commence take sue and prosecute their said Appeal from the said pretenced Sentence and for the reversing of the said pretenced Sentence within this Realm in such like manner and form as was used to be pursued or might have béen pursued within this Realm at any time since the xxiv year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth upon Sentences given in the Court or Courts of any Archbishop within this Realm And that such Appeal as so hereafter shall be taken or pursued by the said Richard Chetwood and Agnes or either of them and the Sentence that herein or thereupon shall hereafter be given shall be judged to be good and effectual in the Law to all intents and purposes any Law Custom Vsage Canon Constitution or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding An Appeal between Richard Harcourt and Anthony Fydell Provided also and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid That where there is the like Appeal now depending in the said Court of Rome betweén one Richard Harcourt Merchant of the Staple and Elizabeth Harcourt otherwise called Elizabeth Robins of the one party and Anthony Fydell Merchant Stranger on the other party that the said Robert Elizabeth and Anthony and every of them shall and may for the prosecuting and trying of their said Appeal have and enjoy the like remedy benefit and advantage in like manner and form as the said Richard and Agnes or any of them hath may or ought to have and enjoy this Act or any thing therein contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Stat. i Eliz. cap. ii An Act for the Vniformity of Common Prayer and Service in the Church and the Administration of the Sacraments WHere at the death of our late Soveraign Lord King Edward the Sixth Stat. Sect. 1. there remained one uniform Order of Common Service and Prayer and of the Administration of Sacraments Rites and Ceremonies in the Church of England which was set forth in one Book Intituled The Book of Common Prayer and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies in the Church of England Authorized by Act of Parliament holden in the Fifth and Sixth years of our said late Sovereign Lord King Edward the Sixth Intituled An Act for the Vniformity of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments the which was repealed and taken away by Act of Parliament in the First year of the Reign of our late Sovereign Lady Quéen Mary to the great decay of the due honour of God and discomfort to the Professors of the Truth of Christ's Religion Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That the said Estatute of Repeal A repeal of the Statute of 1 M. 2. And the Book of Common Prayer shall be in force and every thing therein contained only concerning the said Book and the Service Administration of the Sacraments Rites and Ceremonies contained or appointed in or by the said Book shall be void and of none effect from and after the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming And that the said Book with the Order of Service and of the Administration of Sacraments Rites and Ceremonies with the alteration and additions therein added and appointed by this Estatute shall stand and be from and after the said Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist in full force and effect according to the tenor and effect of this Estatute Any thing in the aforesaid Estatute of Repeal to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 2. The Book of Common Prayer shall be used And further Be it Enacted by the Queens Highness with the assent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That all and singular Ministers in any Cathedral or Parish Church or other place within this Realm of England Wales and the Marches of the same or other the Quéens Dominions shall from and after the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming be bounden to say and use the Mattens Evensong Celebration of the Lords Supper and Administration of each of the Sacraments and all the Common and open Prayer The alteration of the Book set forth 5 6 Ed. 6. in such Order and Form as is mentioned in the said Book so Authorized by Parliament in the said Fifth and Sixth years of the Reign of King Edward the Sixth with one alteration or addition of certain Lessons to be used on every Sunday in the year and the Form of the Letany altered and corrected and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacrament to the Communicants and none other or otherwise The forfeiture of those which use any other Service then the Book of Common Prayer And that if any manner of Parson Vicar or other whatsoever Minister that ought or should sing or say Common Prayer mentioned in the said Book or Minister the Sacraments from and after the Feast of the Nativity of Saint John Baptist next coming refuse to use the said Common Prayers or to Administer the Sacraments in such Cathedral or Parish Church or other places as he should use to Minister the same in such Order and Form as they be mentioned and set forth in the said Book or shall wilfully or obstinately standing in the same use any other Rite Ceremony Order Form or Manner of celebrating the Lords Supper openly or privily or Mattens Evensong Administration of the Sacraments or other open Prayers then is mentioned and set forth in the said Book open Prayer in and throughout this Act is meant that Prayer which is for others to come unto or hear either in common Churches The Penalty for depraving the Book of Common Prayer or private Chappels or Oratories commonly called the Service of the Church or shall Preach Declare or Speak any thing in the Derogation or Depraving of the said Book or any thing therein contained or of any part thereof and shall be thereof lawfully convicted according to the Laws of this Realm by Verdict of twelve Men or by his own Confession or by the notorious Evidence of the Fact shall loose and forfeit to the Queens Highness her Heirs and Successors for his first offence the profit of all his Spiritual Benefices or Promotions coming or arising in one whole year next after his conviction And also that the person so convicted shall for the same Offence suffer Imprisonment for the space of Six months without Bail or Mainprize That ought or should sing or say Common Prayer c. What Minister is here meant Although the first part of this Clause viz. All and singular Ministers in any Cathedral or Parish Church or other place seems to intend a local Minister only and not one who is neither Parson Vicar or Stipendiary Chaplain yet the next words If any Parson Vicar or other Minister that ought to say Common Prayer or minister the Sacraments c. clearly comprehend all lawful
the 1 2 Ph. M. 8. and all and every Branches Clauses and Articles therein contained other than such Branches and Sentences as hereafter shall be excepted may from the last day of this Session of Parliament by Authority of this present Parliament be repealed and shall from thenceforth be utterly void and of none effect The Statute of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. here mentioned repealed The King declared supream Head Stat. 1 2. Ph. Mar. 8. 26 H. 8. 1. 35 H. 8. 3. the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 1. and 35 H. 8. cap. 3. By both which King Henry the Eighth his Heirs and Successors were declared supream Head of the Church of England And by the repeal of that of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. those other of 26 and 35 H. 8. were revived and are again in force Co. 4. Inst 325. Vide Sect. 5. Stat. Sect. 3. A reviver of several Stat. And that also for the reviving of divers of the said good Laws and Statutes made in the time of your said dear Father it may also please your Highness That one Act and Statute made in the three and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that no person shall be cited out of the Diocess where he or she dwelleth except in certain Cases And one other Act made in the Four and Twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act that Appeals in such cases as hath been used to be pursued to the See of Rome shall not be from henceforth had ne used but within this Realm And one other Act made the five and twentieth year of the said late King concerning restraint of payment of Annates and First-fruits of Archbishopricks and Bishopricks to the See of Rome And one other Act in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the submission of the Clergy to the Kings Majesty And also one Act made in the five and twentieth year entituled An Act restraining the payment of Annates or First-fruits to the Bishop of Rome and of the Electing and Consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops within this Realm And one other Act made in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the Exoneration of the Kings Subjects from Exactions and Impositions heretofore paid to the See of Rome and for having Licences and Dispensations within this Realm without suing further for the same And one other Act made in the six and twentieth year of the said late King entituled An Act for Nomination and Consecration of Suffragans within this Realm And also one other Act made in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act for the Release of such as have obtained pretended Licences and Dispensations from the See of Rome And all and every Branches Words and Sentences in the said several Acts and Statutes contained The Sentences and Branches in the aforesaid Statutes shall extend to the Queen by Authority of this present Parliament from and at all times after the last day of this Session of Parliament shall be revived and shall stand and be in full force and strength to all intents constructions and purposes And that the Branches Sentences and Words of the said several Acts and every of them from thenceforth shall and may be judged déemed and taken to extend to your Highness your Heirs and Successors as fully and largely as ever the same Acts or any of them did extend to the said late King Henry the Eighth your Highnesses Father And that it may also please your Highness that it may be enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That so much of one Act or Statute made in the two and thirtieth year of the Reign of your said dear Father King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act concerning Precontracts of Marriages and touching degrees of Consanguinity as in the time of the late King Edward the sixth your Highnesses most dear Brother by one other Act or Statute was not repealed And also one Act made in the seven and thirtieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that Doctors of the Civil Law being married may exercise Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction And all and every Branches and Articles in the said two Acts last mentioned and not repealed in the time of the said late King Edward the sixth may from henceforth likewise stand and be revived and remain in their full force and strength to all intents and purposes Any thing contained in the said Act of repeal before mentioned or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding What Stat. repealed by the Stat. of 1 2 P. M. 8. shall continue repealed And that it may also please your Highness that it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all other Laws and Statutes and the Branches and Clauses of any Act or Statute repealed and made void by the said Act of Repeal made in the time of the said late King Philip and Quéen Mary and not in this present Act specially mentioned and revived shall stand remain and be repealed and void in such like manner and form as they were before the making of this Act any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding A reviver of the Stat. of 1 Ed. 6. 1. And that it may also please your Highness That it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first year of the Reign of the late King Edward the sixth your Majesties most dear Brother entituled An Act against such persons as shall unreverently speak against the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ commonly called the Sacrament of the Altar and for the receiving thereof under both kinds and all and every Branches Clauses and Sentences therein contained shall and may likewise from the last day of this Session of Parliament be revived and from thenceforth shall and may stand remain and be in full force strength and effect to all intents constructions and purposes in such like manner and form as the same was at any time in the first year of the Reign of the said late King Edward the Sixth any Law Statute or other matter to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding A repeal of the Statute of 1 2 P. M. 6. and several other Statutes And that also it may please your Highness That it may be further established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first and second years of the late King Philip and Queen Mary entituled An Act for the reviving of three Statutes made for the punishment of Heresies and also the said three Statutes mentioned in the said Act and by the same Act revived And all and every Branches Articles Clauses and Sentences contained in the said several Acts and Statutes and every of them shall be
be understood of such an Estate as he may lawfully forfeit And the general words of the Statute of Praemunire Stat. 16 R. 2. 5. W. 2. 1. 16 R. 2. c. 5. scil Lands and Tenements shall not take away the force of the Statute de donis Conditionaelibus Co. 1. Inst 130. 391. Co. 11. 63. Godbolt 308. Lord Sheffeild and Ratcliffe And the person attainted in a Praemunire is disabled to be a Witness in any Cause Co. 1. Inst 6. or to Sue For Attainder in a Praemunire is a good plea in disability of the Plaintiff A person attainted in a Praemunire was out of the Kings Protection Sc. 25 E. 3. 22. according to Littleton 41. By the Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 22. which saith That a man attainted in a Praemunire shall be out of the Kings Protection and it may be done with him as with the Kings Enemy It seemeth that any man might have lawfully slain such a person as was held 24 H. 8. Bro. Coron 196. Vide Bulstrode 2. 299. Sir Anthony Mildmay's Case And this Sir Edward Coke Co. 7. 14. Calvins Case Co. 12. 38. seemeth to allow for Law before this Statute of 5 Eliz. and positively affirms it to have been Law in his 1 Inst 130. and yet in the same Case of Calvin he saith that in that Statute of 25 E. 3. is intended only a legal Protection according to Littleton 41. and so likewise he expounds it in his 3d Inst. 126. But yet that the party attainted was still under that Protection which the Law of Nature giveth to the King which he explains to be such a Protection as a person attainted of Felony or Treason is under notwithstanding his Attainder so that if any man had killed him without Warrant he should have been punished by Law as a manslayer And this sort of Protection by the Law of Nature saith he is indelebilis immutabilis which the Parliament could not take away But yet under favour if a man attainted in a Praemunire were before this Act of 5 Eliz. under that indeleble and immutable Protection of the King given by the Law of Nature then the Opinion held in Brooke and allowed by himself was not Law But if that Opinion in Brooke were Law and any man might before this Statute have killed a man attainted in a Praemunire and that by force of the Statute of 25 E. 3. it follows that the Protection which the Law of Nature giveth is not indelebilis or immutabilis but that an Act of Parliament might in a particular Case take it away But there is now no further need of this Question in the Case of a Praemunire For if this Protection by the Law of Nature were taken away by 25 E. 3. it is now restored by this Statute and no man can lawfully slay a person attainted in a Praemunire no more than he can without Warrant a man attainted of Felony or Treason Provided always Stat. Sect. 15. Upon what proof only any person may be indicted and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no person or persons shall hereafter be Indicted for assisting aiding maintaining comforting or abetting of any person or persons for any the said Offences in extolling setting forth or defending of the usurped Power and Authority of the Bishop of Rome unless he or they be thereof lawfully accused by such good and sufficient testimony or proof as by the Iury by whom he shall so be Indicted shall be thought good lawful and sufficient to prove him or them guilty of the said Offences Stat. xiii Eliz. cap. ii An Act against the bringing in and putting in Execution of Bulls Writings or Instruments and other Superstitious things from the See of Rome Stat. Sect. 1. A rehearsal of the Stat. of 5 El. 1. touching the abolishing of the Authority of the Bishop and See of Rome WHere in the Parliament holden at Westminster in the fifth year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lady the Quéens Majesty that now is by one Act and Statute then and there made Intituled An Act for the Assurance of the Queens Majesties Royal Power over all States and Subjects within her Highness Dominions it is among other things very well ordained and provided for the abolishing of the usurped Power and Iurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome and of the See of Rome heretofore unlawfully claimed and usurped within this Realm and other the Dominions to the Quéens Majestie belonging That no person or persons shall hold or stand with to set forth maintain defend or extol the same usurped Power or attribute any manner of Iurisdiction Authority or Preheminence to the same to be had or used within this Realm or any the said Dominions upon pain to incur the danger penalties and forfeitures ordained and provided by the Statute of Provision and Praemunire made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the second as by the same Act more at large it doth and may appear And yet nevertheless divers seditious and very evil disposed people without respect of their Duty to Almighty God or of the Faith and Allegiance which they ought to bear and have to our said Sovereign Lady the Quern and without all fear and regard had to the said good Law and Statute or the pains therein limited but minding as it should seem very seditiously and unnaturally not only to bring this Realm and the Imperial Crown thereof being in very deed of it self most free into the thraldom and subjection of that Forreign usurped and unlawful Iurisdiction Preheminence and Authority claimed by the said See of Rome but also to estrange and alienate the minds and hearts of sundry her Majesties Subjects from their dutiful obedience and to raise and stir Sedition and Rebellion within this Realm to the disturbance of the most happy peace thereof have lately procured and obtained to themselves from the said Bishop of Rome The effect of Bulls brought from Rome and his said Sée divers Bulls and Writings the effect whereof hath been and is to absolve and reconcile all those that will be contented to forsake their due obedience to our most gracious Sovereign Lady the Queens Majesty and to yield and subject themselves to the said fained unlawful and usurped Authority and by colour of the said Bulls and Writings the said wicked persons very secretly and most seditiously in such parts of this Realm where the people for want of good instruction are most weak simple and ignorant and thereby farthest from the good understanding of their Duties towards God and the Quéens Majesty have by their lewd and subtile practises and perswasion so far forth wrought that sundry simple and ignorant persons have been contented to be reconciled to the said usurped Authority of the See of Rome and to take absolution at the hands of the said naughty and subtile practicers whereby hath grown great dissobedience and boldness in many not only to withdraw and absent themselves from all
but the other Justices may Stat. Sect. 8. Provided alway That every person guilty of any offence against this Statute other then Treason and misprision of Treason which shall before he be thereof Indicted or at his Arraignment or Trial before Iudgment A remedy for a guilty person conforming himself submit and conform himself before the Bishop of the Diocess where he shall be resident or before the Iustices where he shall be Indicted Arraigned or Tryed having not before made like submission at any his Tryal being Indicted for his first like offence shall upon his Recognition of such submission in open Assizes or Sessions of the County where such person shall be resident be discharged of all and every the said Offences against this Act except Treason and misprision of Treason and of all pains and forfeitures for the same Before Iudgment submit and conform himself Conformity after judgment saves the penalty Stat. 1 Jac. 4. But now by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. if the Recusant conforms after Judgment it seems it shall be time enough to save the forfeiture Vide that Statute Sect. 2. A man is convicted of Recusancy according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. upon Proclamation and default of appearance 29 Eliz. 6. and afterwards submits and conforms he shall by force of this Clause be discharged of the forfeiture of Twenty pounds per month for this is a submission and conformity before Judgment Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment the conviction upon Proclamation being no Judgment but only in nature of a conviction by Verdict as was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 38 Eliz. vide Dr. Fosters Case Rolls 1. 94 C. 41. Certain persons Indicted upon this Statute for not coming to Church were Outlawed upon the Indictment Submission after Outlawry the Court of Kings-Bench would not in this Case receive their submission but advised them to purchase their pardon for the Outlawry which they did and then their submission was accepted of and they were discharged Leonard 4. 54. n. 138. Note in the Report of this Case the Statute of 13 Eliz. is mistaken for this of 23 Eliz. for no Indictment for not coming to Church lies on 13. Stat. 13 Eliz. 2 Before the Bishop of the Diocess Conformity where and how to be pleaded If a man be Indicted for Recusancy before Justices of Pcace and he submits and conforms before the Bishop of the Diocess he may remove the Indictment by Certiorari into the Kings-Bench and there plead his conformity by Certificate under the Bishops Hand and Seal Vide Styles 26. For the manner of a Recusants submission and conformity before the Bishop after conviction Submission and Certificate and the Bishops certificate thereupon Vide Co. lib. intr 569. Stat. Sect. 9. Who shall have the money forfeited by this Statute And be it likewise Enacted That all forfeitures of any sums of money limited by this Act shall be divided in thrée equal parts whereof one third part shall be to the Queéns Majesty to her own use one other third part to the Queens Majesty for the relief of the Poor in the Parish where the offence shall be committed to be delivered by Warrant of the principal Officers in the Receipt of the Exchequer without further Warrant from her Majesty and the other third part to such person as will sue for the same in any Court of Record by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information In which Suit no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be allowed And that every person which shall forfeit any sums of money by vertue of this Act He shall be imprisoned that is not able or doth not pay the forfeiture and shall not be able or shall fail to pay the same within thrée months after Iudgment thereof given shall be committed to Prison there to remain until he have paid the said sums or conform himself to go to Church and there do as is aforesaid Distribution of the penalties All forfeitures of any sums of money limited by this Act. So that the distribution here appointed extends not only to the forfeitures of Two hundred and One hundred Marks for saying or hearing Mass and the Ten pounds a month for keeping a Schoolmaster contrary to this Act but likewise to the Twenty pounds per month for not repairing to Church In which last Case the Informer Qui tam c. shall have the third part as well as in the other Cases For although by the foregoing clause the whole Twenty pounds per month is given to the Queen which the other forfeitures are not in express words yet that will not alter the Case nor make void the express appointment made here in what manner and to whom all the forfeitures limited by this Act shall be disposed of And 't is usual in Acts of Parliament to give the whole penalty for any criminal matter to the King and afterwards in the same Act to make distribution thereof and give part to him that will sue as in the Statutes of 3 H. 6. Stat. 3 H. 6. 3. 3 H. 7. 7. cap. 3. and 3 H. 7. cap. 7. and others And the subsequent distribution shall always stand good notwithstanding the precedent words of limitation of the whole to the King For those words in penal Statutes To the King or to the Queen are upon the matter but void and superfluous and give the King or Queen no other or stricter Interest then they would have had if they had been omitted and it had been only said shall forfeit without appointing to whom And the reason is for that the Law devolves the forfeiture upon the King where no other person is appointed and shall forfeit without more saying is as much as shall forfeit to the King But when afterwards in the same Statute a particular appointment is made how the penalty shall be distributed that qualifies the former general words and such distribution shall be made as the Statute appoints Co. 11. 60. Rolles 1. 89. 90. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Anderson 1. 139. 140. C. 190. Cuff against Vachell Vide supra Sect. 5. For relief of the Poor in the Parish Scot was Indicted upon this Statute for Recusancy Anno 26 Eliz. by the name of William Scot of Southwark Gent. and exception was taken to the Indictment for that within Southwark are several Parishes and the third part of the penalty is to be applied to the relief of the Poor of the Parish where the offence was committed But in this Case the Recusant being named generally of Southwark non potest constare Curiae where the Offence was nor to what Parish the third part of the penalty belongs But the whole Court of Kings-Bench were clear of Opinion The Parish need not be mentioned that the Indictment was good enough notwithstanding 't is not said of what Parish the Recusant was For the whole penalty of
Verdict pass against him these are Convictions in Law but yet by these Convictions he forfeits nothing until Judgment nor shall the penalty of 20 l. per month run on or be appropriated to the King until Judgment be given By Convicted therefore is here to be understood convicted by Proclamation and Default or convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for so the word is here to be taken viz. for adjudged or attainted unless it be in Case of Conviction upon Proclamation And in such a sense it is to be taken in divers other Cases Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 5. When the 20 l per month is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both For the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time contained in the Indictment in the very first of those Terms next after his Conviction See for this Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 6. From what time the said penalty shall run on Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For every month after such Conviction For what time the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on after the Recusant is indicted and convicted and in what Cases the Informer and all others but the King shall be barred after such Conviction Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. antea Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. postea Office Take seize and enjoy But as to Lands and Tenements there must first be an Office found for the King for regularly before the finding of such Office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands Co. 2. Inst 573. Co. 8. 169. Paris Stoughters Case Bro. tit Office 17. 55. Plowden 486. Nicholls Case By this Statute the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants Lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis The two parts not satisfactory of the twenty pounds per month until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the Twenty pounds per month incurred for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accompted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture For the Statute inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a farther penalty for his neglect of payment of the Twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case Cro. Eliz. 845. 846. and by all the Judges The Law now altered in that point 3 Jac. at Russell House Jones 24. Standen versus Vniversity d'Oxon Whitton But now the Law is altered in this point by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Vide the Stat. infra Sect. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4 All the goods A Recusant is Indicted and Convicted Recusants goods when forfeited and then fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month yet his goods are not forfeited to the King by this Statute before seizure For the King hath his Election whether he will seize them or no. By Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12. Jac. Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman A Recusant lends money Recognizance forfeited and for security hath a Rent-charge granted him in Fee by Deed indented with condition of redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture The Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month In this case the King shall have the Recognizance by force of this Act for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a chattel personal What is given to the King by this word Goods and shall pass to the King by this word goods For in an Act of Parliament where the Offenders goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and Actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession And here in this Act as take and seize refer to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy refers to goods And the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a Rent-charge in fee which seems to savour of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of money which is personal Co. 12. 1. 2. Ford and Sheldons Case If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another Recognizance taken in anothers name forfeited the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of taking the Recognizance and so continued until the time of his Conviction it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of the levying of the forfeiture and such Covin shall not bar the King Co. 12. 2. 3. the same Case The Kings grant If a Recognizance or Obligation be forfeited to the King by force of this Act he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Hereditaments Rent Advowson in gross Hereditaments A Rent of Inheritance and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word But whether the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since the Stat. of 3 Jac. c. 5. which gives the Presentation to the Universities Stat. 3 Jac. 5 Vide that Stat. infra Sect. 19. All other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seisure or to the penalties aforesaid It hath been much disputed whether Copyhold Lands are within this Branch of the Statute Copyhold Lands if seizable for regularly in Acts of Parliament which are Enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such at the Common Law and not those which are such by custom only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case Co. 3. 8. That where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the Act shall not extend to Copyholds Vide Savile 67. C. 138. And if the King should seize them by force of the general words here viz. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory Customs and Services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clark in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30 Eliz. That Copyholds are within this Act and although Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within
it directly by express words yet they both conceived they were within the intent of the Act by reason as Manwood said of these words all other the Lands c. liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid But it was granted on all hands that by these general words here the King hath not any estate given him in the Recusants Copyhold Lands but only a right or title to two thirds of the profits By the Kings receiving of which the Lord cannot be impeached of his Customs and Services as he would be if the King should seize the Land it self And a difference was there taken between an Act of Parliament which transfers an Estate to the King and an Act of Parliament which gives him only the profits of the Estate For in the first Case the Rule in Heydons Case that Copyhold Lands shall not pass by general words shall stand good for the prejudice that may otherwise accrew to the Lord But where the Lords Seigniory Customs and Services are not to be Impeached or taken away as here they will not by the Kings bare receiving of the profits there it was said Copyholds shall be included within the general words of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leonard 1. 97. C. 126. And yet Vide Owen 37. where this Case is otherwise reported and that it was at length after great debate adjudged that Copyhold Lands are not within this Statute nor are seizable for the Kings two parts And according to this Judgment I take the modern practice of the Exchequer to have been that neither the Land it self nor the profits of Copyhold Lands are liable to such seizure And for the more spéedy conviction of such Offender Stat. Sect. 5. The Indictment sufficient though it be not mentioned that the party is within the Realm in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Indictment of every such Offender mentioning the not coming of such Offender to the Church of the Parish where such person at any time before such Indictment was or did keép House or Residence nor to any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer shall be sufficient in the Law And that it shall not be neédful to mention in any such Indictment that the party Offender was or is inhabiting within this Realm of England or any other the Queens Majestis Dominions But if it shall happen any such Offender then not to be within this Realm or other her Majesties Dominions that in such case the party shall be relieved by Plea to be put in in that behalf and not otherwise And that upon the Indictment of such Offender Stat. Sect. 6. A Proclamation that the party Indicted shall render his Body to the Sheriff a Proclamation shall be made at the same Assizes or Goal delivery in which the Indictment shall be taken if the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery by which it shall be commanded that the body of such Offender shall de rendred to the Sheriff of the same County before the said next Assizes or general Goal delivery to be holden in the same County And if at the said next Assizes or Goal delivery the same Offender so proclaimed shall not make appearance of Record that then upon such default Recorded the same shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law of the said Offence whereof the party so standeth Indicted as is aforesaid as if upon the same Indictment a Trial by Verdict thereupon had proceeded and been recorded If the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery For if the Indictment had been taken before Justices of Peace Proclamation by whom to be made no Proclamation thereupon could have been made upon this Statute by the Justices of Assize or Goal delivery as was resolved in the Case of Edward Plowden And therefore upon such an Indictment for Recusancy taken before Justices of Peace the Court was to remove the Indictment into the Kings-Bench And there process might have been made out against the Recusant and he convicted For the Justices of Peace could do no more then Indict all other proceedings being taken away from them by this Statute Co. 11. 63. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. the same Case But now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. the Law is altered in this point Stat. 3 Jac. 4. and the Justices of Peace upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to proclaim and convict the Recusant as well as Justices of Assize and Goal delivery Shall be rendred to the Sheriff Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Before the said next Assizes or general Gaol delivery Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Appearance Make appearance of Record What appearance will serve in this Case Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Vpon such default That is upon his default of appearance of Record at the next Assizes or Goal delivery For if he makes such appearance Default saved that shall save his default of not rendring his Body to the Sheriff and the not rendring himself to the Sheriff shall be no conviction as Wingate would make it to be Tit. Crowne numb 66. As sufficient a Conviction in Law That is as if he were convicted by Verdict Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment but not as sufficient as if a Judgment were had against the Recusant For although by force of this and other Statutes the conviction upon Proclamation and default of appearance make the Recusant liable to divers penalties and incapacities and is in those respects as forceable as a Judgment yet it shall not in other Cases have the force or effect of a Judgment And therefore it was resolved 37 38 Eliz. in the Case of the general pardon Anno 35 Eliz. where there is an exception of all penalties and forfeitures due to the Queen and converted to a debt by Judgment that notwithstanding that exception a Recusant convicted upon Proclamation was within the pardon and the forfeitures due upon such conviction were thereby pardoned For the debt was not due to the Queen by Judgment but upon conviction only But otherwise it had been if he had been convicted according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 without Proclamation and Judgment had been given thereupon Vide Co. 11. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Stat. Sect. 7. Provided always That whensoever any such Offender as is aforesaid shall make submission and become conformable according to the form limited by the same Estatute made in the thrée and twentieth year of the Quéens Majesties Reign The Offender submitting or dying no forfeiture shall ensue or be continued or shall fortune to die that then no forfeiture of twenty pounds for any month or seizure of the Lands of the same Offender from and after such Submission and Conformity or Death and full satisfaction of all
charged in what not in respect or by reason of his or her Ancestors Recusancy And if at the decease of any such Recusant his heir shall happen to be a Recusant and after shall become conformable and obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the intent and true meaning of the said Statutes and Ordinances in that behalf made as is aforesaid and also shall take the Oath of Supremacy in such sort as that Oath is expressed in one Act of Parliament made in the first year of the Reign of our late Sovereign Lady Quéen Elizabeth before the Archbishop or Bishop of the Diocess that in every such Case every such heir shall be freed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy Provided always and be it Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That if the heir of any Recusant shall happen to be within the age of sixtéen years at the time of the decease of his or her Ancestor and shall after his or her said age of sixteen years become or be a Recusant that in every such Case any such heir shall not be freéd or discharged of all or any of the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy until he or she shall submit or reform him or her self and become obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the intent and true meaning of the said Statutes and Ordinances in that behalf as is aforesaid and shall take the said Oath of Supremacy in manner and form afore expressed and yet nevertheless from and after such submission and Oath had and taken every such heir shall be fréed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy If any Recusant shall hereafter die That is Convicted Recusant a Recusant either Convicted upon Proclamation and Default or Convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged For in both those cases if the Recusant die the discharge of the heir depends upon his Conformity Of all and singular the penalties Judgment against Tenant in Tail charges and incumbrances If Judgment be had at the Kings Suit against a Recusant Tenant in Tail for Recusancy this is a charge and incumbrance within this Statute of which the heir in Tail shall not be discharged unless he conforms but must satisfie all the arrears incurred in the life time of his Ancestor For it being a Debt to the King upon a Judgment the intailed Lands are liable thereto by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. Stat. 33 H. 8. 39 But these two Clauses discharge the arrears of the Twenty pounds per month incurred in the Recusants life time upon the conformity of the heir in such Cases only where the two parts of the Recusants Lands were not seized before his death Seisure in the Recusants life time for if they are seized in his life time and continue so till his death neither his Fee-simple Lands nor his Intailed Lands if a Judgment were had against him for his Recusancy at the Kings Suit shall be discharged upon the heirs conformity without payment of the arrears for which Vide postea Sect. 4. Stat. Sect. 4. The two parts of a Recusants Lands shall go towards satisfaction of the Twenty pounds per month And be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That where any seizure shall be had of the two parts of any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases or Farmes for the not payment of the Twenty pounds due and payable for each month according to the Statute in that Case lately made and provided That in every such Case every such two parts shall according to the extent thereof go towards the satisfaction and payment of the Twenty pounds due and payable for each month and unpaid by any such Recusant and that the third part thereof shall not be extended or seized by the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors for not-payment of the said Twenty pounds payable for each month forfeited or lost by any such Recusant And after his death shall remain in the Kings hands until the arrears be satisfied And where any such seizure shall be had of the two parts of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases or Farmes of any such Recusant as is aforesaid and such Recusant shall die the debt or duty by reason of his Recusancy not paid satisfied or discharged that in every such Case the same two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession until the residue or remainder of the said debt or duty be thereby or otherwise paid satisfied or discharged And that his Majesty his Heirs or Successors shall not seize or extend any third part descending to any such heirs or any part thereof either by reason of the Recusancy of his or her Ancestors or the Recusancy of any such heir What seizure is here meant Where any seizure shall be had That is a seizure upon either a Judgment against the Recusant by Indictment on the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 29 Eliz 6 or on Indictment and Conviction by Proclamation and default of appearance according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. For the seizure of two parts of the Recusants Lands was given the King by 29. upon default of payment of the Twenty pounds per month in either of those Cases as hath been said for which see that Statute Sect. 4. Go towards the satisfaction and payment of the Twenty pounds Stat. 29 Eliz 6 altered Hereby a principal branch of the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. is altered For whereas by 29. the Queen might for non-payment of the forfeiture have seized two parts of a convicted Recusants Lands nomine poenae and as a gage or penalty until the Twenty pounds per month had been paid and yet the profits should not have gone towards the satisfaction of the said Twenty pounds per month This Statute was made for the ease and benefit of the Recusant in that point The two parts satisfactory of the penalty so that now if two parts of his Lands be seized for default of payment of the forfeiture the profits received to the Kings use shall go towards satisfaction thereof and when the forfeiture is paid out of the profits the Recusant shall have his Land again unless in such Case where the King by force of the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. makes his Election and seizes two parts in
lieu of the Twenty pounds per month And therefore the Resolution or Judgment said to be given in the Case of one Gray Anno 1. or 2. Jac. and cited in Beckets Case 8 Jac. Lane 93. and by Sergeant Bridgman in his Argument of Parker and Webbs Case 16 Jac. Rolles 2. 25. and applied thereunto viz. That if a Recusant convicted fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month the King shall have his Lands as a gage or penalty and the profits shall not go towards satisfaction thereof However it were true as the Law stood upon 29 Eliz. and before the making of this Act of 1 Jac. yet 't is not Law at this day nor could be applicable to either of those Cases of Becket or Parker and Webb which came to be debated long after this Act was made and the Law of 29 Eliz. altered in that point Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 7. Where any such seizure shall be had c. This Relative such takes in both the seizures beforementioned viz. a seizure upon Indictment and Judgment thereupon by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. and a seizure upon Conviction on Proclamation and default according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. And What seizure is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz 1 29 Eliz. â— as in both those Cases the Recusant who fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month shall have the benefit to discount the profits received by the King so the King shall in the like Cases of seizure retain the two parts in his hands after the Recusants death until the residue of the Debt or Duty due and payable to the King be satisfied Where this extends not to Intailed Lands Two parts of the Lands c. of any such Recusant This Clause extends not to Intailed Lands unless where there is a Judgment for the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy And therefore if the Recusant convicted upon Proclamation and default be Tenant in Tail and two parts of his Lands be seized in his Life time for non-payment of the Twenty pounds per month and he die the arrears not being satisfied to the King yet the heir in Tail shall have the Land out of the Kings hands without payment of the arrears For that such Conviction is in the nature of a Verdict only Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment and not of a Judgment as was held in Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1.94 C. 41. And where a Statute gives to the King a seizure or forfeiture of Lands it shall not be intended of Lands in Tail unless it be expresly so appointed by the Statute or by force of some other Statute cooperating therewith In which Case the Intailed Lands may be charged by general words in the Statute which gives the forteiture or seizure An instance whereof we have in the Case of a Recusant Tenant in Tail Indicted Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Convicted and Adjudged upon 23 Eliz. 1. for his Intailed Lands shall remain after his death in the Kings possession until the arrears be satisfied 29 Eliz. 6 33 H. 8. 39 and that by force of 29 Eliz. c. 6. and this Statute cooperating with the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. which charges the Lands of the heir in Tail with debts due to the King upon a Judgment had against the Ancestor Praemunire Stat. 16 R. 2. 5 But otherwise 't is in the Case of a Praemunire upon the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. which saith the Lands and Tenements of the Offender shall be forfeit to the King for there his Intailed Lands shall be forfeit during his life only And the reason is for that general words in an Act of Parliament unless aided by some other Act of Parliament shall never take away the force of the Statute de donis conditionalibus Co. 1. Inst. 130. 391. Co. 11.63 Godbolt 308. Lord Sheffeild and Ratcliffe Treason Stat. 26 H. 8. 13 5 E. 6. 11 And therefore in the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 13. and 5 E. 6. cap. 11. which make Intailed Lands forfeitable for Treason the word inheritance was added any Estate of Inheritance which expresly denotes Lands in Fee Tail as well as Feesimple Now there being neither in this Act or that of 29 Eliz. any express appointment that the two parts of all Lands seized in the Recusants life time wherein he had any Estate of Inheritance shall after his death continue in the Kings possession nor no other Statute which charges the heir in Tail with the forfeiture due to the King upon Conviction by Proclamation and Default the general words here that his Lands Tenements c. shall continue in the Kings possession shall not inforce a construction in prejudice of the Heir in Tail who claims by the Statute de donis conditionalibus but where there is no Judgment the Recusants Fee simple Lands shall after his death satisfie the intent of these Statutes And so was the Law in reference to intailed Lands upon the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. which speaks of the full satisfaction of Arrearages in Case of the death of the Recusant Arrears where to be paid by the Heir in Tail where not And the Arrears were to have been paid by the Heir in Tail only in such Case where there was a Judgment obtained by the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy but not where the Ancestor Tenant in Tail was convicted only upon Proclamation and default for in this last Case the Heir in Tail was not bound by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. because 't is not a Debt by Judgment as that Statute requires Moore 523. C. 691. And thus the Opinion of the two Chief Justices Trin. 43 Eliz. is to be understood for they held That if intailed Lands had been seized for non-payment of the 20 l. per month and the Tenant in Tail had died the issue in Tail should not have had the Land out of the Queens hands before the Debt were satisfied but should have been charged with the said Debt Cro. Eliz. 846. At the end of which Case is added a Dubitatur But yet the Opinion there held stands good if it be intended only of a Conviction of the Ancestor by Judgment upon Trial or Confession and not of a Conviction upon Proclamation and default And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 2. None shall go or send any other to a Seminary c. That all and every person and persons under the Kings Obedience which at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall send or cause to be sent any Child or any other person under their or any of their Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent to enter into or be resident in any Colledge Seminary or House of Iesuits Priests or any other Popish Order
presentment as a profit of the Advowson which is parcel of the Mannor Moore ibid. The Recusant may plead collateral matter Or other defect whatsoever This is meant of defects within the Indictment or other proceedings and not of any collateral matter which the Recusant hath to discharge himself as a Pardon auterfoits convict c. For the Recusant is not hereby disabled to plead such collateral matter but may take advantage thereof Co. 11. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Nor yet is this meant of all defects whatsoever within the Indictment or other proceedings For if there be any defect Defects to the Kings prejudice which apparently tends to the Kings prejudice the Recusant may take advantage of it And therefore in the Case of the Marquess of Winchester who was Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and had Judgment thereupon but ideo capiatur was omitted the Judgment was reversed for that omission Cro. Trin. 14 Car. 504 505. Provided always That if any person or persons Stat. Sect. 14. He that Conforms may avoid an Indictment or other proceedings so Indicted or to be Indicted shall at any time hereafter submit and conform him or her self and become Obedient to the Laws of the Church of England and repair to the Parish Church of his or her most abiding and if there be none such then to the Church next adjoyning to his or her such dwelling and there hear Divine Service according to the true meaning of the Statute in that behalf made and provided and there publickly receive the said Sacrament according to the Laws of this Realm of England now established That then every such person and persons so Indicted shall and may from thenceforth be admitted and allowed to avoid discharge reverse and undo the said Indictment and Indictments and all procéedings thereupon in such manner and form as if this present Act had not beén had nor made Any thing herein contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And forasmuch as it is found by late experience Stat. Sect. 15. That such as go voluntarily out of this Realm of England to serve Forreign Princes States or Potentates are for the most part perverted in their Religion and Loyalty by Iesuits and Fugitives with whom they do there converse Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Subject of this Realm that after the Tenth day of June next coming shall go or pass out of this Realm to serve any Forreign Prince State or Potentate or shall after the said Tenth day of June pass over the Seas He shall take the Oath which goeth out of the Realm to serve another Prince and there shall voluntarily serve any such Forreign Prince State or Potentate not having before his or their going or passing as aforesaid taken the Oath aforesaid before the Officer hereafter appointed shall be a Felon And that if any Gentleman or person of higher degrée or any person or persons which hath born or shall bear any Office or place of Captain Lieutenant or any other place Certain persons to be bound to the King charge or Office in Camp Army or Company of Soldiers or Conducter of Soldiers shall after go or pass voluntarily out of this Realm to serve any such Forreign Prince State or Potentate or shall voluntarily serve any such Prince State or Potentate before that he and they shall become bound by Obligation with two such sureties as shall be allowed of by the Officers which are hereafter by this Act limited to take the same Bond unto our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors in the sum of twenty pounds of currant English money at the least with Condition to the effect following shall be a Felon Subject of this Realm Every Subject of this Realm What is meant by a Subject of this Realm vide postea Sect. 23. Service Shall go or pass out of this Realm to serve The Service mentioned throughout this branch of the Statute is intended of civil or domestick Service as well as Military Co. 3. Inst. 80. and although the later part of it speaks of Officers and Soldiers yet it also speaks there of Gentlemen and persons of higher Degree without pointing at any particular sort of Service so that to serve or go to serve a Forreign Prince c. in any capacity whatsoever without first doing what is here required is Felony by this Act. Felony though the party serve not The passing or going out of this Realm to serve a Forreign Prince c. without taking the Oath or if of that quality entring into Bond is Felony by this Statute although the party be never received into actual Service For the words are in the disjunctive go or pass to serve or voluntarily serve Co. 3. Inst 80. Or intended not to serve Or shall c. pass over the Seas and there shall voluntarily serve So if he pass over the Seas upon some other occasion and not with an intent to serve a Forreign Prince c. yet if when he is there he voluntarily serve him and did not before his departing hence take the Oath and if of that quality enter into such Bond he shall incur the penalty of this Law and suffer as a Felon Co. 3. Inst 81. Bond must be Domino Regi Shall become bound by Obligation c. unto our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty An Obligation made to the Kings use is not sufficient nor will satisfie the intent of the Act but it must be made to the King himself For the Bond must be Domino Regi according to the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. Stat. 33 H. 8. 39 or the Officer who takes it is liable to Imprisonment for taking a Bond contrary to that Statute Wingate therefore tit Crown numb 112. lays a snare for the Officer of the Port when he directs him only to take this Bond to the Kings use And he might have informed himself out of that Statute of 33. and the Statute of 24 H. 8. cap. 8. of the difference between a Bond made to the King and a Bond made to the Kings use Vide Savile 13. C. 33. Shall be a Felon The Offender against any part of this branch of the Statute may have the benefit of his Clergy Clergy Co. 3. Inst 81. Vide postea Sect. 28. The tenor of which Condition followeth viz. Stat. Sect. 16. The Condition of the Bond. That if the within bounden c. shall not any time then after be reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome nor shall enter into or consent unto any practice Plot or Conspiracy whatsoever against the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors or any his and their Estate and Estates Realms or Dominions but shall within convenient time after knowledge thereof had reveal and disclose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors or some of the Lords of his or their Honourable Privy Council all such Practices Plots and
Recusant not Convicted who hath no certain place of aboad as of the Popish Recusant Convicted And the benefit of having Licences from the King or three Privy Counsellors by force of this Act is intended as well to the one as the other although the Convicted only are mentioned in the recital and this will plainly appear first by the following words here which impower the Justices of Peace to grant Licences and expresly extend to all persons confined by vertue of the said Statute that is the Statute of 35 Eliz. now it cannot be presumed that the makers of the Law intended any difference between the persons to be licenced by the King or Privy Counsellors and the persons to be Licensed by the Justices of Peace the only difference being in the manner of granting the Licence the power given to the King or Privy Counsellors being more absolute and not under such precautions as is that which is given to the Justices of Peace For the King or Privy Counsellors may grant a Licence to the Recusant to travel without any particular cause shewn in the Licence or the assent of any other person and without any Oath to be made by the Recusant which the Justices of Peace cannot do And there is no reason to think that the Power here given to the King or Privy Counsellors which in all other particulars is so much more absolute and extensive then that given to the Justices of Peace should be yet less extensive as to the persons to be Licensed Secondly It were absurd to think that the Makers of the Law intended to confer a greater priviledge upon the Recusant convicted whose Offence appears upon Record then to such as are not convicted Et ealis interpretatio in ambiguis semper fienda est ut evitetur inconveniens absurdum But if by such Recusant should be meant only such as are mentioned in the recital viz. those Convicted and not all who are Confined by 35 Eliz. It would follow that the Convicted Recusant who is the more notorious Offender may have a Licence without any cause shewn or Oath made But he who is not Convicted is barred of that priviledge and can apply himself only to the Justices of Peace for a Licence clogged with divers circumstances which are not required in a Licence granted by the King or the three Privy Counsellors Shall not impeach 35 El. 2. Much less shall this Recital of the Statute of 35 Eliz. impeach the express words of that Statute as if no other Popish Recusants were intended to be confined thereby but only such as are Convicted because no other are mentioned in the Recital For the Recital of an Act of Parliament in another Act of Parliament being only by way of Preface or Introduction cannot add to or diminish the Act recited or make it liable to any other construction then what shall naturally flow from the Act it self Vide Co. 4. Inst 331. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 3. Without any other cause to be expressed Here is one difference between a Licence by the King or three of the Privy Counsel Necessary business where requisite to a Licence where not and a Licence by Justices of Peace For by these it ought not to be granted unless the Popish Recusant hath necessary occasions or business But the Kings or Privy Counsellors Licence may be granted in any Case at the Recusants request Seals and Subscription Vnder the Hands and Seals An Indictment was brought upon the Statute of 35 Eliz. 2. for travelling out of the compass of five miles The Recusant pleaded a Licence under the Seals of four Justices of Peace and exception was taken to the Plea For that the Licence ought to have been under their Hands as well as their Seals Cro. Mich. 12 Jac. 352. Maxfeilds Case And this is a good exception for a Licence by Justices of Peace although in Writing is not sufficient without Seals and Subscription both Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. Mucclefields Case Four Justices Peace Of four of the Iustices of Peace And a Licence from less then four will not now serve since the repeal of the aforesaid Branch of 35 Eliz. touching Licences Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 and therefore the Case of Mucclefield Mich. 12 Jac. in Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. is misreported in that particular For there mention is made of a Licence from two Justices of Peace as if no more were then requisite and that Case could not be grounded upon the Proviso in 35 Eliz. which required only two Justices as well for the distance of time being nine years after the Repeal of the said Proviso as for that in the said Case of Mucclefield there is mention of a Licence under the Seals of the Justices of Peace and of the Oath to be taken by the Recusant neither of which was appointed by the said Proviso in 35 Eliz. but by this Statute of 3 Jac. which must therefore necessarily be there intended and not any Statute of 1 Jac. which is another mistake in the Report of that Case Vide the Case and the objections urged against the Licence there in question With the privity and assent in Writing of the Bishop c. the Lieutenant or of any Deputy Lieutenant An Information was brought against a Popish Recusant Convict for removing above five miles from the place of his confinement who pleaded a Licence from four Justices of Peace but the Plea was disallowed saith the Reporter because he did not set forth that the Licence was granted with the privity of the Bishop or Lieutenant Mich. 12 Jac. Moore 836. C. 1127. Mansfields Case Assent of a Deputy Lieutenant sufficient But yet if it had been granted with the assent of any Deputy Lieutenant residing in the County there 's no doubt but it had been good enough The Bishop Lieutenant or Deputy Lieutenant Five persons viz. four to Licence and one to assent who gives his assent must be a distinct person from the Justices of Peace who grant the Licence And therefore if one and the same person be a Justice of Peace and Deputy Lieutenant he cannot Act herein in both Capacities For una persona non potest supplere vicem duarum And if he Sign and Seal the Licence as a Justice of Peace the assent of some other Deputy Lieutenant or of the Bishop or Lieutenant must be had thereto or the Licence is void Cro. Mich. 12 Jac. 352. Maxfields Case Moore 836. C. 1127. Mansfields Case Rolles 1. 108. C. 47. Mucclefields Case And although the Rule be Quando duo jura concurrunt in una persona aequum est ac si essent in diversis yet that Rule holds not in such Cases where distinct persons are necessarily required by the Law Co. 7. 14. Calvins Case and here four persons are necessarily required to grant the Licence and another person to assent to it In Maxfields Case B. R. one exception to the Licence was Licence and
from the last day of this Session of Parliament deemed and remain utterly repealed void and of none effect to all intents and purposes Any thing in the said several Acts or any of them contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 4. The abolishing of Forreign Authority And to the intent that all usurped and Forreign Power and Authority Spiritual and Temporal may for ever be clearly extinguished and never to be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries may it please your Highness That it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal shall at any time after the last day of this Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Iurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries that now be or hereafter shall be but from thenceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other your Highnesses Dominions for ever Any Statute Ordinance Custom Constitutions or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the abrogating the Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate Archbishop of Canterburies concurrent Jurisdiction abrogated all Jurisdiction derived from such Forreigner is abrogated likewise And therefore the concurrent Jurisdiction which the Archbishop of Canterbury is supposed to have in the inferiour Diocesses ought not now to be exercised by him but is utterly taken away by this Act For he had it not as Archbishop but as Legatus natus to the Pope and if continued to be exercised is a meer Usurpation Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case And that also it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 5. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction annexed to the Crown that it may be established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that such Iurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Preheminences Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as by any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Power or Authority hath heretofore béen or may lawfully be exercised or used for the Visitation of the Ecclesiastical State and Persons and for Reformation Order and Correction of the same And of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities shall for ever by Authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 325. calls this an Act of Restitution of the ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical which always belonged of Right to the Crown of England That is a restitution of the exercise of it For in truth this Statute is not introductory of a new Law The Kings ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical but declaratory of the old and annexes not any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of the Kings Jurisdiction By which Laws the King as supream Head hath full and intire Power in all causes Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal For the Ecclesiastical Laws are the Kings Laws as well as the Temporal And the Judges of either of those Laws derive their Authority from him alone Co. 5.8 9. Cawdries Case where are several instances of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction exercised by the Kings of this Realm in several Ages Moore 755. b. 1043. The King is Persona mixta And in this respect the King is said to be Persona mixta and Persona mixta unita cum Sacerdotibus for that he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction 10 H. 7.18 Co. 2.44 Bishop of Winchesters Case Coke 13.17 Case of Modus Decimandi Vid. Co. lib. 6. Praefac ' And supream Ordinary The King is the supream Ordinary and by the ancient Laws of this Realm may without any Act of Parliament make Ordinances and Institutions for the Government of the Clergy and may deprive them if they obey not Moore 755. C. 1043. Cro. Trin. 2. Jac. 37. And if there be a controversie between Spiritual Persons concerning their Jurisdiction the King is Arbitrator and 't is a right of his Crown to distribute to them and to declare their Bounds Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case Laws to be administred distinctly And yet although these Jurisdictions Ecclesiastical and Temporal are both in the King they are not to be confounded For although both Laws are the Kings Laws yet they are to be administred distinctly so that he who hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction derived from the King ought not to usurp upon the temporal Law And the Ecclesiastical Judge who meddles in Temporal Causes or Suits and draws the Interest or Cause of the Subject which ought to be determined by the Common Law ad aliud examen viz. to be decided by the Ecclesiastical Law offends contra Coronam dignitatem Regiam In confounding those Jurisdictions of the King which ought to be kept separate and distinct Prohibition And in such Cases not only a Prohibition lies but the Ecclesiastical Judge if the Cause originally belongs to the Common Law Pramunire and not to the Ecclesiastical Court incurs a Praemunire for depriving the Subject of the benefit of the Common Law which is his Birthright Co. 12.37 38 39 40. Co. 3. Inst 120. And therefore it was Resolved That if a man be excommunicated in the Bishops Court for a matter which belongs to the determination of the Common Law 't is no less than a Praemunire Praemunire And that by force of the word elsewhere in the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Stat. 16 R. 2. 5. If any man pursue in the Court of Rome or elsewhere c. 5 E. 4.6 The King may do what the Pope might by the Canon Law By this and the former Clause which restores to the King the Title and Exercise of the Power of Supream Head of the Church of England and annexes to the Crown all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction heretofore exercised by any Forreigner The King as supream Head may do whatever the Pope might formerly do within this Realm by the Canon Law And upon this ground it was resolved Trin. 39 Eliz. in Hollingworths Case in the Kings-Bench That notwithstanding the Statute of 25 H. 8. cap. 19. Stat. 25 H. 8. 19 which makes the sentence of the Delegates definitive and saith that no further Appeal shall be had yet the King after such definitive Sentence may grant a Commission of Review Commission ad revidendum For that after a definitive Sentence the Pope as supream Head by the Canon Law used to grant a Commission ad revidendum Co. 4. Inst 341. Upon this ground it was likewise resolved in the Case of Grendon versus the Bishop of Lincoln al' That the King with the consent of the Patron and without the Bishop may make an Appropriation Appropriation And in such Case the King doth it Authoritate sua regia
suprema Ecclesiastica qua fungitur for so are the words in the Charter there Plowden 497 498 500. Vide Co. 5. 10. Cawdries Case Co. 11. 10 11. Pridle and Nappers Case And where the King is Patron an Appropriation may be made by him alone Addition to Popham 145. And as he is supream Head and supream Ordinary a Resignation Resignation made to him of a Deanry is as good as if it were made to the Bishop Dyer 12 13 Eliz. 293. Pollard and Walronds Case Plowden 498. Palmer 493. Hayward and Fulchers Case And that your Highness your Heirs and Successors Stat. Sect. 6. The Queen may assign Commissioners to exercise Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Kings or Queens of this Realm shall have full Power and Authority by vertue of this Act by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England to assign name and authorize when and as often as your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall think meet and convenient And for such and so long time as shall please your Highness your Heirs or Successors such person or persons being natural born Subjects to your Highness your Heirs or Successors as your Majesty your Heirs or Successors shall think meet to exercise use occupy and execute under your Highness your Heirs and Successors all manner of Iurisdictions Priviledges and Preheminencies in any wise touching or concerning any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction within these your Realms of England and Ireland or any other your Highnesses Dominions and Countries And to visit reform redress order correct and amend all such Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities whatsoever which by any manner of Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Power Authority or Iurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered redressed corrected restrained or amended to the pleasure of Almighty God the increase of Virtue and the conservation of the Peace and Vnity of this Realm And that such person or persons so to be named assigned authorized and appointed by your Highness your Heirs or Successors after the said Letters Patents to him or them made and delivered as is aforesaid shall have full Power and Authority by virtue of this Act and of the said Letters Patents under your Highness your Heirs or Successors to exercise use and execute all the premisses according to the tenor and effect of the said Letters Patents Any matter or cause to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding High Commission Court The Jurisdiction and Authority here by given to the late Court commonly called the High Commission Court are now taken away by Act of Parliament but the Power here given the Queen to constitute such Commissioners was no more than she had before by ancient Prerogative and the Laws of England For thereby she might have made such an Ecclesiastical Commission if this Act of 1 Eliz. had never been made Co. 5.8 9. Cawdries Case Cro. Trin. 2. Jac. 37. Stat. Who are compellable to take the Oath Ecclesiastical Persons and Officers Judge Justice Mayor Temporal Officer He that hath the Queens Fee And for the better observation and maintenance of this Act may it please your Highness That it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every Archbishop Bishop and all and every other Ecclesiastical person and other Ecclesiastical Officer and Minister of what Estate Dignity Preheminence or Degree soever he or they be or shall be and all and every temporal Iudge Iustice Mayor and other Lay or Temporal Officer and Minister and every other person having your Highnesses Fees or Wages within this Realm or any your Highnesses Dominions shall make take and receive a corporal Oath upon the Evangelist before such person or persons as shall please your Highness your Heirs or Successors under the Great Seal of England to assign and name to accept and to take the same according to the tenor and effect hereafter following that is to say I A. B. do utterly testifie and declare in my Conscience The Oath for the Queens Supremacy That the Queens Highness is the only Supream Governour of this Realm and of all other Her Highness Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal And that no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all Forreign Jurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Queens Highness her Heirs and lawful Successors and to my Power shall assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the Queens Highness her Heirs and Successors or united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm So help me God and by the Contents of this Book And that it may also be Enacted The penalty for refusing the Oath That if any such Archbishop Bishop or other Ecclesiastical Officer or Minister or any of the said Temporal Iudges Iusticiaries or other Lay-Officer or Minister shall peremptorily or obstinately refuse to take or receive the said Oath That then he so refusing shall forfeit and lose only during his life all and every Ecclesiastical and Spiritual Promotion Benefice and Office and every Temporal and Lay-Promotion and Office which he hath solely at the time of such refusal made And that the whole Title Interest and Incumdency in every such Promotion Benefice and other Office as against such person only so refusing during his life shall clearly cease and be void as though the party so refusing were dead And that also all and every such person and persons so refusing to take the said Oath shall immediately after such refusal be from thenceforth during his life disabled to retain or exercise any Office or other Promotion which he at the time of such refusal hath joyntly or in Common with any other person or persons And that all and every person and persons that at any time hereafter shall be preferred promoted or collated to any Archbishoprick or Bishoprick or to any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Benefice Promotion Dignity or Office or Ministry or that shall be by your Highness your Heirs or Successors preferred or promoted to any Temporal or Lay-Office Ministry or Service within this Realm or in any your Highness Dominions before he or they shall take upon him or them to receive use exercise supply or occupy any such Archbishoprick Bishoprick Promotion Dignity Office Ministry or Service shall likewise make take and receive the said Corporal Oath before mentioned upon the Evangelist before such persons as have or shall have Authority to admit any such person to any such Office Ministry or Service or else before such person or persons as by your Highness your Heirs or Successors by Commission under the Great Seal of England shall be named assigned or appointed to minister the
Ministers and Priests whatsoever For 't is held in our Law that as he is Sacerdos he ought and is bound jure divino celebrare Coenam Dominicam dictae Coenae orationes c. And if he be indicted upon this Statute with the addition of Clericus that word implies him to be a Priest or Minister within the meaning thereof Dyer 3. Eliz. 203. Note That by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. Stat. 14 Car. 2. This and all other Laws which were then in force for the Uniformity of Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments within the Realm of England are now applicable to the Book of Common Prayer Book of Common Prayer authorized by that Act of 14 Car. and are to be put in ure with relation to the said Book Wilfully or obstinately standing in the same These words wilfully or obstinately standing in the same seem to restrain the Law to such other Prayers as are used in hindrance of or opposition to the Common Prayer or after admonition or warning to the contrary Prayers in the Pulpit and therefore the Prayers used in the Pulpit before Sermon seem not to be within the meaning of this Law nor to be forbidden by it because generally tolerated by those in Authority and so not obstinately used And were those words wanting although the words of the Statute are general any other form or open Prayers yet they ought to have a particular construction according to reason and the intent of the makers of the Law viz. That no Minister shall use any other form to the hindrance of or in opposition to this For a penal Law shall not always be construed according to the words of it but according to the intent of the makers of it Plowden 18. Fogassa's Case Ib. 465 466 467. Eyston versus Studd Ibib. 109 110. Fulmerston versus Stewarde And the words of a Law may be infringed and yet the Law it self may not be infringed unless the intent be likewise Plowden 18. which intent shall never be construed to be against reason For many things are excepted out of Statutes by the Law of reason which yet are not excepted by express words Plowden 13. Fogassa's Case And 't is a general Rule to be allowed in construction of Statute Laws Quamvis Lex-generaliter loquitur restringenda tamen est ut cessante ratione ipsa cesset cum enim ratio sit anima vigorque ipsius Legis non videtur Legislator id sensisse quod ratione careat etiamsi verborum generalitas aliter suadeat Co. 4. Inst 330 331. Stat. Sect. 3. The penalty for the second Offence And if any such person once convict of any Offence concerning the premisses shall after this first conviction eftsoons offend and be thereof in form aforesaid lawfully convict that then the same person shall for his second offence suffer imprisonment by the space of one whole year and also shall therefore be deprived ipso facto of all his spiritual Promotions and that it shall be lawful to all Patrons or Donors of all and singular the same spiritual Promotions or of any of them to present or collate to the same as though the person or persons so offending were dead The penalty for the third Offence And that if any such person and persons after he shall be twice convicted in form aforesaid shall offend against any of the premisses the third time and shall be thereof in form aforesaid lawfully convicted that then the person so offending and convicted the third time shall be deprived ipso facto of all his spiritual Promotions and also shall suffer Imprisonment during his Life Where the second Indictment must mention the first conviction where not For his second Offence One is Indicted upon this Statute for administring Baptism in other form than is thereby prescribed And is convicted and afterwards he is again indicted for the like Offence By the Opinion of Clench Justice B. R. the second Indictment must mention the first Conviction or the Judgment cannot be for the second Offence viz. Imprisonment for a year and deprivation But Wray Chief Justice held That if both Indictments were before the same Justices they are to take notice of the first Conviction although it be not mentioned in the second Indictment and ought to give Judgment accordingly But if the second Indictment be taken by other Justices then without mention therein of the first Conviction they cannot give Judgment for the second Offence Leonard 1. 295. C. 403. The Benefice void without any Sentence To present or collate c. If the Offender against this Branch of the Act be judicially convicted of Record for the second or third Offence It seems that there needs not any Sentence declaratory by the Ecclesiastical Judge but his Benefices or spiritual Promotions are void ipso facto upon such Conviction For although the word void be not here as it is in the Statute of 21 H. 8. Stat. 21 H. 8. 13 13 Eliz. 12. c 13. of Pluralities And of 13 Eliz. cap. 12. about reading the 39 Articles Upon which Statutes 't is resolved that a Sentence declaratory is not necessary but that the Benefice is actually void without it Co. 4. 75. Hollands Case Co. 4. 79. Digbies Case Co. 6. 29. Greens Case yet the words here that the Patron may present or collate as if the person so offending were dead are tantamount and of as large an extent as if it had been said that his spiritual Promotions should be void And therefore if a Parson be convicted for the second or third Offence against this Statute and after such Conviction sues the Parishioners for Tythes it s a good plea to say that he stands convicted c. For he is thereby no longer Parson nor can sue for the Tythes no more than if he neglected to read the 39 Articles And that he is disabled in this last Case was adjudged Trin. 30 Eliz. in a Prohibition inter Morrice Eaton Vide Leonard 2. 212. C. 267. Wiggen and Arscotts Case nor will the Kings Pardon The Kings Pardon help or restore an Offender against this Act after the second or third Conviction no more than it will him who neglects to read the 39 Articles Vide Cro. Trin. 41 Eliz. 679 680. Baker versus Brent Robinson The Patron must at his peril take notice of a Conviction of the Incumbent upon this Statute Notice to the Patron not necessary For if he present not within six months after a Lapse will incur against him although no notice be given him For all men at their perils ought to take notice of an Act of Parliament to which every one is party 39 E. 3. 7. Bishop of Chichesters Case Dyer 7 Eliz. 237. Co. Hollands Case and Digbies Case supra In which three last Cases it was held That no notice to the Patron is necessary upon an avoidance by the Statute of 21 H. 8. of Pluralities Vide Termes de la
Contents thereof or secretly deliver out such Books to others he knowing the Contents thereof unless in this last Case he be a Trader in them and deliver them out upon that Account without any act or attribution by conference or allowance he is an Offender within this Act by the words Hold and stand with to maintain c. and so is the receiver likewise if he afterwards Reads and Confers upon any such Book with any other person and in his Conference by any Words or Speeches allows the Book to be good or conveys it secretly to his Friend to the intent he should Read it and be perswaded to be of that Opinion or if a man hear of the Contents of such Book by the report of others and doth by any overt Speech commend or affirm it to be good In all these Cases the Person so doing especially he that reads it and then allows of it is an Offender within this Act and shall for the first Offence incur a Praemunire and for the second be Guilty of high Treason So likewise if any Book to that effect be made and Written within the Realm and sent over Seas as if it were made out of the Realm and be afterwards Bought Read or Conference be had thereupon ut supra such Offences are within the danger of this Law Dyer 11 El. 281. 282. vide Co. l. 6. Praefat ' Vpon purpose and to the intent The intent material A. was Indicted upon this Statute and that of 13 Eliz. cap. 2. of a Praemunire for aiding one B. knowing him to be a principal maintainer of the Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop and See of Rome contra formam Statut ' praedict ' and the Indictment was certified into the Kings Bench And it was held by the greater part of the Justices that the Indictment was insufficient for want of those words Vpon purpose and to the intent to set forth and extol the Authority c. And contra formam Statut ' will not supply that defect Trin. 20 Eliz. Dyer 363. Note in the Report of this Case the Statute of 1 Eliz. is mistaken for this of 5 Eliz. there being no mention of the intent in that of Primo Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. The intent is a hidden thing and lies in the Heart and therefore there must be some overt Act or Speech which declares the intent for the intent it self is not traversable What traversable but that by which it is made manifest as was adjudged in Boothes Case Co. 5. 77. And it is also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. That as well Iustices of Assize in their Circuits as Iustices of Peace within Sect. 3 the limits of their Commission and Authorities What Justices may inquire of and certifie the Offences aforesaid or two of every such Iustices of Peace at the least whereof one to be of the Quorum shall have full Power and Authority by vertue of this Act in their Quarter or open Sessions to inquire of all Offences Contempts and Transgressions perpetrated committed or done contrary to the true meaning of the Premises in like manner and form as they may of other Offences against the Quéens Peace and shall certifie every Presentment before them or any of them had or made concerning the same or any part thereof before the Queén her Heirs and Successors in her or their Court commonly called the Kings Bench within forty days next after any such Presentment had or made if the Term be then open and if not at the first day of the full Term next following the said forty days upon pain that every of the Iustices of Assize or Iustices of the Peace The Penalty for default of Certificate of the said Offences before whom such Presentment shall be made making default of such Certificate contrary to this Statute to lose and forfeit for every such default One hundred pounds to the Quéens Highness her Heirs and Successors And it is Enacted by the Authority aforesaid The Justices of the Kings Bench may hear and determine the Offences aforesaid That the Iustices of the Kings Bench as well upon every such Certificate as by enquiry before themselves within the limits of their Authorities shall have full Power and Authority to hear order and determine every such Offence done or committed contrary to the true meaning of this present Act according to the Laws of this Realm in such like manner and form to all intents and purposes as if the Person or Persons against whom any Presentment shall be had upon this Estatute had beén Presented upon any matter of offence expressed in the said Estatute made in the said Sixteenth year of King Richard the Second All Offences c. contrary to the true meaning of the Premises That is the Offences in holding or standing with to extol c. the Jurisdiction of the See or Bishop of Rome or attributing such Jurisdiction c. or Procuring Counselling c. which is here for the first Offence made a Praemunire For these are the only Premises in the Act and this Clause extends not to the Oath of Supremacy or any Offence in refusing of it much less to all Offences against this Act as 't is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 11. Nor doth it seem to be the intent of the Statute to give the Justices of Peace any Power to inquire of any Offence made High Treason thereby The Power of Justices of Peace herein For the Power here given to the Justices of Peace is only to inquire of Offences contrary to the true meaning of the Premises and the Premises extend only to those Offences made a Praemunire And this clearly appears by the subsequent words viz. That the Presentment thereof shall be certified into the Kings Bench who shall hear and determine every such Offence as if the Offender had been Presented upon any matter in the Statute of 16 R. 2. Now that cannot be intended of High Treason And of Justices of Assize The like may be said of Justices of Assize for as they are meerly Justices of Assize they cannot by force of this Act inquire of either the first or second Offence in refusing the Oath of Supremacy nor of the second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority only for the first Offence of this last kind they may inquire and take Indictments thereof and certifie them into the Kings Bench but then by their Commission of Oyer and Terminer they may not only inquire of the first or second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority or refusing the Oath of Supremacy but may hear and determine them And accordingly were Slade and Bodye Indicted Arraigned and Tried in the County of Southampton of a Praemunire for the first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority upon which they were Attainted and afterwards of Treason for the second Offence before Sir Roger Manwood and Justice
Inst 34. Which Iury shall or may c. proceed to Indict Who to Indict him So that the Jury is to Indict and not the Sheriff as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 11. And for stronger defence and maintenance of this Act Stat. Sect. 8. It shall be Treason the second time to maintain the Authority of the Bishop or See of Rome it is further Ordained Enacted and Established by the Authority aforesaid That if any such Offender or Offenders as is aforesaid of the first part or Branch of this Estatute that is to say by Writing Cyphering Printing Preaching or Teaching Deed or Act Advisedly and Wittingly hold or stand with to extol set forth maintain or defend the Authority Iurisdiction or Power of the Bishop of Rome or of his See heretofore claimed used or usurped within this Realm or in any Dominion or Country being of within or under the Queens Power or Obeysance or by any Speech open Deed or Act Advisedly and Wittingly attribute any such manner of Iurisdiction Authority or Preheminence to the said See of Rome or to any Bishop of the same See for the time being within this Realm or in any the Queens Dominions or Countries or be to any such Offender or offenders Abetting Procuring or Counselling or Aiding Assisting or Comforting upon purpose and to the intent to set forth further and extol the said usurped Power Authority or Iurisdiction After such Conviction and Attainder as is aforesaid do eftsoons commit or do the said Offences or any of them in manner and form aforesaid and be thereof duly convicted and attainted as is aforesaid Or to refuse the Oath And also that if any the persons abovenamed and appointed by this Act to take the Oath aforesaid do after the space of thrée months next after the first tender thereof the second time refuse to take and pronounce or do not take or pronounce the same in form aforesaid to be tendred that then every such Offender or Offenders for the same second Offence and Offences shall forfeit lose and suffer such like and the same pains forfeitures Iudgment and Execution as is used in Cases of High Treason What is an advised or witting maintenance Advisedly and wittingly Slade and Body were condemned in a Praemunire upon this Statute before Justices of Oyer and Terminer for extolling the Authority of the Bishop of Rome and remained in Prison for the space of two years and afterwards were brought to the Assizes and demanded whether they were still of the same Opinion To which they answered that they were and one of them said that if they had a thousand Lives they would lose them all in this Case upon which they were Indicted and Arraigned and Convicted upon this second Branch of the Statute for High Treason And it was Resolved by the greater part of the Justices that the words should be taken to be spoken Advisedly and Wittingly and were within the meaning of this second Branch Savile 46. 47. C. 99. Tender and refusal For tender and refusal Vide Stat. 7. Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 4. 5. postea Stat. Sect. 9. Provided always That this Act nor any thing therein contained nor any Attainder to be had by force and vertue of this Act shall not extend to make any corruption of Blood the disheriting of any Heir forfeiture of Dower No corruption of Blood disheriting of Heir or forfeiture of Dower for any Attainder by this Act nor to the prejudice of the Right or Title of any person or persons other then the Right or Title of the Offender or Offenders during his her or their natural Lives only And that it shall and maybe lawful to every person and persons to whom the Right or Interest of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments after the death of any such Offender or Offenders should or might have appertained if no such Attainder had been to enter into the same without any Ouster le maine to be sued in such sort as he or they might have done if this Act had never been had ne made Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act How the Oath expressed An. 1. Eliz. 1. shall be expounded made in the said first year shall be taken and expounded in such form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queens Majesties Injunctions published in the first year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledge in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority then that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said admonition more plainly may appear And be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid In what Courts and places this Act shall be published That this Act shall be openly Read and Published and Declared at every Quarter Sessions by the Clerk of the Peace and at every Leet and Law-day by the Steward of the Court and once in every Term in the open Hall of every House and Houses of Court and Chancery at the times and by the persons thereunto to be limited and appointed by the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seal for the time being And be it further Enacted Stat. Sect. 10. Every Knight Citizen and Burgess of the Parliament shall take the said Oath That every person which hereafter shall be Elected or appointed a Knight Citizen or Burgess or Baron for any of the five Ports for any Parliament or Parliaments hereafter to be holden shall from henceforth before he shall enter into the Parliament House or have any Voice there openly receive and pronounce the said Oath before the Lord Steward for the time being or his Deputy or Deputies for that time to be appointed And that he which shall enter into the Parliament House without taking the said Oath shall be deemed no Knight Citizen Burgess nor Baron for that Parliament nor shall have any Voice but shall be to all intents constructions and purposes as if he had never been Returned nor Elected Knight Citizen Burgess or Baron for that Parliament and shall suffer such pains and penalties as if he had presumed to sit in the same without Election Return or Authority The Kings dispensation void The King cannot dispence with any Member of the Commons House from taking this Oath For the reason given by the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan in the Case of Thomas and Sorrell touching the Oath of Allegiance holds here viz. Because by this Statute he is persona inhabilis until he hath taken it Vaughan 355. Stat. Sect. 11. Where no temporal person of or above the degree of a Baron shall be compelled to take the said Oath Provided alway That forasmuch as the Quéens Majesty is otherwise sufficiently assured of the Faith and Loyalty of the Temporal Lords of her High Court of Parliament Therefore this Act nor any thing therein contained shall
persons authorized or claiming Authority by or from the said Bishop or Seé of Rome to Consecrate or Hallow the same which said Agnus Dei is used to be specially Hallowed and Consecrated as it is termed by the said Bishop in his own person and the said Crosses Pictures Beads and such like superstitious things been also hallowed either by the same Bishop or by others having power or pretending to have power from him or his said Sée and divers Pardons Immunities and Exemptions granted by the Authority of the said Sée to such as shall receive and use the same and that if the same person or persons so bringing in as is aforesaid such Agnus Dei and other like things as have been before specified shall deliver or cause or offer to be delivered the same or any of them to any Subject of this Realm or of any the Dominions of the same to be worn or used in any wise that then as well the same person and persons so doing as also all and every other person or persons which shall receive and take the same to the intent to use or wear the same being thereof lawfully Convicted and Attainted by the order of the Common Laws of this Realm shall incur into the dangers penalties pains and forfeitures ordained and provided by the Statute of Praemunire and Provision made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Bringers in offerers and deliverers And that if the same Person or Persons so bringing in A man brings into the Kings Dominions such Agnus Dei or other like superstitious things and another offers or delivers them It seems that neither he that brings them in nor he that offers or delivers them is within this Act or liable to the penalty for by the express words it must be the same person So that neither the bringer in unless he offer or deliver them or cause them to be delivered nor he who delivers them or causeth or offereth them to be delivered unless he be the person who brought them in is an Offender within the Act. To whom an Agnus Dei c. may not be offered or delivered To any Subject of this Realm c. The offer or delivery of such Agnus Dei or other superstitious thing to any sort of person is not an offence within this Act as Wingate supposes it to be tit Crown Numb 37. But to make it an Offence it must be delivered or offered to a Subject of this Realm or of the Dominions of the same The intent material To be worn or used c. to the intent to use or wear the same The Intent is material in this Case an◠therefore If a man be Indicted upon this Statute for bringing in and offering or delivering such Agnus Dei c. or receiving the same the intent must be mentioned in the Indictment as it must be in Indictments upon all Statutes where the intent as here is made part of the offence So in an Indictment upon the Statute of 5 E. 6. cap. 4. Stat. 5 E. 6. 4. it is not enough to say the party drew his Dagger in the Church against J. S. but it must be averred that he did it with an intent to strike him as was Resolved by the Court of Kings-Bench Trin. 33 Eliz. in Penhalls Case Leonard 4. 49. C. 127. It seems by the words of this Statute that to make the Receiver of such superstitious things an offender within it there must be a concurrence of intentions for the using or wearing them both in the giver and receiver And that therefore if a person coming from beyond the Seas brings into this Realm any such superstitious things but with no intent that they should be worn or used and gives them to his friend at his request who receives them with an intent to wear or use them this is penal to neither Not to the giver for he had no superstitious intent and the intent is material nor to the receiver for that the offering or delivering them to be worn or used is expresly made in the Statute a condition precedent to the obliquity of the fact in receiving them for the Statute saith Then as well the person so doing as also every other person receiving them to that intent shall incur a Praemunire So that then only when the person delivering them so doth that is delivers them to be worn or used the person receiving them to that intent shall incur a Praemunire But yet there needs not any such concurrence of intentions in the giver and receiver to make the giver an offender And therefore if a man brings into the Realm such superstitious things and delivers them to be worn or used though the party receive them not to the intent to use or wear them but defaces burns or otherwise destroies them yet he that gave or delivered them incurs a Praemunire for the words in the Act relating to the Offerer or Deliverer are intire in themselves and have no dependance on the subsequent words relating to the receiver but generally make all Offenders who bring them in and either offer or deliver them to a superstitious intent without any respect to the intent of the party who receives or is offered them Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 7. Apprehending an Offender or disclosing his name and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons to whom any such Agnus Dei or other the things aforesaid shall be tendered and offered to be delivered shall apprehend the party so offering the same and bring him to the next Iustice of Peace of that Shire where such tender shall be made if he shall be of power and able so to do or for lack of such ability shall within the space of three days next after such offer made as is aforesaid disclose the name or names of such person or persons as so shall make the same offer and the dwelling place or place of resort of the same person or persons which he shall indeavor himself to know by all the ways and means he can to the Ordinary of that Diocess or to any Iustice of Peace of that Shire where such person or persons to whom such offer shall be made as is aforesaid shall be resiant And also Delivering of Agnus Dei received to the Ordinary or a Justice of Peace if such person or persons to whom such offer shall be made shall happen to receive any such Agnus Dei or other thing above remembred and shall within the space of one day next after such receipt deliver the same to any Iustice of Peace within the same Shire where the party so receiving shall be then resiant or shall happen to be That then every such person or persons doing any the Acts or things in this Proviso above mentioned in forme above declared shall not by force of this Statute incur any danger or penalty appointed by this Statute or
had never béen had nor made Any thing herein contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding Stat. xxiii Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience WHere sithence the Statute made in the thirteénth year of the Reign of the Queén our Soveraign Lady Entituled Stat. Sect. 1. An Act against the bringing in and putting in Execution of Bulls Writings and Instruments and other Superstitious things from the See of Rome divers evil affected persons have practised contrary to the meaning of the said Statute by other means than by Bulls or Instruments Written or Printed to withdraw divers the Queéns Majesties Subjects from their natural Obedience to her Majesty and to obey the said usurped Authority of Rome and in respect of the same to perswade great numbers to withdraw their due Obedience to her Majesties Laws established for the due Service of Almighty God For Reformation whereof Stat. Sect. 2. Treason to withdraw any from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion and to declare the true meaning of the said Law Be it declared and enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That all persons whatsoever which have or shall have or shall pretend to have power or shall by any ways or means put in practice to absolve perswade or withdraw any of the Queéns Majesties Subjects or any within her Highnesses Realms and Dominions from their natural Obedience to her Majesty or to withdraw them for that intent from the Religion now by her Highnesses Authority established within her Highnesses Dominions to the Romish Religion or to move them or any of them to promise any Obedience to any pretended Authority of the Seé of Rome or of any other Prince State or Potentate to be had or used within her Dominions or shall do any overt act to that intent or purpose and every of them shall be to all intents adjudged to be Traytors And being thereof lawfully convicted shall have Iudgment suffer and forfeit as in case of High Treason And if any person shall after the end of this Session of Parliament by any means be willingly absolved or withdrawn as aforesaid or willingly be reconciled It shall be Treason to be reconciled or withdrawn to the Romish Religion or shall promise any Obedience to any such pretended Authority Prince State or Potentate as is aforesaid that then every such person their Procurers and Counsellors thereunto being thereof lawfully convicted shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as in Cases of High Treason Perswade or withdraw It was held in Lovett and Faulkners Case Mich. 12. Jac. B. R. That if a man were Indicted for endeavouring and practising voluntarie felonice proditorie to perswade and withdraw any of the Kings Subjects from his Obedience unto the Romish Religion and was afterwards debito modo acquietatus yet an Action upon the Case in nature of a Conspiracy would not lye against the party who procured him to be Indicted Cro. Mich. 12. Jac. 357 358. Rolls 1. 209. C. 49. Bulstrode 2. 271. and the main reason given was That forasmuch as every man is bound to discover Treason and 't is dangerous to conceal any thing which may tend to Treason therefore the procuring one to be Indicted concerning it was no Cause of Action And in that Case Coke Chief Justice said That such an Action was never before that time brought But later Resolutions have been to the contrary of this Opinion Action lies for indicting a man of High Treason And 't is held for Law at this day That if a man procures another to be Indicted of High Treason an Action upon the Case in nature of Conspiracy lies against him that procures it as well as if it were for Felony The first leading Case of this nature which was resolved upon any solemn argument or debate was that of Smith versus Cranshaw or Crashaw and others where it was adjudged upon great deliberation by all the Four Judges of the Court of Kings Bench Hill 1. Car. 1. That an Action in nature of a Conspiracy doth well lye in such Case and that not only in Case of Acquittal upon Trial but upon the exhibiting a Bill of Indictment for High Treason to the Court or Jury if the Jury bring in Ignoramus although in this last Case a Writ of Conspiracy lyeth not And Lovett and Faulkners Case was denied to be Law Addition to Bendloes 152. Latch 79 80. Jones 93 94 95. And Justice Dodderidge who concurred in Opinion with the other Judges in the Case of Lovett and Faulkner changed his Opinion in that of Smith and Cranshaw and held that the Action was maintainable Bulstrode 2. 271 272. so that whosoever of meer malice without probable cause causes any person to be Indicted upon this Statute Stat. 3. Jac. 4. or that of 3 Jac. cap. 4. for endeavouring or practising so to perswade or withdraw any Subject or prefers a Bill to the Court or Jury for that purpose is liable to an Action of the Case for so doing if the party be acquitted or the Jury bring in Ignoramus as in other Cases of Felony Any of the Queens Majesties Subjects Queens Subjects Stat. 3 Jac. 4. What is meant by the Queens Subjects Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 19. And be it likewise Enacted and declared Stat. Sect. 3. The penalty of aiders maintainers and concealers That all and every person and persons that shall wittingly be aiders or maintainers of such persons so offending as is above expressed or of any of them knowing the same or which shall conceal any offence aforesaid and shall not within twenty days at the furthest after such persons knowledge of such offence disclose the same to some Iustice of Peace or other higher Officer shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as Offenders in misprision of Treason These words And shall not within twenty days Aiders or maintainers punishable though discoverers c. disclose the same have no reference to those who are aiders or maintainers of the Offender but only to those who have barely a knowledge of the Offence without aiding or maintaining the party And therefore if such as are aiders or maintainers of the person offending discover the offence within twenty days yet such discovery shall not free them from the guilt of misprision of Treason as Wingate mistakes in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 42. but if they once aid or maintain the party knowing him to be an Offender they are guilty whether they disclose or conceal the offence and shall have no benefit of the twenty days And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 4. The forfeiture for saying or hearing of Mass That every person which shall say or sing Mass being thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit the sum of Two hundred Marks and be commited to Prison in the next Goal there to remain by the space of
Recusant was absent from Church from the 10 of September 15 Jac. unto the 9 of Sept. 16. Jac. and demanded Two hundred and twenty pounds for eleven monthes upon non culp pleaded it was found against the Defendant And it was resolved that although the Informer had demanded less then by his own shewing was due for the time mentioned in the Information was thirteen months compleat except one day yet the Information was well enough For the Recovery shall be intended to be for the eleven months when the Recusant was first absent and the addition of more time is not material Cro. Pasch 17 Jac. 529. 530. Rolles 2. 90. Parker versus Sir John Curson and his Wife And this is not like the Case of Bawderock versus Mackaller where the Informer Qui tam c. upon the Statute of Symony demanded less than the penalty and the Court seemed to be of Opinion that although it was good enough for the King notwithstanding that misprision yet it was not so for the Informer and compared it to the Case of Agard and Candish where an Information was brought upon the Statute of Liveries after the year and it was Adjudged to be good for the King but not for the Informer Cro. Mich. 9. Car. 331. For upon the Statute of Symony which gives one intire penalty for the offence if less be demanded the Statute is not pursued And there is a clear variance between that and the Information But in the Case of Recusancy when he demands Two hundred pound for eleven moneths the Statute is pursued and though it appears by the Information that the Recusant was absent for a longer time yet the Informer is at liberty whether he will demand the penalty for his absence during that supernumerary time The Informer demands for 13 months and the Jury find for 12. If it be shewed in the Information that the Recusant was absent from Church from a day certain to a day certain which in all makes 13 months and the penalty is demanded for that time and the Jury find the party guilty for 12 months It hath been held by some that the Verdict shall be good for 12 months But whether for the first 12 months is a question For in Sir J. Cursons Case supra the demand was but for 11 months And when the Jury finds the Defendant guilty it shall be intended to be for the 11 months for which the penalty is demanded and that shall be accounted from the 10 of September which was the first day of absence alledged in the Information and the rest of the time to the ninth of September following after the first eleven months is to be accounted as Surplusage But in this Case where the Jury abridges the time for which the penalty is demanded it may be questioned whether the Verdict shall be intended to be for the first twelve months of the thirteen And the Judges of the Kings Bench to salve a question of the like nature in an Information brought by Donner against Smith upon the Statute of Liveries seemed to be of Opinion That it is not material which were the twelve months wherein the party offended Cro. Trin. 43 Eliz. 835. But if that Opinion be Law it must follow that the party can never be punished for the thirteenth month but that must be remitted to him because it 's left uncertain which of the thirteen shall be accounted the month not found by the Jury And it rather seems for this reason That the Verdict is void for the uncertainty which twelve months of the thirteen the party offended unless it shall be intended of the first twelve Mr. Shephard in his Sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. raises this Question viz. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2. This Statute having reference to that of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. which saith every one shall come to Church every Sunday and Holy-day whether he that is not at Church every Holy-day doth not rigore juris forfeit 20 l. a month by force of this Statute of 23. But this Question seems altogether needless The forbearance from Church must be for a whole month or no forfeiture of 20 l. For 't is clear by the express words here that it must be a forbearance from Church contrary to 1 Eliz. for a whole month together that makes the party liable to the forfeiture of 20 l. and if he comes to Church on any Sunday or Holy-day within the month he is freed from the penalty of 20 l. although not from the twelve pence by 1 Eliz. for the days of his absence if he comes not every Sunday and Holy-day both Be bound Some have made a question Recusants where to be bound to the good behaviour and among them Mr. Shephard in his Sure Guide cap. 6. Sect. 5. by whom or in what Court the Recusant shall be bound to the good behaviour by force of this Statute For that the Court is not expresly mentioned And Wingate in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 44. hath stumbled upon a Conceit That after Certificate made into the Kings Bench a Justice of Assize Goal delivery or Peace shall bind the party to the good behaviour and misrecites the Statute accordingly But it seems That the intention of the Law-makers was that he should be bound in the Kings Bench and of that Opinion is Dalton V. cap. 75. title Good Behaviour For where any proceedings are appointed to be upon or after a Certificate sent to any Court there by common Intendment the proceedings are to be in that Court to whom the Certificate is sent if no other Court be named And it cannot be presumed by any reasonable construction of this Act That the Certificate into the Kings Bench is to any other end than for the Justices there to proceed in such manner as the Act directs to be done after such Certificate as no question they may in this Case as well as upon Certificate of a Presentment or of refusal of the Oath of Supremacy against the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 5 Eliz. 1. quod vide supra And 't is a rule in construction of Statutes that where the intention plainly appears the Law ought to be advanced according to its end though the words be short and imperfect especially Laws made for Religion as is held in Colt and Glovers Case Hobart 157. and Magdalen Colledge Case Co. 11. Vide Bulstrode 2. 155. the Case of Griffith and others Popish Recusants convict not sufficient sureties Sufficient sureties Popish Recusants convicted are not to be reputed sufficient sureties and therefore were refused by the Court of Kings Bench in the Case of Griffith and other Recusants who were brought thither to be bound to their good Behaviour Bulstrode 2. 155. And be it further Enacted That if any person or persons body Politick or Corporate Stat. Sect. 6. The forfeiture for keeping of a Schoolmaster not repairing to Church or allowed by the Ordinary after
the Feast of Pentecost next coming shall kéep or maintain any School-master which shall not repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed by the Bishop or Ordinary of the Diocess where such School-master shall be so kept shall forfeit and lose for every month so kéeping him ten pounds Provided That no such Ordinary or their Ministers shall take any thing for the said allowance The penalty on such School-master And such School-master or Teacher presuming to teach contrary to this Act and being thereof lawfully convict shall be disabled to be a Teacher of youth and shall suffer Imprisonment without Bail or Mainprize for one year Any School-master An Usher Usher or Assistant in teaching is a Master in the School and seemeth to be included within the word School-master And the following words here or Teacher explain who is intended viz. every Teacher of Youth A School-master conforms or is licensed either of them sufficient Stat. 1 Jac. 4. 14 Car. 2. What he must do by Stat. 14 Car. 2. Repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed This Clause being in the dis-junctive It seems That although a School-master doth not come to Church yet if he be licensed by the Bishop or Ordinary it shall excuse the penalty And this is not altered in that particular either by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 9. quod vide postea nor by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. But then he must by that of 14 Car. 2. among other things for which Vide the Statute at large subscribe a Declaration or Acknowledgment that he will conform to the Liturgie of the Church of England as it is now by Law Established or he shall for the first Offence suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and for the second and every other Offence shall suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and also forfeit five pounds But if he be licenced and subscribe and do as aforesaid and so cannot be punished by this or either of the other said Acts yet now by the Statute of 17 Car. 2.2 unless he take the Oath there mentioned and frequent Divine Service established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry himself there as in the said Statute is appointed he shall forfeit for every offence 40 l. So that now Conformity in repairing to Church is necessarily required of every such School-master No such Ordinary c. shall take anything Twelve pence for a Licence But now by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. there may be 12 pence taken for such Licence And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 7. What Justices may enquire of Offences done against the Stat. of 1 Eliz. 1. 5 El. 1. 13 El. 2. That all and every Offences against this Act or against the Acts of the first fifth or thirtéenth years of her Majesties Reign touching acknowledging of her Majesties Supream Government in Causes Ecclesiastical or other matters touching the Service of God or coming to Church or Establishment of true Religion in this Realm shall and may be inquirable as well before Iustices of Peace as other Iustices named in the same Statutes within one year and a day after every such Offence committed Any thing in this Act or in any other Act to the contrary notwithstanding Be it likewise Enacted That Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery in their several limits shall have power to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Statute And Iustices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions of Peace shall have power by vertue of this Act to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Act except Treason and misprision of Treason Within one year and a day Where the Indictment of the Offender was to have been within a year and day Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. 5 Eliz. 1. 13 Eliz. 2. This limitation of time extends not to any Offence made Treason by this Act but only to such Offences mentioned in this Act or those of 1 5 and 13 Eliz. as concern the Kings Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical the Service of God coming to Church or Establishment of Religion and for those touching Religion this Statute enlarges the time limited by 1 Eliz. cap. 2. which saith the party must be Indicted the next Sessions or if in a Corporation within fifteen days after Easter or Michaelmas for now he may be Indicted at any time within the year and day In what cases he may be Indicted afterwards But for absolving or withdrawing or for being absolved withdrawn or reconciled which are here made Treason no time is limited for the prosecution but the Offender may be Indicted at any time after the year and day For the latter part of this Clause speaks of those Offences of Treason which the Justices of Peace cannot hear and determine and there no time is limited although there be in the former part for those Offences which are inquirable by Justices of Peace Leonard 1. 238. C. 322. Guilfords Case Vide Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 9. infra Sect 9. touching the Informer Justices of Oyer and Terminer who Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery c. and Iustices of Peace The Justices of the Court of Kings Bench are the Soveraign Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Gaol-delivery Co. 9. 118. Lord Sanchars Case and therefore may enquire of hear and determine the Offences against this Act although they be not here especially named Two Indictments before several Justices If an Indictment be preferred upon this Statute before Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assize for any offence not made Treason or misprision of Treason and there is an Indictment before Justices of Peace likewise for the same Offence The Judgment of the Justices who do first enquire hear and determine the same shall stand and the Judgment given by the other shall be void as was held in the like Case upon the Statute of Inmates Co. 2. Inst 739. Justices of Peace may hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. The power here given the Justices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is in force at this day notwithstanding the Statute of 29 El. c. 6. which saith That every Conviction for not coming to Church shall be in the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Gaol-delivery and not elsewhere for the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. hath given power to Justices of Peace in their general or quarter Sessions to enquire hear and determine of all Offences for not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as the Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery might do by former Laws in the Case of Recusancy for not repairing to Church which is clearly a reviver of the Power of Justices of Peace given to them by this
Statute to proceed against Recusants and taken from them by 29 Eliz. nor doth that following Clause in 3 Jac. touching Conviction by Proclamation impeach this or restrain the Justices of Peace to proceed to Conviction upon Proclamation only and default of appearance no more than the Justices of Assize or Gaol delivery are restrained thereby or by 29 Eliz. which gives them likewise Authority to proceed by Proclamation For both these Clauses of 3 Jac. are in the Affirmative viz. First That the Justices of Peace shall have power to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery might do And those Justices might hear and determine that Offence according to this Statute of 23 Eliz. 23 Eliz. 1. And then comes the next Clause of 3 Jac. That the Justices of Peace shall have power to convict by Proclamation which is purely Affirmative also and therefore abrogates no part of the power given them by the former Clause And this agrees with what Sir Edward Coke saith lib. 12. fol. 13. That if a man be Indicted for Recusancy at the Assizes or Sessions of the Peace the Court may waive the proceedings by Proclamation upon the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. and may still if they please proceed against the party by Process upon this Statute of 23 Eliz. Upon this Stature In which Case the Process must be by Venire facias capias c. as in Indictments of Trespass And if saith he the party be fugitive in another County the Indictment may be removed into the Kings Bench and then Process may be there made out against him into any County of England In their open Quarter Sessions of Peace What is meant by Quarter Sessions By Quarter Sessions is intended here only the Sessions of the Peace held at four times of the year and not any other although it be a general Sessions And therefore the Justices of Peace in London who hold a Sessions every month cannot take Indictments upon this Statute at any of them unless it be the Quarter Sessions For that their Authority is given them only at a certain time as was resolved in the like Case upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 9. of Perjury Mich. 17 Jac. B.R. Palmer 44. Taylors Case Stat. 5 Eliz 9. 3 Jac. 4. And the Statute of 3 Jac. c. 4. which gives Justices of Peace Power to take Indictments of Recusancy at their General or Quarter Sessions for so the word said there imports having reference to the General or Quarter Sessions mentioned before about Presentments yet doth not enlarge the Power of the Justices of Peace in this particular nor enable them to take such Indictments at any Sessions but their four Quarter Sessions For although it be put there dis-junctively General or Quarter yet the latter word is but Explicative of the former and shews what General Sessions are meant as appears by the said Statute of 3 Jac. 4. and that other of 7 Jac. cap. 6. touching the Oath of Allegiance 7 Jac. 6. For in 3 Jac. 4. 't is said That if the party refuse the Oath he shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes General Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions or General or Quarter Sessions And if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in their open Assizes or by the Justices of Peace in their said general Quarter Sessions he shall incur a Praemunire And in 7 Jac. 6. That the party refusing shall be committed to Goal until the next Assizes or general Quarter Sessions and if he refuse the Oath tendred him by the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in their open Assizes or Goal delivery or the Justices of Peace or the greater part of them in their general or Quarter Sessions he shall incur a Praemunire which clearly shews that the same thing is intended by general Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions And that all general Sessions which are not Quarter Sessions are excluded out of the meaning of those Statutes Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 11. 7 Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 5. Indictments only here intended To enquire hear and determine The Justices named in this Branch of the Statute are hereby impowered to proceed by Indictment only and no other way For they are to hear and determine after Inquiry And the word enquire implies an Indictment and is always so to be expounded And so are the other words hear and determine where other proceedings are not specially named as here they are not For the Action of Debt Information c. in any Court of Record is given to the Informer Qui tam c. afterwards in a distinct Branch by it self without any reference to this so that by this Statute and before that of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 which gave the Queen an Action of Debt c. The Queen had no other remedy to recover the entire forfeitures given hereby but by Indictment only Co. 11. 60. Rolls 1. 93. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Vide Jones 193. For that and the Suit by the Common Informer are the only ways appointed by this Statute and the subsequent Clause of Submission which names the Justices before whom the party is to submit viz. the Justices before whom he is Indicted Arraigned or Tried shews what proceedings are meant which are to be had before the Justices here named that is by Indictment Hobart 205. Pie versus Lovell Offence and Penalty by two several Statutes Talbot and Shelden were Indicted for Recusancy Contra formam Statuti 23 Eliz. in which Indictment the penalty was demanded and in a Writ of Error the Judgment was reversed For the Offence is made by the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2 and the penalty is given by this Statute and therefore it should have been Contra formam Statutorum Owen 135. Wests Case Feme Covert when chargeable If a Feme Covert be Indicted at the Kings Suit for an offence within this Act she may be charged with the penalty after her Husbands death but the Husband is not chargeable nor shall pay the penalty for that he is no party to the Judgment And this was one of the causes of making the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 By which Statute the King may have an Action of debt and recover the forfeiture against the Husband Rolles 1. 93. 94. Roy versus Foster Savile 25 C. 59. Except Treason and misprision of Treason This exception of Treason and misprision of Treason extends not to the Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assize and Goal delivery as Wingate hath mistaken in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 46. Where the Justices of Peace cannot meddle but only to the Justices of Peace who are not to meddle in those two Cases
Twenty pounds per month is at first given to the Queen and the Inhabitants of the Parish where the Offence was are to Sue in the Exchequer for their third part The Parish must Sue for their third part in the Exchequer and surmise in their Bill that the Offence was in their Parish and if it were so it shall be delivered to them as the Act directs Leonard 2. 167. C. 204. The principal Officers in the Receipt of Exchequer Principal Officers of the Exchequer The principal Officers of the Court of Exchequer are the Treasurer and Barons but the principal Officers of the Receipt of the Exchequer are the Treasurer and Chamberlains Savile 38. C. 87. To such person as will sue for the same Rules and Cases touching the common Informer This Branch of the Statute being the Axis upon which all popular Suits for Recusancy by the common Informer turn and move I shall be the larger thereupon and shall here set down the several Rules Cases and Resolutions in our Books which concern the common Informer or Plaintiff qui tam c. as far as they are applicable to the Case of Recusancy or the other Cases within this Statute Upon a penal Statute where part af the forfeiture is given to the King and part to him that will Sue Tam pro Domino Rege c. material the Informer or Plaintiff qui tam c. sequitur tam pro Domino Rege quam pro seipso and so it must be said in the Information or Declaration and not only there but in the joyning of Issue and the Venire facias it must be entred qui tam pro Domino Rege c. or the omission of it is Error Cro. Mich. 9 Car. 336. In an Information upon this Statute the usual way is The particular Statute must be named that the Informer for himself petit inde tertiam partem juxta formam Statut ' Vide Co. 11. 56. Dr. Fosters Case But then the Statute must be named for in an Information by Broughton Qui tam c. against Moore for forbearing to come to Church contra formam Statuti without naming which Statute in which Case the Informer demanded the third part for himself it was adjudged by the Court of Kings-Bench to be ill For there are several Statutes against Recusancy and it did not appear which of them was meant Cro. Mich. 4 Jac. 142. Judgment of a Moiety to the King and a Moiety to the Informer where good But if this Statute be named in certain and the party who sues demands the whole forfeiture for the King and himself and Judgment be given that the King recover one moiety and the Informer or Plaintiff Qui tam c. the other moiety in that case the Judgment is well enough For the Information or Declaration being Quod actio accrevit Domino Regi praefat A. ad habend ' exigend ' the full forfeiture the Judgment doth not vary therefrom when it saith that a moiety shall be to the King and a moiety to the Plaintiff or Informer And although the Statute saith That he which will sue shall have but a third part yet that is by way of distribution only And such distribution of the penalty is an Act subsequent to the Judgment and is to be made as well out of the moiety given by the Judgment to the Informer or Plaintiff Qui tam c. as out of the moiety given thereby to the King And this I conceive to be the reason of the resolution in Chambers Case where such a Judgment in the Case of Recusancy upon this Statute was allowed to be good Rolles 2. 437. The Informers demand must be certain But if the whole forfeiture be not demanded in certain there although the party who sues demands his own share 't is ill And so it was adjudged in an Information upon a poenal Statute which concluded Vnde petit advisamentum Curiae quod forisfaciat 5 l. pro qualibet offens unde ipse petit medietatem For the Informer doth not make his demand certain but leaves it to the Court or Jury to cast up the sum it amounts to Hobart 245. Pie versus Westly Where Contra formam Statuti and where Statutorum If there be several Statutes and each of them prohibit one and the same thing and inflict a penalty and give an Information for recovery of it the Information may conclude contra formam Statuti and good because the best shall be taken for the King 5 H. 7. 17. So if one Statute make the Offence and another inflicts the penalty or forfeiture and the Information be for the Offence only it may conclude contra formam Statuti which is to be understood of that Statute which makes the Offence But if the Information both lay down the Offence and demand the penalty there both Statutes must be recited or at least the Information must conclude contra formam Statutorum Owen 135. Wests Case Vide supra Sect. 7. In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 191. tit Informations Informations within which Statute of Jeofailes St. 32 H. 8. 30. 18 Eliz. 14. 21 Jac. 13. Sect. 6. its said That Informations and Suits on penal Statutes are stricti juris and excepted out of all the Statutes of Jeofailes which is a mistake For they are not excepted out of the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 30. It 's true they are out of the Statutes of 18 Eliz. cap. 14. and 21 Jac. cap. 13. and that as it seems in all Cases within those two Statutes Vide Styles 307. Theoballs against Newton And in the Case of Scott versus Lawes Hobart 328. it seems to be intimated that they are excluded out of all three where the Case was that in an Action of Debt brought by an Informer Qui tam c. upon a penal Statute the Defendant pleads non debet praefato J. meaning the Informer and not the King and the issue was found against the Defendant In that Case it was resolved that this was a good Cause to stay Judgment and there it 's said that it being upon a penal Statute the Statute of Jeofailes would not help it But that reason was ex abundanti it being an incurable fault not aided by any Statute of Jeofailes in any sort of Action and under favour might well have been spared For the Statute of 32 H. 8. seems to extend to all popular Suits whatsoever and in Wallers Case in an Information brought against him 18 Eliz. by Topcliffe Qui tam pro Domina Regina quam pro seipso c. upon the Statute of 37 H. 8. cap. 9. of Vsury it was adjudged 37 H. 8.9 that the mis-conveying of Process and mis-joyning of issue in the said Information were aided by 32 H. 8. Dyer 346 347. By the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 5. an Informer Qui tam 31 Eliz. 5. c. must begin his Suit within one
c. Jones 193. And such a construction hath been made of those words Court of Record upon several Statutes Stat. 4 5 Ph. Mar. 5. as that of 4 5 Ph. Mar. cap. 5. of Woollen Cloathes Co. 6. 19 20. Gregories Case 21 H. 8. 13. Moore 600. C. 827. The same Case Stat. 21 H. 8. cap. 13. Of Non-residence Cro. Mich. 4. Car. 146. Greene versus Guy 23 H. 8. 4. Stat. 23 H. 8. cap. 4. of Brewers Cro. Trin. 4. Car. 112 113. Farrington versus Keymer Hutton 99. the same Case Stat. 7 E. 6. cap. 5. 7 E. 6. 5. of Selling Wine without Licence Styles 340. Buckstone against Shurlock 5 Eliz. 4. Stat. 5 Eliz. cap. 4. of Trades and Apprentices Cro. Hill 42 Eliz. 737. Barnabee versus Goodale Cro. Trin. 17 Jac. 538. Millers Case Styles 383. Hodges Case the Statutes of Tanning of Leather Moore 421. C. 581. and divers others It was held Mich. 6 7 Eliz. by all the Justices but three That where a Statute appoints a penalty for any Offence made thereby which was not an Offence at the Common Law to be recovered in any of the Queens Courts of Record by Action of Debt and no other Court is appointed The Statute intends the four ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster and the offence and penalty cannot be punished and determined by Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer in Patriam Dyer 236. But Dyer makes a Quaere hereupon and Sir Edward Coke in Scarlets Case 10 Jac. lib. 12.98 saith That the Opinion of Catlin Sanders and Whiddon which were the three dissenting Justices before mentioned is at this day held for good Law And the Opinion aforesaid of the rest of the Justices that any Courts of Record are restrained to the Ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster is not held for Law Continual experience saith he being against it For that Justices of Assize in respect of their Commission of Oyer and Terminer have always enquired of Offences where the penalty is appointed to be sued in any Court of Record as upon the Statutes of 33 H. 8. 9. of unlawful Games 35 H. 8. 17. of Woods 5 E. 6. 14. of Forestallers 33 H. 8. 9. 35 H. 8. 17. 5 E. 6.14 Ingrossers and Regrators and other Statutes But under favour although Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer may take Indictments for the doing of that which is made malum prohibitum by a Statute Law yet that part of the Opinion in Dyer which relates to the Action of Debt and the Courts of Record where such Action must be brought is good Law and where only Courts of Record are named such Action cannot be brought in any other Court than the four ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster as appears by the several Cases and Resolutions before recited By the Statute of 21 Jac. cap. 4. it is enacted 21 Jac. 4 That all Offences to be committed against any penal Statute for which any common Informer or Promoter may lawfully ground any popular Action Bill Plaint Suit or Information before Justices of Assize Justices of Nisi prius or Goal delivery Justices of Oyer and Terminer or Justices of Peace in their General or Quarter Sessions shall be prosecuted tried and determined by way of Action Plaint Bill Information or Indictment before the said Justices of the Counties or Liberties where such offences shall be committed in any of the Courts places of Judicature or liberties aforesaid respectively and not elsewhere save only in the said Counties or places usual for those Counties or any of them And that in all Informations Bills Counts Plaints and Declarations in any Action or Suit by or on the behalf of the King or any other concerning any Offence committed against any penal Statute the Offence shall be laid alledged to have been committed in the County where such Offence was in truth committed and not elsewhere But this Act shall not extend to any Information or Suit grounded upon any Law against Popish Recusants Suits against Recusants there excepted or such who do not frequent the Church and hear Divine Service nor to any Information or Suit for other Offences named in the said Statute of 21. but that such Offences may be laid or alledged to be in any County at the pleasure of any Informer Sir Edward Coke 3. Inst 193. and 4 Inst 174. saith That this Exceptiom of Recusancy in the said Statute of 21 Jac. doth not extend to the Courts wherein the Informer is to sue but only to the County where the Offence is to be laid so that notwithstanding that exception the Kings Bench Chancery Common Pleas Exchequer or Exchequer Chamber cannot receive or hold Plea of any Information for Recusancy either by the Kings Attorney or any common Informer but the matter shall be heard and determined before Justices of Assize Nisi prius Goal delivery or Oyer and Terminer or Justices of Peace in their general Sessions according to this Statute of 21 Jac. But the Informer if it be for Recusancy may by force of that Exception lay or alledge such Offence in what County he will For the said Exception extends only to the County and not to the Courts where the Informer is to sue Which Opinion of his touching the extensiveness of the Exception is probable enough viz. That it shall extend only to the County and not to the Courts where the Informer is to sue for the latter part of it speaks only of the County But this is unaptly applied to popular Informations upon this Statute of 23 Eliz. for Recusancy for they are not within the meaning of that Branch of 21 Jac. touching the Courts where the Informer is to sue For that part of the Statute which speaks of the Courts In what Courts an Informer may sue meddles not with Informations upon those penal Laws which give the Informer no other remedy for recovery of the penalty but by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in the Courts of Record at Westminster nor doth it give the Justices of Assize or other Justices there named any new or further power than they had before but only appoints that where Informations might have been brought before them or in the Courts of Westminster at the Election of the Informer now they shall be brought before Justices of Assize Nisi prius Goal delivery or Oyer and Terminer or at the Sessions of the Peace in the County where the Offence was committed for the ease of the Subjects who are Defendants and not in the Courts at Westminster Cro. Trin. 4 Car. 112 113. But in our Case of Recusancy there is no such Election given the Informer by this Statute of 23 Eliz. or any other Statute but he is strictly tied to take his Remedy by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in one of the Courts at Westminster and therefore 21 Jac. extends not to it in that branch touching the Courts where the Informer is to
aforesaid Stat. Sect. 5. Sending relief to any Jesuit Priest or other person abiding in a Seminary If any person under her Maiesties Subjection or obedience shall at any time after the end of the said forty days by way of Exchange or by any other shift way or means whatsoever wittingly and willingly either directly or indirectly convey deliver or send or cause or procure to be conveyed or delivered to be sent over the Seas or out of this Realm or out of any other her Majesties Dominions or Territories into any Forreign parts or shall otherwise wittingly and willingly yield give or contribute any money or other relief to or for any Iesuit Seminary Priest or such other Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is aforesaid or to or for the maintenance or relief of any Colledge of Iesuits or Seminary already erected or ordained or hereafter to be erected or ordained in any the parts beyond the Seas or out of this Realm in any forreign parts or of any person then being of or in any the same Colledges or Seminaries and not returned into this Realm with submission as in this Act is expressed and tontinuing in the same Realm That then every such person so offending for the same offence shall incur the danger and penalty of Praemunire mentioned in the Statute of Praemunire made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Convey Deliver Conveying or delivering relief to a Jesuite c. So that he who is barely a Messenger or Instrument to convey or deliver such money or other relief is within the danger of this Law as well as the sender or giver Then being of or in the same Colledges or Seminaries To what persons this extends to what not This Clause extends not to every person brought up in such Colledge or Seminary as Wingate tit Crowne n. 54. mistakes For if such person afterwards quits his Colledge or Seminary and hath no longer any relation thereunto but abides elsewhere beyond the Seas he who gives or conveys relief or maintenance to him is not within this branch of the Statute because the person relieved or maintained is not then of or in any Colledge or Seminary And yet perhaps this may be an offence within the Statute of 3 Car. 1. Stat. 3 Car. 1. 2 cap. 2. quod vide postea Stat. Sect. 6. None shall send his Child or other beyond the Seas without licence And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful for any person of or under her Highness obedience at any time after the said forty days during her Majesties life which God long preserve to send his or her Child other person being under his or her Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of her Highness obedience without the special Licence of her Majesty or of four of her Highness Privy Councel under their hands in that behalf first had or obtained except Merchants for such only as they or any of them shall send over the Seas only for or about his her or their Trade of Merchandize or to serve as Mariners and not otherwise upon pain to forfeit and lose for every such their offence the sum of One hundred pounds Where the Offences committed against this Act shall be inquired of and determined And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every offence to be committed or done against the tenor of this Act shall and may be enquired of heard and determined as well in the Court commonly called the Kings-Bench in the County where the same Court shall for the time be as also in any other County within this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions where the offence is or shall be committed or where the Offendor shall be apprehended and taken Transporting of Jesuits Priests c. Provided also and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful for and to every Owner and Master of any Ship Bark or Boat at any time within the said forty days or other time before limited for their departure to Transport into any the parts beyond the Seas any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest aforesaid so as the same Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest aforesaid so to be Transported do deliver unto the Mayor or other Chief Officer of the Town Port or Place where he shall be taken in to be transported his Name and in what Place he received such Order and how long he hath remained in this Realm or in any other her Highness Dominions being under her Obedience Stat. Sect. 7. A Jesuit or Priest submitting himself taking the oath and obeying the Laws Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend to any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is before mentioned as shall at any time within the said forty days or within threé days after that he shall hereafter come into this Realm or any other her Highness Dominions submit himself to some Archbishop or Bishop of this Realm or to some Iustice of Peace within the County where he shall arrive or Land and do thereupon truly and sincerely before the same Archbishop Bishop or such Iustice of Peace take the said Oath set forth in Anno primo and by writing under his hand confess and acknowledge and from thenceforth continue his due obedience unto her Highness Laws Statutes and Ordinances made and provided or to be made or provided in Causes of Religion Continue his due Obedience The person submitting must continue his obedience The taking of the Oath by such Jesuit Priest or other Ecclesiastical person and his acknowledgment of his due obedience doth not exempt him from the danger of this Law as Wingate mistakes tit Crowne numb 57. but he must continue his due obedience to the Laws made in Cases of Religion And this seems to be clearly the meaning of the makers of this Law so that if afterwards he shew his disobedience to any of those Laws by forbearing to come to Church c. he may be indicted as a Traitor for coming into the Realm as if he had never made any such submission and acknowledgment Vnto her Highness Laws That is Where King or Queen includes successors the Laws of her and her Successors and not only those which were made in her own time but such likewise as should be made afterwards For in Acts of Parliament King or Queen if a Sovereign includes Successors unless there be express words of restraint to that individual person Plowden 176. Hill versus Grange Co. 6. 27. Cases de Soldiers Co. 12. 109. Co. 1. Inst 9. 2. Inst 742. 3. Inst 6. 4. Inst. 352. And so it is of the Kings Grants if in his politick capacity for there his Successor shall be charged though the Grant mention neither
Conviction do yet remain unpaid in form as hereafter ensueth that is to say the one moiety thereof before the end of the next Trinity Term and the other moiety thereof before the end of the next Hillary Term or at any such other times as by the Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Chief Baron of the Exchequer or any two of them shall by composition upon good Bond and Surety taken be limited before the end of the said next Trinity Term if any such Composition shall happen to be And shall also in every Easter and Michaelmas Term until such time as the same person do make Submission and be Conformable according to the true meaning of the said Statute pay into the said Receipt of the Exchequer twenty pounds for every month which shall incur in all that mean time Stat. Sect. 4. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every such Offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute as hereafter shall fortune to be thereof once convicted shall in such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas as shall be next after such Conviction pay into the said Receipt of the Exchequer after the rate of twenty pounds for every month which shall be contained in the Indictment whereupon such Conviction shall be And shall also for every month after such Conviction without any other Indictment or Conviction pay into the Receipt of the Exchequer aforesaid at two times in the year that is to say in every Easter Term and Michaelmas Term as much as then shall remain unpaid after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month after such Conviction The Queen may take all the Goods and two parts of the Lands and Leases of the Offender who pays not 20 l. a month And if default shall be made in any part of any payment aforesaid contrary to the form herein before limited that then and so often the Quéens Majesty shall and may by Process out of the said Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of this Act leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family What Conviction is here meant and when the penalty is appropriated to the King Once convicted This Statute meddles not with any other way of Conviction then at the Queens Suit by Indictment as hath been said And so is the Conviction here mentioned to be understood For this Statute is not introductory of a new Law nor gave the Queen any new or other remedy then what she had against the Recusant by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. that is by Indictment but only gave her a more speedy way of proceeding upon that fundamental remedy Co. 11. 60. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. the same Case so that a Conviction upon an Information against the Recusant upon 23. or any other way save by Indictment doth not appropriate the penalty of twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by force of this Statute Hobart 205. Pye and Lovells Case nor for the same reason by force of that 3 Jac. cap. 4. where the same words are used and a Conviction by Indictment only intended as here In that Case of Pye and Lovell its said That if a man at the making of this Statute had been convicted of Recusancy by any other means then by Indictment he had not been bound by this Law to pay the twenty shillings It should be twenty pounds a month from the Conviction And if a man be now convicted in the Kings Bench by Indictment or otherwise he cannot be proclaimed nor otherwise his penalty run on which last words infer that the Conviction here intended is only a Conviction according to this Statute by Proclamation upon default But if we compare together this Clause which speaks of a Conviction after the making of this Statute and the former Clause which speaks of a Conviction before this Statute the contrary will evidently appear For the former Clause touching Conviction before this Statute must necessarily be intended of Convictions according to 23 Eliz. cap. 1. without any Proclamation For the Proclamation in the Case of Recusancy was not given until 29. And if a man had been convicted of Recusancy upon Indictment in the Kings Bench or elsewhere before this Act the forfeiture of 20 l. per month should by force of this Act have run on from the time of such Conviction that 's clear by the express words of the former Clause Then comes this Clause which provides what shall be done upon Convictions for the future and appoints in that Case likewise the forfeiture of 26 l. per month to run on from the time of Conviction Both which Convictions as well before as after this Statute are granted to be meant only of Convictions upon Indictment And there is no difference between the penning of these two Clauses but that one respects the time past and the other the time to come but both appoint the penalty to run on Now there is no reason to suppose that the makers of the Law intended the word Convicted in a more restrained sense in this Clause then in the former Clause where the penalty should have run on upon any conviction whatsoever upon Indictment or that the conviction in the former Clause by Indictment upon 23. without Proclamation should be wholly shut out of the later Clause By Conviction therefore in these two Clauses seems to be meant such Convictions upon Indictment as were warranted by the Statutes in force at the several and respective times here mentioned That is in the former which speaks of the time foregoing a Conviction upon 23 Eliz. without Proclamation and in this later which speaks of the time to come a Conviction either with or without a Proclamation In either of which Cases the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on by force of this Act and consequently it shall run on if the Recusant be Indicted Convicted and adjudged in the Kings Bench although he cannot be proclaimed there And accordingly it was agreed in Dr. Fosters Case that where the Recusant is convicted upon Indictment the penalty should ever after run on and be appropriated to the King Roiles 1. 93. C. 41. And 't is not restrained there to a Conviction upon Proclamation only But yet although this Clause extends as well to a Conviction upon 23 Eliz. as to a Conviction by Proclamation yet every Conviction upon 23 Eliz. is not here intended For if a man Indicted of Recusancy do upon his Arraignment confess the Indictment to be true and plead guilty or upon Trial a
the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding This Branch seems not to extend to all forfeitures for Recusancy For the power here given the Lord Treasurer To what cases of Conviction this Clause extends and to what not c. is only in relation to those forfeitures which are by this Act appointed to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer which are the forfeitures due to the Queen by Conviction upon Indictment for this Act meddles with no other so that if the twenty pounds per month be recovered in a popular Suit by the Informer Qui tam c. one third part thereof ought still to be paid to the Poor of the Parish only according to 23 Eliz. cap. 1. notwithstanding this Act. Provided always That this Act Stat. Sect. 9. Assurances made bona fide not to be impeached or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to make void or impeach any Grant or Lease heretofore to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon any yearly Rent or payment is reserved or payable or any Grant or Lease hereafter to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon the accustomed yearly Rent or more shall be reserved or any other Conveyance Assurance or Assignment whatsoever heretofore made bona fide upon good consideration and without fraud or covin which is not or shall not be revokable at the pleasure of such Offender otherwise then to give benefit and title to her Majesty her Heirs and Successors to have perceive and enjoy such Rents and Payments during the continuance of such Lease or Grant according to the true meaning of this Act. Seizure of Lands whereof the Offender hath but an Estate for life or in his Wives right And provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to continue any seizure of any Lands or Tenements of such Offender in her Majesties hands or in the hands of her Heirs or Successors after the said Offenders death which Lands or Tenements he shall have or be seized of only for term of his life or in the Right of his Wife Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience FOR preventing and avoiding of such great inconveniencies and perils as might happen and grow by the wicked and dangerous practices of seditious Sectaries and disloyal persons Stat. Sect. 1. The penalty of a Recusant perswading others to impugne the Queens Ecclesiastical power Be it Enacted by the Queéns most Excellent Majesty and by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons above the age of sixteen years which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service established by her Majesties Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and shall forbear to do the same by the space of a month next after without any lawful cause shall at any time after forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament by Printing Writing or express words or speéches advisedly or purposely practise or go about to move or perswade any of her Majesties Subjects or any other within her Highness Realms or Dominions to deny withstand and impugne her Majesties Power and Authority in cases Ecclesiastical united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm or to that end or purpose shall advisedly and maliciously move or perswade any other person whatsoever to forbear or abstain from coming to Church to hear Divine Service Or to forbear coming to Church or to receive the Communion according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid or to come to or to be present at any unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meétings under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Or to be present at unlawful Conventicles contrary to her Majesties said Laws and Statutes Or if any person or persons which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and shall forbear by the space of a month to hear Divine Service as is aforesaid shall after the said forty days either of him or themselves or by the motion perswasion inticement or allurement of any other willingly joyn in or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Méetings under colour or pretence of any such exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as is aforesaid That then every such person so offending as aforesaid and being thereof lawfully convicted shall be committed to Prison there to remain without Bail or Mainprize until they shall conform and yield themselves to come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hear Divine Service according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid and to make such open submission and Declaration of their said Conformity as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed Which shall obstinately refuse to repair c. shall c. by Printing c. Wingate in abridging of this Statute tit Crowne numb 70. saith that if any person above sixteen years of age obstinately refuses to come to Church for a month or impugnes the Queens Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical he shall be committed to Prison which is a great mistake for no man shall be punished by this Act for either of those Causes only The not coming to Church being only a precedent Qualification required in the person whom the Act makes liable to the penalties thereof for the other offences therein mentioned Who may be an offender within this Act and who not And therefore if a man never comes to Church yet he is no offender within this Act unless he advisedly or purposely move or perswade another to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to that end or purpose advisedly and maliciously move or perswade some other to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or he himself be present at such Conventicles c. And on the other hand if a man move or perswade any other to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or if he himself be present at any Conventicles c. yet he is no Offender within this Act if he goes to Church once within the compass of a month so that the party must both forbear to come to Church and be guilty of some other of the offences here enumerated or he is not punishable by this Act And as for the denying or impugning the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical it s no offence within this Statute unless the party moves or
cap. 1. Sect. 9. in that part touching the Informer and the Cases there cited to prove that no other Suits are restrained by that Statute to a year and a day but only Suits by Indictment By Action of Debt Bill Plaint Information If the King sue by any of these ways no Proclamation Proclamation can be made thereupon For the Proclamation given by the Statutes of 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4 in Case of Recusancy at the Kings Suit is upon Indictment only Co. 11. 62. Dr. Fosters Case The Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer This Statute adds two other Courts where the King may sue for Recusancy Two Courts added where the King may sue Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 or for saying or hearing of Mass For by 29 Eliz. cap. 6. the Queen was limited to the Kings-Bench the Assizes or general Goal delivery and that only by way of Indictment but now by this Statute she might sue not only in those Courts by Indictment but in the Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information Co. 11. 61. Dr. Fosters Case But whereas 't is there said that this Statute of 35 takes not off the restriction of the Informer Qui tam c. by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. to the Courts there mentioned viz. the Kings-Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery This passage was occasioned by an opinion there held in the said Case of Dr. Foster that the Informer Qui tam c. was restrained by 29. to those Courts The Informer not restrained by 29 Eliz. 6. But that opinion is not Law nor was there ever any such restriction of the Informer for the Statute of 29 Eliz. intends only Suits by Indictment but touches not the popular Action or Information Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 2. As c. any other Debt c. should or may be recovered Before this Statute the Queen had no way to recover of the Husband the intire forfeiture for the Recusancy of his Wife For if the Wife had been Indicted of Recusancy at the Queens Suit and convicted thereupon this had not affected the Husband who shall never be charged for the Act or default of his Wife but where he may be made party to the Action or Suit as in an Action of Debt Trespass Action of the Case for scandalous words by the Wife c. but not upon an Indictment And in this respect the Queen having before this Statute no remedy for recovery of the forfeiture but by Indictment where the Husband could not be charged for his Wife the Informer was then in better Case then the Queen For he may charge the Husband and Wife both for the Recusancy of the Wife and shall recover the forfeiture of him by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide that Stat. Sect. 9. But upon the Conviction of the Wife upon Indictment the Queen must have staid till the death of the Husband before she could have levied the forfeiture and if the Wife had died before her Husband it was utterly lost in most Cases Baron and Feme may be charged for Recusancy of the feme But by this Act the Queen might and the King may at this day charge the Husband and Wife joyntly by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife in such sort as he may be charged in any other Action at Common Law for the Debt or Trespass of his Wife and the forfeiture for her Recusancy shall be recovered of him And this was the principal end and scope of making this Branch of the Statute and to this purpose were these words added here In such sort and in all respects as by the ordinary course of the Common Laws of this Realm any other Debt due by any such person in any other Case should or may be recovered Co. 11. 61 62. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 233 234. Roy versus Law son feme Savile 25. C. 59. Provided always Stat. Sect. 9. How the third part of the Penalties shall be imployed That the third part of the penalties to be had or received by vertue of this Act shall be imployed and bestowed to such good and charitable uses and in such manner and form as is limited and appointed in the Statute made in the 28. year of her Majesties Reign touching Recusants The Statute here mentioned Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 and called the Statute of 28 Eliz. is the same with 29 Eliz. cap. 6. before recited It being in some Books called the Statute of 28 in others of 29 but as it seems more properly 29. For the Session wherein it was made was by Prorogation held the 15 of February 29. Eliz. Provided also That no Popish Recusant Stat. Sect. 10. Popish Recusant or Feme Covert not to abjure Popish recusant or Feme Covert shall be compelled or bound to abjure by vertue of this Act. No Popish Recusant Here Wingate tit Crowne n. 77. leads his Reader into a great mistake for he mentions only a Feme Covert leaving out the Popish Recusant Feme Covert not here excepted in all Cases Or Feme Covert In the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. 't is said that no married Woman is punishable by this Statute but are thereout excepted whereas in truth they are no where excepted throughout this Statute save only that they shall not be compelled or bound to abjure For if a married Woman comes not to Church but forbears for a month and goes to Conventicles or any other Meetings or Assemblies under colour or pretence of the exercise of Religion contrary to Law whether they be Popish or other or perswades others so to do or to forbear the Church or to impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical she shall be imprisoned by force of this Act until she conform and submit her self but she cannot be further proceeded against so as to require her to abjure A married Woman with her Husband is likewise punishable by this Act for her Recusancy by Action of Debt c. brought against her and her Husband at the Kings Suit so that 't is a great mistake to say she is not punishable by this Statute Stat. Sect. 11. The forfeiture of him that abjures or refuses to abjure The Wise shall lose no Dower nor the heir any Land for these Offences Provided also That every person that shall abjure by force of this Act or refuse to abjure being thereunto required as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose to her Majesty all his goods and chattels forever and shall further lose all his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments for and during the life only of such offender and no longer and that the Wife of any Offender by force of this Act shall not lose her dower nor that any corruption of Blood shall grow or be by reason of any offence
mentioned in this Act but that the heir of every such Offender by force of this Act shall and may after the death of every Offender have and enjoy the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of such Offender as if this Act had not beén made Every Abjuration Abjuration as well as that for Felony is an Exile or Banishment and if perpetual and by Authority of Parliament amounts to a civil death and therefore the Wife of a Man banished or abjured forever might sue or be sued without her Husband Suit as was ruled in the Case of the Lady Maltravers 10 E. 3. and of the Lady Belknap 1 H. 4. 1. 2 H. 4. 7. And if a man be perpetually banished by Authority of Parliament unless is be for Felony or by force of this Act his Wife shall be endowed living the Husband And if he had been perpetually banished or abjured for Felony the Wife should have had her joynture Jointure presently although not her Dower Dower as was resolved in Weylands Case 19 E. 1. and the reason is because though the Husband be naturally living yet he is civilly and in the Eye of the Law as a dead man But yet these Cases are to be understood of a Banishment or abjuration forever and not of a Relegation or Exile for a time For in such Case neither could the Wife sue or be sued without her Husband nor could she have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband Co. 1. Inst 132. 133. Co. 2. Inst 47. Bulstrode 3. 188. Rolles 1. 400. C. 27. Wilmores Case Moore 851. C. 1159. Wilmots Case But if a man be abjured by force of this Act What dower is here saved the Wife shall not have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband although he be abjured forever but she is in worse Case then the Wife of a person perpetually banished was at the Common Law For this Act by express words gives his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the Queen during his life which is to be understood of his natural life And the saving here of the Wives Dower is not intended of the Dower which she might claim at Common Law presently upon the abjuration of her Husband nor shall make void the former words of the Act by which all his Lands are given to the Queen during his natural life but is only the usual Provision made in Acts of Parliament which create any new Felony for the saving of the Dower of the Wife after the death of the Husband So that the meaning of this Branch is that if the Husband refuse to abjure or abjure and refuse to depart according to this Act or return without lieence yet the Wife shall be endowed and the heir inherit his Lands after he is naturally dead And this Act to continue no longer than to the end of the next Session of Parliament Stat. Sect. 12. Note this Act being at first but temporary This Act at first but temporary was afterwards discontinued Hutton 61. 62. but is since revived by the Statute of 3 Car. 1. c. 4. and is in full force at this day And in such Case it hath been questioned if a Statute be discontinued and afterwards revived how an Indictment thereupon shall conclude whether contra formam Statuti or Statutorum Where if a Statute be discontinued and revived it shall be contra formam Statuti and where contra formam Statutorum For if a Statute be temporary and afterwards continued for a longer time or made perpetual and never discontinued there without doubt it shall be contra formam Statuti but it hath been held by some that where it was once discontinued and then revived there it is as if there were two several and distinct Statutes and the Indictment shall conclude contra formam Statutorum Palmers Case 9 Eliz. But others have held the contrary and that there is not any difference in the Case of a Statute at first temporary and afterwards before any discontinuance continued for a longer time or made perpetual and a Statute discontinued and then revived but that it shall in both Cases be held but as one Statute and the conclusion shall be contra formam Statuti and not Statutorum unless where the Act of Reviver makes any addition to the former Act or increaseth the penalty or forfeiture For then there is no doubt but they are two distinct Acts of Parliament And according to this later opinion hath the practice been in Informations upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 9. of Perjury Stat. 5 Eliz. 9 which determined 14 Eliz. and was revived 29 Eliz. And yet all Informations thereupon conclude Contra formam Statuti And so as it seems ought all Indictments upon this Statute of 35. notwithstanding its discontinuance and reviver Vide Owen 135. Wests Case Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. ii An Act for the restraining of Popish Recusants to some certain place of abode FOr the better discovering and avoiding of such Traiterous and most dangerous Conspiracies and Attempts as are daily devised and practiced against our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Queéns Majesty Stat. Sect. 1. and the happy estate of this Common-weal by sundry wicked and seditious persons who terming themselves Catholicks and being indéed spies and intelligencers not only for her Majesties forreign Enemies but also for Rebellious and Traiterous Subjects born within her Highness Realms and Dominions and hiding their most detestable and divellish purposes under a false pretext of Religion and Conscience do secretly wander and shift from place to place within this Realm to corrupt and seduce her Majesties Subjects and to stir them to Sedition and Rebellion Be it Ordained and Enacted by our Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal A Popish Recusant convicted and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That every person above the age of sixtéen years born within any of the Quéens Majesties Realms and Dominions or made Denizen being a Popish Recusant and before the end of this Session of Parliament convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the tenor of the Laws and Statutes heretofore made and provided in that behalf and having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm shall within forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament if they be within this Realm and not restrained or stayed either by Imprisonment or by her Majesties Commandment or by order or direction of some six or more of the Privy Council or by such sickness and infirmity of body as they shall not be able to Travel without imminent danger of Life and in such Cases of absence out of the Realm restraint or stay then within 20 days next after they shall return into the Realm and be
enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of dwelling where they usually heretofore made their common abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence Stat. Sect. 2. Or to be convicted shall repair to his usual dwelling and not remove above five miles And also That every person being above the age of sixtéen years born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen and having or which hereafter shall have any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm which being then a Popish Recusant shall at any time hereafter be lawfully convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the said Laws and Statutes and being within this Realm at the time that they shall be convicted shall within forty days next after the same Conviction if they be not restrained or stayed by Imprisonment or otherwise as is aforesaid and in such Cases of restraint and stay then within twenty days next after they shall be enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of usual dwelling and abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence The punishment of an Offender upon pain that every person and persons that shall offend against the tenor and intent of this Act in any thing before mentioned shall lose and forfeit all his and their Goods and Chattels and shall also lose and forfeit to the Quéens Majesty all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and all the Rents and Annuities of every such person so doing or offending during the Life of the same Offender What Popish Recusants are not within this Act Born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen So that all Popish Recusants are not within this Branch as Wingate tit Crown n. 78. mistakes For it extends not to an Alien who is born out of the Kings Leigeance unless he be made Denizen And which are In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. this Clause is restrained to such as are born in England but it is clear that it extends to all the Kings natural Subjects if they live in England although they were born in Ireland or any other of the late Queens Dominions besides England Denizen who By Denizen is here to be understood an Alien who owes to the King an acquired Subjection or Allegiance whether he be made Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents or be naturalized by Act of Parliament For Naturalization includes all the priviledges of a Denizen and something more and every one who is naturalized is thereby made a Denizen although he that is made a Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents is not thereby naturalized Which being then a Popish Recusant This is the first penal Statute which was made against Popish Recusants by that name and as distinguished from other Recusants In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. What is Recusancy it 's said That the matter of Recusancy stands in two particulars First absenting from the Church Secondly refusing the Oaths prescribed by 1 Eliz. 1. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 1 Eliz 1. 3 Jac. 4. But this description of Recusancy is either too narrow or too large For if the word Recusancy be taken in a large sense then the refusing to receive the Sacrament contrary to the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. by him that conforms and comes to Church may be as fitly called a point of Recusancy as the refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance But if Recusancy be taken in a strict and proper sense then it extends only to the point of not coming to Church and not to refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance And in this last sense are all the Statutes to be understood which inflict any penalty or disability upon a Recusant or a Popish Recusant unless where the not receiving of the Sacrament is particularly mentioned And this appears by the explanation which the Statutes make every where of Conformity the opposite to Recusancy viz. repairing to Church What is Conformity and more particularly the said Statute of 3 Jac. 4. which saith That the Popish Recusant convicted which conforms himself and repairs to the Church shall receive the Sacrament which words and repairs to the Church are explanatory of the former viz. which conforms himself so that this Conformity is not intended of taking the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance but consists only in repairing to Church and consequently Recusancy its opposite properly so called consists in absenting from Church And this appears further by that Branch of the said Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. which relates to the Oath of Allegiance where 't is said That the Oath shall be required of him who confesseth or denieth not himself to be a Recusant or that he hath not received the Sacrament where Recusant cannot be understood in any other sense then of him who forbears to come to Church An Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant for Recusancy is of the same form with that against any other Recusant viz. That he came not to his Parish Church or any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but forbore the same by the space of c. Vide Co. lib. intr 569. Co. 11. 56. Dr. Fosters Case so that upon his Conviction for Recusancy it doth not appear of Record whether the Offender be a Popish or other Recusant And therefore where this or any of the subsequent Statutes commands or prohibits a Popish Recusant convict to do a thing and a person convicted of Recusancy who is a Popish Recusant be Indicted thereupon his Conviction must be set forth in the Indictment with this or the like confusion Per quod praedict A.B. devenit Papalis Recusans convictus so it is if a Popish Recusant Convict be incapacitated to take or to give or dispose of any thing and another person be substituted by the Statute in his stead as in the Case of a Presentation by force of the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 5. Stat. 3 Jac. 5. in a Quare Impedit Quare Impedit brought by the Chancellor and Schollars of the University His Conviction must be be set forth with an averment that he is Papalis Recusans Vide Co. 10. 54. And if a Popish Recusant whether convicted or not convicted be so commanded prohibited or incapacitated in an Indictment or Information upon the Statute it must be averred that he is Papalis Recusans A person who hath a certain place of abode is convicted for not coming to Church What Popish Recusants are not within this Act. and afterwards becomes a Papist being none before It seems that he is not restrained
person which shall be so suspected shall refuse to answer directly and truly whether he be a Iesuit or a Seminary or Massing Priest as is aforesaid every such person so refusing to answer shall for his Disobedience and Contempt in that behalf be committed to Prison by such as shall examine him as is aforesaid and thereupon shall remain and continue in Prison without Bail or Mainprize until he shall make direct and true answer to the said Questions whereupon he shall be so examined Cause of suspicion Suspected Although the party be no Jesuit Seminary or Massing Priest yet if there be cause to suspect him and he refuse to answer whether he be so or no such suspicion and refusal is ground enough for his Commitment Having lawful Authority in that behalf This Clause seems to refer to the Statute of 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 27 Eliz. 2. which appoints that the discovery of a Popish Priest or Jesuit shall be made to some Justice of Peace or higher Officer who is to give Information thereof to some of the Privy Council c. under the penalty of two hundred marks Who shall examine a Jesuit c. which Statute of 27. though it do not in express terms say that the Justice of Peace or other higher Officer shall examine the Priest or Jesuit so discovered yet inasmuch as it gives him power to take Cognizance of the matter it seems implicitely to impower him to inform himself of the truth whether the party be a Priest or Jesuit or not as well by examination of the party as otherwise that he may be the better enabled to give Information thereof to some of the Privy Council c. And one Justice of Peace having by 27. lawful Authority to examine him he hath Authority likewise by this Statute of 35. to commit him And commit him if he be suspected to be a Priest or Jesuit and refuses to answer whether he be such or no. As for Mr. Shephards Opinion in his Sure Guide cap. 14. Sect. 5. that there must be two Justices of Peace to Commit a man by force of this Statute who is suspected to be a Jesuit or Priest till he answers directly I see no ground at all for it Answer to the said Questions That is To what point he may be examined whether he be a Jesuit Seminary or Massing Priest for he is not bound to answer to any other question nor can be committed by force of this Act for his Refusal Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 9. Licence to travel above five miles Alt. 3 Jac. 5. and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any of the persons which are hereby limited and appointed to continue and abide within five miles of their usual dwelling place or of such place where they were born or where their Father and Mother shall be dwelling as is aforesaid shall have necessary occasion or business to go and Travel out of the compass of the said five miles That then and in every such Case upon Licence in that behalf to be gotten under the hands of two of the Iustices of Peace of the same County with the privity and assent in writing of the Bishop of the Diocess or of the Lieutenant or of any Deputy Lieutenant of the same County under their hands it shall and may be lawful for every such person to go and Travel about such their necessary business and for such time only for their travelling attending and returning as shall be comprised in the same Licence Any thing before in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding This Clause is repealed Repeal Stat. 3 Jac. 5. and a new form of Licence appointed by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 5. which see there Sect. 8. Provided also Stat. Sect. 10. Persons urged by Process or commanded to appear That if any such person so restrained as is aforesaid shall be urged by Process without fraud or covin or be bounden without fraud or covin to make appearance in any her Majesties Courts or shall be sent for commanded or required by any thrée or more of her Majesties Privy Council or by any four or more of any Commissioners to be in that behalf nominated and assigned by her Majesty to make appearance before her Majesties said Counsel or Commissioners That in every such Case every such person so bounden urged commanded or required to make such appearance shall not incur any pain forfeiture or loss for travelling to make appearance accordingly nor for his abode concerning the same nor for convenient time for his return back again upon the same Vrged by Process If a Popish Recusant restrained by this Act be summoned by Warrant of a Justice of Peace to appear before him the Recusant ought not to travel to such Justice out of his compass of 5 miles For although a Justice of Peace his Warrant be the Kings Process Wha◠Process is here meant yet it is not intended here For these words urged by Process are restrained by the subsequent words to such Process as requires the Recusants appearance in some one of the Kings Courts and extend not to all Cases of Summons and Process as Wingate tit Crown numb 83. mistakes But if in the Case aforesaid the Warrant be to Arrest the Recusant and by force thereof he be carried by the Constable c. out of the compass of five miles there he is excused and shall forfeit nothing for that it was done by compulsion And yet if there be any Covin between the Recusant and the Justice of Peace or Officer it may be otherwise The Kings Courts In any her Majesties Courts All Courts wherein the proceedings are directed by the Kings Laws are the Kings Courts and therefore a Court Leet Court Leet though of an inferiour nature and kept in the Lords name yet is the Kings Court Co. 5. 39. Cawdries Case Hetley 18. Ecclesiastical Court If a Popish Recusant restrained by this Act be cited into the Ecclesiastical Court he may by force of this Proviso Travel out of the compass of five miles to appear there for all Ecclesiastical Courts are the Kings Courts and the Laws by which they proceed there are the Kings Laws Vide Cawdries Case supra Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 7. Stat. Sect. 11. Persons which are to yield their bodies to the Sheriff And be it further provided and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons so restrained as is aforesaid shall be bound or ought to yield and render their bodies to the Sheriff of the County where they shall happen to be upon Proclamation in that behalf without fraud or covin to be made That then in every such Case every such person which shall be so bounden or ought to yield and render their body as aforesaid shall not incur any pain forfeiture or loss for Travelling for that intent and purpose only without any fraud
Curate of every Parish where such Submission and Declaration of Conformity shall hereafter be so made by any such Offender as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 14. The Minister shall enter the Submission into a Book shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose and within ten days then next following shall certifie the same in writing to the Bishop of the same Diocess Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 15. A Recusant submitting and falling into Relapse That if any such Offender after such Submission made as is aforesaid shall afterward fall into Relapse or eftsoons become a Recusant in not repairing to Church to hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same contrary to the Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and provided That then every such Offender shall lose all such benefit as he or she might otherwise by virtue of this Act have or enjoy by reason of their said Submission And shall thereupon stand and remain in such plight condition and degrée to all intents as though such Submission had never beén made Such Relapse with the Indictment thereof Relapse where to be certified is to be certified into the Court of Exchequer as was done by the Justices of the Kings Bench in the Case of Francis Holt. Pasch 9 Jac. Bulstrode 1. 133. Stat. Sect. 16. Married Women bound by this Act saving in the Case of Abjuration Provided always and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every Woman married or hereafter to be married shall be bound by all and every Article branch and matter contained in this Statute other then the Branch and Article of Abjuration before mentioned And that no such Woman married or to be married during marriage shall be in any wise forced or compelled to abjure or be abjured by virtue of this Act Any thing therein contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding Stat. i Jac. cap. iv An Act for the due execution of the Statutes against Jesuits Seminary Priests Recusants c. FOr the better and more due execution of the Statutes heretofore made aswell against Iesuits Stat. Sect. 1. All Statutes made against Jesuits Priests and Recusants shall be put in Execution Seminary Priests and other such like Priests as also against all manner of Recusants Be it Ordained and Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That all and every the Statutes heretofore made in the Reign of the late Quéen of famous memory Elizabeth as well against Iesuits Seminary Priests and other Priests Deacons Religious and Ecclesiastical persons whatsoever made ordained or professed or to be made ordained or professed by any Authority or Iurisdiction derived challenged or pretended from the Sée of Rome as those which do in any wise concern the withdrawing of the Kings Subjects from their due obedience and the Religion now professed and the taking of the Oath of obedience unto the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors together with all those made in the said late Quéens time against any manner of Recusants shall be put in due and exact execution Oath of Obedience By the Oath of Obedience Oath of Obedience Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. is here meant the Oath of Supremacy in the Stat. of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. which see there Sect. 7. and by that name it is here called afterwards Sect. 3. Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 2. A Recusant conforming himself shall be discharged and be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That if any that is or shall be a Recusant shall submit or reform him or her self and become obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the true meaning of the Statutes in that behalf in the said late Quéens time made and provided That then every such person for and during such time as he or she shall so continue in such conformity and obedience shall from thenceforth be freed and discharged of and from any the penalties and losses which the same person might otherwise sustain and bear in respect or by reason of such persons Recusancy According to the true meaning of the Statutes in that behalf It hath been doubted whether these words do refer only to the manner of the Recusants conformity or to the time likewise when it is to be done as well as to the manner For if they refer to the time then the Recusant is still bound notwithstanding this Statute to conform before Judgment according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 or his conformity afterwards shall not discharge him of the penalty But the better opinion is that by these words according to the true meaning of the Statutes is to be intended only that the Recusant must conform in such manner as is there appointed but as to the time the general words here have inlarged the time limited by 23 Eliz. If the Recusant conforms after Judgment 't is sufficient For this Statute is made in further favor of the Recusant So that now if he conforms after Judgment 't is time enough and he shall be discharged of all penalties in respect of his Recusancy And if an Information tam pro Domino Rege quam pro seipso be brought upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. against the Recusant and after Judgment had against him thereupon he conforms he shall be discharged of the Judgment but first his Conformity must appear of Record otherwise the Court cannot take notice of it and as for that his remedies against the King and the Informer must be several His remedies against the King and informer Audita Quaerela Plea for against the Informer he must bring his Audita Quaerela and against the King he must plead his conformity which he may do in this Case after Judgment for that no Audita Quaerela lies against the King 11 H. 7. 10. and if he should not be admitted to plead he would be without any legal Remedy to discharge himself of the forfeiture and Judgment as to the Kings part whose execution will not be hindred by the Audita Quaerela against the Informer But if the Defendant neglect to put in his Plea and Execution issues for the King and he be taken in Execution he comes too late to plead his Conformity and hath then no other way left to relieve himself as to the Kings part but by his Petition Petition to the King to pardon the Debt Bulstrode 2. 324 325. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 95. C. 41. the same Case Vide Savile 23. C. 56. Tirringhams Case Stat. Sect. 3. And if any Recusant shall hereafter die his heir being no Recusant that in every such Case every such heir shall be freed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her In what Cases a Recusants heir shall be
which it shall be commanded that the body of every such Offender shall be rendred to the Sheriff of the same County or Bailiff or other kéeper of the Goal of the Liberty before the next Assizes and general Goal delivery or before the next general or Quarter Sessions respectively to be holden for the said Shire Limit Division or Liberty And if at the said next Assizes and general Goal delivery or Sessions the same Offender so proclaimed shall not make appearance of Record Conviction of a Recusant That then upon every such Default recorded the same shall be as sufficient a Conviction in Law of the said Offence whereof the party shall stand Indicted as aforesaid as if upon the same Indictment a Trial by Verdict thereupon had proceéded and béen found against him or her and recorded General or Quarter Sessions Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Power of Justices of Peace revived Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 29 Eliz. 6. At their said Sessions c. General or Quarter Sessions c. What Sessions are here meant vide 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. To enquire hear and determine This is intended of Indictments only and revives the power of Justices of Peace given them by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. and taken from them by the negative words of the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. so that now the Justices of Peace may proceed to Judgment against the Recusant upon 23. or convict him upon Proclamation and default of appearance and so may the Justices of Assize and Goal-delivery Justices of Assize and Goal delivery proceed either way For the words of this Statute and that of 29. which give the Proclamation being in the affirmative The Proclamation may be waved do not take away the proceedings upon 23. but that the Justices may wave the Conviction by Proclamation if they please Nor is the Informers Informer popular Suit taken away by 29. or by this Statute Co. 11.61 Dr. Fosters Case vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. Against any Person either for not repairing to Church This branch extends to all Recusants c. So that this Branch of the Statute which gives the Conviction by Proclamation extends to other Recusants besides Popish Recusants and is not restrained to this latter sort but is misrecited in this particular by Dalton V. cap. 110. tit Forfeiture for Felony Shall be rendred to the Sheriff c. before the next Assizes c. In an Action brought against Sir John Webb and his Wife for recovery of twenty pounds per month for the Recusancy of the Wife The Defendants plead that the Feme was before that time convicted for the same absence upon Indictment at the Kings Suit Proclamation erroneous and Proclamation made that she should render her self at the next Assizes and default of appearance thereupon But it was resolved by the Court of Kings Bench That the Plea was ill and that this was not a Conviction according to Law and therefore was in effect as no Conviction For the Proclamation was erroneous in two points 1. In the person to whom the Statute saith it shall be proclaimed that the Offenders body shall be rendred to the Sheriff c. But this Proclamation was That she should render her self to the Justices of Assize For the rendring of the body to the Sheriff is a material point And the intent of the Statute is not pursued in this Proclamation For the intent was that Recusants being dangerous members of the Commonwealth should be in the Custody of the Sheriff c. ne nocere valeant 2. In the time when The Proclamation was that she should render her self at the next Assizes but the Statute saith before the next Assizes And when the Proclamation is ill the Conviction for default of appearance thereupon cannot be good nor shall bar the King or the Informer of their Action And although by the subsequent Clause in this Act That no Proclamation shall be avoided for any defect c. the Recusant perhaps may be estopped to take such exception to the Proclamation yet the King is not Palmer 40.41 Bridgman 122. Rolles 2.108 Note that Palmer in his Report of this Case hath stated the first difference between the Statute and Proclamation as 't is here laid down and so the truth of the Case was But in reciting Bridgmans Argument he reports it quite contrary viz. That the Proclamation was That the Recusants body should be rendred to the Sheriff and that it ought to have been that it should be rendred to the Justices of Assize But this is a mistake and contrary to the Statute and the truth of the Case Or other kéeper of the Goal Keeper of a Goal A keeper of a Goal may be by usage or prescription Lib. Assiz 259. A. 42. Pl. 7. Co. 1. Inst 114. And if the person indicted for Recusancy live in a Corporation where the Sheriff hath not to do and he be Proclaimed upon this Statute he may render himself to the keeper of the Goal there Shall not make appearance of Record And if the Recusant do appear of Record at the Assizes Appearance shall save the default Goal delivery or general or quarter Sessions it shall be sufficient to save his default although he did not render himself to the Sheriff upon the Proclamation and this is clear by the words of the Statute which is grosly mistaken in this particular by Wingate tit Crowne numb 102. who saith the Recusant shall be convicted if he render not his Body to the Sheriff or Bailiff of the Liberty and that default be recorded Appearance how to be made This appearance must be in proper person and not by Attorney for none can at first appear by Attorney unless enabled by some Statute and all appearances by the Defendant in any Court ought by the Common Law to be in person Co. 10.101 Bewfages Case But after a Plea pleaded to an Indictment an Attorney may be admitted at the discretion of the Court if they think fit but not otherwise and in some Cases not without a special Writ directed to the Justices to that purpose Vide 16 E. 4. 5. Fitz. N. B. 26. It must be entred of record The party Indicted and Proclaimed who appears at the Assizes or Sessions must take care that his appearance be entred of Record For if the Clerk of the Assizes or Clerk of the Peace should mistake and instead thereof record his default he hath no way to avoid his standing convicted Action upon the Case But is put to his Action upon the Case against such Clerk of the Assizes or Peace Vide Popham 29. Keilway 180. What is a good appearance and what not The personal presence at the next Assizes or Sessions of the party indicted of Recusancy and Proclaimed although he continue there from the beginning to the ending is no sufficient ground to record his appearance nor shall save his default For
although he be there personally present and openly confess himself to be the same person who was Indicted and against whom the Proclamation issued yet if he deny to appear upon the Proclamation or to consent that his appearance be entred of Record it seems that his appearance cannot be Recorded but his default shall and he shall stand Convicted thereupon And this is no more an appearance then where a Prisoner is brought to the Common Pleas Bar by habeas Corpus to the intent to have him appear to an Original brought against him and he denies to appear to the Action in which Case his appearance cannot be Recorded as was resolved in Ascoughs Case 43 Eliz. Gouldsborough 118. Shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law That is a Recusant thus Convicted upon Proclamation and Default of appearance shall be in the same Condition as if he were convicted by Verdict but no Judgment is given Bridgman 122. Parker versus Webb But this Conviction upon Proclamation is no Judgment as was resolved in Doctor Fosters Case Co. 11.65 Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment And although it shall make the Recusant liable to the several forfeitures penalties and incapacities inflicted on Recusants convict yet it shall not operate as a judgment as hath been already shewed in divers instances For this reason it hath been questioned whether if a Recusant be Convicted upon Indictment and Proclamation the King may not wave his advantage of this Conviction and bring his Action of Debt given him by the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 For that such Conviction is no Judgment and consequently ought not to bind the King as a Judgment against the Recusant should have done Palmer 40.41 Sir John Webbs Case Worsley obtained a Patent to have all the Penalties of Recusants convict Although such a Patent was illegal for that the King cannot grant the penalty of a penal Law to a Subject for which Vide Rolles 1.10 C. 11. Roy versus Tollin Hobart 155. Colt Glover versus the Bishop of Coventry and Litchfield Ib. 183. Davison versus Barber yet admitting the Patent to be good The King cannot grant the forfeiture on a penal Law it was resolved that the penalties of Recusants convicted by Proclamation should not pass by those general words Rolles 1. 94 95. C. 41. Doctor Fosters Case And be it further Enacted Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a convicted Recusant That every offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Statutes in that behalf made and provided that hereafter shall fortune to be thereof once convicted shall in such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such Conviction pay into the Receipt of the Exchequer after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month which shall be contained in the Indictment whereupon such conviction shall be And shall also for every month after such Conviction without any other Indictment or Conviction forfeit Twenty pounds and pay into the Receipt of the Excheqver aforesaid at two times in the year that is to say in every Easter and Michaelmas Term as much as then shall remain unpaid after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month after such Conviction except in such Cases where the King shall and may by force of this Act refuse the same and take two parts of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender till the said party being Indicted for not coming to Church contrary to former Laws shall conform himself and come to Church according to the meaning of the Statute in that behalf made and provided What Convictions are here meant Once Convicted This extends to all Convictions whatsoever upon Indictment whether by Verdict Confession c. whereupon Judgment is given as well as to Convictions upon Proclamation and default And the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall in any of the said Cases run on forever after and be appropriated to the King Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. In what Term the forfeiture is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such conviction Here Easter and Michaelmas is to be taken disjunctively for Easter or Michaelmas as it is in the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. For the meaning is not that the Recusant shall have both of the Terms of Easter and Mithaelmas next after his Conviction wherein to pay the forfeiture of Twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment But he ought to pay the whole into the Exchequer the next Easter or Michaelmas Term which shall first happen after his Conviction And therefore if he be convicted in February he ought to pay the whole the next Easter Term unless where the King chooses to seize the two thirds of his Lands by force of this Statute as was admitted in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Hill 20 Jac. Jones 24. 25. And in the Lady Webbs Case who was convicted in March the pleading was that in the Easter Term then next following the said Katherine did not pay into the Exchequer according to the rate of 20 l. per month without any mention of Michaelmas Term Bridgman Pasch 16 Jac. 121. For every month after such Conviction By this Clause and that of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. 29 Eliz. 6. Penalty appropriated to the King to the same purpose after the Recusant is once Convicted the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall run on without any new Indictment or Conviction and shall be for ever afterwards appropriated to the King alone and paid into the Exchequer so that the Informer cannot bring any popular Action or Information for the Twenty pounds per month Informer barred for any time incurred after such Conviction but is utterly barred Co. 11.61 Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. the same Case Owen 37. Sulherd and Evererds Case The Lady Webb was Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy upon Proclamation and default of appearance Whether barred in the Case of a Feme Covert and afterwards an Informer Qui tam c. sued her and her Husband for a new offence of Recusancy in the Wife subsequent to such Conviction to which they both pleaded the said Conviction at the Kings Suit The question was whether the Informer should be barred by this Plea or whether the Information was maintainable notwithstanding such former Conviction of the Wife for that the Wife seems not to be such an Offender as is here intended because she can have no Goods or Lands during the Husbands life which may be seized for non-payment of the penalty But it was granted on all hands that if she had been a Feme sole this had been a good Plea in bar of the Informers popular Suit for then she had been bound to pay the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and
but forbear the same contrary to the tenor of a Statute made in the first year of the Reign of the said late Quéen for Vniformity of Common Prayer and being thereof lawfully convicted should forfeit to the said Quéen for every month after the end of the said Session of Parliament which he or she should so forbear twenty pounds of lawful English money as in and by the said Act of Parliament more at large appeareth And whereas afterward by another Act of Parliament of the said Quéen It was further Enacted by the Authority of the said Parliament amongst other things how and when the said payments of the said 20 l. should be made and that if default should be made in any part of any payment of the said twenty pounds contrary to the form in the said last specified Statute limited that then and so often the said Quéen should and might by Process out of her Highness Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of the said Act of Parliament leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family as in and by the last specified Statute more at large also may appear Now forasmuch as the said penalty of twenty pounds monthly is a greater burden unto men of small living then unto such as are of better ability and do refuse to come unto Divine Service as aforesaid who rather then they will have two parts of their Lands to be seized will be ready always to pay the said twenty pounds according to the limitation of the said Statutes and yet retain the residue of their livings and Inheritance in their own hands being of great yearly value which they do for the most part imploy as experience hath taught to the maintenance of Superstition and Popish Religion and to the relief of Iesuits Seminaries Popish Priests and other dangerous persons to the State Therefore to the intent that hereafter the penalty for not repairing to Divine Service might be inflicted in better proportion upon men of great ability Be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament The King may refuse 20 l. a month and take two parts of a Recusants Lands That the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall from and after the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next coming after the end of this Session of Parliament have full power and liberty to refuse the penalty of twenty pounds a month though it be tendred ready to be paid according to the Law and thereupon to seize and take to his own use and the uses intents and purposes hereafter limited two parts in threé to be divided as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms that at the time of such seizure shall be or afterward shall come to any the said Offenders in not coming to Church or any other to his or her use or in trust for him or her or at his or her disposition or whereby or wherewith or in consideration whereof such Offender or his Family or any of them shall be relieved maintained or kept as of all other Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in any wise or at any time liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid and the same to retain to his own and other uses intents and purposes hereafter in this Act appointed till every such Offender shall conform him or her self respectively as aforesaid in lieu and full recompence of the twenty pounds monthly that during his such seizure and retainer shall incur any thing in the said Statutes or any of them or any other Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding saving to our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and all and every person and persons Saving the Right of others bodies politick and corporate their Heirs and Successors other then the said Offender his or her Heirs and all claiming to his or their use or in trust for him or them or at his or their will or disposition all and all manner of Leases Rents Conditions and other Rights and Titles whatsoever had made and done bona fide and without fraud and covin before such seizure Though it be tendred or ready to be paid By this Branch of the Act a new advantage is given to the King against the Recusant For whereas by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. the convicted Recusant had his Election to pay the King twenty pounds per month and so prevent the seizure of the two third parts of his Lands now by this Statute that Election is taken away Election taken from the Recusant and given to the King and the choice is given to the King whether he will accept of the twenty pounds per month or refuse it and seize two third parts of the Recusants Lands in lieu thereof and if the King chooses the Lands the tender of the twenty pounds per month at the Exchequer will not save the seizure but the King shall enjoy the Lands notwithstanding Jones 24 25. Standen versus University of Oxford Hereditaments An Advowson is an Hereditament Hereditament Advowson and passes by that word 18 Eliz. Dyer 351. and is devisable by the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 1. of Wills as an Hereditament and if it be an Advowson in gross yet it may be seized by the King by force of this Act as part of his two parts of the Recusants Hereditaments Jones 23 24. Standen versus University of Oxford For 't is a thing valuable and shall be Assets and is extendable for the Kings Debt and upon a Writ of right of an Advowson there shall be a Recovery in value scil for every mark twelve pence Fitzh Recovery in value 9. 11. Hobart 304. London versus the Chapter of Southwell Co. 1. Inst 374. Britton 185. In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 23. 't is said That the King may refuse the twenty pounds per month and take to two parts of the Recusants Lands and all the Goods c. And an Advowson is without that Clause and the said Case of Standen and the University of Oxon is there cited for Authority But this is a mistake as to the Clause it self and as to the point in Law and the Authority brought for it For in truth there is no such Clause in this Statute nor in any other that the King upon refusal of the twenty pounds per month should take the Recusants Goods For the seizure of the Goods is given where the Offender fails of payment of the twenty pounds per month Where a Recusants Goods cannot be seized but not
or Constitution of man Naturalization being but a fiction in Law which confers the priviledges of a natural Subject but cannot make him a natural Subject who was none before For then he would have two natural Princes one where he was born and the other where Naturalized Vaughan 279 280. 283. Craw versus Ramsey Co. 7. 5 6 7. 25. Calvins Case Dyer 3 4 Ph. Mar. 145. Hobart 171. Curteenes Case so that to absolve perswade withdraw or reconcile an Alien born whose Subjection to the King began not with his birth or for any such to be absolved perswaded withdrawn or reconciled seems not to be Treason within this Act. But this Subjection is not to be understood locally Subjection not to be understood locally or in respect of the place of a mans Birth but in respect of the Prince to whom Subjection is due at the time of his Birth And therefore if a Scot or Irishman be absolved or reconciled in England although the Offence be committed in another Kingdom then that where his Subjection begun yet being born a Subject to the King of England its Treason in the absolver or person reconciling and in him that is absolved or reconciled Nor is it necessary in all Cases that the party be born in the Kings Dominions but that he may be a natural Subject notwithstanding and consequently within this Act as in the Case of an Embassador vide Co. 7. 18. Calvins Case Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 2. Stat. Sect. 20. A reconciled person taking the Oath Provided nevertheless That the last mentioned Clause of this Branch or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be taken to extend to any person or persons whatsoever which shall hereafter be reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome as aforesaid for and touching the point of so being reconciled only that shall return into this Realm and thereupon within six days next after such return before the Bishop of the Diocess or two Iustices of Peace joyntly or severally of the County where he shall arrive submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws and take the Oath set forth by Act in the first year of the Reign of the late Quéen Elizabeth commonly called the Oath of Supremacy as also the Oath before set down in this present Act which said Oaths the said Bishop and Iustices respectively shall have Power and Authority by this present Act to minister to such persons as aforesaid And the said Oaths so taken the said Bishop and Iustices before whom such Oaths shall be so taken respectively shall certifie at the next General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace to be holden within the said Shire Limit Division or Liberty wherein such person as aforesaid shall submit himself and take the said Oaths as aforesaid upon pain of every one neglecting to certifie the same as aforesaid the sum of Forty pounds Submission in case of Treason Which shall hereafter be reconciled In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 12. is intimated that this Clause which provides in Case of Submission extends to no Cases of Treason or Misprision of Treason for there in reciting this part of the Statute the Cases of Treason and Misprision of Treason are excepted which is a great mistake For the Submission here spoken of is only in the Case of a declared Treason scil being reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome For and touching the point of so being reconciled only In the latter part of the former Section there are three several sorts of Offences made Treason Reconciled to the Pope c. what meant thereby 1. To be willingly absolved or withdrawn from a mans natural Obedience 2. To be willingly reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome 3. To promise Obedience to any pretended Authority of that See or to any other Prince State or Potentate but in this Clause only the second of these Offences is remitted in Case of Submission viz. the being reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome By which I conceive to be meant the forsaking of the Religion established by Law and embracing that which is professed and maintained by the Pope and See of Rome And in that sense those words are commonly taken at this day And that this is the meaning of those words appears by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. which makes it Treason to absolve or withdraw the Subjects from their natural Obedience or to withdraw them from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion or to move them to promise Obedience to the See of Rome or any other Prince c. to answer which follows in that Act three other sorts of Treason viz. to be absolved or withdrawn or to be reconciled or to promise such Obedience so that the Offence of being reconciled answers to the Offence of withdrawing the Subjects from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion which explains what is meant by such Reconciliation viz. the being so withdrawn from the one Religion to the other But by this Clause if a person be thus reconciled that is change his Religion and become a Papist yet if he be capacitated to submit as is required by this Act and submit accordingly and take the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance such Offence of being reconciled shall not be Treason But as for being absolved or withdrawn from his natural Obedience Offences not within this Proviso or promising Obedience to the pretended Authority of the See of Rome or any other Prince State or Potentate besides his natural King such Submission and taking the Oaths shall not absolve him from that guilt but he shall have Judgment and suffer for the same as in Case of High Treason notwithstanding such Submission c. Dalton V. cap. 89. tit High Treason is therefore clearly mistaken in extending the benefit of this Submission c. generally to all who have been willingly absolved withdrawn or reconciled or have promised such Obedience Submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws The Kings Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2 What Laws are here meant vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. Sect. 21. Where the Trial shall be And be it further Enacted That all and every person and persons that shall offend contrary to this present branch of this Statute shall be Indicted tried and proceéded against by and before the Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery of that County for the time being or before the Iustices of the Court of Kings Bench and be there procéeded against according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm against Traitors as if the said Offence had béen committed in the same County where such person or persons shall be so taken Any Law Custom or Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding In what County The Offender may be proceeded against by force of this Act in any County where he shall be imprisoned for
so the word taken is to be expounded and the like Exposition hath been made of the Statutes of 2 3 E. 6. cap. 2. of Soldiers and 1 Jac. cap. 11. of having two Wives living Stat. 1 3 E. 6. 2 1 Jac. 11. Hutton 131. If the Offence be committed out of this Realm yet it cannot be tried upon the Statute of 35 H. 8. cap. 2. Stat 35 H. 8. 2. of Trial of Treasons committed out of the Realm For this Act hath prescribed a special form of a Trial in this Case which must be observed And if such Offender be a Peer of England Indictment of a Peer the Indictment cannot be taken before any others then the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in the County where he is imprisoned or the Justices of the Kings Bench Hutton 131. Lord Digbies Case Stat. Sect. 22. Trial of Peers Provided always That if any Peér of this Realm shall happen to be Indicted of any Offence made Treason by this Act he shall have his Trial by his Péers as in other like Cases of Treason is accustomed Stat. Sect. 23. And be it further Enacted That if any Subject of this Realm at any time after one month next after the end of this present Session of Parliament shall not resort or repair every Sunday to some Chuch Chappel or some other usual place appointed for Common Prayer and there hear Divine Service according to the Statute made in that behalf in the first year of the Reign of the late Q. Elizabeth that then it shall and may be lawful to and for any one Iustice of Peace of that Limit Division or Liberty wherein the said party shall dwell upon proof unto him made of such default by confession of the party or Oath of witness to call the said party before him and if he or she shall not make a sufficient excuse and due proof thereof to the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace That it shall be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to give Warrant to the Churchwarden of the said Parish wherein the said party shall dwell under his Hand and Seal to levy twelve pence for every such default by distress and sale of the Goods of every such Offender rendring to the said Offender the Overplus of the money raised of the said Goods so to be sold and that in default of such distress it shall and may be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to commit every such Offender to some Prison within the said Shire Division Limit or Liberty wherein such Offender shall be inhabiting until payment be made of the said sum or sums so to be forfeited which forfeiture shall be imployed to and for the use of the Poor of that Parish wherein the Offender shall be resident or abiding at the time of such Offence committed Provided That no man be impeached upon this Clause Within what time the Offender shall be impeached except he be called in question for his said default within one month next after the said default made And that no man being punished according to this Branch But once punished for one Offence shall for the same Offence be punished by the forfeiture of twelve pence upon the Law made in the first year of the late Quéen Elizabeth If any Subject of this Realm By a Subject of this Realm Subject of this Realm who here meant is to be understood a natural born Subject or an Alien naturalized here by Act of Parliament or made a Denizen of England by the Kings Letters Patents And who not But these words here are exclusive of two sorts of Subjects 1. Of an Alien inhabiting in this Realm who oweth to the King a local Subjection or Ligeance and is neither naturalized or made Denizen For the word Subject is as a mark of distinction and must be necessarily exclusive of some persons or other within this Realm and therefore cannot be supposed to take in meer Aliens who if neither naturalized or made Denizens are only local Subjects and of the lowest form For if no person inhabiting within the Realm were here intended to be excepted the word Subject would be idle and to no purpose 2. An Alien Naturalized by Act of Parliament in Scotland or Ireland or made Denizen of either of those Kingdoms by the Kings Letters Patents is for the same reason out of the meaning of this Branch although he live in England For it seems that such a person is still an Alien here and shall not partake of any priviledges in England by his being Naturalized or made Denizen in Scotland or Ireland Their Acts or Laws not being Obligative or concluding to us in England Vide Vaughan 278 279 280 285 287. Craw versus Ramsey And therefore the power here given any one Justice of Peace to levy the twelve pence per Sunday doth not extend to either sort of these Aliens An Alien within Stat. 1. Eliz. 2 but yet they may forfeit twelve pence per Sunday for their absence from Church upon an Indictment of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. and that by force of the general words there Every person and persons inhabiting within this Realm so that what is said in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11.63 viz. That this Statute gives a more speedy remedy for the Recovery of the twelve pence is not to be understood of all persons within 1 Eliz. but only of the Subjects of this Realm in the sense of this Branch of the Statute And if a man be born within any of the Kings Dominions which were such and united with England in their subjection at the time of his birth although he be not born within England Natural Subjection not local yet if he live here he is a Subject of this Realm within the intent of this Act For Natural Subjection and Ligeance are not local or confined to that Kingdom or Country where he was born But he is a natural Subject in any of the Dominions belonging at the time of his Birth to the Prince under whom he was born And upon this ground it was resolved in Calvins Case Co. lib. 7. Postnati That a man born in Scotland after the Union of the two Kingdoms should inherit in England So that a man born in Scotland or Ireland or any other of the Kings Dominions which were such and so united at the time of his birth if he live in England is punishable by this Act and any one Justice of Peace may grant his Warrant to levy the twelve pence for his absence from Church vide antea Sect. 19. Morning and Evening Prayers Every Sunday This repairing to Church every Sunday must be as well to Evening Prayers as to Morning Prayers For it ought to be an entire day and an entire Service By Hutton and Berkley Justices Dalton V. cap. 45. tit Recusants To the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace In this Case the Justice of
proved that it was for her Joynture or if a man devise Lands by his last Will to his Wife generally and there is no mention in the Will that 't is for her Joynture for in this Case an Averment that it was so intended will not serve unless there be express words in the Will to that purpose These Estates so gained by the Wife as they do not bar her Dower out of the residue of her Husbands Estate but that she shall enjoy both the one and the other Co. 4. 4. so they are not within the meaning of this Act because not made for her Joynture And she shall not forfeit the profits of two parts of them although she may forfeit the profits of 2 parts of her Dower which she hath out of the residue of her Husbands Estate If Lands be conveyed to the Wife before marriage for part of her Joynture and other Lands are conveyed to her after Marriage in full satisfaction of her Jointure and she refuse those conveyed after Marriage in this Case she may retain those conveyed before Marriage and yet be endowed of the residue of her Husbands Estate For that the Lands first setled on her were not for her whole Joynture Co. 1. Inst 35. Co. 4. 3. Forfeiture of the profits of part of her Jointure And if she be a Popish Recusant Convict and her Husband none and she conform not within the year next before his death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts both of such Dower and of the Estate so conveyed to her before her Marriage And as the Wife shall have her Joynture and Dower both Where the Jointure is pursuant to the Statute in such Cases where the Joynture is not pursuant to the Statute of 27 H. 8. so in some Cases likewise where she hath a Joynture pursuant to that Statute As where she hath such a Joynture made to her by the Husband before Marriage and he afterwards endow her ad ostium Ecclesiae or if she hath a Joynture made by the Husband in his life time and after his death his Heir or Feoffee assign other Lands to her in Dower or the Heir plead to her in a Writ of Dower ne unque seisi que Dower c. or nient accouple in Loyal Matrimony or any other Plea save Joynture in bar of Dower and it be found against him In these Cases the Wife shall hold her Joynture and yet be endowed and if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act shall forfeit the profits of two parts of her Joynture and Dower both But if a Widow Dower not forfeited who is indowed of the Lands of her deceased Husband takes a second Husband who is no Popish Recusant Convicted by whom she hath a Jointure and she becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and the second Husband dies and the Wife is an Offender within this Act In this Case she shall not by force thereof forfeit the profits of two parts of such Dower and Jointure both but only of her Jointure For that her Dower is not out of the Lands of her said Husband that is of the Husband in whose life time she stood convicted and after such Conviction forbore to conform c. within the year next before his death And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 12. A Popish Recusant shall be disabled as an Excommunicate person That every Popish Recusant which is or shall be convicted of Popish Recusancy shall stand and be reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person lawfully and duly Excommunicated and as if he or she had béen so denounced and excommunicated according to the Laws of this Realm until he or she so disabled shall conform him or her self and come to Church and hear Divine Service and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm and also take the Oath appointed and prescribed in one other Act made this present Session of Parliament Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants And that every person or persons sued or to be sued by such person so disabled shall and may plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff as if he or she were Excommunicated by Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court What Conviction disables him Convicted of Popish Recusancy The Conviction mentioned here and in the other branches of this Statute seems to be intended not only of a Conviction according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. upon Proclamation and default of appearance but of a Judgment likewise upon an Indictment or popular Suit on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt c. by the King alone by force of the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. For Convicted in relation to these three last mentioned remedies is to be taken for adjudged or attainted Vide for this the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. Sect. 5. And the Popish Recusant who is either convicted upon Proclamation and default of appearance or against whom Judgment is had upon an Indictment popular Suit or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit is hereby disabled as an Excommunicate person and liable to all other the penalties and incapacities inflicted by this Act on a Popish Recusant convicted To what intent as excommunicate Reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person c. Excommunicated And not reputed to all intents as an Excommunicate person as Wingate tit Crown numb 135. misrecites the Statute For as it seems by the words of the Statute the Popish Recusant convicted is not to be reputed as a person Excommunicate in any other respect or to any other intent but as to his disability only And yet the Opinion of the Court of Kings Bench Mich. 11 Jac. in the Case of Griffith and others seems to be to the contrary and that a Popish Recusant convicted may by force hereof be attached upon a Writ of Excommunicato capiendo Excommmnicato capiendo Bulstrode 2. 155. Tamen Quaere whether this Statute being a penal Law and speaking only of the point of disability shall be extended by Equity to other Cases or the Recusant be attached upon an Excommunicato capiendo unless he be first actually Excommunicated A Popish Recusant Convict is disabled as an Excommunicate person Witness to be a Witness in any Cause between party and party By Coke Chief Justice Bulstrode 2. 155. This disability but quousque May plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff This disability in the Popish Recusant convicted is but quousque c. until he Conform c. and take the Oath of Allegiance And the Defendant must in this Case plead the Conviction at large and must as in a Plea of Excommengement demand if the Plaintiff shall be answered Hetley 18. which is the legal conclusion of a Plea in disability of
and really in him who hath the right of nomination as is held in 14 H. 4. 11. Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity Chancellor and Schollers a good description Although the University be incorporated by the name of Chancellor Masters and Schollers yet the description here made of them by the name of Chancellor and Schollers is well enough and sufficiently denotes the persons intended And the University shall have the presentation c. as if the true name of the Incorporation had been expressed For Acts of Parliament as well as Wills are to be taken according to the intent of the Makers and not according to the strict Letter Co. 10. 57. Shall have the presentation c. What is given the University It hath been made a Question what is given the University by these words whether only a bare power or liberty to present or a setled estate and interest in the Partronage or Advowson See the before cited Case of Standen versus University d'Oxon Jones 22 23 25 26. where two Justices Hutton and Jones were divided in opinion upon this point For Hutton held that that which is given to the University by this Act is a setled estate and interest and compared it to the interest or estate of the Lord who was to hold the Land until he was satisfied the value of the marriage of the Heir and to that of the Conusee by the Statute of Acton Burnell and to an estate given to a Man until a hundred pounds be paid In all which Cases the party hath a setled estate and interest in the Land But Jones held the contrary and that the University hath by this Act only a power or liberty to Present when the Church becomes void and compared it to the power given to the Bishop to Present by lapse after the six months and to that given by the Statute of Proviso's 25 E. 3. where the Pope provides Stat. 25 E. 3. 31 Eliz. 6 and to that given the King by the Statute of 31 Eliz. of Simony In which Cases no Estate or Interest is transferred but only a power or liberty granted to Present For this Act doth not remove the Patronage from the Popish Recusant The Recusant is still Patron but that continues still in him and he is Patron notwithstanding his Conviction and as Patron shall confirm a Lease made by the Incumbent as he might have done before his Conviction which proves that the Interest of the Patronage is not devested out of him nor consequently setled in the University Private clause Note Although this be a general Statute and that part of it which disables the Recusant to Present c. or to grant any Avoidance be general of which the Judges ought to take notice yet this part of it which gives the Presentation c. to the Universities is special and private for that it concerns only particular persons and must be pleaded or specially found or otherwise the Judges cannot take notice of it Hobart 227. Anne Needler versus the Bishop of Winchester Co. 10. 57. See the Rules touching publick and private Acts of Parliament and touching special or private Clauses in general Acts of Parliament 13 E. 4. 8. Co. 4. 76 77. Hollands Case During such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict Conviction when requisite If the University bring a Quare Impedit upon this Statute they must averr that the Popish Recusant Convict was and remained such at the time when the Church became void For without that they do not enable themselves to Present But they need not averr that he remains a Popish Recusant Convict at the time of the bringing of the Quare Impedit for when the Presentment hac vice is once vested in the University although the Recusant conform or die yet the University shall Present Co. 10.57 58. University hath a limited power These words are words of restraint and the Statute gives only a limited power to the University scil so long as the Recusant shall be Patron or the Patron shall be a Recusant So that if before the Church becomes void the Recusancy be removed from the Patron by his Conformity or the Patronage be removed from the Recusant although he continues a Recusant the University have lost their power to Present Jones 19. And therefore if the Patron grant the Advowson in Fee or in Tail Grants which bar the University or for life or years these Cases are out of the Statute And although after the Grant he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and then the Church becomes void yet the University shall not Present And it seems that although the Patron make such Grant of the Advowson after his Conviction and before the Church is void yet this shall bar the University For the Patronage was before the Avoidance removed from the Recusant Jones 19. Co. 10. 56. contrary to the Opinion of Hutton who held that if a man make a Lease for years of an Advowson yet if afterwards he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict the University shall have the Presentation as a future interest given to them by this Act notwithstanding such Lease Jones 26. And the reason why by such Grants the University shall be barred is for that the disability here inflicted on the Recusant is only a disability to Present or to grant the next Avoidance which extends not to any of the Grants beforementioned nor severs the Patronage from the Patron as those other Grants do And the intent of the Statute is to prevent a Presentation by the Recusant or by him to whom he should grant the next Avoidance Intent of the Statute who it was presumed would Present such an one as the Recusant should appoint But now when he grants the Advowson it self away that mischief is prevented and the Statute intended not in that Case to give away the Presentation from the Grantee to the University Jones 19 20. And yet if the Recusants Grant of the Advowson in Fee Covinous Grant or in Tail or for life or years were by Covin or in Trust on purpose to avoid this Statute and be averred and found so to be such Grant shall not bar the University Jones 20. Co. 10. 56. Vide Godbolt 216. C. 309. But then the Averment Averment in such Case must not be of Covin or Fraud to any other intent only but it must be averred to be to the particular intent to avoid this Statute and defeat the University of the Presentment and so it must be found by the Jury Verdict For if it be averred or the Jury find that the Recusant granted away the Advowson for any other Covinous purpose Intent as to deceive Creditors or the like and not to avoid this Act this will not help the University nor shall they take advantage thereof so as to devest or impeach the Interest or Estate of the Grantee in the Advowson And this
resembles the Case of 9 10 Eliz. in the Court of Wards cited in the Case of the Chancellor c. of the University of Oxford Co. 10. 57. Tenant in Capite makes a Feoffment to the intent to deceive his Creditors And this fraudulent intent was found quod nulla alia Causa aut Collusio viz. ad defraudandam Reginam c. de custodia haeredum vel terrarum c. There it was resolved That although in truth by the event the Queen was by the Feotfment defrauded of the Wardship of the Body and Lands of the Heir yet because the fraud was found only to one particular intent scil to deceive Creditors it should not be extended to another intent scil to defeat the Queen of her Wardship A man seized inter alia of an Advowson in gross Where the King shall Present becomes a Popish Recusant Convict The King seizes the Advowson as part of his two parts The Church becomes void In this Case it was held by Justice Hutton That the University and not the King shall Present But Justice Jones held strongly to the contrary and that notwithstanding this Act the King shall have the Presentation Stat. 3 Jac. 4. For the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. saith That the King may take and seize two third parts of a Recusants Hereditaments under which word an Advowson is comprehended And although the power or liberty of Presenting is here given the University yet that is to be intended only in such Cases where a Popish Recusant Convict is Patron But when the King hath seized the Advowson as part of his two parts the King is Patron and not the Recusant nor shall the Title the King hath to the Advowson by the Act of 3 Jac. 4. be devested by another Act of Parliament unless it had been there given away from the King in express terms And Hobart Chief Justice and Winch Justice declared they were of the same Opinion with Jones in the main point Jones 17. c. Standen al' versus University d' Oxon Whitton Obj. To this it hath been objected That when this Statute disables the Recusant to grant any Avoidance it disables him to grant it to the King as well as to any other person But if the Recusant may forfeit the Advowson to the King he may forfeit the Avoidance to the King And every forfeiture being a Grant or Gift in Law as is held in Hales Case Plowden 260 263. the Recusant by consequence may grant the Avoidance contrary to the express Letter of this Act Answ But to pass by the questions whether by the Recusants being disabled to grant any Avoidance generally he is disabled to grant an Avoidance to the King or whether the forfeiture of the two thirds by the Recusant can be properly called a Grant or Gift from the Recusant and not rather from the Law which creates the forfeiture It s enough for our purpose here to distinguish between voluntary Acts and Acts by compulsion For this Statute which disables the Recusant to Present or to grant any Avoidance was intended only to restrain his voluntary Acts But when he forfeits the Avoidance to the King although the offence viz. his Recusancy be voluntary yet the Conviction and Forfeiture thereupon are involuntary And the Recusant is therein potius patiens quam agens Jones 21. A Popish Recusant Convict seized in fee of an Advowson in gross is attainted of Felony or Praemunire Felony Praemunire and the Church becomes void In this Case Hutton held That the Interest which accrued to the University upon the Conviction for Recusancy should not be devested by the Attainder And that if a man seized of such an Advowson Statute Merchant acknowledge a Statute Merchant and afterwards becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and then the Statute is extended the Interest of the University shall not be devested by the extent But Jones seemed to be of a contrary Opinion in the Case of Treason or Praemunire Jones 20.26 If the King seize two parts of a Mannor belonging to a Popish Recusant Convict Advowson follows the Mannor for non-payment of the forfeiture of twenty pounds per month to which Mannor an Advowson is appendant The two parts of the Advowson shall follow the two parts of the Mannor and the King shall Present and not the University notwithstanding this Act For after such seizure the King is Patron of the Advowson and not the Recusant and in this Case the King shall present alone Hobart 126 127. The King shall Present alone Chancellor c. of Cambridge versus Walgrave al' Moore 872. C. 1214. the same Case As shall then have any other Benefice with Cure of Souls And not as is already beneficed as Wingate tit Crown numb 140. mistakes For a sine Cura is a Benefice Sint Cura and yet the University may Present or Nominate him who hath a sine cura A Donative of the Kings may be cum cura animarum Donative cum cura And so is the Church of the Tower of London Cro. Mich. 9. Car. Mackaller versus Todderick And the University cannot Present or Nominate him that hath such a Donative Notwithstanding what is said by Sir Edward Coke 3. Inst 355. Deanry Archdeaconry Prebend c. It seems that a Deanry Archdeaconry Prebend c. are not Benefices with Cure of Souls nor had they been comprehended under the name of Benefices with Cure of Souls within the Statute of 21 H. 8. Pluralities Stat. 21 H. 8. of Pluralities Although the special Proviso in that Act had been omitted For that Proviso is ex abundanti and there is no such to except them out of the Statute of 13 Eliz. cap. 12. Stat. 13 El. 12. of reading the Articles and yet if a Dean Archdeacon or Prebendary read not the Articles within the time limited by 13 Eliz. his promotion is not void by that Statute And the reason is because 't is not a Benefice with Cure of Souls The Opinion of Justice Tirrell at Lincoln Assizes in Lent 1668 9. Who in the Case of Dr. Sanderson denied the Archdeacon of Lincoln to be lawful Archdeacon For that he had not read the Articles within the time so limited and affirmed an Archdeaconry to be a Benefice with Cure within 13 Eliz. being contrary to Law and to the received meaning of that Statute And as for a Prebend the reason given for the Opinion in Bland and Maddox Case B. R. Mich. 29 30 Eliz. is expresly against what is said by Sir Edward Coke For it was there agreed that a Layman may be presented to a Prebend quia non habet curam animarum Cro. Eliz. 79. And for the same reason a Dean Archdeacon Prebendary c. may be in this Case presented or nominated by the University for their promotion is not a Benefice with Cure of Souls Stat. Sect. 21. Moreover because Recusants Convict are not thought
or principal Secretary for the time being to be one And if such person or persons live and reside in the Country distant above thirty miles from London then before the Lord Bishop of the Diocess or such other person or persons as the Lord Chancellor or Lord Kéeper of the Great Seal for the time being shall thereto by Writ of Dedimus potestatem Authorize The sworn Servants of the King Queen Prince c. And all and every the sworn Servants ordinary and extraordinary of your Highness the Quéens Grace or of the Houshold of the Prince of Wales and of the rest of your Highness Children before the Lord Steward the Lord Chamberlains and Vicechamberlains to your Highness and the Quéen the Treasurer and Controller of your Highness Houshold the Master of your Highness Horse the Dean of the Chappel and the Knight Marshal for the time being the Officers of the Gréen-cloth or any thrée of them Temporal Judges Ministers of Justices They which receive any Fée of the King All and every temporal Iudge Iustices of Peace Sheriffs Escheators Feodaries and other Officers and Ministers of Iustice in this present Act not specially mentioned and every other person or persons that doth or shall receive any Fée of your Highness your Heirs and Successors before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Kéeper of the Great Seal Lord Treasurer Lord Admiral Lord Warden of the Five Ports for the time being or one of them or before one of the Chief Iustices either of your Majesties Bench or of the Common Pleas or before Iustices of Assize of the same County where the parties reside or other such persons as the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seal shall thereto Authorize Chief Officers of Cities and Towns Corporate And all Mayors Bailiffs or other chief Officers of Cities and Towns Corporate by what name soever they be called or known before such person or persons as usually administer the Oath to them at their first entrance into their said Offices And all and every the Knights Citizens Burgesses and Barons of the Five Ports of the Commons House of Parliament Stat. Sect. 2. Knights Citizens Burgesses and Barons of the Commons House of Parliament at any Parliament or Session of Parliament hereafter to be Assembled before he or they shall be permitted to enter into the said House before the Lord Steward for the time being or his Deputy or Deputies The King cannot dispence with any Member of the Commons House of Parliament from taking this Oath The Kings dispensation void For that he is here declared to be persona inhabilis until he take it Vaughan 355. Thomas and Sorrel's Case And the Master of the Ordnance Lieutenant of the Tower Stat. Sect. 3. Master of the Ordnance Lieutenant of the Tower c. of London and Mint-master there the four principal Officers of your Navy under the Lord Admiral before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Admiral for the time being or any of them And all the Officers Ministers Officers and Servants in the Tower Servants and others within your said Tower of London before the Lieutenant of the Tower And all the Vice-Admirals Captains Masters Officers Ministers and Souldiers in your Highness Ships or any of them before the said four principal Officers of your Navy or any two of them And all persons having charge of Castles Fortresses Captains of Castles and Souldiers Block-houses or Garrisons and all Captains who shall have Charge of Souldiers within this your Highness Realm before the Iustices of Assize of the same County or before two Iustices of the Peace of the same County City or Liberty where the same Castles Fortresses or Block-houses shall stand or the Charge of Souldiers shall be All Doctors Advocates and Proctors of the Civil Law Doctors Advocates and Proctors of the Civil Law and their Clerks before the Bishop of the Diocess where they shall for the most part dwell or reside And all and every person or persons Temporal that hereafter shall Sue Livery or Ouster le maine Suers of Livery and Ouster le maine out of the Hands of your Highness your Heirs or Successors before his or their Ouster le maine Sued forth and allowed before the Master of the Wards and Liveries or before the Surveyor and Attorney of your Highness said Court in open Court Sergeants at Law and the Judges Servants All the Sergeants at Law Servants to the Iudges in your Highness Courts at Westminster and all other in the Sergeants Inns before the Chief Iustice of your Majesties Bench the Chief Iustice of the Common Pleas and the Chief Baron of your Exchequer or some or one of them Gentlemen of the Inns of Court Principals and Treasurers of the Inns of Chancery All your Highness Subjects in the Inns of Court or that hereafter shall be admitted thereinto and the Principals and Treasurers of every Inn of Chancery before the Readers and Benchers of the several houses whereto they belong or four of them at the least in their open Halls All others of the Inns of Chancery All other your Majesties Subjects as well Ancients as other not being Principal or Treasurer that now are or hereafter shall be admitted into any Inn of Chancery before the Principal or Treasurer and Ancients of the several Inns of Chancery or four of them in their open Halls Prothonotaries Philizers Officers Attorneys Clerks All Prothonotaries Philizers Officers Ministers Attorneys and Clerks that now are or hereafter shall be admitted to write or practice in any of your Highness Courts at Westminster or in any other Court of Record before the Iudge or Iudges of the same Court Clerks and Officers of the Chancery All Clerks of the Chancery and all their under-clerks and all other Officers of the said Court of Chancery and their Clerks before the Master of the Rolls for the time being or before two of the Masters of the said Court of Chancery Parsons Vicars Curates persons in Orders Schoolmaster Usher All Parsons Vicars and Curats and all other persons Ecclesiastical taking Orders and all and every School-master or Vsher before the Bishop of the Diocess or other Ordinary in the same sitting in open Court The Vice-chancellors of both the Universities Heads of Colledges and Halls Proctors Beadles The Vice-Chancellors of both the Vniversities for the time being and the Presidents Wardens Provosts Masters of Colledges and Halls and all other Heads and Principals of Houses Proctors and Beadles of the Vniversities publickly in the Convocation before the Senior Masters there present Persons taking Degrees in School And all and every other persons whatsoever that is or shall be promoted to any Degrée in School before the Vice-Chancellor of the said Vniversity for the time being in the Congregation house Fellows and Schollers of Halls or Colledges All Fellows of Houses and all Schollers of Halls or
Privy Council of your Highness your Heirs or Successors or by the Bishop of the Diocess if she be a Baroness or if she be under that Degrée by two Iustices of the Peace of the same County whereof one to be of the Quorum there to remain without Ball or Mainprize until she shall conform her self and come to Church and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper unless the Husband of such Wife shall pay to the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors for the Offence of his said Wife for every month ten pounds of lawful money of England or else the third part in thrée parts to be divided of all his Lands and Tenements at the choice of the Husband whose Wife is so convicted as aforesaid for and during so long time as she remaining a Recusant convicted shall continue out of Prison during which time and no longer she may be at liberty What Conviction is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. Being lawfully convicted as a Popish Recusant That is upon Indictment at the Kings Suit or a popular Action or Information on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone according to the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. In which two last Cases the former Laws are somewhat altered by this Statute For by the former Laws if a person had been convicted of Recusancy any other way then by Indictment no more could have been demanded either by the King or Informer then for the months mentioned in the Information or Count And the penalty should not have run on in such Case For that the Statutes of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. which appropriate the penalty to the King after Conviction intend no other Conviction then by Indictment as hath been there said Baron and seme But by this Statute if a popular Action or Information or an Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit alone be brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife and Judgment be had against them the Husband shall not only pay for the time contained in the Information or Count but the Wife shall be imprisoned ever afterwards unless she conform or the Husband pay ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands to the King And yet this Statute doth not after such Conviction of the Wife in a popular Suit Suits upon former Statutes not taken away or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit take away the popular Action or Information from the Informer or the Action of Debt c. from the King for the time to come but that they may be brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife for any month or months wherein she is absent from Church after such Conviction For this Statute and 23 Eliz. 1. and 35 Eliz. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 35 Eliz. 1 are all affirmative Laws and may well stand together so that any of the three remedies given by these Statutes may be pursued This Statute not abrogating any former Law but only providing another way of punishment for the Wife after she is once convicted Howbeit she shall not be punished by any more then one of these three ways Co. 11. 63 64. Rolles 1. 94. Doctor Fosters Case Cro. Pasch 17 Jac. 529. Parker versus Curson And therefore if the King bring an Action of Debt c. upon 35 Eliz. against the Husband and Wife Where the Wife shall not be imprisoned or the Informer sue them upon 23 Eliz. for any absence of the Wife from Church after she is once convicted by either of those ways and recover the Privy Counsellor Bishop or Justices of Peace here mentioned cannot imprison her by force of this Act for the non-payment of the ten pounds per month by the Husband for those months for which the King or Informer hath recovered or for his not yielding the thirds of his Lands to the King And the reason is for that when the Husband stands charged with the penalty of twenty pounds per month for the absence of the Wife the intent of the Act is satisfied in respect of those months of her absence for which he stands so charged For if he pay not the twenty pounds per month so recovered the King or Informer hath the ordinary remedy after Judgment by Process of Capias against them both both And the intent of the Act was no more then that the Husband should pay for the Recusancy of his Wife or the Wife be imprisoned And if in this Case the Privy Counsellor Bishop or Justices of Peace should have power to imprison the Wife unless the Husband would pay ten pounds for the months for which the King or Informer hath recovered it would follow that the Husband hath his Election whether he will pay ten pounds per month to the King by force of this Act or the twenty pounds per month so recovered against him by the King or Informer For he shall not pay both the one and the other for that were bis puniri pro uno delicto And if he shall have his Election the King or Informer might by this device be eluded of the penalty of twenty pounds per month so recovered which could not be the intent of the makers of this Law The King and Informer barred by her Imprisonment But if the Wife be after such Conviction imprisoned by force of this Act neither the King or Informer can so sue the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife For she is already punished by this Act and must remain in Prison until the Husband pay the ten pounds for every month or yield the thirds of his Lands to the King or the Wife conforms Or if the Husband yields the thirds So if the Husband yields the thirds of his Lands to save his Wives imprisonment he is already punished by this Act and shall not again be punished or Sued by the King or Informer either upon 23 Eliz. or 35 Eliz. Or pay Ten pounds per month And if after such conviction of the Wife he pay Ten pounds per month to save her imprisonment he cannot be sued with his Wife for the Twenty pounds per month upon either of those Statutes by the King or Informer for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her conviction for which he hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not Bis puniri pro uno delicto Hitherto hath been spoken of the Conviction of the Wife at the Suit of the King alone by Action of Debt c. or by the Informer Qui tam c. which doth not appropriate the penalty to the King by 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Conviction upon Indictment If the Wife be convicted of Recusancy upon an Indictment it hath been much debated whether that doth not so appropriate the
penalty of Twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by the said Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4. that the King cannot bring an Action of Debt or the Informer any popular Suit against the Husband and Wife for any offence of Recusancy committed by the Wife after such Conviction see for this Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 9. and 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. However admitting they may yet now if the King take advantage of this Statute and the Wife be either Imprisoned or the Husband yields the third part of his Lands to the King there is no question but the King and Informer are both barred The King and Informer barred to sue for the Twenty pounds per month for any time incurred after her Conviction For the King hath made his Election to punish her this way and the Informer cannot sue her for she is punished already at the Suit of the King And if the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month the King and Informer are likewise barred for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her Conviction for which the Husband hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not be twice punished for the same offence Of all his Lands and Tenements By Tenements Tenements what are to be understood Offices Rents Commons Profits apprender out of Lands Advowsons and the like wherein a man hath any Franktenement and whereof he is seized ut de libero tenemento for all these are included under the word Tenement as well as Lands and other Inheritances which are holden Co. 1. inst 6. Perkins Sect. 114 115. 11 H. 6. 22 Bro. Grant 143. Finch 130. Womans Lawyer lib. 3. 188. Anderson 2. 4. But Tenement extends not to a Chattel or Lease for years Bro. Done 41. Grant 87. Bulstrode 1. 101. Turpine against Forreyner So that the Husband need not yield to the King the third part of his Leases for years for the Recusancy of his Wife Shall continue out of Prison A married Woman Imprisonment of the Wife for other cause convicted as a Popish Recusant is after her Conviction and before any further prosecution or any Election made by the Husband whether he will pay the Ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands imprisoned by process of Law or for some other Cause not relating to such Conviction and afterwards is set at Liberty It seems that the Husband shall not pay the Ten pounds per month for the time she was in Prison for the Act speaks only of the time during which she continues out of Prison and although she were not imprisoned for her Recusancy yet seeing she had not during such her Imprisonment the benefit intended to her in consideration of the Ten pounds per month or third part viz. her Liberty the Husband shall not for that time pay the penalty here appointed to save her Imprisonment but if he pay it for the time after she is set at Liberty that is sufficient to satisfie the intent of this Act. But if after such Conviction Covinous Imprisonment the Wife be imprisoned by Covin upon some pretence not relating to such Conviction that shall not save the Husbands payment of the Ten pounds per month for the time she was imprisoned but after she is set at Liberty she may be again Imprisoned by force of this Act unless the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month or satisfie to the King the third part of the profits of his Lands as well for the time of such covinous Imprisonment as for the future for the covinous Imprisonment was upon the matter her own Act and no person shall take advantage of an Imprisonment covinously caused by him or her self 16 E. 4. 5. And here she continued out of Prison in the sence of this Act because her Imprisonment was not by Process of Law in invitam Outlawry by Covin And so if a Man be Outlawed while he is in Prison yet the Outlawry shall not be avoided for that Cause if the Imprisonment were by Covin or consent of the party Outlawed Co. 1. Inst. 259. 38. Assiz Pl. 17. Stat. iii Car. i. cap. ii An Act to restrain the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas FOrasmuch as divers ill affected persons to the true Religion established within this Realm Stat. Sect. 1. have sent their Children into Forreign parts to be bred up in Popery notwithstanding the restraint thereof by the Statute made in the first year of the Reign of our late Soveraign Lord King James of famous memory Be it Enacted that the said Statute shall be put in due execution And be it further Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same that in Case any person or persons under the Obedience of the King his Heirs and Successors He that goes himself or sends any other beyond the Seas to be trained up in Popery c. shall be disabled to sue c. and shall lose all his Goods and shall forfeit all his Lands c. for life at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall convey or send or cause to be sent or conveyed any Child or other person out of any of the Kings Dominions into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent and purpose to enter into or be resident or trained up in any Priory Abbey Nunnery Popish Vniversity Colledge or School or House of Iesuites Priests or in any private Popish Family and shall be there by any Iesuite Seminary Priest Friar Monk or other Popish Person instructed perswaded or strengthned in the Popish Religion in any sort to profess the same or shall convey or send or cause to be conveyed or sent by the hands or means of any person whatsoever any sum or sums of money or other thing for or towards the maintenance of any Child or other person already gone or sent or to go or to be sent and trained and instructed as is aforesaid or under the the name or colour of any Charity Benevolence or Alms towards the relief of any Priory Abbey Nunnery Colledge School or any Religious House whatsoever Every person so sending conveying or causing to be sent and conveyed as well any such Child or other person as any sum or sums of money or other thing and every person passing or being sent beyond the Seas being thereof Lawfully Convicted in or upon any Information Presentment or Indictment as is aforesaid shall be disabled from thenceforth to sue or use any Action Bill Plaint or Information in course of Law or to prosecute any Suit in any Court of Equity or to be Committée of any Ward or Executor or Administrator
University 231 232 233. The King is Patron in that case 232 233. And shall present alone 172. 233. Difference between a Bond to the King and a Bond to the Kings use 182. Licences by the King 116. 139. 155. 206. 223. Dispensation by the King where void 44. 243. Fine and Imprisonment at the Kings pleasure by whom to be inflicted 97. Lapse see Notice Laws See Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction Statutes What is meant by the Kings or Queens Laws 95. The Ecclesiastical Laws are the Kings Laws 5 6. Ecclesiastical and Temporal Laws are to be administred distinctly 6. The Laws of Scotland or Ireland not obligative to England 189. Lease See Confirmation Trust Licence See Abjuration Bishop Councel Iustices of Peace King Schoolmaster What Licence a Popish Recusant may have to travel out of the compass of five miles and from whom 206. 208. To what Popish Recusants such Licence may be granted 206 207. What is a good Licence and what not 206. Where it may be granted without any particular cause shewed and where not 206 207 208. 210. Where it ought to be averred that the cause contained in the Licence is true 211. Where the Licence must be under hand and where under hand and seal both 206 207 208. Where there must be a person to assent as well as persons to Licence and where not 206 207 208 209 210. Where the Lieutenant or a Deputy Lieutenant may assent to such Licence and where not 206 208 209 210. They who Licence and he who assents must be all distinct persons 209. The Licence and Assent may be both in one writing 209. The person assenting must be resident in the County 209 210. Where the Recusant Licenced must take an Oath and what Oath and before whom and where not 206 207 208 210 211. Lieutenant see Licence Ligeance see Subjection London see Recusants Mayor see Corporations Mansion See Recusants Mansion-house what 173. Marriage see Baron Feme Marshalsie Is the ordinary Prison of the Court of Kings Bench 251. Masse Saying and hearing of Masse and the Penalties 24 25 26. 45. 59. 200 201. Miles How to be accounted 130 131. Minister See Common Prayer Ecclesiastical Persons Misprision of Treason 51. 59. Mittimus see Indictments Month. How to be accounted 13 14. 61. Mortgage see Chattels Mother See Administration Kin. Naturalization See Alien Naturalization is a Fiction in Law 185. It s effect 185. It includes Denization 128 129. What they ought to do who are to be naturalized 240. Natural King Natural King and natural Subject are Correlatives 185. Next of Kin see Kin Nobility See Councel Nobility by Birth is Character indelebilis 247. Nobility gotten by Marriage may be lost by marriage 198. 247. Where a Nobleman or Noblewoman may be committed to prison for refusing the Oath of Allegiance 250 251. Nomination See Recusants Vniversity The Presentment is in him who hath the right of Nomination to a Benefice 229. He is in effect the Patron and may have a Quare Impedit 228. Nonsuit See Informers King Notice Aiders or Relievers of an offender not punishable unless they had notice of the offence 17. Where a lapse will incur upon Deprivation without notice to the Patron 23. All men are bound to take notice of an Act of Parliament 23. To what cases only the clause in 13 Eliz. 12. of notice to the Patron extends 23. Number Pluralis numerus est duobus contentus 238. Oaths See Bishop Councel Indictments Iustices of Peace Nobility Oath of Abjuration see Abjuration and Coroner Oath of Supremacy 9. Called the Oath of Obedience 147. How to be expounded 43. Who must take it and before whom 8 10 11. 38 39 40. 43 44. 92. 95. 149. 186. 240. 261 262. 264. 266. The Penalties for refusing or neglecting to take it 9 10. 40. 42 43 44. 263. see Disability He that hath an Office of Inheritance if he refuse it and afterwards take it shall be restored 11. The penalty for not certifying the refusal of it 40. Where the party refusing it is to be tried 41. Where the Refusal of it upon the second tender is not Treason 45. Who not bound to take it 44. Oath of Allegiance 176 177 178 179. Sequitur personam non locum 246. 249. Who is to give it and who must take it and in what cases 173 174 175 176. 181 182 183. 186. 195 196 197 198. 215. 224. 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248. 261 262. 264. 266 267. Where the party taking it must set to his name or mark 179. Where and whither the taking of it is to be certified and the Certificate recorded 174. 249 250. The penalties for refusing it or not taking it 174 175 176. 181 182. 195 196. 215. 224. 243. 250 251. 263. see Disability The party refusing it shall be committed to Gaol and by whom 174 175. 250 251. He may be committed either until the Assizes or Sessions at the discretion of him who tenders it 175. In that case sureties cannot be taken 175. Where a married woman refusing it shall be imprisoned till she takes it 175. 250. What tender and refusal of it shall be binding and what not 251 Refusal of any word of it is a refusal of the whole 179. Serving or going to serve a forraign Prince c. without first taking the said Oath is Felony 181 182. What service is there meant 182. Who shall give the Oath in that case 183. 198. The penalty for not certifying it and on whom 183 184. 198 199. The penalty for not certifying the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance taken by a person submitting 186. Certificate of Oaths taken by a Jesuite c. or a person returning from a Seminary see Conformity An Office of Inheritance saved to him who takes not the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance 265 266. Where and before whom persons who are to be restored in Blood or naturalized are to take the said Oaths 240. Oath by a Popish Recusant licenced to travel 206 207 208. 210 211. Obedience See Oaths Perswading or withdrawing the Kings Subjects from their Natural Obedience or being perswaded or withdrawn is High Treason 57 58. 184 185 186. What is Natural Obedience 185. A Jesuite c. submitting must continue in his due Obedience 95. Obligation See King Service Offence see Iudgment Office Where necessary before seizure 104. Offices and Officers See Excommengement Oaths Port. Recusants Where the Husband of a Popish Recusant convict shall not bear any Office 211 212. Officers of the Exchequer 71. Officers shall answer for their Deputies 184. What persons are disabled to bear office and in what cases 10. 43 44. 211 212. 243. 251. 257 258. 263 264. The penalty on him who executes any Office and doth not receive the Sacrament and take the Oaths and Test injoined by 25 Car. 2. 2. 263 264 265. A saving of some Offices 265 266 267. Ordinary See Probate Ordinary who 45. The King is supream Ordinary 6 7. The name c. of
the person offering an Agnus Dei c. shall be disclosed to the Ordinary of the Diocess 53 54. A Schoolmaster may be allowed by the Ordinary of the Diocess 64. What the Ordinary may take for such allowance 65. Ornaments What Church Ornaments shall be used 31. Outlawry see Vtlawry Pardon Where the King may pardon the forfeiture upon a poenal Law and where not 80. His pardon will not restore an offender deprived by 1 Eliz. 23. Parish See Church The Ecclesiastical Court cannot try the limits or bounds of Parishes 28. The Parish the Recusant is of need not be named in the Indictment 71. How the Parish is to recover that part of the penalty given by 23 Eliz. 1. to the Poor 71. Parliament When the Parliament of 1 Eliz. began 24. Every Member of the Commons House must take the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance 43 44. 243. Patron See King Nomination Recusants Vtlawry Notice to the Patron where necessary and where not 23. Péers See Praemunire By and before whom to be indicted 88. 188. By whom to be tried 16. 29. 44. 56. 87. 93. 96. 188. Provision in Acts of Parliament for trial of a Peer by his Peers where ex abundanti 16. In what cases only a Peer shall be tried by his Peers 198. Saving of the Priviledges of Peers 265 266. Penalty See Baron Feme Cinque Ports Forfeiture King Parish Recusants Penalties given by 23 Eliz. 1. how to be recovered by the King and where 120 121 122. Penalties given by 23 El. 1. and 35 El. 1. how to be distributed 70. 111. 123. The subsequent distribution of a Penalty shall be good although the whole be at first given to the King 70 71. Penalties For refusing to abjure see Abjuration For absolving perswading or withdrawing the Kings Subjects from their Obedience or the Religion established to the Romish Religion or reconciling them to the Pope or See of Rome or being absolved c. See Absolution Obedience Religion Rome For bringing in c. any Agnus Dei c. See Agnus Dei. For concealing the offenders name See Agnus Dei. On such who aid maintain relieve c. offenders See Aide For refusing to discover or hindring the delivery of a Popish Recusants Arms. See Armour If the Child of a Popish Recusant convict be baptized contrary to 3 Jac. 5. See Baptisme On a Popish Recusant convict who is married contrary to 3 Jac. 5. See Baron Feme Recusants On a married woman convicted as a Popish Recusant if she conforms not See Baron Feme Recusants For bringing in c. Popish Books See Books For getting or putting in ure Bulls from Rome See Bulls If a Popish Recusant be buried contrary to 3 Jac. 5. See Burial For not coming to Church See Church Recusants For depraving hindring or not using the Common Prayer or using or maintaining any other See Common Prayer On Concealers of Offences See Concealers For going to Conventicles or perswading others so to do or to impugne the Kings Ecclesiastical power or to forbear to come to Church See Church Conventicles King For not certifying the submission required by 27 Eliz. 2. See Conformity For refusing to make submission according to 35 Eliz. 1. or 35 Eliz. 2. See Conformity For keeping a Recusant in his house See House For maintaining any Forraign Jurisdiction within this Realm See Iurisdiction For saying or hearing of Masse See Masse For refusing or not taking the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance See Oaths For not certifying the Refusal or the taking of the Oath of Supremacy See Oaths For not certifying the taking of the Oath of Allegiance See Oaths For serving or going to serve a Forraign Prince c. without first taking the Oath of Allegiance See Oaths For executing any Office without receiving the Sacrament and taking the Oaths and Test injoined by 25 Car. 2. 2. See Offices For not certifying Presentments of Offences against 5 Eliz. 1. See Presentments For not presenting Popish Recusants at the Sessions See Recusants For not entring and recording such Presentments See Recusants On a Popish Recusant confined and offending against 35 Eliz. 2. See Recusants For keeping or maintaining Recusants See Recusants On a Popish Recusant convict who comes to Court See Recusants On a Popish Recusant who departs not out of London and ten miles compass See Recusants On a Recusant convict for exercising certain Offices and Functions See Recusants On a married woman who is a Popish Recusant convict and conforms not in her husbands life time See Recusants For maintaining the Bishop or See of Romes Authority See Rome For Educating Children in the Popish Religion See Rome On the Popish Recusant who conforms and receives not the Sacrament of the Lords Supper yearly See Sacrament For keeping or being a Schoolmaster contrary to 23 Eliz. 1. or 1 Jac. 4. See Schoolmaster For suffering Women or Children to go beyond Seas without Licence and on such as go or send them See Seas For a Jesuite Seminary Priest c. to be within this Realm See Seminary For not discovering them See Seminary For not giving Information of such discovery See Seminary For relieving or maintaining such or any Popish Colledge Seminary c. or such who abide there or in any Popish Family beyond the Seas See Seminary For going or sending any thither See Seminary For returning from a Seminary without making submission See Seminary For serving or going to serve a forraign Prince c. without first entring into Bond. See Service For not certifying such Bond. See Service Pensions Saving of Pensions and Salaries 265. 267. Petition Petition to the King 148. Plea See Baron Feme Excommengement Informations Issue Plea to an Indictment for refusing the Oath of Supremacy 39. Plea to an Information for being married contrary to 3 Jac. 5. 221. In a Suit for Tythes it s a good plea to say he stands convicted on 1 El. 2.23 Where ipsi non sunt culpabiles is a good plea by Baron Feme 75 76. Plea in disability of the person of the Recusant in what cases allowable and in what not 215. 217 218. The conclusion of it 216. Such plea is peremptory 216. Where in a popular Suit the Kings Attorney is to reply and where the Plaintiff or Informer 79 80. Plea after Judgment in what case allowable 148. Poor see Parish Pope see Rome Port. Officers of the Ports what they are impowred to do 155. 183. Where punishable 155. 183 184. Power See Iurisdiction King Praemunire See Indictments Vniversity Praemunire 6. 12. 34. 36. 40. 51 52. 56. 93. 175 176. 196 197 198. 248. In a Praemunire no trial of a Peer by his Peers 198. Nor Councel allowed 198. The Judgment and forfeiture in a Praemunire 46. 152. Not lawful to slay a man attainted in a Praemunire 46. How a man attainted in a Praemunire is out of the Kings Protection 46 47. Prayers See Church Common Prayer Prayers in the Pulpit before Sermon 21. Prerogative See Advowson
perswades others so to do and not then neither unless he hath been absent from Church by the space of a month Where this Act extends to Popish Recusants Vnder colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Although this Act is commonly called the Act against Sectaries as distinguished from those of the Romish profession yet in truth it extends to all Recusants whatsoever as well Popish as other except in the point of abjuration For the Popish service is performed under colour or pretence of exercise of Religion and the Assembly or Meeting of Popish Recusants under such colour or pretence is an Assembly or Meeting contrary to the Laws and Statutes And they as well as others may be Indicted upon this Statute if they forbear to come to Church for the space of a moneth and be present at any part of the Popish service or move or perswade ut supra And may be imprisoned without Bail until they conform and make submission as by this Act is appointed But they cannot be required to abjure unless they offend against the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 A Popish Recusant is likewise subject to the Action of Debt c. given to the Queen by this Statute Being thereof lawfully convicted That is What conviction sufficient convicted both of his absence from Church and of that other Offence which makes him punishable by this Act viz. going to Conventicles or moving or perswading c. for his absence from Church for a month must be laid down precisely in the Indictment for without that the other is no Offence within this Act as hath been said And 't is not necessary that the party be convicted of such absence upon any Prior Indictment for although there was never any former conviction of him for Recusancy yet if he offend against this Act in any of the other particulars he may be convicted both of that Offence and of his absence upon one and the same Indictment And so was the Indictment in the Case of Lee and others who were Indicted upon this Statute at the Sessions of the Peace in Essex for absenting themselves for a month from Church and resorting to Conventicles To which they pleaded not guilty and the Indictment was removed into the Kings-Bench to be tried there Cro. Mich. 16 Car. 593. Trial. Provided always Stat. Sect. 2. An Offender not conforming himself abjure shall the Realm and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons which shall offend against this Act as aforesaid shall not within thrée months next after they shall be convicted for their said Offence conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or Curate of the Parish That in every such Case every such Offender being thereunto warned or required by any Iustice of the Peace of the same County where such Offenders shall then be shall upon his and their Corporal Oath before the Iustices of the Peace in the open Quarter Sessions of the same County or at the Assizes and Goal delivery of the same County before the Iustices of the same Assizes and Goal delivery abjure this Realm of England and all other the Queéns Majesties Dominions forever unless her Majesty shall licence the party to return And thereupon shall depart out of this Realm at such Haven or Port and within such time as shall in that behalf be assigned and appointed by the said Iustices before whom such abjuration shall be made unless the same Offender be letted or stayed by such lawful and reasonable means or causes as by the Common Laws of this Realm are permitted and allowed in Cases of abjuration for felony And in such cases of let or stay then within such reasonable and convenient time after as the Common Law requireth in Case of abjuration for Felony as is aforesaid And that the Iustices of Peace before whom any such abjuration shall happen to be made as is aforesaid shall cause the same presently to be entred of Record before them and shall certifie the same to the Iustices of Assizes and Goal delivery of the County at the next Assizes of Goal delivery to be holden in the same County In what case the offender is not bound to abjure Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. or any Iustice of the Peace c. But put the Case that the Offender is convicted and the Three months next after his Conviction elapse before he is required by the Bishop or any Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate of the Parish to conform and make the submission here appointed and afterwards he is required by one of them so to do It seems in this Case such request comes too late for he ought to conform and submit within the three months if he be required but if he be not required he is not bound to abjure for omitting it although he shall remain in prison till he conforms and submits But if within the three months he be required to conform and submit and refuse there is no question but he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure Abjuration Abjure this Realm of England c. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 6. Stat. Sect. 3. The punishment for refusing to abjure not departing or returning without Licence And if any such Offender which by the tenor and intent of this Act is to be abjured as is aforesaid shall refuse to make Abjuration as is aforesaid or after such Abjuration made shall not go to such Haven and within such time as is before appointed and from thence depart out of this Realm according to this present Act or after such his departure shall return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions without her Majesties special Licence in that behalf first had and obtained That then in every such Case the person so offending shall be adjudged a Felon and shall suffer as in Case of Felony without benefit of Clergy Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. 35 Eliâ— â— And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sâ—ct 4. An Offender shall be discharged upon his open submission That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they be so warned or required to make Abjuration according to the tenor of this Act repair to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make
hurt or prejudice the Péerage of any Péer of this Realm or to take away any Right Power Priviledge or Profit which any person being a Péer of this Realm hath or ought to enjoy by reason of his Péerage either in time of Parliament or otherwise or to take away creation-money or Bills of Impost nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary granted by His Majesty to any person for valuable and sufficient Consideration for Life Lives or Years other then such as relate to any Office or to any Place of Trust under His Majesty and other then Pensions of bounty or voluntary Pensions nor to take away or make void any Estate of Inheritance granted by His Majesty or any His Predecessors to any person or persons of or in any Lands Rents Tithes or Hereditaments not being Offices nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary already granted by His Majesty to any person who was Instrumental in the happy preservation of His Sacred Majesty after the Battel at Worcester in the year One thousand six hundred fifty one until His Majesties arrival beyond the Seas nor to take away or make void the Grant of any Office or Offices of Inheritance or any Fée Salary or Reward for executing such Office or Offices or thereto any way belonging granted by His Majesty or any his Predecessors to or enjoyed or which hereafter shall be enjoyed by any person or persons who shall refuse or neglect to take the said Oaths or either of them or to receive the Sacrament or to subscribe the Declaration mentioned in this Act in manner therein expressed Nevertheless so as such person or persons having or enjoying any such Office or Offices of Inheritance do or shall substitute and appoint his or their sufficient Deputy or Deputies which such Officer or Officers respectively are hereby impowred from time to time to make or change any former Law or Vsage to the contrary notwithstanding to exercise the said Office or Offices until such time as the person or persons having such Office or Offices shall voluntarily in the Court of Chancery before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper for the time being or in the Court of Kings Bench take the said Oaths and receive the Sacrament according to Law and subscribe the said Declaration and so as all and every the Deputy and Deputies so as aforesaid to be appointed take the said Oaths receive the Sacrament and subscribe the said Declaration from time to time as they shall happen to be so appointed in manner as by this Act such Officers whose Deputies they be are appointed to do and so as such Deputies be from time to time approved of by the Kings Majesty under His Privy Signer But that all and every the Péers of this Realm shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid and all and every other person or persons before mentioned denoted or intended within this Proviso shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid notwithstanding any incapacity or disability mentioned in this Act. Provided also That the said Péers and every of them may take the said Oaths and make the said Subscription and deliver the said Certificates before the Péers sitting in Parliament if the Parliament be sitting within the time limited for doing thereof and in the intervals of Parliament in the High Court of Chancery in which respective Courts all the said proceédings are to be recorded in manner aforesaid Provided always That no married Woman or person under the age of Eightéen years or being beyond or upon the Seas or found by the lawful Oaths of Twelve men to be non compos mentis and so being and remaining at the end of Trinity Term in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred seventy thrée having any Office shall by vertue of this Act loose or forfeit any such his or her Office other then such married Woman during the life of her Husband only for any neglect or refusal of taking the Oaths and doing the other things required by this Act to be done by persons having Offices so as such respective persons within Four months after the death of the Husband coming to the age of Eighteen years returning into this Kingdom and becoming of sound mind shall respectively take the said Oaths and perform all other things in manner as by this Act is appointed for persons to do who shall happen to have any Office or Offices to them given or fallen after the end of the said Trinity Term. Provided also That any person who by his or her neglect or refusal according to this Act shall lose or forfeit any Office may be capable by a new Grant of the said Office or of any other and to have and hold the same again such person taking the said Oaths and doing all other things required by this Act so as such Office be not granted to and actually enjoyed by some other person at the time of the regranting thereof Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to make any Forfeiture Disability or Incapacity in by or upon any non-Commission-Officer or Officers in His Majesties Navy if such Officer or Officers shall only subscribe the Declaration therein required in manner as the same is direted Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to prejudice George Earl of Bristol or Anne Countess of Bristol his Wife in the Pension or Pensions granted to them by Patent under the Great Seal of England hearing date the Sixtéenth day of July in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred sixty and nine being in lieu of a just Debt due to the said Earl from His Majesty particularly expressed in the said Patent Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend to the Office of any High Constable Petty Constable Tithingman Headborough Overseer of the Poor Church-wardens Surveyor of the High-ways or any like inferior Civil Office or to any Office of Forester or Kéeper of any Park Chace Warren or Game or of Bailiff of any Manor or Lands or to any like private Offices or to any person or persons having only any the before mentioned or any the like Offices FINIS THE TABLE Abjuration See Baron Feme IN what cases the offender against 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles and the Popish Recusant confined by 35 Eliz. 2. are to abjure the Realm and in what cases not 115. 116. 123. 134 135 136 137 138. 143. Who may require such Abjuration 116. 135. Before whom it must be made 116. 135. Refusing to abjure or staying or returning without licence is Felony 116 117. 139 140. What he who abjures or refuses to abjure forfeits 124. The form of the Oath of Abjuration 138 139. He that abjures yet oweth to the King his ligeance 139. Absolution What Absolution is not within 13 Eliz. 2.50 Where absolving of the Kings Subjects or being absolved is High Treason 57 58. 184
185. Actions Popular see Informations Acts of Parliament See Statutes Administration and Administrators See Excommengement Executor Probate Recusants Who is disabled to be an Administrator 212. 234 235. 258. 263. The Mother shall administer before the Brother or Sister 225. Advowson See Covin Recusants Vniversity An Advowson is comprehended under the word Hereditament 106. 171. 172. It may be seized for Recusancy 106. 171 172. Where the King hath seized the Advowson of a Popish Recusant whether the King or University shall present 172. 231 232. By the Kings seizure of two parts of a mannor two parts of an Advowson appendant are seized by consequence 172. 233. In such case the King shall present alone by his Prerogative 172. 233. His two parts shall not pass from him by general words 173. Where upon reversal of an utlawry the Patron of an Advowson shall be restored to his Presentment and where not 180. Age 198. Agnus Dei c. Where the bringing in offering delivering or receiving of an Aguns Dei c. is a Praemunire and where not 51 52 53. Where the offender must be apprehended or his name disclosed and to whom 53 54. The Penalty for concealing the offenders name 55 56. Aid see Notice Aiders Maintainers Relievers c. of offenders where and how punishable 12. 17. 34 35. 42. 47. 50 51. 59. 90 91. 93 94. 184 185. Alien An Information lies against an Alien and a Writ of Error for him 76. An Alien though indenized or naturalized is no natural Subject 185. Indictment of High Treason against an Alien by birth 185. It shall not be contra naturalem Dominum 185. An Alien indenized or naturalized in Scotland or Ireland is still an Alien here 189. Where an Alien shall forfeit 12 d. per Sunday or Holiday for not coming to Church and where not 190. Allegiance see Oath of Allegiance Appearance See Baron Feme What appearance upon Proclamation shall save the Recusants default and what not 108. 164 165. Where he cannot appear by Attorney 164. His Remedy if his Appearnce be not recorded 164. Appropriation Where the King may make an Appropriation 7. Archbishop See Bishop Archbishop of Canterburies concurrent jurisdiction abrogated 5. Armour See Iustices of Peace Where the Arms of a Popish Recusant convict may be seized by force of 3 Jac. 5. and where not 237 238. The penalty for refusing to discover or hindring the delivery of such Arms 237. A Popish Recusant Convict shall maintain his Armour 239. Arraignment See Witnesses The party must be first arraigned and convicted before he can be fined and imprisoned at the Kings pleasure 97. Assent see Licence Attainder see Vniversity Attorney see Appearance Audita Querela Audita Quaerela against the Informer 148. It lies not against the King 148. Averment See Covin Indictment Iointure Licence Quare Impedit Bail SPecial Bail where not necessary 75. Baptism The penalty where the child of a Popish Recusant convict is baptized contrary to 3 Jac. 5.222 223. Baron Feme See Conformity Covin Custom Oath Plea Sacrament A married woman is liable to the Penalties for Recusancy 26. 68. And may 〈◊〉 imprisoned for non-payment thereof 86. 252 253. She ought in such case to have hard and close imprisonment 86. Where the Husband may save her imprisonment by paying 10 l. per month or yielding the thirds of his Lands to the King 252 253 254 255 256. Where the Husband is chargeable for the Wives Recusancy and where not 68. 75 76. 79. 122 123. 167. And may be imprisoned for non-payment of the Forfeiture 86. 253. Where the Wife cannot appear or plead without her Husband 75. The penalty by 7 Jac. 6. of a married woman convicted as a Popish Recusant if she conforms not 252. Where she shall forfeit the profits of two thirds of her Jointure and Dower and be otherwise disabled if she conform not in her Husbands life time 212 213. 214. Of what Dower she shall not forfeit any profits 215. Where a Woman may have Jointure and Dower both 213 214 215. Whether the Conviction of the Wife on an Indictment of Recusancy shall bar the King of his action of Debt and the Informer of his popular suit 79. 167. 254. A Feme Covert is within 1 Eliz. 2. of depraving c. the Common Prayer 24. And punishable by 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles and by 35 Eliz. 2. of Popish Recusants save as to Abjuration 123 124. 146. In what cases she may be punished upon 3 Jac. 4. and in what cases not 195. Where the Wife of a man abjured may sue without her Husband and shall have her Dower or Jointure in his life time and where not 124 125. Where the Husband of a Popish Recusant convict shall not bear any office 111 112. The penalty on a Popish Recusant convict who is married contrary to 3 Jac. 5. 220 221 222. In what case the Recusant so married cannot be punished by 3 Jac. 5. 222. Bar. See Baron Feme Informers King Good Behaviour see Recusants Benefice See Cura animatum Nomination Recusants Birth Birthright is Character indelebilis 247. Bishop See Archbishop Conformity Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction Excommengement Ordinary Before whom Archbishops and Bishops shall take the Oath of Supremacy 8. And the Oath of Allegiance 241 242. To whom an Archbishop or Bishop may tender or minister the Oath of Supremacy 39. 186. Where an Archbishop or Bishop may associate himself to the Justices of Over and Determiner or of Assise 29. But they 〈◊〉 associate themselves to Head-officers of Corporations 30. Where a Schoolmaster may be license◠〈◊〉 allowed by the Archbishop or Bishop 64 65 1â—5â— Submission to an Archbishop or Bishop in what case 95. Submission and Conformity before the Bishop of the Diocess in what cases 69. 92. 186. The Penalty on an offender who is required by the Bishop of the Diocess and yet refuses to conform and submit himself 118 135 138. Where 〈…〉 and Conformity must be certified to the Bishop 119. 145. Where the Bishop of the Diocess nay 〈◊〉 and â—â—â—â—â—ter the Oath of Allegiance and to whom 174 175. 186. 196 197 198. 242 243 244 245. And may commit the Party refusing it 174. 250. Where he may imprison a married woman convicted as a Popish Recusant and where not 252 253 254. Where his assent to a licence for a Popish Recusant to travel out of his compass of five miles is good and where not 206. 208 209 210. Blood See Corruption of Blood 〈◊〉 What they ought to do who are to be restored in Blood â—40 Books Books maintaining the Authority of the Bishop or See of Rome 34. Popish Books prohibited and the penalty for bringing them in c. 236. Bulls The effect of Bulls brought from Rome 49. Getting â—â— putting them iniure is High Treason 49 50. Bull why so called â—◠〈◊〉 The Penalty if a Popish Recusant be buried contrary to â— Jac. 5.223 Ceremonies Who may ordain Ceremonies and Rites of the Church 31