authorised by the statute whereupon the Commission is founded which I have set down in the beginning of the first chapter For it was ancient jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall which was restored to the Crown in that act and meant to be executed by the Commissioners as Nicholas Fuller avowed in the defence of his Clients But to fine imprison and force any person to accuse themselves upon their own enforced othes their being no accuser known nor accusation libelled he proved was not ancient jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall but brought in in the second yeere of â— Hen. the 4. In the record of the worthy proceedings of the House of the Commons at the Parliam holden 1610 we have this greivance Secondly for that whereas by the intention and words of the sayd statute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction is restored to the Crowne and your highnessly that statute inabled to give onely such power Ecclesiasticall to the sayd Commissioners yet under colour of some words in that statute whereby the Commissioners are authorized to execute their commission according to the tenour and effect of your â—ighnesse letters patents and by letters patents grounded therupon the sayd Commissioners do fine and imprison and exercise other authority not belonging to the Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction restored by that statute which wee conceive to bee a great â—â—rong to the subjects Aud that these Commissioners might as well by colour of these words if they were so authorized by your Highnesse letters patents fine without stint and imprison without limitation of time as also according to will and discretion without any rules of law spirituall or temporall adiudge and impose utter confiscation of goods forfeiture of lands yea the taking away of limme and of life it selfe and this for any matter whatsoever pertaining to spirituall jurisdiction Which never was nor could bee meant by the makers of that law To fine and imprison at pleasure are punishments belonging to the temporall sword which Christ hath forbidden his Apostles and all Pastors their successors to use The weapons of their warfare are not carnall but spirituall Christ committed unto them keyes not swords In very deed there is no crueller beast nor more tyrannous then a degenerate Churchman Hee is more insolent and outragious with the Dative sword then Princes are with the Native Why should they not be like their eldest brother that bloody beast of Rome Degenerate Clergimen will either usurpe the power of the temporall sword or take it when it is offered but â—ver abuse it The three commissioners may inflict spirituall censures and punishments as suspension deprivation deposition excommunication They may call for a Priest comand him to denounce and declare in some Cathedrall Church or other publick place the offender to bee excommunicated but they enquire cognosce decerne and pronouuce the sentence of excommunication in their Court and the excommunicate may be denounced long after and howbeit the Priest should pronounce the sentence in judgement yet he should bee onely like the dempster that pronounceth the doome or like the hangman or poore slave directed by the judge hee neither inquireth cognosceth nor decerneth Yet if ye think the coÌ„missioners may excommunicate because the Archbishop is present ye are deceived for his power in the high commission is not Episcopall nor Archiepiscopall but delegate onely from the Prince which other assessours not Bishops have as well as he and by this delegate power he with his two associates as I have sayd may inflict this censure upon any subject within England or Ireland which hee cannot doe as Bishop or Archbishop for their jurisdiction ordinary is limited within the bounds of their Diocie or Province When Spottiswood pretended Archbishop of Saintandros was but a rurall minister in Calder and Law of Glasgow a rural minister at Kirkliston possessing onely the rents of Bishoprickes not authorized as yet with the office of Bishops for that pretended Assembly of Glasgow was not yet convocated yet were they armed with power to decern excommunication against any subject within our Realm to command the minister of the offender to proceed against him and if he refused to suspend deprive or ward him They were thus armed immediatly before that pretended assembly with power of warding â—ining imprisoning suspending degrading and decerning excommunication without the consent of the Church or approbation of the Estates that they might wring out of the hands of the Kirke at that corrupt and pretended Assembly EpisEpiscopall jurisdiction which many times they protested never to usurp before and without the free consent of the Church obtained thereunto O perfidious violence What we have said of excommunication may be likewise said of suspension deprivation and deposition The Archbishop doth not suspend or deprive as Archbishop but as the Kings Delegate Iudge and Commissioner by which power he may suspend or deprive Ministers out of the bounds of his ordinarie jurisdiction which no Bishops or Archbishops may doe by their ordinarie power We had a late example in our own Archbishops about two yeares since for when Mr. Spotiswood was at Court Mr. Law pretended Archbishop of Glasgow suspended Mr. Blyth and Mr. Forrester from their ministerie which he could not doe as Archbishop for they were neither within his Diocie nor his province He did it then as head of the Commission sitting for the time that is by a delegate power from the King To let passe that at that same vile Assembly no mention was made of Archbishops and paction was onely made with these men who had the benefices for which vulgarly they were called Bishops that excommunication suspension deprivation and deposition should not be coÌ„cluded without theÌ„ not that they might suspend deprive excommunicate by themselves and at their pleasures in the high Commission or any where else but according to the damnable Canons made by that wofull but pretended and null Assembly Farther the Prince may inable one or moâ— lay men with this same commission wihout mixture of Ecclesiasticall persons It is then an extraordinary power wherewith they are inabled by the Prince to suspend depose and excommunicate But the Prince hath not this power himselfe and therfore by no right of Gods law may he communicate this power unto them and it is a proud usurpation over the Church to them to receive it or exercise it In the Parliament holden 1592. some acts which were made in that turbulent time of the 1584 yeare were repealed as followeth Item our Soveraigne Lord and Estates of Parliament foresayd abrogates cassis and annulls the act of the same Parliament holden at Edinburgh the sayd yeare 1584. granting commission to Bishops and other iudges constitute in Ecclesiasticall causes to receive his highnesse presentations to benefices to give collation thereupon and to put order in all causes Ecclesiasticall which his Maiesty and estates foresayd declares to be expired in the selfe and to be null in time comming and of none availe force nor effect Not withstanding of this repealed commission our
perfidious Prelats haue resumed the same again without any law reviving it But let us proceed and heare what is recorded in the worthy proceedings of the Parliament above mentioned The Act is found to be inconvenient and of dangerous extent in divers respects 4. for that every pettie offence pertaining to spirituall jurisdiction is by the colour of the said words and letters patents grounded therupon made snbject to excommunications and punishment by that strange and exorhitant power and commission whereby the least offenders not committing any thing of any enormous or high nature may be drawn from the most remote places of the kingdome to London or yorke which is very grievous and inconvenient These three Commissioners being armed with double vengeance and power of both swords temporall and spirituall may strike a man at one strike in one sentence for one and the selfe same fault both with temporall and Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments They may depose and imprison a minister at one time for one offence they may fine and excommunicate at one time c. Againe they may punish the same offence in one person with a fine in another with imprisonment in the third with excommunication in the fourth with deprivation For their owne pleasures and discretions and not the lawes ar the rules of their censures and punishments Let us see what is recorded in the grievances Therein to wit in the Commission grounded upon the statute is grievance apprehended thus First for that therby the same men have both spirituall and temporall iâ—risdiction and may both force the partie by oath to accuse himselfe of an offence and also inquire thereof by a jurie and lâ—stly may inflict for the same offence at the same time and by one and the same sentence both spirituall and temporall punishments 2. wheras upon sentences of deprivation or other spirituall censures given by force of ordinarie jurisdiction any appeale lyeth for the party grieved that is heere excluded by expresse words of the commission Also heere is to be a tryall by Iurie yet no remedie by traverse not attaint Neither can a man have any writ of errour though a judgement or sentence be given against him â—â—â—â—unting to the taking away of all his goods and imprisoning him during life yea to the adjudging him in the case of premumire whereby his lanâ—s are forfeited and he out of the protection of the Law 3. That wheras penall lawes and offences against the same cannot be determined in other Courts or by other persons then by those trusted by Parliament with the execution therof yet the execution of many such Statutes divers whereof were made since 1. Eliz. are commended and committed to these Commissioners Ecclesiasticall who are either to inflict the punishments contained in the Statutes being Premunire and other high nature and so to inforce a man upon his owne oath to accuse and expose himselfe to these punishments or else to inflict other temporall punishment at their pleasure And yet besides and after that done the parties shall bee subiect in Courts mentioned in the acts to punishment by the same acts appointed and inflicted which we thinke were unreasonable The three Commissioners may not onely enquire and try but also judge in all causes Ecclesiasticall in causes of heresie simonie idolatry c. It is I grant provided in the statute 1. Elizabeth that they shall not in any wise have authoritie or power to order determine or adiudge any matter or cause to he heresie but onely such as heretofore have been determined ordered or adiuged to be heresie by the authoritie of the Canonicall Scripture or by the first 4. generall Councels or any of them or by any other generall Councell wherein the same was declared heresie by the expresse and plaine words of the said Canonicall Scriptures or such as heereafter shall be ordered iudged or determined to be heresie by the high Court of Parliament of this Realme with the assent of the Clergie in their Convocation This provision is no limitation unlesse wee will say that without the limits of the Canonicall Scripture there are some heresies determined which are not determined within the bounds of the Canonicall Scripture Seeing then they may determine in all he resies determined in the Scripture they may determine in all herefies whatsoever and may affirme that to bee determined for heresie in the Scripture which is orthodoxall If the commissioners the Princes delegates may be judges in all causes of herefie farre more is the Prince himselfe by their lawes and that without the provision foresayd wherwith the delegate commissioners are circumscribed These three Commissioners have power to receive appellations from other inferiour courts Ecclesiasticall like as the five with us have power by the Kings letters patents to receive and disusse all appellations made to them from any inferiour Ecclesiasticall Judges and to inhibite the said Ecclesiasticall judges to proceed iu any matter which they shall hold to be improper for them wherin they shall perceiue the said Iudges to have behaved themselves partially advocating the said matters is their own judgment See the commission renewed Anno 1618. So they may draw to themselves any cause whatsoever agitated in inferiour courts not onely at the appellation of any notorious villaine pretending grievance but also by advocation when they shall construe the cause to be unproper or the proceedings of the infeâ—iour Court to be partiall In the narrative of the proclamation it was pretended that this high commission is erected to stay advocation of causes granted by the Lords of Councell and Session That forasmuch as it hath bene compleaened by the Archbishops Bishops and other Ministers of that his Maiesties Kingdome that advocations and suspensions are frequently granted by the Lords of Councell and Session unto such as bee in processe before them and their Ecclesiasticall Courts for offences committed whereby offenders are imboldned continuing in their wickednesse and â—ing the said advocations and suspensions or meanes to delay their tryall and punishment Therfore c. Complaint hath been made sometime by ministers and suit to stay advocations that the ordinarie indicatures Ecclesiasticall might proceed to their censures without stop but not to change advocations Are the Archbishops and Bishops with their associates honester and more conscientions men then the Lord of Councel and Session An ambitious and covetous Clergie-man is of all men the most vile and prophane Did the Bishops complaine why do they then advocate causes from inferiour Courts Ecclesiasticall seeing they have usurped the sway of proceedings in Courts Ecclesiasticall to themselves Doe they accuse themselves of partialitiall proceeding in inferiour courts or handling improper causes and will these same men bee lesse partiall and more conscientious in the high Commission If no censure can take effect without their approbation and appellations should ascend from inferiour courts to superiour courts and Synods wherefore will they rather advocate causes to this extraordinary court of high
allegeance but not with the oath of supremacie for feare of troubling his tender conscience The statute of the supremacie was explained the same year of Qu. Elizabeths raigne in an admonition added to the injunctions as followeth That her Maiestie neither doth nor ever will challenge any other authority then was challenged and lately vsed by the noble kings of famous memory king Henry the 8. and king Edward the 6. which is and was of ancient time due to the Imperial crown of this Realme that is under God to have the soveraignty and rule over all manner of persons born within these her realmes dominions and countries of what estate soever they be either Ecclesiasticall or temporall so as no other forraigne power shall or ought to have superiority over them In this admonition the subjects are made to understand that her Maiestie did not claime power to minister divine offices in the Church as to preach the word and minister the sacraments They have been too simple who have construed the statute in such a sense For no wise man will thinke that kings and Queens will take upon them either the paines or worldly discredit to preach the word minister the sacraments intimate to the congregation the sentence of excommunication The statute doth make no mention of divine offices in the Church but of jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall which is and was in time of papistrie exercised at visitations and in Ecclesiasticall courts This explanation therefore of the admonition annexed to the Injunctions and ratified by Parliament in the fift yeare of Qu. Elizabeth derogateth nothing from the former statute but onely summeth it in more generall tearmes To challenge no more then was challenged and lately used by the noble kings of famous memory K. Henry 8. and Edward 6. is to challenge to be head of the Church to have all jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall flowing from the possessour of the Crowne as from the head and fountaine Mr. Fox in his Acts Monuments relateth that in the 34. of K. Henry the 8. it was enacted That the king his heirs and successors kings of that Realme shall bee taken accepted and reputed the onely supreme head on earth of the Church of England and shall have and enjoy annexed and united to the Imperiall crowne as well the title and stile thereof as all honours dignities preeminences iurisdictions priviledges authorities immunities profits and commodities to the sayd dignitie of supreme head of the same Church belonging and appertaining and that they shall have full power authority from time to time to visit represse redresse reforme and amend all such errors abuses offences contempts and enormities whatsoever they be which by any manner of spirituall authority or iurisdiction might or may lawfully be reformed repressed ordered redressed corrected or amended In a rescript of Edward the sixth it is thus written to Cranmer Archbishop of Canterburie Seeing all manner of authoritie and iurisdiction as well Ecclesiasticall as secular doth slow from our regall power as from a supreme head c. we give unto you power by these presents which are to endure at our good pleâ—sâ—re to give and promove to the sacred orders even of the Eldership or as they use to speake Priesthood any within your Diocie Anno 1. Edw. 6. cap. 12. an act was made That the Bishop should bee maâ—e by the Kings letters patents and not â—y election of Deane and Chapter and that they should make their proces and writings in the Kings name and not under their own names and that their seales should be the Kings armes This act repealed in the 1. of Queen Mary was revived in the 1. of K. James It was objected to Bishop Farrar in the dayes of the same yong king Edward that hee deserved deprivation because hee constituted his Chancellor by his letters of commission omitting the kings majesties stile and authority and that he had made collations and institutions in his owne name and authority without expressing the kings supremacie His answer was that howbeit there was some default of formalitie in the commission yet his highnes stile and authority was sufficiently expressed in the sayd commission Neither did the sayd Chancellor offer to visit but in the Kings name and authority to the sayd Bishop committed And as to the other poynt that hee made his collations and institutions in his owne name not by his own authority nor by any others save the kings authority expressing in them the kings supremacie with the Bishops own name and seale of office Whitgift sometime Bishop of Canterburie sayth We acknowledge all jurisdiction that any court in England hath or doth exercise be it civill or Ecclesiasticall to be executed in her Majesties name and right and to come from her as supreme Governour And againe in another place The Prince having the supreme government of the Realme in all causes and over all persons as she doth expresse the one by the Lord Chancellor so doth she the other by the Archbishops Dr. Bancroft who was afterward made Bishop of London and at last Bishop of Canterbury in a Sermon made at Pauls Crosse anno 1589. maketh her maiesty a petie Pope and assigneth unto her not some of the Popes power but all honours dignities preeminences iurisdictions privileges authorities profits and commodities which by usurpation did at any time appertaine unto the Pope belike relating the words of the act made in the 34. Henry 8. Our Bancroft Mr. Spottiswood pretended Archbishop of Saintandros at the pretended deposition of N. in the high commission sayd likewise I say unto you N. the king is now Pope and so shall be To be supreme governour in all causes Ecclesiasticall then is not onely to be an avenger with the sword as Bilson would make the Iesuits beleeve in his book of obedience but also to be judge in matters of errour and heresie superstition and idolatry and all other causes Ecclesiasticall and as a supreme governour to communicate this power to auy naturall borne subject In the Parliament holden at Perth anno 1606. where a number of the Nobility consented to the restitution of the Bishops to their 3 estate and old privileges that they might get the other prelacies erected in temporall Lordships it was declared in the second act That the whole estates of their bounden dutie with most hartie and faithfull affection humbly and truely acknowledge his Maiestie to be soveraigne Monarch absolute Prince iudge and governour over all persons estates and causes both spiritnall and temporall within his sayd Realme He is then not onely governour but judge also over all causes But the nature of the supremacie may be yet better conceived when we have taken a view of the particular rights of the supremacie and of the power granted to the high commission The Kings supremacie considered particularly consisteth either of things which are granted onely by statute or restored by statute as due of right to the Royall Crowne Granted first by
iurisdiction power is united and anexed to the crown from whence it is derived as from a source unto them and by law they are bound to make their proces and writings in the kings name and not in their own names and that their seals should be graved with the Kings armes as I have already declared in the first chapter It is true that they make processes in their owne name and use their own seals but herein they transgresse the formes prescribed by lawTheir manner of holding in Capite in chiefe of the king their Episcopall power and jurisdiction is not changed for all that want of formalitie as before I have cleared out of Bishop Farrars answer Sir Edward Cooke in the 5. booke of his Reports doth prove That the Function and Iurisdiction of Bishops and Archbishops in England is by and from the Kings of England and concludeth that though the proceedings and progresse of the Ecclesiasticall Courts run in the Bishops name yet both their courts and lawes whereby they proceed are the Kings as M. Sheerwood in his Reply to Downam doth report So then all the acts of their Episcopall jurisdiction are performed by authoritie derived from the King If ye will call that authoritie civill then actions of a spirituall nature are performed by a civill authoritie which is absurd But seeing this is impossible that civill authoritie can be elevated to so high a nature it must follow that it is truely spirituall power which is united to and derived from the possessor of the Crown I meane in the estimation of men and judgement of the Law howbeit in it selfe and by Gods Law it cannot be done It followeth therefore that all the Iurisdiction properly spirituall which the English Prelates doe exercise as Prelates is unlawfull how soever they have the warrant of mens Lawes It is but onely to save their own credite that they have set Downam Bilson and other their friends on worke to plead that Bishops are above Pastors jure divino by divine Institution which they are not able to prove Next is to be considered their sole authoritie which is censured by Sir Francis Bacon now Chancellour of England after this manner There be two circumstances in the administration of Bishops wherein I confesse I could never be satisfied The one the sole exercise of their authoritie The other the deputation of their authoritie For the first the Bishop giveth orders alone excommunicateth alone judgeth alone This seemeth to bee a thing almost without exemple in government and therefore not unlikely to have crept in in the degenerate and corrupt times We see that the greatest Kings and Monarches have their councell There is no temporal Court in any land of the higher sort where the authoritie doth rest in one person The Kings bench common pleas and the Exchequer are benches of a certain number of judges The Chauncellour of England â—ath the assistance of 12 masters of the Chauncerie The master of the Words hath 4 Councell of the court so hath the Chauncellour of the Dutchy In the Exchequer chamber the Lord Treasurer is ioyned with the Chauncellour and the Barons The Masters of Requests are ever more then one The justices of Assize are two The Lord President in the Marches and in the North have Councell of divers The Starre Chamber is an Assembly of the Kings privie Councell aspersed with Lords spirituall and temporall So as in all the Courts the principal person hath ever either colleagues or assessours The like is to be found in other well governed kingdomes abroad where the jurisdiction is yet more distributed as in the Courts of Parliament of France and in other places No man will deny but the acts that passe by the Bishops iurisdiction are of as great importance as those that posse by the civill Courts For mens soules are more pretious then their bodies and so are their good names Bishope have their infirmities and have no exception from that generall malediction against all men living Vae soli nam si ceciderit c. Nay we see that the first warrant in spirituall causes is directed to a number Dic Ecclesiae which is not so in temporall matters And wee see that in generall causes of Church government there are as well assemblies of all the Clergie in councels as of the Estates in Parliament whence theâ— should this sole exercise of jurisdiction come Surely I doe suppose and I doe thinke upon good ground that ab initio non fuit ita and that the Deanes and Chapters were councells about the Seas and Chaires of Bishops at the first and were unto them a Presbyterie or Consistorie and medled not onely with the disposing of their revenues and endowments but much more in jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall But that is probable that the Dean and Chapter stucke close to the Bishop in matters of profit and the worlds and would not loose their hold But in matters of jurisdiction which they accounted but trouble and attendance they suffred the Bishops to encroch and usurpe and so the one continueth and the other is lost And we see that the Bishop of Rome fas est ab hoste doceri and no question in that Church the first institutions were excellent performeth all Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction as in Consistorie And whereof consisteth this his Consistorie but of the parish priests of Rome which terme themselves Cardinals a Cardinibus mundi because the Bishop pretendeth to bee universall over the whole world And hereof againe we see divers shadowes yet remain in as much as the Deane and Chapter pro forma chooseth the Bishop which is the highest poynt of iurisâ—iction And that the Bishop when hee giveth orders if there be any ministers casually present calleth them to ioyne with him in imposition of hands and some other particulars And therefore that seemeth to me a thing reasonable and religious and according to the first institution that Bishops in the greatest causes and those which require a spirituall discerning namely the ordaining suspending or depriving Ministers in excommunication being restored to the true and proper use as shall be afterward touched in sentencing the validitie of marriage and legitimations in judging causes criminous as Simonie incest blasphemie and the like should not proceed sole and unassisted which point as I understand is a reformation that may be planted sine strepitu without any perturbation at all and that is a mater which will give strength to the Bishops countenance to the inferiour degrees of Prelates or Ministers and the better issue or proceeding in those causes that shall passe And as I wish thiâ— strength given to your Bishops in Councell so that is not unworthy your Majestiesâ— royall consideration whether you shall not thinke fit to give strength to the generall councell of your Clergie the convocation house which was then restreyned when the state of the Clergie was thought a suspected part of thâ— Kingdome in regard of their late homage to the Bishop of Rome