some others should signifie habituall or inherent righteousnes would it thence necessarily followe that it should haue the same signification in the article of Iustification 4 Deferre not vnto death to bee iustified Ecclus. 18. 21 therefore there is habituall righteousnes gotten by many actions Ans 1 The meaning is deferre not to bee conuerted and reconciled with GOD c. Therefore this argument hangeth not together 2. If to iustifie bee all one with the author of that booke as of vniust to make iust then an absurde sense would followe from the same wordes in the beginning of this chapter The Lord onely iustificabitur shall bee iustified that is by the former interpretation of an vniust God shall be made a iust God by an infused habite 5 Hee that is iust iustificetur let him be iustified still Revel 22 11 therefore iustification consisteth of an habite Ans 1 The speach is figuratiue for by a Synecdoche the whole is put for the part or the cause for the effect for hee speakes of Renovation vnder the name of iustification which the words next following added by way of explication doe declare and hee that is holy let him be made holy stil Sanctificetur adhuc 2. from Renovation to iustification no conclusion can be made but by foure termes QVESTION 2 Whether the grace of Iustification bee bestowed equally vpon all them that be iustified In this question the controversie is not about Renouation which may and ought to receiue growth and increasing all our life longe neither is there controuersie about the gifts of the holie Ghost bestowed vpon them who are iustified but about that righteousnesse by the which wee are said to be iust before God and are reconciled to God through Christ Our aduersaries affirme that this iustice or righteousnesse is not equall and alike in all them which are iustified and that it doth receiue increase according to diuersitie of persons and times but we vtterly deny it for these reasons Because our righteousnes whereby we are iust before God is not our owne but is the righteousnesse of Christ for hee is made vnto vs of God righteousnes and sanctification 1 Corinth 1 30. Nowe Christ is receiued by faith of all them that truely beleeue not in part but wholly with all his merite Peter writeth to them which had receiued like pretious faith with him amongst whome those were also which were weake in the faith 2 Pet 1 1 So Christ giueth to them which beleeue not an halfe but a whole and entire iustification for he promised to them that beleeue eternall life and eternall life is not giuen to them who are iustified in part onely but to them who are wholly iustified Ioh 3 15 36 and 5 24. and 6 40 47. and 17. 2 and 20 31. Act 4 12 and 10 43 and 51 11 c. Christ was the same to Peter as he was to Paule as he was to the father of him that was possessed Marc. 9 23 c. to the Samaritan woman Iohn 4. Neither is he diuerse of one kind or degree to on of an other to an other according to the difference of men and their faith So the man sicke of the palsie was iustified wholly and not in part by one act so to speake complet and finished at one and the same instant Matt 9 2 the Publican Luk 18. 13 14. the theefe Luke 23 40 c the sinfull woman that annointed Iesus Luke 7 38 c Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 To euery one of vs is giuen grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ Ephes 4. 7. therefore c. Ans Paull speakes not of Iustification but of the gifts bestowed vppon them which are Iustifyed for the adorning and edifying of the Church as the wordes following do declare There are therefore foure termes in this argument for in the Antecedent the word grace is taken for a gift of the spirit in the consequent for iustification 2 There are diuersities of the gifts of God 1 cor 12. 4. Ans He speaketh of gifts which are bestowed vpon them who are iustified and so iustification is presupposed to goe before as already hath beene said And hereof there is no controversie IustificatioÌ„ is on thing and the strong and weake apprehending or laying â—ould of it is an other 3 Iustifying faith is stronger in some men and weaker in others Ans 1 Yet there is the same obiect totall and not partiall of faith whether it bee strong oâ— weake to wit Christ Iesus whole entire with his most holy merits which is our righteousnes Peter calleth faith like precious 2 Pet. I 1 because there is the same obiect apprehended or laid hold on by all although without all doubt all to whom hee wrote had not the like strength and firmenesse of faith which Peter had and Christ yeelded himselfe to bee receaued or laied holde on by a weake faith Marke 9 23 24 c. Isai 42 3. as was aforesaid 4. We are commanded to pray for the increase of Gods gifts therefore c. Ans Wee are commaunded to pray for Note The Papists doe stil coÌ„found iustification with renovation or sanctification the increase of the gifts of renovation or sanctification but not of iustification Question 3. VVhereas Renovation doth concurre together in Iustification and faith cannot bee without good workes it is questioned What that is whereby the righteousnes of Christ is apprehended of vs whether it be faith or good works The Papists ascribe it to good works but we proue that justification may not bee graunted or attributed to good works by these reasons Because good workes are not accepted of God vnlesse they bee done by men that are iustified therefore iustification goes before good works by the order of nature which order is inverted if iustification be ascribed to good works Because good works onely in them which are iustified please God and so iustification goeth before works Now if wee will be iustified the second time by workes that come after what is this else but to doe that which is already done Iustification by works doth derogate from Christ so much as is attributed to our works for if wee could haue beene iustified by our works what neede was there of the merite of Christ who alone hath made satisfaction for all our sinnes 1 I haue troden the Wine-presse alone and of all the people there was none with me Isai 63 3. 2 The bloud of Iesus Christ his sonne clenseth vs from all sinne 1 Ioh 1 7. 3 Hee not our good works is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onely but also for the sinnes of the whole world 1 Ioh. 2 2. 4. Among men there is none other namâ— vnder heauen whereby we must be saved Act 4 12. Iustification by workes taketh away the certainty of Salvation which the Scripture proposeth vnto vs. 1 Because wee know not what and howe many workes are necessarily required as
13. 13. Therefore Charitie doth iustifie An. 1 Paul compareth loue or charity with faith not in respect of iustification but of duration and continuance Therefore this is a fallacie from that which is spoken in some respect to the same taken absolutely and in all respectes 2 Faith dooth not iustifie as it is a vertue or habit for it own worth but as it is considered respectively in respect of Christ whose merits it applyeth vnto vs and so doth iustifie vs for his sake There are therefore in this argument more than three tearmes and it hangeth together like a rope of sande 16 If iustificatioÌ„ be takeÌ„ away froÌ„ good works no man will thence forward bee mooued to doo good workes Ans 1. It is a fallacie supposing that for the cause which is not the cause for the true doctrine of iustification is not the cause why some men doe not good workes 2 Neither may we doe evill that good may come of it that is we may not falsely ascribe iustification to works that men may thereby be stirred vp to good works 3 There are notwithstanding many most waighty causes besides why we should doe good works although iustification be not ascribed vnto them Question 4. Our Aduersaries denie that wee are justified by faith alone but to faith they joine hope and charity We on the contrary side ascribe justification to faith in Christ alone for these reasons Because in the former question all works are excluded from the acte of iustification and therefore faith onely is left Romanes 3 4. and 11 Chapter and a man is not iustified but by faith Galathians 2 and 3 Chapter 2 Timoth 1 Tit 3 Psalm 32 as the remooving of all other thinges hath sufficientlie beene proued by these places in the former question Because the holy Scripture wheresoeuer it speaketh of Iustification doth so describe it that it mentioneth none either work or affection but onely faith in Christ Let vs then briefly runne over the places of the new Testament 1 The Gospell of Iohn 1. As many as receaued him to them hâ—e gaue power to bee the sonnes of God even Let our Aduersaries shewe aniething but faith alone in all these sayings of Scripture to them that beleeue in his name Iohn 1 12. 2. As Moses lift vp the serpent in the wildernes c. That whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue eternall life Iohn 3 14 15. 3 So God loued the world that hee hath giuen his onely begotten sonne that whosoeuer beleeveth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life Ioh. 3 16. 4. Hee that beleeueth in him shall not bee condemned Ioh 3. 18. 5. Hee that beleeveth in the sonne hath euerlasting life Ioh 3 36. 6. The Iewes demaund what shall we do that wee might worke the works of GOD Christ answereth This is the worke of God that yee beleeue in him whom he hath sent Ioh. 6 28. 29. 7. This is the will of him which hath sent mee that euery one which seeth the sonne and beleeveth in him should haue euerlasting life Ioh 6. 40. 8. Verily verily I say vnto you he that beleeveth in me hath life euerlasting Ioh. 6. 47. 9. These things are written that yee might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the sonne of God and that in beleeving yee might haue life through his name Ioh. 20. 31. 2 The Acts of the Apostles 1. To him gaue all the Prophets witnesse that through his name all that beleeue in him should receaue remission of sinnes Act. 10 43. 2. By him euery one that beleeueth is iustified Act. 13. 39. 3. By faith the heart is purified Act 15 9. 4. The Iaylor asketh Sirs what must I doe to bee saved and they saide beleeue in the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalt be saved thine houshold Act. 16 31 32. 3 The Epistle to the Romanes 1 The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that belieue Rom. 3 22. 2 Wee conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the works of the lawe Rom. 3 28. 3 Abraham beleeved GOD and it was counted to him for righteousnes Rom. 4 3. 4 To him that worketh not but believeth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnes Rom 4 5. 5 Therefore it is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might bee sure to all the seede Rom 4 16. 6 This is written for vs also to whom it shall bee imputed for righteousnes which beleeue in him that raised vp Iesus our Lord from the dead Rom 4 24. 7 Being iustified by faith wee haue peace toward God Rom 5 1. 8 If thou shalt confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and shalt belieue in thine heart that God raised him vp from the dead thou shalt be saued Rom 10 11 9 VVith the heart man belieueth vnto righteousnes Rom 10 10 4 The first Epistle to the Corinthians It pleased God by the foolishnes of preaching to saue them that beleeue 1 Corinth 1 21. 5 The Epistle to the Galatians 1 We know that a man is not iustified by the works of the law but note that he saith but or except by the faith of Iesus Christ and wee have beleeued in Iesus Christ that wee might be iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the law Galathians 2. 16. 2 They which are of faith the same are the children of Abraham Galathians 3. 7. 3. God doth iustifie the Gentiles through faith Gal 3. 8. 4. They which bee of faith are blessed with faithfull Abraham Gal. 3 9. 5. The iust shall liue by faith Galathians 3 11. 6. The Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ should be given to them that beleeue Gal 3 22. 7. The law was our school maister to bring vs vnto Christ that we might be made righteous by faith Gal 3. 24. 8. Yee are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus Gal. 3 26. 6 The Epistle to the Ephesians By grace are yee saved through faith not of works least any man should boast Ephes 2 8 9. 7 The Epistle to the Philippians That I might be found in him not having mine own righteousnes which is of the law but that which is through the faith of Christ Philip 3 9. 8 The Epistle to the Hebrewes 1. By faith Abell obtained witnesse that he was righteous God testifying of his gifts by the which faith also hee being dead yet speaketh Heb 11. 4. 2. By faith was Enoch taken away that he should not see death Heb 11 5 3 He that commeth to God must beleeue that God is c. Heb 11 6 Finally that whole Chapter is spent in the commendation of faith alone Nowe whereas in these sayings of Scripture there is handled the way and meanes to attaine salvation iustification everlasting life forgiuenes of sinnes a testimonie of righteousnes c. Why if any other
is faith is not that righteousnes in it selfe whereby wee are iust before God but it is that instrument whereby we lay hold vpon Christ his righteousnes which being by faith made and accounted with God as ours we stand iust by the righteousnes of Christ before God and this we proue 1 Because the Scripture speaketh still of faith relatiuely as it respecteth and is referred vnto Christ as He that beleeueth in Christ in him on him the faith of Christ c. Ioh. 3 15 and 6 40 47 Act 10 43 and 15 11 Galat 2 16 Rom 3 22 26 and 4 24 and infinite moe such like Contrariwise our aduersaries doe reason 1 Faith is the gift of God but the gifts of God are qualities therefore faith is a qualitie Ans 1 We denie not but it is a qualitie but it doth not iustifie as a qualitie but because it layeth hold on Christ 2. Faith is called in the Scripture a gift not that it should be defined as a quality but that we might vnderstand that it is freely giuen vs. 2 Faith is oftentimes in the Scripture vsed absolutely without determination or reference to any other thing as Hee that shall beleeue and bee baptized c. Mark 16 16 if yee beleeue not surely yee shall not be established Isai 7. 9. Ans The obiect of faith is alwaies understood by the figure Synecdoche for without it faith doth neither beleeue neither is it faith 2 The Apostles taught their hearers to beleeue not absolutely without reference to Christ but to beleeue in Christ in whom they were bid to beleeue and to be baptized in his name Matt 28 19 3 Faith is a worke Iohn 6 29 therfore it iustifies as a worke Ans 1 The question is not whether faith may be called a worke but how it is considered in the verie act of IustificatioÌ„ This how it is to be considered Christ declareth in the words next following This is the worke of God that yee beleeue in him See there is the relatiue or respectiue acception whome he hath sent 2 Besides in this argument there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses for the collection they make is such like as this faith is in some sorte a worke therefore it iustifieth as a worke Our aduersaries doe acknowledge nothing in faith but a bare and general knowledge and assent Condition 2 making it only an historicall faith but wee as wee presuppose knowledge and assent so wee affirme that in faith there is required a trust or confidence whereby we relie and depende vpon God that for these reasons Because truste or confidence is the essential and proper difference whereby the faith of Christians is distinguished from the faith of Diuels for that Diuells though they certainely beleeâ—e that Christ died for the sinnes of mankinde yet they doe not put their trust in him seeing that benefite doth not belong vnto them Because the Scripture when it speaketh of faith doth expressely vse such wordes as be token trust or confidence 1 By Christ wee haue bouldnesse and entrance with confidence by faith in him Eph 3 12 2 Let vs goe bouldly vnto the throne of grace Heb 4 16 3 Seeing that by the bloud of Iesus we may be bould to enter into the holy place let vs drawe neare with a true heart in assurance of faith Hebrewes 10 19 22 4 Herein is loue perfect in vs that wee should haue boldnes in the day of iudgement c. There is no feare in loue but perfect loue casteth out feare for feare hath painefulnes and he that feareth is not perfect in loue 1 Ioh 4 17 18. In this saying the excluding of feare presupposeth a trust in Christ 5. Sonne be of good comfort thy sinnes are forgiuen thee Matth 9 2. 6 Daughter be of good comfort thy faith hath made thee whole Matt 9 22. 7 Bee of good comfort I haue ouercome the world Ioh. 16 33. Contrariwise our aduersaries reason Iames acknowledgeth no other faith but that which consisteth of a meere knowledge and assent Iam. 2. Ans 1 This holdes not Iames founde no other faith in the Diuels therefore neither did hee finde any other in true Christians 2. Neither doth this follow Iames intreateth only of one kind of faith to wit of historicall faith therefore the Scripture teacheth none other kind of faith Our Aduersaries affirme that faith may bee in Condition 3 impenitent and wicked men in Epicures and adulterers c. but we denie that faith can be in such men for these reasons Being iustified by faith we haue peace towards God Rom. 5 1 but euery one that committeth sinne is of the Deuill 1 Ioh 3 8 therefore hee hath not peace towards God consequently hee wanteth true faith All men haue not faith 2. Thessal 3 2 The hearts of the beleeuers are purified by faith Acts 15 9 therefore true iustifying faith is not in a wicked and impure heart which is polluted and laden with sinne Paule speakes of the wicked ones after an other manner than our Aduersaries doe 1 That as concerning faith they haue made shipwracke 1 Timoth 1 19 of those which haue bid all conscience farewell 2 That they haue erred from the faith 1 Tim 6 10 of couetous men 3 That they haue denied the faith 1 Tim 5 8 of such as are without naturall affection Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 Wicked men haue wrought miracles in the name of Christ by faith Matt. 7. 22 23 therefore there is faith in the wicked ones Ans They haue the faith of miracles but not iustifying faith 2 Satan himselfe hath faith Iames 2 19. Ans Satan hath an historicall faith but our question is of a iustifying faith therefore seeing one kinde of faith is meant in the Antecedent and an other in the consequent there bee foure termes 3 Simon Magus beleeued whose heart notwithstanding was not right Act 8 13. 21 Answere He was conuicted in conscience that the miracles of the Apostles were not magicall but deuine as the forcerers of Egypt acknowledged the finger of God Exod 8 19 Simon therefore beleeued as Saint Luke saith but it was an historicall faith onely and not a true iustifying faith Our Aduersaries dreame that true faith may be without workes but wee maintaine that a true iustifying Condition 4 faith cannot want his fruites and that for these reasons A good tree cannot bring forth euill fruite Matt 7 18. Faith worketh by loue Galat. 5 6 Faith without workes is dead Iames 2 26 Because Christ shall proue our faith by our workes as by the in fallible effects therof Matt. 25. Contrariwise our aduersaries doe reason 1 Shew me thy faith without workes Iam. 2. 18 therefore faith may be without workes Ans That translation is faultie for according to the Greek it should be translated shew me thy faith by or out of thy works 2 vnlesse S. Iames thought true faith to be effectual working by loue he would not
But sacrameÌ„ts haue not Ceremonies which are left to mens liberty Seeing theÌ„ heere be vnderstood sacramentall Ceremonies both which are see that it was still vsed of the Apostles their so precise vsing of it ought to be vnto vs in steed of a comman dement Calvin Iustitut lib. 4. cap. 3 5. 16. How soeuer there is no thing in it to make it the matter of a Sacrament left and which are not left to mens choise and libertie there arise fower termes 3 The order of the Ministerie hath a promise of grace that God will work effectually by the ministerie Therefore it is a Sacrament Ans 1. That promise respecteth rather the hearers than him that is ordained For he may preach vnto others to their saluation and himselfe be a cast-away but the Sacraments doe apply grace to him that vseth them 4 But wee reade that in Ordination grace iâ— bestowed vpon them which are ordained As we reade of Timothy 2 Timoth 1 6. Answer 1 The Apostles had the gift of miracles and did giue the Holy-ghost miraculously by the imposition of hands 2 GOD dooth vsually worke by the good meanes ordained by himselfe and so dooth bestowe his grace vppon the person which was ordayned at the praier and request of the whole congregation gathered together in his name for so holy an exercise Yet wee may not therefore thinke that the imposition of hands is a sacramentall signe which conferreth grace 5 Augustine writing against the Donatistes dooth call Order a Sacrament as doo other of the Fathers also Ans 1. They did so in some sort and respect for the excellencie and reuerence of the ministerie which the Donatistes did debase 2. The Fathers vsed the word Sacrament in a larger signification than we here take it as was sayde in the beginning of this Chapter 4. Matrimonie Why wee doe not account matrimonie for a Sacrament these be our reasons Because it hath no promise of grace of iustification Because by the same reason it should haue been a Sacrament in the Olde Testament which the Papists will not grant Because if it were a Sacrament then Sacraments should bee amongst infidells and without the Church which is absurde Because it hath no visible Element Because there is there no applying of grace Because our Aduersaries doo so speake of Matrimonie that they leaue no place for it Pope Syricius among Sacraments calling it a carnall state wherein they that live cannot please God they say also that Priests are polluted by this state How then dare they call Matrimony a Sacrament seeing their Ecclesiasticall persons doe abhorre it as a prophane thing Contrariwise our aduersaries doe dispute Paul calleth matrimonie a Sacrament Ephes 5 32. Ans 1 The Papists translation is corrupt the worde in the Greeke signifieth a mysterie or secreâ—â— Paul sayth not of mariage that it is a mysterie but of the spiritual coniunction of Christ his Church as hee expoundeth himselfe But I speake concerning Christ and the Church 2 Mariage is honourable among all and the bed without spott Hebrewes 13 4. But the bed should not be without spot if there were not They bee the wordes of Eckius in his Enchiridion the Grace of the Sacrament Ans 1 The Ministerie Magistrates Parents are honourable and yet no Sacraments 2 Here is a fallacie taking that for a cause which is not For the bed is sayde to bee vnspotted not because matrimonie is a Sacrament but because the religious Man and Wife dooth not defile the bedde with whoredome and adulterie as the next words following do declare 3 If the grace of the Sacrament doo make the bed spotlesse why do they not grant matrimony to their priests why doo they esteeme it more tollerable for a Priest to bee a whoremonger and adulterer than a married man For such Priests haue they to lerated manie in poperie when as they will not away with honest mariage 3 Mariage hath the promise of eternall life For the woman shall bee saued by bearing of children 1 Timoth 2. 15. Ans 1 By this reason all married persons euen the infidels should bee saued 2 Paul comforteth women that their sorrowes which GOD layeth vpon them for a punishment do turne to them to bee offices of their calling exercises of the crosse of a Sacrament neuer a word 3 Paul speaketh vpon supposition and with limitation If they continue in faith c. Hee dooth not ascribe saluation to matrimony but onely dooth teach that those wiues shall be saued in the state of wedlocke who keep faith godlinesse charitie and chastitie 4. Godly women by perseuerance in faith loue c. doo sanctifie their matrimonie but sacraments are not sanctified by man but on the contrarie side men receiue sanctification from the Sacrament 4 The vnbeleeuing husband is sanctified by the Wife 1 Cor. 7 14 Seeing therfore Matrimonie hath the power of sanctifying it is a Sacrament Answ 1. If this sanctifying heere spoken of pertaine to saluation then it followeth that infidels shall bee saued by their belieuing wines which is absurde but if to sanctifie heere signifie an other thing then the argument falleth to the ground 2 But there bee fowre termes For in the Antecedent holy signifieth after the phrase of the Hebrues that which is granted and permitted as a thing that is lawfull to be vsed in holy manner in which sense creeping things are saide to be purified Acts 10 15. but in the consequent it is taken for sanctitie or holinesse and iustification and renouation 5 Matrimonie hath his institution blessing from God Gen. 2 18 22 24. Therefore it is a Sacrament Ans That promise of blessing is not of the grace of iustification and reconciliation but onely of a temporall felicitie It is nothing therfore to a Sacrament which is conuersant onely about the grace of reconciliation 6 Matrimonie is a remedie or medicine as the schoole-men speake of a spirituall disease to witfornication 1 Cor 7 2 Ans 1 This is not sufficient to make it a Sacrament because it is a remedie against fornication 2 Faith and praier are remedies against tentations shall they therefore bee counted Sacraments 5 Extreame vnction We admit not of extreame vnction because it neither hath the wordes of institution which is to continue in Church nor any certaine ordination of his rite described by the circumstances thereof nor the promise of grace of iustification nor any other property at all of a true Sacrament Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe dispute 1. Extreame vnction hath the outward element of oile therefore it wanteth not the property of a Sacrament Ans Vnlesse to this element there come the word to destinate it to this purpose to coÌ„ maund it and to promise the forgiuenes of sinnes and euerlasting life of all which our Aduersaries can shew nothing in the Scripture their oile of the sicke is no more to bee esteemed than oile Oliue which is provided to be sawce for a sallet of hearbs 2.
volume of Controuersies betweene the Protestants and the Papists CHAP. 1. Of the holy Scriptures The holy Scripture alone is the Iudge of all controuersies which arise in the Church and the most certaine rule of truth REASONS THE Prophet Isaie sendes vs in deciding of coÌ„trouersies of Religion to the law and to the testimonie Isai 8. 20. that is to the holy Scripture Christ in the controuersie of his person â—nd doctrine saith to the Pharisies Search â—he Scriptures c. they are they which teâ—tifie of mee Ioh. 5 39. Saint Paul greatly commendeth the holy Scriptures vnto vs saying The whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improue to correct and instruct in righteousnes that the man of God may bee absolute being made perfect vnto euery good worke 2 Timoth 3 16 17. The Citizens of Beraea iudged of Pauls Sermons opinions out of the Scriptures whether Paul taught such things as were agreeable to the holy Scriptures and are for that cause commended Act 17 11. Christ answered out of the Scriptures to the questions of the Pharisies Matthew 19 4 c. of the Sadducees Matth 22 31 c. of the perfect fulfilling of the law Luke 10. 26 27. of his diuinitie out of Psalme 110 Matthew 22 43 44. Whereas hee might haue confuted and confounded them with his miracles alone The Apostles confirmed all their assertions out of the Scriptures as did also the Euangelists Matthew speaketh often of the fulfilling of the Prophets and so decides the greatest controuersie that euer was concerning the Messias out of the writings of the Prophets So Peter also prooueth out of the holy Scripture that Iesus is the promised Messias the Sauiour of the worlde Acts 2 25 c. And Chapter 3. verse 18 c. and Chapter 4 verse 11 25 c. and Chap. 10 verse 43 Stephen fighteth against his aduersaries the Priests Pharisies Scribes with the weapons of the Scripture Acts 7. Paul in the controuersie of Religion which he had with the Iewes prouokes to the law and the writings of the Prophets Acts 24 14 and 26 22 27. The same Paul gathered the doctrine of Iustification out of the Scripture Romanes 1 2 3 4 and 10 Chapters Galath 3 and 4 Chapter and cleareth the controuersie of the person of our Sauiour out of the Scriptures Ephesians 4. Peter draweth Baptisme 1 Peter 3. 21 And other controuersed points betwixt the Iewes and the Christians out of the Scripture of the old â—estament The Epistle to the Hebrewesis wholly heerein occupied to proue the greatest controuersie of his time concerning Christ the only true high Priest out of the Scripture of the old Testament The same did likewise the ancient Fathers in the Church of God who confuted the Heretikes out of the holy Scripture and the ancient godly Counsels ouerthrew the Heretikes not by the opinions of men but by testimonies of the holy Scripture dulie waighed The Position of our Aduersaries The holy Scripture alone cannot be the Iudge of controuersies Their reasons are Because it is insufficient and containeth not all things which pertaine to faith Because it is obscure Because it is vncertaine and may be drawne either to this or that side Hence arise these questions following The first question Whether the Scripture be insufficient They affirme we denie that it is insufficient and that for these testimonies following These things are written saith Iohn that you might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God and that in belieuing you might haue life through his name Ioh. 20. 31. Therefore those which belieue may attaine euerlasting life by those thinges which are left writteÌ„ in the holy Scriptures and so the Scripture is sufficient for the saluation of men Thou hast knowne the holy Scriptures of a childe saith Paul to Timothie which are able to make thee wise to saluation 2. Timothie 3. 15. All things that I haue heard of my Father haue I made knowne to you Iohn 15 15. The holy Scripture doth mâ—ke â—he man of God absolute and perfect to euery good worke 2 Timo 3 17. I kept back nothing but shewed you all the counsell of God Act 20 27. There can be moued no controuersie of Religion for which the Scripture hath not afore hand prouided a deciding or determining sentence therefore Saint Paul in the controuersie of Iustification calleth the Scripture prouident or fore-seeing Galath 3 8. Contrariwise our Aduersaries reason thus 1 The Apostles taught many things which are not written Answer 1. This is a begging of the question for this same thing is it which is denied Now a doubtfull thing ought not to bee proued by an other as doubtfull 2 The contrarie heereto is contained in the places of Scriptures before alleadged 3 The Apostles should heereby be conuinced of vnfaithfulnes as hauing kept back things necessary to saluation 4 Moreouer there is extant not one onely writing of an Apostle or Euangelist but more that that which is not contained in one may plainely be seene in other of the Apostles writings 2 I haue yet many thinges to say vnto you but you cannot beare them now Ioh. 16 12 Answer 1. It is a fallacie from that which is saide in some particular respect to the same spoken absolutely and generally in all respects for Christ speaketh of his Apostles not yet illuminated by his holy Spirit but he speaks not of them as beeing endued with the holie Ghost in the day of Pentecost That which the worde Now dooth plainely declare 2. While our Aduersaries argue from the Apostles not enlightened to the Church instructed by the writings of the Apostles there arise in the Syllogisme foure termes 3 Besides it was one manner of knowledge which the Apostles had before the day of Pentecost and an other after the receiuing of the holy Ghost therefore these different thinges ought not to bee confounded 3 Other thinges saith Saint Paul will I set in order when I come 1 Corinthians 11 34 therefore Paul did not write all things Answer Paul speakes of indifferent Ceremonies in the Church not of articles of Religion necessarie to saluation Their Argument therefore as the saying is is from the staffe to the corner 4 Manie thinges are not contained in the holy Scripture which are necessarie to faith Ans 1. This we denie it is the very thing in question therefore it is a begging of the question 2. Our Aduersaries play with the word Faith for they meane not a true and sauing faith whereof our question is but in a large sence they take the word Faith vnfitlie wrapping in the word Faith euery friuolous toy long after the Apostles time as it were yesterday obtruded vpon the Church of Christ and so from the two-fold signification of the word Faith there arise foure termes which hinder that there can be no iust conclusion 5 The Scripture saith nothing of Christs descension into hell Answere That is most false for the
voluntarie but originall sinne is not voluntarie therfore c. An 1. We may not leape from one science See Chap. 13 quest 2 obiect 6. to an other which is done in this argument whiles in defining what is sinne the Aduersarie goes from Divinitie to Philosophie to fetch the definition thereof from Aristotle 2 And so here is a confusion of distinct principles and seuerall artes and a fallacie of manie questions as but of one 3 Originall sinne though it be not voluntarie in vs now in respect of the present corruption which wee draw by nature from our Parents yet it was and is voluntarie in respect of the beginning principle and cause therof Adam and all his posteritie in his loynes coÌ„mitted the first sinne of disobedience against God willingly and thence issued Originall corruption And this is sufficient even in reaâ—on and philosophie to make an action sinâ—ull For a drunken man though hee knowe â—ot what hee dooth yet if hee kill a man in â—is drunkennesse is by the Ciuill Lawes of men guiltie of murder because himselfe was the cause of his drunkennesse See more in the place of Renouation Cap 13 quest 2. QVESTION 3. Of the workes of infidels The Question is whether the good workes or vertues of infidells be so devoide of all fault that the doers thereof do deserue grace The Papists affirme they bee wee denie it for these reasons Without Faith it is vnpossible note that hee sayth it is vnpossible to please God Hebr 11 6 but infidells want faith otherwise they should not bee called infidells therefore c. Without Christ there is no saluation noâ— eternall life no favour or acceptance with God Iohn 17 2 3. Acts 4 12. Matthew 3 17. But Infidells are ignorant of Christ therâ—fore c. The end of the workes which Infidellâ— doe is not for the glorie of God but most vsually for their owne glory or couetousnes or ambition or pleasure c. 4 If the person that doth the workes be not accepted of God then neither can the workes be how glorious soeuer they bee So God had no respect to the sacrifice of Cain not because for that the sacrifice was not of it selfe good but because God hated Cain for his impietie See more heereof in the 12 Cap quest 1â— Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason thus 1 Vertuous actions in infidels are not of themselues Simil Wine that is of it selfe very good if it bee kept in a corrupt vessell becommeth so distastful that it may breed loathing or cause vomiting in them that drinke of it euill therefore they may not bee reckoned amongst sinnes An. What vertues are of themselues wee are not heere to dispute but howe they are to bee esteemed by reason of the faultinesse of them in whome they are 2 It is therefore a fallacie making moe questions where there should be but one for these two are confusedly shuffled together what vertues are in theÌ„selues what in respect of the maÌ„ in whom they be It is also a fallacie from that which is spoken in some particular respect to the same taken absolutely and simply for these actions are in the former place taken absolutely and in the later as they are considered in respect of him that doth them 2 Vertues in infidels are the gifts of God therfore they are not to be accounted for sinnes Ans 1. As they are the gifts of God so they are no sinnes but heere they are considered not as they proceede from god but as the good and holy gifts of God are polluted in corrupt instrumeÌ„ts 2. Ther are some gifts of god which sanctifie the receiver and some which doe not of these later sort are all the gifts of God in infidells 3. A good thing by abusing of it may become to be not good 3. God hath sometimes rewarded the vertues of infidels therefore they haue pleased him and haue not beene counted for sinnes Ans God hath commanded outward honestie and civility and doth bestowe temporall rewards on it but our question is not of temporall but of spirituall rewards therefore this is nothing to the purpose The Iesuites in the Article of Iustification doe expound the word Grace for a gift or habite infused into the soule of man from heauen vvherby he is moved or stirred to worke righteously and by the which his workes are accepted with God and this Grace they deuide into the first and seconde Grace or into a preventing Grace whereby a man may prepare himselfe to the grace of Iustification and a subsequent grace whereby a man is actually and habitually made iust and so they goe about to shift of by this their explication al the sayings of the scripture concerning the free instification by faith But we in the Article of Iustification acknowledge no signification of the word Grace but such as excludeth all merits of men and that for these reasons Because the word Grace in the article of iustification is opposed to Merits workes and debt 1 To him that worketh the wages is not accounted by fauour but by debt Rom 4. 4. 2 If it be of grace it is no more of workes or else grace were no more grace Rom 11. 6 3 Hee hath saued vs not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace which was giuen to vs through Christ Iesus before the world was 2 Tim 1 9 4 By grace ye are saued through faith that not of your selues it is the gift of God not of workes c. Ephes 2 8 9 Because it is opposed to the law which causeth wrath we are not vnder the law but vnder grace Rom 6 14 Because the Scripture declareth the same by equivalent termes or words of the same value and signification 1 They are iustified freely by his grace Rom 3 4. 2 When the bountifulnes and loue of god our sauiour toward man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which wee had done but according to his mercy he saued vs Tit 3 4 5 3 Let vs goe boldly to the throne of grace that we may receiue mercy Heb 4 15. Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe dispute 1 The word grace is oftentimes in the Scripture taken for the gifts of the holy Ghost as 1 Corin â—â— 4 there are Diuisiones Gratiarum diuersities of graces Ans 1 The propositions of this reason are meere particulars and therefore no conclusion followes 2. Whereas Saint Paul in that place treateth of miraculous gifts not of iustification and our question is only of iustification the argument is frivolous and not to the present purpose 3. Though wee denie not but that the worde grace is sometimes in Scripture taken figuratiuely for the free gifts of God bestowed vpon men for only we deny it to bee vsed in that signification in the article of Iustification any where in the Scripture yet neither in this place alledged is the word Charis vsed which properly signifieth grace but Charisma which signifieth a gift freely bestowed
and therefore the place is fitly and properly translated There are diuersities of gifts 2 Wee haue receiued grace for grace Iohn 1 16. 1 This is a Doctour like exposition made of their meere Doctour like authoritie without reason wee haue receiued grace that is the grace of iustification for grace that is for the first preuenting grace but the meaning of Saint Iohn is because the sonne of God was in highest grace and fauour with his heauenly father therfore the father doth embrace vs also with his grace and louing kindnesse for his sonnes sake in whom we beleeue 2. That grace in this place is opposed vnto merites the wordes next following doe declare for the law was giuen by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Heere Christ and Moses are opposed betwixt themselues as it were in the proper differences of their offices that is of wrath by the lawe and of grace by the Gospell 3 Grace is the gift of God Ephes 2. 8. therefore it is an infused and inherent habite Answere 1 It is a fallacie of composition and diuision arising from the construction of the words for the word gift is not simplie and alone construed with the word grace but with saluation by grace which if it might should haue been expressed in one word Brieffely plainely the Apostle saith not Grace is the gift of God but that ye are saued by grace that is the gift of God 2 and for the same cause the gift in this place is not a habite for gift is opposed there to workes and merites as being a thing that is bestowed of meere fauour 4 It is a good thing that the hart be established with grace Heb 13 9 Answere 1 It is a begging of the question because this is controuersed whether Grace doe in these wordes signifie an infused habite 2. In that very place the Apostle opposeth Grace to the vaine confidence of workes against them who put confidence in meates drinkes c. Therefore by the nature of contraries it appeareth that the worde grace is heere taken for the free fauour and mercy of God so the argument hangeth not together for in the Antecedent Grace is taken for the fauour of God in the consequent for an infused habite CHAP. 10. Of Iustification SEeing our aduersaries doe diuerse wayes wrâ—p and inuolue this disputation let vs devide it into certaine and distinct members and questions Question 1. And first of all whereas the word Iustification wrested to a wrong signification by our aduersaries as if to iustifie were of an vniust man to make one iust habitually or by a habite infused and seeing they hisse at imputed righteousnesse let vs consider the true signification of the word which is no other but to be absolved from the guilte of sinne that it bee not imputed but pardoned which appeareth to bee so by the reasons following Because the word Iustification is a borowed word from the court and place of iudgement which in his proper and naturall signification is vsed in the Scripture for to absolue acquitte from fault and guilte as 1 Wo to them that iustifie the wicked for a reward Isai 5 23. 2 The righteous shal bee iustified and the wicked condemned Deuter 25 1 3 Euerie man that hath a matter might come vnto me that I might iustifie him as the originall hath and is translated agreeable to the sense more plainely that I might doe him iustice 2 Sam. 15 4. 4 He that iustifieth the wicked and hee that condemneth the iust euen they both are abomination Note that the whole acte of Iustification is very liuely described in the scripture as a kind of iudiciall acte processe the person guilty is called to the barre is accused witnesses are brought he is condemned or acquitted c. to the Lord Prov. 17 15. So doth the same word keepe the same signification borowed from the court and iudicial proceedings in the Article of Iustification in the Scripture 1 Who shall laie any thing to the charge of Gods chosen It is God that Iustifieth who shall condemne c. Rom 8 33 34 heere yee see words and phrases borowed froÌ„ the court and Iudiciall proceedings to accuse to condemne to iustifie c. The equivalent termes of iustification or other words vsed to signifie iustification doth proue the same 1 Reconciliation is taken for Iustification Rom 5 9 10 2 Corinth 5 19 2 Remission of sinnes is taken for Iustification 1 Blessed is he whose wickednesse is forgiuen Psal 32 1 2 Iesus shall saue his people from their sinnes Matt. 1 21. 3 To giue knowledge of saluation vnto his people by the remission of their sinnes Luke 1 77 3 To cover sinnes is vsed for Iustification Blessed is he whose sinne is couered Psal 32 1 4 The holy Scripture doth describe Iustification by the words imputation reckoning accounting c as 1 God was in Christ and reconciled the world vnto himselfe not imputing their sinnes vnto them 2 Corinth 5 19. 2 Blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord imputeth not iniquitie Psal 32 2 3 As Dauid declareth the blessednesse of the man vnto whome God imputeth righteousnes without workes Rom 4 6 4 Abraham belieued God and it was counted to him for righteousnes Rom 4 â— 5 To him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom 4 5. 6 It is not written for him onely that it was imputed to him for righteousnes but also for vs to whom it shall be imputed for righteousnes which beleeue in him c. Rom. 4. 23 24 Contrariwise our aduersaries do reason 1 To iustifie by force of grammaticall composition of the word is all one as to make a man iust of one who before was not iust therefore to iustifie is to make iust Ans 1 Heere be foure termes in the Antecedent the signification of the word iustificatioÌ„ is taken grammatically in the consequent it is taken according to that signification which belongeth properly to Diuinitie 2. The true signification of the word is to be sought for in the proper science wherin the question is contained 2 By his knowledge shall my righteous seruant iustifie many Esai 53. 11 therefore hee doth iustifie them by an infused habite Ans It is a fallacie called ignoratio elenchi for the necessarie determination or limitation is omitted which followeth in the next words for he shal beare their iniquities which wordes declare that iustification is to bee vnderstoode heere by imputation for they are iustified by his bearing their sinnes as if themselues had borne and wyped away their owne sinnes 3 Holinesse shall preserue and iustifie the heart that is shall cause that the heart bee made iuste Ecclesiastic 1. 17. Answere 1 The booke is not Canonicall and therefore in a point of such moment his authoritie is not sufficient â— in the Greeke text the word iustification is not found 3 Neither if to iustifie in this place
bestowed Roma 6. 23 doron a gifte Ephe. 2 8. kecharistai Ho Theos God gaue it freely Galathians 3 18. 19. 3. The word One by the grace of one Rom 5 15 with one offering c Heb 10 14. 4 Without the Law Rom 3 21 not by the lawe Galat 2 21 3 11. 5 The exclusion of workes without works Romans 4 6. not by workes Titus 3 5 not according to our workes 2 Timo 1 9. not of your selues Ephes 2 8. Not hauing mine owne righteousnesse Philip 3. 9. going about to stablisâ— their own righteousnesse haue not c. Rom 10 3. 6 The word Imputation which is opposed vnto merites Rom 4 3 4. 6 c. 7 The forgiuenesse of sinnes and the not recompensing for them by workes Psalm 32 1 Rom 4 7. 8 Not but by the faith of Iesus Christ Gala 3 16. The force of which exclusiue what it is is plaine by the like Phrase and manner of speech Ioh. 6 44. No man commeth vnto mee except the Father drawe him and No man commeth to the Father but by Mee Ambro in Epist ad Roma ca. 3 14. August in Ps â—8 et in Ioh. tract 42. et de â—empore Ser. 68. Basil homil de Humil. Chrys in Epist ad Gal. cap 3 c. Therfore exclusiue words which exclude all things in vs from iustification but faith are fully contained in Scripture Neither can it be denied but the Fathers have vsed the word onely by faith or by faith alone 10. If iustification be ascribed to faith alone there will be made too too easie a way to eternal life Ans 1. To belieue is not so easie a thing For faith is the gift of GOD and it is not in the power of man to belieue when he will 2 We require good workes to saluation as necessarie conditions but not as causes of iustification or saluation 3 Nay the Papists do make the way to HeaueÌ„ much more easie while first they place it in the free-will of man and then expounde it that Heauen is to bee purchased with money QVESTION 5. Our Aduersaries moue vs a fift question while they seeke for themselues a starting hole affirming that by the workes of the lawe in the places before cited Paul vnderstandeth the Ceremoniall law onelie and not the morall And secondlie that the workes of the Lawe are opposed to the workes of the Gospell as if the commandements of the Gospel were diuerse from those which are contained in the ten commandements The places of the Scripture following do most manifestlie contradict this opinion The righteousnesse of the Lawe is denied vnto Abraham Rom 4 where doubtles the Ceremoniall law cannot be vnderstood for that it had then no being but the morall law is meant Paul vseth the word Works absolutely without anie restraint as Ephes 2 9. Rom 4 6. and 11 6 c. in which places the nature of the thing will not suffer the word works to bee restrained to the Ceremoniall lawe onely So in like sorte he reiected the workes of Righteousnesse Tit. 3 5. Hee convinceth the Iewes to be sinnefull by the morall lawe as before hee conuicted the GENTILES by the morall lawe written by nature in the heart of man Paul decreede the morall lawe to be the rule of good workes euen in the regenerate also Therefore he doth vnderstand not the Ceremoniall onely Wee establish the lawe sayth Paul Romans 3 31. But the Ceremoniall lawe is not established for it is abrogated by the Gospell By the lawe commeth the knowledge of sin which seeing it is a general speech appertaining as well to vs as to the Iewes it cannot be vnderstood of the Ceremoniall but of the morall law Rom 3 20. 8 I knew not sinne but by the lawe but what law was that heare some particular commandement by way of instance out of that lawe I had not knowne lust except the law c. Rom. 7. 7 but the Ceremoniall law containeth nothing concerning lust It is evident therefore that Paul doth speake principally of the morall law although hee doe sometimes adioyne the Ceremoniall law too but hee bereaueth both morall and Ceremoniall of all power to iustifie Contrariwise our Aduersaries do reason 1 Paul maketh an opposition beetweene the law of workes and the law of faith Rom 3. 27. therefore we are to accept of this distinction Answere Paul doth in that place vse the worde law in a generall signification for a doctrine And whilest he denieth iustification to the law of workes hee doth certainly denie it to works therefore this is nothing to the purpose And our Aduersaries doe not or wil not vnderstand the phrase and manner of speach of the Hebrewes whereby the word law Thorah is taken for a doctrine 2 Paul speaketh of some things that are Ceremoniall as of the Sabbaoth of the new moones of Circumcision in the Epistle to the Galatians therfore he vnderstandeth not the morall lawe Ans 1 Paul passeth sometimes from the particular to the generall and sometime from the generall to the particular that hee may make it manifest that no workes of the whole law doe iustifie a man 2. Wee haue alreadie proued that he speaketh of all parts of the law and not only of the Ceremoniall 3 In the Acts of the Apostles Chap 15 the Ceremoniall lawes only are handled Ans 1 Be it neuer so true that the Ceremoniall law is there only haÌ„dled yet we may not argue thus Iustification is denied to the Ceremoniall law therefore it is not denied to the morall Now in that place the mention was of the Ceremoniall lawe because there was expressely moued a coÌ„trouersie coÌ„cerning the keeping of ceremonies 2 And yet that that place doth not only treate of the Ceremonial law is prooued by these words which wee were neither able to beare neither our fathers amongst whom the fathers that liued before Moses without the Ceremoniall lawe may be understood but we beleeue through the grace of the Lorde Iesus Christ to be saued euen as they Act 5 10 11. In which words Saint Peter had reference to the fathers which were not able to beare the burden of the morall law so that they might perfectly satisfie and fulfill the same And Peter doth expressely oppose the grace of Iesus christ and faith in Christ to the fulfilling of the lawe that which the whole course and order of the place doth manifestly declare to be true CHAP. 11. Of Faith Question 1. IT is no marvaile that our Aduersaries doe deny iustification by faith alone seeing they doe not acknowledge faith and those which bee the necessarie conditions thereof Wherefore now let vs treat of the conditions of faith what they be wherein our aduersaries doe dissent from vs. We consider faith not as our Aduersaries doe Condition 1 as a worke vertue habite or qualitie but we vnderstand it relatiuely according to the meaning of the Scriptures as it hath respect and relation vnto Christ and iâ— grounded vpon him * that
whether the people are to receiue sub vtraque specie vnder both kinds that is both the breade and the wine not vnder both accidents which were a senselesse speach but they take the word Species for a shape or accident which the Fathers meant not CHAP. 16. Of the adoration inclusion and carying about of the Eucharist as also of the Sacraments out of their vse THe adoring carying about and shutting of the Eucharist in a boxe vseth to bee glosed with this colour especially among the Papists for that they say that the Eucharist is and remaines a Sacrament besides and out of the vse thereof turning that into an argument or proofe which is a controversie therefore are wee also to make a question heereof Question 1. Whether the Eucharist remaine a Sacrament out of the vse thereof We denie it for these reasons Because seeing Sacraments are actions they consist onely in vse and action that they may bee Sacraments which action and vse ceasing the Sacrament it selfe ceaseth also Seeing our Aduersaries themselues doe not account Baptisme to bee a Sacrament out of his vse as in which the wordes of the action are contained in the institution and moe wordes of the action doe concurre in the Lords Supper than in the institution of Baptisme much lesse also may the Eucharist remaine out of his vse than Baptisme may Where the whole action is not neither is there the whole Sacrament but when the Consecration is rent and seperated from the communicating or receauing there is not the whole action neither is there therefore the whole Sacrament Christ doth prescribe a certaine end and vse Eate drinke Christ instituted this vse for this Sacrament wherefore this vse ceasing the Sacrament ceaseth also Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe dispute 1. When Christ pronounced these words This is my body the Disciples had not eaten as yet and yet the words of Christ were true then before they did eate therefore it was a Sacrament also even before and without the vse thereof Ans 1. If we made the action and vse onelie to consist in eating and drinking then the argument would follow but we doe not define that action to consist onely in eating and drinking but in doing all those thinges which Christ either by his example or commaundement bids vs doe as namely to receaue the bread to breake blesse distribute and eate it to giue God thanks and to shew the Lords death It was not therefore out of the vse of the Sacrament when Christ reached the bread to his Apostles 2. Luke omitteth these wordes Take eate intimating thereby that the body of Christ is in the Eucharist out of the vse thereof Answere 1. By a fallacie of Division those things are severed asunder which ought out of foure rehearsalls of the institution to haue beene ioined together for that which Luke omitted the other two Euangelists and Paule haue supplied The whole action then is not to bee taken from some one of them alone but iointly and together from them all 2 They conclude heere any thing of everie thing for what coherence is Luke omitted some words therefore he did omit them for none other cause but to shewe that the Sacrament out of his vse is neuerthelesse a Sacrament 3. Christ faith this is he saith not It shall bee made my body heereafter to wit in the eating Answere 1. It was answered a while agoe that the action and vse doth not consist in eating alone And therefore in the acte of the Supper the bread is rightly called the bodie of Christ even before the eating that it shall not be needefull to say This shall bee made the body of Christ 2 And Christ in these wordes would simply say this much I giue you my body to be eaten 4 If the Eucharist bee not a Sacrament out of his vse it would followe that not the wordes of Christ but our vse doth make a Sacrament Answere 1. Christs will whom wee ought to obey in eating and drinking maketh the Sacrament and not our vse The vse of the Sacrament therefore relyeth vpon the words of institution and how then doe wee ascribe it to vs and not rather to the word of Christ while wee doe that which is commaunded by the wordes of Christ It is therefore a fallacie supposing that to bee a cause which is none 5. In the Primitiue Church the Deacons were woont to carie parts of the Eucharist to the sicke therefore the Eucharist remaines a Sacrament out of the vse Ans These parts were caried to the sicke that they should take them and eate them as Communicants and partakers of the common action according to Christs institution and therefore that was not out of the vse of the Sacrament It is therefore a loose conclusion from the Sacrament in vse to the Sacrament out of his vse 6. Ecclesiasticall writers doe report that some were wont to carie the Eucharist home with them and to reserue it Ans 1. And it may be doubted whether they did well or no 2. Other mens abuse doth not make a rule for vs and impose a necessitie to doe or approoue the like And the Reader may heere obscrue that the Papists doe vsuallie in their Sophisticall reasons suppresse that proposition which is weake and lyable to open exception as knowing that they cannot proue it but this is not to deale sincerely with the Church of God 7. But when afterward some daies being passed after the consecration they did in the time of persecution eate the consecrated bread which they had reserved who would denie but that they receaued the body of Christ especially being as they were so deuoutly affected Ans 1. Wee may not make rules of those things which happen in case of necessitie 2. Neither may we thinke that those deuout Christians in that agonie of persecution did receaue the reserved Eucharist without the memorie of Christs passion without godly praiers and giving of thankes All which seeing they belong to the vse and action of the Supper it may not bee saide that they receaved the Sacrament out of the vse And the elements which they vsed were destinated to the vse of the Lords Supper Question 2. VVhether the Eucharist bee to bee adored Our Aduersaries doe adore it with divine worship onely due to God not onely in the vse therof but out of the vse too in their Oratories and in publicke processions when it is caried about We say that the Eucharist is to be reverenced as an holy mysterie but not to bee adored or worshippeed and that foâ— these reasons Because the Sacraments doe consist of an earthly and an heavenly matter therefore when the Sacrament is adored the element and the earthly matter is adored which is Artolatria a worshipping of bread Out of the vse the worshipping of the Eucharist is more absurd Idolatrie for out of the vse Sacraments cease to bee Sacraments and so they worship bread which is not so much as holy or sacramentall bread True adoration
Christ did not send the Thiefe vpon the Crosse to Purgatorie though hee had done many ill deedes but calleth him directly to heaven Luk 23 43 Paul would not haue Christians to be ignorant of the estate of theÌ„ which are dead in Christ there he doth not only say nothing of Purgatorie but hath arguments also against it 1 Thes 4 13. c. 1 He saith the faithfull departed do sleepe not they are tormented in purgatorie ver 13. 2 He speaketh it for our comfort But there would be no comfort if we should know that our friends religiously departed were in paine and torments and such as bee extreame ver 13. 3 Christ will bring with him at his coÌ„ming the faithfull departed hee will not then at length cal them to him out of Purgatorie ver 14. The Popish purgatorie whereby wee should bee purged from sinnes after death doth crosse and twhart the one only and true purgatorie of Christians which is the merit and bloud of Christ layed holde on by faith 1 Mens hearts are purged by faith not by the fire of purgatorie Act. 15 9. 2 The bloude of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God purgeth vs from all sinne 1 Ioh 1 7. 3 Be not deceiued neither fornicatours nor idolaters nor adulterers nor wantons c shal inherit the kingdoÌ„e of God And such were some of you now see their purgatorie what it was but ye are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are iustified in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6 9 10 11. It twharteth also the perfect satisfaction and perfect merite of CHRIST if no we after all wee must make satisfaction in the paines of purgatorie 1 For so the passiue righteousnesse of Christ shall be thrust out of dores 2 Christ is the reconciliation for the sinnes of the whole World 1 Ioh. 2 2. 3 Surely hee hath borne our infirmities c. I say dooth in one place refute Purgatorie by many arguments Hee was wounded for our transgressions c. with his stripes we are healed c. the Lord hath layde vpon him the iniquity of vs all c. The chastisement of our peace the punishment of our sinnes was vpon him c. Hee hath caried our sorrowes Isay 53 4 5 6. It is contrarie to the article of the Christian faith 1 We belieue the remission not the compensation of sinnes 2 Wee belieue eternall life Heere is no mention of Purgatorie The opinion of our Aduersaries concerning Purgatorie hath no waight 1 For they confesse that there was no purgatorie in the time of the olde Testament 2 They cannot auoyde the absurditie concerning them which shall bee founde aliue at the latter day and haue deserued Purgatory what shall be done with them whether God will pardon them those punishments or whether they must bee tormented for a time after the finall sentence of the last â—â—dgment 3 The grounds of this opinion were taken from Plato and Virgil lib 6. Aened Contrariwise our Aduersaries do reason 1 Because all men haue not perfect and firme faith therefore all after this life cannot perfectly beâ—aued Ans 1 Christ when he saith that faith is the instrumentall cause of saluatiâ—n hee speaketh of faith generally and excludeth neither weake nor imperfect faith 2. Christ layed holde on by faith cannot be deuâ—ded that he should be said to be laied hold on but in part and they which lay holde on him to be saued but in part but whole Christ is apprehended as well by a weake as by a strong faith 3 It is a fallacie taking that for a cause which is no cause For the strongnesse or weakenesse of faith or an accident of faith is not the cause of apprehending saluation but of retaining it Now that which is spoken of retaining that ouâ— Aduersaries do wrongfully apply to the apprehending thereof 2 No vncleane thing shall enter into the kingdome of Heaâ—en Reuel 21 27. Therfore needs they must be purged by purgatorie Answ 1 There bee foure termes in the argument For the purging from the filth of sinne in the Antecedent is taken for the iustification of faith whereby all that belieue are washed are sanctified are purified 1 Cor 6 11 1 Ioh 1 7. Acts 15 9. in the consequent it is taken for a clensing in purgatorie neither knowen to God nor to the Scriptures 2 There is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent For it followeth not the heires of eternall life are vncleane therefore they are purified onely by the fire of Purgatorie and not by any other means such as these which concurre together are faith the bloud the merite of Christ 3 In the name of Iesus shall euerie knee bow both of things in Heauâ—n and things in earth and things vnder the earth Philip. 2 10 Reuel 5 13. But the deuills hate Christ and doe not bow the knees vnto him Therefore there are soules in purgatorie and consequently there is a purgatorie Ans 1 The bowing of the knees in this place is the same that subiection in which sense euen the Deuils though they tremble doe in outward cariage confesse subiection to Christ 2 It is an error taking that which is spoken indefinitely of al sorts of creatuâ—es whether reasonable or vnreasonable as iâ— it were spoken definitely of a certaine sort of men of whom notwithstanding there is no certaintie in Scripture 3 As concerning the place Reuelat 5 3 13. where there is mention made of such as are vnder the earth I answeare 1 If there were a purgatory yet were it not certaine that it were vnder the earth 2 Vnder the earth are both the creatures vnder the earth also the dead which are buried which shall appeare before Christ at the resurrection and shall testifie their subiection 4 If anie mans worke burne hee shall suffer losse but he shall be safe himselfe neuerthelesse yet as it were by the fire 1 Câ—rin 3 15. Therefore there is a Purgatorie Ans 1 It followeth not the fire shall â—ye it Therefore purgatorie fire shall trie it 2 Paul saith the worke shall burne not the person but our Aduersaries imagine the persons and soules shall burne 3 If Paul speake of purgatorie then the Saints shall be thrust into purgatory which is proued by the vniuersall particle Eueriâ— mans worke c. 4 He speaketh of the fire of tribulation affliction and tentation against which stubble may not be opposed but faith which is more precious than golde 5. So then while they confound the worke that shall burne and the persons that shall burne and also the fire of tribulation and the fire of purgatorie there arise not foure but fiâ—e termes 5 Of the sinne against the Holy-ghost it is sayd it shall neither bee forgiuen in this World nor in the World to come Matth. 12 32. Therefore there remaineth a place after death wherein sinnes are forgiuen Answere 1 CHRIST speaketh of the World to come but our Aduersaries themselues