Commons in his said Parliament assembled By Authority of the said Parliament by Authority of the same Parliament Our Sovereign Lord the King hath ordained and established divers Statutes Declarations and Ordinances The Preface to the Statutes at (c) Idem Anno 1452. fol. 286. Reading 31 Regni hath these words Our Lord the King by Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons being in the said Parliament and by Authority of the same Parliament hath made ordained and established divers Acts and Statutes Here the Commons Assent is joyned with the Lords whereas in most others of his Reign it is At the special request of the Commons So it is in that at Westminster which is like the first only it saith Our Sovereign Lord c. the Thirty ninth of his Noble and Gracious Reign Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Fourth 's Reign THE Preamble to the Statutes of (a) Idem Anno 1461. fol. 291. King Edward by the Grace of God Westminster 1 Regni is Edward by the Grace of God c. to the Honour of God and Holy Church to nourish Peace Unity and Concord within his Realm which he much desireth by the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal of the same Realm and at the special Request of the Commons of his said Realm assembled by Authority of the same Parliament hath ordained The rest of the Prefaces vary very little except that in the 3 E. 4. it is By the Advice and Assent of his Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons c. Of the Parliament in King Richard the Third's time THE Preamble to the Statutes at (a) Idem Anno 1483. fol. 315. Westminster 1 R. 3. runs thus Richard by the Grace of God c. to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and for the Common-wealth of his Realm of England Advice and Assent of Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Request of the Commons c. By the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the Request of the Commons of the said Realm summoned to the said Parliament by the Authority of the same Parliament hath ordained and established for the Quietness of his People certain Statutes Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Seventh 's time THE Prefaces to all the Acts in his (a) Idem Anno 1485. fol. 324. Reign are much alike thus The King our Sovereign Lord Henry c. To the Honour of God c. By the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by Authority of the said Parliament hath done to be made certain Statutes and Ordinances Of the Parliaments in King Henry the Eighth 's time MOST of the Prefaces to the 20th of his Reign are the same as in King H. the 7th mutatis mutandis The Title of the 21 H. 8. (a) Id. fol. 392. only is Statuta ad Rempublicam spectantia edita in 1 Sessione Parliamenti c. Anno Regni invictissimi Principis Henrici c. In the 5th Chapter of the Acts of the (b) Id. fol. 435. 24th of his Reign The King our Sovereign Lord. it is thus Be it enacted by the King our Sovereign Lord with the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same So most of the rest are excepting that in the second Chapter of the 26. of (c) Id. fol. 465. his Reign it is said Therefore be it enacted by Authority of this present Parliament So in the first Chapter of the (d) Id. fol. 485. 28 Regni it is said For the Remedy whereof May it please the King c. it be enacted may it please the King our Sovereign Lord by the Assent c. it may be enacted The Title of the Acts 31 H. 8. (e) Id. fol. 537. H. 8. Defender of the Faith and in Earth Supreme Head c. runs thus Henry the 8th c. Defender of the Faith and in Earth supreme Head immediately under Christ of the Church of England to the Honour of Almighty God Conservation of the true Doctrine of Christian Religion and for the Concord Quiet and Wealth of this his Realm and Subjects of the same held his most high Court of Parliament c. wherein were established these Acts following and in the first Chapter it is said Be it enacted c. Be it enacted by the King our dread Sovereign Lord and by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and by the Commons of this present Parliament assembled The Thirty second of H. 8. hath these Expressions which day the said Parliament continued by divers Prorogations was by His Graces Authority finished and dissolved amongst many other the Acts following By his Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons assembled in the said Parliament have been Established Ordained and Enacted Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Sixth 's Reign IN the first Chapter of the first (a) Id. fol. 687. Statutes made 1. Regni it is said The Kings most Excellent Majesty King 's Excellent Majesty Princely Serenity Highness minding the Governance and Order of his most loving Subjects to be in most perfect Unity and Concord in all things c. as his most Princely Serenity and Majesty hath already declared by evident Proofs Be it enacted by the Kings Highness with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and of the Commons of this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same In the second and third Year of Ed. 6. they are called (b) Id. fol. 712. Acts in the Session c. humbly prayen That it may be Ordained and Enacted by His Majesty with the assent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same The rest are much what like these foregoing Of the Parliaments in Queen Mary's Reign IN the Title of her first (a) Id. fol. 817. Acts she is stiled Ordained and enacted by the Queen our Sovereign Lady and Assent of Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons Defender of the Faith and Supreme Head of the Church c. Be it therefore ordained and enacted by the Queen our Sovereign Lady with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same After the Marriage of (b) Id. fol. 831. Queen Mary with King Philip of Spain the title is only Acts made in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord and Lady Philip and Mary Defenders of the Faith leaving out Supreme Head c. In the fourth and (c) Id. fol. 863. fifth of Philip and Mary in the Body of the Acts it is thus Be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the King and Queens Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons
in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same Of the Parliaments in Queen Elizabeth's time WE may observe something new in the Acts of this Queen we have noted once in Henry the Eighth's time the two Houses pray that it may be enacted and so in Edward the Sixth but in the first (a) Id. fol. 873. Chapter of the Acts of this Queen it is more full thus Most humbly beseech Your most Excellent Majesty Most humbly beseech your most excellent Majesty your faithful and obedient Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of this your present Parliament assembled and in another (b) Id. fol. 874. Paragraph That it may please your Highness that it may be further enacted and in another place If some redress by Authority of this your High Court of Parliament High Court of Parliament with the assent of your Highness be not had and provided 5 Eliz. Cap. 1. it is thus expressed Be it therefore Enacted Ordained and Established by the Queen our Sovereign Lady and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same And in the Eighth Be it now Declared and Enated by the Authority of this present Parliament Most of all the rest of the Acts of her Reign are expressed after some of these forms The 43 of her Reign in the First Chapter it is thus In most humble wise beseechen your most excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons of your Highness's Parliament assembled Of the Parliaments in King James the First 's Reign THE Title of his first (a) Id. fol. 1085. Acts is at the Parliament begun c. To the pleasure of Almighty God the Weal publick of this Realm were Enacted c. In the First Chapter We therefore your most Humble and Loyal Subjects the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled In most humble and lowly manner do beseech in most humble and lowly manner do beseech your most excellent Majesty that it may be published and declared in this High Court of Parliament and Enacted by Authority of the same In the Second Chapter it is said Be it further (b) Id. fol. 1086. Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Assent and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same In the Seventh of King James is only expressed Be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament c. The rest agrees with some of these Of the Parliaments in King Charles the First 's Reign THE Preface of his First (a) Id. fol. 1226. Parliament is At the Parliament c. To the high pleasure of Almighty God and to the weal publick of this Realm were enacted c. In the First Chapter (b) Id. fol. 1227. Be it enacted by the King c. it is said Be it Enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same In the beginning of the Petition (c) Id. fol. 1229. Petition of Right of Right it is thus worded Humbly shew unto our Soveraign Lord the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled c. and the close of it is All which they most humbly pray your most excellent Majesty as their Rights and Liberties according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm c and that your Majesty would be graciously pleased In the Seventeenth of the said King (d) Id. fol. 1237. Chap. 6. it is thus expressed Therefore the Kings most excellent Majesty out of his Princely care c. by the Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same Ordaineth Enacteth and Establisheth Of the Parliaments in King Charles the Seconds Reign THE Preface to the Acts of the two Houses (a) Id. fol. 1249. begun 25 Apr. 1660. not summoned by the Kings Writ is much the same with that of King Charles the First and King James mutatis mutandis In the Third Chapter it is said Be it Enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty and the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament In the Fourth Chapter (b) Id. fol. 1251. The Commons do by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords in this present Parliament and by Authority of the same give and grant unto you our Supreme Liege Lord and Soveraign one Subsidy c. Supreme Liege-lord and Sovereign In the First Chapter 13 Car. 2. the (c) Id. fol. 1300. enacting part is thus worded Do most humbly beseech your most Excellent Majesty Most humbly beseech Your most Excellent Majesty c. that it may be Enacted and be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by Authority of the same The rest of the Acts in King Charles the Second's Reign are continued in the same form The Titles of the Acts of Parliament 1 Jac. 2. our most Gracious Soveraign are At the Parliament begun at Westminster the 19th Day of May Anno Dom. 1685. in the First Year of the Reign of our most Gracious Soveraign Lord James c. The Enacting part of the granting an Imposition c. thus Most Gracious Soveraign We your Majesties most Dutiful and Loyal Subjects the Commons Assembled in Parliament towards a Supply c. and with an humble and thankful acknowledgment of your Majesties favourable and tender regard to us your Commons have chearfully and unanimously given and granted unto your Majesty an Aid and Assistance and we do humbly beseech your Majesty that it may be Enacted and be it Enacted by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same All the other Acts which are not Grants of Aid Assistance or Supply are conceived in the latter words By this full enumeration of the most considerable Expressions either of Records or Historians relating to the Great Councils or Parliaments from William the Conqueror's time to this present Age which in a continued series of time I have deduced it appears that till King John's time only the Prelates Earls and Barons and such of the great Tenents in Capite as were not Barons were summoned and at the Kings pleasure by special Writ and after King John's Charter the lesser Tenents in Capite by General Summons Also that the Charters of Kings wherein they granted Liberties to their Subjects were received as Laws and gave as ample Satisfaction as now The King willeth doth to pass a Bill tendred for his Royal Assent by both Houses and there was good
puts an end to the Sessions so that what ever Bills are ready and pass not the Royal Assent must be again read three times in either House for the more security it is usual to insert a Proviso That the Session is not thereby concluded The Royal Assent is given two ways First Royal Assent by Patent by Commission since the Statute of the 33 H. 8. c. 21. wherein it is expressed That the Kings Royal Assent by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal Signed by his hand and declared and notified in his absence to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and to the Commons Assembled in the higher House is and ever was of as good strengh and force as if the King had been there personally present and assented openly and publickly to the same The manner of the King 's giving his Publick Assent is in this manner The King cometh in Person in his Parliament-Robes Royal Assent when the King present and sitteth in his State and the Upper House sit in their Robes The Speaker with all the Commons House cometh to the Bar of the Lords House and in Sir Thomas Smith's time Sir Th. Smith's Commonwealth p. 45. Speeches used to be made there the Chancellor for the Lords and the Speaker for the Commons in set Speeches returned the Prince Thanks for that he hath so great Care of the good Government of his People and for calling them together to advise of such things as should be for the Reformation Establishing and Ornament of the Commonweal After which the Chancellor in the Prince's Name giveth Thanks to the Lords and Commons for their Pains and Travel taken which he saith the Prince will remember and recompense when Time and Occasion shall serve and that the Prince is ready to declare his Pleasure concerning their Proceedings whereby the same may have perfect Life and Accomplishment by his Princely Authority I think now mostly Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 181 182. the Speaker of the House of Commons makes a Speech acquainting the King with the purport of the Bills Then the Clerk of the Crown readeth the Title of the Bills in such Order as they are in Consequence After the Title of every Bill is read singly The Clerk of the Crown pronounceth the Royal Assent or Dissent the Clerk of the Parliament pronounceth the Royal Assent according to certain Instructions given from his Majesty in that behalf If it be a Publick Bill to which the King assenteth the Answer is Le Roy le veult The King willeth If a Private Bill allowed by the King the Answer is Soit fait comme il est desire Let it be done as it is desired And upon a Petitionary Bill the like is used If it be a Publick Bill which the King forbeareth to allow he saith Le Roy se avisera The King will advise To a Subsidy Bill the Clerk pronounceth Le Roy remercie ses loyaux Subjects accepte leur Benevolence aussi le veult The King thanks his Loyal Subjects accepts their Benevolence and also willeth To a general Pardon is pronounced Les Prelates Seigneurs Communs en cest Parlement assembles au nom de touts vous autres Subjects remercient tres humblement vostre Majesty prient Dieu vous donner en sante bone vie longe The Prelates Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled in the name of all your other Subjects thrice humbly give thanks to your Majesty and pray God to give you in health a good Life and long These P. 46. saith Sir Thomas Smith be taken now as perfect Laws and Ordinances of the Realm of England and none other and as shortly as may be are printed except it be some Private Acts made for the Benefit or Prejudice of some Private Man these be only exemplified under the Seal of the Parliament CHAP. XXIX Of Factious Combinations in Parliaments I Hope in the foregoing Chapters I have so explained the Constitution of Parliaments and the Legislative Power that unbiassed and unprejudiced Persons will no more be misled by the Sophisms and plausible pretences which to aggrandize the Power of the two Houses at first and after of the Commons House only the Penmen of the long Parliament made use of yet because many of late were furbishing the rusty Armour of their Demagogues and trimming their Helmets with fresh Plumes I conceive it necessary to take notice of some of their chiefest Arguments and examine those which had greatest Influence upon the People The great and venerable name of Parliament and its Authority was constantly used as Shield and Buckler to ward off all the Force of the Loyal Assaults and Mr. Prynne writ a large Volume which he stiled The Soveraign Power of Parliaments and when the very Lees and Dregs of the Commons House was put in Ferment that very Kilderkin would admit no lower Stile than the supreme Authority of the Nation to be pearched on its Bunghole Therefore to disabuse the less considerate The various Acceptation of the word Parliament and to detect the Frauds of those which under that great Name applyed whatever they met with in the Laws or History to the House of Commons I think it necessary in the first place to clear the acceptation of the Word Appropriated to the Lords House Sometimes the word Parliament is used for the House of (a) Egerton sect 4. 22 23. Lords only as when upon Writ of Error any Judgment in the King's-Bench is examined in the House of Lords the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed by Parliament The Appellation of Parliament is likewise used for the two Houses To both the Houses in regard they are the gross Body whereof the Parliament consists there only wanting the Sovereign Head to compleat it But they are so far from being the High Court of Parliament that they cannot co-unite to be an entire Court either of Sovereign or Ministerial Justice but only in concurring in Votes in their several Houses for preparing of matters in order to an act of all the Body which when they have done their Votes are so far from having any legal Authority in the State as in Law there is no Stile or Form of their joynt Acts further than Bills nor doth the Law so much as take notice of them till they have Royal Assent without which the Votes of the two Houses dye in the Womb like an Embryo So that the proper use of the word Parliament How properly the High Court of Parliament as Authority of Law-making is annexed to the name is only when the King and the two Houses concurr in one Act and in that sence only is the Parliament the Supream Court the highest Judicatory and the most Sovereign Power Not for any Soveraignty in the two Houses and from them transferred to the King by their joining and consenting with him but because every compleat and perfect Act of it is the Act of
Land and the other the demean of the Fee So it is in an Estate of Power and Authority If the King granteth an Estate of Power Authority and Jurisdiction in Fee-simple or in Fee-tail for term longer or shorter the King hath the demean of Power and the other the demean of Use the King hath Dominium directum the other Dominium utile which he applies to the two Houses but it must be likewise considered that this distinct Authority they have is wholly derivative and so much the more depending on the Sovereign as he can at his Pleasure totally deprive them of the Exercise of it by Prorogation or totally annihilate it by Dissolution Another Objection they made Objection The Three Estates to restrain the Excess of each other was from the Answer the King authorized a Gentleman to make to the Observer That the three Estates are constituted to the End that the Power of the one should moderate and restrain the excess of the Power in the other From which he infers That this is an Allay and mixture in the Root and essence of the Constitution To this it may be answered Answer to it That there is no such Power in the two Houses they are called to consult and to consent All they can do is that they have the opportunity of having grievances redressed because they may otherwise deny the King the assistance he desires But they have no Authority of themselves to redress them or to restrain and moderate his Excesses by Force nor can they moderate the Excesses of one another by any Act of their own singly further than the exorbitant Estate shall be willing to be moderated It is a most absurd thing to imagine that when the Law hath placed the Sovereign Power in the King it should again for a space of time during the Session of Parliament unsovereign Him and place in the two Houses the same Sovereign Trust and with a second absurdity leave in the King's Hands the summoning and dissolving the Power by which himself should be constrained and to make up all should by Authority of that Power constrain all the Heads of the People and even the Representative Body of that Power by Solemn Oath to declare that the King is not only supreme Governour but that he is only supreme Governour Besides the Arguments they sued upon this Head of a debased Monarch that was not only to admit some of his Subjects into the Participation of his Burthen but of his Soveraignty whereby they pleaded for both the Houses being joynt-Sovereigns for the time they used other Arguments singly for the House of Commons which they endeavoured to aggrandize and raise to a strange over-towring heighth above both King and Lords and they grounded all their Arguments upon the immense Power of their being the Peoples Representatives The Observer saith Objection concerning the Power of Representatives That the vertue of Representation is the great Privilege of Privileges that unalterable Basis of all Honour and Power whereby the House of Commons claims the entire Right of all the Gentry and People and that there can be nothing under Heaven next to renouncing of God which can be more perfidious and more pernicious to the People than the withdrawing from them and doth acknowledge that the Arbitrary Rule was once most safe for the World But now since most Countries have found out an Art and peaceable Order for publick Assemblies he means by Representatives whereby the People may assume its own Power and do it self Right without the disturbance of it self or injury to Princes he is very unjust that will oppose this Art and Order In answer to which it ought to be considered That the Representative Body deserves the highest Honour and Observance that can be given to the Body Represented Answer What Honour is due to Representatives of the Subjects but this Honour will depend upon two things First the quality and condition of the Body represented and Secondly on the quality of the Representative it self If therefore the Body at large were an absolute Sovereign as in Republicks the true Representative of that Body were to be observed with all Sovereign Honour and due Subjection But when the Body at large it self is but a Subject as it is in Monarchy the Honour and Authority of the Representative cannot exceed the Honour and Authority of a Subject for none can make the Image more than the Original or without Adulterating Arts appear so Therefore however abhorrent a Crime he makes it in such as concurr not in their Judgment with their Representatives that exceed their Authority and Commission yet all sober and just Persons ought to consider that the Subjects by giving Authority to some of their own Order to represent them and advise and consent for them gave them no such Power above that of Subjects yea so much above the condition of their Sovereigns that neither breach of Faith nor the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy which they never took to them or any other Duty to their King was comparable to the withdrawing from the Vote or Act of their Representators as if the Rights of the Crown and Kingdom and the Laws made by the King with the assent of the three Estates in Parliament did not so much concern the Commons of the Land but that against all these they stood solely bound to the Representatives as the only Sovereign of their Obedience I shall now offer some Reasons against this dangerous Opinion First It is to be considered Reasons against the Power of Representatives That in our Kingdom the Representors are not equally chosen as in the united Provinces and other Commonwealths but it lies in the Power of the Sovereign here to make a Town equal in number of Burgesses to a County which doth vehemently demonstrate That the first Institution and end of such Representatives was rather to minister Information of the State and Condition of that particular place and advise and assist the Sovereign and to consent with him and not to determine Sovereignly Secondly The cockering the People in that Opinion that the Soveraignty lies in Materia prima in them and by their Representatives that they may exert it is the certain way to ruin not only Monarchy but all government as was evident in the case of the Rebellious House of Commons in King Charles the First 's time who prided themselves so much with the Title of Representatives and by pretext of that and the Assistance of their Army having unyoked themselves from all Subjection to their Lawful King and disengaged themselves from their dangerous and useless Collegues the Lords as they then voted them after some while they lost their Honour and Reverence with their own Army who then would be the People and pulled them out of their House justly charging them with a design to perpetuate themselves And so the Tyrannical Supremacy was exercised by Cromwell and his Council of Officers a while
preserved in Peace Arms are necessary and they cannot be provided for without Taxes The Subjects receive the benefit of protection and by the care of the Government peaceable possession of their Houses Fields and Cattle Liberty of Trade dispensation of Justice and other great Emoluments by its guard and vigilance which require a numerous retinue of Officers of State Justice and War and Multitude of subordinate Ministers Something also must be allowed for the grandeur and port is necessary for the regulating it at home and abroad the maintaining Correspondence by Ambassadors the providing for defence against foreign Invasions and preserving Tranquillity at home in all which the Publick is concerned therefore the reason is very just and equitable that besides a standing Revenue for defraying these constant charges there should be subsidiary supplys upon emergencies adequate to the occasions As Cicero justly admonisheth Da operam ut omnes intelligant si salvi esse volunt necessitati esse parendum That the Subjects be made to understand that if they will be safe As the Subject is protected so he ought to support the Government they must yield to necessity this absolute necessity of parting with a portion of their Estates for securing the rest For though it be prudence in a private man justly and moderately to enrich himself yet craftily to withhold from the Publick and to defraud it of such parts of the Wealth as is by Law required is no sign of prudence saith Mr. Hobs as judiciously as any position he lyes down but want of knowledge of what is necessary Civil War for their own defence and covetousness to part with nothing they can hold makes this restive humour in many That the Kings of England have quitted that Soveraign badge of raising money upon the Subject by their own Impositions without consent of Parliament is manifest since Edward the First 's time (b) 27 E. 1. c. 5. Anno 1299. The Act for which runs thus For so much as divers People of our Realm are in fear that the Aids and Tasks which they have given us before time towards our Wars and other business of their own grant and good will howsoever they were made might turn to a Bondage to them and their Heirs because they might be at another time found in the Rolls and likewise for the prices taken throughout the Realm by our Ministers We have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not draw such Aids Task nor Prices into a Custom for any thing that hath been done heretofore be it by Roll or any other Precedent that may be found (c) Cap. 6. The next is thus Moreover we have granted for us and our Heirs as well to Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors and other folk of Holy Church as also to Earls Barons and to all the Commonalty of the Land that for no business from henceforth we shall take such manner of Aids Tasks nor Prices but by the common assent of the Realm and for the common profit thereof See for this the Charter of King John saving the ancient Aids and Prices due and accustomed These being not fully enough expressed the Statute of 34. E. 1. though as short in words as any to be found yet is of the largest extent and as liberal a Boon of Royal bounty as any People can boast of from their Prince It is thus No Tallage or Aid shall be taken or levied by Us or our Heirs in our Realm without the good will and assent of Archbishops Bishops Earls Barons Knights Burgesses and other Free-men of the Land Therefore all those who would enjoy the benefit of this Law must take care they preserve the Succession and the two Houses of Parliament (d) MS. Speech second Parl. Elâ—z an 1562. Inducements to supply the Sovereign The Lord Chancellor in Queen Elizabeth's time thus by the Queens command discourseth to the Houses If when any part of the natural Body hap to be in danger the Head and every part hasteth to the relief so how inconvenient and unnatural is it when danger is offered to the whole that the Head should take the whole care and bear the whole burthen and the Members remain uncareful and uncharged It is certain (e) Coke Instit 1.90 the Prince can make no War of any great concernment without the assistance of his Subjects Purses as well as Bodies unless all would voluntarily serve upon their own charges for that neither sudden dangers can be evaded nor Forces raised and all things necessary for them provided nor peace be long preserved when the Prince hath an empty Exchequer for Treasure is Firmamentum Belli Ornamentum Pacis A late (f) States of France Objection French Author concerning his own Country makes this objection That Princes having assigned for their usual charges of the Government Tribute and other Incomes they ought to be therewith contented and not without occasion raise new Taxes to the detriment of the Liege people and contrary to the intention of the Trust Yet he owns this ought to be soberly understood for a wise Physician applies those Remedies necessary without the Patient's leave and will force him though by cutting off a Limb to save his life So when there may happen a necessity urgent and unforeseen that either will suffer no delay or which ought not for some time to be divulged in such cases saith he the King without the States and whether they will or no may lay new Impositions and make all other necessary provisions by the absolute Power he hath to rule and preserve his State and Subjects he not being able to defend them without necessary Forces Therefore in such occasions it is to be supposed that with the Power of Government there is transferred to the Prince the Power to do that without which good Government cannot be executed but when there is not that kind of necessity the States are called Thus far my Author Since therefore (g) Coke 1. Insiit p. 161. qui diruit medium destruit finem he that takes away the necessary means for a King to preserve his people in uncommon events hazards the ruine of the People some have inferred that when dangers should be so sudden that there could not be time to convene a Parliament or that such a Parliament met should for some design deny the Prince Money then the Kings Prerogative might extend to the raising of Money and they instance in the Loans by Privy Seals exacted upon the Subjects even in Queen Elizabeth's time This indeed was the Plea for Ship-money and as the case was stated by King Charles the First Concerning Ship-Money all the Judges once subscribed their affirmative opinions though Mr. Justice Hutton and Crooke retracted after and with great learning the case was argued and Judgment given in favour of the King Yet he hoping by the yielding to the abolishing of it to have stopped the misery of a War consented to an
Council and the Optimates witnessing are Cynedrid the Queen three Bishops one Abbot and Brorda Wiega Cuthbert Eobing Esne Cydda Winbert Heardbert and Brorda Dukes besides Ethelbeard Archbishop Forthred Abbat and Sighore Son of Siger But I shall hereafter more copiously give an Account of the constituent Parts of the great Councils The King the Fountain of Laws The Legislative Power saith a learned (h) Sheringham's Supremacy p. 34. Leges vero Anglicanae consuetudines Regum Authoritate jubent quandoque quandoque vetant quandoque vindicant puniunt transgressores Bracton lib. 1. c. 2. Author belongs to the King alone by the Common Law for though the two Houses have Authority granted them by the King to assent or dissent yet the Power that makes it a Law the Authority that animates it and makes it differ from a dead Letter is in the King who is the Life and Soul of the Law by whose Authority alone the Laws command forbid vindicate and punish Transgressors This was resolved by divers Earls and Barons and by all the Justices in the Reign of King Edward the Third for one (i) Fuit dit que le Roy sist les Leis per assent des Peres de la Commune non pas les Peres le Commune qu'il ne avera nul Pere en sa terre demesne que le Roy per eux ne doit estre ajuge 22 E. 3. c. 1. Haedlow and his Wife having a Controversie with the King and desiring to have it decided in Parliament It was resolved That the King makes Laws by the Assent of the Lords and Commons and not the Lords and Commons and that he could have no Peer in his own Land and could not be judged by them This is further manifested that the Laws are primarily and properly made by the King and the two Houses have a Cooperation but no Co-ordination of Power for the breach of any Statute whether it be by Treason Murther Felony Perjury or by any other way is an offence against the (k) Encounter la Corone Dignitie le Roy. Stanford 's Pleas of the Crown lib. 1. c. 1. Kings Authority alone and Pleas made against such Offences are called The Pleas of the Crown because they are done against the Crown and Dignity of the King So that it is not the Dignity and Authority of the Lords and Commons which is violated but the Dignity and Authority of the King This appears also in the Power the (l) Sheringham p. 35. See Finch lib. 2. fol. 22. Coke 2 II. 7. lib. 7. fol. 14. Stanford lib. 2.101 King hath in dispensing with such Laws as forbid a thing which is not malum in se and in pardoning the Transgression of others as Treason Felony c. which in Reason he ought no more to do than to dispense with the Laws of Germany Spain or France or pardon the Transgressors thereof if they were not made by his Authority Furthermore it is a certain Maxim of the Law (m) Ejusdem est leges interpretari cujus est condere The Amendment was sealed by the Great Seal 2 May 9 E. 1. commanding the Justices to do and execute all and every thing contained in it though the same did not accord with the Statute of Gloucester in all things None can interpret the Laws but the same Power that makes them But the King may do this as appears by the Statute of Glocester 6â—â— where immediately after the Statute are these words After by the King and his Justices certain Expositions were made upon some of the Articles above mentioned So the Judges are appointed by the King and they have from him a Power to interpret the Law judicialiter otherwise they could not proceed to Judgment and being called by the King with him and under him they have a Power to interpret the Law Authoritativé But the two Houses besides that they can do nothing singly or joyntly without the Kings Concurrence in (n) Sheringham ut supra their make and composition are unfit to interpret Law For such Power as interprets Law must be always existent or in being to act according to emergent Occasions which the two Houses are not And if they were a permanent Body yet they having a Negative upon each other the Interpretation of the Law must be retarded and all Controversies depending thereupon undecided And this Disagreement might perhaps endure for ever and so a final Determination in such Suits would be impossible Now these are Inconveniences which ought not to be admitted in any Commonwealth for it derogates both from the Honour and Wisdom of a Nation to be so moulded and framed that Justice cannot have a free Passage in all Contingencies Not only the Legislative Power it self but the very (o) Hem p. 36. The King may provide for all things necessary for Government where the Law hath not provided or contradicts not Exercise of the Power also so far as it is essential to Government is in the King alone for he can by Edicts and Proclamations provide for all necessary occasions and special Emergencies not provided for by fixed Laws which is one of the most excellent and eminent Acts of the Legislative Power and a sufficient Remedy against all Mischiefs in case the two Houses should refuse to concurr with him in those things which concern the Benefit of the Kingdoms For as (p) Ea quae Jurisdictioâ—is sunt pacis ea qâ—ae sunt Justitiae paci annexa ad nullum pertinent nisi ad Coronam Dignitatem Regiâ—m Bracton lib. 2. c. 24. Bracton saith those things which belong to Jurisdiction and Peace and those which are annexed to Justice and Peace appertain to none but the Crown neither can they be separated from it because they make the Crown If the King should unwarily by Act of Parliament consent to any thing prejudicial and derogatory to His Royal Prerogative such Acts are void by the Common Law and the Judges are bound to declare them so as that of 23. H. 6. about Sheriffs not to continue longer than one Year was by the Judges declared void and all Kings since might with a Clause of non obstante against the manifest words of the Statute have granted that office for Life in Tail or in Fee But I need not enlarge upon this for all the Acts for the King's Supremacy all the Laws and Statutes that over were made put this beyond Dispute that the affirmative Voice is absolutely in the King that no Laws can be binding or be Laws at all without his special Consent and this being one of the great Rights of Sovereignty cannot be separated from the Person of the King although he (q) Suprema jurisdictio potestas Regia etsi Princeps volet separari non pessunt sunt enim ipsa sorma substantialis essentia Majestatis ergo manente ipso Rege ab eo abdicari non possunt
Cabedo Pract. Obs par 2. decis 40. would himself For it is essential to Majesty and Soveraignty and cannot be abdicated while he remaineth King nor separated without the diminution or destruction of Majesty How both King and People are obliged to defend the Rights of the Crown will appear in the Laws ascribed to King Edward the Confessor in the 17.35 and 56. As to the Particular How absolutely necessary the Royal Assent is to all Laws in the Act of Recognition to King James the First it is fully expressed thus Which if Your Majesty shall be pleased as an Argument of your Gracious acceptation to adorn with Your Majestie 's Royal Assent without which it can neither be Compleat and Perfect nor remain to all Posterity according to our Desire as a Memorial of your Princely and tender Affection towards us c. Against what I have laid down those who were for co-ordinate Powers in the two Houses object many things Answers to some Objections against the King's sole establishing of Laws some I have answered in the Chapter of the King's Sovereignty and I shall meet with others in the Chapters of Parliaments And shall here only take notice of some omitted or not fully answered there Against the assertion That the Liberties granted by King Henry the Third were by way of Charter they produce the Preamble (r) Coke 2 Instit fol. 525. to the Confirmation of King Edward the First of Magna Charta La Charte des Franchises la Charte de la Forest les queux fuerent faitz per Commen de tout Royalm en le temps le Roy Henry pier soient tenue c. and Charta de Foresta wherein he saith that the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of the Forest made by the Community of all the Realm in the time of King Henry our Father shall be kept c. To which with the Judicious Doctor (s) General Preface to Compleat History p. 41. The ancient Kings sealing of Charters of Liberties reputed Laws Brady may be answered that these were the Petitions and Requests of the Community of the Kingdom and may be said to be made that is digested by them into the form of a Charter So the Barons offered King John's Magna Charta to him ready drawn in a Schedule and forced him to grant it and cause his Seal to be put to it and the whole strength and validity of the Charter lay in his Grant and the Confirmation of it under his Seal This was the only Security they desired and demanded no other and the Tenour of all the Charters were accordingly We grant We confirm We give for us and our Heirs to them and their Heirs c. Which Grants and Concessious were always in these times accepted and acknowledged to be sufficient without the least doubting or scruple There was no other Power or Authority that gave them being but the King's so that it seemed the great Councils or Parliaments of those times owned the Kings Charters under Seal and the Grants made by them to the People to be of good force and effect and that their Petitions to which he gave his assent and caused to be put under his Seal were by them accepted and from time to time acknowledged as firm and valid Laws The same learned (t) Idem p. 67. The Laws planted by Kings Doctor Brady observes that Sir Edward Coke hath a formal way of speaking The Law doth this and The Law doth that This is Law That is by Common Law of England abstracting it from any dependance upon or Creation by the Government as if it had been here before there was any and had grown up with the first Trees Herbs and Grass that grew upon English Ground and had not been of our antient Kings and their Successors planting by assistance and advice of their great Councils in all Ages as it was found expedient either by them or upon Petition and Request of their People which is acknowledged by all the Bishops Earls Barons and People present at the (u) Claus 1 E. 2. m. 10. dorso Coronation of King Edward the Second in these words Sir Will you grant and keep and by your Oath confirm to the People of England the Laws and Customs granted to them by the antient Kings of England your Predecessors true and devout to God and namely the Laws and Customs and Liberties granted to the Clergy and People by the glorious King Edward your Predecessor Another Objection some make against the Absoluteness of the King's Power Second Objection when it is said in antient Statutes The King ordains The King wills that it hath been resolved by many of the Judges (w) Coke 8. Report s 20. b. that if these Statutes be entred in the Parliament Rolls and allowed as acts of Parliament it shall be intended they were by Authority of Parliament With the Judicious Dr. Brady I shall not enquire how such Entry and such Allowance without any Words in the Statutes to that purpose can make them to be by Authority of Parliament But we may he sure those Words The King ordains The King wills being pronounced in Parliament and recorded in the Rolls thereof do clearly prove the King's Authority and Power in making Laws to be far greater than many Men would allow him or have him to enjoy (x) Lib. 3. c. 9. Bracton and the Author of (y) Lib. 1. c. 17. â—leta applying the Passage of the Civil Law Quod Principi placet Legis habet vigorem to the King of England say That Clause ought not to be understood of every thing that is rashly presumed to be his Will but of that which is justly determined upon good Advice and Deliberation by the Counsel of his Magistrates (z) Râ—ge Authoritatem prastante the King giving it Authority and confirming it for a Law and from hence (a) Cum ipse sit Author Juris non debet inde Injuriarum nasci occasio unde Jura nascuntur infer That when he himself is the Author of the Law Injustice ought not to spring from the same Fountain from whence the Law doth spring It is no diminution of the Sovereignty of a Prince in the matter of making Laws or repealing them to have the Assent of the Nobles and such a select Body of Great and Wise Men as the House of Commons are But when as in the Parliament 1641. the Two Houses claim a Co-ordinate Power and would make their Advices be swallowed as Commands it is this that all Loyal Persons should oppose We generally understand that the Persian Monarchy was as Absolute as any yet in it we have a manifest Discovery of the Concurrence of the Nobles in preparing a Decree The Persian manner of making Laws yet they wanted the King's establishing the Decree by his signing it whereby it might not be changed and Grotius thinks they signed it also (b) Dan. cap. 6. v. 7 8
Barons Justices and others which are of the King's Council who may not depart without special leave of the King I shall not here enter into the enquiry how far the extent of the Power of the King's Council was in those days but it is very apparent that the King with advice of his Council proposed Laws and that others proposed by the Houses were considered by the King and Council as no doubt they are now considered before the King gives his Assent to Bills So in the Statute of the Definition of (x) Pulton An. 1304. fol. 72. Conspirators in the three and Thirtieth Year of King Edward the First it is said This Ordinance was accorded by the King and his Council in his Parliament Also in the Ordinance of (y) Idem Anno 1305. Enquests the Eighteenth of Sept. in the thirty third Year of Ed. the First It is said it is agreed and ordained by the King and all his Council that is his Parliament As to the special Prerogative of the King in giving the ultimate Character and fiat to the Laws every Act expresseth it so the Statute of (z) 18 Sept. 33 E. 1. Champerty the Statutes are called by the King Our Statutes and Our Lord the King hath commanded and in the Statute de Conjunctim feoffat it is said It is no new thing that among divers Establishments of Laws which we have ordained in our time so in the Ordinatio Forestae 34 Ed. 1. The King Ordains (a) Id. Anno 1306. fol. 73. We have ordained for our selves and our Heirs So in the Statute De asportatu Religiosorum 35 Ed. 1. it is said by the Council of his Earls Barons great Men and other Nobles of his Kingdom at his Parliament Our Lord the King hath Ordained and Enacted I shall only note first That in the Twenty eighth of this King those the (b) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso King had appointed being ready to give an account of the Perambulation of the Forests the King put a present stop to their report and his determination because the Prelates Earls Barons The Reason the King will determine nothing without advice in Parliament and the rest of the Magnates of the Kingdom in whose Presence his own and others Reasons should be propounded and heard and by whose Councils he intended to work especially seeing they were bound by Oath as well as himself to observe and maintain the Rights of the Kingdom and Crown were not then present and those were not summoned who should propound their Reasons so far as the matters concerned them and the King was not willing without their advice to put an end to the matters therefore he orders the Sheriffs to cause the two Knights that came to the last Parliament by his Precept now to come and the like for the Cities and Burroughs and if any were dead or infirm so that he could not come then to cause another to be chosen By which it appears that it was only from the King's Indulgence and that he might more deliberately resolve for the best advantage of his Subjects and for their satisfaction that he would have the advice of a fuller Assembly We may also further note from hence that it was in the King's Power to summon the same Knights Citizens and Burgesses without a new Choice except the Persons were dead or infirm Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Second's time IN this King's Reign these following Particulars are most observable In the Statute for (a) Pulton An. 1307. fol. 79. Knights 1 Regni it is said Our Lord the King hath granted In the Summons 5 Ed. 2. the Precept to the Sheriff The same Knights c. to come that were before is to cause to come to the Parliament to be held at Westminster those Knights Citizens and Burgesses in his Bailiwick which he caused to come lately to the present Parliament at London and which for certain causes went from the said Parliament (b) Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 26. dorso Vel alios ad hâ—â— idoneos loco ipsorum si ad hoc vacare non possunt or others fit for the Imployment if they cannot be at leisure Dated Octob. 11. In the sixth of Ed. 2. we have an example of the King 's (c) Cl. 6 E. 2. m. 27. dorso A Form of Prorogation proroguing the House of Commons in these Words Dominus Rex praecepit quod Milites Cives Burgenses qui ad Parliamentum Regis ibidem summonitum convenerunt pro Comitatibus Civitatibus Burgis Angliae ad propria remearent ita quod reverterentur ibidem in crastino S. Mich. prox futuro sub poena qua decet So that as they were commanded to return home so they were appointed a time to return under the Intimation of a Punishment The Preamble to the (d) Pulton An. 1315. fol. 80. The King with his Council revise Articles after the Parliament ended Articuli Cleri runs thus That by the Kings Progrenitors and himself at the Instance of the Prelates certain Articles were made and in the Parliament at Lincoln 9 Regni he caused them to be rehearsed before his Council and made certain answers to be corrected and to the residue of the Articles answers were made by him and his Council and so by way of Charter they are published at York 24 Nov. 10 Regni The Statute of (e) Id. 1316. fol. 83. Gavelet at London saith It is provided by our Lord the King and his Justices In the Statute de Terris (f) Id. Anno 1323. 17 E. 2. fol. 91. Templariorum it is said Great conference was had before the King himself in the presence of the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and great Men of the Realm and others present whereupon the Greater part of the King's Council The King's Council and Justices affirm as well the Justices as other Lay-men being assembled the Justices affirmed precisely c. After the recital of Particulars the words are It is ordained and agreed in the same Parliament Anno 1326. the last of Ed. 2. There is a Prorogation of the (g) Claus 20 E. 2. m. 4. dorso A Prorogation before Meeting Parliament before meeting which runs thus That though the King had intended Colloquium Tractatum Conference and Treaty in the Quindene of St. Andrew by Isabel the Queen and Edward his eldest Son Custos of the Kingdom the King then being beyond Sea and the Prelats Proceres Magnates Regni and so had commanded two Knights of the Community of the County two Burgesses of every Burrough (h) Quia tamen quibusdam de causis necessariis utilibus praedict Parliamentum Tractatum usque in crast inum Epiphaniae prox jam futur c. duximus prorogandum yet for certain causes necessary and profitable he hath prorogued the said Parliament and Treaty unto the day after Epiphany c. Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Third's
Curiae suae Baronum Parium suorum So Anno 1240. 24 H. 3. (i) Graviter accusatus coram Rege Curia tota Lond. Mat. Westm 153. Matthew Paris saith That Hubert de Burgo Earl of Kent was grievously accused before the King and his whole Court and it was adjudged he should resign to the King four of his Castles I cannot omit one memorable passage that (k) Mat. Westm Anno 1260. p. 295 296. Anno 1260. 44 H. 3. there falling out a difference betwixt King Hen. 3. Prince Edward his Son Simon Montfort and other Nobles the King called his Baronage to St. Pauls and there it being urged that Prince Edward had done some injuries to the King he offered to prove himself innocent before the King and his Uncle who was King of the Romans saying Who are Peers of Prince Edward That none of (l) Omnes alios Barones Comites sibi de â—ure non esse Pares nec sâ—â—s in eum excercerâ— disâ—ussiones the rest of the Barons and Earls were by right his Peers nor ought to exercise upon him their Discussions of the matter By which it appears that he judged himself to be something more than a Peer of the Realm being the Heir apparent of the Crown I might fill a large Volum with the Histories and Records to prove this but since Levellers and the House of Commons that voted the House of Lords dangerous and useless have received such deadly wounds by Mr. Prynne in his Plea for the Lords who was once one of their own Champions I think it needless to whet those Weapons again since they always will be in readiness for any one to make use of if need require and shall only obviate one objection that may be urged That whatever the usage was before the Representatives of the Commons An Objection That after the House of Commons were admitted the Jurisdiction of the Lords House was lessened Answered yet the Commons after were often admitted to a share of Judicature in some cases But I shall give a few Instances how after this change of the Constitution of Parliament still this power of Judicature remained in the King and House of Lords Roger de (m) 4 E. 3. num 11.28 E. 3. num 9 10. Mortimer being accused of High Treason 4 E. 3. for the Murther of King Edward 2. after his resignation and unlawful deposition Knighton (n) De Event Angliae lib. 3. c. 16. col 1556 1557. giving an account of the proceedings agreeable to the Parliament Roll saith Rex praecepit Comitibus Baronibus caeteris Magnatibus Regni justum judicium ferre super praedicto Rogero de Mortimer So at the Parliament held at Salisbury 7 R. 2. W. de Zouch is said to be called to the Parliament to stand to the Judgment (o) Ad standum judicio Regis Domincrum Walâ—ingham p. 334. Hist Ang. Hypodig Neust p. 141. of the King and the Lords So Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk and Chancellor of England 10 R. 2. (p) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 6. ad 18. was accused by the Commons in full Parliament before the King Bishops and Lords and at last it is said The Lords in full Parliament gave judgment against him In the Parliament 11 R. 2. Thomas Duke of Gloucester offered to put himself upon his Tryal as the Lords of the Parliament would award c. After which the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal claimed their Liberties and Franchises namely That all weighty matters in the same Parliament which should be after moved touching the Peers of the Land should be judged and determined by them by the course of Parliament and not by the Civil Law nor yet by the Common Law of the Land used in other Courts of the Realm Yet this seems a very high Demand for they have not Juris dandi but dati Jurisdictionem as they are a Court of Ministerial Jurisdiction being the Court of the King's Barons in Parliament And though when upon Writ of Error (q) Egerton sect 4.22 23. any Judgment in the King's Bench is examined in the House of Lords and there affirmed or reversed the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed in Parliament yet we cannot conclude they have the Power of the High Court of Parliament that their Decrees if against the Law should be as binding as Acts of Parliament How the Lords judge ministerially And though the same House in the same Session may not have Power to review again their own Judgment nor to restore again any Judgment they have reversed because they judge ministerially and not sovereignly and so bind their own Hands as well as their Inferiors whereas an Absolute Supreme Court is never at the last Period of Jurisdiction yet we see Attainders in one Parliament reversed in another and so may their Judgments be But this obiter I shall but add one proof more being full and express to the purpose to prove the House of Lords sole Jurisdiction with the King who must always be understood to give Judgment by them The Record is 1 H. 4. (r) Rot. Par. 1 H. 4. num 79. Exact Abridgment p. 392. where it is said That 3 Nov. the Commons in this Parliament shewed to the King Come les joggements du Parlement apperteignent soulement au Roy Seignieurs nient aus Communes c. That the Judgments of Parliament appertained only to the King and to the Lords and not unto the Commons Thereupon they prayed the King out of his special Grace to shew unto them the said Judgments and the cause of them that so no Record might be made in Parliament against the said Commons which are or shall be parties to any Judgment given or hereafter to be given in Parliament without their Privity Whereunto the Archbishop of Canterbury gave them this Answer by the Kings Commandment That the Commons themselves are Petitioners and Demanders and that the King (s) Et que le Roy les Seigniours de tout temps ont eues averont de droit les Juggement in Parliament en manere come mesmes les Communes soâ—t monstres and Lords from all times have had and shall have of right the Judgments in Parliaments in manner as the Commons have shewed How far the King and House of Lords have been Judges of the Priviledges of the House of Commons I shall declare in that part of this Chapter wherein I treat of that House SECT 5. Of the Assistants to the House of Lords HAving thus far treated of the Constituent Parts of the House of Lords I come now to the Assistants to this most Honourable House which were mostly the (t) Prynne's Brief Register part 1. sect 3. p. 240. The Judges and other Assistants of the House of Lords King 's Great Officers as well Clergy-men as Secular Persons who were no Lords or Barons of the Realm as namely his Treasurer
Chancellor of the Exchequer Judges of his Courts at Westminster Justices in Eyre Justices Assignes Barons of his Exchequer Clerks Secretaries of his Council and sometimes his Serjeants at Law with such other Officers and Persons whom our Kings thought meet to summon The first Writ that Mr. Prynne finds extant in our Records and which Sir William Dugdale mentions is entred in the Clause-Roll 23 E. 1. dorso 9. directed to Gilbert de Thornton and thirty eight more whose Names are in Sir William Dugdale whereof there are eleven by the name of Magistri three Deans and two Archdeacons only I find them differently ranked in Mr. Prynne to what they are in Sir William Dugdale The Writ runs thus Rex dilecto fideâ—i suo Gilberto de Thornton salutem Quia super quibusdam arduis negotiis nos Regnum nostrum ac vos caeterosque de Concilio nostro tangentibus quae sine vestra eorum praesentia nolumus expediri c. Vobis mandamus in fide dilectione c. as in the usual Summons to the Bishops Sometimes as 25 E. 1. there (u) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 25. dorso was no Writ directed to them but we find under the Name of Milites with a Lines space betwixt them and the Barons thirteen named which by other Records are known to be the King's Justices The differences in their Writs are mostly these Sometimes The difference in their Writs as in 27 E. 1. it is Cum caeteris de Concilio nostro habere volumus colloquium tractatum or as in 28 E. 1. (w) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso showing the special Cause Quia super Jure Dominio quae nobis in Regno Scotiae competit c. cum Juris peritis cum caeteris de Concilio nostro speciale colloquium habere volumus tractatum vobis mandamus c. cum caeteris de Concilio nostro super praemissis tractaturis vestrumque consilium impensuris At the same time there are Writs to the Chancellor of the University of Oxford to send four or five Persons skilful in the Law summoned from the Universities de discretioribus in Jure scripto magis expertis and to the Chancellor of the University of Cambridge to send two or three in the like manner qualified and then follow Writs to several Abbats Priors Deans and Chapters and all these Writs mentioned the Business of the King's Claim to the Jurisdiction of Scotland and in the Writs of Summons to the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Temporal Lords Justices and Sheriffs of Counties that Particular is not mentioned which shows that the King summoned these particular Persons as most fit to search and â— send their Chronicles to the Parliament The Occasion and Result whereof and of sending these Lawyers from the Universities you may read at large in (x) An. 13â—2 p. 419. to p. 438. Matth. Westminster and (y) Hist Ang. p. 32. to 58. Walsingham In some Writs as that of 9 E. 2. (z) Cl. 9 E. 2. m. 20. dorso the Justices are appointed to expedite their Assizes that they may not fail to be present at the Parliament or to leave two to attend the Business of the King's Bench And the 7 of E. 2. (a) Cl. 7 E. 2. m. 25â— dorso Justices to leave the Assâ—zes to attend the Parliament That whereas they had appointed the Assizes at Duresm and other Parts in the Northern Circuit at certain days after the time the Parliament was to convene at which he wondred he orders them to put off the Assizes and attend By which two Writs it appears their Summons by Writ to attend and counsel the King in Parliament was a Supersedeas to them to take Assizes during the Parliament and that the Assizes and Suits of private Persons ought to give place to the publick Affairs of the King and Kingdom in Parliament Whoever desires to know who were summoned in this manner and the further variety of Summons may consult Mr. Prynne and Sir William Dugdale's Summons From these Writs we may observe Observations from these Writs first That sometimes the Persons summoned were many in number sometimes very few and always (b) Brief Register part 1. a p. 366. ad p. 394. more or less at the King's Pleasure Secondly in latter times the Clergy-men were wholly omitted Thirdly That they were never licensed to appear by Proxies Mr. Prynne hath collected a great many Precedents to prove that these Persons thus summoned together with the King 's ordinary Council had a very great Hand Power and Authority not only in making Ordinances Proclamations deciding all weighty Controversies regulating most publick Abuses and punishing all exorbitant Offences out of Parliament in the Star-Chamber and elsewhere The Employment of these Assistants but likewise in receiving and answering all sorts of Petitions determining and adjudging all weighty doubtful Cases and Pleas yea in making or compiling Acts Ordinances Statutes and transacting all weighty Affairs concerning the King or Kingdom even in Parliaments themselves when summoned to them Yet these have no Vote but only are to speak to such Matters as their Opinions are required in and sit uncovered unless the Chancellor or Lord Keeper give leave to the Judges to be covered SECT 6. Concerning the House of Commons I Now come to consider the Honourable House of Commons and the Use The Summons of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Constitution and Priviledges of it and shall first consider the Summons by which they have their Power to act as an House and third Estate in Parliament Mr. (c) Second Part of Brief Register a p. 1. ad 29. Prynn hath cleared that all the Writs of Summons directed to Sheriffs in King John and Henry the Third's time before 49 H. 3. to send Knights to the King at set times were either for Information of the Council what voluntary aid each particular County would grant the King in his great necessity or to assist with Men and Arms and were not elected as Representatives of the Commons till 49 H. 3. To whom I shall refer the curious for Satisfaction as also to Dr. Brady who hath by his own Inspection as well as the considerate application of what Mr. Prynn hath amassed in his Books since his late Majesties Restauration and after 1648 composed many most useful Observations for the understanding of the ancient customs usages and practices relating to Parliaments Therefore I shall endeavour to be as short as possibly I can and without obscurity contract what they and most others that treat of the House of Commons have at large filled Volumes with The form of the Writ 49 H. 3. to the Sheriffs is not (d) Cl. 49 H. 3. m. 11â— dorso expressed but after the recital of the Writ to the Bishop of Duresm and Norwich and the eodem modo to the Bishops Abbats Priors Deans Earls Lords and Barons there follows this entry
Thomas Moile their Speaker before Sir Thomas Audley Lord Chancellor and all the Lords and Judges there assembled judging the contempt to be very great referred the punishment thereof to the Order of the Commons House The Lord Chancellor offered to grant them a Writ to the Sheriffs of London to require delivery which the House refused being clear in opinion that all Commandments and other Acts proceeding from the nether House were to be done and executed by their Serjeant without Writ only by shew of his Mace which was his Warrant The House applying it self to the Lords who were saith Mr. Prynne (i) Brief Register part 4. p. 860. the ancient proper Judges of the Violations and Violators of the Commons Privileges was the right Parliamentary way for their Members Release and if they had applied themselves to them at first they had prevented all Affronts to (k) Id. p. 862 863. themselves and Officers and met with no opposition And Mr. Prynne humbly apprehends that this Precedent will not warrant an absolute Jurisdiction in the House of Commons without any antecedent Complaint or (l) See Freeholders Grand Inquest from p. 50. to 64. Petition to the King or Lords in Parliament to punish any breach of their Members Privileges not first complained of to Application to be made to the King and Lords for punishment of Violators of this Privilege and adjudged by the King or Lords to be an actual breach or referred to themselves by the Lords or King to punish or without their subsequent Ratification or that it will justifie the Enlargement of any of their Members or menial Servants out of Execution by their Mace alone without an Habeas Corpus Writ of Privilege or special Act of Parliament or matter of Record for the Sheriff or Officers Indemnity against Actions of Escape or for the Plaintiffs relief to recover his Debt by a second Execution for the proof of all this I must refer the inquisitive Reader to Mr. Prynne's (m) Sect. 10. a p. 622. ad 870. Fourth Part of his Brief Register wherein he hath largely examined most of the then claimed Privileges of the House of Commons and disallows of them when not judged by the King and Lords In which Controversie I shall not presume to write any thing because it will be more pleasant and satisfactory to have recourse to himself SECT 10. Concerning Regulating Elections THE first thing I find concerning new Elections in the place of Absents and Defaulters is in the 5 E. 2. Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 26. dorso as I have touched before divers Knights Citizens and Burgesses departing from the Parliament the King thereupon issued out Writs to several Sheriffs to summon them to return to the Parliament Vel alios ad hoc idoneos loco ipsorum sâ— ad hoc vâ—care non possunt eligere or to chuse other fit persons in their places if they cannot be at leisure to come up The Commons in this Age medled not with the re-summoning or causing new ones to be Elected in the rooms of those that could not come I have before instanced in several Summons The King anciently only ordered new Elections wherein the Kings ordain the Sheriffs to re-summon the Members of former Parliaments or others for those who were dead or unable and sometimes but one of those By which it appears that in those days the King solely Authorized new Elections where any were dead or disabled The first Petition against an undue Election First Petition against undue Elections Prynne 's Brevia Parl. râ—â—iviva p. 286. A nosâ—re tres excellâ—nt tres gracious Seignior nostre Seignior le Roy les â—res nobles Seigniors Sâ—ges Comuns c. pleignont les Major c. that I have met with is Anno 7 R. 2. from the Mayor Bailiffs and Commons of Shaftsbury To our thrice Excellent and thrice Gracious Lord our Lord the King and the thrice noble Lords and sage Commons of this present Parliament That whereas they had chosen Walter Henly and Thomas Steward the Sheriff of Dorsetshire for the last had returned Thomas Camel to the great dammage of our Lord the King and contrary to the Will of the Mayor c. So that here the Complaint is to the King the Lords and Commons jointly and the name of this Camel is not endorsed returned in the Writ but the other two In all the Statutes made for regulating Elections they run See Freeholders Grand Inquest p. 15 16. The King willeth and commandeth 5 Ric. 2. c. 4. Our Lord the King at the grievous complaint of the Commons hath ordained 7 H. 4. c. 15. and so Our Lord the King ordained 11 H. 4. c. 1.5 H. 5. and such like in all the Statutes to 8 H. 6. So in the Statute 5 R. 2. Par. 2. c. 4. All Persons which shall from henceforth receive the Summons of Parliament Prynne's Plea for Lords p. 393. and come not at the said Summons except he may reasonably and honestly excuse himself to our Soveraign Lord the King shall be amerced and otherwise punished as of old time c. So that here the Excuse is to be made to the King so that it was not then in use for the Commons to fine and tax their Members In the Parliament holden at Westminster 5 H. 4. Id. 391. Rot. Parl. 5 H. 4. num 38. because the Writ of Summons of Parliament returned by the Sheriff of Rutland was not sufficiently or duly returned as the Commons conceived the said Commons prayed our Lord the King The Commons petition the King and Lords to examine and order undue Returns and the Lords in Parliament that this matter may be duly examined in Parliament c. Whereupon our Lord the King in full Parliament commanded the Lords in Parliament to examine the said matter and to do thereupon as to them should seem best in their Discretions So the Lords called before them the Sheriffs and Parties and it was agreed by the said Lords that the Sheriff should amend his Return and the Sheriff for his default should be discharged of his Office and committed Prisoner to the Fleet and make Fine and Ransom at the King's pleasure Upon this and other Precedents Mr. Id. p. 364 365. Mr. Prynne's Opinion Prynne saith That no Statute doth give the Commons House the least Power or Authority to judg or determine the Legality or Illegality of any Elections but leaves this to the King and Lords to redress as at first before their making and gives the Knights duly chosen but not returned a hundred Pound Damages against the Sheriffs and Citizens and Burgesses forty Pound against Mayors and Bailiffs who make false Returns by way of Action of Debt in the Kings Courts at Westminster or in the Star-Chamber when in being or before the King Lords and Council as in Bronker's case Dyer fol. 113 168. Plowden fol. 118. to 131. Old Book of
intended to invade the Subjects Liberties but if they allowed the Writ the delicious Power of Imprisoning such as they had a Pique to was utterly lost and all Persons referred to the ordinary Courts of Justice or upon their failure to the House of Lords Sir William Jones against any ones Release by Habeas Corpus if they were imprisoned by the House of Commons the Supreme Tribunal of England Sir William Jones insisted much upon the Power of the House and that they did not intend by that Act to bind themselves which yet must bind the King though it might as well be alledged That he did not intend to bind himself by it However Sir William persisted urging See Debates of the House p. 217. That whatever Reasons may be given for discharging such as are not committed for Breach of Privilege if grounded on the Act for the Habeas Corpus will hold as strong for discharging of Persons for Breach of Privilege and so consequently deprive the House of all its Power and Dignity and so make it insignificant and said That was so plain and obvious that all the Judges ought to take notice of it and so judged it below the House to make any Resolution therein but rather to leave the Judges to do otherwise at their peril and let the Debate fall without any Question But Baron Weston had the Courage to grant the Habeas Corpus Baron Weston grants the Habeas Corpus as rather willing to expose himself to the Displeasure of the House than deny or delay Justice contrary to his Oath I could not omit this remarkable Passage as a Specimen of the Arbitrariness of the Leading Party in that House Brief Register part 4. p. 846. and now shall proceed to Mr. Prynne's Remarks upon the Proceedings of the long House of Commons He observes Privilegia omnino amittere meretur qui sibi abutitur concessa penestate Ejus est interpretari cujus concedere Summa Rosella Privilegium 3. That Privileges may be lost by the abuse of the Power and that whatever Privilege the House hath is from the King's Grant or Toleration Therefore according to the Canonists Rule If the Privilege granted be expressed in general dubious or obscure Words then it is in the power of him to interpret who hath the power to grant Now the Petition of the Speaker is That the Commons in this Parliament may and shall have all their Ancient and Just Privileges allowed them Therefore the King Nemini liceat Chartas Regias nisi ipsis Regibus judicare Placita Parl. 18 E. 1. num 19. p. 20. being the sole Granter of these Privileges must be the only proper Interpreter and Judge of them as he is of all his other Charters of Privileges Liberties Franchises and Acts of Parliament themselves after his Regal Assent thereto not the Commons or Persons to whom they are granted and that both in and out of Parliament by Advice of his Nobles or Judges of the Common-Law Therefore he saith first How the Breach of Privilege to be punished according to Mr. Prynne See the Authority Brief Regist part 2. p. 847. That if the Commons by Petition to the King and Lords in Parliament complain of the Breach of their ancient Privileges and Liberties as they ever did in the Cases of Lark Thorp Hyde Clerk Atwyll and others the King by Advice of his Lords in Parliament assisted with his Judges hath been and as he humbly conceives is the sole proper Judge of them and their violations not the Commons who being Parties Prosecutors and Complainants are no legal indifferent Judges in their own or Menial Servants cases if they will avoid partiality which is the reason the Law allows Challenges to Jurors in Civil and Criminal causes Therefore he observes Ibid. p. 1206. that the House of Commons taking Informations without Oath may be easilier abused by misinformation and sometimes thereby are put upon over hasty Votes which upon finding out evil Combinations they are forced to retract Secondly The Chancellor or Lord Keeper to grant the Writ If the complaint of the breach of Privilege be made in the Commons House and thereupon an Habeas Corpus Writ of Privilege or Supersedeas prayed under the great Seal for the Members or menial Servants release whose Privilege is infringed the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seal representing the Kings person in Chancery the Court for relief in cases of Privilege is the properest Judge and Examiner of the claimed Privilege and its violations upon Oath and other sufficient Evidence assisted by all the Kings Judges in cases of difficulty who thereupon will grant or deny the Writs Thirdly The Judges of the Courts to which the Writ is directed to judge of the validity of the Privilege When these Writs of Privilege Supersedeas or Habeas Corpus are granted to any Member or menial Servants and directed to any of the Kings Courts to enlarge their restrained Persons or stay any Arrests Process or Judgments against them the Kings own Judges in his respective Courts to which they are directed are then the proper Judges of the Privileges of Parliament and of their breaches suggested in these Writs who may examine not only all matters of Law or Fact comprised in them which are Traversable but likewise adjudge allow or disallow the very Privilege it self if no real ancient Parliamentary Privilege allowed by the Laws and Customs of the Realm How far he is in the right I will not undertake to judge but I remember somewhere he wisheth an Act of Parliament to pass to adjust these matters which possibly would prevent many of those chargeable attendances about false Returns and save much expence of time in the discussing of them and enable the Subjects to pay a right and due obedience to them SECT 12. Concerning the Royal Assent to Bills I Have treated so much of this elsewhere as to the sole Power in the King the ancient Custom of Sealing the Acts with the Kings Seal and of some of the Prelates and Nobles as Witnesses of their Assents that I shall only now speak as to the usual formality of passing the Bills into Acts by the Kings last Act. See also his Memorials For Mr. Hackwell hath given a full account of the manner how Statutes are enacted in Parliament by passing of Bills to which Book I refer the curious Reader that would understand the order that is used in the debating and passing of them When Bills are passed by both Houses upon three several Readings in either House Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 179. ad 182. they ought for their last approbation to have the Royal Assent whereby every Statute is as Mr. Hackwell observes like Silver seven times tryed The Royal Assent is usually deferred to the last day of the Session and because some have been of opinion that the passing of Bills The Royal Assent determines not the Session
the personal Will and Power of the Sovereign himself standing in his highest Estate Royal. Therefore whoever reads the Authors that writ in defence of the Parliament must consider this Fallacy they frequently used that he do not apply the Authoritative Act of the King with the Consent of the two Houses to the Houses without the King From the Co-operation of the two Houses in preparing Laws (b) Freeholder's Grand Inquest p. 34. the late 〈◊〉 since King Charles the First 's time of the words The King is not one of the Three Estates Be it endâ—ed by the King the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons as if they were all Fellow-Commissioners and the unwariness of some of the Penners of the King's Answers to some of the Papers of the two Houses wherein they stiled the King the third Estate the Commonwealths-Men have taken the advantage to reckon the King but as a third Legislator Therefore I think it necessary to remove this Rub e're I proceed further Although the Author of the Imposture The Modus makes the Parliament to consist of six Parts called the modus tenendi Parliamentum makes six degrees of constituent Members of the Parliament viz. The King first then Secondly the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors and other Clerks who held Baronies Thirdly the Proctors of the Clergy Fourthly the Earls Barons and other great Men who held to the value of a County or Barony Fifthly the Knights of Shires Sixthly the Citizens and Burgesses to which he might have added the Barons of the Cinque-Ports yet he saith the King is the Head Beginning and End of the Parliament and so hath no (c) Ita non habet Parem in suo gradu Peer in his degree Yet it plainly appears that these we now call the two Houses were by reason of their distinct Orders most frequently divided into three For in (d) As queux Prelats ou la Clargie par eux mesmes les Countes Barons par eux mesmes Chevalers Gentz de Countez Gentz de la Commune par eux mesmes entreteront Prynne Animadv p. 10. 6 E. 3. at his Parliament at York the Record saith That on the Friday before the Feast of St. Michael the Prelates or the Clergy by themselves the Earls and Barons by themselves the Knights of the Counties and the Commons by themselves treated c. Othertimes we find the Prelates Earls Barons and great Men and the Knights Citizens and Burgesses to have separate Consultations by themselves and to give their several answers to Articles and business propounded to them in Parliament as Mr. Prynne out of the Abridgment of the Records of the Tower hath given us above twenty instances At the making of the Statute of Praemunire 16 R. 2. the Commons pray The Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Commons make the Three Estates That the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal severally and all the Estates of Parliament might be examined how they thought of that matter and the Lords Spiritual answered by themselves and the Lords Temporal by themselves and the King was Petitioned to make this Examination So in 40 E. 3. the King asking the Houses Whether King John could have subjected the Realm as he did the Prelates by themselves and the Dukes Earls and Barons by themselves gave their Answer Besides we find as at large I have before instanced in the last Chapter the Writs of Summons of the Bishops and Clergy were only in side dilectione and the Barons generally (e) Stat. 18. â— 6. c. 1. in fide homagio or Ligeancia and the Clergy granted their Subsidies apart and distinct from the Nobles Besides that the Bishops are to be esteemed the Third Estate is clear by Act of Parliament for it being questioned (f) 8 Eliz. c. 1. whether the making Bishops had been duly and orderly done according to Law the Statute saith That the questioning of it is much tending to the slander of all the Clergy being 〈◊〉 of the greatest States of the Realm So Sir (g) P. 36. Thomas Smith as in the last Chapter I have noted distinguisheth the two Houses into three Estates and Sir Edward (h) 4. Instr p. 1. Coke saith expresly That the High Court of Parliament consisteth of the Kings Majesty sitting in his Royal Politick Capacity and the three States of the Realm viz. the Lords Spiritual Lords Temporal and Commons the like the learned (i) Interpreter tit Parliament Cowel affirms Sir Henry Spelman (k) Solenne collequium omnium Ordinum Regni Authoritate solius Regis ad consulendum statuendumque de negotiis Regni indictum Gloss p. 449. calls it a Colloquy of all the Orders of the Kingdom convened by the sole Authority of the King to consult and appoint in the Affairs of the Kingdom This was also known to Foreigners uninteressed Persons for the Lord Argenton speaking how Subsidies were granted in England saith * Lib. 5. p. 253. Convocatis primis Ordinibus Clericis Laicis assentiente Populo And Bodin ‖ De Repul lib. 6. whenever he speaks of the Constitution of our Parliament calls it the King and the three Estates of the Realm But to put all out of doubt in King Charles the Second's Reign it is determined in the Act for the Form of Prayers for the Fifth of November For the Preservation of the King and the Three Estates Now the reason why in King Charles the First 's answer Why in some of King Charles the First 's Writings the King was called the Third Estate we meet with the expressions of making the King the third Estate was because at that time the Bishops being voted out of the House of Lords and the two Houses setting themselves in all the points of Controversie in opposition to the King the notion of a Triumvirate was more intelligible as it may be thought to the People and those who were so bitter Enemies to the King and had such a Rebellious force would have still increased the Peoples aversion if the King had asserted his Royal Prerogative otherwise Whether this were the true reason or the oversight of the Penners of his Majesties Answers I will not undertake to determine but I am induced to believe the first because I find the King and those that writ in defence of his Cause using frequently this way of Argument In every State there are three Parts saith (l) Review of Observations one the King ordered to write for him capable of just or unjust Soveraignty viz. the Prince Nobles and People Now through the Piety of our Lawgiving Princes a just and regular course of Government being obtained the stability of which being found to be more concerned in the Power of making Laws than in any other Power belonging to the Soveraign for preventing of Innovations that might subvert that setled regularity the frame and state of Government was in such a sort established as that the
Prince should be limited from using the legislative Power without concurrent assent of the Peers and Commons By which means the constitution of our Parliaments is so equal and geometrical and all parts so equally contribute their Offices that no part can have an extream predominance over other Therefore to prevent any evil that might come by the admission of two such Bodies to a participation of Power in this particular of making Laws if they should combine against the Soveraign the Law gives them an equal Power to assent or dissent The Ballancing of the Powers in Parliament so that opposing the single Power of every one of them to the Votes of every other two there might be so secure a balancing of the Power of one against the other that no practice of any two of them should do any prejudice and diminution to the third without the third Party it self did give consent unto it otherwise the King and Peers might oppress the Commons the King and Commons oppress the Peers or the Peers and Commons oppose the King and the Peers being easily oppressed by the Commons as we saw in our late calamitous Times an Appian Decemvirate or the 30 or 300 Tyrants might get the Power into their own hands In another place he saith Though properly Laws be the Acts of the King in Parliament yet are they also truly the Acts of the whole Parliament because every of the Estates contribute their Power according to the diversity of their Office and Interest and so as from a sacred Tripos the civil Oracles of the Law are delivered It is therefore to be considered saith a Judicious (m) King's Supremacy asserted c. 9. p. 96. where the Reader may find a full Answer to the Deductions they make from the King's way of arguing Author in answer to some other passages of his Majesty that the Parliamentarians wrested That if his Majesty out of a desire to save the effusion of Blood used such gracious Expressions as were most likely to prevail with the People and consolidate their Minds they ought not in Equity to prejudice the Rights of the Crown although he had abdicated therein some parts of his Authority and granted things destructive to his own Prerogative From his Majesties saying That the Power legally placed in both Houses is more than sufficient to prevent and restrain the Power of Tyranny they infer This cannot be made good without a Power of Resistance for that Tyranny cannot otherwise be restrained Which is easily answered For it cannot be understood that the King means by this a forceable resistance or restraint (n) Id possit quisquam quod jure possit but a legal one so far as Humane Prudence can by lawful and just ways provide The Power they have by Law being to inflict punishments on evil Instruments whereby others may be afraid to take upon them such Imployments and they may refuse to give the King Subsidies and other necessary Assistance if he refuseth to moderate excesses which are Powers more efficacious than resistance the success of the one being more probable and likely than the other However The not asserting of King Charles the First 's Prerogative disadvantagious in my poor opinion it had been more honourable and probably more efficacious to have spent less time in this kind of defending the Kings Interest by the Pen and have imployed it in asserting the true Prerogative of the King and his undoubted Rights to have let the People as well as the Houses know what he would reform and out of Princely Clemency grant for his Peoples ease and at their earnest Petition but neither to have depreciated or descended so much below the Majesty and Dignity of his place to enter into Reply and Duply Altercation and Apologies with his Subjects But that King composed all of Mercy Justice and Tenderness to his Subjects judging others by his own Royal Standard of Integrity let the Houses seize his Ships Magazines and left them the City of London's Purse while he retired to the North and plied the Houses with Declarations and Messages to have reduced them to their Duties and though his condescensions were great and the way of Argument such as before I have instanced in yet I cannot find except in that particular of making himself one of the three Estates that he yielded any part of his Royal Prerogative till he was made Prisoner that in his restraint he condescended to a temporary divesting himself of the Militia and other things which all sorts of Subjects except the very chief of those in Rebellion against him found infinitely more tending to the enslaving and utter ruine of the People than ever they could have been if the King had managed all by his absolute Will and the direction of those they accounted his worst Instruments I having in several places cleared the Kings Soveraignty shall only on this Head endeavour to answer the principal of those popular Reasons the Writers for the Parliament used not grounded upon any Law or Constitution of the Government but only upon the false supposition That the Wisdom of the two Houses was to be valued above the Wisdom of the King and Council in proposing matters for the Royal Assent which were conducible to the Liberty of the Subject which they pretended was their whole design and that they would establish the Kings Throne in more Glory and Splendor than had ever been in any Ages The first and principal Topick they used was The Monarchy of England not mixed That the Monarchy of England was in its Constitution allayed and the Power of the two Houses in making Laws had such a Copartnership and radical mixture that they had something more than a Consultive and Assenting part and that the King was oblig'd in the duty of his Office and by his Coronation Oath to grant what they desired Mr. Sherringham (o) King's Supremacy asserted p. 74. hath culled out the prime Arguments of the Author of the Treatise of Monarchy The fuller Answerer and others upon this Head and so fully answer'd them that I must refer the Reader to him for satisfaction and shall only select some of the chiefest of these Arguments more for the orderly continuance of this Discourse than for any need of repeating them First They say That King Charles the First owned the Law (p) Declaration from Nâ—wmarket 9 March 1641. to be the Measure of his Power and if so it is limited But this concludes no more than that his Power is of such a size and bigness as the Law hath ordained and if the Law give the King absolute full and entire Power and limits him only in the exercise of it this is a restraint and limitation according to such Laws as the Soveraign hath established in that particular alone and is the happiness of the English Subject that Kings act not Arbitrarily but this gives no Power to the two Houses to be any checks upon
in such cases it is not to be wondred at that a majority of Votes might be opposite to more judicious and foreseeing Members judgments neither is the Maxim universally true for it must be caeteris paribus if all things be alike For it is not sufficient for an Adviser to see unless he can let another see by the light of Reason A man ought not implicitely to ground his Actions upon the Authority of other mens Eyes whether many or few but of his own One Physician may see more into the state of a mans body than many Empiricks One experienced Commander may know more in Military Affairs than ten fresh-water Souldiers One old States-man in his own Element is worth many new Practitioners One man upon a Hill may see more than an Hundred in a Valley And who will deny but among an Hundred one of them may have a stronger Eye and see clearer and further than all the Ninety Nine So one Paphnutius in the Council of Nice saw more than many greater Clerks And it is no new thing to find one or two men in the Parliament change the Votes of the House Therefore nothing is got by this way of arguing though it be one of the plausiblest and most improveable of any of the Topicks they choose And if we could be sure that all the Members of such Assemblies were free from all the imperfections such are liable to much might be yielded to it All these Arguments were used for that sole end that they might possess their Party with the reasonableness of their desires to the King that he would implicitly yield up his reason to the guidance of their Councils They were not so frontless at first Concerning the Negative Voice as positively to deny the Kings negative Vote in Parliament that had never been doubted and there is good reason it should be a most sure Fundamental of the Government since nothing can be Statute-law but that to which the King assents Le Roy le veult For who can be said to will that hath not the Power to deny Si vult is scire an velim efficite us possim nolle Seneca But they affirmed that in Cases extraordinary when the Kingdom was to be saved from ruine the King seduced and preferring dangerous men it was necessary for them to take care of the Publick And then the Kings denying to pass their Bills was a deserting of them Objection That in Cases of Extraordinary necessity the Houses to have Power to secure the People from Tyranny Otherwise they alledged Parliaments had not sufficient Power to restrain Tyranny and so they boldly affirmed they had an absolute indisputable Power in declaring Law and as their Observer words it they are not bound to Precedents since Statutes cannot bind them there being no obligation stronger than the Justice and Honour of Parliaments And to summ up all he tells us if the Parliament meaning the two Houses be not vertually the whole Kingdom it self if it be not the supreme Judicature as well in matters of State as matters of Law if it be not the great Council of the Kingdom as well as of the King to whom it belongeth by the consent of all Nations to provide in all extraordinary cases ne quid detrimenti capiat Respublica let the brand of Treason saith he stick upon it Indeed because by all these most false and impious assertions and those horrid Acts built upon them they brought so great a ruine to the Kingdom they are and ever will be uâ—less a Platonick year return again branded with Rebellion in the highest degree To answer this Accumulation of Treasonable Positions for such I hope I may call in some sence Answer what is against the Kings Crown and Dignity is no ways difficult from the discourse of right constituted Parliaments For those of them that carry any shew of Reason are such only as may be understood of Acts of Parliament compleated by the Royal Assent but being spoken of either or both Houses in opposition to the King they are most false as I shall shew in particular For First If the two Houses are not bound to keep any Law no man can accuse them of breach of any What obligation can Justice lay on them who by a strange vertue of Representation are not capable of doing wrong But it is well known that Statutes stand in full force to the two Houses as being not void till repealed by a joynt consent of the King and the two Houses It would be much for the credit of the Observers desperate Cause if he were able to shew one such Precedent of an Ordinance made by Parliament without the Kings assent that was binding to the Kingdom in nature of a Law Our Kings can repeal no Laws by their own Prerogative though they may suspend the Execution It seems the Houses would have Power to do both and our Author in another place thinks it strange that the King should assume or challenge such a share in the Legislative Power to himself as without his concurrence the Lords and Commons should have no right to make Temporary Orders for putting the Kingdom into a Posture of Defence These were strange Phrases never heard before by English Ears Our Laws give this Honour to the King That he can joyn or be sharer with no man The King like Solomon's true Mother challengeth the whole Child not a divisible share but the very life of the Legislative Power The Commons present and pray the Lords advise and consent the King Enacts Secondly The Houses have no Power to declare Law As to their claiming an absolute Power in declaring Law it is as bold and false an Assertion as the other when spoken of the two Houses They may vote in order to a new Bill the explaining or repeal of any Law formerly made or prepare a Bill for any New Law and that is all they can do but authoritatively to declare any Law is most contrary to the Constitution of the Houses and never was adjudged one of their Privileges Thirdly As to the Justice and Honour of a Parliament when the State is in quiet and the Conventions only for making wholsome Laws for the Publick weal there are no Factions in Court or Country no private Intriegues to be managed the People neither uneasie nor discontented then it is to be expected That none but the wisest and wealthiest of the Gentry will be chosen Members of that August Assembly and their Justice and Honour will be conspicuous in all their Actions But have we not known Houses of Commons composed of other kinds of Persons who have voted their own Justice and Honour to be to imprison their fellow Members and fellow Subjects in an Arbitrary way How (d) Address part 3. p. 121. could a generous Soul conscious to himself he had transgressed no Law kneel at the Bar of such a House with the same submission as if he believed the Speaker
infallible and every Member an Angel But the Observer Objection That if the King have a Negative Voice there will be no need of Parliaments and his Pewfellows urge That if the Houses can do no Act for publick good without the King's consent and if the King may reject their Counsels and Advice it were needless to put the Country to the charge of choosing Members of Parliament And if the King may prefer other opinions before Parliamentary Motives then Parliaments are vain and useless helps Princes are unlimited and the People miserable These Objections are of such an odious nature Answer That no good Subject can take delight in them whose duty is to pray for the like consent among the several Orders of the Kingdom as is supposed to be among the several Orbs of Heaven The King undoubtedly the Primum movens the Great and Privy Council the lower Spheres The usual but not the only form of the Kings Answers to such Bills as they were not willing to pass Le Roy s'avisera proves (e) Answer to Observations p. 56. That after the advice of this his Great Council he is yet at liberty to advise further with persons or occasions as his own Wisdom shall think meet But these Authors will by no means take notice That the use of Council is to perswade not to compel as if a Man in business of great concernment might not very prudently consult with many Friends and yet at last follow the advice perhaps of one if it appear more proportionable to the end he aims at If it were because they are a more numerous body therefore their Counsel is upon that account to be yielded to then the liberty of dissenting may be denied to the House of Peers in comparison of the House of Commons and to that House too in comparison of the People and so both King Lords and Commons are voted out of Parliament Besides Natural Wisdom and Fidelity there is a thing called Experience of high concernment in the managery of Publick Affairs He that will steer one Kingdom aright must know the right Constitution of all others their Strength their Affections their Counsels and Resolutions that upon each different Face of the Skie he may alter his Rudder The best Governments have more Councils than one One for the Publick Interest of the Kingdom another for the Affairs of State a Council for War and a Council for Peace Let them be as wise and faithful Counsellors as the Observer pleaseth only let them be but Counsellors Necesse est us Lancea in libra ponderibus impositis deprimi sic animum perspicuis cedere Let their conlusions have as much credit as the premisses deserve and if they can necessitate the Prince by weight of Reason and convincing Evidence of experience let them do it on Gods name But it is not to be done upon the Authority of a bare Vote as I think all uninterested persons are satisfied in the Votes of the Houses in 1641. about the Militia Church-Government and the voted Nineteen Propositions or the late Votes about the Bill of Seclusion the Repealing of the branch of the Statute of Queen Elizabeth against Protestant Dissenters and the Loans upon the Kings Revenue There are other ends besides Counsel for which Parliaments are called as consenting to new Laws furnishing the Public with Moneys and maintaining the Interest of the Government and liberty of the Subject from the removing one social end to inferr that an Action is superfluous deserves no answer but silence and contempt This should teach the Electors Wisdom not to chuse such as have Factious Bents or are not truly qualified in their Allegiance to their Prince or Malecontents who render such Conventions useless to the Publick Ends of Government and the Peace Tranquillity and Prosperity of both Prince and People Because the Long Parliament Writers would have no Stone unturned nor any specious Argument uninforced Concerning the Coronation-Oaths of the King of England that might bring the King to their Lure to consent to what they proposed they endeavoured to make the World believe that the King was bound by his Coronation Oath to pass all such Bills as they presented or tendered to him grounding as Mr. Prynne and others alledged on a promise of the Kings at his Coronation to grant and keep the Laws and Customs which the Commonalty shall chuse Before I come to give the particular Answer I think it not unfit to take this opportunity to give a full account of the Coronation Oaths of our Kings and how the same from Age to Age were varied by which the Ingenious Reader will find what the respective Kings by their Oaths did promise That I may deduce as high as I have yet found the Original of Soveraign Princes taking Oaths at their Coronations it may be noted that the first Emperor that was Crowned and had any Coronation Oath prescribed was (f) Evagrius Hisâ— Eccles lib. 3. c. 32. Who first took a Coronation-Oath Anastasius the Greek Emperor who being elected by the Senate and Soldiers about Ann. 486. Euphemius Patriarch of Constantinople suspecting him to be addicted to the Heresy of Eutychius and the Manichees would not consent to his Coronation till he should deliver him a Writing under his Hand ratified with his Oath wherein he should plainly declare That if he were Crowned Emperour he would maintain the true Faith and Synod of Chalcedon during his Reign and bring in no Novelty to the Church of God This Writing ratified with his Oath Macedonius the Treasurer was to keep and after he was made Patriarch the Emperor demanded it and said It was a great discredit unto his Subjects that his Hand-writing should be kept to testifie against him or that he should be tied to Pen and Paper There is no mention of any Coronation Oath used from thence to the Year 804. that (g) Eutrop. lib. 24. p. 145 146. Zonar Annal. tom 3. fol. 142 143. Imperatorio Diademate est ornatus postulato prius scripto quo promitteret se nulla Ecclesiae statuta violaturum Stauratius Son to Nicephorus slain in his Wars against the Bulgarians being declared Emperor by some Michael Curopolata was adorned by the Patriarch with the Diadem a Writing before being desired in which he promised to violate none of the Statutes of the Church c. Which is the first Precedent of a Promise not an Oath demanded from or given by any Roman King for confirming the Laws of the Church c. The first Emperor Crowned at Rome by any Pope (h) Onuphr was Charles the Great Anno 800. but without an Oath and Henry the Fifth (i) Dicens Imperatorem nemini jurari debere cum juramentorum sacramenta ab omnibus sint sibi adhibenda Hermold Chron. Scl. l. 1. c. 40. Sim. Dunelm 232 237. refused to take any Corporal Oath saying That an Emperor ought to Swear to none for that Oath i. e. of Fealty
Earls Barons Great Men and the whole body of the Tenents in Capite expressed by those words in the former Questions Clergy and People for by them these demands were made and no doubt they would first ask for themselves for the Vulgar or Rabble could not come near to make their Demands at such a Solemnity as this was so (y) Walsingham fol. 95. num 20. great and splendid there being at it Charles and Lewis Earls of Clermont two of the King of France's Brothers the D. of Brabant the Earl of Fens and the other great Men both of France and England with the Countess of Artois Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult the same learned (z) Elossary p. 24. Author who makes it clear That the word Plebs Vulgus Populus in the Writers of that Age was used for the Laity in way of contradistinction from the Clergy I shall at present leave this and note that for any thing appears to the contrary the same Interrogations Oath c. presented to Edward the Second and Third without the additions of King Richard's continued without any alteration to Henry the Eighth's (a) Book of Oaths fol. 1. time and in that we find the King promiseth he shall keep and maintain the Liberties of the Holy Church of old time granted by their Righteous Kings of England The Oath of King Henry the Eighth I find in the Heralds Office the words thus Do ye grant the rightful Laws and Cusioms to be holden and permit ye after your Strength and Power such Laws as to the Honour of God shall be chosen to the People by you to be strengthned and desensed Vid in Coll. Arm. p. 60. and that he shall keep all the Lands Honours and Dignities righteous and free of the Church of England in all manner Holy without any manner of minishments and the rights of the Crown hurt decay or loss to his Power shall call again into the ancient estate and that he shall keep the Peace of Holy Church and of the Clergy and of the People with good accord and that he shall do in his Judgment Equity and right Justice with Discretion and Mercy and that he shall grant to hold the Laws and Customs of the Realm and to his Power keep them and affirm them which the People and Flock have chosen and the evil Laws and Customs wholly to put out and stedfast and stable Peace to the People of this Realm keep and cause to be kept to his Power In this Oath King Henry the Eighth interlined for the right explication of it instead of People and Flock these Words which the Nobles and People have chosen with my Consent The Oath of King Edward the Sixth Oath of Edward the Sixth so far as relates to my purpose was this Do you grant to make no new Laws but such as shall be to the honour and glory of God and to the good of the Commonwealth and that the same shall be made by the consent of the People as hath been accustomed Oaths of Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth not seen by the Author The Oaths of King James the First and King Charles the First The Oath of King Charles the Second Hist Coronationis Caroli 2. in Colleg. Arm. I have not seen any Transcripts of the Oaths of Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth those which King James and King Charles the First took run thus Will you grant to hold and keep the Laws and Rightful Customs which the Commonalty of this Kingdom have and will you defend and uphold them to the Honour of God so much as in you lyeth That Branch of the Oath which relates to my purpose taken by King Charles the Second runs thus Sir Will you grant to keep the rightful Customs which the Commonalty of your Kingdom have c. The Oath that our present King James the Second took at his Coronation The Oath of King James the Second was in the same Words as that of his Royal Brother wherein the Word Customs is to be taken in the largest extent to include Laws also Now upon the whole we must consider First Considerations upon this Discourse of the Coronation Oaths That in the Eye of the Law the King never dyes so that he is King before any Solemnity of Coronation Secondly The variety of Forms and Precedents seem to prove that one precise form is not simply necessary so the interlining of Henry the Eighth upon Record also shews And if it had been of consequence to have retained the old form we should have heard of it either then or in some succeeding Parliaments Lastly it cannot be denied that if the King be bound by a lawful Oath to pass all Bills it is not the form of denying it but the not doing of it which makes the Perjury And so when the King is tender of a flat denial and attributing so much to the judgment of his great Council that he only useth the words avisera it would be a strange Doctrine that all the Kings of England who have given this Answer have been forsworn and neither Parliament nor Convocation taken notice of it in so many Ages But when by dint of Argument the Parliament Champions were driven from these Holds they fled to their last Burrow So one of them confesses that in Acts of Grace the King is not bound to assent nor in Acts wherein he is to depart from the particular right and interest of his Crown and lastly that if he do not consent however bound by Oath yet they are not binding Laws to the Subject How the Long Parliament Writers would have the King part with his Prerogative in Cases of necessity only But then comes the handful of Gourds which spoils the Pottage Except in cases of necessity If the safety of the People be concerned If it may prove dangerous or inconvenient to them then an extraordinary course may be taken This was the plausible Plea of 1641. to get the Militia into their hands for they urged that in case of apparent and imminent danger the Peoples safety was not to be neglected They might not be exposed as a prey to their Enemies therefore must be put into a posture of defence This was grateful to the People out of that real love they bare to themselves they must favour that side which pretends to take care of their safety Give to any Person or Society a Legislative Power without the King in case of necessity (b) Answer to Observ b. 76. permit them withal to be sole Judges of necessity when it is and how long it lasts and then it is more than probable the necessity will not determine till they have their utmost desires which is the same in effect as if they had the Legislative Power Further it must be considered that necessity upon that supposition must be very evident there needs no such great stir who shall be Judge of it when it comes indeed it
agreeth with the Act of Parliament 37 E. 3. c. 18. where it is said before the Chancellor Treasurer and Great Council Thirdly The Kings Privy Council which appears to be different from the last Great Council by many Records and particularly by that of (c) Rot. Claus 16 E. 2. m. 5. dorso 16 E. 2. where it is said Hen. de Bellomont Baron of the Kings Great and Private Council was sworn This Council is called Concilium Privatum secretum continuum Regis The Privy Council properly so called Lord President The First Member of this Council is the Lord President who was anciently called Principalis Consiliarius and sometimes Capitalis Consiliarius The first Lord President Sir Edward Coke (d) 4. Instit c. 2. fol. 55. 1. par Pat. num 22. John Bishop of Norwich is mentioned 7 Jo. by Matt. Paris fol. 205. mentions was the Earl of Lancaster 50 E. 3. 1 R. 2. then he reckons these in order the Duke of Bedford 1 H. 6. the Duke of Gloucester 10 H. 6. the Duke of York 11 and 22 H. 6. John Russel Bishop of Rochester and after of Lincoln is called President 13 E. 4. John Fisher Bishop of Rochester 12 H. 7. Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk from the 25th to the 37th of H. 8. the Lord Pawlet 1 E. 6. the Duke of Northumberland 5 and 7 of E. 6. the Earl of Arundel 1 and 2 Ph. and M. in Q. Elizabeth's time we find none but in this Catalogue Mr. Prynne (e) Animadv p. 45. Pat. 13 E. 4. part 1. m. 3. hath truly noted That the Bishop of Rochester was not made President of the Kings Council but of the Prince's and was his Tutor as appears by the Patent it self there cited dated the 10th of Nov. This Office of Lord President was never granted but by Letters Patents under the Great Seal durante beneplacito In the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 2. he is said to be attendant on the Kings most Royal Person the reason of which saith Sir Ed. Coke is That of latter times he hath used to report to the King the Passages and the State of the business at the Council Table The Lord Privy Seal is the next Principal Person that hath Precedence in the Kings Council Lord Privy-Seal concerning whose Office my Lord (f) 4. Instit c. 2. fol. 56. Coke hath discoursed at large to whom I must refer the Curious Reader as also to him for the Acts of Parliament Orders of the same and Acts of Council together with Mr. Prynne's (g) P. 45. Animadversions whereby the Privy-Council was to be regulated and concerning the Jurisdiction and Proceedings of the Kings Council Mr. Lambard's (h) P. 108. to 116. fol. 29. Archaion and Mr. Crompton's Jurisdiction of Courts may be consulted the several Bundels of Petitions to the King and his Council in the Tower of London and the Answers to them the Placita Parliamentaria coram Rege Concilio in the Tally Office of the Exchequer and in the Parchment Book of them in the Tower under King Edward the First printed by Mr. (i) In Placit Parl. Append. Those summoned to Parliaments as Assistants called the King's Council and in Parliament-time joyned with the King's Council in several Cases Ryley Of this Privy Council there seems to me to be two sorts one constantly attending the King and his Affairs the other in Parliament time only which had their particular Summons as I have before at full discoursed of and these two I find so obscurely distinguished that it is difficult in some places to understand which are meant but I think in time of Parliament these were joyned to the Kings Council for besides that they had a distinct Summons and in them as a specifical distinction the word caeteris was omitted in that part of the Summons which runs dictis die loco personalitor intersitis nobiscum ac cum caeteris Praelatis Magnatibus c. because they were not Parliamentary Barons there was also added in proceedings and judgments upon them these words coram ipso Domino Rege ejus concilio ad Parliamenta sua or ad Parliamentum suum or coram Concilio nostro in praesenti Parliamento For the particular Instances of which being they are very numerous Mr. Prynn's (k) A pag. 363. ad pag. 393. brief Register may be consulted wherein it seems to me upon the perusal of the several Records that these Assistants to the House of Lords were likewise joyned to the rest of the Kings standing Council in Parliament time so it is expressed in the Case of (l) Idem pag. 378. John Salâ—eyn and Margaret his Wife and Isabel her Sister Daughters and Heirs of Robert de Ross de Work thus Habito super praemissis diligenti tractatu per ipsum Dom. Regem totum Concilium and in the same it is thus also worded videtur Dom. Regi Concilio suo concordatum est consideratum per ipsum Dom. Regem Concilium suum So in others per Concilium Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum Comitum Baronum caeterorumque (m) Idem pag. 380. de Concilio suo existentium singulis de Concilio suo totius Concilii Domini Regis So in 21 E. 1. the Archbishop of York's Case videtur Domino Regi in pleno Parliamento praedicto Comitibus Baronibus Justiciariis similiter toti Concilio ipsius Dom. Regis and so it is said Magnates alios de Concilio ipsius Domini Regis rogavit This is further cleared by sundry (n) Idem pag. 383. The Court of Star-chamber was said to be coram Rege Concilio suo See Coke Inst 4. c. 5. Prefaces to and passages in our Printed Statutes as formerly I have noted So the Statute of Bigamy 4 Oct. 4 E. 1. saith In the presence of certain Reverend Fathers Bishops of England and others of the Kings Council the constitutions under written were recited after heard and published before the King and his Council for as much as all the Kings Council Justices and others did agree So the Statute of Quo Warranto 30 E. 1. Cum apud Westminster per nos Concilium nostrum provisum So 33 E. 1. it is agreed and ordained by the King and all his Council So 42 E. 3. c. 3. the Statute made on Petition of the Commons in Parliament begins (o) Plese a nostre Seigneur le Roy son bon Counsel pur droyt Government de son Peuple ordeigner Pleaseth it our Lord the King and his good Council for the better Government of his People to ordain By great store of Records it is apparent that in old times the Kings and their Councils gave Judgment in divers Cases of difficulty and other Common Cases concerning the Law of the Realm (p) See 11 H. 4. num 28. 63. Respectuatur per Dom. Principem Concilium Pryn. Animadv p. 39. 264 265 267 296.
Parliament of England knew they had no Power to make such an Act and we may conclude That such Politick and Temporary provisions find no approbation either by the Laws or succeeding ages who in all such cases judge more impartially therefore it is much more honourable for the Legislative Power to found their Laws upon Justice and Right rather than upon the humours and Interests of those who desire but the shadow of a Law to countenance their designs It must be owned that King Edward the Second was deposed The Injustice in deposing Kings for making use of Gaveston and the Spencers But how illegally all succeeding ages have acknowledged and it rather shews how extravagant the People and their Representatives are in their humors than how just their Powers are For by the same parity of Reason the horrid Murther of the blessed Martyr or the Murther of Edward the Second may be justified as his deposing may be and the like may be said of King Richard the Second against whom the Fourteenth Article was that he refused to allow the Laws made in Parliament which had been in effect to consent that the two Houses should have been the Soveraign and that he had transferred the Royal Power on them Whoever desires further satisfaction may consult Arnisaeus in that Treatise Quod nulla ex causa subditis fas sit contra legitimum Principem arma sumere Whereas Richard Duke of York in Henry the Sixth's time after he had been declared Heir Apparent was by another Act of Parliament declared uncapable of Succession all that can be inferred from it is When Acts of Parliament to be less esteemed That Acts of Parliament when they are bottomed upon private affections to Parties in times of Faction and civil War are not to be looked upon with that veneration as when they regularly pass in times that are calm when no potent Persons oppress Justice or usurping Powers hinder faithful Judges from expounding the Laws soundly Therefore we find in the claim of the said Duke of York that it is more consentaneously to Law expressed That no Act taketh place or is of force against him that is right inheritor of the Crown as accordeth saith the Record with Gods Laws and all natural Laws and we may observe that though there was a Succession of three Kings of the House of Lancaster who had usurped the Crown for Sixty Years yet all our Historians and the Laws call those Kings de facto and not de jure Such a true sence of just and right the uninterested Ages have had of that Usurpation ever since although there were Acts of Parliament carefully penned to corroborate â—he Title of the house of Lancaster during that time and all ways and means used to have established that Line yet by vertue of the Right of Lineal Succession Edward the Fourth Son to the said Duke of York came to be owned lawful King of England though the Right of his Family had been interrupted ever since Henry the Fourth usurped the Crown which might have been a sufficient document to all Ages not to have attempted any sort of praeterition of the Right Heir Yet we find that unsuccessful attempts were made by H. 8. contrary to the fundamentals of Succession which when rightly considered I hope will convince all of how little validity even such Acts are to be reputed Therefore because these have been made use of for Precedents I shall speak a little more fully to them In the 25 of H. 8. (f) Cap. 22. the Marriage with Queen Katherine is made void Concerning the several Entailings of the Crown by King Henry the Eighth and that with Queen Anne's declared good and an Entail made on the Issue Male or Female and the Penalty for hurting the Kings Person disturbing his Title to the Crown or slandering the present Marriage is judged High Treason and Anno 26. (g) Cap. 2. a strict Oath is injoyned to observe the Succession there appointed But 28 H. 8. (h) Cap. 7. it is declared that the former Act was made upon a pure perfect and clear foundation thinking the Marriage then had between his Majesty and the Lady Anne they are the words of the Act in their Consciences to have been pure sincere and perfect and good c. till now of late that it appeareth that the said Marriage was never good or consonant to the Laws but utterly void and of none effect and so both the Marriage with the Princess Katherine and the Lady Anne are declared void and their Issue made illegitimate and the perils are enumerated that might ensue to the Realm for want of a declared lawful Successor to the Crown and the Act impowers the King if he dye without Issue of his body that he may limit the Crown to any by his Letters Patents or his last Will in Writing and it is declared Treason to declare either of the Marriages to be good or to call the Lady Mary or Lady Elizabeth Legitimate and the former Oath is made void and this may be judged to be procured when he resolved to settle the Crown on Henry Fitz Roy Duke of Richmond his natural Son But after the Birth of Prince Edward 38 H. 8. (i) Cap. 1. another alteration is made whereby the Crown is entailed on Prince Edward and for want of his Issue on the Lady Mary and for want of her Issue on the Lady Elizabeth and for want of Issue of the King or them then the King is impowered by his Letters Patents or last Will to dispose of the Crown at his free will It is therefore to be considered that in such a juncture of affairs when the legality of the Kings Marriages were so disputable by reason that two of the legal Successors upon niceties not of nature but of the Popes 〈◊〉 for Divorcing were declared Bastards there was some â—eason (k) 25 H. 8. c. 22. that the Act should express that the Ambiguity of several Titles pretended to the Crown then not perfectly declared but that men might expound them to every ones sinister affection and sence contrary to the right legality of Succession and Posterity of the lawful Kings and Emperours of the Realm hath been the cause of that great effusion and destruction of mens blood and the like cause will produce the like effect as the words are Upon such grounds it was very plausible to declare by Act of Parliament the Succession But this does not prove that where the Right of nature is clear that the Parliament may invert the same and they teach us how dangerous it is to leave Parliaments to the Impression of Kings when it is too obvious the first of these Laws was made to gratifie the Kings affection to Queen Anne in the case of naming a Successor as it is also to expose Kings to the Arbitrariness of Parliaments And we may well infer H. 8. taking such care by his Parliaments to legitimate and illegitimate his
Issue according to the present interests of his Affairs and Passions that such contradictory Acts could not be all true and though the Responses from Delphos or any Oracles of the Gentile ages might miss the truth as much yet by their dubious answers they forfeited not their reputations so much We may also note (l) Jus Regium p. 178 179. that by God Almighty's Providence and the care of his own Laws the Duke of Richmond was removed by death to prevent the unjust Competitors and Prince Edward was born and by the same Providence and the sence the Subjects had of the great Fundamental of Hereditary Succession contrary to some of these Acts and what Edward the Sixth did in setling the Crown upon the Lady Jane Grey proved of no force for Queen Mary succeeded though she was a Papist and Queen Elizabeth succeeded her though she was declared Bastard The rights of Blood prevailing over the Formalities of Divorce and the Dispensations of the Popes and the Laws made to gratify Henry the Eighth's pleasure as the strength of nature doth often prevail over Poisons and to evince the greater certainty of their being void so little notice was taken of those and the subsequent Acts Anno 1535. that the Heirs of the Blood succeeded without repealing that Act as an Act in it self invalid from the beginning For such Acts are past by without being repealed as we find in the Act of Recognition of Queen Elizabeth no notice was taken of the Act of Parliament against her and Blackwood (m) P. 45. observes very well that so conscious were the makers of these Acts Jus Regium p. 179. of the illegality of them and of their being contrary to the immutable Laws of God Nature and Nations that none durst produce that Kings Testament wherein he did nominate a Successor conformable to the power granted by those Acts but that as soon as they were freed by his Death from the violent oppressions that had forced them to alter a Successor three several times and at last to swear implicitly to whomsoever he should nominate they proclaimed first Queen Mary and after her decease Queen Elizabeth Therefore all these Acts both of Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth are to be looked upon as Politick interims to serve for some present ends And as we observe the trepidations vibrations and as we may say uneasiness of things in all that have been displaced till reseated again whereby we have a certain Indicium of any thing Natural so may we note the naturalness of Hereditary Succession by the Tragical Convulsions and unsetledness of things in any State where great force and policy have usurped the Crown till it hath returned to the right owner So we see after the force was removed by the expiration of Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth things returned again into their pristin State according to the Laws of the Crown I shall now pass to consider other Reasons and First it may be observed Fundamentals in Government not to be altered That the Venerable Age of such Fundamental Laws should have another kind of respect pay'd to them than to be made obsolete because they will not sort with some new-fashioned Intrigue For it is a most true Maxime Non magis aliunde floret respublica quam si legum vigeat Authoritas So in the first Parliament (n) Cap. 2. of King James the First it is fully expressed That to alter and innovate the Fundamental ad Ancient Laws See Commission for Union 16â—4 Priviledges and good Customs of the Kingdom whereby not only the Kings Regal Authority but the Peoples securities of Lands Livings and Priviledges both in general and particular are preserved and maintained and by the abolishing or alteration of the which it is impossible but that present confusion will fall upon the whole State and frame of Government is of most dangerous consequence whence we may well infer That to endeavour to alter the right of Succession of the Crown in the direct line is one of the most dangerous Innovations of all others as drawing innumerable mischiefs after it Now there can be no greater fundamental right than the Succession of our Monarch The Hereditary Succession is a Fundamental That our Monarchy is Hereditary is the great Basis upon which most of all the positions of the Laws are established which every where we meet with in the Writings of Lawyers viz. That the King never dies the next Successour in Blood is legally King from the very moment in which the last King dies that there needs neither Coronation or Recognition of the People to intitle him to the exercise of his Regal Authority that his Commissions are valid all Men are liable to do him Homage and hold their rights of him and his Heirs he may call Parliaments dispose of the Lands belonging to the Crown and all that oppose him are Rebells Generally this Principle runs through all the Veins of our Laws it is that which gives Life and Authority to our Statutes but receives none from them which are undeniable marks and Characters of a Fundamental Right in all Nations Secondly Such further provision hath the Law made to secure the Succession in the direct line that if the right Heir of the Blood or the Father or Mother of the right Heir be attainted of High Treason by Parliament the Attainder is no obstruction to the descent If he who were to succeed had committed Murther or were declared Traytor formerly to the Crown for open Rebellion against the King and Kingdom yet upon his coming to the Crown he need not to be restored by Act of Parliament but his very right of Blood would purge all these Imperfections For tanta est Regii sanguinis praerogativa dignitas ut vitium non admittat nec se contaminare patiatur saith a (o) Craig learned Lawyer and the Reasons given are For that no Man can be a Rebel against himself nor can the King have a Superior and consequently there can be none whom he can (p) Jus Reg. p. 169. offend and it would be absurd that he who can restore all other Men should need to be restored himself Also the Punishments of Crimes such as Confiscations c. are to be inflicted by the Kings Authority or to fall to the Kings Treasury and it would be most absurd that a Man should exact from himself a Punishment So Richard Plantaginet Duke of York and Edward the Fourth his Son were both attainted yet Edward the Fourth was rightful King and no impediment in the Succession accrued by it So Charles the Seventh of France though banished by Sentence of Parliament did afterwards succeed to the Crown and though Lewis the Twelfth forfeited for taking up Arms against Charles the Eighth yet he succeeded and Alexander Duke of Albany and his Descendants being declared Traytors by his Brother King James the Fourth yet his Son John being called home upon
his Uncles Death was declared Tutor and Governour without any remission or being restored and if his Cousin King James had died without Issue he had been declared the true Successour of the Crown We have a memorable Instance of this in H. 7. who when he came to the Crown called his Parliament and the Judges having determined that those Members of the House that had been outlawed by the Parliament in Richard the Third's time and been declared Rebels should absent themselves till a Bill were brought in for their restoring It was moved among the Judges what should be done about the King who had been condemned and declared Traytor c. and it was by the unanimous consent of all the Judges saith the learned (q) St. Alban's Hist H. 7. p. 29. Chancellor declared That the Crown removed all the obstructions in the Blood which might in any manner impede its descent and from that time the King took the Crown Coronam ipsam omnes sanguinis oppilationes quae descensum Coronae ullatenus impediunt deobstruere Vt Regi opera Parliamentaria non fuisset opus the fountain of his Blood was purged and all the Corruptions and Impurities taken away so that he had no need of any Parliamentary help to supply him Thirdly The Consideration of the Oaths which the Subjects are bound to take and observe gives some further Proof of the Obligation of all the Subjects to maintain this lineal Succession The Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy bind the Subjects to bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness The Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy against altering Succession his Heirs and lawful Successors and that to their Power they shall assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors or united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm and of those Priviledges c. I think none will deny but that Hereditary Succession is one of the principal Prerogatives intended by those Oaths We are not in these only sworn to His Majesty but his Lawful Successors which word Lawful is inserted to cut off the Pretences of such as should not succeed by Law and the insolent Arbitrariness of such as being but Subjects themselves think they may chuse their King These being promissory Oaths as well to the Successors when their Right shall fall as to the present King they have every of them in their respective degrees and orders and indispensible Right confirmed to them by this Oath So that the Predecessor hath no legal right to deprive his Successor as hereafter I shall clear nor to remit the Peoples Obligation to him as lawful Heir and Successor (r) Address part 3. p. 64. much less can the two Houses do it for they are all within the Obligation of this Oath and it is unreasonable that Men should dispence with their own promissory Oaths to others for this would destroy all Faith and Confidence amongst Men and pull up the very roots of Society and Government Whereas some object out of my Lord (s) Coke on Littleton p. 8. Coke Objection That none is Heir before the death of his Ancestor but Heir apparent It is to be considered Answered that it must be the Heir presumptive or apparent that is here understood otherwise the inserting the word Heir were superfluous if by the Oaths were not intended he that is next Heir upon the Death of the King and if any Person think to evade it by affirming that if the Parliament declare any Person to be no next Heir he ceaseth to be so as also not to be lawful Successor because by such an Act he is outlawed Let such Persons consider that this is neither better nor worse than palpable Aequivocation For we swear in the common Sence of the words and so by Heir we understand such as by proximity of Blood have greatest right to succeed in the Inheritance It may be farther considered that the Lord Chancellor Treasurer and Judges (t) See 18 E. 3. all the great Officers of State the Privy-Council c. are all sworn to defend the Rights of the Crown and that they shall not concurr or assent to any thing which may turn to the King in Damage or Dis-herison How then can any of these much less the Judges who are to expound and interpret the Law consent without palpable violation of their Oaths to the changing of the Essence of the Monarchy I shall now endeavour to prove Acts of Parliament cannot alter Lineal Succession that no Parliament by a compleat Act can legally alter the Succession in an Hereditary Monarchy For first all (u) Jus Reg. p. 153. Kings and Parliaments are subordinate to the Laws of God the Laws of Nature and Nations So that unless we give the Inferior Power and Jurisdiction over the Superior no Act of Parliament can be binding to overturn what those three Laws have have established and I hope I have proved under all these Heads in the preceding part of this discourse that the right of Succession is founded on them As to the Law of God it is clear not only from the general dictates of Religion but 28 H. 8. c. 7. the Parliament uses these words For no Man can dispence with God's Laws which we also affirm and think As to the Laws of Nature they are acknowledged to be immutable from the Principles of Reason So the (w) Sect. sed naturale Institut de Jure naturali Law it self confesseth Naturalia quaedam Jura quae apud omnes gentes observantur divina quadam providentia constituta semper firma atque immutabilia permanent Certain natural Laws which are observed by all Nations and such is that of Primogeniture by Divine Providence being constituted remain always firm and immutable So when the Law declares that a supreme Prince is free from the obligation of Laws solutus Legibus yet Lawyers (x) Voet. de Statutis sect 5. c. 1 Accursius in L. Princeps F. de Leg. Clementina pasturalis de re Judicata still acknowledge that this does not exclude these Supream Powers from being liable to the Laws of God Nature and Nations as is evident by all that treat of that Point Nor can the Law of Nations be overturned by private municipal Laws so all Statutes to the prejudice of Ambassadors who are secured by the Law of Nations are confessed by all to be null and the highest Power whatsoever cannot take off the denouncing of a War before a War can be lawful Besides secondly a Parliament cannot do more than (y) Jus Reg. p. 154. any absolute Monarch in his own Kingdom for they when joyned are but in place of the supreme Power sitting in Judgment We must not think our Parliaments have an unlimited Power de jure so as they may make a forfeiture or take away Life without a cause or pass Sentence against the Subjects
without citing or hearing them For if they had such Power we should be the greatest Slaves and live under the most arbitrary Government imaginable Therefore an absolute Prince cannot in an Hereditary Kingdom where the Successor is to succeed Jure Regni (z) Nulla clausula Successori Jus auferri potest modo succedat ille Jure Regni Aristaeus c. 7. num 5. prejudge the Successors right of Succession for the same right the present King hath to the Possession the next of Blood hath to the Succession Therefore Hottoman Lib. 2. de Regno Galliae affirms That ea quae Jure Regni primogenito competunt ne Testamento quidem Patris adimi possunt That in the absolute Monarchy of France The Father cannot by his last Will deprive the First-born of those things which belong to him by Royal right So when the King of France designed to break the Salique Law of Succession as in the Reign of Charles the Fifth it was found impracticable by the three States So when Pyrrhus would have preferred his younger Son to the Crown (a) Pausanias lib. 1. the Epirots following the Law of Nations and then own refused him So Anno 1649. when Amurat the Grand Signior left the Empire to Han the Tartarian passing his Brother Ibrahim the whole Officers of State did unanimously cancel the Testament and restored Ibrahim the true Heir though no other than a Fool. So if Kings could have inverted their Succession Saint Lewis had preferred his own Third Son to Lewis his Eldest and Alphonsus King of Leon in Spain had preferred his Daughter to Ferdinand his Eldest Son and Edward the Sixth of England had preferred and did actually prefer the Lady Jane Grey to his Sisters Mary and Elizabeth Thirdly It is undeniable in the opinion of all Lawyers That a King cannot in Law alienate his Crown but that the Deed is void nor can he in Law consent to an Act of Parliament declaring that he should be the last King For if such consents and Acts (b) Jus Regium p. 163. had been sufficient to bind Successors then weak Kings by their own simplicity and gentle Kings by the Rebellion of their Subjects or being wrought upon by the importunity of their Wives or Concubines or the mis-representation of Favourites might do great mischiefs to their People in raising up continual Factions of the miseries of which I shall speak hereafter This is owned in Subjects That the Honour and Nobility that is bestowed upon a man and his Heirs doth so necessarily descend upon those Heirs that the Father or Predecessor cannot exclude the Successor or derogate from his Right by renouncing resigning following base or mean Trades or such like For Fab. Cod. 9. tiâ— 28. say the Lawyers since he derives his Right from his old Progenitors and owes it not to his Father his Fathers Deed should not prejudge him so much more in Kings the ill consequences of such violations of Justice and Right being infinitely more destructive the Predecessor should not do any Act to prejudice his Successor For that right of blood which makes the Eldest First makes the other Second and all the Statutes that acknowledge the present Kings Prerogative acknowledge that they belong to him and his Heirs For as a Prince cannot even ex plenitudine potestatis legitimate a Bastard in prejudice of former Children though they have only but an hope of Succession much less can he bastardize or disinherit the Right Heir who is so made by God and honoured from him with the Character If therefore Kings how absolute soever cannot de jure invert the natural order of Succession there is no reason that the States of Parliament should have such a Power For by the known Laws they have no Legislative Power otherwise than by assenting to what the King does and all that their assent could do would be no more than that they and their Successors should not oppose his nomination because of their consent but that can never amount to a Power of transferring For if the States of Parliament had this Power originally in themselves to bestow why might they not reserve it for themselves and so perpetuate the Government in their own hands So Judge Jenkin asserts according to Law That no King can be named or in any time made in this Kingdom (d) Liberty of Subject p. 25. by the People Kings being before there were Parliaments and there is good reason for then the Monarchy should not be Hereditary but Elective the very Essence of Hereditary Monarchy consisting in the Right of Succession whereas if the Parliament can prefer the next save one they may prefer the last of all the Line and the same reason by which they can chuse a Successor which can only be that they have Power above him should likewise in the opinion of a very (e) Jus Regium p. 167. learned Person justify their deposing of Kings as we saw in the last Age that such reasons as of late have been urged to incapacitate the Children of King Charles the First from the hope of Succession viz. Popery and Arbitrary Government did embolden men to dethrone and murther the Father who was actual King For if it were once yielded that the Houses had a Right in themselves to take care for the Salus populi that none but such Princes should succeed who were approved of by the prevailing Faction in their body nothing but confusion would follow one Party having their Votes seconded by force one time and a quite contrary another yet all pretending the Publick Weal and so a large breach should be made by pretending to stop one dangerous Successor to the inflowing of successive Usurpers and thereby the Crown should not only by ambulatory but unstable upon every head that wore it and alwaies in danger of a bloody surprise till at last the Regalia being secured from the expectant Heir the Factious would find a way to pillage them from the present Soveraign and convert them into a Mace for an House of Commons I writ this Part with greater Enlargements in answer to the plausiblest Arguments for the Bill of Seclusion while that matter was in the hottest agitation But since there will be no need of dilating upon that Subject now that God Almighty hath so signally determined the Controversie by the peaceable settlement of his Majesty upon his Throne I shall close this Chapter with some few remarks of the miseries have been brought upon Kingdoms and especially upon this by the disjoynting the Succession So we read what dreadful (f) Jus Regium p. 166. mischiefs arose from Pelops preferring his younger Son to the Kingdom of Mycene The Miseries which Kingdoms have sustained where the Succession hath been interrupted from Oedipus commanding that Polynices his Youngest Son should reign interchangeably with the Eldest From Parisatis the Queen of Persia's preferring her Youngest Son Cyrus to her Eldest Artaxerxes From Aristodomus admitting
not Republics Having thus far Illustrated the Government in the Golden Age of the World wherein we find no Footsteps or the least tract of any popular Suffrages but an entailing of Sovereign Authority We may farther consider God appointed Kings that the Government of the several Kingdoms in this World have been and are by the appointment of the Sovereign of the whole World not only by Gods appointment of Moses the several Judges and Kings of Israel and Judah but by the frequent expressions in Scripture that by God Kings Reign that Kings are the Ministers of God that God will give deliverance to his King to his anointed c. By which Expressions we may rationally (e) Jus Reg. p. 15. 21. conclude that God hath reserved to himself the immediate Dependance of the supream Power to shut out the restless and extravagant Multitudes from the frequent Revolutions they would make and the desolations they would occasion if they had any ground to think the supream Power depended on theirs or that they were not bound to obey for Conscience sake their Governours Whence also are they stiled Gods but to denote they were not made by Men And as it is most clear that inferior Magistrates derive their Power from the King and not from the People as supream so by that Analogy which runs in a dependance and chains through the whole Creation Kings should derive their Power from God alone who is their King and as the (f) Rom. 13. v. 13 14. Apostle saith are ordained of God and so no humane Ordinance for Supremacy is affixt to the King but Governors are sent by him and if the King were the Creature or Creation of the People it would have been express'd that they were commissioned or sent by them whereas it is expresly said They are of God That Kings or Sovereigns derive their Power from God alone The Testimony of Authors and consequently not from the People is attested by the joint consent of all unbiass'd Learned Men Fathers and Schoolmen in all Ages who have unanimously given their Suffrages for the same as grounded upon solid Reason (g) Contra Gentes So Tertullian saith Let Kings know that from God only they have their Empire in whose Power they only are So St. (h) De Civitate Dei lib. 5. cap. 21. Augustine Let us not attribute to any other the Power of giving Kingdoms and Empires but to the true God So in the Civil Law (i) Cod. de veteri Codice enucleand we find Deo anctore nostrum gubernante Imperium quod nobis à Coelesti Majestate traditum God being the Author governing our Empire which was delivered to us from the Heavenly Majesty (k) Novel 6. Instit Nov. 40 45 46 133. pr. Justinian acknowlegeth his Obligation to take care of his People because he received the charge of them from God And certainly the People are happier in such acknowledgments than if Kings think it only a charge conferred on them by the People and that they were therefore only answerable to them The Reader that would be further satisfied may consult Arniseus Cap. de essentia majestatis Marca Archbishop of Paris de Concordia Sacerdotum Imperii Lib. 2. Cap. 2. Num. 2. Graswinckelius de Jure Majestatis Cap. 8. Num. 2. The Learned and Loyal Kings Advocate of Scotland and the Authorities I have cited in the Chapter of Monarchy Besides what I have urged hitherto we may with a (l) Dr. Hammond's Address p. 10 11. Reverend Author consider that the Sovereign hath an higher Power than the People can give not as representing them but as representing God himself For every supream Magistrate hath a Power that never was in the People to give for never any Man was by God or Nature invested with Power of his own Life to take it away or kill himself lawfully For all Christians generally declare against this Self-murther as a Crime equally against the sixth Commandment as the killing of any other Man Now this Power of Life being so essential a part of the Supremacy and no part of the natural Liberty cannot be inherent naturally in a Community of Men which have no more Power so united than each single Person hath So that though it cannot be said with some Nemo est dominus Membrorum suorum for Man hath the power over his Members to cause one to be cut off for the preserving the whole and the Jew under Gods own Government had power to make himself a Slave yet this Jus Gladii the Right and Power of the Sword which is really the Sovereign Power is by the (m) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 13.2 Ordinance of God not the Donation of the People For it was not in the Power of the People to dispense with Gods Precept Thou shalt not kill nor to distinguish shedding of Blood with the Sword of Vengeance from Murther and consequently the Power is not deriv'd to Kings and Princes by private Men who cannot transfer that Power they never had according to that known Maxim Nemo plus juris transferre ad alium potest quam ipse habet but it 's bestowed on them by God Almighty who is the sole Arbiter of Life and Death who can only take it away because he gave it The supream Magistrate therefore as God's Deputy hath the Power communicated to him as an Endowment necessary to that Power which is design'd to protect and govern others So Agamemnon having received contumelious Language from his Officers in a Council of War to let them understand his Sovereign Power tells them (n) Homer Hiad 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That he had Power of Death When Kings are Elective though it be the act of the People and not of God immediately that designs or nominates the Person to that Office yet doth not this Nomination bestow this Power but God who alone hath this Power bestows it on him who is so Elected Which we may illustrate by the Example of chusing inferiour Officers For though a Corporation by the Grant of a Sovereign hath Power to chuse a Mayor or chief Officer yet they give him not the Power of Executing that Office so and so For that is appointed and limited by the King 's especial Grace and Favour The nominating of the person being granted to them by the Sovereign but the qualifications of his Office and Power are by the sole Prescript of the King's Charter and Laws Having hitherto founded my Reasoning upon the History of Moses and the Authority of Scripture I might bring in a long Discourse out of prophane Historians Greeks and Romans as well as more modern Writers who give an account of the Foundations of Kingdoms but since a late (o) French Monarchy p. 16. Author hath made such a flourish out of Polybius slily and maliciously endeavouring to represent Monarchy as a Tyrannical Government wh◠the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the three constituent parts viz.
would put them upon that Dilemma will chuse to suffer if they cannot fly rather than rebel Therefore since it pleased his Majesty at his first Step to the Royal Throne which was like that of the rising Sun dispensing innumerable Blessings to his People to express his Royal Favour to the Church of England The King's Commendation of the Principles of the Church of England as to Monarchy with such an Encomium of its Members in that most refreshing Declaration at his first Council which from so just a Prince carries the Force and Energy of an Act of Parliament as well as of State in it it ought to bow the Hearts of all Men that design not to be Rebels as one Man to him Since which by the repeated solemnity of it to his two Houses of Parliament all suspicion of his Majestie 's ever acting to the contrary so long as the Subjects keep their dutiful Station is totally removed His Majesty also hath laid a solid Foundation for true Piety in the discountenancing and discrediting all forts of Vice and Debauchery by which none can doubt but himself as well as his Subjects will in short time reap happy Benefit according to that so the excellent (b) Diutius durant exempla quam mores Tacitus 4. Histor Historian Examples have a more durable force than Laws I shall conclude this particular with the famous Story of the Zealots in (c) Josephus de Bello Judaico lib. 4. c. 5. lib. 7. Judaea Those being told by Vespasian which Messages Josephus himself carried to them that he would change nothing of their Religion but maintain them therein The Evils by Rebelling upon pretence of Religion and in all their Liberties and Franchises yet under colour that they were bound to sacrifice their Lives in the defence of the Temple would never hearken to Peace upon any condition what ever but living upon Forraging Rapines Free-booty and committing most cruel Butcheries Vespasian found himself obliged to arm against them and use them with all Extremity In fine Those who pretended so much the Preservation of their Religion committed a Thousand sort of Impieties and Cruelties and themselves set the Temple of Jerusalem on Fire and at last brought utter Ruin to their Country I shall make no further Application but that from hence we may learn First That it was agreeable to Principles of Government that Vespasian though a Prince of a different Religion to the Jews should not alter their Civil or Religious Government And Secondly That the utter Extermination of a People and their Religion there was the Consequence of the Zelots Rebellion as to the apparent procuring cause for I enquire not here into the Original cause of that Nations Destruction viz. The crucifying of our Lord and Saviour I come now to consider wherein a Sovereign's care of Religion consists Wherein the Sovereign's Care of Religion consists which would carry me into a dangerous Ocean if I should survey all the Rocks Creeks and Quick-sands to be avoided in this matter At the best I shall find an high rolling Sea as that in the Bay of Biscay if I escape the difficult and dangerous passage betwixt Scylla and Charybdis First therefore I shall consider the Obligation the Pagan Romans thought they had not to make any Innovation in matters of their Religion with some Reflections upon it Secondly Consider the Condition of People under Diversity of Religions Thirdly The Roman Heathens not for change of Religion Speak something of the Diversities of Religion sprung up in the time of the late War And Lastly Something concerning Toleration But I must praemonish the Reader that I intend not to treat of these either as Divine or Statesman but only as a Lay-man that loves Order and Peace in transitu as a Parergon First then as to the Heathens we find that remarkable Advice of (*) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dio Cassius lib. 52. Mecaenas to Augustus That he ought to worship the Deity in all Methods and at all times himself according to his Countries Laws and cause others to do so and further adds That he should restrain those that would innovate in Divine things not for the cause only of the Gods but because those that bring in new Deities do drive men to make other dangerous Changes and from thence Conspiracies Sedition Conventicles Cabals c. which are things no ways conducible to the benefit of Government In which we may consider Mecaenas to advise like a Statesman considering that Augustus had but newly extricated himself from a great and dangerous War for no less than the Empire Therefore it behoved him to make no Alterations in Matters that might endanger the Settlement of his present Estate Therefore we find That Augustus laid aside the name of Triumvir contented with the Consulship and for defence of the People with the Tribunitian Authority which were old Offices the People were acquainted with and that he attracted the Soldiers good Will to him by Gifts the Peoples by Provision of Food and all with the sweetness of Peace arising by (d) Paulatim insurgere munia Senatus Magistratuum 〈◊〉 in se trabere aullo adversante Tacit. 1. Annal degrees to draw to himself the Imployment and Authority of the Senate the Magistrates and the Laws none opposing him How far this is to be imitated by Princes in the Circumstances of Augustus I leave to others to determine As to the general Sentiment that the Heathen Roman Religion was not to be changed I shall content my self with two Authorities of the great Orator who in one place (e) Majorum instituta tueri sacris caeremoniisque retinendis sapientis est Patrios ritus migrare aut violare ubique gentium nefarium sir Cic. de Divinatione saith That it is the part of a wise Man to defend the Institutions of their Ancestors in retaining sacred Ceremonies and that in all Nations it is reputed wicked to violate and banish our Countries Rites In another place (f) Omnes Religione moventur deos patrios quos a majoribus acceperunt colendos sibi diligenter retinendos arbitrantur Cic. in Verrem he pronounceth it absolutely That all are moved with Religion and judge their Country Gods which they have received from their Ancestors to be worshipped and retained I am sensible that if this were yielded to Christianity would not have been propagated in the World For if it had not been lawful to alter the so long established Idol Worship and Polytheism the Doctrine of Christianity had been shut out But on the other side when I consider how Christianity was propagated by the working of Miracles and by the Force and Energy of Conviction upon the Minds of such as would admit the Explanation and Dilucidation of the Doctrine and the Christians patient sufferings under the Heathen Persecutions and peaceable awaiting till God Almighty disposed the Emperor Constantine's Heart to embrace the saving Doctrine of
WEST SEAXNA CYNING I Ine by the Grace of God King of the West Saxons in his preamble to his Laws But until about our Henry the Third it was not of so constant use as that the Stile of the King necessarily required it This Stile of Dei Gratia is frequently given in old time Given to Spiritual Lords and yet in use to Spiritual Lords nothing being more common in the Instruments of Bishops and Abbats in the Chartularies of Monasteries and it is given from Kings to them in the Summons of Parliament and Writs to Assemble or Prorogue Convocations in this form Jacobus c. Reverendissimo in Christo â—â—tri praedilectoque fideli Consiliario nostro Georgio eadeâ—◠〈…〉 Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi c. But at this day though it 〈◊〉 â—â—ven to them they use it not in the first Person but Deâ— (i) Rosula Novella 〈◊〉 cap. 111. â—â—mentia or Providentia Divina and in older times when they writ to the Pope Emperor or King they were not to write Dei Gratia of themselves but only such or such licet indignus vel immerens Bononiae Episcopus c. By all these Titles we cannot but observe that the dignity of Kings and Sovereigns was looked upon in all Ages as deriving Authority from God Almighty and his Vicegerents here upon Earth having the Attributes of God that as he was Supreme over all things in Heaven and Earth so they within their Districts upon Earth I shall end this Chapter with this Observation That the Attribute of Dei Gratia applied to Sovereigns and Bishops might probably have Authority from the Constitution of Justinian (k) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Just Noâ— 6. init 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid. which runs thus The greatest Gifts which Gods goodness from above hath conferred on Men are the Priesthood and Empire both of which proceed from one and the same Principle and are for the ordering and disposing of the Affairs of Mankind Concerning the peculiar Title of our Kings of England Defender of the Faith the learned Spelman having given us thâ— Copy of the Bull and discoursed so fully of it I shall 〈◊〉 the curious Reader to him for satisfaction CHAP. XVII Of the Soveraignty of the Kings of England according to our Histories and Laws THE Titles and Attributes which other Soveraign Princes have either assumed The Kings of England have used all the Titles proper to Sovereign Princes or have been given to them our Kings of England have used as might be made appear by innumerable Examples But I shall treat but of a few and shew wherein the Soveraignty is discovered and what ancient Prerogatives they have by their acts of Grace quitted and lastly how the long Parliament of 1641. would have cramped the King's Authority First as to the Title of King or Emperor promiscuously So our Edgar frequently in his Charters calls himself Albionis Anglorum Basileus As King Emperour Lord. and I have noted before that the Grecians esteemed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be of full as eminent Signification as Emperor So in a Charter (a) Cod. Wigorn. to Oswald Bishop of Worcester he is called Anglorum Basileus omniumque Regum Insularum Oceanique Britanniam circumjacentis cunctarumque Nationum quae infra eam includuntur Imperator Dominus In which we may note that one of our Kings of England writ himself not only Basileus according to the Grecian usage which signified King and Emperor but also Emperor and Lord three of the fullest Attributes either the Grecian or Roman Emperors ever used as also Lord of the British Sea as Canutus his Successor challenged So in a Charter to (b) Mon. Ang. par 1. p. 64. Peterburg Ego Edgar sub ipso sidereo Rege praesidens Regno Magnae Britanniae I have seen another (c) Lib. MS. Roberti de Swapham c. Fundationis Burgensis Coenobii p. 38. of his Charters prefaced thus Gratia Domini nostri Jesu Christi omnium seculorum omnia suo Intuitu distribuentis Regna terrarum moderantis habenas rerum Ego Edgar sub ipso eodem Rege praesidens Regno Britanniae c. So King (d) Id. p. 39. Edward in the same Book stiles himself Ego Edwardus Rex Anglorum Monarchiam Regiminis tenens hoc decretum Patris mei per deprecationem Abbatis Aidulfi perhenniter affirmavi In which we may note that Edgar owns himself subject to Jesus Christ God And King Edward saith he holds the single Command of Government So King Edward in a (e) Coke Praefat. 4. Reports Rex Anglorum totius Britanniae Telluris Gubernator Rector Angligenum Orcadarum necnon in Gyro jacentium Monarcha Anglorum Induperator Charter to Ramsey stiles himself Totius Albionis Dei moderante Dominatione Basileus King of all Albion and King Edwin in a Charter to Crowland calls himself King of England and Governour and Ruler of all the Land of Britain So Ethelred in his Charter to Canterbury stiles himself Of all the English born and the Oreades lying in Circuit about it Monarch and Emperor of the English So that by Orcades must be understood all the Isles about Britain So William Rufus dates his Charter to the Monastery of Shaftsbury secundo Anno Imperii mei By all which it appears that the Kings of England have justly assumed the Supream Imperial Command in their own Dominions and though the Title of Emperor hath been disused Kings of England as much Sovereigns as Emperours yet we shall find the substance of it sufficiently challenged in that of (f) Ipse omnes libertaâ—â—s 〈◊〉 Râ—gno habebat suo quas Imperator vendicabat in Imperio Matt. Paris in vita Willielmi 2. William Rufus to Arch-Bishop Anselm when he told him That he had all the Liberties in his Kingdom which the Emperor challenged in the Empire And in a Constitution (g) Râ—gâ—um Angliae ab omâ—i subjectione Imperiali liberrimum Claus 13 E. 2. m. 6. dorso of King Edward the Second it is declared That the Kingdom of England is most free from all Imperial Subjection which excluded all public Notaries who were made by the Emperor or Popes and by this Constitution were utterly rejected The Statutes for it This further appears in the (h) Stat. Anno 23 E. 3. c. 1. Vide Coke Instit 2. 111. 4 part 6. 8. 3. Instit 120 125. Statute of Praemunire made 23 Ed. 3. which runs thus That it being shown by the grievous and clamorous Complaints of the great Men and Commons how that divers of the People be and been drawn out of the Realm to answer of things whereof the Cognizance pertaineth to the King's Court and also that the Judgments given in the same Court be impeached in another Court in prejudice and dis-inherison of our Lord the King and of his Crown c. Therefore it was enacted That none of the King's Liege-People of
by the Law said to be in the King (z) Sheppard ut supra a threefold greatness of Perfection First of being freed from Infamy and all kind of Imperfections common to Man Secondly of Power in having the command of all his People Thirdly of Majesty being the Fountain of Honour Justice and Mercy The King is Gods immediate Viceroy (a) Câ—k 2.44.5.29 within his Dominions Vicarius Dei As his Protection and Government reacheth to all his People as Subjects so the Allegiance and Obedience of them all is due to him as their Sovereign whether Ecclesiastical or Civil and so he is Persona mixta his Prerogatives are called Jura Regalia Insignia Coronae Ancient Prerogatives and Royal Flowers of the Crown so inseparably annexed to the Crown that none but the King may have them nor can they be communicated to or taken by any Subject (b) Bracton lib. 1. c. 8. Stat. 25 H. 8. c. 21. Nemo terram nisi Authoritate Râ—gia possiâ—et Plowden 136. Jenkins Cent. 7. Case 77. 2. Case 16.17 E. 2. c. 17. Nevil 101.174 All Lands are said to be held of him immediately or mediately he can hold of no Man or any be equal to him as to be joynt Tenant of Land with him and his Jurisdiction is over all places within his Dominions both on the dry Land and on the Sea The Judges are to observe it as a certain Rule That whatever may be for the benefit of the King and his profit shall be taken most largely for him and what against him and for his disprofit be taken strictly neither is it only the duty of Judges but of all other his Subjects in their Stations to help the King to his Right The Perogatives are many and great yet such as are his by the Ancient Law of the Land and what the Kings of England have time out of mind used and are such as are of absolute (c) Coâ—e 12.8.30.2 part Instit 262.496.5 part 11.2.8 necessity for the security of the Government and the Public weals As to call and dissolve Parliaments give his Royal Assent to Laws command the Militia coyn Moneys grant Honors make and dispose of the great Seal dispense with penal Laws pardon Felonies and Treasons make and appoint great Officers Justices of Eyre and Assize of the Peace Gaol-delivery and Sheriffs to grant Charters to Corporations and other Persons or Fraternities He hath the sole Power of appointing ratifying and consummating all Treaties with Foreign Princes making War and Peace granting Safe-Conduct and Protection and all these and many other are firmly ascertained (d) Quod Rex est 〈◊〉 Lex est Regi Rex est Amma 〈◊〉 Lex est Anima Regi by Laws and have ever been and still are in the King alone and at his own Discretion Although there is no need in describing the Sovereignty of our Kings to carry it up to that absoluteness of Monarchy where all things are appointed and reversed by the Sovereigns fiat yet (e) Jus Regium p. 42. we must on the other side consider That the Monarchy which is subject to the impetuous Caprices of the Multitude when giddy or to the incorrigible Factiousness of the Nobility when interested is in effect no Government at all it must be owned That in all Governments a Sovereignty must reside some where and a Monarch can 〈◊〉 no Participants For then it would cease to be a Monarchy and in things that relate immediately to Government the King hath as much right to regulate them as to instance to restrain the Licence of the Press or secure Peace as we have to regulate and dispose of our Property Government being the Kings Property for with the Monarchy the King must enjoy all things that are necessary for the Administration of it according to that just Maxim (f) Quando aliquid â—oneditur omnia concessa videntur sine quibus concessum explicari nequit of the Law When any thing is granted all things seem to be granted without which the thing granted cannot be explained Which warrants the Kings Advocate of Scotland to lay that down as a general (g) Jus Regium p. 77. Rule That their Kings can do every thing that relates to Government and is necessary for the Administration thereof though there be no special Law or Act of Parliament for it if the same be not contrary to the Law of God Nature or Nations The Power and Authority of the Kings of England have been much more unbounded than they are at present (h) Part 1. c. 16. sol 34. Bracton speaking of his time saith That neither the Justices or private Persons might dispute the Kings Charter but if there were a doubt of it the Resolution must come from the Kings own Interpretation If Justice be demanded of the King saith (i) Idem lib. 1. c. 8. p. 5. he seeing no Writ lies against him one must petition that he would correct and amend what he hath done By the Condescensions of gracious Princes such Restrictions have been made of their Sovereign Absoluteness By the Grants and Condescensions of our Kings their Absoluteness lessened that they have obliged themselves to govern their Kingdoms transmitted to them with such Limitations by their numerous Ancestors by Rules of Law Equity Justice and right Judgment in Imitation of their Supreme Head and Omnipotent Monarch That therefore it may demonstratively appear how happily the Government of England is constituted for the Benefit of the Subjects who under so benign a Monarchy enjoy more Advantages in the Security of their Persons and Proprieties than under the most free Commonwealth that ever we read of I shall lightly touch upon some of those Particulars which the Kings of England by reason of several Acts of Parliament they have given their Royal Assents to have precluded themselves from the single Disposal of as in Absolute Monarchies are used yet I hope to make it clear in several Branches of this Discourse That there is no such thing as Co-ordinacy of any other Power or such a mixture as vitiates the Monarchy by a debasing Alloy much less that the Government can be Arbitrary or Tyrannical which hath sheathed the Sword of Justice within the Velvet Scabbard of the Laws and lined the Scarlet Robes of Majesty with the softest Ermine of Indulgence to well deserving Subjects who by their Obedience and Considerateness make their Princes and their own Happiness most perfect For it is equally unhappy to Princes and Subjects where (k) Alii Principes Reges hominum ipse Rex Regum Maximilian's Jest is true That whereas other Princes were Kings of Men he was King of Kings because his Subjects would do but only what they list But to come to the Particulars of Royal Abatements and Indulgences The Kings of England may not rule their People by their Will or by Proclamation as the Roman Emperors by their (l) 〈◊〉 lib. 2. c. 8. The
(q) Power of the Prince p. 81. Primate is obvious because the inflicting of a punishment is an Act of a Superior to an Inferior and to make one upon Earth Superior to the Supreme Governour would imploy an absolute contradiction though a Father or Master were never so faulty none would be so absurd as to think that their Servants or Children might chastise them When I reflect on that dismal Day when the wicked High Court of Justice arraigned and sentenced the most Innocent Just and Religious King that possibly hath worn a Crown since our Saviours time I always stand amazed and read or meditate on that Tragical Act with a concern next to that of our Saviour's suffering All that black and bloody Scene was acted by Men of and upon the Principles successful Rebels made use of The Preamble to the Treasonable Charge against King Charles the First That Kings are admitted and trusted with a limited Power to govern by and according to the Laws of the Land and not otherwise and by their Trust Oath and Office are obliged to use the Power committed to them for the Good and Benefit of the People and for the Preservation of their Rights and Liberties which they charged that Blessed King to have designedly violated To which I shall give only some k short Heads of his Majesties Answer (r) His Majesty's Speeches and Tryal p. 429. which if they had been weighed were enough to confound all their arguing He demanded by what lawful Authority he was seated there he had a trust committed to him by God by old and lawful Descent that he would not betray Pag. 431. to answer to a new unlawful Authority That England was an Hereditary Kingdom He tells them how great a sin it is to withstand lawful Authority and submit to a Tyrannical or Unlawful That Kings can be no Delinquents That Obedience unto Kings is strictly commanded in the old and new Testament pag. 435. particularizing that one place Where the word of a King is there is Power and who may say unto him What dost thou Eccl. 8.4 That no Impeachment can lye against him all running in his Name That the King can do no wrong the House of Commons never being a Court of Judicature can erect none He owns an Obligation to God to defend and maintain the Liberties of his People against all such Illegal and Arbitrary Proceedings Pag. 439. But 't was to no purpose to show such Crown-Jewels before such Wolves and Bears that were gaping for his Blood and would not admit his only request to them to be heard for the Welfare of the Kingdom and Liberty of the Subject before they precipitated Sentence against him before the Lords and Commons and pressed it That it may be it was something he had to say they had not heard before Hand But nothing his sacred Majesty could say would move those who under a vile and notorious Lye in the Name of the People the Supreme Authority as they called it passed that barbarous Sentence against that sacred Head to the amazement of the whole World sufficient to raise the utmost Indignation of all good Men against such barbarous Principles and Proceedings CHAP. XIX That the Sovereign may dispense with the Execution of the Laws of his Country in several Cases HAving discoursed of the Kings being unaccountable to any but God Almighty when he governs not according to the Laws of God Nature or his Dominions The Connexion of this with the foregoing Chapter upon that Foundation That there cannot be two Supremes here upon Earth in one Kingdom I come now to discover what Power Kings in general and our Kings in particular have to dispense with the Execution of the Laws upon some cases for it is far from my thoughts ever to suggest any such dangerous assertion That Princes in general may dispense with the Execution of the Laws Plutarch (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Compar Flaminii Philopaemenis setteth this down as a chief point of that natural skill which Philopoemen had in Government That he did not only rule according to the Laws but over-ruled the Laws themselves when he found it conducing to the Weal publick For as the (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Jun. Imp. praef Constit 3. Emperor saith whilst the Laws stand in force it is fit that sometimes the Kings Clemency should be mingled with the severity of them especially when by that means the Subject may be freed from much Detriment and Damage Princes according to the (c) Princeps est supra legem adeo quod secundum conscientiam suam judicare potest Cyrus in L. Rescript c. Judgment of great Lawyers have Power to judge according to their own Conscience and not according to the Letter of the Law and no doubt it was such written Laws as these that (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justinian Novel 105. Justinian the Emperor meant when upon the enacting of a Constitution of this kind he added thereunto this Limitation From all these things which have been said by us let the Emperors State be excepted whereunto God hath subjected the very Laws themselves sending him as a living Law unto Men who therefore in another place assumeth to himself the Title of a Father of the Law Whereupon the (e) Nota Imperatorem vocari patrem Legis under c Leges sune ei subjecte Gloss in Novel 12. c. 4. Glossator maketh this Observation Note That the Emperor is the Father of the Law whereupon the Laws also are subject to him So the great (f) Princeps est supra legem in quantum si expediens est potest legem mutare in ea dispensare pro loco tempore Vid. Thom. in 1.2 q. 96. Artic 5. ad 3. Schoolman saith The Prince is above the Law so far that if it be expedient he may change the Law and dispense with Time and Place as when a Man is condemned to banishment the Prince if he see cause may revoke him from thence and therein saith (g) Gloss in lib. 4. de Poenis Accursius his own Will is accounted a great and just cause Magna justa Causa est ejus Voluntas The Reason of these Assertions is couched in what Aeneas (h) Convenit Imperatori Juris rigorem aequitatis fraeno temperare cui soli inter aequitatem jusque interpositam interpretationem licet incumbit inspicere De Ortu Authoribus Imperii Sylvius observes That there is a certain other thing to which the Emperor is more obnoxious than to the Law and that is Equity which is not always found written Now if the Law doth command one thing and Equity perswade another It is fit the Emperor should temper the Rigor of the Law with the Bridle of Equity as he who alone may and ought to look unto that Interpretation which lyeth interposed betwixt Law and Equity since no Law can sufficiently
subsequent Acts of Parliament supplied all Defects and all the Limitations of that absolute Power which accrued by Conquest being the free Concession of himself and his Successors which appears in their Grants by way of Charter as I shall hereafter have occasion to enlarge upon it is most evident that the King's Power is absolute where no Law (f) D. Digs Unlawfulness of Resisting can be produced to the contrary and no special Case can be determined by the Subject to the Kings disadvantage and though the Kings succeeding the Conquest to sweeten Subjection quaedam jura pactis minuerunt and these Acts of Grace were confirmed by Promise and Oath No Contract betwixt King and Subjects whereby they may exact an Account yet we find no Footsteps of any security given that should endanger the Person or Regal Authority by giving to their Subjects any legal Power to unking them if they should not perform Covenant Nor could it be rational to expect such for they knew full well if they should not break such Promises yet a Pretence that they did so as we have known it was alledged concerning the Coronation Oath might upon the first opportunity create a Civil War Therefore their Subjects had as little reason to accept as the Kings had to offer so pernicious a Security as would bring both Parties into such a sad Condition For if Rebellion were to be allowed in any Case that Case would be always pretended and though the Prince were Just Wise and Religious yet ambitious Men to compass their own Ends would impute to him Oppression Weakness or Irreligion as the World knows by too sad Experience was verified in King Charles the Martyr who taking his measures of others Sincerity by the rule of his own Heart suffered pretences of publick Good to grow up to insolent Tumults and at last to Rebellion and notwithstanding his Exemplary Practice in his publick Devotions was traduced to have but handsomly dissembled and favoured another Religion in his Heart and at last brought before a crew of Regicides impeached of breach of Trust Tyranny and I know not how many horrid Crimes against his Subjects who yet died the Peoples Martyr and the Royal Asserter of their Liberties and Priviledges which all his Subjects found to expire with him the greatest Arbitrariness and cruellest Tyranny being during their Power exercised by the new Common-wealth Men that ever was read of in any History Those who read Books among those of the Sect of Libertines in Politicks and so much magnify the great name of Liberty of the Subject and co-ordinate Powers Writers who lived under Common-wealths no Guides to us converse most in Greek and Latin Authors who lived under Commonwealths and so were profuse in the commendation of their Country Government against Usurpers or else these admired Authors were (g) Jus Regium p. 134. Stoicks who out of a selfish Pride equalled themselves not only to their Kings but to their own Gods even as our Quakers who pretend a Light within them a more sure guide to them than the Law Now the same reason they had to commend their form of Government We have more reason to commâ—nd our Government than the Romans or Grecians theirs and so much more as Monarchy is preferrable to Aristocracy we in England have reason to commend our Constitution where our Kings are truly the Fathers of their Country and if they would ballance the convenience or inconvenience of either Government they would soon discover it For whereas they say that the Doctrine of Non-resistance is the readiest Motive to establish Tyranny It is much more certain and experimentally known that the Leaders of the Rabble always prove such and that the Distractions of a civil War which ordinarily are occasioned by the pretence of reforming something amiss in the Governours and Competitions betwixt Persons for Soveraignty destroy more than the Lusts of any one Tyrant can do which made Lucan a Republican and of the Pompeian Party conclude after a sad review of the continual Civil Wars betwixt Sylla and Marius Caesar and Pompey without touching upon what followed under the Triumvirs Foelices Arabes Medique Eoaque tellus Qui sub perpetuis tenuerunt Regna Tyrannis And if he preferred even the Tyranny or absoluteness of those Kings before the State of Civil Wars how much more have we reason to submit and that chearfully to the most easy Yoak of the Sovereignty of our Princes We need not be solicitous that their unaccountableness to their Subjects shall prompt them to Tyranny because we have good Security as strong as humane Wisdom ever invented that we shall live happily under that Constitution which our Fore-fathers enjoyed the Benefit of in an high Degree The Security we have that no Arbitrary Government can be exercised in England never distrusting the sound temper of the Policy For first our Kings swear at their Coronations to preserve the Laws Liberties Properties and Religion Secondly If they should command illegal things the Executors of them are responsible to Parliamentary Inquisitions Lastly the Interest of the King is the same with that of the Subject as to their Prosperity and Misery so that a King will always consult the good of his Subjects which made (h) Praeestis hominibus sed hominum causa nec domini modo Arbitri rerum sed Tutores Administratores estis Collata est in sinum vestrum a deo hominibus Respublica sed nempe in sinum ut foveatur Epist Dedicat ad Imp. Reges Principes Lipsius tell the Sovereigns That they govern over Men but for their good and are not only Lords and Judges of Matters but Tutors and Administrators That the Government of the Commonweal by God and Men is placed in their Bosoms or Laps but so as to be cherished and protected there To conclude this discourse We have heard of or seen the sad Calamities the Republican Rebellion brought upon all his Majesties Dominions when the mild Government of King Charles the First was altered to the most Bloody and Tyrannical one of his rebellious Subjects that any Age could parallel and we have had Experience of the merciful Government of his Royal Son and Successor and have lived to see all the Establishments of Usurpers brought to Confusion We have seen a formidable Rebellion burst forth in our Magnanimous King James the Second's Reign which had been forming seven Years before utterly overthrown in two Months and we cannot peruse Histories but we must meet with infinite Examples of the sad devastations such Rebellions bring to their Country and the unsuccessfulness of them Therefore I would earnestly advise all Malecontents never to make their Country's Ruine and the slain Carcasses of their Countrymen the Steps by which they must ascend the Scaffolds or the Rounds of the Ladders they must mount the Gallows which without a Prince's Clemency are the sure Rewards of all Rebels and their certain Fate CHAP.
had with Ecclesiasticks and Laicks and in the Laws it is often said Thonne cwaedon these we pronounce or appoint and sometimes the single person is used and in other places us betweonan heoldan it is holden betwixt us Here we find the Great Council summoned by the King and the constituent parts of it to be the Clergy and Laity and that the Laity were only the Princes Dukes Earls great Officers Military Commanders the Kings Ministers Graeves Praepositi Thanes sometimes denoted by the general names of Wites translated Sapientes Magnates Optimates c. as is every where beyond all possible doubt cleared by the most Judicious Dr. Brady in his Answer to Mr. Petyt to whose great collection for the proof of this point before I proceed further I shall only in transitu instance in a few The Title of the Council of Berghamsted (f) Spelman Concil vol. 1. fol. 194. Anno 697. Withrad 5 of Withred King of Kent is This Synd Wightraedes domas Cantuara Cyninges Saxon Great Councils These are the Judgments of Withred King of Kent and the persons mentioned particularly are the King that convened them and Birthwald Bretone Heahbisceop High or Archbishop of Britain Gibmund Bishop of Rochester and the rest of the Ecclesiastick (g) Aelc had ciricean thaere maegthe acmodlice Order of that Nation mid thy Hersuman Folcy with the Military Persons such as in after times were called Here-Thegni in King Ina's Laws and Heretoches in the Auctuary (h) Lamb. tit Heretoch fol. 147. to the 35 Laws of King Edward the Confessor which are there interpreted Barones Nobiles Insignes Sapientes Ductores Excercitus So in the Council at Clovesho 3. Cal. Nov. Anno Dom. 824. under (i) Spelm. Conc. vol. 1. fol. 333. Beornwulph Beornwulph King of the Mercians besides the Archbishop VVulfred and several Bishops and Abbats are enumerated only Beornoth Eadberht Sigered Egberht Eadwulf Alheard Mucel Vhtred and Ludica under the stile of Duces Bynna Frater Regis Aldred Thelonius So in the Great Council at London (k) Idem fol. 336. Egbert 26 May Anno 833. the Title is Presidentibus Egberto Rege West-Saxoniae Withlasio Rege Merciorum utroque Archiepiscopo caeterisque Angliae Episcopis Magnatibus and besides the Bishops and Abbats that subscribe we find these Adelwulphus filius Regis West-Saxoniae Wulhardus Dux Athelmus Dux Herenbrithus Dux So in the Council at Kingsburie Anno 851. Bertulph Idem fol. 344. under Bertulph King of the Mercians it is said to be praesentibus Ceolnotho Dorobernensi Archiepiscopo caeterisque Regni Merciae Episcopis Magnatibus and the Subscribers are besides the Bishops and Abbats Ernulphus Dux Osrithus Dux Serlo Comes Elbertus Comes Huda Comes Oflat Pincerna Regis I have upon this occasion instanced in these few of the Ancientest to clear who the Persons were according to their Orders Ranks and Degrees that constituted these Great Councils and shall now proceed to other Saxon Councils succeeding Eldred King of all England gave the Monastery (l) Ingulphi Hist fol. 477. King Eldred's Great Council of Croyland to Abbat Turketul and his Monks by his Charter dated in Festo Nativitatis B. M. Virginis Anno Dom. 948. cum universi Magnates Regni per Regium edictum summoniti when all the great Men of the Kingdom were summoned by the Kings command and then more particularly he divides them into the two Orders of Ecclesiasticks and Laicks thus Tam Archiepescopi Episcopi Abbates quam caeteri totius Regni Proceres Optimates Londoniis convenissent ad tractandum de negotiis publicis totius Regni Some may object That Ingulphus giving this account may rather express the Members and the occasion of it to treat of the Publick Affairs of the whole Kingdom according to the usage of the Age he lived in than of the Age the Great Council was held in which is well to be observed in many cases But in the Laws of King Edgar I shall shew it was then used in such manner to give account of the great Councils as both his Laws and those I have hitherto mentioned of the oldest Date manifest The Preface to King Edgar's Laws is thus This is seo geraednysse the Eadgar Cyng mid his Witena getheahte geraed King Edgar's Laws Lamb. Conc. fol. 62. Regn. coepit 959. desiit 975. This is the Constitution Act or Decree which King Edgar with his Wisemen or Great-men hath made ready trimmed or enacted Then follow the three great Ends for which such Councils are called viz. God to lofe to the Love Glory or Praise of God in appointing Religious Laws him Sylfum to Cynescipe rendred by Lambard ad Regiae Majestatis ornamentum or according to the significancy of the Words himself to make Kingly or his own Kingship or Soveraignty to manifest and thirdly eallum his leodscip to thearf all his People or Nation to profit or according to Lambard ad totius Reipublicae utilitatem The same King Edgar (m) Spelmanâ— Concil Tom. 1. fol. 4â—5 in his Charter to Glastonbury concludes it thus Hanc privilegii paginam Rex Edgarus XII Regni sui Sacro Scripto apud Londoniam communi Concilio Optimatum suorum confirmavit So that it appears this was in the presence of a great Council and the Witnesses named are Elfgina Regis mater Edward Clito filius Kinedius Rex Albaniae Mareusius Archiparata Admiral Then follow both the Archbishops and several Bishops and Abbats after whom the secular Optimates viz. Elpher Oslac Ethelwine by the Title of Duces Oswold Eufward Ethelsic Ellshie by the Title of Ministri which were Officers under the King as Thegns praepositi In the account given of a Council held at (n) Idem 490. Winchester in this Kings Reign those present at it are reckoned thus Praesentibus Edgaro Rege cum Conjuge Dunstano Archiepiscopo Elfero Principe Merciorum Ethelwino Duce Orientalium Anglorum and the same persons called Duces in the foregoing Charter Elfwoldo suo Germano Brithnotho Comiti cum Nobilitate totius Regni So that none but the Nobility were present The Witnesses to a Charter of the same King to the Monastery of Hyde in Winchester are the King Archbishop Dunstan Eadmund Clito legitimus praefati Regis filius Edward eodem Rege Clito procreatus Aelftheyth Regina Eadgita Regis avia the present Queen hath the precedence of the Queen Dowager Then follow several Bishops and Abbats after whom the Lay-Peers viz. Odgar Athelstan Athelwin Dukes Aethelweard Aelfweard and Walston Ministri It is to be noted That most do make the Laws of King Edward the Confesson to be principally a revival of King Edgar's Laws mixing such as Canutus had adjoyned to them The Preamble to the Laws of King Ethelred runs thus The Laws of Ethelred fol. 88. Regn. coepit A. 979. desiit 1016. This is tha geraednyss the Ethelred Cyning his Witan geraeddon eallum Folc to fritherbote These are the Constitutions King
according to the Title the Knights Agelnodus Walfricus Sywardus Godricus To the third Charter (d) Id. 636. when he dedicated St. Peter's Church Anno 1066. there are these more added to the Lay-Nobility besides Osbern Peter and Robert the King's Chaplain who are placed next after the Chancellor As to King Edward's Laws and their Confirmation by the Conqueror and the Addâ—â—ions and Amendments see Dr. Brady fol. 254. Aâ—gum Aâ—tinorm 296 298 299. As to the â—arallel betwixt the Saxon and Norman Laws see his Preface to the Norman Story before the Dukes Gud Comes Marheâ—â—s Comes Radulphus Minister Agelnodus Minister and besides that Wulfric Syward and Godrich in the aforesaid Charter are called here Knights there are added Colo and Wulsward Knights and the Conclusion of all is Omnes consentientes subscripsimus So that here may be noted the use of the Subscriptions of the Noblemen to the King's Charters which then were only by the mark of a Cross and in after times by their Seals to those we call Acts of Parliament as hereafter will be shown Having thus treated of the General Councils and such like Conventions under the Saxon and Danish Kings I shall pass to the Norman Kings and so descending to the present Age show the constituent Parts of the great Councils and Parliaments and by what variety of Expressions in the gradual Progress of the respective Kings Reigns the Soveraigns enacting of Laws was exhibited only before I enter I cannot but take notice that Mr. Selden by what compliance I know not Ab his vix alios ante Saxones comperio Custodes sub eis varie partitos c. Explent numerum Rex Conâ—â—â—â—â—ularius Cancellarius Thesaurarius Angliae Aldermannus Aldermannus Provinâ—â—arum Gravii Janus Angl. p. 40. with the mode of his time calls those which we make constituent Parts of the great Councils of the Saxon times Custodes and saith he scarce meets with any of these Guardians of the Laws different from these Lawmakers Yet he brings no Representatives of the Commons for he makes them the King the Lord High-Constable the Chancellor the Treasurer the Alderman of England the Aldermen of Provinces and the Graves I cannot but wonder that he should not at least give some hint what difference there was betwixt the King and his Graeve in the point of Law-making Surely he knew the Constitution of the great Councils as well as any but being a Sitting Member in that long Parliament was in that Particular tainted per contagionem uvaque livorem deducet ab uva CHAP. XXV Of the great Councils of the Norman Kings 'till the end of the Reign of King John WHAT Changes William the Conqueror made in the Government how he brought in the Feudal Laws of Normandy and many other Alterations Doctor Brady hath proved at large in his Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and the Preface to his Complete History so that I shall touch very little upon that Subject The Conqueror saith the learned Sir (a) Praefâ—tio ad LL. Willielmi primi pag. 155. Edit Wheeloch Three things the Conqueror designed Roger Twysden having obtained the Kingdom by dint of Sword and knowing that no Empire is firmly established by Arms without Justice applied his mind to three things First That he might have a sufficient Military Force Secondly That he might gratifie his French and Norman Adventurers yet so as the English might not by over much severity be instigated to rebel And Thirdly That the Husbandmen might live as Servants and to perform the Drudgery but not to be wholly extirpated As to the First He disposed the Militia so as (b) Lib. 4. p. 523. About his Militia and Revenue Ordericus Vitalis tells us it was reported That he could expend 1600 l. and 30 s. three Half-pence Sterling Money every day besides the Presents Fines for remitting of Punishments upon Transgressions of the Laws and many other ways whereby his Treasury was encreased and he made the Kingdom be surveyed and all his Tributes or Revenues Piscos as in the time of King Edward he made be truly described His Lands he so distributed to his Soldiers Disposed the Lands in Military Service and disposed them so that in the Kingdom of England he had 60000 Horsemen which he could with great readiness call together therefore in the 58 Law ascribed to him and which is in the Red Book of the Exchequer it is thus expressed We (c) Statuimus etiam sirmiter praecipimus ut omnes liberi homines totius Regni nostri sint fratres cenjurati ad Monarchiâ—m nostram ad Regnum nostrum pro viribus suis facultatihus contra inimicos pro posse suo defendendum viriliter servandum Pacem Dignitatem Coronae nostrae integram observandâ—m judicium rectum justitiam constanter omnibus modis pro posse suo sine delatione â—aciendam Fol. 171. appoint and firmly command that all the Liberi Homines such as held in Military Service to whom he had distributed all the Lands of the English except what he kept in his own Possession as in all Authors that treat of such matters is most evident of his whole Kingdom should be sworn Brothers to defend and manfully preserve his Monarchy and the Kingdom according to their Power against all Enemies and keeping entire the Peace and Dignity of his Crown and for the executing of right Judgment and Justice constantly in all ways according to their Power without Deceit or Delay I have inserted this at large because it seems the Primary Law upon which his Government was established and it seemeth to me to be the Substance of the Oath of Fealty that all the Subjects which held in Capite were to take or that the same Oath was to the same ends and purpose This Law is said to be made in the City of London But without doubt it was much according to the (d) Monsieur Berault Custom Norman fol. 86. usage of Normandy established by Rollo and what had been practised by the Francks when they conquered the Gauls in the declining of the Roman Empire who distributed their Lands among their Soldiers to whom was reserved the Dignity of Gentlemen and the Management of Arms and the use of them taken from the Ancient Gauls who were called Roturiers and they were only permitted to manage the matters of Husbandry and Merchandice So the Conqueror gave to some of his Followers (e) Brady's Preface Norm History p. 159. whole Counties to some two or three or more Counties with a great Portion of Land to others Hundreds Mannors or Towns who parcelled them out to their Dependants and Friends 'till at last though the Saxons most frequently held their own Estates of those new Lords and by new Titles from them some Soldiers and ordinary Men had some proportionable Shares for their Services though upon hard Conditions possessing them for the most part as Feudatories Of the Feudal Law and
the King (e) Remisit libere concessit integre promisiâ— remitted freely granted and fully promised the Investiture by Ring and Staff and freely left the Election of the Prelates to their respective Churches By which we may not only note who made up this Great Council but that the enacting part was solely the King's Grant The Charter (f) Lib. rub Scaccar Twysden LL. Id. 1. p. 175. of Henry the First was made before the Eighteenth of his Reign in which he saith because his Kingdom was oppressed with unjust Exactions in (g) Ego respectu Dei amore quem ergâ— vos habeo Matt. Paris fol. 292. num 10. See the Explanation of this Charter Brady's Argum. fol. 265. and Selden's Epinomis respect of God and the Love which he hath to his Subjects he makes the Holy Church free and so proceeds in the rest of his Laws by way of single Grant and Prohibition Anno 1127. 28 H. 1. (h) Rex auditis Concilii gestis consensum praebuit Authoritate Regia potestate concessit consirmavit statuta Concilii Continuat Florent Wigorn p. 503. W. Archbishop of Canterbury gathered a General Council of all the Bishops Abbats and Religious Persons and at the close of the Acts it is said That the King being at London having heard the Acts of the Council gave his consent to them and by his Kingly Authority and Power granted and confirmed the Statutes of the Council By which we may see that even the Constitutions of Ecclesiastical Councils required the Sovereign's Confirmation Of the Great Councils in King Stephen's time THat he was an Usurper is notoriously known His first great Council is only said by Malmsbury to be gathered at London (a) Coacto magno Episcoporum Procerum Abbatum concilio Fol. 92. b. num 4. consisting of Bishops Nobles and Abbats in which many Ecclesiastical and Secular Matters were ordained Matthew Paris saith That he having gathered at London the Magnates Regni he promised the bettering of the Laws according to the will (b) Juxta voluntatem arbiâ—rium singulorum Fol. 62. num 40. and pleasure of all The reason of which compliance of this King was for that he was set up and Crowned by a Faction there being reckoned by Authors none of Eminence present at his Coronation but the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishop of Winchester and Roger of Salisbury his Brother no Abbats and but few of the Nobility they having all sworn (c) Malmsb. Hist Novel fol. 101. b. num 16. Fealty to Maud the Empress in Henry the first 's life time though he in the following Charter saith That he was elected King Assensu Cleri Populi But to proceed King Stephen primo Regni at Oxford Anno 1136. grants the Liberties to his Subjects by way of Charter (d) Ego Stephanus Dei gratia assensu Cleri c. omnes exactiones meschenningas injustitias sive per Vicecomites vel per alios quoslibet male inductas funditus extirpo bonas leges antiquas justas consuetudines c. observabo observari praecipio constituo Malmsb. Hist Novel p. 101. b. num 20. that the Church be free and he confirms due Reverence to it and so proceeds to recite many particular Priviledges to it and as to his Lay-Subjects he doth utterly root out all exactions misdeeds and injustices evilly brought in by Sheriffs or any others That he will observe himself and appoints and constitutes to be observed the good Laws and antient and just Customs in Hundreds Pleas or other matters This was by Charter and my Author saith he disdains to set to the names of the Witnesses which were many because he so lightly or foolishly changed all But Richard Prior of Hexham closes the Charter thus (e) Ric. Prior Hâ—gustald col 314. num 6. Anno 1136. 1 Regni The King grants his Charter with a Salvo Haec omnia concedo confirmo salva Regia justa Dignitate mea By which Conclusion it is apparent the King reserved to himself a Latitude to use his Prerogative and some are of opinion Kings cannot by any Concessions divest themselves of that but I want Mittans to handle such noli me tangere's of the Crown What I have further to add concerning this Charter is That the Prior of Hexham makes it granted after the Popes Confirmation (f) Id. 313. num 30. Note That all Authors think strange thâ— Pope should â—â—â—firm and so countenance King Stephen an Usurper of him in which if ever that See consulted its private Interest it was then and in my poor Opinion nothing hath more discovered the Personal failures of Popes than such countenancing of Usurpers my Author I say makes it to be passed at his Parliament at Oxford where he saith he celebrated a general Council Episcopos Proceres sui Regni regali edicto in unum convenire praecepit The Witnesses this Author sets down makes it (g) Id. 315. num 10. appear there were none besides the Clergy and Barons present for after fourteen Bishops named the rest of the Witnesses are Roger the Chancellor Henry Nephew of the King Robert Earl of Gloucester William Earl Warren Ralph Earl of Chester Roger Earl of Warwick Rob. de Vere Miles de Gloucester Rob. de Olli Briano Filio Comitis Constab Robert de Martel Hugh Bigot Humfrid de Bohun Simon de Bellocampo Dapif Rob. de Ferrers William Petrus Simon de Silbanâ—et William de Albania Hugh de Sancto Claro Ilbert de Lecsio All which were very great Barons the last of them being Heir to 150 Knights Fees at least his Grandfather had so many So that we cannot judge the Commons by any Representation were present The other great Councils of this King are to be found in the Authors (h) Flor Wigorn. Anno 1138. fol. 668. cited in the Margent That at Northampton had Turstin Archbishop of York president and the rest enumerated are Episcopi Abbates Comites Barones Nobiles quique per Angliam That of the sixteenth (i) Hen. Hunt Anno 1151. fol. 226. mentions only the Archbishop of Canterbury Eustachius the King's Son Angliae Proceres in the (k) Chron. Norm Anno 1152. Agreement 17 Regni the Conventus was Episcoporum Comitum aliorum Optimatum and the last I find Anno 1154. ultimo Regni e is cum Episcopis Optimatibus (l) Jo. Brompton col 1000. num 50. never any Commons represented being to be met with Of the Great Council in King Henry the Second's Reign THE first considerable Act of State that I find Henry the Second did was Anno 1154. 1 Reg. That he gathered his General Council to London in Lent (a) Spelman Concil Tom. 2. fol. 54. Congregavit Concilium generale renovavit pacem leges consuetudines per Angliam ab antiquis temporibus constitutas he renewed Peace and the Laws and Customs of antient
suae â—re proprio specialiter sibi Regno suo salvavit excepit That the King in the Declaration of the said Sentence did by his own Mouth specially save and except to himself and his Kingdom all the Liberties ancient Customs of his Kingdom and Usages Dignities and Rights of his Crown By which it is apparent how cautious the King was in these liberal Concessions not to prejudice his Prerogative They are neither few in Number nor of mean repute for judgment and learning in our Laws who assert Such like Protestation King Richard the Second made 10 Reg. Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 32. See in King Stephen that as Acts of Parliament made contrary to Magna Charta are void so likewise are all such as diminish the Prerogative in any part of it which is necessary for the support of the Government So upon the passing the Petition (q) His Majesty's Speeches fol. 368. of the Basilica of Right King Charles the First the King said The King willeth that Right be done according to the Laws and Customs of the Land and that the Statutes be put in due Execution that the Subjects may have no cause to complain of any Wrong or Oppression contrary to their Just Rights and Liberties to the Preservation whereof he holdeth himself obliged as well as of his Prerogative But this would not please and so he pronounced Le droit soit fait comme il est desire and adds that he is sure is full but no more than he granted in his first Answer his meaning in that being to confirm all their Liberties knowing according to their Protestations they neither meant nor can hurt his Prerogative The Peoples Liberty strengthens the Kings Prerogative and the Kings Prerogative is to defend the Peoples Liberties The rest of the Parliaments of this Kings Reign are said to be called (r) Id. 435. num 10.21 H. 3. Id. 693. num 20.26 H. 3. Id. fol. 579. num 40. Id. fol. 696. num 30. Id. fol. 698. num 40. Vide Brady's Appendix fol. 59 60. per scripta Regalia submonitione Regia or that scripsit Rex praecipiens or missis literis convocavit Anno 1246. 30 H. 3. or Edicto Regio convocat c. which denotes the Authority convening them and for the Members they are either stiled Magnates omnis Regni Nobilitas or Clerus Populus cum Magnatibus Magnates tam Laici quam Praelati Episcopi alii Ecclesiarum Praelati cum Proceribus Regni or else they are particularly numbred to be Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors for the Clergy and the Comites Barones for the Laity In one I find Archiepiscopus cum Suffraganeis suis for the rest of the Bishops and (s) M. Paris fol. 397. num 10.10 H. 3. another runs thus Anno 1247. 31 H. 3. fecit Dominus Rex Magnates suos nec-non Angliae Archidiaconos per scripta sua Regia Londinum convocari Yet though Matt. Paris only mention the Magnates Archidiaconi yet he saith when the prefixed day was come the Bishops all willingly absented themselves and he gives the Reason ne viderentur propâ—iis factis eminus adversari sciebant enim corda omnium usque ad animae amaritudinem non immerito sauciari Then when he (u) Id. 629. Edit ult num 10. Archdeacons summoned to Parliament gives an Account of the business of this great Council he saith that the Archdeacons of England as also not the least part of the whole Clergy of the Kingdom with the Magnates complained of the Popes exaction and so Letters were writ to the Pope and Cardinals It may be noted also That in those Days the Kings summoned other dignified Clergy besides Bishops Abbats and Priors I shall insist no longer upon these Matters The new Constitution of Parliament by Representatives but pass to the great Mutation which was made in the Constitution of our English Parliaments It seems to be clear that before King John's time the Members of the Great Councils were summoned by special Writ and they were only the Archbishops Bishops Abbats and Priors for the Clergy and the Earls and Barons and such of the Tenents in Capite as were of greatest quality as the King pleased But in King John's Charter all the Tenents in Capite were convened by a General Summons which did much encrease the number of the Members of these great Councils and by so much as they were more numerous it is likely the Popular Barons hoped to make their Party the stronger against the King for we find it introduced when the Barons were propense to rebel So the Second great Alteration on the Constitution of Parliament was introduced Montfort's Rebellion when Simon Montfort Earl of Leicester and the Rebellious Barons had the King and the Prince Prisoners Simon Montford to strengthen his Interest first in the Kings Name summons the Earls and Barons which were in Arms against the King also at other times summoned more Abbats and Priors than had been used for that the Clergy at that time had a great Opinion of him and he was their Minion as is apparent in Matthew Paris and fully in the judicious (w) Answer to Petyt fol. 137 138 139. Doctor Brady to whom I must specially refer the curious Reader in this particular The 14th The Form of the Writ of Summons of Dec. 48 H. 3. the first Writ issued out thus Item mandatum est singulis Vicecomitibus per Angliam quod venire faciant duos Milites de legalioribus discretioribus Militibus singulorum Comitatuum It is commanded to all the Sheriffs of England that they make or cause to come two Knights of the more Legal and Discreet Knights of every County to be at London on the Octaves of St. Hilary next So in the like manner (x) Cl. 49 H. 3. m. 11. dorso schedulae Writs were directed to Cities and Burroughs to send two of the more Discreet Legal and Honest Citizens and Burgesses This is without Date that to the Barons of the Cinque Ports is Jan. 20. It doth not appear by the Writ to the Sheriffs whether they or the Counties were to elect and send those Knights or who were Electors It is the Opinion of most learned (y) Brady against Petyt fol. 143. Dugdale's Baronage fol. 759. col 3. Men that Simon Montfort apprehended from the Concourse of the Nobility and their great Retinues and the Example of his and the Barons Practices at Oxford some danger to himself and his Affairs and so altered the ancient Usage Upon the 5th of August 49 H. 3. Simon Montfort was slain at Evesham and all his Party routed and the 8th of September following the King convened his Parliament at Winchester which according to the old form The old Form again used consisted only of the Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and Great Men nor did he continue Montfort's Method after as appears by that Parliament he
called 50 Regni By the Statute of Marleburgh 52 H. 3. it is evident All the Barons not summoned but the more discreet and so of the lesser Barons That even all the great Barons were not summoned but only the more Discreet and such as the King thought fit to call and the like is observed of the lesser Barons or Tenents in Capite For if it had been by General Summons that Restriction of the more Discreet had been useless so that it appears that what (z) Britannia fol. 122. Quibus ipâ—â— Rex dignaâ—us est brevia summonitionis dirigere venirent c. non alii Mr. Camden's ancient Author observes is true That after the horrid Confusions and Troubles of the Barons Wars those Earls and Barons whom the King thought worthy to summon by his Writ to meet came to his Parliaments and no other The Preamble to this Statute of (a) Stat. Edit 1576. p. 15. Marlebridge runs thus in Tottel Providente ipso Domino Rege ad Regni sui Angliae meliorationem exhibitionem Justitiae prout Regalis Officii poscit Vtilitas pleniorem convocatis discretioribus ejusdem Regni tam majoribus quam minoribus provisum est statutum ac concordatum ordinatum According to Pulton the (b) Fol. 14. Preamble is thus That whereas the Realm of England of late had been disquieted with manifold Troubles and Dissentions for Reformation whereof Statutes and Laws be right necessary The Use and Benefit of Laws whereby the Peace and Tranquillity of the People must be observed wherein the King intending to devise convenient Remedy hath made these Acts Ordinances and Statutes underwritten which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects as well high as low Thus we see in the whole Reign of H. 3. excepting in that Parliament of Montfort's Faction the Bishops and dignified Clergy Earls Barons and Tenents in Capite were only summoned as Members of the great Councils and there were no Representatives of the Commons and the Kings Authority in summoning dissolving and making Laws is most manifest Of Parliaments in King Edward the First 's Reign I Shall now glean out of Tottel and Pulton's Editions of the Statutes the most material Preambles which give light to the constituent Parts of Parliaments to the Legislative Power in the King with the Concurrence of the two Houses and how that in the Series of the Kings Reign hath been expressed and such other matters relating to the Parliament as may shew the gradual Progress of their Constitution to the usage of this present Age leaving the Reader to make his own remarques from the matters of Fact and the expressions used by my Authors and explaining some The Preface to the Statute of (a) Ceux sont les establishments le Roy Ed. fitz Roy Hen. fait a Westminst c. par son Councel par Passentments des Archevesques Evesques Abbes Priores Countes Barons tout le Commonalty de la terre illonques summons Tottel Stat. fol. 24. Pulton p. 19. Westminster begins thus These are the Establishments of King Edward Son to King Henry made at Westminster at his first General Parliament after his Coronation c. by his Council and by the Assent of the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and the whole Commonalty of the Land thither summoned This Parliament was prorogued before it met and the Writ of Prorogation mentions only Quia generale Parliamentum nostrum quod cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri proposuimus habere c. Therefore having prorogued it mandamus c. Intersitis ad tractandum ordinandum una cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri (b) Brady against Petyâ— fol. 147. c. So that all the Members are included in the two general Terms of Praelati Magnates which great Men very frequently comprehended as well the Barones Majores as Minores the Earls Barons and greater Tenents in Capite and the less which then were called the Community of the Kingdom The rest of the Preamble of the Statutes made at (c) Pulton's Stat. An. 1275.3 E. 1. f. 19. Westminster runs thus Because our Lord the King hath great Zeal and desire to redress the State of the Realm c. the King hath ordained and established these Acts under written The Preface to the Statute de Bigamis 4 Oct. 4 Ed. 1. is thus (d) In prasentia venerabilium purum quâ—ruâ—dam Episcoporum Angliae aliorum de Concilio Râ—gis â—â—citatae sâ—â—erunt constitutiones â—ub â—riptae postmodâ—â—m coram Domino Rege Concilio sâ—o auditae publicatae Quia omnes de consiliâ—â—am â—usâ—â—â—â—arii quam alii concordaverunt c. Tottel p. 39. b. expressed In the Presence of certain Reverend Fathers Bishops of England and others of the Kings Council the constitutions under written were recited and after heard and published before the King and his Council for as much as all the King's Council as well Justices as others did agree that they should be put in writing for a perpetual memory and that they should be stedfastly observed In the First Chapter it is said Concordatum est per Justiciarios alios sapientes de Concilio Regni Domini Regis It was agreed by the Justices and other wise or sage Men of the Council of the Kingdom of the Lord the King Perhaps saith the judicious Doctor Brady the best understanding of the preamble and first Chapter may be that the Laws and Constitutions were prepared by the King and his (e) Answer to Pâ—tyt fol. 148. Council with the Assistance of the Justices and Lawyers that were of it or called to assist in it and declared afterwards in Parliament (f) Praeâ—iâ—â—ae autem constitutiones eâ—iâ—â— suerunt c. exâ—une lâ—â—um habeanâ— Tottel fol. 40. for it is said in the close of the Statute The aforesaid Constitutions were published at Westminster in the Parliament after the Feast of St. Michael the 4th of the Kings Reign and thence forward to take place The Preamble to the Statute of Gloucester Anno 1278. 6 E. 1. is thus (g) Pour amendment de son Roialm pur plus pleinir exhibition de droit si comâ—â—â—â— prâ—sit dâ— Office demanâ— appâ—lles le plues discretes de son Roialme auâ—â— bien des Granders comâ— des Meindres establie est concordantment ordine Tottel fol. 50. The King for the amendment of the Realm and for the more full Exhibition of Justice according as the benefit of his Office requires having called the most discreet of his Realm as well the greater as the smaller It is established and unanimously ordained as Pulton adds after by the King and his Justices certain Expositions were made The Statute of Mortmain is thus prefaced Nos pro (h) Tottel p. 48. Vtilitate Regni volentes providere Remedium de Concilio Praelatorum Comitum Baronum aliorum fidelium
414 415. How the House of Commons of the Parliament 1641. seduded their Members till there were not above 70 left whom the Army-Officers impeached or disliked as a corrupt Party or corrupt Majority and so fifty or sixty by the power of the Army secured secluded and expelled near 400 Members and made themselves the Commons House without them and so proceeded to vote down and seclude both King and House of Lords and voted themselves to be the Parliament of England and sole Legislators and Supream Authority of the Nation The consequences of all which are too well known to the whole Kingdom whose Calamity of Civil War and all the unspeakable Tragedies of it flowed from the packing of Members in the Commons House and the Assistance the People relying upon their Sageness and Authority afforded them How this revived against Abhorrers We had of later Years a fresh revival of the same method in the House of Commons expelling those they called Abhorrers which is so well known that I need say nothing of it yet I would recommend to all interessed Persons the perusal of two Treatises which though they pass for Pamphlets yet have been writ by Judicious Authors and those are The Lawyer outlawed and the Three parts of the Addresses which are Books very fit for Gentlemen to peruse How full and unquestioned a power the Commons have to represent Grievances to the King and petition for Redress The unquestioned Rights of the Commons to impeach any Person of the highest Quality that is a Subject for Treason or high Misdemeanors to have the sole Power in having all Bills for Subsidies Aids and Supplies to begin and I think be perfected in their House and the Privileges they petition for by their Speaker are so well known that they need no Discourse upon But I find several Judicious Persons will not allow the House of Commons to be a Court which Sir Edward Coke affirms 4. Instit p. 28. Whether the House of Commons be properly a Court. and uses this only one Argument for it Because it is not Prorogued or Adjourned by the Prorogation or Adjournment of the Lords House but the Speaker upon signification of the Kings Pleasure by the Assent of the House of Commons doth say This Court doth Prorogue or Adjourn it self But to this it is answered Lawyer outlawed p. 18. That if this were sufficient to denominate a Court every Committee of Lords and Commons though never so few in number must upon this account be a distinct Court because they may thus adjourn and prorogue themselves without their respective Houses In another place 4. Instit p. 23. the same Chief Justice offers to prove the House of Commons not only a Court but a Court of Judicature and Record for that the Clerks Book of the House of Commons is a Record and so declared by Act of Parliament 6 H. 8. c. 16. But this House had no such Book as a Journal much less any Authentick Record When the House of Commons had a Journal first before the first Year of Ed. the Sixth all their material proceedings till then being drawn in Minutes by a Clerk appointed to attend them for that purpose and by him entred of Record in the House of Lords Therefore the Words of the Statute are That the Speakers Licence for Members going into the Country be entred of Record in the Book of the Clerk of the Parliament appointed for the Commons House and this Journal is rather a Register of what passeth than such a Record as denotes a Court of Judicature as the Author of The Lawyer outlawed endeavours to prove P. 17 18 19. Plowd Com. fol. 319. Coke 1. Inst fol. 260. because there is no Court but what is established by the Kings Patent by Act of Parliament or by the Common Law i. e. the constant immemorial Custom of former Ages for by that the House of Lords is the sole supream Court of Judicature it having never been heard of before Sir Edward Coke's fancy That there were two distinct Courts in the same Parliament Also there is no Court without a power of tryal but the House of Commons have no power to try any Crime or Offence because they cannot examine upon Oath and there can be no legal Tryal without Witnesses nor are any Witnesses of any force in Law unless examined upon Oath But I shall not enter into these Controversies Some Observations on the Privileges of the House of Commons in general but shall now lay down some general Observations and Rules which Judicious Persons have noted as worthy the consideration of the Honourable House in point of their claims of Privileges and Judicature First King James the First in his Declaration touching his proceedings in Parliament 1621. resolves That most Privileges of Parliament grew from Precedents which rather shew a Toleration than an Inheritance therefore he could not allow of the Stile calling it their Ancient and undoubted Right and inheritance but could rather have wished that they had said All Privileges from the Crown Their Privileges were derived from the Grace and permission of his Ancestors and him and thereupon concludes That he cannot with patience endure his Subjects to use such Antimonarchical Words concerning their Liberties except they had subjoyned That they were granted unto them by the Grace and Favour of his Predecessors yet he promiseth to be carefull of whatsoever Privileges they enjoy by long Custom and uncontrolled and lawful Precedents Secondly C. 29. None to be punished but by Legal Trial. It is to be considered That by the Great Charter it is declared That no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or diseised of his Freehold or Liberties or his Free Customs or be Outlawed or Exiled or in any manner destroyed but by the lawful Judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land Stat. 28 E. 3. c. 3. So 28 E. 3. it is Enacted That no Man of what estate or condition he be shall be put out of his Land or Tenements nor taken nor imprisoned nor dis-inherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due Process of Law So 42 E. 3. c. 3. it is assented and accorded for the good Government of the Commons that no Man be put to answer without presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due course of Law or Writ Original according to the Old Laws of the Land Nulla Curia quae Recordum non habet potest imponere finem neque aliquem mandare carceri quia isla tantummodo spectant ad Curias de Recordo Mar. Sess 3. So Sir Edward Coke saith Courts which are not of Record cannot impose a Fine or commit any to Prison because these only belong to Courts of Record for which see Beecher's Case fol. 60. 120. Bonham's Case and lib. 11 fol. 43. Godfrey's Case So in the First Parliament of Q. Mary it is declared That the most Ancient
the King who by the same Laws hath the Power of putting in execution and suspending the execution of the Laws in many Cases or that Aristocracy or Democracy have any such mixture with the Monarchy as they can impose their Laws upon him For to suppose a mixed Monarchy consisting of Three Estates independent for their Authority upon one another and to have several shares in the Rights of Sovereignty and to say The Government of three Estates is the Government of one Monarch is perfect nonsence for when (q) Besold Synopsis Polit. Doct. l. 1. c. 6. Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy are melted and allayed together that which resulteth can take its name from none of the simple species or kinds of Government but must have some other Appellation Whoever will consider aright of the concurrence of the two Houses in preparing Bills will find How the two Houses concur in making Laws That though the Houses be as the Causa sine qua non yet the efficient procatarctick Cause and the Authoritative Power in passing these into Laws is the King only and what the two Houses do without his Assent is but as the Counsellor at Law 's framing a Deed and the Clerks Ingrossing the Indenture of Conveyance but till the Seal be set to it and delivery made as the Act and Deed of Donor or Conveyor it is of no force and virtue neither do we call it the Act and Deed of the Counsellor or Clerk but of the Person that seals it Another Objection those Champions for the two Houses made great noise with was (r) King's Supremacy p. 84. Objection That the Mixture is in the Supremacy of Power That the Power where the Legislative is in all Three is in the very Root and Essence of it compounded and mixed of those three so that where this height of Power resideth in a mixed Subject that is in three concurrent Estates the consent and concursus of all being most free and none depending on the Will of the other that Monarchy is in the most proper sence and in the very model of it a mixed Constitution And that such is the State of the Monarchy of England the Objector thinks clear because the House of Peers are an Aristocracy and the Commons a Democracy and this mixture of Interests and Powers being in the very Legislative Power he concludes the mixture is in the Root and Supremacy of Power and not in the exercise alone In answer to which it must be considered Answer That is only in the Exercise of the Power That though the concurrence of both the Estates with the Monarch in the making and promulgation of Laws be such as our Laws describe yet it is no otherwise than in the precedent Chapters by undeniable proofs I have made it out That what participation soever the two Houses have with the King in the Legislature it is only derivative from the Crown by the King's Summons and the restriction of those Summons to do and consent It is known to be the common Assertion of (s) Panorm cap. Gravem de Sent. Excom Canonists (t) Bertol. in Lomnes Populi sect de Justitia Jure q. 2. Civilians and (u) Suarez lib. 1. de Leg. c. 8. n. 9. Schoolmen That the Legislative Power is communicable by the Princes allowance and that such a concurrence as our Kings have allowed is no Argument of Supremacy such a mixture of the three Estates hath been in other Monarchies * Besold de Juribus Magist c. 2. which every where are owned to be absolute in respect of Power For as they are summoned by the Princes single Authority and dissolved at his own pleasure they can claim no sort of Right during their Session further than to consult about and prepare Bills for the Royal Assent Therefore (w) De Imperio Summarum Potestatum circa sacra c. 8. num 11. Grotius saith Istam Legislationem quae aliis quam Summae Potestati competit nihil imminuere de jure Summae Potestatis quod in Scholis dicunt cumulative datum censeri non privative So in our Kingdom every Corporation hath Authority to make Ordinances and Constitutions within their own Liberties for the good Order and Government of the Body and the Inhabitants (x) Coke 5. part tit Cases de By-Laws Ordinances of every Parish to make By-Laws and Ordinances among themselves for their own profit where they have Custom for it and for the Publick Good where they have no Custom Surely this is a sort of Legislative Power yet thereby it cannot be inferred that they have any Co-ordinate Power with the King in the Rights of Soveraignty So that allowing the Power of the two Houses as large as can be proved by the Laws for the stretch that the Parliamentarians would make is by the Tenters they only have set up the whole latitude of the Nomothetical Power is not jointly in the two Houses for none but Strangers to our Laws can deny That the King hath sole Power to dispense with the Statutes and abate their Rigour where a mischief would otherwise insue he alone hath Power by Edicts and Proclamations to order all Affairs for which there is no order taken by certain and perpetual Laws The Legislative Power is either (y) King's Supremacy p. 88. Of Architectonical and Preceptive Power Architectonical or Preceptive The Architectonical is that which layeth Materials of Law and consisteth in two things First in determining what is just convenient or necessary Secondly in declaring and promulgating that to be actually made a Law and Enacted which upon consultation is thought to be just convenient or necessary The first shews no Jurisdiction in the Persons who have it but only an Office and Imployment to deliberate and consult But whoever hath the Second Power hath a Jurisdiction to define Authoritatively what shall be Law and this Preceptive Power is that which makes the Law sacred and inviolable and which giveth it force to oblige the Conscience Now it is evident by undeniable Testimony and Authority that the exercise of the Architectonical Power is only committed to the two Houses who have votum consultivum decisivum but it is derived from the King who hath only the Preceptive Power So that the Writers for the two Houses generally did use a Sophistical way of arguing not discovering what they could not but know the difference betwixt the King's and the two Houses Powers in the making of Laws For subordinate Agents that are but Instruments of another and work by a derived Power when they concur with the Principal and supream Agent have their causality in producing the Effect yet this doth not prove the Authority to be radically in them As in an Estate of Lands saith (z) Idem p. 91. Mr. Sherringham wherein a Man hath a perpetual Right in Fee his Right is distinguished from the King 's Right of whom he holds the King having the demean of the
should be forwardest to supply the necessities of the Crown to shew all Loyal Dutifulness to their Sovereign whereby a most dangerous Rebellion in both Kingdoms was the easilier crushed and which endears them to the King that there can be no danger but whatever good and wholsome Laws they shall propose for the general good of the Kingdom will find a chearful allowance by him How happy had our Forefathers been if King Charles the First had met with such considerate Parliaments who by a seasonable supply and compliance might have had without that vast effusion of Blood and Treasure all their Grievances redressed and the flourishing State of the Kingdom preserved and the Memories of a great many Noblemen and Gentlemen had been transmitted without stain to their remote Nephews But to draw towards a Conclusion of this Discourse Some not willing to hear of the Miscarriages of Parliaments think this Discourse needless Some that may not be willing to hear of the Miscarriages of some Parliaments wherein probably they were concerned may say what need is there now to bring again upon the Stage the rigorous Proceedings of the two Houses of Parliament or more properly of the leading and designing Men in the House of Commons in the Years 1640 and 1680. since we are now happily past these Rocks Quicksands and treacherous Shores All the World indeed must acknowledg we have a Royal wise Pilot Because we have a most wise King and good Parliament who knows full well to steer the Soveraignty of the Commonweal He hath weathered out high going Seas so that neither their over-whelming liquid Mountains nor the terrible Shot from the floating Castles have daunted him magnanimity unparallel'd Courage and an Experience beyond most Crowned Heads have raised him great Trophies of his Victorious toils He is served with sage Councils both private and National So that all must confess we have less cause to fear any more dangers of Hurricanes and Shipwracks But though we now enjoy Halcyon days Yet we are not secure but that in after-Ages evil Members of Parliament may be under a Sovereign enriched with Royal abilities to the heighth of our Wishes though he is blessed with a Parliament as Loyal as can be desired betwixt whom there is no other Strife but who shall out-pass the other in mutual Obligations Yet are we secure that no ill Exhalations may be gathered in after-Ages Can we expect always temperate Weather pleasing Sunshine and fruitful Showres No in small revolutions of Years we find Epidemical Diseases return excesses of Drought Rains or Frosts are often marked in our Annals even after promising Configurations of the Coelestial Bodies I write not an Almanack for a Year The Design of the Author in writing against the Exorbitances of some or Pamphlet for a time my Design is not Infandum renovare Dolorem out of any Pique but as much as in me lies to show from the by-past Irregularities and Exorbitances of some Men how Loyal good and Just Men may measure things by the Golden Standard of the Laws how mischievous Practices and Principles may be obviated how every one may see what the upshot of rebellious Principles will be how to detect and how to avoid the same kind of Rocks and Sands in after-Ages I know some Persons recovered from a valitudinary Condition Some love not to hear of their Distempers love not to hear of the Torments they have undergone nor of the Extravagances of their delirous State Yet this should not hinder but the Healthful and those that would avoid the Calenture should patiently endure to hear a Description of the Causes and Symptoms In this Discourse I have only culled out such Particulars The Author's Apology for himself as I find Judicious Authors have insisted upon against the unprecedented Proceedings of some late Houses of Commons which I think all Loyal Persons disapprove and I believe a great many as well as my self have heard many of the then sitting Members dislike when things were carried with an impetuous Torrent that it was more dangerous to speak against their proceedings or question the unlimited Power assumed by that House than it was to speak Seditious I had almost said Treasonable Words against the King Therefore I hope none of this present Honourable House of Commons who have so signalized their Loyalty in the last Session will take offence at what from such judicious Persons as I have met with I have delivered the Sentiments of My intention is no ways to lessen the Rights or necessary Privileges of that venerable Assembly which never can be unbeneficial to the King or People but when Discontent Faction and Sedition hath too spreadingly infected the Electors The continuance of that worst of Parliaments of 1641. What evil Principles taught during the Long Parliament in their disloyal Practices so long by the overgrowing of the Tares which were only suffered to thrive occasioned so much corrupt seed to be sown as in twenty years there was no wholesom grain left We saw too late how by some evil Seedsmen a fertile but dangerous Crop was shooting up apace It is not a little Labour nor small diligence will howe and weed out the Briars Thistles and destructive Shrubs and poysonous Weeds that shoot their spreading Roots so far But I hope the great Wisdom of this Loyal Parliament will find out ways and methods to prevent the danger of their thriving in a Soil worthy of better Plants than any will be set by Republican Hands CHAP. XXX Of the Kings most Honourable Privy-Council I Find by several Authors Four kinds of the King's Councils The First that there are reckoned Four Councils of the King First The Magnum Concilium consisting of the Prelates and Nobles in Parliament of which Bracton (a) Lib. 1. c. 2. may be consulted and what I have writ in the Chapter of Parliaments Secondly A Convention of the Peers of the Realm The Second Lords of Parliament yet not meeting as a Parliament which appears manifestly in the Record 25 Aug. 5 H. 7. upon an exchange made of some Lands betwixt the King and the Earl of Northumberland the King promiseth to deliver the Earl Lands to the value c. by (b) Per advice assent du Estates de son Realm de son Parliament parensi que Parliament soit devant le Feast de St. Lucy ou autrement per advice de son Grand Council autres Estates de son Realm que le Roy serra assemblez devant le dit Feast in case que le Parliament ne soit Coke 1. Instit lib. 2. c. 10. sect 164. the Advice of the Estates of his Realm of his Parliament if the Parliament be convened before the Feast of St. Lucy or otherwise by the Advice of his Great Council and other Estates of his Realm which the King shall Assemble before the said Feast in case the Parliament be not called which well
saith That Enrollments (l) Pur le Enrolments de Pardon de Roy in le Chancery en temps le Roy Alfred of Pardons of the King were in the Chancery in the time of King Alfred Altho' Mauricius Regis Cancellarius by that title subscribes as witness to the Charter of King William the Conquerer to the Abby of Westminster yet none of these prove that such a Court was in those Ages constituted as we now call the Chancery For Sir Henry Spelman (m) Gless p. 107 ◠proves the Chancery was no Court but only the Ship as he calls it of the Kings Writs and Charters in old time now consisting of three Parts sc è Collegio Scribarum Regiorum è Foro Juris communis è Praetorio boni aqui Mr. Lambard (n) Archaion p. 62 63. hath proved that till the Reign of King Edward the First we find nothing of the Chancellors hearing and determining of Civil causes for till then the Justiciarius Angliae had the great Power Sir William Dugdale 's Origines Jurid fol. 36. b. which being then restrained ad placita coram Rege tenenda the King together with the trust and charge of the Great Seals appointed him to represent his own Royal and extraordinary Preheminence of Jurisdiction in Civil Causes and he gives this particular reason for his opinion That Britton a Learned Lawyer in Edward the First 's time writing of all other Courts from the highest Tribunal to a Court Baron maketh no mention of this Chancery Yet towards (o) 28 E. 1. c. 5. the latter end of his Reign we find it enacted The Chancellor and Justices of the King's-Bench to follow the King That the Chancellor and Justices of the Bench should follow the King that is remove with the Kings Court so that he might have at all times near him some Sages of the Law which were able to order all such matters as should come unto the Court at all times when need should require Yet this Act did not give an absolute Power to the Chancellor alone of determining in such Civil Causes as may seem by that Law which was made 20 Ed. 3. (p) Cap. 6. where it appears the Treasurer was joyned with him to hear complaints against Sheriffs Escheators c. something like this about Purveyors and Escheators that they might not oppress was enacted (q) Cap. 3. 36 Ed. 3. Nevertheless Mr. Lambard observes When Causes in Equity determined in Chancery that it doth not appear in the Reports of the Common Law that there is any frequent mention of Causes usually drawn before the Chancellor for help in Equity till from the time of King Henry the fourth nor are there found any Bills and Decrees in Chancery before the 20 of H. 6. such Causes as since that time were heard in that Court having formerly been determined in the Lords House of Parliament So Sir Edward Coke saith In the Chancery are two Courts First the ordinary coram Domino Rege in Cancellaria where in the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal proceeds according to the right line (r) Secundum Legen Consuetudinem Angliae of the Laws and Statutes of the Realm Secondly extraordinary according to the Rule of Equity Secundum aequum bonum But it is not my business to enter into particulars The curious may consult Sir Edward (s) 4. Instit c. 8. Coke Mr. Richard Cromptom cap. 3. Sir Henry Spelman 1. glossar 1. de Cancellario à pag. 105. ad pag 113. Ryley's Appendix Ash's Repertory tit Courts Sect. 2. Roll's Abridgment p. 374. to 587. Prynne's Animadversions p. 48. Anno 5 Eliz. (t) Cap. 18. it was Enacted that the Lord Keeper for the time being hath always had used and executed and so may for the future The Lord Keeper equal to Lord Chancellor the like place Authority Preheminence Jurisdiction Execution of Law c. as the Lord Chancellor of England for the time being lawfully used The Oath of the Chancellor or Lord Keeper is to be found (u) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. col 8. 10 R. 2. consisting of six Parts First That well and truly he shall serve our Soveraign Lord the King and his People in the Office of Chancellor The Oath of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Secondly That he shall do right to all manner of people Poor and Rich after the Laws and usages of the Realm Thirdly That he shall truly counsel the King and his Counsel he shall layen i. e. hide or keep secret Fourthly That he shall not know nor suffer the hurt or disheriting of the King or that the Rights of the Crown be decreased by any means as far as he may lett it Fifthly That if he may not lett it he shall make it clearly and expresly to be known to the King with his true Advice and Counsel Sixthly That he shall do and purchase the Kings profit in all that he reasonably may as God help him and by the Contents of this Book SECT 6. Of the Court of the Exchequer SIR Edward Coke saith the Authority of this Court is of original Jurisdiction without any Commission Bracton mentioneth nothing of this Court and Fleta giveth a very short account that the King hath his Court and his Justiciaries residing at his Exchequer but descends to no particulars of the Jurisdiction (w) Fol. 2 b. But x Britton who lived in Edward the First 's Reign and all along writes in the name of the King as if his whole work had been the Kings gives us an account of the Nature of this Court in several particulars To hear and determine all Causes which touch the Kings Debts his Fees and the incident Causes without which these cannot be tried So of Purprestures Rents Farms Customs and generally of whatever appertained to the Revenue of the Crown the Tenants and Receivers of it so that the Court is divided into two Parts viz. Judicial Accounts called Scaccarium Computorum and into the Receipt of the Exchequer The principal Officer is the Lord Treasurer of England who formerly had this great Office The Lord Treasurer principal Officer of the Exchequer by delivery of the Golden Keys of the Treasury and hath the Office this day by delivery of a white Staff at the Kings Will and Pleasure his Oath is much-what the same as the Chancellors differing principally in that clause That the Kings Treasure he shall truly keep and dispend The other great Officers are the Treasurer of the Exchequer the Chancellor and Chief Baron and other Barons of the Exchequer The rest of the Officers are particularly reckoned in Sir (x) 4. Instit fol. 106 107 108. Edward Coke The Oath of the Barons of the Exchequer is to be found in the Statutes (y) The Oath of 〈◊〉 Barons of the 〈◊〉 chequer 20 Ed. 3. cap. 2. whereof the principal parts are That he shall truly charge and discharge
Capitularia Caroli (e) See Fred. Lindebrogus Codex Legum Antiq. magnis the Burgundian Alman Bavarian Saxon Longobard Ripuarian and Frisons Laws mention such Officers for preserving the publick Peace and (f) See Prynne 's Irenarch Redivivus p. 1. ad 5. punishing all Malefactors and infringers of the publick Peace as we have At the Common-Law before Justices of Peace were made there were sundry Persons to whose Charge the maintenance of the Peace was recommended and who with their other (g) Dalton's Justice of Peace c. 1. Conservators of the Peace Offices had and yet still have the Conservation of the Peace annexed to their Charge as incident to and inseparable from their said Offices yet they were only stiled and so now are by their Offices the Conservation of the Peace being included therein First the King is the principal (h) Idem Conservator of the Peace within his Dominions The King the principal Conservator of Peace and is properly Capitalis Justiciarius Angliae in whose Hands at the beginning the Administration of all Justice and all Judicature in all Causes first was and afterwards by and from him only was the Authority derived and given to all yet the Power nevertheless remains still in himself insomuch that he may himself sit in Judgment as in ancient times the Kings here have done and may take Knowledg of all cases and causes Before I leave this Head I cannot pass by the Act of (i) 20 H. 7. c. 11. H. 7. wherein is so fully declared the King's Care to have due Administration of Justice as in the close of the last Chapter I have only hinted The Reasons why Justices of Peace made The King's Care for right and easie Administration of Justice The Preamble saith The King considereth that a great part of the Wealth and Prosperity of the Land standeth in that that his Subjects may live in Surety under his Peace in their Bodies and Goods and that the Husbandry of this Land may encrease and be upholden which must be had by due Execution of Laws and Ordinances and so commandeth the Justices to execute the tenor of their Commission as they will stand in Love and Favour of his Grace and in avoiding the pains that he ordained if they do the contrary If they be lett or hindred they must show it to the King which if they do not and it come to the Kings knowledg they shall be out of his Favour as Men out of Credence and put out of Commission for ever Moreover he chargeth and commandeth all manner of Men as well Poor as Rich which be to him all one in due Administration of Justice that is hurt or grieved in any thing that the said Justice of Peace may hear determine or execute in any wise that he so grieved make his complaint to the next Justice of Peace and if he afford no remedy then to the Justices of the Assise and if he find no remedy there then to the King or Chancellor c. and as a further security it is added And over that his Highness shall not lett for any favour affection costs charge nor none other cause but that he shall see his Laws to have plain and true execution and his Subjects to live in security of their Lands Bodies and Goods according to his said Laws Thus we see who is the Principal Other Conservator of the Peace and Royal Conservator of the Peace others are the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Lord Treasurer Lord High Steward of England Earl Marshal Lord High Constable of England every Justice of the Kings Bench and Master of the Rolls who have the power included in their Office and over all the Realm when they are present may award Precepts take Recognisances for the Peace of which and others Lambard in his Eirenarche may be consulted and how far Justices of Assise Stewards of the Sheriffs Turn and Court of Pye-powders the Sheriffs Chief Constable Coroners and Petty Constables may commit to Ward breakers of the Peace in their view though they cannot take surety at the request of any man that being peculiar to the Justices of Peace's Office Sir Edward Coke (k) Term. Pasch fol. 176. 4. Inst Coram Rege prima fuit Institutio Justiciariorum pro Pace conservanda Ad Pacem nostram conservandam saith that the first institution of Justices for the preserving the Peace was 6 Ed. 1. but Mr. Prynne will have it of older date because he finds that King Henry the Third by several Patents or Writs from the 17th to the end of his Reign did constitute and appoint several persons in most Counties of the Realm to be Guardians and Preservers of the Peace of the Realm and in the Patent 51 H. 3. m. 10.13 dorso it is dilectis fidelibus suis custodibus pacis Com. Linc. North. Ebor. Vicecom eorundem Comitat. and the like 54 H. 3. m. 21. d. But the first regular settlement of them seems to be Anno 1327. 1 Ed. 3. c. 16. The Authorities afterwards were further explained 4 Ed. 3. c. 2. 18 Ed. 3. c. 2. 34 Ed. 3. c. 1. Sir Edward Coke (l) Ibid. 171. tells us that the Commission of Peace stood over-burthened and incumbered with divers Statutes some whereof were before and some since repealed and stuffed with many vain and unnecessary repetitions and many other corruptions crept into it by mistaking of Clerks c. for amendment and correction whereof (m) Mich. 32 33 Eliz. Sir Christopher Wray Chief Justice of England assembled all the Judges of England and upon perusal had of the former Commission of Peace and due consideration had thereupon and often conferences betwixt themselves they resolved upon a reformation of the form with divers additions and alterations both in matter and method as it stood in Sir Edward's time and he saith It needed another Reformation by reason of Statutes since repealed and others expired of which he gives several instances Therefore he saith It is a good rule for all Judges and Justices whatsoever that have Jurisdiction by any Statute which at the first was Temporary or for a time to consider well before they give Judgment Whether that Statute hath been continued or made perpetual and if at first it was made perpetual Whether it be not repealed or altered by any later Statute What Commissions Patents and Writs were issued out by King Edward the First for preserving the Peace of the Realm suppressing seising and punishing of those who disturbed it may be found Cl. 9 Ed. 1. m. 10. d. in Rylies (n) P. 443 451 to 457 433 480. Prynne's Animadv fol. 149. Appendix so there is a Patent 14 Ed. 1. m. 15. 15 Ed. 1. m. 13. de militibus constitutis ad Articulos in Statuto de conservatione pacis edito contentoâ— observandos constituting persons of note in every County to observe them named in the Record and so for other Kings Reigns
the Justices in Queen Elizabeth's time the Chancellor tells them that the Queen had levied Forces and Reason willeth and the obedience of good Subjects requireth that all things that the Prince commandeth for defence of the State should by the Subjects diligently and obediently be performed for dutys sake either not examining the cause or presuming the best cause but at that time she was pleased to signifie the cause of her doings As to the King of England's making War and Peace abroad it hath always been owned as the King 's sole Prerogative and when some Parliaments have addressed to our Kings to make War or Peace contrary to what the Soveraign judged convenient they have been advertised of their Duties yet when War is to be made in remote Countries which cannot be performed without great Expence much time and the exhausting of the Kingdoms Forces That the People may more chearfully serve their Prince and Country and that the Exchequer may not be too much diminished whereby the usual Charges of the Government may not be substracted Kings have upon good Reason proposed the Matter to their Parliaments whereby necessary Aids might be sufficiently supplied The Laws now in force concerning the Militia are That the (k) 13 Car. 2. c. 6. 14 Car. 2. c. 3. King hath the Prerogative alone to dispose of the Militia of the Nation to make War and Peace Leagues and Truces to grant Safe-Conduct without the Parliament and he may issue out Commissions of Lieutenancy impowering them to form into Regiments to lead them and employ them as well within their own as other Countries as the King shall direct to suppress Insurrections Rebellions and Invasions He hath the Command of all the Forts and places of Strength and alone to have the keeping and Command of the Magazins of Arms he alone to give Letters of Mark and Reprizal in times of War to give Safe-Conduct for Merchants to make a stop of Trades as he sees cause In the time of danger and for defence of the (l) Coke 7. 25. Realm may command all his Subjects to Arm and they are to assist him and for this the Commission of Array may be made use of and all the Courts of Officers of War in a time of War are his Prerogative and the Subjects are to serve the King within the Kingdom against Rebels and Traytors (m) Jenkins Cent. 6. Case 14.26.89 without Pay or Wages and this as it seems in any part of the Nation especially if the King go himself The Subject except in an extraordinary (n) Coke 7.8 Case is not to be forced out of the Realm unless it be to go with the Kings Person nor in any case unless upon the sudden Invasion or Assault of an Enemy to serve the King without wages and the King in time of War may take any mans (o) I e. 3. Stat. 1. 2 Eliz. c. 2. House to build a Fort or make a Bulwark upon any mans Land But the King may not rate the Nation to pay any money towards any War of his It is true in time of Peace the King cannot quarter his Military Forces without the consent of the respective Subjects nor raise money without Act of Parliament for the maintenance of any Army so that the Subject while they keep dutiful are in no danger of oppression by such a Power yet without a competent Standing Force and Guard Some Standing Forces necessary at the Kings absolute pleasure what Livy saith of the Senate (p) Timor inde Patres incessit ac si dimissus exercitus foret rursus câ—tus occultaeque conjurationes fierent Lib. 6. The Long Parliaments Claim of the Militia would be most true of all Soveraigns That if the Forces were dismissed unlawful Assemblies and covert Conspiracies would be again set on foot The longest lived mischievous Parliament that any English History can record knowing that they could not effect their designs of weakning the King without the Power of the Militia though they had a numerous Party prepared to espouse their Interest and as ready for Rebellion as they could desire yet that they might have some colour for justifying their proceedings pretended necessity of putting the Kingdom into a posture of defence against foreign Invasions which by subtile Plots they possessed the people they had Intelligence of and for fear of any violence to be offered to themselves or that the King seduced by evil Counsellors should set up Arbitrary Power so having obtained that Fatal Act of not being to be dissolved without their own consent issued out their Commissions for Levying Trayning and Exercising Forces in all Counties where they had power by no Law or colour of Law but that of pretended imminent danger wherein the King refused to grant Commissions to such as they could confide in for their aforesaid purposes All which was but colour and shew to wrest the Power out of the Kings hands To obviate such like mischievous practices for the future upon his Majestys happy Restauration it was enacted and declared The Claims of any Right of the Two Houses to the Militia totally vacated That the sole supreme Government Command and disposition of the Militia and all Forces by Sea and Land and of all places of strength c. is and by the Law of England ever was the undoubted right of his Majesty and his Royal Predecessors Kings and Queens of England and that both or either of the Houses of Parliament cannot nor ought to pretend to the same nor can or lawfully may raise or levy War offensive or defensive against his Majesty his Heirs and lawful Successors So that now that great Controversy which wasso violently disputed to the loss of so much English Blood and Treasure is I hope eternally determined never again to be revived without an horrid prosperous Rebellion and this Prerogative of the Crown being thus guarded by Law will never more be attacked while the Royal line continues which is to be hoped and wished will without interruption be prolonged while the British Soil exists CHAP. XXXVI Concerning raising of Money upon the Subject and the obligation of Subjects to supply the Soveraign AS to the raising of Money for the support of Government I have discoursed something in the Title of Property and shall here only treat of the necessity in all Government That the Soveraign be plentifully supplyed with a Revenue suitable to the charge Although Darius the Persian be reckoned by Herodotus one of the first that exacted Tribute The necessity of Tributes and Aids yet it cannot be conceived but that ever since there was a Prince who commanded large Countrys and had potent Neighbours Tribute Aid and such like provision was exacted of the people for the defraying the necessary charges of it So Tacitus (a) Nec enim quies gentium sine armis nec arma sine stipendiis nec stipendia sine tributis 4. Hist tells us That we may be
sought after as the Trumpets and Kettle-drums that call together the whole Array against the Government And if they cannot be dispossessed of that Evil Spirit by gentler means they are to undergo the severity of the Laws which are made against Incendiaries of a Kingdom which is of more dangerous consequence than the firing of a Private Man's Habitation The danger from these Libels are the greater because (g) In civitate discordi ob crebras Principum mutationes inter libertatem licentiam incerta parvae quoque res magnis motibus agebantur Tacit. 2. Hist in times of Faction and the often Changes of Government the People being unfixed fluctuating betwixt Liberty and Licentiousness small Matters are transacted with great Emotions As to Corporations they have all of them been endowed with their Privileges by the Grace and Bounty of the Sovereign from whence all Immunities and Honours do flow The first Institution of them was no doubt Concerning Corporations that Justice might be executed in them for the better governing their numerous Inhabitants that they might be the Places of Traffick where the adjacent Country might be supplied and their Neighbours might vend their Growth and Manufacture And thus being enriched by Commerce separated from their Country-Neighbours by Honours Offices and Liberties something a Gentiler Education might be expected there whereby they might be Patterns to their adjoyning Neighbours of good and vertuous Deportment being exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Justices of Peace and attendance upon Assizes whereby Legal Matters in order to the necessary Administration of Justice are executed in their Precincts by their own Members and many of them besides the Privileges to be found at large in the Statutes and Law-Books have power to chuse as many to represent them in Parliament as the whole County hath It would fill a large Volume to recount the particular Powers and Freedoms have been granted to them by the Royal Favour of the successive Kings of England whereby they are erected into little Commonwealths Therefore there is good reason as they may do much good or harm and they have all the enriching Streams and Conduits from the Sovereign Spring and Fountain so they should have a strict dependence upon the Sovereign that they may not employ those great Privileges against the Laws and Government nor the rich pragmatical Magistrates Citizens and Freemen animate Factions and Seditions against it or presume to obtrude their impertinent Advices upon their Sovereign or by their clamorous Petitions for Redress of pretended Grievances and Male-administration or by their Election of Factious Representatives dispose of the Fate of the Empire as they did in 1641. by their general Combinations with the then Parliament which they so effectually assisted in their Rebellion It is too manifest how little Justice the two last Kings could have in the great Metropolis the King 's Imperial Chamber or in other Corporations although they had all less or more received great Instances of their Royal Favours and Graces And tho' the great City by the late King of Immortal Memory 's Royal Munificence and Princely Care as much as in him lay by Act of Parliament and his own particular Bounty after it was so fatally reduced to Ashes was raised into one entire Palace so beautiful and splendid as all People must acknowledge it the Eighth Wonder yet the grateful Returns were unproportionable This great City enjoyed as ample and beneficial Privileges as any could wish for and though it be deprived of some of them yet by the Munificence of our late and present Sovereign it enjoys what is needful for its well governing in subordination to the Publick Since therefore the Corporations mostly were found to have made ill Returns to their Sovereigns for all their special Graces by a most wise Council it hath been judged fit to enquire by what Warrant they enjoyed those Privileges and to recall those Charters that new ones might be granted mostly with Additions of Privileges only that the Magistrates if they should abuse their Authority might be displaced at the King's Pleasure A most necessary Resumption of Power whereby they might not be in a capacity for the future to give any Disturbance to the Government Elsewhere I have given short Hints of the Practice of former Kings in vacating the Charters of the great City and shall only add what I find in the most Judicious Historian was done in a like Case by the Senate of Rome in Tiberius his Reign The Licence (h) Crebrescebat enim Graecas per urbes licentia atque impunitas asyla statuendi complebantur â—â—mpla pessimis servitiaâ—um eodem subsidio obaeraâ—i adversus creditores suspectique capitalium criminum receptabantur nec ullum satis validum Imperium erat coercendis seditionibus populi flagitia hominum ut Caeremonias Deum protâ—entes Igitur placitum ut mitterent civitates Jura atque Legauos c. Magnaque ejus diei species fuit quo Senatus majorum beneficia sociorum pâ—cta Regum etiam qui ante vim Romanam valuerant decreta Ipsorum numinum Religiones introspexit libero ut quondam quod firmaret mutareâ—ve Tacit. 3. Annal. and Impunities of ordaining Sanctuaries and Privileged Places encreased saith my Author throughout the Cities of Greece the Temples were filled with most lewd Bondslaves in the same were received Debtors against their Creditors and Men guilty of Capital Crimes were protected neither was there any powerful Authority able to bridle the Sedition of the People Villanies were protected no less than the Ceremonies of the Gods Therefore it was appointed That the Cities should send their Agents with their Laws Some by way of Resignation of their Charters freely remitted those things they had falsely usurped many did confide in the Antiquity of their Superstitions and their Deserts to the People of Rome The Pomp of that Day saith the Historian was great in shew In which the Senate for Tiberius had left the Senate a Shadow of their ancient Estate by sending the Requests of the Provinces to be examined by them considered of the Privileges granted by their Predecessors the Agreements with their Confederates the Decrees of the Kings before the Countries became subject to the Romans and the Religion of the Gods themselves to confirm or alter all By which it may appear to be no new thing for Sovereigns to enquire into the Privileges of Cities tho' claimed by Divine Original as many of those were from their Gods or by the Bounties of Princes As to Conventicles the Nurseries of Seditions since the Laws are obvious by which they may be suppressed and that in another Chapter I have treated of them I shall take no further notice of them here being as unwilling that truly consciencious mis led People that endanger not the Government should be severely punished as I heartily wish they would give no Disturbance to it CHAP. XLVI The Preservatives against Faction and Sedition THE general Amulets
a name of Continuance which as the Law presumes shall always remain as Head and Governour of the People For the English Monarchy (x) Coke 4. Report Praef. knows no Interregnum being Successive by inherent Birthright whereby infinite inconveniences are avoided so that the young Phenix stays not to arise out of the Spicy ashes of the old but the Soul of Royalty by a kind of Transmigration passeth immediately out of one body into another and in the same manner will every right Heir acquire the Royalty after his Predecessor ceaseth to be Therefore the judicious Lord (y) Interregnum aut tituli suspensionem â—aeges Regni non permittere Hist H. 7. p. 26. Verulam observes That H. 7. knowing that the Laws permit not any interim suspension or stay of the Title and having no mind to own his Queens Title the best She being the Heiress of the house of York as he in some respects was Heir of the House of Lancaster he ordered the Act so that it should neither be by recognition nor his Title be established by a new Law (z) Potius media via institit simplicis stabilimenti Ideo verbis tectis utrinque nutantibus his ut haereditas Coronae resideres remaneret continuaretur in Rege but chose a milder way viz. of simple Establishment in covert words interpretable several ways that the inheritance of the Crown should reside remain and continue in him So King James in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 209. tells the Prince That at the very moment of the expiring of the King Reigning the nearest and lawful Heir entreth in his place and so to refuse him or intrude another is not to hold out the Successor from coming in but to expel and put out their Righteous King So Sir (a) Report 7 8 10 11. Calvin ' s Case Watson and Clark ' s Case 1 Jac. 1. Edward Coke affirms That it is a known Maxim of the Laws That in the moment of the descent of the Crown the person on whom it descends which is the next immediate Heir only becomes complete and absolute King to all intents and purposes And so he saith The second Son of the King of England after (b) 3. Instit 8. the death of the first-born is eldest Son within the Statute of 25 E. 3. as it was resolved in the case of Prince Charles concerning the Dutchy of Cornwall It would be a tedious work to recite all the Authorities in this Case may be found in the Statutes and Law-Books I will content my self instead of all others with the Act of (c) Cap. 2. Recognition 1 Jacobi primi wherein The Recognition of King James the First after the two Houses had enumerated the benefits by the Conjunction of the Houses of York and Lancaster and the uniting of England and Scotland in the Kings Person and that They agnize their constant Faith Obedience and Loyalty to him and his Royal Progeny The worlds of the Act are In most humble and lowly manner do beseech your most Excellent Majesty as a memorial to all posterity among the Records of your High Court of Parliament for ever to endure of our Loyalty Obedience and hearty humble affection it may be published and declared in the High Court of Parliament and enacted by Authority of the same That we being bound thereunto by the Laws of God and man do recognize and acknowledge and thereby express our unspeakable joyes that immediately upon the dissolution and decease of Elizabeth late Queen of England the Imperial Crown of the Realm of England c. did by inherent Birthright and lawful undoubted Succession descend and come to your most Excellent Majesty as being lineally justly and lawfully next and sole Heir of the blood Royal of this Realm as is aforesaid c. and thereunto we most humbly and faithfully do submit and oblige our selves our Heirs and Posterities for ever until the last drop of our blood be spent and do beseech your Majesty to accept the same as the first-fruits of this High Court of Parliament of our Loyalty and Faith to your Majesty and your Royal Progeny and Posterity for ever By which it first appears that the Crown of England is an unalterable Entail and the reversion in him only by whom Kings reign without any Election or consent of the People otherwise than by acknowledging the lawful Right of the Kings derived from God by their blood to them Also from this Recognition we may consider How to understand the Act made by Queen Elizabeth against the Claims of Mary Queen of Scots Secondly what to think of that Act of Queen Elizabeth That if any Person shall affirm that the Parliament of England has not full power to bind and govern the Crown in point of Succession and descent that such a Person during the Queens life shall be guilty of High Treason For we must consider that by the words bind and govern we may conceive the sence to be That the Parliament is Judge where there are differences (d) Jus Regium p. 181. betwixt Competitors in nice and controvertible points which cannot be otherwise decided So that such temporary Acts as these are to be interpreted and restrained by other uncontroverted Laws We must also look upon it as made to secure the Queen against Mary Queen of Scots and to let her know it was to no purpose for her to design any thing against the Right or Person of Queen Elizabeth upon that ground as may be presumed the Queen of Scots might claim for that Queen Elizabeth by Act of Parliament had been declared a Bastard Therefore to let her know that it was to no purpose to insist upon any such claim and that her other Right as next undoubted Heir by blood to the Crown might be altered or governed this Act was made So that we must from hence conclude That it was to be reckoned only as one of those Statutes which the Law says are made ad terrorem ex terrore only which may appear the more evidently because it was never made use of For it is to be mainly considered that this Law being made to exclude Queen Mary and the Scotish Line as appears by that clause wherein it is declared That every Person or Persons of what degree or Nation soever they be who shall during the Queens life declare or publish that they have Right to the Crown of England shall be disinabled to enjoy the Crown in Succession Therefore it was never valid (e) Id. p. 183. For if it had been good King James might have thereby been excluded by that person who should have succeeded next to the Scotish Race For it is undeniable that Queen Mary did during Queen Elizabeth's life pretend Right to the Crown upon the account that Queen Elizabeth was declared Bastard Therefore the calling in of King James after this Act and the acknowledging his Title do clearly evince that the
used to bodily Labour he ordered him a Chariot and by other ways letting him understand that the weight of Government was not to be sustained by such Shoulders as his so wearied and discouraged him that he desired to be freed from the toylsomeness of it and when he understood the Emperors drift and expected his severity he only recommended him to those Soldiers that were forward to elect him and sent him to his Village If therefore such little Tryals discouraged Camillus what must we think it will do any Prince that hath untractable Subjects who force him to make Essays of various Methods to reclaim them and of a constant standing upon his Guard to secure himself and the Government Such are they who make many Princes Reigns Calamitous that might have been calm and peaceable Kingdoms saith my Lord St. Albans represent our Bodies Many Particulars wherein the Burthen of Government is discovered have their times of Health and Sickness Seasons of Prosperity and Adversity flourish with Wealth and languish in Poverty and Want suffer Distempers Alterations and Changes If therefore the Care and Concern of the Physician be great that hath the Health of many Patients under his Cure How much more must this great Aesculapius's be who hath the superintending of infinite Numbers of Subjects of all Degrees to preserve them in their perfect State of Felicity and Happiness to watch over the growth of depraved Humors and hinder their Ferments from boyling into the Fevers and Calentures of Rebellion to remove all the Obstructions that may hinder the equal distribution of Nourishment in Trade Commerce and the free Energy and Force of the Laws so to order the infinite Varieties of Tempers and Dispositions that the very lucta and jarring of them may produce an Harmony in the whole Besides these there is a Necessity to cherish the Vertuous and the Brave to discountenance the Vitious and Debauched and keep them from infecting others and finally so to manage all things as not only the present Age but remote Posterity may find the happy Effects of his Reign This is to undergo the nobilem Servitutem as Antigonus told his Son Kingship was Governours to be endowed with various Qualifications Therefore Philo observes That as the Pilot must change his Sails and Rudder and as the Physician useth not one kind of Remedy for all Diseases but observing the Encrease or Remisness of Symptoms the plenty or want of Humors and according to the changes of Causes tries various Experiments So a Supreme Governour ought to be multiform or endowed with variety of Qualifications to act one way in times of Peace and another in War being opposed by few to act resolutely and couragiously if by many to add to these Authoritative Suasives in publick Dangers to act himself and to commit those Ministeries to others which require Labour more than Conduct In his Councils to be a Judge in his Exchequer an Accountant in his Armies a General in his Navies Admiral in his whole Dominions the prime Gentleman Patriot and Peer in Vertue as well as Place Besides all these foregoing Considerations though a Prince by his own Justice Prudence and other Regal Vertues and the well disposedness of his People may keep his own Domimions in Peace and though there were no Whirlwinds Earthquakes or Trepidations of Faction and Sedition in his own Kingdom yet a King's Care is no less in making diligent Observations upon the Designs and Actions of all his Neighbour-Princes and States to shelter his own Subjects from Tempests and Hurricanes from abroad to divert Storms A Prince's Care in preserving his People at home and abroad to mingle Interests or divide as shall be most for the advantage of his Subjects to assist his Allies to countermine the Clandestine Designs of his Enemies abroad These require an Atlas to support this immense Structure of Government The Imployment of many under a Prince These require many Hands of the roughest delicatest and strongest many Feet of the swiftest and steadiest many strong Shoulders and brawny Arms many severe commanding or charming Eyes many wise subtle and toyling Brains infinite Varieties of Tempers and Dispositions which must be directed ordered and imployed by that presiding Soul that every where in every part and in all seasons must give Life and Energy to all its Members Faculties and Imployments Furthermore A Prince much concerned foâ— his Fame the Actions of Princes after their deaths will be judged (i) Suum cuique decus posâ—â—â— it is rependit Tacit. 4. Annal. without Flattery and Varnish As after Death and Corruption of parts the Vertues of Kings perfume their Graves ennoble and by Examples refine Posterity and leave a taste of immortality behind out-living their Marble So if they rule ill they cannot think by their (k) Praesenti potentia extingui posse sequertis avi mâ—moriam Id. present Power to extinguish the memory of the next Age saith the judicious Historian Therefore Lipsius saith ‖ Post fata nullus est locus nullum tempus quo funestorum Principum manes a posteris exeâ—rationibus conquiescent After their Deaths there is no place then or time wherein the Ghosts of detested Princes will be free from Execration Since therefore Kings are like heavenly bodies cause good or evil times have much Veneration but no rest since their Examples are constantly imitated so that as * Aâ— virtutem ille praeit sequimur aâ— vitia inclinamus bene beateque agit sloremâ—s improspere labimur aut ruimus cum illo Epist ad Polit. Flexibiles in quamcunque partem duâ—imur a Principe sequaces Panegyr Lipsius saith If a Prince lead to Vertue we follow if to Vice we easily bend to it if he live happily we flourish if unfortunately we fall into the praecipice with him Or that of Pliny be true That Subjects are mostly plyant and easily handed into whatsoever way the Prince leads it necessarily follows That this Consideration must bring a great Addition to their Cares For such elevated Souls must needs undergo great Anxiety how to comport themselves so as being conspicuous in Vertue and Conduct they may be secure of good Report For as (l) Omnia facta dictaque Principis rumor excipit nec magis ei quam Soli latere contigit 1. de Clem. Seneca saith Fame wafts abroad all the Deeds and Works of Princes that they cannot more lay hid than the Sun Hence Possibly we may conclude the Reason of that Inscription on Constantine's and others Coyn Soli invicto Comiti For as the Sun not only by his Light and enlivening Heat brings that unspeakable benefit to the whole Earth and living Creatures as a King is to do to his Subjects so by its Diurnal Motion we discover it never to be at rest Therefore it must be a great Care in a Prince that is placed in his Kingdom as the Sun in our Vortex whereby his Actions can never be long hid
that he act nothing that (m) Cordati magni Principis est nihil committere quod ipsius dignitati aut famae detrahit may detract from his Fame and the Dignity of his Place All the Actions of Sovereigns being not only Examples but Precepts there being no such Incentments to Vertue or Vice as their Practices Besides A Prince to be Exemplary in Vertue what I have hitherto delivered on this Head there lies still an heavier Burthen upon a Prince That for his Subjects sake he be not only vertuous himself but by all his Industry endeavour to take care that they be so likewise I know this is much facilitated by his own Example For as (n) Vita 〈…〉 ad 〈…〉 ad 〈…〉 perio nobis 〈…〉 quam exemplo Paneâ—â—â— Pliny saith The Life of the Prince is a standing Law of manners to it we direct our course are all Heliotropes turning to it For Subjects need not so much command as Example yet we find that when some in the Senate moved (o) 〈…〉 suasurus 〈…〉 quibus 〈…〉 essemus Lib 3. Annal. Tiberius that he would restrain the Roman Luxury he writes to them That he knows not whether he should perswade them to pass by the strong and overgrown Vices rather than to discover how unable they were to suppress them and so tells them that he would not have the matter of envy to fall upon him but refers it to the proper Officers There being (p) Majus aliqued excelsius a 〈…〉 Ibid. something greater and more sublime required of a Prince viz. the guarding of Italy the Sea and Provinces By this we may see how arduous a task it is to root out vicious Customs and Habits which by a short Intermission of Executing the Laws severely will soon be so overgrown A Prince to 〈◊〉 care that hiâ— Subjects be Vertuous that it will be much Labour to dig up their Roots and requires a long and frequent weeding 'till all the Young Plants the Evil Plentiful Seed hath produced be cleansed out of the Ground This Tiberius that declined this task was at that time in such esteem that some Provinces as particularly the further Spain would have built Temples to him and he denying that yet could tell the Senate That it was (q) Majoribus meis dignum rerumque vestrarum providum const antâ—â—â— in periculis offensionurâ— pro utilitate publica non pavidum credant Tacit Annal. lib. 4. enough to him that he possessed the Supreme place and desired them to witness and Posterity to remember That they believed he was worthy of his Ancestors was provident of their Affairs constant in Danger not fearful to give Offence to any for the profit of the Commonwealth These things to him should be Temples and the beautifulest Statues In this we find a short Description of the Burthen of a Prince and a shorter but comprehensive one in (r) Maximo Imperio maximam esse cur 〈◊〉 Ad Caesarem Sallust That the greatest Empires have the greatest Cares (s) Sed 〈◊〉 adstricti moris Aâ—ctor fuit antiquo ipse cultu victuque 〈◊〉 inde in 〈◊〉 aemulandi amor validior quam poena ex legibus metâ—â— 3. Annal. Tacitus tells us of Vespasian That he was Author of a stricter manner of living than formerly using the Ancient Frugal Dyet and plainer Cloths which had that effect that the study to imitate the Prince was more efficacious than the Fear and Punishment of the Laws If then to be conspicuous in all sorts of Vertue and the Actions (t) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. Polit. c. 10. that flow from them and the whole higher and lower class of them in the most Comprehensive Qualifications be no small Labour and require no small sedulous Care to effect in ones self how much more must it be to make so many Millions more Vertuous by Example Precept strict Vigilance and Punishments Every one that attentively reflects on this must needs own it an Herculean Labour and such as exceeds almost the Apprehension of the Subjects Since then we are happy in such a King as hath laid this as a Corner Stone upon which his Throne is built King James the Second's discouraging Vice by his own Example to discountenance all Vice and since so great and weighty a Burthen of the well-ordering and governing so great a People lies with great pressure upon him for our ease and tranquillity let us not be so impolitick unworthy or ingrateful by Seditions Factions or Rebellions to cause him to undergo more disquiets For the result will be Our own Miseries and Calamities will sit close behind us when we set our Faces against such a Prince worthy of the most Imperial of Diadems CHAP. XVI Of the King's Authority and Soveraignty AN awful Reverence The Sublimeness of The Subject Qualm and Trembling must necessarily surprise every one that considerately raiseth his Thoughts to contemplate so sublime a Subject as the Soveraignty of Princes least what he delivers should appear too dis-spirited and below the dignity of the Theam or he should be guilty of such Indiscretion as to think he could enrich the Crown and Scepter with Lacker of his own Composure (a) Magnum propiusque noscendum id eruditissimo viro visum Lib. 6. Epist 16. Jam navibus cinis inciderat quo prepius accederet calidior densior Jam pumices nigrique ambusti fracti igne lapides Ib. Pliny the younger tells us that the great Naturalist his Uncle was so desirous to discover the true causes of the burning of Vesuvius what materials they were that afforded Fuel to so lasting a Fire and by what imprisoned Spirits so violent eruptions of Flame and Cinders were at times belched out of the Caverns of that Mountain though less stupendious than Aetna Hecla or other Vulcano's that his curiosity led him to climb so near the Eruptions of those Flames that Posterity lost the Benefit of his Observations by his untimely Death in the approaches he made We daily see the Pyralis not only singe her Wings but often lose her Life by her rash approaches to the Flame It behoves me therefore with all the Circumspection I can to endeavour to keep my self from such a Fate as Temerity too prying or daring an Attempt may bring upon me on the one hand or that I fall not into as unpitied a Destiny of being contemned and despised for too gross and palpable Flattery in equalling the Throne of Kings with that of the Deity The Flattery of some especially of Valerius Maximâ—â— A bold stroke of this kind of Sycophantry we find in (b) Penes quem hominum deorumque consensus maris ac terrae Regimen esse voluit cujus coelesâ—i providentia virtutes de quibus dicturus sum benignissime foventur vitia severissime vindicantur Prologo Valerius Maximus his Epistle Dedicatory to Tiberius wherein he tells him that he invokes him as Patron of
to Kingly Government and he every where commends it as most acceptable to the People and most safe for the Prince There is an excellent (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 De Creatione Princ. Soliloquy that Philo brings in his King to make and which may become the potentest Monarch to imitate That he writ the Laws himself into a Book that he might transcribe them into his Soul and imprint into his Mind those divine Characters never to be washed out again whereas other Kings therefore bear Staves for their Scepter the abridgment of the Law should be his Scepter his rejoycing and Glory uncontroulable the Ensign of that unreproveable Government which is fashioned according to the Pattern of Gods own Kingdom Although according to Harmenopulus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the King is not to be subject to the Laws because offending against them he is not punished and as St. (b) Neque ullis ad poenam legibus voâ—antur tuti Imperii potestate Apol. pro Davide Ambrose speaking of David saith He being a King was tyed to no Laws because Kings are freed from the Bonds or Punishments of Faults being called to Punishment by no Laws being protected by the Power of their Empire yet (c) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Greg. Naz. Orat. 27. as a grave Father saith God's Word and right Reason must give a Law to the Law-giver Therefore that weighty and elegant Expression of (d) Temperans Majestatem Caesaris infra Deum magis illum commendo Deo cui soli subjicio Ideo magnus quia coelo minor est Apol. c. 35. Tertullian deserves consideration by all Princes which is this While we temper the Majesty of Caesar under God we commend him the more to God unto whom alone we do subject him therefore great because he is less than Heaven To the voluntary submission of a Prince to his own or the Laws of his Progenitors may be referred the memorable saying of Valentinian (e) Revera majus Imperio est submittere legibus Principâ—tum Lib. 4. c. de Leg. c. Licet Lex Imperii solennibus Juris Imperatorem solverit nihil tamen tam proprium Imperii est quam legibus vivere Lib. 3. c. de Testam the Younger It is in truth a greater thing than Empire to submit the Princedom it self to the Laws and that other equally imitable by Princes Though the Laws of the Empire have freed the Emperor from the Solemnities of the Laws yet nothing is so proper for Empire as to live by the Laws or according to them So inthat commendation which Plutarch gives (f) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Orat. 2. de Fortuna Alex. Alexander the Great That he conceived he ought to be thought superior unto all Men yet subject to Justice Such a Prince we find Pliny fully describe in his (g) Nec minus hominem se quam hominibus praeesse meminit Panegyrick of Trajan That he thinks himself to be one of us and so much the more excellent and eminent he is that he so thinketh and no less remembreth that he is a Man than that he is a Ruler of Men. For he who hath nothing left to (h) Cui nihil ad augendum fastigium superest hic uno modo crescere potest si se ipse submittat securus magnitudinis suae increase his heighth hath but this one way to grow by if he submit himself that is to the governing by Laws it may be presumed he means being secure of greatness and in another place he calls him equal to all in this only greater than the rest That he was better and more nearly to our present purpose Thou hast made (i) Ipse te legibus subjecisti Legibus Caesar quas 〈◊〉 Principi scrip 〈◊〉 thy self subject to the Laws O Caesar which were not written to restrain the Prince by So we find both Severus (k) Licet legibus soluti simus attamen legibus 〈…〉 Instit quibus modis Testam infirment 8. Vet. and Antonius often set down in their Rescripts Although we be loosed from the Laws yet we live by the Laws These Laws are the Laws of God of Nature or those of the Kingdom concerning the first and last I shall not now discourse concerning that of Nature the (l) Non scripta sed nata lex quam non didicimus accepimus legimus verum ex natura ipsa arripuimus hausimus expressimus ad quam non docti sed facti non instituti sed imbuti sumus Pro Milone Orator saith It is not writ but born with us which we have not learnt received or read but from Nature it self have powerfully attracted drunk in and extracted to which we are not taught but made obedient not instructed but imbued Concerning the original of which Law he saith (m) Vnus erit communis quasi Magister Imperator omnium Deus ille legis hujus inventor disceptator lator â—ui qui non pâ—rebit ipâ—e se fugiet aâ— naturam hominis spernabitur atque hoc ipsâ— luet maximas poenas etiamsi caetera supplicia quae putantur â—ffugerit Lib. 3. de Repub. That God our common Master and Ruler of all is the Inventer Judg and Law-giver which he who will not obey must fly from himself i. e. abandon the Dictates of his own Reason and Conscience and despise the Nature of Man and in himself i. e. in his Conscience undergo the greatest Pains although he should escape all those other which commonly are accounted Punishments It is concerning this Law he saith That from it neither the Senate noâ— the People can exempt us nor is it lawful to abrogate it in the whole nor derogate from it (n) Ibid. Neque derogari ex hac aliquid licet neque tota abrogari potest nec vero aut per Senatum aut per populum solvi hac lege possumus The fore-mentioned Archbishop (o) Vsâ—er's Power of Princes p. 70. from hence concludes That to this moral Law of God whether by Nature thus written in the Hearts of Men or more fully delivered by Gods own written word or by just consequence deduced from the grounds of either of them the greatest Monarch upon Earth owes as much obedience as the lowest and meanest of all his Subjects And however the Prince is obliged to the directive force of the Law and so ought to be governed by it as his Director and though it be most true that (p) Reges Jolo Dei timore metuque Gehennae coercentur Isiodorus 3. Sent. c. 31. Kings are restrained only by the fear of God and Hell yet we may conclude that these together with the consideration of their Interests will be sufficient Incitements to them to govern according to such Laws Yet still it is to be owned That when a King doth not act according to such Laws he is not thereby capable of any Punishment for the transgressing of them and the reason saith the learned
Act for that purpose yet that prevented not the Inundation of blood and we found those men that moved Heaven and Earth with their clamours against the King as governing arbitrarily when they got the Power made it their dayly practice to lay what unprecedented illegal Taxes they pleased on their fellow Subjects to the value as some compute of Forty Eight Millions Therefore all Judicious persons lovers of their King The Advantages to Prince and People when the Crown is liberally provided for Country and Posterity finding the sad effects those disputes brought to the Blessed King and the whole Kingdom will think it a necessary prudence in a Prince to have always such a provision of Money ready as will enable him in all difficulties that may occur in the Administration of the Government without being obliged to part with any of his Royal Prerogatives when any discontented or designing Factious Members shall be able to take advantage of his Wants whereby to drive their barter with the Crown for thereby he shall defeat their ends On the other side it will be the most prudent and dutiful course both for their own security and the Princes honour for Parliaments upon all just and honourable Wars or occasions of assisting Allies preparing Fleets in readiness upon necessary defence to assist the Prince liberally and repay out of the Publick what for publick Service he hath expended out of his own Revenue rather than he should be in disesteem with his Neighbours and Allies whereby the honour of the Prince and consequently of his Subjects should be Eclipsed or he be necessitated to take any unusual course for raising Money or be compelled to make any inglorious Peace for we can never forget how the want of supplies to King Charles the First brought not only Ship-money and Knight-hoodmony Monopolies and the long disuse of Parliaments but at last that most calamitous War upon the whole Nation We cannot forget how zealous an House of Commons was of late to prevent any Arbitrariness as it was insinuated Decemb. 17.1680 The Care of some Parliaments to keep the King poor in the late King so that they voted a Bill to be brought in against illegal Exaction of Money upon the People under the Penalty of Treason not foreseeing that the Charters of the City of London and many other Corporations were forfeitable upon that account which if it had been made Treason the King had got a good Revenue against the intentions of those who in all appearance voted for a contrary end which further appeared in their Vote Jan. the 7th following (h) Address part 3. That whosoever should lend or cause to be lent by way of advance any Money upon the branches of the Kings Revenue arising by Customs Excise or Hearth-money the three principal branches should be judged to hinder the sitting of Parliament and be responsible for the same in Parliament So that they would give nothing themselves but as much as in them lay terrified others from lending or advancing any Money to him which was not according to their Writ to advise but by duress and force to compel the King to submit to their Judgments and instead of giving him Assistance to support his Allies and enable him to preserve Tangier they tended to the disenabling him from contributing to either by his own Revenue and Credit not only exposing him to the dangers that might happen either at home or abroad but endeavouring to deprive him of the Possibility of supporting the Government it self and reduce him to a more helpless Condition than the meanest of his Subjects as the King sadly and justly complained and in that Vote the Subjects Liberty and Property was invaded in that he could not dispose of his Money to his own Profit and the Benefit of the Government if either Insurrection or Rebellion happened in the interval of Parliament or a foreign Force on a sudden should attacque us yet these Gentlemen would be counted Loyal and Dutiful Subjects It is not to be denyed but that if a Prince's standing Revenue were so great that by it he might not only support the ordinary expences of the Government but lay by a summ sufficient to defray all extraordinary incident Charges either occasioned by intestine Rebellions or foreign Invasions that a King should not have occasion to have so often recourse to Parliaments for Aids Yet when we confider that there would be many other occasions of frequent convening that great Council for making wholesom Laws which is one great Portion of their Business and that the Subjects never can be happy under a poor Prince who thereby should be brought into contempt and how much greater mischiefs accrue to the Subjects by rendring their Prince impotent and unable to preserve them from factious disturbers of their Peace and Repose and the preserving their Properties as well as the defending them from the designs of foreign Princes who would injure our Merchants lock us in our Island and force us to sell our own native Commodities and receive theirs at what Rates they pleased if our Soveraign were not able to keep a sufficient Fleet and infinite other Mischiefs which would accompany a starved Exchequer we should too late find that the Expence of many Millions would not again restore us to that condition of Prosperity and Renown that one timely bestowed on our Prince would preserve us in It is much less Charge to keep in good Repair a well-built Fort Castle or Man of War than to build a new one especially if upon the demolishing of the old we were to fight for the Ground and Materials whereupon and wherewith we should build the new It is a singular Security to the English Subject that no Money can be levied upon him but by Act of Parliament to which in his Representatives he gives his Consent and the House of Commons is generally careful that they understand a great necessity ere they pass any Money-bill yet we have known in our Age some that have stood upon such terms with their Sovereign that either he hath chosen rather to want Supplies than have them upon such hard Terms or their Principals have suffered a thousand times more by such denials than they had done if they had been granted So was Constantinople lost to the Turks for want of furnishing the Emperor with the hundredth part of that which the victorious Enemy plundered the Citizens of and so the Count Palatine elected King of Bohemia lost that Kingdom and all his Hereditary Seigniories by unfurnishing his Soldiers with present Pay when he had it by him And how many suffer by the want of a liberal and proportionable Supply to pay off the Debts of the Exchequer is too sadly felt by many and if the Parliament of 1639. had furnished King Charles the First with twelve Subsidies as it appears by the sequel the Expence of four times as many Millions besides the infinite quantity of Christian Blood shed in the