Selected quad for the lemma: act_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
act_n faith_n habit_n justify_v 3,628 5 9.3789 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A89737 The orthodox evangelist. Or A treatise wherein many great evangelical truths (not a few whereof are much opposed and eclipsed in this perillous hour of the passion of the Gospel) are briefly discussed, cleared, and confirmed: as a further help, for the begeting, and establishing of the faith which is in Jesus. As also the state of the blessed, where; of the condition of their souls from the instant of their dissolution: and of their persons after their resurrection. By John Norton, teacher of the church at Ipswich in New England. Norton, John, 1606-1663. 1654 (1654) Wing N1320; Thomason E734_9; ESTC R206951 276,720 371

There are 30 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

is generally affirmed to be a part of Sanctification Sanctification in Scripture is sometimes placed before Justification 1 Pet. 1.2 through sanctification of the Spirit and sprinkling of the blood of Christ i. e. Justification and sometimes before the act of faith 2 Thes 2.13 Obj. 2. Acts 26.18 Wee are said to bee sanctified by faith therefore Sanctification followes faith if so neither can faith be a part of Sanctification nor can Sanctification be together in order of Nature with faith nor can it be before Justification Ans Though Sanctification taken strictly followes Faith we cannot therefore conclude the same of Sanctification taken largely The reason of the mistake of this Text is the omission of the Comma or note of distinction at the word Sanctified which saith Beza seemeth to have deceived Erasmus the putting of the Comma in that place according to the example of the Latine Translators joyns those words by faith to the Verb received and not to the participle sanctified which being done you have the sense as if you read the Verse thus That they may receive by faith in me remission of sins and an inheritance amongst them that are sanctified Vide Calvin Beza in loc This sense is not only agreeable to the analagie of faith but also to the antient Greek Copies which as Beza testifieth are thus pointed Likewise with the sense of the like phrase of Luke the Pen-man hereof And to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified Act. 20.32 This text then rightly understood sheweth the quality of those persons that shal obtaine the inheritance viz. that they are such who are sanctified and the manner how such qualified persons heretofore received remission of sins and hereafter shal receive the inheritance viz. by faith not by workes but of the manner how they came to be sanctified it speakes not at all Calvin doth not obscurely insinuate Sanctification sometimes to be used more generally oft-times more specially and in reference to the more general use thereof hee speakes thus God sanctifieth us by effectual calling of us Quod si istae sunt partes vel effectus Sanctificationis Calvin in 1 Pet. 1.2 aliter hic sanctificatio capitur quam saepe apud Paulum hoc est magis generaliter Sanctificat ergo nos Deus efficaciter nos vocando Chamier maketh Faith a part of Sanctification Faith it selfe saith the same Author elsewhere is by it selfe a part of Sanctification Agamus de Sanctificatione Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 10. c. 3 S 1. lib 22 c. 11. ● 5 primo quidem de perfectione deinde de partibus ejus nemp● fide operibus Est enim sides ipsa per se pars Sanctificatien●s The habit of Faith is not before but a part of our Sanctification Pemble of the nature and properties of grace and faith p. 20. Ames Resp ad Grevinch de praedest c. 1. the habits of Grace are co-equal stemmes of one common root of inherent sanctity Pemble Faith saith Ames is a part of inherent sanctity of the Image of God according to which wee are renewed a member of the new Man Sanctitat is internae inhaerent is inchoatae vel naturae illius cujus participes sumus Divinae partem aliquam esse fidem liquidius est ex Natura imaginis Dei gratiae infusae gratiae gratum facientis virtutis denique Theol. spiritualis quam ut iis quidquam opponatur For there is no man but acknowledgeth Faith it selfe to be a part of our Sanctification Twiss de permiss l. 2. cr 4. Sect. 5. Spanhem exercit de grat universali Annot. in S. 13. Doct. Twisse Nam fidem ipsam Sanctificationis nostrae partem esse nemo non agnoscit Sanctification is taken strictly as it is distinguished from internal vocation or in its Latitude whereof that is of Sanctification in its Latitude Faith cannot be denied to bee an effect Spanhemius Quae verò à nobis de Sanctificatione dicta fuêre de Sanctificatione strictè ex usu Scholarum sie dicta prout à vocatione interna distinguitur intelligenda sunt sed de Sanctificatione sumpta in sua Latitudine cujus fidem effectum esse negari nequit c. Fides est primus acius primus fructus spiritus Sanctificantis The infused habit of Sanctification Rhetorf Survey of Antinomianisme c. 60. by order of Nature goeth before Justification Rhetorf As the affirmative is no way prejudicial to the analogy of faith tendeth to the exalting of Christ the abasing of man making the Soule not only passive in the receiving of faith but in the receiving the habits of all saving grace that is in respect of their whole conversion nor only of part thereof so there appeares no concluding reason for the contrary CHAP. XII The Soule is passive in Vocation FOr the clearing and confirming of this Proposition seven things are to be considered 1 What Vocation is 2 What it is for the Soule to be passive 3 What the Habit of Faith or any other Grace is 4 What the second act Life-operation or exercise of Faith or any other Grace commonly called the act is 5 The just distinction between the Habit and the second Act or exercise of Grace which is carefully to be observed 6 That the habit of Faith which also holds in any other Grace precedes the second Act or exercise thereof 7 That in receiving the habit the Soule is passive What Vocation is Vocation is the infusion of a principle of Life or as some speake of the solitary habit of Faith Vocation what in whose sense this Proposition also stands good and untouched by the Spirit into the lost Soule in measure sensible of its inability and enmity to beleeve repent or doe any good by the meanes of and together with the external call of the Gospel in which worke the Soule notwithstanding any preparatory worke is meerly passive i. e. a meere passive receiver This gracious and saving work of the Spirit infusing life into the Soule is called Vocation by a Metonymie i. e. a Figure naming the work it selfe by the name of the instrument and external meanes by which the Spirit works it What it is for the Soule to be passive What it is for the Soule to be passive Passivenesse or suffering is either Perfecting tending to the good and perfection of the subject so the Creature which before was nothing suffered in receiving its being the Life-lesse body of Adam when it was made alive the Soule of Nebuchadnezzar when his reason returned to him Or Corruptive Passio Perfectiva Corruptiva Keck Phys lib. 3. c. 16. tending to the hurt and destruction of the subject so the Creature suffers in being made subject to vanity the body of Adam putrifying in the grave and the Soul of Nebuchadnezzar when it was depriv'd of reason The passivenesse of the Soule is the obediential subjection of a Soule Ministerially prepared wherein being unable to act it
only receiveth the impression of the Agent The Will in respect of this first reception of Grace hath neither the nature of a free Agent nor of a natural Patient but of an obediential subjection Obediential subjection is that capacity in the subject to receive an impression from the agent whereby as it remaines without ability in itself to put forth any causal vertue in order to such an effect so neither hath it any such repugnancy or contradiction in its nature whereby it is rendred uncapable of being made partaker of such an impression or effect by the power of a supernatural cause Briefly Impossibile Naturâ Naturae there is in such a subject in order to such an effect an impossibility by Nature but not to Nature i. e. an impossibility in respect of its owne power but a possibility in respect to a supernatural power this was the condition of those bones Ezek. 37. in respect of Life though there was in them a simple impossibility to live of themselves yet there was no impossibility but that they might be made alive by the power of God Power to receive a new forme is either Natural or Obediential Natural is in the thing or matter that is changed as in the seed of an Herb there is power to become an Herb Obediential power of a subject to receive a new forme puts not any causal power in the thing or matter to be changed all such power is without it viz. in the efficient there is only a power of reception in the thing or matter all power of causality being without the thing in the efficient So stones are in an obediential power to become men that is there is in them a subjection to become Men but all causality whence they doe become men is without them and in the efficient thereof namely God Obediential subjection is a capacity in the Creature to receive the impression of the first cause For the Soule then to be passive in the work of Vocation is for the Soule to receive the first saving grace and supernatural effect of the Spirit of Christ so as the Soule it selfe in this work is no way active from any such principle of activity as is of any power to produce such an effect no more than there is in a dead man to produce life Tho. 1 ●ae qu. 111. Art 2. in this worke the will is only moved of God but moveth not it selfe The Soule in this passive reception acteth not only it receiveth the impression of the Agent as Adams body was a passive receiver of Life inspired by God thereinto Gen. 2.17 formed and organized but yet life-lesse and breathlesse so were those bones Ezek. 37.8.10 and the body of the Shunamites childe 2 King 4.34 Hence the infusing of life into the Soule is compared to quickning of the dead Ephes 2. As a vessel is a passive receiver of the liquor poured into it the Soule is compared unto a vessel Rom. 9.21.23 and 2 Tim. 2.20 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And not only in the application of justifying grace is the love of God said to be poured out abundantly in our hearts Rom. 5.5 but also the creating of inherent grace in the Soule by the Spirit is compared to the infusion or pouring out of precious liquor thereinto God in effectual Vocation makes us vessels of honour In Vocation notwithstanding all preparatory work life is wrought by the quickning active Spirit of Christ Vocare est facere vas in honorem August Epist 105. Twiss vind grat l. 1. par 1. digr 8. S. 4. What the habit of faith or any other grace is in a dead passive Soule What the habit of faith or of any other saving grace is The habit of saving grave in general is an inherent and permanent frame of saving qualities infused into the Soule The habit of faith in particular is an inherent and permanent quality whereby Christ is received infused into the Soule by the Spirit in respect of which the Soule is only a meer passive subject and not any way an efficient The same habitual grace in several respects hath divers names Being considered as a potent quality that is such a quality as is predominant in the subject where it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non est ad malum qua tale coron Artic. quart de conversione and enabling the Soule through the concurrence of assisting grace to all duties and above all oppositions it is called a power Being considered as a causative quality that is such a quality as is not only first but hath the nature of a cause unto the consequent second acts following from thence it is called a Principle Being considered as an infused inherent and permanent quality disposing the subject to the second acts it is called a Habit. What the second act What the second act Life-operation or c. Life-operation or exercise of faith or of any other grace commonly called the Act is The exercise of faith or of any other saving grace is a Life-operation flowing from the infused power principle or habit through the help of the antecedaneous concurrence of assisting grace in respect of which the beleever is not only a subject but also an efficient co-working cause The just distinction between the habit The just distinction between the habit c. and the second act or exercise of grace is carefully to be observed The supernatural power principle or habit for all those termes mean the same thing is the first act the Life-operation is the second act The habit is the grace it selfe Pemble of grace and faith p. 84 or the nature of grace the Life-operation or life-Life-act is the exercise of grace The habit is conversion in the first act the Life-operation or life-Life-act is conversion in the second act The habit is actually or an active principle existing without its causes the Life-act is action The habit is an immanent act i. e. such an act as is inward and abideth The Life-act is a transient act that is such an act as passeth away The habit is the will it self the Life-act is the volition The habit is the inclining of the soule to the object of its action the Life-act is the union of the soule with the object In the infusion of the habit the soule acteth not but is onely acted Haminis vero primtsm passio quòa trahitur à patre deinde act io quòu tractus venit ad Christum Jun. de nat grat collat 11. l. 57. In the Life-act the soule being acted acteth The habit God worketh without us the life-Life-act God worketh with us In the habit of faith is the being of faith it self the life-Life-act of saith is the working of this grace now wrought The infusion of the habit is effectuall vocation The life-Life-act of faith is our answer unto the call of God Effectual vocation is called the drawing of the Father Joh. 6.44 our being taught of God our
hearing and learning of the Father John 6.45 The Life act of faith is the souls immediate comming unto Christ upon its being drawn taught of God and having heard and learned of the Father By the infusion of the habit the immediate and irresistable work of the Spirit of grace God converteth the soul By the life-Life-act the soule being converted converteth it self unto God By the insusion of the habit God maketh us his people Hos 2.23 1 Pet. 2.10 By the Life-act we avouch him to bee our God we say it in truth and lye not we unsay it not again By the habit we are made good trees by the life-act we bring forth good fruit The habit or first act doth not alwayes infer the second it may be without the second but the second alayes supposeth the first Two contrary habits may be together in the same subject as grace and originall concupiscence in the soul heat and cold in the same water but there cannot be two second acts proceeding from those contrary habits at the same time The habit is a principle inhering in the wil as its subject and denominating it willing after the nature of a quality the life-act floweth efficiently from this principle and is accountable to us as a good act unto which God in his mercy hath appointed a reward The habit unto the act Suarez Meraph Tom. post disp 44. Sect. 8. is as the faculty of sight to actuall seeing or vision Aristotle compareth the habit to a man sleeping the act to a man waking The habit of faith which also holds in any other grace precedes the second act or exercise thereof The habit of faith precedes the second act or exercise of faith The habit of faith which also holds in respect of any other grace goeth before the second act commonly called the act or Life-operation or exercise of faith appeareth thus from the order of the first and second act The habit is the first act the Life-operation is the second act First as before Second The nature of the thing teacheth the being of grace which is life it self to be before the vital operation of that grace the grace of faith is the being of faith it self called the Spirit of faith 2 Cor. 4.13 The vitall operation of faith expressed by the acts of coming to Christ Joh. 5.4 6.44 45. Eating of his flesh vers 54. Drinking of his blood ibid. answering the call of God must needs follow the being of faith we cannot act before we are we cannot act acts of life such as coming eating drinking answering are before we are alive the cause precedeth the effect the grace of faith is an efficient cause the Life-operation is the effect All creature-effects i.e. all such effects as proceed from the creature according to the order of second causes whether acts or habits for acquired habits follow acts presuppose a principle virtually or formally containing such effects But supernatural life-operations are creature-effects whose principle is the same with an habit as hath been cleared in the explication of an habit therefore supernatural life-operations presuppose a principle foregoing such acts That supernatural life-operations are creature-effects is manifest grace the new-creature whether considered in part or whole is a creature That creature-effects presuppose a principle in the subject formally or virtually containing such effects appeareth by this induction All creature-effects or actions are either supernaturall proceeding from a supernatural principle infused or inspired or moral whose principle is the Law written in the heart Rom. 2.14 hence are actions of external conformity to the Law or artificial whose principle is right reason or natural which flow from inclination or instinct Obj. 1. Acquired habits as Arts and Sciences ex gr the knowledge of a Physician the faculty of a Scrivener the skill of a Tradesman c. are gotten and caused by multiplied acts therefore all creature-effects do not presuppose principles in the subject formally or virtually containing such acts Resp 1. Albeit acquired habits were such creature-effects as did not presuppose their principle as before in the subject it weakned onely the argument not the cause which proceeds onely concerning such natural creature-effects as acquired habits are not but the argument ex abundanti proving all creature-effects and consequently acquired habits to presuppose some principle of them in the subject concludes the question much more evidently in respect of supernatural creature-effects 2 Notwithstanding there be many artificial acts that may be done without a habit acquired as he may scrible that hath not the faculty of writing well yet even those acts according to the ordinary course of second causes be not done without some inherent principle they may be done without a habit i.e. Such a principle that so affects the subject as to enable it to act promptly easily and with delight but they cannot be done without a principle simply to enable the subject to act Obj. 2. The act of Prophesying was not by way of habit therefore there were not principles thereof in the subject Answ The gift of Prophesie was miraculous therefore falleth not under the compasse of creature-effects proceeding according to the order of second causes 2 Principles are either transient or inherent the act of Prophesie flowed from the transient and passing inspiration of the Spirit whence they prophesied when they were inspired though not from an inherent principle therefore could not prophesie when they pleased We may distinguish between the matter of Prophesie and the act of publishing that matter of Prophesie the matter of Prophesie was miraculously inspired therefore without the limits of the question as before the publication of that matter was a creature-effect proceeding from principles natural rational and spiritual Obj. 3 The act i.e. the Life-act of faith by which the soule commeth to Christ is given in the work of Vocation without any foregoing habit Ans 1 This as it is barely affirmed without any reason given may untill then be sufficiently answered with a denial 2 We must distinguish between Vocation wherein is infused into the soul a power to come to Christ and the terme of Vocation wherein is contained our actuall coming to Christ If the act of faith be given in Vocation without any habit in order of Nature foregoing it then it will follow Either that the soul is not passive in Vocation or Conversion a pure Arminian affection justly opposed and abhorred by the joynt vote of orthodox Divines Or that Vocation precedes believing that is one may be a Member of the Catholick Church and consequently be a Member of Christ in order of Nature at least before he is a belecver which none will affirme Or that Vocation followeth the act of faith whereby the Soule cometh unto Christ which were to affirme Vocation to follow our union active receiving of Christ and Justification an assertion in no meane degree repugnant both unto Divinity and Reason That they i.e. the Arminians suppose the act
Pemble of grace and faith p. 59. in Divine graces goes before the habit is saith Pemble an assertion in Divinity not tollerable which tels us the tree must be good before the fruit can be good and that question which Christ put to the Pharisees Mat. 12.34 How can yee that are evil speake good things is more than any Arminian can tell how to answer Either the Life-operation or Life-act presupposeth life or the Life-act is life it selfe or there may be a Life-act without life But there cannot be a Life-act before life nor is that Life-act life it selfe otherwise there being an intermission or cessation of that act there would be a cessation of life Whence would follow interitus gratiae a falling a way from grace the immortal seed 1 Joh. 3.9 should become mortal the beleever so oft as the act of faith ceaseth by reason of sleep or sinne or what else becometh an unbeleever and dying asleep must either not be saved or be saved without faith therefore the Life-operation necessarily presupposeth life If the life-Life-act of faith whereby the Soule cometh unto Christ have no habit preceding it in order then it will follow either that there is no infused habit of faith or that this infused habit followeth the act of faith but true it is First that there is an infused habit Secondly that this infused habit followeth not the act of faith as we have already seen Obj. How doth it appeare that there is any habit it being no Scripture terme Ans Though the word Habit were not in the Scripture yet the thing signified by that word being in the Scripture it is sufficient according to that received Proposition Whatsoever is contained in the Scripture either in termes or by manifest consequence is Scripture So Divines defend the use of the terms Effence Person Trinity and Merit c. though the words in so many letters are not there found That the thing which those words habit of faith intend is contained in Scripture is manifest from the nature of a Habit thus An infused inherent permanent quality disposing the subject through assisting grace to supernatural acts is the thing signified or intended by the words Habit of faith the grace of saving faith is such an infused inherent permanent quality therefore the grace of faith is a Habit this inherent quality or habit is in the Scripture called the Spirit of faith 2 Cor. 4.13 a power Eph. 3.20 the will Phil. 2.13 the lust of the Spirit Gal. 5.17 the Divine nature 2 Pet. 1.4 the seed remaining 1 Joh. 3.9 for though the most appellations mentioned seeme not to be given to the grace of faith only but to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole frame of habitual grace yet in that they are given to the whole whereof faith is a part they are also given to faith as a part of that whole The word habit is a Scripture terme used Heb. 5.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendered habit by the Latine Translators generally who by reason of the habit have their senses exercised to discerne good and evil the inherent faculty of doing good and eschewing evil is called an habit The infused and inherent grace of faith whether it be called a power principle or habit no way prejudiceth the truth asserted by which of these termes soever it be called the thing is the same therefore the cause is the same and as firme So cleare is the doctrine of infused habits whereof faith is one that many of the School-men both ancient and late Dispositio aut habit us ille supernaturalis c. requiritur simpliciter ad actum istum supernaturalem Rescript Ames ad Grev. c. 10. attest thereunto Those habits Ad quaestionem tamen dico quod oportet ponere fidem infusam propter auctoritatom Scripturae Sanctorum Scot. lib. 3. dist 33. qu. 1. idem lib. 1. dist 17.9 3. 11.30 whereby man is disposed to such an end as exceeds Nature are of necessity in men by Divine infusion We ought faith Scotus himselfe to beleeve the habit of faith infused for the authority of the Scripture and of the Saints Scotus is commended for deducing out of the Master of the Sentences such inferences as might be apprehended not to have denied all supernatural habits Valentia Valentia Tom. 2. disp 4.9.3 p 4. Vbi fusè tractat quaestionem Utrum aliqui habit us infundant ur nobis supernaturaliter à Deo unwilling that the Council of Trent should bee thought to have denied infused habits notwithstanding he denieth not the testimony of Sotus who was there present to be true namely that the Council no wonder if that were difficult to be pronounced by the Adversaries of the Doctrine of Grace industriously abstained from the word habit yet endeavoureth to prove the thing signified by the word being taught by them not the dislike of the word but rather some other reason mentioned by him to have been the cause why they abstained from the use thereof In the same place hee asserreth the being of Habits from Argument Scripture and Authority and mentions other of the principal School-men like-minded with himselfe The Arminians though they could not be ignorant how much it concerned their cause to oppose the habit of faith yet none of them openly denied it before Grevinchovius Faith faith Fstius both in Infants Fides est habitus à Deo infusus tam in baptismo parvulorum quam in justificatione adultorum Estius l. 3. d. 23. s 1. 11. collat is cum dist 24. s 1. and in persons of discretion is a habit infused of God alone In receiving the habit of Grace In receiving the habit of Grace the Soul is passive whether we are to understand thereby the solitary habit of saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature of which before chap. 11. the Soule is passive The proof of this Proposition appeares by Scriptures Arguments Authorities By Scriptures thus Phil. 2.13 For it is God which worketh in you Velle non de substantia voluntatis sed de nova qualitate accipitur Bucan●oc 18 qu. 10. both to will and to doe of his owne pleasure The Apostle here distinguisheth between doing and a power to doe which hee calleth the will both these are wrought of God to will or power to doe he worketh without us to doe he worketh by us in the first we are passive and not active manifest it is the Soul cannot actually doe whilst it is but yet receiving power to doe in the second we are not only passive but also active yet so as wee are passive before we are active A second Scripture for the confirming of this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we have Phil. 3.12 But I follow after if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ The Apostle here expresly as those that understand the Original know makes mention of himselfe in
the passive voyce as being received by Christ before he makes mention of himselfe in the active voyce as having actively received Christ Receptie respeciu hominis est vel passiva vel activa Medulla l. 1. c. 26. Upon this Text Doctor Ames grounds that Spiritual and profitable distinction of a double receiving of Christ Passive and Active Passive whereby the Spiritual principle of grace is ingenerated Active proceeding from that ingenerated habit of grace and the operation of God fore-going and exciting thereunto we are received of Christ before we doe receive Christ Christ in working the grace of faith receiveth us by the act of faith we receive him Christ taketh the Soul before the Soul taketh him A third place to the same purpose is Ephes 2.1.5 And you hath he quickned who were dead in trespasses and sins even when we were dead in sins he hath quickned us together with Christ The infusion of the habit of Faith or Grace into the Soul is the quickning of the Soul until then the Soul is dead as a dead body so a dead Soul is passive in respect of its quickning or being made alive That the infusion of saving faith or saving grace is the infusion of Life appeares thus The Spirit of the Command and Promise viz. that infused grace which inclineth us to obey the Command and receive the Promise is Life the Image of God in Adam which consisted in a conformity to the Command was his spiritual life the spirit of Faith is the spirit of the Command 1 Joh. 3.23 this is his Commandement That we should beleeve on the name of his Son Jesus Christ that it is the spirit of the Promise is out of doubt Joh. 3.33 As the Image of God in Adam which consisted in conformity to the command was his Spiritual life so the Image of God created anew in the Soul is life either this is life or what can be life As the spirit of sinne is the spirit of death so by the rule of contraries the spirit of effectual saving grace is Spiritual life He that hath the Sonne hath life 1 Joh. 5.12 But every Beleever hath the Sonne From the nature of the grace of faith receiving of Jesus Christ as our Lord and Saviour being of the essence and form thereof as a natural principle of natural sense motion and action is natural life so a supernatural principle of supernatural sense motion and action is supernatural life But such a Principle is saving faith and each other saving grace No Life-lesse principle can enable the Soul to a life-Life-act it cannot be reasonably conceived how a Beleever as a Beleever should not be alive The summe is this text holds forth an Active-quickning Christ enlivening a dead passive Soul So from Scripture the Arguments follow First from the supernatural nature of the Habit of saving faith or of the habitual frame of the New Creature In receiving a supernatural Habit Theologi vocant habirum infusum per se quiaper se sua natusra postulat ita non alitèr fieri suarez Meraph Tom. post disp 44. sect 13 n. 6. or Principle the Soul is passive saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature is a supernatural Habit or Principle therefore in receiving saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature the Soul is passive Supernatural is that which exceeds the power of Nature and is received of the Soul by way of inspiration only as the gift of Prophecy or both by inspiration and infusion as the habits of grace such habits the Schools call Habits infused of themselves their very nature denying them to be otherwise attained either by acts or any created cause whereby they are distinguished from Habits infused by accident such as are the gifts of Tongues and the gifts of healing which though they are ordinarily acquired and gotten by acts of study and practise yet have sometime been infused as in the Apostles time In receiving that supernatural saving habit or principle before which the soul hath received no supernatural saving habit or principle the soul is passive But the grace of saving faith is such a supernatural saving habit or principle received before which the soul hath received no supernatural saving habit or principle Therefore in receiving the supernatural saving habit or principle of faith the soul is passive From the nature of the subject of saving faith which is wholly unable to confer any causative power towards the producing of such an effect In receiving a miraculous impression the soule is passive but the infusion of the habit of faith or principle of life in Vocation or Conversion is a miraculous impression Vocation is a miracle it being no lesse a miracle to raise a soul from spiritual than a body from natural death therefore in receiving the infused habit of faith the soul is passive notwithstanding God oft-times makes such use as he pleaseth of men in working a miraculous effect in them yet because in such works the whole efficiency alwayes flows from God and none from man Men are passive in receiving such miraculous effects or impressions Moses putting his hand into and plucking it out of his bosome Exod. 4.7 Naamans dipping himself seven times in Jordan 2 King 5.14 conferred no more power to the curing of their Leprosie nor the womans touching the hem of Christs garment Mark 5.28 29. to the healing of her issue of blood than if they had done nothing In receiving that saving power to do before which there is no such active saving power the soul is passive we cannot do any thing whilst we are but yet receiving power to do but in receiving the habit of faith we receive that saving power to do before which there is no such active saving-power Therefore in receiving the habit of faith the soul is passive Vocation is compared to Circumcision of the heart Deut. 30.6 to Creation to powring out of the Spirit so is the habit of faith there called Tit. 3.6 to quickning or making alive As therefore the person circumcised was passive in Circumcision the creature in its creation the subject quickned in its vivification and the subject into which precious water is powred is passive in respect of the water powred thereinto So the soul in Vocation which is all these spiritually as being that work wherein the heart is circumcised quickned hath inherent saving grace created in it and powred out into it by the Spirit must needs be passive The contrary tenet makes us in the creation of faith to be our own creators in part An assertion as full of pride as empty of reason it makes us in part authors of our faith a high degree of spiritual facrilege against the glory of Christ and grace of the Gospel Obj. 1. The Soul before and in receiving of grace is active in respect of the use of means therefore not meerly passive Sol. Passive is taken either absolutely for that which is simply passive and
Church For thy Maker is thy Husband the Lord of Hosts is his name and the Redeemer the holy one of Israel the God of the whole earth shal he be called Isa 54.5 Thou shalt no more be termed forsaken neither shall thy Land any more be termed desolate but thou shalt bee called Hephzi-bah and thy Land Beulah for the Lord delighteth in thee and thy Land shall be married Isa 62.4 The fourth is the state of glory And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them that they may be one even as we are one I in them and thou in me that they may be made perfect in one and that the world may know that thou hast sent me Joh. 17.22 23. Touching the bands 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Commissurae vocantur ea omnia quae nos Christo devinciunt ab 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tango per has commissuras Christus tangit nos nos Christum tangimus see Exod 12.22 Heb. or tyes which hold the Head and Body together so as Christ and the Beleever doe thereby in this union touch one another for so the word turned Bands Col. 2.19 implieth we are to know that according as the third beings or tertiums differ whereinto Christ and a Beleever are united so the bands differ whereby they are united thus If Sameness of spirit be the third being then God in Christ giving his Spirit in a word of grace on the one part and the Soul receiving passively that Spirit of grace as an empty vessel receiveth oyl on the other part are the bands of union When the body mysticall is looked at as that third being then Christ in the gift of the grace of faith giving himselfe as our God actually is the band on his part and either the Souls receiving of Christ actually in its passive receipt of faith or actively by the act of faith is respectively the band on our part When we look at this union Christus suum consensum nobis efficacitèr patefacit suum Spiritum in corda nostra infundendo per hunc enim efficit ut sentiamus eum revera velle idque ex patris etiam voluntate nostrum esse sponsum eòque caput 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nostrum Zanch. in Eph. cap. 5. Th. 3. in the third being of a Spiritual Marriage-estate the consent of Christ manifested by his infusion of his Spirit is the band on his part and the act of faith drawn forth by the power of assisting grace whereby we receive and take Christ as our Husband is the band on our part Lastly If we consider this union in the third being of a state of glory Christ giving glory is the band on his part our receiving whether passively or actively may respectively bee looked at as the band on our part The just observation of these several kinds of Union may haply be of use to reconcile that tenet which affirmeth Union to be by the habit of faith with that tenet ordinarily held forth in the writing of the Orthodox affirming Union to be by the Spirit and Faith understanding by faith the act of faith The first kinde of union is by the Habit not by the Act the second may be looked at as being by both either Habit or Act the third is by the Act not by the Habit. That proposition of frequent use among Divines sc Union is by the Spirit and faith that is by the Spirit on Christs part and Faith on our part Zauch in Eph. 5. de unione quaest 4. is to be understood of the third kind of union Touching the manner of this Union wherein Christ and the Beleever are united we may not unprofitably consider it First negatively Secondly positively Negatively it is not essential such as is the union of the three Persons in one essence in God Nor personal such as is the union of the Divine and Human nature in one and that an increated person in Christ Not natural whether essential as is the union of the form with the matter or by Local contact i. e. natural touching one of another as water is united to the vessel or by mixture as water is united to Hony or by the coupling together of a common and special nature as the Genus is united to the Species or by Cohesion as when one part of the body cohereth with another or by Adhesion as when Pitch cleaveth to our hands or by Inhesion as an accident inhereth in the subject or any other whatsoever 't is not civil as is the union of many persons into one body Politique Secondly Positively 't is a Spiritual and a Mystical union therefore the whole into which these Members are united is called a Mystical body This Spiritual union in respect of the verity thereof is real in respect of the things united 't is substantial in respect of its way or manner 't is supernatural and secret in respect of the neernesse of it 't is close and intimate 'T is a true not an imaginary union 't is sayed to be real or substantial in respect of the things that are united viz. the substance of Christ and the substance of the Beleever In this union we doe not receive the species or likenesse of Christ as the understanding receiveth the species of the Object but not the Object it selfe not are we thereby made partakers of the Spirit of Christ alone and not of himselfe but we are made partakers of both the very person of Christ and the person of the Beleever are as we saw before united together as the person of the Husband and the person of the Wife notwithstanding Local distance are united together From the neernesse of the union between Christ and his Members the body Mystical is called by the name of Christ Christ is considered either Personally in himselfe or Collectively together with the Church which is his Body so both Head and Members are required to make one Christ that is Christ not Personal but Mystical in which latter sense the Scripture calleth the Head and Body taken together by the name of Christ 1 Cor. 12.12 For as the body is one and hath many members and all the members of that one body being many are one body so is Christ Gal. 3.16 And to thy seed which is Christ that is all his Mystical body Hence the sufferings of Paul and of other Beleevers which we must yet remember were edificatory not satisfactory in way of edification not in way of satisfaction are called the sufferings of Christ Col. 1.24 The end of union is an everlasting and satisfactory communion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nempe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of the order of Union 1 Cor. 1.9 to the glory of God in Christ the good of the whole Mystical body and our own happinesse Union in order of nature though not in order of time followeth Vocation which appeareth by the considering of a being or essence Oneness and Union distinctly A being or essence is the thing
thus 1 In what sense the term Justification is here used 2 What Justification by Faith is 3 The causes of Justification viz. Efficient Meritorious Material Formal Final Instrumental 4 Plow Faith justifieth 5 Divers objections satisfied 6 Many mysteries that shine forth in the doctrine of Justification 7 The peace of conscience following thereupon In what sense the term Justification is used in this question Justification is the making of a person just or righteous and it is done either by infusion or declaratively by ajudicial sentence To justifie by infusion Justitia imputata est quoad essentiam idem ille status coram Deo quem perdidimus in Ademo B. ex T. 4. lib. 6. cap. 1. Pemble Treanise of Justification Pag. 2. is to make a person inherently righteous by infusing into him an indwelling principle of holinesse So Adam was made just Eccl. 7.29 To justifie declaratively is when a person accused or both accused and convicted as an offender is justly acquitted by the judicial declaration of his Legal innocency and freedome from guilt and punishment To justifie in this place is not by way of infusion viz. to sanctifie that is of a person unclean unholy and unjust to make him formally and inherently pure holy just by working in him the inherent qualities of purity sanctity and righteousnesse but judicially to absolve a guilty sinner at the Tribunal of Gods Justice from guilt and punishment and to declare him righteous Justification in this place doth not signifie a change of our nature but a change of our state i. e. of our spiritual condition in order to the curse and promise so as the person which was under the Law before is now not under the Law but under grace Rom. 6.14 It is a Court-phrase taken not Physically but Judicially for a Judicial not a Physical act it signifieth a relative Justification of accounting a man just not an habitual Justification of making a man just thus Barrabas a Thief is acquitted judicially whence followed a Legal not a Physical change of Barrabas Justification is sometimes applyed to God when a man justifieth Psal 51.4 Rom. 3.4 Luke 7.29 Matth. 11.19 Luke 7.35 sometimes to man between man and man Deut. 25.1 Isa 5.23 Prov. 17.15 2 Sam. 15.4 In which last places and the like Pemble after others observeth that to justifie is in judicial proceeding to absolve a party from fault and blame whether it be rightly or wrongfully Ezek. 16.52 Luke 16.15 Sometimes unto man between God and man Exod. 23.7 Isa 50.8 Rom. 8.33 34. 1 Cor. 4.4 Act. 13.38 39. which places can intend no other but a judicial or declarative not a physical or infused Justification whereby a person of unjust is made just Infused righteousnesse which is sanctification is distinguished from Justification Though they are inseparable yet they are distinguished as light and heat in the Sun 1 Cor. 1.30 6.11 The subject of our Justification is Christ the subject of Sanctification is the Beleever Justification is onely imputative Sanctification is inherent Justification makes a relative change Sanctification an inherent Physical change Justification is an individuall act all at once Sanctification is gradual by degrees Justification is perfect in this life Sanctification is imperfect It is plain that the Apostle by Justification intends remission of sins therefore not inherent righteousnesse We are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3.23 24. which redemption is remission of sins Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.14 See Rom. 8.33 Act. 13.38 Justification is opposed to Condemnation Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opouitur 3 ad Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lat. Jujtificare opouitur 3 ad Rom. Condemnare Rom. 5.18 As condemnation therefore consists not in infusing a principle of guilt into a person but in a Legal pronouncing of a person to be guilty so Justification is not by infusing a principle of righteousnesse into a person but onely the pronouncing of a person to be righteous To justifie is not to make a person habitually righteous Praeterea nullo nec Hebraico nec Greco nec Latino nec Vernaculo idiomate justificare est habitualiter justum efficere Par. in Rom. c. 3. neither in the Hebrew Greeke Latine nor any other Tongue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in the Old Testament many times yet it is but once used in any other sense which also is observed of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the New The Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to justifie never signifieth to make inherently but alwayes to make declaratively just excepting Dan. 12.3 where it signifieth not those that pronounce righteous but those who instruct others unto righteousnesse The Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which the Hebrew is rendred hath the same signification in the New Testamenent and difficult it is to produce it in any other sense except Rev. 22.11 This observation saith Pareus is firmly to be urged against false teachers Haec observatio fermiter tenen●a urgenda est emtra Sophistas quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem quod illi contendunt sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum Pareus in Rom. 3.28 Praeter unum locum ex Danielis 12. alterum ex Apocrypho Syracida ecclesiast 18. tertium ex Apocalypsi his exceptis audacter dico non dari posse alium Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 21. c. 5. n. 11. because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense in no wise to signifie the making of one righteous or the infusion of habitual righteousnesse which they contend for but a free absolution from sins and imputation of righteousnesse for the merit of Christ These places being excepted viz. Dan. 12.3 Rev. 22.11 Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense What Justification by Faith is What Justification by faith is Justification is a gracious act of God upon a beleever whereby for the righteousnesse sake of Christ imputed by God and applied by faith he doth freely discharge him from sin and the curse and accept him as righteous with the righteousnesse of Christ and acknowledge him to have a right unto eternal life The Efficient cause of Justification is the gracious good pleasure of God Efficient cause the Father Son and Holy Ghost In the Scriptures it is called Grace In the Schools grace that makes us acceptable He is God Lord Law-giver and Judge whose will is the rule of righteousnesse Sin as sin In scripturis appellatur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Scholis gratia gra●●n faciens is properly committed against God Psal 51.4 and God only can remit sin Mark 2.7 It is called the Righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse
though we are made partakers of it by a power which is without us yet it is inherent in us as in its proper subject and in that notion is opposed to the righteousnesse of Christ whereby we are justified whereof he is not only the worker but which also is inherent in him as its proper subject therefore the justification of a Beleever is by way of imputation No sinner remaining a sinner when he is justified can be justified otherwise than by imputed righteousnesse but all Beleevers though justified yet remain sinners while they live in this world 1 Joh. 1.8 therefore all Beleevers are justified by an imputed righteousnesse The final cause is the manifestation of the glory of grace The finall cause in a way of Mercy tempered with Justice in a way of Mercy in that he justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.5 and that freely Rom. 3.24 tempered with Justice in that he justifieth not without Christs full satisfaction unto the Law Rom. 3.26 The instrumental cause or instrument of our Justification The instrumental cause or instrument for faith here is but a meer instrument is faith the fuller understanding of this Proposition followeth in the next particular Here observe the intent and consent of such Scriptures as speak diversly of the cause of Justification we are sayed to bee justified by grace Rom. 3.24 i. e. as the Efficient cause by his Blood Rom. 5.9 i. e. as the Meritorious cause by his obedience Rom. 5.19 i. e. as the Material cause by imputation of his obedience Rom. 4.6 i.e. as the Formal cause by faith Rom. 5.1 i. e. as the instrument This Proposition We are justified by faith is figurative How Faith justifieth i.e. Metonymical whereby that which belongs to the principal cause is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not for its own worth but for the worth of the object which it apprehends Faith doth not justifie as an act of ours but all the vertue thereof proceedeth from its object the vertue that healed the Israelites proceeded from the object viz. the brazen Serpent they looked upon not from the looking upon the Brazen Serpent and the vertue that healed the Woman Luke 8.46.48.50 proceeded out of Christ who was touched not out of the Womans touch we are declared righteous upon our beleeving Faith in the matter of our Justification is the instrument apprehending and applying that which doth justifie the proper act of Faith is to receive the righteousnesse of another we are justified by faith correlatively that is we are justified by that which is the correlate of faith namely the obedience of Christ the meaning is it is the Obedience of Christ not Faith that justifieth that which is apprehended not that which apprehendeth Faith alone justifieth that is faith as it justifieth is alone but justifying faith is not alone that is faith as it justifieth is without workes but the faith that justifieth is a working faith We are justified by faith alone 1 Because as it justifieth it is not a work Rom. 4.5 2 Because we are not justified by our own righteousnesse i. e. that righteousnesse whereof we are the subjects 3 Because we are justified by the righteousnesse of another sometimes called the righteousnesse of God viz. that whereof God is the Author and Ordainer sometimes the righteousnesse of Christ viz. that whereof he who is God-man is both the Worker and the Subject 4 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is made ours by imputation not by infusion as Abraham was justified 5 Because we are justified by a righteousnesse that is actually procured before we doe beleeve Our righteousnesse is compared unto a garment Reval 19.8 Rom. 13.14 Gal. 3.27 which we put on by beleeving yet faith never took stitch in it What was accounted to Abraham for righteousnesse Zanch. in Phil. 3. Not the action by which but that which he did beleeve or as others speak faith not in respect of it self apprehending but in respect of the object apprehended Zanchy Gen. 15.6 Quid reputatum ad justitiam non actio quâ sed id quod credidit seu ut alii loquuntur ipsa fides non sui apprehendentis sed objecti apprehensi respectu This Proposition We are justified by faith understood legally with the Papists is not true but Blasphemous but being taken correlatively it is true Vrsin Haec propositio Ursin explicat catech part 2. qu. 63 fide justificamur legaliter intellecta cum Papist is non est vera sed Blasphema correlativè autem accept a hoc est Evangelicè est vera Faith as a quality doth not justifie but as an instrument receiving and applying to us the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Rivet Fides pro qualitate sumpta Rivet Cathol orthod tract 4. q. 10 non justificat nos sed justificat tanquam instrumentum recipiens applicans nob is imputatam Christi justitiam Faith justifies relatively to wit by a Metonymy whereby the effect of the principal is attributed to the instrumental cause Faith justifieth not habitually as a quality but relatively Paraeus Fides justificat relatè Paraeus in Rom. 3. phrasi nimirum Metaleptica quâ effectus causae principalis tribuitur instrumentali Fides justificat non habitualitèr ut qualitas sed Relatè Faith justifies not simply but relatively after the manner of an instrument applying Chamier Fides justificat Cham. Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 11 non simpliciter sed Relatè per modum instrumenti applicantis He saith Calvin shal be said to be justified by faith that being excluded from the righteousnesse of workes doth by faith take hold of the righteousnesse of Christ wherewith when he is cloathed he appeareth in the sight of God not as a sinner but as righteous and saith he after a few lines we say that the same consisteth in the forgivenesse of sins and imputation of the righteousness of Christ Contra justificabitur ille fide Calvin institut lib. 3. cap. 11. s 2. qui operum justitia exclusus Christi justitiam per fidem apprehendit qua vestitus in Dei conspectu non ut peccator sed tanquam justus apparet ita nos justificationem simpliciter interpretamur acceptionem qua nos Déus in gratiam receptos pro just is habet eámque in peccatorum remissione ac justitiae Christi imputatione positam esse dicimus Confer Sect. 21. 23. Faith doth not justifie as a work Welleb comp l. 1. c. 30. but as an instrument apprehending Christ Wollebius Etsi igitur fides sola non sit sed cum operibus conjuncta sola tamen justificat Fides non tanquam opus sed tanquam instrumentum Christum apprehendens Justification consists in faith organically Spanh de gr un erot 21. in the obedience of Christ objectively and meritoriously Spanhemius Justificatio consistit in fide organicè in Christi obedientia objectivè meritoriè We say with the Apostle Beza in confe majore c.
4. art 7. that we are justified by faith alone because it imbraceth him that justifieth us namely Jesus Christ Beza Cum Apostolo fide sola nos justificari dicimus eo quod amplectitur eum qui nos justificat nempe Jesum Christum Faith justifieth not as an inherent quality and gift in us Willet synop cent 4. err 56 by any worthinesse thereof but as it apprehendeth Christs righteousnesse and this to us and a little after So that in faith reputed for righteousnesse we are not to respect the worthinesse of the act of beleeving in it self but in respect of the Elect Dr. Willet Consensum patrum cum orthodoxis reformatis in hac hujusce propositionis explicatione videat qui volet apud Chamierum panstrat Tom. 3. l. 22. c. 5. apud Polanum Symphon cathol cap. 12 For the cleerer understanding the justification of a sinner by faith let these three acts be considered the one looked at as succeeding the other in order not in time First God actually imputes the active and the passive Mediatorly obedience of Christ unto a beleever Rom. 4.6 therein God is freely giving Secondly The soul having before in order of nature not in time received Jesus Christ as its head and Saviour by the same faith receiveth his obedience as the matter of its righteousnesse herein the soul is taking Rom. 5.17 Rom. 6.11 Gal. 3.13 Thirdly God hereupon in the court of Conscience judicially declares and pronounceth the sinner to be righteous and to have right unto eternal life by vertue of the promise Joh. 5.24 Rom. 3.22.30 The righteousnesse of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By faith through faith upon them that beleeve which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that beleeve By this act of grace the person of the sinner is justified in himself really yet not inherently but imputatively his state changed who before justifying faith was a childe of wrath even as others untill now the persons of the Elect not being accepted in themselves neither are their actions accepted but now our persons being accepted our actions are capable of being accepted Gen. 4.4 Faith 1 Acknowledges that we are justified for the righteousnesse sake of another viz. Christ God-man 2 Acknowledgeth that our justification is free 3 Renounceth our own righteousnesse First We need the righteousnesse of another and the righteousnesse of this other is sufficient the least sinner needs no lesse the greatest sinner needs no more the least sinner cannot be saved without it the greatest sinner needs no more to be saved God cannot save any Infant without the righteousnesse of Christ the righteousnesse of Christ is fully able to save all beleevers See the Sinfulness of Sin that nothing but the righteousnesse of him who is God could expiate it See the Righteousnesse of Christ which taketh away all sin Faith acknowledgeth the least sin unpardonable without it the greatest pardonable by it Were we onely guilty of Adams sin we could not be saved without it Were we guilty of all the sins of the Elect we might be saved by it To think any sin little is a great sin t is a greater to think that Christs righteousnes is not above all sin our disobedience is but the disobedience of man but the obedience of Christ is the obedence of him who is both God and man the disobedience of man is infinit only improperly in respect of the object the obedience of Christ is infinite properly in respect of the subject that which is infinit hath no limits but the pleasure of the disposer Davids childe needed the righteousnesse of Christ for its justification and Manasseth needed no more To think any sin little is no little sin t is to excuse sin to accuse justice in sentencing our sin in Adam or original sin with death to lessen nay so far to frustrate the righteousnesse of Christ The Pharisee puts confidence in his not having done so ill yea in his having done better than other men Luke 18.11 That he had so done was good but that he put confidence in it was bad If thy hope be more in thy little sins then in Christs great mercy Woe be unto thee had there been but one man to have been redeemed Christ must have dyed and Christs death was sufficient to have redeemed all men T is a sin for the least sinner not to despair of righteousnesse in respect of himself Isa 5.7.10 T is a sin for the greatest sinner to despair concerning the righteousnesse of Christ He that beleeveth not be he never so righteous shall be damned He that beleeveth hath he been never so unrighteous shall be saved 2 The beleever acknowledging his righteousnesse to be the righteousnesse of another to be merited by another acknowledgeth it to be free it cost Christ to the full but it cost us nothing being justified freely by his grace Rom. 3.24 Justification is called the gift of righteousnesse Rom. 5.11 the free gift the gift of grace vers 15 Grace in this verse noting the love of God it self the gift by grace Justification as an effect of that love God will either not justifie at all or justifie for nothing t is the glory of grace to be free and mans prirce to come without mony The experience of this truth is compared to buying because the sinner parts as hardly with his righteousnesse as the covetous man doth with his mony Isa 55.1 And when they had nothing to pay he frankly forgave them both Luke 7.42 God will take nothing for our Justification as it is repugnant to the whole so to each part of grace not to be free To attribute any thing to man in way of condignity or congruity were to lessen the sinfulnesse of sin to exalt man to betray Grace and to take so much from Christ This truth God standeth much upon as is notably to be seen in the manner of Naamans cure a figure of the free recovery of a sinner both from the power and guilt of sin hence the Prophet healeth him for nothing and though urged refuseth and that not without an oath but he said As the Lord liveth before whom I stand I will receive none and he being urged to take it still refuseth 2 King 5.16 Where God forgiveth sin be forgiveth much no sin is in it self little Luke 7.47 Simon the Pharisee who looked at sin as a little thing was not forgiven at all where God forgiveth little or much he forgiveth all for nothing That which is said of the Lilly compared with Solomon Consider the Lillies of the field how they grow they toyl not neither do they spin and yet I say unto you that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these Matth. 6.28 29. is most true of the Beleevers compared with the Lillies The Garments of fine linnen the righteousness of the Saints far exceed the glorious aray of the Lillies yet they do not so much as spin for it Thirdly
In the putting on of the Garments of Christs righteousnesse there is a putting off of the filthy rags of our own righteousnesse In this sense Christ cloaths only the naked and he that is cloathed savingly owneth his own nakednesse and the unrighteousnesse of his own righteousnesse Our unrighteousnesse strikes against the Law but our righteousnesse takes away grace that is against God this against God and Christ that makes us need the remedy this keeps us incurable by it that is against the command this is against the promise Gal. 3.14 that makes the Law weak Rom. 8.3 this submits not unto the strength of the Gospel Rom. 10.3 the beleever accounts much of the righteousnesse of Christ and loatheth his own Phil. 3.8 he abhorreth himself for his own high account of his own righteousness onr own righteousness is called our shame Phil. 3.15 Christs righteousnesse is our glory Isa 55.25 In the Lord shall the seed of Israel be justified and shall glory The beleever how great a sinner soever formerly though a Murtherer Adulterer Lyar c. by this one act of beleeving Jesus Christ and his righteousnesse yeeldeth more obedience unto God than ever he committed disobedience honoureth God more than ever he hath hitherto dishonoured him pleaseth God better than if he had ever continued in innocency and never sinned God makes much account of the obedience of faith because faith makes much account of the grace of God It is a name of honour unto Christ to be called Our Righteousnesse Jer. 23 6. and a name of honour to the people of God that according to their duty they are known to acknowledge Christ according to this name And this is the name wherewith He shall be called The Lord our Righteousnesse Jer. 33.16 Object Bellar. de Just l. 1. c. 10. If we are justified by faith then faith is in order before justification and consequently the act is before the object whereas on the contrary the act depends upon the object and not the object upon the act To this effect Bellarmine Answ 1. We may distinguish between the being of Justification and our being justified that is between Justification taken in an abstract sense viz. without the receiving-subject thereof namely the beleever And Justification taken in the concrete sense i. e. together with the beleever Justification considered in the abstract i. e. simply and in it self in which sense it signifieth remission of sins and righteousnesse to acceptation prepared though not yet conferred upon the Elect hath before faith a being not onely in the purpose of God but also in the Covenant between the Father and the Mediator and in the purchase of Christ This truth held forth in the Gospel makes the object of faith and thus the object is before the act Or thus distinguish between Justification actually procured and actually applied Justification was eminentially procured before faith Docet A minius Christum satisfactione sua nactum esse jus peccatorum remittendorum non peccatorum remissionem Twiss de permiss l. 2. er 4 p. 84. in respect of those who beleeved before Christ dyed when it was as entire to God to justifie for the merit sake of Christ to dye as it is now for the merit sake of Christ dead it is actually procured for those who beleeve after the death of Christ though it be not actually applied before faith This actuall procuring of Justification as did also the eminential procuring of it before Christ giveth a being to Justification as considered in it self and constitutes the object of justifying faith Justification is compared to a garment our being justified to the putting on of that garment the garment is made before it be put on Justification is compared to a pardon our being justified unto the Delinquents being pardoned the pardon is procured before the Delinquent is pardoned These then are both truths First Justification hath a being before the Elect do beleeve Secondly That the Elect are not justified before they do beleeve Justification is the object faith is the act the object is before the act our being actually justified is an effect faith is the instrumental cause the cause is before the effect That Justification is actually and absolutely procured for the Elect before faith and shall infallibly be applied to them all in time seemeth to reach the scope intended by the godly Learned whose spirits have more particularly laboured to hold forth the full truth in this precious part of the soul-reconciling and soul-supporting mystery of the Gospèl To say that we are justified by vertue of a singular promise in the Court of Conscience and in our own persons in which sense the Scripture constantly saith that we are justified by faith is not that I know affirmed by any The grounds of this Distinction are thus evidenced Justification was in Gods Decree before faith before sin yea from all Eternity Gal. 3.8 whom God hath set forth that is fore-ordained Rom. 3.25 The Justification of the Elect is absolutely and actually procured for them by Christs satisfaction before faith Col. 2.14 The hand-writing of Ordinances cannot be limited to the Ceremonial Law onely because it had respect unto the Gentiles then living to whom the Ceremonial Law belonged not God hath declared his acceptation of this satisfaction of Christ whereby he hath actually procured Justification for the Elect before faith It is no small part of the Ministry of Reconciliation that God imputed unto Christ the sins of the world of the Elect before they did beleeve and will not impute them unto the Elect 2 Cor. 5.18 19. this great Gospel-truth is of special use to beget justifying faith in the heart of a sinner the same Apostle confirms Beleevers concerning their salvation Rom. 5.10 from this argument namely that their reconciliation was wrought for them when they were enemies that is unbeleevers Here then is a twofold Reconciliation mentioned one at the death of Christ before Paul or the Romans some of them at least here spoken to were beleevers The other at our Conversion The first Reconciliation though it was vertually wrought before by the Lamb slain in Gods appointment acceptance together with his own consent from the beginning of the world Rev. 13.8 yet it was not actually wrought untill the death Christ for this satisfaction sake God imputes not sin unto the Redeemed for he cannot impute sin to Christ and the Elect both yea he accepteth us in the Beloved Eph. 1.6 Loving the persons of the Elect Rom. 11.28 though hating theirs sins and also their state under the curse of the Law Ro. 6.14 Ch. 7.6 Eph. 2.3 The second is wrought at our Conversion when the enmity of nature is slain by the infusion of grace our persons are justified in themselves and our state changed by faith in Christ Jesus This place then seemeth not to be understood as that Rom. 4.5 God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively that is such who were ungodly till they were justified
is in this sense no worker working giveth glory unto man Rom. 4.2 beleeving giveth glory unto God Psa 20. None so unable to work as the Beleever legally and properly Justitia propria dicitur quia in illa acquirenda elaboratur propriis viribus homini à natura insitis Piscat in Phil. 3. none so able to work the work of new obedience that is to work Evangelically Faith puts on but doth not take one stitch in the garment of Justification it is as we saw before with the Beleever as with the Lilly which doth not so much as spin yet Solomon in all his royalty was not cloathed like one of them To work supposeth four things 1 That such an act be done by the principle of grace received in innocency i. e. by our own strength 2 That it be done by our own persons 3 That it be done exactly according to the Letter of the Law 4 That there be a reward due thereunto according to order of Justice To make Faith as it is a Work to be a part or whole of our Justification were to make a Covenant of Grace a covenant of Works and consequently to destroy the Gospel Rom. 4.14 Gal. 3.18 Justification by faith establisheth the Law Rom. 3.31 but Justification by works makes faith voyd Gal. 3.21 This Proposition We are justified by faith if it be understood Legally it is false and blaspemous if understood Evangelically it is true and giveth glory to God Obj. 4. It is true works that are done without faith can be no matter of our Justification but works done by the grace of Jesus Christ may which is so farre from eclipsing that it illustrates the glory of grace It is much more honour to Christ to merit that we may merit Ans Had the Papists not eyes to see saith Cartwright yet might they wel have groped the contrary of that is here cavilled Faith and Works are opposite in the matter of our Justification Rom. 4.5 Man is justified in such a way as giveth glory unto God and excludes boasting Rom. 3.27 But if we were justified by any works wrought in us we should have whereof to glory Rom. 4.2 Paul is afraid to be found in his own righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 viz. in that righteousnesse whereof he is the subject which justifieth according to the order of the Law A Meritorious work is such an act whereunto a reward is due according to order of Justice hereunto are required those fouring redients mentioned in the answer to the fore-going objection which cannot be found in Man since the Fall neither in the state of Sin Grace nor Glory not in the state of Sinne Fideles sunt vasa misericordlae ex omni parte praeparationis adgloriam imò in ipsa gloria sunt vasa misericordiae Bell. enerv To. 4. lib. 7. cap. 2. n. 8. Paraeus in Rom. 3.23 Heb. 11.6 nor in the state of Grace where evil cleaveth to our best actions Luk. 17.10 nor in the state of Glory wherein the Elect remain vessels of Mercy their actions fruits of thanksgiving having their acceptation from the righteousness of Christ To say that Christ merited that we might merit is to say that Christ who merited that we should be saved by his grace merited that we should be saved by our own works a contradiction in Reason and a notable Master-piece of the mysterie of Iniquity as concerning the doctrine of Religion it were to merit away the nature of Merit and to turn the Covenant of Grace into a covenant of Works In the way of Salvation Merit and Grace are immediate opposites Rom. 11.5 Had Adam stood in the first Covenant he had merited but the Covenant of Grace hath removed Merit for ever from Man to Christ under the Gospel Christ is the only Person of Merit The Angels are confirmed by grace Man whether looked at as a vessel of grace or as a vessel of glory is a vessel of Mercy not the very Angels much lesse Men though in glory have any matter of glorying The faithful saith Doctor Ames in the very state of glory are vessels of Mercy Neither the Angels Ames Paraeus ubi supra nor the blessed in Heaven have matter of glorying Paraeus Obj. Vnto Justification by Faith Faith is required which is an act of the Beleever how then can we be sayed to be justified freely Ans Justification is actually procured and hath its being in Gods decree and in our Surety before we doe beleeve Faith is no instrument or motive of Gods absolute decree to justifie nor is it any instrument of Christs satisfactory and meritorious obedience either active or passive or of Gods acceptation of that satisfaction nor of the imputing of his obedience unto the beleever but the effect thereof The actual declaration in the Court of Conscience of the Beleever to be righteous is by faith not for faith by faith as a band means or instrument receiving not for faith as a cause of that which is received The nature of faith is to receive acknowledge and accept Free grace to seal to the truth of Free grace Lastly this grace whose nature is to apprehend and apply Free grace is the effect of Free grace surely it ariseth from the mist of remaining legalnesse that our being justified in such a way whose very nature is to acknowledge the freeness of our justification should occasion us to think Justification in that respect not to be free Faith and Free Grace agree therefore it is of faith that it might be by grace Rom. 4.16 Many Mysteries of the wisdome of God shine forth in the doctrin of Justification Many depths of the wisdom of God to be observed in the doctrin of justification Justification is universal God forgiveth all sin sins past sins present and sins to come sins past formally sins to come vertually those in themselves these in the subjects of them Justification is an individual act it admits not of degrees it doth not receive more nor lesse though our sensiblenesse of it be more or lesse yet our Justification is the same perfect from its first instant and not gradual Paul a beleever was as justified as Paul in glory because the righteousnesse of Christ which is the matter of the justification of the Saints is the same for ever of like vertue whether our faith be weaker or stronger it is not such a degree but the truth of our faith that sufficeth unto our being justified a thousand pounds received by a Palsie hand is a thousand pounds as wel as a thousand received by a healthful hand He that looked on the brazen Scrpent though with a weaker sight was healed as throughly as he that looked upon it with a strong sight A touch cureth the Woman as wel as a ful hold Mar. 5.34 The sense of our Justification is according to the degree and exercise of our faith but the truth of our justification is according to the truth of our faith the justification of
then a sinner and before a Blasphemer a Persecutor and injurious wel knowing the sinfulnesse of sin and the terrour of the Lord Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect It is God that justifieth who is he that condemneth It is Christ that dyed yea rather that is risen again who is at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for us Rom. 8.33 34. Obj. Few Beleevers seem to have this peace Ans All Beleevers have the same state of peace although many Beleevers have not the full perswasion and comfortable sense of it we must distinguish between justifying faith properly so called namely the direct act of faith receiving Christ and his righteousnesse or relying upon him for pardon according to the Promise whereby we are justified and have peace and assurance namely a reflex act of faith whereby we are fully perswaded and doe beleeve that we doe beleeve hereby we are not justified and made first partakers of peace but we rest perswaded that we are justified and have the sense of our peace the first is called the certainty of the Object the thing beleeved is certain i.e. infallible the second is called the certainty of the subject because the subject i.e. the person beleeving is certain that he doth beleeve This distinction is of great use unto many Beleevers who not sufficiently attending to the nature of justifying faith think they have no faith because they want assurance A great mistake saith Master Pemble and that which casteth many a Conscience upon the wrack Pemble of grace and faith toward the end of the treatise tormenting it with unsufferable fear where there is no cause CHAP. XV. Of the state of the blessed where Of the condition of their souls from the instant of their Dissolution and of their persons after the Resurrection Here consider 1 THe probability that the Saints in glory see the Divine Essence 2 What the Beatifical Vision is where of the Extent of the object of the Beatifical Vision Manner of the Beatifical Vision Effect of the Beatifical Vision 3 That the soul separated immediately upon its dissolution from the body enjoyeth this Blessednesse in the presence and sight of God and Christ 4 The Adjuncts of Blessednesse viz. The place of the Blessed Their Society The Duration of all 5 The condition of the Body after the Resurrection 6 Whether the Blessednesse of the soul be greater after the Resurrection than it was before The Saints in glory see the Divine Essence it self We shall see him as he is 1 Joh. 3.2 Consider 1. Visio facialis For now we see through a glasse darkly but then face to face 1 Cor. 13.12 The great object seen now and then is the same onely the manner of seeing it is not the same then we shall see it immediately now we see mediately but then shall I know even as also I am known ibid. And they shall see his face Rev. 22.4 I say unto you in Heaven the Angels do alwayes behold the face of my Father Mitth 18.10 The happinesse of heaven consisteth principally in seeing Gods face The Blessed see God with such a sight as is opposite to the sight of Faith We that are at home in the body walk by faith they who are absent from the body walk by sight 2 Cor. 5.7 Therefore the sight of God by faith being mediate what hinders but that the sight of him in the state of felicity opposed in that respect to that of faith shall be immediate Man naturally desireth the Vision of God himself whether he be considered as the first cause for effects once found Smising tr 2. Disput 6. n. 46.49 Intellect us non quiet at nr summe intelligibili nisi illud possideat perfectissimo genere cognitionis non implicante contradictionem ibid. n. 51. Synops disp 52. n. 16. we naturally desire to see their cause or as the objective cause of Blessednesse as the sight is not quieted except in the most excellent of visible objects So is it impossible for the understanding to acquiesce except it be in the highest being A created being cannot be our Summum Bonum i.e. our chiefest good onely God who is increated can fill and satisfie the soul of Man This Synops Vbi supra Junius cont 7. c. 1. n. 3. c. 3. n. 1. Festus Hominius disp 34. trac 2. Bucan Lec 36. q. 10. Annotat. upon Rev. 22.4 Daven 1. Col. 1.15 Cham. Tom. 3. l. 25. cap. 1. Zanch. De operibus Dei lib. 3. c. 6. Thes 1. Polan synt l. 1. c. 6. vide August Epist 111. 〈◊〉 112. as it is the judgement of the School-men and of the Papists so seemeth it to be the judgement of the Protestant Divines generally We saith Junius in the name of the Protestants confesse the Saints departed do enjoy the Vision of God properly Dr. Willet upon Exodus 33. denieth not that the souls of men in the next life shall see the Divine Essence apprehensively not comprehensively or fully which is all that is intended and as much as is taught by sober Writers either ours or others Obj. God is invisible 1 Col. 15. 1 Tim. 1.17 and 6.16 Ans The Divine Essence is not visible to bodily eyes either in this life or hereafter 1 Tim. 6.16 the Essence simply considered cannot be seen by the soul in this life Exod. 33.20 In the life to come though it be seen of the soul apprehensively i.e. so far as we are capable yet non comprehensively and fully Joh. 1.18 Obj. The visive power of the soul that is said to see the Divine Essence is created the Divine Essenee is increated and infinite between that which is finite and that which is infinite there is no proportion Therefore it seemeth the Divine Essence it self cannot be seen by the soul Ans Though there be no Geometrical proportion between the Divine Essence and the visive power of the soul in glory yet there may be between them the proportion of an act and its object The eye of the body of Christ glorified may be supposed to have a visive power not onely adequate to but far exceeding the light of the Sun and so could see the Sun comprehensively the eye of an ordinary mortall man though his visive power be far short of the lightsome visibility in the Sun yet he can and doth see the Sun apprehensively though not comprehensively That the distance between the Creator and the creature is not repugnant to the proportion of an act an object or that which terminates and that which is terminated is evident in the Incarnation where the Divine Essence Vide Smising tract 2. disp 6. n. 52. subsisting in the second Person which is increated terminates the humane nature of Christ which is a creature being united thereunto and the humane nature is terminated thereby If the distance between the Divine Essence and a creature is not such as inferreth an impossibility of personal union much lesse
first cause with the second c. 5. p. 106. 108. seq The necessity of the Concourse of the first cause with the second c. 5. p. 106 107 The manner of the Concourse of the first cause with the second c. 5. p. 107 108 The Concourse of the first cause with the second is mediate both in respect of its vertue and its presence c. 5. p. 109 The Concluding the soul under sin and guilt what c. 7. p. 154 Though the Decree be absolute yet the dispensation thereof in the Gospel is Conditionall c. 4. p. 85 86. seq Certain Condemnation without faith c. 9. p. 218 A Condition properly and improperly what c. 10. p. 227 A double Consideration of the second Person in the Trinity helpful to understand the Person of Christ c. 3. p. 36 Conviction of the holinesse of the Law what c. 7. p. 142 Conviction of sin what ibid. D. To justifie God is our duty but to be contented to be Damned is no where commanded c. 7. p. 151 Decree what c. 4. p. 51 The Decree is the antecedent not the cause of sin c. 4. p. 52 What order is to be observed in propounding the doctrine of the Decree c. 4. p. 82 83 se The Decree proceedeth according to the order of the end and means c. 4. p. 82. The Dependence of the second cause upon the first is universall c. 4. p. 98 The Determination of the second cause by the first hindreth not the freedome of the second cause in its operations c. 5. p. 114 115 The Disorder of the second cause not such as is inconsistent with the all-governing providence of God c. 5. p 115. 116 c. The Disorder of second causes no prejudice to the wisdome of God c. 5. p. 117 How a person is Distinguished from the Essence c. 2. p. 26 Things are Distinguished really rationally or modally and how ibid. Distinguish between the Doctrine of the Decree and the personal application thereof in respect of Election and Reprobation c. 4. p. 82 83 Vpon the instant of Dissolution the soul immediately enjoyeth blessednesse c. 15. p. 336 The Dominion of sin what c. 7. p. 144 The Duration of eternity eviternity and time distinguished c. 15. p. 348 E. The Efficiency of God what c. 5. 101 The distribution of the Efficiency of God c. 5. p. 102 The All-Efficiency of the first cause prejudiceth not the Efficiency of the second cause c. 5. p. 111 To deny the Efficiency of the second cause how unreasonable and abominable c. 5.111 112 113 The Doctrin of the Efficiency of God an Antidote against Atheism Epicurism Stoicism Fortune Libertinism and the corrupt doctrine of the Jesuits and Arminians concerning the concurse of the first second cause c. 5. p. 124 125 Gods Efficiency is answerable to his Decree c. 5. p. 126 No person can know he is elected before faith c. 4. p. 84 Election no part of the primary part of the object of faith c. 9. p. 156 All the Elect first or last shall beleeve c. 10. p. 230 The Elect only do beleeve c. 10. p. 231 Eminential continency or for the effect to be contained eminently in the cause c. 1. p. 20 The grace of Eminency in Christ what c. 3. p. 46 The special E●mity of the heart against beleeving c. 9. p. 207 Eleven Gospel-Encouragements unto a soul under preparatory work before faith c. 8. p. 191 192 Encouragement from the sense of our inability to beleeve c. 9. p. 217 218 Eternity what c. 1. p. 7 Eviternity what ibid. Probable that the Saints in glory see the Divine Essence c. 15. p. 327 328 329 It is mans duty to sanctifie God in respect of his Decree and his all-glorious Efficient execution thereof c. 5. p. 127 F. Faith and Repentance c. how ascribed unto God c. 5. p. 113 114 Every one before Faith is under the Law the Curse and Sin c. 8. p. 173 The eminency of the principle requisite to the creating of Faith c. 9. p. 208 The acceptablenesse of the obedience of Faith c. 9. p. 215 Faith a condition improperly not properly c. 10. p. 227 228 This Proposition Faith is the effect of grace is affirmed by Pelagians Semipelagians Jesuits and Arminians but with a diverse sense c. 10. p. 228 229 Faith i. e. Saving faith is the effect of speciall grace c. 10. p. 230 God hath bound himself for Christs sake to give Faith unto the Elect c. 10. p. 248 The habit of Faith is not infused alone without the habits of other saving graces c. 11. p. 152 c. How Faith justifies c. 14. p. 307 308 Faith in our justification acknowledgeth three things c. 14. p. 311 312 313 Fear filial and servile c. 6. p. 138 Three things to be attended in the form of Vnion between Christ and the Beleever c. 13. p. 287 Four things wherein Christ and the Beleever are united c. 13. p. 287 288 G. God knoweth and seeth all things always c. 4. p. 94 Goodnesse of God what c. 1. p. 12 The Gospel propounded with a Command and a Promise c. 9. p. 215 The Gospel holds forth power for the enabling of us to beleeve c. 9. p. 217 Gods generall Government of the creature what c. 5. p. 103 In the government of the unreasonable Creature three things to be considered c. 5. p. 103 Gods government of the reasonable Creature what c. 5. p. 104 c. Free Grace both increated and created what c. 10. p. 223 The distribution of Grace with a description of each part of the distribution c. 10. p. 219 220 Saving Grace and common Grace how distinguished c. 10. p. 222 In an elect person yet an unbeleever there is no other qualification than what is the effect of common grace c. 8. p. 170 Perillous consequences from not distinguishing between common and saving grace c. 8. p. 168 169 Special or saving Grace proceeds from Christ as our Head c. 8. p. 168 169 Guilt what c. 7. p. 144 Conviction of guilt what c. 7. p. 144 H. What the Habit of Faith is or of any other saving grace c. 12. p. 259 Justification of the term Habit c. 12. p. 265 266 The Habit of Grace proved by Scriptures c. 12 p. 267 By Arguments c. 12. p. 268 269 By Authorities c. 12. p. 272 Some Objections answered c. 12. p. 270 271 The distinction between the Habit and second Act c. 12. p. 260 The Habit of Grace precedeth the second Act c. 12 p. 261 Some Objections thereunto answered c. 12. p. 262 263 Created Habitual grace is in Christ in its full Latitude c. 3. p 46 The happiness of the glorified body consists especially in two things c. 15. p. 349 The third Heaven what c. 15. p. 342 With its name place and excellency c. 15. p. 342. to 346 Holinesse in God What c. 1. p. 16 Hunger legal or preparatory before faith or saving after faith c. 8. p. 284 I. The Incarnated Idaea of all things what c. 1.
7. Mutua immanentia circum incessio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Holy Ghost is God of himself no less then the Father is God of himself Hence there is an Original in regard of the manner of the Essence but not in regard of the Essence it self That Proposition in the Nycene Creed God of God is to be understood of God taken in a concrete sence that is for the Essence and manner of the Essence considered together not for God taken in an abstracted sence that is for the Essence considered absolutely Hence appeareth 1. The in-being of one Person in another John 14.10 11. 1 John 1. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father in me Because a person signifying both the Essence and its relative property all the Persons having one and the same Essence it followeth that in respect of the Essence one person is in another Thus John saith There are three that is three distinct Persons in respect of their relative opposition adding withal that these three are one namely in respect of the sameness of the Essence And here we may see the reason of those words of Christ John 8.19 If you had known me ye should have known my Father also he that hath seen me hath seen the Father 2. That all the Persons are equal Who being in the Form of God thought it no robbery to be equal with God Philip. 2.6 John 5.18 Either the Persons are equal or else because every Person is God there would follow an inequality and consequently an inferiority in God which is inconsistent with his perfection 3. That all the Attributes in that they flow from the Essence are true of every person because every person hath the whole Essence 4. That all the Attributes whether Relative Negative or Positive or if any other in that they proceed from the Essence are true of every person because the whose Essence as was now said is in every person The Father is Eternal the Son is Eternal the Holy Ghost is Eternal because the whole Essence is in every one of them yet there are not three Eternals but one Eternal because the Essence which is in them all is but one In like manner the Father is Infinite the Son is Infinite the Holy Ghost is Infinite yet c. And so of all the rest 5. That all the Works of God which concern the creature i. e. whatsoever is besides God Tho. 22● qu. 2. a. 3. Vrsin Explic Catech. Part. 2. qu. 25. q. 8. Keck Theol. lib. 1. cap. 3. propè finem are wrought by all the persons joyntly because the efficacy whereby they are what they are proceeds likewise from the Essence it self not from the manner of the Essence Moreover The Knowledge of the Trinity is necessary to salvation because saving faith hath for its object God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ God-man No man is saved without the knowledge of the Father No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him John 1.18 No man is saved without the knowledge of the Son Whosoever denyeth the Son the same hath not the Father 1 John 2.23 He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him John 5.23 1 John 5.20 No man is saved without the knowledge of the Holy Ghost Now if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Rom. 8.9 Even the Spirit of truth whom the world cannot receive because it seeth him not neither knoweth him but ye know him for he dwelleth with you and shall be in you John 14.17 God heareth none but such as call upon him in the Name of Christ none can call upon God in Christ but such as are taught and assisted by his Spirit We cannot worship God aright without the knowledge of the Trinity As God the Father Son and Holy Ghost is of the object of faith so is he of the object of divine worship Baptism is an Act of Worship and Seal of the Covenant but we are baptized into the Name of the Father Qui Patrem adorat distinctè simul etiam Filium Spiritum Sanctum adorat unitè Alsted Cas● conscien cap. 5. and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Matth. 28.19 God hath committed all judgment to the Son that all men should honour the Son as they honour the Fanher He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him John 5.22 23. Believers are the Temples of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 3.16 and 1 Cor. 6.19 The Lord of the Temple is worshipped in the Temple We worship the Trinity in Unity and the Unity in Trinity All obedience is to be performed unto God the Father Son and Holy Ghost To him that elected us that gave Christ to redeem us that created us that brought Israel out of Egypt that in a word doth all for us is obedience to be performed But God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and that as God the Father Son and Holy Ghost elected us gave Christ to redeem us created us c. Therefore unto God the Father Son and Holy Ghost is all obedience to be performed The Plurality of persons in the Trinity is of great use for the confirmation of the truth unto us John asserts that great truth of Jesus Christ being the Son of God and Saviour of all them that believe not only from the testimony of one God but from the testimony of that one God who is three Witnesses For there are three that bare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one 1 John 5.7 To the same purpose is the Argument Christ useth disputing against the Scribes and Pharisees proving the truth of what he had spoken concerning himself being the Light of the world because it was averred by the Father and him as two witnesses It is also written in your Law that the testimony of two men is true I am one that bare witness of my self and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me John 8.12.17 18. The Knowledge of the Trinity tends unto the Consolation of Believers Vide Estium in Col. 2.2 Paul affectionately desirous that the hearts of the Colossians might be comforted sheweth two special means thereof viz. The Acknowledgment of the Mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ with the full assurance of understanding and brotherly-love of God i. e. of God and of his Attributes of the Father i. e. of the Persons the first of which is the Father of Christ i. e. of his Person and Office so some without repugnancy to the Analogy of faith or the words of the text Lastly The Knowledge of the Doctrine of the Trinity is requisite to our Communion which as our union is with God the Father Son and Holy Ghost And truly our Fellowship is with the
Liberty of God in the Decree is Of the Liberty of the Decree i. e. Of God decreeing Deus ita liberè nos elegit ut potuerit etiam non eligere Zanch. de Nat. Dei lib. 3. cap. 4. qu. 6. God willing whatsoever is besides himself not of any necessity of nature but out of his meer good Pleasure Rom. 9.16 Ephes 1.4.11 1 Cor. 12.11 Matth. 20.15 and Matth. 11.25 26. The Liberty of God appeareth in his freedom from Necessity Moral Obligation Any Motive thereunto besides himself 1. He was free with freedom from necessity Scot. lib. 1. dist 39. n. 15. Objecta à Deo nequaquam necessariò voli●a esse demonstrare possimus quomodo tamen nutus divinus liberè transeat ad Objecta perscrutari non est nostrum Twiss praefat in libros de Sc. Med. Liberty is increated or created Created Liberty is in respect of the Acts themselves so men are said to be free Agents because they are free to act or not to act But Increated Liberty is in respect of the Objects not of the acts that is There is no necessary connexion between the being of the creature and the Being of God He might have been without the creature he had been God blessed for ever although that had been nothing for ever Each possibility which yet shall never be is equally founded in the Sufficiency of God with those things that have an actual being And the things that have an actual being might had God so pleased have remained in their nothing and possibilities that never shall be have had their actual beings God can do whatsoever he will though he will not do whatsoever he can He is Omnipotent but not Omnivolent 2. God is free in respect of any moral obligation so as that he had done the creature no wrong if he had never willed it to be he cannot become a debtor unto the creature otherwise then as he makes himself a debtor of his meer good pleasure 3. Extra Deum nulla causa officiens decreti esse possit quia Decretum Dei re ipsa nil aliud est quam ipsamet Essentia Dei decernens God is free from any Motive thereunto besides his own will There can be no Motive of Gods Will besides himself Not in the creature it self whether we suppose faith or good works foreseen or ought else Either the creature must be considered as it is in God or as it is in its own actual being but this is the effect of the Decree therefore cannot be the Motive thereof If as it is in God the Objective Being of the creature in God is nothing else but God himself considered as able to cause the creature to be as the futurition of the creature is God willing the creature to be Not in Christ whether we consider Christ in respect of his Incarnation Deus vult hoc esse propter hoc sed non propter hoc vult hoc Tho. p. 1. q. 19 art 5 Office or Acceptation he is not the cause but the effect of the Decree See Chap. 9. intitled Faith is the effect of special grace yea notwithstanding the Decree is rightly conceived by us according to the order of the end and the means conducing to that end yet the end willed of God is not the cause of Gods willing the means for that end because God willeth all that he willeth with one single act whether means or end Otherwise there would follow two Acts in God Twiss de Elect. which is inconsisting with his Nature who is one meer act God willeth one creature to be the cause of another Deus hoc vult esse hoc hoc propter hoc non autem propt r hoc vult Hoc est Deus vult effectus esse causas effectus esse pr. pter causas non tamen propter causas vult effectus Twiss lib. 1. de Elect. part 2. and to be for the use of another but yet that other thing is not the cause of Gods so willing God willeth both the Being of the Father and the Son and willeth the Father to be the means to beget the Son yet the Father is not the cause why God willeth the Son God hath willed the Sabbath and other creatures to be for the good and use of man so as man is the subordinate end of their being but yet man is not the cause of Gods willing their being to that end Man is the subordinate end of their being that are so willed but he is not the cause of Gods willing their being to that subordinate end Obj. 1. The Merit of Christ is the Cause of Election The Chiefe Objections made against the Doctrine of the Decree considered answered Christus ut Mediator non est praedestinationis causa sed effectum Pisc Cont. sch Th. 97. Ephes 1.4 6. Therefore the meer good pleasure of God is not the only cause of the Decree Ans We must distinguish between Election it self and the Application of the good of Election The merit of Christ is the cause of the application of the good of Election but not of Election it self Obj. 2 Faith foreseen is the cause of Election therefore the meer good pleasure of God is not the only cause of the Decree Ans Faith as every other creature considered without the Decree is but a possibility a may-be founded in the sufficiency of God who is able to give being to what he pleaseth and consequently to faith That this may-be become a shal-be i. e. That faith yet but a possibility passeth from the condition of a thing possible unto the condition of a thing that shall be can proceed from no other cause then the Decree or the Will of God Which one consideration well observed and applyed affordeth a sufficient answer to all objections arguing for any thing in the creature foreseen as a cause of the Decree This Proposition God electeth for faith foreseen inferreth a Succession of Acts in God Faith foreseen necessarily presupposeth a fore-going Decree concerning the being of that faith which is foreseen according to it Thus 1. God decreeth faith to be Neque enim actus aliqu s vilendi cum fit actus immanens in Deo suboritur de novo Twiss de Elect l. 1. p. 2. 2. Foreseeth that faith 3. Upon that faith foreseen passeth the Decree of Election so as the sight of faith coming between the two Decrees there must needs be two Acts and the second succeed the former But God is one Act in whom there is no succession It is as if one should say God intends to intend or he determineth to determine which cannot be true of God because it would not only imply divers Acts in God contrary to his simplicity and those divers acts to be by way of succession that is one after another contrary to his Eternity Deus voluit sibi rationem esse volendi aliquid praepostere dictū Twiss ibid. But also it
that necessary and infallible connexion with Eternal life whence salvation may be certainly promised to the person so qualified Or Saving Qualifications are taken improperly First Causally viz. instrumentally for the external means whereby a saving work is wrought so that act of hearing the Word by which faith is begotten in the heart is called saving 2. In respect of the purpose of God and so all previous dispositions intended by God as preparative unto a saving work afterwards to be wrought by him are by some called saving But we are to know that a saving work in the two last sences neither being saving properly nor having a personal promise of salvation made thereunto and therefore indeed is no saving work falleth not under the compass of this question By Faith we are to understand the Faith of Gods Elect which we ordinarily call justifying or saving Faith Concerning the varity of judgements The various judgements concerning the question touching the relation that qualifications before faith have unto conversion Some erre on the one hand with the Enthusiasts not giving them their due by denying any preparatory use of them more on the other by giving them too much we all being prone thereunto by reason of that legal self the remainders of which are yet dwelling in us Albeit we take so much from Christ as we overgive to them whose differing tenets together with their gradual aberrations from the truth and defections even unto the Pelagian heresie it may not be unprofitable in this place to take a brief notice of beginning with the last Pelagius affirmed that man merited grace by the Works of Nature Acta Scripta Synod Art 3 4. The Missilienses by Prosper called the reliques of Pelagians and commonly Semi-Pelagians affirmed that man by previous dispositions performed by the strength of nature obtained grace as a reward The Papists teach Bellarm. de Justif l. 1. c. 2 Zeged sum doct Papist That there are certain pre-requisite and preparatory Dispositions that merit the infusion of grace and justification which to them is the same and more then conversion is with us with the merit of congruity The Arminians taxe the Orthodox Acta Scripta Synod ubi supra Pemble alii for asserting all acts before faith to be sin and teach that there is in a man not regenerate that is vvithout faith a hunger and thirst after righteousness a hatred of sin and such other like acts which ought to be accounted acceptable unto God unto the communicating of further grace that to all such God giveth sufficient grace to believe and leaveth it in the power of such a soul vvhether it will believe or not Others vvith vvhom the fore-mentioned are not to be named reverend learned judicious and pious though they justly abhor the tenets of the fore-mentioned yet seem to teach that there are some qualifications before faith that are saving vvhereunto faith and salvation may be ascertained This tenet religiously premising all due reverence and high esteem in the Lord unto the persons This discourse I hope in the Spirit of Christ craveth leave to examine and also to propound the following considerations for the negative alvvays asserting That it is our duty to encourage orderly to the uttermost to believe in Christ and to hold forth the increase of hope according as the preparatory work doth increase yet not so far as certainly to promise faith or salvation or to deny yea or not to teach the soul before faith however qualified to be the object of and to lye under the si credideris that is the If you believe of the Gospel So as it remains a truth concerning the Soul yet without faith however qualified that if God shevveth it mercy it is free and meer mercy if he doth not shevv it mercy he doth it no vvrong and that his purpose to shevv or not to shevv mercy thereto is yet unrevealed Texts of Scripture against ascertaining Salvation to any qualifications before faith Mark 16.16 He that believeth not shall not be damned John 3.34 He that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Rom. 14.23 Whatsoever is not of faith is sin Heb. 11.6 But without faith it is impossible to please God 2 Cor. 13.5 Examine your selves whether you be in the faith prove your own selves Know you not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be Reprobates John 5.12 He that hath the Son hath life and he that hath not the Son hath not life John 15.5 For without me you can do nothing Rom. 8.9 Now if any have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Mat. 7.17 18. Even so every good tree brings forth good fruit but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit Mat. 12.33 Either make the tree good and his fruit good or else make the tree corrupt and his fruit corrupt 1 Cor. 13.2 3. And though I give my body to be burned and have not charity it profiteth me nothing Which charity they that are without justifying faith have not it being the effect thereof Gal. 5.6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but faith which worketh by love Rom. 8.2 For the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the Law of sin and death To assert the death of sin before the in-dwelling Spirit of Christ Jesus is to assert the effect before the cause So of the Scriptures the Arguments follow Arg. 1. To promise salvation before faith and consequently before Christ holds not correspondency vvith the rest of Gods Dispensation of his Acts of grace who so orders the administration thereof as that Christ may have the preheminence in all things Which appeareth by the follovving induction of some particulars God his love to his viz. Election is in Christ Ephes 1.4 The Meritorious Procuring of the effects of this love to be applyed viz. Redemption was wrought by Christ In the first actual application of this Love by effectual Vocation the Soul passively receiveth Christ by the infused grace of faith for unto Dr Ames putting the Souls passive receiving of Christ before the active I fully consent and conceive it manifest that the nature and very form of faith consisting in receiving of Christ it thence followeth that if the Soul acting faith that is by the second act of faith receiveth Christ actively then by the grace of faith viz. by the first act it receiveth Christ passively If then Gods Love to his be in Christ the meritorious procuring the effects of this Love to be applyed be by Christ the first actual application of this Love be the receiving of Christ judg whether it be agreeable to that administration which giveth unto Christ the preeminence in all things that the revelation of this Love which is clearly
implyed in a personal and certain promise of Salvation should be before him without him and so applyed unto the Soul where he is not and not rather suspended and waiting upon his presence as an honour to his actual coming and a peculiar favour to Beleevers that have received him That Proposition which is repugnant to part of the scope of the Gospel Argum. 2. which is to make Christ as acting in the way of his special grace to be all in matter of Salvation and man without Christ however qualified to be nothing in that respect is unsound But this Proposition asserting some saving qualifications before faith is such Ergo. If it be said The Asserters of such qualifications acknowledg them to be from Grace and from Christ I answer That is not enough to acknowledg such qualifications to be from God or Christ or Grace except it be in such a way namely of his peculiar grace viz. from God according to Election from Christ as Mediator and the designed Head of his Church and consequently from his special grace The Reason is because all things and all grace common and saving are from God and Christ but not in the same way The not distinguishing of Grace into common and special or saving troubles the understanding of the friends of Grace obscures the Doctrine of Grace and advantageth the Enemies of Grace Without it Pelagians Semi-Pelagians Arminians Papists and Orthodox are all confounded together for all acknowledg Grace To the Papist apologizing for himself Perkins Gal. 6.3 that he ascribes all to the praise of God Perkins answereth So did the Pharisee Luke 18.11 We deceive our selves in thinking we ascribe unto God if we do not ascribe unto him in his own way This one thing I desire the cordial Reader would weigh viz that the Satisfaction of Christ undertaken for us sinners could not have availed if there had not been some foregoing conjunction between us and Christ namely such whereby he was designed of God that he should be the Head of the Body whereof we are member Dr Ames Hoc unum perpendat venim cordatus Lector Ames Coron art 2. cap. 3. sat factionem illā Christi pro●nobis nocent●bus susceptam valere non potuisse nisi aliqua antecedente inter nos Christum conjunctione tali scilicet quâ designatus erat a Deo ut caput esset c rporis cujus nos sumus membra All saving blessings are said to be communicated unto us from Christ as in an Head Dr Ames Omnia salutari nobis dicuntur communicari a Christo ut in Capite Medulla lib. 1. cap. 24. num 6. Jun. Collat. ratio 8. Cain saith Junius was not partaker of a Saviour as a Saviour neither is any ungodly man partaker of him Cain servator●s non fuit particeps ●ut servatoris nec particeps ejus est impius quisquam Man is no partaker of a Saviour but of the works of a Saviour but the faithful are not only partakers of his works but also of the Saviour himself Junius Homo non est particeps Servatoris Idem ibid. rat 24. sed operum a Servatore fideles autē non solum participes operum sed ipsius Servatoris sunt If it now be said for else I see nothing here that can be said that these saving qualifications before faith are effects of Election and from Christ as acting in the way of his special grace that Reply shall receive its Answer in the next Argument Unto the person in whom there is no other qualification but that which is common viz. such as may be found in a Reprobate Faith and Salvation cannot be ascertained Argum. 3. But in an elect person yet not a Beleever there is no other qualification then what may be found in a Reprobate To make good this Argument let us 1. Shew the ground of the distinction of special or saving and common grace 2. Clear the terms 3. Confirm the Minor viz. that in an elect person yet not a Beleever there is no other qualification then what is the effect of common grace The term Grace is used for common grace Rom. 12.3 6. Ephes 3.8 1 Pet. 4.10 for saving grace Ephes 2.8 and elsewhere frequently upon which places and texts equivalent besides the general consent of Orthodox and learned Writers that distinction is sufficiently founded Common grace is that which those that are not elected may be and often are made partakers of Special or saving grace is that which floweth from Election as an effect and argument of Election and proper to the Elect. No effect of Election is before effectual Vocation of the very form whereof is the grace of faith Where is no life there is yet no effect of Election therefore no other but common grace But where there is no faith by which the Soul receiveth the Son 1 John 5.12 there is no life Therefore where there is no faith there is no other then common grace The person who notvvithstanding any qualification vvrought in him is yet nothing in point of Salvation is partaker of no other then common grace But every Soul hovvever qualified before faith is nothing in point of Salvation because the Soul that is vvithout faith is vvithout love and the Soul that hath not love hovvever qualified is nothing 1 Cor. 13.2 Until faith the Elect are children of Wrath even as others Ephes 2.3 Vocation is the first act of Election which springeth up or is exercised in man himself whence also it is that Vocation and Election are sometimes taken in the Scripture in the same sence altogether Ames Vocatio est primus actus Electionis qui in homine ipso exoritur Medul li. 1. cap. 26. nū 5. vel exercetur unde etiam est quod Vocatio Electio aliquando in Scripturis eodē planè sensu accipiuntur 1 Cor. 1.26 27 28. Calling is the first act of divine Mercy conversant about miserable men Dr Twisse Vocatio est primus actus misericordiae divinae Twiss de Praedest l. 1. p. 1. digres 9. Rhetorf de Gratia exercit 2. cap. 3. Cham. Tom. 3. l. 8. cap. 3. num 23. circa miseros versantis Effectual Calling is the first Mercy Mr Rutherford Vocatio efficax est prima misericordia Before Vocation all are said not to have obtained mercy This is to be understood of effectual Vocation whereby in time Paul was made another man Chamier Ante Vocationem omnes dicuntur misericordim non consecuti Hoc intelligi debet de Vocatione efficaci per quaem intempore factus est Paulus alius That Proposition which will not stand with Christs method of preaching the Gospel is not good Argum. 4. But this Proposition ascertaining Salvation before faith will not stand with Christs method of preaching the Gospel Mark 16.16 Therefore That very Proposition which the Holy Ghost calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Gospel viz. Whosoever beleeveth shall be saved is formally an indefinite Proposition offering
Salvation indefinitely and generally unto all upon the condition of beleeving not definitely particularizing and describing the persons and subjects in whom this qualification shall be wrought The Gospel propounds Salvation unto the Elect and non-elect yet unbeleeving not revealing Election or Reprobation in particular so as it is not only a truth That it is the duty of every one that hears the Gospel to beleeve and that whosoever beleeveth shall be saved but also it ministers equal hope unto all answerable to their preparatory proceeding of beleeving and being saved The Gospel holds forth Salvation before faith indefinitely not definitely generally not particularly conditionally to every one not absolutely unto any one it so giveth hope of Salvation to every hearer as it assureth none of Salvation but the Beleever This further appears in that an indefinite Proposition is logically resolved into a Categorick and a connex-singular Hence this indefinite Proposition Whosoever beleeveth shall be saved containeth a Command and a singular or particular-conditional Promise The Command Beleeve the particular-conditional Promise If you beleeve you shall be saved which conditional promise manifestly implyed Mark 16.16 John 3.16 is elsewhere formally expressed Revel 3.20 So that to preach the Gospel according to Christs method unto one without faith which is to offer free Salvation by Jesus Christ to every creature viz. to every perishing sinner that heareth it whether man or woman upon the condition of beleeving in Christ is to preach it with a Command and a conditional Promise Thus Beleeve If you beleeve you shall be saved not with a Command and an absolute personal Promise Thus Beleeve for 't is certain you shall beleeve and be saved So to do were 1. To deny Faith to be the first and firstly-formal condition of the Gospel by placing parting-withall or some other saving qualifications before it 2 To alter the method of the preaching ef the Gospel from Whosoever beleeveth shall be saved to Whosoever parteth withall or hath some other like qualification shall be saved 3. To preach part of the Decree sc Election in particular before the Gospel Argum. Ind bita misericordia 5. If it be a truth concerning every unbeleever however qualified that if Christ sheweth them mercy it is free and meer mercy if he doth not shew them mercy he doth them no wrong then there is no certain personal or particular promise of mercy under which Faith and Salvation and every spiritual blessing in heavenly things is contained made unto any unbeleever But it is a truth concerning every one yet not a believer however qualified That if Christ sheweth them mercy it is free and meer mercy if he doth not shew them mercy he doth them no wrong Rom. 9.15 16. whereby shewing mercy understand though not only effectual vocation viz. the creating of the grace of faith whereby the soul is made a believer and actually one of God his people 1 Cor. 7.25 Rom. 11.30 31. 1 Pet. 2.10 Arg. 6. No one whilest he is in such a condition wherein whilest he continueth it is impossible to please God can be ascertained of salvation But every unbeliever however qualified whilest an unbeliever is in such a condition wherein it is impossible he should please God Heb. 11.6 Therefore no unbeliever however qualified can be ascertained of salvation Arg. 7. All those who are in such a condition to which the Scripture speaks wrath certainly viz. that they shall be damned unto those whilest such the Scripture doth not promise salvation certainly But every unbeliever in that he is yet dead in trespasses and sins Ephes 2.1 is in such a condition to vvhich the Scriptures speak wrath certainly Ephes 2.3 Mark 16.16 Therefore Arg. 8. That Proposition that affirmeth salvation to be personally ascertained unto them who are in such a condition wherein the Scripture pronounceth them to be under the Law Rom. 7.6 under the Curse Gal. 3.13 under sin Rom. 11.32 is not sound Otherwise the Scripture should curse and bless speak life and death to the same person in the same condition and consequently contradict it self But this Proposition ascertaining salvation to some qualification before faith affirmeth the Scripture to ascertain salvation unto them who are in such a condition vvherein the Scripture pronounceth them to be under the Law the curse and sin for such is the condition of every one before faith under the Law Rom. 7.6 Under the curse Gal. 3.13 Under sin Rom. 11.32 Therefore Arg. 2. No Proposition ascertaining salvation unto such a qualification which is a sin is good But this Proposition ascertaining salvation unto such a qualification as is performed by one without faith is a Proposition ascertaining salvation unto a sin Therefore Meer restraint from sin is not sin but the unbelievers restraint from sin is sin his best actions are painted sins because his person not being accepted his action cannot be accepted and selfe is predominant The best works of an unbeliever vvhat common grace soever be found in them are sins for the reason before mentioned Good works of believers though they have sin in them yet they are not sins because their persons being accepted such actions of theirs wherein grace is predominant are also accepted in the Righteousness of Jesus Christ Hence the very parting with sin that is before faith is a sin Arg. 10. No Proposition ascertaining salvation unto a work or as it were unto a work to speak proportionably to Apostles Phrase Rom. 9.32 is good But this Proposition ascertaining salvation unto a qualification before faith is a Proposition ascertaining salvation unto a work or as it were unto a work Because no action performed by an unbeliever can be an act of faith their best actions must either be acts of faith or not of faith therefore works or as it were works A Promise of salvation made unto a Work though not for a Work in any person before faith is legal Because the person that is without faith is under a legal state Therefore all his actions proceeding from him in that estate must needs be legal So of the Arguments the Authorities follow The first Effect of Predestination is Christ himself Zanch. de ● Nat. Dei lib. 5. c. 2. Th. 2. dwelling in our hearts by his Spirit as a Mediatour and Saviour Primum igitur praedestinationis Effectum est Christus ipse ut Mediator ac Servator in cordibus nostris per Spiritum inhabi●ans The Elect before they are called to Christ can never be certain of their Election Zanchy Electi antequam vocentur ad Christum nunquam de sui Electione certisunt He speaks too indistinctly who promises certainty of salvation unto men we more considerately who promise it only to believers Chamierus Nimis indistinctè loquitur Cham. Tom. 3. lib. 13. cap 17. Num. 20. qui kominibus promittit certitudinem salutis nos consideratiùs qui tantum fidelibus To whom doth the Promise oblige God except it be unto him who
that which none denyeth namely that a Beleever is dead to sin before Marriage-union between Christ and the Soul that is before the act of faith for Marriage-union is not without the act of faith on our part which also is acknowledged by them with whō this discours argueth But it doth in no case affirm which must be carefully attended to that we are dead to sin before the grace of faith The death of sin is in order after the grace of faith in Vocation The infusion of faith and grace infers the death of sin the immediate effect thereof as the income of life expelled death in the Shunamites child 2 King 4. The Sum is That before our Marriage union with Christ I mean before in order of nature not in time there is first The grace of faith 1. The death of sin 3. The act of faith and this last according to your own grant before the act of faith is both the grace of faith and the death of sin Before the death of sin is the grace of faith Before the grace of faith nothing that is saving Obj. 2. Matth. 13.44 Selling all is placed before buying But by selling we are to understand parting with sin By buying believing Therefore there is a saving Qualification viz. Selling of all or parting with sin before faith Ans In answer to this Objection it will be convenient First to distinguish the terms viz. selling of all or parting from sin which may be applicable and useful for the resolving of sundry other occasional objections and afterwards speak to the Text. The souls selling of all or parting from sin is either before faith viz. Preparatory or Legal so called not always from the means namely the Law by which such a parting with sin is wrought but also from the state of the soul still continuing under the Law notwithstanding any Gospel-work And it is nothing else but such a measurable conviction of the impotency and unprofitableness of all lusts and carnal confidences which the soul before counted gain as that novv it letteth them all go as loss so far as it ceaseth to live upon them any longer Rom. 11.24 Philip. 3.8 Matth. 18.25 Luke 15.14 17. It is the same in effect with a lost estate This preparatory parting from sin is either external consisting in the conforming of the outward man unto the practise of known duties and the restraint of the outward man from knovvn sin Philip. 3.6 2 Pet. 2.20 Or Internal consisting in the legal restraint of the invvard man from sin for this Restraint being understood savingly and properly is in appearance only but not in truth whether to our selves or others together with such spiritual gifts and enlargements as are wrought by the common Gospel-work of the Spirit Or else the souls parting with sin is after faith viz. saving which is threefold 1. Habitual namely the death of sin or destroying of the body of death Rom. 6.6 Chap. 7.14 which is wrought by the infusion of the Spirit of life in Vocation herein the soul is passive it being the immediate effect thereof as the in-come of life was the expelling of death in the Shunamites child Or as the cessation of darkness is the effect of light coming into the air Here is the cessation of the reign of sin 2. Repentance viz. Evangelical part of which consists in sorrow for sin as sin and aversness from sin as sin in which the soul is active 3. Mortification which is a part of Sanctification wherein the soul is also active The Distinction premised the Text remains to be spoken to vvhich being a parable it is seasonable in the interpretation thereof to make use of that generally received and commanded Rule viz. That the principal Scope is to be attended the Metaphors not to be urged above what is consonant to other Scriptures where the same truth is taught in proper and simple terms Calvin Cartwright Junius Chemnitius Piscator Pareus in their Commentaries upon the place seem not to understand conversion to be the Scope of this Parable but rather that it intends the constancy of such who are already converted in the profession of the truth of the Gospel though they should be called to suffer the loss of all yea of life it self in testimony thereunto But be it supposed That Conversion is the Scope of this Parable and so the main intent thereof to be that the soul must part with all that maketh it preparatorily uncapable of believing before it can believe yet selling of all is to be understood of a preparatory not of a saving selling of all 1. Because Selling preparatorily fully answereth the Scope of the place 2. Because Selling savingly is the act of a living spiritual man vvhich none can be vvithout faith as selling civilly is the act of a natural living man Adde hereunto That it being supposed that by buying vve are to understand the first act of faith wherein the soul is active and by selling all a saving parting with sin which yet with due submission to better Judgements appeareth not to be the true meaning of the place yet even this interpretation concludes only a saving selling of all or parting with sin before the act of faith according to the sence of the distinction and as you may please to see therein which is not the matter here controverted but it doth not conclude any saving selling of all or parting with sin before the grace of faith which is the question The Sum of this Ansvver is The Text in that it is a Parable through our infirmity is the more apt to suffer by a mis-interpretation If it be taken in the first sence according to the Commentators above-mentioned it concerns not the question If taken in the latter sence whether selling of all be interpreted preparatorily or savingly it doth not conclude the question that is It doth in no sence hold forth a saving parting with sin before the grace of faith Obj. 3. Salvation is promised unto hungering thirsting poverty of spirit seeking repentance c. which are qualifications preceding faith therefore salvation may be promised to some qualification before faith Ans All Objections raised from these and the like promises vvhereof there are many in the Scriptures may receive a full answer by the right application of the distinction of qualifications into Preparatory or Legal vvhich go before faith And Saving or Evangelical vvhich follow faith intimated before in the beginning of the Answer to the second Objection Accordingly there is a Poverty Luke 4.18 Revel 3.17 A Hunger Luke 15.14 Isai 65.13 A Thirst Isai 65.13 A Seeking Luke 13.24 A Repentance Mark 1.15 Matth. 27.3 All without faith and in judgement of charity before faith viz preparatory poverty Poenitentia Legalis Poenitentia Evangelica Bucan loc 30. Poenitentia Interna salutaris Poenitentia Externa disciplinaris Spanh Exc. de gr●●● Sect. 32. Sitis totalis indigentiae fruitionis complacentiae partialis Ames Coron Art 5. Recipiscentia
and a conditional Promise in particulur If you beleeve you shall be saved Mark 16.16 3. God doth seriously invite beseech and charge them all to beleeve 4. Their beleeving is a high honour pleasure and service done unto Christ above all the dishonour and grief that their unbelief and sin hath been or can be unto him 'T is a greater honour unto them hereby to crown him with his Crown of Glory then to be crowned by him with the Crown of tender Mercy 5. That if they do beleeve in him they shall be saved 6. Notwithstanding the wholesom use even in this place of the Doctrine of the Decree in general yet as they cannot make application of it in particular for them so neither ought they to make application of it in particular against them but to look unto their duty which is to beleeve 7. 'T is a sin for any to beleeve they are not elected and therefore they shall not beleeve 8. As such who live under the Gospel have a ministerial hope Jer. 2.25 Ephes 2.12 Heb. 3.7 Isai 56.3 the Gentiles were far off the Jews were nigh so such to whom God doth not only offer Salvation in the Ministry but moveth upon their hearts by his Spirit they have a preparatory hope Isai 55.6 Psal 27.8 32.6 95.7 8. Acts 2.38 39. 2 Cor. 6.2 Ephes 2.17 9. According as the Preparatory Work doth kindly proceed it admitting degrees so their preparatory hope if you please by that name to let it be distinguished from the ministerial hope before mentioned is encreased Zech. 9.11 12. Mark 12.34 10. The Soul measurably prepared looking unto and thirsting after Christ Jesus as propounded in the Gospel in the diligent use of means is in respect of preparatory work nextly disposed and immediately called to beleeve 11. There can be no Example found in the whole Scripture that ever God forsook such a Soul which did not first forsake him Self-encouragements from qualifications are Legal and therefore please us best Encouragements according to truth are Evangelical and therefore will help us best Error in it self tends not to our furtherance nor Truth to our hinderance Truth is a far better encouragement then Error That there is before faith hope in the use of means and ordinarily not otherwise encourageth unto diligence and deters from negligence That before faith there is not certainty leaveth place for legal humiliation and the spirit of bondage and bloweth upon the glory of all flesh without Christ Hereby the Soul however qualified justifieth God if he sheweth no mercy Mar. 16.16 John 3.16 Revel 3.20 2 Tim. 2.25 Aug. l. 5. de Pers cap. 16. Cavendū est igitur vè dū timeamus vè tepescat hortatio extinguatur oratio accendatur elatio waiteth under the If you beleeve of the Gospel for mercy magnifieth God for free and undeserved mercy being made partaker thereof It is not an inconsiderable part of this Cause that was acted by Augustine one thousand two hundred years since though more tacitly and in its principles where he used that approved speech of his We must take heed lest whilest we fear our Exhortation being cooled Prayer be damped and Pride inflamed That the Soul in measure prepared called immediately to beleeve wait in the use of means with preparatory hope under the If you beleeve of the Gospel for Christ as acting by his special grace to ingenerate faith whereby the Soul passively receives him and whence through assisting grace it may by the act thereof come unto him is the method of the Gospel ought to be the direction of the Ministry and course of the Soul being Christs own way and therefore the most hopeful and most speedy way for the attaining of faith and salvation thereby CHAP. IX Of the first Object of Saving Faith IN the Discussing and clearing of this truth concerning the Object of Faith Consider 1. What an Object in general is 2. The Distribution of the Object of Faith 3. What the special and primary Object of Saving Faith is 4. The Order of Faith 5. That it is the duty of all to believe 6. The Difficulty of believing 7. The Means and Manner whereby Faith is wrought 8. Some principa Motives to believe An Object properly so called An Object in general What Objectum est circa quod res vel rei operatio versatur The Distinction of the Object of Faith is that about which the operation of a thing is primarily excercised and unto which it is of it self naturally ordered and directed So Truth is the Object of the understanding Good is the Object of the Will The Object of Faith is either universal scil the whole revealed Will of God Acts 24.14 Believing all things which are written in the Law and the Prophets Or special scil the Gospel or revealed saving Will of God and this is either Primary viz. God himself Father Son and Holy Ghist and Jesus Christ God-man propounded with a Command to believe 1 John 3.23 And a Promise of Salvation to them that do belieeve Mark 16.16 Or Secondary namely The good obtained by believing which because it is contained in the promises therefore the promises are called the Secondary Object of Faith As a Spouse is first married to the person i. e. her Husband before she enjoyeth any conjugal communion with him so we first by faith receive the Person of Christ before we are made partakers of the benefits of Christ bestowed upon believers Union precedes communion God and Christ are the Object of our Faith the Benefits following upon Christ received are the effect and end of our faith The Special Primary What the Special and Primary Object of Saving Faith is and next Object of saving Faith may briefly be conceived under this Proposition viz. Jesus Christ a Saviour to all believers and consequently unto me believing The Special and Primary Objects of saving Faith more largely considered is that gracious Truth and Testimony of God concerning Christ whereby he is tendered as a free and sufficient Saviour to every one that heareth and receiveth it with a Command to believe and a Promise That whosoever believeth shall be saved This Proposition concerning the Object of Faith containeth in it these particulars 1. That the Merit of Christ is all sufficient i. e. of sufficent virtue to have saved all men 2. That God doth seriously tender Jesus Christ as a sufficient Saviour to all unto whom the sound of the Gospel cometh 3. That every one that heareth the tender of the Gospel is bound to believe 4. That all that hear the Gospel are Ministerially equally capable of believing 5. That whosoever believeth shall be saved This Truth concerning Christ about which saving Faith is firstly and immediately exercised is by judicious Divines properly called the Object of Faith the Gospel Mark 16.15 16. Go ye into the world and preach the Gospel to every creature He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved The Testimony 1 John 5.11
And this is the record that God hath given to us Eternal life and this life is in his Son The Word of Promise and saving Faith or the efficatious Relation of this Promise are Relates Hence Faith is compared to a Seal John 3.33 He that hath received his testimony hath set to his seal that God is true As the impression upon the wax answereth to the character of the seal so faith answereth the truth of this testimony or promise The promise is the mouth of Christ faith is the mouth of the souls by this act of faith upon the object of faith Christ and the soul kiss one another Kiss the Son Psal 2.12 As also by the reflex act of faith upon the testimony of his love by the Spirit Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth Cant. 1.2 By faith they saluted the promises Heb. 11.13 Here take seasonable and just notice That Election or Gods Intent concerning his Elect in the Work of Redemption is no part of the primary Object of saving Faith The Rule of Faith as it bindeth all is the first object of faith As the Command not the Decree is the rule of that obedience that floweth from faith so the Command not the Decree is the rule of the obedience of the grace exercise of faith it self for the better understanding whereof compare that act of saith whereby we believe in Jesus Christ a sufficient Saviour to every one that believeth in him which containeth the object of faith with the act of faith whereby we believe in Jesus Christ intended of God to be a Saviour unto us or believe that we are elected or that we are redeemed or that Christ died for us which all with others of like nature are the same in effect containing somewhat of Election of Gods Intent concerning his Elect in the Work of Redemption and their difference will appear in respect first of their object The first propounds Christ as the actual existing cause of salvation to the unbeliever believing The second propounds the Intent of God or Christ concerning our salvation The first holdeth out our duty but not the certain intent of God concerning our estate The holdeth forth purposely the certain intent of God concerning our estate The first holdeth forth a remedy scil the object to be believed in by a sinner that he may be justified the second holdeth forth consolation unto a sinner justified The first is faith in Christ the second is a faith concerning Christ Secondly These acts of faith differ in respect of their subjects the first is principally in the Will though it be also in the understanding the second is principally in the Understanding though it be also in the will Thirdly They differ in respect of Order we first believe in Christ a Saviour before we can believe that God intended Christ to be a Saviour unto us Fourthly They differ in respect of time The first looks at Christ as one who is present the second looks at the Intent of God and Christ which is a thing that is past Lastly They differ in their nature The first giveth us our being in Christ or at most extends not beyond our being in and union with Christ the second is the acknowledgement of what is done Obj. Divines frequently teach That Christ propounded in the simple term Christ neither containing truth nor falshood is the Object of Faith and not Christ held forth in a Proposition Suppose such as is before expressed viz. Jesus Christ a Saviour unto all believers and consequently unto me believing or any other to the like effect Ans The Object of Faith is considered two wayes Objectum fidei appellatur illud quod creditur vel illud de quo aliquid creditur quod creditur est propositio vel enuntiabile de quo creditur est res simplici termino significata Objectum dupliciter consideratur ex parte rei credita sic Objectum sidei est semper aliquid incomplexum vel ex parte credentis sic Objectum sidei est illud enuntiabile quod de illa re sides apprehendit Tho. 22 ae qu. 1. art 2. Durand l. 3. dist 24. q. 1. Davenant in Col. 1. either in respect of the thing believed so the Object of faith is the thing it self concerning which the Proposition of faith is formed propounded in a simple term wherein there is neither a truth nor falshood as Christ Creation Resurrection c. Or in respect of the Believer and so the Object of Faith is the thing which is to be believed held forth in a Proposition as that Christ is a Mediatour and Saviour that Christ shall come to judgement c. The present discourse acknowledging both considerations I chuse to speak in the latter as being more easie to the understanding of the Reader The Doctrine of the Gospel taken in a limited sense viz. for the first Objection of saving faith which the Reader is here desired to re-mind besides those particulars lately forementioned as contained in the Proposition concerning the Object of faith holdeth forth these remarkable truths 1. It is such as remaineth a truth concerning every one that heareth it 2. It is such the participation whereof every hearer is in equal Ministerial capacity of preparatory work which is common both to the Elect and Reprobate being alike in them 3. It is such as that all who hear the Gospel preparatory work being alike are equally bound to believe 4. 'T is such as ministers unto Judas in case of belief as much cause to hope in respect of the Promise as unto John and leaveth John in case of unbelief in as much cause to despair in respect of the curse as Judas that is notwithstanding the usefulness of the Doctrine of the Decree in general Here is no more place for Arguments either of encouragement or discouragement from personal Election or Reprobation then if there were no Decree Such as attests unto the formidableness and danger of the guilt of the least sin and also of greater sin proportionably in the offender whilest it testifies the greatest sins to be abundantly pardonable unto the penitent Believer it takes away from the impenitent all occasion to presume from the penitent all occasion of despair Sin appears no where more nor no where less then in the Gospel There is a Mystery of Wisdom in propounding this part of the Mystery of the Gospel namely the first Object of saving Faith unto a Soul as yet not effectually called so as all and only the pertinent truth may be spoken without any errour on the one hand or on the other either concerning the Decree Christ the Persons called to believe the Condition of those Persons or Motives to believing Quest How can God command them to believe conconcerning whom he hath decreed that they shall not believe Not Gods pleasure what shall be but his pleasure what shall be our duty together with our obligation is the ground of the Command
There is a double necessity either of coaction or of infallibility The Decree puts upon men a necessity of infallibility not of coaction or compulsion Necessity of infallibility doth not prejudice liberty God is necessarily good yet freely good he is goodness it self and perfection it self Man acts as freely as if there were no Decree yet as infallibly as if there were no liberty See this undenyably manifest in a disjunctive Demonstration Thomas will either come into this room or not come into this room he cannot both come into this room and not come into this room he will do that of these two freely which God hath decreed infallibly The being of the Will of whose essence liberty is consists with the Decree of God therefore also the acting of the Will Liberty is the effect of the Decree so far is the Decree from prejudicing liberty Quest How can they have hope to believe whom God hath decreed shall not believe Ans Hope is grounded on Gods revealed Will not upon the Decree unrevealed according to the revealed Will of God every person that hears the Gospel is equally capable of believing It is a sin for any to believe they are reprobated We are according to ordinary dispensation to look at all living under the Gospel as elected in the judgement of charity 'T is the duty of every one to whom the Object of Faith is propounded to believe and 't is the duty of every Believer to believe that he is elected We are to make use of the Decree according to the Command that is to sanctifie God in the general Doctrine thereof to apply our selves unto our duty namely to believe and to forbear any particular and personal application thereof before we do believe Saving Faith hath for its Object God and Christ yet so Of the Ord●● of Faith as we first believe in Jesus Christ God-man a Saviour unto them that do believe and by Christ we believe in God the the Father Son and Holy Ghost a God and Father unto them that believe in him For the fuller understanding whereof these four following Propositions are to be considered and made good 1. Propos 1. Resp nd neminē salvatum fuisse in veteri testamento nisi qui ●eum unum trinū agnoverit Keck Th. lib. 1. Propos 2. That God the Father Son and Holy Ghost is of the Object of Saving Faith No man was ever saved without this faith no man ever called upon God but by the help of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 12.3 As no man can say that Jesus is the Christ so neither can any man say that God is God but by the Foly Ghost Neither did God ever hear any man that called upon him for salvation but for his Sons sake 2. Jesus Christ God-man is of the Object of Faith and therefore to be believed in John 14.1 Believe also in me Acts 16.31 And they said Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved and thy house Acts 20.21 Testifying both to the Jews and also to the Greeks repentance towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ Acts 2.18 That they may receive forgiveness of sins and inheritance amongst them that are sanctified by faith in me We are commanded to believe in Christ 1 John 3.23 And this is his Commandment that we should believe in the Name of his Son Jesus Christ By Jesus Christ we are not to understand the divine and humane nature only but that Person that consists of both Natures that is Jesus Christ God-man Because the Man Christ Jesus is God As none can be the formal primary and proper Object of Faith but he that is God faith being a part of divine moral worship and therefore giving divine honour to him in whom we do believe so it is also manifest that he that is God is to be believed in it being evident from the Nature of God that whosoever rightly knoweth him must forthwith acknowledge that he is absolutely to be believed in according to what he reveals They that know thy Name will put their trust in thee Psal 9.10 Because as God-man he is our Saviour This is a great part of the difference between the first and the second Covenant The Object of Faith in the first Covenant was God the Father Son and Holy Ghost but not Jesus Christ God-man Mediatour The Object of Faith in the second Covenant is both God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ God-man Mediatour In the first Covenant man might have believed in God without believing in Christ but man could never believe in Christ without believing in God Hence Paul desires to know nothing but Christ Our communion is by Faith in the Son of God Gal. 2.20 And the life which I now live in the stesh I live by the Faith of the Son of God Therefore we have faith in the Son of God As Christ is the Object of divine Worship Acts 7.59 Revel 5.12 of saving Hope Col. 1.27 of our greatest love 1 Cor. 16.22 of our absolute service Rom. 14.9 18. so he is the Object of our divine Faith We believe both in God and Christ Prop. 3. John 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me John 17.3 And this is life eternal that they may know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent So the first and third Articles of the Apostles Creed I believe in God the Father Almighty and in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord. Calvin reprehends those Calv. instit l. 2. c. 6. Sect. 4. l. 3. c. 2. Sect. 1. Ipsa veritas Deus Dei Filius homine assumpto non tamen consumpto eandem constituit atque fundavit fidem ut ad Deum iter esset homini per hominem Deum hic est enim Mediator Dei hominum Christus Iesus as highly injurious to miserable souls who by calling God the Object of Faith simply in the mean while omit Christ without whom there can be no faith nor access unto God The Object of Faith is God and Christ Mediatour we must have both to found our faith upon We cannot believe in God except we believe in Christ We in order not in time believe first in Christ Propos 4. and by Christ in God who by him do believe in God 1 Pet. 1.21 From the Institution of God I am the way John 14.6 From the Office of Christ he is a Mediatour There is one God and one Mediatour between God and man Vide August de Civ Dei lib. 11. cap. 2. Per totum Dr Sibs Ser. 2. upon John 14.1 Christus qua Redemptor est fidei objectum mediaatum non ultimum per Christū enim credimus in Deum Med. lib. 1. cap. 3. It is the duty of all to believe Quia fides nec exigitur nec exigi potest ab omnibus singulis c. Span. Ex●r de gra univers Annot in Sect. 25. N. 13. Molin Anat. of Armin. c.
the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Now Christ dying as a publck Person for the sins of the Elect and rising again as a publick Person for the justification of the Elect. It was more to raise Christ from the dead then it hath or vvill be to raise all the Elect from sin or then it will be to raise all the dead at the last day Hence in the working of faith in the soul God is not only said to move the soul but to dravv it None can come to me Except the Father which hath sent me draw him John 6.44 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dravving is an Act wherein the Agent putteth forth his might for us To believe is said to be the Work of God John 6.29 Emphatically so called not only because of its special acceptableness unto God but also because he is the Efficient of it and that with a preëminent efficacy of the Authour shining forth in this Work compared with his other works God is able to graffe them in again Rom. 11.23 in the ingenerating of faith in Christ and uniting of the soul unto Christ are manifested both the inability of man and the ability of God Here appears the Elects malice unto Christ and Christs love unto the Elect the evil of the spirit of corrupt nature and the good of the Spirit of grace Sarah her conceiving of Isaac whose birth was a figure of regeneration Gal. 4. was a great Work a Miracle Mary her conception of Christ by the Power i. e. by the Command and Blessing of the Holy Ghost was also a great Work a Miracle but for Christ to be formed in the soul by believing is a greater-Work Christ himself the Object of Faith is the greatest of Gods Works the Creation of Faith in Christ that is to make a sinner a believer may be reckoned amongst those that are next thereunto 3. Concerning the Greatness and Largeness of the Obedience of Faith consider that as in unbelief and its consequences there is unspeakable disobedience So faith besides vvhat is formally contained in its proper nature hath an influence unto all new obedience Amongst other notable Services implyed in Faith it necessarily presupposeth these great duties First The right discerning of its Object an Act of such high contentment unto Christ as that he professeth himself to be ravished therewith Cant. 4.9 Secondly The Denial of our selves in matter of our righteousness Philip. 3.8 9. Yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the Excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith Thirdly Denial of our own wills As the Camel passeth through the Needles eye so is the Will unravel'd littled nothing'd by being brought to faith in Christ Jesus Mat. 19.24 Fourthly The Denial of our own glory John 5.44 How can ye believe which receive honour one of another and seek not the honour that cometh from God only The Obedience of the Law vvas perfect and glorying giving glory unto man Rom. 4.2 For if Abraham were justified by works he hath whereby to glory but not before God The Obedience of the Gospel is perfect and humble giving glory unto Christ that is unto God in and by Christ Rom. 4.20 Abraham was strong in Faith giving glory to God Fides pro varia dispositione ipsi ad Objecta varia vir utes omnes habitus omnes bo●os ia se continet tanquam proprietates in forma virtualitèr ab ipsa perdentes in actu secundo Ames de traduct peccat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Covenant of Grace makes man as holy as the Covenant of Works and more lowly And as Faith in it self necessarily presupposeth these high and supernatural Services so as was intimated a little before hath it also in relation to the exercise of all other graces an influence into universal obedience By Faith we are united to Christ Ephes 3.17 By Faith we are justified Rom. 5.1 By it we perform all duties of both Tables Gal. 2.20 By it we persevere 1 Pet. 1.5 And lastly By it we are saved Ephes 2.8 To shew the Eminence of the Obedience of Faith The Truth that is to be believed is called the Truth John 8.44 At least as some take the place the Witness That God gave of his Son 1 John 5.10 the Command 1 John 3.23 And to believe is called the the Work John 6.29 No marvel therefore if it be said 'T is easier to keep the whole Law then to believe Seeing by faith we receive Christ himself and from him legal obedience imputatively and assisting power in our ovvn persons practically to fulfil all new obedience Evangelically Because also there is more power required to make Adam a believer then either to have created or continued him in the state of innocency wherein had he persevered he had fully answered the Law The Grace of Creation confirming grace being superadded sufficed to that the Grace of Redemption is requisite to this Gods pleasure vvas enough without any cost for that but this besides the good pleasure of the Lord cost God his Son and Christ his Blood in that the Soul vvas a meer nothing and so could do nothing for it self yet being but a meer nothing it made no resistance but here besides the helplesness of a meer nothing there is also the enmity of a most corrupt thing The Believer obeyeth both Law and Gospel we obey the Law legally in our Surety the Gospel perfectly in our ovvn persons with the perfection of parts or sincerely in this life with the perfection of degrees in the life to come Believers obey the Law legally in their Surety Legi satisfecimus in Christo justificamur praedita eâ justitia quam lex à nobis postulat Piscat in Rom. 8.4 because in him vve obey the Precept Do this Levit. 18.5 and satisfied the curse Thou shalt dye Gen. 2.17 The believer hath satisfied the Law in Christ through faith in vvhom vve are endued vvith that righteousness which the Law requireth Rom. 8.4 and 10.4 Believers obey the Gospel perfectly vvith the perfection of parts The Gospel is the Law in Christ the Rule of Righteousness is the same both in the Lavv and in the Gospel though the manner and end of obeying are changed the manner of obedience under the Lavv was by the Grace of Creation the manner of obedience under the Gospel is by the Grace of Redemption i. e. by the Grace of Jesus Christ A great end of obeying under the Law vvas That vve might obtain life as due unto us for perfect obedience thereunto in a way of justice The great end of obeying under the Gospel is thankfulnese
of this truth to wit That God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself not imputing their trespasses unto them appeareth in that he doth not only express a special rejoycing in Spirit because the preaching of this Doctrine was made part of his Commission but also in that from hence he dignifieth the Dispensation of the Gospel with two titles a Et hic insignis locus si quis alius in toto Paulo Calv. in loc 1. The Ministery of Reconciliation 2 Cor. 5. ver 18. 2. The Word of Reconciliation ver 19. It is called the Word of Reconciliation 1. Because it makes known Reconciliation absolutely and actually procured 2. Because the Ministery thereof is the external means whereby the Spirit worketh reconciliation in us applyeth reconciliation to us and causeth us to receive the reconciliation applyed b Spanh Ex de grat univ annot in Sect. 17. N. 8. Rom. 5.11 c Si credis Christus pro te mortuus est Est Propositio vera ratione nexus antec● dentis consequentis non ratione ullius causalitatis quasi per sidem nostram fiat ut Christus pro●●bis mortuus fuerit Span● annot ad defens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. N. 4. To say Christ dyed for us if we do believe is a true Proposition if understood in respect of the inseparable connexion of the Antecedent and the Consequent but false if understood in way of Causality The vigorous grace of the Gospel runneth better being held out thus Christ dyed for his when sinners and enemies that they might infallibly believe 3. The Proposition of the Gospel that is of Christ with a Command to believe and a Promise that every one that believes shall be saved d Redemptio impetrata nō si credant sed ut credant Idem annot in Sect. 21. 4. The acceptableness of this Obedience unto God as unbelief is in its manner all disobedience so to believe containeth in its manner all obedience To receive Christ is the greatest pleasure to reject Christ is the greatest grief unto the Spirit of grace This one act of faith is more acceptable unto God then the performing all legal obedience of the first Covenant The obedience of justifying faith is more acceptable then the disobedience of Adams sin Original sin and actual sin is unacceptable 5. Interpret God in the best sence according to his revealed Will. The Elect stumble not finally at sinful unreasonable and malicious Cavils touching the secret purpose of God concerning them in particular but acknowledge it their duty to magnifie the free tender of grace and to interpret God according to his revealed Will and accordingly to apply themselves to their acknowledged duty The woman of Canaan ceaseth not her suit but gathers upon Christ even from appearing discouragements Matth. 15.22 28. It is unlikely that Jonah denouncing only destruction to the Ninevites and being exceedingly displeased that they were spared incouraged them to believe yet God purposing outward mercy to them See how the King is stirred up to incourage both himself and them to fasting and turning from their evil way upon this ground of hope Who can tell if God will turn and repent notwithstanding destruction threatned Jonah 3.4 9. Did ever any poor shipwracked creature yet floating and striving amongst others in the waves for life Vide Examplum Medici Nautarum Alumni upon the unexpected approach of some tender-hearted Mariner casting out his lines and calling upon them all indefinitely to take hold thereupon and save their lives Did ever I say such a poor creature reject the opportunity because the Marriner had not as yet expressed his affection touching him in particular Spanhem Ex. de grat univ Annot. ad def 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. N. 2. 6. Full Satisfaction to all Objections No Objection can be answered without Christ all Objections are answered by Christ Christ is compared to a garment Rom. 13.14 As the garment is fitted for a person so is Christ fit for the lost soul As all other Objections so those in particular raised and aggravated from the Circumstances of the Nature Number Continuance Conviction of sin c. Vanish before the grace of the Gospel rightly understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rō 5.17 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 20. Christs obedience being in all respects infinite exceeds infinitely all mans disobedience Where sin abounded grace did ●uch more abound Rom. 5.20 That very Rule of Obedience which you have broken is fully obeyed and the debt for such disobedience as you are guilty of is fully satisfied Object I am unworthy c. Answ As if you should say I have no merit therefore God will have no mercy There is no salvation for me by the Law therefore there is no salvation for me by the Gospel 'T is most true we have no merit 't is as true Christ hath enough If you look at God with a legal eye so the least sinner is uncapable but if you look at him with an Evangelical eye so the greatest sinner is capable of mercy This Objection is so far from being a real Objection as that the sence of our unworthiness renders us so much the more capable the contrary apprehension keeps us whilest such uncapable of mercy Briefly it is a legal and unworthy objection and argueth sad shameful and lamentable ignorance of the Gospel 7. The Power held forth in the Gospel for the inabling of us to believe John 6.29 Rom. 11.23 Ephes 1.19 Abraham becometh a Father and Sarah a Mother by overcoming such temptations as arose from his dead body and the deadness of her womb through the consideration of Gods Promise Fidelity and Ability Rom. 4.19 21. Heb. 11.11 The strength of the Captives in Babylon was the Promise of their deliverance by the meditation whereof their duty was to stir up themselves to lay hold upon God Isai 64.7 The precious thoughts of God revealed in the Gospel are our strength and a savour of life unto life they are not as our thoughts which are a savour of death unto death The grace held forth in the Gospel is of the same nature and of the same power in it self both before and after faith though none can personally apply it but the believer The general tender of the free absolute and irresistable grace of the Gospel though without a personal promise becometh through the concurring operations of the Spirit such an attractive as incourageth the Elect unto and affects them with a restlesness in the use of means until they are made partakers thereof That great Speech of a Believer I will not let thee go Whether express or implicit Gen. 32.26 Exod. 32.10 Cant. 3.4 is the effect of our believing that God hath said He will not let us go and presupposeth an absolute and answerable promise both special and personal Such as the Gospel holds forth to all believers 8. The encouragement that ariseth from the sense of our infability to believe
electione fides electorum tantū Spanh exer de grat resp ad erot 24. Nam in Dei Decreto haec reciprocātur Christus mortuus est pro credentibus soli sunt credentes pro quibus Christus mortuus est Rhetorf de grat ex 2. c. 2 Twiss de erratis lib. 3. errat 8. S. 2. that is in this present general defection of the whole Nation there is a remnant a portion of Jews made the people of God by effectual vocation according to the Election of grace Faith and vocation in which is faith are expresly mentioned as the effects of election And as many as were ordained to Eteraal life believed Acts 13.48 Called according to his purpose Rom. 8.28 Other faith will not save the many who are only otherwise called are not amongst those few that are chosen Gods willing the futurition of all things is the cause of all things therefore Election which is his will to have mercy of which mercy faith is a part must needs be the cause of mercy which is the whole and consequently of faith which is a part of the whole 1 Pet. 1.20 I obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful 1 Cor. 7.25 2 Tim. 1.9 Redemption is the meritorious cause of faith God according to Order of Justice hath bound himself for Christs sake to give faith unto the Elect Iesa 53.10 Because the active and passive obedience of Christ was not only satisfactory but meritorious both of grace and glory But redemption is the effect of election that which is the cause of the cause is the cause of the effect following from that cause In Gods Decree those two Propositions reciprocate that is they are true both ways for Wards and Backwards Christ died for believers and believers only that is such as are or shall be believers are those for whom Christ died The Elect and Believers are reciprocated that is All that are elected do or shall believe And all that do or shall believe are elected CHAP. XI What is the first saving gift actually applied unto an Elect Soul THe Person of Jesus Christ Mediator together with his Spirit whereof Faith is a principall part is the first saving gift actually applyed unto an elect person All Beleevers have received both the Person of Christ and the Spirit of Christ The Person of Christ Job 1.12 Col. 2.6 1 Joh. 5.12 Rom. 8.32 1 Cor. 6.15 Heb. 3.14 The Spirit of Christ Rom. 8.9 10. 2 Cor. 13.5 They receive not his Person without his Spirit nor his Spirit without his Person but both his Person and his Spirit together For the clearing of this Proposition consider 1 What the Person of Christ is 2 What the Spirit of Christ is 3 Why it is called the Spirit of Christ 4 Why Faith is called a principal part of the Spirit of Christ 5 What it is to receive the Person of Christ and what it is to receive his Spirit 6 The Arguments concluding the Proposition By the Person of Christ we are to understand God viz. What the Person of Christ is The second Person in the Trinity and man Mediator in one and that an increated Person By the Spirit of Christ What the Spirit of Christ is we are to understand the universal habitual created frame of inherent saving grace The whole body of renewed saving qualities The saving gifts of the Spirit And hereby we know that he abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us 1 Joh. 3.24 It is called life Rom. 8.10 The Spirit is Life because of Righteousnesse The Spirit of the command and promise is Life The Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 i.e. The divine qualities of the mind resembling the Nature of God The seed remaining 1 Joh. 3.9 The Image of God consisting of righteousnesse and true holinesse i.e. Of conformity of the understanding and will or the spirit of obedience unto both Tables Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 Created in the soul the second time The new man Eph. 4.24 The new creature 2 Cor. 5.17 Here distinguish between the increated Spirit which is the Author the created transient gracious motion of the Spirit which is the efficient cause and saving grace which is the permanent effect thereof It is called the Spirit of Christ Why is it called the Spirit of Christ First Because the Holy Spirit to which the work of saving grace is eminently ascribed notwithstanding it be equally wrought by all the three Persons of the Trinity proceedeth not only from the Father but also from the Son Joh. 14.26 15.26 Gal. 4.6 Secondly Because the motion of the Spirit upon the soul is from Christ as a Head the same individual action proceeds both from the three Persons whose works upon the creature are undivided and from Christ as a Head In the actions of Christ as a Head the whole person acts in way of office the Divine nature principally the Humane nature instrumentally Thirdly Because Christ hath merited the effectual operation of the Spirit Joh. 16.14 15. Fourthly Because the Spirit works according to the wil of Christ Joh. 5.21.26 Joh. 15.26 Fifthly Because the Spirit which we receive in measure is the same in kind with the Spirit which Christ as man received out of measure 1 Cor. 6.17 The soule by faith receiveth the person really and objectively but not personally it were blasphemy so to affirm that is How the soul by faith receiveth the Person of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it apprehends the Person of Christ the immediate object of faith is Christ himself the Divine nature is in the three Persons essentially The second Person of the Trinity dwelleth in the Manhood personally The Spirit is in the Beleever energetically or operatively that is by its saving effects That by faith the soule receiveth the Person of Christ appeareth thus from the nature of Faith whose very being consists in receiving of Christ To receive Christ Jesus as our Lord and Saviour is of the form of faith and principally differenceth it from other saving grace wherewith in respect of its next matter it agreeth we may as well deny a man to be a reasonable creature as deny that the soul by faith receiveth Christ hence faith is called a receiving of Christ John 1.12 Col. 2.6 As therefore by the act of faith the soule actively receiveth Christ so by the habit of faith the soul passively receiveth Christ This appears yet further from the nature of Relates Fides per se est qualitas sed ratione respectus ad objectum vecatur relatio Keck Log. Lib. 1. Sect. 1 cap. 12. faith and the object of faith that is Christ are Relates faith in it selfe considered is a quality but in respect of Christ the object thereof it is a Relate Relates necessarily affirm one the other they are together not onely in time and nature but in knowledge also the one cannot be known without the other as it is impossible to be a Son without an actuall respect unto a
in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. c●p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for
not subjectively that is such as remain ungodly when they are justified The Text saith not he reconcileth enemies according to the sense of those words in the former place He justifieth the ungodly But If when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son mark the time of this Reconciliation was the time of the death of his Son not the time of our Conversion much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life that is If while we were enemies in respect of our nature and state we were reconciled in our head i. e. our Reconciliation was actually purchased by and acknowledged at the death of his Son how much more being reconciled in our selves by the slaying of the enmity of nature through the infusion of grace and the changing of our estate in respect of our persons and actions through faith in Christ shall we be saved by his life he that hath done the greater with greatest difficulty he will do the lesse having overcome and triumphed over all difficulty past and proceeding being without all difficulty in respect of what is to come This exposition is agreeable to the Analogie of faith strengthens the Apostles arguing from the greater to the lesser and any shorter interpretation seemeth to straighten those words We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son Thus Dr. Amos and Dr. Twisse understand this place Medulla l. 1. c. 20. Twiss de permiss l. 2 cr 4. digr 10. Sect. 4. and Calvin seemeth very well to allow thereof nor doth Piscator dissent there-from as appeareth in his citation of this Text disputing with Vorstius There is remission of sins that is actually procured before we do beleeve Cham. Nobis persuasissimum est Calv. in loc Cham. Tom. 3 lib. 12. Sect 18. Perkins in Gal. 3.16 Medulla c. 24. 27. remissa esse peccata antequam credidimus Christ is first justified that is acquit of our sins and we justified in him Perkins There is a kind of previous application of Redemption to us in Christ The sentence of our Justification was pronounced in Christ our head rising from the dead Ames Transactio inter Deum Christum fuit praevia quaedam applicatio ad nos Sententia haec fuit in Christo capite nostro à mortuis jam resurgente pronunciata There is saith Mr. Rutherford Rhetorf exc 1. c. 2. a Justification in the mind of God Eternal and a Justification in time terminated in the conscience of the beleever Obj. But if it be yeelded that the grace of Justification be before Faith it will follow that in justification by faith there is nothing really and possitively wrought in the Soul but only a manifestation of what was before Ans Not so in the justification of a sinner there is that which is real and positive both on Gods part and on the Beleevers part on Gods part 1 An actual imputing of the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ to the Beleever 2 A transient judicial act of God whereby he declareth the sinner to be justified for the righteousnesse sake of Christ received by faith terminated in the Conscience of the Beleever upon the Beleevers part there is 1. An actual relying upon the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ 2. A renouncing of our own righteousnesse Obj. But if we yeeld a being of Iustification how doth the condition of an elect person justified by faith differ from his condition yet an unbeleever in respect of his Iustification Ans God hath absolutely decreed to justifie them before they doe beleeve their persons are beloved from eternity Jesus Christ hath actually and absolutely procured their justification before faith God hath accepted this Meritorious satisfaction of Christ before faith God never imputes the sins of the world of the elect to them unto Condemnation having already imputed them unto and being satisfied for them by Christ All which notwithstanding the condition or state of the Elect before faith is the same with the condition of those who are not elected we are the children of wrath even as others Ephes 2 3. guilty of sinne before God and therefore in respect of their estate obnoxious to Condemnation even as others Though their Justification be absolutely Vide Retorf ex 1. c. 2. and actually procured before Faith yet they are not justified until they doe beleeve now and not until now is their state changed now and not until now doe the effects of Gods displeasure cease towards them by vertue of the Promise He that beleeveth shall not come into condemnation now and not before are their persons accepted in themselves and consequently their actions capable of being accepted hence Albeit the justification of the Elect is absolue ely procured before they doe beleeve yet they have no consolation nor peace of Conscience till they doe beleeve Obj. Yee see how that by works a man is justified and not by faith only Jam. 2.24 Sol. That James agreeth with Paul concerning the Doctrine of Justification is evident in that the same Scripture Gen. 15.6 cited by Paul Rom. 4.3 is cited and acknowledged to be fulfilled by James 2.23 and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham beleeved God and it was imputed unto him for righteousnesse That Proposition of Pauls We are justified by faith without works and that of James We are justified by works and not by faith only are distinct but not opposite Propositions for Iames referreth not to the manner of our Justification of which Paul speaks but to the nature of justifying faith against such as boasted of such a faith as justifying which was without works Paul disputes against the Legalist Iames both against the Legalists and Libertines Paul sheweth the manner of Justification by faith Iames the nature of justifying faith Pauls conclusion is that We are justified by faith without works Iames's conclusion is that Faith without works doth not justifie Justificamur Effectivè à Deo Approhensivé à fide Declarativè ab operibus Prideaux lect 5. de Justificatione The objection also is further satisfied by distinguishing of Justification Justification is either of our persons before God so Faith only justifies or of our faith before Men so works justifie that is they declare our faith before men to be unfeigned I will shew thee my faith by my works Jam. 2.18 By works was faith made perfect ver 22. Obj. We are justified by faith Rom. 4.9 Faith is a work therefore we are not justified without works and consequently not by faith only Ans How Faith justifieth hath been spoken before that faith doth not justifie as a work is evident Rom. 4 5. But to him that worketh not but beleeveth on him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse God makes high account of that faith which accounts of its object as the matter of our Justification God makes no account of that faith which we account of as a work in the matter of our Justification the Beleever
a sinner is an undivided act done altogether not by parts it doth not receive more or lesse if there be any there is all and if not all not any either all or none Justification in respect of the price and the acceptation of the persons justified is equal thus The Person that suffered for all is one and the same the sufficiency of an infinite Person suffering was requisite for the redemption of one and in the suffering of an infinite Person there was sufficiency for the redemption of all The kinde of punishment suffered for all was the same Gods acceptation thereof was the same Christ having suffered the punishment due in kinde and degree to the greatest sinner it cost Christ no more to pardon Paul than Timothy it cost him as much to pardon Davids childe 2 Sam. 12.23 as to pardon Manasseth The punishment for kinde and degree due unto the greatest sinner being suffered by an infinite person it was as much as if all the elect had suffered an infinite person containeth eminently all persons Christ therefore being in himself an infinite person and being by Divine ordination a publick Person in his suffering he was as many persons as God willed him to stand for therein Hence when the redemption mony was brought the rich must not give more the poor must not give lesse Exod. 30.15 in the Passeover and in the Supper of the Lord the portion of all is equal the distribution of Manna was equal Exod. 16.18 A Beleever at the same time is a sinner in respect of the remaining principle of inherent disobedience and righteous in respect of the imputed obedience of Christ guilty of damnation if looked at in himself not guilty of Damnation if looked at in Christ Adam a Beleever though a sinner was more just than Adam before the Fall Adam before the Fall was without sinne and innocent but not just because he had not fulfilled the righteousnesse of the Law Adam a Beleever though a sinner is yet just because by beleeving he hath fulfilled the righteousnesse of the Law Adam innocent had no right unto eternallife Adam a beleever notwithstanding sin hath right unto eternal life The righteousnesse of one Beleever is more acceptable unto God than the righteousnesse of all Mankind in the first Covenant The Lord Jesus Christ was just inherently but a sinner imputatively the Beleever is a sinner inherently but just imputatively Mary under the Crosse was more just imputatively than Christ which was also true of every Beleever then living when Christ was under the actual imputation of sin the same righteousnesse is both anothers and ours also Anothers that is Christs subjectively yet ours that is the Beleevers imputatively The righteousnesse of a Beleever in this life is both perfect and imperfect perfect in respect of Justification imperfect in respect of Sanctification Annot on the Bible in Numb 23. God looking on beleevers through Christ seeth no more sin safely understood than he seeth in him for they are made the righteousnesse of God in him by imputation Hence followeth peace of Conscience to all Beleevers Of the peace of Conscience following upon justification by faith notwithstanding all their unrighteousnesse Rom. 5.1 so farre as we have confidence in justifying grace there remaineth no conscience of condemning sin Rom. 8.1 No bitterer warre than between the Conscience and the Curse no sweeter peace than when Mercy and the Beleever meet together when the Conscience and the Promise kisse each other that is a taste of Hel this of Heaven Peace is that Gospel-tranquillity which followeth upon the Souls certain relyance on Christ concerning its freedome from the evil of the Curse and fruition of the good of the Promise As Christ being the great sinner imputatively in the instant of his dissolution passed from a state of wrath into a state of perfect peace so doth the Beleever upon his justification by faith If Christ hath peace who was made our sin then need must the Beleever have peace who is made his righteousnesse if Adams peace had been perfect in case of his fulfilling all righteousnesse then the Beleevers peace is perfect who hath fulfilled all righteousnesse in his Surety the beleeving commanded in the Gospel hath in Christ done yea out-done the doing commanded in the Law The peace of the Beleever is as perfect as the peace of those who are in glory the righteousnesse of these being the same with theirs See the grounds hereof in respect of God and Christ God himselfe is the Author and Object of our peace therefore it is called the peace of God Phil. 4.7 peace with God Rom. 5.1 He even he it is who is the Creator of peace Isa 57.19 The Speaker of peace Psal 85.5 When he giveth quietnesse who can give trouble Job 34.29 them hee also justified What shall we say to these things if God be for us who can be against us Rom. 8.30 31. The Merit of Christ a fruit and effect whereof is justifying grace is infinite because of the eminency of the person being God-man the Law violated was but a Creature but he that was made subject to it is a Creator the holinesse of the subject exceeds the holinesse of the Law the transgressor of the Law was but a Man the satisfier is God-man See here the honour of the Law that had such a subject farre more than what could have redounded to it from the subjection of all Angels and meer men See the security of the Transgressor that hath such a satisfier our disobedience is but the disobedience of Men his obedience is the obedience of him who is God needs then must his righteousnesse exceed our unrighteousnesse and in this respect wel may justifying grace compared with sin be called abundance of grace Rom. 5.17 And God bee sayd abundandy to pardon Isa 55.7 This sweet truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 longe majus est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 postcrioris Adami quam fuit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prioris Terra instar puncti respectu caeli the sweet Psalmist of Israel sings forth in lively compatisons Psal 103.11 12 13. For as the heaven is high above the earth so great is his mercy towards them that fear him As farre as the East is from the West so farre hath he removed our transgressions from us Like as a Father pittieth his children so the Lord pittieth them that fear him Sin is exceding sinful and grace is out of measure gracious Though sin hath abounded yet grace doth much more abound Rom. 5.20 God Christ the Gospel the Law and the Beleever all gain through justification by faith The Merit of Christ being infinite hath no bounds but is excendible according to the pleasure of the disposer thereof the obedience of Christ is All-sufficient able to have saved the whole world had God so pleased and that as wel as one man From the effectual apprehension and perswasion of the Premises proceeded that triumphing speech of a Beleever
truth c. 12 p. 281 Peace of conscience what c. 14. 324 The state of the beleever is a state of perfect peace with the grounds thereof c. 14. p. 324 325 Perfection in God what c. 1. p. 20 The perfection of the whole creature is in God eminently c. 15. p. 332 A person in the Divine Nature what c. 2. p. 22 What constitutes a person in God ibid. Difference between a created and an increated Person c. 2.23 A Person how distinguished from a Person c. 2. p. 27 A created Person what c. 3. p. 37 The Person of Christ what c. 11. p. 249 The soul by faith receiveth the Person of Christ yet not personally but objectively c. 11. p. 250 A Personal property what c. 2. p. 28 The Personal notions in number five and which c. 2. p. 30 Positive Attributes what in number six c. 1. p. 16 Poverty legal and preparatory before faith and saving after faith c. 8. p. 184 185 Preparatory work what c. 6. p. 130 Preparatory work taken in its extent what c. 7. p. 141 Works Preparatory properly or in the judgement of charity c. 6. p. 129 130 Preparatory works by way of meer order c. 6. p. 130 Four objections against Preparatory work answered c. 6 p. 139 140 Preparatory work no whit darkneth free grace c. 6. p. 139 The heads whereunto the Preparatory work of the Gospel may be referred c. 7. p. 152 Three cases of conscience concerning Preparatory work c. 7. p. 160 161 c. The notion Preparatory as concerning preparatory work distinguished c. 8. p. 164 The peculiar wayes of Gods Presence with divers creatures c. 1. p. 8 A preservative against temptations concerning the justice of God c. 5. p. 122 Actuall Providence what c. 52 p. 102 Q. Soul-Qualifications what c. 8. p. 163 Saving-Qualifications taken properly or improperly c. 8. p. 164 165 Taken properly what c. 8. p. 164 The variety of Judgements touching the relations that Qualifications before faith have unto conversion c. 8. p. 165 Texts of Scripture against the ascertaining salvation to any Qualification before faith c. 8. p. 166 167 Ten arguments to the same effect c. 8. p. 167 to 175 Our best Qualifications as also our operations before faith are sin c. 8. p. 174 Authorities against ascertaining salvation upon a Qualification before faith c. 8. p. 175 to 179 Nine Objections against the not ascertaining salvation upon some Qualification or Qualifications before faith fully answered c. 8. p. 179 to 190 The four Celestial Qualities of the glorified body opened c. 15. p. 350 351 352. R. Receiving Christ is either active or passive c. 12.267 Reconciliation twofold one before the other after our conversion c. 14. p. 316 The Ministry and Word of Reconciliation why so styled 2 Cor. 5 18 19. c. 9. p. 215 Relative Attributes in number seven c. 1. p. 10 Relative Attributes put no change in God ibid. Repentance legal or saving c. 7. p. 153 Preparatory or legal Repentance what c. 7. ibid Repentance legal or preparatory before faith or saving after faith c. 8. p. 184 185 Reprobation is not an act of Justice c. 4. p. 66 67 68 Reprobation is not the cause of sin though the antecedent thereof c. 4. p. 69 None in this life can ordinarily conclude they are Reprobate c. 4 p. 84. The Gospel why called a Revelation c. 7. p. 152 Revelation of Christ so far as is necessary to salvation what c. 7. ibid. The Law not the Decree is the Rule of life c. 4. p. 80 81 Seven Rules to be observed in propounding of the Doctrine of the Decree c. 4. 82 83 84 85 S. Faith in what sense it is affirmed to be a part of Sanctification c. 11. p. 255 256 To ascertain salvation before faith is to ascertain it to a worke or as it were to a worke c. 8. p. 174 Saving faith what c. 10. p. 219 Saving faith the effect of Election c. 10. p. 199 Before the grace of faith there is nothing that is saving c. 8.170 Seeking Christ without faith and with faith what c. 7. p. 159 Though we cannot seek Christ in faith yet it is our duty to pray c. 7. p. ibid. Jesus Christ findeth the soul while it so seeks him as yet it cannot seek him c. 7. p. 160 The souls selling of all is either legal or saving legal what and how distinguished c. 8. p. 182 183 Saving threefold and what ibid. Simplicity in God what c. 1. p. 5 Adams sin original sin actual sin what c. 7. p. 142 143 144 God is not the author of sin c. 4. p. 61 to 67 As God is not the author of sin so be is not a meer permitter thereof c. 4. p. 66 God delighteth not in the death of a sinner c. 4. p. 73 Man is the cause of sin c. 4. p. 70 Sin is the cause of punishment c. 4. p. 71 Acknowledgement of the Sovereignty of God in point of shewing or not shewing mercy is a point of our humiliation c. 7. 158 The term special to be attended in this Proposition faith is the effect of sperial grace c. 10. p. 228 The Spirit of Christ received by beleevers what and why so called c. 11. p. 249 150 How the soule receives the Spirit of Christ c. 11. p. 250 The Angels and Spirits of the just made perfect how they speak one unto another c. 15. p. 347 T. High cause of Thankfulnesse to be seen in the Decree c. 4. p. 99 A Trance what c. 15. p. 339 The usefulnesse of the doctrines of the Trinity c. 2. p. 31 32 33 34 What Terms are to be avoyded in speaking of the Trinity c. 2. p. 29 V. The effects of the beatifical Vision c. 15. p. 334 The fault of Vnbelief lyeth wholly upon our selves c 9. p. 205 206 It is impossible for an Unbeleever how ever qualified to please God c. 8. p. 173 Every Vnbeleever is in such a condition to which the Scripture speaks wrath c. 8. ibid. God to be taken in the best sense in his tender of grace to an Vnbeleever c. 9. p. 215 T is a truth concerning every Unbeleever how ever qualified that if Christ sheweth him mercy it is meer mercy if hee doth not shew them mercy he doth them no wrong c. 8. p. 172 173 The Vnderstanding of God Angels and men in respect of the manner thereof how distinguished c. 1. p. 16 17 The Personal Vnion what c. 3. p. 38 The manner of the Personal Union c. 3. p. 40 Three most eminent Unions and which c. 13. p. 283 284 The Union betwixt Christ and the Beleever held forth in Scripture under divers lively metaphors c. 13. p. 284 Union between Christ and the Beleever what c. 13. p. 285 The whole Person of Christ is Vnited to the whole Person of the Beleever c. 13. p. 286 Vnion between Christ and the Beleever is reall substantial and supernatural c. 13. p. 290 Union followeth Vocation in order of Nature c. 13 p. 291 Vocation what c. 12. p. 257 Vocation is wrought in an instant c. 12. p. 282 283 W. Waiting on the Lord Jesus in the use of means with preparatory hope what c. 7. p. 159 The Will of God is the first and universal cause of all things c. 4. p. 91 The Will of God is one c. 4. ibid. The Will of God is absolute c. 4. p. 93 No motive of Gods Will besides or without himselfe c. 4. p. 58. seq The All-decreeing and All-disposing Will of God is a ground why we should sanctifie him in all our changes c. 4. p. 99 The distinction of the absolute and conditional as also of the antecedent and consequent Will in God both unsound c. 1. p. 17 18 The Will is determined by God in its operations c. 5. p. 110 and 114 Wisdome in God what c. 1. p. 16 Christ as God-man the object of Divine Worship c. 3. p. 47 FINIS
Father so it is impossible there should be faith without an actuall I say not active receiving of Christ As it is a truth That he that hath the Son that is the Person of the Son hath Life so it is a truth That he that hath Life hath the Son because he that hath not the Son hath not Life Joh. 5.12 But every Believer as a Beleever hath Life for it were a strange thing even in notion to suppose a dead Beleever Therefore every Beleever hath the Son He that hath Christ for his Head hath the Person of Christ But every beleever hath Christ for his Head because every beleever is a member of Christ now a member cannot be without a Head therefore every beleever hath the Person of Christ As when God actually makes us his people he actually makes himselfe our God so when the Lord Christ actually makes us his people he makes himself our Lord and Head But in vocation he makes us his people It is a confessed truth that beleevers are not made partakers onely of the gifts of Christ but also of the Person of Christ It holds forth a sweet correspondence with that truth Col. 1.18 That in all things he Christ might have the preheminence that we should not be made partakers of any of his saving gifts before we are made partakers of his Person How shall not he with him give us all things Rom. 8.32 Not any saving thing given from him without the gift of him The soule rests not in saying Vocation is mine Justification is mine Sanctification is mine but in saying Christ is mine Ruth had refreshing in Boaz his kindnesse Ruth 2.14 but not Rest chap. 3.1 untill she had Boaz himself It is a Harlots practice first to have conjugal communion and then to be united and married to the Person But we first must be married to the Person and then have conjugal communion In Vocation we receive Christ in union we are joyned with Christ in the same spiritual third Being by communion we receive from Christ and returne unto Christ now being ours and united unto us By Vocation Christ is in us by union Christ dwelleth in us by communion he communicates the benefits of a Head unto us As we receive the Person of Christ objectively so we receive the Spirit of Christ formally What it is to receive the Spirit of Christ For the soul to receive the Spirit of Christ is for the soul so to be made partaker thereof as to become the formal subject of that universal habitual created frame of inherent saving grace or whole body of renewed saving qualities of which before in the second Particular whereby we are made Evangelically conformable to the revealed will of God This body of renewed saving qualities is infused by the Spirit of grace in receiving whereof the soul is passive as a vessel is a passive receiver of oyl powred thereinto The Arguments concluding the Proposition The habit of faith due Reverence premised to any godly learned that may herein dissent seemeth not to be infused alone before the other habits of saving grace The universal frame of saving grace or of the new creature is infused into the soul at once as one general habit To affirme the presence of faith though but notionally in signo rationis i.e. for a moment of reason though not for a moment of time with the totall absence of all other graces implyeth these improbabilities if not impossibilities 1 It affirmes the Soule under that conception to be dead in part where Christ is for where faith is Christ is as was shewed before but where there is a totall absence of all other graces there the Soule is wholly dead in respect of all the members of the Old man unbelief excepted 2 It affirmes Sin to reigne where Christ is since where faith is Christ is and where many graces are not there the many contrary sins reigne except we should suppose a middle estate of the Soule wherein neither sin nor grace reignes 3 It affirmes the Soule to be both dead and alive at the same instant in eodem momento rationis for this also necessarily followeth in that it is alive in respect of faith and dead in respect of the absence of the life of all other graces and presence of the contrary reigning sins 4 It affirmes also the Old man to be both alive and dead at the same instant dead in respect of unbelief alive in respect of his other members 5 It affirmeth that the Soule is both converted and not converted in the same instant or moment converted because it beleeves not converted because all sinne reignes in it except unbelief Now all contraties being repugnants in Nature are uncapable of meeting together in the same subject in their strength for a moment of reason as well as for a moment of time 6 It affirmes either that the habitual alteration of the Soule in all respects that of its change from unbelief to faith excepted is not conversion which is against reason or else that the Soule is active in respect of this alteration and consequently in respect of so great a part of its conversion which is so farre contrary to the generally received Doctrine of the passiveness of the Soule in conversion The Image of God in Adam a part whereof was his faith in God according to the nature of that Covenan was infused to him at once Faith in Christ was not formally though vertually in the Angels till after the habit of universal obedience but we no where read that justifying faith was in any sense infused into any before the habitual frame of obedience The universal habit as it were of corruption seized upon the Soule at once not first unbeleefe then the principle of universall disobedience why may we not in like manner think the whole frame of inherent saving grace is insused into the Soule at once Grace comes into the Soule as Life into Lazarus dead body infused into and giving life unto every part at once or as Light into the Aire before Dark which is illuminated all at once Obj. 1. If the universall frame of inherent saving Grace the New Creature or whole body of renewed saving qualities be infused into the Soule at once it would thence follow that Sanctification should precede Justification but not so therefore Ans Sanctification may be taken largely or habitually for the universal habitual frame of inherent saving grace or strictly and practically for the exercise of this grace in the latter sense Sanctification followeth Justification because our actions cannot be accepted until our persons be accepted But in the former sense what hinders why Sanctification may not goe before Justification since by Sanctification is understood only the habitual saving grace insused into the Soule together with faith in vocation which the Reasons before argue Vocation precedes Justification Rom. 8.30 't is manifest that this infused grace is sanctifying grace Faith by the Learned and godly Orthodox