for Times â—e Times of First-fruits c. and for Years the Years of Jubiâ—e the seventh and the fiftieth years And some of the Colossiâ—s Col. 2. 16 might be corrupted with the same Conceits about â—oly Days and New Moons and Sabbaths which Sabbaths I think ought here to be render'd Weeks as the same Greek â—ord is render'd John 20. 19 Luke 24. 1. Mark 16. 2 Mat. 28. 1. â—y Expositors and by our Translation of all the four Evangelists â—d so also 1 Cor. 16. 1 2 and Acts 20. 2. And if this in Col. â— 16 be Weeks then there is also an end of that Doubt and â— it be meant Sabbaths yet then by the whole Context there â—here the Apostle speaketh of the Hand-writing of Ordinances â—hich Christ hath blotted out and taken out of the way naiâ—g it to the Cross Col. 2. 14. It must plainly referr to the yearâ— Levitical Festivals which being part of the Ceremonial Law â—nd no part of the Moral Law were all abolish'd by Christ â—nd this I humbly offer as plain and that which I think may â—ve others satisfaction Some think Gal. 4. 10 spoken against Astrologers who observe times forbidden Deut. 18. 10 12 14 Mic. 5. 12 Jâ—â— 27. 9 2 Kings 23 5. but I rather think the Apostle speaks of and means Weeks or Days imposed by the Ceremonial Law and not at all such days as are commanded by the Moral Law whereof then there was no manner of doubt That Magistrates or private Christians may set apart a day of Thanksgiving for some eminent Mercy or of Fasting and Humiliation under some extraordinary Case is not controverted though such as are yearly or monthly or weekly soon degenerate into Form Custom and Coldness And I take this to be past doubt that neither private Christians nor Magistrates noâ— Churches no nor the greatest Councils ever could since the time of Christ and his Apostles have any power to make a constant common weekly day holy so that it should be a Sin against God to labour thereon Nor have any now a liberty to keep Jewish Holy-days But if those places in Romans Galatians and Colossians do referâ— to Ceremonial days as days of Circumcision Col. 2. 11 12 and other Days and Weeks before mentioned which some of the converted Jews having been educated in the observation oâ— them might be still fond of and contend for then they have no such rueful Consequences as some few would draw froâ— them And what if I should add Why may not the observation oâ— Days blamed in those Scriptures be amongst others the observation of the First day for worshipping the Sun which was lonâ— before observed by the Heathens And if the First day haâ— been then observed by the Churches of Christ which I thinâ— was not or the Apostle's sence in those Epistles had been â—â— level all days he had by those general words certainly as it seemâ— levelled the First day with the rest but as I think that was nâ— the Apostle's sence so I think also that the First day was not at aâ— then observed by Christians nor by any that bore that Namâ— for about One hundred years after and that was one Sunday in year in favour of Easter and when a few were corrupted iâ— that matter for some Corruptions crept in very early and Antâ—christ began to work in the times of the Apostles 2 Thess 2. â— the generality of Christians observed the Seventh-day Sabbaâ— whereof more hereafter But if Sunday were then observed bâ— any Christians any man may well affirm by such an Interpretation as some would make that those Scriptures do absolutely lay it aside and if Sunday were then laid aside it is wholly and for ever laid aside Ans 5. Or it may be those places may referr to some other Heathenish Holy-days and Bacchinals as well as to Sundays and to the Jewish Ceremonial Festivals which some then as now in compliance with those under whom or with whom they lived might observe and think themselves obliged so to do or to have a Liberty to observe without damage to that Liberty which Christ had purchased for them Col. 2. 14 but this is somewhat uncertain Ans 6. And that these Scriptures quoted out of Paul's Epistles were never meant by him to abolish the weekly Seventh-day Sabbath appears plainly from Paul's constantly keeping that day as his manner was Acts 17. 2 and every Sabbath Acts 18. 4 whereof before for no man can charitably think that Paul in â—his Epistles forbids all observation of any days whatsoever and so â—he weekly Seventh day Sabbath and yet that his own Practice â—hould be recorded by the Holy Spirit to be constantly as is mentioned Acts 17. 2 18. 4. Ans 7. And besides Who can possibly understand the many Expressions in his Epistles in such a sence wherein he commends â—e whole Law where he undoubtedly means the Moral Law â—s holy just and good a part whereof was the Seventh-day Sabâ—ath whereof also before Ans 8. The last Answer I offer to this Objection is taken â—om Mat. 24. 20 21 22 30 and the rest of that Chapter Pray â—at your flight be not in the Winter nor on the Sabbath day with â—hich you may compare Mark 13. 18 19 20 26 and the rest â—â— that Chapter First The soonest time that Flight could referr unto was the â—estruction of Jerusalem which was about Thirty eight years â—ter the Death of Christ which whether it were before or after â—â—ul's writing these Epistles which I think not much material do not certainly know But if the time of Flight there mentioned referred to the Season of any Desolations then and still yet to come then this Scripture in Matthew is the stronger for the Seventh-day Sabbath though I think it fully strong enough by referring to Thirty eight years after Christ's Death although divers Expressions in those Chapters of Matthew 24 and Mark 13 in my weak Opinion may and do referr to some other great Periods of Time and I think most certainly to Christ's second Coming Mat. 24. 29 30 Mark 13. 26 which answers the Question of the Disciples Mat. 24. 2 3. and it may be to some other times of great Trials which would come upon the Churches whereof one may not be far off but of that I have no certainty All which sences of longer Times will carry the Observation of the Seventh-day Sabbath till the Times there mentioned come which are not yet come But however that be I think it is agreed that Prophesied Flight was partly fulfilled upon the Romans besieging and taking Jerusalem about Thirty eight years after the Death of Christ and so the Sabbath by the Lord Jesus Christ in that express Text Mat. 24. 20 was not to be abrogated by his Death or Resurrection nor Thirty eight years after which I think is as much as to say Not at all as long as the World should last And whenever the Desolation Christ prophesied in that Chapter should
great deal of Rubbish and before mentioned may be sufficient in my weak Opinion to prove to the satisfaction of the unprejudic'd that the Word of God fully and a strong Tradition are for the Seventh-day Sabbath and against the First day And if the Seventh day be the true Christian Sabbath and that day and that day only be commanded to be kept as it plainly seems to me by the Scriptures and very far by Tradition except that of Rome and its Followers then do we weekly and wilfully break the Fourth Command in a point wherein there seems no sound Reason can be assigned for God expresly commands to keep the Seventh day and we will keep not that which he commands but one of those upon which he has commanded us to labour What a learned Noble Gentleman means by his Inequality of days in his Cosmical Suspicions I know not See Isa 30. 19 26. Prov. 3. 1 2 16. Orek Jammim Nor what of Truth there may be in the Story of Fluvius Sabbaticus in Palestine which some say only flows another that it only rests upon the Seventh day but divers take notice of it Baronius An. Chr. 33 fol. 28 sect 12. Josephus 7. de bello 24. Plin. 31 Hist 2. c. but on these I build not And here I think it may be of some use to bestow a Sheet or two upon the case of Easter to shew how that came in and is held up As to the time of keeping the Passover the Lamb was to be taken up the tenth day of the first Moon or Month Nisan which Nisan they say answered to part of our March and part of April and was to be killed the fourteenth day of that Month Exod. 12. 1 6. The Month Nisan I take to be the first New Moon after the Vernal Aequinox which Vernal Aequinox is our Eleventh or Twelfth day of March and whether the Fourteenth day was not to be reckoned from the day of the Aequinox which Fourteenth day was alwaies in the Month Nisan I cannot tell Lucius Cent. 2. 117 D. But this I doubt and rather take the first viz. That the Month or Moon Nisan began after the Vernal Aequinox and that the Paschal Lamb was to be killed the Fourteenth day of that Moon Or what other Reckoning they had I cannot certainly resolve To this Feast of the Passover i. e. passing over the Houses of the Israelites when God slew the First born of the Aegyptians our Lord's Parents went up to Jerusalem every year Luke 2. 41. This Passover though it preserved the Memory of the great Deliverance the Israelites had out of Aegypt yet the Lamb then killed was eminently a Type of Christ This Passover was also observed by Christ Mat. 26. 1 17 18 19. Mark 14. 12. Luke 22. 7. John 13. 1. The day when Christ went with his Disciples to keep the Passover was probably the Evening before our Friday and that Evening i. e. the beginning of Friday he and his Disciples probably began to keep it and that night he was betray'd and taken and on Friday was crucified which Passover the Jews observed upon the next day after being the Sabbath day The Ancients say the Jews had a Custom when two Feasts viz. the Passover and the Sabbath came so near together as to be next one another that by Rabbinical Tradition they observed both upon one day viz. upon the Sabbath day 'T is said thereupon that the Jews by that Rule then kept the Passover upon the Seventh-day Sabbath which began in the Evening which they should have observed upon Friday the Sixth day of the week And that Christ kept it upon the Evening of the Sixth day which was the right day which was the Evening after our Thursday Mark 15. 42. Luke 23. 54. John 19. 14. See Lucius Cent. 1 lib. 1. fol. 259 E Whether the Apostles kept it after the Death of Christ I cannot yet resolve although in Acts 18. 21 the Feast which the Apostle says he was to keep at Jerusalem seems to be the Passover though that be not named and if it were I think Paul took occasion to be there at that publick great Concourse of People to preach Christ to that Multitude And so in 1 Cor. 5. 8 the Feast there spoken of might be the Passover though it be not named But that the Apostles were under no obligation to keep that Feast of the Passover after the Death of Christ is to me past doubt because the Passover and Lamb then slain were a Type of Christ and prefigured him who is our Paschal Lamb who being himself slain and sacrificed for us 1 Cor. 5. 7 at his Death the Passover the Type and Figure wholly ceased and was abolished by his Death the true Antitype and so the Apostles and all others were by his Death delivered from that as Lucius Cent. 1. well as other Ceremonies which are all nailed to his Cross and the keeping the Feast with Unleaveneds the Apostle v. 8 expounds of their sincerity of Life who believed in Christ Lucius Cent. 1. lib. 2. 36. H However there were some particularly those at Rome in conformity to the Jews Passover though in crossness to the day the Jews kept the Passover on or it may be out of a good Intention in memory of the Resurrection or for what other reason I cannot tell who it seems by the Histories did about the Second and Third Centuries observe one yearly Festival in commemoration of the Resurrection which Resurrection falling out to be the First day of the week they would have others yearly observe upon the First day which the Eastern Churches generally opposed those there who kept it keeping it the fourteenth day of the first Month the day Christ kept it upon whatever day of the week it fell out to be But what Law from Christ either they or any others had or have to make any such Observation now upon either of those days or upon any other day I am wholly to seek 'T is true the Jews observed the Passover as appears Acts 12. 4 where the Passover is rendered Easter And that some yearly Feast was kept by divers Christians in lieu of the Passover is very likely Lucius 1 Cent. lib. 2. fol. 387. C D where John and Philip the Evangelist and other Apostles are said to keep that yearly Feast the fourteenth day of the first Moon and that some cast it rejecisse upon the Dominical day Cent. 2 fol. 7. C D where a Question being moved Who first preached the Gospel in Britain 't is said It does not sufficiently appear but certainly this is not unlikely to Truth That that Church i. e. in Britain was planted in the beginning by the Grecian or Oriental Teachers and not by the Romans or Western Teachers and that the Grecians transferred their Riâ—es and Ceremonies to them and he so thinks first because Petrus Cluniacensis Abbas writing to St. Bernard affirms The Scots according to the manner of
Christ is Jehovah Jehovah our Righteousness I pass by that in Zecharâ—ah Zech. 11. 11 12 13 where the Price Jehovah was prized at was thirty pieces of silver cast to the Potter compared with Mat. 26. 14 15 27. 6 7 10 Mark 14. 10 11. And Zech. 9. 1 9 compared with Luke 19. 30 33 35. And Zech. 12. 10 compared with John 19. 7. I pass by also that in Malachy Behold I will send my Messenger and he shall prepare the way before me and Jehovah whom ye seek shall suddenly come to his Temple Mal. 3. 1 and Es 40. 3 where Christ is expresly named Jehovah compared with Mat. 3. 1 3 and Mat. 11. 13 Mark 1. 3 Luke 1. 17 3. 4 John 1. 23. before whom John was the Messenger Behold I will send you Elljah the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of Jehovah Mal. 4. 5 6. Elijah was John the Baptist Mat. 11. 7 9 11 13 14 and Mat. 17. 11 12 13 which John was to prepare the way of Jehovah Es 40. 3 compared with Luke 1. 6 7 11 76. Luke 2. 9 11 13 14. Which places in Zechariah and Malachi compared as above do also prove Christ to be Jehovah 6. The last Proof of the Deity of Christ I take from the New Testament which is very full of that great Doctrine of the Mystery of the Trinity and the Deity of Christ in special According to the Promise of the righteous Branch whom Jehovah the Father would raise unto David who should be called Jehovah our Righteousness Jer. 23. 5 6. We have Jesus Christ the Son of David Mat. 1. 1. Behold a Virgin shall be with Child and shall bring forth a Son and they shall call his name Emmanrel which being interpreted is God with us Mat. 1. 23. Which was promised as I think by Jehovah the Father Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bear a Son and shall call his name Emmanuel Es 7. 14. Now if the name of Christ be God then He is God for He is what his Name is and if he be God then he ought to be so acknowledged and his Name Jesus from his saving his People from their sins Mat. 1. 21 I think proves his Godhead also for none else but God can save â—s from Sin into whose Name Christians are baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit Mat. 28. 19. Which is one name into which those in Samaria were baptized i. e. the Name of the Lord Acts 10. 48. as before And what is called the Gospel of Jesus Christ Mark 1. 1 is called the Gospel of God Rom. 1. 1 and called the Gospel of Christ Rom. 1. 16. To you is born a Saviour Christ the Lord Luke 2. 11. I I Jehovah and beside me there is no Saviour Es 43. 10 11. Jesus is a Saviour by which name he is often named in the Psalms Isaiah and other Prophets and whom at his Ascension the Disciples worshipped Luke 24. 52 which they ought not to have done if he had not been God The Glory which Esaias saw was Christ's Glory John 12. 41 the King Jehovah of Hosts Es 6. 1 2 3 5. And here I shall pass by the many Miracles wrought by Jesus Christ whereof the four Evangelists are full whereof some were done before Thousands of Witnesses which Miracles every one of them are Proofs of his Deity And I pass by after the giving the Holy Spirit the Miracles wrought by the Apostles in his Name and in particular the conversion of Thousands by a Sermon which turning Men from Darkness to Light and from the power of Satan unto God Acts 26. 18 and John 3. 3 I think is still a standing Miracle in the World and will so continue to the end of it whereof whilest some men find nothing in their private Conversation nor in the effects of their publick Ministry no wonder if they proclaim their Infidelity by speaking and writing against Christ's Deity Which Conversion and new Birth was and is and must needs be a Mystery to Unbelievers And Christ is exalted to give Repentance which none can give but he that is God Such a change from Contraries are frequent in some Christian Assemblies and cannot be brought about but by Jehovah the Father's giving such to Christ Jehovah the Son's purchasing and redeeming them and Jehovah the Holy Spirit 's converting and sanctifying them whereof we have also much in the Epistles which I pass by and shall offer a Case After the Resurrection of our Lord he had appeared unto the rest of the Apostles but Thomas was not with them when Jesus came and the other Disciples told Thomas that they had seen the Lord but he said Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails and put my finger into the print of the nails and thrust my hand into his side I will not believe Afterwards the Disciples being within and Thomas with them the doors shut Jesus came and stood in the midst and saith to Thomas Reach hither thy finger and thy hand c. and be not faithless but believing And Thomas said unto him My Lord and my God John 20. 24 25 26 27 28. Which case plainly intimates that the rest of the Apostles there did believe the same Truth before which Confession of Thomas Christ approves with Blessed are they who have not seen as Thomas did and yet have believed that Christ is our Lord and our God Whom after our Lord's Ascension and after they were all filled with the Holy Spirit Peter preaches to be Jehovah Acts 2. 4 14 22 24 25. And David v. 25 speaking concerning Jesus of Nazareth I foresaw the Lord alwaies before my face which is quoted out of Psalm 16. 8 where He whom Peter names the Lord David names Jehovah by which Sermon about Three thousand were converted Acts 2. 41. So that Peter preached Christ to be Jehovah Jesus Christ which before was preached unto you whom the Heavens must receive until the time of restitution of all things which God hath spoken by the mouth of his holy Prophets since the World began Acts 3. 20 21 26. whereof you may before see a small collection By the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth doth this man stand here before you whole neither is there salvation in any other for there is no other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved Acts 4. 10 12. And if this be so then Christ is God The Church of God which he i. e. God hath purchased with his own blood i. e. with the Blood of Christ Acts 20. 28. Out of the Israelites as concerning the flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever Amen Rom. 9. 4 5. Which is also plain and positive that Christ is God Christ the Lord of the dead and living we shall all stand before his Judgment-seat for it is written As I live saith the Lord every knee shall
Verses especially do shew that it is the Heavenly Rest with the Beginnings of it by Faith and Holiness whicâ— is meant in the 4th of Heb. Let us labour therefore to enter into thâ— Rest v. 11 which is the Use that since many through Unbelieâ— fall short of that everlasting Rest let us study hard and wiâ— Earnestness and Diligence endeavour to obtain it for which eâ— the Word of God is quick and powerful v. 12 to stir us up â— strive to enter into God's Rest which Labour is commended â— all and especially to the Hebrews to whom that Epistle is directeâ— to bring them to believe in Christ Jesus the Son of God v. 13 1â— whose being God-man the Author of that Epistle doth clearâ— assert and the only Mediator by Faith in whom alone we câ— obtain that everlasting Rest Obj. But one of the principal Objections is raised from Aâ— 20. 7. And upon the First day of the week when the Disciples caâ— together to break Bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart the morrow and continued his speech until midnight Ans The first day of the week they guess was Sunday which I shall not controvert provided they will admit which I think they will not deny that it was Paul's manner to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Acts 17. 2 and provided they tell us what part of Sunday this was for it seems to me and I think to these Objectors also to be the Evening after the Seventh day which Evening was the beginning of Sunday as the Evening was the beginning of every other day of the week Gen. 1. 5 8 13 19 23 31. And that it was in the Evening after the Sabbath I think probable from his being ready to depart on the morrow i. e. on Sunday and from his speaking till midnight and till break of day v. 7 11. And they guess the breaking of Bread there was the Lord's Supper which they guess the Disciples did there once come together to do upon the First day of the week and therefore they guess did upon the First day of every week then and ever after and Paul's preaching to them then they guess was because the Seventh day was changed to the First day but when where or by whom they shew us not but generally acknowledge to be no where found in the Scriptures only we must take their word for it which without a word from the Lord I cannot satisfie my self to do In answer to which Objection the Reader may take notice that the Greek word here preached is the same Greek word which is rendered reasoned Acts 17. 2 where Paul as his manner was his constant manner was went in unto them and three Sabbath days i. e. Seventh-day Sabbaths he preached to â—hem out of the Scriptures and is the same Greek word which is â—endered reasoned Acts 18. 4 where Paul reasoned i. e. preached in the Synagogue every Sabbath And he that without â—rejudice considers those two places will see somewhat how far â—his goes in answer to the Objection Now if we do admit that once for 't is but once Paul with the Disciples came together upon the First day of the week to break Bread â—nd if we should admit that breaking of Bread was giving and â—eceiving the Lord's Supper I say it is but once that is but one â—nstance but one Fact which was never yet understood to make New or repeal an Old Law and it would be a very dangerous â—octrine to affirm that one Fact done by the Apostles â—nd those Disciples who were at Troas and that upon a special occasion should have the force of a Law to repeal or alter one of the Ten Commands to all the World in all after Ages And this once was upon occasion of Paul's being to depart on the morrow i. e. on Sunday This was but once that Paul preached upon the First day buâ— his constant Custom was to preach on the Sabbath days Acts â—7 2 and that upon every Sabbath day Acts 18. 4. The other is pretended to be but once And not one word of instituting the First day or repealing the Seventh day And if we may humbly take a liberty of offering our weâ— sence upon this place as others do upon this and all the rest oâ— the Scriptures I further answer that it is likely to me that Pâ— abiding seven days at Troas which some think was Troy or the Country thereabout Acts 20. 6. kept as his manner was Act 17. 2. 18. 4. the Sabbath there as his Custom was and in thâ— Evening when the First day began as every other day of thâ— week did begin in the Evening Gen. 1. 5 8 13 19 23 31 the Disciples came together to break Bread And that it was thuâ— I think I have the Opinion of a whole Synod Lucius Ecclesiasâ—cal History V. Cent. 313 D. 315. a b c d e Basileae 162 Synodus Toletana Which breaking of Bread might be to receive the Lord 's Suppeâ— together or it might be only for common eating or supping togâ—ther for neither is positively or particularly expressed And may be it was common Eating because in the same Book of thâ— Acts viz. Acts 27. 35 the same Greek word is used for Paâ— breaking Bread which was common Eating in the Ship wiâ— the Centurion Souldiers and Seamen who were Heathenâ— whatever the other Prisoners with Paul were which the Serâ— of the History there shews was common Eating and I take â— be so understood by Expositors And in this very Chapter vâ— Acts 20. 11 when Paul had broken Bread and eaten he departâ— which may be the same breaking Bread mentioned v. 7 but the same Greek word and probably was common Eating Aâ— the same Greek word for breaking Bread is used Mat. 14. 1â— where Christ fed a Multitude with five Loaves and two Fishâ— which was before the Institution of the Supper And the saâ— Greek word is also used Mat. 15. 36 at another miraculous feeâ—ing of a Multitude and Mark 8. 6 19 which could not be â— Supper being before the Institution thereof So that compâ—ring Acts 20 7 with Acts 20. 11 and Acts 27. 35 and Mat. 15. 36 and Mark 8. 6 19 it seems it might be common Eating but suppose it were the Lord's Supper 't is likely Paul having kept the Sabbath with them as his manner was and intending to be gone the next morning i. e. on Sunday morning they met to have the Lord's Supper together and after Supper that Paul preached to them and talked long till break of day and then departed which seems to be Sunday morning But why the coming together of the Disciples v. 7 might not be as Friends commonly do when a Minister or any other special Acquaintance intends to take a Journey in the morning to supp with him over-night I see no substantial Reason which is a Sence obvious to common Understandings as it seems without Violence Whereas the haling of this Text to make a new
so to overturn the commanded day and to lay it aside and then to set up another Day of Rest every week which as has been said we do not find commanded by the Lord when they certainly know that the Day observed in obedience to the Fourth Command by the Israelites and Proselytes was the Seventh day and no other and the Sabbath and Seventh day did both result in the weekly Seventh-day Sabbath and both relate to the first Sabbath Gen. 2 ordained by Christ which they know was the Seventh day and no other day of the week And whosoever not over-prejudic'd does read this Command I think will find this strongly there enforced viz. That the weekly day the Creator rested on is the very day to which this Command referrs and that all the World who have and receive the Word do know and confess was not the first nor sixth but the seventh day of the week and that day only and no other day and upon this I do insist And here I commend to the Reader Heb. 8. 10 where the Lord promises to put his Laws into the Minds of his People and to write them in their Hearts which is called a new Covenant v. 8 with which we may compare Jer. 31. 33 which Law promised to be written in our Hearts I think is the Moral Law which Moral Law is the Ten Commands whereof the Fourth is one And with how many Distinctions must the Word the Promises New Covenant and Command be mangled to be accommodated to such a new sence of the First day Which change of the day well considered may be one cause of the Israelites standing off from Christ Who will be converted grafted into Christ and saved by him Rom. 11. 7 26. And I hear some of late in defence of the First day have positively affirmed that the First day of the week is the Seventh day of the week and so the very day which the Letter of the Command requires by which Rule that which the Word calls the Seventh day should then become the Sixth and the Sixth the Fifth and so all the days in confusion and all the Jews and Christians hitherto in the World out in their reckoning of Seven Whilst I was considering this Question a learned Manuscript was sent me from an unknown Author who to maintain the First day of the week to be the Seventh day by the Fourth Command says to this effect That we ought to invert the Days i. e. to reckon them backward and then that which the Scriptures call the Seventh day is the First the Sixth the Second the Fifth the Third the Fourth the Fourth the Third the Fifth the Second the Sixth and then the First is the Seventh so great contrariety there is and must needs be in defending a Paradox Obj. and Ans Some farther object That the Sabbath was a Type and withal acknowledge it a Type of that Rest which is above with Christ in the upper World which we shall easily admit provided such will admit also what we think cannot be denied to Types that the Sabbath which is the Type continue till Heaven the Antitype do come Obj. and Ans Those who build the whole of this Change upon the Authority of the Church and not upon the Word which Word is against them who are very eminent may take this short Answer That if the Church have Power to change one of the Commands the Consequence is plain why may not the Church change more If any one of them be left to the Discretion of the Church certainly all are exposed as was said before Obj. and Ans Some Objectors there are who misunderstanding certain general Expressions in Paul s Epistles about the Law misapply them against the Ten Commands and so lay aside all the Moral Law which general Expressions are evidently meant of the Ceremonial Laws and may sometimes be written against some then erroneous Conceits of Justification by obedience to the Moral Law And others taking advantage of some incautelous Writings about the Privileges purchased by Christ have that way attempted to throw down the Ten Commands a Doctrine which would surely please many in this debauched licentious and erroneous Age if it would hold and some of these with the Law take away the Old Testament Obj. and Ans One thinks the Decalogue is not at all in force to the Gentiles and thinks the Preface to it Exod. 20. 2 I the Lord thy God which have brought thee out of the Land of Aegypt out of the House of Bondage was to shew that it only concerned the Jews Whereas if we consider that the Church then in Aegypt was the Church of Christ and that Deliverance was of the whole then visible Church of Christ in the World amongst whom there were also many Gentiles as well as Jews I think it may be allow'd that the Preface concerns all Christians and that Deliverance expressed in the Preface as before ought to be celebrated in all After-ages by all Christians in the World whereof there is often mention in the Psalms and other Scriptures and so that Consideration from the Preface does not lessen the Obligation of the Decalogue upon the Gentiles but strengthen it And for the Obligation of the Decalogue when I find Christ so directly confirming the Law Mat. 5. 18 and Luke 16. 17 by which Law is understood the Decalogue I think I ought not to be over-ruled by any man's contrary Opinion whatever esteem I have of those who thus write and of many useful things written by them Mark 10. 19 and John 14. 15 If ye love me keep my Commands By which Commands the Decalogue is generally understood I do believe that Text Blessed are they who do his Commandments Rev. 22. 14 relates to the Ten Commandments And those general Expressions about the Law in the Acts and Epistles will be better understood if we reflect upon the occasion of them In Acts 15. 1 certain men taught the Brethren Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses ye cannot be saved Where it was Circumcision and the Ceremonial Law that was in question not the Moral Law the Ceremonial Laws were as a burthen lain aside by the Death of Christ and by the Holy Spirit as is plain in that Chapter And when Paul Acts 21. 17 18 21 came to Jerusalem some told him that many Thousands of the Jews who believed were zealous of the Law i. e. of the Ceremonial Law and were informed of Paul that he taught the Jews which were among the Gentiles to forsake Moses that is the Ceremonial Laws given by Moses saying They ought not to circumcise their Children neither to walk after the Customs and then they advise Paul to purifie himself to remove that Objection to whose Advice Paul yields v. 24 25 26 which occasion'd the Commotion v. 27 28 Crying Men of Israel help this is the man that teacheth all men every where against the Law i. e. the Ceremonial Law of Purifications and