VValter the aforesaid Letters Patents to him of the aforesaid Mannor of Grafton Fleuard and the said VValter and the aforesaid Elizabeth the said Letters Patents to them of the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton in form aforesaid made to the said late King Henry the 8th in his Chancery had delivered up there to be cancelled By the said letters patents gave and granted to the abovesaid VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid Manor of Abotesly with the appurtenances whereof c. to have and to hold to them the said VValter and Elizabeth and to the heirs males of the bodie of the said VValter begotten And the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his plea aforesaid hath not shewed in fact that the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th by his letters patents had given and graunted to the aforesaid VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton with the appurtenances to have and to hold to the said VValter and Elizabeth for the Term of the longest liver of them as by the Law he ought to have shewed and because expresly it is not shewed in the said plea that the same grants were made but only by way of recital The aforesaid Consideration in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th in the yeer of his Reign the 23th aforesaid made are void and insufficient in Law And the said late King in his grant aforesaid by reason thereof was deceived And in this That the aforesaid Richard in his Plea aforesaid allegeth that the aforesaid VValter and Elizabeth the said Letters Patents to them of the aforesaid Mannor of Charleton made in the Chancery of the said late King Henry the 8th had surrendred and procured to be cancelled By which the Estate of the said VValter and Elizabeth of and in that Mannor was determined Whereas by the Law of the Land the estate of the said Elizabeth then being under Covert Baron by the surrendring and cancelling of the said Letters Patents was not determined or surrendred up And upon this That whereas the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his pleading alleged That by the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th the 8th day of June in the 28th year of his Reign made it was Enacted That the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors should have hold and enjoy all and singular the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in Fee simple saving alwayes to all person and persons Bodies politique and Corporate their Heirs and Successors and to the Heirs and Successors of every of them other than to the aforesaid late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs and the Heirs of the said Richard late Earl of Warwick Brother of the said late Countess all such Rights Titles Uses Interests Term of years demise demises Entries Actions Grants and Conditions which he or any of their Heir or the Heirs or Successors of any of them have or had or might to have or ought to have had if the said Act of Parliament had never been made any thing in the said Act to the contrary thereof notwithstanding And the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in his Plea aforesaid doth not allege in fact That the aforesaid Ann now Countess of Warwick in whose Right and as Servant of which Countess the said Richard makes Justification of the Trespass and Intrusion aforesaid was not Heir of the said Richard late Earl of Warwick as by the Law of the Land it ought to be shewed and in this that by the said Act of the 28th abovesaid The aforesaid Mannor of Abbottesley with the appurtenances whereof c. was given by express words to the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors and thereof the said Saving in the same Act mentioned is repugnant and void to reserve any right in that Mannor to any other person and therefore the aforesaid Walter Walshe and Elizabeth his wife to have or claim any right or estate of or in the said Mannor by force of the said Act of Parliament are barred And in this That whereas the aforesaid Plea of the said Richard Bushopp above in Barr pleaded is insufficient in Law to discharge or excuse him the said Richard of the Trespass intrusion and ingress aforesaid upon which Plea the aforesaid Attorney of the said Lady the Queen had demurred in Law and demanded Judgement there for the said Lady the Queen yet that notwithstanding it is adjudged by the Barons That the Plea of the said Richard is sufficient in Law him the said Richard of the Entry and Intrusion into the aforesaid Wood called Alton-wood otherwise Aluingâ—on-wood the aforesaid first day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th and from the same day until the exhibiting of the Information aforesaid and of the taking of the issues and profits thereof by that time to discharge And so the same Attorney General for the said Lady the Queen saith That in the Record and process aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly erred And thereupon the said Attorney of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth That the Judgement aforesaid for those Errors and others in the Record and Process aforesaid be revoked annulled and be had for nothing And also a Writ to warn the aforesaid Richard Bushopp to be here before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer at a certain day to hear the Record and Process aforesaid as also the aforesaid Errors which he the said Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is there alleged and it is granted unto him And it is commanded to the Sherif of the said County of Worcester That by good and lawful men of his Balywick he give warning to the said Richard Bushop that he before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid upon Tuesday falling the 26th day of the said Moneth of April to hear in form aforesaid if c. And further c. that to the Court c. At which day the same Sherif that is to say Edward Harwell Esquire retorned the Writ aforesaid and sent that the said Writ was so late delivered unto him that for the shortnesse of the time he could not execute it Yet the aforesaid Richard Bushop before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer at the same day comes into the Chamber aforesaid by Arthur Salway his Attorny and demands the hearing of the Record and of the Processe as also of the aforesaid Errors and they are read
Assignes the interest aforesaid of the aforesaid Term of years of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lends aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert Wright the Grandfathe in form aforesaid demised By virtue whereof the said Edward was of the interest of the Term aforesaid possessed and being so thereof possessed The said Edward the 11th day of July in the yeer of our Lord 1563. at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by his said Testament constituted and appointed Agnes then his Wife to be sole Executrix of his said last Will And by the said his last Will gave and bequeathed all his interest aforesaid in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid so as before is said with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright now the plantiâ— one of the Sons of the said Edward And afterwards the said Edward Wright at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised possessed After whose death the aforesaid Agnes took upon her the burden of Execution of the last Will of the said Edward aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid and the said Executrix at Eastmeon aforesaid gave her consent that he the said Robert Wright should have and injoy to him and his Assignes the interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised By virtue of which the said Robert Wright now plantif was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed until the morrow of the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord 1575. in which morrow of the aforesaid Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer 1575. aforesaid The said Robert Wright now plantif into the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And so thereof being possessed the said Moyety with the Appurtenances had held and injoyed and now hath and occupieth and ought to have and occupy of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in or upon the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any parcel thereof yeerly any manner of wayes growing and appertaining renewing or arising for the occasion aforesaid in this behalf alleged utterly exonerated acquitted freed and privileged by reason of the Prescription and Privilege aforesaid And whereas by the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the second yeer of his Reign amongst other things It is enacted by authority of that Parliament That no person be sued or otherwise compelled to yeeld giue or pay any manner of Tithes for any Manors Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or Prescription were not chargeable with the payment of any such Tithes by any Composition reall as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appeareth Yet the aforesaid Nicholas Wright in his life time pretending himself to be Farmer of the Rectory of the Parish Church aforesaid and by colour of a demise to him thereof made by Thomas by Divine Providence then Bishop of Winchester for the Term of 21. yeers supposed to be made upon that occasion falsely supposing Tithes whatsoever in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid demised arising and happening to the said Nicholas Wright by virtue of the demise aforesaid to him in form â—foresaid supposed to be made to belong and appertain whereas in truth The said Robert now plantif the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid by virtue of the Demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid made and by reason of the immunity of the Privilege and Act aforesaid above specified was exonerated acquitted freed and privileged of and from payment of Tithes whatsoever thereupon growing to have and injoy ought during the Term aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid granted of the premises not ignorant endeavouring the Queens Majesty that now is and her Regal Crown to desinherit and to draw the conusance of her Pleas which do belong to her Royal Crown and not to the spiritual Court to another Jurisdiction and Examination in the spiritual Court supposing the Indenture of demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Granfather made and the Writing of Confirmation aforesaid as also the Estate of him the said Robert now plantif of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather from the Tithes aforesaid in form aforesaid discharged had and made to be void and of no validity in Law whereas in truth The Indenture of demise aforesaid and the Writing of Confirmation theâ—eof and also the Estate of the said Robert aforesaid the now plantif of and in the Moyety of the aforesaid demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather in manner aforesaid demised so as before is said discharged of Tithes is good and effectual in the Law And whereas in truth the same demise to the aforesaid Nicholas in form aforesaid alleged to be made if any such waâ— was utterly void and insufficient in Law as to any Tithes of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid growing is The said Robert Wright now the plantif in the spiritual Court before the Reverend and worthy Man Mr. William Awbray Doctor of Law in the Court of Audience of causes and businesse in the Court of Canterbury lawfully deputed to hear of and for the withdrawing and not payment of Tithes of Wheat Barly Pease and Beans of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord 1590. growing renewing arising and happening as also of and for the withdrawing and non payment of the Tithes of the Wool of Lambs and Sheep of the said Robert now plantif of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord aforesaid kept shorn and arising as also of the Tithes of the Aples of the said Robert Wright the plantif of in and upon the said aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer aforesaid growing gotten and arising the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Eastmeon aforesaid in the County aforesaid drew into sute And the aforesaid Nicholas the same Robert now plantif before the aforesaid spiritual Judge for that occasion aforesaid to appear and to the said Nicholas of and upon the premises to
should be fully satisfied and paid as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By virtue of which Gift and Grant the said Ann was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And so thereof being seized The said Ann afterwards and before the time in which c. at Suâ—ton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Dionisius And afterwards and before the time in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid of the Cattel aforesaid to be done that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Dionisius at Sutton Atthone aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Ann him over lived and was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And because 20. pound of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid by one whole yeer ended at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th and within the space of 40. dayes then next following were not paid to the said Ann but were behind The said George Mason and Francis as Bayliffs of the said Ann do well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. as in parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the distresse of the said Ann in form aforesaid charged and bound And this they are ready to aver Whereupon They demand Judgement and Retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with their damages costs and charges by them about their Sute in this behalf put unto to be adjudged unto them c. And the aforesaid John Kettel saith That the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterly by any thing before alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to be just ought not to acknowledge For he saith that long before the aforesaid time of taking of the aforesaid Cattel done and long before the grant of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 40 pound And long before the said Dionisius Mayow had any thing of and in the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenanes One Thomas Mayow was thereof seized in his demesn as of Fee And so being thereof seized The said Tho-Mayow before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid long before the Grant of the aforesaid Annuity that is to say the 15. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen the 19th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid of the said 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. Enfeossed one Thomas Scot of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Gentleman and John Fremling of Dartford in the said County Baker amongst other things By the name of all those his Two Manors of Sawters and Sawley with the Barns Stables Dove-houses and all other the Houses and Buildings to the said Manors belonging Orchards Gardens with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in Sutton Atthone aforesaid then in the Tenure or Occupation of the said Thomas Mayow and also by the name of all other his Houses and Buildings Lands and Tenements Meadow Pasture Woods and Underwoods Rents and Reversions situate lying and being within the Towns Parishes and Fields of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Wilmington and Dartford or elsewhere in the aforesaid County of Kent as also the Reversion and Remainder of all and singular the premises Rents and yeerly profits reserved upon whatsoever Demises or Grants of the premises or any parcel thereof before then made To have and to hold the aforesaid Manors and other the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling their Heirs and Assignes for ever to the only use and behoof of the aforesaid Dionise Mayow Son and Heir Apparent of the said Thomas Mayow his Heirs and Assignes for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof first due and of right accustomed upon the Conditions following That is to say That the aforesaid Dionise Mayow or his Heirs should pay or cause to paid to Petronill Martin of Mylton in the aforesaid County of Kent Widow the yeerly Rent of 10. pound for the Term of the life of her the said Petronill Which yeerly Rent of 10. pound the aforesaid Thomas Mayow to the aforesaid Petronill before had granted for and in consideration of a Mariage to be had and solemnized between the aforesaid Thomas Mayow and the aforesaid Petronill after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Mayow And upon Condition That if the aforesaid Thomas Mayow at any time during the natural life of the said Thomas should pay or cause to be paid to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling or to either of them or to the Heirs of the longer liver of them 10. shillings of good and lawful Mony of England that then the Feoffment aforesaid should be void and of no force in Law And that then it should be lawful to the aforesaid Tho. Mayow into the aforesaid Two Manors and all the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. to re-enter and the same to have again in his former Estate and Condition any Act Thing Cause or Matter whatsoever to the contrary thereof notwithstanding By virtue of which Feoâ—fment and by force of a certain Act in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses into possession The said Dionise Mayow was seized of the aforesad 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which in his demesn as of Fee upon the Conditions aforesaid And so thereof being seized The said Dionise before the aforesaid time of taking the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing â—ealâ—d with his Seal bearing date the same day and yeer Gave and Granted to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwel in the County of Essex the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. amongst other in manner and form as the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley above in their Conusance abovesaid have allâ—ged And the said Ann afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At Sutton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the said Dionise and afterwards and before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid Thomas Mayow at Sutton Atthone aforesaid payed to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John
be taken and seized And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who c. As to the said Plea of the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Helc by them above in form aforesaid pleaded for the said Lord the King saith That that Plea and the matter therein conteined is not sufficient in Law to maintain That the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph ought not to be revoked and annulled or that the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances into the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought not to be seized To which Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea of the said John Hele and Warwick Hele in this behalf The said Attorny General for the said Lord the King demandeth Judgement and that the said Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made be revoked and annulled And the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances be taken and seized into the Hands of the Lord the King c. Upon which the aforesaid Henry Lindley saith That the Plea of the aforesaid Attorny General for the said Lord the King that now is to the Plea of the said Henry Lindley above by Replication pleaded and the matters therein conteined are not sufficient for him the said Henry Lindley to say That there is not any such Record of any such Act of parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof is recited and specified Nor that there is any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by Authority of the Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias thereof above is recited and specified to Bar And that the said Henry Lindley to that Plea in manner aforesaid by Replication pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to rejoyn And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in his behalf the said Henry Lindley as at first demandeth Judgement If the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be annulled or the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances or any of them ought to be taken seized into the hands of the Lord the King that now is And the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele for themselves say that in as much as they sufficient matter in their plea aforesaid by them above pleaded have alleged that is to say the aforesaid seisin of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Tauuton Treloâ—ia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England and the grant aforesaid by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said late Queen and the rest of the Matters by them above pleaded which the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick are ready to aveâ— which matter the aforesaid Attorny General of the Lord the King that now is doth not deny nor to the same any waies answereth but the same averment to admit altogether refuseth as at first demand Judgment if the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances made ought to be revoked and annulled or the said Manors with the Appurtenances or any of them in the hands of the said Lord the King that now is ought to be taken or seised And farther for the better information and to more fully inform the said Lord the King that now is and the Court here of the State of the said Lord the King that now is to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and to other Manors to the said late Dutchy any maner of way belonging or annexed or part or parcel thereof The said John and Warwick say that in the Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th held at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 7th day of November in the first yeer of his Reign made amongst other things ordayned It was enacted and established by authority of Parliament that the said Lord King Henry the 7th should have hold enjoy and possess to him and his Heirs for ever from the 21th day of August then last past the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal and all and singular Honors Castles Lordships Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services Poffessions Advowsons and other Hereditaments with all and singular their members and appurtenances to the aforesaid Dutchy belonging and appertaining or which were belonging annexed reputed or taken parcel of the same any time of the Reigns of Henry the 6th Edward the 4th late Kings of England in as ample and large manner with all liberties Franchises and other things to the same belonging in like manner form and condition as the aforesaid Kings or either of them had held occupied used or enjoyed or had held occupied was used and enjoyed in the same in any time during the said Kings Reigns as in the Statute aforesaid in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th the first abovesaid amongst other things it is more fully contained and appeareth By which the said King James now King was and yet is seised of the rest of the Manors Lands and Tenements to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall belonging by the aforesaid late Queen Elizabeth not aliened in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England whereupon they pray that the Court here take knowledge and notice of the aforesaid Statute in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry 7th the first abovesaid made and of the aforesaid Statu te of the said Lord the King that now is to the rest of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwal belonging they would take and accept c. And the aforesaid Henry Hobert Attorny General of the aforesaid Lord the King that now is who c. as to that whereupon the aforesaid Henry Lindley above demurreth in Law in as much as he sufficient matter in Law for the said Lord the King to bar the aforesaid Henry Lindley from saying that there is not any such record of any such Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 3d. made nor any such Record of the aforesaid Charter by the said late King Edward the 3d. by authority of Parliament aforesaid made as in the aforesaid Writ of Scire Facias
give unto the Treasury and Storehouse of my intended Hospital to begin their Stock with and to defend the Rights of the House 1000. pound of lawful English Mony And I give to every one of my Feoffees whom I have put in trust about my intended Hospital to whom I have not given any thing in this my Will the sum of 26. pound 13. shillings and 4. pence of lawfull Mony of England as by the said Testament and last Will more fully appeareth And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 12th day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid at Hackney in the County of Middlesex dyed without issue of his Body lawfully begotten And that the aforesaid Simon Baxter now Plaintiff is and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Sutton was Cosin and next Heir of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton that is to say Son and Heir of Dorothy the onely Sister of the said Thomas Sutton And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law afterwards and before the time in which c. claiming as two Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenues and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in Chater House within the County of Middlesex at the humble petition and only costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire in the names and to the use of them who are named Governours as aforesaid into all and singular the premises with the Appurtenances called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field whereof c. entred and were thereof seised as the Law requireth upon the possessions of which Richard Sutton and John Law thereof afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Simon Baxter into the said premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised as the Law requireth Upon the possession of which Simon Baxter thereof the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law the aforesaid time in which into the premises aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. claiming as two Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Chater-House At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq in the names and to the use of those who are called Governours as afore is said re-entred as the aforesaid Simon Baxter against them complaineth And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th year of King JAMES abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said King and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one part the aforesaid George Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and others of the other part bearing date the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid named And the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law now Defendants are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury the Reverend Father Launcelot Bishop of Elie Thomas Foster Henry Hobert John Overal Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law and Thomas Brown in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid named and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said Lord the King and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made to George Arch Bishop of Canterby and others are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that the most Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury John Bishop of London Launcelot Bishop of Elie Thomas Foster Henry Hobart John Overal George Mountain Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law and Thomas Brown in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King mentioned and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one partt and the aforesaid Reverend Father in God Gerrge Arch Bishop of Canterby Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury John Bishop of London Launcelot Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Thomas Foster Henry Hobart John Overal George Mountain Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law Thomas Brown and John Hutton of the other part are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that all the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents by the aforesaid Lord the King to the aforesaid Thomas Sutton granted and in the Indenture aforesaid of Bargain and Sale made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid George Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others except the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called the late dissolved Charter House besides Smithfield purchased of the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk mentioned are one and the same Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk and others bearing date the 9th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King to Thomas Sutton aforesaid and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others likewise named whereof c. are one and the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Thomas Sutton in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid named and in the Writing aforesaid to John Hutton aforesaid made is one and the same person and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid George Mountain at the time of the making of the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King was and now is Dean of the Church collegiat at Westminster And that the aforesaid George Mountain in the said Letters Patents of the said Lord the King named and the aforesaid George Mountain in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale by the aforesaid Thomas Sutton to the aforesaid Geo. Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others as afore is said made named is one and the same person and not other nor divers And that the aforesaid John Hutton in the aforesaid Writing named and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale of the aforesaid Tho. Sutton named is one and the same person and not other nor divers But
107 191 215 285 286 316 329 Issue joyned upon seisin of services 266 Judgement 209 Where it is Concessum where Conside ratum est 3 5 8 20 63 97 101 In an Action upon the Case 3 5 8 In an Assize 20 In Debt upon Escape against a Sheriff 50 In Ejectione Firme 63 105 Given against the Queen 175 218 Reversed 184 In a Replevin 232 237 257 264 In Trespass 315 323 339 352 Jurisdiction of Courts In what cases Jurisdiction belongs to the Ecclesiastical Court in what to the Common-Law 210 219 Sute in Ecclesiastical Court for not paying a Tax for the Repair of a Church 219 Ecclesiastical Judges refuse to allow a plea 219 Justification Where not in an Action of False Imprisonment 133 134 L. LEases 210 259 Of Lands with a stock of Cattel 210 By a Bishop confirmed by the Dean and Charter Of a Rectory Tithes c. 70 Livery and Seisin where good where not 264 Licence Of the King to be absent from executing an Office for a time 301 Of the King to found and erect an Hospital London The Custom there to demise their Lands 53 The Custom there for levying of Plaints and the manner of Entry of them and where 147 148 M. MIsnosmer Of a Borough incorporated by name Majoris Burgensium Burgi de Lynn And in an Obligation to them made the word â—urgesse is ommitted 28 Monstrans de droit 185 301 O. OBligation Oyer demanded of it 134 Office Trove 166 186 187 found by â—scheator ought to be retorned 177 P. PAtents and Letters Patents 123 167 Of Incorporation of a Borough and by what name they shall take or be sued 28 Of the King of concealed Lands what shall pass 25 Of Incorporating the Colledge of Physicians in London 127 128 129 Of Creation of the Prince Duke of Cornwall and gift of Lands to the Dutchy with a particular of the Lands 280 281 290. to 296 Of the King of Licence and the founding and erecting an Hospital with all the particulars concerning the same 375 376 377 Pleadings Nul tiel record of Capias ut Ligatum 21 22 Non est factum 27 Of an Act of Parliament for incorporating a Burough 28 Nihil debet in Debt against a Sheriff upon Escape 46 In nullo est erratum upon a Judgement in Debt against a Sheriff upon an Escape 50 Of not guilty in part 126 Of a Discent 137 Of an Attainder 165 Of a Fine a Recovery in Bar of a Rent granted by him in the remainder in tail 224 225 226 Nul tiel Record of an Act of Parliament no plea 286 287 And no plea against a Charter of the King inrolled 287 290 Of License of the King to absent for a time for the executing of an Office 301 302 Pledges de prosequend 5â— 69 79 92 106 138 209 220 352 Prescription in a Water-course to a Mill where it extends to a new built Mill 1 To be discharged of payment of Tythes 210 To be discharged of Taxes for repayr of the Church 218 Postea retorned 53 58 Prohibition 209 217 Q. QUo Minus 51 R. REatachment granted upon an Assize 19 Rents granted for life upon a Fine levied with a Nomine paenae 102 Charge granted by Tenant for life and he in the Remainder for life with warranty 246 Releases 137 By a Woman Guardian by Nucture of all Action nec non of hâ—r Dower to him in the Reversion 31 32 General where it shall bind è cour 36 Of Errours 68 With Warranty 137 Of damages recovered 232 A Deed of Release read to a Man illiterate in other words as a general Release where it was intended but an Acquittance for Rent only shall not bind 343 Replication 14 33 135 156 173 Replevin 220 233 237 250 265 276 Retorn of the Sheriff 23 Of a Writ of Summons and Attachment in an Assize 20 Remainder of a Term and of the Residue of years the difference 72 73 74 Revocation of uses of part of the Lands before setled 198. with power to sell them for payment of Debts ibid. Of letters Patents and the Lands to be seized into the Kings Hands 285 Power of Revoking uses and to limit new uses 326 327 Where a Power of Revocation is extinct and by what Act extinct 327 S. SCire Facias to shew why Letters Patents granted by the King should not be repealed 285 Sheriffs delivery over of Prisoners to the new Sheriff 49 Seisin Of one service where it shall be of another 266 267 Of Homage is Seisin of Fealty 367 What shall be said to be a good Seisin of services 267 268 Of Fealty and Sute where good of other services 267 Statutes of 34. H. 8. Of 27. H. 8. of uses 193. 221 239 253 288 308 13 42 57 84 115 172 332 347 375 Of 34. H. 8. Cap. 20 42 Of 31. E. 3. Of Errours 63 64 65 175 Of 1. E. 6. Of Chauntries 116 Of 1. Eliz. Of incorporating the Colledge of Physicians in London 129 130 and to whom it extends not 135 Of 11. H. 7. Cap. 20. 140. Of E. 6. of â—ithes 212. Of 11. E. 3. Of reation of the Prince Duke of Cornwal 280 Of uniting of Lands to the Dutchy of Cornwal 282 283 Of 43. Eliz. Of Confirmation of Letters Patents 289 Of 1. H. 7. Of Confirmation of the Charter of 11. Ed. 3. of the Dutchy of Cornwall 298 Of 19. H. 7. Of Attainder of Edward Earl of Warwick 165 Of 28. H. 8. A special Act for giving Lands to the King 169 Of 31. H. 8. Of Monasteries 347 Surrender Two joynts for life and one surrendreth to him in the Reversion 354 T. TAles de circumstantibus 47 53 80 98 122 157 261 262 330 346 353 Taxes Imposed for the repair of a Church 219 Tenures 187 265 268 271 272 By Knights service 187 By Heriot service 268 Traverse 14 172 155 Of Nul tiel Recovered 156 Trespass 306 315 323 315 329 339 345 352 356 366 New Assignment in 340 For hindring one to execute his Office and receive the profits of it 361 V. VErdict special in Action upon the Case upon Assumpsit 5 Special 15 47 72 73 81 â—3 99 107 123 157 234 262 302 303 304 305 316 343 346 347 353 354 361 362 367 Uses Declared by Indenture dat after the Recovery suffered 11 199 Not raised to the Queen upon a general consideration without averment 82 Vpon a Fine levied 82 83 84 103 239 Vses contingent destroyed by a Feoffment 333 334 Contingent once destroyed shall never Revive 334 335 W. WAste against an Asignee of Lessee for years for waste done in cutting down of Woods 395 Brought by Barganee of a Reversion 396 In cutting down Trees and the value of the Trees 397 Warranty 81 83 242 239 Voucher to Warranty 4 Where Collateral shall bind the issue in tail 137 to 141 Descends upon an Infant where it shall not bind 335 336 Several Warranties by several persons 174 175 Wills 203 235 236 94