pretended Birthright and Inheritance floweth only from the Kings Primitive Grace and Favour and that they would not pray that de Gratiâ of Grace if they had any Colour to claim the same de Jure of Right And the renewing of this Petition every Parliament proves the Grant to be but Temporary But the late Usurpers pretended they had Priviledge granted to them to sit by the Mentioned Act of Continuance c. And therefore all fair Offers from his said Majesty for Publick Good and for the Preservation of the Government in Church and State were afterwards interpreted a Breach of Priviledge Though the soundest Lawyers of that time were of Opinion that the said Act of Continuance was Void in it self in regard that what Grants or Concessions soever the King makes the Law presupposeth they are always with this Provisoe Salvo jure regio salvo jure Coronae In the 20th of Rich. the Second it may be seen in Mr. Howe 's Chronicle that a Parliament holden at Westminster was Ordained to endure Forty eight days but it was Abridged for the King would not tarry there more than Five days wherein he declared the things pertaining to the Realm especially such Matters as touched himself c. One property of every good Law of Man is that the Maker exceed not his Authority which certainly they did that framed that Bill for the Act of Continuance c. And Coke 10th rep 57. b. it is agreed that Parliamentum testamentum arbitramentum are to be construed according to the intention of the Makers the said King certainly intended not thereby to Exclude himself because by the Laws of our Land it cannot properly be said a Parliament unless it be consisting of King Lords and Commons And if Kingly Government be constituted by Divine Right then St. Jermyn tells us that Customs and Statutes are void that are against the Law of God and so that Act was null in its own Nature at the very first and the proposal of it was Treason in a high degree Parliamentary Priviledges are but Temporary and are not in them till asked by their Speaker Precario and granted by their Sovereign But Mr. Plowden Fol. 322. b. saith that every Prerogative of the King containeth in it self a Prescription for it resteth in usage And Fol. 319. b. and 322. a. he saith that the Prerogative of the King may not be said to be torcius that is consonant to reason and hath been used from time to time in the time of one King after another for the Law is not known if not by usage and usage proveth that it is Law And Fol. 322. a. and 323. he saith all the Prerogatives mentioned in the Statute of Prerogativa Regis made in 17o. Ed. 2 di were in the King by the Common Law before the said Statute and many others and Fol. 318. a. he saith It is a commendable thing for the King to abstain from the extremity of his Prerogative of his special grace in benefit of his Subjects but withall saith that the Law doth not force him so to do And Sir Ed. Coke in the First part of his Institutes Fol. 90. b. saith that Praerogativa is derived of prae id est ante and rogare that is to ask or Demand before hand whereof cometh Prerogativa and is denominated of the most excellent part because though an Act hath passed both the Houses of the Lords and Commons in Parliament yet before it be a Law the Royal Assent must be asked or Demanded and Obtained Bracton li. jo calleth it libertatem in another place privilegium Regis Britton Fol. 27. calleth it droit le Roy the Right of the King the Register of the Writs calleth it jus regium Coronae the Royal or Regal Right of the Crown And Mr. Stanford in Praerog Fol. 5. a. b. saith Praerogativa is as much to say as a Priviledge or Preeminence that one person hath before another which as it is tolerable in some so it is most to be permitted and allowed in a Prince or Soveraign Governour of a Realm for besides that he is the most worthyest or excellent Part or Member of the body of the Commonwealth so is he also through his good Governance the preserver nourisher and defender of all the People being the rest of the same body for which cause the Laws do attribute unto him all Honour Dignity Prerogative and Preeminence It is said Coke 7. 10. b. and 11. a. That the King is an absolute Prince before his Coronation which is but a Royal Ceremony Ornament and Solemnization of the Royal Descent but no part of the Title and that Rex non est Rex quia Coronatur sed Coronatur quia est Rex The King is not a King hecause he is Crowned but he is Crowned because he is a King And Coke 11.72 a. The King is said to be sponsus Regni and per annulum by a Ring is said to be espoused to the Realm at his Coronation which is a great Mark of Soveraignty and Power in the King over his People for admit the King to be sponsus the Bridegroom or new Married Man and the Realm to be sponsa the Bride or new Married Woman at this Solemnity of his Coronation every Woman is sub potestate viri sui under the Power of ber Husband ipse dominabitur ejus and he shall Rule or Reign over her by Gods Law Gen. 3.16 and our Law doth not estrange the Husband of any Interest Prerogative or thing that the Wife hath at the time of the intermarriâ—ge or after But as in all Rebellions so in the late time of Rebellion the Woman wore the Breeches as is easily proved by the Money Coined in those times Also in Coke 7. 10. b. The King is said to be pater patriae the Father of his Country which is another Mark of his Soveraignty and Supream Power for at the beginning of Kingdoms when all the World consisted of a few Housholds the Elder or Father of the Family exercised Authority over his Meyney and did distribute reward or punishment amongst them after his own discretion all which aforesaid is agreeing with what the Poet saith Jura dant singuli natis uxoribus every single individual Person gives Laws to his Wife and Children This was patria potestas Fatherly power the fountain of Regia potestas Kingly power and so Regia potestas is lege Naturae non arbitrio populi and so Kingly Authority is by the Law of Nature not by the Will Power or Arbitrement of the People leges Naturae perfectissimae sunt immutabilâ—s and the Laws of Nature are the most perfect and not to be Altered or Changed No sooner was there a Houshold but there was a Soveraign All regal Authority was then included in the Office of Father And therefore God Almighty in giving the Fifth Commandment called the Crown Commandment Honour thy Father and thy Mother intended the Duty belonging to all Magistrates Afterwards
of this damned Thesis or Position then we are all presently fellows at Footbal and Over Milk will presently be as good as Swasey Cream and whatever gets uppermost will be King In the time of Edward the Second about 400 years since this separation of Soveraignty from the person of the King and manner of abstracting the Person of the King from his Office was found out by the Two Spencers the Father and the Son who to cover their Treason invented this damnable opinion that Homage and the Oath of Allegiance were rather by reason of the Kings Crown than his Person upon which as may be seen in C. 7. 11. a. b. were inferred these Execrable Consequences First If the King did not demean or behave himself well his Liege People were bound by their Oath to remove him Secondly Because the King might not be reformed by suit of Law that ought to be done by asperty Thirdly That his Liege People are bound to govern in aid and default of him All which detestable opinions were then condemned in two Parliaments the first was by an Act made in the time of Edward the Second called Exilium Hugonis De Spencer the Banishment of Hugh Spencer the last was by an Act made in the First year of Edward the Third the first Chapter Let all take notice that by the Laws of our Realm of England all Power Soveraignty Homage Allegiance and Subjection is commanded and required as properly due to the Natural Body of the King And that therefore it was said by Glanvil who was Chief Justice in the time of Henry the Second Dominus Rex nullum habere potest parem multo minus Superiorem Our Lord the King can have no Peer or Equal much less can he have any Superior within his Realms or Dominions And Bracton qui sub Henrico tertio viginti annos summi Justiciarii munere defunctus est that for Twenty years together was Chief Justice in the time of Henry the Third saith that Omnis quidem sub Rege ipse sub nullo nisi tantum sub deo every Man is under the King and he is under none but God alone And Non potest Regi necessitatem aliquis imponere quod injuriam suam corrigat amendet cum superiorem non habeat nisi deum satis erit ei ad paenam quod Dominum expectet ultorem nor saith he can any Man put a necessity upon the King to correct and amend his injury unless he will himself since he hath no Superior but God it will be sufficient punishment for him to expect the Lord for his Avenger neither hath he hereby other Priviledge than what by God Himself is given to Kingly Majesty as may be seen in the 8th chap. of Ecclesiastes 2 3 and 4th verses I Counsel thee to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God be not hasty to go out of his sight stand not in an Evil thing for he doth whatsoever pleaseth him and where the word of a King is there is Power and who may say unto him What doest thou Yet I observe that once heretofore the Miter may be said Sawcily to have Oretopped the Crown in the 20th year of King Henry the Eight we read in Mr. Howe 's Chronicle Fol. 541. that the Kings Marriage came on to be argued in open Court at the Black Fryers then the King and Queen were Summoned and Ascited to appear but there may be seen what the opinion of wise Men in those times was thereupon which was that it was a strange sight and the newest device that ever was read or heard of before in any Region Story or Chronicle a King and Queen to be constrained by Process compellatory to appear in any Court as Common Persons within their own Realm and Dominion to abide the Judgments and Decrees of their own Subjects being the Royal Diadem and Prerogative thereof However this was the less wonder then because the Pope did then send as Legate into England the Cardinal Campejus to debate the Controversie delegated to him and the Cardinal of York for the publication of the invalidity of the Kings first Marriage at the instance of the King himself as may be seen in Guicciardin's History Fol. 756. But as we may see in Stanf. 153. a. The King of England hath no Peer in his own Land Realm or Dominion and therefore he cannot be Judged or called to account for his Actions by his People Nay it may be there seen that Parliaments are Assembled for the profit of the King and his People and the People are Summoned thither by the Kings Writ ad consulendum c non ad consedendum solum multo minus ad supersedendum to consult of the certain difficult matters c. not only there to Sit together much less to Sit upon their Lord the King in Judgment CHAP. XIII Sheweth that no Action lyeth against the King but in place thereof Petition must be made unto him and that due circumstances observed the Subject shall have his remedy against the King by way of Petition as readily as one Subjct may recover against another Subject by way of Action in any of the Kings Courts for that all his Majesties Subordinate Officers are Sworn to do Justice between the King and his Subjects which if they do not they are Answerable for the injury not the King IT is said C. 11. 72. a. b. That the King being the Lieutenant of God solum hoc non potest facere quod non potest injuste facere which is agreeable to a Maxim in our Law that the King can do no wrong therefore as we may see in Mr. Stanford prer 72. b. In place of Action against the King for the dignity of his Person Petition must be made unto him in the Chancery or in Parliament for no Action did ever lie against the King at the Common Law but the party is driven to his Petition which is all the remedy the Subject hath when the King Seizeth his Lands or taketh away his Goods from him having no Title by order of his Laws so to do And this Petition is called a Petition of Right because of the Right the Subject hath against the King by the Order of his Laws to the thing he sueth for by Petition And it may be sued as well in the Parliament as out of the Parliament and if it be sued in the Parliament then it may be Enacted and passed as an Act of Parliament or else to be Ordered in like manner as a Petition that is sued out of Parliament And suit by Petition can be to none other than only to the King for no such suit shall be made to the Queen the Consort of the King or to the Lord Prince for these Personages have no such Prerogative Further plainly shewing and declaring the manner of suing by Petition and where and in what cases it lyeth and where not and that due circumstances observed by him
his Heirs 3 d. of the Pound for all Merchandizes imported or exported by them as is expressed more particularly in the said Charter which is to be found in the Office of the Chief Remembrancer in the Exchequer And this Charter of Ed. 1. in all Points was ratified and confirmed by Act of Parliament 27 Ed. 3. ca. 26 and this is the Original of Pettit Custom so called because this Pettit Custom for Forreign Commodities was accepted by the King when but a small quantity of such Forreign Wares was imported into England for in the time of Ed. 1. and after that in the time of Ed. 3. the native Commodities of England exported were of greater quantity and value by two parts of three at the least than the Forreign Merchandizes imported but now it is quite contrary for at this day the Outgate is less than the Ingate the Foreign Mercery and Grocery Wares c. imported are of far greater quantity and value than our Native Commodities exported 3. Prisage of Wines is also a Custom due by Prescription and parcel of the Ancient Inheritance of the Crown and that the King hath Inheritance in the Prisage of Wines appeareth by the Charters granted to the Citizens of London and to those of the cinque Ports to be discharged of Prisage in all Ports for ever See the Stat. of 1 H. 8. ca. 5. And the Duke of Ormond hath an Estate of Inheritance in the Prisage of Wines in the Kingdom of Ireland by grant of the King and this is the Nature Original and Difference of the Ancient duties payable for Merchandizes which are properly called Customs and are the Inheritance of the Crown 2. Subsedies also are duties payable for Merchandizes exported and imported but are granted by Act of Parliament Dyer 31 H. 8. 43. b. 1. Mar. Dyer 92. a. and are of three divers sorts according to the diversity of the Commodities and are called 1st Aides or Subsedies being granted out of the said Native Commodities to wit Wool Woolfells and Hides over and above the Ancient Custom aforesaid 2dly Tonnage granted out of Wines of all sorts over and above the Prizage and the said Custom of 2 s. on the Tun granted by the Charter of 31. Ed. 1. now called Butlerage 3dly Poundage granted out of all Commodities imported and exported except Wines and the staple Commodities aforesaid and payable by the Merchant strangers over and above the said Pettit Custom 1. These Aides or Subsedies were not of a certain quantity or continuance till to the time of Ed. 6. to which King in the first Parliament of his Reign was granted a Subsedy of 33 s. 4 d. of every Sack of Wool 33 s. 4 d. for every 240. Woolfells and 3 l. 6 s. 8 d. for every Last of Hides exported by Denizons for every Sack of Wooll exported by Aliens 3 l. 6 s. 8 d. and for every 240. Woolfells 3 l. 6 s. 8 d. and for every Last of Hides 3 l. 13 s. 4 d. And this Subsedy was granted to continue during the Life Natural of that King And after his demise or death all Kings and Queens except King Charles the First have had the like grants for Life 2. Tonnage which is a Subsedy out of Wines of all sorts was first granted by Parliament 5th R. 2. where 2 s. of every Tun of Wine to be imported into England was granted to the King for Two years and that was for Maintenance of a Fleet upon the Sea to suppress the Pyrates But after by Parliament 3. Ed. 4. Tonnage was granted to this King for Term of his Natural Life in this manner viz. 3 s. for every Tun of Wines and besides those 3 s. for every Tun of Sweet Wines 3 s. more see the Statute of 12th Ed. 4. ca. 3. And this Subsedy was after granted to H. 8. and Ed. 6th with this Addition in time of Ed. 6th that of every Awm of Rhenish Wine also 1 s. shall be paid and after the time of Ed. 6th this Subsedy of Tonnage was as of course Granted in England by several Acts of Parliament to Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth and King James during their several Natural Lives 3. Poundage which is a Subsedy granted out of all Commodities exported and imported except Wines and the Ancient staple Wares as above and payable by all Merchants Denizons and Aliens is the 20th part of the value of Merchandizes to wit 12 d. of the Pound and was first Granted by Parliament in England 31. H. 6. during the Life of this King which Grant was immediately resumed But after that 3. Ed. 4. this Subsedy of Poundage was granted to the said King See the Stat. 12. Ed. 4. ca. 3. and after the same Subsedy was Granted to H. 8. during his Life and the same Grant was renewed to Ed. 6. Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth and King James during their several Lives by several Acts of Parliament 3ly Imposts or Impositions are the Third kind of Duties payable for Merchandizes and are sometimes Rated and assessed by Parliament and then are in nature of Subsedies and are sometimes imposed by Prerogative Royal to support the necessary Charges of the Crown and then Nihil magis justum est quam quod necessarium est nothing is more just than what is necessary as an Ancient Senator of Rome was wont to say The Impost upon Wines in Ireland was first assessed by Parliaments and limitted to be paid for a certain time of Years which being expired that is now continued there by Prerogative of the King Davyes rep 12. a. It is to be observed from what hath been said that Anciently the Outgate was more than the Ingate and that since or of latter times it is otherwise that the Merchandizes imported do far surmount the value and quantity of our Native Commodities exported which caused the aforesaid Pettit and new Custom to exceed the said grand and Ancient Custom for by continuance of time all the Kings Dominions were much better Peopled and are more Populous at home and in all his Foreign Plantations of latter time acquired and by reason thereof our Lands and the Annual Rents thereof within the Kings said Dominions are much improved and likewise trade by Sea is also much improved as is easily made manifest by the great disproportion of the Rent reserved to be paid for the Customs by the Farmours thereof when last let to Farms and the Rent paid for the same to go no higher in the times of King James and Queen Elizabeth and that wise King Ed. 1. by his said Charter remitted Prizes and by Priviledges Granted to Aliens encouraged them to the more free Trade and Commerce and by consequence there was in after Ages the greater reason for an improvement of the Customs by the best usual and accustomed way of Granting Subsedies for the Lives of our Kings Successively one after another by Act of Parliament Seeing Subsedies themselves are no more than an Improvement in the Improvement of time of
to restrain and be a curb to such as will not Conform and be Obedient to those Rules the Law prescribeth requiring their Obedience to the Magistrates Superior Middle and Inferior and as all are to know the Superior is not nor can be subject to the controul of the Inferior In pares est nullum imperium multo minus in eos qui majus imperium habent therefore all Magistrates Subordinate be they either of the Superior Middle or Inferior Rank and à fortiori all other Subjects whatsoever are to be Obedient to their Soveraign Lord the King as Supream qui majus imo maximum imperium habet that hath the greater yea the greatest Command Power and Supream Soveraignty over all his Subjects in these his Majesties Realms and Dominions But as to this matter of the Kings Supremacy in Church and State Here I shall say no more but shall leave all to be further informed as to their bounden Duties therein in this ensuing Treatise wherein is more fully and at large discoursed thereof I remember in this ensuing Discourse also is said citing Sir Edward Coke in 7th Report 7. b. in Calvins Case that every Subject is bound to go with the King in his Wars infra extra Regnum but he is there pleased to add that the Subject is not compellable to go out of the Kingdom without Wages and citeth many Statutes as 8th Ed. the 3d. ca. 7th c. in defence of his opinion I do not presume to contradict him but am satisfied that he sheweth good warrant for what he there Writeth Moreover no considerable Foreign War upon any occasion whatsoever is ever so rashly undertaken but first the King useth to Summon his great Council the Parliament and therein is the Honour Interest and safety of the King and Kingdom considered and Parliamentary Supplies are granted for the defraying carrying on and answering the necessary charges of the War however Sir Ed. Coke denieth not but infra regnum within the Kingdom all are compellable and bound by duty of their Allegiance with or without Wages to serve the Lord the King in his Wars for then if ever that saying is true ad regem potestas omnium pertinet ad singulos proprietas the Power of all Men and all Things they have enjoy or possess belongeth to the King and yet every Mans single property remains and is continued but as may be seen in St. Jermin in his Doct. and Stud. 64. b. The Law doth assign divers conditions upon the Property and that to alter the Property without consent of the Owner if the conditions are not contrary to the Law of God or Reason And nothing is more agreeing with the Law of God nay our Obedience to the King as Supream is commanded in and by the Word of God and nothing can be more agreeable to Reason unless we will simply and contrary to all Reason admit of the Children to give Laws to their Father or Infants Males or Females to give Suck to their Mothers And it is a thing obvious and well known to every Man that knoweth any thing in our Law that every Mans Property and Estates whatsoever by Act in Law are Forfeit to the King for Treason or Fellony for Treason which all and every Rebellion is to the King for ever of what mean Lord soever they are holden for Fellony to the King for a Year Day and Wast and afterwards to the Lord of the Mannor of whom they are holden for ever In my ensuing Discourse to shew what care was made for the preservation of the Royal Rights Priviledges Jurisdictions and Prerogatives and Person of the King I make mention of the Stat. made in the 12. Car. 2di chap. 1. though in the first clause thereof by me mentioned is said That if any during the Life of the Kings Majesty c. I let this stand unaltered though the death of the Natural Body of the late King happened since because that clause thereof was made but in affirmance of the Common Law and the Stat. of 25. Ed. 3. ca. 2. as to the security of the Kings Person and the Government as appears in Mr. Stanford's Pleas of the Crown the first chap. as to the Second and Third clauses thereof the offenders against the Second clause are not only made uncapable of any imployment in Church or State but are also made lyable to such punishments as by the Laws and Statutes of this Realm are to be inflicted in such Cases As to the Third clause thereof every Person offending against the same shall incur the danger and penalty of Premunire mentioned in the Stat. of 16. Rich. 2. ca. 5. It appeareth by Bracton Libro 3tio Tract 2do cap. 15o. Fol. 134o. that Canutus the Danish King having settled himself in this Kingdom in Peace kept notwitstanding for the better continuance thereof great Armies within this Realm The Peers and Nobles distasting the Government by Arms and Armies odimus accipitrem quia semper vivit in armis Wisely and Politickly perswaded the King that they would provide for the safety of him and his People and yet his Armies carrying with them many inconveniencies should be withdrawn hereupon Canutus presently withdrew his Armies and within a while after lost his Crown and the same was restored to the right Owner I mention this matter and have it from Sir Ed. Coke who citeth Bracton for his voucher in his 7. rep 16. b. and withall I desire all to take notice that the Excise by Act of Parliament made in the first Parliament after his late Majesties most happy Restauration was continued to be paid to the late King during his Life Hearth Money was settled upon the late King his Heirs and Successors and was in recompence to the Crown for the dissolution of the Court of Wards and Liveries Customs upon Merchandizes imported and exported this little Book will tell you were all originally payable to the King his Heirs and Successors and that Subsedies granted by Parliament are but an improvement in the improvement of time and trade of the Ancient Customs payable to the Crown and were granted to the late King for his Life as they were from the time of King Henry the 7th granted to all his Royal Ancestors Kings and Queens of this Realm except his Sacred Majesties Royal Father King Charles the First Now mark what Sir Edward Coke more saith in his 7th rep 10th b. Haereditas Principis est successio in universum jus quod defunctus Antecessor suus habuit The Inheritance of the Prince is his Succession unto every Right that his deceased Ancestor had And suppose the Right Heir of the Crown had been attainted of Treason yet shall the Crown descend to him and eo instante without any reversal the attainder is utterly avoided as it fell out in the case of King Henry the 7th as may be seen in 1 H. 7th Fol. 4o. I have laid down before you these matters to let you know that
the Death of the Natural Body of the King is called Plow 234. a. the Demise of the King because that thereby he Demiseth the Realm to another and the Body Politick is transferred from one Body Natural immediately to another Body Natural that Right hath and that because our Realm doth not admit of any Interregnum Hence it was that in the year of our Lord 1660. at the very instant of his late Sacred Majesties most happy Restauration all Charters and Writings whatsoever were Written Reputed and Esteemed to be made in the Twelfth year of his Reign though that from 1648. to that time he was injuriously and wickedly Deprived Robbed and kept out from his Inheritance of all his Regal Rights of the Crown whereof he was the undoubted right Heir by the late Usurpers CHAP. X. Herein you have an Heir defined and divided and is shewed that the Right Heir of the Crown ought not nor can lawfully be Disinherited that a Bastard ought not nor can be Heir to the Crown and further something is said to the late Bill for the Exclusion of the late most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now our Soveraign Lord King James the Second NOW Sir Edward Coke in the First part of his Institutes Fol. 7. b. saith that in the Legal understanding of the Common Law he is said to be haeres an Heir that is ex justis nuptiis procreatus for haeres legittimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and is he to whom Lands Tenements or hereditaments by the Act of God and right of Blood do descend of some Estate of Inheritance for solus deus haeredem facere potest non homo God alone can make an Heir not Man And Heirs are either Lineal who ever shall first Inherit or Collateral who are to Inherit for want of Lineal Lineal descent is conveyed downwards in the right Line as from the Grandfather to the Father from the Father to the Son c. Collateral descent is derived from the side of the Lineal as Grandfathers Brother Fathers Brother c. Now in Mr. Swinb 5th part Fol. 289. he that hath Issue Natural but not Lawful is said to die without Issue and in such Case the Fathers Brother shall Inherit and not the Issue Natural of the Father for such Issue Natural in our Law is said to be nullius filius no Mans Son whence may be Inferred that no Mans Son shall Inherit no Mans Land much less a Crown And in the 23d chap. of Deuteron the 2d verse is said a Bastard shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord even to his Tenth generation shall he not enter into the Congregation of the Lord. And 10. H. 7. 18. it is said that Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote quia tam Ecclesiasticam quam temporalem habet jurisdictionem The King is a person mixt or participating with the Priest in the Priesthood because he is said to have Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction as well as Temporal And Sir John Fortescue Fol. 95. a. b. saith that it is convenient that Mans Law in the benefit of Succession should cut them short whom the Church judgeth unworthy to be received into Holy Orders yea whom Holy Scripture judgeth as touching their Birthright inferior to the Legitimate or Lawfully Begotten as we read in the 25th chap. of Gen. 5 and 6th verses Abraham gave all his Inheritance to his Son Isaac and to the Sons of his Concubines he gave Gifts And again in Mr. Swinb part 5th Fol. 17. is said A King may ex plenitudine potestatis make his unlawful Issue capable of whatsoever by Will deviseable he doth give or bequeath unto him But Mr. Plowden saith 247. a. b. It is an evil or unlawful thing to Disinherit the Right Heir And Mr. Swinb in his 2d part Fol. 118. saith that by the Civil Canon and Common Laws also of this Realm of England It is unlawful for a King to give away his Kingdom from his Lawful Heirs However we had lately a House of Commons or rather a Major part of them that had framed a Bill for the Excluding and Disabling the then most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now King James the Second for ever from Possessing Having Holding Inheriting and Enjoying of the Imperial Crowns of this Realm and Kingdoms It was a Presumptuous Bill for the Excluding of the Presumptive Heir of these Crowns However it was refused by the Lords House and so could not be offered to his late Majesty for his Royal Assent to make it a Law Have me excused for saying it was a Presumptuous Bill Matters of that nature have been in times past esteemed so in 35o. Eliz. Mr. Peter Wentworth and Sir Henry Bromley delivered a Petition to the Lord Keeper desiring the Lords of the Upper House to be suppliants with them of the Lower House unto her Majesty for entailing the Succession of the Crown whereof a Bill was ready drawn the Queen was highly displeased herewith and charged her Council to call the Parties before them so Sir Thomas Heneage was sent to fetch them they were first commanded to forbear going to the House and not to go out of their several Lodgings afterwards they were called before the Lord Treasurer the Lord Buckhurst and Sir Thomas Heneage Wentworth was Committed to the Tower Bromley to the Fleet together with Mr. Stevens as also Mr. Welch Knight for Worcester-shire and yet it was then thought no Breach of Priviledge They that meddle with this matter of the Succession to the Crown do not only trench upon the Power and Priviledge of Almighty God who as the Prophet Daniel tells us in his 4th chap. is the most High that Ruleth in the Kingdom of Men and giveth it to whomsoever he will but also we have found by woful experience that they Praevaricate with the King himself for in the very word King is included all Succession so that where a Guift is made to the King a Fee-simple passeth without the words either of Heirs or Successors or both as may be seen C. Inst. 1. part 9. b. and in the same Book Fol. 22. b. is said a Man cannot have an Heir during his Life for non est haeres viventis And Mr. Plowden 45. b. saith no Heir hath Right or Title till after the Death of his Ancestor that hath the Inheritance be the Heir either Lineal or Collateral and not in his Life and this is because let all the provision imaginable by Man nay by a Parliament be appointed yet the same by the death of the Presumptive Heir or Heir apparent in the Life time of the Ancestor by the Act of God not otherwise may and can be disappointed And Anciently and now also as in C. 8. 28. it is held That Princeps coruscat radiis Regis censetur una persona cum Rege the Prince is enlightned and made splendid by the shining brightness of the King and is esteemed to be one and the same Person with the
understood that such personages never do lack the Counsel of such Grave and Discreet Men as be able to supply all other defects Now we are to understand that our Nation hath not used any other general Authority neither Aristocratical nor Democratical but only the Imperial Monarchy or the Royal and Kingly Majesty which Anciently and at the very First as in the time of the Heptarchy was divided to many and sundry Kings each absolutely Reigning in his Country none under Subjection of other till observe by Fighting one with the other the Overcomed always falling to the Augmentation of the Vanquisher and Overcomer at last the Realm of England grew into one Monarchy neither one of these Kings neither he who first or at the last had all took any investiture at the Hands of the Emperor of Rome or of any other Superior or Forreign Prince but as may be seen in the Statute of 16th Rich. the Second chap. 5th held immediately of God to himself acknowledging no Prince on Earth his Superior and so we are to take notice it is kept and holden at this day and we may see that by a Statute made in the 13th Car. 2 di ca. 1. That if any during the Life of the King Majesty shall within the Realm or without Compass or Intend the Death or Bodily Harm Imprisonment or Restraint of the Person of the King or to Depose him from the Kingly Name of the Imperial Crowns of his Realms or Levy Wars against him or stir up any Forreigner to a Forcible Invasion and such compassings shall express by Printing Writing Preaching or Malitious and Advised Speeches and be Convicted thereof upon the Oath of Two credible Witnesses every Person so Offending shall be Adjudged to be Traitors and shall lose and forfeit as in Case of High Treason And by the same Act it is provided amongst other things That if any shall affirm the King to be an Heretick or a Papist or that he intends to introduce Popery or shall Maliciously and Advisedly by Writing Printing Preaching or other Speeches Publish or Declare any word or other thing or things to stir up the People to hatred or dislike of the Person of his Majesty or Government every such Person thereof convicted are thereby made uncapable of any Office or Imployment in Church and State and are made lyable to such Further punishments as by the Laws and Statutes of this Realm are to be inflicted in such Cases take notice this Act was made presently after his late Majesties most happy Restauration when again the Major part if not all then Living of the Secluded Members in the late pretended Parliament without King or House of Lords were again chosen by the Freeholders of their several Counties to come to this long expected and much wished for Free Parliament It would then have made a true English-man smile to see Old Esq Prynne trudge through Westminster-hall to the House of Commons with his Basket not Silver Hilt Sword by his Side time was then come that his Eyes were opened and as a principal Member of that Parliament he was one of the Framers of that Bill for the forementioned Act wherein it is further-provided that if any Person or Persons shall Maliciously and Advisedly by Writing Printing Preaching or Speaking Declare or Affirm that the Parliament began at Westminster November 3. 1640. is not Dissolved nor Determined or that it ought to be in being Or that there lies any Obligation upon him or any other Person from the Oath Covenant or Engagement to endeavour a change of Government or that both or either Houses of Parliament have a Legislative Power without the King or words to the same effect Every Person so Offending shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire whereof mention is made in the before mentioned Statute of 16th Rich. the Second I have made mention of this latter clause in the said Act the more especially because thereby all Interregna Kings de facto wicked and injurious Usurpers are Excluded and the Body Natural and Politick of our Lawful King are so conjoined and closed together that I hope in God for the future it shall not lye in the Power of the People by Rising in Rebellion against their Rightful Soveraign Lord to make any Separation of the Soveraignty from the Person of our Lord the King or to abstract the Person of our King from his Office to the Ruin Alteration or Subvertion again of his Majesties Realms and Dominions And I have mentioned the former Clauses to give you to understand what care hath been made for the Security and Preservation of his Majesties Royal Person and Government ask it is freed and secured thereby from all Restraint Bodily Harm or violence whatsoever by wicked Words or Deeds CHAP. XVI Sheweth that all Vnlawful Assemblies or Meetings for the Plotting of harm to the King or the Alteration of the Government are Vnlawful and further sheweth what Misprision of Treason is and that it is the Duty of every good Subject presently to discover Treason NOW we are to know how that we are forbid also by sundry Laws in force to Congregate and Associate our selves to Unlawful Assemblies or Meetings in Coffee-houses or elsewhere where any discontented seduced wicked Persons shall Assemble themselves together to Plot or Contrive Bodily harm to the King or the Alteration of the Government If it shall be the hard mishap of any Loyal and well affected Christian Person to chance to be in such evil Company let him learn of Mordecai the Jew his Duty therein as we may see in the second chap. of the Book of Esther the 21 22 23. verses while Mordecai sat in the Kings Gate Two of the Kings Chamberlaines Bigthana and Teresh of those which kept the Door were wroth and sought to lay hands on the King Ahasuerus and the thing was known to Mordecai who told it unto Esther the Queen and Esther certified the King thereof in Mordecai's Name and when inquisition was made of the matter it was found out therefore they were both Hanged on a Tree and it was Written in the Book of the Chronicles before the King And Ahasuerus afterwards reading in the Chronicles of the good service done by Mordechai took care for his reward as may be seen in the sixth chap. of the said Book of Esther And we may see in Stanf. 37. b. when one knoweth that another hath done Treason or Fellony and he will not him discover to the King or his Counsel or to some Magistrate but concealeth his Offence that is Misprision which Offence Bracton placeth amongst the Offences of Treason because he was of opinion that concealment beyond a certain time shall make it amount rather to Treason than to Misprision for that purpose he saith Statim sine aliquo intervallo c. that presently and without any stop pause or giving over for a time he ought to go to the King himself if he may or otherwise to some of his