Selected quad for the lemma: act_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
act_n	end_n	parliament_n	session_n	2,454	5	10.4165	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66733	The law of laws, or, The excellencie of the civil law above all humane laws whatsoever by Sir Robert Wiseman ... ; together with a discourse concerning the oath ex officio and canonical purgation.	Wiseman, Robert, Sir, 1613-1684.; Lake, Edward, Sir, 1596 or 7-1674.	1664 (1664)	Wing W3113A; ESTC R33680	273,497	368

question was made whether she had sworn truly or no for proof whereof she was to drink the Bitter waters which would be the confirmers of the Oath if true and the revengers if false Num. 5.24 Against another When the Law had provided that out of the mouth of two or three witnesses who being sworn had given testimony against a man the matter should be established Deut. 19.15 Lest any man should take humane testimonies for Divine Oracles in the next Verse 't is commanded that the suspected witnesse must stand before the Lord the Priests and it must be enquired into whether he hath carried himself sincerely and truly in the testimony he hath given but if he be convicted of falsity then shall he be punished as he should have been whom he complained of But I shall transgress upon the time and upon the Church too the Clock having a while ago called us off if I should further follow these trifles which whoever list my bray with arguments they of their own accord so overflow therefore I restore you to your selves and conclude Isa 28.17 If as the Prophet saith this Judgment which we use be laid to the Line and Righteousnesse to the Plummet of Gods Word there shall be in those things no sin For the Magistrate to require and that from the party guilty or defendant especially if the cause be not capital or a cause of Bloud an Oath and that he may do it so far whether it be that the controversie may thereby be set upon its foundation whilest the state of the cause is sought for or that the truth of the proofs may be made evident whilest the question is handled Nor does the ends of the Oath or the order or the examination offend against Divinity and therefore cannot be declined They that decline it first they do it out of ignorance of Gods Law then the example is dangerous that one may thus for his pleasure enquire into publick judgments without judgment if we may call into question the rest of the affairs of the Kingdom and the moments of the Commonwealth lastly the Law it self if it make not for us That God Almighty may avert this from us to whom turning our selves let us pray that he will give us grace to be modestly wise and sober in all things to see in our minds how irreligious it is how unchristian to decline the judgments of our Nation but rather with all our endeavour with all the strength and force of our Wit to maintain them which maintain the Commonwealth and us all for next after God and his service most true is that saying of Elihu Judgment and Justice maintain all things Job 36.17 Upon the consideration most especially of what hath been written by Dr. Cosens in that Apology touching the Oath Ex officio and Purgation and what is said in that short Manuscript and in the Lord Bishop Andrews Determination thereupon and of the inconveniences and hurt that probably may be feared to ensue upon the prohibiting that Oath and Purgation together with the practice still at Common Law in the like cases and the rest that is here set forth as it is hoped that Act may be thought fit to be revised and re-examined and perhaps altered so with the like humility all that is said or shall be said in this Treatise is most submisly tendered to His Sacred Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this happy Parliament now assembled to be weighed by them if so to their Wisdoms it shall be thought fit otherwise to be as unsaid and retracted as is every thing there if it be dissonant to Gods Word His Majesties Prerogative the Laws of Church or State or the known Laws of the Land or the just policy and government in Church or State or against Christian charity or brotherly love Should any man object That some Civilians desired that this Act whereby the Oath Ex officio and Purgation is forbidden should passe at the end of the recess of Parliament the latter end of this last Summer 1661. when many other Acts of great concernment were in agitation and some then passed and some stayed supposed that they will be resumed and considered of at the next meeting of Parliament that I say this Act should not stay as some would have had it till that next meeting but rather pass now though with these Proviso's on it I can say no more then this that Certa incertis praeferenda if they could not have all they would have yet to have something that in a manner wanted all was but reasonable prudence it had perhaps savoured of morosity to have done otherwise especially considering that those that have long fasted would be glad to eat though I hope these that administred this food to them did not fear they would as hungry men use to do feed too fast to their hurt not to their nourishment and therefore did set the less meat before them but upon a pause after this refreshment there may be a supply Neither need I humbly conceive any thing that is already done hinder the review or alteration of this Act in that point For it is no new thing nor discommendable but contrary to make Laws upon present reasons or emergencies and yet upon future accidents or contingencies and variation of the times and occasions and other necessary requisites which could not well be foreseen at the making of these Laws nor perhaps dreamt on till they happened to alter change or repeal the former Hereof many instances might be given but so plain a case I shall mention but one and that in a matter of Ecclesiastical cognisance touching Precontracts of Matrimony in 32 H. 8. c. 38. 32 H. 8. cap. 38. What Marriages are lawful and what not WHereas heretofore the usurped power of the Bishop of Rome hath alwayes entangled and troubled the méer jurisdiction and regall power of this Realm of England and also unquieted much the subjects of the same by his usurped power in them as by making that unlawfull which by Gods word is lawfull both in marriages and other things as hereafter shall appear more at length and till now of late in our Soveraign Lords time which is otherwise by learning taught then his predecessors in times past long time have been hath so continued the same whereof yet some sparks be left which hereafter might kindle a greater fire and so remaining his power not to seem utterly extinct Therefore it is thought most convenient to the Kings Highness his Lords spirituall and temporal with the Commons of this Realm assembled in this present Parliament that two things specially for this time be with diligence provided for whereby many inconveniences have ensued and many moe else mought ensue and follow as where heretofore divers and many persons after long continuance together in Matrimony without any allegation of either of the parties or any other at their marriage why the same matrimony should

having the said contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding solemnization cohabitation consummation and fractation as it becometh man and wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the Kings Ecclesiastical Iudge by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made any clause article or sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Provided alwayes and be it enacted that this Act do not extend to disannul dissolve or break any marriage that hath or shall be solemnizated and consummated before the said first day of Day next ensuing by title or colour of any Precontract but that they be and be deemed of like force and effect to all intents constructions and purposes as if this Act had never been had ne made any thing in this present Act notwithstanding Provided also that this Act do not extend to make good any of the other causes to the dissolntion or disannulling of Matrimony which be in the said Act spoken of and disannulled But that in all other causes and other things there mentioned the said former Act of the two and thirtieth year of the late King of famous memory do stand and remain in his full strength and power any thing in this Act notwithstanding Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. By these the inconveniency appeareth of taking away or altering an ancient long-settled Law practised long in all Christian Countries as this way which had it not been good probably the inconveniency and hurt of it had appeared in so long a time and the Law for the Oath Ex officio and Purgation is of like antiquity and practice in all Christian Countries without inconvenience or hurt thereby arising as yet that I ever could hear of therefore such Laws ought to be deeply weighed and considered of before they be repealed or altered And now that I am speaking of repealing and altering old Laws and making new I thought fit to close this Tract with some Notes of mine drawn up almost all of them in the time of the usurped Government and some after His Majesties restauration and communicated to the sight of some of Quality touching the repealing or altering of some old Laws and making new Some are already past and effected as that for the Lords the Bishops sitting again in the Lords House in Parliament and other things These I offer with all humility to be considered of if it shall by those in Authority be thought fit otherwise to be as unsaid Protesting that I retract as before any thing which is here mentioned that shall appear contrary to Gods Word His Majesties Prerogative or the Laws of the Land or the Just policy and government of any of His Majesties Dominions Touching Parliaments AS a Parliament well constituted and acting regularly Parliament proceedings conduces much to the happinesse of King and Subject so any exorbitancy or deviation therein of which surely all unbiassed men cannot but confesse we have had too much sad experience in the Long Parliament works the contrary corruptio optimi pessima In the time of the Long Parliament some as it were idoliz'd it even almost to an opinion even of Infallibility of which they have made too much advantage to the misery of King and People Some advised then that that great Wheel that great Court should have had its sphere of activity it s known certain bounds publickly declared and not have been like a great River prodigiously overflowing all its banks and bounds Such a Parliament acting regularly is' t not probable the Members thereof would not so much have thirsted to lengthen much lesse to perpetuate it They were called up to consult may not he that calls his Counsellor forbear consulting him when he pleases and dismisse him The extent of an Ordinance of Parliament Ordinance of Parliament having by some been tentor'd then even almost to Infinity might it not have been precisely circumscribed and the exact definition of an Ordinance given As also the just privileges of Parliament explicitely have been made known Privileges of Parliament that the Subject might not then have sworn or promised or protested to have maintained and observed them and yet could not possibly know what they were That due care should have been taken that they might have been observed and kept inviolable on all sides neither diminished nor scrued too high and both the Members of the Houses and the People to have had their just rights entire and for this purpose that that Protestation then put in by the Lords Spiritual the Bishops The Bishops Protestation with their Petition to have the force removed that kept them from the Lords House should have been well consider'd on and the right of Protestation in Parliament declared and maintained being a great privilege And whether after a just Protestation unjustly rejected and the Members kept out of the House by force that so protested and petitioned whether the other Members could then have proceeded further in the House In the late Kings time in the beginning of his Reign when the Earl of Arundel was imprisoned in the Tower about his sons marriage of the Duke of Lenox's daughter being of the Bloud Royal without the Kings consent the Lords would do nothing in their House till he was restored in regard he was committed onely for a misdemeanour and neither for Treason Felony nor breach of peace in which cases they then confessed a Member of Parliament in Parliament time might be kept prisoner The King none of the three Estates And the Lords Spiritual being one of the three Estates as 1 Eliz. 3. and elsewhere and the King being none of the three Estates the contrary whereof hath been falsly held but the Head and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons being but Members and further the Lords Spiritual being one of the greatest Estates of the Realm as 8 Eliz. 1. Some doubted whether one of the Estates can destroy another and whether that come not near the contradicting that Axiom that the Parliament cannot be Felo de se whether that concerns not the Lords Temporal and Commons as well as the Lords Spiritual As for His late Majesties assent 't is known how far the prevalent power in both Houses then carried that and other things too to the misery of the Kingdom Who knows not in what condition the King then was forced to flye by reason of the tumults from Westminster to remoter places And as touching that Act of Parliament for their expulsion out of the Lords House it is not to be forgotten that when it was first brought into the Lords House it was rejected and ought not to have been brought in again that Session yet afterwards it was contrary to the order and course of Parliament brought in again when a great part of the Lords were absent if

it was denied and judg'd against in France in the year 1584. Besides that it should be thought that men whose knowledge of the Law and skill to do right and justice is no greater then bare nature and their illiterate education has affoorded them should be able to do it quicker and at less charge to those that seek it then those that have made it their whole study and employment is to me an imagination strange and beyond belief for unquestionably the skilful and expert Judge that by his study and practise is accustomed to such business as he does best understand it so he must needs soonest dispatch it also Because custome and knowledge hath made all things of that nature obvious and easie to him and such a judge will not allow any thing to be spoken impertinently and beside the matter in question and so a multitude of business goes off quickest under him and both delay and much charge is avoided But when they come to judge thereof who never meditated or dealt in such things it must needs be that they must run into many impertinent questions and that they must toyle and perplex themselves to understand the true point in issue meeting every where with knots and difficulties and scarce any thing that is easie clear to them wherby they cannot without long and frequent debates and much time spent resolve any case in question And though it be rightly decided in the end which it is twenty to one if it be and is an act of chance rather then judgment yet in a multitude of other business before any comes to be judg'd the attendance I am sure is most tedious and the charge intollerable so that to put the Maritime and forreign affairs to be judg'd by Merchants is to augment delay and charge rather then to lessen either In like manner those that study and profess onely the Law of their own Countrey which as I said before is commonly but of narrow extent and serves but for a few particular occasions onely may be as justly deemed incapable to judge and sit upon triall of such matters though they do concern the dispensing of Law and justice too wherein the Municipal Law is silent and has made no provision at all or peradventure is not capable to make any determination in them as when they fall out upon the main and open Sea or in a forreign State or are controversies arising between two several Nations or their subjects to which no Municipal Law can be applied In brief where the Laws stand distinct and the professions thereof distinct also the exercise of them ought not to be confounded by the ones thrusting into the others function and calling And therefore much less reason have they to prohibit the Civilians who have the knowledge the triall of those cases and assume it to themselves who have it not Hereupon therefore we say it is that though every Nation has Laws and Statutes of their own proper for their affairs and people and those within their several confines so far as they do prescribe have the preeminence above any other Law or reason in the world as has been said before Yet there is no forreign Nation in the World that has a distinct study and profession of the Municipal Law of the Nation apart and divided from the Roman Civil Law neither are there any where else students and professours of any Municipal Law distinctly so called and dignified as there are in England But the study and profession of Law that is to be found in the other parts of the World and is serviceable for the government of the Civil State is the study and profession of the Roman Civil Law onely All which and whatsoever else we shall say hereafter to the same purpose we would have understood as humble proposals onely to be considered of in order to a future settlement which we hope and long for But if the Authority of this Nation who best can judge what is fittest for the people and what suits best with the present Government shall in the end commit and dispose of those Trials which formerly did belong to the profession of the Civil Law into the hands of others that do not partake of that excellent knowledge it does behove all persons to sit down satisfied therewith and to submit unto it without any murmuring or disputing for I do greatly approve of that golden saying of the Civil Law e L● 3. Co. De crim sacrileg Disputare de principali judicio non oportet Sacrilegii enim instar est dubitare an is dignus sit quem Imperator elegerit No man ought to question that which the supreme Magistrate has once decided For it is a kind of sacriledg to doubt of that persons merit whom the highest magistrate by his immediate election has thought fit to dignifie CHAP. VIII The reasons are strong and weighty upon which so many forreign States do direct and order the business of their Tribunals most by the praescript reason and equity of the Civil Law IT is from the Roman Civil Law that the students in forreign Nations do derive their first principles of Law and justice and in this are all publick Lectures read and degrees taken and not in any Municipal Law Yet it is true that before they practise or sit in places of Judicature they read and throughly inform themselves in the Laws of their own Countrey by which where there is positive and express constitution in the point their pleadings and judgments must be directed wholly But in cases where there is none as the cases be but few where there is in comparison of those where there is not or where that which is is either in sense ambiguous or in words obscure and must be interpreted or where no Municipal Law can be of any force or use at all as in the cases above specified there they generally make the Civil Law or the reason thereof their onely rule and guide to administer right and justice by both to their own people and to forreigners also To this they are led by divers necessary and most important reasons First for them to do so is but answerable to their education as they are all Civilians and to those principles which their learning hath ingrafted in them For since they have been bred and disciplined under it it is no wonder if their judgments and results be steered by it it being natural that waters should have the true relish of the fountain from whence they flow And therefore when the learned of that profession sate in divers Judicatories of England distribution of justice was ever after the same rules in such cases wherein no special Law was or could be made to guide them Secondly it cannot be devised how such cases as neither the Law nor the custome of the place has specially provided in can be well understood and receive a true and right judgment without the help of that profession All other