imagine that by the Parliament that is mentioned in the said Act of the 30 of January 1651. for banishing one Lieutenant-Colonel John Lilburn is in the least meant the late Parliament of the Commonwealth of England sitting at Westminster especially because it is not so therein exprest who had taken many Oaths and past abundance of Declarations and particularly that of the 9 of February 1648. inviolably to maintain the Fundamental Laws of the Land in reference to the Peoples lives liberties and properties with all things incident appertaining and belonging thereunto But that rather it was some ignorant sottish French Parliament sitting at Paris or elsewhere in France that understand nothing of the Laws Liberties and Freedoms of England or that it was the malignant Cavalier Parliament lately sitting at Oxford in the Kings Quarters there post-dating their Act and thereby endeavouring by the said Act to create such a president as in the consequence of it would destroy all the Laws Liberties and Properties of the free-born people of England and thereby absolutely set up the Kings will and prerogative above Law the bare endeavouring of which in the Earl of Strafford hath been long since adjudged high treason Or in the next place it the authors of the said monstrous and illegal Act of Banishment be neither the ignorant Parliament of Paris nor the Cavalier Parliament of Oxford Then of necessity in the third place it cannot in charity and reason but be judged that the said Act of Banishment was drawn up by Mr. Scobel the Parliaments Clerk Mr. Hill their Chayr-man and Mr. Prideaux their Attorney and Post-master-general when they were all riding post and so jumbled or shaken with fast riding that it was impossible for them to hold their pens to write right and true and when they had framed it then by some cunning artifice or inchantment of theirs they preferred it to the said Parliament who in charity and common reason must needs be judged to pass it when they were three quarters asleep against some silly natural fool called Lieutenant-Colonel John Lilburn that could not be imagined ever in his life to have read any thing of Law or Reason it being impossible in the least in reason to be conceived that the late Supreme Authority the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England sitting at Westminster being onely by their own Declarations but trusted to provide for the peoples weal but not in the least for their wo would ever in their right wits or not being three quarters asleep pass such an Act of Parliament against John Lilburn now prisoner at the Bar who hath much read the Law and very well understands the Fundamental Liberties of England and hath hazardously adventured his life a thousand cimes for the inviolable preserving of them because such an Act of Parliament as the foresaid Act of Parliament is in the first place an Act of Parliament against common right common equity and common reason and therefore is void and null in Law and ought not to be executed as appears by these following authorities viz. 1 part of Dr. Bonham's Case fol. 118. and the 8 of Edw. 3. fol. 3 30 33. F. Cessavit 32 27 H. G. Annuity 41. and 1 Eliz. Dyer 113. and 1 part Cook 's Institutes lib. 2. Chap. 11. Sect. 209. fol. 140. and 4 Edw. 4.12 and 12 Edw. 4.18 and 1 H. 7.12 13. and Plowd Com. fol. 369. and Judge Jenkins learned works in the Law printed for J. Giles 1648. but particularly by his Discourse of Long Parliaments p. 139 140. and see also Mr. W. Prynne's notable book of the 16 of June 1649. called A Legal Vindication of the Liberties of England against illegal Taxes p. 11 12 13 c. But especially see a book intituled The Legal Fundamental Liberties of England revived asserted and vindicated printed and reprinted in the yeer 1649 page 54 55 56 57. yea an Act of Parliament that a man shall be judge in his own case is a void Act in law as appears in Hubberts Case fol. 120. and by the 8 part of Cook 's Reports in Dr. Bonham's Case and by the present Armies own Book of Declarations p. 35 52 54 59 60 61 63 132 141 142 143 144. yea saith that learned Oracle of the Law of England Sir Edw. Cook in the 4 part of his Institutes fol. 330. Where Reason ceaseth there the Law ceaseth for seeing Reason is the very life and spirit of the Law it self the Law-giver is not to be esteemed to respect that which hath no reason although the generality of the words at the first sight or after the letter seem otherwise And saith the said learned Author in his first part Institutes fol. 140. All Customs and Prescriptions Acts of Parliament Laws and Judgements that be against Reason are void and null in themselves And saith the Armies Sollicitor-General John Cook in the late Kings Case stated p. 23. That by the law of England any Act or Agreement against the Laws of God and Nature is a meer nullity for as a man hath no hand in making the Laws of God and Nature no more hath he power to marre or alter them And he cites the Earl of Leicester's adjudged Case for a proof And in page 20 he also saith that all the Judges in England cannot make one Case to be Law that is not Reason no more then they can prove an hair to be white that is black which if they should so declare or adjudge it is a meer nullity for Law saith he must be Reason adjudged And therefore saith he page 8. That man or men that rules by lust and not by law is or are creatures that were never of Gods making nor of Gods approbation but his permission and though such men be said to be gods on earth 't is in no other sense then the devil is called the god of this world And excellent to this very purpose is that ancient Law-book called The Doctor and Student who in his second Chapter pag. 4. expresly sayth Against the law of Nature which he calls the Law of Reason Prescription Statute or Customs may not prevail and if any be brought in against it they be no Prescriptions Statutes nor Customs but things void and against justice And what this law of Nature or Reason is he excellently sheweth in the latter end of the fourth page and the beginning of the fifth and therefore in pag. 7. he expresty saith That to every good Law is required these properties viz. That it be honest right wise possible in it self and after the custom of the Country convenient for the place and time necessary profitable and also manifest that it be not captious by any dark sentence nor mixt with any private wealth but all made for the common good for saith he every mans law must be consonant to the Law of God otherwise they are not righteous nor obligatory All which Judgements or Cases in Law in the equitable and rational part of
them are fully confirmed by that commonly reputed able Lawyer Serjeant John Bradshaw late Lord President of the high Court of Justice against King Charles who in his large Speech to him and against him printed in the second Edition of his Tryal and sold by Peter Cole Francis Tyton and John Playford 1650. from p. 52. to 70. And amongst other passages in p. 55. he hath this That the end of having Kings or any other Governours it is for the enjoying of justice that is the end Now Sir saith he if so be the King will go contrary to that end or any other Governour will go contrary to the end of his Government he must understand that he is but an Officer in trust and he or they ought to discharge that trust and they are to take order for the animadversion and punishment of such an offending Governour And in p. 53. he tells the King That as the Law is his superiour so also he tells him there is something that is superiour to the Law and that is indeed the parent or author of the Law and that is the people of England for Sir as they are those that at the first as other Countries have done did chuse to themselves this form of Government even for Justice sake that justice might be administred that peace might be preserved so that Sir saith he to the King the people gave Laws to Governours according to which they should govern and if those Laws should have proved inconvenient or prejudicial to the Publike the People had a power in them and reserved to themselves to alter them as they shall see cause Secondly such an Act of Parliament as the aforesaid Act of Banishment is not onely against common right common equity and common reason but it is absolutely destructive to the very ends of the peoples Trust conferred upon the Parliament and so the highest of treasons that can be committed And that it is destructive to the ends of the peoples Trust clearly appears by the Statutes of 4 Edw. 3. cap. 14 and 16 Edw. 3.10 which expresly saith that a Parliament at least shall be holden once every yeer and that for the maintenance of the peoples Laws and Liberties and the redress of divers mischiefs and grievances that daily happen And sutable to these things are the ends contained in the Writs that summon them and the intentions of those that chuse the Members and send them And sutable to this is the end of the Parliaments sitting as the present General and his Army in many of their remarkable Declarations have fully declared against the late 11 Members and their accomplices yea and forced the late Parliament to raze out of their books and Records many wicked and unjust things as they judged them to be after the Parliament had solemnly past them as Votes Orders Judgements and Acts yea and endeavoured very earnestly to hang divers of those as Traytors that had executed them as particularly Alderman Adams Alderman Langham Alderman Bunce with the Lord Maior Sir John Gayre and divers others But the greatest grievances and mischiefs in the world are by the aforesaid mischievous and unjust Banishing Act established ratified and confirmed for by it a man is condemned to lose his liberty and estate and the comforts of this life and that without any the least crime committed or accusation exhibited or legal Processes issued out to summon the party to make any defence in the world or ever calling or permitting him to speak one word for himself which is an Act or proceeding against the light and law of Nature Reason the Law of God against the law of Honour Conscience and common Honesty yea a dealing worse with the party then ever the cruel Jews did with Christ or then the bloody butchers Bishop Gardner and Bonner did with the rosted Martyrs in Queen Mary's days who always suffered them to have due processes of Law and to know and see their accusers and to have free liberty to speak for themselves and never condemned them but for transgressing a known and declared law in being Yea also dealing worse with the party then ever the bloody Gunpowder-Traytors were dealt with by King James who always allowed them fair tryals in law from the beginning to the end at the Bar of Justice for their lives Yea it is a worse dealing with the party then ever the Parliament themselves dealt with the bloodiest and most massacring Traytors that ever were in Arms against them to cut their throats Yea the forementioned practice of the foresaid most illegal and unrighteous Act of Banishment is an Act and proceedings in the highest subversion of the Fundamental Law and Liberty of England that can be invented or imagined and by consequence if it may without the highest offence or soloecism in Law be supposed that his Excellencie the Lord Gen. Cromwel Major-Gen Harison and the rest of the Members of the late Supreme Authority of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England sitting at Westm had any real finger in it or were actors of it they may and ought all of them with all the rest under them that have executed any part of the aforesaid unjust injurious illegal Act of Parliament to be apprehended indicted and proceeded against at the Common Law as Traytors and subverters of the Fundamental Laws Liberties and Freedoms of the free-born people of England as that learned man in the Laws of England Sir Edward Cook in the second third and fourth Parts of his Institutes all three of which are published by two special Orders of the late House of Commons in anno 1641. for good Laws doth declare and prove was dealt with by Empson and Dudley in less cases then the fore-recited unjust act of Banishment and of which severe punishments those Arbitrary and discretionary Judges viz. Trisilian Fulthrop Belknap Care Holt Burge and Lockton in Richard the seconds time sufficiently tasted of as also their arbitrary Accomplices the then Lord Major of London Sir Simon Burley Sir William Ellinham Sir John Salisbury Sir Thomas Trevit Sir James Barnis and Sir Nicholas Dodgworth some of whom were destroyed and hanged for setting their hands to Judgements in subversion of the peoples fundamental Law and Liberties in advancing the Kings will above the same yea one of them was banished therefore although he had a Dagger held unto his very brest to compel him to set his hand thereto But the two first mentioned persons cases being the most remarkable the prisoner at the Bar shall only at present inlarge upon theirs Which Case of Empson and Dudley was thus At the Parliament holden by King Lords and Commons in Henry the sevenths time who was an undoubted lawful king of England and by his marriage of his wife the Lady Elizabeth heir apparent to the House of York as himself was to the house of Lancaster had united the two claimes of Lancaster and York in himself and in a pitcht battel had slaine King Richard
the third the usurper and by reason of the extraordinary many troubles of his reign and the ignorant Regal time in which he lived considered he had a thousand times more grounds to be arbitrary and discretionary in his proceedings with the people of England then the late decapitated Parliament had yet he summoned a free Parliament who sate peaceably and quietly without the force or purging of souldiers and after that several Juries at Assizes and Sessions by corruption and savour had refused to finde persons that were judicially proved guilty before them of breach of penal laws as in full and free Parliament by King Lords and Commons is avowedly declared an Act of Parliament recorded in the fourth part of Cooks Institutes fol. 40. 41. in the 11. of Hen. 7. chap. 3. was passed by King Lords and Commons in full and free Parliament to enable the Justices of Assize in open Sessions to be holden before them and the Justices of the Peace in each County in England upon information for the King before them to be made to have full power and authority by their discretion without tryals by Juries to hear and determine all offences and contempts committed against penal laws in all which arbitrary or discretional proceedings murther treason and felony was excepted out of their cognizance or jurisdiction as also all other offences whereby any person should lose life or member or lands goods or chattels to the party complaining By pretext of which Statute saith the Lord Cook in his last recited folio Empson and Dudley privy Councellors and Justices of Peace to Henry the seventh did commit upon the subject insufferable pressures and oppressions which yet at the highest was but the taking away some small part of the persons estates from them that they condemned And therefore this Statute was justly soon after the decease of Henry the seventh repealed at the next Parliament after his decease by the Statute of the 1 Hen. 8. cha 6. A good caveat saith he to Parliaments to leave all causes to be measured by the golden and streight met-wand of the law and not to the uncertaine and crooked cord of disrcetion for it is not almost credible to foresee saith he when any maxime or fundamental law of this realm is altered as elsewhere in the fourth part of Lord Cooks Reports hath been observed what dangerous inconveniences do follow which most expresly appeareth by this most unjust and strange Act of 11 H. 7. for hereby not only Empson and Dudley themselves but such Justices of Peace corrupt men as they caused to be authorized committed most grievous and heavy oppressions and exactions grinding the face of the poor subjects by penal laws be they never so obsolete or unfit for the time by information onely without any presentment or trial by Jury being the ancient birthright of the subject but to hear and determine the same by their discretion inflicting such penalty as the Statutes not repealed imposed these and other like actions and oppressions by or by the means of Empson and Dudley and their instruments brought infinite treasures to the Kings Coffers whereof the Kâ—ng himself in the end with great grief and compunction repenced as in another place we have observed This Statute of 11. H. 7. We have recited and shewed the just inconveniences thereof to the end that the lâ—ke should never hereafter be attempted in any court of Parlâ—ament and that others might avoid the fearful end of those two time-servers Empâ—on and Dudley Qui corum vâ—stigia insistant corum exitus perâ—oâ— rescan that is those that follow their footsteps may fear the same destruction that they had whose end in the third part of the Institutes fol. 208. and the fourth part fol. 198 199. may be seen was severally to be Indicted at common law whose Indictments is there to be read and convicted and executed as traitors for subvertâ—ng the fundamental laws and liberties of England viz. trials by Juries which the Conquest of the Româ—nâ— Saxons Dâ—nâ—â— or Normans could never blot out of the Kalender of English mens fundamental liberties but hath from time to time with the infinite hazards of their lives bloods been preserved as the choicest of their Jewels and as one of their chiefest fundamental rights of whom the said L. Cook in his exposition of the 29 Ch. of Magnâ— Charta in his 2 part Instit fol. 51. upon the words of lex terrae or the law of the land where he plentifully shews that no Englishman whatsoever ought for any Crime whatsoever in any Court whatsoever by any power or authority whatsoever to be tryed but by juries and due process of law as is before shewed expresly saith yet against the ancient fundamental lasâ— in the face thereof I finde an Act of Parliament made saith he that as well justices of Assize as Justices of Peace without any finding or presenâ—ment by the Verdict of twelve men upon a bare information for the King before them made should have full power and authority by their discretions to hear and determine all offences and contempts committed or done by any person or persons against the forme ordinance and effect of any Statute made and not repealâ—d c. by colour of which Act shaking this fundamental law it is not credâ—ble what horrible oppressions and exaction to the undoing infinite numbers of people were committed by Sir Richard Empson knight and Edmund Dudley being Justices of the Peace throughout England upon this unjust and injurious Act as commonly in like cases â—t falleth out a new office was erected and they made masters of the Kings forfeitures But at the Parliament holden â—n the first yeer of Henry the eighth This Act of the 11. of Hâ—nry the seventh is rejected and made void and repeater and the reason thereof is yeelded for that by force of the said act it was manifestly â—nown that many sinister and crafty feigned forged informations had been pursued agaâ—nst divers of the Kâ—ngs subjects to their great damage and wrongâ—ul vexations and ill success hereoâ— and the fearful ends of the two oppressors should deter others from câ—mâ—â—ttâ—ng the lâ—ke and should admonish Parliaments that in stead of the ordinary and precious trial per legem terrae by the law of the land they bring not in absolute an partial trial by discretion And in the fourth part of his Institutes folio 37. he expresly saith That he findes an Attainder by Parliament of a subject viz. Thomas Cromwel then Earle of Essex of high treason who was committed to the Tower and thereby forth coming to be heard and yet was never called to answer in any of the Houses of Parliament Of the manner of which proceedings he thus saith Ausâ—â—a 〈◊〉 si potest si non ut cunque silontiam legat That is let the Parlâ—aments crime be buried in oblivion if it be possible and if not nevertheless yet let it give place to silence for the present for saith he The
against the King for but to pull him out of his Throne slay him and divide his inheritance amongst him and his accomplices and then to set up his lust will and pleasure as the peoples standing Laws By which apparent and in the face of the â—un avowed practices of his he hath all over the Christian world brought more scorn and contempt upon the zealous profession of God and godliness and all the pretences of strugling for Liberty and Freedom then any one man that ever I read of â—n all the Histories of the world that ever my eyes were fixed upon yea and in the doing of the forementioned things hath given in the face of the sun the absolute and perfect lye to himself and all his many printed Declarations both as he is to be considered as a Parliament-man or as an Officer in Arms. And first consider him as a Parliament-man how many Oaths Covenants Protestations and Engagements hath he formerly taken to maintain the fundamental Laws and Liberties of the people of England and also after he had caused the Parliament to be purged over and over again and again and left none to sit there but those that then pleased his tooth and by their authority taken away the Kings life and altered the form of Government nominally into a Commonwealth or free State did not he and his said friends or Councellors immediately after that publish a solemn Declaration of Febr. 9. 1648. in these very words verbatim A Declaration of the Parliament of England for maintaining the Fundamental Laws of this Nation THe Parliament of England now assembled doth declare That they are fully resolved to maintain and shall and will uphold preserve and keep the fundamental Laws of this Nation for and concerning the preservation of the lives properties and liberties of the people with all things incident thereunto with the alterations touching Kings and House of Lords already resolved in this present Parliament for the good of the people and what shall be further necessary for the perfecting thereof and do require and expect that all Judges Justices Sheriffs and all Officers and ministers of Justice for the time being do administer justice and do proceed in their respective places and Offices accordingly which resolution with the reasons thereof shall be hereafter publâ—shed in a larger Declaration touching the same And it is hereby ordered and appointed that this Declaration shall be forthwith proclaimed in Westminster-Hall and at the Old Exchange and the Judges in their respective Courts at Westminster and at the first sitting thereof are to cause this Declaration to be publikely read And the Sheriffs in their several Counties are to cause this Declaration to be likewise published Die Veneris 9 February 1648. Ordered by the Commons assembled in Parliament That this Declaration be forthwith printed and published and that the Members of this House do take care to disperse the said Declaration into the several Counties with all speed H. Scobel Cler. Parl. D. Com. London Printed by Edward Husbands Which said Declaration was backed also with a large pithy one the 17 of March 1648. which expresseth the grounds and reasons of their late proceedings and setling the present Government in way of a Free State Yea John Lilburn now prisoner at the bar for his further plea saith That by the Act of the late Parliament intituled An Act for the abolishing the Kingly Office in England and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging it is there amongst other things enacted and declared that the Office of a King in this Nation shall not henceforth reside in or be exercised by any one single person And that no person whatsoever shall or may have or hold the office stile dignity power or authority of King of the said Dominions or any of them upon pain of high treason against the Parliament and People of England to all such said persons and to all their aiders assisters comforters or abettors Now whether or no that the said actions of laying Taxes and chusing the people Law makers be not the absolute exercising the office dignity power and authority of the greatest King that ever was in England the prisoner at the Bar submits it to the judgement of the learned Judges of the Law And in the last forementioned Act it is further declared and averred that by the abolishing of the Kingly Office a most happie way is made for this English Nation to return to its just and ancient rights of being governed by its own Representatives or National Meetings in Councel from time to time chosen and intrusted for that purpose by the people And further it is therefore there resolved and declared by the Commons assembled in Parliament That they will put a period to the sitting of this present Parliament and dissolve the same as soon as may possibly stand with the safety of the people that hath betrusted them with what is absolutely necessary for the preserving and upholding the Government now setled in the way of a Common-wealth And that they will carefully provide for the certain meeting chusing sitting of the next and future Representatives with such other circumstances of freedom in choice and equality in distribution of Members to be elected thereunto as shall most conduce to the lasting freedom and good of this Commonwealth And in several other Acts immediately made after the last forementioned Acts and particularly those two Acts of Parliament of the 14 of May and the 17 of June 1649. declaring what offences shall be judged treason it is thus expressed Whereas the Parliament hath abolished the Kingly Office in England and Ireland and in the dominions and territories thereunto belonging and hath resolved and declared that the people shall for the future be governed by its own Representatives or National Meetings in Councel chosen and intrusted by them for that purpose And the Prisoner at the Bar for further plea in the second place saith that his Declarations as a Souldier or Commander to this purpose are so full as more cannot be said and particularly that remarkable Declaration of the 14 of June 1647. printed in the Armies Book of Declar. p. 36. 37. c. in which 37. p. there he positively declares that the setling of the liberties and freedoms and peace of the Nation is the blessing of God then which of all worldly things nothing say they is more dear unto us or more precious in our thoughts we having hitherto thought all our present enjoments whether of live or livelihood or nearest relations a price but sufficient to the puchase of so rich a blessing that we and all the free-borne people of this Nation may sit downe in quiet under our Vines and under the glorious administration of justice and righteousness and in full possession of those fundamental rights and liberties without which we can have little hopes as to humane considerations to enjoy either any comforts of life or so much as life it self but at the
more high and absolute the jurisdiction of Court is the more just and honorable it ought to be in the proceeding and to give examples of justice to inferior Courts And fol. 38. He is confidently perswaded that the rehearseal of this unjust Attainder will hereafter cause the Honorable Members of both Houses of Parliament to be so tender of their duty in perserving the fundamental Laws and Liberties of the people of England as that never hereafter such an unjust Attainder shall be brought where the party is forth coming to condemn him without hearing of him And consonant unto this is the Scripture and the Law of God therein contained as appears by the third of Gen vers 9. where God after Adam had transgressed his law summons him before him to answer for himself before he would pass judgement against him And when Sodom had abominably defiled its wayes with the height of wickedness yet the just God of heaven and earth would not judge condemne or pass sentence against them till he went down to see whether they have done altogether according to the cry that is come up against them or not and saith God I will know Gen. 18 and Deut. 17.6.11 and Chap. 20.15 God saith expresly One witness shall not rise against a man for any iniquity or for any sin in any sin that he sinneth at the mouth of two witnesses or at the mouth of three witnesses shall the matter be established And by the hand of Moses he required the people of Israel to do according to the sentence of the Law and the judgement which shall be given thereupon and not to decline from the law and the judgement which shall be given thereupon and not to decline from the Law to the right hand or to the left And suitable to this is the judicial and legal proceedings of the great congregation of the children of Israel consisting to the number of four thousand able men in the case of the Levite and his ravished and slain concubine who in their judicial proceedings in that case first demanded of him how so great a wickedness came to be committed in Israel And the conclusion after their hearing and examining the cause was to consider consult and then to give sentence And saith Nicodemus that learned man in the law of God against the Scribes and Pharisees in behalf of Christ Doth our law judge any man before it hear him and know what he doth John 7.51 And saith Festus the heathen Roman Governour in Judea that had no other guide to walk by but the light and Law of Nature In the behalf of Paul against his bloody enemies It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any one to dye before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face and have license to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him Acts 25.16 And saith righteous Paul who writ the Oracles of God infallibly by the Spirit of God Where there is no law there is nor can be no transgression Rom. 4.15 But saith that judicious and learned Lawyer Sir Edward Cook in the third part of his Institutes folio 35. of Rhadamanthus that cruel and wicked Judge of hell First he punisheth before he hears like the late Parliament and when he doth hear the denial then he compels the party accused by torture to confess it but saith he far otherwise doth Almighty God proceed for after that the guilty person is accused he calls he examines and then judges or condemns Luk. 16.1 2. But in his fourth part Institutes he proceeds and goeth on and saith in his last fore-recited folio As evil was the proceedings in Parliament in the second of Henry the 6. Number 18. against Sir John Mortimer the third son of Edmund the second Earle of Marsh descended from Lionel Duke of Clarence who was Indicted of high treason for certaine words which Indictment without any arraignment or pleading being meerly feigned to blemish the title of the Mortimers and withall being insufficient in law as by the same appeareth was confirmed by authority of Parliament and the said Sir John being brought into the Parliament without arraignment and answer judgement in Parliament was given against him upon the said Indictment that he should be carried to the Tower of London and drawn through the City to Tiburn and there hanged drawn and quartered his head to be set on London-bridge his four quarters on the four gates of London as by the Record of Parliament appeareth And therefore in the next folio being folio 39. he saith that whereas by order of Law a man cannot be attainted of high treason unless the offence be in law high treason he ought not to be attained by general words of high treason By authority of Parliament as sometime hath been used but the high treason ought to be specially expressed seeing that the Court of Parliament is the highest and most honorable Court of Justice and ought as hath been said to give examples to inferior Courts And further to shew that Parliaments which in their right constitution are the best conservators of our laws and liberties are erroneous things when they walk by their own wills and forsake their true and only guide the fundamental laws of England What need there any more instances then many of the Armies own Declarations in several of which and their frequent discourses they have declared the late Parliament a traiterous Parliament breakers of their trust and imbroylers of the Nation in bloody wars and subverters of the peoples liberties and freedomes yea and in the conclusion the Lord General Cromwel himself and Major Gen. Harison with their own hands have pulled them out by the ears and pluckt them up by the very roots as final breakers of their trust and as a pack of the vilest knaves and villaines that ever breathed in England although they were fenced in and about by an Act of Parliament made before the wars by King Lords and Commons in the seventeenth of the raigne of the late King being in the yeer 1641 that they should not be dissolved but by their own free and voluntary consents And also since they changed the Kingdome into a Commonwealth by two several Acts of Parliament of the 14. of May 1649. and the 17. of July 1649. In which it is expresly made high treason for any Englishman or men by writing printing or words declaring or by endeavouring to raise or stir up force to dissolve the late Parliament or their Councel of State without their own consents or to say that the said late Parliament or their Councel of State is tyrannical usurped or unlawful as by the said Acts of Parliament with reference thereunto being had more at large doth appear which Acts are printed in the first part of the trial or arraignment of the prisoner at the Bar at Guild-hall Oct. 1649. pag. 86 87 88 89. the first of which Acts viz. that of the 14. of May 1649. thus followeth
Act of Parliament But as for the said Generals and the said Major-General Harisons dissolving the late Parliament by force against their own consents and thereby against several Acts of Parliament afore mentioned partly of their own making committing high-treason against the apparent letter of a known printed and declared Law before their fact committed out of which evil action as it is in it self simply considered though it be granted that that God that can and hath brought light out of darkness and order out of confusion and good out of evil may out of it by his wisdom power and omnipotencie bring abundance of good to this poor nation of England yet already it hath visibly produced this grand mischief and evil viz. to give the said General a colourable pretence of a Necessity of his own making and creating to assume unto himself all the Civil powers in the Nation into his own hands and thereby not onely to make slaves if he please of all his own private souldiers in subjecting them to Tryals for their lives by Military or arbitrary Discipline in times of peace when all the Courts of Justice for administring the Law are or ought to be open which is expresly against the Petition of Right and the declared end wherefore the Wars were engaged in against the late King but also of the free people of England that have fought as heartily and faithfully for the preservation of their Liberties and Freedoms as himself who have already thereby lost two of the chiefest of their fundamental rights and freedoms viz. First to have Taxes layd upon them by the General with the advice of his Military Officers all of whom at most are but the peoples hired and payd servants to kill the Weasels and Polecats that would destroy their Liberties which is not onely contrary to the express tenour of that most excellent Law as the late Parliament in their remarkable Declaration of March 17. 1648. calls it of the Petition of Right which expresly sayth That no Taxes Ayds or Contributions whatever shall by any person or persons or any Authority whatsoever be layd or levyrd upon the people but by common consent of their chosen Deputies or Trustees in Parliament assâ—mbled for that end See also the Lord Cooks 4 part Institutes chap. High Court of Parliament fol. 14 34. and by the Statute made in the late Parliament in the 17 yeer being anno 1641 of the late King intituled An Act for declaring unlawful and void the late proceedings touching Ship money The Judgement of the Judges in that case is declared null and void and against the right of Proprieties although their judgements were grounded upon these plausible Questions viz. That when the good and safety of the Kingdom in general is concerned and the whole Kingdom in danger Whether the King might by writ under the Great Seal of England command all the Subjects of his Kingdom at their charge to provide and furnish such number of Ships with Men Victuals and Munition and for such a time as the King should think fit for the defence and safeguard of the kingdom from such peril and danger and Whether by Law the King might compel the doing thereof in case of refusal or â—â—fâ—actariâ—ss And whether that the King who was then a far more legal Magistrate then the Lord General Cromwel now is were noâ— the solâ— judge both of the danger and wiâ—â—n and â—ow the same is to be prevented and avoided According to which grounds and reasons all the justices of the said Courts of Kâ—ngs Bench and Common pleas and the said Barons of the Exchequer having been formerly conâ—ulâ—â—d with by his Majesties command had set their hands to an extrajudicial Opinion expressed to the same purpose That he might and yet notwithstanding all this thus decreed and adjudged by all the judges all such Ship-writes and all proceedings thereupon are by King Lords and Commons in full legal and free Parliament declared that they were and are contrary and against the Laws and Statutes of this Realm and the Petition of Right made in the third yeer of the Reign of his Majesty that then was And it is there further declared and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every the particulars prayed or desired in the said Petition of Right shall from henceforth be put in execution accordingly and shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as in the same Petition they are prayed and expressed And that all the said Judgements and Proceedings about the said Ship money be vacated and cancelled One of the makers of which Law was the said Oliver Cromwel now Lord General and also one of the impeachers of the said Ship money-Judges of high-treason for arbitrary subverters of the free people of England's fundamental Laws Liberties and Proprieties Secondly the General with whom of his Officers by his will he is pleased to joyn with him hath not onely by their late forcible dissolving of the late Parliament assumed the whole Civil power of the Nation into his own hands by means of which already by his Declaration with the advice of his Officeâ—s of the 9 of June 1653. he hath arbitrarily layd a Tax of Sixscore thousand pounds per month upon the free people of England by which all their proprieties are confounded and destroyed For by the same Rule that he lays Sixscore thousand pounds Tax a month upon the people he may when he pleaseth lay six Millions a month upon them and so ad infinitum and ingross into his own coffers and hands and his Officers not onely all the peoples treasure but also their whole lands and estates as Joseph did the slavish Egyptians unto Pharaoh Gen 47. but that which is worse he hath not onely there by created a president to destroy all their proprieties but his chusing the people Legislators or Law-makers though it 's possible the men may prove in their actions the justest men in the Nation and denying those that never forfeited their Liberties in their lives that inherent and natural right he hath created a president to destroy their Laws Liberties and Lives and absolutely subject them to his will and mercy which crimes put together are in the eye of the Law the highest Treason that ever I read any transgressor in the Nation charged with ever since it became a Politick Society or Nation and an act that the highest of three Tyrants or Conquerors either under the Romanes Saxons Danes or Normans durst never attempt to put in execution By means of which he hath given away the just and honest Cause betwixt the King and Parliament and done as much as in him hath to make all those murderers that have since the beginning of the late Civil war engaged in the Parliament-quarrel against the late King his actions as evidently as the â—un declaring it was not in the least for the securing of the people 's incroached upon Liberties and Freedoms that he and his accomplices took up Arms
the least as to punish man whatsoever that is not of them for if my crime whatsoever which in part is already touched upon in the former part of the Prisoners Plea at the Bar and also the absolute Irrationality and Illegality of their making a particular law or their settâ—ng up of a particular Court for a particular man which are notably and rationally discussed upon in the seâ—ond Edition of the book Intituled The Picture of the Councel of State pag. 45. and the second Edâ—tion of The Lâ—gal Fundamental Liberties of England recâ—ivâ—d asserted and vindicated pag. 71 72 73. For though a Parliament hath power to levie what mony they judge convenient upon the people by a general tax for common safety of the Nation which Act both by Law and reason they may do yet they cannot in law equity or reason lay all tax upon one two or three men alone and so make them bear all the charges of the publick even so though Parliaments may pass Acts for the good of the People to administer law indifferently to all the people of England alike without exception of persons yet they can neither by law nor reason pass a particular Act of Parliament on purpose to destroy or condemn one two or three individual persons and which shall not in his extent or intention reach any body else because such an Act is against common reason common equity all English men or people being all borne free equally alike and the liberties and freedomes thereof being equally intailed to all alike without exception of persons and therefâ—…â—…e in common reason not to be burthened with an Iron yoak of a particular Act of Parliament when the universalities goeth scotfree in that particular Yea he might urge many Arguments lawful to prove that the Parliament was no Parliament when they past the said Act of Banishment but were long before dissolved and that by their owne consents when the late Parliament took upon them the exercise of regality and the dissolution of Kingship and the house of Lords as it is notaly endeavoured to be proved in the late discourse of the Armies champions as for particularly one licensed to be printed for Giles Calvert and another by Richard Moon at the ssven sters in Pauls Church yard and that it was long since dissolved by that learned man in the Law of England Judge Jenkins renders many reasons in Law to prove it as in his works printed for J. Gyles are to be read p. 19. 20. 26. 27. 48. 49. 50. 96. 139. 140. 142. 147. But much more full to prove its absolute dissolution long since is Mr. Will. Prynne Barrester at Law In his Law-Arguments of the 16 of June 1649. called A Legal vindication of the Liberties of England against illegal Taxes and pretended Acts of Parliament p. 3 4 5 6 c. and p. 44 45 46 c. And that the Parl. Acts long since in Law dissolved the prisoner at the Bar for further plea saith The death of tde King in law indispensibly dissolved the late Parl. as appears by the express Judgement of the Parl. of 1 H. 4. Rot. Parl. Num. 1. and the Parl. of 14 H. 4. 1 H. 5. Rot. Parl. N. 26. and 4 part Cooks Iast f. 46. which book was published for good Law by two special Orders of the House of Commons in an 1641 and 4 E. 4. 44 b. For the Writ of Summons of the late Parliament that was directed to the Sheriffs by vertue of which men were chosen for the last Parl. runs in these words King Charles being to have conference and treaty with and upon such a day about or concerning as the words of the Triennial Act hath it and high and urgent affairs concerning his Majestie the State and the defence of the kingdom and Church of England But how it 's possible for a Parl. to confer or treat with King Charles now he is dead is not to be imagined See 2 H. 5. Cook tit Parl. 3. and therefore the whole current of the Law of England yea Reason it self from the beginning to the end is expresly that the Kings death doth ipso facto dissolve this late Parliament though it had been all the time before never so entire and unquestionable to that very hour And it must needs be so he being in Law yea and by the authority of this very Parl. stiled The Head the Beginning and End of Parliaments See Cooks 1 part Instit f. 109. b. 110. a. and 4 part Inst f. 1 2 3. and Mr. Pym's fore-mentioned Speech against Strafford p. 8. and the Lord St. Joâ—ns Argum. against Strafford p. 12 70 71. and therefore as a Parl. in Law cannot begin without the Kings presence in it either by person or representation Cook ibid. in part 4. fol. 6. see also Rot. Parl. 25 E. 3. N. 10. so it is positively dissolved by his death for thereby not onely the true declared but intended end of their assembling which was to treat and confer with King Charles is ceased See 1 Edw. 6. cap. 7. Cooks 7 Rep. 30 30. and Dyer 156. 4 E. 4. f. 43 44. 1 E. 5. f. 1. Brooks Commission 19 21. and thereby a final end is put unto all the means that are appointed to attain unto the end and therefore it is as impossible for the late Parliament or any Parliament summoned by the King to be the Parliament in law after his death as it is for a Parl. to make King Charles alive again The Kings Writ that summoned this Parl. is the basis in Law and foundation of this Parl. If the foundation be destroyed the Parl. falls but the foundation of it in every circumstance is destroyed and therefore the thing built upon that foundation must needs fall it is a Maxime both in Law and Reason But if it be objected the law of necessity required the continuance of the Parliament against the letter of the Law The Prisoner at the Bar answers first its necessary to consider whether the men that would have it continue as long as they please or after it is in Law dissolved be not those that have created the necessities on purpose that by the colour thereof they may make themselves great and potent and if so then that objection hath no weight nor by any rules of Justice can they be allowed to gain this advantage by their own fault as to make that a ground of their justification which is a great part of their offence and that it is true in it self is so obvious to every unbyassed knowing eye it needs no illustration Secondly I answer There can be no necessity be pretended that can be justifiable for breach of trusts that are conferred on purpose for the redress of mischiefs and grievances yea to the subversions of Laws and liberties I am sure Mr. Pym by the Parliaments command and order told the Earl of Strafford so when he objected the like and that he was the Kings Counsellor and