though till then wee shall not be so thoroughly heated with it 2. Betweene Gods love to our persons Gods love to our qualities actions A distinction which God well knowes how to make and wee should sometimes learne to use it not hating mens persons because of some infirmities Parents I am sure are well skilled in putting this difference betweene the vices and persons of their children those they hate these they love and when for their vices they chastise their persons they remember with much compassion that t is a childe whom they have under the rod. To the point the cause is alike betweene God and the Elect his love to their persons is from everlasting the same nor doth their sinnefulnesse lessen it nor their sanctity increase it Because God in loving their persons never considered them otherwise than as most perfectly holy and unblameable in Christ. But Gods love to their qualites works then begins when both the one and other become holy by the grace of conversion before which time and after too God is angry even with his Elect and testifies his hatred of their sins as much as of any others by manifold chastisements upon their persons for their offences Wherefore though Paul were a chosen vessell dearely beloved of God for his person even then when in ignorant zeale hee furiously persecuted the Church yet for his conditions they were hatefull and highly displeasing to God till after his conversion Most true it is that sin doth justly make that person hatefull in whom it is and it doth so in the reprobate whose sinnes God hates and for their sinnes their persons which he alwaies beholds polluted in their uncleannesse yet in the Elect whom hee hath loved for ever this difference of affection is manifest God approves of their persons whilst hee disallowes their corruptions and when his fiercest wrath was shewed against the sinnes of the Elect in the person of Christ then did God most compassionately love the persons both of Christ and of all the Elect. Wherefore God might easily take away his Image from Adams nature yet not his favour from his person which he loved as elect in Christ whilst yet he punished his transgression sharply and we see nothing more common in Christian observation than for men after such time as they are converted and assured of Gods tender love unto them yet then to feele the bitterest stormes of his displeasure raised up against them for their sinnes Hence then it appeares that our effectuall Vocation and Conversion is justly to be accounted a fruit or effect of Gods singular favour towards the persons of his Elected with whom being actually reconciled in Christ having justified them from all their sinnes by his merits he afterwards sends forth his holy Spirit into their hearts calling them from darknesse to light from under the power of Satan and their corruption to the libertie of Gods sonnes that being thus sanctified they may be made meet to be partakers of the inheritance with the Saints in light And whereas that place of the Apostle Heb. 11. 6. Without faith it is impossible to please God may breed a doubt against this which hath beespoken as seeming to imply that before our actuall Conversion and Beleeving wee are no way at all pleasing unto God nor beloved of him For the removing of this scruple wee are according to the second distinction understand this place of the Actions not to the Persons of the Elect. Towards their Persons hee beareth perpetuall good-will but this is secret they feele it not nor doth so much appeare vnto them or others till their conuersion when only God declares himselfe to bee pleased both with their persons and actions But for their actions t is certaine no worke whatsoeuer any of the Elect doth before the infusion of sauing faith can bee done according to Gods will and so be pleasing vnto him Of which ordinary course of pleasing of God in our Workes according to his reuealed will this place is to be interpreted and that out of the place it selfe for it is apparant the Apostle giues a reason why Abels Sacrifice pleased God not Cains why Enochs life and religious walking with God was pleasing to him namely because they had faith in and by which they performed those seruices acceptably Without which faith it is impossible saith the Apostle to please God namely in any Worke that we goe about he addes the reason For he that cometh to God whether in sacrifices prayers or any other religious duties to be performed to God he must beleeue that God is that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him Here therefore is nothing against that Love of God which he alwaies beares towards his Elect in Christ through whom they are pleasing vnto him when yet their works please him not And thus much of the Moving cause of our Effectuall Vocation viz. Gods Love and Actuall Reconciliation with the Elect. From hence I deduce two corollaries 1. That Sanctification and Inberent righteousnesse goes before our Iustification and imputed righteousnesse but with a distinction of a double justification 1. In Foro Diuino in Gods fight and this goeth before all our sanctification for even whilst the elect are unconverted they are then actually justified freed from all sin by the Death of Christ God so esteemes of them as free and hauing accepted of that Satisfaction is actually reconciled to them By this Iustification we are freed from the guilt of our Sins and because that is done away God in due time proceeds to give us the grace of Sanctification to free us from sins corruption still inherent in our Persons 2. In Foro Conscientiae in our owne sense which is but the revelation and certaine declaration of Gods former secret act of accepting Christs righteousnesse to our justification The manifestation of which to our hearts and consciences is the only ground of all our peace and comfort and it followes our Sanctification upon and after the Infusion of Saving Faith the only instrument of this our Iustification This distinction is needfull to be obserued as giving light to many things and without it I know not what reasonable construction can be made of these words of Tilenus Synt. part 2. cap. 45. Thes. 38. Perperam absurdè prorsus inter effecta Sanctificationis numer atur justificatio quae illam naturâ praecedit neque enim sanctificatur quisquam nisi jam justificatus omninoque necesse est ut arbor bona sit priusquam bonos ferat fructus If he meane that no man is sanctified but he that is first justified in Gods sight by Christs righteousnesse accepted for him t is true but if that none is sanctified but he that is first justified in his owne sense through the apprehension of Christs righteousnesse by faith t is apparantly false seeing a man cannot have Faith nor use faith till he be first sanctified And the reason hee gives
Atheisticall to denie his truth or strangely subtle to shift it off from it selfe when t is pressed with it in particular But when the spirit of Grace hath overshadowed the soule sanctifying all the powers thereof throughout t is admirable to see how it stoopes to the command of the Word There is then a singular harmony betweene the holinesse of the Will and of the Word this food of spirituall life relisheth as sweet and savoury unto the soule as milke to Infants or strong meat to able and healthy men Regeneration hath restored health unto the soule whereby it hath recovered a true taste of the Lords bounty and goodnesse whence followes a constant appetite thereunto asmuch as unto corporall nourishment as the Apostle argues 1 Pet. 2. 1. 2. 3. Hence the soule begins to conceive a high esteeme of the dignity of the Word it sees now nothing so reasonable excellent as the wisedome thereof it beholds nothing â—o terrible as Gods threats nothing so lovely as his favour it sees no ornament of the soule comparable to Grace no pleasure like unto the peace of Conscience it comprehends an end of all other perfection but the further it lookes into Gods law the deeper wonders it discernes it lookes upon the world and reades Vanity in all the things thereof and strange folly in mens desires of them and now it counts no preferment any whit comparable to the hope of heaven it hath now Reall apprehensions of Divine things and conceives of Religion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as of a Worke to be done not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a businesse to bee discours'd and talked of it judges now that there is an absolute necessity of obeying God though all the world bee displeased and that the regard of saving a mans soule must thrust out of the way all importunate pleasures and profits that would presse in upon us Being thus illightened and inwardly touched by the finger of God the soule presently puts it wholly upon the certainty and excellency of Gods truth revealed it stretcheth forth the armes of her strongest confidence affiance unto every branch of the Scriptures embracing absolutely and without all limitation the truth goodnesse power and wisedome of God shining therein it beleeves what it knowes and as it can where t is ignorant it prayes for knowledge where weake it sues for strength and increase of faith where stubborne it offers it selfe unto God to bee bowed or broken if he please counting it now a happy thing to be crossed in sinne to bee met with at every by-turning with some reproofe or chastisement let him chide or strike it falls downe at his feet and without quarrelling disputing and arguing the case takes all with a Benedictus Dominus c. Blessed be the Lord and blessed bee his Ministers and blessed be their counsell who have kept me from committing this sinne against the Lord. When thus the heart is softened and sanctified then and not before is wrought that habituall Grace and blessed disposition of the will which we call true Faith whereby the Creature is willing to resigne up its understanding desires affections thoughts words workes and all to the disposing of his Creator in such a sort as by his revealed Will hee hath or shall make known beleeving certainly that in every thing t is best to follow his counsell This for cause of true Faith next followes 2. The Object of this particular Faith which is twofold 1. The whole Will of God revealed unto us in his Word containing all Histories Doctrines Commands Threatnings Promises of what kind soever 2. The particular Promise of Remission of sinnes and Everlasting Life by the death of Christ which in one word we call the Gospell It is needfull thus to distinguish of the object of Faith because although it be but one and the same infused grace of true Faith which respects both forasmuch as by the same sacred Habite of the soule we are inclined to beleeve both the whole and each part of Gods will be it in it selfe more or lesse excellent or more or lesse needfull to us neverthelesse Faith as it hath reference to these Objects The whole Will of God and The particular Promise of the Gospell admitteth of divers considerations names and uses Faith as it assents to the whole Will of God in what kind soever I call Legall because it is such a Vertue as is immediately required by the Morall Law in the same manner as other duties of the Morall Law are Forasmuch as all men are bound by the Law of their creation to give full assent and affiance to all things whatsoever God shall reveale unto them And as all other Morall dueties are required of us in their degrees as parts of our outward obedience and inward sanctity necessary to salvation so is this of Faith commanded as 〈◊〉 principall grace of the soule and a prime part of our obedience to the first Commandement And so Faith in this respect may bee called Saving namely as all other Graces are because required in their measure as needfull to Salvation Faith as it assents unto the speciall promise of grace I call Evangelicall because it is such an Act as is expressely commanded in the Gospell the object thereof being not revealed by the Morall Law It is called also properly Saving and Iustifying in regard of the use it now hath through Gods gracious appointment to be the onely instrument of our Iustification and Salvation by Christ. In which distinction between Legal Evangelicall Faith we must not conceive of two distinct Habits of Faith it is but one gracious quality of the soule disposing it to the beliefe of all divine truth which for the substance of it was the same in innocent Adam with that which is in regenerate men The difference stands onely herein 1. In the Degrees Adams Faith was perfect because his understanding was fully inlightened and his affections absolutely conformable to all holinesse Wee know but little and by reason of our inward weaknesse beleeve but weakly what we doe know 2. In the Originall in Adam it was naturall by creation in us t is supernaturall from the holy Ghosts infusion 3. In the particular Object Adam beleeved God without reference to Christ the Mediatour wee beleeve chiefly the promise of Grace in Christ and all other things with some relation to him Here then is no new Faith but a New object of Faith not revealed unto Adam whereto our Faith is now directed and here 's also a singular priviledge newly granted unto Faith that God accepteth it to our Iustification in his sight Otherwise if wee looke unto the grace it selfe as it was in Adam a part of Gods Image given him by creation and is in us a part of the same Image restored by regeneration so there 's no difference at all and therefore in that question whether Iustifying Faith bee commanded in the Morall Law there needs no great dispute t is manifest that
the Morall Law 110 Faith Legall and Euangelicall the same in substance and differ only in the vse and obiect 111 The excellencie of Faith 158 What Faith or beleefe is in generall 159 How it agrees with and differs from knowledge opinion 160. c. Three grounds of the certaintie of assent in Faith 164. 206 The first 206 The second 220 The third 222 Faith a degree beyond beleefe being an assent with confidence and reliance 170 Faith taken in a speciall sence as it is Christian Faith described 171 Diuers acceptions of it ibid. 172 The obiect of Faith described 172. c. The subiect euerie reasonable creature 197. 198 Faith is in the whole heart euen in the will as well as in the vnderstanding 199. 230 Faith which Papists call iustifying is the faith of diuels and reprobates 237 Faith foolishly distinguished by Papists into formed and vnformed 237 Faith without works differs in nature from Faith with workes 238 Particular assent in Faith and the root and cause of it 241 The obiect of it two-fold 244 Faith of the Elect wherein it differs from Faith of Hypocrites 247 Faith vnfained 253. 254 Faith of Hypocrites doth not assent to all Diuine truth at all times 147. 148. c. Faith implicit of Papists confuted 194 Faith in the particular promise of grace defined 257 The iustifying act therof propounded proued 258 How it is wrought 259 The comfort of it 260 Faith of the Elect by what degrees of assent and essentiall differences it is distinguished from other Faith 226 Temporarie Faith 227 The causes of it 228. 229 G GOD as Creator how far he may be knowne to naturall men 65 Goodnesse of the naturall man not generall 80 It respâ—cts others more then himselfe 79 Grace what the habit of it is 7 It is infused all at once 10. 11 The actions of it appeare sooner or later stronger or weaker in some 9 It is so firmely wrought in the Elect that it shall neuer be blotted out 34 Grace preuenting assisting inciting helping 13 By what meanes Grace may be quenched 37 Grace sufficient for conuersion not giuen to the Gentiles while they are out of the Church 55. 56. 57 Nor to all Christians in the visible Church 88. 89. c. Grace of conuersion friuolously distinguished into sufficient and effectuall 89 Grace sufficient to conuersion is alwayes effectuall and effectuall Grace onely is sufficient 91 Grace giuen to those who are within the Church set forth in the diuers kinds thereof 94 Grace doth not rectifie inferiour faculties first 127 Grace sufficient to beleeue and turne to God is no other but the Grace of regeneration 92. 93 It is not giuen to all 93 Grace preparatiue to conuersion how it may be resisted 140. 141. c. H HOly Spirit giuen two wayes 26 I IGnorance of the very time of our conuersion no iust cause of doubting fear that we are not conuerted and why 44 Illumination both naturall and spirituall described 94 95 When it is not sufficient for sanctification of the heart 101. c. Common Illumination not giuen to all hearers of the Word 100 Image of God wherein Adam was made 4 Implicit faith of Papists confuted 194. c. Infants dying without Baptisme may be saued 45 Infants are charitably supposed to be regenerate in Baptisme 45 Why they may not receiue the Lords Supper 49. 50 Infusion of grace hath no concurrence of mans naturall abilities but onely requires in him a passiue capacity to receiue 32 K KNowledge of Christian Religion must be alwayes increasing and fruitfull Preface 14 Knowledge meere naturall of the Morall Law brings little practise 70 Knowledge more certaine then beleefe in things of the same kind 166 Perfect Knowledge takes away all beleefe 167 Knowledge by sight so far as sight goes takes away faith 191 Knowledge distinct and explicit of Diuine things necessarie to the being of faith 192 L LAw morall how far it may be knowne to a naturall man 66. 68 Learned men vnsanctified fit to make hereticks pr. 19. 20 Loue of God reacheth to the Elect before they be regenerate 17 Considered in it selfe it differs from the manifestation of it to vs 18 Gods Loue to our persons and actions 19 Light of nature well vsed by the Heathen doth not bind God in Iustice to giue them supernaturall light 84 MEanes of common faith 229 Meditation of what things will stir vs vp to praise Gods rich grace and mercy in our conuersion 38 Ministers dutie in preaching the Word 113 Miraculous faith ground on immediat reuelations 173 Motions naturall and spirituall which are wrought by the Word described 95. 96 NAturall man cannot by the most industrious vse of all helpes naturall attaine to the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ 64 His knowledge of God confined within two limits 65 How far his knowledge of God as Creator reacheth 65 He neuer goeth so far in practise as he might and as he knowes he ought to doe 71 He neither knowes the cause nor can iudge aright of the nature of sin 74. 75 His vertue and goodnesse how far it goes and is approued of God 76 He cannot possibly desire grace and mercy and why 84 Necessitie doth well stand together with libertie in the will regenerate 156 OBedience of regenerate men how it is made irregular 152 Obscuritie in the obiect of faith as it is held by the Papists confuted 187. 188. c. Obseruation of Gods mercies iudgments on our selus or other a speciall meanes to increase faith 223. P PAssions and affections naturall not subiect to reason 124 Plainnesse of speech and matter to be vsed in preaching of Gods Word Pref. 22. 23 Priesthood of Christ and how Christ and Aaron agree and differ Pref. 23 Promises the obiect of faith 170 QValities in the reasonable soule differ three wayes according to the threefold state of man 4. 5 REgeneration improperly ascribed to the Word 97 Regenerat man hath in him two contrarie qualies grace and corruption as he is spirituall he neuer resists the worke of grace 148 Resistance of grace in Regenerat men whence it flowes 151 How the preuailing act of it is taken away 152 VVhy it preuailes many times 153 Religion breeds ciuility knowledg of all arts 68. 69 Righteousnesse of the naturall man not acceptable to God 81 Rather negatiue then positiue 79 More outward then inward 76. 77 SAnctification how it goes before iustification 21 It is infused into Infants 43 VVrought in a maner meerely supernaturall 29 Sanctification how it hath mans free-will concurring to it two waies 31 Man not a moral agent in it 33. 34 Schollars how made complete Pref. 20. 21. c. Scriptures freed from Popish imputations of obscurity 177. 178. c. How they are certainly knowne to be Gods VVord 208. 209 By themselues 213 and by the Spirit 214. 215 Sin what a snare it hath layd to intrap wicked men 139 Spirit how far
Prophets in the famous Vniversity of Oxford yet I assure my selfe that whosoever reads this booke with good attention and understanding shall finde the Authors meditations therein so throughly digested and the nature properties and proper acts of Grace and Faith so distinctly layde downe and accurately distinguished that he shall reape to himselfe much profite and comfort thereby and shall with me admire the grace of God abounding toward the Author in all wisedome and in all knowledge lively sense and utterance of heavenly and supernaturall mysteries far above all which can be expected from or is ordinarily found in one of his age and yeares If as we know trees by their fruit so we may passe our sentence upon the composer of this Treatise by his work we cannot conceive or speake lesse of him but that as hee was from his childehood trayned up in the Schooles of learning and had profited above his equals in the studies of the best arts humane divine so undoubtedly he hath from his tender yeares beene throughly disciplined in the Schole of Christ and hath by much and daily experience of afflictions and manifold temptatiâ—ns in himselfe and of the inward sensible operations of Gods spirit and grace in his owne soule attained to this high measure of heavenly knowledge and understanding whereof he hath here given us a lively experiment It is not the most strong out stretched arme of humane reason nor the most swift and farre flying arrow of the sharpest naturall wit nor the farre extended lines of long continued studies which can reach so high to these heavenly and supernaturall mysteries It is onely the holy Spirit of grace comming upon all these taking possession of mans soule dwelling in him and making him a new creature which brings this kind and measure of profound wisedome and this distinct knowledge of divine things yea by the fiery tryall of inward temptations onely doth that blessed Spirit drive the thirsly soules of Gods militant Saints to digge and dive so deep into the fountaines of the sacred Scriptures and to draw such living waters from the very bottome of those Wells of salvation In a word as the Apostle saith of yongue Abel that by Faith having offered up a more excellent sacrifice than his elder brother Cain he by it obtained witnesse that he was righteous God testifying of his gifts by it he being dead yet speaketh Heb. 11. 4. so I will not doubt nor bee affraid to say of the godly and learned Author of this Booke who having offered up to God in a publike place these exercises as the first fruits of his heavenly learning did not long after leave this world in the flower of his age and ascended up into that supercelestiall glory towards which he had ever bent all his studies and desires and which alwaies hee had sought after in the whole course of his life that by faith hee though yongue in yeares hath offered up a more excellent sacrifice than many of his elder brethren by which hee being dead yet speaketh and shall speake to future ages And as hereby he shall obtaine witnesse of all Gods surviving Saints that hee himselfe was a righteous and faithfull servant of Christ excelling in grace and vertue in the dayes of his pilgrimage here on earth So God also will testifie of this his gift that it is holy and acceptable in the eyes of his Majestie by making it powerfull and effectuall to the begetting and increasing of saving grace faith and knowledge in all such as reade and peruse it with true Christian docilitie diligence and humble devotion To the blessing of which gracious God I leave this worke and to his grace commend you all desiring in my daily prayers to be and continue Your brother companion and fellow souldier in seeking the glory of Gods grace defending the truth of the Gospell and fighting against the spreading errours and springing heresies of this age George Walker The Table of the chiefe matters contained in this Treatise ABilities of man are not to be measured by his own partiall iudgement page 145 Actions of grace and holinesse how far they are in a godly mans owne power 147 Admonition three-fold about searching the Scriptures 217. c. Affections two-fold sensuall rationall described 125 Affections not quickned nor stirred vp to loue of goodnesse before conuersion 125 Not rightly moued towards Spirituall things but when thoy are affected spiritually 130 Articles of the Arminian faith 53 Arminians how they erre about vniuersall grace 54 Their errors about the worke of Gods Word and mans calling 99 Their obiections and reasons answered 106. 107. c. Their errors about the subiection of mans naturall affections to his reason discouered 125. c. They giue large allowance of grace to men vnregenerate 127 Their absurdities therein 128 Their grosse errors about mans will discouered 132 c. Their errors in holding that conuersion doth begin and consist in the act onely of beleeuing 134 135. c. The dangerous issue and conclusion of their errors 136 Assent differs in degree according to the diuersity of the obiects assented vnto 169 Assistance effectuall why denied by God at some times to the regenerate 153 B BAptizing of Infants lawfull 47 Beleefe how it differs from faith and trust 170 C CAlumnies of Arminians and Iesuites 155 Calling outward and inward described 94 How the Arminians conceiue of Calling 99 Catechizing needfull and vsefull in the Church of Christ Preface page 6 Certaintie of assent in Faith springs from three grounds The first 206 The second 220 The third 222 Communion with Christ two-fold 15 Conuersion of a sinner to God 6. 7 The causes of it 16. 24 The subiect 37 The manner how it is wrought 27 It goes before Faith 4 It signifies First Gods infusing of habituall grace Second The regenerate mans actuall imploying of grace infused 89. 144 Conuersion mistaken by Arminians which is a cause of confusion in their writings 92 Conuersion how to be truly discerned 115 Preparatiue meanes vnto it 137. 138 How weake they are and in a man vnregenerate how they are said to be sinfull 139 That they may be resisted and how 140. c. Cooperation of Gods Spirit necessarie in all holy actions of men regenerate 151 Corruption of nature what it is 5 D DEsire of spirituall things after a naturall manner is a corrupt desire 130 E ELect men onely are the proper subiect of true conuersion vnto God 41 Euidence of the Scriptures declared proued 175. 176 Conclusions touching it The first 176 The second 182 The third ibid. 183 F FAlling from grace and finall resistance described 142 Faith in Christ a part of sanctification 10 The habit and act of it and when it is wrought ibid. It is not properly the root of all grace 12 There is some Spirituall life before it 13 and some participation with Christ 15. 23 It helps forward and increaseth grace and all gracious actions 14 Faith is commanded in
abates more or lesse or as there is greater necessity and use of one grace more than another For the case is not altogether alike in our New as in our Naturall birth here all parts are nourished alike and grow proportionably unto full perfection if the body be healthy and of good temper But in the birth of the new creature it is otherwise he is crazic and sickly from the very wombe and first conception infirmity and corruption hangs upon every joint and limbe of him so that although life be in every part yet every part thrives not equally nor is alike active in its operations It s with him as with instants that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syderati planet strucken or as wee say taken with some ill aire in whom some parts grow wearish and withered whilst others grow strong and lusty All grow and have life but those more slowly and weakely which diversity make the body somewhat deformed though not monstrous So in Grace every faculty is quickened with spirituall life and strength and yet one may have a more free exercise of this gracious power than another which may bee hindered and kept under through some stopping of the Spirit some ill humour unpurged some corrupt custome company or example inclining it another way And this appeares by manifest experience of that great diversity of the degrees of grace which are found even in one regenerate man who many times proves eminent in some one or few graces yet in others attains but to a very meane mediocrity This distinction between the Vnity of the Habit and Multiplicity of the Operations of Grace infused may be further cleered by comparison with other things as namely with originall justice and originall sinne That was but one Image of God ingraven universally in Adams whole nature possessing and sanctifying every part which were thereby disposed at all occasions to all convenient and due operations without let This also is not a particular but universall depravation indisposing all parts to good ill-disposing them to naught Which as originall justice should have beene is in all infants together with life but shewes it by degrees and with much diversity as with increase of yeares custome of education force of temperature strength of temptations provoke and inslame it So our sanctification being the restoring of originall righteousnesse and doing away of originall corruption is for its inherence one generall habite sanctifying all at once and working in every part a gracious disposition to its proper holy performances though the execution it selfe be with much variety as also hinderance and difficulty by reason of the contrary habite of corruption Againe health is not a particular but universall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or right temper of the whole body which in divers parts hath divers names by which every part workes diversly and all orderly In a universall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 on the contrary And such are the habites of grace and corruption Lastly as the reasonable soule in infants hath all its faculties entirely though the exercise of each of them appeare not but in time by degrees so in our regeneration grace is entire even in its infancy and first birth though the operations of it are more or lesse according to our growth in Christ. Now to make application of this to our enquiry touching the originall of faith you may perceive by what is spoken Whereof faith is a part and When faith is wrought in the soule Namely that faith is a part of our sanctification that faith is wrought in the soule then when we are regenerate by the infusion of the habite of grace into our whole man This will appeare if we distinguish between 1. The habite of faith which is in generall the renued quality of the soule whereby it is made able to discerne and yeeld assent unto and also willing to put affiance in all divine truth revealed 2. The act of faith when the understanding and will do actually know and relie upon Gods truth and goodnesse This is a fruit of the former and followes it in time the former is a branch of the Image of God restored unto us a streame of the common fountaine of sanctification whence all graces slow a part of our inherent righteousnesse as is most apparant It being impossible that the understanding and will of man should bee effectually inclined towards their spirituall and supernaturall object to give credence and put confidence in it untill such time as they bee first rectified by grace and purged from their habituall inbred blindnesse and rebellion Which change when it is wrought in the soule by the Spirit of grace sanctifying and quickning it in all the powers thereof with spirituall life then follow those living actions of Faith Hope Love c performed by the strength of inherent and assisting grace Wherefore wee are not to imagine that faith is infused eyther Before or without other graces or that the soule is not at the same time and as soone disposed to love feare God as to beleeve in him or to Humility to Patience to Charity to Repentance as for Faith The seed of all these graces is sowne at once and for their habites they are coâ—vall stemmes of one common roote of inherent sanctity though yet some of them shoot up faster and beare fruit sooner than other Those that doe so are the two principall graces of Faith and Repentance the actions of both which seem to appeare first in the regenerate which of them shew first I will not now dispute but certaine it is that the regenerate soule workes here most lively and stirring and after the infusion of spirituall life the pulse beates strongest in those arteries The reason whereof I take it is the singular use of these two graces arising from the manner of our conversion which being wrought by the sight of sinne and misery on the one side and the representation of grace and mercy on the other of necessity drawes the newly-regenerate soule by strong motions immediately to conceive sorrow for and detestation of its sinnefull misery and also to a vehement desiring and looking after the promise of grace which may bring it deliverance from an estate so damnable But in this point of the priority of one grace before another wee may not be too bold nor curious for as the working of the holy Ghost is secret and wonderfull in making us wild gourds partakers of the sap and sweetenesse of the true Vine so is it not possibly observable in all or the most where and in what branch this sap first buds forth into blossomes and fruit Hence this conclusion is to be observed 1. That Eaith properly is not the roote of all other graces nor the first degree of our sanctification and spirituall life Take faith in which sense we please for the Act or for the Habit If for the Act the Habite is Before that and the roote of it If for the Habit
that is not Before but a part of our sanctification nor yet a solitaty Habite infused alone by it selfe but together with the Actus primi or Habits of all supernaturall graces whatsoever T is true in some sense that before faith there is no life nor sanctity in the soule because faith is a part of our life of grace and of sanctity But there are other parts too Hope Charity c. and of these it may be said as well as of faith there 's no grace in the soule till hope charity be wrought in it All are parts of our spirituall life wrought together For as the corporall so the spirituall life is not one distinct but omnes actus primi of every faculty whereby it can worke regularly And though in the body some part may live alone and others bee dead yet in our spirituall life t is farre otherwise all powers are quickned and live together where the habit of one grace is there are all and as soone all as one every Faculty being rectified as well as any and all the operations of each faculty tending to all its objects renued as well as any one operation directed to some one object Wherefore I see not under correction of quicke eyes how Faith can bee accounted the roote whence spring all other fruits of righteousnesse the efficient cause of our sanctification the onely pipe through which the waters of life flow into the soule that first-borne grace in our spirituall regeneration so much that before its actuall operation there is no jot of spirituall life and sanctity in our hearts Many divine Elogies are given to faith in the Scriptures but none such as to cause us to make it the fountaine of all graces That the heart is regenerate before the act of beleeving and other graces wrought therein together with the habit of faith may appear by these reasons 1. It is the true and generall doctrine of all Divines that actuall faith is never wrought in the soule till besides the supernaturall illumination of the understanding the will bee also changed and freed in part from its naturall perversnesse For till this bee done t is utterly impossible it should ever embrace the promise Now the doing away of this ignorance and rebellion what is it but an effect of the grace of sanctification implanted in the soule by which it is sweetly and freely inclined to all heavenly things 2. To beleeve is an action of a man living by grace not dead in sinne The soule therefore is first endued with the life of grace before it can performe this living action 3. There can be no reason given why in our regeneration it should bee necessary first to have faith before we can have any other grace of sanctification no more than that it should be needfull to have some other grace before we can have faith or why we are more fit being unconverted to receive the grace of faith rather than any other grace as of repentance c. A man unregenerate having no preparations at all to any grace is alike disposed to receive every one and so there is no difference on mans part If any say that the Spirit which must worke other graces is not received till wee doe actually beleeve in so saying he confutes himselfe it being most apparant that the Spirit is given to men incredulous to the end to make them beleevers and no man should ever bee converted were not the holy Ghost given to him whilst he is unconverted to worke his conversion Now God that for Christs sake gives faith unto us when we had none without any predisposition in us to receive it can and doth for the same Christs sake give us all other graces as well at the same time 4. It cannot well bee shewne how faith produceth all other vertues in us seeing that all habites of grace are infused not acquired and one habite cannot produce another nor doth one habite bring forth the operations of another T is true that faith lends a hand to helpe forward all gracious actions and does much in their guidance and direction but t is like as the understanding guides the actions of the will and inferiour faculties or as prudence moderates the actions of all other morall vertues which actions notwithstanding come from their proper faculties and habites as their immediate principia and fountaines But of this point more at large when we come to shew the dependance that obedience hath upon faith Against this may be objected That we live by faith Gal. 2. 20. that by faith Christ dwells in our hearts Eph. 3. 17. that through faith we are risen with Christ Col. 2. 12. that by faith we receive the holy Ghost Ioh. 7. 38 39. Eph. 1. 13. So that we have no life till we be in Christ no being in him til we have faith to beleeve on him no sap from the vine no vertue from the body till we be united as branches as members which union is by faith onely no Spirit of grace to give us life till wee have faith to receive it In briefe thus Christ by his Spirit is the author of all our spirituall life sanctification But till we beleeve wee have no participation nor fellowship with Christ and his Spirit Therefore till wee beleeve wee have in us no life at all consequently by faith we are made partakers of all life and grace To which I answer We must carefully distinguish betweene a twofold Vnion and Communion we have with Christ. 1. By the Spirit on his part for Christ as by his Death he is the meritorious cause of life and grace unto the elect so by his Spirit he is the onely efficient of life and grace in the regenerate To whom whilst they are yet dead in sin and destitute of all grace so as they neyther doe nor possibly can beleeve Christ sends his Spirit which breathes life into them changes and purifies their nature by working all holy and rectified abilities in every part Now this first worke of the Spirit creating of grace in the soule doth most apparantly precede not onely the act of beleeving but the habite also for the habite it selfe is infused by this worke And therefore it is also manifest that before all faith we have and must have some participation with Christ even to this end that wee may have faith But this union with him is wrought meerely by the holy Spirit which is that band whereby Christ knits himselfe to us communicating all gracious and quickning vertue from himselfe to us and thereby making us living members of his body 2. By our faith on our parts when being quickned by infused grace wee actually apply our selves to embrace the promise and to relye upon Christ onely And here wee knit our selves to Christ resting upon him alone for all comfort By which uniting of our selves to Christ wee receive a greater increase and larger measure of grace from
that prayer To give a reason of this different working why grace is bestowed on some presently at baptisme in others t is deferred till a long time after is to unlocke the treasurie of Gods secret counsells onely this wee may say that God will shew that no age is uncapable of grace and that he will bee glorified aswell in sauing some from falling into the fire as by pulling others out of it by the gentle and easie deliverance of one and by the more violent torments and panges of the New-birth in another that both wayes he may have the Thankes and wee the Benefit of this his grace and power 3. A Defence of the salvation of Infants dying before Baptisme against the Popish assertion to the contrary For this ground being certaine No uncleane thing shall enter in the kingdome of Heaven it followes by the law of contraries that whatsoeuer is cleane may enter thereinto But Infants such as are elect may be cleane and holy before their Baptisme as is manifest whether we respect the guilt of Sin or the corruption of it They are cleane from the guilt of originall sinne by the death of Christ which God hath accepted to their perfect justification long before they were borne They are likewise made cleane in part from the Corruption of originall sinne by the infusion of Habituall sanctity into their soules For being justified by Christ from the guilt and punishment of sinne what should hinder why they may not be sanctified by the Holy Ghost in part whilst they live and perfectly upon the severing of the Soule and Body when originall corruption is in a moment done away and the soule invested in the robes of righteousnesse fit for its entrance into happinesse Cannot this worke of Sanctification be wrought in them before Baptisme it may as well as after seeing it is not baptisme but the Spirit is the cause thereof whose worke is free and not so to be tyed unto that ordinance as they of the Romish Synagogue would make us beleeve but that hee may sanctifie the Elect sometime before sometime after and not alwaies at the present celebration of it Now if Infants thus justified and sanctified depart this life what should stoppe their passage to heaven It will bee vaine to object that they have not actuall Faith and therefore must be excluded Wee may aswell say they want repentance and therefore cannot be saved seeing the Scriptures make alike necessitie of both graces to our salvation And the objection holds aswell after Baptisme as before when yet all grant the salvation of Infants For t is a thing inconceivable and inexplicable how Infants should have Actuall Faith whilst they are not yet able to exercise any one faculty of their reasonable soule The truth is that the Habits of Faith and Repentance they have as of all other Spirituall graces infused into them which if they lived would also appeare by their actuall opperations but for that time they have not the Acts of those graces nor are they capable of them nor is it simply needfull they should have them The case is extraordinary and God as before they were hath pardoned them of their originall righteousnesse by the bloud of Christ so can hee aswell bestowe Holinesse and Happinesse on them without any actuall faith of theirs comming betweene as an instrument to receive both If this may not bee said touching such elect Infants I must confesse that unto me the knowledge of the salvation of their soules is as inscrutable as the fashioning of their tender bodies in their mothers wombe And this which hath beene said of Infants may be also applied to such as are Deafe or â—ooles having such naturall defects as make them uncapable of Discipline 4. A just apologie for the lawfulnesse of Childrens Baptisme against Hereticall impugners of the same For how can the Signe be denied unto them which have and enjoy the thing signified That which is signified in Baptisme is our Iustification by the blood of Christ our Sanctification by the Spirit of Christ. Baptisme is the Scale of both unto us and Infants may be partakers of both being washed from the guilt of sinne by the blood of Christ in whom they are reconciled to God and actually justified before him and also purified in partfrom the uncleannesse of sinne by the infusion of Grace from the Holy Ghost What then should hinder why these Infants should not also be washed with the water of the Sacrament thereof If it be demanded how wee can presume that Christian Infants have a part in the graces of Iustification and Sanctification I answer we have good warrant so to thinke from the Covenant and Promise of God that hee will be the God of the faithfull and of their seed But for Heathens and Infidells wee haue no such promise whereon to ground our judgement of Charity and therefore albeit some of them who are out of the Church may bee within the compasse of God selection yet seeing God hath excluded them by an apparant barre wee may not venture to give them the Sacrament of Baptisme till such time as they shall make profession of their faith and that by their appearing conversion wee may charitably judge they belong to the Covenant of Grace Now although of such as live within the Church we know for a certainty in the generall that many both of Christian parents are not faithfull and of Christian children that they have no part in Christ yet we may not exclude them from Baptisme because no man dares be so hardy as to passe his peremptory censure of this or that persons rejection in particular This is one thing if wee did know infallibly now that any one were certainely excluded out of Gods election and should never have benefit by Christs death such a one be hee Infidell or borne of the most Christian parents in the world wee ought by no meanes to baptize no more than wee may admit of that person to come to the Lords Supper that hath apparantly sinned against the Holy Ghost or as the Church doth with such as are justly Excommunicated who for the time of their open inpenitencie declare themselves publikely to have no Faith nor part in Christ. For it were a manifest mockery and abuse of this sacred institution to apply this Seale to a Blanke and to dip them in the water of Baptisme whom wee know shall never be washed with the Holy Ghost Further it helpes not the Caâ—abaptists a jot that when Christian Infants come to age and ability to make profession then wee may discerne and judge of their estate For that 's impossible no man can infallibly perceive by any words or actions what the Heart is whether there be in it true faith or not And so in this case if Baptisme should never bee administred till other men may judge of their Faith it shall bee afforded to none at all or if it be given to every one that professeth and saith hee
opposite which at most are but subordinate and differ only as the cause and effect For is it not the fancy of some crackt braine to affirme that there is a Grace every way sufficient and powerfull enough in it selfe to worke the conversion of a Sinner and yet when this grace is given to such a sinner with a purpose and intent to convert him by it it shall be found to be utterly unsufficient to Effect it T is strange whence or how men should conceit a sufficiency in the power of such grace when they finde insufficiency in the performance of the worke 2. By the word Grace we understand some Supernaturall gift freely given unto man from God himselfe 3. By the word Christians wee meane all those that live in externall communion with the militant Church enjoying the ministery of the Word and being of yeares to make use of it for this Question toucheth not Infants 4. Lastly by Conversion as heretofore hath beene shewed we are to understand two things either 1. The Roote and Cause of that act namely the Sanctification of all the Faculties by the Infusion of Habituall Holinesse 2. The Fruite or Act of Conversion properly so called when a man regenerate and renued in all parts doth actually imploy them in loving and obeying God The first is Gods worke upon us the next our worke performed toward him when by the strength of inward Grace given we after convert our selves in Thought and Worke towards God This latter is not here to bee understood in this Question but the former namely that Conversion of a man which God workes in him by infusion of the grace of Regeneration into all parts This infusion of Grace into the Soule by an immediate act of Gods Spirit the Arminians can by no meanes endure to heare of in this businesse of our Conversion and therefore they burden this assertion with odious but untrue imputations of Anabaptisticall Enthusiasmes and of a Lazy expectation of all Grace to be poured into us sleeping without any endeavour of our owne to get it Which slanders are only devised for the countenance of that impious opinion of their owne namely That mans Conversion to God begins in some act which man himselfe performes and not in a worke first wrought in us by God Now that act of man is his assent and actuall Faith given to the promise A lewd imagination sufficiently confuted and cryed downe in the venerable assembly of the last Synod as most derogatory to the whole worke of Grace in our Vocation most repugnant to reason and Scriptures which tell us That the tree must bee good before the fruit can bee so it being impossible that an action so Holy and good as is the yeelding of Assent and Beliefe to the promises of the Gospell should be done by a man unlesse he be first regenerate and sanctified in all his faculties The termes thus explaned the state of the Question is more fully thus Whether God doe bestow upon all such as Heare the Word preached any such Supernaturall gift as is sufficiently powerfull to worke in them true Sanctification though it doe not alwayes effectually produce it Our Adversaries affirme it but we truly maintaine the Negative part opposing against their assertion these two Conclusions 1. That there is no supernaturall gift given unto the unregenerate which is Sufficient to worke his Sanctification but that only which is Effectuall to worke it This hath appeared manifestly enough in the explication of the termes of this Question and will bee more and more evident to us if we consider that maine mistake of our Adversaries in this businesse of our Conversion which is that they imagine our Conversion to begin in some act of ours namely our Assenting and Beleeving not in some act of God sanctifying the Soule before it can Assent and Beleeve Now because this act is good and therefore must be done by Gods helpe for to salve this they have found a daintie new devise of Spirituall strength infused into the Soule by the Holy Ghost which strength when it is inherent in the soule a man may use it if hee will to the producing of the act of Faith If he doe use it then by that act he is converted if not yet that was sufficient to bring forth the Act if it had beene thereto applied As in a like Case when Christ said to the sicke man Arise take up thy bed and walke Hee gave him bodily strength sufficient to doe what he bad him but yet the man might have let his bed lie and stood still if hee list So when God commands us to beleeve he gives us strength sufficient so to doe it albeit we may if we will neglect to make use of it This foule error hath bred all that confusion and darknesse wherein this controversie is wrapped up and it containes two grosse absurdities in it 1. That they suppose a supernaturall abilitie of beleeving infused into the soule by the Holy Ghost which yet shall be no sanctifying grace of the Spirit an opinion altogether new and against reason For aske them is not the inward disability of our soules to beleeve and convert a part of our corruption It cannot bee denied Well is not then the infusion of an Ability to Beleeve and Convert the doing away of that corruption It is And then shall not that gift which abolishes our sinfull infirmities bee justly called a Sanctifying grace It is most evident and none but such as are possest with the Spirit of wilfull contradiction to all manifest truth will affirme That the Rectifying of our weake and corrupt faculties by a supernaturall ability put into them and disposing them to the most excellent worke of Faith can be any thing else than the grace of Regeneration An Act so Holy must come from an Habit as Holy 2. That they suppose the Act in Divine graces goes before the Habit an assertion in Divinitie not tolerable which tells us that the Tree must be good before the fruit can be good And that Question which Christ put to the Pharisees Mat. 12. 34. How can yee that are evill speake good things is more than any Arminian cau tell how to answer This pincheth them and puts them to this choyce either that an unregenerate man who certainely is utterly Evill may by the helpe of such a gift as hath not sanctified nor made him Good not only speake but doe that which is eminently Good namely Beleeve and Convert or that the Act of Faith performed by such a one is not good and sound and so no beginning of true Conversion or that they doe confesse the Habit of Faith as of other graces to be first implanted in our soules in the universall renovation of all the Faculties thereof whence the operation of faith doth afterwards issue And this is the truth which under those obscure and unexplicated termes of Supernaturall strength to Beleeve they grant in effect for the strength is either Nothing
at all or Nothing else but that Habituall Faith which wee maintaine to be given us as a principall part of our regeneration These mistakings of the Nature of our Conversion hath utterly confounded our Adversaries in their opinions and writings about this point They speake of Sufficiency of Grace to produce the acts and operations of Faith and other vertues when the Question is meant of the Sufficiencie of Grace in producing the Habit of all Inherent Holinesse Now as in the former example of the sicke man it is one thing to enquire whether the Health and strength Christ gave him was sufficient to cause him to walk another thing to demand what vertue of Christ was sufficient to give him that health and strength so in this case t is one thing to aske whether the grace of Spirituall health or Sanctification be sufficient for the producing of the actions of a Sanctified man another thing to aske what grace is sufficient to worke in the soule the grace of Sanctification it selfe Wherefore in this matter we affirme that as Health when it is in a man is sufficient to every Naturall action though alwaies it be not effectuall because wee make not use of our strength at all times but to worke Health in a sicke man no vertue is sufficient but that onely which being applied proves effectuall to restore it So where Sanctification is it is alwaies sufficient to every gracious action if it be duely exercised thereabouts but may sometime bee ineffectuall through our default in not applying it aright but now to worke Sanctification in the heart that hath it not there is no other gift whatsoever sufficient but the onely vertue and power of the Holy Ghost the immortall seede of our Regeneration and wheresoever this onely and all-sufficient vertue worketh in the heart of any man there it is alwayes infallibly effectuall To dreame of any other inherent quality in the soule given to man as sufficient to Sanctifie the soule and yet after t is given ineffectuall to performe it is a fancy never thought of till of late times wherein mens hearts are strangely embittered in fierce opposition against the glory of Gods free Grace This of the first Conclusion the second followeth and it is this That sufficient grace for Sanctification is not given unto all This is a necessary consectary of the former for seeing Sufficient and Effectuall are all one in this case seeing t is apparant that this grace is not Effectuall in some who are never Sanctified it follows necessarily that such Sufficient grace is not given unto all This were enough to have beene said against this opinion of Sufficiency of Grace given to all within the Church But yet ex abundanti for our better satisfaction I desire your patience and attention in the further examination of this second Conclusion The truth of it will be cleered by considering what the grace is which is given to those that are within the Church Now this grace is twofold 1. The Externall Declaration of Gods will made unto all men in common by the Preaching of the Word the ordinary consequent whereof is Knowledge or Illumination And this is termed our Externall Vocation by the Word 2. The Inward gracious worke and vertue of the Holy Ghost immediately exercised upon the Vnderstanding Will Affections and whole Man The constant effect whereof is Regeneration And this is called our Internall Vocation by the Spirit In the explication of the Nature Distinction and Sufficiency of these two unto the worke of Sanctification consists the further cleering of this troublesome controversie The Orthodoxe sentence which hath beene held touching this matter agreeably to the Scriptures is this There are two things which are ordinarily wrought in men living under the Ministery of the Word 1. Illumination of the Vnderstanding 2. A touch or motion of the Will and Affections These two because they are the fountaine of all Outward actions we onely consider in this businesse letting passe such effects as are visible in mens conversations Now both these are each of them of two different sorts Illumination is either 1. Common and Naturall when a man in hearing or reading conceives the litterall sense and meaning of the Scriptures in most points of Christian Religion so that he is able to discourse dispute and write of them I call this knowledge Common because t is bestowed on reprobates as well as others I call it also Naturall because although the object thereof bee Supernaturall and Divine nor could be knowne but by revelation yet being revealed the manner of apprehending it in such a one is meerely Naturall and Carnall and that light which the Spirit affords to such a one is but some more eminent degree of that common assistance which hee gives to all that seeke after knowledge in any learning for a publicke benefite For the case is plaine enough a learned Schollar unregenerate knowes and studies Divinity in the same manner as he doth any other Art and as in them so in this hee may attaine excellent knowledge by a speciall but no sanctifying gift of the Spirit perfecting his Naturall reason but not making it Spirituall 2. Proper and Spirituall when a man by a singular gift of the Spirit of grace is inabled to judge of Heavenly things in a Spirituall manner according to their truth and goodnesse represented to the understanding in their native beauty and excellency I call this Proper because it belongs onely to the Elect and Spirituall because the Sanctified understanding judgeth of them Spiritually Thus for knowledge next touching the Motions which are wrought in the Will they are likewise double 1. Naturall when upon the understanding of threatnings or promises the Will is touched with some kinde of affections towards those things as they which are naturally hurtfull or beneficiall to it as to love hope desire feare or hate such or such a good or evill thing spoken of in the Word I terme these affections Naturall being proportionable to that first sort of knowledge that bred them For when an unregenerate man shall heare it plainly and amply declared what happinesse belongs to the Saints what comfort is in Gods favour what glory in heaven what horrour in Hell and a bad conscience hee will be easily stirred up with many desires of enjoying the one and escaping the other But this he doth in no other manner than as every man by instinct of Nature will wish and seeke for that good which he knoweth to be proportionable to his nature and also shunne the Contrarie 2. Spirituall when upon the thorough apprehension of all Spirituall Good and Evill known beleeved by Faith the Will is strongly inclined with all Constant and Vehement affections of Love and Hatred earnestly to embrace the one and detest the other above all things else whatsoever How great difference there is betweene these Illuminations and Motions in the regenerate and unregenerate I shall by Gods grace shortly have
ascribes unto mans Heart corruption and grace as much nay more than to any other part of man That the Heart of man is the root of all evill workes out of it come evill thoughts murders adulteries and such other things as defile a man Mat. 15. 18 19. That the Heart is deceitfull and wicked above all things Ier. 17. 9. That in regeneration the Heart must bee renued made cleane softened of stony made fleshy That the Heart is the seate of all Spirituall gifts as Vprightnesse Purity Goodnesse and Honesty Faith Lowlinesse and many more spoken of in every chapter of the Bible almost In which places by the Heart to understand our Sensuall and brutish affections were most absurd And if as it is the Soule of man be there meant it cannot be but a nice subtilty beyond the intention of Scriptures to exclude the Will from having any part in that good or evill which is attributed to the Heart as if by the Heart were meant only the understanding part of the Soule 3. Wee preferre the uniforme judgement of all the learned hitherto above the opinion of one Arminiâ—â— and his followers who as they make the Vnderstanding the seate of all speculative Habits so for all practicall Habits whether Morall or Theologicall they place them in the Will With whom agreeably to Scripture and sound reason we maintaine that there was in Adams will besides the liberty thereof an Habituall holy inclination to all that was good though with a possibility of embracing evill again there is in our wills since the Fall besides some kind of liberty an Habituall vitious quality making them averse and froward in choosing the good prone and inclinable to embrace the â—vill so that man now doth naturally drinke iniquity like water Iob 15 16. and make a pastime of doing evill Prov. 2. 14. And therefore as Adams will was truly good not onely in the actions but in the inward qualities thereof so our will is truely and properly corrupt not onely in its evill actions but also the inward vitious disposition thereof This is the fourth errour the fifth is but a consectary of the former namely 5. That the wll of a man Vnregenerate hath a naturall freedome to choose any Spirituall good thing as soone as it is made knowne vnto him For say they the Will of man hath no other property but onely liberty when man fell and lost other good qualities his will had no hurt but retained its liberty perfect and entire So that an Vnregenerate man after once hee knowes any Spirituall good thing offered unto him hath naturally as much freedome of will to embrace it even as Adam had in his Innocency or as any man can have after his Conversion But this opinion falls to the ground with the former upon which it is built presupposing that there is no vitious quality in the will drawing it to evill But we know that to be false and therefore we confesse that untill such time as God doe heale that disease and replant in our wills their primitive integrity they are utterly dead in sinne captives and bond-slaves of corruption So that however they have some liberty in Naturall Civill or Externall Spirituall things yet in regard of true Grace and Holinesse they have no liberty at all to will and choose that but are wholly enthralled unto sinne according to that of the Apostle Rom. 6 20. When yee were the servants of sinne yee were free from righteousnesse and Rom. 8. 7. The carnall minde is enmity against God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeede can bee Doe they not then manifestly give the Scripture the lie that affirme a man in the state of unregeneration who without doubt is if any be a servant of sinne and carnally minded is notwithstanding free unto righteousnesse and may be even of his owne naturall power subject to the Law of God commanding him faith and obedience There are yet other errors the sixth therefore is this 6. That mans Conversion begins in the Act of Beleeving not in the Habit of Faith infused I have heretofore touched upon this point in shewing the falshood of that assertion of theirs That Conversion begins in some worke that we do not in a worke that God first doth Here you are further to note whereto tends this opinion and that is to establish their other opinion of Falling away from grace For seeing Conversion is nothing but the Act of Beleeving this Act is freely in our power as not to do it at first so when it is once done not to repeat it often for the continuance of our Conversion it follows thence that as it was in our power not to become Converts by not doing that Act so being Converted t is in our power to relapse by not continuing to doe it For which purpose they deny that there is any such thing as the grace of Faith infused into the heart yea that there is any constant habit of Faith at all and that a man is not termed a Beleever from the Habit but from the Acts of Faith which being transient and vanishing Faith ceaseth when they cease So that belike when a godly man is asleepe he hath no faith when Noah and all his Family were asleepe in the Arke then Faith ceased in the Church and seeing by faith we please God men asleepe or dying in a Lethargy doe not please God T is wonder but these men will deny all other Habits too and say that David had no skill in Musicke but that his right hand had forgot her cunning as soone as he had layd his Harpe aside They may aswell denie the one as the other both are alike ridiculous There is yet one Error more and that is this 7. That mans Conversion is properly nothing but the Act of Beleeving the Promise of Grace This restraint of our Conversion unto so narrow a compasse as first to bring it from the Habit of Faith to the Act of Beleeving and then to appropriate it to that Act without so much as once mentioning any other graces this narrow conceit touching our Conversion is that which hath filled the writings of many learned about this point with much darknesse and confusion They so speake and write of Conversion as if it began in that one and only Action of mans will Consenting to the promise of mercy in Christ. But this is without all ground To convert is not only to beleeve but to repent to love God and our Neighbour to abstaine from every evill way to practise all duties of Piety and Goodnesse these acts are as proper and immediat parts of true Conversion as Faith Nor doth the Scripture so much as intimate any such limitation as to appropriate our Conversion to the Act of Faith nay t is manifest that the Scriptures when they speake of manâ— Turning unto God doe joyne repentance and other godly Acts together with Faith as appeares by that solemne invitation of
the worke of Gods Spirit when hee intends to bestow this first grace of Sanctification upon a sinner This of Habituall Conversion in the internall renovation of all the faculties which cannot be resisted or hindered in the next place we are to consider of Conversion as it is our act consisting in the operations and exercises of all gracious habites infused as when we actually beleeue repent and doe other good workes This Active Conversion is nothing but the practice of Sanctification when being made holy and good wee doe good and holy workes as a man after he is raised from death or restored to health performes the actions of a living of a healthy man For that similitude of S. Austins is certaine Non ideo currit rota ut sit rotunda c. as a wheele runs not that it may be round but because it is round so the will beleeves not that it may be regenerate but because it is regenerate And therefore that is an errour of the coursest bran when our adversaries make the act of Beleeving to go before our Sanctification whereas nothing is more certain than this that all holy actions whether of Faith or any other grace come from that common root of holinesse infused into our soules Now then touching these actions proceeding from grace inherent the question is how farre they are in mans power to refuse the doing of them and the question may bee laid generally touching all good workes inward or outward thus Whether or no that man who is truely sanctified may refuse to doe any good and holy worke at all for if any one be in his power to refuse it all may be in his power by the same reason But yet because Faith is a principall grace and all the dispute is touching the act thereof we may restraine the question unto it though whatever can bee spoken of mans power about the action of Faith is appliable to all other gracious actions whatsoever The question therefore is thus Whether after that a man is once sanctified and regenerate it be in the freedom of his will to choose whether he will actually beleeve and assent to the Promise or not For the explication of this point How farre every good action is in a godly mans power to doe or leave it undone you are to note that there is a double beginning or Cause of every gracious action in a man regenerate 1. The spirit of God by his exciting and Cooperating grace 2. Man himselfe renued and sanctified in all his faculties The former is termed Principium à quo the latter Principium quod man worketh but hee must be moved thereto and assisted by the Spirit of grace both together concurre to the producing of every holy action I say both together for although man in his first conversion was meerely passive Gods spirit working all without mans helpe yet Man in performance of any holy act is not meerely Active able to doe all of himselfe without Gods helpe No he is partly Passive partly Active Passive as hee stands in need of Gods grace to stirre up guide and strengthen the endevour of each faculty in the doing of good Active in as much as being thus helped by Grace himselfe willingly moves himselfe to every godly worke Now by reason of this concurrence of man with God these operations of grace are properly called Mans worke not Gods worke in man So that when a regenerate man beleeves this act though it be caused by Gods Spirit yet it is done and exercised by Man voluntarily moving himselfe in that action and therefore wee say it is Man that beleveth not Gods spirit that beleeveth as if the act of beleeving were wrought in mans Will by the Spirit of God in the same sort as Iugglers worke strange motions in their Puppets which seeme to doe wondrous feats but t is an unseene hand that 's the cause of all Such grosse conceits should not have beene devised by ingenuous mindes and put upon so plaine and cleere doctrine as that is touching the concurrence of Gods grace with our strength in all Holy actions whatsoever The point is easie to him that will understand Every good desire and good worke is partly from man because he wills it hee workes it but principally from Gods Spirit because hee makes Man to will and to worke it Without which cooperating grace man by Habituall inherent grace could doe no good worke at all according to that of Christ Ioh. 15. 5. Without mee yee can doe nothing and of the Apostle Phil. 1. 6. He that hath begun the good worke will also performe it and againe Phil. 2. 13. It is God that worketh in you both the will and the deed even of his good pleasure and againe 1 Cor. 15. 10. I have laboured more abundantly than they all yet not I but the grace of God which is in me These things thus explaned we are yet further to note that in a man Regenerate there are two contrary qualities inherent in every Faculty 1. Grace in a rectified holy inclination to goodnesse infused into it 2. Corruption in a vitious Quality disposing it to evill These two Qualities abide in the regenerate and oppose one another till sinne be finally overcome abolished by death Vpon these undeniable grounds let us proceed to declare what is a regenerate mans resistance that hee makes against the working of Grace in hindering the performance of any good worke which you shall perceive by these two conclusions 1. A man regenerate so farre forth as hee is Spirituall never resists the worke of Grace but is constantly most willing and forward to the performance of all holy actions None can be so ignorant in the mystery of Sanctification as to deny this therfore they tell â—…ge wonders in Divinity who teach that mans 〈…〉 put in aequilibrio hanging like a beame upon 〈…〉 to bow either way and indifferently disposed to 〈◊〉 good or evill A very dreame it is contrary to all Sâ—…â—â—d â—â—perience whereby we are taught that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—â—ing regenerate and made spirituall as it is so 〈◊〉 so farre from standing upon termes of indifferencie deliberating whether it shall yeeld or whether it shall denie obedience whether it shall beleeve or not beleeve c. as on the contrary it doth most constantly and eatnestly desire in all things to obey alwayes A man whose eye God hath truly inlightened and touched his heart by the finger of his sanctifying Spirit doth not stand in a mammering shall I shall I shall I beleeve shall I obey were I best doe this good worke or shall I let it alone No all his desire is now for godlinesse the weight and strength of his resolutions and affections leane wholy to obedience his will chooseth the good with full purpose to cleave to that only turning it selfe from evill with much hatred and detestation This constant determination of the spirituall will unto obedience and that only is a thing most manifest in
tho Reasonable Creature is the Subiectum quod of Faith but we may yet more particularly enquire of the Subiectum quo in which Facultie of the Reasonable Creature Faith is resident In euerie Intellectuall nature there are vsually made two Distinct Faculties First The Vnderstanding Secondly The Will The Obiect of that is Truth The Obiect of this Goodnesse Now then Faith being an assent to the Truth and Goodnesse of Diuine reuelations we must see in which of those Faculties it is resident or whether in both Our Aduersaries teach that the Assent of Faith is an act of the Vnderstanding onely not of the Will This opinion we reiect as erroneous because Diuine Reuelations are essentially as Good as they be true nor hath their truth any prerogatiue aboue their goodnesse and so Faith is giuen but by halues vnto one part of the Obiect where there is not as well an Election and Approbation of the Goodnesse of it by the Will as an ascent to the truth of it in the Vnderstanding Wherefore we affirme that this Assent of Faith is an act of the Vnderstanding and of the Will both together approuing and allowing the truth and goodnesse of all Diuine things In which assertion you are to note that we doe not make the Habit of Faith to be inherent in two diuers subiects nor this act of Assent to come from two diuers Principles or two seuerall Faculties of the mind but we affirme the subiect is but one and the same namely the intellectuall Nature For I take it with diuers of the Learned yet as they doe vnder correction of the more Learned that those Speculations about the reall distinction of Faculties in such Spirituall Substances as are the Angels and soules of men are but meere subtleties of the Schoole without any true ground in natuâ—e it selfe He that shall in an vnpartiall search after Truth and Full Satisfaction thoroughly examine the same Distinction of Faculties in the Sencitiue Soule that the Common Sence Phantasie and Memory are three powers of it really distinct as in Nature so in place let him but examine the weakenesse of the ground of this distinction and the inexplicable difficulties that doe accompanie it he shall find vpon study of the point that it is no Heresie in Philosophy to hold that our grand Master hath herein affirmed more then will be euer vnderstood or thoroughly iustified by any of his Disciples As in these materiall Formes so much more in those Spirituall Essences Faculties haue beene multiplyed beyond necessitie and that thought to be done by more that may be performed by fewer helpes Our Sences haue in this case deceiued our Reason and because we find in Compounded bodyes diuers actions and motions to flow from diuers qualities we haue therefore imagined that in Simple Spirituall Substances the case must be alike and there is no remedy but we must Vnderstand by one Facultie Will or Nill by another Remember by a third Whereas all these seuerall actions flow immediately from the liuely and actiue essence of such a Spirituall Substance without any such distinct faculties that need come betweene the Agent and the Action For our purpose it appeares that the Vnderstanding and Will are not distinct Faculties that haue distinct actions Thus First The Vnderstanding essentially includes the Will For the Vnderstanding hath a naturall inclmation to Truth as the Will hath to Goodnesse It abhors Falshood as that doth Euill This desire and loue of Truth is 〈◊〉 this refusall and hatred of Falshood is Nolitio and so Velle and Nolle are actions euen of the Vnderstanding too and this proposition Intellectus vulirerum non 〈◊〉 salsum is most true and proper Secondly The Will essentially includes the Vnderstanding For to will or nill any thing good onâ—uill is an action either of knowledge or of ignorance If of ignorance then the Will in reasonable nature shall be an vnreasonable Facultie which is blindly carried to the embracing or refusing of that which it selfe knowes not at all but only it is knowne to another facultie the Vnderstanding But this were an absurd imagination to make the Will Facultatem non-intelligentem and to appropriate vnto it such a motion as is destitute of knowledge like a blind man that is led by the seeing he knowes not whither So should the Doctrine of Free-will in any kind whatsoeuer fall to the ground For how is the Will free but because it may choose this or that How can it make choyce vnlesse it doe also vnderstand campare aduise and deliberate about the nature and consequences of things offered vnto its choyce Wherefore it is manifest that Intelligere and Iudicare are actions belonging vnto the Will also and that this proposition Voluntas intelligit bonum aut malum is true and proper Thus in regard of the actions Valends and Intelligendi we haue no reason to make a distinction of Faculties where the actions are common and indifferently agree to each of them If one facultie can doe both what reason is there to make two And if the Philosopher be in the right denying a distinct facultie for the Memorie in the reasonable soule because the Vnderstanding sufficeth to that for as much as eiusdem est seruare Habitus â—â—s vti we haue the same reason to hold the Vnderstanding and Will to be no distinct Faculties seeing eiusdem est intelligere velle Thirdly The Obiect of the Vnderstanding and Will are one and the same For Truth and Goodnesse are essencially the same thing In Naturall things it is most plaine that their Truth and Goodnesse is all one Their goodnesse is nothing but the Truth of their Being in their perfect conformitie to Gods vnderstanding and will when their Essence and Qualities are perfectly the same which they had by their creation When the Creature is as it was made then it is both True and Good so farre as any part of truth is lost so much of goodnesse is gone And this appeares by the contrarie Malum and â—alsum in the creature opposed to this naturall goodnesse and truth of it are both but one thing namely any Defect or Excesse in the parts or degrees of their Essenâ—e and Qualities otherwise then according to the Truth of their Creation Such defects and excesses we call Errors Vntruths and Euils in nature So that if we consider Truth and Goodnesse in the nature of things themselues it is not possible to make any reall distinction between them What things are in our opinion it matters not much Our conceit we haue of them makes them not either true or good Nor is gold and precious stones any iot the better or worse because ciuill nations haue them in greatest account or Tartars and other Sauadges despise them as toyes and vnnecessarie to mans life Where the Essence of any thing is entire and perfect there is Truth and goodnesse though all thinke nothing or thinke otherwise of it And let vs thinke as long as we
will we cannot conceiue any naturall thing as true but we must conceiue as Good too Witnesse all I ogicke rules Philosophy Mathematickes there is no conclusion how vnpleasant soeuer it seeme to be but if it be apprehended as True it also affects the vnderstanding with ioy delight and contentment in the goodnesse of it It delights because it is true and so Truth quatenus Truth is good So that vnto such as aske wherefore are the Mathematickes good I answer Because they are True a part of Gods created truth of which it is blasphemy to hold and affirme that any the least part is euill and nought worth nor deseruing a mans study All Truth is amiable like God the Authour of it and goodnesse is so essentially incorporated together with Truth that they cannot be seuered in our knowledge or affection Now in morall and Diuine things the case is much more plaine That their Truth consists wholly in their Goodnesse nor can it be imagined how vertue should be said to be true but onely because it is good or what the Truth of Grace is but onely the Goodnesse of it Wherefore generally that rule is Cortaine Bonum Verum conuertuntur and their praedication each of other is not onely in the Concrete Verum est bonum but also in the abstract Verâ—… est bonitas ò cont◠〈◊〉 And so the Scripture takes these two indifferently as Gen. 1. 31. When God had created all his workes he looked on them and saw that they were Very Good They were true as well as good but one includes both And Iohn 8. 44. it is said touching Satan that He abode not in the Truth that is in that perfect and good condition wherein God created him for he fell from his goodnesse as well as from his Truth By this it appeares that this distinction which is made betweene the truth and goodnesse of things is not from their Nature but from our esteeme and conceit of them We measure the goodnesse of things by our owne ends and the vse we haue of them such things as fit our purposes are proportionable to our necessities those we account good and Such things we make the Obiect of our wils because wee desire them with a more notable degree of Constancy and vehemency Other things though very good in themselues yet because they touch vs not and our desire of them is slight and vanishing we make them the obiect of our vnderstanding only as if wee apprehend in them nothing but bare Truth As for example he that shall discourse vnto an intemperate man in his temperate moode how shamefull and vnseemely a thing it is for a Christian to be ouercome of drinke to be a seruant to his appetite to wallow in filthy pleasures to bee seene in base company and hase places and shall tell him how comely and commendable a vertue sobriety is how gracious an ornament of a man how necessary a duty in euery Christian when you tell him of these things he vnderstands you and assents not only to the truth but to the goodnesse of what you say But heere is the mischeefe his resolution stands otherwise sottish delights preuaile against all sober aduise and the stronger desires of pleasures drowne those faint affectious towards Temperance How in this case the truth and goodnesse of the vertue commended is but one thing and the intemperate man did aâ—t that same time apprehend and approue of both in generall wishing that it were with him as it should be and is with other men But now when anon after he comes to put in practise what he thus knowes and allowes of long Custome and ill perswasions doe so farre darken his former apprehension of the Goodnesse of the thing that now there seemes to be nothing left in his head but a generall notion of the Truth of that which he heard at such a time So then Truth and Goodnesse are not two seuerall things nor apprehended by two seuerall faculties but one and the same thing knowne and desired by the same facultie The difference lyes onely in the diuers degree of our apprehension which varies according as the things apprehended seeme to haue more or lesse agreement with our particular vses and necessities Where matters fit vs in particular there our desires are Strong and Constant When they agree to vs onely in the generall then our Generall Desires not well rooted are choked and stisled by contrarie affections in the particular performance It fares with men as it did with Shimei Salomons commandement of not Departing the Citie is Good till Shimei haue a Seruant take his heeles and run to Gath and then Shimeis beliefe of Solomans threatning must giue way to his Couetous desire of recouering his runnagate Seruant So in matters of Religion men know and approue of their truth and goodnesse in generall wishing that themselues had all the grace and pietie which is so much spoken of but when after they compare it with their more pleasing contentments in this or that kind they renounce the Goodnesse of Religion and hold it onely as a Truth Of which diuersitie in assenting to the goodnesse of things in generall and in particular more shall be spoken hereafter in the next point For conclusion of this point touching the subiect of Faith we doe not appropriate faith either to the Vnderstanding or the Will nor yet refer it to both as vnto two distinct faculties but we place it immediately in the whole intellectuall Nature whether of mans soule or of Angels In which wee follow the sentence of the Scriptures that seate Faith in the whole heart as Rom. 10. 10. With the Heart man belieueth vnto righteousnesse and Acts 8. 37. If thou belieuest with all thine heart Now it is a thing manifest that in Scripture the heart is taken for the Whole soule with all its powers and operations as of vnderstanding 1 King 3. 9. Salomon asketh of Godan vnderstanding Heart of Willing and Choosing Act. 7. 29. In their harts they went backe to Egypt 1 Cor. 7. 37. He that stâ—nâ—â—th firme in this Heart i. in his purpose and resolution Againe of the Affections Mat. 6. 21. Where the treasure there is the Heart also i. Loue for Rom. 1. 24. of the memory Luk. 1. 16. They did those words in their hearts so Luke 21. 14. We need not goe seeke on t any trouble some distinction of faculties wherein to place faith seeing the Scriptures speake simply of the whole soule and neither Nature nor Scriptures do intimate any necessity at all of malâ—ing such a difference Wee come now to the third and last point proposed in the definition or the Genus vnder which it is comprehended that is Assent about which wee must enquire after two things 1 The Certainty of this Assent of Faith 2 The Diuers Degrees and Essentiall Differences whereby the assent of Faith in Gods Elect is distinguished from all other Faith The Certainty and strength of
hath the generall custome and consent of the times and Church wherein wee live whereby men are they know not how nor upon what firme grounds drawne to beleeve those things which they see others hold and maintaine fortruth Lastly 3. Some extraordinary worke or event confirming the truth of Religion So did Miracles in the time of Christ and his Apostles perswade many to beleeve who were notwithstanding farre from being true beleevers as Ioh. 2. 23. Many beleeved in his name when they saw the miracles which hee did but t was not good crediting of them that beleeved only upon miracles therefore Christ would not commit himselfe to them ver 24. And thus the Magitian when he saw the signes and great wonders which were done by the Apostles he beleeved and wondred when yet his heart was not right in the sight of God Act. 8. 13. 21. By these and the like meanes is this imperfect and generall kinde of Faith wrought in men destitute of all inward grace and holinesse Such motives as these cause this assent but there is no Internum principium no roote in themselves as our Saviour speakes Mat. 13. 21. whence this beliefe springeth no thorough sanctification of the soule conforming all the powers thereof unto the puritie and holinesse of divine things and inclining the affections to a constant embracing thereof These men like Religion well and commend it as men doe costly Iewells set forth to sale but when it comes to the point that this Good Pearle of great price is to be bought then if God will let them have it at their owne rates there 's a match made they 'le beleeve and be religious if God withall will spare them the use of some sinnes and pleasures they love well but if it must be purchased at Gods price with the sale of all that they have they are no merchants for such a hard bargaine with the yongue man they shrinke away sorrowfull that heaven cannot be had at a cheaper rate Thus when it comes to the proofe in particular application and practice this kinde of faith vanisheth away and comes to just nothing Thus you have the explication of this first degree of Faith withall you see that this faith falls greatly short of that perfection which is required unto that saith which is saving and justifying Neverthelesse our Adversaries of the Romish Church maintaine that this assent is that justifying Faith whereof the Scriptures speake Their opinion touching this point is sufficiently declared by Becanus who followes the rest of that rabble Hee Theol. Schol. Tom. 3. cap. 8. q. 1. disputing of the act of justifying Faith rejects the Lutherans opinion who place Faith in the will and make it to be Fiduciam de misericordia Dei propter Christum and saith that the doctrine of the Catholikes is this that faith belongs to the understanding and is nothing else but Credere sive assentiri eis quae à Deo revelata sunt Thence hee setteth downe this Conclusion § 6. Actus fidei consistit in assensu quo quis assentitur alicui propositioni à Deo revelatae propter authoritatem revelantis In this definition there are two parts 1. the Object of this assent Propositions revealed by God 2. The essentiall difference of this act taken à formaliratione credendi and that is to beleeve propter authoritatem revelantis By this saith Becanus Cap. 8. q. 2. § 2. assensus fidei constituitur in sua specie essentiall that is the assent of Faith is made supernaturall and justifying when wee beleeve things because God hath revealed them for saith he if articles of faith be beleeved upon other motives as upon mans authority c. then this assent of faith is naturall as in Heritickes and Divells So then according to Popish doctrine that faith which justifies us is nothing but a bare assent of the minde to such things as God reveales because of Gods authority that revealed them Than which explication of the nature of justifying faith nothing can be poorer and more below the majestie of so high a grace as faith is I will trouble you but with two reasons proving that this kinde of assent is not that faith whereby wee are justified 1. The act of justifying faith must needs be supernaturall such as cannot bee done without the aide of speciall grace of Gods spirit But unto this assent there is required no such speciall grace therefore it is not an act of justifying faith The Major is evident and granted by the Schooleman Cap. 8. 4. 4. that something there is in faith above nature requiring a supernaturall cause whereto the Scriptures plainely inforce him Eph. 2. 8. By grace yee are saved thorough Faith and that not of ourselves it is the gift of God Phil. 1. 29. Vnto you it is given for Christ that not only yee should beleeve in him but also suffer for his sake So Ioh. 6. 45. Wherefore § 3. he teacheth that this act of assent must be supernaturall partly in regard of the Object id est divine revelations and partly in regard of the principium or cause by which it is produced id est non per solas naturae vires sed per auxilium gratiae Wee agree then in the Proposition For the assumption That there needes not any speciall grace of the Spirit to worke this bare assent unto the truth of divine revelations this wee prove out of the same Schoolemens doctrine who teach that the Vnderstanding assents not unlesse the Will command it because say they the act of beleeving is absolutely in our treewill Cap 8. q. 5. Well be it so But now say wee the Will may without the helpe of grace command the assent of the Vnderstanding which wee prove thus Whatsoever the Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges to be honest that the Will can desire by the only strength of nature But by the only light of Nature the Vnderstanding judges that it is an honest thing to beleeve Gods authority revealing any thing to us therefore the Will by the only strength of Nature may desire this act of beleeving and so consequently there 's no need of Grace to move the Will to command the Vnderstanding T is Becanus owne argument against himselfe cap. 8. q. 5. § 9. Whereto he would faine giue an answer if hee could tell how Something he sayes to that Minor proposition whereof he thus distinguisheth The Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges it a thing honest to beleeve Gods authority when hee reveales any thing Via ac modo naturali not when he reveales any thing Via ac modo supernaturali Beleeve it a rare distinction and full of mystery Divine Revelations are of two sorts supernaturall and naturall Againe when God reveales his will to us by naturall meanes then the very light of Nature teacheth us that 't is honest to beleeve his authority But if hee reveale things to us by supernaturall meanes the light of nature
doth not teach that 't is honest to beleeve him Can any thing be more senselesse or will not every man in the world excepting a Iesuite confesse that the very light of nature teacheth him to acknowledge that it is a very good and honest thing to beleeve Gods authority let him reveale his will unto us which way hee please But t is the fashion of these writers to dorre their readers with a distinction and so to leave them with a prius conceditur posterius negatur distracted and confounded rather than any whit satisfied This of the first reason That a man may beleeve without the helpe of Gods grace the second followes which also confirmes the former viz. 2. That is no act of Iustifying Faith which is found in Divells Heretickes Hypocrites and Reprobates But this assent unto divine Revelations because of Gods authority is in those both divells and men Ergo It is no act of Iustifying Faith The major is agreed upon that the acts of Iustifying Faith are found onely in those who are justified which cannot be said those persons mentioned The minor is likewise evident That Divells Hereticks Hypocrites and Reprobates may and doe assent unto such propositions as God reveales and that because of Gods authority who doth reveale them This hath beene formerly shewed unto you in the explication of the nature of a generall Faith and t is so cleere by Scriptures and experience that our adversaries cannot deny it The forenamed Schoole-man grants it manifestly as concerning Hypocrites and wicked livers who yet professe the Catholicke Faith for disputing Cap. 8. de Habit. Fidei touching that vertue which is infused into the Will whereby it may if it list command the Supernaturall assent of the Vnderstanding heetelleth us that this Vertue is a distinct vertue from all others and is neither Charity nor Obedience § 10. in conclus and that it is perfect in it selfe though it be without them according as other morall habites of justice temperance c. are Whence hee tells us § 11. in plaine termes Potest esse sinâ— charitate ut patet in Christiano peccatorâ— qui Fidem habet siue gratia charitate A Christian that is a sinner may have Faith without grace and charity What Iustifying Faith yea according to the Romish Divinity for he may beleeve the truth of the articles of Religion because of Gods authority who hath revealed them and to do this is a Supernaturall assent and the proper act of Iustifying Faith as these men teach Now touching the Divells and Heretickes the man is a little more coy He will not confesse that the Divels yeeld that assent of Faith he speakes of They doe not beleeve the mysteries of Religion Per assensum supernat uralem i. e. because of Gods authority but Per assensum quendam naturalem qui non oritur ex pio affectu sed ex vi pondere argumentorum quibus intellectus illorum convincitur cap. 11. quaest 2. § 4. We grant willingly that they doe not assent out of any good affection nor is that needfull to make their assent supernaturall for in hypocriticall impenitent and reprobate Catholickes there 's no pious affection moving them to beleeve and yet if wee beleeve their Doctors there is in them a supernaturall assent of Faith But for that other thing That the divells beleeve onely ex vi pondere argumentorum t is utterly false seeing it cannot be doubted but that they beleeve the truth of many future contingents wherof they are not convinced by any force of argument from the things themselves but from authority of Gods Revelations in his Word or otherwise Which infallible truth of God in all his revelations is so cleerely apprehended by these damned Spirits that it makes them to acknowledge the truth and goodnesse of that which otherwise they abhorre Wherefore that comparison which hee makes betweene the faith of 〈◊〉 and wicked Christians is most vaine and erroneoâ—… 〈◊〉 â—…ith hee you consider the faith of either of them wâ—…â—egard to the Object there 's par ratio both being â—…d about the same things But if you take it with râ—â—ard 〈◊〉 honesty of the act so the assent of the Divells is farrâ—… 〈◊〉 than that of bad Christians who have faith anâ—â—…rkes But wherein He tells us The Faith of Châ—… Supernaturalis Voluntaria Honesta The Faith of Divells is Naturalis Coacta pravis circumstantijs vitiata All which are false For the Faith of Divells is Supernaturallas much as that of wicked Christians seeing both beleeve propter authoritatem Dei revelantis which is formalis ratio of Supernaturall assent Againe the Faith of divells is as voluntary as that of wicked men for it cannot bee wrought in either by compulsion simply and if the Majesty of Gods infallible truth command the assent of Divells to that which they love not doth not the same cause also prevaile with ungodly men who beare as little true affection to God and Goodnesse as the divells doe Lastly the Faith of Divells is as Honest as that of wicked men For let any man speake Is it not as Honest a thing for wicked angâ—lls to beleeve what God saith as it is for wicked men If not wherein lies the dishonesty of that act in the angells or wherein stands the honesty of that act in men Can there be named any circumstances which make the Divels Faith dishonest but that the same or as bad may bee alledged against the honesty of the Faith of wicked Christians Sure I am what everthese men conceit of the Honesty of Faith without workes in men Saint Iames is plaine in his comparison that t is no whit better than the Faith of Divells Iames 2. 19. Thou beleevest that there is one God thou doest well the Divells also beleeve it and doe not they doe well too Yes haply better than thou for they beleeve and tremble which thou doest not To conclude in the last place we object that Heretickes have such a kinde of Faith as the Romanists call Iustifying For though they erre in some articles of Faith yet others they assent unto because of Gods authority revealing them This Becanus denies telling us that Heretici qui veâ— in uno articulo sunt infideles omnem fidem amiserunt cap. 11. quaest 3. § 4. which answer hee makes upon this ground That the Habite of Faith is lost by any one act of infidelity § 2. and therefore whereas Heretickes beleeve many things t is but upon a kinde of custome and by a humane faith We reply and say that that position One act of infidelity destroyes the habit of Faith is false and contrary to reason and Scriptures as hereafter I shall have occasion to shew speaking of the opposites of Faith For the point we grant that He who is a persevering Heretick though but in one fundamentall article he hath no justifying faith not because he hath lost it but because he never had it But
wee affirme that for that other generall faith in assenting to the truth of divine things because of Gods authority this faith as he had when hee was a Catholike so hee still hath it in part now he is an Hereticke and by the same faith he beleeved matters of Religion before his Heresie by the same he beleeves them afterward And those that are Heretickes indeed or such whom wee stile by that name let them bee asked why they beleeve such and such points of religion they 'le answer truly and resolutely they beleeve them because of Gods authoritie that hath revealed them in his Word and for such things wherein they dissent could they be perswaded the Scripture did teach the contrary they would for the same authority sake beleeve the contrary The Iesuite is yet urgent upon us and tells us that no Calvinist or Lutheran beleeves Gods authority but doubts of it Wee tell him againe that 's a foule slander and more than hee can make good yes that he will by a distinction too Gods authority considered Abstractivè in it selfe so indeed we doubt not of But Gods authoritie considered practicé in respect of the Church as it is proposed unto us by the Pastors of the Church so we doubt of it because wee admit not the judgement of the Church but follow our owne phantasie ibid. § 7. To this we answer that we passe very little to be judged Infidells upon such a ground because wee call in question the supposed infallibility and authority of the Romish Church We finde in Scriptures no such straight relation betweene her authority and Gods authority that if wee call hers in question wee must needs doubt of his Wee doubt not of the authority of Scriptures but we denie that the Romish Church hath any infallible authority of judging and interpreting them No one man nor all men ought to usurpe such authority over our faith And let the truth be judge who be the greater Insidells Calvinists and Lutherans that beleeve the Scriptures authority for its owne sake or popish Catholikes that will not beleeve but for mans saying Thus you have this second reason somewhat largely that Faith which our Adversaries call Iustifying is in Divells and ungodly men therefore it is not that justifying faith which the Scriptures speake of and appropriate unto the Elect Tit. 1. 1. Here it is but a vaine shift our Adversaries make to runne unto that poore distinction of Fides Formata and Informis namely that Faith may exist two wayes 1. Vt est conjuncta cum charitate ut in homine iusto and then Faith is called formata viva because Charity is Vita animae In this case Faith can Elicere operationes vitales seu aeternae vitae moritorias Gal. 5. 6. Faith worketh by Charity 2. Vt est separata à charitate quod fit in homine peccatore qui amissa per peccatum mortale charitate retinet fidem quamdin Catholicus est This Faith is called Informis mortuâ— nec potest habere operationes vitales seu meritorias Iam. 2. 17. Faith if it have no workes is dead in it selfe and ver 26. as the body without the spirit c. Becan tom 3. cap. 10. § 4. 5. 6. Thus they would have the quality and proper act of justifying Faith to be in reprobate men and divells but yet it doth them no good because t is without Charity Faith without Workes may be in its nature justifying Faith because t is an assent to the articles of Religion upon Gods authority but yet it justifies not because t is without workes Hereunto we reply that in this distinction there is not a syllable of sound doctrine nor yet of reasonable sense Thus much we grant that there is according to St. Iames. a kinde of â—aith without Workes namely a generall assent unto the truth of divine things but we denie that this kinde of Faith is for the substance one and the same with that Faith which is properly called Iustifying Faith without workes is of one kinde Faith with workes is of another not onely in regard of consequent because one hath workes the other hath not but in regard of their proper nature because the quality and acts of the one differ from the quality and acts of the other Wherefore in vaine doe they tell us that the same Faith is sometime with sometime without Charity Iustifying Faith is never without Charity and that which is is not Iustifying Vnto that conceit that Charity is the forme of Faith wee say t is Metaphysicall and such as no good construction can be made of it He saith Charity is Vita animae hee would say Vita fidei but take his meaning Faith lives by Charity as the body by the forme or soule Here 1. T is absurd to make one habite of the minde the forme of the other wee may as well say that Temperance is the forme of Liberality Each habite of the minde is distinguished by its proper object and actions and this the Schooleman cap. 18. quaest 2. § 3. grants in the strict sense 2. How doth Faith live by Charity We say it lives with Charity as its fellow-grace not by Charity as its soule We say without Charity it is dead yet t is not Charity that gives it life The Iesâ—it saith it doth for being joined with it Faith can elicere vitales operationes performe vitall acts Yea but what are these actions Faith hath but two acts 1. proper and immediate viz. Credere seu Assentiri 2. by consequent Iustificare Neither of these comes from Charity even by these mens owne doctrine Not the first for Catholickes without Charity may assent to the articles of Faith for Gods authority sake Not the second for to Iustifie in the Popish sense is to Sanctifie of a bad man to make a good Now how absurd is it to say Faith by Charity Iustifies i. e. Faith by the love of God and our neighbour sanctifies us or taking Charity for the Act not the Habite Faith by good workes of prayer fasting almes-deeds c. sanctifies us Both these are senselesse propositions for t is manifest that hee who hath Charity i. e. loves God and his Neighbour and doth good workes is not as yet to bee sanctified and made good of bad but is thereby sanctified already T is true that Faith is one part of our sanctification or inherent grace and Charity is another but neither doth Faith sanctifie by Charity nor Charity by Faith but we are sanctified by both together If there by any other vitall acts of Faith they should have beene named The glosse which the Iesuit addeth whereby he interpreteth what hee meaneth by vitall operations viz. aeternae vitae meritorias such as deserve eternall life carrieth with it as absurd a sense as the other Thus Charity is the forme and life of Faith i. e. Charity makes the acts of Faith to be Meritorious sâ—il our love of God and man or our good
workes makes our Faith i. e. our assent to the Articles of Religion because of Gods authority to deserve eternall life Is there in the Scriptures the least intimation of such a strange and uncouth meaning when it tells that wee are justified by Faith To the places of Scriptures Gael 5. 6. Faith workes by Charity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wee answer the meaning of the place is no more but That in Christianity no outward matters are of value that onely which is to be regarded is Faith that bringeth forth good workes These good workes come from Charity or inward love of God and man This Charity is stirred up and provoked to worke through Faith So that Faith workes by Charity as by that chiefe instrument which Faith imployes in the doing of all good works but Charity works by Faith as by the moving cause whereby t is excited to worke according to 1. Tim. 1. 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Faith is the first wheel in the clock that moves all the rest Faith stirs up and directs the other graces of the soule in their operations whose strength and vigour increaseth according as Faith increaseth Tantum amamâ—… quantum credimus t is cleer in all experience those that have the strongest Faith they shew the greatest love to God and man as in Abraham Moses Paul all the Martyrs But of this more in shewing the connexion between Faith and Obedience To that other place Iames 2. 26. As the body without the Spirit is dead even so Faith without workes is dead we answer that S. Iames understands by that similitude not modum Informationis but necessitatem Vnionis that good workes are necessarily coupled with a justifying Faith not that good workes are the forme and life of Faith à priori They are arguments and effects of a living Faith they are not causes that make it living as is apparent because it is impossible any good worke should goe before justifying Faith Heb. 11. 6. Wherefore this similitude is not so to be strained unto a Philosophicall construction where the Apostle intends no more in all his dispute but to shew that true saying Faith must of necessity bee conjoyned with good workes And if our adversaries bee so strict upon the termes of this similitude t is manifest that they fit not their doctrine for so as the soule is the forme of the body so workes shall be the forme of Faith i. e. an Act shall bee the forme of a Habite which is against reason and their owne doctrine who make the Habituall grace of Charity not good workes the fruits of it to be the forme of Faith S. Iames therefore is to bee taken in the former sense or else wee may without any violence interpret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place not Spiritum i. e. Animam but Spiritum i. e. Halitum Respirationem and thus the comparison is exact as the body without breathing and motion is dead so Faith without workes Thus it appeares how Faith is sleighted by our adversaries whilst they hold that the Faith wherby a sinner is justified is nothing but an assent to Articles of Religion because of Gods authority Some places of Scriptures there are they would faine build this upon as Heb. 11. 1. Rom. 4. 3. Tit. 1. 1. Ioh. 20. 31. but their arguments thence are so inconsequent and weake they are not worth the mentioning or refuting I proceed therefore from this generall Faith unto that other which is speciall particular Particular assent of Faith is when all things revealed by God are assented unto as most true and excellent in regard of our selves when they are particularly applyed to our proper occasion and compared with all desires and provocations whatsoever to the contrary When we know and beleeve those things that are generally delivered for our selves in application to our owne use and practice as Iob was counselled by his friends so that wee beleeve in this particular aswell as in that at this time aswell as at another In the Explication of the nature of such a particular assent I propose to your consideration two things 1. The Roote and Cause whence it springs 2. The Object of it whereto it is directed 1. The true root and fountaine whence this Blessed assent of Faith ariseth is that grace of sanctification wrought in the heart by the holy Ghost renewing the soule in all the powers thereof T is not common illumination for many know and despise the truth or beleeve it but in generall T is not the Authority of all the men in the world that can perswade to it wee should not then have had so many thousand â—…rmons of Prophets Ministers learned holy and powerfull in their doctrine yet preached to very small purpose with the most of mâ—n T is not miracles and strange accidents that can force this Faith the Iewes had plenty of them yet continued still unbeleeving T is only the sanctifying Grace of Gods spirit that brings this to passe For consider with your selves how deadly an opposition there is betweene a mans unsanctified nature and the wisedome and goodnesse of God all his counsells seeme but craft his words foolishnesse his mercies light and not worthy of estimation His exhortations promises or threatnings are entertained with inward disdaine and the heart saith within it selfe Who is God that I should feare him or what profit shall a man have by beleeving his Word and walking in his wayes Yea men that are otherwise ingenuous and of fairer temper in this case are full of secret scorne and despite of God and goodnesse they account basely of the holinesse of Religion being privie scoffers and bitter deriders of the power of Grace when they are alone by themselves or in company that fits them They make a tush at Scriptures and smile at such perswasions to pietie as they afford counting it an indignitie for men of parts and resolution to bee moved with faire words of a simple man though hee speake in the words of God If their beliefe and knowledge of the truth be good in the generall yet in the application the heart makes violent opposition it begins to hold probable dispute whether it be wisedome to doe so or so whether they be bound in conscience considering such and such circumstances it casts all inconveniences that may possibly be thought on to discourage it selfe yea perchance the truth it selfe shall be called in question and it thinkes Sure I am deceived Gods meaning is otherwise at last it resolves I may doe this and yet fare well enough and If I doe no worse I hope t will not be much amisse and I trust that these commodities and pleasures I enjoy may well countervaile the neglect of such or such a small matter Thus the heart not washed by the holy Ghost in the laver of Regeneration but abiding in its naturall corruption is not nor can be subject to the law of God but proves either impudent and
to muster up their owne forces and duly consider their abilities lest venturing rashly they at last sit downe with losse and disgrace The same I speake to you my brethren Sit yee downe first take counsell reckon the cost see what religion will stand you in your lusts must be crossed the world must be displeased and despised too Sathan must be fought withall hazzard of disgrace and dammage must be undergone friends and goods and life must be parted withall if need require the crosse must be borne daily If now upon these conditions thou art heartily and freely content to plight thy faith to God and take Religion with all its inconveniences then goe on and prosper in this resolution thy heart is sincere and thy faith sound But if upon heady and slight considerations thou hast put thy selfe forward upon the profession of Religion not forecasting the worst aswell as the best of it then know that thy case is like that of the Scribe Mat. 8. 18. who there tells Christ in great forwardnesse Hee would follow him whithersoever he went But when the silly man heard Christ reply otherwise than hee lookt for The Foxes have holes and the birds of the ayre have nests but the Sonne of man hath not whereon to rest his head implying that there was little hope to be rich and honourable by being one of his followers this now fits not his covetous and ambitious humour and therefore upon such an unexpected answer hee slinches Christs company is too meane and poore for his great hopes and for him he shall goe alone A miserable thing it is for a man thus to come in at last with a Non putâram I had not thought religion had required such absolute obedience I thought I might have done so and so and yet have beene a true beloever Hadst thou not thought it The more foole thou that wouldest not bethinke thy selfe better in so serious a businesse Thinke then of it now and thinke alwayes of it that hee who beleoves and does only what him pleaseth hee neither beleeves nor doth any thing as hee ought Thus wee have done with Faith as it respects the whole course of Religion and every part of the Word of what nature soever Next wee are to consider of True Faith as it lookes towards the particular promise of Grace and is directed unto Christ. Which Act though it be particular yet is of greater necessity and excellency than all other because it gives life as to our soules so to our beleefe of other things which are beleeved with relation unto Christ. Faith in regard of this particular Object and Act I thus define It is a grade of sanctification wrought by the holy Ghostâ— in every regenerate man whereby for his owne particular hee trusteth perfectly unto the promise of Remission of finnes and Salvation by Christs righteousnesse I neede not stand at large upon every particular That Faith is a sanctifying Grace part of our inherent righteousnesse that the Spirit of God is the onely author of it that a regenerate man is the onely subject of it these things have beene shewed heretofore The Object also of it is manifest by what names soever the Scriptures expresse it namely the Lord Iesus Christ or God in Christ or the Gospell or the Promise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all comes to one and wee neede not be curious But touching the proper Act of Faith as it justifies us a little more at large It consisteth in Trust or Reliance upon the promise for our owne particular when the soule depends wholly thereupon looking after no other helpe You have heard heretofore that to Beleeve the truth of a particular promise is to Trust upon the performance of it to mee and that the Assent of Faith which is given to such a promise is properly called Fiducia or Trust. Now the Promise of grace in Christ is made unto us in particular termes both in the Word preached and Sacraments to assent unto this promise is not barely to acknowledge that there is such a thing in the world as Remission of sinnes by Christ to bee bestowed on some God knowes who for this is to beleeve the Promise not as a promise but as an History but this assent is of the whole heart in Trust Reliance Dependance Adherence Affiance or if there bee any other word expressing that action of the regenerate soule whereby it casseth and reposeth it selfe onely upon Gods Promise in Christ for the obtaining of eternall happinesse That Fiducia is of the essence of Iustifying Faith wee make good 1. From the phraso of Scripture used in this businesse Those phrases 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Beleeve in or upon or into God Christ the holy Ghost are not used as the learned know by prophane Writers but only by Ecclesiastical implying that in Divine matters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies besides the naked acknowledgement of the Head the confidence and affiance of the Heart 2. From that opposition which is made betweene Faith and distrust or Doubting â—am 1. 16. Let him aske in Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nothing doubting and Rom. 4. 20 Abraham 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doubted not thorough unbeleefe 3. From that excellent place 2. Tim. 1. 12. where it is apparant that to beleeue is as much as to commit our selves to Christs trust and keeping I know saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in whom I have beleeved or whom I have trusted for as it followes I am perswaded that he is able to keep◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that thing wherewith I have entrusted him or delivered up to his keeping What was that His Soule unto everlasting Salvation Wherefore to Beleeve the promise is with Confidence and Trust to relye upon it resting our soules upon the performance of it Which assent of Faith is wrought in the soule in this manner 1 A man is inlightned to see his sinne and miserie and therewith an utter impossibilitie to satisfie God for the one or free himselfe from the other by any power and merit in heaven or earth but onely by the Name of Iesus Christ And this drives him from seeking helpe elsewhere 2 The promise of Grace is proposed and Christ freely offered unto him 3 Whence in the third place the Heart touched by the Spirit of Grace drawes neere unto Christ throwes it selfe into his armes grasping about him with all its might hiding it selfe in the clefts of this rocke from the stormes of Gods furious indignation It bespeakes Christ in all termes of confidence and affiance My Lord my God my hope my fortresse my rocke my strength my salvation Save me or I perish Have you seene how a tender infant in the apprehension of some danger approching runnes into the armes of his Parent for succour so doth a soule pursued by the terrors of the Law and affrighted with the fearefull sight of