studying the peace of this Church and Kingdom will receive without peevishnesse prejudice or partiality the satisfaction which herein is with so much affection and charity endeavoured and tendered then the pains herein taken shall be thought well placed and imployed EDENBURGH Sederunt tertio Die Novembris 1681. His Royal Highness c. Athol Praeses Montrose Argyle Winton Linlithgow Perth Strathmore Roxburgh Ancram Airley Balcarres Lorn Levingston Bishop of Edenburgh Elphinston Rosse Dalziel President of Session Treasurer Deputy Register Advocate Justice Clerk Collintoun Lundie This day the Earl of Argyll having first openly declared his sense as you have it hereafter set down in his explication took the Test as a Privy Councellor and after he was called to and had taken his place the Councils explication which I have already mentioned having been formerly read and debated was put to the vote and passed the Earl not voting thereto as hath been remarked Edenburgh the 3d day of November 1681. The Privy Councils Explanation of the Test. FOrasmuch as some have entertained jealousies and prejudices aganst the Oath and Test appointed to be taken by all persons in publik Trust. Civil Ecclesiastical or Military in this Kingdom by the Sixth Act of His Maje 〈…〉 ies Third Parliament as if thereby they were to swear to every Proposition or Clause of the Confession of Faith therein mentioned or that invasion were made by it upon the intrinsik spiritual Power of the Church or Power of the Keys or as if the present Episcopal Government of this National Church by Law established were thereby exposed to the hazard of alteration or subversion All which are far from the intention or design of the Parliament's imposing this Oath and from the genuine sense and meaning thereof Therefore His Royal Highness His Majesties High Commissioner and Lords of Privy-Council do allow authorise and impower the Archbishops and Bishops to administer this Oath and Test to the Ministers in their respective Diocesses in this express sense 1. That tho the Confession of Faith ratified in Parliament 1567. was framed in the Infancy of Reformation and deserves its due praise yet by the Test we do not swear to every Proposition or clause therein contained but only to the true Protestant Religion founded on the word of God contained in that Confession as it as opposed to Popery and Fanaticism 2. That by the Test or any clause therein contained no invasion or encroatchment is made or intended upon the intrinsik spiritual power of the Church or power of the Keys as it was exercised by the Apostles and the most pure and primitive Church in the first three Centuries after Christ and which is still reserved intirely to the Church 3. That the Oath and Test is without any prejudice to the Episcopal Government of this National Church which is declared by the first Act of the second Session of His Majesties first Parliament to be most agreeable to the word of God and most suitable to Monarchy and which upon all occasions His Majesty hath declared he will inviolably and unalterably preserve And appoint the Archbishops and Bishops to require the Ministers in their respective Diocesses with their first conveniency to obey the Law in swearing and subscribing the foresaid Oath and Test with certification that the refusers shall be esteemed persons disaffected to the Protestant Religion and to his Majesties Government and that the punishment appointed by the foresaid sixth Act of His Majesties third Parliament shall be impartially and without delay inflicted upon them By me Pet. Menzeis Sederunt quarto Die Novembris 1681. His Royal Highness c. Montrose Praeses Perth Ancram Levingston President of Session Advocate Winton Strathmore Airley Bishop of Edenburgh Treasurer Deputy Lundie Linlithgow Roxburgh Balcaras Elphynstoun Register This day the Earl of Argyle being about to take the Test as a Commissioner of the Treasury and having uponcommand produced a paper bearing the sense in which he took the Test the preceeding day and in which he would take the same as a Commissioner of the Treasury Upon consideration thereof it was resolved that he cannot sit in Council not having taken the Test in thesense and meaning of the Act of Parliament and therefore was removed The Earl of Argyle's Explication of the Test vvhen he took it I Have considered the Test and I am very desirous to give obedience as far as I can I 'm confident the Parliament never intended to impose contradictory Oaths Therefore I think no man can explain it but for himself Accordingly I take it as far as it is consistent with it self and the Protestant Religion And I do declare That I mean not to bind up my self in my station and in a lawful way to wish and endeavour any alteration I think to the advantage of Church or State not repugnant to the Protestant Religion and my Loyalty And this I understand as a part of my Oath But the Earl finding as hath been narrated this his Explication though accepted and approven by His Highness and Council the day before to be this day carped and offended at and advantages thereupon sought and designed against him did immediatlie draw up the following Explanation of his Explication and for his own vindication did first communicat it to some privatlie and thereafter intended to have offered it at his trial for clearing of his defences The Explanation of his Explication I Have delayed hitherto to take the Oath appointed by the Pa 〈…〉 ent to be taken betwixt and the first of January nixt but now being required 〈◊〉 two moneths sooner to take it this day peremptourly or to refuse I have considered the Test and have seen several Objections moved against it especially by many of the Orthodox Clergy notwithstanding whereof I have endeavoured to satisfie my self with a just explanation which I here offer that I may both satisfie my conscience and obey Your Highness and Your Lordships commands in taking the Test though the Act of Parliament do not simply command the thing but only under a certification which I could easily submit to if it were with Your Highness favour and might be without offence but I love not to be singular and I am very desirous to give obedience in this and everything as far as I can and that which clears me is that I am confident whatever any man may think or say to the prejudice of this Oath the Parliament never intended to impose contradictory Oaths and because their sense they being the framers and imposers is the true sense and that this Test injoyned is of no privat interpretation nor are the Kings Statuts to be interpreted but as they â—ear and to the intent they are made Therefor I 〈…〉 nk no man that is no privat person can explain it for another to amuse or trouble â—im with it may be mistaken glosses But every man as he is to take it so is to ex 〈…〉 ain it for himself and to endeavour
THE CASE OF THE EARL of ARGYLE OR An exact and full Account of his Trial Escape and Sentence Wherein are insert the Act of Parliament injoining the Test the Confession of Faith the old Act of the King's Oath to be given at His Coronation With several other old Acts made for establishing the Protestant Religion As also several Explications made of the Test by the Conformed Clergy With the Secret Councils Explanation thereof Together with several Papers of Objections against the Test all framed and emitted by Conformists With the Bishop of Edinburgh's Vindication of the Test in answer thereto As likewise a Relation of several Matters of fact for better clearing of the said Case Whereunto is added An APPENDIX in answer to a late Pamphlet called A Vindication of His Majestie 's Government and Judicatories in Scotland Especially with Relation to the Earl of Argyle's Process In so far as concerns the Earl's Trial Printed in the Year M. D. C. LXXXIII THE PUBLISHER TO THE READER HAving received the ensuing Narrative of the Case and Trial of the Earl of Argyle under the Caution you may find in the close of it not to hasten the publication but rather to vvait for a more convenient season It 's like I had continued to comply as I have done hitherto vvith the Earl's inclination if not excited to the contrary by a Paper called A Vindication of His Majestie 's Government and Judicatories in Scotland Especially with relation to the late Earl of Argyle's Process printed at Edinburgh and reprinted at London vvith the appearance of a publick allovvance For albeit all wise and sober men not only in Scotland but also in the vvorld vvho have heard this affair do at this day sufficiently understand its rise procedure issue and tendency vvith all the just consideration that either oppressed innocence abused justice or impotent and ill contrived malice do deserve Yet seeing these concerned have had the confidence to subject their Res Judicata to an unexpected review and vvithall the equitie to leave their advantages and sist themselves on even ground vvith an open defiance to all contradictors and fair submission to the common sense and reason of mankind I thought I could not be vvanting to such an happy opportunity vvithout disappointing so generous an offer deserting my good Friend the Author of the Mist and failing of the second and principal part of my Trust And therefore resolved vvithout further delay to give the follovving sheets their long desired licence Purposing to subjoyn as an Appendix any further animadversions that the above-mentioned Pamphlet may seem to deserve ERRATA PAg. 2. L. 48. Acts r. Oaths p. 6. l. 39. Tursday r. Thursday p. 8. I. 9. peased r. pleased l. 20. And r. But. p. 40. l. 24. prositive r. positive p. 41. l. 38. 1667. r. 1567. p. 44. l. 61. ther r the. p. 64. l. 6. King r. Kingdom p. 66. l. 48 the Earl's hand r. the Earl of Glencairn first Chancellour after His Majesties Return his hand p. 76. l. 2. is not r. as not p. 82. l. 34. yet r. et p. 86. l. 3. Governour r. Deputy Governour p. 94. l. 3. I have considered r. I have not considered Edinburgh 30. May 1682. SIR The case of the late Earl of Argyl which even before the Process led against him you was earnest to know was at first I thought so plain that I needed not and grew afterwards so exceedingly mysterious that I could not for some time give you so perfect ane accompt of it as I wished But this time being still no less proper the exactness of mynarrative will I hope excuse all delays The design against him being now so clear and the grounds founded on so slender that to satisfie all unbyassed Persons of his integrity there needs no more but barely to represent matter of fact I should think shame to spend so many words either on arguments or relation were it not lest to strangers some mystery might still be suspected to remain concealed And therefore to make plain what they can hardly believe though we clearly see it At His Royal Highness arrival in Scotland the Earl was one of the first to wait upon him and until the meeting of our last Parliament the world believed the Earl was as much in His Highness favour as any intrusted in His Majestie 's affairs in this Kingdom When it was resolved and His Majestie moved to call the Parliament the Earl was in the countrey and at the opening of it he appeared as forward as any in His Majestie 's and His Highness service but it had not fat many dayes when a change was noticed in His Highness and the Earl observed to decline in His Highness favour In the beginning of the Parliament the Earl was appointed one of the Lords of the Articles to prepare matters for the Parliament and named by His Highness to be one of a Committee of the Articles for Religion which by the custom of all Scots Parliaments and His Majestie 's instructions to his Commissioner at this time was the first thing treated of In this Committee there was ane Act prepared for securing the Protestant Religion which Act did ratify the Act approving the Confession of Faith and also the Act containing the Coronation Oath appointed by several standing Acts of Parliament to be taken by all our Kings Regents before their entrie to the exercise of the Government This Act was drawn somewhat less binding upon the Successor as to his own profession But full as strictly tying him to maintain the Protestant Religion in the publick profession thereof and to put the Laws concerning it in execution and also appointing a further Test beside the former to exclude Papists from places of publick trust and because the fines of such as should act without taking the Test appeared no better then discharged if falling in the hands of a Popish Successor and some accounting any limitation worse then ane exclusion and all being conâ—ent to put no limitation on the Crown so it might consist with the safety and security of the Protestant Religion it was ordained that all such fines and forfaultures should appertain the one half to the informers and the other half should be bestowed on pious uses according to certain Rules expressed in the Act. But this Act being no wise pleasing to some it was laid aside and the Committee discharged any more to meet and instead of this Act there was brought in to the Parliament at the same time with the Act of succession a short Act ratifying all former Acts made for the securitie of the Protestant Religion which is the first of the printed Acts of this Parliament At the passing of this Act the Earl proposed that these words And all Acts against Poperie might be added which was opposed by the Advocat and some of the Clergie as unnecessary But the motion being seconded by Sir George Lockhart and the then President of the Session now
Arms all Collectors Sub Collectors and Fermers of His Majesties Customes and Excise all Magistrats Deans of Gild Councellors and Clerks of Boroughs Royal Regality all Deacons of trades and Deâ—con-conveeners in the said Burghs all Masters and Doctors in Universities Colledges or Schools all Chaplans in families Pedagogues to children and all Officers and Soldiers in Armies Forts or Militia And all other persons in any publick Trust or office within this Kingdom who shall publickly swear and subscribe the said Oath as follows viz. Archbishops Chief Commanders of the Forces and Officers of the Crown and State and Councellors before the Secret Council all the Lords of Session and all members of the Colledg of Justice and others depending upon them before the Lords of Session the Lords of lustitiary and all these depending upon that Court in the Iustice-Court the Lords and other Members of the Exchequer before the exchequer all Bishops before the Archibishops all the Inferior Clergy Commisaries Masters Doctors of Universities Schools Chaiplans Pedagogues before the Bishops of the respective Diocesses Sheriffs Stewards Baylies of Royalty and Regality and these depending on these Iurisdictions before their respective Courts all Provosts Baylies and others of the Boroughs before the Town-Council all Collectors and Fermers of the Kings Customs and Excise before the Exchequer the Commissioners of the Borders before the Privy-Council all Iustices of the Peace before the Conveeners and the Officers of the Mint before the General of the Mint and the Officers of the Forces before the Commander in chief and common Soldiers before their respective Officers The Lyon before the Privy Council and Heraulds Pursevants and Messengers at Arms before the Lyon And His Majesty with consent foresaid Statutes and ordains that all these who presently possess and enjoy any of the foresaid offices publick Trusts and Imployments shall take and subscribe the following Oath in one of the foresaid Offices in manner before prescribed betwixt and the first of January next which is to be recorded in the Registers of the respective Courts and extracts thereof under the Clerks hand to be reported to His Majesties Privy-Council betwixt and the first of March 1682. and hereafter in any other Courts whereof they are Iudges or Members the first time they shall sit or exercise in any of these respective Courts and ordains That all who shall hereafter be promoted to or imployed in any of the foresaid Offices Trusts or Imployments shall at their entry into and before their exercising thereof take and subscribe the said Oath in manner foresaid to be recorded in the Registers of their respective Courts and reported to His Majesties Privy Council within the space of fourty days after their taking of the same And if any shall presume to exercise any of the faid offices or Imployments or any publick Office or Trust within this Kingdom the Kings Brothers and Sons only excepted until they take the Oath foresaid and subscribe the same to be recorded in the Registers of the respective Courts they shall be declared incapable of all publick trust thereafter and be further punished with the loss of their moveables and liferent-escheats the one half whereof is to be given to the Informer and the other half to belong to his Majesty and his Majesty with advice foresaid recommends to his Privy-Council to see this Act put to due and vigorous execution The TEST Containing the Oath to be taken by all Persons in publick Trust. I Solemnly swear in the presence of the eternal God whom I invoke as Judge and witnesse of the sincere intention of this my Oath That I own and sincerely profess the true Protestant Religion contained in the Confession of Faith recorded in the first Parliament of King James the VI and that I believe the same to be founded on and agreeable to the written Word of God And I promise and swear That I shall adhere thereunto during all the dayes of my life-time and shall endeavour to educate my Children therein And shall never consent to any change or alteration contrary thereto and that I disoun and renounce all such Principles Doctrines or practices whether Popish or Fanatical which are contrare unto and inconsistent with the said Protestant Religion and Confession of Faith And for testification of my obedience â—o my most gracious Soveraign Charles the II. I do affirm and swear by this my solemn Oath that the Kings Majesty is the only Supreme Governour of this Realm over all persons and in all causes as well ecclesiastical as civil And that no forreign Prince Person Pope Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminency or Authority Ecclesiastical or Civil within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign Jurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities And do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and lawful Successors and to my power shall assist and defend all Rights Jurisdictions Prerogatives Priviledges Preferments and Authorities belonging to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and lawful Successors And I further affirm and swear by this my solemn Oath That I judge it unlawful for Subjects upon pretence of Reformation or any other pretence whatsoever to enter into Covenants or Leagues or to convocar conveen or assemble in any Councils Conventions or Assemblies to treat consult or determine in any matter of State Civil or Ecclesiastick without his Majesties special command or express licence had thereto or to take up arms against the King or these Commissionate by him And that I shall never so rise in arms or enter into such Covenants or Assemblies And that there lies no obligation on me from the National Covenant or the Solemn League and Covenant commonly so called or any other manner of way whatsoever to endeavour any change or alteration in the Government either in Church or State as it is now established by the Laws of this Kingdom And I promise and swear That I shall with my utmost power defend assist and maintain his Majesties Jurisdiction foresaid against all deadly And I shall never decline his Majesties Power and Jurisdiction as I shall answer to God And finally I affirm and swear That this my solemn Oath is given in the plain genuine sense and meaning of the words without any equivocation mental reservation or any manner of evasion whatsoever and that I shall not accept or use any dispensation from any creature whatsoever So help me God Act J. 6. P. 1. C. 3. Anno 1567. Anent the annulling of the Acts of Parliament made against God His Word and for maintainance of Idolatrie in any tymes bypast ITem our Soveraigne Lord with advice of his dearest Regent and three Estates of this present Parliament ratifies and approves the Act under-written made in the Parliament holden at Edinburgh the 24. day of August the year of God anâ— thousand five hundred threescore years And
of new in this present Parliament statutes and ordains the said Act to be as a perpetual Law to all our Soveraigne Lords leiges in all times coming Of the quhilk the tenour followes The quhilk day for sameâ—â—le as there has been divers and sundrie Acts of Parliament made in King James the I. II. III. IV. and V's times Kings of Scotland for the time and also in our soveraigne Ladies time not agreeing with Gods holy Word and by them divers persons take occasion to maintaine Idolatrie and Superstition within the Kirk of God and repâ—esse such persons as were professors of the said Word wherethrow divers innocents did suffer And for escheving such inconveniences in time coming the three Estates of Parliament has annulled and declared all such Acts made in tymes bypast not agreeing with God His Word and now contrary to the Confession of Faith according to the said Word published in this Parliament to be of none availe force nor effect And decerns the said Acts and every ane of them to have no effect nor strength in time to come But the same to be abolished and extinguished for ever in so far as any of the foresaid Acts are repugnant and contrary to the Confession of Faith and Word of God foresaid ratified and approved by the Estates in this present Parliament And therefore decerns and ordains the Contraveeners of the famine Act in any time hereafter to be punished according to the Lawes Of the Quhilk Confession of the Faith the â—â—nour follows THE Confession of the Faith and Doctrine Believed and professed by the Protestants of Scotland exhibited to the Estates of the same in Parliament and by their publick Vots authorized as a Doctrine grounded upon the infallible Word of God As the same Confession stands recorded Ja. 6. p. 1. c 4. Anno 1567. I. Of God WE confesse and acknowledge ane onely God to whom onely we must cleave whom onely we must serve whom only we must worship and in whom onely we must put our trust who is Eternal Infinit Unmeasurable Incomprehensible Omnipotent Invisible ane in substance and yet distinct in three Persons the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost By whom we confesse and believe all things in heaven and earth aswel Visible as Invisible to have been created to be retained in their being and to be ruled and guided by his inscrutable Providence to sik end as his Eternal Wisdome Goodness and Justice has appointed them to the manifestation of his own glorie II. Of the Creation of Man WE confess and acknowledge this our God to have created man to wit our first father Adam in his own Image and similitude to whom he gave Wisedome Lordship Iustice Free will and clear knowledge of himself so that in the hail nature of man there could be noted no imperfection Fra quhilk honour and perfection Man and Woman did both fall the Woman being deceived be the Serpent and Man obeying the voyce of the Woman both conspiring against the Soveraign Majestie of God who in expresse words had before threatned death if they presumed to eat of the forbidden Tree III. Of Original Sinne. BE quhilk transgression commonlie called Original Sinne was the image of God utterlie defaced in Man and he and his posteritie of nature became enemies to God slaves to Sathan and servants unto sin in samiekle that death everlasting has had and shall have power and dominion over all that have not been are not or shall not be regenerated from above quhilk regeneration is wrought by the power of the holie Ghost working in the hearts of the elect of God ane assured faith in the promise of God revealed to us in his word be quilk Faith we apprehend Christ Jesus with the graces and benefits promised in him IV. Of the Revelation of the Promise FOR this we constantlie believe that God after the fearful and horrible defection of man fra his obedience did seek Adam again call upon him rebuke his sin convict him of the same and in the end made unto him ane most joyful promise to wit that the seed of the woman should break down the serpents head that is he should destroy the works of the Devil quhilk promise as it was repeated and made mair cleare from time to time so was it embraced with joy and maist constantly received of all the faithful from Adam to Noah from Noah to Abraham from Abraham to David and so forth to the incarnation of Christ Jesus all we mean the faithful fathers under the law did see the joyful day of Christ Jesus and did rejoyce V. Of The continuance increase and preservation of the Kirk WE maist constantly believe that God preserved instructed multiplyed honoured decored and from death called to life his Kiâ—k in all ages fra Adam till the coming of Christ Jesus in the flesh For Abraham he called from his fathers countrey him he instructed his seedhe multiplyed the same he marvelously preserved and mair marvelously delivered from the bondage and tyranny of Pharaoh to them he gave his Laws constitutions and ceremonies them he possessed in the Land of Canaan to them after Iudges and after Saul he gave David to be King to whom he made promise that of the fruit of his Ioynes should ane sit for ever upon his regnall seat To this same people from time to time he sent Prophets to reduce them to the right way of their God from the quhilk oftentimes they declined by Idolatry and albeit that for their stubborn contempt of justice he was compelled to give them into the hands of their enemies as before was threatned by the mouth of Moses in sameikle that the hally City was destroyed the temple burnt with fire and the haile land left desolate the space of lxx years yet of mercy did he reduce them again to Jerusalem where the City and Temple were reedified and they against all temptations and assaults of Sathan did abide till the Messias came according to the promise VI. Of the Incarnation of Christ Jesus WHEN the fulness of time came God sent his Son his eternal wisdome the substance of his own glory into this World who took the nature of man-head of the substance of woman to wit of a virgin and that by operation of the Holy Ghost and so was born the just seed of â—avid the Angel of thâ— great counsell of God the very Messias promised whom we confess and acknowledge Emmanuel very God and very man two perfect natures united and joyned in one person By quhilk our Confession we condemn the damnable and pestilent herefies of Arrius Marchion Eutiches Nestâ—rius and sik others as either did deny the eternity of his God-head or the verity of his human nature or confounded them or yet divided them VII Why it behoved the Mediator to be very God and very man WE acknowledge and confess that this maist wonderous conjunction betwixt the God-head and the man-head in Christ Jesus did proceed from the
word of God be the certain and infallible signs of the true Kirk we mean not that every particular person joyned with such company be an elect member of Christ iesus For we acknowledg and confess that dornel cockle and chaff may be sown grow and in great abundancely in the midst of the wheat that is the Reprobate may be joyned in the society of the Elect and may externally use with them the benefits of the word and Sacraments But such being but temporal professors in mouth but not in heart do fall back and continue not to the end And therefore have they no fruit of Christs Death Resurrection nor Ascension but such as with heart unfeignedly believe with mouth boldly confess the Lord Iesus as before we have said shall most assuredly receive these gifts First In this life remission of sins and that by only Faith in Christs blood in so much that albeit sin remains and continually abides in these our mortal bodies yet it is not imputed unto us but is remitted and covered with Christs Justice Secondly in the general Judgment there shall be given to everyman and woman resurrection of the flesh for the Sea shall give her dead the Earth these that therein be inclosed yea the Eternal God shall stretch out his hand on the dust and the dead shall arise uncorruptible and that in the substance of the self-same flesh that every man now bears to receive according to their works glory or punishment For such as now delight in vanity cruelty filthiness superstition or idolatry shall be adjudged to the fire unquenchable in which they shall be tormented for ever as well in their bodies as in their souls which now they give to serve the Devil in all abomination But such as continue in well-doing to the end boldly professing the Lord Jesus we constantly believe that they shall receive glory honour and immortality to reign for ever in life everlasting with Christ Iesus to whose glorified body all his Elect shall be made like when he shall appear again in Iudgment shall render up the Kingdom to God his Father who then shall be and ever shall remain in all things God blessed for ever To whom with the Son and with the Holy Ghost se all honour and glory now and ever So be it Arise O Lord and let thine enemies be confounded let them flee from thy presence that hate thy godly Name Give thy Servants strength to speak thy VVord in boldnessâ— and let all Nations cleave to thy true Knowledge Amen Thir Acts and Articles were read in the face of Parliament and ratified by the three Estates at Edinburgh the 17. day of August the year of God 1560. years Act I. 6. P. 1. C. 8. Anno 1567. Anent the Kings Aith to be given at His Coronation ITem Because that the increase of vertue suppressing of Idolatrie craves that the Prince and the People be of ane perfite Religion quhilk of Gods mercie is now presently professed within this Realm Therefore it is statute and ordained be our Soveraign Lord my Lord Regent and the three Estates of this present Parliament that all Kings and Princes or Magistrats whatsoever holding their place quhilk hereafter in any time sall happen to reigne and bear rule over this realm at the time of their Coronation and receipt of their Princely Authoritie make their faithfull promise be aith in presence of the eternal God that during the haill course of their lives they sall serve the samin eternall God to the uttermost of their power according as he hes required in his maist haly Word revieled and contained in the new and auld Testaments And according to the samin word sall maintaine the trew Religion of Christ Iesus the preaching of his halie word and due and right ministration of the Sacraments now received and preached within this realme And sall abolish and gainstand all false Religion contrare to the samin And sall rule the people committed to their charge according to the will and command of God revealed in his foresaid Word and according to the laudable Lawes and Constitutions received in this realme nawise repugnant to the said Word of the eternal God And sall procure to the uttermaist of their power to the Kirk of God and haill Christian people trew and perfite peace in all time cumming The Rights and rents with all just Priviledges of the Croun of Scotland to preserve and keep inviolated nouther sall they transfer nor alienate the samin They sall forbid and represse in all estates and degrees reife oppression and all kinde of wrang In all judgements they sall command and procure that justice and equitie de keeped to all creatures without exception as the Lord and father of all mercies be mereyful to them And out of their Lands and Empyre they sall be carefull to root out all heretikes and enemies to the trew worship of God that shall be convict be the trew Kirk of God of the foresaid crymes And that they fall faithfullie affirme the things above written be their solemn aith Act. J. 6. P. 1. C. 9. Anno 1567. No person may be judge Procurator Notar nor Member of Court quha professis not the Religion ITem The Kings grace with advice of my Lord Regent and the three Estates of this present Parliament statutes and ordains That no manner of person nor persons be received in any times hereafter to bear publick office removabill of judgment within this Realm but sik as profess the puritie of Religion and Doctrine now presently established And that nane be permitted to procure nor admitted Notar or created a Mâ—mber of Court in any time coming without he in likewise professe the Evangel and Religion foresaid Providing alwayes that this Act be on no wise extended to any manner of person or persons havand their offices heritable or in life-rent but that they may use the samin conforme to their infeftments and dispositions granted to them thereof Which Act was thereafter Anno 1609. explained and extended in this manner Part of the Act I. 6. P. 2. C. 5. Anno 1609. intituled c. AND that the Act made in His Highness first Parliament bearing that nane that professe not the true Religion presently professed within this Realm may be judge Procurator or Member of Court be extended to all and whatsomever offices without any exception or restriction in all time coming Act. J. 6. P. 3. C. 47. Anno 1572. Adversaries of the true Religion are not Subjects of the King Of Apostats ITem Forsameikle as there hes been great rebellion and disobedience against our Soveraign Lords authoritie in time bypast and seeing the cause of Gods true Religion and His Highness authoritie foresaid are so joyned as the hurt of the ane is common to baith It is therefore declared statute and ordained by our Soveraign Lord with advice and consent of his Regents grace with the three Estates and hail bodie of this present Parliament That
us were judged by all both in Articles and Parliament and that after long and strenuous application and endeavour in contriving ane new Act for these ends not only sufficient but the best security for our Religion against all hazards and contingencies in which the best and wisest part of the Parliament acquiesced till the importunity and repeated clamours of some who needs would appear more warmly concerned in this mater than others they offering new overtures to the Articles for the securing of the Protestant Religion of which they often received an account in open Parliament did awaken a more narrow inspection into this more concerning Affair And therefore for the farther security of Religion from the danger of Popery on the one hand and of Principles and Practices of Rebellion and fanatical Schism on the other did judg it necessary that ane Act should be past disabling Papists and Fanaticks from any power or capacity to subvert or overthrow it which in their deep wisdom they found could never be so effectually done as by keeping all such out of places of publik Trust and Employment Civil Ecclesiastik or Military And in regard that the good and wholesom Laws and the steady and vigorus execution thereof are the best and most firm human security of Religion Therefore such wise provisions were piously made by that Act as might bar all disaffected to the Protestant Religion from electing or being elected Members of Parliament wherein the Law making power is lodged or from creeping into any Office or Trust whereby the execution of the Law is managed So that our established Religion might never be endangered or subverted by evil or corrupt Laws or by the remiss and negligent execution of good ones Notwithstanding such is the fate of the best of human Constitutions that nothing can be so piously intended or prudently contrived but either through ignorance or malice misprision or mistake it may be misrepresented misconstrued and many groundless and unaccountable jealousies by scruples and prejudices entertained against it as is but too clearly instanced in the matter of the present Oath and Test which the wisdom of our Governours hath enacted and appointed to be taken by all persons employed in Offices of publik Trust as the best fence of the Church and security of the Protestant Religion against the invasion and encroachments they stand in danger of from the restless adversaries Some of the Regular and Orthodox Clergy and other well-meaning Subjects having entertained some jealousies which far exceed their causes and vented some scruples and objections against it which are most part founded on mistakes and unnecessary not to say uncharitable stretching and extending the meaning thereof far beyond either the genuine sense of the words or design and intention of the Parliament in framing and enjoyning that Test tenderness and compassion towards these conform and loyal persons who may either be imposed upon by the malice and craft of the Church's Adversaries to stumble at or by their own fears and misapprehensions may be led into mistakes of the meaning and design of this excellent mean for securing our Church and Religion hath prevailed with us to endeavour a short Essay for vindicating this Oath and Test from all mistakes and scruples by answering and satisfying the Objections which are commonly moved against it and that thereby the plain and genuine sense in which this Oath is required by Authority to be taken by all persons in Trust may be clear and apparent Pursuant to this it will be fit to read and consider the Oath or Test it self as it is contained in the sixth Act of the last Session of this Currant Parliament In the next place it will not be amiss to rank up the doubts and objections moved against it in their several Heads and Classes and to resolve and answer them accordingly in their respective place and order Of these Scruples and Objections some are founded upon the Consession of Faith contained in the foresaid Oath others arise from the Oath of Allegiance and Supremacy and the asserting therein of the Kings Prerogative some are taken from that part of the Test wherein the unlawfulness of assembling in any Councils or Conventions to treat consult or determine in any mater of State Civil or Ecclesiastik without the Kings special command and license had thereto is asserted and sworn and finally others arise from the Clause asserting that no obligation lyes from the late Covenants or any other manner of way whatsoever to endeavour any change or alteration in the Government either in Church or State as the same is now established by the Laws of this Kingdom It is beyond all peradventure that as Conscience is the most tender thing in the Soul of man so Oaths are of the strictest force and obligation and are to be taken in Truth Righteousness and Iudgment which is the Doctrine of all sound Casuists Juramenti obligatio est stricti juris yet this strictum jus is not so to be understood as if it did exclude all sensing and interpreting of it the interpretation thereof amounting to no more than meerly to make clear and plain any word or sentence therein which may seem to be dark doubtful and ambiguous It is excellently said by that judicious Casuist Doctor Sandersone Prel 2. De juramenti obligatione p. 8. De lege Charitatis aliena dicta facta praesertim Principum Parentum aliorumque Rectorum sunt benignae interpretationis Juxta id quod dici solet dubia esse interpretanda in meliorem partem That is by the Law of Charity the words and deeds of others especially of our Princes Parents and other Governours are to be moderated by a favourable interpretation according to the usual maxim That things doubtful are to be interpreted to the best sense This being premised the Objections of the first Classis arising upon the Confession of Faith are to be first considered and in order to this it must be remembered that this Confession is not to be lookt upon as fully comprehensive of all the Protestant Doctrine in opposition to all the Errors and Superstition of the Romish Church and other Heresies nor is there any one amongst the Harmony of the Confessions of the Reformed Churches which can challenge this perfection to it self nor is it to be thought strange that in many things it should be defective if we consider that it was hastily compiled in the short space of four days by a select number of Barons and Ministers in the very Infancy of our Reformation as the History of the Reformation of the Church of Scotland commonly ascribed to John Knox Printed at London in the Year 1644 in Fol. p. 252. doth inform Nor are the Authors of the foresaid Confession so prositive as to look upon all therein contained as infallible or to be received as Articles of Faith as appears from the Preface prefixed thereto as it is set down in the History of the Reformation
lawful for you to make to your self an Act of Parliament since he who can make any part of an Act may make the whole the Power and Authority in both being the same Of the which Crimes above-mentioned you the said Archibald Earl of Argyle are Actor Art and Part which being found by the Assize you ought to be punished with the pains of Death for faulture and escheat of Lands and Goods to the terror of others to commit the like hereafter An Abstract of the several Acts of Parliament upon which the Indictment against the Earl of Argyle was grounded Concerning Raisers of Rumors betwixt the King and his People Chap 20. 1. Statutes of King Robert 1. IT is defended and forbidden That no man be a Conspirator or Inventer of Narrations or Rumors by the which occasion of discord may arise betwixt the King and his People And if any such man shall be found and attainted thereof incontinent he shall be taken and put in Prison and there shall be surely keeped up ay and while the King declare his will anent him Act 43. of Par. 2. King James 1. March 11. 1424. Leasing-makers for fault Life and Goods Item it is ordained by the King and whole Parliament that all Leasing makers and tellers of them which may engender discord betwixt the King and his People wherever they may be gotten shall be challenged by them that power has and tyne Life and Goods to the King Act 83. Par 6. James 5. Dec. 10. 1540. Of Leasing-makers ITem Touching the Article of Leasing-makers to the Kings Grace of his Barons Great-men and Leidges and for punishment to be put to them therefore the Kings Grace with advice of his three Estates ratifies and approves the Acts and Statutes made thereupon before and ordains the same to be put in execution in all Points and also Statutes and ordains That if any manner of person makes any evil Information of his Highness to his Barons and Leidges that they shall be punished in such manner and by the same punishment as they that make Leasings to his Grace of his Lords Barons and Leidges Act 134. Par. 8 James 6. May 22. 1584. Anent Slandereres of the King his Progenitors Estate and Realm FOrasmuch as it is understood to our Soveraign Lord and his Three Estates assembled in this present Parliament what great harm and inconveniency has fallen in this Realm chiefly since the beginning of the Civil Troubles occurred in the time of His Highness minority through the wicked and licentious publik and private speeches and untrue Calumnies of divers of his Subjects to the disdain contempt and reproach of His Majesty his Council and Proceedings and to the dishonour and prejudice of His Highness his Parents Progenitors and Estate stirring up His Highness's Subjects thereby to misliking sedition unquietness and to cast off their due obedience to His Majesty to their evident peril tinsil and destruction His Highness continuing always in love and clemency toward all his good Subjects and most willing to seek the safety and preservation of them all which wilfully needlesly and upon plain malice after His Highness's mercy and pardon oft-times afore granted has procured themselves by their treasonable deeds to be cut off as corrupt Members of this Commonwealth Therefore it is statut and ordained by our Soveraign Lord and his Three Estates in this present Parliament that none of his Subjects of whatsoever Function Degree or Quality in time coming shall presume or take upon hand privately or publikly in Sermons Declamations and familiar Conferences to utter any false slanderous or untrue speeches to the disdain reproach and contempt of His Majesty his Council and Proceedings or to the dishonour hurt or prejudice of His Highness his Parents and Progenitors or to meddle in the Affairs of His Highness and his Estate present by-gone and in time coming under the pains contained in the Acts of Parliament anent makers and tellers of Leesings certifying them that shall be tryed contraveeners thereof or that hear such slanderous speeches and reports not the same with diligence the said pain shall be executed against them with all rigour in example of others Act 205. Par. 14 King James 6. June 8. 1594. Anent Leasing-makers and Authors of Slanders OUr Soveraign Lord with advice of his Estates in this present Parliament ratifies approves and for His Highness and Successors perpetually confirms the Act made by his Noble Progenitors King James the First of Worthy Memory against Leasing-makers the Act made by King James the Second entituled Against Leasing-makers and tellers of them the Act made by King James the Fifth entituled Of Leasing-makers and the Act made by his Highness's self with advice of his Estates in Parliament upon the 22 day of May 1584. entituled For the punishment of the Authors of Slanders and untrue Calumnies against the Kings Majesty his Council and Proceedings to the dishonour and prejudice of His Highness his Parents Progenitors Crown and Estate as also the Act made in His Highness's Parliament holden at Linlithgow upon the 10 of December 1585. entituled Against the Authors of slanderous speeches or Writs and statutes and ordains all the said Acts to be published of new and to be put in execution in time coming with this addition That whoever hears the said Leasings Calumnies or slanderous Speeches or Writs to be made and apprehends not the Authors thereof if it lyes in his power and reveals not the same to His Highness or one of his Privy-Council or to the Sheriff Steward or Bayliff of the Shire Stewards in Regality or Royalty or to the Provost or any of the Bayliffs within Burgh by whom the same may come to the knowledg of his Highness or his said Privy-Council wherethrough the said Leasing-makers and Authors of slanderous Speeches may be called tryed and punished according to the said Acts The hearer and not apprehender if it lye in his power and concealer and not revealer of the said Leasing-makers and Authors of the said slanderous Speeches or Writs shall incur the like pain and punishment as the Principal Offender Act 107. Par. 7. King James 1. March 1. 1427. That none interpret the Kings Statutes wrongously ITem The King by deliverance of Council by manner of Statute forbids That no man interpret his Statutes otherwise than the Statutes bear and to the intent and effect that they were made for and as the maker of them understood and whoso does in the contrary shall be punished at the Kings will Act 10. Par 10. King James 6. Dec. 10. 1585. Authors of slanderous Speeches or Writs should be punished to the death IT is statuted and ordained by our Soveraign Lord and Three Estates That all his Highness's Subjects content themselves in quietness and dutiful obedience to his Highness and his Authority and that none of them presume or take upon hand publikly to declaim or privately to speak or write any purpose of reproach or slander of His Majesties Person Estate
or Government or to deprave his Laws and Acts of Parliament or misconstrue his Proceedings whereby any misliking may be moved betwixt his Highness and his Nobility and loving Subjects in time coming under the pain of death certifying them that do in the contrary they shall be reputed as seditious and wicked instruments enemies to his Highness and the Commonwealth of this Realm and the said pain of death shall be executed upon them with all rigour in example of others Act for preservation of His Majesties Person Authority and Government May 16â—2 And further it is by His Majesty and Estates of Parliament declared statuted and enacted That if any person or persons shall by writing printing praying preaching libelling remonstrating or by any malicious or advised speaking express publish or declare any words or sentences to stir up the people to the hatred or dislike of His Majesties Royal Prerogative and Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical or of the Government of the Church by Archbishops and Bishops as it is now setled by Law That every such person or persons so offending and being Legally Convicted thereof are hereby declared incapable to enjoy or exercise any place or employment Civil Ecclesiastik or Military within this Church and Kingdom and shall be liable to such further pains as are due by the Law in such Cases Act 130. Par. 8. James 6. May 22. 1584 Anent the Authority of the Three Estates of Parliament THe Kings Majesty considering the Honour and the Authority of his Supreme Court of Parliament continued past all memory of man unto their days as constitut upon the free Votes of the Three Estates of this ancient Kingdom by whom the same under God has ever been upholden rebellious and traiterous Subjects punished the good and faithful preserved and maintained and the Laws and Acts of Parliament by which all men are governed made and established And finding the Power Dignity and Authority of the said Court of Parliament of late years called in some doubt at least some curiously travelling to have introduced some Innovation thereanent His Majesties firm will and mind always being as it is yet That the Honour Authority and Dignity of his said Three Estates shall stand and continue in their own Integrity according to the ancient and laudable custom by-gone without any alteration or diminution Therefore it is statuted and ordained by our said Soveraign Lord and his said Three Estates in this present Parliament That none of his Leidges or Subjects presume or take upon hand to impugn the Dignity and Authority of the said Three Estates or to seek or procure the innovation or diminution of the power and Authority of the same Three Estates or any of them in time coming under the pain of Treason The Earl of Argyle's first Petition for Advocats or Council to be allovved him To his Royal Highness His Majesties High Commissioner and to the Right Honourable the Lords of His Majesties Privy-Council The Humble Petition of Archibald Earl of Argyle SHEWETH THat your Petitioner being Criminally Indicted before the Lords Commissioners of ustitiary at the instance of His Majesties Advocate for Crimes of an high Nature And whereas in this Case no Advocate will readily plead for the Petitioner unless they have your Royal Higâ—ness's and â—ordships Special Licence and Warrant to that Effect which is usual in the like Cases It is therefore humbly desired that Your Royal Highness and Lordships would give special Order and Warrant to Sir George Lockhart his ordinary Advocate to consâ—lt and plead for him in the foresaid Criminal Process without incurring â—ny hazard upon that account and your Petitioner shall ever pray Edenburgh Novemb. 22. 1681. The Councils Answer to the Earl of Argyl's first Petition about his having Advocates allowed him HIS Royal Highness his Majesties High Commissioner and Lords of Privy-Council do refuse the desire of the above-written Bill but allows any Lawyers the Petitioners shall employ to consult and plead for him in the Processof Treason and other Crimes to be pursued against him at the instance of His Majesties Advocate Extr. By me Will. Paterson The Earl of Argyl's second Petition for Council to be allovved him To His Royal Highness His Majesties High Commissioner and to the Right Honourable the Lords of His Majesties Privy-Council The humble Petition of Archibald Earl of Argyle SHEWETH THat your Petitioner having given in a former Petition humbly representing That he being Criminally Indicted before the Lords Commissioners of Justitiary at the instance of His Majesties Advocate for Crimes of an high Nature And therefore desiring that your Royal Highness and Lordships would give special Warrant to Sir George Lockhart to consult and plead for him Whereupon your Royal Highness and Lordships did allow the Petitioner to make use of such Advocates as he should think fit to call Accordingly your Petitioner having desired Sir George Lockhart to consult and plead for him he hath as yet refused your Petitioner And by the 11. Parliament of King James the VI. Cap. 38. As it is the undeniable priviledg of all Subjects accused for any Crimes to have liberty to provide themselves of Advocates to defend their Lives Honour and Lands against whatsoever accusation so the same Priviledg is not only by Parliament 11. King James the VI. Cap. 90. farther asserted and confirmed but also it is declared That in case the Advocates refuse the Judges are to compel them lest the party accused should be prejudged And this being an affair of great importance to your Petitioner and Sir George Lockhart having been not only still his ordinary Advocate but also by his constant converse with him is best known to your Petitioners Principles and of whose eminent abilities and fidelity your Petitioner as many others have hath had special proof all along in his Concerns and hath such singular confidence in him that he is most necessary to your Petitioner at this occasion May it therefore please Your Royal Highness and Lordships to interpose your Authority by giving a special Order and Warrant to the said Sir George Lockhart to consult and plead for him in the said Criminal Process conform to the tenor of the said Acts of Parliament and constant known practice in the like Cases which was never refused to any Subject of the meanest quality even to the greatest Criminals And Your Royal Highness's and Lordships Answer is humbly craved Edenburgh Novemb. 24. 1681. The Councils Answer to the Earl of Argyle's second Petition HIS Royal Highness His Majesties High Commissioner and Lords of Privy Council having considered the foresaid Petition do adhere to their former Order allowing Advocates to appear for the Petitioner in the Process foresaid Extr. By me Will. Paterson The Earl of Argyle's Letter of Attorney constituting Alexander Dunbar his Procurator for requiring Sir George Lockhart to plead for him WE Archibald Earl of Argyle do hereby substitute constitute and ordain Alexander Dunbar our Servitor to be our Procurator to pass and require
for reasons that you shall hear to stay till his Majesties return came to the Councils last Letter but taking his opportunity made his escape out of the Castle of Edinburgh upon tuesday the twentieth of December about eight at night and in a day or two after came his Majesties answer here subjoyned The Kings Answer to the Councils Letter 18 Decemb 1681. C. R. MOst dearly c. having this day received your Letter of the 14. instant giving an account that our Advocate having been ordered by you to insist in that Process raised at our instance against the Earl of Argyle he was after full debate and clear probation found guilty of Treason and Leasing making betwixt us our Parliament and our people and the reproaching our Laws and Acts of Parliament We have now thought fit notwithstanding of what was ordered by us in our Letter to you of the 15. of November last hereby to authorize you to grant a warrand to our Iustice General and the remanent Iudges of our Iustice Court for proceeding to pronounce a Sentence upon the Verdict of the Iury against the said Earl nevertheless it is our express pleasure and we do hereby require you to take care that all execution of the Sentence be stopped untill we shall think fit to declare our further pleasure in this affair For doing whereof c. Which answer being read in Council on the thursday and the Court of Iustitiary according to its last adjournment as shall be told you being to meet upon the fryday after a little hesitation in Council whether the Court of Iustitiary could proceed to the sentence of forfaulture against the Earl he being absent it was resolved in the affirmative And what were the grounds urged either of hesitation or resolution I cannot precisly say there being nothing on record that I can learn But that you may have a full and satisfying account I shall briefly tell you what was ordinarly discoursed a part whereof I also find in a petition given in by the Countess of Argyle to the Lords of Justitiary before pronouncing sentence but without any answer or effect It was then commonly said that by the old Law and custom the Court of Iustitiary could no more in the case of Treason then of any other Crime proceed further against a person not compearing and absent then to declare him Out-Law and Fugitive And that albeit it be singlar in the case of Treason that the trial may go on even to a final sentence tho the partie be absent yet such trials were only proper to alwayes reserved for Parliaments And that so it had been constantly observed untill after the Rebellion in the Year 1666 But there being severall persones Notourly engaged in that rebellion who had escaped and thereby withdrawn themselves from Justice it was thought that the want of a Parliament for the time ought not to afford them any immunity and therefore it was resolved by the Council with advice of the Lords of Session that the Court of Iustitiary should summond and proceed to trial and sentence against these absents whether they compeared or not and so it was done Only because the thing was new and indeed an innovation of the old custom to make all sure in the first Parliament held thereafter in the Year 1669 it was thought fit to confirm these proceedings of the Justitiary in that point and also to make a perpetual statut that in case of open Rebellion and Rising in armes against the King and Government the Treason in all time coming might by an order from his Majestie 's Council be tried and the actors proceeded against by the Lords of Iustitiary even to final sentence whether the traitours compeared or not This being then the present Law and custom it is apparent in the first place that the Earl's case not being that of an open Rebellion and Rising in Armes is not at all comprehended in the Act of Parliament So that it is without question that if in the beginning he had not entered himself prisoner but absented himself the Lords of Iustitiary could not have gone further then upon a citation to have declared him fugitive But others said that the Earl having both entered himself prisoner and compeared and after debate having been found guilty before he made his escape the case was much altered And whether the Court could notwithstanding of the Earl's interveening escape yet go on to sentence was still debatable for it was alledged for the affirmative that seeing the Earl had twice compeared and that after debate the Court had given judgment and the Assize returned their Verdict so that nothing remained but the pronouncing of sentence It was absurd to think that it should be in the power of the partie thus accused and found guilty by his escape to frustrate justice and withdraw himself from the punishment he deserved But on the other hand it was pleaded for the Eâ—rl That first It was a fundamental rule That until once the cause were concluded no sentence could be pronounced Nixt that it was a sure Maxime in Law that in Criminal Actions there neither is nor can be any other conclusion of the cause then the parties presence and silence So that after all that had past the Earl had still freedom to adde what he thought fit in his own defence before pronouncing sentence and therefore the Lords of Iustitiary could no more proceed to sentence against him being escaped then if he had been absent from the beginning the cause being in both cases equally not concluded and the principle of Law uniformly the same viz. that in criminals except in cases excepted no final sentence can be given in absence For as the Law in case of absence from the beginning doth hold that just temper as neither to suffer the contumacious to go altogether unpunished nor on the other hand finally to condemn a partie unheard And therefore doth only declare him fugitive and there stops So in the case of an escape before sentence where it cannot be said the partie was fully heard and the cause concluded the Law doth not distinguish nor can the parity of reason be refused Admitting then that the Cause was so far advanced against the Earl that he was found Guilty Yet 1. This is but a declaring of what the Law doth as plainly presume against the partie absent from the beginning and consequently of it self can operate no further 2ly The finding of a partie Guilty is no Conclusion of the cause And 3ly As it was never seen nor heard that a Partie was condemned in absence except in excepted cases whereof the Earl's is none so he having escaped and the Cause remaining thereby unconcluded the general rule did still hold and no sentence could be given against him It was also remembred that the dyets and dayes of the justice Court are peremptour and that in that case even in Civil â—ar more in Criminal Courts and Causes a Citation to hear
God Subjects may take up Arms against him 2. They maintain That nothing is to be allowed in the worship of God but what is prescribed in his Word Were not these the Principles that embroiled these Kingdoms that raised a Combustion and that turned all things upside down both in Church and State And are not these Principles plainly taught in this Confession It is reckoned Art 15 a duty to repress Tyranny and to disobey and resist Kings is a sin with this caution and limitation while they pass not over the bounds of their Office or do that thing which appertains to their charge And in like manner the assistance we ow them is cautioned and limited while they vigilantly travel in the execution of their Office Is not this the very Doctrine of the Solemn League and Covenant by which they bind themselves to defend the Kings Majesty's Person and Authority in the preservation and defence of the true Religion and Liberties of the Kingdom Let any but read Spotswood's History of the Resormation Anno 1558 1559 1560. among others how Subjects did bind themselves by Oaths and Subscriptions to assist one another for advancing the Cause of Religion how by the advice of the Ministers they deprived the Queen Regent of her Government and this very year this Confession was compiled and ratified in Parliament And I am sure there can remain no doubt about the sense of the Confession in this point But to render the matter beyond exception It is declared rebellious and treasonable by Act of Parliament for Subjects to put limitations on their due obedience and allegiance And for the other Principles about Divine Worship the Confession affirms these to be evil works that in matters of Religion and Worship of God have no other assurance but the invention and opinion men In this principle they condemn very Ancient and laudable Customs of Churches as singing the Doxology and the most innocent and indifferent Ceremonies for decency and helps for Devotion calling them by the odious titles of Superstition and Will-worship But be these Principles true or false in themselves certainly they are utterly inconsistent with these other clauses in the Test that assert it unlawful on any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King and invest him with such a Supremacy as impowers him to erect such Constitutions and orders about Ecclesiastical matters as His Majesty thinks fit And in this also there is a palpable Contradiction that the Test binds us not to consent to any change contrary to the Confession and by and by enjoyns to swear what is flatly contradictory to it We cannot take this Test unless with the same breath we swear and forswear under Oath protest onething and forthwith under Oath protest the quite contrary It obliges us to swear we shall with our utmost power defend assist and maintain all the Kings Rights And is not this to swear we know not what or is it not to swear we shall maintain and defend with the greatest zeal and concernedness whatsoever the King challenges or the Parliament votes to belong to him And may not a Prince come to claim a Right to act Arbitrarily and may not iniquity happen to be established by Law Nay doth not the King de facto challenge and has not the Parliament declared Supremacy to be an inherent Right of the Crown by which His Majesty may settle and emit such Acts and Orders as he pleases about Ecclesiastical matters And are not Articles of Faith Ecclesiastical maters And what is this but to avow we hold our selves obliged to believe as the King believes And so ere long the Rights Jurisdictions Prerogatives Priviledges Preeminences and Authorities that may be v ted to belong to our Prince may come to swallow up Religion Liberty Property and all our Priviledges We do not see how any man of Sense and Conscience can swear this clause in so great a Latitude and so illimited Terms It obliges us to swear That we acknowledg it unlawful without the Kings special Command to convocate conveen or assemble in any Council Convention or Assembly to treat consult or determine in any matter of State Civil or Ecclesiastik The clause excepting ordinary judgments which was added in all such convocating conveening and assembling which were declared unlawful Anno 1661. 1. Par. Char. 2. Act 21. being left out here we have reason to think that all such Sessions Presbyteries and Synods are discharged there being no special Command or Express for them that we know of And these meetings being of great use for curbing of Vice and Prophanesse and for setling and entertaining Peace and good Order in the Church we cannot swear to forbear holding of them tho we have not an express License from the King We acknowledg Princes have Power and Authority to inhibit their Subjects to meet as they see cause but we cannot bind our selves to obey them against such liberty which Christ hath conferred on his Church This is a Priviledg the Church ever enjoyed since it was founded and erected by our Saviour and in all Ages used as the state of affairs required So we cannot devoid our selves of it without proving betrayers of our Trust and condemning the conduct of the Primitive Christians who without special command nay contrary to the express Edict of Princes did convocate conveen or assemble in Councils and Conventions to treat consult and determine about Ecclesiastical matters and yet for all that have been no less commended and admired for loyalty and peaceableness than for piety and zeal And seeing that in the present juncture its notour that there are Cabals and Engines formed and carried on to undermine the Protestant Religion and to bereave us of the Truth which our Lord has committed to us as so many Depositaries Can we without the most horrid guilt and the blackest infamy swear That we shall not so much as meet Two or Three of us together till we have the Kings Warrant perhaps never to consult about the Welfare of the Church and the Salvation of our own and other Mens Souls It obliges us to swear there is no obligation on us any manner of way whatsoever to endeavour any change or alteration in the Government either in Church or State Is not this to swear what no man living can assuredly know And are there not indeed many tyes on us as Men as Christians as Pastors to procure as far as in us lyes the happiness of the Church and State Now if we discern and it be acknowledged by wise and good men that the Government may be bettered by enacting wholsome new Laws and abrogating corrupt old ones might we not ought we not in our stations endeavour such an alteration The Constitution of a National Synod e. g. gives the Archbishop of St. Andrew's a Negative when the whole Clergy is contrary so that were all our Bishops and other Members of the Synod men of Apostolick sanctity and zeal yet nothing could be done
whatsoever were throughly convinced of the doctrine and duty of their obedience to the Supreme Powers otherways as they grow popular they become dangerous Sacerdoces eo quidem sunt ingenio ut ni pareant territent St. Chrysostom comments excellently on Rom. 13 v. 1. 2. Let every soul be subject saying whether he be an Apostle or Evangelist a Prophet c. let him be subject to the higher Powers Our blessed Saviour and the Apostles were the most eminent Ecclesiastical persons yet did not think themselves exempted from the Authority and Jurisdiction of the Civil Powers and if the 24th Article of the Confession of Faith mentioned in the Test be considered it will be found to grant as much to the Civil Magistrate as here is asserted and yeelded Yet all this power belonging to the supreme Magistrate over religious persons and matters doth not interfer with nor suppress the intrinsik and essential Power and Authority of the Church for the Church's power is internal and spiritual and the power of the supreme Magistrate is external coercive and temporal which when duely weighed in a just balance will be found not only to be poised of just different kinds and natures but so far from interfering with or destroying one another that if duely and rightly managed they do mutually assist and support each other Beside the sense of the Oath of Supremacy asserted in a Speech delivered by B. James Usher then Bishop of Meath and afterwards Primate of Ireland at Dublin Novemb. 22. 1622. for which he received the thinks of King James the sixth the Solomon of his Age by a Letter from His Majesty dated the 11. day of January 1623. is so clear and plain that it leaves no place for any manner of scruple concerning the intrinsick power of the Church as if it were invaded and incroached upon by the foresaid Oath where it is said That the Kings Supremacy reacheth the outward man only but the spiritual and intrinsick power of the Church reacheth to the inward this binding or loosing the soul that laying hold only on the body and things belonging thereto Yea there is an Act of the Parliament of England 13. Eliz. declaring That by the supreme Government given to the Prince is understood that kind of Government only which is exercised with the Civil Sword So that there is nothing can be more evident than that by the Kings Supremacy as asserted by the Act November 16. 1669. no incroachment or invasion is made upon the spiritual intrinsick power of the Church Besides by the very express words of that assertory Act No more is declared to belong to the King save the ordering and disposal of the external Government and Policy of the Church And again The administration of the external Government of the Church where not a syllable can be found touching upon the internal spiritual and essential power and iurisdiction thereof And as to the word matters contained in that Act the Kings emitting Orders concerning religious matters as well as persons it needs stumble no thinking person as if our Religion were thereby exposed to dangers at the pleasure of the Prince if we consider the following words viz. Matters to be proposed and determined in Ecclesiastical Meetings or Assemblies which reserves the power of determining matters of Religion still in the hands of that Meeting or Assembly So that tho the King may by vertue of his RoyalSupremacy propose any matter of Religion to a National Asâ— Yet it is not to pass unto an act till first it be determined by the deliberate and free consent vote and suffrage of the major part of that Ecclesiastical Meeting And now let the Impartial Judg if any so great security for the true Protestant Religion can be devised as to have all Bishops Ministers and Members of a National Synod to whom the determining of matters of Religion by Law belongs solemnly sworn and bound by this Oath and Test to adhere to the same Protestant Religion all the days of their lives and never to consent to any alteration or change thereof As for the other Objection of these who think that by this assertory Act 1669. there is a power declared to be vested in the King to alter and change the Established Episcopal Government of this National Church which these who believe Episcopacy to be of Divine Right and Apostolical Institution and by consequence unalterable by any humane Authority can never swear to belong to the Crown as an Inherent Right and Prerogative thereof For answer Tho this point of the Divine Right of Episcopacy is tenderly to be touched the Phrase of Jus Divinum being in terms subject to misconstruction yet it must be acknowledged that no form of Church Government was ever yet modelled or set up which hath not claimed to a Jus Divinum as well as Episcopacy tho every one of them with far more noise but with far less reason than this hath done For the Papists ground the Popes Oecumenical Supremacy upon Christs Commands to St. Peter to execute it and to all the Flock of Christ Soveraign Princes as well as others to submit to him as to their Universal Pastor The Presbyterians cry up their model of Government tho of a very late Edition as the very Scepter of Christs Kingdom to which all Kings are bound to submit theirs making it also unalterable and as inevitably necessary to the being of a Church as the Word and Sacraments The Independents assert that any single Confederate Congregation is Jure Divino free and absolute within it self to govern it self by such Rules as shall be consented to by its Members without dependance from any except Jesus Christ alone or subjection to any Prince Bishop or any other Person or Consistory whatsoever So that all these other flatly deny the Kings Supremacy and claim a Power and Jurisdiction over him The Presbyterians agreeing with the Papists in this branch of Antichristianism and claiming to their Consistories as full and absolute Jurisdiction over Princes even to the highest censure by Excommunication as the Romanists challenge to belong to the Pope or pleading at least a priviledg of exemption from the Kings Authority and Jurisdiction The Independents exempting their Congregations from all Ecclesiastical subjection to Christian Kings in asample manner as ther Papists do their Clergy whereas the Protestant Bishop and regular Ministers as becometh good Christians and dutiful Subjects do neither pretend to any Jurisdiction over the King nor withdraw their Subjection from him but humbly acknowledg His Majesty to have Soveraign Power over them as well as over his other Subjects and that in all matters Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal But for a more closse Answer to this Objection They who believe the Indifferency of the forms and models of Church-Goverment cannot have any scruple on this Head in regard of the present Church-Government For should it be changed by Authority then are they not obliged by this Oath any longer
whoso does in the contrary to be punished at the Kings will And by the 10th Act Par. 10. James 6. it is statuted That none of His Majesties Subjects presume or take upon him publikly to declare or privately to speak or write any purpose of reproach or slander of His Majesties Person Estate or Government or to deprave his Laws or Acts of Parliament or mistconstrue his Proceedings whereby any mistaking may be moved betwixt his Highness his Nobility and loving Subjects in time coming under pain of death certifying them that does in the contrary they shall be reputed as seditious and wicked instruments enemies to his Highness and to the Commonwealth of this Realm and the said pain of death shall be executed against them with all rigour to the example of others And by the second Act Ses. 2. Par. 1 Char. 2. it is statuted That whosoever shall by writing libelling remonstrating express publish or declare any words or sentences to stir up the people to the dislike of His Majesties Prerogative and Supremacy in causes Ecclesiastik or of the Government of the Church by Archbishops and Bishops as it is now setled by Law is under the pain of being declared incapable to exercise any Office Civil Ecclesiastik or Military within this Kingdom in any time coming Like as by the fundamental Laws of this Nation By the 130th Act Par 8. James 6. it is declared That none of His Majesties Subjects presume to impugn the Dignity or Authority of the Three Estates or to procure innovation or diminution of their Power and Authority under the pain of Treason And that it is much more Treason in any of His Majesties Subjects to presume to alter Laws already made or to make new Laws or to add any part to any Law by their own Authority that being to assume the Legislative Power to themselves with his Majesties highest and most incommunicable Prerogative Yet true it is That albeit His Sacred Majesty did not only bestow on you the said Archibald Earl of Argyle those vast Lands Jurisdictons and Superiorities justly for faulted to His Majesty by the Crimes of your deceased Father preferring your Family to those who had served His Majesty against it in the late Rebellion but also pardoned and remitted to you the Crimes of leasing making and misconstruing His Majesties and his Parliaments proceedings against the very Laws above written whereof you were found guilty and condemned to die therefore by the High Court of Parliament the 25. of August 1662. And raised you to the Title and Dignity of an Earl and being a member of all His Majesties Judicatures Notwithstanding of all these and many other Favours you the said Archibald Earl of Argyle Being put by the Lords of His Majesties Privy-Council to take the Test appointed by the Act of the last Parliament to be taken by all persons in publik Trust you insteed of taking the said Test and swearing the same in the plain genuine sense and meaning of the words without any equivocation mental reservation or evasion whatsoever you did declare against and defame the said Act and having to the end you might corrupt others by your pernicious sense drawn the same in a Libel of which Libel you dispersed and gave abroad Copies whereby ill impressions were given of the King and Parliaments Proceedings at a time especially when his Majesties Subjects were expecting what submission should be given to the said Test and being desired the next day to take the same as one of the Commissioners of His Majesties Treasury you did give in to the Lords of His Majesties Privy-Council and owned twice in plain judgment before them the said defamatory Libel against the said Test and Act of Parliament declaring That you had considered the said â—est and was desirous to give obedience as far as you could whereby you clearly insinuated that you was not able to give full obedience In the second Article of which Libel you declare That you were confident the Parliament never intended to impose contradictory Oaths thereby to abuse the people with a belief that the Parliament had been so impious as really and actually to have imposed contradictory Oaths and so ridiculous as to have made an act of Parliament which should be most deliberate of all humane Actions quite contrary to their own intentions after which you subsumed contrary to the nature of all Oaths and to the Acts of Parliament above-cited that every man must explain it for himself and take it in his own sense by which not only that excellent Law and the Oath therein specified which is intended to be a Fence to the Government both of Church and State but all other Oaths and Laws shall be rendered altogether uselesse to the Government If every man take the Oaths imposed by Law in his own sense then the Oath imposed is to no purpose for the Legislator cannot be sure that the Oath imposed by him will bind the takers according to the design and intent for which he appointed it and the Legislative Power is taken from the Imposers and setled in the taker of the Oath And so he is allowed to be the Legislator which is not only an open and violent depraving of His Majesties Laws and Acts of Parliament but is likewise a setling of the Legistative Power on private Subjects who are to take such Oaths In the third Article of that Paper you declare That you take the Test in so far only as it is consistent with it self and the Protestant Religion by which you maliciously intimate to the people That the said Oath is inconsistent with it self and with the Protestant Religion which is not only a down-right depraving of the said Act of Parliament but is likewise a misconstruing of His Majesties and the Parliaments Proceedings and misrepresenting them to the people in the highest degree in the tenderest points they can be concerned and implying that the King and the Parliament have done things inconsistent with the Protestant Religion for securing of which that Test was particularly intended In the Fourth Article you do expresly declare that you mean not by taking the said Test to bind up your self from wishing and endeavouring any alteration in a lawful way that you shall think fit for advancing of Church and State whereby also it was designed by the said Act of Parliament and Oath That no man should make any alteration in the Government of Church and State as it is now established and that it is the duty of all good Subjects in humble and quiet manner to obey the present Government Yet you not only declare your self but by your example you invite others to think themselves â—oosed from that Obligation and that it is free for them to make any alteration in either as they shall think fit concluding your whole Paper with these words And this I understand as a part of my Oath which is a treasonable invasion upon the Royal Legislative Power as if it were
Sir George Lockhart Advocate to consult and plead for us in the Criminal Process intended against us at the instance of His Majesties Advocate and to compear with us before the Lords Commissioners of Justitiary upon the 12th of December next conform to an Act of Council dated the 22d of Novemb. instant allowing any Lawyers that we should employ to consult and plead for us in the said Process and to another Act of Council of the 24th of Novemb. instant relative to the former and conform to the Acts of Parliament In witness whereof we have Subscribed these Presents at Edenburgh-Castle Nov 26. 1681. before these Witnesses Duncan Campbell Servitor to James Glen Stationer in Edenburgh and John Thom Merchant in the said Burgh ARGYLE Duncan Campbell Iohn Thom Witnesses An Instrument whereby the Earl of Argyle required Sir George Lockhart to appear and plead for him Apud Edenburgum vigesimo sexto die Mensis Novembris Anno Domini millesimo sexcentesimo octuagesimo primo Anno Regni Car. 2. Regis trigesimo tertio THe which day in presence of Me Notar publik and Witnesses under-subscribed compeared personally Alexander Dunbar Servitor to a Noble Earl Archibald Earl of Argyle as Procurator and in name of the said Earl conform to a Procuration subscribed by the said Earl at the Castle of Edenburgh upon the twenty first day of November 1681. making and constituting the said Alexander Dunbar his Procurator to the effect under-written and past to the personal presence of Sir George Lockhart Advocate in his own lodging in Edenburgh having and holding in his hands an Act of his Majesties Privy Council of the date the 22 of November 1681. instant proceeding upon a Petition given in by the said Earl of Argyle to the said Lords shewing That he being Criminally indicted before the Lords Commissioners of Justitiary at the instance of His Majesties Advocate for Crimes of an high Nature and whereas in that case no Advocates would readily plead for the said Earl unless they had his Royal Highness's and their Lordships special Licence and Warrant to that effect which is usual in the like Cases And by the said Petition humbly supplicated That his Highness and the Council would give special Order and Command to the said Sir George Lockhart the said Earl's ordinary Advocate to consult and plead for him in the foresaid Criminal Process without incurring any hazard upon that account His Royal Highness and Lords of the said Privy-Council did refuse the desire of the said Petition but allowed any Lawyers the Petitioner should employ to consult and plead for him in the Process of Treason and other Crimes to be pursued against him at the instance of His Majesties Advocate And also the said Alexander Dunbar having and holding in his hands another Act of the said Lords of Privy-Council of the date the 24th of the said moneth relative to and nar rating the foresaid first Act and Proceeding upon another supplication given in by the said Earl to the said-Lords craving That his Royal Highness and the said Lords would interâ—ose their Authority by giving a positive and special Order and Warrant to the said Sir George Lockhart to consult and plead with him in the foresaid Criminal Process conform to the tenor of the Acts of Parliament mentioned and particularized in the said Petition and frequent and known practice in the like cases which was never refused to any Subjects of the meanest quality His Royal Highness and Lords of Privy-Council having considered the foresaid Petition did by the said Act adhere to their former Order allowing Advocates to appear for the said Earl in the Process foresaid as the said Acts bear and produced the said Acts and Procuratory foresaid to the said Sir George Lockhart who took the same in his hands and read them over successive and after reading thereof the said Alexander Dunbar Procurator and in name and behalf foresaid solemnly required the said Sir George Lockhart as the said Noble Earl's ordinary Advocate and as a Lawyer and Advocate upon the said Earl's reasonable expence to consult and advise the said Earl's said Processe at any time and place the said Sir George should appoint to meet thereupon conform to the foresaid Two Acts of Council and Acts of Parliament therein mentioned appointing Advocates to consult in such matters Which the said Sir George Lockhart altogether refused Whereupon the said Alexander Dunbar as Procurator and in Name foresaid asked and took Instruments one or more in the hands of me Notary publik undersubscribed And these things were done within the said Sir George Lockhart's Lodging on the South side of the Street of Edenburgh in the Lane-Mercat within the Dining-room of the said Lodging betwixt Four and Five hours in the Afternoon Day Moneth Year Place and of His Majesties Reign respective foresaid before Robert Dicksone and John Lesly Servitors to John Campbell Writer to His Majesties Signet and Doâ—gall Maâ— Alester Messenger in Edenburgh with divers others called and required to the Premisses Ita esse Ego Johannes Broun Notarius publicui in Praemissis requisitus Attestor Testantibus his meis signe subscriptione manualibus solitis consuetis Broun Witnesses Robert Dicksone Dowgall Mac. Alester Iohn Lesly Decemb. 5. 1682. The Opinion of divers Lawyers concerning the Case of the Earl of Argyle WE have considered the Criminal Letters raised at the instance of His Majesties Advocate against the Earl of Argyle with the Acts of Parliament contained and narrated in the same Criminal Letters and have compared the same with a Paper or Explication which is libelled to have been given in by the Earl to the Lords of His Majesties Privy-Council and owned by him as the sense and explication in which he did take the Oath imposed by the late Act of Parliament Which Paper is of this tenor I have considered the Test and am very desirous to give obedience as far as I can c. And having likewise considered that the Earl after he had taken the Oath with the explication and sense then put upon it it was acquiesced to by the Lords of Privy-Council and he allowed to take his Place and to sit and vote And that before the Earl's taking of the Oath there were several Papers spread abroad containing Objections and alledging inconsistencies and contradictions in the Oath and some thereof were presented by Synods and Presbyteries of the Orthodox Clergy to some of the Bishops of the Church It is our humble Opinion that seeing the Earls design and meaning in offering the said Explication was allenarly for the clearing of his own Conscience and upon no factious or seditious design and that the matter and import of the said Paper is no contradiction of the Laws and Acts of Parliament It doth not at all import any of the Crimes libelled against him viz. Treason Leasing-making depraving of His Majesties Laws or the Crime of Perjury but that the Glosses and Inferences put by the Libel upon the said Paper
Confession was designedly left out of it But it being again debated that the bare naming of the Protestant Religion without condescending on a Standard for it was not sufficient the Confession of Faith was of new added And after the affirmative clause for owning it and adhering to it was insert upon a new motion the negative never to consent to any alteration contrary to or inconsistent with the said Protestant Religion and Confession of Faith was also subjoyned But not without a new debate and opposition made against the words And Confession of Faith by the Bishop of Edinburgh until at length he also yeelded All which it is hoped was done for some purpose And if at that time any had doubted of the thing he had certainly been judged most ridiculous For it was by that addition concluded by all that the Confession was to be sworn and further it appears plainly by the Bishop of Edinburgh his vindication that when he wrote it he believed the Confession was to be sworn to for he takes pains to justify it though calumniously enough alledging That it was hastily compiled in the short space of four dayes by some Barrons and Ministers in the infancy of our Reformation Where by the by you see that he makes no reckoning of what the Act of Parliament to which the Test refers expresly bears viz. That that second Ratification 1567. which we only have recorded was no less then seven years after this Confession was first exhibited and approven Anno 1560. But moreover he tells us That the Doctors of Aberdeen who refused the Covenant vvere yet vvilling not only to subscribe but to svvear this Confession of Faith Which again to answer the Bishops critik of four dayes was more then 70. years after it was universally received It 's true that when the Bishop finds himself straitned how to answer objections he is forced to make use of the new Gloss I shall not call it of Orelans whereby the Protestant Religion is made to be sworn to only as far as every man pleases to interpret as far as may be consistent with any new principles of state But the Parliament certainly I do not speak ironically did intend by this Test to swear assert the True Protestant Religion and the said Confession of Faith whatever may be now pretended The Earl could not also but very well remember what His Highness had said to himself about the inserting of the Confession and no doubt the Advocate if ingenuous knows all this For the thing was at that time mater of common talk and indeed till Papers objecting contradictions and inconsistencies betwixt the Confession and the rest of the Test began to be so numerous which was about the end of October that there was no possibility left to answer them but by alledging That in the Test men do not swear to every article and proposition of the Confession but only to the Protestant Religion therein contained this point was never doubted And whether this answer be true and a solid Vindication consonant to the words of the Test or a circulating evasion enervating all its force let others judge But the Advocate sayes When it was moved in Parliament to read the Confession it was waved Most true the reason given by the Bishops for it was that it was notour they knew it and it was already insert in the Acts of Parliament And the truth was the reading of it would have spent more time then was allowed on examining the whole Test. It was likewise late after a long Sederunt and it was resolved to have the Act passed that night so it went on But it was likewise moved to read the Covenant seing it was to be disclaimed and this was flatly refused And will the Advocate thence infer That by the Test the Covenant is not abjured albeit it be most certain that many in the Parliament at that time had never read the one or the other But to follow the Advocat's excursions and answer them more particularly The motion for reading the Confession being made on this very occasion because it was to be insert in the Test and sworn to concluds enough against him For no body can be so effronted as to say it was used in Parliament as an argument not to read it because it was not to be sworn to but though it cost a debate it was plainly agreed to be sworn to and therefore insert 2ly Can any man doubt the Confession was to be sworn to when it is notour that severalls who were members of Parliament and by reason of offices they enjoyed were called to swear the Test pretending with reason tenderness of an Oath did before swearing make a fashion at least of reading and studying the Confession to satisfy themselves how far they might swear it And that this was done by an hundred I can attest themselves Lastly it is certain that vvhen in the end of October the Bishop of Edenburgh did quarrel S r George Lockhart for causing the Confession to be insert in the Test he answered that without it a Turk might sign the Test it vvas not then pretended by the Bishop that the Confession vvas not to be svvorn to and therefore he at that time had no reply But this is a debate I confess not altogether necessary for my present task only thereby you may see ground enough for the Earl to believe the Confession vvas svvorn to And all that did svvear before the Councils Explanation having svvorn in that sense and for ought I knovv all except the Clergy being by the Councils Act still bound to do so It vvas not strange the Earl might be of this Opinion And seeing that many of the Contradictions vvere alledged to arise hence and the Earl being a dissenter it vvas yet less strange that the Earl did scruple nor is it unreasonable that his modest Explanation should have a most benign acceptance The second pretence of aggravation is That his Majesty did not only bestow on the Earl his Lands and Iurisdictions fallen into his Majesties hands by the forfaulture of his Father but also pardon him the crimes of Leasing-making and Misconstruing whereof he was found guilty by the Parliament 1662. And raised him to the title and dignity of an Earl and to be a member of all his Majesties Iudicatories All vvhich the Earl as he hath ever doth still most thankfully acknovvledge But seeing the Advocate hath no vvarrand to upbraid him vvith his Majesties favours and that these things are novv remembred vvith a manifest design to raise dust and blind strangers and to add a very ill thing Ingratitude to the heap of groundless calumnies cast upon him I must crave leave to ansvver a little more particularly and refute this new tout as the scots proverb is in an old horn This old Leasing-making is then novv brought in seriously after it hath been treated in ridicule for 18 years by the very Actors vvho did never pretend
that were all were designed as was at first given out the Advocate needed not have set him oâ— high as Naboth and accusâ— him as a blasphemer of God and the King Then turning his speech to the Lords of Iustitiary he thought to have desired that they would yet seriously consider his words in their true sense and circumstances his own Explanation of his Explication and especially the forgoing matter of fact to have been laid before them with his Defences and grounds of Exculpation as also to have told them that they could not but observe how that he was singled out amongst thousands against whom much more then all he is charged with could be alledged and that they must of necessity acknowledge if they would speak out their own conscience that what he had said was spoke in pure innocence and duty and only for the exoneration of himself as a Christian and one honoured to be of His Majesties Privy Council where he was bound by his Oath to speak truth freely And not to throw the smallest reproach on either person or thing Adding that he was â—oath to say any thing that lookes like a reflection upon His Majesties Privy Council but if the Council can wrong one of their own number he thought he might demand if he had not met with hard measure For first he was pressed and perswaded to come to the Council then they receive his Explanation and take his Oath then they complain of him to His Majesty where he had no access to be heard and by their Letter under their hands affirm that they had been careful not to suffer any to take the Test with their own Explanations albeit they had allowed a thing very like it first to Earl Queensberry then to the Clergy And the President now Chancellour had permitted several members of the Colledge of Iustice to premise when they sware the Test some one sense some another and some non-sense as one saying he took it in sane sensu another making a speech that no man understood a third all the time of the reading repeating Lord have mercy upon me miserable sinner Nay even an Advocate after being debarred a few dayes because albeit no Clerk yet he would not take it without the benefit of his clergy viz. the Councils Explanation was yet thereafter admitted without the Warrant of the Councils Act but all this in the case of so many other was right and good Further the Council expresly declare the Earl to be Guilty before he had ever said one word in his own defence Thereafter some of them become his Assizers and others of them witness against him and after all they do of new concern themselves by a second Letter to His Majesty wherein they assert That after full debate and clear probation he was found guilty of Treason c. to have a sentence past against him and that of so high a nature and so dreadfull a consequence as suffers no person to be inconcerned far less their Lordships his Iudges who upon grounds equally just and which is more already predetermined by themselves may soon meet with the same measure not only as Concealers of Treason but upon the least pretended disobedience or non-compliance with any Act of Parliament and after all must infallibly render an accunt to God Almighty He bids them therefore Lay their hands to their hearts and whatever they shall judge he is assured that God knows and he hopes all unbyassed men in the world will or may know he is neither Guilty of Treason nor any of the Crimes libelled He sayes he is glad how many out do him in asserting the true Protestant Religion and their Loyalty to His Majesty Only he addes If he could justify himself to God as he can to His Majesty he is sure he might account himself the happiest man alive But yet seeing he hath a better hope in the mercy of God through Jesus Christ he thereupon rests whether he find Justice here on earth or not He sayes he will adde nothing to move them either to tenderness or pity he knows that not to be the place and pretends to neither from them He pleads his Innocence and craves Justice leaving it to their Lordships to consider not so much his particular case as what a Preparative it may be made and what may be its consequences And if all he hath said do neither convince nor perswade them to alter their judgment yet he desires them to consider whether the case do not at least deserve to be more fully represented and left to His Majesties wisdom and justice seeing that if once the matter pass upon record for Treason it is undoubted that hundreds of the best and who think themselves most innocent may by the same methods fall under the like Condemnation when ever the Kings Advocate shall be thereto prompted And thus you have a part of what the Earl intended to have said before pronouncing Sentence if he had not made his Escape before the day Yet some things I perceive by his notes are still in his own breast as only proper to be said to His Majesty I find several Quotations out of the Advocates printed books that it seemes he was to make some use of but seeing it would have been too great an interruption to have applyed them to the places designed I have subjoyned them together leaving them to the Advocate 's own and all mens consideration It was by some remarked That when the Lords of Iustitiary after the ending of the first dayes debate resolved that same night to give Judgment upon it they sent for the Lord Nairn one of their number an old and infirm man who being also a Lord of the Session is so decayed through age that he hath not for a considerable time been allowed to take his turn in the Outer house as they call it where they judgelesser causes alone But notwithstanding both his age and infirmity and that he was gone to bed he was raised and brought to the Court to consider a debate a great deal whereof he had not heard in full Court and withall as is informed while the Clerk was reading some of it fell of new asleep It was also remarked that the Lords of Justitiary being in all five viz. the Lord Nairn above-mentioned with the Lords Collintoun Newtoun Hirkhouse and Forret the Libell was found relevant only by the odds of three to two viz. the Lord Nairn foresaid the Lord Newtoun since made President of the Session and the Lord Forret both well enough known against the Lord Collintoun a very ingenuous Gentleman and a true old Cavalier and the Lord Hirkhouse a learned and upright judge As for the Lord Justice General who was also present and presided his vote according to the constitution of the Court was not asked yet he is since made a Marquies and Lord high Treasurer But to return to my Narrative the Earl as I have already told you did not think fit
Slandering Reproaching or Depraving charged against him except the injuriandi animus as well as the words had been both libelled and proven But so it is that his words do manifestly a low of a good sense that there is not the least presumption of injurie can be alledged against him That he did most plainly purge himself of all suspicion of guilt by declaring his sound and upright intention And that his words do not inferre either clearly or unclearly the smallest measure of guilt And withall neither was the injuriandi animus at all proven But on the contrary the words at first were taken for no injurie so that they could not afterward become such As is above fully cleared Ergo even the Advocate being judge the Earl is no Slanderer 6ly If it were necessary I could further tell you several things that he alledges to be sufficient for purging a man of any criminal intention As where he sayes ibid. p. 563. l. 2. That in matters of fact persons even judicious following the Faith of such as understand are to be excused And l. 30. That if it appear by the meanness of the crime he should say the smalness of the deed And what can be less then the uttering of a few words in the manner that the Earl spoke them That there was no design of transgression And that the committer designed not for so small a matter to committ a crime much less such horrid ones as Depraving and Treason In that case the meanness of the transgression or deed ought to defend against the relevancy c. But to give you one instance for all how much the Advocate may one day or other be oblidged to plead the innocence of his intentions to free himself of words downright in themselves slanderous and depraving an act of Parliament much better nor he understands it and in fresh and constant observance Ibid. p 139 towards the middle speaking of the 151. Act. Ja. 6. P. 12. Whereby it is statut That seeing diverse exceptions and objections riles upon criminal libells and parties are frustrate of Justice by the alledged irrelevancy thereof That in time coming all criminal libells shall contain that the persons complained on are Art Part of the crimes libelled which shall be relevant to accuse them thereof swa that no exception or objection take away that part of the libell in time coming He sayes That he finds no Act of Parliament more unreasonable For the statutory part of that Act committing the triall of Art and Part to Assizers seemes most unjust Seeing in committing the greatest questions of the Law to the most ignorant of the Subjects it puts a sharp sword in the hands of blind men And the reason of this Act specified in the Narrative is likewise most inept and no wayes illative c. What reproaches What Blasp hemies The Earl said not one word against any Act of Parliament But on the contrary that he was confident the Parliament intended no contradiction and that he was willing to take the Test in the Parliaments sense But here the Adâ—ocate both sayes and prints it That an Act of Parliament is most unreasonable and most unjust and its reason most inept and that it puts a sharp sword in the hands of blind men Whereof the smallest branch is infinitly more reproachfull then all can be strained out of the Earl's words But Sir Speculation is but Speculation and if the Advocate when his day comes be as able to purge himself of practical depravations as I am inclined to excuse all his visionarie lapses notwithstanding of the famous Title Quod quisque juris in altâ—râ—m statuerit utipse eodem jure utatur he shall never be the worse of my censure FINIS APPENDIX In Answer to a late Pamphlet called A Vindication of His Majesties Government and Judicatories in Scotland Especially with a Relation to the late Earl of Argyl's Process In so far as concerns the said Process IT now remains that we consider the fore-mentioned Paper called a Vindication c. And though the account you have had in the Narrative may abundantly satisfy all rational men as to any thing contained in this Vindication in relation to the Earl's process my only concern yet because the Writer of it hath taken liberty to vent many falshoods known to be such to himself and the whole Kingdom and that in such a positive presuming Stile as with his insinuat character seems to be purposely designed to impose upon strangers and lead them from the Mist he pretends to discuss into gross Darkness I shall here without giving you the trouble of letter upon letter transcribe shortly what my friend who sent me the Narrative hath since given me the occasion to remark upon this Vindication in so far as it refers to it without digressing to other things which no doubt others more concerned and better qualified will not fail to examin And after having first wisely projected to disarm all his opponents by robbing them of the liberty of the press that himself may use it without control and spread his informations and vindications without reply as Diurnals writ for Regulation Of Lying to enform the Nation And in the nixt place chaffed himself by some rambling reflections on past controversies which yet for all the boast he makes of the present blessed composure of affairs in Scotland if he and his associats still persist to treat them after their manner will I fear never finally end untill they be reacted and all former errors for ever corrected He comes to notice the Earl's Process and a pamphlet called the Scotch mist that takes pains as he sayes to make it appear an unanswerable instance of the arbitraryness of Scotch Iudges Where having prefaced just as much in their vindication as may be said for all the Judges of the world whereof yet we know that thousands are ignorant corrupt and violent And nixt told us very discreetly that Earl Strafford was murthered by King Lords and Commons because forsooth that they following the known rule of the civil Law Si quam paenam Princeps irrogavit nec ad exemplum trahitur nec per sonam transgreditur made an Act That none should die by that preparative with some other stories of the like nature backed with a few fables of his own invention For clearing matter of Fact he sayes first That the Earl of Argyl's learned Iudges were not a pack't Commission but the ordinary judges of the Nation But what then if this lessen their tentation doth it not rather aggravat their injustice But 2ly Not to trouble you with the just and true characters of some of them which to persons unacquainted might possibly appear a libel is it not well known that at the first and untill sufficient assurances of the bench were obtained there was a resolution to have given or pack't as our Author speaks Assessors with them 3ly Were they not all Judges of the late edition to wit no more advitam
have heard and by the above-mentioned Restitution of the Marquess of Huntly were miserably cut off But upon the Earl's present disaster what neither material justice nor the merit of the Persons could obtain against the House of Huntly is now by importunity procured against the Earl of Argyle for the more effectual ruine of his Family and Friends and these old Creditors of Huntly who were no original Creditors of Argyle brought in upon Argyl's Estate to the exclusion of his proper Creditors And further least the real Securities by Morgages and otherwise that some of the Earl's Creditors have should avail them these are also made void by the Act of Quinquennial Possession and the other Rigours of forfaultures only accustomed to be practised and yet not without some mitigation in the case of atrocious and open Rebellion against the King and Kingdom And besides all this his Majesty hath been also moved to give away considerable Superiorities and Lands pertaining to the Earl to several Persons having no other pretension or merit saving an unreasonable enmity against the Family of Argyle By all which it is evident that besides the horrible usage the Earl met with in his Trial and Sentence not only is He himself wholly neglected and his Children little regarded in this late disposal of his Estate but his proper Creditors and Friends are also prejudged and postponed And in effect his whole Estate fair and opulent enough to have payed all his debts honestly provided his Children competently and sustained the dignity of his Rank honourably cutted and carved on before his eyes at pleasure and much of it parcelled out and bestowed upon the worst of his neighbors and his greatest enemies But to make a mends for all our Author sayes The Tiends are returned to the Church But seeing the Earl possessed all his tithes by good and lawfull purchases and undoubted rights from the Church whereof the Church neither did nor could complain our Author should have remembered that The Lord loves Iudgment and hates Robbery for burnt offering Yet in all this the Earl doth not intertain one hard thought of His Majesty knowing certainly that notwithstanding all was prepared for him by his learned Iudges and wife Councellours Yet he hath not stept one step in this affair but by importunity even tho all access to represent any thing to him on the Earl's behalf was way-laid Nor did his Majesty yeeld to pass the late Signature disposing of the Earl's Estate albeit the Earl of Middletoun was sent express about it until his Royal Highness arrived from Scotland at Newmarket and prevailed As for the three capital Sentences against the Earl's Family which our Author mentions you have a full account of them in the Narrative What return shall we then make to our Author 's Euge for a happy Kingdom but O unhappy happy Kingdom Wherein the fairest words are made the foulest offence and the smallest offence punished as the greatest Treason where dreames and visions are exhibited for Indictments and Judges and Jurors find them to be Realities where Right is turned to precarious Gift and then taken and retaken at pleasure And yet all these things gloried in as the greatest marks of its felicity And in a word whose misery is lamented by all except a few that enrich themselves with its spoyls and triumph in its Ruines Our Author comes in the next place to give an account in what manner the Earl gave in his Explanation and took the Test Where denying and affirming many things at random which are all distinctly set down and cleared in the Narrative I shall here only briefly remark his own as he pretends to do other mens Mistakes And first albeit the Earl was not publikly desired to take the Test yet it is most true that in private his Royal Highness did much press him to it and after a meeting of Council had been designedly appointed for the Earl's taking or resussing his Highness did peremptorily oblidge him to attend the next council-Council-day in course and plainly refused to give him leave to withdraw and take the benefite of the two moneths longer time allowed by the Act of Parliament 2ly It is false That the Earl had assured both his Royal Highness and many others that he would not take the Test that he came in abruptly to the Council that he spoke with so slow or soft a voice that none say they hear'd him that he clapt down on his knees and took the Test. When as 3ly It is certain That what passed betwixt his Royal Highness and the Earl about the Test is faithfully setdown in the Narrative and the Earl was not more positive with any other on that subject That it was with difficulty that the Earl got his appearance before the Council delayed untill the day he presented hemself And that that day he was expected and also spoke to and treated with by several Councellors before he entred about the swearing with an Explication That being entred and a stool set to him to kneel upon he first gave in or which is more declared openly and word by word directed toward his Royal Highness the Sense and Explanation wherein he was content to swear That his Highness heard it and told the Earl so much the next morning That the Clerks heard it and repeated it to several persons and one of them in his Witnessing against the Earl expresly swears that he heard it and saw it accepted That some that sate remotest in the Council both heard and repeated the Earl's words That after the Earl had pronounced them the Oath was administrat to and sworn by him Which was the most proper natural and direct Acceptance that could be desired So that after this business was thus publikly transacted for our Author to say either that the Earl spoke softly or that he specially being himself a Privy Councellour should first have given in his Sense and petitioned to know if it was acceptable is a silly pretence But 4ly Our Author not only contrary to truth but which is more remarkable in contradiction even to his Majesties Advocate and the Records of the Court proceeds to affirm 1. That the Earl dispersed copies of his Explanation albeit his Majesties Advocate having libelled the same thing was necessitat to pass from it because absolutly false and destitute of all evidence And next That his Majesties Advocate having allowed the Earl to prove That the Council heard and approved it yet he failed in the probation Whereas it is manifest from the Process that the Earl having alledged for a defence against the crimes of Leasing making Depraving and Treason That the Council had accepted his Explanation in manner above declared and that therefore it could not be made a ground to infer any of these crimes against him The Lords by their Judgment Interloquutour did expresly repell this defence And all they sustained was a defence proponed to elude the Perjury to witt That the Earl emitted his