Gentlemen I shall begin to shew you that which all of you might remember that is your oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to add to this that obligation which all this whole Nation did oblige themselves to by the Parliament without question then rightly represented and in being the first of K. James whereby to shew you that not only persons but the Body politick of the Nations not only the single Members but the Members in both houses of Parliament were loyal and obedient subjects to the King their head even to yeeld a natural and humble Obedience and Allegiance I told you the Act of the 1. of K. James when K. James came first into Engl. We the Lords and Com. representing the whole People of the Nation the very words of the Act are so primo Jacobi Chapter the first Representing the whole Body of the Nation do acknowledge an humble natural Leige Obedience to the King as Supreme his Heirs and Successors And in the name of themselves and all the people humbly submit themselves untill the last drop of their bloud be spent in defence of the King and his Royall posterity and therefore they did oblige themselves and all the People of England as far as they could represent them the words are more full then I can express them and indeed it is so dark I cannot read them They did acknowledg to be bound to him and his Imperial Crown Remember these were not words of Complement you shall find that they all of them and so did so many of you as were Members of Parliament yea all of you before you came into the House of Commons did take the Oath of Allegiance which was made after this Recognition the third and fourth of King James or otherwise were not to be Members What was that Oath of Allegiance that you took it was That you should defend the King his Person that is in 3 Jacobi Chapter the fourth his Crown and Dignity What was it Not only against the Pope's Power to depose but the words are or otherwise look into the Act and reflect upon your Conscience and you shall find that all did swear to defend the King his Crown and Dignity and there it is called Imperial Crown I would have you lay this to heart and see how far you have kept this Oath Gentlemen In the Oath of Supremacy which you all took therein you did further acknowledg that the King was the only Supream Governour of this Realm Mark the words I will repeat them that you may lay it to heart you that have more time to apply it to your Fact and you that have less time for ought I know you have reason to consider what I have to say you sware then That the King by the Oath of Supremacy which all of you have taken or ought to have taken if any of you have not taken it yet notwithstanding you are not absolved from the obligation of it but most of you did take it there you sware that the King is the only Supream Governor of this Realm and you sware there that you would defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness His Heirs and Successors or united and annexed unto the Imperial Crown of this Realm For the first If the King be Supream then there is no co-ordination Non habet majorem non habet parem that word Imperial Crown is at least in nine or ten several Statutes it is the very word in this Act that was made lately in pursuance of former Acts concerning Judicial Proceedings And so in the time of King Charles they acknowledged him to be their Leige Sovereign I say that word Supream and so the word Imperial Crown is in the first of Queen Elizabeth the third and the eighth of Elizabeth the twenty fourth of Henry the Eighth Chap. 12. there it is said this Kingdom is an Imperial Crown subject to none but God Almighty Before these times you shall find in the sixteenth of Richard the Second the Statute of Praemunire the Crown of England subject to God alone I will go higher William Rufus some of you are Historians and you shall find the same in Eadmerus and also in Matthew Paris shortly after William Rufus his Time when he wrote to the Pope he challenged and had the same liberty in this Kingdom of England as the Emperor had in his Empire mistake me not I speak only as to the Person of the King I do not meddle of Rights between the King and Subjects or Subject and Subject you see in this Case concerning the Death of his Majesty's dear Father and our Blessed Sovereign of happy memory he doth not judg himself but according to Law that which I assert is as to the Person of the King which was the priviledg of Emperors as to their Personal Priviledges if he had offended and committed an Offence he was only accountable to God himself I will come back to what I have said You swore to be faithful to the King as Supreme The King of Poland hath a Crown but at his Oath of Coronation it is conditioned with the People That if he shall not govern according to such and such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But it differs with our King for he was a King before Oath The King takes his Oath but not upon any condition this I shew you to let you see that we have no coercive Power against the King The King of England was anointed with Oil at his Coronation which was to shew that Absolute Power I do not say of Government but of being accountable to God for what he did The Law saith The King doth no injury to any Man not but that the King may have the imbecilities and infirmities of other Men but the King in his single Person can do no wrong but if the King command a Man to beat me or to disseize me of my Land I have my remedy against the Man though not against the King The Law in all Cases preserves the Person of the King to be untouched but what is done by his Ministers unlawfully there is a remedy against his Ministers for it but in this Case when you come to the Person of the King what do our Law Books say he is they call it Caput Reipublicae salus Populi the Leiutenant of God and let me tell you there was never such a blow given to the Church of England and the Protestant Religion There was a Case and that of the Spencers you shall find in the 7th Report of the Lord Cook in Calvin's Case that Homage is due to the King in his Politick Capacity and then they made this damnable Inference That therefore if the King did not demean himself as he ought that he should be reformed pure aspertee by asperity sharpness or Imprisonment but these were condemned by two Acts of Parliament in Print that they could not do that even
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
of the Lord and did weigh the things After that when the Bill was brought into the house my name was put in there with several others so I came to be in and what I did was upon these two Accounts First in obedience as I told you to the Lord which was the chief thing And in obedience to that which was then the Supreme Authority of this Nation and therefore I shall mention these grounds very briefly because indeed the things that are controverted here at this time they have been controverted in the Face of the whole world in several Nations and the Lord hath given an answer upon solemn Appeals to these things I shall therefore mention them very briefly because they have been so publique The Declarations and Remonstrances that have passed between the King and Parliament concerning the beginning of the Wars L. Chief Baron Mr. Ca. I would be very loth to interrupt you But I see what course is taken and the peoples eyes are upon you You seek delays and against the course of Prisoners you say you will confess but you do confess the Fact after you have spent the time And all the Witnesses are heard for this that you speak of now you go about to justifie as in the fear of the Lord or any thing of that nature that we cannot allow of but we do allow you to speak and give the heads of what you will say as to the matter of Fact but to hear you make discourses and debates which are a justification of a horrid and notorious Treason we cannot hear it we ought not to hear the maintaining of open Treason cannot hear you to speak that upon your opening which is Treason We are willing that you open the Heads what you have to say we are upon our consciences and to appear before God for what we do and so are you too but remember the Devil sometimes appears in the habit of an Angel of light If you will couch your matter in a few words the Court affords you liberty which is indeed beyond the strict Rules of Law Ca. You say you sit here by the Laws of the Land and are sworn to maintain the Laws We ought not that we should plead to this Indictment for what we did was by an Act of Parliament Court Pray Sir this must not be let fall without reproof or rather punishment Ca. I believe there is no Precedent for it Court Sir We know the act of Parliament as well as you and most of the standers by You go upon a false ground there was no such Act of the Supreme Authority as you pretend to these are but Phantasms of your own brain and must not be suffered these things have been controverted and decided many a time again and again Ca. I desire to have time to speak how it was begun and carried on or else how shall I be able to make my defence or to tell you what are the Heads I wil insist upon I shall declare the grounds upon which the Parliament did proceed L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew If that be your ground the Parliament did it the House of Commons did it I have something to offer not to interrupt you to the then Commons Ca. In my humble opinion for the maintaining of this It was by Authority the supreme Authority by which it was done L. Chief Baron Did you sign this Warrant for the summoning and warning of that Court And did you sign the Warrant for executing the late King Ca. I desire I may go on with my defence L. Chief Baron We would not have you be mistaken You seem to confess the act and now you justifie it you cannot speak any thing for your justification till you confess the fact Ca. I shall speak to that in its time L. Chief Baron You must speak to that first that is matter of Fact whereupon the Jury are to go Ca. There is matter of Law Court You must speak to matter of Fact first Ca. I say this is that I was about to say That the Supreme Authority Court You must speak to the Fact first Whether you did compass c. the Kings death or not that is the first ground if you did not there is an end of the business It is proved against you that you did it if you come to justifie it it must be when you have first agreed the matter of Fact Ca. I desire I may have liberty to proceed either for matter of Fact or Law as I list Court No no you must first speak to the Fact you may be after heard You know in all cases they must begin with the Fact either denying or extenuating For matter of Law in this case must arise from the fact Ca. But I humbly conceive there is a matter of Law in this case and it is matter of Law that is above the jurisdiction of this inferior Court Mr. Sol. Finch I pray that he may be held to the issue Guilty or Not Guilty If he deny the Fact let us relie upon our Evidence and he upon his he cannot come to Law till he hath confessed the Fact The question is Whether you did or not there is the Fact if you have any thing to justifie that follows Ca. I was upon that and going on to shew the reasons and grounds of it Court First you must confess it if you will shew the reasons why you did it Ca. I told you there was some things I did Coun. What are those some Ca. I do acknowledg that I was there at the Court. Coun. Did you sign the Warrants for summoning that Court and for Execution of the King Ca. Yes I did sign them both Coun. Then say what you will L. Chief Baron Now go on Ca. In the Year 1640. there was a Parliament called according to the Laws and constitutions of this Nation and after that there was some difference between the King and the Parliament the two Houses of Parliament Lords and Commons and thereupon the King did withdraw from the two Houses of Parliament as appears by their own Declaration The great Remonstrance printed in 1642. and thereupon the Lords and Commons did declare L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew The Court are of opinion not to suffer you to go on in this they say it tends not only to justifie your Act but you cast in Bones here to make some difference You talk of the Lords and Commons you have nothing to do with that business your authority that you pretend to was an Act of Parliament as they called themselves and that where there was but 46 Commons in the House and but 26 Voted it Ca. I say that the Lords and Commons by their Declaration Mr. J. Foster Hold your hand a while Sir not so fast you go to raise up those differences which I hope are asleep new Troubles to revive those things which by the grace of God are extinct you are not to be suffered in this it is not the singling
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
writing The Warrant shewn him Mr. Nutley I do verily believe it is Coun. Have you been acquainted with the writing of his name Mr. N. I have seen him write his name and do verily believe it to be his hand Coun. Clerk read the Warrant He read it accordingly Coun. That which remains of our Evidence is to prove his boasting of this villany We shall desire you to hear Sir Theophilus Biddolph Sir Theo. Biddolph sworn Coun. Pray tell my Lords and the Jury what you have heard the Prisoner say touching this business of putting the King to death Sir Th. Bid. I did hear him confess that he did sit as one of the Judges of the late King and that he was so far from repenting of the Act that he did desire when he dyed That a Tomb-stone might be laid over him with this Inscription Here lyes Thomas Scot who adjudged to death the late King Coun. Where did he say this Sir T. B. In the Parliament House Coll. Copley Esq sworn Coun. Pray Mr. Copley tell my Lords what you know of this business Mr. Cop. My Lord I was one of the Secluded Members when we were called to sit in the House again the Prisoner at the Bar Mr. Thomas Scot I think it was the last day we sate there being some speaking of the horridness of the Fact he made a long Harangue about that horrid Act and he said He hoped he should never repent of it and desired that when he dyed it might be written upon his Tomb-stone Here lies Thomas Scot who adjudged to death the late King Coun. We have done with our Evidence Court Sir Theophilus Biddolph When was it you heard him speak those words Sir T. B. To my best remembrance it was in Richards Parliament it was about January or February was twelve months Coun. Were not you a Member for the City of London in that Parliament Sir T. B. Yes Coun. Mr. Copley When was it that heard it Mr. Cop. It was in April last Mr. Soll. Gen. It was a settled perswasion of his heart and he thought it fit to be gloried in The Lord Mayor Elect sworn Coun. Pray my Lord tell my Lords what you know concerning the Prisoner at the Bar. Lord M. Elect. My Lords I was one of those Secluded members that were returned again a little before the coming in of His Majesty Upon the last day of our sitting Mr. Scot seeing the House must break said Their heads must be laid to the Block if there were a new Parliament For said you looking on Mr. Scot I confess I had a hand in putting the King to death and I desire all the world may take notice of it and I desire when I dye it may be written on my Tomb I do not repent of any thing I have done if it were to do I could do it again Mr. Soll. Gen. Do it again He follows his blows home William Lenthall Esq sworn Coun. Mr. Lenthall pray be pleased to tell my Lords and the Jury what you do remember of any discourse of Mr. Tho. Scot the Prisoner at the Bar tending to the glorying in this Act or any thing in Justification of that Act. Mr. Lenth My Lords the last day it was the last instant of time We were resolving of breaking the House there was some opposition in it not very much The general consent of the House was to dissolve it I must confess at that time I did hear Mr. Scot much justifie that Act of the death of the King which truly I was much offended at I confess to you upon my Oath touching his Speech of the Inscription upon his Tomb I did not hear that Justifying the death of the King he made a long Harangue about and he â—â—e at the upper end of the Gallery but these words Of â—â—ving it written upon his Tomb and to have all the world take â—â—â—ice of it I do not remember Coun. My Lords my Lord Mayor Elect omitted something pray let him speak to it Lo. Ma. Elect. My Lords the Conclusion of his Speech ended thus Being it is your pleasure to have it so the House Dissolved I know not how to hinder it but when that is done I know not where to hide this hated HEAD of mine Coun. We desire to hear what the Prisoner will say for himself Scot. I have no certainty from the Witnesses that I was there but in a wandring way they know not where I sate nor my posture Mr. Baker sworn Coun. We do not call this Witness as material for we must insist upon it quite through that after 12. years time it is not possible a Witness should remember where every particular person sate Pray hear this Witness Mr. Baker I do perfectly remember That Mr. Scot sate two rows above Mr. Bradshaw on his left hand in that which they called the High Court of Justice Scot. As to the Warrant you speak of I know not what it signifies I desire to know what the nature of it is Coun. The Warrant hath been read it is not produced against him as a Record for then it needed not be proved but it is produced against him as an evidence in writing under his own hand that he was consenting to the death of the King Scot. They may very much mistake my hand You speak of words that I should utter in Parliament I do humbly insist upon it That I am not to answer nor they alledge any thing of that nature It is a high breach of Priviledge Coun. There is no priviledge of Parliament for treason First some of the words were spoken in Richards Parliament that you do not own to be a Parliam then another thing a known rule in Law there is no priviledge of Parliament for treason Scot. I have heard the Rule but do not so well understand it of that spoken in Richards Parliament it will be a nice thing for me to distinguish between that and another Parliament but this I think That Convention of the people onght to have the Priviledge of the Parliament as well as any other I humbly conceive it was testimony ought not to be given to you Whatever I say in Parliament the Priviledge extends to no more than this that I may be lawfully secured till the Parliament hath been acquainted with it but not finally concluded till the Parliament have heard it Lo. Ch. Bar. You are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the death of the King I would have you understand That in case a man should commit an Act of Treason be it in what place soever there is no place of Sanctuary for Treason In case of Felony if a man be Indicted for Felony in the Parliament House during the time of Parliament this is not to be tryed in Parliament but according to the Rule of Common Law So in case of Treason the House of Commons in Parliament doth not try Treasons That distinction which you make is nothing Scot. I humbly conceive there is
be deterred from committing such Acts the Magistrate is bound to put him to death But where there is not such a thing there it is different though it is said the land is defiled that is where there is danger that the like may be committed again now all things are setled there is no danger at all now there can never come such a case as this again I say my Lord what I acted I did as a Counsellor I had no malitious intention in it Mr. Nutley bare testimony so far that I told him there was not intention of putting his Majesty to death I only did say that I desired them to do Justice and I hope what was done was their Act not mine and so I leave my self to your Lordships Court Silence commanded Mr. Sol. G. My Lords this Gentleman who is the prisoner at the Bar requires such an evidence of the Fact as may be evident he saith so evident as may be as clear as the Sun I think that evidence is not to seek but if he must never be convicted till he be so far convinced as to be speechless I believe we may stay long enough nevertheless if he be willing as he saith he is to pay his debts to political Justice we shall quickly give him the total sum That which he hath said hath been like a Lawyer the best that his Case will bear but withal it is a great aggravation to his Crime that he that knew the Law so well should so much transgress it He began Words do not make treason he mistakes his Charge is not for words Gentlemen his Charge is for compassing and imagining the Death of the King and the evidence of that Charge is meeting in that Assembly and the part that he bore in that Assembly And yet my Lords he will be much mistaken too under favour and with submission to your Lordships Judgement and those that hear him if they think that in all Cases it is a general rule that words are no Treason for when a man shall proceed to declare the imagination of his heart as to exhort and perswade men to effect that wicked thing The killing of the K. certainly there cannot be a greater overt act than these words nor a clearer evidence of such an imagination for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks My L. to say that the demanding of Justice is not Treason though injustice do follow is a very weak gloss upon a wicked action The Subject matter was a Charge of High Treason against the King the conclusion of the Charge was a Protestation by which he saved to himself a Liberty to put in a new Charge if that was not sufficient upon the whole he desires that the King as a Traytor may be brought to Justice Judge you now Gentlemen upon the nature of this demand whether this were such a demand of Justice as might end in acquital Whether he that presses that this Charge may be taken pro Confesso did mean that when the Court had recorded it they should acquit him when they had done My Lords to say there are four Actors in this Case the Witness or accuser the Judge the Jury and the Executioner and that he is none of them and therefore in this Case he cannot be a Traytor still my Lord that is to beg the question for if he be one of them that did Assemble in the place and were any instrument of that Assembly he hath thereby given an evidence of an Overtact of his wicked heart when all is done this poor gloss amounts but to this I am none of those four Ranks that is there were others worse than my self and therefore I am none at all My Lord the thing that he hath mainly insisted upon is the Act of Indempnity my Lord he doth observe that his name is excepted in that Act That he doth hope that it is so pen'd as by the favour of the Parl. It may reach his Case he hath argued very much upon it and he speaks as if he did believe it himself But surely there is no colour for that interpretation that he should step out of this proviso by the very Act of Indempnity that was made on purpose to bring him in by-Name the words are provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to Pardon or give any benefit to John Cook c. All which persons for their execrable Treasons in Sentencing to Death or signing the Instrument for the horrid Murder or being instrumental in taking away the precious Life of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors c. First my Lord this general and clear answer I conceive is to be given that the Prisoner at the Bar being by Name excepted out of the Act of Indemnity by the proviso mentioned in it although the subsequent lines that follow be the reasons why the Parlim do except yet if he be within the very words of the Exception whether he be in the reasons that moved them to that exception is not material if he could distinguish that he was not instrumental in that sense to which he labours to restrain this Proviso he can but say this the Parliament was mistaken in their reason but not in their conclusion but he is directly within the exception and the reason of it too for the word instrumental goes as far as far can be and he is properly literally in the strict notion of the word an instrument of the death of the King The King could never have been brought to death if not to the Bar never had been sentenced if he had not been impeached that impeachment could never have been taken pro Confesso nor the impeachment it self delivered if he had not delivered the one and pressed the other He that brought the Axe from the Tower was not more instrumental than he and besides a Lawyer as he of great understanding and of good parts he knows very well there are no accessaries in Treason but he that Acts any part in so wicked a Conspiracy let him begin at what end he will he stands responsible for the utmost consequence of it and in effect the very penning of this proviso is an express Judgement of Parliament that he was instrumental but that is not to be pressed The next thing he doth insist upon is the Declaration of his Majesty that he sent from Breda which he saith he laid hold upon here lies the weight of his answer The King writes his Letter to the Parliament now sitting that he doth purpose for the quieting of the hearts of men that may be in doubt to pardon all persons all crimes of what nature soever either against himself or Royal Father excepting those which shall be byAct of Parliament excepted and my Lord he doth say and modestly presses that he doth conceive the meaning of that is to pardon all persons what
keep up our Army seven years longer we need not care for the King and all his posterity Peters My Lord I must deny abundance of this the King commanded me to ride before him that the Bishop of London might come to him L. Ch. B. But this was three weeks after The next witness against you is one Proctor he saith that day as the other witness did he saw you riding just before the Kings Coach and because he did his duty the Souldiers threw him horse and all into a ditch The next witness is one Hardwick he saith that when the Proclamation was read he saw you in Westminster-Hall and that you said they had done as good as nothing unless it was proclaimed in Cheapside and at the old Exchange this you said to some of the Officers there Peters My Lord I cannot acknowledge it L. Ch. Bar. The next witness against you is Simson he swears he saw you in consultation with Oliver Cromwel and take Sir William Brereton by the hand and come to Bradshaws and this during the time of the Kings Tryal he saith further that one day when the King was at his Tryal you commanded Colonel Stubbers to bid his Souldiers cry out Justice Justice which they cryed and afterwards some of the Souldiers spit upon the King Peters I do believe that he that swore that cannot say I was there L. Ch. Bar. Another witness is one Richardson who saw you the first day in the Court and he said further that you commended Bradshaw and another to wit Cook for their carriage in the tryal of the King That you held up your hands and said this is a most glorious beginning of the work Peters Whereabouts in the Court Richards In the body of the Court called then the High Court of Justice Peters My Lord I do not know that ever I was in the body of the Court. L. Ch. Bar. The next witness is Sir Jeremy Whitchcot he saith he heard you often speak scurrilously of the King and making a Narrative of Cromwels escape you said there was a meeting and there we resolved to set aside the King remember what the other witness said we agreed and here we resolved you said I cannot but reverence the High Court of Justice it doth resemble the judging of the world at the last day by the Saints so it was the Saints that sate there I would have preached before the wretch but the poor wretch would not hear me you often call'd him Tyrant I cannot possibly remember the place things or words that are alledged Then you have another witness Nonnelly he saith he came with a warrant to Oliver Cromwel for some money and that he should say go and see the beheading of the King at Whitehall he saith there he met with you though you said you were not there that day going to the Banquetting house that you spoke to Tench and whispered in his ear and that Tench went and knockt Staples on the Scaffold he meeting Tench said what are you a Hangman saith Tench this day will be a happy day he saith after all this Hugh Peters was upon the Scaffold and that he went out with the Hangman Peters I do profess to your Lordships before Angels and men that I did not stir out of my Chamber that day L. Ch. B. The Council doth not put relyance upon that because of what your witness saith though his evidence is not at all satisfactory The next is Clough and he swears this that he saw you in the Painted Chamber with the Council of Officers and there you desired them to call on God for a blessing upon their business and there you said O Lord what a mercy it is to see this great City fall down before us and what a stir is there to bring this great man to tryal without whose blood he will turn us all into blood if he reign again and this was about a month before the King was murthered L. Ch. Bar. You hear it Mr. Peters Peters Some part I did but it is impossible for me to bear down many witnesses indeed my Lord I say this they are marvellous uncharitable and speak many false things L. Ch. Bar. The next is this the testimony concerning several Sermons of yours and let me tell you the Pulpit ought not to be a place where men with impunity may speak any thing what they list of Sedition and Treason Peters I am of the same judgement my self my Lord. L. Ch. Bar. And there was a solemn day to seek God then you preached at St. Margarets Church this was Mr. Bever in he came and heard you talk much of Barab and our Saviour there you fell upon this speaking of the K. it is a sad thing that it should now be a question whether we should crucifie our Saviour Jesus Christ or that great Barabbas speaking of the King you call'd him Traytor Tyrant Murtherer of his subjects and the like you went on in a way of a story these Citizens for a little Trading they will have Christ crucified and the great Barabbas at Windsor released and said you the Clergy the Assembly they are all for crucifying Christ and releasing Barabbas you made that expression O Jesus what shall we do the King was a Prisoner then at Windsor you made your application to the Parliament that was then present you told them the people did expect Justice from them you must not prefer the great Tyrant and Traytor naming the King to these poor hearts the Redcoats standing by Peters I must profess against most of that Lord Chief Baron There is the same by others It is further proved by the Order that you were appointed to preach Peters I do not deny I preached but not these things Lord Chief Bar. The next thing is this there was one Mr. Chase this was during the tryal he saith you preached at Whitehall upon this Text the 149. Psalm to bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles in fetters of iron you had two or three other verses more then you made a discourse of a Major and a Bishops man the Bishops man being drunk the Major committed him to prison the Bishop being angry asked by what authority the Major said there was an Act of Parliament for it he did not find that either the Bishop or his man was excepted you applyed that to the King said you I will shew you an act of the Bible Whosoever sheds mans blood by man shall his blood be shed this doth not except the King Prince Prince Rupert Prince Maurice or any of that rabble Peters It is false Lord Chief Baron You said further This is the day that I and many other Saints of God have prayed for these many years and Oliver Cromwel laughed at that time The next witness was Tongue he heard you preach and he swears the same with the former that you applauded the souldiers and that you hoped to see such another day following as the day before and
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
a sentence that he did conjure them to withdraw once again and to consider of it if it were but half an hour or saith he if that be too much for you I will withdraw My Lord here I can make my appeal to him that must judg me when you have done with me I had not a murderous nor a trayterous thought against him but Sir I confess such deep passions did fall upon me that truly my self I was not I remember the persons betwen whom I sate as it fell out were one Mr. Cawly and Col. Walton these two I sate betwixt these were the very words I speak to them Have we hearts of stone are we men they laboured to appease me they told me I would ruine both my self and them said I if I die for it I must do it Cromwel sate just the seat below me the hearing of me make some stir whispering he looked up to me and asked me if I were my self what I meant to do that I could not be quiet Sir said I No I cannot be quiet upon that I started up in the very nick when the President commanded the Clerk to read the Sentence I stepping up and as loud as I could speak spoke to this effect these words or to the like purpose My Lord said I I am not satisfied to give my consent to this Sentence but have Reasons to offer to you against it and I desire the Court may adjourn to hear me presently he stept up and looked at me Nay saith he if any one of the Court be unsatisfied the Court must adjourn Sir accordingly they did adjourn into the inner Court of Wards when they came there I was called upon by Cromwel to give an account why I had put this trouble and disturbance upon the Court I did speak Sir to this effect it is long ago the very words I think I cannot speak but to this effect I did speak My Lord I should have been exceeding glad if the Court had been pleased to condescend to this gracious Expression but it is not too late for me I desire not his Death but his Life and that the Nations may be setled in Peace The King now is pleased to offer That if he might but speak with his Parliament he would offer to them such things as should be satisfactory to us all So said I what would you have Your pretence of bringing him to these Proceedings was That after such a long and bloody War his Majesty would not condescend to such Concessions as might secure the Parliaments Party but now you hear him that he will give every one of us satisfaction I told them sadly told them I think I may truly say more sadly then than at this time that if they should go precipitantly on and give Judgment upon him before they had acquainted the Parliament with what the King was pleased to offer we should never be able answer it the rather my Lord and that I did press with all the little understanding that I had if they did but consider the last concluded Order that the Parliament made after the passing of the Act for Trial that which was so called I say there was this Order that shut up all That upon any Emergency that could not at that time be thought on in the House the Court should immediately acquaint the House with it My Lord I did infer as strongly as I could to them That if this were not Emergent I could not tell what was The King denied the Jurisdiction of the Court and yet with all vehemency desired to speak with his Parliament were not these Emergencies if not I knew not what were Emergences My Lords Besides this there was another thing I did press that I thought was of greater consequence than this as to the satisfaction of every Man 's particular Conscience that admitting if it might be admitted that the King was liable to his Subjects that they might call him to an account and might condemn him I beg your pardon that I take the boldness to make such admissions but if such a thing might be admitted certainly it did exceedingly become those Judges that were to give such a Sentence not against a common Person but against the greatest to be very well satisfied in Matter of Fact to a full Evidence before them that such and such things that were said were true I do acknowledg this that to the best of my apprehension I wish it had been so to others there was a great shortness in this I do humbly affirm this That not one Member of the Court did hear one Witness Viva Voce I did press That if the Court did give Judgment against the King without a fair Examination I said it was such a thing as no Judg at any Assizes would do against a common Person what I had was from Peters and from some private Whispers from one of them that is gone and hath received his Sentence and Doom Cromwel did answer with a great deal of storm He told the President that now he saw what great reason the Gentleman had to put such a trouble and disturbance upon them saith he Sure he doth not know that he hath to do with the hardest hearted Man that lives upon the Earth however it is not fit that the Court should be hindred from their Duty by one peevish Man he said the bottom was known that he would fain save his old Master and desired the Court without any more ado would go and do their Duty Another that spoke to me in answer was one that hath been before you and hath rereived his Sentence but is not dead and I desire I may not name his Name his answer was to what I have said That some Men were either Scepticks or Infidels After this I did go into the Speaker's Chamber and there I did ease my mind and heart with tears God only knows I have an unhappy memory I have slipt many thinâ—s Lord Chief Baron Remember your self by Papers if you have any no man will hinder you Downes I have no papers but my Lord for the truth of this I have said there are some witnesses that will make the substance the effect of this appear Lord Chief Baron Mr. Downes there is one particular before you come to the witnesses that after all these Convictions you signed the Warrant you deny it the Council will prove it Downes I did never hope or think that any thing I can say should be so satisfactory to you but things might be retorted upon me and perhaps what I thought might be for extenuating my Crime my fall out to my disadvantage I understand you do proceed upon three particulars either signing the first Warrant for constituting the Court To my remembrance I know not of it if my hand was to it I have forgot Counsel Your hand is not to that but we mean your hand is to the Warrant for execution pray shew it him It was shewn him Downes My Lord
be directed to answer and if he refused That the matter of the Charge be taken pro confesso And the King not owning their Authority was remanded Fol. 58. Westminster-Hall Tuesday the 23d Afternoon The King not owning their Authority was remanded and the Court Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there Resolved They would examine Witnesses Fol. 61. Painted-Chamber Wednesday the 24th was spent in examining their Witnesses Fol. 66. Painted-Chamber Thursday the 25th Afternoon They examined more Witnesses They Resolved to proceed to Sentence of Condemnation against the King And that this Condemnation be for being Tyrant Traytor and Murtherer and Publick Enemy to the Commonwealth And that the Condemnation extend to Death Fol. 68. And Ordered That a Sentence grounded upon these Votes be prepared by Scot Marten Harrison and others Painted-Chamber Friday the 26 th The draught of the Sentence Reported and agreed And Resolved That the King be brought the next day to Westminster-Hall to receive it Fol 96. Painted-Chamber Saturday the 27 th Fore-noon The Sentence being engrossed Resolved The same should be the Sentence which should be read and published in Westminster-Hall the same day That the President should not permit the King to speak after Sentence That after the Sentence read he should declare it to be the Sence and Judgment of the Court. That the Commissioners should thereupon signifie their Consent by standing up And the same day the Commons Ordered the Clerk to bring in the Records of that Judgment to the House Journal of the House Westminster-Hall the same Day After-noon The King being brought in and not owning their Authority the Sentence was read And upon the Declaration of the President That it was the Judgment of the Court they stood up and Owned it and Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there appointed Waller and others to consider of the Time and Place for Execution Painted-Chamber Monday the 29 th Upon the report of the Committee Ordered A Warrant be drawn for executing the King in the open Street before White-Hall the next day directed to Hacker and others which was done accordingly Fol. 116. 31. January 1648. Ordered by the Commons That the Lord Grey out of Haberdashers-Hall to difpose of 100 l. for the Service of the Common-wealth 2. February 1648. They Ordered in the first place to take into Consideration and Debate the House of Lords for settlement of the Government 6. February 1648. The House being seventy three And the Question put Whether that House should take the Advice of the House of Lords in the exercise of the Legislative Power The House was divided and it carried in the Negative by fifteen Voices And then Resolved That the House of Peers was useless and dangerous and ought to be abolished And Ordered an Act to be brought in for that purpose 7. February 1648. The Declared That the Office of a King in this Nation and to have Power thereof in a Single Person was unnecessary burthensom and dangerous to the Liberty Safety and publick interest of the People and therefore ought to be abolished 9. February 1648. They Ordered The Narrative of the Proceeding and Records for Tryal of the King to be forthwith brought into this House 16. February 1648. They Ordered That the Clerk of that High Court of Justice be desired to bring in those Proceedings to their House the next Day March 1648. Sir Arthur Hasilrig Reports from the Committee that Charls and James Stewart Sons of the late King should dye without Mercy wheresoever they should be found 12. December 1650. Mr. Say Reported the Proceedings of their High-Court against the King contained in a Book entituled A Journal c. which was read at large by their Clerk He likewise presented from that Court the Act for Tryal of the King and the Precept for holding the Court. The Charge was exhibited the twentieth And The Sentence Read the twenty seventh of January 1648. And thereupon they Declared That the Persons entrusted in that great Service had discharged their Trust with great Courage and Fidelity That the Parliament was well satisfied in that Accompt of the Particulars and Proceedings And Ordered That the same Records do remain among the Records of Parliament That those Proceedings be Engrossed in a Roll and Recorded among the Parliament-Rolls for transmitting the Memory thereof to Posterity And Resolved That their Commissioners for their Great Seal issue a Certiorari to their Clerk to transmit those Proceedings into the Chancery there to be on Record And that the same be sent by Mittimus from thence to other Courts at Westminster and Custos Rotulorum of the Counties to be Recorded In the County Middlesex The Proceedings at Hicks Hall Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. in order to the Tryal of the pretended Judges of his late Sacred Majesty THe Court being sate the Commission of Oyer and Terminer under the Great Seal of England was first read It was directed to the Lords and others hereafter named viz. Thomas Aleyn Knight and Baronet Lord Mayor of the City of London The Lord Chancellor of England The Earl of South-hampton Lord Treasurer of England The Duke of Somerset The Duke of Albemarle The Marquess of Ormond Steward of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Lindsey Great Chamberlain of England The Earl of Manchester Chamberlain of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Dorset The Earl of Berkshire The Earl of Sandwich Viscount Say and Seal The Lord Roberts The Lord Finch Denzil Hollis Esquire Sir Frederick Cornwallis Knight and Baronet Treasurer of His Majesties Houshold Sir Charles Barkly Knight Comptrouler of His Majesties Houshold Mr. Secretary Nicholas Mr. Secretary Morris Sir Anthony Ashley-Cooper Arthur Annesley Esquire The Lord Chief Baron Mr. Justice Foster Mr. Justice Mallet Mr. Justice Hide Mr. Baron Atkins Mr. Justice Twisden Mr. Justice Tyrrel Mr. Baron Turner Sir Harbottle Grimston Knight and Baronet Sir William Wild Knight and Baronet Recorder of London Mr. Serjeant Brown Mr. Serjeant Hale John Howel Esquire Sir Geoffry Palmer His Majestie 's Attorny General Sir Heneage Finch His Majestie 's Solicitor General Sir Edward Turner Attorney to His Highness the Duke of York Wadham Windham Esquire Edward Shelton Esquire Clerk of the Crown The Grand Jury Sworn were Sir William Darcy Baronet Foreman Sir Robert Bolles Baronet Sir Edward Ford Knight Sir Thomas Prestwick Sir William Coney Knight Sir Charles Sidley Baronet Sir Lewis Kirk Knight Sir Henry Littleton Baronet Sir Ralph Bovey Baronet Edward Chard Esquire Robert Giggon Esquire John Fotherly Esquire Charles Gibbons Esquire Thomas Geree Esquire Richard Cox Esquire Robert Bladwell Esquire Henry Mustian Esquire John Markham Esquire Edward Buckley Gent. Francis Bourchier Gent. Edward Lole Hart Cryer After Proclamation for silence was made it pleased Sir Orlando-Bridgman Lord Chief Baron of His Majestie 's High Court of Exchequer to speak to the Jury as followeth The Lord Chief Baron's Speech Gentlemen YOu are the Grand Inquest for the Body of this County of Middlesex You may
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some overt-Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an overt-Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
thing to govern absolutely Gentlemen The Imperial Crown is a Word that is significative you shall find in all Statutes primo Eliz. and the first of King James nay even in the Act of Judicial proceedings of this Parliament it is called an Imperial Crown They that take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy they swear that they will to their power assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King His Heirs and Successors or annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm What is an Imperial Crown It is that which as to the Coercive part is subject to no man under God The King of Poland has a Crown But what is it At his Coronation it is conditioned with the people That if he shall not Govern them according to such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But the Crown of England is and always was an Imperial Crown and so sworn Gentlemen As I told you even now the Imperial Crown is a Word significative that Crown which as to the Coercive part is not subject-to any Humane Tribunal or Judicature whatsoever And truly that this is such an Imperial Crown though I have cited Authorities ancient enough you may find them much more ancient I remember in the Story of William Rufus you shall find it in Matthew Paris and Eadmerus some Question was about Investiture of Bishops and the like the King writes His Letter That c. God forbid I should intend any absolute Government by this It is one thing to have an Absolute Monarchy another thing to have that Government Absolutely without Laws as to any coercive power over the Person of the King for as to Things and Actions they will fall under another consideration as I will tell you by and by Gentlemen Since this is so consider the Oath of Supremacy which most men have taken or should take All men that enter into the Parliament-House they are expresly enjoyned by Statute to take the Oath of Supremacy What says that Oath We swear that The King is the only Supreme Governour within this Realm and Dominions He is Supreme and the onely Supreme and truly if he be Supreme there is neither Major nor Superior I urge this the more lest any Person by any Misconstruction or inference which they might make from something that hath been Acted by the Higher Powers they might draw some dangerous Inferences or Consequences to colour or shadow over those Murtherous and Traiterous Acts which afterwards they committed They had no Authority But as I told you though I do set forth this and declare this to you to let you know that the King was immediately subject to God and so was not punishable by any Perfon yet let me tell you there is that excellent Temperament in our Laws that for all this the King cannot rule but by His Laws It preserves the King and his Person and the peoples Rights There are three things touching which the Law is conversant Personae Res Actiones Persons Things and Actions For the Person of the King He is the Supreme Head He is not punishable by any coercive Power the Laws provide for that The King can do no wrong it is a Rule of Law it is in our Law-books very frequent 22d of Edward the Fourth Lord Coke and many others If he can do no Wrong He cannot be punished for any wrong The King He hath the infirmities and weakness of a man but he cannot do any injury at least not considerable in Person He must do it by Ministers Agents Instruments Now the Law though it provide for the King yet if any of his Ministers do wrong though by his command they are punishable The King cannot arrest a man as he cannot be arrested Himself but if He arrest me by another Man I have remedy against this man though not against the King and so He cannot take away my Estate This as to the Person of the King He is not to be touched Touch not mine Anointed I come to Things If the King claim a Right the King must sue according to His Laws the King is subject to the Laws in that case His Possessions shall be tried by Juries If He will try a man for His Fathers Death you see he will try them by the Laws The Law is the Rule and Square of His actions and by which He Himself-is judged Then for Actions that is such Actions whereby Rights and Titles are prosecuted or recovered the King cannot judge in Person betwixt man and man He does it by his Judges and upon Oath and so in all cases whatsoever If the King will have his Right it must be brought before His Judges Though this is an Absolute Monarchy yet this is so far from infringing the Peoples Rights that the People as to their Properties Liberties and Lives have as great a priviledge as the King It is not the sharing of Government that is for the Libertie and Benefit of the People but it is how they may have their Lives and Liberties and Estates safely secured under Government And you know when the Fatness of the Olive was laid aside and we were Governed by Brambles these Brambles they did not only tear the Skin but tore the Flesh to the very Bone Gentlemen I have done in this Particular to let you see that the Supreme Power being in the King the King is immediately under God owing his Power to none but God It is true blessed be God we have as great Liberties as any People have in Christendom in the World but let us own them where they are due We have them by the Concessions of Our Princes Our Princes have granted them and the King now He in them hath granted them likewise Gentlmen I have been a little too long in this and yet I cannot say it is too long because it may clear misunderstanding so many Poisonous Opinions having gone abroad To come a little nearer If we consider suppose there were the Highest Authority but when we shall consider this horrid Murther truly I cannot almost speak of it but Vox faucibus haeret When we shall consider that a few Members of the House of Commons those that had taken the Oath of Supremacy and those that had taken the Oath of Allegiance that was to defend the King and His Heirs against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever against His and their Persons Their Crowns and Dignities not onely against the Pope's Sentence as some would pretend but as otherwise against all Attempts and Conspiracies not onely against His Person Crown and Royal Dignity nor Pope's Sentence nor onely in order to the Profession of Religion but absolutely or otherwise that is whatsoever Attempts by any power Authority or Pretence whatsoever I say when a few Members of the House of Commons not an eighth part of them having taken these Oaths shall assume upon themselves an Authority an Authority what to do shall assume to
Clerk George Fleetwood Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty George Fleetwood My Lord I came in upon his Majestie 's Proclamation Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty George Fleetwood I must Confess I am Guilty And thereupon he delivered a Petition in to the Court which he said was directed To his Majesty and the Parliament and the Court did receive it accordingly Clerk Set him aside Clerk Simon Meyn Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Sim. Meyn Not guilty I come in upon His Majestie 's Proclamation my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Sim. Meyn By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk James Temple Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty James Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried James Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Peter Temple Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Peter Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Peter Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Thomas Wait Hold up your Hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art Arraigned or Not Guilty Th Wait. I desire to be heard a word or two Court There is a Rule of Law which is set to us and you that in all these Cases you are to plead Guilty or Not guilty When you have Pleaded if Not Guilty you may speak what you will in its proper time Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I pray let me be heard a word I am very unwilling to spend time knowing you have a great deal of Business I am very unwilling to deprive my self of my Native Right I shall speak nothing but that which is Truth Court Do not Preface then but speak what you would say Th. Wait. My Lord my Case is different from the rest Court Whatsoever the Case he you have no Plea to us but guilty or Not guilty We can go no other way The Law sets our your Plea Th. Wait. My Lord I would speak one word There was a Great Peer of this Nation Indicted at Northampton within these two years for killing a man The Judges there Court You must Plead guilty or Not guiley Pray who are you that should take this upon you more then all the rest You must go the ordinary way guilty or Not guilty Are you guilty or Not guilty We do not intend to prevent any thing you have to say but it must be proper Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I cannot say I am Guilty Court How then Th. Wait. I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Th. Wait. By God and the Countrey Clerk Good send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Hugh Peters I would not for ten thousand Worlds say I am Guilty I am Not guilty Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By the Word of God Here the People laughed Court You must say By God and the Countrey Tell him you that stand by him what he should say if he doth not know Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Dan. Axtel Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Dan. Axtel May it please your Lordship I desire to have the freedom of an English-man that which is my Right by Law and inheritance I have something to offer in point of Law Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel My Lords give me leave to speak For the Matter of the Indictment I conceive is upon the King's Death that there is a Commission of Oyer and Terminer for you to sit But in regard it was in pursuance of an Act of Parliament I conceive no Inferiour Court ought to judge of it I desire Councel it being of great and eminent Concernment in Law That ever any Judges or any Inferiour Court should judge of the Powers and Priviledges of a Parliament and I pray that Councel may be assigned me Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel If the Court over-rule me and I shall not have my Liberty as an English-man Court The Course of Law is this No man can Justifie Treason If the matter which you have to say be Justifiable it is not Treason if Treason it is not Justifiable Therefore you must go to the ordinary course of the Law You must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel I can produce many Precedents Cour Are you Guilty or Not guilty The Language is put into your Mouth You have no other words to express your self by at this time but Guilty or Not guilty Dan Axtel Judg Heath had Councel assigned him upon the same Case Court That is very strange the same case What was it for killing a King Dan. Axtel If the Court will over-rule me I cannot help it Mr. Solicitour Gen. It may be this Gentleman may be deceived by a Mistake It may be he knows not the Law which your Lordships may be pleased to acquaint him with That to stand Mute in High-Treason is all one as to Confess the Fact and will have the same Sentence and Condemnation upon them as if they had Confessed it Lord Chief Baron Then I 'le tell you the Law He that doth refuse to put himself upon his Legal Trial of God and the Countrey is a Mute in Law and therefore you must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Let his Language be what it will he is a Mute in Law Dan. Axtel I do not refuse it Court Then say Dan. Axtel I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Dan. Axtel By twelve lawful men according to the Constitutions of the Law Court That is by God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel That is not lawful God is not locally here Clerk How wilt thou be Tried You must say By God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good Deliverance Lord Chief Baron Mr. Axtel have you your Papers again Dan. Axtel Yes my Lord. Lord Chief Baron When your Indictment is read the second time when you come to your Trial you may take what Notes you please The Court then Adjourned to the same Place till the next morning seven of the Clock
so unnatural and Devilish to destroy his Father But we do find amongst the Romanes such a Fact was committed and then they were at a loss to punish it The way was this that they found out the Offendour they sewed into a Mail of Leather so close that no Water could get in when they had done they threw him into the Sea by this denoting the Offendour was not worthy to Tread upon the Ground nor to Breath in the Air nor to have the benefit of any of the four Elements nor the use of any of God's Creatures and so he starved Gentlemen Parricide and Regicide differ not in Nature but in Degree Parricide is the killing of the Father of one or a few Persons Regicide the Killing the Father of a Countrey What Punishment then is suitable to this Offence Gentlemen The Prisoner at the Bar is accused of this Offence and now to be Tried by you but before we enter upon the Evidence I must with the leave of the Court inform you That though the Indictment contains many Circumstances and Gradations in the Treason yet the Imagining and Compassing the Death of our late Sovereign is the Treason to which we shall apply our Evidence this being both by the Common-Law and by the Statute of the 25th of Edward the 3d. the Principal Treason to be enquired of And the other Circumstances in the Indictment are but so many matters to prove the Overt-Act The Consultations the Assuming Power to Try and Condemn the King The Assault upon him and the Fatal Blow that was given him are but so many Demonstrations and open Acts proving the first Treasonable Design of the Heart It will be enough for you and so my Lords will tell you if we prove the Treason it self which is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King though we fail in some of the Circumstances laid in the Indictment I do not speak this as if we should fail in any but it is not necessary to prove them all if we prove any you are to find the Prisoner Guilty I am not willing to hold your Lordships too long in the Porch but desire to descend into the Body of the Business and so we shall call our Witnesses and doubt not but to prove that this Man at the Bar was the first and not the least of these Offendours Mr. George Masterson was called Mr. Harrison When I was before your Lordships yesterday I offered something very material in reference to the Jurisdiction of the Court but you told me according to the Rule I must Plead Guilty or Not Guilty and what I had to offer should be heard in its proper place I now desire to know whether it be proper now to deliver my self before you proceed to the calling of Witnesses for I would go the best way and would not willingly displease you Lord Chief Baron What was promised you yesterday God forbid but you should have it But I think it will be best for you to hear the Evidence and then what you have to say you shall be fully heard Mr. Harrison I am content Whereupon George Masterson Stephen Kirk Francis Hearn William Clark Robert Coitmore and James Nutley were called and sworn Councel Mr. Masterson Whether did the Prisoner at the Bar sit in that which they called the High Court of Justice to sentence the King or no Pray tell my Lords and the Jury thereof and what else you know of the matter Mr. Masterson Upon the Oath I have taken my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner Th. Harrison sit in that which they called The High Court of Justice upon the 27th day of January in the year 1648. to sentence the King Councel Was it the day the Sentence was passed against the King Mr. Masterson It was the day of the Sentence the 27th of Jan. 1648. Councel Can you say any thing else Mr. Masterson I do Sir further remember that when the Clerk of the Court as he was called read the Sentence against the King and said It was the sentence of the whole Court I saw the Prisoner at the Bar together with others stand up to my apprehension as Assenting to it Councel Was there not direction that all should stand up as Assenting Mr. Masterson I do not know that but when the Sentence was read several of them did stand up and he among the rest as Assenting to the Sentence as the Spectatours understood Councel Mr. Clark What do you say to the same Question Mr. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I remember I saw the Prisoner at the Bar sit several times in the Court of Justice as they called it particularly on the 23d and 27th of January 1648. as I took notice of it in a Book Councel Was that the day of the Sentence Mr. Clark Yes my Lord. Coun. What say you to that of the rising of those persons in the Court Mr. Clark I remember they all rose but I did not take particular notice then of the Prisoner Councel Mr. Kirk You hear the Question Did you see the Prisoner at the Bar in Westminster-Hall sitting upon the Bench in that which they called the High Court of Justice when the King stood Prisoner at the Bar there Mr. Kirk My Lord I did see the Prisoner at the Bar sit several days in that which they called the High Court of Justice I was there every day of their sitting Councel Do you remember he was there on the 27th of Jan. 1648 Mr. Kirk I do Sir Councel Tell the Jury what was the Work there Mr. Kirk It was Sentence I did take the Names of all those Gentlemen that did appear in the Court on that day the 27th of Jan. 1648. and amongst the rest I took a Note of that Gentleman's Name as being present Councel Whereas these Gentlemen Mr. Masterson and Mr. Clark have declared that as Assenting to the Sentence they all stood up Did you see them stand And whether by Direction or no Mr. Kirk As for the Direction I know nothing of it but the Members then present in the Court after Sentence was read as far as my Eyes could perceive stood up unanimously I suppose as Assenting to the Sentence Court Mr. Nutley Did you know the Prisoner at the Bar Have you seen him sit in Westminster-Hall at any time upon the Bench when the King was brought as a Prisoner to the Bar Mr. Nutley My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the Prisoner at the Bar several days sit there amongst the rest of the Judges as a Judge I suppose To the best of my remembrance he sate there four days together Court Was he there upon the day of the Sentence Mr. Nutley I did take Notes My Lord that day in the Court and I find he did sit that day Court Do you know any thing more of the Prisoner at the Bar Mr. Nutley Thus much I know concerning the Prisoner at the Bar my Lord. The first
the Hand-writing of the Prisoner at the Bar The Instrument being shewed him Mr. Farrington I did not see him write it my Lords but I believe it to be his for I have often seen his Hand-writing It is his hand so far as possibly a man can know any Person 's hand that did not see him write Mr. Harrison I desire to see the Instrument Which being shew'd to him he said I believe it is my own Hand Councel That 's the Warrant for summoning that Court that he owns his hand too Court Shew him the other Instrument That being for Execution of the Sentence Mr. Harrison it being shew'd him I do think this is my hand too Councel If you think it the Jury will not doubt it That 's the Bloody Warrant for Execution And we desire they may be both read Mr. Harrison My Lords do these Learned Gentlemen offer these as being any Records Councel No but as your own hand-writing Mr. Harrison If you do not read it as a Record I hope your Lordships will not admit of any thing of that kind against me Councel He knows that a Letter under his hand and Seal may be read in a Court We do not offer it as a Record but prove it by Witnesses that it is your hand-writing Court You have Confessed these to be your hands Whether they are Records or no whether Papers or Letters they may be read against you You signed the Warrant for Convening together those which you called The High Court of Justice and you signed the other Warrant for putting the King to Death You do Confess these two things We do not see what further Use may be made of them Court You might observe how the Indictment was for the Imagining Compassing and Contriving the King's Death To prove that there must be some overt-Overt-Act and a Letter under the Partie's Hand is a sufficient Overt-Act to prove such Imagination to that end these are used Mr. Harrison I do not come to be denying any thing that in my own Judgment and Conscience I have done or Committed but rather to be bringing it forth to the Light Court Sir you must understand this by the way this you must take along with you That these are read not as any thing of Authority in themselves or as used to any other purpose but as an Evidence of the Fact against you Take that along with you The two Bloody Warrants for Trial and for Execution of His Majesty were here read the later of which is as followeth At the High Court of Justice for the Trying and Judging of Charles Stuart King of England Jan. 29. 1648. WHereas Charles Stuart King of England is and standeth Convicted Attainted and Condemned of High Treason and other High Crimes and Sentence upon Saturday last was pronounced against him by this Court to be put to Death by the severing his Head from his Body of which Sentence Execution yet remaineth to be done These are therefore to will and require you to see the said Sentence executed in the open street before White-hall upon the marrow being the 30th day of this instant Moneth of January between the hours of ten in the Morning and five in the Afternoon of the same day with full effect And for so doing this shall be your sufficient Warrant And these are to require all Officers and Souldiers and other the good People of this Nation of England to be assistant unto you in this service To Colonel Francis Hacker Colonel Hunks and Lieutenant-Colonel Phayre and every of them Given under our Hands and Seals Sealed and subscribed BY John Bradshaw Lord President Jo. Hewson Per. Pelham Thomas Grey Oliver Cromwel Edward Whalley John Okey Jo. Danvers Mich. Livesey Jo. Bourchier Hen. Ireton Thomas Maleverer Jo. Blakestone Jo. Hutchinson Will. Goff Thomas Pride Hen. Smith Peter Temple Tho. Harrison Isaac Ewer Val. Wanton Simon Meyn Tho. Horton Jo. Jones Jo. Moor. Hardress Waller Gilbert Millington Geo. Fleetwood Jo. Alured Rob. Lilburn Wil. Say Rich. Dean Rob. Tichbourn Hum. Edwards Dan. Blagrave Owen Roe Will. Puefroy Adrian Scroop James Temple Aug. Garland Edmond Ludlow Hen. Marten Vincent Potter Will. Constable Rich. Ingoldsby Will. Cawley Joh. Barkstead Anth. Stapeley Greg. Norton Tho. Challoner Tho. Wogan Jo. Ven. Greg. Clement Jo. Downs Tho. Wayt. Tho. Scot. Jo. Carew Miles Corbet Mr. Wyndham Gentlemen of the Jury We have done our Evidence and you must know Gentlemen that the principal Point of the Indictment is for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of his late Majesty of Glorious Memory There lies the Treason So saies the Statute of the 25th Ed. 3d. It hath nothing of Killing the King there but of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King The going about it that 's the Treason as hath been learnedly opened to you The rest are but Overt-Acts If there be such an Imagination or Compassing the Death of the King once declared though no fruit at all follow it is Treason Here certainly you have a very full Evidence given We shew you a Consultation this is one overt-Overt-Act which would do the work if there were nothing else I must tell you and that with Submission to my Lords the Justices if they had advised and gone no further that had been Treason in the Letter of the Law They Convened and met together and suppose then they had absolved and acquitted him do you think they had absolved themselves from Treason With reverence be it spoken if they had acquitted him they had been guilty of Treason Assuming a Power to put the King to Death is an overt-Overt-Act declaring such an Imagination You see this Prisoner was no ordinary Actour in it his Hand is in at all Games Taking of Him Imprisoning of Him bringing Him to London and setting Guards on Him You see also his Malice Let us Blacken Him for they knew His Innocency would Shine forth unless it was blackened by their Imputations He Sate many times as your hear and Sentenced Him and Assented to that Sentence by standing up and likewise by Concluding the Catastrophe of that sad beginning of Sufferings his making a Warrant for his Execution and accordingly you know what did follow I think a clearer Evidence of a Fact can never be given then is for these things Here the Spectatours Hummed Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen This Humming is not at all becoming the Gravity of this Court. Let there be free-speaking by the Prisoner and Counsel It is more fitting for a Stage-Play then for a Court of Justice Mr. Harrison It is now time my Lords to offer what I have to say Have these Learned Gentlemen offered what they will say Councel We have no more till he hath given us occasion not for Evidence of the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords The matter that hath been offered to you as it was touched was not a thing done in a Corner I believe the sound of it hath been in most Nations I believe the Hearts of some have felt the
Terrours of that Presence of God that was with his Servants in those days However it seemeth good to him to suffer this Turn to come on us and are Witnesses that the things were not done in a Corner I have desired as in the sight of him that searcheth all hearts whilest this hath been done to wait and receive from him Convictions upon my own Conscience though I have sought it with Tears many a time and Prayers over and over to that God to whom you and all Nations are less than a Drop of water of the Bucket and to this moment I have received rather Assurance of it and that the things that have been done as astonishing on one hand I do believe e're it be long it will be made known from Heaven There was more from God than men are aware of I do profess that I would not offer of my self the least Injury to the poorest Man or Woman that goes upon the Earth That I have humbly to offer is this to your Lordships You know what a Contest hath been in these Nations for many years Divers of those that sit upon the Bench were formerly as Active Court Pray Mr. Harrison do not thus Reflect on the Court This is not to the Business Mr. Harrison I followed not my own Judgment I did what I did as out of Conscience to the Lord. For when I found those that were as the Apple of mine Eye to turn aside I did loath them and suffered Imprisonment many years Rather then to turn as many did that did put their Hands to this Plough I chose rather to be separated from Wife and Family than to have Compliance with them though it was said Sit at my Right Hand and such kind of Expressions Thus I have given a little poor Testimony that I have not been doing things in a Corner or from my self May be I might be a little mistaken but I did it all according to the best of my understanding desiring to make the Revealed Will of God in his Holy Scriptures as a guide to me I humbly conceive That what was done was done in the name of the Parliament of England that what was done was done by their Power and Authority and I do humbly conceive it is my Duty to offer unto you in the beginning that this Court or any Court below the High Court of Parliament hath no Jurisdiction of their Actions Here are many Learned in the Law and to shorten the Work I desire I may have the help of Councel Learned in the Laws that may in this matter give me a little assistance to offer those Grounds that the Law of the Land doth offer I say what was done was done by the Authority of the Parliament which was then the Supreme Authority and that those that have Acted under them are not to be questioned by any Power less than them And for that I conceive there is much out of the Laws to be shewed to you and many Presidents also in the Case Much is to be offered to you in that according to the Laws of the Nations that was a due Parliament Those Commissions were issued forth and what was done was done by their Power And whereas it hath been said we did Assume and Usurp an Authority I say this was done rather in the Fear of the Lord. Court Away with him Know where you are Sir You are in the Assembly of Christians Will you make God the Author of your Treasons and Murthers Take heed where you are Christians must not hear this We will allow you to say for your own Defence what you can And we have with a great deal of Patience suffered you to sally out wherein you have not gone about so much for Extenuation of your Crimes as to Justifie them to fall upon others and to Blaspheme God and commit a new Treason For your having of Councel This is the reason for allowing of Councel when a man would Plead any thing because he would Plead it in Formality Councel is allowed But you must first say in what the Matter shall be and then you shall have the Court's Answer Lord Finch Though my Lords here have been pleased to give you a great Latitude this must not be suffered that you should run into these damnable Excursions to make God the Author of this damnable Treason Committed Mr. Harrison I have two things to offer to you to say for my Defence in Matter of Law One is That this that hath been done was done by a Parliament of England by the Commons of England assembled in Parliament and that being so whatever was done by their Commands or their Authority is not questionable by your Lordships as being as I humbly conceive a Power Inferiour to that of an High Court of Parliament That 's one A second is this That what therefore any did in obedience to that Power and Authority they are not to be questioned for it otherwise we are in a most miserable Condition bound to obey them that are in Authority and yet to be punished if obeyed We are not to Judg what is lawful or what is unlawful My Lords Upon these two Points I do desire that those that are Learned in the Laws may speak too on my behalf It concerns all my Countreymen There are Cases alike to this you know in King Richard the Second's Time wherein some Question had been of what had been done by a Parliament and what followed upon it I need not urge in it I hope it will seem good to you that Councel may be assigned for it concerns all my Countreymen Councel You are mistaken if you appeal to your Countreymen They will cry you Out and shame you Mr. Harrison May be so my Lords some will but I am sure others will not Mr. Sollicitor Gen. These two Points my Lords are but one and they are a new Treason at the Bar for which he deserves to dy if there were no other Indictment It is the Malice of his heart to the Dignity and Crown of England I say this is not matter for which Councel can be assigned Councel cannot put into Form that which is not Matter Pleadable it self It is so far from being true that this was the Act of the Supreme Parliament of the People of England that there was nothing received with more Heart-bleeding than this Bloody Business But that the World may not be abused by the Insinuations of a man who acts as if he had a Spirit and in truth is possessed I will say That the Lords and Commons are not a Parliament That the King and Lords cannot do any thing without the Commons Nor the King and Commons without the Lords Nor the Lords and Commons without the King especially against the King If they do they must answer it with their Head for the King is not accountable to any Coercive Power And for the Prisoner to Justifie his Act as if it were the Act of the Commons of England
had not the blood of English-men that had been shed Councel Me thinks he should be sent to Bedlam till he comes to the Gallows to render an Account of this This must not be suffered It is in a manner a new Impeachment of this King to justifie their Treasons against His late Majesty Mr. Solicitour General My Lords I pray that the Jury may go together upon the Evidence Sir Edw. Turner My Lords This man hath the Plague all over him it is Pity any should stand near him for he will infect them Let us say to him as they use to write over an House infected The Lord have Mercy upon him and so let the Officer take him away Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison We are ready to hear you again but to hear such Stuff it cannot be suffered You have spoken that which is as high a Degree of Blasphemy next to that against God as I have heard You have made very ill use of these Favours that have been allowed you to speak your own Conscience cannot but tell you the Contradiction of your Actions against this that you have heard as the Opinion of the Court. To extenuate your Crimes you may go on but you must not go as before Mr. Harrison I must not speak so as to be pleasing to men but if I must not have liberty as an English-man Court Pray do not reflect thus You have had liberty and more then any Prisoner in your Condition can expect and I wish you had made a good use of it Keep to the Business say what you will Mr. Harrison My Lords thus There was a Discourse by one of the Witnesses that I was at the Committee preparing the Charge and that I should say Let us blacken Him The thing is utterly untrue I abhorred the doing of any thing touching the Blackning of the King There was a little Discourse between the King and my self The King had told me that He had heard that I should come privately to the Isle of Wight to offer some injury to Him But I told Him I abhorred the thoughts of it And whereas it is said that my Carriage was hard to Him when I brought Him to London it was not I that brought Him to London I was commanded by the General to fetch Him from Hurst-Castle I do not remember any hard Carriage towards Him Court Mr. Harrison You have said That you deny that of Blackning which the Witness hath sworn and somewhat else touching the King in His Way to London that the Witness hath sworn to also The Jury must consider of it both of their Oaths and your Contradictions If you have nothing more to say which tends to your Justification We must direct the Jury The end of your Speech is nothing but to infect the People Mr. Harrison You are uncharitable in that Justice Foster My Lords This ought not to come from the Bar to the Bench if you sally out thus about your Conscience If your Conscience should be a darkened Conscience that must not be the Rule of other mens Actions What you speak of that Nature is nothing to the Business If you have any thing to say by way of Excuse for your self for matter of Fact you may speak but if you will go on as before it must not be suffered Mr. Harrison The things that have been done have been done upon the Stage in the sight of the Sun Court All this is a Continuance of the Justification and Confession of the Fact We need no other Evidence Councel He hath confessed his Fact my Lords The matter it self is Treason upon Treason Therefore we pray Direction to the Jury Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison I must give Direction to the Jury if you will not go further touching the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords I say what I did was by the Supreme Authority I have said it before and appeal to your own Consciences that this Court cannot call me to question Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison you have appealed to our Consciences We shall do that which by the Blessing of God shall be just for which we shall answer before the Tribunal of God Pray take heed of an Obdurate Hard Heart and a Seared Conscience Mr. Harrison My Lords I have been kept six Moneths a Close Prisoner and could not prepare my self for this Trial by Councel I have got here some Acts of Parliament of that House of Commons which your Lordships will not own and the Proceedings of that House whose Authority I did own Lord Chief Baron This you have said already If you shew never so many of that Nature they will not help you you have heard the Opinion of the Court touching that Authority They all unanimously concur in it Gentlemen of the Jury You see that this Prisoner at the Bar is Indicted for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of Blessed Memory In this Indictment there are several things given but as Evidences of it they are but the Overt-Acts of it The one is first that they did meet and consult together about the putting the King to Death and that alone if nothing else had been proved in the Case was enough for you to find the Indictment For the Imagination alone is Treason by the Law But beause the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is secret in the Heart and no man knowes it but God Almighty I say That the Imagination is Treason yet it is not such as the Law can lay hold of unless it appear by some overt-Overt-Act Then the first Overt-Act is their Meeting Consulting and Proposing to put the King to Death The second is more open namely their Sitting together and Assuming an Authority to put the King to Death The third is Sentencing the King And I must tell you that any one of these Acts prove the Indictment If you find him guilty but of any one of them either Consulting Proposing Sitting or Sentencing though there is full Proof for all yet notwithstanding you ought to find the Indictment You have heard what the Witnesses have said and the Prisoner's own Confession Witnesses have sworn their sitting together and that he was one One swears he sate four times another twice some several times There are several Witnesses for this as Mr. Masterson Mr. Clark Mr. Kirk and Mr. Nutley And then you have another thing too which truly the Prisoner did not speak of Witness was given against him That he was the Person that Conducted the King this was before that which he would have to be done by a Legislative Power and that is another overt-Overt-Act If a man will go about to Imprison the King the Law knows what is the sad Effect of such Imprisonment That hath often been adjudged to be an Evidence of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King That man the Prisoner at the Bar it hath been proved to you did Imprison the King and it appears by his own
to pronounce Judgment against his Soveraign In this he rested not but he among them set his Hand and Seal to that bloody Roll or Warrant for putting him to death which accordingly was done and to these several open acts we shall call out Witnesses and so proceed M. Masterson M. Clark and M. Kirk sworn Coun. M. Masterson look upon the prisoner did you see him sit in that they called the High Court of Justice Lord Chief Baron Mr. Carew if you will have pen ink and paper you may have it pray call for it Carew I have no need of it Coun. Mr. Masterson did you see c. Ma. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was present at that Assembly which they called the High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King upon the 22 23 and 27th days of Jan. 1648. and there I saw the King stand a Prisoner at the Bar. I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar sit upon the Bench in that Court as one of his Majesties Judges particularly upon the 27th day of Jan. which was the day of Sentence I saw him sitting there Coun. Mr. Clark You hear the Question Do you remember that you saw the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice Mr. Clark I remember I saw the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice for the Trial of the late King and particularly I took notice upon the 23. and 27th of Jan. 1648. that he was present Coun. What was done upon that 27th day Mr. Clark The 27th day the late King was sentenced to death Jury What is your Name Sir Coun. His Name is William Clark Coun. Mr. Kirk What say you to the former Question touching the Prisoner his being at that which they called the High Court of Justice Mr. Kirk My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was present at the Tryal of his late Majesty of blessed memory I saw that Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar several days there particularly the day of the Sentence which was the 27th day of Jan. 1648. when the Sentence was passed he rose up assenting to it Then the Warrant for summoning that pretended Court was shewed to Mr. Kirk Coun. Do you believe that Hand to be the Hand of Mr. Jo. Carew Prisoner at the Bar Kirk My Lords I do believe it to be his Hand I have seen his Hand to several Orders and being very well acquainted with his Hand-writing I believe it to be his Hand as much as any Man can possibly know another man's Hand Then the Warrant for Execution of the King was likewise shewn him Coun. Is that the Hand also of the Prisoner at the Bar Kirk It is the same Hand my Lord. Court Was Mr. Carew a Member of the Long Parliament K. Yes My Lord. Coun. Had you occasion to be acquainted with his hand K. My Lord I have seen him set his hand several times to Orders and other Papers Mr. Farrington sworn Coun. Do you know the Warrants being shewn him those hands to be the writing of the Prisoner at the Bar Far. My Lords really I believe these are his hands Court Are you acquainted with his hand Far. Yes My Lord and I do believe these to be his hand-writing I did not see him write them but so far as possibly a man can know anothers writing I do believe these to be his Court If you will ask to see them you may see them Mr. Carew Ca. Please you to go on Here they were both read Coun. May it please your Lordships we shall not need to trouble the Jury any further we have proved that the Prisoner did sign that Warrant for summoning that Court of Injustice that he sate there and sentenced the King to death among other and that he signed the Warrant for execution L. Chief Baron M. Carew you have heard the evidence you may please to speak what you think fit for your self Ca. My Lords the crimes that are here laid to my charge in this Indictment are Treason and Murther L. Chief Baron I would not have you to be mis-informed it is Treason onely but it carries the other in with it Murther Ca. Because you say it carries the other inclusively L. Chief Baron It doth the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King the other is but evidence Ca. Then the thing that I stand upon before the Lord and before you all I say before the Lord before whom we must all stand and give an account of this action which is a very great and weighty one And whereas it is charged there for I shall not trouble you with many words as to the particulars or as to the proofs but I shall ingeniously acknowledg what the truth is and how far I can believe it and therefore I say as to the beginning of what was charg'd by the Council and according to the course of the Indictment that what was done in those things that it was not having the fear of God before mine eyes but being moved by the Devil and that it was done with a Trayterous Malicious and Devilish heart and all those things mentioned in the Indictment As for that I can say in the presence of the Lord who is the searcher of all hearts that what I did was in his fear and I did it in obedience to his holy and righteous Laws Here the people hum'd L. Chief Bar. Go on he stands for his Life let him have liberty Ca. It is part of my charge not to have the fear of God c. I did such and such things I hope I may have liberty L. Chief Bar. Go on you shall not be interrupted Ca. I say that I did it in the fear of the Lord and I will begin with that and confess ingeniously the truth of it When this came into question there was an Ordinance brought in to try the King where my name was not as one of the Judges There was another afterwards an Act which I shall mention upon what ground by and by what that was and that Act was brought in and committed and names brought in and my Name was not brought in and so afterwards my name was put in and seeing it I did strike it out After the Committee was up I told them I did desire to be excused in such a business I have told you how wherein and the ground that I did it which I shall leave with the Lord in whose hand your and my breath and all our breaths are and therefore when it was so I did because of the weight of it as being a very great and special thing and so I was very unwilling because of there being enow which I thought had more experience every way for so great a concernment as that was to be imployed rather then I yet being satisfied with that Authority that did it This is to shew you how that I had the fear
Convening that Court together whereby the King was to be brought to his Tryal and that he sate at his Sentence and issued the warrant for his Execution You saw that this Gentleman did the Fact did Compass and Imagine the King's Death That which you are to try is this Issue being Indicted for High Treason and pleading not Guilty whether this Gentleman that went so far Sate upon him Condemned him Signed the Warrant for his Execution did not Compass and Imagin the King's Death I think you need not stir from the Bar where you are but I leave that to you After a very small time of Consultation by the Jury amongst themselves at the Bar they agreed in a Verdict Silence was Commanded Clerk John Carew Hold up thy Hand Gentlemen of the Jury look upon the Prisoner How say you Is he Guilty of the horrid Treason whereof he stands Indicted or not Guilty Foreman Guilty Cl. What Goods and Chattels c. Jury None that we know of Mr. Scot's Tryal on Friday October 12. 1660. At the Sessions-House aforenamed Clerk Set Thomas Scot to the Bar which was accordingly done Thomas Scot hold up thy hand These men that have been of the last Jury are to try c. If you will Challenge all or any of them you must Challenge them before they are sworn Scot. I desire that those men who have been of the former Jury may not be named I know my liberty of excepting against my number Lo. Ch. B. Mr. Scot That which you do desire is a thing not right the Offence with one is not the same with others I speak not but that the Court will do you all Right the Court will grant it if you will wave your Challenges but if you mean those that have been by others challenged it is against Law Scot. I am willing to bring my self upon my Tryal and I will take the ordinary way of Excepting and Challenging Sir Hen. Wroth Sir Jer. Whitchcote James Hawley Rich. Rider Fra. Beale Chr. Abdy Nicho. Raynton Tho. Winter John Kirke Rich. Abel Sir Tho. Aleyn Abr. Scudamore Ralph Halsall George Tirrey Tho. Swallowe Charles Pickerne Arthur Newman Tho. Blithe William Vincent Rich. Whaley were called and challenged Thomar Grover Edw. Rolfe Tho. Vfman William Whitcombe Rich. Cheney Tho. Bide Charles Pitfield John Smith Tho. Morris Tho. Fruen Henry Twyford Samuel Starnel were the Jury sworn Clerk Cryer make Proclamation Cryer O yes If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Clerk Tho. Scot. hold up thy hand You that are sworn of this Jury you shall understand that the Prisoner at the Bar stands Indicted by the name of Tho. Scot late of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Gent. For that he together with John Lisle c. Here the Indictment was read Unto which Indictment he hath been arraigned and thereunto hath pleaded Not guilty and for his Tryal hath put himself upon God and the Countrey which Countrey you are Now your Charge is to enquire whether c. Mr. Soll. Gen. You that are sworn of this Jury this Inquisition for blood Royal Blood goes on against the Prisoner at the Bar he stands Indicted for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the death of the late King of blessed Memory It is laid to his Charge in the Indictment That he did assemble at Westminster and that he with other persons usurped an Authority of sitting and sentencing to death his said late Majesty and that in consequence and pursuance of that the King came to his death The Treason he stands charged with is the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death The other parts of the Indictment are but overt acts that do but evidence and prove the Corruption of his heart if we prove but some of these overt acts then you must find him guilty Our Evidence against this Gentleman will be thus We shall call Witnesses to prove his sitting in the Court sentencing his King while his King stood a Prisoner at the Bar the Warrant for Execution of the King directed to certain persons to see Execution done accordingly was under Hands and Seals and among those Hands and Seals the Hand and Seal of the Prisoner at the Bar is one and then we shall produce to your Lordships Witnesses to shew you with what a hard and impenitent heart this hath been Committed for he so gloried in the Act That he desired it might be writ upon his Tomb Mr. Nutley M. Kirke Mr. Masterson and Mr. Clark sworn Coun. Mr. Masterson be pleased to tell my Lords and the Jury if you have seen the Prisoner at the Bar sit in that which they called the High Court of Justice Mr. M. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I saw the prisoner at the Bar present at the High Court of Justice as they call'd it for the Tryal of the late King some days that is to say either upon the 22. or 23. day of Jan. 1648. but particularly upon the 27th day of that Month in the said year when the Sentence of death was pronounced against his late Majesty I saw the Prisoner at the Bar present Coun. As one of the Judges do you mean Mr. Ma. As one of the Judges sitting upon the Bench. Scot. Do you know where abouts I sate Mr. Ma. I cannot satisfie you in that but I saw you sitting upon one of the Benches Coun. Mr. Clark you hear the question pray answer what you know touching it Mr. Cl. My Lords and you Gentlemen of the Jury I was present in the year 1648. when his late Majesty stood a Prisoner at the Bar in that which they called the High Court of Justice and among other persons there present in that business I observed Mr. Scot the Prisoner at the Bar to sit as one of the Judges and particularly upon the 23 and 27th days of Jan. in the said year upon which last day the Court pronounced Judgement upon the late King Coun. Did he stand up as assenting to the Sentence Mr. Cl. They all stood up to my apprehension I know not particularly whether the Prisoner at the Bar did Coun. Mr. Kirke tell my Lords and the Jury your knowledge in this business touching the Prisoner at the Bar. Mr. K. I was present at the Tryals of his late Majesty several days among the rest of the persons that sate in the Court as Judges I saw the Prisoner at the Bar and particularly upon the day of the Sentence the 27th of Jan. 1648. The Court stood up unanimously as assenting Coun. Shew him the Warrant for Execution K. This is his Hand Coun. Have you seen his Hand often K. Yes Sir and am well acquainted with it George Farrington sworn Coun. Shew Mr. Farrington the Warrant Do you know that to be Mr. Scots Hand-writing Mr. Far. I did not see him write it but I do verily believe it to be his I have often seen his Hand-writing Coun. Mr. Nutley do you know Mr. Scots hand-writing Is that Mr. Scots
such a Priviledge that no man shall ever be called to account for any thing spoken in Parliament if he be not called to account by the House before any other Member be suffered to speak Lord Ch. Bar. That is the House will not determine but that doth not extend to your Case you are not charged here criminally for speaking those words that have been testified against you but for Compassing and Imagining the Kings death of which there are other Evidences and this but an Evidence to prove that Scot. My Lord I never did say these words with that aggravation which is put upon them I have a great deal of hard measure as to say I hope I shall never repent I take God to witness I have often because it was spoken well of by some and ill by others I have by prayers and tears often sought the Lord that if there were iniquity in it he would shew it me I do affirm I did not say so Mr. Baker My Lord I omitted something which was this I had occasion to speak with Mr. Scot whilest Richard's Parliament was sitting and among other discourse insisting upon some things that Richard had done saith he I have cut off one Tyrants head and I hope to cut off another Scot. My Lord This is but a single witness Mr. Soll. Gen. I suppose he meant Rich. for he was a Tyrant Lord Ch. Bar. Speak on Mr. Scot whatever you have to say Sc. If that he laid aside as an impertinency I have the less to say L. Ch. Bar. The next thing you have to do is to answer to the fact whether you did it or did it not Scot. I say this Whatever I did be it more or less I did it by he Command and Authority of a Parliamentary Power I did sit as one of the Judges of the King and that doth justifie me whatever the nature of the fact was Lo. Ch. Bar. We have had these things alledged before us again and again The Court are clearly satisfied in themselves that this act could not be done by any Parliamentary power whatsoever I must tell you what hath been delivered that there is no power on earth that hath any coercive power over the King neither single Persons nor a Community neither the people Collectively nor Representatively In the next place that which you offer to be done as by Authority of Parliament it was done by a few members of the House of Commons there were but 46 there at that time and of these 46 not above 26 that voted it at that time the House of Lords was sitting who had rejected it and without them there was no Parliament there was a force upon the Parliament there was excluded seven parts of eight Supposing you were a full House of Commons and that without exception there was not Authority enough and it is known to you no man better that there never was a House of Commons before this time that this foul Act was made for erecting that High Court of Justice as you call'd it assumed that Authority of making a Law you cannot pretend to act by Authority of Parliament and because you would excuse it you did it by Authority of Parliament whether it were good or no If a man do that which is unlawful by an unlawful Authority the assuming to do it by that Authority is an Aggravation not an Extenuation of the Fact It was over-ruled I think my Lords will tell you That they do not allow of that Authority at all either to be for Justification or Plea Scot. My Lords I humbly pray leave to say that without offence to the Court every person whereof I honour This Court hath not Cognizance to Declare whether it were a Parliament or no. Lo. Ch. Bar. That was objected too and we must aquaint you That first of all it is no Derogation to Parliaments That what is a Statute or not a Statute should be adjudged by the Common Laws We have often brought it into question whether such and such a thing was an Act of Parliament or not any man may pretend to an Authority of Parliament If forty men should meet at Shooters Hill as the Little Convention did at Westminster and say We do declare our selves a Parliament of England because they do so shall not this be judged what is a Statute and what not It is every days practise we do judge upon it the Fact is so known to every body they did assume to themselves a Royal Authority it hath been over-ruled already it hath been the mistake of many the vulgar acceptation of the word Parliament A Parliament consists of the King Lords and Commons it is not the House of Commons alone and so it is not by Authority of Parliament It is not unless it be by that Authority which makes up the Parliament You cannot give one instance That ever the House of Commons did assume the Kings Authority Scot. I can many where there was nothing but a House of Commons Court When was that Scot. In the Saxons time Court You say it was in the Saxons time you do not come to any time within 600 years you speak of those times wherein things were obscure Scot. I know not but that it might be as lawful for them to make Laws as this late Parliament being called by the Keepers of the Liberties of England My Lords I have no seditious design but to submit to the providence of God Court This is notorious to every man This we have already heard and over-ruled L. Finch That that I hope is this That Mr. Scot will contradict that which he hath said before that is That he hopes he should not repent I hope he doth desire to repent Mr. Scot for this we must over-rule it as we have done before there is nothing at all to be pleaded to the Jurisdiction and this point hath been determined before Scot. The Parliament informer times consisted not so much of King Lords and Commons but King and Parliament In the beginning of the Parliament in 1641. the Bishops were one of the three Estates if it be not properly to be called a Parliament a legislative Power though it be not a Parliament it is binding If two Estates may take away the third if the second do not continue to execuâ—â— their trust he that is in occupancy may have a title to the whole I do affirm I have a Parliamentary Authority a legislative power to justifie me Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot what you speak concerning the Lords Spiritual is nothing to your Case be it either one way of other it was done by an Act of Parliament with consent of the King Lords and Commons though you will bring it down to make these Commons have a legislative Power I told you it was over-ruled before We have suffered you to expatiate into that which was a thing not intended by many of my Lords that you should have any such power to expatiate into that which is
compass of it according to his Royal Word and Honour in it you will have the benefit of it but it is not a Plea in Law but it must be a Pardon under Seal whatsoever concerns that Proclamation will be considered It is nothing to the matter whereupon the Jury are to go Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen of the Jury you see the Prisoner Tho. Scot stands Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the death of our Dread Soveraign King Charles the First of most glorious and blessed memory He is Indicted for Compassing and Imagining his death there is the Treason and what is set afterwards in this Indictment is only to manifest this Compassing and Imagining because that being in the heart alone without some overt Act no body can prove it There are several overt Acts laid in the Indictment one is A Trayterous consulting and meeting together how to put the King to death Then a sitting upon the King as a Prisoner being before them about his life and death The third is Sentencing to death that which followed is That he was Murthered If any of these acts should be proved the Indictment is proved for the proof there are several Witnesses have fully proved that he did sit there several times particularly upon Jan. 27. which was the day of the Sentence That he did sit there all of them agree to that It is true as to the Circumstance where he sate one Gentleman saith he sate in the second Row on the left hand of Bradshaw you well remember it is 12. years ago how any man upon the view and after so long a distance of time should he able to remember in what posture one man was from the rest I think neither you nor I can remember Here is one proved to you that he did sign that Warrant for Executing the King he saith How can another know his Hand You see what the Witnesses say they knew it a man can prove nothing more of another mans Hand than that unless they see it written there is nothing to put upon you but his words You see what words are aggravated against Mr. Scot Whereas he saith It is a breach of the Priviledges of Parliament if it were so it is nothing to this Fact though another man should break the priviledges of Parliament it is nothing to you but besides it is not a breach of the priviledge of Parliament You have heard the Witnesses what they have said against him Mr. Lenthall swears that he did speak at large fully in owning that business of the Kings death The rest swear positively to the same effect and that at several times What was that He gloried in it defended it and said He could wish it were Engraven on his Tomb stone he hath denyed this that the Witnesses have proved That which is lest to you is whether upon all this matter that you have heard Whether the Prisoner at the Bar is Guilty of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death and so go together After a little Consultation together they setled in their places again Clerk Tho. Scot hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar How say you is he Guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Indicted or not Guilty Jury Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner is Guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set Mr. Scot aside Clerk Set John Jones and Gregory Clement to the Bar. Which was done accordingly Thereupon the said Gregory Clement preferred his Petition to the Court. Indictment read against them both Lo. Ch. Bar. If you do confess your Offence your Petition will be read Clem. I do my Lord. Lord Ch. B. Mr. Clement if you do confess that you may understand it you must when you are called and when the Jury are to be charged You must say if you will have it go by way of Confession That you Wave your former Plea and confess the Fact Clerk Gregory Clement you have been Indicted of High Treason for Compassing and Imagining the death of his late Majesty and you have pleaded not Guilty Are you contented to wave that Plea and confess it Clem. I do confess my self to be Guilty my Lord. Clerk Set him aside Clkek John Jones hold up thy hand These men that were last called c. if you will Challenge all or any of them you must Challenge them when they come to the Book and before they are sworn Jones I confess I sate amongst them some days but not maliciously contrived the death of the King Coun. He is troubled at the Form he confesseth the Matter That he was there sitting in the High Court of Justice If he will not confess it he knows we can prove his Hand and Seal to that bloody Warrant He is troubled that he is said to have Trayterously and Maliciously Contrived the Kings death He that doth these Acts towards it is by Law responsible as to the Malice Jury Sworn Sir Tho. Allen Sir Henry Wroth Sir Jer. Whitchott James Hawley Henry Mildmay Christ Abdy Nich. Raynton Richard Cheney Tho. Bide Charles Pitfield Abraham Scudamore Charles Pickerne in all 12. Cl. Cryer make Proclamation Cryer If any man can inform c. Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner c. Mr. Soll. Gen. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I must open to you as to other Juries that the short Point of this long Indictment is but this That the Prisoner at the Bar did Imagine and Compass the death of the King which is your Issue to Try We shall prove it by those overt acts which the Law doth require To prove the Sitting Sentencing and Signing the Warrant for Execution by the Prisoner at the Bar. Coun. Call Mr. Clark and Mr. Carr and Holl. Symson who were sworn Mr. Symson did you see the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice Sym. I did see Mr. Jones sit divers times both there and in the Painted Chamber Jones I do confess I sate divers times Coun. Did he sit the day of Sentence Sym. I cannot say it Coun. Mr. Clark you hear the question Pray answer my Lord. Clark My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was there the 27. of Jan. 1648 I saw Coll. Jones there several days before but I did not see him that day his name was called but I do not know whether he was present Coun. Mr. Carr did you see him sit on the 27th day which was the day of Sentence Carr. My Lords he answered to his name some days I am not able to tell what day Mr. Nutley Sworn Coun. Can you tell whether the Prisoner at the Bar was present in that which they called the High Court of Justice Nutley The Prisoner at the Bar was several times in the Court which was called the High Court of Justice truly I cannot say whether he was there the 27th day the day of the Sentence The Warrant for Summoning that
Court being shewed Coun. Is that Mr. Jones's Hand the Prisoner at the Bar set to that Warrant Nut. I have been acquainted with his Hand I do believe it is The Warrant for Execution was also shewed Coun. Is that the same Hand-writing Nut. Yes I believe it is he hath written several Letters to me Mr. Hartlib Sworn Court Mr. Hartlib do you know Mr. Jones's Hand Har. I never did see him write but I have seen several Letters out of Ireland and other Papers which have been supposed to be his Hand-writing This seems to be like that which was reputed to be his Hand Coun. Mr. Clark do you know Mr. Jones's Hand-writing Cl. I have seen several Letters of Col. Jones and these are like his Hand-writing I do believe they are his Hand-writing Mr. Jones looks upon them both and confesses they are like his hand-writing Coun. We have given our Evidence What do you say for your self before Charge be given to the Jury Jones I have little to say your Lordships have already heard what is to be said in this Case I have nothing to say to the point I am not fit to plead any thing especially in matter of Law I must wholly put my self upon the Lord and this Honourable Court and Jury Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury here is this Prisoner John Jones stands Indicted for that he with others did Compass and Imagine the Kings death that is the substance of the Indictment The Indictment sets forth several Acts each proving the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death One of them is that he did consult and meet together and propound how the King should be put to death The second is they did assume a power to Judge the King The third is that they did actually sit upon him And the last of them is that they sentenced the King and afterwards the King was murthered The whole substance is whether he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death If any one of these particulars that are alledged for the overt acts be proved you are to find the Indictment He hath confessed very Ingenuously that he did sit upon the King that he did sit in that Court and so there is an overt act proved if nothing else you ought to find him guilty of this Treason There is further Evidence though not any Evidence of his sitting the last day of the Sentence you have had three comparing similitudes of hands to prove that he did sign that Sentence that horrid Instrument whereby the King was ordered to be put to death one of them having received Letters from Ireland and others acquainted with his hand say that it is like his hand he hath so confessed the likeness of his hand but he saith he doth not remember he signed it As to you of the Jury there is no more to be considered if any one of the acts do appear true to you that is sufficient to find him guilty though he were not guilty of all but that he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death is clear in sitting and signing the Warrant for the other whether you shall find that he did sentence the King that must be left to you Whatsoever it is still it is the same if any one be proved you ought to find him guilty of the Indictment which is the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death I think you need not stir from the Bar for he hath confessed it The Jury went together and after a little Consultation returned to their places Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our Foreman Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar. How say ye is he guilty c. Foreman Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner at the Bar is guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set all that have been tryed this day to the Bar. Lord Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot I must speak a word to you you made mention of the Kings Proclamation for pardon and you did desire the benefit of it As I told you before so now again That it was not proper for us upon that Proclamation to give any allowance by way of Plea because the Pardon ought to be under the Broad Seal but God forbid but just and due Consideration should be had of it with honour so far as you are comprehended within it Though Judgment shall pass no Warrant for Execution shall go out against you till consideration be had how far you are within the Compass of that Proclamation and the like to you Mr. Scroop Clerk Adrian Scroop Hold up thy hand Thou hast been Indicted of High Treason and hast thereof been found guilty What canst thou say for thy self why Judgement should not pass for thee to dye according to Law Scroop I do humbly submit to his Majesties mercy Cl. John Carew Hold up thy hand Thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Carew I commit my cause unto the Lord. Cl. Thomas Scot Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Scot. I shall only say I do only cast my self upon his Majesty and pray mercy Cl. John Jones Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what hast thou to say c. Jones I pray his Majesties Clemency Cl. Gregory Clement hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason and thereunto hast pleaded guilty What canst thou say c. Clem. I pray mercy from the King Lo. Ch. Bar. You that are Prisoners at the Bar Ye see the Sentence of death is now to pass against you and for ought you know or we know yet may be nearer than you are aware How soon it will be executed we know not when you have reflected upon your own consciences many of you could not chuse but look there and see as in a glass the foulness of this horrid Offence It is the Murther of our most gracious Soveraign King Charles the First of blessed memory a Prince whom we such of us as had the honour personally to attend him knew was of such parts and vertues if he had been a private man more could not have been desired truly what he did as a King his Clemency how it appeared at first in this Princes time If you look what Peace and Prosperity we enjoyned in his days we will not find it in other Kings times You had not a Noble-man put to death save one and that for an Offence which must not be named A Prince that had granted so much You may remember what was granted before the beginning of these Wars Grievances complained of Star-Chamber High Commission Court Ship money The Claim of Stannery c. All these were taken away What Concessions he made after in the Isle of Wight how much he wooed and courted the people for Peace I urge this unto
you only that you would lay it to your hearts that you would consider what it is to Kill a King and to kill such a King If any of you shall say That we had no hand in the actual Murther of the King remember that they that brought him to the Bar were all one as if they had brought him to the Block as St. Paul confessed though he held but the Clothes he killed the Martyr Stephen You are shortly to appear before Gods Tribunal and I beseech God Almighty that he will give you and us all those hearts that we may look into our selves No fig-leaves will serve the turn whatsoever you have said now as Prisoners or allowed to say for your own preservation in point of Fact Notwithstanding it will not serve before God Almighty All things are naked before him Lay it to your hearts God Almighty though you have committed these foul and horrid sins yet he can pardon you as he pardoned that murther of David I speak it to you that you may lay it to your hearts I am heartily sorry in respect you are Persons of great Civility and those that I know of very good parts and this I must say That you will consider with your selves if any of you have been led away though it were with his own conscience if any of you did it as you conceived in conscience remember that our Saviour saith The time shall come when they will persecute you and kill you and think they do God good service I have the Judgment of Charity possibly some of you did it in this kind and this is less than doing it wilfully others might do it by a mis guided Conscience there is a spiritual pride men may over-run themselves by their own holiness and they may go by pretended Revelations Men may say I have prayed about such a thing I do not speak it with reproach to any If a man that should commit a Robbery or Murther meerly because he will and should come and say I have prayed against it and cannot understand it to be a sin as one in Shropshire did and yet notwithstanding killed his own Father and Mother try your own spirits you must not think that every Fancy and Imagaination is conscience Men may have a strange fancy and presumption and that they may call conscience Take heed there is a spiritual pride the Devil doth many times appear like an Angel of light do not rest upon that self-confidence Examine your hearts consider the Fact by the word of God That is the rule the Law is to be applyed to it Eccles 8. Where the word of a King is there is power and who can say unto him What dost thou that is to shew the power of Kings in Scripture Remember withal that of David in Psalm 51. that penitential Psalm when he had committed that horrid sin against Vriah Remember what he said being a K. Tibi soli peccavi Against thee only have I sinned Truly it being in such a Case I speak it as before God almighty according to my duty and conscience I wish most heartily as to your Persons I pray God to give you that grace that you may seriously consider it and lay it to heart and to have mercy upon you and to forgive you And this is all that I have to say and now not I but the Sentence of the Law the Judgment which I have to give against you is this You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgement of the Court is and the Court doth award that you be led back c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Clerk Cryer make Proclamation Cryer O Yes c. All manner of Person c. Jurors and Witnesses to appear to morrow morning at seven of the Clock at this place So God save his Majesty Session-House Old-Bayly Octo. 1â— 1660. The Courts being Assembled Proclamation was made Clerk of the Court. Set Cook Peters Hacker and Axtel to the Bar They being brought the Keeper was afterwards ordered to take back all except M. Cook Cl. John Cook hold up thy hand c. Jury Sir J. Whitchcot James Hawley Jo. Nichol of Henden Tho. Nichol F. Thorn Edw. Wilford Wil. Gumbleton Jo. Shelbury Tho. Jenney Tho. Willet Sir H. Wroth Rich. Cheney of the Jury called and Sworn Mr. Cook May it please your Lordship I do not know any of these Persons I beseech your Lordship that in regard the safety of my life depends upon the indifferency of these Persons that your Lordship may demand of the Sheriff to know whether he hath not heard them say or any of them that they are preingaged I hope they are not and thereupon I have not challenged any Lo. Ch. Bar. Sir the Officer reads their names out of his Papers I suppose he doth not pick and chuse them I would not have him and I am sure he will not do you any wrong in that particular Cook My Lord I am satisfied Cl. If any man can inform c. Cl. J. Cook hold up thy hand Cook My Lords I desire Pen Ink and Paper Lo. Ch. Bar. Give it him Cl. J. C. Hold up thy hand You that are sworn look upon the Prisoner You shall understand c. Here the Indictment was read as before Mr. Soll Gen. May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are sworn of this Jury the Prisoner at the Bar stands Indicted for High Treason for Compassing and Imagining the death of the late K. of Blessed Memory The indictment sets forth That he together with others did assemble at Westminster Hall and sets forth many other particulars of sitting sentencing and of the consequent Death and Murther of the King The matter and charge of the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King the rest of the Circumstances of the Indictment are but alledged as overt acts to prove the Imagination which only is the Treason This Prisoner at the Bar stands here Indicted for this Treason of Compassing and imagining the late Kings Death My Lord his part and portion in this matter will be different from those that have been tryed before you they sat as Judges to sentence the King and he my Lord stood as a wicked Instrument of that matter at the Bar and there he doth with his own hand subscribe and exhibite a charge of High Treason a scandalous Libel against our Soveraign to that pretended Court to be read against him as an accusasion in the name of all the people of England when he had done that he makes large discourses and aggravations to prove if it had been possible innocency it self to be Treason When he had done he would not suffer his Majesty to speak in his defence but still took him up and said that he did spin out delays and desired that the charge might be taken as if he had confessed it He pressed the Court that Judgment might be given against the King he was the man that did
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
heard the Charge read Hern. I did not hear the Charge read I was not there the first day I heard you confess you had exhibited a Charge of high Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar which was then the King's Majestie Cook Whether I did not in the Charge conclude that all proceedings might be according to Justice Court Read the Title and last Article of that Charge which was accordingly read and follows in haec verba The Title of the Charge The Charge of the Commons of England against Charles Sewart KING of England of High Treason and other Crimes exhibited to the High Court of Justice The last Clause in the Charge And the said Iohn Cook by protestation saving on the behalf of the people of Eng. the liberty of exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Charge against the said Char. Stew. and also of replying to the answers which the said Char. Stew. shall make to the premisses or any of them or any other charge that shall be so exhibited doth for the said Treasons and Crimes on the behalf of the said people of England impeach the said Charles Stewart as a Tyrant Traytor Murderer publick and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth of England and prayeth that the said Charles Stewart King of England may be put to answer all and every the premisses that such proceedings examinations tryals sentences and judgement may be hereupon had as shall be agreeable to Justice Court Mr. Cook will you have any Witnesses examined touching the question you last asked Cook No be pleased to go on Mr. Baker Sworn Mr. Bak. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was at the High Court of Justice as they called it the first second and third daies not to trouble you with the proceedings of of Bradshaw I will tell you what I observed of this Gentleman I have the notes that I took there and pray that I may read them to help my memory which was granted and then proceeded in this manner That day my Lord Mr. Cook told the Court that he charged the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the KING with Treason and high misdemeanors and desired that the Charge might be read the Charge was this That he had upheld a Tyrannical Government c. and for that cause was adjudged to be a Tyrant c. and did then press that the prisoner might give an answer to that and that very earnestly The second day my Lord he told the Court that he did the last day exhibit a Charged High Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the King and that he did desire he might make answer to it and he told them also that instead of making an answer to the Court the King had delayed the Court but desired the K. might make a positive answer or otherwise that it might be taken pro confesso The third day my Lord he came and told the Court as before that the King had delayed then and then he charged him with the Highest Treasons and Crimes that ever were acted upon the Theatre of England and then pressed that Judgement might be given against him and another expression was that it was not so much He but the Innocent and precious bloud that was shed that did crie for Judgment against the Prisoner at the Bar this my Lord in substance there were other passages Cook Whether before this time he had not heard some thing of an Act or Order proclaimed at Westminster whether there was any other word in effect used in that charge more than in the Proclamation Mr. Baker I did hear of the Proclamation and Charge and the substance of it I have given an accompt of it and I did hear you press upon it very much the Proclamation I heard of it that it was made forthe summoning of the Court but I did not hear the Proclamation made Cook That that was called the Act of the Commons for Trying of the King Mr. Baker I did hear of the Act but did not take notice of it Mr. George Masterson Sworn Counc Mr. Masterson pray inform my Lords and the Jury what you know touching the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at the Tryal of his late Majesty Mr. Masterson My Lords and you Gentlemen of the Jury I was present in that they called the High Court of Justice upon the 22 23. and 27. days of January in the year 1648. I shall wave those circumstances which you have heard and many of which I well remember and what I heard likewise between the King who was then a Prisoner and the then President Bradshaw but concerning the Prisoner at the Bar this I very well remember that upon Munday I heard him say he had exhibited a Charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then the King and demanded how that he might plead to his charge I do very well remember that after some passages between the King and the Court the Prisoner at the Bar desired the King might plead to his Charge or else it might be taken pro Confesso I remember upon the last day the day of that fatal Sentence I heard the Prisoner at the Bar demand in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and all the good people of England Judgement upon the Prisoner at the Bar pointing to the King this is all Mr. Burden sworn Councel Do you know who did examine the witnesses against the King and were you examined and by whom Burden By Judge Cook for so he was called in Ireland Councel Did he examine you as a witness against the King did he give you an Oath Burden Yes my Lord and many others Cook This is a new thing I never heard of this before where was it that I examined him I had no power Council No we know that but you were active Court Where was it Cook Whether there were not any others with me in the Room and where it was Burden It was at Westminster-hall within the High Court of Justice Cook Who was there besides me Burden I cannot tell Axtel he was there and I am sure Cook was there Councel Mr. Burden Pray tell my L. the Jury what questions you were examined upon and what they tended to Burden He examined me and gave me my Oath there was eight or nine of us we had been in the Kings Army in former times this Gentleman Col. Axtel brought us in commanded us out of our Company I was in his Company and this Gentleman himself gave us our Oaths he asked us where we saw the King in action I did reply to him and told him I saw him in the Field with his Army he asked me many other questions that I could not tell him he asked me whether I did see the King at Nottingham set up his Standard and I was never at Nottingham in my life these were the questions Mr. Starkey Sworn Court Pray inform my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury what passed between you and the Prisoner at
Treason and my Lord had this been in times of peace and had His Majesty been no Prisoner now he was under the power of an Army this had been great Treason but he being a Prisoner not by my means for I was no sword-man what can a man that knows himself innocent being a Prisoner desire more than a speedy Tryal so that making the Tryal more speedy cannot be said to be done trayterously A Tryal doth follow imprisonment as naturally and necessarily as the shadow doth the body If any man shall desire and be instrumental in bringing him to a Tryal which might acquit rather than condemn him and so humbly pray proceedings according to Justice this will have I hope a better name than Treason I am much beholding to His Majesty and this honourable Parli for the penning of the Act of Indempnity which I hope my L. you will give me leave to take notice of Court Open as much as you will of it Cook My Lords the words that I would make use of are in the beginning Treason Murder and other Felonies that are spoken of they are said to be counselled commanded acted or done in the preamble which is as the Key to open the mind and meaning of the Law-makers it is said that all persons shall be pardoned for all excepting such as shall be named and in such manner as they shall be excepted and then it comes provided that this Act shall not extend to pardon such and such persons and by name I am one and it is said all which persons for their execrable Treason in Sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign Lord Charles the First of glorious memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to his late Majesty according to the Laws of England and are out of the said Act wholly excepted and foreprized There is not any thing offered against me upon the two 1st great words which are Sentencing and signing that which I have to do to endeavour to clear my self is this being instrumental in taking away the life of his said Majesty first I humbly offer this to the Juries consideration That where the Parliament doth begin to fix the treasonable part there I hope and no otherwise this honourabe Court will fix it if it had been the Intention that Counsellors advisers and such as spoke their minds sometimes in the business you know that was Epidemical many words were spoken which cannot be justified whether naturally it would not have followed that all such persons for their counselling advising or being instrumental are left to be proceeded against as Traytors I hope you will take that into consideration concerning the words or being instrumental observe it is not said or being any otherwaies instrumental but Sentencing signing or being instrumental if therefore the word Instrumental be not of a general comprehensive nature then all this evidence which hath been given in against me being before the Sentencing and signing will fall to the ground that this is the legal genuine and Grammatical sense cannot be any otherwise than as particular as if it were the Sentencer signer Executioner which if it had been so nothing of the Evidence would have reached me My argument is this such a use is to be made of an Act of Parliament that no word may be frustrate and insignificant but if this Interpretation shall be put upon it sentencing signing or being any way instrumental then the words Sentencing and Signing need not have been if Instrumental will carry the words Sentencing and signing then these words will carry no force atall especially my Lord when there is no need of any retrospect at all if it be so I know not how far it may look back there is no necessity of putting any comprehensive generality upon this word instrumental but that the plain natural sense will be this That those that did sentence and Sign and those that were instrumental in taking away his life that is those that did abet and comfort that person unknown or justifie or countenance him which is after the Sentencing and not before in the legal sense Next I conceive that a Councellor cannot be said to do any thing vi armis It is said that by force and Arms I did abet c. it is Rhetorical to say that words may be as Swords but legal it is not unless there be something vi armis in the Grammatical sense instrumental in taking away the Kings life it is not said instrumental in order to take away the K. life or instrumental in advising to take away the K. life but instrumental in taking away the K. life My Lord The next thing is that there cannot be any thing to be said to be done by me first not falso because in that sense it must have the operation of mendacity that there must be a lie told in it I did nothing but what I was required to do to set down such and such words I did not invent nor contrive them I heard nothing of it till the tenth day of Jan. My Lord for malitiose that I did not any thing maliciously I hope it will appear in this what I then spoke it was for my Fee it may be called avaritia but not malitia for the Law will imply a malice but when there is no other express ground or reason why the thing was done but here was an express ground to speak for my Fee I hope the Jury will take that into consideration Then Secondly I was not Judicial in the Case I was not Magisterial as any Officer but ministerial As touching examining of witnesses it is a great mistake the Court had power to give an Oath I might be there but I had no power to give an Oath but whether I might ask any question I do not remember but that I should give an Oath that is a falsity then my Lord for proditorie I hope there is nothing at all that appears to the Jury so that there was no malice nor trayterous intention in the thing There are some matters of Law which I desire your Lordships will give me leave to speak to and that your Lordships will be of Counsel with me I would offer something concerning his Majesties gracious Declaration from Breda to the Parliament I was then in Ireland I did put in a Petition to the honourable Commissioners before any exception was that I might have the benefit of that Declaration I did lay hold of it My Lords there are two things in that Declaration that I would offer His Majesty saith that for the restoring of the Kings Peers and people of the Kingdom to their just rights and liberties He will grant a free and general Pardon to all excepting such as shall be by Parliament excepted and within three or four lines after it is said a free Parliament though I do not in the
confesso was afflicted with the delays how angry he was when he was interrupted Is it not proved to you that he was at first against the thing and said it was a base business when he was engaged in it said that he was a Servant of the people of this Kingdome what doth he do at last when the thing had gone far he speaks that which is the only truth which I have yet heard from him He must dye and Monarchy then must perish with him from which Event good Lord deliver us Sir Edward Turner My Lord the substance of the defence that the Prisoner hath made at the Bar with much skill and cunning may be referred to two heads The first to the Statute of the 25 of Edward the 3. The second to the late Act of Oblivion for the first my Lord he saith that his fact is not comprized within that Statute saith he I did never conspire or imagine the death of the King nor did believe that would be a consequent of their actings It was expresly proved that himself did say that the King must die and Monarchy with him but Gentlemen though he had said true that it had not been proved or that he did not believe that would be a consequent yet my Lord I must tell you that every step of this Tragedy was Treason the summoning themselves that was Treason every proceeding upon that was Treason the summoning of their meetings in the Painted Chamber coming into Westminster-Hall every person as instrumental those that came to act the least part in that Tragedy were every one guilty of Treason what saith he I acted as a Councellour for my see It was that see that Judas had the 30. pieces of silver that made him hang himself He goes further and tells you there must be no semblable Treasons this is clear the conspiring and imagining the death of the King that 's the Treason that is mentioned in the Act Treason by the Common Law though this be not named the killing of the King yet all these proceedings are demonstrations to you there was a Secret Imagination to kill him Then to the Act of Oblivion his Argument is That because the Act saith that if they had Sentenced signed or been Instrumental in the death of the King that they should be excepted but it is not said or otherwise Instrumental that therefore this should refer to subsequent not precedent Acts that 's a strange Exposition take it Grammatically it hath the most large construction Instrumental more large than if they had said or otherwise for it doth comprehend every thing There having been so full an answer already I will be short I will not meddle with his civil debts but with his Political If a man kill another though he doth repent the Magistrate must do Justice in terrorem Though he doth repent I hope in God he doth so The Magistrates your Lordships must do Justice in terrorem I desire that Justice may be done upon that man He said it was no Treason to demand Justice against the King because he did but demand it I hope he will think it no unkindness in me to desire judgement against him because it is just Mr. Wadham Windham As I understand the Prisoner at the Bar the chief argument which he shelters himself under was his profession which gives a blast to all of us of the long robe I will not mince his arguments saith he here was a Court I was appointed Sollicitor and saith he for men to practise before those that have not a proper Judicature it is not Felony Murther or Treason I would not willingly mince his Argument and that I was appointed and the words dictated to me and a Councellor carrying himself within the compass of his profession is not answerable but if he will exceed his bounds his profession is so far from sheltring him that as it hath been opened it is very much an aggravation it is the duty of a Councellor to give Counsel if a man shall come to me and ask counsel and I shall counsel him to kill a man am not I accessary to that murder Words by his argument will not amount to Treason if the fact follows I am as guilty as if I did the fact in point of Treason it is all one as if I had done that very act If Mr. Cook did advise that Act or was instrumental he is as much a Traytor as the man in the Frock that did the Execution for his profession truly my Lord I do not think that a Counseller is always bound to know the patent of him that sits as Judge that will not be his Case here was no ordinary Warrant of Law to carry on Justice Grotius saith in case of necessity for carrying on Justice there may be many things allowed I pray where did Mr. Cook read of such a Court as a High Court of Justice there was never such a High Court of Justice read of in the Law then as this was a mock Court so under good favour it was a mock Jurisdiction Was there any Law under Heaven to put the King to death is it not out of the compass of all Courts whatsoever to do it and under good favour my Lord this is but to shelter a mans self under colour of Justice to do the most execrable Treason in the World I have no more to say to you Lo. Ch. Bar. I would repeat the Evidence and your answer to you if you have any thing new speak to it Cook This is new it was said by one that if there had been no charge there had been no sentence given in the Case I say that the Indictment or Charge is no part of the Tryal by the Statute of Magna Charta The Peers of the Land shall be tryed by Peers but are indicted by the Countrey I conceive by what they have said they do make me causal of the Kings death It is said in the Indictment there was a power I say this I did not assume any power it cannot be said if Council be come in to an unlawful power that he takes the power but stands with respect at the Bar. At Assises Judgement passes the Clerk of the Assises he is not instrumental in taking away life for that which Mr. Starkey should say that I should say The King must die and Monarchy with him I humbly beg that the Jury would take notice of what Mr. Nut. said that I told him there was no intention of taking away the Kingslife and besides it is but a single witness I hope there must be two witnesses in point of Law to convict a man of High Treason Lo. Ch. Baron Mr. Cook you said right but even now that if there was any thing in matter of Law which the Court knows of which may be of advantage to you they are of Council to you and so they ought to be Cook I think your Lordships L. Ch. Bar. I shall repeat the whole Evidence and
begin with that first we are upon our Oaths the Witnesses that are against you I took notice of them you have had a great deal of Liberty which you have made use of civilly but Sir for the fact I think it is a great deal more full than as you have answered First The first witness produced against you was Mr. Nutley I shall speak only the material parts that concern your Charge He swears expresly that he saw Price a Scrivener writing a Charge in the Court of Wards that he saw his Charge in your hands He saw afterwards when the King of blessed memory was brought as a Prisoner that there you delivered the Charge in there is more than words you delivered that Charge in that alone is an overt act then if ther were nothing else in that Case that a man in a paper should call the King Traytor Tyrant Murtherer and implacable enemy as there the words are and he deliver this paper and this be read if this be not an overt act of imagining and compassing the Kings death I do not know what an overt act is and he gives further evidence if I mistake take free liberty to interrupt me Cook Sir they were not my words but their words that commanded me Lo. Chief Baron This I say that this very thing alone such a paper approved by you delivering this paper to an Assembly requiring it may be read this is an overt act to prove the imagination of your heart for the Death of the King the reason is if the King should be a Tyrant a Traytor c. it stirs up hatred in the people and the consequences of that hatred is the death of the Prince The next thing that Mr. Nutley said was this He said that you demanded positively Judgement against him against the blessed King then Prisoner at the Bar. I remember you said that you did demand Judgement but that you did not demand Judgement against the King take it so whether you did or not though you shall find in some other Witnesses that I shall repeat that you said Judgement against the King the consequence will be the same who could you demand Judgement against but the King he was the Prisoner because he did demand a further hearing by the Parliament you urged that his Charge might be taken pro Confesso then it must needs be Judgement against the K. it is effectively and implicitely the same He went further and that was that being your friend acquaintance acknowledging your parts as a Lawyer which truly I do very much know my self and do know this Gentleman to be a man of very great parts in his profession he had familiar acquaintaince with you he told you what a base business it was and you did your self acknowledge it said the Prisoner to M. Nutley himself it is a base business but they put it upon me He did discourse further to him of the Oaths of Allegiance Supremacy which he knew very well no man better this Gentleman he very ingenuously confessed it saying I confess it is so they put me upon it I cannot avoid it but then excuses it I am the servant of the people Afterwards he pressed the K. to answer positively whether guilty or not guilty the pressing of the K. to answer what was it in effect but to hasten Judgement and that was to hasten his death so that that is the substance of Mr. Nutley's testimony that he pressed Judgment Judgement was demanded by the Prisoner now at the Bar it is not only demanded but pressed and all the current of the witnesses at several days are to this purpose it is true that I may repeat the whole for you and against you that this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar when Mr. Nutley did urge this to him said he hoped they did not intend to take away the Kings life I verily believe they do not intend to take away the Kings life I hope they do not But Mr. Cook it is no excuse to say you hope or you believe they will not c. How far it may be in such a crime something in extenuation in foro Coeli but not in foro Civili you opened it your self that if a man should go about to take the K. Prisoner it is Treason the Law adjudged that to be Treason when you knew they would condemn him as a Tyrant Murtherer c. you must easily believe what would follow such a condemnation Truly death that is no colour of excuse in foro Civili Farrington swears to the same purpose that he saw you having a Parchment in your hands delivering it in prayed it might be read as a Charge of the People you did not speak I deliver this in as from those that deliver'd it to me that was not in the paper that you said of your self My brethren will tell you all this is an apparent point of the imagination of your heart at that time he swears the same thing that you did desire it might be taken pro Confesso Master Bodurdo is the third he swears the same thing too that you exhibited a charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then at the Bar tells you the substance of it he saith that all but the first day you demanded Judgement for not pleading to the Charge he adds that you complained of the delaies I am sure that was not dictated to you that could not be thought that you should desire Judgement for the Prisoner It is very true which you say for your self in that that you did not demand it first till it was demanded by the Court Master Bodurdo tells you and so it was granted the first day that Bradshaw onely said it but afterwards that you alwaies demanded it The next was Master Herne he swears the same words again that you did in the Name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the People of England exhibit a Charge c. These are your own words if you did exhibit a Charge against the King to exhibit a Charge of High Treason the very thing followed If it were so there was death so certainly there cannot be a greater expression of the imagination of a mans heart than that is it is true you asked then a question and that was whether that that you concluded was not that you desired them to proceed according to Justice it is true the words of the Charge are so but before you come to conclusion you charge him as a Traytor Tyrant c. Communis Hostis after you had given that Charge you demanded Justice those that spit in his face they demanded Justice every one knew what belonged to that Justice Then Baker he swears positively that you did exhibit the Charge in this manner he said this that you said you had exhibited a Charge of High Treason c. and that the King sought delays there is your insisting upon it he sayes further that you said these words
that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
more unless he was present and see it but you owned the Charge and there your name is that besides the two Witnesses there is your own actions to prove it When two Witnesses shall swear it is like your hand and you own that Charge I must leave it to the Jury you say you did this after command the words were dictated to you the words were conceptis verbis appointed and ordered by the Court but the pressing was yours he stands upon delays let it be taken pro confesso demanding Judgement these were your words another man may dictate a thing but you are not forced to speak it you urged it owned it you demanded not in the name of the Court but in the name of all the People of England you say further that your demanding Justice is not within the Statute as I said before what can be the effect of demanding Justice but that the King should die upon those premises you say further that it was in behoof of the King as you would urge it to do the King a Courtesie in asking the King might have Justice but you did not name what Justice it was but you did him a Courtesie truly the King was but a little beholden to you for that request all the world knows what that demanding of Justice was it was to have the Kings head cut off you went as far as you could it ended with you when you demanded Justice that is as far as you could you cut off the head S. Paul when the Witnesses laid down the clothes at his feet he said I killed Stephen the Martyr You say further that in all Tragedies the Accuser or Witness the Jury the Judge and executioner are the only persons and you are none of these you are only of Council if Justice was not done what was it to you you said you did not assume a power there was only Eloquence required in the Councel it hath been truly said that this is a great aggravation to be of Councel against the King you said his Majesty was then a Prisoner and accused Counsel cannot be heard against the King you undertake to be Counsel against the King in his own person and in the highest Crime if the Council at the Barr in behalf of his Client should speak Treason he went beyond his sphere but you did not only speak but acted Treason you said you used not a disrespective word to the King truly for that you hear what the witnesses have said you pressed upon him you called it a delay you termed him not the King but the Prisoner at the Bar at every word you say you did not assume an authority it is an assumption of authority if you countenance and allow of their authority you say you do not remember you demanded Judgement against the King that is fully proved against you you your self asked the question whether you did say against the King he did not remember but others positively that you demanded Judgement against the King and Prisoner at the Bar you said that before Sentence there was not an intention to put the King to death to that Mr. Starkey swears that you expresly said the King must die and Monarchy with him and this before the sentence whereas you say this is but one witness that there is to be in Treason two witnesses but that there should be two witnesses to every particular that is an Evidence of the fact that is not Law if to one particular that is an Evidence there be one witness another to another here are two witnesses within the meaning of the Statute two witnesses to the Indictment compassing and imagining the Death of the King being accompanied with other circumstances this one witness if you believe him is as good as twenty witnesses because other overt acts are expresly proved by several witnesses You say next for the drawing of the Charge in right reason it ought to be counted for the service of the King First you do acknowledge and truly very ingenuously that in the time of peace to bring him to the Bar not being a prisoner is Treason you say it according to the Law and that you delivered the charge for the accelerating of the Charge and that it was not done by you traiterously you say the King was a Prisoner before and you say what hands he was in in the hands of men of power and violence it had been your duty to have delayed it not accelerated it that there might have been some means of prevention of that bloody act that followed if you knew that to be Treason to make him a prisoner Subjects do not use to make Kings Prisoners but Death follows You urge in the next place the Act of Indemnity and that you are not excepted for that you have made as much of it as the matter will bear yet you must consider First as a rule in Law that where they are general words when they come to be explained by the particulars you shall not include them within the general Mark the very words they are these Provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to pardon discharge or give any other benefits whatsoever unto such and such among whom you are named nor any of them nor to those two persons or either of them who being disguised by Frocks and Vizards did appear upon the Scaffold erected before White-Hall upon the thirtieth of January 1648. All which persons these are the words First It shall not extend to you then it comes All which persons for their execrable Treason in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being Instrumental in taking away the Precious Life of our late Soveraign Lord CHARLES the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to His late Majestie according to the Laws of England and are out of this present Act wholly excepted and foreprized First as I told you before and as it was very well said by Master Sollicitor admitting the reason had been mistaken and that you had not been comprehended in the reason you are excepted out of the body provided it shall not extend c. Many times Laws do make recitals which in themselves are sometimes false in point of fact that which is the Law is positive words the other words are for the reason Excepting all which that is Master Cook which persons are excepted not for doing of it but for his execrable crimes in being instrumental It is clear without that if it were not so we say when a Sentence is or such a one or such a one the third Or makes all disjunctive Here are three Or 's first in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument then comes this or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign c. this Or doth clearly exclude the other two or instrumental not only in point of death but further being neither a Sentencer Signer or being
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
equitie of the Act. They had not all the Authority at that time they were a few of the people that did it they had some part of the Army with them the Lords were not dissolved then when they had adjourned some time they did sit afterwards so that all the particulars you alledge are against you The last thing was this you say that it having pleased God to restore the King Judgement should be given for example for terrour to others that this could not be drawn into example again why because by the blessing of God peace was restored no probability that if your life was spared that it would be drawn again into example this is the weakest thing you have urged you must know the reason there are two things there is the punishment and example punishment goes to the prisoner but example to the documents of all others God knows what such things may be in after ages if there should be impunity for them it would rather make men impudent and confident afterwards if you have any more to say I will hear you if not I must conclude to the Jury You hear the evidence is clear for compassing and imagining the Death of the King you have heard what he has said and what he hath done he has within and examined Witnesses against the King that he was by at the drawing of the charge where it was drawn you hear he exhibited this charge in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England and what this charge is it is high Treason and other high misdemeanors you find that he does complain of delays dosagain and again speak of this Charge desire it may be taken pro confesso in the close of all it was not so much he as innocent blood that demanded Justice this was more than was dictated to him You have heard the Witnesses he was perswaded to forbear acknowledged the King to be a gracious and wise King The Oaths alledged against him and you have heard his excuse I have nothing to say more I shall be very willing to hear you further I have not absolutely directed the Jury Cook I do humbly acknowledge your patience in hearing me and that your Lordships have truly and justly stated both proofs and my answer If your Lordships are pleased to lay aside these Acts or Orders or Authority whereby I did at that time truly conscientiously act and did think that it would bear me out if you lay aside that and look upon it as so many men got together without authority and aswell those that were instrumental though not sentencers or signers and that clause in the Act I confess I humbly make bold to say I have not received satisfaction in my judgment those very words of not so much I as the innocent blood cries for justice were dictated to me there was nothing at all left to me because his Majesty did not plead there was no Tryal that which I did was according to the best though it may be according to the weakest part of my judgment I have no new matter L. Ch. Bar. You have said no new matter unless it be worse than before for now you warrant that Authority Cook Do not mistake me my Lord I mean so far as to excuse me in the point of High Treason L. C. B. We delivered our opinions as to that formerly we were of opinion that the acting by colour of that pretended authority was so far from any extenuation that it was an aggravation of the thing the meeting by that authoty was Treason and in them that acted under them and approving of it the making of that trayterous pretended Act making the Proclamation sitting upon it they were all so many Treasons That was the reason why that was urged against you assuming upon you the power that was you approving of their power by acting under them so that there is nothing more to be said Gentlemen of the Jury you have heard the indictment was for compassing and imagining the death of the King you have heard the several Overt acts repeated and whether these are guilty of Treason to deliver in a charge against the K. such a one as that was in these words as against a Traytor Tyrant Murderer and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth in these very words to desire Judgement against the Prisoner then the King at the Bar angry at delayes to desire that the Charge might be taken pro confesso to have it expresly again again to demand Judgement if these be not Overt acts of compassing and imagining the Death of the King that which hath been said by the Witnesses it must be left to you I think you need not go from the Bar. Jury went together Silence is commanded Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall speak for you Jury The Fore-man Clerk John Cook hold up thy hand look upon the Prisoner at the Bar how say you is he guilty of the Treason in manner form as he stands indicted or not guilty Fore-man Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper Clerk What Goods and Chattells Jury None that we know of The Tryal of Hugh Peters the same 13. of October and at the same Bar. Clerk of the Crown SET Hugh Peters to the Bar he was brought accordingly H. P. Hold up thy hand thou standest indicted c. If you will challenge any of the Jury you must challenge them when they come to the book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Peters You may challenge to the number of 35 peremptiorily but beyond that you cannot without good cause shewn and you may have Pen Ink and Paper Peters My Lord I shall challenge none Jury sworn 12. Sir Jer. Whitch James Hally Christo Abdy Nich. Rainton Rich. Cheyney Jo. Smith Rich. Abell George Terry Charl. Pickern Jo. Nichol. Fran. Dorrington Anthony Hall Cler. Hugh Peters hold up thy hand Look on the Prisoner you that are sworn c. Sir Ed. Turner to the Jury You have often heard repeated to you that the substantial part of the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King and all the rest will be but evidence to prove that imagination against the Prisoner at the Bar whom we will prove to be a principal actor in this sad Tragedy and next to him whom God hath taken away and reserved to his own Judgment and we shall endeavour to prove That he was a chief Conspirator with Cromwell at serveral times and in several places and that it was designed by them We shall prove that he was the principal person to procure the Souldiery to cry out Justice Justice or assist or desire those for the taking away the life of the King He did make use of his profession wherein he should have been the Minister of peace to make himself a Trumpeter of war of Treason and Sedition in the Kingdom He preached many Sermons to the Souldiery in direct
You know your self sure how many years since 1648. Peters How long before the King dyed do you say Clough About three weeks or a month before the King was murdered Coun. We shall call a witness to prove that in Decemb. 1648. there was a solemn Fast appointed to seek God in what they were about and Mr. Peters was appointed to preach before them Mr. Beaver Sworn Mr. Beavers Evidence My Lord and you Gentlemen of the Jury upon a day that was appointed for a Fast for those that sate then as a Parliament I went to Westminster to find out some company to dine with me and having walked bout an hour in Westminster-Hall and finding none of my friends to dine with me I went to that place called Heaven and dined there after I had dined I passed through St. Margarets Church-yard to go home again I lay in the Strand I perceived all the Church-yard full of Muskets and Pikes upon the ground and asked some Souldiers that were there what was the business they told me they were guarding the Parliament that were keeping a Fast at St. Margarets who preaches said I they told me Mr. Peters is just now gone up into the Pulpit said I I must needs have the curiosity to hear that man having heard many stories of the manner of his preaching God knows I did not do it out of any manner of devotion I crouded near the Pulpit and came near the Speakers Pew and I saw a great many of the Members there whom I knew well I could not guess what his Text might be but hearing him talk much of Barabbas and our Saviour and insisting altogether upon that I guessed his Text was that passage wherein the Jews did desire the release of Barabbas and crucifying of Christ and so it proved the first thing I heard him say was it is a very sad thing that this should be a question amongst us as among the old Jews whether our Saviour Jesus Christ must be crucified or that Barabbas should be released the oppressor of the people O Jesus said he where are we that that should be a question amongst us saies he And because that you should think my Lords and Gentlemen that it is a question I will tell you it is a question I have been in the City which may very well be compared to Hierusalem in this conjuncture of time and I profess those foolish Citizens for a little trading and profit they will have Christ pointing to the Redcoats on the Pulpit stairs crucified and that great Barabbas at Windsor released sayes he but I do not much heed what the rabble sayes I hope sayes he that my brethren of the Clergy will be wiser the lips of the Priests do use to preserve knowledge I have been with them too in the Assembly and having seen and heard what they said I perceive they are for crucifying of Christ and releasing of Barabbas O Jesus what shall we do now with such like strange expressions and shrugging of his shoulders in the Pulpit Councel How long was this before the King was murdered It was a few dayes before the house of Commons made that thing called An Act for his Tryal Coun. What did he say to the Members I am coming to it sayes he My Lords and you noble Gentlemen of the House of Commons you are the Sanhedrim and the great Councel of the Nation therefore you must be sure to do Justice and it is from you we expect it you must not only be inheritors of your Ancestors but you must do as they did they have opposed Tyrannical Kings they have destroyed them it is you chiefly that we look for Justice from Do not prefer the great Barabbas Murderer Tyrant and Traytor before these poor hearts pointing to the Redcoats and the Army who are our Saviours and thus for two or three hours time that he spent he did nothing but rake up all the reasons arguments and examples he could to perswade them to bring the King to condign speedy and capital punishment Peters I do not know you are you sure you saw me at that time Do you know me Yes Sir Peters I did not preach there at that time Coun. Pray my Lord will you call Mr. Jessop who hath the Records of the Parlia and can produce the Order whereby you were appointed to carry on the work of that Fast there was the Order for his preaching and Order for thanks for his work Mr. Jessop produced the Journal wherein was the Order following which was read Cl. reads Die Jovis 7. Septemb. 1648. Resolved that there be a day of publick Humiliation for this House to seek God in these times of difficulty and that to morrow be the day and kept here in this House Resolved that Mr. Peters Mr. Marshal and Mr. Caril be desired to perform the duty on the day of Humiliation with the House to morrow Coun. That is not it we intend there was one after that in Decemb. 1648. Cl. reads 20 Decemb. 1648. Ordered that Mr. Peters be desired to preach on Friday next the day of publick Humiliation at Margarets Westminster in the place of Coun. Call Mr. Chase After this the work went on and the High Court of Justice sate and the first day they sate was Saturday the 20. Jan. in Westminster Hall the 21. being the Sunday following I think this Gentleman was at Whitehall he will tell you what he preached Mr. Chase sworn Chase My Lord I heard the Prisoner at the Bar preaching before Oliver Cromwell and Bradshaw who was called Lord President of the High Court of Justice and he took his Text out of the Psalms in these words Bind your Kings with chains and your Nobles in fetters of iron that was part of the Text But sayes he in his Sermon Beloved it is the last Psalm but one and the next Psalm hath six verses and twelve Hallelujahs praise ye the Lord Praise God in his Sanctuary and so on for what saies he look into my Text there is the reason of it That Kings were bound in chains c. He went on with a story of Major and a Bishop and his man the Bishops man saith he being drunk the Major laid him by the heels the Bishop sends to the Major to know by what authority he imprisoned his servant the Majors answer was there is an Act of Parliament for it and neither the Bishop nor his man are excepted out of it and applyed it thus Here is saith he a great discourse and talk in the world what will ye cut off the Kings head the head of a Protestant Prince and King turn to your Bibles and you shall find it there Whosoever sheds mans blood by man shall his blood be shed saies he I will even answer them as the Major did the Bishop here is an Act of God Whosoever sheds mans blood by man shall his blood be shed and I see neither King Charles nor Prince Charles nor Prince Rupert nor Prince
come to the matter Peters My Lord I cannot remember them Lord Ch. Baron Then I will remember you you are charged by this Indictment for compassing and imagining the death of the King and there is set forth sundry particulars to prove the overt act that you with other persons named in that Indictment did consult and meet together how to bring about the Kings death Then you are charged with several Acts of contriving and endeavouring the Kings death Overt acts that tend to the compassing or imagining the Kings death or any one of these to encourage the bringing on the King to his death the consulting or meeting together about it though you did not sit or sentence yet if you did any thing tending to that incouragement or otherwise abet it comfort or any wise ayd those trayterous persons that did it in the doing of it you are by law guilty of the whole fact the proposing and determining the King shall die though you were not he that actually put him to death yet notwithstanding if you did the other you are guilty of all if you shall speak any seditious speeches be they in the Pulpit or out of the Pulpit if you shall utter any thing that tends to sedition these are open acts which prove the imagination of the heart though imagination of the heart be Treason yet it cannot be proved but by open acts yet the imagination it self is Treason first you did conspire all the witnesses go along to prove this Dr. Young saith you came over from Ireland to his house and after five days that you were recovered of the Flux you staid there ten weeks you said your self there was enough if it were true to condemn you or any man I shall repeat it to you you told him a narrative that you came from New England from thence to Ireland and then you came to Holland with an intent to see how you might bring on the Kingdom to be a Commonwealth next he saith you spake very often against the King by way of disgrace against him and his family against the King and his off-spring this you said very often then you spake in vilification of Monarchical Government that this Commonwealth would never be at peace till 150. or three L's Lords Levites and Lawyers were taken away at which he replyed then they must be all Switzers Tinkers or Traytors he swears you were a Colonel and had a Commission that you would have had him accept of a Commission and that you had two Companies come from the West you told him the Parliament had an intent to secure Cromwel and your self but that you rid hard for it and then you confessed you agreed then upon his death to bring him to tryal and to cut off his head you did agree together and he believes it was your advice to Cromwel your answer was this that he was more violent than your self that he took upon him to be a spie and that he was no competent witness because he was under a temptation because you did not help him to his living and so conceived it to be malice you say he was used to take up such courses in his own Country the matter is not whether you had malice to the Kings life or Monarchy For the next one Gunter he swears that he was a Servant to Mr. Hildesly at the Star in Coleman-street and this was in 1648. he saith that many of the party of Cromwel did use to resort thither among the rest he saw you he said he came in to them and their discourse was about Charles Stewart and the Prisoner and did guess it was about the King that you were privy to it then he saih this was three daies before O. Cromwel went out of Town the effect of that is urged no further than this that you were so far of the Cabal that you were present with those persons Cromwel Ireton Rich and others you said I was there once with Mr. Nathaniel Fines Starkey he saith that at his Fathers house Ireton lay and was quartered there at Windsor before and when the King was Prisoner that you had your quarter there and Cromwel too in that Town The general meeting of the Councel of War was at his Fathers house there Ireton and his Wife lying there you came and resorted thither very often he saith then that it appeared that after the Councel of War had done many times Rich and you and Cromwel and Ireton were there together sometimes till two a clock in the morning he saith then that he did observe there was a fifth person he did not remember his name you sate up usually till two or three in the morning you had guards about you he saith further that Ireton being a Domestick he often discoursed with him and you came sometimes to be there too that there being some discourse concerning the King many times he did assert the Law concerning him that he was solutus legibus as to his person that you should say that it was an unequal law and that you did then discourse fully against the K. Government you said he was a Tyrant and not fit for that office that the office was useless chargeable and dangerous these very words he observed which afterwards were printed when they took away Monarchy He saith further that was their full and whole discourse he saith that his Father at Supper used to say that usual Grace God save the King Prince and Realm but afterwards that he heard the King was made a Prisoner that his Father altering the Grace he said God save his most Excellent Majesty and deliver him out of all his Enemies hands you rose up and said old Gentleman your Idol will not stand long That he did observe you often with them he saith further when Bacon was coming out and speaking some words concerning your frequent affronting the King you took up a staff and were ready to beat him and made an uproar it appears also of your being privy to Cromwels actions the next witness is Walkeley and he swears this against you that he was in the Painted Chamber the next day after the Proclamation was made and there he saw John Goodwin and You and there was an assembly and at the middle of the Table John Goodwin was and made a long speech or prayer that Cromwel would have had the people stay there but it was ordered they should be turned out at the end he saw you come out with the rest there it appeared you were in the consultation he saith he met the Army at St. James's and there when they were half past he saw the King in his Coach and there he saw Mr. Peters like Bishop Almoner riding immediately before the King and at St. James's Park he saw you marshalling the Souldiers that he was forced thereupon to go about he saith further that within a year or two after the Army was raised he heard you say these words If we can
actually guilty of putting the King to death nay admitting in charity you had no intent to go as far as you did you are by the laws of Christ and this Nation guilty of high Treason in that you that are a Lawyer know very well and I speak it that you may lay it to your heart in the convictions of your conscience I must say to you as Joshua said to Achan my son give glory to God and confess and it would become you so to do you know very well it is the law of this Nation that no one house nor both houses of Parliament have any coercive power over the King much less to put him to death you know as you cited very well that the imprisoning of the King is Treason You know both of you this is an undoubted truth the rule of Law is that the King can do no wrong that is the King can do no wrong in the estimation of Law he may do some particular Acts as a private person but he can do little prejudice in his own person if he would hurt any it must be by Ministers in that case the Law provides a remedy if he doth it by Ministers they must answer for it The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown what is that It is not to do what he will no but it is that he shall not be punished in his own person if he doth that which in it self is unlawful Now remember this when you took the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy I presume you both did so what was your oath of Supremacy It was this that the King was the only Supream Governour of these Realms it goes farther as he was Supream Governour so he was the only Supream Governour that excludes Coordination you swear farther that you will to the utmost of your power defend the King against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever truly you that were a Lawyer when you had thus sworn your fee could be no excuse against what you had sworn to We know that the King in his politick or natural capacity is not only salus populi but salus Reipublicae The Law hath taken care that the people shall have justice and right the Kings person ought not to be touched the King himself is pleased to judge by the Law you see he doth by Law question the death of his Father he doth not judge it himself but the Law judges it Mr. Peters knows very well he subscribed the 39. Articles of Religion look upon them that were made in 1552. and upon those Articles that were confirmed in 13. Elizabeth the King is there acknowledged to have the chief power in these Nations the medling with the King was a Jesutical doctrine This I speak not that the King should or ought to govern but by the Fundamental laws of the land they that keep within the bounds of the law are happy you that are a Lawyer know this in point of law and you that are a Divine know this in point of Divinity You both know the truth of it and when you have thought upon it I hope you will reflect upon that horrid crime the shedding of Royal Blood You see he had granted all those grievances of the people taken them away secured them for the future and at this very time when this horrid act was done you see he had granted all at the desire of the people he had made those concessions such as were it not in respect of others more than those that treated themselves they thought was more than could be expected by the Nation You that had a hand in the Kings death it falls upon you the guilt of it because you were some of those instruments that assisted those persons that broke the Treaty prepare your selves for that death which you are to die it is a debt which we all owe to nature if in this case there is something of shame comes to you it is that you must take as part of the reward of your sin The only work I have now to do is to pronouce the Judgment and this is the judgment of the Court and the Court doth award That both of you be led back to the place from whence you came and from thence shall be drawn upon a hurdle c. and the Lord have mercy upon your souls Cl. Cryer make proclamation Cryer O yes c. All manner of persons c. and all Jurors and witnesses are to appear at this place to morrow morning at seven of the Clock in the morning upon pain of 100. l. a piece So God bless King Charles c. 15. Octo. 1660. at the Sessions House in the Old Bailey The Tryal of William Howlet Memorandum that the Bill of Indictment against William Hewlet alias Howlet was found at Hickes-hall 12 Octob. instant Proclamation of the Court being made Clerk of the Crown SET William Hewlet alias Howlet to the Bar which was done accordingly Cl. William Hewlet alias Howlet hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason in the County of Middlesex by the name of William Hewlet alias Howlet for that thou c. How sayest thou art thou guilty of the High Treason whereof thou hast been Indicted and art now arraigned or not guilty Hewlet I am not guilty my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be tryed Hewlet By God and the Country Cl. God send thee a good delivery Set him aside Octob. 15. 1660. Clerk of the Crown Set Axtell to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Daniel Axtell hold up thy Hand Axtell Pray my Lord let me have Pen and Ink. L. Ch. Bar. Give Mr. Axtell Pen and Ink. Cler. Daniel Axtell these men that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. if you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Do you know how many you have liberty to challenge because I would not have you misinformed 35 you may challenge peremptorily and no more Axtell I thank you Lordship L. Ch. Bar. Unless you have any particular cause if so you may challenge more Axtell I confess I am wholly ignorant of the law John Kirke John Smith Thomas Morris Ralph Halsell John Sherecroft Francis Beale Robert Cromwell John Gallyerd John Shelbury George Rithe were called and by the Prisoner challenged Thomas Bide Charles Pitfield Robert Sheppard William Dod Thomas Vsman William Maynerd George Plucknet Samuel Harris John Nicoll of Hendon Henry Marsh Thomas Bishop Thomas Snow in all 12 were admitted and sworn of the Jury Cler. of the Crown If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Cl. Daniel Axtell hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner you that are sworn and harken to your charge you shall understand that the prisoner stands Indicted c. K. Council May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are Sworn of this Jury The High Court
of Injustice that was Erected for Tryal of the late King it had all the formalities of a Court to put in Execution that bloody Act they had their President their Council their Chaplain and their Guards some of their Judges have been already Tryed one of their Council and their Chaplain Now my Lord we come to the Guards and this Gentleman at the Bar that is now the Prisoner He was Commander of that Black Guard that cruel and bloody Guard The Indictment is That he did Imagin and compass the Death of the King there be several overt acts that are mentioned in the Indictment as Evidences of that Imagination as the consultation to bring him to Tryal the Actual bringing him to Tryal and the Bloody Execution upon the Scaffold Our Evidence shall be this That during the time of the Tryal the Prisoner at the Bar did Command the Souldiers in Westminster-Hall himself did keep the Entrance into the Court and when Bradshaw did speak to the King and told him he trifled away time and required his answer to the charge exhibited in the Name of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament and the good People of England that a Noble person in the Gallery there cryed out it was a Lye saying that above half the Commons disowned it saying where are these good people it is a lye Oliver Cromwel is a Traytor this bloodly Fellow commanded the Souldiers to shoot her he did several times command and encourage the Souldiers to cry out Justice justice and the last day of that horrid Tryal called by them the day of Judgement he likewise commanded them to cry out Execution Execution and when some of them would not do it he had the Valour to Beat them My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury if we prove any of these particulars to demonstrate unto you that he was Guilty of compassing and imagining the King's Death it is equal as if we had proved he did Actually cut off the King's head Mr. Bodurdoe Mr. Nutly Mr. Harrington Sir Purback Temple Mr. Sympson Mr. Baker Mr. Huncks and Mr. Jeoner Sworn Coun. Mr. Symp. tell my Lords and the Jury who had the command of the Souldiers during the Tryal of the King in Westminster-Hall Sym. My Lords as I said before in the Case of Mr. Peters Col. Stubberd and Col. Axtel had the command of the Souldiers below Stairs near that which was called the High Court of Justice Axtell I desire to know his Name my Lord Sym. My Name is Holland Sympson Coun. Did you see him there commanding the Souldiers Sym. There was a kind of a Hubbub in the Court there was a Lady they said it was the Lady Fairfax who at the Exhibiting of the Charge against the King said to be in the Name of the Commons and people of England She spoke out aloud and said it was a lye that not half not a quarter of the people Oliver Comwell is a Rogue and a Traytor they called for a Guard this Gentleman he was called and brought up some Musqueteers and commanded his Souldiers to Present and give Fire against the Lady and commanded her to Unmask Axtell What Lady was it I desire to know Sim. She went by the name of the Lady Fairfax I know not whether it was so or no it was the common report it was she Cl. Mr. H. pray tell my Lord what you know of the Prisoner at the Bar. Huncks My Lord to say positively any thing of the man touching his command I cannot but only that morning the King Dyed he came into the Door of the Room where Colonel Phayre Colonel Hacker Cromwell and my self were Ireton and Harrison lying in bed together in the same Room and then he stood at the Door half in and half out I refusing to Sign an Order for Executing the King as Cromwell ordered me and some little cross Language having passed saith the Prisoner at the Bar Colonel Huncks Iam ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor This I appeal to your self but for crying out Knock them down Shoot them I know not who it was the Officers cryed Justice and some of the Souldiers but I profess I know not who it was particularly but they cryed Justice and then I fell a trembling for I was afraid of the King but these were the words he used to me will you strike sayle c. Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question L. Ch. Bar. Ask him what you will Axtell If I am not in the right I hope your Lordships will direct me L. Ch. Bar. Go on Axtell Col. Huncks where was it Huncks In a little Room in White hall where Ireton and Harrison lay in bed together Axtell Do you know whereabouts Huncks I think I can go to the Room I appeal to your own conscience before all this people Axtell By your favour Sir the Room I perceive you know not and truly Sir My Lord if you please to give me leave because he appeals to my conscience I do appeal to the Great God before whom it may be I may be Arraigned to give an account of all my Words thoughts and Actions I do not remember that ever I had any converse with this man there or met him there or any of that company there that day he was a stranger to me but I wish that you to save your self being in the Warrant for Execution do not make others a Peace-Offiring to save your self the Lord that knows my heart I appeal to him I appeal to your own conscience because you appeal to my conscience I never met you nor saw you there Huncks Have you done then give me leave you say you do not know me I appeal to the same God when Cromwell took upon him to have the Crown have not I said What have you got by being Jehu-like Lord strike me dead here if it be not true Axtell I will not reflect upon him but because he hath appealed to my conscience therefore I speak it it is known Notoriously how Jehu-like you were when you were one of the chief Guards of his Majesty one of the Fourty Halberteers that did oppose every person then for the King had I had time and had not been a close Prisoner as I was there were Witnesses enough Council This after our Evidence is more proper Huncks Spare me not Col. Axtell L. Ch. Bar. Take the Old and Antient course let the Witnesses that are produced for the King be all heard then give your answer to all of them together Axtell My Memory is not very good L. Ch. Bar. You have Pen Ink and Paper L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell is this all that you desire to speak to Col. Huncks Axtell Yes my Lord. L. Ch. Bar. Have you any other Questions Council My Lord we have a few words he Objects as if Col. Huncks were under a danger he is pardoned Axtell I desire to ask
him upon what account these words were spoke Huncks My Lord it was this Cromwell having a Commission which I think I heard read here Colonel Hacker was reading of it My Lord Cromwell he comes to me and by Vertue of that Commission he would have me to write a Warrant for Executing the King I refusing to write that Warrant upon this which he speaks of that standing at the Door if God bless me I will search all the Doors at Whitehall but I will find it out I not doing it I said why should it be offered to me sayes Cromwell thou art a peevish Fellow Cromwell fell a writing assoon as ever he had done that writing he gave Hacker the pen what Hacker writes I know not and upon my refusing this prisoner at the Bar said Col. Huncks I am now ashamed of you The Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you now strike Sayle before you cast Anchor Council You observe the course of this evidence there was a Warrant or Commission directed to three persons Hacker Huncks and Phaire for Execution of the King Cromwell demanded of this Gentleman Col. Huncks that he should sign a Warrant by Vertue of that other Warrant and this Gentleman refusing it the Prisoner objects this that he to save himself doth witness this against the Prisoner Gentlemen he did refuse the thing have you any thing to ask Col. Huncks Axtell He says Col. Phaire and Hacker were there I do not doubt but they will be so conscientious to vindicate me from all this Charge L. Ch. Bar. If it be any thing that tends to your defence that you will be heard afterwards but have you any Questions to ask Col. Huncks Axtell No more I know nothing of it if I were to dye at this Bar presently Council Sir Purback Temple pray tell my Lords and the Jury your knowledge of the carriage of this Gentleman touching the Tryal of his Late Majesty Sir P. Tem. My Lord being present and engaged by some persons of Honour Servants of his late Majesty to be present when that horrid Murther was acting before this Court of Justice as they called it I was present at all the Tryals of the King and very near him I heard the King demand from Bradshaw by what Authority and Commission they proceeded thus strangely to Try him Then I heard the Lady Fairfax and one Mrs. Nelson my Sister after the exhibiting of the charge in the Name of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the good people of this Kingdom against Charles Stuart King of England I say I heard the said Lady cry out from a Gallery over the Court Not half the people it is false where are they or their Consents Oliver Cromwell is a Traitor Upon which I heard the Prisoner at the Bar cry out Down with the Whores shoot them which made me take the further notice of him seeing him in Westminster-Hall commanding the Souldiers there I saw him the most activest person there and during the time that the King was urging to be heard he was then laughing entertaining his Souldiers scoffing aloud whilst some of the Souldiers by his suffering and I believe procurement did fire powder in the palms of their hands that they did not onely offend his Majesties smell but enforced him to rise up out of his Chair and with his hand to turn away the smoke and after this he turned about to the people and smiled upon them and those Souldiers that so rudely treated him Then turning himself to Bradshaw said to him and the Court There are some sitting here fixing his Eyes upon some persons near Bradshaw that well knew that if I would have Forfeited or Betrayed the Liberties and Rights of the People I need not have come hither or words to this effect But their Liberties and Rights are dearer and nearer to me than my three Kingdoms nay than my life it self Therefore I desire you to hear me and remember that I am your lawful King that have done you many Acts of Grace and Favour After which this person Mr. Axtell Prisoner at the Bar commanded his Souldiers to cry out Justice which the Souldiers not readily obeying of him I saw him beat four or five of them with his Cane until they cried out with himself Justice Justice Execution Execution which made me turn to a Noble Lord by whom I then stood and said Pray my Lord take notice there is not above 4 or 5 that cry out Justice Justice I heard also of their spitting in the Kings Face and I think no bodies sufferings have been so like those of our Saviour Christ Jesus as his Majesties were After this this persons crying Justice Justice Execution Execution a second time the Court proceeded to pass a Sentence the which his Majesty pressed hard against and told him Sir before you pass that ugly Sentence which I very well understand you are intended to do I desire you to hear me hear me hear me passionately and not affectionately expressing it which they denying the King and the notice of Justice Justice Execution Execution being repeated they proceeded and read that ugly Sentence of Death after which his Majesty was immediately hurried away from the Bar into a common Cedan where he was carried by two common Porters which Cedan I followed to the middle of King's Street where I saw the two Porters in reverence go bare till the Souldiers under the Command of the Prisoner at the Bar beat them and would not suffer them to go bare when they carried him After this the people cried out What do you carry the King in a common Cedan as they carry such as have the Plague God deliver your Majesty out of such Enemies hands In which Street I was forced to leave the sight of his Majesty occasioned by the injuries and hurts I received in my person from the Souldiers under Axtel's command they carrying him through the Streets shouting in triumph A short time after I received an importuate command from a Lady of great Honour a Servant of his Majesties that I would endeavour to find out where the body of the Martyr'd King was and to give her an account where it then was Applying my self to Whitehall after two or threescore Intreaties I was denyed but understanding that money would do it I gave the persons then under the command of Mr. Axtell that then kept it to shew it me half a piece who in a scoffing manner took me by the hand said If thou thinkest there is any sanctity or holiness in it look here where I saw the Head of that blessed martyr'd King lie in a Coffin with his Body which smiled as perfectly as if it had been alive this is the sad account of the martyr'd King and this sad horrid Prisoner Mr. Axtell Axtell My Lord may I ask that Gentleman some Questions L. ch Bar. Yes yes Axtell My Lord He seems to say that I bid the Souldiers cry out for Justice he doth
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended
by law that the right of the Militia was in them and your Lordships will remember in several Declarations and Acts that was mutually exchanged between his Majesty and Parliament and my Lord that was the Authority the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament raised a Force and made the Earl of Essex Ceneral and after him the Earl of Manchester of the Eastern Association and after that Sir Tho. Fairfax Lord General of the Forces by this Authority I acted and this Authority I humbly conceive to be legal because this Parliament was called by the Kings Writ chosen by the People and passed a Bill they should not be dissolved without their own consents that the Parliament was in being when the Tryal was and a question whether yet legally Dissolved In the fourth place they were not only owned and obeyed at home but abroad to be the chief Authority of the Nation and also owned by Foreign States and Kingdoms sent Ambassadors to that purpose under them did all the Judges of the Land Act who ought to be the Eye of the Land and the very light of the People to Guide them in their right Actions and I remember the Judges upon Tryal I have read it of High Treason Judg Thorp Nicholas and Jermin have declared it publickly That it was a lawful justifiable thing by the Law of the Land to obey the Parliament of England My Lord it further appears as to their Authority over the People of this Nation petitioning them as the supreme and lawful Authority and My Lords as I have heard it hath been objected that the Houses of Lords and Commons could make no Act. Truly my Lord if you will not allow them to be Acts though they intitle them so call them so and obeyed as so by the Judges Ministers and Officers of State and by all other persons in the Nation yet I hope they cannot be denied to be Orders of Parliament and were they no more but Orders yet were they sufficient as I humbly couceive to bear out such as acted thereby And my Lord the Parliament thus constituted and having made their Generals he by their Authority did constitute and appoint me to be an Inferior Officer in the Army serving them in the quarters of the Parliament and under and within their power and what I have done my Lord it hath been done only as a Souldier deriving my power from the General he had his power from the Fountain to wit the Lords and Commons and my Lord this being done as hath been said by several that I was there and had command at Westminster-Hall truly my Lord if the Parliament command the General and the General the inferiour Officers I am bound by my Commission according to the Laws and Customs of War to be where the Regiment is I came not thither voluntarily but by command of the General who had a Commission as I said before from the Parliament I was no Counsellor no Contriver I was no Parliament-man none of the Judges none that Sentenced Signed none that had any hand in the Execution onely that which is charged is that I was an Officer in the Army if that be so great a crime I conceive I am no more guilty than the Earl of Essex Fairfax or the Lord of Manchester Judg Mallet You are not charged as you were an Officer of the Army Axtell My Lords That is the main thing they do insist upon my Lord I am no more guilty than his Excellency the Lord General Monck who Acted by the same Authority and all the People in the three Nations and my Lord I do humbly suppose if the Authority had been only an Authority in Fact and not Right yet those that Acted under them ought not to be questioned but if the Authority commanded whatsoever offence they committed especially that that guided me was no less than the declared Judgment of the Lords and Commons sitting in Parliament they declared that was their right as to the Militia and having explained several Statutes of Henry the 7th wherein the King having enterchanged Declarations with the Parliament the Parliament comes to make an Explanation on that Statute and my Lord it is in Folio 280. wherein they do positively expound it and declare it as their allowed Judgment To clear up all scruples to all that should take up Arms for them saith the Parliament there as to the Statute of 11. of Henry the 7th Chapter the first which is printed at large comes there to explain it in general and comes here Folio 281. and gives this Judgment It is not say they agreeable to Reason or Conscience that any ones duty should be known if the Judgment of the High Court of Parliament be not a Rule or Guide to them In the next place this is the next Guidance Rule and Judgment of Parliament upon the Exposition of this Statute and as they have said in several places was it not too much to take up your Lordships time they are the proper Judges and Expounders of the Laws The High Court of Parliament have taken upon them to expound the Law and said that we Lawyers will give the meaning of the Text contrary to what they have expounded the meaning under their hands in the same Declaration his Majesty is pleased to quit that Statute upon which I stand Indicted the 25th of Edward the Third where they do my Lord expound that very Statute in the Declaration made in 1643. Folio 722. I come to the declared Judgment wherein they did positively say that the persons that do Act under their Authority ought not to be questioned as persons Guilty Folio 727. that is the Exposition that the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament doth make upon the statute Councel My Lord this is an Argumentation of Discourse in justification of his proceedings we desire to know what he will answer as to the Plea Axtell My Lords I have this further to say that if a House of Commons Assembled in Parliament may be Guilty of Treason for the truth is if I Acted Treason that Acted under the Authority of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and of the Commons in Parliament then doubtless they must begin the Treason if the House of Commons who are the collective body and Representation of the Nation all the people of England who chose them are guilty too and then where will there be a Jury to try this concerning the Commons alone I have been over ruled L. ch Bar. If you have any thing to say to the Lords and Commons answer to your charge your charge is nothing of the Lords and Commons but what you Acted when the house was broke and Forced Coun. You cannot but know that there is nothing charged against you for which you can so much as pretend an Authority of the Lords and Commons you know before you could do this Horrid Murther you were the persons that destroyed the Lords and Commons both indeed you Ravel in a
were the subsequent overtacts to prove the same Axtell I hope you will not think it much to give me some more freedom for my own defence for life My Lord I must needs say though there was a force on the Parliament I am not to justifie it I was no Lawyer no Statesman no Councellor but a Souldier and if the General who had a Commission from the Lords and Commons and that some years before and after the King's Death be not guilty of Treason what I did was by command from my General and though I am charged with being in Arms in Westminster-hall and at such and such a place yet it was not a Voluntary Act for I was bound to obey my General I do humbly pray that I may have your Lordships Judgment in this point I must say it was from the sense of their exposition of the Law and of the Statutes and from the Authority that every one took up Arms for and served them and obeyed either the one General or the other I say it was under this very Authority and this must needs acquit me from all the guilt that is laid upon me L. ch Bar. You put your self upon the Judgment of the Court upon this which you call a point in Law First it is manifest that there is no excuse at all for Treason no man by his Commission can warrant the doing of an Act which is Treason you must take notice of the Authority whether it be good or no your Commission was not to put the King to Death but on the contrary to preserve the Kings life The Lords and Commons what they did we do not meddle with the Reason and Ground of what they did was the preservation of the Kings Person as well as the maintenance of the Laws and Liberties of this Nation they made Protestations Declarations and Oaths for the preservation of the King's Person and you could not but take notice of those things Now whereas you go about to shroud your self under the Lord Fairfax he had no such Power and therefore you can challenge no more then he had and to what you say concerning the Judgment of the Parliament there will be a great deal of difference between a particular Case and a Declaration of Lords and Commons there is nothing you have said that hath any thing of Force and God forbid you should make use of it But I must tell you you could not but notoriously know all those Transactions that were in the Army what the Army had done that they came up with Swords in their Hands and turn'd out whom they would you saw what the Lords and Commons had done that the Treaty was ready for his Birth And then you come up with your Mermidons with Force and Arms and Exclude the greatest part of the Members and then the Lords were laid aside it is true the Lords were not wholly dissolved but they would not suffer them to Sit nor Act at all and this was apparent to the Nation If men under colour and pretence of such things Namely that a few persons for so they were but an Eighth part of the House of Commons permitted to remain and of that Eighth part which was but 46 in the whole there were but 26 that Voted that Act which you say you obeyed but you say you obeyed the General you were not to obey the General in this Case for the Facts that you have committed are not charged as Acts of War you are not charged for bringing the Souldiers in but for those Violent Actions that you were guilty of there you made the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice Execution Execution you sent officiously for a Hang-man to come down to you your Commission gave you no power for this the Death of the King you know how it was designed you know the Act for the bringing in of that Commission as they call'd it to sit in justice was after the House of Commons was reduced to a very small Number and some of those dissenting too what you did Act under that Authority if you can justifie it in the Name of God say so but do not Engage the Nation in those things which they abhorred and by the mercy of God are laid asleep Mr. Justice Foster You begin at the wrong End you ought as all men ought to do First to answer the matter of Fact and not to put in these long dilatory Pleas till you have answered the matter of Fact whether those things charged on you be true or not then if you have any thing further to say for your self by way of excuse it will be the time to speak and not before Axt. May it please your Lordships I humbly conceive I am upon that method to the first part of the witness they accuse me for commanding my Souldiers in Westminster-hall then I must prove my Authority which I have been about to do and declared the Judgment of Parliament L. ch B. The Court have heard you with a great deal of patience and that which is not at all to the business Axtell I only refer this as to the Authority I humbly conceive you will give me leave to insist upon this and how far I may improve it for my own defence here is the Commission by which my Lord Fairfax acted and that after the King's Death and I acted by the same Authority he did I had not been at Westminster-hall but on the command of the General Court Doth that Commission Authorize you to cry Justice Justice and to look up and down to get Witnesses against the King is that in your Commission Axt. I am to serve and obey all my Superior Officers that is my Commission if I do not I die by the Law of War Court You are to obey them in their just commands all unjust commands are invalid If our Superiors should command us to undue and irregular things much more if to the committing of Treason we are in each Case to make use of our passive not active Obedience Axt. Under Favour it is not proved that I did either Compass or Imagine the King's Death that is matter of Fact Court Let us try that Axt. My Lord I did nothing but as a meer Souldier I had Authority from the General I would leave this before your Lordships and the Jury that what I have done hath been by Authority of the Genetal L. Hollis Sir a word to you If you could satisfie the Court that you had received a Commission from the General to do those things with which you stand charged it were something then were it proper for you to plead it and the Court to judg Pray take this along with you the General gave you no such command what you are charged with in the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that by such and such overt acts as making your Souldiers cry out Justice and Execution for being active and forward in sending for the
a voluntary Act of mine own and so it cannot be Compassing the death of the King For to the word Execution what can be the sense of this word Execution is a single word those people that started the word justice might put it in the heads of the Souldiers which I might strike to command silence they likewise might upon the same account cry out Execution and so to hinder all Tumults and Hubbubs and the like in the place I might repeat their words in correcting of them for it I might say I 'le justice you I 'le execution you But my Lord this word Execution of justice it is a glorious word not that there can be an inference that what they did I should say was Justice or to approve of any thing that they did but only in general Execution of justice which my Lord relates not to any person possibly the rude people might be speaking as hath been said before in that manner and the Souldiers might take it up and I might reprove them and make use of their own words by word of repetition I will Justice you I will Execution you My Lord in the next place I do observe to speak that of Mr. Burden he did observe to your Lordships and the Jury my Country-men my Brethren with whom are the issues of life and death for whose life they must answer before the Lord as to Righteousness Judgment and Equity I say my Lord as to Mr. Burden he tells you that for my sake he was imprisoned saith he I have suffered much by him and speaks it with much indignation of spirit I have suffered and been imprisoned by him and afterwards he comes to speak his Evidence how much his Evidence may be of Force I desire my Lord the Jury may consider of that and then he comes and saith I commanded a Guard at the Banqueting-house in Whitehall Truly my Lord the Lord Fairfax commanded a Regiment to quarter there and I as an inferior Officer might be there in the next place my Lord he saith I sent Alisha Axtell to fetch the Hang-man Truly my Lord I wonder this person is come from Ireland if this were so the Authority there would not send that person with his great Evidence as well as this person he may as well charge any person with this as me It is evident Ireton Harrison and Cromwell they did all amongst themselves I never was with them amongst them received no command from them nor obeyed them nor did any thing but what I had command for from the General who by the Law I was bound to obey as a Souldier I shall only observe one thing more this person being so long a Prisoner to Extricate himself out of his imprisonment and chains poor man he may say more than is true I wonder he should say I sent for the Executioner I never knew of any circumstance touching consultation about his Death or took him Prisoner When they sent to me to be one of his Gnard I never would go I humbly conceive there is nothing sticks upon me in this considering the circumstances and the words of he person that spoke them My Lord the next person that speaks against me is Mr. Cooke and he saith he heard me say Thrust that Lady down that made a disturbance in the Court or words to that purpose it is probable there might be a desire of silence The next Evidence is Lt. Col. Nelson he saith that upon a Discourse L. Ch. Bar. I would put you in remembrance lest you should forget what Sir Purback Temple said That by leave of persons under your command he saw the body of the King It is only a Circumstance Axtell I have heard there were Chirurgions Physitians and Halberteers appointed by whom I know not they had the care of such things and had the keeping of him he was locked up by them no body could come in but by them I never had a Key possibly Col. Temple might come to me quartering there and desire me to speak to some persons that had the charge of it to let him in whether I did or no I cannot remember but if it were so I hope it will not amount to Treason The last thing given in Evidence against me is Mr. Nelson he saith that upon some discourse between us he was asking what person cut off the Kings head and that I should say Hewlet c. Truly my Lord I was never privy and I appeal to Mr. Rushworth if he were here who was Secretary if ever he saw me in any Counsel to advise or Act or any thing in that kind in relation to the Kings Tryal Sentence or Execution for me to know the person that was imployed about the Execution it is strange when as I said before they did all within themselves I had no knowledg thereof and medled not with any thing but within my own Sphear as a Souldier under my L. Fairfax by Authority of Parliament For naming of any person truly my Lord it would be a wonder to me that I should name any person to go to do any person that wrong and injury to say he was the person I must invent it for I knew nothing of it But by common fame up and down the City it was said to be another person but who it was I cannot say my Lord but to all this that hath been said against me there are but two things upon two Witnesses that are placed upon me the First my Lord here is two Witnesses for crying Justice and Execution L. Ch. Bar. I think you have more than two to those words Axtell Not for both together L. Ch. Bar. No but several for Justice Axtell There is three to that I shall only say this to your Lordship and this Jury in whose hand this life of mine is and is committed to them either to acquit or condemn me and God knows the hearts of all men and my innocency and integrity I shall say nothing to the Witnesses it is a day of Temptation and I desire the Jury my Countrymen my fellow Citizens my Brethren that they would well consider of it the word Execution and Justice admit I had said them which my Lord I do not I must not Grant there being an uprore of people there such words might be used and possibly Souldiers might take them up from them and chastising the Souldiers I might repeat the words I will Justice you I will Execution you L. Ch. Bar. The Evidence is that you beat them because they did not readily cry Justice Justice Axtel It might be more probable I beat them because they did do it I might chastise them for doing of it and repeat it as a reason for their Chastisement and but admitting it was true which I grant not yet I hope Justice and Execution of Justice as it is so great an Attribute of God by Gods Laws nor Mans Laws is no where made Treason but Mercy attends it and Judgment attends
the contrary I leave it upon the consciences of the Jury to weigh it carefully how I could be guilty of Compassing or Imagining the Death of the King when nothing is charged against me to be either of Counsel Sentencing or Signing or to be at the Execution only one man as I told you before he spoke something wrathly and that he had suffered much and therefore he is come over now and saith I should send for the Executioner which I never knew of or had any hand in sending for how much validity that hath I leave to the Jury if it were so it is not treason for words may make a Heretick not a Traytor I speak that by way of preface I do humbly conceive that these being only noted words Execution and Justice the King not so much as named nor any thing done to it by me I say I conceive it doth not amount to Treason by the Law and besides it is against the Law of the great Judg the Judg of Judges all of us that are now and are to come shall stand before him to receive our deserts I say it is against the Law of God to make me an Offender for a word for a word I have heard the Judges say that the Laws of England are grounded upon the Laws of God and the Laws of England are Laws of mercy not of rigour My Lord if a man shall be destroyed in his Life in his Posterity for a word admit the thing had been so I leave upon the consciences of my Jury before the presence of Jesus Christ and before whom they and I must come to be rejudged again at the Tribunal and besides it is only words and words uncertain and Sir Edward Cook saith he must declare plain truth in matter of Treason nothing must be taken for Evidence that may be a presumption or inference or strain of wit I hope upon this consideration that the word Justice fixed upon me by two Witnesses may be taken up at second or third hand from the People or Souldiers by chastising them for the Tumult Then my Lord in the next place these words were never put in writing and so not Treason then my Lord there was never an overt act done by me for that Act of Indemnity that his Majesty and both Houses of Parliament passed wherein they were pleased the very last to except me I wonder'd when I came to be excepted of that number I do come back to the place where I left and that is the overt act My Lord I would only bring it in in this place when I was excepted by the House of Commons one of the twenty I was excepted thus not extending to life I went up and down free at noon day I did not hide my self ingaging a person that was one of his Majesties Servants to do me a courtesie he promised me he would do it and contrary to his promise he was pleased to bring the Kings Warrant to carry me to the Tower and after that I came to be excepted with that black Catalogue of excepted persons and to be brought to the Tryal of the Law Now my Lord I return to that overt act as it was but words uncertain and they may be words repeated from the third or the fourth hand for they were not put in writing according to that Act of Indemnity which I understand the meaning of to be thus That for their Execrable Treasons in Sentencing Signing or otherwise Instrumental they are excepted out of this Act and to be Tryed according to the Laws of this Nation I understand that to be Instrumental to be Instrumentally the Executioner of the King I never had any hand in that Upon the whole this is the Fact that is proved by two Witnesses they heard me say Justice and Execution which must relate to the Execution of Justice which by the Law of God is not Treason especially when there was not the word King for a word to take away and destroy so many my Life Wife Children and many Fatherless that are under the Charge of the Prisoner at the Bar is very sad the words I do not grant but upon such probabilities as I have said I might repeat them I will Justice you I will Execution you and then the words were not written I say as Sir Edw. Cook said they may make a Heretick but not a Traytor the other part of the Evidence is this that I was there with Souldiers at Westminster-Hall I must say if that be Treason to be guided by Judgment of Lords and Commons in Parliament I must say if that be Treason to take up Arms for a Parliament upon such Grounds and Expositions of the statute which they have made and published by their own Authority if I am Guilty under the General then the Parliament would be guilty of Treason L. Ch. Bar. That you have spoke to I am loath to interrupt you Axt. I thank your Lordships for informing me but I was commanded to be there by my General if I had not gone I must have dyed I did only stand there for preservation of the peace in no other sense if the General order me to be at such a Rendezvous I must be there if I disobeyed he would have condemned me by the Law of War The next thing against me material are these two things that is that I should send one Elisha Axtell for the Executioner I must say it is most Admirable such things should be laid to my charge I hope your Lordships and the Jury do observe he told you he suffered much and a poor man under his extremities and losses and sufferings perhaps might start some unadvised words and being now sent over may ascertain it But doubtless this Elisha Axtell being in Ireland if by command it had been so would have been sent over truly I must say I had no hand in the business it was left wholly to them amongst themselves and what ever was done or whatever was said it was said and done by them I never was acquainted with any thing of that nature he said he heard I should send Elisha Axtell for an Executioner if hearsays may be Treason it will be a hard Lesson and my Lord Sir Edw. Cooke saith there must be two witnesses here is but one It comes from such a man my Lord as the providence of God but I will say no more as to that but pray the Jury will take notice of it L. Ch. Bar. You need not doubt of it it shall be taken notice of this of Burden Axt. Now my Lord I have but two or three words more the Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third it doth intend private persons my Lord here is my Commission L. Ch. Bar. It is owned you had it from your General Axt. My Lord his Majesty is pleased to say in his Gracious Letter We do by these presents declare That we do grant a free and General Pardon to all our Subjects of
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye
ask Col. Huncks whether I read this Warrant or no. L. ch B. This is all you have to say for your self Hacker Yea my Lord. L. ch B. Then Col. Hacker for that which you say for your self that you did it by coommand you must understand that no power on earth could Authorize such a thing No command in such a case can excuse you There is a twofold obedience a passive obedience to suffer rather than do things unlawful and an Active obedience to do that only which is lawful and therefore this will not excuse your obedience to those unlawful commands Gent. of the Jury you see the Prisoner at the Bar stands indicted for compassing and imagining the death of the late King and there are several open Acts set forth in the indictment which tend to prove that matter one is assembling and meeting together another is sitting upon the King another sentencing and at last concludes with the murther of the King as the consequence of all Any thing that tends to the proving of this compassing and imagining his death in any one of these particulars that is an evidence to you to prove the whole indictment This Gentleman was Commander of Halberteers Col. Tomlinson saith that though he kept the Guards that were about the Kings person this Gentleman with two other persons brought Halberteers that there might not be such frequent access as formerly to the King there is one Act. He commands these Halberteers at that time when the business was in agitation before that High Court as they called it You see after the sentence was given that he was one of the persons to whom the Warrant for Execution was directed you see afterwards there was a consulting together Cromwel Ireton Harrison and Axtel were in the Chamber when Col. Huncks refused to sign the prisoner signed the Warrant but knows not the person to whom it was directed you see besides Col. Tomlinson's testimony who saith further that when they were discharged Col. Hacker went in and the King was brought out presently after to that fatal place Col. Huncks swears that when that Warrant was offered to him he refused it that Hacker the Prisoner at the Bar signed a Warrant though he doth not remember the name of the person to whom it appears by two Witnesses honourable persons he confessed he signed it but he did not know the person to whom directed You see another Witness Benjamin Francis he saith he saw Hacker upon the Scaffold with the King He doth not deny the fact you need go no further it is very plain he had a hand in this business a principal agent in it he that brought the King to the Scaffold he that had the care in managing that business he that signed the Warrant to the Executioner either he is guilty of compassing the death of the King or no man can be said to be guilty The Jury went together and after some little consultation returned to their places Clerk of the Crown Gentlemen of the Jury are you agreed on your Verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall say for you Jury Our Foreman Clerk Francis Hacker hold up thy hand Gentlemen look upon the Prisoner at the Bar how say you is he guilty of high Treason whereof he stands indicted and hath been arraigned or not guilty Foreman Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper Clerk What Goods and Chattels c. Jury None that we know of The Tryal of William Hulet 15. Octob. 1660. CLerk of the Crown Set William Hulet to the Bar who was brought accordingly William Hulet alias Houlet hold up thy hand Those persons that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. If you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they be sworn L. Ch. Bar. Understand you have power to challenge five and thirty men and not above You may challenge them without cause shewn If you have cause for any other you may challenge them also If you will have Pen Ink and Paper you may have them Hulet Truly my Lord I cannot Write but a very little I shall not need them I did not understand my Indictment well I desire to hear it again L. Ch. Bar. You will hear it read again Clerk Sir Thomas Allen Sir Henry Wroth Thomas Bide Robert Sheppard Thomas Morris Ralph Halsal John Gallyard John Nicoll Thomas Vfman Christopher Abdy William Dod in all twelve Jury called and sworn Cl. of the Cr. Will. Hulet alias Houlet hold up thy hand You Gentlemen that are sworn look upon the Prisoner Cl. You shall understand that he stands indicted of high Treason by the name of Will. Hulet alias Howlet late of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Gent. for that he as a false Traytor c. here the indictment was read Unto which indictment he hath pleaded not guilty and for his Tryal hath put himself upon God and the Country which Country you are Now your charge is to inquire c. Sir Edward Turner May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are sworn of this Jury we are now entering upon the last Act in this sad tragedy of the Murther of the late King there have been before you some of the Judges the Councel the Chaplain and the Guard this Prisoner at the Bar in the last place was one of those which came with a frock on his body and a vizor on his face to do the work The course of our evidence will be this first we shall prove by witnesses that saw him and knew him that he was thus disguised he hath confest that he was upon the Scaffold that he hath had several preferments and I fear it will appear that it was he that gave that fatal blow for he hath confessed he had an hundred pounds given him for his service therein and we doubt not but to pluck off his vizor by and by The indictment is for compassing and imagining the death of his late Majesty of glorious memory if we prove to you any circumstantial overtact whereby you shall be convinced of this you are to find him guilty Richard Gittens sworn Councel Mr. Gittens tell my Lord and the Jury what you know touching the prisoner at the Bar. Gittens The thing is this my Lord this Gentleman at the Bar and my self were both in a Regiment in one company as Serjeants about twelve or thirteen years together About a day or two before the King came to the Scaffold Colonel Hewson did give notice to a Lieutenant that we should come to him about 38 of us and he put us all to our Oaths that we should say nothing of what they did he swore us to the book after he had sworn us he asked us if we would undertake to do such an Act if we would we should have an hundred pounds down and preferment in the Army as long as that stood and the Parliament Afterwards we refused every person we thought Captain
that about me that would have compelled him or words to that effect other times I have heard him speak something to this November the last in the the Queens County at Maryborough Col. Jones took upon him to be Governour and to choose two out of a Regiment that might be the Rulers of the people Legislators I think they call'd them I did discourse about the business again and did oppose it all after a while he began to be very hot in the business about Lambert said I you were heretofore too forward sayes he if it be the business of the Kings head I will never deny it call me to an account when you will I have observed in Ireland that it hath been generally reported that he was either the man that cut off the Kings Head or that held it up as I said before and I have heard them sometimes call him Grandsire Grey-beard Hulet My Lord I do confess I know the Gentleman very well we were in a Regiment together I never discoursed with any concerning this but only once at a place going from Cullen to Munster we did drink at a place called Goran we were discoursing about the business of the King the justification of the cutting off his head saith Stammers I did hear that you were one of the persons for that purpose said I they that say so do me wrong saith he it is no matter if you were so for it was a just act said I whether it was or no I have nothing to do to justifie it he was speaking as I hope to be saved I would have done it Walter Davis Sworn Councel What can you say Mr. Davies to this business Davies Gentlemen that which I can say is this in January last was two years I was at Dublin I met Captain Hulet he invited me to take share of a pint of Wine I went with him to a Tavern when we were in the Tavern he called for a pint of wine and I called for another before we had drank out the last pint of wine said I to Captain Hulet I pray resolve me this one question it is reported that you took up the Kings head and said behold the head of a Traytor Sir said he it was a question I never resolved any man though often demanded yet saith he whosoever said it then it matters not I say it now it was the head of a Traytour H. I confess we did meet together as you say but I must and do deny the words Lieutenant Collonel Nelson sworn Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a discourse with Col. Axtel as I related once this day about six years since in many other discourses we fell to discourse about the death of the late King I supposing he had been acquainted with that affair I desired him to tell me those two persons disguised upon the Scaffold he told me I knew the persons as well as himself saith he they have been upon service with you many a time pray Sir said I let me know their names truly said he we would not imploy persons of low spirits that we did not know and therefore we pitcht upon two stout fellows who were those said I It was Walker and Hulet they were both Serjeants in Kent when you were there and stout men Who gave the blow said saith he poor Walker and Hulet took up the head pray said I what reward had they I am not certain whether they had thirty pounds apiece or thirty pounds between them Hulet Pray let Mr. Axtel speak to this he is hard by Colonel Tomlinson sworn Counsel Pray tell my Lords your knowledg in this business Tomlinson My Lords and Gentlemen of this Jury I cannot punctually remember what their habits were but they had close garments to thier bodies they had hair on their faces one was gray to the best of my remembrance the other was flaxen colour Councel Can you tell who struck the blow Tom. My Lord I cannot remember but I think he with the gray hair on his face did it Nelson My Lord I will not positively say it but it came lately to my mind that I did hear in Ireland by Col. Pretty that Hulet did it my Lord this Col. Pretty is alive in Ireland Ben. Francis sworn Francis My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury as to the Prisoner at the bar he was very active in that horrid act there was two of them had both clothes alike their frocks were close to their bodies as I remember they were rather in Butchers habits of woollen one had a black hat on his head cockt up and a black beard and the other had a grey grisled periwig hung down very low I affirm that he that cut off the Kings head was he in the gray periwig and I beleeve this was about that mans stature pointing to Mr. Hulet and his beard was of the same colour if he had any I was coming from Westminster the Scaffold was encompassed within with a great Guard of Souldiers of Redcoats I think commanded by Biscoe Hulet Was you upon the Scaffold Francis No Sir there was none of my constitution upon the Scaffold Councel Fuller evidence I think cannot be expected you have heard all the Witnesses what can you say for your self Hulet My Lord here is several witnesses examined concerning the business and for my part I do not understand the Law I must leave it to the Court I can upon the other account prove where I was at that very time I can in the next place my Lord since I came into London for I did not hear it before I can tell you who was the person that did that act I can bring forty and forty witnesses that will prove who they were that did it as I have been informed by several Witnesses that they know who was the person that did it upon the other accompt I can prove where I was that day but I did not know when I was arraigned what was laid to my charge Here was some examinations taken before my Lord Mayor concerning the person or persons that did that act here he offered a paper a copy of the said examinations subscribed Mary Brandon and divers others Mr. Secretary Morrice Was you not examined in the Tower Hulet Yes Sir Mr. Secr. Morice Did not we tell you that you were charged with cutting off the head of the King Hulet Yes Sir you did tell me so L. Ch. B. Then you had time to provide your witnesses H. I was a close prisoner L. Ch. B. Where were you on the day of execution H. I was a prisoner then at Whitehall L. Ch. B. For what H. Upon this accompt we were taken up about seven or nine of us were taken up we were all Serjeants three of Col. Hackers the rest of Prides and Fairfaxes and about ten of clock at night were discharged L. Ch. Baron For what were you imprisoned H. For refusing to be upon the Scaffold Burden It was a common
I did it ignorantly not knowing what I did I shall not deny the matter of Fact but as to that I pleaded Not Guilty before it was in relation to that which I was ignorant of the Law of the Nation I have not been bred to it I humbly desire your Lordships to consider that what I did was done ignorantly not knowing the Law Counsel What was that Smith I do confess that I sat in the Court I do not remember that I signed or sealed both the Warrants being shewed him adds My Lord I confess the hands are like mine but whether they be so or no I know not Counsel Then we will prove it Is the Seal yours Smith I do not know Counsel Do you confess you were in the Painted Chamber the 29th of January Do you remember any thing of that Smith I do not certainly know that Counsel My Lord he hath said enough Shall the Jury doubt of that which he believes Smith I do not remember that I did write it Counsel My Lord we press it no farther he hath confessed enough Smith My Lord what I have don I beseech you consider I did it in ignorance not knowing the Law there were those about me that were able to call me who were then in Authority whom I dared not disobey if so I had been in danger also Counsel My Lords we have done be pleased to direct the Jury upon these several Evidences and Confessions Smith I beg one word I must declare this I can speak it seriously That from the first to the last of these unhappy Wars I have been a Man of trouble and sorrow I have been as many wiser Men have been run upon Error My Lord I know not what I have done I pray that this Court will be pleased to be a Mediator for me that I may have his Majesties favour and that this Petition may be received on my behalf He then delivered his Petition to the Court. I can rejoice for that happy settlement that is again in the Nations and declare chearfully my humble submission to that Government and desire the Lord will bless and prosper his Majesty and the Parliament in these Nations My Lord I rendred my self according to the Proclamation I shall say no more Lord Chief Baron Gentlemen you of the Jury These Prisoners that stand before you at the Bar that is Mr. Harvy Pennington Marten Millington Titchburn Roe Lilburn and Mr. Smith there are eight these are Persons who by the Act of Indempnity are to be tried for their Lives for the Treasons they have committed but no Execution is to be until the Parliament have further considered the Matter that is before us and you are to find the Matter of Fact What Mercy they shall find hereafter that is to be left as I told you to the consideration of the Parliament we are to proceed according to Law and Justice They are all Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our late Soveraign Lord Charles the First of most glorious memory And for that that hath been opened to you there are so many Overt Acts which are as so many Evidences to prove that Indictment which is the compassing and imagination of their Hearts to put the King to Death If any one of these be proved that is alone enough to prove the Indictment which is the compassing and imagining of the Heart that is the Treason the other are but Evidences If any thing burst forth from the Mouth or from the Hand as here it is these are Evidences of the imagination of the Heart for this you have heard by the confession of all of them that they did enough to find the Indictment they have all of them confessed their sitting upon the King in that traiterous Assembly which they called the High Court of Justice There is one of the Overt Acts expresly laid down in the Indictment they took upon them an Authority to consider how to put the King to death and that they did put the King to death but they were mistaken as some of them said that the actual murdering of the King was not their meaning But if they did that which tended towards it they are all guilty of Treason it is all one to you if they be guilty of any of these either Sitting Sentencing or Signing they are guilty and all of these except two are guilty of all these The Matter is clear and pregnant there is something hath been said by many of them with a great deal of expression of sorrow they did confess all but one the Fact and that which tended to their defence was ignorance but that doth not at all concern you It will be taken in its due time into consideration the several deportments of them all that is for another Judicature Your business is to find the Matter of Fact only this let me repeat unto you There is Mr. Harvy who hath pleaded several Matters which are not proper for you expressing his sorrow and penitence We shall not trouble you with that because they are for the consideration of another Court We ought all to have a tender compassion ought to be sorry with and for them that are sorrowful The like of Alderman Pennington Marten hath done that which looks forward more than backward I could wish with all my heart he had looked more backward that is to repentance of that which is past than obedience to that which is to come it is a trouble to repeat those things which he said himself and truly I hope in charity he meant better than his words were Millington he hath done the like with the rest confessed the Fact put himself upon Mercy wholly and said He was over-awed by the present Power This I repeat not as any thing to you who are to consider only Matter of Fact For Alderman Titchburn he hath spoken very fully and truly very conscienciously upon the whole Matter acknowledges his ignorance his sorrow his conviction in point of Conscience and I beseech God Almighty to incline his heart more and more to repentance They that crucified Christ to use his own words through ignorance found mercy Colonel Roe He confesses the same wholly and casts himself upon the King's Mercy and he thought it a blessed thing that the King was restored again and submitted wholly to mercy and so did Mr. Lilburn he said he went to his Chamber and mourned the day the King was beheaded I am very glad he had so early a sense of it William Smith He did it ignorantly he was not guilty thus far that was he was led on even like one silly Sheep that follows another by what relation I have heard of the Person at that time he was not thought fit to be of the Privy Council There is nothing more to say to you the Fact is confessed by them all It is so clear you need not go from the Bar. After a little consultation between the Jurors they returned to their places
how to reconcile that which hath been said before with this that comes after I leave it to you I am totally at a loss When those times were how impetuous the Soldiers how not a man that durst either disown them or speak against them I was threatned with my very life by the threats of one that hath received his reward I was induced to it Certainly my Lord it doth argue that there was not malice predommant Love and Hatred cannot be at the same time in one person Design my Lord what should be my design a poor ordinary mean man Surely my Lord I could not design any great matters or places I knew my self unfit I humbly beg you would give me leave to tell you a little what I got Mr. Sol. Gen. By your favour my Lord the Prisoners at the Bar may say what they will by way of extenuation but we expect that when they enter upon these Discourses they will save your Lordships time and ours by a publick confession and evidence of sorrow We cannot spend so long time to hear these long Discourses we will rather prove it against every man singly Downes I will trouble you no further I do acknowledge all I humbly submit and beg your favour and leave my self eupon my Countrymen the Jury and beg the King's mercy specially Pray spare me one word that you would hear but a Witness or two unto that business Counsel He doth confess he sate and signed we beleive he is sorrowful and against his Conscience he did sign and that he did it out of a fear and from a threat that he was over-awed so was the Hangman too but after he had apprehended this sorrow and declared his Judgment upon the fact he signed the Warrant Downes My Lord I do humbly beg his Majesties mercy I came in upon the Proclamation Vincent Potter My Lord my condition requires ease for my Body he had a fit of the Stone upon him at that same time I pray that the passing the Sentence for execution may be suspended L. Ch. B. The Execution must be suspended for you are within that Qualification Potter I desire only this I am not in a condition to declare what I know and would speak I am mighty ful of pain if I am under that Qualification let me rest under that Counsel Do you confess the Indictment or will you put us to prove it Potter I am one that came in L. Ch. B. It is thus with you whether or no did you sit sign or act in this High Court of Justice against the King Potter I will deny nothing I confess the fact but did not contrive it I am full of pain Lord Chief Baron According to the demerit of the Case in Law you must receive Judgment here but no execution of that Judgment shall be until the King by advice and consent of Lords and Commons shall order the execution of it you are to be tried now Do you confess you signed the Warrant for execution of the King Potter I do confess it my Lord. Counsel We do accept it Potter I beseech you let me go to ease my self Lord Chief Baron Officer set a Chair for him which was done Mr Potter sit down Aug. Garland May it please your Lordship I came here this day intending to have waved my plea and referred my self to this honourable Court to be recommended to the Kings mercy and the Parliament But hearing of some scandal upâ—â— me more then ever I did hear till within these few dayes I shall desire your favour in hearing of my Trial. Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord he saith well for if he had confessed the Indictment we should not have accepted it Call the Witnesses Garland I do confess this I sate and at the day of Sentence signed the Warrant for Execution Mr. Sol. Gen. And we will prove that he spat in the Kings face Gar. I pray let me hear that Otherwise I would not have put you to any trouble at all Clench sworn Counsel Do you know the prisoner at the Bar Augustine Garland Clench I know him very well Counsel Tell my Lords and the Jury how you saw him behave himself to our Sovereign Lord the King when he was at the Bar. Clench I was that day at Westminstar-hall when the King had sentence they hurried the King down this Mr. Garland came down stairs by them towards the bottome of the stairs he spit in his face at a little distance Couns Do you believe he did it on purpose upon your oath Clench I suppose he did it somewhat suspiciously in that way I did see the King put his hand in his left pocket but I do not know whether the king wiped it off Mr. Sol. Gen. The King wiped it off but he will never wipe it off so long as he lives He hath confessed that he sate that he sentenced and that he signed We say he contrived it at the beginning and at last bid defiance to the King I shall desire he may be remembred in another place Garland I do not know that I was near him at that time I do not remember this passage I am afraid he is an Indigent person If I was guilty of this inhumanity I desire no favour from God Almighty L. Ch. B. I will tell you this doth not at all concern the Jury but this Circumstance possibly may be considered in another place Gar. I refer my self whether you be satisfied that I did such an Inhumane act I submit that to you I dare appeal to all these Gentlemen here looking upon the prisoners or any other whether they ever heard of it nor I was never accused for such a thing till a few dayes since but I wave my plea and refer my self to the Court Now my Lord this is the truth of my Case there is that honorable Gentleman the Speaker of the House of Commons knows I lived in Essex in the beginning of these troubles and I was inforced to forsake my habitation I came from thence to London where I have behaved my self fairly in my way Afterwards in 1648 I was chosen a member into the Parliament in June 1648 I came in a Member of the Parliament My Lord after the division of the House by the insolency of the Soldiery some came to me and desired me that I would go to the House I was then at my Chamber at Lincolns-Inne I forbore a Week and more said I I do not expect to be admitted for they look upon me as another person said they If you will go you shall have no contradiction I went and went in when I was in the first business that came was the business of Tryal of the King and it was put on me to be Chair-man for bringing in this Act for Tryal I did not know how to contradict that power or authority be it what it will but I must obey I fear my ruine will follow it in that respect my Lord when I came there I
in that Case one was called the Banishment of Hugh Spencer and the other is in 1. Edward 3. upon the Roll. My Masters In the first of Henry the Seventh you shall find it in the printed seven Books he saith That as to the Regality of his Crown he is immediately subject unto God Mark the Doctrine of the Church of England Gentlemen I do not know with what Spirit of Equivocation any Man can take that Oath of Supremacy You shall find in the Articles of the Church of England the last but one or two it is that Article which sets forth the Doctrine of the Church of England they say That the Queen and so the King hath the Supreme Power in this Realm and hath the chief Government over all the Estates of the Realm the very words are so this was shortly after making the Act the Articles were in 1552 and she came in 1558 or 1559 it is to shew you the King hath the chief Government over all the Estates within the Nation and if you look upon it you shall find it was not only the Judgment of the Church but of the Parliament at the same time They did confirm this Article so far that they appointed that no Man should take or be capable of a Living but those that had taken that Oath God forgive those Ministers that went against it The Queen and the Church were willing that these should be put into Latin that all the World might see the Confession of the Church of England and of the People of England you may reade it in Cambden I have told you how and wherein the chief Power consisted not in respect the King could do what he would no the Emperors themselves did not challenge that but this they challenge by it That they were not accountable to Man for what they did No Man ought to touch the Person of the King I press it to you in point of Conscience you see in the Scripture in Psalm 51. the Psalm of Mercy whereby we ask pardon of God for our great Offences I think none of you in this condition but will join in this you know the Adultery and Murder that David committed this penitential Psalm was made for that What doth he say Against thee thee only have I sinned c. tibi soli peccavi Domine not because he had not sinned against Man for 't is plain he had sinned both against Bathsheba and Vriah too But because he was not liable to the Tribunal of Man he was not bound nor accountable to any Man upon Earth And now my Masters I beseech you consider that some of you for ought I know suddenly and some of you for ought I know not long after all of us we do not know how soon must come to make a right account to God of what we have done After this Life you enter into an Eternity an Eternity of Happiness or of Woe God Almighty is merciful to those that are truly penitent the Thief upon the Cross and to all that are of a penitent heart You are Persons of education do not you go on in an obstinate perverse course for shame of Men even this shame which you now have and which you may have when you come to die a sanctified use may be made of it you pay to God some part of that punishment which you owe to him for your sins I have no more to say but the next thing I have to do is to give the Sentence the Judgment which truly I do with as unwilling a heart as you do receive it You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Court adjourned till Friday morning seven a Clock Friday Octob. 19. 1660. Set William Heveningham to the Bar. Serjeant Keeling May it please your Lordships the Prisoner at the Bar William Heveningham hath been indicted of High-Treason for compassing and imagining the Death of the late King of blessed memory he has been tried the Jury has found him guilty I do humbly move your Lordships in the behalf of the King that you will proceed to Judgment Clerk William Heveningham hold up thy hand what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Heveningham My Lords I have nothing more to say than I said formerly only I plead the benefit of the Proclamation and cast my self upon the Mercy of our most gracious Sovereign and desire your Lordships to be Mediators on my behalf Lord Ch. Baron By the Act of Indempnity of which you claim the Benefit and we ought to take notice of it we are to proceed to Judgment but no Execution of this Judgment is to be until by another Act of Parliament by consent of the King it shall be ordered And therefore I need not speak any more of that or any Exhortation to prepare your self for Death our work is only to give Judgment The Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that you the Prisoner at the Bar be led back to c. And the Lord have mercy upon your Soul THus having given the Reader a most impartial view of every Passage occurring in this so solemn and legal Indictment Arraignment Trial and Condemnation of these twenty nine black Regicides with their several Pleas and Defences in their own words It may be also some additinal satisfaction to let the Reader know the time and manner of the Death of such of them who were according to the Sentence Executed For their last Discourses and Prayers as they were made in a Croud and therefore not possible to be taken exactly so it was thought fit rather to say nothing than give an untrue account thereof chusing rather to appear lame than to be supported with imperfect assistances ON Saturday the 13th of October 1660 betwixt nine and ten of the clock in the Morning Mr. Tho. Harrison or Major General Harrison according to this Sentence was upon a Hurdle drawn from Newgate to the place called Charing-Cross where within certain Rails lately there made a Gibbet was erected and he hanged with his face looking towards the Banqueting-house at Whitehall the place where our late Sovereign of eternal memory was sacrificed being half dead he was cut down by the common Executioner his Privy Members cut off before his Eyes his Bowels burned his Head severed from his Body and his Body divided into Quarters which were returned back to Newgate upon the same Hurdle that carried it His Head is since set on a Pole on the top of the South-East end of Westminster-Hall looking towards London The Quarters of his Body are in like manner exposed upon some of the City Gates Monday following being the sixteenth of October abouâ— the same hour Mr. John Carew was carried in like manner to the same place of Execution where having suffered like pains his Quarters were also returned to Newgate on the same Hurdle which carried him His Majesty was pleased to give upon intercession made by his Friends his Body to be buried Tuesday following being the sixteenth of October Master John Cook and Mr. Hugh Peters were about the same hour 〈◊〉 on two Hurdles to the same place and executed in the same manner and their Quarters returned in like manner to the place whence they came The Head of John Cook is since set on a Pole on the North-East end of Westminster-Hall on the left of Mr. Harrison's looking towards London and the Head of Mr. Peters on London-Bridg Their Quarters are exposed in like manner upon the tops of some of the City Gates Wednesday October 17 about the hour of nine in the 〈◊〉 Mr. Thomas Scot and Mr. Gregory Clemenâ— were â—ought â—n several Hurdles and about one hour after Master Adriâ—n Scroop and Mr. John Jones together in one Hurdle were carried to the same place and suffered the same death and were returned and disposed of in like manner Mr. Francis Hacker and Mr. Daniel Axtel were on Friday the 19th of October about the same time of the morning drawn on one Hurdle from Newgate to Tiburn and there both Hanged Mr. Axtel was Quartered and returned back and disposed as the former but the Body of Mr. Hacker was by his Majesties great favour given entire to his Friends and buried FINIS 3. Jan. 1647.