the 1 2 Ph. M. 8. and all and every Branches Clauses and Articles therein contained other than such Branches and Sentences as hereafter shall be excepted may from the last day of this Session of Parliament by Authority of this present Parliament be repealed and shall from thenceforth be utterly void and of none effect The Statute of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. here mentioned repealed The King declared supream Head Stat. 1 2. Ph. Mar. 8. 26 H. 8. 1. 35 H. 8. 3. the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 1. and 35 H. 8. cap. 3. By both which King Henry the Eighth his Heirs and Successors were declared supream Head of the Church of England And by the repeal of that of 1. and 2. Ph. Mar. those other of 26 and 35 H. 8. were revived and are again in force Co. 4. Inst 325. Vide Sect. 5. Stat. Sect. 3. A reviver of several Stat. And that also for the reviving of divers of the said good Laws and Statutes made in the time of your said dear Father it may also please your Highness That one Act and Statute made in the three and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that no person shall be cited out of the Diocess where he or she dwelleth except in certain Cases And one other Act made in the Four and Twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act that Appeals in such cases as hath been used to be pursued to the See of Rome shall not be from henceforth had ne used but within this Realm And one other Act made the five and twentieth year of the said late King concerning restraint of payment of Annates and First-fruits of Archbishopricks and Bishopricks to the See of Rome And one other Act in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the submission of the Clergy to the Kings Majesty And also one Act made in the five and twentieth year entituled An Act restraining the payment of Annates or First-fruits to the Bishop of Rome and of the Electing and Consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops within this Realm And one other Act made in the said five and twentieth year entituled An Act concerning the Exoneration of the Kings Subjects from Exactions and Impositions heretofore paid to the See of Rome and for having Licences and Dispensations within this Realm without suing further for the same And one other Act made in the six and twentieth year of the said late King entituled An Act for Nomination and Consecration of Suffragans within this Realm And also one other Act made in the eight and twentieth year of the Reign of the said late King entituled An Act for the Release of such as have obtained pretended Licences and Dispensations from the See of Rome And all and every Branches Words and Sentences in the said several Acts and Statutes contained The Sentences and Branches in the aforesaid Statutes shall extend to the Queen by Authority of this present Parliament from and at all times after the last day of this Session of Parliament shall be revived and shall stand and be in full force and strength to all intents constructions and purposes And that the Branches Sentences and Words of the said several Acts and every of them from thenceforth shall and may be judged déemed and taken to extend to your Highness your Heirs and Successors as fully and largely as ever the same Acts or any of them did extend to the said late King Henry the Eighth your Highnesses Father And that it may also please your Highness that it may be enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That so much of one Act or Statute made in the two and thirtieth year of the Reign of your said dear Father King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act concerning Precontracts of Marriages and touching degrees of Consanguinity as in the time of the late King Edward the sixth your Highnesses most dear Brother by one other Act or Statute was not repealed And also one Act made in the seven and thirtieth year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the Eighth entituled An Act that Doctors of the Civil Law being married may exercise Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction And all and every Branches and Articles in the said two Acts last mentioned and not repealed in the time of the said late King Edward the sixth may from henceforth likewise stand and be revived and remain in their full force and strength to all intents and purposes Any thing contained in the said Act of repeal before mentioned or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding What Stat. repealed by the Stat. of 1 2 P. M. 8. shall continue repealed And that it may also please your Highness that it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all other Laws and Statutes and the Branches and Clauses of any Act or Statute repealed and made void by the said Act of Repeal made in the time of the said late King Philip and Quéen Mary and not in this present Act specially mentioned and revived shall stand remain and be repealed and void in such like manner and form as they were before the making of this Act any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding A reviver of the Stat. of 1 Ed. 6. 1. And that it may also please your Highness That it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first year of the Reign of the late King Edward the sixth your Majesties most dear Brother entituled An Act against such persons as shall unreverently speak against the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ commonly called the Sacrament of the Altar and for the receiving thereof under both kinds and all and every Branches Clauses and Sentences therein contained shall and may likewise from the last day of this Session of Parliament be revived and from thenceforth shall and may stand remain and be in full force strength and effect to all intents constructions and purposes in such like manner and form as the same was at any time in the first year of the Reign of the said late King Edward the Sixth any Law Statute or other matter to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding A repeal of the Statute of 1 2 P. M. 6. and several other Statutes And that also it may please your Highness That it may be further established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that one Act and Statute made in the first and second years of the late King Philip and Queen Mary entituled An Act for the reviving of three Statutes made for the punishment of Heresies and also the said three Statutes mentioned in the said Act and by the same Act revived And all and every Branches Articles Clauses and Sentences contained in the said several Acts and Statutes and every of them shall be
from the last day of this Session of Parliament deemed and remain utterly repealed void and of none effect to all intents and purposes Any thing in the said several Acts or any of them contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 4. The abolishing of Forreign Authority And to the intent that all usurped and Forreign Power and Authority Spiritual and Temporal may for ever be clearly extinguished and never to be used or obeyed within this Realm or any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries may it please your Highness That it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no Forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate Spiritual or Temporal shall at any time after the last day of this Session of Parliament use enjoy or exercise any manner of Power Iurisdiction Superiority Authority Preheminence or Priviledge Spiritual or Ecclesiastical within this Realm or within any other your Majesties Dominions or Countries that now be or hereafter shall be but from thenceforth the same shall be clearly abolished out of this Realm and all other your Highnesses Dominions for ever Any Statute Ordinance Custom Constitutions or any other matter or cause whatsoever to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the abrogating the Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate Archbishop of Canterburies concurrent Jurisdiction abrogated all Jurisdiction derived from such Forreigner is abrogated likewise And therefore the concurrent Jurisdiction which the Archbishop of Canterbury is supposed to have in the inferiour Diocesses ought not now to be exercised by him but is utterly taken away by this Act For he had it not as Archbishop but as Legatus natus to the Pope and if continued to be exercised is a meer Usurpation Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case And that also it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 5. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction annexed to the Crown that it may be established and enacted by the Authority aforesaid that such Iurisdictions Priviledges Superiorities and Preheminences Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as by any Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Power or Authority hath heretofore béen or may lawfully be exercised or used for the Visitation of the Ecclesiastical State and Persons and for Reformation Order and Correction of the same And of all manner of Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses Offences Contempts and Enormities shall for ever by Authority of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 325. calls this an Act of Restitution of the ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical which always belonged of Right to the Crown of England That is a restitution of the exercise of it For in truth this Statute is not introductory of a new Law The Kings ancient Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical but declaratory of the old and annexes not any Jurisdiction to the Crown but that which was or of right ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of the Kings Jurisdiction By which Laws the King as supream Head hath full and intire Power in all causes Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal For the Ecclesiastical Laws are the Kings Laws as well as the Temporal And the Judges of either of those Laws derive their Authority from him alone Co. 5.8 9. Cawdries Case where are several instances of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction exercised by the Kings of this Realm in several Ages Moore 755. b. 1043. The King is Persona mixta And in this respect the King is said to be Persona mixta and Persona mixta unita cum Sacerdotibus for that he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction 10 H. 7.18 Co. 2.44 Bishop of Winchesters Case Coke 13.17 Case of Modus Decimandi Vid. Co. lib. 6. Praefac ' And supream Ordinary The King is the supream Ordinary and by the ancient Laws of this Realm may without any Act of Parliament make Ordinances and Institutions for the Government of the Clergy and may deprive them if they obey not Moore 755. C. 1043. Cro. Trin. 2. Jac. 37. And if there be a controversie between Spiritual Persons concerning their Jurisdiction the King is Arbitrator and 't is a right of his Crown to distribute to them and to declare their Bounds Hobart 17. Dr. James's Case Laws to be administred distinctly And yet although these Jurisdictions Ecclesiastical and Temporal are both in the King they are not to be confounded For although both Laws are the Kings Laws yet they are to be administred distinctly so that he who hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction derived from the King ought not to usurp upon the temporal Law And the Ecclesiastical Judge who meddles in Temporal Causes or Suits and draws the Interest or Cause of the Subject which ought to be determined by the Common Law ad aliud examen viz. to be decided by the Ecclesiastical Law offends contra Coronam dignitatem Regiam In confounding those Jurisdictions of the King which ought to be kept separate and distinct Prohibition And in such Cases not only a Prohibition lies but the Ecclesiastical Judge if the Cause originally belongs to the Common Law Pramunire and not to the Ecclesiastical Court incurs a Praemunire for depriving the Subject of the benefit of the Common Law which is his Birthright Co. 12.37 38 39 40. Co. 3. Inst 120. And therefore it was Resolved That if a man be excommunicated in the Bishops Court for a matter which belongs to the determination of the Common Law 't is no less than a Praemunire Praemunire And that by force of the word elsewhere in the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. Stat. 16 R. 2. 5. If any man pursue in the Court of Rome or elsewhere c. 5 E. 4.6 The King may do what the Pope might by the Canon Law By this and the former Clause which restores to the King the Title and Exercise of the Power of Supream Head of the Church of England and annexes to the Crown all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction heretofore exercised by any Forreigner The King as supream Head may do whatever the Pope might formerly do within this Realm by the Canon Law And upon this ground it was resolved Trin. 39 Eliz. in Hollingworths Case in the Kings-Bench That notwithstanding the Statute of 25 H. 8. cap. 19. Stat. 25 H. 8. 19 which makes the sentence of the Delegates definitive and saith that no further Appeal shall be had yet the King after such definitive Sentence may grant a Commission of Review Commission ad revidendum For that after a definitive Sentence the Pope as supream Head by the Canon Law used to grant a Commission ad revidendum Co. 4. Inst 341. Upon this ground it was likewise resolved in the Case of Grendon versus the Bishop of Lincoln al' That the King with the consent of the Patron and without the Bishop may make an Appropriation Appropriation And in such Case the King doth it Authoritate sua regia
said Oath And that it may likewise be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons as at any time hereafter shall be promoted preferred or collated to any such Promotion Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Benefice Office or Ministry or that by your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall be promoted or preferred to any Temporal or Lay Office Ministry or Service shall and do peremptorily and obstinately refuse to take the same Oath so to him to be offered that then he or they so refusing shall presently be judged disabled in the Law to receive take or have the same Promotion Spiritual or Ecclesiastical or the same Temporal Office Ministry or Service within this Realm or any other your Highnesse Dominions to all intents constructions and purposes He that sues Livery or 〈…〉 And that it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that all and every person and persons Temporal suing Livery or Oustre le maine out of the hands of your Highness your Heirs or Successors before his or their Livery or Oustre le maine sued forth and allowed He that doth homage to the Queen He that shall be received into the Queens service and every Temporal person or persons doing any homage to your Highness your Heirs or Successors or that shall be received into Service with your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall make take and receive the said Corporal Oath before mentioned before the Lord Chancellor of England or the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal for the time being or before such person or persons as by your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall be named and appointed to accept or receive the same And that also all and every person and persons taking Orders He that taketh Orders He that taketh Degrees in any University and all and every other person and persons which shall be promoted or preferred to any Degree of Learning in any Vniversity within this your Realm or Dominions before he shall receive or take any such Orders or be preferred to any such Degree of Learning shall make take and receive the said Oath by this Act set forth and declared as is aforesaid before his or their Ordinary Commissary Chancellor or Vice-Chancellor or their sufficient Deputies in the said Vniversity Provided always He that having an Estate of Inheritance in a temporal Office first refuseth and then taketh the Oath and that it may be further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person having any Estate of Inheritance in any Temporal Office or Offices shall hereafter obstinately and peremptorily refuse to accept and take the said Oath as is aforesaid and after at any time during his life shall willingly require to take and receive the said Oath and so do take and accept the same Oath before any person or persons that shall have lawful Authority to minister the same that then every such person immediately after he hath so received the same Oath shall be vested judged and deemed in like estate and possession of the said Office as he was before the said refusal and shall and may use and exercise the said Office in such manner and form as he should or might have done before such refusal Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And for the more sure Observation of this Act Stat. Sect. 8. The penalty of the maintenance of Forreign Authority and the utter Extinguishment of all Forreign and usurped Power and Authority may it please your Highness that it may further be enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons dwelling or inhabiting within this your Realm or in any other your Highnesses Realms or Dominions of what Estate Dignity or Degree whatsoever he or they be after the end of 30 days next after the determination of this Session of this present Parliament shall by Writing Printing Teaching Preaching express words deed or act advisedly maliciously and directly affirm hold stand with set forth maintain or defend the Authority Preheminence Power or Iurisdiction Spiritual or Ecclesiastical of any Forreign Prince Prelate Person State or Potentate whatsoever heretofore claimed used or usurped within this Realm or any Dominion or Country being within or under the Power Dominion or Obeysance of your Highness or shall advisedly maliciously and directly put in ure or execute any thing for the extolling advancement setting forth maintenance or defence of any such pretended or usurped Iurisdiction Power Preheminence or Authority or any part thereof that then every such person and persons so doing and offending their abettors aiders procurers and Counsellors being thereof lawfully convicted and attainted according to the true order and course of the Common Laws of this Realm for his or their first offence shall forfeit and lose unto your Highness your Heirs and Successors all his and their Goods and Chattels as well real as personal The forfeiture for the first Offence And if any person so convicted or attainted shall not have or be worth of his proper Goods and Chattels to the value of twenty pounds at the time of his Conviction or Attainder That then every such person so convicted and attainted over and besides the forfeiture of all his said Goods and Chattels shall have and suffer Imprisonment by the space of one whole year without Bail or Mainprise And that also all and every the Benefices Prebends and other Ecclesiastical Promotions and Dignities whatsoever of every spiritual person so offending and being attainted shall immediately after such Attainder be utterly void to all intents and purposes as though the Incumbent thereof were dead And that the Patron and Donor of every such Benefice Prebend spiritual Promotion and Dignity shall and may lawfully present unto the same or give the same in such manner and form as if the said Incumbent were dead The forfeiture for the second Offence And if any such Offender or Offenders after such Conviction or Attainder do eftsoons commit or do the said Offences or any of them in manner and form aforesaid and be thereof duly convicted and attainted as is aforesaid That then every such Offender and Offenders shall for the same second Offence incur into the dangers penalties and forfeitures ordained and provided by the Statute of Provision and Praemunire made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the second The forfeiture for the third Offence And if any such Offender or Offenders at any time after the said second Conviction and Attainder do the third time commit and do the said Offences or any of them in manner and form aforesaid and be thereof duly convicted and attainted as is aforesaid That then every such Offence or Offences shall be deemed and adjudged High Treason and that the Offender or Offenders therein being thereof lawfully convicted and attainted according to the Laws of this Realm shall suffer pains of death and other penalties forfeitures and losses as in
Act of Repeal made in the said first and second years of the Reigns of the said late King Philip and Quéen Mary as doth in any wise touch or concern any matter or cause of Praemunire or that doth make or ordain any matter or cause to be within the Case of Praemunire but that the same for so much only as toucheth or concerneth any Case or matter of Praemunire shall stand and remain in such force and effect as the same was before the making of this Act Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Provided also and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid Offences committed against Statutes revived That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be prejudicial to any person or persons for any Offence or Offences committed or done or hereafter to be committed or done contrary to the tenour and effect of any Act or Statute now revived by this Act before the end of thirty days next after the end of the Session of this present Parliament Any thing in this Act contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 11. Trial of Peers And if it happen that any Peér of this Realm shall fortune to be indicted of and for any Offence that is revived or made Praemunire or Treason by this Act that then he so being indicted shall have his Trial by his Péers in such like manner and form as in other Cases of Treason hath been used Provision for Trial of Peers The provision made in this and other Acts of Parliament for the Trial of a Peer by his Peers in case of Treason where he was to be tried according to the course of the Common Law is Ex abundanti and he should have such Trial if no such Proviso were inserted the like in the Case of Felony Stamford Pl. Coron 153. Stat. Sect. 12. No matter of Religion c. made by this Parliament shall be adjudged Error Heresie or Schism Provided always and be it enacted as is aforesaid That no manner of Order Act or Determination for any matter of Religion or cause Ecclesiastical had or made by the Authority of this present Parliament shall be accepted deémed interpreted or adjudged at any time hereafter to be any Error Heresie Schism or schismatical Opinion Any Order Decreé Sentence Constitution or Law whatsoever the same be to the contrary notwithstanding What things the Commissiners may adjudge to be Heresie Provided always and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid That such person or persons to whom your Highness your Heirs or Successors shall hereafter by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England give Authority to have or execute any Iurisdiction Power or Authority Spiritual or to visit reform order or correct any Errors Heresies Schisms Abuses or Enormities by virtue of this Act shall not in any wise have Authority or Power to Order determine or adjudge any matter or cause to be Heresie but only such as heretofore have been determined ordered or adjudged to be Heresie by the Authority of the Canonical Scriptures The Scripture Four general Counsels or by the first four general Counsels or any of them or by any other general Counsel wherein the same was declared Heresie by the express and plain words of the said Canonical Scriptures or such as hereafter shall be ordered judged or determined to be Heresie by the high Court of Parliament of this Realm with the assent of the Clergy in their Convocation Any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding None shall be indicted or arraigned but by Witnesses And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no person or persons shall be hereafter indicted or arraigned for any of the Offences made ordained revived or adjudged by this Act unless there be two sufficient Witnesses or more to testifie and declare the said Offences whereof he shall be indicted or arraigned And that the said Witnesses or so many of them as shall be living and within this Realm at the time of Arraignment of such person so indicted shall be brought forth in person face to face before the party so arraigned and there shall testifie and declare what they can say against the party so arraigned if he require the same Provided also A Proviso for them that give relief to Offenders and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons shall hereafter happen to give any relief aid or comfort or in any wise be aiding helping or comforting to the person or persons of any that shall hereafter happen to be an Offender in any matter or case of Praemunire or Treason revived or made by this Act that then such relief aid or comfort given shall not be judged or taken to be any Offence unless there be two sufficient Witnesses at the least that can and will openly testifie and declare that the person or persons that so give such relief aid or comfort had notice and knowledge of such Offence committed and done by the said Offender at the time of such relief aid or comfort so to him given or ministred Any thing in this Act contained or any other matter or cause to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And where one pretenced sentence hath heretofore béen given in the Consistory in Pauls before certain Iudges De Legate by the Authority Legantine of the late Cardinal Poole by reason of a Forreign usurped Power and Authority against Richard Chetwood Esq and Agnes his Wife Chetwoods Appeal to the Court of Rome by the name of Agnes Woodhull at the suit of Charles Tyrrel Gent. in a Cause of Matrimony solemnized betweén the said Richard and Agnes as by the same pretended Sentence more plainly doth appear from which Sentence the said Richard and Agnes have appealed to the Court of Rome which Appeal doth there remain and yet is not determined May it therefore please your Highness that it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if Sentence in the said Appeal shall happen to be given at the said Court of Rome for and in the behalf of the said Richard and Agnes for the reversing of the said pretenced Sentence before the end of threéscore days next after the end of this Session of this present Parliament that then the same shall be judged and taken to be good and effectual in the Law and shall and may be used pleaded and allowed in any Court or Place within this Realm Any thing in this Act or in any other Act or Statute contained to the contrary notwithstanding And if no Sentence shall be given at the Court of Rome in the said Appeal for the reversing of the said pretenced Sentence before the end of the said thréescore days that then it shall and may be lawful for the said Richard and Agnes and either of them at any time hereafter to
Heir or Successor as was adjudged in the Case of an Annuity granted to Sir Thomas Wroth during his life Plowden 457. Provided always Stat. Sect. 8. Trial of a Peer If it happen at any time hereafter any Péer of this Realm to be Indicted of any Offence made Treason Felony or Praemunire by this Act That he shall have his Trial by his Péers as in other Cases of Treason Felony or Praemunire is accustomed Provided nevertheless and it is declared by authority aforesaid That if any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest abovesaid shall fortune to be so weak or infirm of Body that he or they may not pass out of the Realm by the time herein limited without eminent danger of life and this understood as well by the Corporal Oath of the party as by other good means unto the Bishop of the Diocess and two Iustices of Peace of the same County where such person or persons do dwell or abide That then and upon good and sufficient Bond of the person or persons with Sureties of the sum of Two hundred pounds at the least with condition that he or they shall be of good behavior towards our Sovereign Lady the Queén and all her liege people Then he or they so licensed and doing as is aforesaid shall and may remain and be still within this Realm without any loss or danger to fall on him or them by this Act for so long time as by the same Bishop and Iustices shall be limited and appointed so as the same time of aboad exceed not the space of six months at the most And that no person or persons shall sustain any loss or incur any danger by this Act for the receiving or maintaining of any such person or persons so licensed as is aforesaid for and during such time only as such person or persons shall be so licensed to tarry within this Realm Any thing contained in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 9. One knowing a Jesuit or Priest to remain in the Realm must discover it to a Justice of Peace or higher Officer And be it also further Enacted by Authority aforesaid That every person or persons being Subject of this Realm which after the said forty days shall know and understand that any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest abovesaid shall abide stay tarry or be within this Realm or other the Queéns Dominions and Countries contrary to the true meaning of this Act and shall not discover the same unto some Iustice of Peace or other higher Officer within twelve days next after his said knowledge but willingly conceal his knowledge therein that every such Offender shall make Fine and be imprisoned at the Quéens pleasure And that if such Iustice of Peace or other such Officer to whom such matter shall be so discovered do not within Eight and twenty days then next following give Information thereof to some of the Quéens Privy Councel or to the President or Vice-president of the Quéens Councel established in the North or in the Marches of Wales for the time being That then he or they so offending shall for every such Offence forfeit the sum of two hundred marks And be it likewise Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That such of the Privy Councel President or Vice-president to whom such Informations shall be made shall thereupon deliver a note in writing subscribed with his own Hand to the party by whom he shall receive such Information testifying that such Information was made unto him Being Subject of this Realm And not any person as Wingate tit Crowne numb 59. mistakes What is meant by a Subject of this Realm Subject of this Realm who Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 23. Vnto some Iustice of Peace or other higher Officer Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 8. At the Quéens pleasure Fine and imprisonment at the Queens pleasure In this Case the Offender must be proceeded against according to the course of Law for he cannot be fined or imprisoned at the Kings pleasure by force of this Statute before he be Indicted Convicted and Judgment given against him And so were the proceedings against Sir Thomas Figet for going armed contrary to the Statute of 2 E. 3. Stat. 2 E. 3. 3 cap. 3. For the Book 24 E. 3. 33. saith that he was arraigned c. And if in this Case the Offender be committed to prison in order to his Trial and conviction yet before Judgment or at least before conviction he may be let to mainprize and the Fine shall be imposed by the Justices before whom he is convicted Justiciarii per eorum discretionem assessent finem non Dominus Rex per se in Camera sua nec aliter coram se nisi per Justiciarios suos haec est voluntas Regis viz. per Justiciarios suos legem suam unum est dicere 2 R. 3. 11. vide Co. 4. Inst. 71. 179. Note Sir Robert Brook in abridging the forementioned Case of Sir Thomas Figet saith that he was committed to the Prison of the Marshalsey and could not be mainprized until the King had signified his pleasure but omits the principal matter worthy of observation viz. That he was first arraigned c. Bro. Contempts 6. And be it also Enacted That all such Oaths Stat. Sect. 10. All Oaths Bonds and submissions to be certified into the Chancery Bonds and Submissions as shall be made by force of this Act as aforesaid shall be certified into the Chancery by such parties before whom the same shall be made within thrée months after such submission upon pain to forfeit and lose for every such Offence One hundred pounds of lawful English money the said forfeiture to be to the Quéen her Heirs and Successors None submitting himself shall come within ten miles of the Queen And that if any person so submitttng himself as aforesaid do at any time within the space of Ten years after such submission made come within Ten miles of such place where her Majesty shall ve without especial Licence from her Majesty in that behalf to be obtained in writing under her Hand that then and from thenceforth such person shall take no benefit of his said submission but that the same submission shall be void as if the same had never béen Stat. xxix Eliz. cap. vi An Act for the more speedy and due Execution of certain Branches of the Statute made in the 23 d. year of the Queens Majesties Reign Entituled An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience FOr avoiding of all Frauds and Delays heretofore practised Stat. Sect. 3. Certain assurances made by Recusants shall be void against the Queen or hereafter to be put in ure to the hindrance of the due and spéedy Execution of the Statute made in the Session of Parliament holden by Prorogation at Westminster the sixtéenth day of January in the thrée and twentieth year of
of Law shall be allowed Stat. Sect. 4. Popish Recusants shall depart from London And that all Popish Recusants Indicted or Convicted and all other persons which have not repaired to some usuall Church or Chappel and there heard Divine Service but have forborn the same by the space of thrée months last past contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm dwelling abiding or remaining within the City of London or the Liberties thereof or within ten miles of the said City shall within thrée months next after the end of this Session of Parliament depart from the said City of London and ten miles Compass of the same and also shall deliver up their names to the Lord Mayor of London in case such Recusant do dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof And in case the said Recusant shall dwell or remain in any other County within Ten miles of the same City Then the said Recusant shall deliver up his or her name to the next Iustice of Peace within such County where the said Recusant shall so dwell or remain within forty days after the end of this Session of Parliament upon pain that every person offending herein shall forfeit to our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the sum of One hundred pounds The one moiety whereof shall be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the other moiety to him or them that will sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Stat. Sect. 5. And that all Popish Recusants which shall hereafter come dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof or within ten miles of the said City which now are or hereafter shall be Indicted or Convicted of such Recusancy or which shall at any time hereafter not repair unto some Church or Chappel and there hear Divine Service but shall forbear the same by the space of threé months contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm shall within ten dayes after such Indictment or Conviction depart from the said City of London and ten miles Compass of the same and also shall deliver up their names to the Lord Mayor of London for the time being in Case such Recusant shall dwell or remain within the said City of London or the Liberties thereof And in Case the said Recusant shall dwell or remain in any other County within ten miles of the said City then the said Recusant shall deliver up his or her name to the next Iustice of Peace within such County where the said Recusant shall so dwell or remain within the said ten days next after such Indictment or Conviction upon pain that every person offending herein shall likewise forfeit to our said Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the like sum of an hundred pounds The one moiety whereof shall be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other to him or them that will sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign protection or wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 45. this Clause is otherwise recited viz. That the Recusant Delivery up of the Recusants name if he live within ten miles distance of London is to deliver up his name to the Lord Mayor there and if he live above ten miles distance then to the next Justice of Peace But the Statute is there mistaken in both points For if the Recusant dwell within ten miles of London and not in London he is to deliver up his name to the next Justice of Peace and not to the Lord Mayor And if he dwell above ten miles from London he is not within this Act nor bound by force thereof to deliver up his name at all For miles Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 2. Provided always Stat. Sect. 6. Tradesmen and dwellers in or about London That such person or persons as now use any Trade mystery or manual Occupation within the said City of London or within ten miles of the same and such as have or shall have their only dwelling within the said City or ten miles Compass of the same not having any other dwelling or place of abode elsewhere shall or may remain and continue in such place within the said City or ten miles of the same as they have dwelled inhabited or remained in by the space of thrée months next before this present Session of Parliament Any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding This Proviso is by some taken to be in force at this day At this day not excepted But yet under favour as the Proviso is penned it seems to the contrary and that now all Popish Recusants Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy or not repairing to Church but forbearing by the space of three months are by this Act to depart London and ten miles compass of the same notwithstanding they are Tradesmen or have no other place of dwelling For as to Tradesmen here are no other excepted then such as when this Act was made used some Trade Mystery or manual Occupation And as to both Tradesmen and such as had or should have their only dwelling within London or ten miles compass the Statute limits them to that place where they inhabited three months next before that Session of Parliament wherein this Act was made which cannot by any strained construction extend to those in future times But the meaning seems to be That Popish Recusants Indicted or Convicted of Recusancy or not repairing to Church c. who were then Tradesmen within London or ten miles compass or such as then resided within London or ten miles compass and should have no other place of abode might continue there so that they removed not to any other dwelling then where they inhabited by the space of three months next before that Session of Parliament or if they did they were to lose the benefit of this Proviso and must have removed above ten miles from London as well as other Popish Recusants Convicted or Indicted or not repairing to Church as aforesaid As for those words such as shall have their only dwelling within the said City c. the future Tense shall have doth not intend such Recusants as should have their dwelling there or within ten miles compass after the making of this Act and not before But only such who having their dwelling there before that Session of Parliament should at the time of their being Indicted or Convicted have their only dwelling there and no other place of dwelling elsewhere For if they had at such time of their being Convicted or Indicted two several Houses one within London or ten miles and the other at
had never béen had nor made Any thing herein contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding Stat. xxiii Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience WHere sithence the Statute made in the thirteénth year of the Reign of the Queén our Soveraign Lady Entituled Stat. Sect. 1. An Act against the bringing in and putting in Execution of Bulls Writings and Instruments and other Superstitious things from the See of Rome divers evil affected persons have practised contrary to the meaning of the said Statute by other means than by Bulls or Instruments Written or Printed to withdraw divers the Queéns Majesties Subjects from their natural Obedience to her Majesty and to obey the said usurped Authority of Rome and in respect of the same to perswade great numbers to withdraw their due Obedience to her Majesties Laws established for the due Service of Almighty God For Reformation whereof Stat. Sect. 2. Treason to withdraw any from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion and to declare the true meaning of the said Law Be it declared and enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That all persons whatsoever which have or shall have or shall pretend to have power or shall by any ways or means put in practice to absolve perswade or withdraw any of the Queéns Majesties Subjects or any within her Highnesses Realms and Dominions from their natural Obedience to her Majesty or to withdraw them for that intent from the Religion now by her Highnesses Authority established within her Highnesses Dominions to the Romish Religion or to move them or any of them to promise any Obedience to any pretended Authority of the Seé of Rome or of any other Prince State or Potentate to be had or used within her Dominions or shall do any overt act to that intent or purpose and every of them shall be to all intents adjudged to be Traytors And being thereof lawfully convicted shall have Iudgment suffer and forfeit as in case of High Treason And if any person shall after the end of this Session of Parliament by any means be willingly absolved or withdrawn as aforesaid or willingly be reconciled It shall be Treason to be reconciled or withdrawn to the Romish Religion or shall promise any Obedience to any such pretended Authority Prince State or Potentate as is aforesaid that then every such person their Procurers and Counsellors thereunto being thereof lawfully convicted shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as in Cases of High Treason Perswade or withdraw It was held in Lovett and Faulkners Case Mich. 12. Jac. B. R. That if a man were Indicted for endeavouring and practising voluntarie felonice proditorie to perswade and withdraw any of the Kings Subjects from his Obedience unto the Romish Religion and was afterwards debito modo acquietatus yet an Action upon the Case in nature of a Conspiracy would not lye against the party who procured him to be Indicted Cro. Mich. 12. Jac. 357 358. Rolls 1. 209. C. 49. Bulstrode 2. 271. and the main reason given was That forasmuch as every man is bound to discover Treason and 't is dangerous to conceal any thing which may tend to Treason therefore the procuring one to be Indicted concerning it was no Cause of Action And in that Case Coke Chief Justice said That such an Action was never before that time brought But later Resolutions have been to the contrary of this Opinion Action lies for indicting a man of High Treason And 't is held for Law at this day That if a man procures another to be Indicted of High Treason an Action upon the Case in nature of Conspiracy lies against him that procures it as well as if it were for Felony The first leading Case of this nature which was resolved upon any solemn argument or debate was that of Smith versus Cranshaw or Crashaw and others where it was adjudged upon great deliberation by all the Four Judges of the Court of Kings Bench Hill 1. Car. 1. That an Action in nature of a Conspiracy doth well lye in such Case and that not only in Case of Acquittal upon Trial but upon the exhibiting a Bill of Indictment for High Treason to the Court or Jury if the Jury bring in Ignoramus although in this last Case a Writ of Conspiracy lyeth not And Lovett and Faulkners Case was denied to be Law Addition to Bendloes 152. Latch 79 80. Jones 93 94 95. And Justice Dodderidge who concurred in Opinion with the other Judges in the Case of Lovett and Faulkner changed his Opinion in that of Smith and Cranshaw and held that the Action was maintainable Bulstrode 2. 271 272. so that whosoever of meer malice without probable cause causes any person to be Indicted upon this Statute Stat. 3. Jac. 4. or that of 3 Jac. cap. 4. for endeavouring or practising so to perswade or withdraw any Subject or prefers a Bill to the Court or Jury for that purpose is liable to an Action of the Case for so doing if the party be acquitted or the Jury bring in Ignoramus as in other Cases of Felony Any of the Queens Majesties Subjects Queens Subjects Stat. 3 Jac. 4. What is meant by the Queens Subjects Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 19. And be it likewise Enacted and declared Stat. Sect. 3. The penalty of aiders maintainers and concealers That all and every person and persons that shall wittingly be aiders or maintainers of such persons so offending as is above expressed or of any of them knowing the same or which shall conceal any offence aforesaid and shall not within twenty days at the furthest after such persons knowledge of such offence disclose the same to some Iustice of Peace or other higher Officer shall be taken tried and judged and shall suffer and forfeit as Offenders in misprision of Treason These words And shall not within twenty days Aiders or maintainers punishable though discoverers c. disclose the same have no reference to those who are aiders or maintainers of the Offender but only to those who have barely a knowledge of the Offence without aiding or maintaining the party And therefore if such as are aiders or maintainers of the person offending discover the offence within twenty days yet such discovery shall not free them from the guilt of misprision of Treason as Wingate mistakes in his Abridgment of this Clause tit Crown numb 42. but if they once aid or maintain the party knowing him to be an Offender they are guilty whether they disclose or conceal the offence and shall have no benefit of the twenty days And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 4. The forfeiture for saying or hearing of Mass That every person which shall say or sing Mass being thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit the sum of Two hundred Marks and be commited to Prison in the next Goal there to remain by the space of
the Feast of Pentecost next coming shall kéep or maintain any School-master which shall not repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed by the Bishop or Ordinary of the Diocess where such School-master shall be so kept shall forfeit and lose for every month so kéeping him ten pounds Provided That no such Ordinary or their Ministers shall take any thing for the said allowance The penalty on such School-master And such School-master or Teacher presuming to teach contrary to this Act and being thereof lawfully convict shall be disabled to be a Teacher of youth and shall suffer Imprisonment without Bail or Mainprize for one year Any School-master An Usher Usher or Assistant in teaching is a Master in the School and seemeth to be included within the word School-master And the following words here or Teacher explain who is intended viz. every Teacher of Youth A School-master conforms or is licensed either of them sufficient Stat. 1 Jac. 4. 14 Car. 2. What he must do by Stat. 14 Car. 2. Repair to Church as is aforesaid or be allowed This Clause being in the dis-junctive It seems That although a School-master doth not come to Church yet if he be licensed by the Bishop or Ordinary it shall excuse the penalty And this is not altered in that particular either by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 9. quod vide postea nor by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. But then he must by that of 14 Car. 2. among other things for which Vide the Statute at large subscribe a Declaration or Acknowledgment that he will conform to the Liturgie of the Church of England as it is now by Law Established or he shall for the first Offence suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and for the second and every other Offence shall suffer three months Imprisonment without Bail and also forfeit five pounds But if he be licenced and subscribe and do as aforesaid and so cannot be punished by this or either of the other said Acts yet now by the Statute of 17 Car. 2.2 unless he take the Oath there mentioned and frequent Divine Service established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry himself there as in the said Statute is appointed he shall forfeit for every offence 40 l. So that now Conformity in repairing to Church is necessarily required of every such School-master No such Ordinary c. shall take anything Twelve pence for a Licence But now by the Statute of 14 Car. 2. there may be 12 pence taken for such Licence And be it likewise Enacted Stat. Sect. 7. What Justices may enquire of Offences done against the Stat. of 1 Eliz. 1. 5 El. 1. 13 El. 2. That all and every Offences against this Act or against the Acts of the first fifth or thirtéenth years of her Majesties Reign touching acknowledging of her Majesties Supream Government in Causes Ecclesiastical or other matters touching the Service of God or coming to Church or Establishment of true Religion in this Realm shall and may be inquirable as well before Iustices of Peace as other Iustices named in the same Statutes within one year and a day after every such Offence committed Any thing in this Act or in any other Act to the contrary notwithstanding Be it likewise Enacted That Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery in their several limits shall have power to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Statute And Iustices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions of Peace shall have power by vertue of this Act to enquire hear and determine of all Offences against this Act except Treason and misprision of Treason Within one year and a day Where the Indictment of the Offender was to have been within a year and day Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. 5 Eliz. 1. 13 Eliz. 2. This limitation of time extends not to any Offence made Treason by this Act but only to such Offences mentioned in this Act or those of 1 5 and 13 Eliz. as concern the Kings Supremacy in Causes Ecclesiastical the Service of God coming to Church or Establishment of Religion and for those touching Religion this Statute enlarges the time limited by 1 Eliz. cap. 2. which saith the party must be Indicted the next Sessions or if in a Corporation within fifteen days after Easter or Michaelmas for now he may be Indicted at any time within the year and day In what cases he may be Indicted afterwards But for absolving or withdrawing or for being absolved withdrawn or reconciled which are here made Treason no time is limited for the prosecution but the Offender may be Indicted at any time after the year and day For the latter part of this Clause speaks of those Offences of Treason which the Justices of Peace cannot hear and determine and there no time is limited although there be in the former part for those Offences which are inquirable by Justices of Peace Leonard 1. 238. C. 322. Guilfords Case Vide Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 9. infra Sect 9. touching the Informer Justices of Oyer and Terminer who Iustices of Oyer and Terminer and Iustices of Assize and of Gaol delivery c. and Iustices of Peace The Justices of the Court of Kings Bench are the Soveraign Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Gaol-delivery Co. 9. 118. Lord Sanchars Case and therefore may enquire of hear and determine the Offences against this Act although they be not here especially named Two Indictments before several Justices If an Indictment be preferred upon this Statute before Justices of Oyer and Terminer or of Assize for any offence not made Treason or misprision of Treason and there is an Indictment before Justices of Peace likewise for the same Offence The Judgment of the Justices who do first enquire hear and determine the same shall stand and the Judgment given by the other shall be void as was held in the like Case upon the Statute of Inmates Co. 2. Inst 739. Justices of Peace may hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. The power here given the Justices of Peace in their open Quarter Sessions to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is in force at this day notwithstanding the Statute of 29 El. c. 6. which saith That every Conviction for not coming to Church shall be in the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Gaol-delivery and not elsewhere for the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. hath given power to Justices of Peace in their general or quarter Sessions to enquire hear and determine of all Offences for not coming to Church according to former Laws in such manner as the Justices of Assize and Gaol delivery might do by former Laws in the Case of Recusancy for not repairing to Church which is clearly a reviver of the Power of Justices of Peace given to them by this
sue And as for Sir Edward Cokes Opinion that since the said Statute of 21 Jac. the Courts at Westminster cannot receive or hold Plea of any Information brought by a common Informer not only common Experience ever since that Statute is against it but the Judgments and Resolutions both of the Kings Bench Mich. 4 Car. 1. in the Case of Greene and Guy upon the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 13. of Non-residence Stat. 21 H. 8. 13. and of the Common Pleas. Trin. 4 Car. 1. in the Case of Farrington and Leymer upon the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 4. of Brewers 23 H. 8. 4. are directly in point contrary thereunto Cro. Car. 146. ibid. 112 113. Hutton 99. And so is the Opinion of Rolles upon the Statute of 7 E. 6. cap. 5. 7 E. 6. 5. of Selling Wines without Licence Styles 340. Buckstone against Shurlock and the Resolution in Jones 193. And yet although in penal Statutes any Court of Record shall be restrained to the ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster In what Statutes Courts of Record may be taken in a large sense possibly in other Statutes those words may admit of a larger Construction Vide Rolles 1. 51. C. 21. Floyde versus Beste By Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information An Informer may sue upon this Statute by Bill Stat. 18 Eliz. 5. By the Statute of 18 Eliz. cap. 5. it is Enacted That none shall be admitted or received to pursue against any person upon any penal Statute but by way of Information or original Action and not otherwise Vide Co. 6. 19 20. Gregories Case Moore 412. C. 565. 600. C. 827. the same Case Cro. Hill 39 Eliz. 544. Gadley versus Whitecot And this seems to extend to as well penal Statutes made afterwards as to those which were in force when the said Act was made For 't is usual for a later Act of Parliament to be guided by a former of which see several Instances in Vernons Case Co. 4.4 But then that must be in such Cases where there are not express words in the later Act to controul the former And therefore although the words of 18 Eliz. be in the Negative that the Informer shall not pursue otherwise then by Information or original Action yet the Affirmative words of this subsequent Statute of 23 Eliz. that the Informer may Sue by Bill hath taken away the force of that Negative in 18 in relation to the Offences mentioned in 23. And the prosecutor Qui tam c. upon this Statute may Sue by Bill in the Kings-Bench as well as by Information which otherwise had there been no direct words here to that purpose he could not do as it seems by the resolution given in Woodson and Clarks Case in a Suit brought by Bill in the Kings-Bench 23 H. 6. 10. upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. cap. 10. of Sheriffs Co. 3. Inst 194. and in Vdeson and the Mayor of Nottinghams Case Moore 248. C. 390. contrary to the opinion in Styles 381. 382. Hill against Dechair Within threé months after Iudgment thereof given shall be committed to Prison Qui non habet in aere luet in corpore The Judgment shall be absolute And yet the Judgment in this Case shall be absolute that the King and Informer recover c. Anderson 1. 140. C. 190. Vachels Case A Feme Covert Feme Covert Recusant if the forfeiture be not paid within the time here limited may be imprisoned by force of this Statute until she pay or conform Co. 11. 61. Dr. Fosters Case Hobart 97. Moore vesus Hussey And if she be convicted upon Indictment at the Kings Suit in which Case the Husband is not bound to pay the penalty she ought by the opinion of Manword to have hard and close Imprisonment Imprisoned and be sequestred from all Company until she conform or the forfeiture be paid Savile 25. C. 59. But if the Husband and Wife be Sued upon this Statute in a popular Action or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife Her Husband chargeable and Judgment be had against them and the forfeiture is not paid within the three months the Husband in that Case may be imprisoned likewise Savile 25. C. 59. Stat. Sect. 10. Service in a mans private House Provided also That every person which usually on the Sunday shall have in his or her house the Divine Service which is established by the Law of this Realm and be thereat himself or her self usually or most commonly present and shall not obstinately refuse to come to Church and there to do as is aforesaid and shall also four times in the year at the least be present at the Divine Service in the Church of the Parish where he or she shall be resident or in some other open Common Church or such Chappel of ease shall not incur any pain or penalty limited by this Act for not repairing to Church Stat. Sect. 11. Fraudulent Assurances to defeat forfeitures And be it likewise Enacted and Declared That every Grant Conveyance Bond Iudgment and Execution had or made since the beginning of this Session of Parliament or hereafter to be had or made of Covinous purpose to defraud any interest right or title that may or ought to grow to the Queén or to any other person by means of any Conviction or Iudgment by vertue of this Statute or of the said Statute of the said thirteenth year shall be and be adjudged to be utterly void against the Quéen and against such as shall Sue for any part of the said penalties in form aforesaid Since the beginning of this Session of Parliament And yet a Covenons Conveyance though made before that Session of Parliament should not have defeated the interest Fraudulent conveyances right or title which was given to the Queen by this Statute And therefore in the Case or Sir John Southwell who in An. 19 Eliz. conveyed his lands to certain Feoffees and their heirs in Trust for the maintenance of him and his Family marriage of his Daughters payment of his Debts c. and to answer to him the Surplusage of the mean profits with a Clause of Revocation after which he granted Trees took fines for Leases c. and then came this Statute upon which he was Indicted and Convicted It was resolved by all the Judges of England that the said Lands were liable to this Statute and the Jurors charged to inquire what Lands he had were committed to the Fleet and fined each of them Fifty pounds for that they would not find those Lands to be his Leonard 3. 147. 148. By means of any Conviction or Iudgment Pauncefoot being Indicted of Recusancy A 〈◊〉 Outlawâ—â—â— made a Deed of Gift of all his Leases and Goods to a great value coloured over with fained considerations to defeat the Queen of what might accrew to her by his recusancy or flight and then went beyond Sea and afterwards was
perswades others so to do and not then neither unless he hath been absent from Church by the space of a month Where this Act extends to Popish Recusants Vnder colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Although this Act is commonly called the Act against Sectaries as distinguished from those of the Romish profession yet in truth it extends to all Recusants whatsoever as well Popish as other except in the point of abjuration For the Popish service is performed under colour or pretence of exercise of Religion and the Assembly or Meeting of Popish Recusants under such colour or pretence is an Assembly or Meeting contrary to the Laws and Statutes And they as well as others may be Indicted upon this Statute if they forbear to come to Church for the space of a moneth and be present at any part of the Popish service or move or perswade ut supra And may be imprisoned without Bail until they conform and make submission as by this Act is appointed But they cannot be required to abjure unless they offend against the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 A Popish Recusant is likewise subject to the Action of Debt c. given to the Queen by this Statute Being thereof lawfully convicted That is What conviction sufficient convicted both of his absence from Church and of that other Offence which makes him punishable by this Act viz. going to Conventicles or moving or perswading c. for his absence from Church for a month must be laid down precisely in the Indictment for without that the other is no Offence within this Act as hath been said And 't is not necessary that the party be convicted of such absence upon any Prior Indictment for although there was never any former conviction of him for Recusancy yet if he offend against this Act in any of the other particulars he may be convicted both of that Offence and of his absence upon one and the same Indictment And so was the Indictment in the Case of Lee and others who were Indicted upon this Statute at the Sessions of the Peace in Essex for absenting themselves for a month from Church and resorting to Conventicles To which they pleaded not guilty and the Indictment was removed into the Kings-Bench to be tried there Cro. Mich. 16 Car. 593. Trial. Provided always Stat. Sect. 2. An Offender not conforming himself abjure shall the Realm and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any such person or persons which shall offend against this Act as aforesaid shall not within thrée months next after they shall be convicted for their said Offence conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or Curate of the Parish That in every such Case every such Offender being thereunto warned or required by any Iustice of the Peace of the same County where such Offenders shall then be shall upon his and their Corporal Oath before the Iustices of the Peace in the open Quarter Sessions of the same County or at the Assizes and Goal delivery of the same County before the Iustices of the same Assizes and Goal delivery abjure this Realm of England and all other the Queéns Majesties Dominions forever unless her Majesty shall licence the party to return And thereupon shall depart out of this Realm at such Haven or Port and within such time as shall in that behalf be assigned and appointed by the said Iustices before whom such abjuration shall be made unless the same Offender be letted or stayed by such lawful and reasonable means or causes as by the Common Laws of this Realm are permitted and allowed in Cases of abjuration for felony And in such cases of let or stay then within such reasonable and convenient time after as the Common Law requireth in Case of abjuration for Felony as is aforesaid And that the Iustices of Peace before whom any such abjuration shall happen to be made as is aforesaid shall cause the same presently to be entred of Record before them and shall certifie the same to the Iustices of Assizes and Goal delivery of the County at the next Assizes of Goal delivery to be holden in the same County In what case the offender is not bound to abjure Being thereunto required by the Bishop c. or any Iustice of the Peace c. But put the Case that the Offender is convicted and the Three months next after his Conviction elapse before he is required by the Bishop or any Justice of Peace or the Minister or Curate of the Parish to conform and make the submission here appointed and afterwards he is required by one of them so to do It seems in this Case such request comes too late for he ought to conform and submit within the three months if he be required but if he be not required he is not bound to abjure for omitting it although he shall remain in prison till he conforms and submits But if within the three months he be required to conform and submit and refuse there is no question but he may be at any time afterwards warned or required to abjure Abjuration Abjure this Realm of England c. Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 6. Stat. Sect. 3. The punishment for refusing to abjure not departing or returning without Licence And if any such Offender which by the tenor and intent of this Act is to be abjured as is aforesaid shall refuse to make Abjuration as is aforesaid or after such Abjuration made shall not go to such Haven and within such time as is before appointed and from thence depart out of this Realm according to this present Act or after such his departure shall return or come again into any her Majesties Realms or Dominions without her Majesties special Licence in that behalf first had and obtained That then in every such Case the person so offending shall be adjudged a Felon and shall suffer as in Case of Felony without benefit of Clergy Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. 35 Eliâ— â— And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sâ—ct 4. An Offender shall be discharged upon his open submission That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they be so warned or required to make Abjuration according to the tenor of this Act repair to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make
mentioned in this Act but that the heir of every such Offender by force of this Act shall and may after the death of every Offender have and enjoy the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of such Offender as if this Act had not beén made Every Abjuration Abjuration as well as that for Felony is an Exile or Banishment and if perpetual and by Authority of Parliament amounts to a civil death and therefore the Wife of a Man banished or abjured forever might sue or be sued without her Husband Suit as was ruled in the Case of the Lady Maltravers 10 E. 3. and of the Lady Belknap 1 H. 4. 1. 2 H. 4. 7. And if a man be perpetually banished by Authority of Parliament unless is be for Felony or by force of this Act his Wife shall be endowed living the Husband And if he had been perpetually banished or abjured for Felony the Wife should have had her joynture Jointure presently although not her Dower Dower as was resolved in Weylands Case 19 E. 1. and the reason is because though the Husband be naturally living yet he is civilly and in the Eye of the Law as a dead man But yet these Cases are to be understood of a Banishment or abjuration forever and not of a Relegation or Exile for a time For in such Case neither could the Wife sue or be sued without her Husband nor could she have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband Co. 1. Inst 132. 133. Co. 2. Inst 47. Bulstrode 3. 188. Rolles 1. 400. C. 27. Wilmores Case Moore 851. C. 1159. Wilmots Case But if a man be abjured by force of this Act What dower is here saved the Wife shall not have her Dower or Joynture during the natural life of her Husband although he be abjured forever but she is in worse Case then the Wife of a person perpetually banished was at the Common Law For this Act by express words gives his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the Queen during his life which is to be understood of his natural life And the saving here of the Wives Dower is not intended of the Dower which she might claim at Common Law presently upon the abjuration of her Husband nor shall make void the former words of the Act by which all his Lands are given to the Queen during his natural life but is only the usual Provision made in Acts of Parliament which create any new Felony for the saving of the Dower of the Wife after the death of the Husband So that the meaning of this Branch is that if the Husband refuse to abjure or abjure and refuse to depart according to this Act or return without lieence yet the Wife shall be endowed and the heir inherit his Lands after he is naturally dead And this Act to continue no longer than to the end of the next Session of Parliament Stat. Sect. 12. Note this Act being at first but temporary This Act at first but temporary was afterwards discontinued Hutton 61. 62. but is since revived by the Statute of 3 Car. 1. c. 4. and is in full force at this day And in such Case it hath been questioned if a Statute be discontinued and afterwards revived how an Indictment thereupon shall conclude whether contra formam Statuti or Statutorum Where if a Statute be discontinued and revived it shall be contra formam Statuti and where contra formam Statutorum For if a Statute be temporary and afterwards continued for a longer time or made perpetual and never discontinued there without doubt it shall be contra formam Statuti but it hath been held by some that where it was once discontinued and then revived there it is as if there were two several and distinct Statutes and the Indictment shall conclude contra formam Statutorum Palmers Case 9 Eliz. But others have held the contrary and that there is not any difference in the Case of a Statute at first temporary and afterwards before any discontinuance continued for a longer time or made perpetual and a Statute discontinued and then revived but that it shall in both Cases be held but as one Statute and the conclusion shall be contra formam Statuti and not Statutorum unless where the Act of Reviver makes any addition to the former Act or increaseth the penalty or forfeiture For then there is no doubt but they are two distinct Acts of Parliament And according to this later opinion hath the practice been in Informations upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 9. of Perjury Stat. 5 Eliz. 9 which determined 14 Eliz. and was revived 29 Eliz. And yet all Informations thereupon conclude Contra formam Statuti And so as it seems ought all Indictments upon this Statute of 35. notwithstanding its discontinuance and reviver Vide Owen 135. Wests Case Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. ii An Act for the restraining of Popish Recusants to some certain place of abode FOr the better discovering and avoiding of such Traiterous and most dangerous Conspiracies and Attempts as are daily devised and practiced against our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Queéns Majesty Stat. Sect. 1. and the happy estate of this Common-weal by sundry wicked and seditious persons who terming themselves Catholicks and being indéed spies and intelligencers not only for her Majesties forreign Enemies but also for Rebellious and Traiterous Subjects born within her Highness Realms and Dominions and hiding their most detestable and divellish purposes under a false pretext of Religion and Conscience do secretly wander and shift from place to place within this Realm to corrupt and seduce her Majesties Subjects and to stir them to Sedition and Rebellion Be it Ordained and Enacted by our Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal A Popish Recusant convicted and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That every person above the age of sixtéen years born within any of the Quéens Majesties Realms and Dominions or made Denizen being a Popish Recusant and before the end of this Session of Parliament convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the tenor of the Laws and Statutes heretofore made and provided in that behalf and having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm shall within forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament if they be within this Realm and not restrained or stayed either by Imprisonment or by her Majesties Commandment or by order or direction of some six or more of the Privy Council or by such sickness and infirmity of body as they shall not be able to Travel without imminent danger of Life and in such Cases of absence out of the Realm restraint or stay then within 20 days next after they shall return into the Realm and be
she should not be doubly punished both that way and at the Suit of the Informer And for the same reason it was urged that this Information would not lye against the Husband and Wife for after the Husbands death she would be liable to pay into the Exchequer all the arrears after the rate of Twenty pounds per month from the time of her Conviction and her goods and two parts of her Lands might be then seized for non-payment thereof And if the Husband and Wife should in the mean time at the Suit of the Informer pay Twenty pounds per month for part of the same time for which the Wife was liable to pay after the Husbands death this would be a double punishment for one and the same offence and it was further said that it was usual where the Wife was Indicted and Convicted for Recusancy Seizure of the Wives Lands and Leases to seize by Exchequer Process the Lands and Leases which the Husband had in her right and one Woods Case was cited to this purpose which proves that a Feme Covert is within the meaning of the Act and therefore after she is once Convicted upon Indictment shall be no more subject to the Informers popular Suit then a Feme sole Cro. Pasch 16 Jac. 481.482 But this last point is much to be questioned for the Lands and Leases of the Wife are the Husbands during the Coverture and 't is a general rule that his Goods or Lands cannot be seized for the forfeiture or penalty where the Wife only is Indicted and Convicted of the Offence See more of this matter antea Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz 1 Sect. 9. A Recusant is Indicted for absenting himself from Church for 12 months and afterwards is Convicted upon that Indictment Where an Informer may sue after Conviction upon Indictment Quaere whether nevertheless the Informer Qui tam c. may not sue him for his absence for the months intervening between the time laid in the Indictment and the time of his Conviction For these words here viz. after such Conviction seem to relate to the proximum antecedens every month and to imply that the penalty here appropriated to the King is only the penalty due for the months which incur after such Conviction upon Indictment at the Kings Suit but not to hinder the Informer after Conviction from suing for the months incurred before Conviction Except in such Cases where the King shall c. refuse the same The King may seize two parts presently after Conviction If a man be Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy the King is not bound to stay till the next Easter or Michaelmas Term to see whether the Recusant will tender twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment and incurred after such Conviction for the King having his Election whether he will accept thereof or seize two parts of the Recusants Lands A Commission for seizure of the Lands may issue out presently if the King will wave the twenty pounds per month For he may take his Election as soon as he will after Conviction By Jones Justice in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Jones 24. Stat. Sect. 7. Every Conviction shall be certified into the Exchequer And that every Conviction recorded for any Offence before-mentioned shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be certified into the Kings Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term following such Conviction in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for the seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as the Cause shall require And if default shall be made in any part of any payment aforesaid contrary to the form herein before limited that then and so often the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall and may by process out of the said Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of this Act leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family Timber Trees All the Goods A Recusant convicted is Tenant for Life the Remainder to a Stranger in Fee He in the Remainder with the Recusants assent cuts down Timber Trees and sells them In this Case the King can be no ways intitled to the Trees Bulstrode 1.133 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Aswell of all the Lands c. Leases and Farms of such Offender Lease in trust for another Elizabeth Bowes was convicted of Recusancy and she standing so Convicted a Lease was made to her in trust which she conveyed over according to the trust The question was whether the King might seize this Lease And the reason given in Lane 39. why the King should have the Term is because the Recusant after she was Convicted was not capable of any trust and therefore the Conveyance made by her was as if it had been voluntary without relation to the Trust Tamen quaere by what Law a Recusant meerly for the matter of Recusancy is incapable of any Trust although Convicted All other the Lands c. liable to such seizure Copyhold Lands Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. or to the penalties aforesaid Whether Copyholds be liable to such seizure vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Lands are conveyed to A. in trust for B. a convicted Recusant Lands in trust for a Recusant Quaere whether the King may seize such Lands for the Recusants non-payment of the twenty pounds per month for if he make his Election and accepts of two thirds in lieu of the twenty pounds per month there is no question but such Lands are liable to seizure For the words of the subsequent Clause are That the King may seize two parts of all Lands that shall come to any other person to the use of or in Trust for such Recusant But in this Clause which relates to the seizure of two parts for non-payment the words seem to be more restrictive Vide Lane 105. 106. Halseys Case And whereas by an Act made in the Session of Parliament holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the thrée and twentieth year of the Reign of the late Queén Elizabeth entituled Stat. Sect. 8. The Stat. of 23 Eliz. 1. touching a Recusants monthly forfeiture An Act to retain the Subjects of the said late Quéen in their due Obedience It was amongst other things Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That every person above the age of sixtéen years which should not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer
or Constitution of man Naturalization being but a fiction in Law which confers the priviledges of a natural Subject but cannot make him a natural Subject who was none before For then he would have two natural Princes one where he was born and the other where Naturalized Vaughan 279 280. 283. Craw versus Ramsey Co. 7. 5 6 7. 25. Calvins Case Dyer 3 4 Ph. Mar. 145. Hobart 171. Curteenes Case so that to absolve perswade withdraw or reconcile an Alien born whose Subjection to the King began not with his birth or for any such to be absolved perswaded withdrawn or reconciled seems not to be Treason within this Act. But this Subjection is not to be understood locally Subjection not to be understood locally or in respect of the place of a mans Birth but in respect of the Prince to whom Subjection is due at the time of his Birth And therefore if a Scot or Irishman be absolved or reconciled in England although the Offence be committed in another Kingdom then that where his Subjection begun yet being born a Subject to the King of England its Treason in the absolver or person reconciling and in him that is absolved or reconciled Nor is it necessary in all Cases that the party be born in the Kings Dominions but that he may be a natural Subject notwithstanding and consequently within this Act as in the Case of an Embassador vide Co. 7. 18. Calvins Case Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 2. Stat. Sect. 20. A reconciled person taking the Oath Provided nevertheless That the last mentioned Clause of this Branch or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be taken to extend to any person or persons whatsoever which shall hereafter be reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome as aforesaid for and touching the point of so being reconciled only that shall return into this Realm and thereupon within six days next after such return before the Bishop of the Diocess or two Iustices of Peace joyntly or severally of the County where he shall arrive submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws and take the Oath set forth by Act in the first year of the Reign of the late Quéen Elizabeth commonly called the Oath of Supremacy as also the Oath before set down in this present Act which said Oaths the said Bishop and Iustices respectively shall have Power and Authority by this present Act to minister to such persons as aforesaid And the said Oaths so taken the said Bishop and Iustices before whom such Oaths shall be so taken respectively shall certifie at the next General or Quarter Sessions of the Peace to be holden within the said Shire Limit Division or Liberty wherein such person as aforesaid shall submit himself and take the said Oaths as aforesaid upon pain of every one neglecting to certifie the same as aforesaid the sum of Forty pounds Submission in case of Treason Which shall hereafter be reconciled In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 12. is intimated that this Clause which provides in Case of Submission extends to no Cases of Treason or Misprision of Treason for there in reciting this part of the Statute the Cases of Treason and Misprision of Treason are excepted which is a great mistake For the Submission here spoken of is only in the Case of a declared Treason scil being reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome For and touching the point of so being reconciled only In the latter part of the former Section there are three several sorts of Offences made Treason Reconciled to the Pope c. what meant thereby 1. To be willingly absolved or withdrawn from a mans natural Obedience 2. To be willingly reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome 3. To promise Obedience to any pretended Authority of that See or to any other Prince State or Potentate but in this Clause only the second of these Offences is remitted in Case of Submission viz. the being reconciled to the Pope or Sée of Rome By which I conceive to be meant the forsaking of the Religion established by Law and embracing that which is professed and maintained by the Pope and See of Rome And in that sense those words are commonly taken at this day And that this is the meaning of those words appears by the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. which makes it Treason to absolve or withdraw the Subjects from their natural Obedience or to withdraw them from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion or to move them to promise Obedience to the See of Rome or any other Prince c. to answer which follows in that Act three other sorts of Treason viz. to be absolved or withdrawn or to be reconciled or to promise such Obedience so that the Offence of being reconciled answers to the Offence of withdrawing the Subjects from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion which explains what is meant by such Reconciliation viz. the being so withdrawn from the one Religion to the other But by this Clause if a person be thus reconciled that is change his Religion and become a Papist yet if he be capacitated to submit as is required by this Act and submit accordingly and take the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance such Offence of being reconciled shall not be Treason But as for being absolved or withdrawn from his natural Obedience Offences not within this Proviso or promising Obedience to the pretended Authority of the See of Rome or any other Prince State or Potentate besides his natural King such Submission and taking the Oaths shall not absolve him from that guilt but he shall have Judgment and suffer for the same as in Case of High Treason notwithstanding such Submission c. Dalton V. cap. 89. tit High Treason is therefore clearly mistaken in extending the benefit of this Submission c. generally to all who have been willingly absolved withdrawn or reconciled or have promised such Obedience Submit himself to his Majesty and his Laws The Kings Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2 What Laws are here meant vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. Stat. Sect. 21. Where the Trial shall be And be it further Enacted That all and every person and persons that shall offend contrary to this present branch of this Statute shall be Indicted tried and proceéded against by and before the Iustices of Assize and Goal delivery of that County for the time being or before the Iustices of the Court of Kings Bench and be there procéeded against according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm against Traitors as if the said Offence had béen committed in the same County where such person or persons shall be so taken Any Law Custom or Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding In what County The Offender may be proceeded against by force of this Act in any County where he shall be imprisoned for
so the word taken is to be expounded and the like Exposition hath been made of the Statutes of 2 3 E. 6. cap. 2. of Soldiers and 1 Jac. cap. 11. of having two Wives living Stat. 1 3 E. 6. 2 1 Jac. 11. Hutton 131. If the Offence be committed out of this Realm yet it cannot be tried upon the Statute of 35 H. 8. cap. 2. Stat 35 H. 8. 2. of Trial of Treasons committed out of the Realm For this Act hath prescribed a special form of a Trial in this Case which must be observed And if such Offender be a Peer of England Indictment of a Peer the Indictment cannot be taken before any others then the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery in the County where he is imprisoned or the Justices of the Kings Bench Hutton 131. Lord Digbies Case Stat. Sect. 22. Trial of Peers Provided always That if any Peér of this Realm shall happen to be Indicted of any Offence made Treason by this Act he shall have his Trial by his Péers as in other like Cases of Treason is accustomed Stat. Sect. 23. And be it further Enacted That if any Subject of this Realm at any time after one month next after the end of this present Session of Parliament shall not resort or repair every Sunday to some Chuch Chappel or some other usual place appointed for Common Prayer and there hear Divine Service according to the Statute made in that behalf in the first year of the Reign of the late Q. Elizabeth that then it shall and may be lawful to and for any one Iustice of Peace of that Limit Division or Liberty wherein the said party shall dwell upon proof unto him made of such default by confession of the party or Oath of witness to call the said party before him and if he or she shall not make a sufficient excuse and due proof thereof to the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace That it shall be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to give Warrant to the Churchwarden of the said Parish wherein the said party shall dwell under his Hand and Seal to levy twelve pence for every such default by distress and sale of the Goods of every such Offender rendring to the said Offender the Overplus of the money raised of the said Goods so to be sold and that in default of such distress it shall and may be lawful for the said Iustice of Peace to commit every such Offender to some Prison within the said Shire Division Limit or Liberty wherein such Offender shall be inhabiting until payment be made of the said sum or sums so to be forfeited which forfeiture shall be imployed to and for the use of the Poor of that Parish wherein the Offender shall be resident or abiding at the time of such Offence committed Provided That no man be impeached upon this Clause Within what time the Offender shall be impeached except he be called in question for his said default within one month next after the said default made And that no man being punished according to this Branch But once punished for one Offence shall for the same Offence be punished by the forfeiture of twelve pence upon the Law made in the first year of the late Quéen Elizabeth If any Subject of this Realm By a Subject of this Realm Subject of this Realm who here meant is to be understood a natural born Subject or an Alien naturalized here by Act of Parliament or made a Denizen of England by the Kings Letters Patents And who not But these words here are exclusive of two sorts of Subjects 1. Of an Alien inhabiting in this Realm who oweth to the King a local Subjection or Ligeance and is neither naturalized or made Denizen For the word Subject is as a mark of distinction and must be necessarily exclusive of some persons or other within this Realm and therefore cannot be supposed to take in meer Aliens who if neither naturalized or made Denizens are only local Subjects and of the lowest form For if no person inhabiting within the Realm were here intended to be excepted the word Subject would be idle and to no purpose 2. An Alien Naturalized by Act of Parliament in Scotland or Ireland or made Denizen of either of those Kingdoms by the Kings Letters Patents is for the same reason out of the meaning of this Branch although he live in England For it seems that such a person is still an Alien here and shall not partake of any priviledges in England by his being Naturalized or made Denizen in Scotland or Ireland Their Acts or Laws not being Obligative or concluding to us in England Vide Vaughan 278 279 280 285 287. Craw versus Ramsey And therefore the power here given any one Justice of Peace to levy the twelve pence per Sunday doth not extend to either sort of these Aliens An Alien within Stat. 1. Eliz. 2 but yet they may forfeit twelve pence per Sunday for their absence from Church upon an Indictment of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. and that by force of the general words there Every person and persons inhabiting within this Realm so that what is said in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11.63 viz. That this Statute gives a more speedy remedy for the Recovery of the twelve pence is not to be understood of all persons within 1 Eliz. but only of the Subjects of this Realm in the sense of this Branch of the Statute And if a man be born within any of the Kings Dominions which were such and united with England in their subjection at the time of his birth although he be not born within England Natural Subjection not local yet if he live here he is a Subject of this Realm within the intent of this Act For Natural Subjection and Ligeance are not local or confined to that Kingdom or Country where he was born But he is a natural Subject in any of the Dominions belonging at the time of his Birth to the Prince under whom he was born And upon this ground it was resolved in Calvins Case Co. lib. 7. Postnati That a man born in Scotland after the Union of the two Kingdoms should inherit in England So that a man born in Scotland or Ireland or any other of the Kings Dominions which were such and so united at the time of his birth if he live in England is punishable by this Act and any one Justice of Peace may grant his Warrant to levy the twelve pence for his absence from Church vide antea Sect. 19. Morning and Evening Prayers Every Sunday This repairing to Church every Sunday must be as well to Evening Prayers as to Morning Prayers For it ought to be an entire day and an entire Service By Hutton and Berkley Justices Dalton V. cap. 45. tit Recusants To the satisfaction of the said Iustice of Peace In this Case the Justice of
proved that it was for her Joynture or if a man devise Lands by his last Will to his Wife generally and there is no mention in the Will that 't is for her Joynture for in this Case an Averment that it was so intended will not serve unless there be express words in the Will to that purpose These Estates so gained by the Wife as they do not bar her Dower out of the residue of her Husbands Estate but that she shall enjoy both the one and the other Co. 4. 4. so they are not within the meaning of this Act because not made for her Joynture And she shall not forfeit the profits of two parts of them although she may forfeit the profits of 2 parts of her Dower which she hath out of the residue of her Husbands Estate If Lands be conveyed to the Wife before marriage for part of her Joynture and other Lands are conveyed to her after Marriage in full satisfaction of her Jointure and she refuse those conveyed after Marriage in this Case she may retain those conveyed before Marriage and yet be endowed of the residue of her Husbands Estate For that the Lands first setled on her were not for her whole Joynture Co. 1. Inst 35. Co. 4. 3. Forfeiture of the profits of part of her Jointure And if she be a Popish Recusant Convict and her Husband none and she conform not within the year next before his death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts both of such Dower and of the Estate so conveyed to her before her Marriage And as the Wife shall have her Joynture and Dower both Where the Jointure is pursuant to the Statute in such Cases where the Joynture is not pursuant to the Statute of 27 H. 8. so in some Cases likewise where she hath a Joynture pursuant to that Statute As where she hath such a Joynture made to her by the Husband before Marriage and he afterwards endow her ad ostium Ecclesiae or if she hath a Joynture made by the Husband in his life time and after his death his Heir or Feoffee assign other Lands to her in Dower or the Heir plead to her in a Writ of Dower ne unque seisi que Dower c. or nient accouple in Loyal Matrimony or any other Plea save Joynture in bar of Dower and it be found against him In these Cases the Wife shall hold her Joynture and yet be endowed and if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act shall forfeit the profits of two parts of her Joynture and Dower both But if a Widow Dower not forfeited who is indowed of the Lands of her deceased Husband takes a second Husband who is no Popish Recusant Convicted by whom she hath a Jointure and she becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and the second Husband dies and the Wife is an Offender within this Act In this Case she shall not by force thereof forfeit the profits of two parts of such Dower and Jointure both but only of her Jointure For that her Dower is not out of the Lands of her said Husband that is of the Husband in whose life time she stood convicted and after such Conviction forbore to conform c. within the year next before his death And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 12. A Popish Recusant shall be disabled as an Excommunicate person That every Popish Recusant which is or shall be convicted of Popish Recusancy shall stand and be reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person lawfully and duly Excommunicated and as if he or she had béen so denounced and excommunicated according to the Laws of this Realm until he or she so disabled shall conform him or her self and come to Church and hear Divine Service and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm and also take the Oath appointed and prescribed in one other Act made this present Session of Parliament Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants And that every person or persons sued or to be sued by such person so disabled shall and may plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff as if he or she were Excommunicated by Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court What Conviction disables him Convicted of Popish Recusancy The Conviction mentioned here and in the other branches of this Statute seems to be intended not only of a Conviction according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. upon Proclamation and default of appearance but of a Judgment likewise upon an Indictment or popular Suit on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt c. by the King alone by force of the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. For Convicted in relation to these three last mentioned remedies is to be taken for adjudged or attainted Vide for this the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. Sect. 5. And the Popish Recusant who is either convicted upon Proclamation and default of appearance or against whom Judgment is had upon an Indictment popular Suit or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit is hereby disabled as an Excommunicate person and liable to all other the penalties and incapacities inflicted by this Act on a Popish Recusant convicted To what intent as excommunicate Reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person c. Excommunicated And not reputed to all intents as an Excommunicate person as Wingate tit Crown numb 135. misrecites the Statute For as it seems by the words of the Statute the Popish Recusant convicted is not to be reputed as a person Excommunicate in any other respect or to any other intent but as to his disability only And yet the Opinion of the Court of Kings Bench Mich. 11 Jac. in the Case of Griffith and others seems to be to the contrary and that a Popish Recusant convicted may by force hereof be attached upon a Writ of Excommunicato capiendo Excommmnicato capiendo Bulstrode 2. 155. Tamen Quaere whether this Statute being a penal Law and speaking only of the point of disability shall be extended by Equity to other Cases or the Recusant be attached upon an Excommunicato capiendo unless he be first actually Excommunicated A Popish Recusant Convict is disabled as an Excommunicate person Witness to be a Witness in any Cause between party and party By Coke Chief Justice Bulstrode 2. 155. This disability but quousque May plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff This disability in the Popish Recusant convicted is but quousque c. until he Conform c. and take the Oath of Allegiance And the Defendant must in this Case plead the Conviction at large and must as in a Plea of Excommengement demand if the Plaintiff shall be answered Hetley 18. which is the legal conclusion of a Plea in disability of
happen it is good reason not to strain the words farther then they reach but to say it is casus omissus and that the Law intended quae frequentius accidunt Vaughan 373. And yet there is no question but such Lands are a Joynture The extent of the word and if made with the Wives assent before marriage shall bar her Dower by the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. which speaks of an Estate or purchase made to the Wife for her Joynture generally not saying by whom Mr. Sheapard therefore in his Epitome p. 523. falls very short of the full description of a Joynture when he limits it only to be of the Franktenement of her Husband which restriction dayly experience confutes For that it is commonly made by the Ancestor of the Husband of Lands in which the Husband never had any Franktenement nor perhaps ever shall have Custom By vertue of any custom of any County City or Place And not of Cities only as 't is restrained in the late additions to Dalton cap. 85. tit Recusants Sect. 48. Where in force The Custom here mentioned viz. that the Wife shall have a certain portion of her Husbands goods after his decease is of force throughout the whole Province of York and in divers other places of England and if he gives them away from her by his Will the bequest is void Vide Swinburne Part 3. cap. 14. p. 151. 152. What goods are not within the Act. A Woman is an offender within this Branch and her Husband by his last will gives her all or part of his goods not claimable by custom she is not by this Act disabled to enjoy them after his death For the words here are plainly restrictive to such goods as she claims by custom Where not Tenant by Curtesie not One hundred pounds forfeited Whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie A Popish Recusant convicted marries an Inheritrix in other form then is appointed by this Act The Wife dies without issue born alive of the marriage In this Case although the Husband is not intituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie yet the possibility which he once had to be so intituled seems to satisfie the intent of the Act and he shall not forfeit the hundred pounds So that here is another Casus omissus For it may so happen that a Popish Recusant Convict may have a great Portion in money with his Wife and but a small Estate in Lands with her perchance but a few Acres yet if he be an Offender within this branch the Lands for that he may be intituled to be Tenant of them by the Courtesie shall save his hundred pounds and if his Wife die having had no issue born alive he is wholly exempted out of the Act and cannot be punished either way Stat. Sect. 16. Baptism of Popish Recusants Children And that every Popish Recusant which shall hereafter have any Child born shall within one month next after the Birth thereof cause the same Child to be baptized by a lawful Minister according to the Laws of this Realm in the open Church of the same Parish where the Child shall be born or in some other Church near adjoyning or Chappel where Baptism is usually administred or if by infirmity of the Child it cannot be brought co such place then the same shall within the time aforesaid be baptized by the lawful Minister of any of the said Parishes or places aforesaid upon pain that the Father of such Child if he be living by the space of one month next after the Birth of such Child or if he be dead within the said month then the Mother of such Child shall for every such Offence forfeit one hundred pounds of lawful money of England one third part whereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to the Informer or him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the said Parish to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed And if any Popish Recusant man or woman Stat. Sect. 17. Burial of Popish Recusants not excommunicate not being Excommunicate shall be buried in any place other than in the Church or Churchyard or not according to the Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm That the Executors or Administrators of every such person so buried knowing the same or the party that causeth him to be so buried shall forfeit the sum of twenty pounds the one third part whereof shall be to our Soveraign Lord the King the other third part to the Informer or him or them that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such person died to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed The Exception here of a Popish Recusant Excommunicate That is not actually Excommunicate is intended only of one actually Excommunicated and not of him who is a Popish Recusant convicted who shall not be reputed as a person Excommunicate to this intent but only as to the point of a disability as hath been said Sect. 12. So that if any Popish Recusant not actually Excommunicate be buried elsewhere or otherwise then is here mentioned although he were convicted yet 't is an Offence punishable by this Law And be it further Enacted by this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 18. Children departing the Realm That if the Children of any Subject within this Realm the said Children not being Soldiers Mariners Merchants or their Apprentices or Factors to prevent their good Education in England or for any other cause shall hereafter be sent or go beyond Seas without Licence of the Kings Majesty or six of his Honourable Privy Council whereof the principal Secretary to be one under their Hands and Seals The forfeiture of such as depart That then all and every such Child and Children so sent or which shall so go beyond the Seas shall take no benefit by any gift conveyance descent devise or otherwise of or to any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods or Chattels until he or they being of the age of eighteén years or above take the Oath mentioned in an Act of Parliament made this present Session Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants before some Iustice of Peace of the County Liberty or Limit where such Parents of such Children as shall be so sent did or shall inherit and dwell And that in the mean time the next of his or her kin which shall be no Popish Recusant shall have and enjoy the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods and Chattels so given conveyed descended or devised until such time
such person as shall so conform him or her self as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 20. A Popish Recusant shall not Present to a Benefice nor grant the next avoidance c. And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That every person or persons that is or shall be a Popish Recusant Convict during the time that he shall be or remain a Recusant shall from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament be utterly disabled to present to any Benefice with cure or without cure Prebend or any other Ecclesiastical living or to collate or nominate to any Freé-school Hospital or Donative whatsoever and from the beginning of this present Session of Parliament shall likewise be disabled to grant any avoidance to any Benefice Prebend or other Ecclesiastical living And that the Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity of Oxford so often as any of them shall be void shall have the Presentation Nomination Collation and Donation of and to every such Benefice Prebend or Ecclesiastical Living School Hospital and Donative set lying and being in the Counties of Oxford Kent Middlesex Sussex Surrey Hampshire Berkshire Buckinghamshire Gloucestershire Worcestershire Staffordshire Warwickshire Wiltshire Somersetshire Devonshire Cornwall Dorsetshire Herefordshire Northamptonshire Pembrokeshire Carmarthenshire Brecknockshire Monmouthshire Cardiganshire Montgomeryshire the City of London and in every City and Town being a County of it self The Chancellor and Schollers of Oxford and Cambridge shall Present to a Popish Recusants Benefice c. lying and being within any of the Limits or Precincts of any of the Counties aforesaid or in or within any of them as shall happen to be void during such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict as aforesaid And that the Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity of Cambridge shall have the Presentation Nomination Collation and Donation of and to every such Benefice Prebend or Ecclesiastical Living School Hospital and Donative set lying and being in the Counties of Essex Hartfordshire Bedfordshire Cambridgeshire Huntingtonshire Suffolk Norfolk Lincolnshire Rutlandshire Leicestershire Darbyshire Nottinghamshire Shropshire Cheshire Lancashire Yorkshire the County of Durham Northumberland Cumberland Westmerland Radnorshire Denbighshire Flintshire Carnarvonshire Angleseyshire Merionethshire Glamorganshire and in every City and Town being a County of it self lying within any of the Limits or Precincts of any of the Counties last before mentioned or in or within any of them as shall happen to be void during such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict as aforesaid Provided None shall be presented who hath another Benefice with cure of Souls That neither of the said Chancellors and Schollers of either the said Vniversities shall present or nominate to any Benefice with Cure Prebend or other Ecclesiastical living any such person as shall then have any other Benefice with cure of Souls And if any such Presentation or Nomination shall be had or made of any such person so beneficed the said Presentation or Nomination shall be utterly void Any thing in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding Grant of the next avoidance where void From and after the end of this present Session of Parliament A man seized of an Advowson grants the next avoidance and then becomes a Popish Recusant Convict The grant of the next Avoidance is void and the University shall Present For the foregoing words during his Recusancy do not import the time when his disability shall begin but when it shall end viz. when he remains no longer a Recusant But when once he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict his disability shall have relation Relation to all the time going before scil from the end of that Session of Parliament wherein this Act was made Co. 10. 55 56. Case of the Chancellor c. of the University of Oxford Jones 20. Standen al' versus University d' Oxon Whitton Retrospects And such retrospects are usual in Acts of Parliament For which see the Cases cited in Co. 10. supra Recusancy by Covin And yet if after the Grant of the next Avoidance the Patron or Grantor becomes a Popish Recusant convict by Covin and to the intent to make void such his Grant this shall not defeat the interest of the Grantee but he may present when the Church becomes void notwithstanding such Conviction Jones 20. Averment Verdict But then the Covin must be averred by the Grantee and found by the Jury to be to that particular intent as in the Case herein after mentioned where the Recusant grants away the Advowson by Covin which vide postea A Recusant disabled to nominate Be utterly disabled to Present to any Benefice c. A man hath the right of nomination to a Benefice which is presentative and another hath the right of Presentation If he who hath the right of Nomination become a Popish Recusant Convict I conceive he is disabled by this Act to nominate For although only the word Present be here used as to a Benefice or Ecclesiastical living presentative yet this shall extend as well to Nomination For the intent of the Act is to prevent a Recusant from appointing who shall be Incumbent and the Case of Nomination is in equal mischief with that of Presentation And if the Recusant should not be disabled to Nominate as well as to Present the intent of the Act would be eluded For he that hath the right of Nomination is in effect the Patron and he that Presents at the Nomination of another is but as a Messenger between him and the Ordinary 14 H. 4. 11. And if he who is to Present Presents any other then the person nominated to him or doth not Present the person nominated he who nominates may bring a Quare Impedit against him And he who hath the Nomination must joyntly with him who hath the Presentation confirm the Lease of the Incumbent Moore 49. C. 147. Fitz. n. b. 33. 'T is true the general Rule is Penal Statues how expounded that penal Statutes shall not be taken by Equity from whence may be inferred that this Statute only disabling a Recusant to present to a Benefice presentative shall not be extended to disable him to nominate although it be within the same mischief but that Rule hath some exceptions and where the intent of the makers of the Law plainly appeares by other words in the same Statute a penal Statute shall be expounded largely and according to that intent beyond the Letter as in the Case of Simony upon the Statute of 31 Eliz. cap. 6. Stat. 31 Eliz. 6. Hobart 75. Now in the subsequent Clause touching the University the nomination as well as presentation is given to them and consequently the Recusant was intended to be disabled in the one Case as well as the other Besides the words disabled to present may be aptly enough expounded disabled to nominate Presentment in whom For the presentment is truly
him who is in another County For the coercive Authority of a Justice of Peace Justice of Peace limited to his County cannot exceed his limits or bounds as is held in Plowden 37. in the Case of the Sheriffs of London And therefore in the Case of the Lord Say it was resolved that if a Justice of Peace of the County where the Felony was committed pursue a Felon into another County and take him there the Felon must be imprisoned in the County where he is taken and the Justice of Peace who pursued him hath no power to carry him to the Goal of the County where he did the Felony for he is a Prisoner in the County where he was taken and there the Justice of Peace hath no more to do then an ordinary person 13 E. 4. 8. Bro. Freshsuite 3. so that as it seems in this Case the party who keeps such Arms cannot be imprisoned by this Act But this likewise is Casus Omissus and not here provided for And yet nevertheless be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 25. A Popish Recusant shall maintain his Armor That notwithstanding the taking away of such Armor Gunpowder and Munition the said Popish Recusant shall and may be charged with the maintaining of the same and with the buying providing and maintaining of Horse and other Armor and Munition in such sort as other his Majesties Subjects from time to time shall be appointed and commanded according to their several Abilities and Qualities and that the said Armor and Munition at the Charge of such Popish Recusant for them and as their own provision of Armor and Munition shall be shewed at every Muster shew or use of Armor to be had or made within the said County Provided always That neither this Act Stat. Sect. 26. Ecclesiastical Censures nor any thing therein contained shall extend to take away or abridge the Authority or Iurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Censures for any cause or matter but that the Commissioners of his Majesty his Heirs and Successors in Causes Ecclesiastical for the time being Archbishops Bishops and other Ecclesiastical Iudges may do and procéed as before the making of this Act they lawfully did or might have done Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Stat. vii Jac. cap. ii An Act that all such as are to be Naturalized or restored in Blood shall first receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and the Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of Supremacy What they shall be bound unto who shall be Naturalized or restored in Blood FOrasmuch as the Naturalizing of Strangers and restoring to Blood persons Attainted have béen ever reputed matters of méer grace and favour which are not fit to be bestowed upon any others then such as are of the Religion now established in this Realm Be it therefore Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled that no person or persons of what Quality Condition or Place whatsoever being of the age of Eightéen years or above shall be Naturalized or restored in Blood unless the said person or persons have received the Sacrament of the Lords Supper within one month before any Bill exhibited for that purpose and also shall take the Oath of Supremacy and the Oath of Allegiance in the Parliament House before his or her Bill be twice Read And for the better effecting of the premises Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Lord Chancellor of England or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal for the time being if the Bill begin in the Vpper House and the Speaker of the Commons House of Parliament for the time being if the Bill begin there shall have Authority at all times during the Session of Parliament to minister such Oath and Oaths and to such person and persons as by the true intent of this Statute is to be ministred This Act to take place from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament Stat. vii Jac. cap. vi An Act for Administring the Oath of Allegiance and Reformation of married Women Recusants WHereas by a Statute made in the Third year of your Majesties Reign intituled Stat. Sect. 1. an Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants the form of an Oath to be ministred and given to certain persons in the same Act mentioned is limited and prescribed tending only to the Declaration of such Duty as every true and well affected Subject not only by bond of Allegiance but also by the commandment of Almighty God ought to bear to your Majesty your Heirs and Successors which Oath such as are infected with Popish superstition do oppugne with many false and unsound Arguments the just defence whereof your Majesty hath heretofore undertaken and worthily performed to the great contentment of all your loving Subjects notwithstanding the gainsayings of contentious Adversaries And to shew how greatly your Loyal Subjects do approve the said Oath they prostrate themselves at your Majesties Féet beséeching your Majesty that the same Oath may be administred to all your Subjects To which end we do with all humbleness beseech your Highness that it may be Enacted Every person above the age of 18 years herein intended shall take the Oath of Allegiance and before whom And be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That all and every person and persons as well Ecclesiastical as Temporal of what Estate Dignity Preheminence Sex Quality or Degrée soever he she or they be or shall be above the age of Eightéen years being in this Act mentioned and intended shall make take and receive a Corporal Oath upon the Evangelists according to the tenor and effect of the said Oath set forth in the forementioned Statute before such person or persons as hereafter in this Act is expressed That is to say All and every Archbishop and Bishop Archbishops and Bishops that now is or hereafter shall be before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Kéeper of the Great Seal for the time being Ecclesiastical Judges and Officers And all and every Ecclesiastical Iudge Officer and Minister of what Estate Dignity Preheminence or Degree soever he or they be or shall be before the Archbishop of the Province or Bishop or other Ordinary of the Diocess for the time being wherein such Ecclesiastical Iudge Officer or Minister ought to exercise his said Office Place or Function A Baron or Baroness or above that Degree Privy Counsellors Presidents And all and every person and persons of or above the Degree of a Baron of Parliament or Baroness of this your Highness Realm of England and all of your Highness Privy Counsel residing in London or Westminster or within thirty miles thereof and the Presidents of Wales and the North Parts before any four of your Highness Privy Counsel whereof the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer Lord Privy Seal
case of High Treason by the Laws of this Realm Vide Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 3. 6. Stat. 1 Eliz. 2. And also that it may likewise please your Highness Stat. Sect. 9. Within what time an Offender shall be impeached That it may be enacted by the Authority aforesaid That no manner of person or persons shall be molested or impeached for any the Offences aforesaid committed or perpetrated only by Preaching teaching or words unless he or they be thereof lawfully indicted within the space of one whole year next after his or their Offences so committed And in Case any person or persons shall fortune to be imprisoned for any of the said Offences committed by Preaching Teaching or words only and be not thereof indicted within the space of one half year next after his or their such Offence so committed and done That then the said person so imprisoned shall be set at liberty and be no longer detained in prison for any such cause or offence Within the space of one whole year Indictment within what time If a man had done any Deed or Act or executed any thing which amounted to the holding standing with or maintaining the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of any Forreign Prelate c. he might before the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. have been indicted for it after the year expired For the Restraint here in point of time extends to Offences committed by Preaching Teaching or words only and not to all cases within this Branch as Wingate tit Crown numb 10. mistakes the meaning of the Clause But now by the Statute of 23. it seems that the prosecution must be within a year and a day for all Offences whatsoever against this Act. Within the space of one half year The half year Half-year here mentioned is not to be understood of six months as Wingate again mistakes which is in Law to be accounted secundum numerum singulorum dierum allowing 28 days to every month and not according to the Solar month nor according to the Kalendar unless it be upon the Statute of W. 2. cap. 5. W. 2. 5. 2 3 E. 6. 13. For the account of the lapse in a Quare Impedit and 2 3 E. 6. 13. of proving a suggestion Co. 1. Inst 135. Cro. Trin. 5. Jac. 166. 167. Bishop of Peterborough versus Catesby Yelverton 100. Catesby versus Baker Hobart 179. Copley versus Collins But the half year here is to be understood according to the Kalendar Sir Edward Coke 4. Inst 331. in his construction of this Statute saith That no persons shall be impeached for any of the Offences by Preaching Teaching or words unless they be lawfully indicted within the space of half a year But yet it seems that the words of the Statute will not bear such a Construction neither if they did is it Law at this day nor was when those Institutes were written For 1. The Statute where it speaks of half a year refers only to the Case of Imprisonment That where the Offender by Preaching Teaching or words is imprisoned and is not indicted within half a year after the Offence committed he shall be set at liberty and be no longer detained in Prison for any such Cause or Offence and this was done in favour of liberty and to prevent a long Imprisonment upon a malicious and groundless Accusation But there is no colour to extend the words to the Offender who was never imprisoned although the Offence was by Preaching Teaching or words only 2. But the Case that an Offender by Preaching Teaching or words had been imprisoned within the half year yet it seems very questionable whether at the half years end when he was set at liberty as he ought to be by this Act if he be not in the mean time indicted he should have been clearly discharged by this Act from any prosecution Prosecution during the half year then next following For although it be said he shall be no longer detained in Prison for any such Cause or Offence yet that seems to refer only to his Imprisonment before Conviction and detained imports as much viz. That he should not be continued or remain in the same Imprisonment which he suffered within the first half year before any Indictment was found against him but not that he should not be indicted afterwards within the compass of the year and if found guilty suffer the Imprisonment and other penalties inflicted by this Act. And it might so have happened that an Offender by Preaching Teaching or words might have been accused taken and imprisoned a day or two before the half year next after the offence expired In which Case it cannot be thought to be the meaning of the makers of the Law that by his Imprisonment for a day or two he should escape the penalties of the Law and could not be afterwards indicted within the compass of the year And yet in that case he ought to be set at liberty by the express words of the Act which saith He shall be set at liberty if not indicted within half a year after the Offence and not half a year after his Imprisonment 3. It seems now to be out of doubt but that any Offender against this Act although by Preaching Teaching or words may be indicted at any time within a year and a day after the Offence committed and that by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. which saith Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. that all Offences against the Acts of 1 Eliz. touching Acknowledgment of her Majesties supream government in Causes Ecclesiastical shall and may be inquirable within a year and a day after the Offence committed And the affirming or maintaining the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of a Forreigner was without question an Offence against her Majesties supream Government in Causes Ecclesiastical and against the acknowledgment thereof so that the year limited by this Statute is now extended to a day farther and whatever the meaning of it was as to the half year All Offences against it whether by Preaching Teaching or words or otherwise for that of 23. is general and reaches all Offences whatsoever against the Act of 1 0. touching the Supremacy Ecclesiastical may now be inquired of within a year and a day whether the party be in Prison or not Within what time But yet it seems that in Case of Imprisonment within the first half year this Provision here for the setting at liberty of the Prisoner at the end thereof if he be not before that time Indicted remains still in force and is not abrogated by 23. Provided always Stat. Sect. 10. All things touching the Praemunire in the Statute 1. 2. P. M. 8. do continue in force and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend to repeal any clause matter or sentence contained or specified in the said
singular persons which shall offend within any their Iurisdictions or Diocess after the said Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist next coming against this Act and Statute Any other Law Statute Priviledge Liberty or Provision heretofore made had or suffered to the contrary notwithstanding Not necessary to go to the Parish Church The Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge cannot legally punish any man for not coming to the Church of that Parish where he inhabits if he goes to any other although he shews not any reasonable Lett. For it shall be a good Plea for the party to say that that is not his Parish Church but that he had used to frequent another Church and did resort thereunto And if the Ecclesiastical Court will not receive this plea the party shall have a Prohibition Prohibition For the Spiritual Court hath no power to judge what shall be said to be a mans Parish Church And so it was resolved by the whole Court of Kings-Bench Trin. 9. Jac. Bulstrode 1. 159. Nor can the Spiritual Court try the limits or bounds of Parishes but they shall be tried by the Common Law Co. 13. 17. Stat. Sect. 10. What Justices may punish these Offences And it is ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every Iustices of Oyer and Determiner or Iustices of Assize shall have full Power and Authority in every of their open and general Sessions to enquire hear and determine all and all manner of Offences that shall be committed or done contrary to any Article contained in this present Act within the limits of the Commission to them directed and to make process for the execution of the same as they may do against any person being indicted before them of Trespass or lawfully convicted thereof Provided always and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid A Bishop may joyn with the Justices to enquire of Offenders That all and every Archbishop and Bishop shall or may at all time and times at his liberty and pleasure joyn and associate himself by vertue of this Act to the said Iustices of Oyer and Determiner or to the said Iustices of Assize at every of the said open and general Sessions to be holden in any place within his Diocess for and to the enquiry hearing and determining of the Offences aforesaid Provided also and be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid At whose charges the Book of Common Prayer shall be gotten That the Books concerning the said Services shall at the Costs and Charges of the Parishioners of every Parish and Cathedral Church be attained and gotten before the said Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist next following and that all such Parishes and Cathedral Churches or other places where the said Books shall be attained and gotten before the said Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist shall within thrée weeks next after the said Books so attained and gotten use the said Service and put the same in ure according to this Act. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid Within what time the Offenders shall be impeached That no person or persons shall be at any time hereafter Impeached or otherwise molested of or for any the Offences above-mentioned hereafter to be committed or done contrary to this Act unless he or they so offending be thereof Indicted at the next general Sessions to be holden before any such Iustices of Oyer and Determiner or Iustices of Assize next after any Offence committed or done contrary to the tenour of this Act. Provided always Trial of Peers and be it ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and singular Lords of the Parliament for the third Offence above-mentioned shall be tried by their Peers Provided also Stat. Sect. 11. Chief Officers of Cities and Boroughs shall enquire of Offenders and be it ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Mayor of London and all other Mayors Bayliffs and other head Officers of all and singular Cities Boroughs and Towns Corporate within this Realm Wales and the Marches of the same to the which Iustices of Assize do not commonly repair shall have full Power and Authority by virtue of this Act to enquire hear and determine the Offences aforesaid and every of them yearly within fifteen days after the Feast of Easter and St. Michael the Archangel in like manner and form as Iustices of Assize and Oyer and Determiner may do These words In like manner and form appoint in what manner the Offences shall be enquired of Mayors and Head Officers of Corporations heard and determined by Mayors and Head Officers of Corporations c. by Indictment for so much enquire imports and Trial and Verdict of twelve men or such other Legal proceedings upon the said Indictment as are used by the Justices of Oyer and Determiner and Assizes in their general Sessions For the Mayor or Head Officer is not left by this Act to his own Arbitrary Will or Discretion in the hearing and determining the Offence but must proceed according to the rules and forms of Law in the Conviction of the Offender And the Statute saith To which Justices of Assize do not commonly repair So that the Mayor or Head Officer of such places were only intended in the lieu and room of Justices of Assize and are therefore to proceed by the same Rules as they do in the Counties at large Within what time to proceed But these words extend not to the point of time limited for Indicting such Offender nor are Mayors and Head Officers tied to their next Sessions as the Justices of Oyer and Determiner and of Assize are as Wingate tit Service and Sacraments numb 26. mistakes the meaning of the Statute For in like manner and form is intended in such respects only where 't is not otherwise provided for by the Statute But 't is expresly provided here that Mayors and Head Officers of Corporations shall enquire of these Offences only twice in the year viz. within fifteen days after Easter and Michaelmas and not at their next general Sessions unless it happen to be the Sessions after one of those two Feasts To whom the Bishop cannot associate himself Nor can the Archbishop or Bishop associate himself in this Case to any Mayor or Head Officer of a Corporation as Wingate tit Service and Sacraments number 25. mistakes Stat. Sect. 12. The Ordinaries Jurisdiction in these Cases Provided always and be it ordained and enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and singular Archbishops and Bishops and every of their Chancellors Commissaries Archdeacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction shall have full Power and Authority by virtue of this Act as well to enquire in their Visitation Synods and elsewhere within their Iurisdiction at any other time and place to take Accusations and Informations of all and every the things above-mentioned done committed or perpetrated within the limits of
their Iurisdictions and Authority and to punish the same by admonition excommunication sequestration or deprivation and other censures and process in like form as heretofore hath béen used in like Cases by the Quéens Ecclesiastical Laws Provided always and be it enacted None shall be punished twice for the same Offence That whatsoever persons offending in the premisses shall for their offences first receive punishment of the Ordinary having a Testimonial thereof under the said Ordinaries Seal shall not for the same Offence eftsoons be convicted before the Iustices And likewise receiving for the said first Offence punishment by the Iustices shall not for the same Offence eftsoons receive punishment of the Ordinary Any thing contained in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding This Clause being in the affirmative doth not abrogate the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction not abrogated which was in the Ecclesiastical Judge before the making of the Statute for that no Negative words are here added as that he should proceed no otherwise or in no other manner or form than this Statute directs And therefore if any Parson Vicar c. deprave or observe not the Book of Common Prayer although this Act inflicts only the forfeiture of a years value and six months Imprisonment for the first Offence yet the Ecclesiastical Judge may for the first Offence deprive him notwithstanding this Act as he might have done if no form of punishment had been here appointed And the said Book being enjoined by Authority the Offence of depraving or non-observing it is punishable by the Ecclesiastical Judge according to the Ecclsiastical Law without the further aid of any Temporal Law then the commanding it to be observed Co. 5.5 6. Cawdries Case And in such Case the Sentence of Deprivation given by the Ecclesiastical Judge though it exceed the punishment inflicted by the Temporal Law is not to be questioned by the Temporal Judges but they ought to give Faith and Credit to it For cuilibet in sua arte perito est credendum Cawdries Case fol. 7. Co. 4.29 Bunting and Heppingwells Case Provided always and be it enacted Stat. Sect. 13. Ornaments of the Church and Ministers That such Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers thereof shall be retained and be in use as was in this Church of England by Authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign of King Edward the Sixth until other Order shall be therein taken by the Authority of the Quéens Majesty with the advice of her Commissioners appointed and authorized under the Great Seal of England for Causes Ecclesiastical or of the Metropolitan of this Realm And also That if there shall happen any Contempt or Irreverence to be used in the Ceremonies or Rites of the Church by the mis-using of the Orders appointed in this Book the Queéns Majesty may by the like advice of the said Commissioners or Metropolitan ordain and publish such further Ceremonies or Rites as may be most for the advancement of Gods Glory the Edifying of his Church and the due Reverence of Christs holy Mysteries and Sacraments All Laws and Ordinances made for other Service shall be void And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all Laws Statutes and Ordinances wherein or whereby any other Service Administration of Sacraments or Common Prayer is limited established or set forth to be vsed within this Realm or any other the Queéns Dominions or Countries shall from henceforth be utterly void and of none effect Stat. v Eliz. cap. i. An Act for the Assurance of the Queens Majesties Royal Power over all States and Subjects within her Dominions FOR preservation of the Queéns most Excellent Highness her Heirs and Successors Stat. and the Dignity of Sect. 1 the Imperial Crown of this Realm of England And for the avoiding both such hurts perils dishonors and inconveniencies as have before time befallen as well to the Quéens Majesties noble Progenitors Kings of this Realm as for the whole Estate thereof by means of the Iurisdiction and Power of the Sée of Rome unjustly Claimed and Vsurped within this Realm and the Dominions thereof and also of the dangers by the fauters of the said usurped Power at this time grown to marvelous outrage and licentious boldness and now requiring more sharp restraint and correction of Laws than hitherto in the time of the Queéns Majesties most mild and merciful Reign have béen had used or established Be it therefore Enacted Ordained and Established Stat. by the Quéen our Soveraign Lady and the Lords Spiritual and Sect. 2 Temporal The Penalty for maintaining the Authority of the Bishop or See of Rome and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same That if any Person or Persons dwelling inhabiting or resiant within this Realm or within any other the Quéens Dominions Seigniories or Countries or in the Marches of the same or elsewhere within or under her Obeysance and Power of what Estate Dignity Preheminence Order or Condition soever he or they be after the first day of April which shall be in the year of our Lord God One thousand five hundred sixty thrée shall by Writing Typhering Printing Preaching or Teaching Déed or Act advisedly and wittingly hold or stand with to extol set forth maintain or defend the Authority Iurisdiction or Power of the Bishop of Rome or of his Sée heretofore claimed used or usurped within this Realm or in any Dominion or Country being of within or under the Queéns Power or Obeisance or by any Spéech open Déed or Act advisedly and wittingly attribute any such manner of Iurisdiction Authority or Preheminence to the said Sée of Rome or to any Bishop of the same Sée for the time being within this Realm or in any the Quéens Dominions or Countries that then every such Person or Persons so doing or offending their Abbettors Procurers and Counsellors and also their aiders assistants and comforters upon purpose and to the intent to set forth further and extol the said usurped Power Authority or Iurisdiction of any of the said Bishop or Bishops of Rome and every of them being thereof lawfully Indicted or Presented within one year next after any such Offences by him or them Committed and being lawfully Convicted or Attainted at any time after according to the Laws of this Realm for every such Default and Offence shall incur into the dangers penalties pains and forfeitures Ordained and Provided by the Statute of Provision and Praemunire made in the Sixtéenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Hold or stand with c. or attribute The Printers of any Book which attributes to the Pope or See of Rome any such Authority or Jurisdiction within this Realm Printing bringing in offering and delivering of Books c. and the utterers thereof in most Cases are within the danger of this Law and if any man bring over such Books Written beyond the Seas knowing the
Contents thereof or secretly deliver out such Books to others he knowing the Contents thereof unless in this last Case he be a Trader in them and deliver them out upon that Account without any act or attribution by conference or allowance he is an Offender within this Act by the words Hold and stand with to maintain c. and so is the receiver likewise if he afterwards Reads and Confers upon any such Book with any other person and in his Conference by any Words or Speeches allows the Book to be good or conveys it secretly to his Friend to the intent he should Read it and be perswaded to be of that Opinion or if a man hear of the Contents of such Book by the report of others and doth by any overt Speech commend or affirm it to be good In all these Cases the Person so doing especially he that reads it and then allows of it is an Offender within this Act and shall for the first Offence incur a Praemunire and for the second be Guilty of high Treason So likewise if any Book to that effect be made and Written within the Realm and sent over Seas as if it were made out of the Realm and be afterwards Bought Read or Conference be had thereupon ut supra such Offences are within the danger of this Law Dyer 11 El. 281. 282. vide Co. l. 6. Praefat ' Vpon purpose and to the intent The intent material A. was Indicted upon this Statute and that of 13 Eliz. cap. 2. of a Praemunire for aiding one B. knowing him to be a principal maintainer of the Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop and See of Rome contra formam Statut ' praedict ' and the Indictment was certified into the Kings Bench And it was held by the greater part of the Justices that the Indictment was insufficient for want of those words Vpon purpose and to the intent to set forth and extol the Authority c. And contra formam Statut ' will not supply that defect Trin. 20 Eliz. Dyer 363. Note in the Report of this Case the Statute of 1 Eliz. is mistaken for this of 5 Eliz. there being no mention of the intent in that of Primo Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. The intent is a hidden thing and lies in the Heart and therefore there must be some overt Act or Speech which declares the intent for the intent it self is not traversable What traversable but that by which it is made manifest as was adjudged in Boothes Case Co. 5. 77. And it is also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. That as well Iustices of Assize in their Circuits as Iustices of Peace within Sect. 3 the limits of their Commission and Authorities What Justices may inquire of and certifie the Offences aforesaid or two of every such Iustices of Peace at the least whereof one to be of the Quorum shall have full Power and Authority by vertue of this Act in their Quarter or open Sessions to inquire of all Offences Contempts and Transgressions perpetrated committed or done contrary to the true meaning of the Premises in like manner and form as they may of other Offences against the Quéens Peace and shall certifie every Presentment before them or any of them had or made concerning the same or any part thereof before the Queén her Heirs and Successors in her or their Court commonly called the Kings Bench within forty days next after any such Presentment had or made if the Term be then open and if not at the first day of the full Term next following the said forty days upon pain that every of the Iustices of Assize or Iustices of the Peace The Penalty for default of Certificate of the said Offences before whom such Presentment shall be made making default of such Certificate contrary to this Statute to lose and forfeit for every such default One hundred pounds to the Quéens Highness her Heirs and Successors And it is Enacted by the Authority aforesaid The Justices of the Kings Bench may hear and determine the Offences aforesaid That the Iustices of the Kings Bench as well upon every such Certificate as by enquiry before themselves within the limits of their Authorities shall have full Power and Authority to hear order and determine every such Offence done or committed contrary to the true meaning of this present Act according to the Laws of this Realm in such like manner and form to all intents and purposes as if the Person or Persons against whom any Presentment shall be had upon this Estatute had beén Presented upon any matter of offence expressed in the said Estatute made in the said Sixteenth year of King Richard the Second All Offences c. contrary to the true meaning of the Premises That is the Offences in holding or standing with to extol c. the Jurisdiction of the See or Bishop of Rome or attributing such Jurisdiction c. or Procuring Counselling c. which is here for the first Offence made a Praemunire For these are the only Premises in the Act and this Clause extends not to the Oath of Supremacy or any Offence in refusing of it much less to all Offences against this Act as 't is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 11. Nor doth it seem to be the intent of the Statute to give the Justices of Peace any Power to inquire of any Offence made High Treason thereby The Power of Justices of Peace herein For the Power here given to the Justices of Peace is only to inquire of Offences contrary to the true meaning of the Premises and the Premises extend only to those Offences made a Praemunire And this clearly appears by the subsequent words viz. That the Presentment thereof shall be certified into the Kings Bench who shall hear and determine every such Offence as if the Offender had been Presented upon any matter in the Statute of 16 R. 2. Now that cannot be intended of High Treason And of Justices of Assize The like may be said of Justices of Assize for as they are meerly Justices of Assize they cannot by force of this Act inquire of either the first or second Offence in refusing the Oath of Supremacy nor of the second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority only for the first Offence of this last kind they may inquire and take Indictments thereof and certifie them into the Kings Bench but then by their Commission of Oyer and Terminer they may not only inquire of the first or second Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority or refusing the Oath of Supremacy but may hear and determine them And accordingly were Slade and Bodye Indicted Arraigned and Tried in the County of Southampton of a Praemunire for the first Offence in extolling the Bishop of Romes Authority upon which they were Attainted and afterwards of Treason for the second Offence before Sir Roger Manwood and Justice
Inst 34. Which Iury shall or may c. proceed to Indict Who to Indict him So that the Jury is to Indict and not the Sheriff as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 11. And for stronger defence and maintenance of this Act Stat. Sect. 8. It shall be Treason the second time to maintain the Authority of the Bishop or See of Rome it is further Ordained Enacted and Established by the Authority aforesaid That if any such Offender or Offenders as is aforesaid of the first part or Branch of this Estatute that is to say by Writing Cyphering Printing Preaching or Teaching Deed or Act Advisedly and Wittingly hold or stand with to extol set forth maintain or defend the Authority Iurisdiction or Power of the Bishop of Rome or of his See heretofore claimed used or usurped within this Realm or in any Dominion or Country being of within or under the Queens Power or Obeysance or by any Speech open Deed or Act Advisedly and Wittingly attribute any such manner of Iurisdiction Authority or Preheminence to the said See of Rome or to any Bishop of the same See for the time being within this Realm or in any the Queens Dominions or Countries or be to any such Offender or offenders Abetting Procuring or Counselling or Aiding Assisting or Comforting upon purpose and to the intent to set forth further and extol the said usurped Power Authority or Iurisdiction After such Conviction and Attainder as is aforesaid do eftsoons commit or do the said Offences or any of them in manner and form aforesaid and be thereof duly convicted and attainted as is aforesaid Or to refuse the Oath And also that if any the persons abovenamed and appointed by this Act to take the Oath aforesaid do after the space of thrée months next after the first tender thereof the second time refuse to take and pronounce or do not take or pronounce the same in form aforesaid to be tendred that then every such Offender or Offenders for the same second Offence and Offences shall forfeit lose and suffer such like and the same pains forfeitures Iudgment and Execution as is used in Cases of High Treason What is an advised or witting maintenance Advisedly and wittingly Slade and Body were condemned in a Praemunire upon this Statute before Justices of Oyer and Terminer for extolling the Authority of the Bishop of Rome and remained in Prison for the space of two years and afterwards were brought to the Assizes and demanded whether they were still of the same Opinion To which they answered that they were and one of them said that if they had a thousand Lives they would lose them all in this Case upon which they were Indicted and Arraigned and Convicted upon this second Branch of the Statute for High Treason And it was Resolved by the greater part of the Justices that the words should be taken to be spoken Advisedly and Wittingly and were within the meaning of this second Branch Savile 46. 47. C. 99. Tender and refusal For tender and refusal Vide Stat. 7. Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 4. 5. postea Stat. Sect. 9. Provided always That this Act nor any thing therein contained nor any Attainder to be had by force and vertue of this Act shall not extend to make any corruption of Blood the disheriting of any Heir forfeiture of Dower No corruption of Blood disheriting of Heir or forfeiture of Dower for any Attainder by this Act nor to the prejudice of the Right or Title of any person or persons other then the Right or Title of the Offender or Offenders during his her or their natural Lives only And that it shall and maybe lawful to every person and persons to whom the Right or Interest of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments after the death of any such Offender or Offenders should or might have appertained if no such Attainder had been to enter into the same without any Ouster le maine to be sued in such sort as he or they might have done if this Act had never been had ne made Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act How the Oath expressed An. 1. Eliz. 1. shall be expounded made in the said first year shall be taken and expounded in such form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queens Majesties Injunctions published in the first year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledge in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority then that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said admonition more plainly may appear And be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid In what Courts and places this Act shall be published That this Act shall be openly Read and Published and Declared at every Quarter Sessions by the Clerk of the Peace and at every Leet and Law-day by the Steward of the Court and once in every Term in the open Hall of every House and Houses of Court and Chancery at the times and by the persons thereunto to be limited and appointed by the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seal for the time being And be it further Enacted Stat. Sect. 10. Every Knight Citizen and Burgess of the Parliament shall take the said Oath That every person which hereafter shall be Elected or appointed a Knight Citizen or Burgess or Baron for any of the five Ports for any Parliament or Parliaments hereafter to be holden shall from henceforth before he shall enter into the Parliament House or have any Voice there openly receive and pronounce the said Oath before the Lord Steward for the time being or his Deputy or Deputies for that time to be appointed And that he which shall enter into the Parliament House without taking the said Oath shall be deemed no Knight Citizen Burgess nor Baron for that Parliament nor shall have any Voice but shall be to all intents constructions and purposes as if he had never been Returned nor Elected Knight Citizen Burgess or Baron for that Parliament and shall suffer such pains and penalties as if he had presumed to sit in the same without Election Return or Authority The Kings dispensation void The King cannot dispence with any Member of the Commons House from taking this Oath For the reason given by the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan in the Case of Thomas and Sorrell touching the Oath of Allegiance holds here viz. Because by this Statute he is persona inhabilis until he hath taken it Vaughan 355. Stat. Sect. 11. Where no temporal person of or above the degree of a Baron shall be compelled to take the said Oath Provided alway That forasmuch as the Quéens Majesty is otherwise sufficiently assured of the Faith and Loyalty of the Temporal Lords of her High Court of Parliament Therefore this Act nor any thing therein contained shall
persons authorized or claiming Authority by or from the said Bishop or Seé of Rome to Consecrate or Hallow the same which said Agnus Dei is used to be specially Hallowed and Consecrated as it is termed by the said Bishop in his own person and the said Crosses Pictures Beads and such like superstitious things been also hallowed either by the same Bishop or by others having power or pretending to have power from him or his said Sée and divers Pardons Immunities and Exemptions granted by the Authority of the said Sée to such as shall receive and use the same and that if the same person or persons so bringing in as is aforesaid such Agnus Dei and other like things as have been before specified shall deliver or cause or offer to be delivered the same or any of them to any Subject of this Realm or of any the Dominions of the same to be worn or used in any wise that then as well the same person and persons so doing as also all and every other person or persons which shall receive and take the same to the intent to use or wear the same being thereof lawfully Convicted and Attainted by the order of the Common Laws of this Realm shall incur into the dangers penalties pains and forfeitures ordained and provided by the Statute of Praemunire and Provision made in the sixteenth year of the Reign of King Richard the Second Bringers in offerers and deliverers And that if the same Person or Persons so bringing in A man brings into the Kings Dominions such Agnus Dei or other like superstitious things and another offers or delivers them It seems that neither he that brings them in nor he that offers or delivers them is within this Act or liable to the penalty for by the express words it must be the same person So that neither the bringer in unless he offer or deliver them or cause them to be delivered nor he who delivers them or causeth or offereth them to be delivered unless he be the person who brought them in is an Offender within the Act. To whom an Agnus Dei c. may not be offered or delivered To any Subject of this Realm c. The offer or delivery of such Agnus Dei or other superstitious thing to any sort of person is not an offence within this Act as Wingate supposes it to be tit Crown Numb 37. But to make it an Offence it must be delivered or offered to a Subject of this Realm or of the Dominions of the same The intent material To be worn or used c. to the intent to use or wear the same The Intent is material in this Case an◠therefore If a man be Indicted upon this Statute for bringing in and offering or delivering such Agnus Dei c. or receiving the same the intent must be mentioned in the Indictment as it must be in Indictments upon all Statutes where the intent as here is made part of the offence So in an Indictment upon the Statute of 5 E. 6. cap. 4. Stat. 5 E. 6. 4. it is not enough to say the party drew his Dagger in the Church against J. S. but it must be averred that he did it with an intent to strike him as was Resolved by the Court of Kings-Bench Trin. 33 Eliz. in Penhalls Case Leonard 4. 49. C. 127. It seems by the words of this Statute that to make the Receiver of such superstitious things an offender within it there must be a concurrence of intentions for the using or wearing them both in the giver and receiver And that therefore if a person coming from beyond the Seas brings into this Realm any such superstitious things but with no intent that they should be worn or used and gives them to his friend at his request who receives them with an intent to wear or use them this is penal to neither Not to the giver for he had no superstitious intent and the intent is material nor to the receiver for that the offering or delivering them to be worn or used is expresly made in the Statute a condition precedent to the obliquity of the fact in receiving them for the Statute saith Then as well the person so doing as also every other person receiving them to that intent shall incur a Praemunire So that then only when the person delivering them so doth that is delivers them to be worn or used the person receiving them to that intent shall incur a Praemunire But yet there needs not any such concurrence of intentions in the giver and receiver to make the giver an offender And therefore if a man brings into the Realm such superstitious things and delivers them to be worn or used though the party receive them not to the intent to use or wear them but defaces burns or otherwise destroies them yet he that gave or delivered them incurs a Praemunire for the words in the Act relating to the Offerer or Deliverer are intire in themselves and have no dependance on the subsequent words relating to the receiver but generally make all Offenders who bring them in and either offer or deliver them to a superstitious intent without any respect to the intent of the party who receives or is offered them Provided nevertheless Stat. Sect. 7. Apprehending an Offender or disclosing his name and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons to whom any such Agnus Dei or other the things aforesaid shall be tendered and offered to be delivered shall apprehend the party so offering the same and bring him to the next Iustice of Peace of that Shire where such tender shall be made if he shall be of power and able so to do or for lack of such ability shall within the space of three days next after such offer made as is aforesaid disclose the name or names of such person or persons as so shall make the same offer and the dwelling place or place of resort of the same person or persons which he shall indeavor himself to know by all the ways and means he can to the Ordinary of that Diocess or to any Iustice of Peace of that Shire where such person or persons to whom such offer shall be made as is aforesaid shall be resiant And also Delivering of Agnus Dei received to the Ordinary or a Justice of Peace if such person or persons to whom such offer shall be made shall happen to receive any such Agnus Dei or other thing above remembred and shall within the space of one day next after such receipt deliver the same to any Iustice of Peace within the same Shire where the party so receiving shall be then resiant or shall happen to be That then every such person or persons doing any the Acts or things in this Proviso above mentioned in forme above declared shall not by force of this Statute incur any danger or penalty appointed by this Statute or
any other pain or penalty this Act or any thing therein contained to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Next Justice of Peace To the next Iustice of Peace If the person to whom such Agnus Dei c. is offered do bring the Offender to any Justice of Peace of the County where the offer is made although he be not the next Justice yet it is good enough and satisfies the intent of the Act For the word next is put in such Cases into Acts of Parliament but for conveniency and the more speedy execution of Justice Vide Styles 246. Maine and Sergeants Case The respective Justices of Peace here intended To any Iustice of Peace The Statute provides for the discovery of the Offender in Order to his punishment in three Cases 1. If any such superstitious thing be offered and the party be able to apprehend him that offers it he must bring him to the next Justice of Peace of the County where the offer is made 2. But if he cannot apprehend him he is to disclose his name and place of aboad or resort to the Ordinary of that Diocess or a Justice of Peace of that County where the person to whom the offer was made is resident and that within three days after such offer made 3. But if he receives the thing offered then he is not to apply to the Ordinary but is strictly tied to deliver it within a day after to some Justice of Peace of that County where he who received it shall then be resident or happen to be and in this last Case if he receives it with an intent to use or wear it and keeps it above a day or delivers it to any other person or Justice of Peace of any other County he incurs a Praemunire But these Justices of Peace are strangely confounded as well in Dalton V. cap. 89. tit High Treason as in Wingate tit Crown numb 37. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 8. A Pardon to them that shall bring in to be cancelled thâ—se Bulls which they received That all and every person and persons which at any time since the beginning of the first year of the Quéens Majesties Reign that now is have brought or caused to be brought into this Realm any such Bulls Writings or Instruments or Reconciliation only as are abovementioned and now have any of the same Bulls Writings or Instruments in his or their hands or custody and shall and do within the space of thrée months next after the end of any Session or Dissolution of this present Parliament bring and deliver all such Bulls Writings and Instruments which they or any of them now have in his or their Custody to the Bishop of the Diocess where such Absolution hath been given and received to the intent that the same Bulls Writings and Instruments may be cancelled and defaced and shall openly and publickly before such Bishop confess and acknowledge his or their Offence therein and humbly desire to be received restored and admitted to the Church of England shall stand and be clearly pardoned and discharged of all and every Offence and Offences done or committed in any matter or cause concerning any of the said Bulls Writings or Instruments for or touching such Absolution or Reconciliation only And that all and every person or persons which have received A Pardon of all those who have been reconciled to the Bishop of Rome and do confess it and submit themselves or taken any Absolution from the said Bishop of Rome or his said Sée of Rome of any Reconciliation unto the said Bishop or to the said Sée of Rome sithence the said first year of the Reign of our said Soveraign Lady the Queen and shall within the said space of three months next after any Session or Dissolution of this present Parliament come before the Bishop of the Diocess of such place where such Absolution or Reconciliation was had or made and shall publickly and openly before the same Bishop confess and acknowledge his or their Offence therein and humbly desire to be received restored and admitted to the Church of England shall likewise stand and he clearly pardoned and discharged of all and every Offence or Offences done or committed in any matter or cause concerning the said Bulls Writings or Instruments for or touching only receiving of such Absolution or Reconciliation and for and concerning all Absolution or Reconciliation had or received by colour of any of the said Bulls Writings or Instruments only Provided also Stat. Sect. 9. The penalty of a Justice of P. not disclosing an Offence declared to him and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Iustice of Peace to whom any Matter or Offence before mentioned shall be uttered shewed or declared as is aforesaid do not within the space of xiv days next after it shall be to him shewed or uttered signifie or declare the same to some one of the Queéns Majesties Privy Counsel that then the same Iustice of Peace shall incur the danger pain and forfeiture provided by the said Statute made in the said sixtéenth year of King Richard the second As is aforesaid So that if the Offence be not declared as is aforesaid No Praemunire incurred that is to such Justice of Peace as is appointed in the foregoing Clause but it shall be declared to any other Justice of Peace of a wrong County that other Justice of Peace shall not incur a Praemunire if he doth not signifie or declare it to a Privy Counsellor One Privy Counsellor sufficient To some one of the Queéns Majesties Privy Council Here 't is plain that any one Privy Counsellor sufficeth and the Justice of Peace is not bound to signifie the Offence to the Privy Council as Wingate tit Crown numb 138. misrecites the Statute Stat. Sect. 10. Trial of a Nobleman by his Peers Provided also and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any Nobleman being a Peér of this Realm shall at any time hereafter happen to be Indicted for any the Offence or Offences aforesaid That then every such Nobleman and Péer of this Realm shall have his Trial by his Péers as in cases of High Treason and Misprision of Treason hath heretofore béen accustomed or used A saving of the right of others Saving to all and every person and persons bodies Politick and Corporate their Heirs and Successors and the Heirs and Successors of every of them other then the said Offenders and their Heirs claiming only as Heir or Heirs to such Offenders and such person and persons as claim to any their uses all such Rights Titles Interests Possessions Leases Rents Reversions Remainders Offices Fées and all other Profits Commodities and Hereditaments as they or any of them shall have at the day of committing such Offence or Offences or any time before in as large ond ample manner to all intents and purposes as if this Act
year after the Offence committed The Informer must sue within the year otherwise he shall not have any part of the penalty Godbolt 158. C. 216. Cro. Hill 12 Jac. 366. Sivedale versus Sir Edward Lenthall But popular Suits upon the Statute of Tillage are excepted and not upon the Statute of Tallage as 't is mistaken in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 191. tit Informations Sect. 3. In Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11.65 it 's said That the Informer hath no Remedy for recovery of the forfeiture for Recusancy after the year and day is expired for that time is limited in certain by this Act But yet with submission it seems the Clause in this Act which limits to a year and a day And hath not a year and a day relates to Indictments only And so it was held in this very Case of Dr. Foster Co. 11. 60. Rolles 1.93 C. 41. and in Pie and Lovells Case Hobart 205. and there was no limitation of time for the Informer Qui tam c. upon this Statute until the said Statute of 31 Eliz. which limits him to a year after the Offence committed and not a year and a day And although this Offence of Recusancy cannot in strictness be said to be committed for that in truth it is but a bare omission as hath been said and therefore there needs not be any place alledged yet in common parlance it will pass well enough for an Offence committed To what intent Recusancy may be said to be committed and seems to be within the meaning of that Branch of 31 Eliz. which limits the time of prosecution And in this very Clause of the Statute of 23 Eliz. it 's said the third part of the forfeiture for Recusancy shall be to the Poor in the Parish where the Offence is committed Now if it be objected That if Recusancy be not an Offence which is to be laid in the proper County by that Statute of 31 Eliz. because 't is not an Offence which can be properly said to be committed By the same reason the Informer who is restrained by that Statute to a year after the Offence committed is not restrained in the Case of Recusancy Nor the Poor of any Parish can take any benefit by this Statute as to the third part of the forfeiture for that there is no Parish wherein Recusancy can be said to be committed I answer there is a great difference between those Cases For in the Cases of limitation of time when the Offence must be prosecuted and that of the Poor of the Parish where the forfeiture is to be distributed the word committed is no part of the substance of the matter and 't is no more then if the Statutes had said within a year after the Offence and to the Parish where the Offence was And there committed may be taken well in that sense And to what intent not but it cannot be so in that other Case about the proper County For the Statute of 31 Eliz. which appoints that in any Declaration or Information the Offence against any penal Statute shall not be laid to be done in any other County but where the matter alledged to be the Offence was in truth done and the Defendant may traverse and alledge that the Offence supposed to be committed was not committed in such County where the Offence is alledged c. makes the Commission of the Offence matter of substance and whether it were committed or not committed in the County where it is laid in the Information or popular Suit goes now to the merits of the Cause For if it were not committed in that County and the Defendant alledge and traverse it and it be found for him the Plaintiff shall be barred And those words that he may traverse that it was not committed clearly shew that Offences which consist only in omission were not intended For otherwise neither Recusancy nor any other Offence of that nature could be punished by any Information or popular Action For the Jury upon their Oaths must of necessity find that it was not committed in any County for that in truth and propriety of speech it was not committed at all Vide supra Sect. 5. Suit by the King within what time Stat. 31 Eliz 5. By the said Statute of 31 Eliz. if the Informer Qui tam c. doth not prosecute within a year after the Offence yet the King may at any time within two years after that year ended And therefore it was resolved in the Case of Syvedale and Sir Edward Lenthall before recited where an Information was brought in the Court of Exchequer Tam pro Domino Rege quam pro seipso upon the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. 3 Jac. 4. for three years forbearance to receive the Sacrament after Conformity that although it was not good for the Informer yet it was well enough as to the King Cro. Jac. 366. A natural born Subject or a Denizen being Defendant in any Suit upon a penal Law in the Kings Bench Common Pleas Special Bail or Exchequer is not compellable to put in special Bail but may appear by Attorney Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 5.31 Eliz. cap. 10. St. 29 Eliz. 5 31 Eliz. 10. Yelverton 53. St. Georges Case An Action of Debt or Information Tam pro Domino Rege quam c. lies upon this Statute against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife Baron and Feme and the Husband in that Case is liable to pay the 20 l. per month notwithstanding he himself be no Recusant Bulstrode 3. 87. The King against Law Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. Dr. Fosters Case Hobart 97. Moore versus Hussey Savile 25. C. 59. But the Wife cannot appear by Supersedeas alone without her Husband for both must appear or both be out-lawed Hobart 179. Lovedens Case Nor can she plead or join issue without her Husband Must both plead Rolles 2. 90. Sir George Curson and his Wives Case And therefore where in an Information brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife the Record was entred praedict J. M. veniunt praedicta M. dicit quod ipsa non est inde culpabilis de hoc ponit se super Patriam this was adjudged to be ill for the Husband pleads not at all But in this Case the Dockett being Quod J. C. M. uxor ejus c. placitant non culp and it being manifest that they both appeared Record amended the Record was amended by the Dockett after Verdict For it was but the misprision of the Clerk in drawing the Plea Cro. Pasch 17 Jac. 530. Parker versus Sir John Curson and his Wife which is the same Case with that in Rolles only the Christian name of the Husband varies At the end of the Report of this Case in Croke there is a subsequent note added that if Sir John Curson and his Wife had pleaded Quod ipsi
outlawed upon the said Indictment and it was Resolved 36 Eliz. by the whole Court of Exchequer that this was a fraudulent Conveyance within the Statute of 13 Eliz. cap. 5. Stat. 13 Eliz. 5 which was made for the Relief of the Queen and other persons as well as Creditors But as this Case is related in Twines Case Co. 3. 82. 'T is observable that although it was debated whether the Queen should avoid this Conveyance by force of the Statute of 50 E. 3. 50 E. 3. 6. cap. 6. or that of 3 H. 7. cap. 4. 3 H. 7. 4. or that of 13 Eliz. before mentioned yet there is no mention made of this branch of 23 Eliz. for 't is clear that the Queen could not avoid such a fraudulent Conveyance by force of this Statute unless Judgment had been first given against the Recusant or he had been convicted And Pauncefoot was neither convicted or adjudged to be a Recusant but the Queens interest accrued to her by means of the Outlawry only Provided alway Stat. Sect. 12. Tryal of a Peer by his Peers That if any Peér of this Realm shall happen to be Indicted of any Offence made Treason or misprision of Treason by this Act he shall have his Trial by his Péers as in other like Cases is accustomed Indictment of Peers by whom Although a Peer shall be tried per pares yet he is to be Indicted by an Inquest under the Degree of Nobility And may be Indicted before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer or in the Kings-Bench if the Offence be committed in the County where the Kings-Bench is Co. 2. Inst 49. Stat. Sect. 13. Ecclesiastical Censures Provided also That neither this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to take away or abridge the Authority or Iurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Censures for any cause or matter But that the Archbishops and Bishops and other Ecclesiastical Iudges may do and proceed as before the making of this Act they lawfully did or might have done Any thing in this Act to the Contrary notwithstanding Stat. xxvii Eliz. cap. ii An Act against Jesuits Seminary Priests and such other like dissobedient persons WHereas divers persons called or professed Iesuits Stat. Sect 1. The Causes why Jesuits and Priests do come into this Realm Seminary Priests and other Priests which have been and from time to time are made in the parts beyond the Seas by or according to the Order and Rites of the Romish Church have of late years comen and béen sent and dayly do come and are sent into this Realm of England and other the Queéns Majesties Dominions of purpose as it hath appeared as well by sundry of their own examinations and confessions as by divers other manifest means and proofs not only to withdraw her Highness Subjects from their due obedience to her Majesty but also to stir up and move Sedition Rebellion and open Hostility within the same her Highness Realms and Dominions to the great indangering of the safety of her most Royal Person and to the utter ruine desolation and overthrow of the whole Realm if the same be not the sooner by some good means foreséen and prevented For reformation whereof be it Ordained All Jesuits and Priests shall depart out of this Realm Established and Enacted by the Queens most Excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority of the same Parliament That all and every Iesuits Seminary Priests and other Priests whatsoever made or Ordained out of the Realm of England or other her Highnesse Dominions or within any of her Majesties Realms or Dominions by any Authority Power or Iurisdiction derived challenged or pretended from the See of Rome since the Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist in the first year of her Highness Reign shall within forty days next after the end of this present Session of Parliament depart out of this Realm of England and out of all other her Highness Realms and Dominions if the wind weather and passage shall serve for the same or else so soon after the end of the said forty days as the Wind Weather and passage shall so serve Stat. Sect. 2. No Jesuits or Priests shall come into or remain in this Realm And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful to or for any Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person whatsoever being born within this Realm or any other her Highnesse Dominions and heretofore since the said Feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist in the first year of her Majesties Reign made ordained or professed or hereafter to be made ordained or professed by any Authority or Iurisdiction derived challenged or pretended from the Sée of Rome by or of what name title or degrée soever the same shall be called or known to come into be or remain in any part of this Realm or any other her Highnesse Dominions after the end of the same forty days other then in such special Cases and upon such special occasions only and for such time only as is expressed in this Act And if he do that then every such Offence shall be taken and adjudged to be High Treason and every person so offending shall for his Offence be adjudged a Traytor and shall suffer lose and forfeit as in Case of High Treason A Priest born within this Realm Being born within this Realm c. And this must be comprised in the Indictment but it need not be shewn in what particular place he was born but generally Quod J. S. natus infra hoc regnum Angliae c. Popham 94. Southwells Case A Priest Ordained c. Made ordained or professed And so it must be alledged in the Indictment that he was made a Jesuit or Priest c. by Authority challenged or pretended from the See of Rome but it need not be shewn where he was made a Jesuit or Priest c. whether beyond Sea or within the Realm for wheresoever it was it is within this Law if he were made so by the pretended Authority of the See of Rome Popham 94. Southwells Case Stat. Sect. 6. Receiving or relieving a Jesuit or Priest shall be felony And every person which after the end of the same forty days and after such time of departure as is before limited and appointed shall wittingly and willingly receive relieve comfort aid or maintain any such Iesuit Seminary Priest or other Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is aforesaid being at liberty or out of hold knowing him to be a Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is aforesaid shall also for offence be adjudged a Felon without benefit of Clergy and suffer death lose and forfeit as in Case of one attainted of Felony In the late Additions to
Dalton cap. 140. tit High Treason Sect. 13. 't is said That the Clause in this Statute touching those who receive relieve or maintain a Jesuit Receiving or relieving a Jesuit Priest c. at this day is Felony by this Act. c. relates only to such as had before that time taken Orders which conceit I suppose is grounded upon those words viz. who at the end of the said forty days and after such time of departure as aforesaid shall receive c. as if no Jesuit or Priest were here intended but such an one as was then a Jesuit or Priest and had forty days given him for his departure nor no person a Felon by this Act who receives or relieves any other But the words here viz. such Iesuit c. seem to be more extensive and to relate as well to the receivers or relievers of a Jesuit or Priest in Orders at this day as to those who were in Orders at the time of making this Statute And if we weigh the Grammatical construction of the words with much more reason the former then the later For the proximum antecedens to such is the Jesuit or Priest who was to be made ordained or professed and not he that was then made ordained or professed already And those words in this Clause of relieving viz. Every person which after the end of the same forty days c. shall receive c. that is forty days next after the end of that Session of Parliament may well be construed to extend to all Cases as well of receiving or relieving such who should be afterwards in Orders and should be found within the Realm for the time to come at any time after those forty days as of such who were then in Orders and were to depart before the forty days were expired so that the receiving relieving or maintaining of a Jesuit Popish Priest or other Popish Ecclesiastical person at liberty and known by the party to be such is Felony at this day by this Act and the Offender shall lose the benefit of his Clergy and so hath the Law been taken upon Actions of the Case for saying the Plaintiff kept a Seminary Priest or Jesuit in his House knowing him to be such Cro. Pasch 10 Jac. 300. Smith versus Flynt Palmer 410. Clerke and Loggins Case And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. They which be in Seminaries shall after Proclamation return and take the Oath If any of her Majesties Subjects not being a Iesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiastical person as is before mentioned now being or which hereafter shall be of or brought up in any Colledge of Iesuits or Seminary already erected or ordained or hereafter to be erected or ordained in the parts beyond the Seas or out of this Realm in any Forraign parts shall not within six months next after Proclamation in that behalf to be made in the City of London under the great Seal of England return into this Realm and thereupon within two days next after such Return before the Bishop of the Diocess or two Iustices of Peace of the County where he shall arrive submit himself to her Majesty and her Laws and take the Oath set forth by Act in the first year of her Reign That then every such person which shall otherwise return come into or be in this Realm or any other her Highnesse Dominions for such Offence of returning or being in this Realm or any other her Highnesse Dominions without submission as aforesaid shall also be adjudged a Traytor and suffer lose and forfeit as in Case of High Treason Persons sent out of this Realm Return into this Realm and thereupon within two days c. By this word Return it seems that none are intended here but such as were sent out of this Realm For others born and resident in some other part of the Kings Dominions until their entry into such Collledge or Seminary cannot be properly said to return hither The Queens Laws And her Laws What Laws are here meant Vide Sect. 7. Whither a person sent beyond Seas must first return Or any other her Highnesse Dominions A Subject of the Kings sent out of England to a Popish Colledge or Seminary is commanded by Proclamation made in London to return into this Realm and within the six months here limited first goes into Ireland and then comes into England and within two days submits himself and takes the Oath of Supremacy In this Case notwithstanding his return into England within the six months he shall be guilty of High Treason For after such Proclamation he ought to have come directly into England and into no other of the late Queens Dominions before he had been in England and if he doth he comes into the said Dominions otherwise then is appointed by this Act For the intent of the Act seems to be That he should not remain in any of the said Dominions until he submits and takes the Oath which submission must be made and Oath taken in England within two days after his arrival here and not elsewhere And although the Oath of Supremacy be in force in Ireland yet his taking it there will not serve nor yet his submission there For he is to submit to the King and his Laws by which are intended the Laws of England and no other But a submission in Ireland to the Kings Laws can be taken to be of such Laws only as are in force in Ireland Trial in England of Treason done in Ireland And in this Case the Offender may be tryed here in England although his Offence was committed in Ireland and that by force of the Statute of 35 H. 8. Stat. 35 H. 8. 2. 1 2 Ph. Mar. 10. cap. 2. notwithstanding the Statute of 1 2 Ph. Mar. cap. 10. For it was resolved by all the Judges of England in the Case of Ororke 33 Eliz. that Treason committed in Ireland may be tryed in England And the like resolution was in Sir John Perrots Case 34 Eliz. Co. 7. 23. Calvins Case Co. 1. Inst. 261. Co. 3. Inst 11. Dyer 13 Eliz. 298. Dr. Stories Case Anderson 1. 263. C. 269. Ororkes Case And if a Subject of England who is a Peer of Ireland Trial of Peers be sent to any such Colledge or Seminary and offend as aforesaid he may be tried in England by a common Jury notwithstanding the offence was in Ireland where he is a Peer contrary to Dyer 19 20 Eliz. 360. where 't is said that Wray Dyer and Gerard Attorney General were of opinion That a Peer of Ireland cannot be tryed in England for Treason done in Ireland because he cannot here have his Tryal by his Peers but this is not Law and Sir Christopher Wray protested he never gave any such opinion but held the contrary Co. 1. Inst 261. And be it further Enacted by the Authority
or covin nor for convenient time taken for their return back again upon the same This extends to all Cases in general where the Popish Recusant ought to render his body to the Sheriff upon Proclamation Proclamation and is not restrained to a Proclamation upon an Indictment for Recusancy And therefore if a Popish Recusant confined by this Act had been proclaimed upon the Statute of Marlebridge in a Plea de Custodia as a Deforceor he might lawfully have gone out of the compass of five miles The like he may do at this day upon any other Proclamation commanding him to render his body to the Sheriff Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 7. And furthermore be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect 12. An Offender upon open submission shall be discharged That if any person or persons that shall at any time hereafter offend against this Act shall before he or they shall be thereof convicted come to some Parish Church on some Sunday or other Festival day and then and there hear Divine Service And at Service time before the Sermon or reading of the Gospel make publick and open Submission and Declaration of his and their Conformity to her Majesties Laws and Statutes as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed That then the same Offender shall thereupon be clearly discharged of and from all and every pains and forfeitures inflicted or imposed by this Act for any of the said Offences in this Act contained Before he or they shall be thereof convicted Where submission will save abjuration A Popish Recusant confined by this Act whose Estate is under value is apprehended for offending against this Act and before the expiration of three months next after his apprehension is convicted of such Offence and then before the said three months expire conforms and makes such Submission and Declaration as is here and in the former branch appointed In this Case although he comes too late after Conviction to save the forfeiture of his Lands and Goods yet he shall not be compelled to abjure For the affirmative words here that upon such Conformity Submission and Declaration before Conviction he shall be discharged of all pains and forfeitures do not carry in them the force of a negative viz. That if it be after Conviction he shall not be discharged of any of them And by the former branch of the Statute he is not compellable to abjure if at any time within three months next after his apprehension he conforms confesses and submits as is there appointed To some Parish Church It must be in some Parish Church It seems clear that no Submission Confession or Declaration can discharge the Popish Recusant who is an Offender within this Act from any pain or forfeiture thereby inflicted unless it be performed in some Parish Church For there is a great difference between the penning of this Statute and that branch of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz 1. where 't is said That the Offender shall be committed to Prison until he come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hear Divine Service and make such open Submission and Declaration of his Conformity as in the Act is appointed For there there is an express designation of the place where such Submission and Declaration shall be viz. in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer whither the Offender comes and this shall free him from his Imprisonment Vide that Statute Sect. 4. supra But here where 't is said in the former part of this Act That he shall abjure unless he comes usually to Church and make such Confession and Submission as is therein afterwards appointed and expressed His coming usually to Church cannot be applied to his Confession and Submission for that is to be made but once and not usually and therefore there being there no place appointed where this Confession and Submission shall be made we must necessarily have recourse to this later branch of the Act where a place is appointed viz. some Parish Church so that the coming usually to Church without this formal Submission and Confession or Declaration in some Parish Church frees not the Offender here in any Case from abjuration although the coming to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hearing Divine Service and making open Submission and Declaration there shall free an Offender within the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. from Imprisonment Parish Church What is a Parish Church Vide Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 4. supra Two several Submissions Submission If a Popish Recusant Indicted upon this Statute makes his Submission and brings with him into the Court of Kings Bench a Testimonial thereof it s the course of that Court to cause him there to make his Submission again upon his knees which the Clerk of the Crown reads to him And so was it done in the Case of one Thoroughgood Pasch 2. Car. 1. But Justice Jones said there was no Statute to compell him to this second Submission And Thoroughgood complained that he was not therein dealt with according to Law Latch 16. Stat. Sect. 13. The same Submission to be as hereafter followeth that is to say The form of the Submission I A. B. do humbly confess and acknowledge that I have grievously offended God in contemning her Majesties godly and lawful Government and Authority by absenting my self from Church and from hearing Divine Service contrary to the Godly Laws and Statutes of this Realm and I am heartily sorry for the same and do acknowledge and testifie in my Conscience that the Bishop or See of Rome hath not nor ought to have any Power or Authority over her Majesty or within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions And I do promise and protest without any dissimulation or any colour or means of any Dispensation That from henceforth I will from time to time obey and perform her Majesties Laws and Statutes in repairing to the Church and hearing Divine Service and do my uttermost endeavour to maintain and defend the same Over her Majesty or within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions What Authority of the Pope is to be renounced And not over her Majesty within any her Dominions as Wingate tit Crown numb 85. grosly misrecites this Submission For that denies only the Popes or See of Romes Authority over her Majesty but not any other Authority which they might claim over her Subjects And 't is clear by the disjunctive or which Wingate omits that both these Authorities are intended to be denied by this Submission Or any colour or means of any Dispensation Dispensation These words which are a very material part of the Submission are likewise omitted by Wingate Her Majesties Laws and Statutes The Queens Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2. What is meant by her Majesties Laws Vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. And that every Minister or
lieu of the Twenty pounds per month And therefore the Resolution or Judgment said to be given in the Case of one Gray Anno 1. or 2. Jac. and cited in Beckets Case 8 Jac. Lane 93. and by Sergeant Bridgman in his Argument of Parker and Webbs Case 16 Jac. Rolles 2. 25. and applied thereunto viz. That if a Recusant convicted fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month the King shall have his Lands as a gage or penalty and the profits shall not go towards satisfaction thereof However it were true as the Law stood upon 29 Eliz. and before the making of this Act of 1 Jac. yet 't is not Law at this day nor could be applicable to either of those Cases of Becket or Parker and Webb which came to be debated long after this Act was made and the Law of 29 Eliz. altered in that point Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 7. Where any such seizure shall be had c. This Relative such takes in both the seizures beforementioned viz. a seizure upon Indictment and Judgment thereupon by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. and a seizure upon Conviction on Proclamation and default according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. And What seizure is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz 1 29 Eliz. â— as in both those Cases the Recusant who fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month shall have the benefit to discount the profits received by the King so the King shall in the like Cases of seizure retain the two parts in his hands after the Recusants death until the residue of the Debt or Duty due and payable to the King be satisfied Where this extends not to Intailed Lands Two parts of the Lands c. of any such Recusant This Clause extends not to Intailed Lands unless where there is a Judgment for the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy And therefore if the Recusant convicted upon Proclamation and default be Tenant in Tail and two parts of his Lands be seized in his Life time for non-payment of the Twenty pounds per month and he die the arrears not being satisfied to the King yet the heir in Tail shall have the Land out of the Kings hands without payment of the arrears For that such Conviction is in the nature of a Verdict only Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment and not of a Judgment as was held in Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1.94 C. 41. And where a Statute gives to the King a seizure or forfeiture of Lands it shall not be intended of Lands in Tail unless it be expresly so appointed by the Statute or by force of some other Statute cooperating therewith In which Case the Intailed Lands may be charged by general words in the Statute which gives the forteiture or seizure An instance whereof we have in the Case of a Recusant Tenant in Tail Indicted Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Convicted and Adjudged upon 23 Eliz. 1. for his Intailed Lands shall remain after his death in the Kings possession until the arrears be satisfied 29 Eliz. 6 33 H. 8. 39 and that by force of 29 Eliz. c. 6. and this Statute cooperating with the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. which charges the Lands of the heir in Tail with debts due to the King upon a Judgment had against the Ancestor Praemunire Stat. 16 R. 2. 5 But otherwise 't is in the Case of a Praemunire upon the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. which saith the Lands and Tenements of the Offender shall be forfeit to the King for there his Intailed Lands shall be forfeit during his life only And the reason is for that general words in an Act of Parliament unless aided by some other Act of Parliament shall never take away the force of the Statute de donis conditionalibus Co. 1. Inst. 130. 391. Co. 11.63 Godbolt 308. Lord Sheffeild and Ratcliffe Treason Stat. 26 H. 8. 13 5 E. 6. 11 And therefore in the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 13. and 5 E. 6. cap. 11. which make Intailed Lands forfeitable for Treason the word inheritance was added any Estate of Inheritance which expresly denotes Lands in Fee Tail as well as Feesimple Now there being neither in this Act or that of 29 Eliz. any express appointment that the two parts of all Lands seized in the Recusants life time wherein he had any Estate of Inheritance shall after his death continue in the Kings possession nor no other Statute which charges the heir in Tail with the forfeiture due to the King upon Conviction by Proclamation and Default the general words here that his Lands Tenements c. shall continue in the Kings possession shall not inforce a construction in prejudice of the Heir in Tail who claims by the Statute de donis conditionalibus but where there is no Judgment the Recusants Fee simple Lands shall after his death satisfie the intent of these Statutes And so was the Law in reference to intailed Lands upon the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. which speaks of the full satisfaction of Arrearages in Case of the death of the Recusant Arrears where to be paid by the Heir in Tail where not And the Arrears were to have been paid by the Heir in Tail only in such Case where there was a Judgment obtained by the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy but not where the Ancestor Tenant in Tail was convicted only upon Proclamation and default for in this last Case the Heir in Tail was not bound by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. because 't is not a Debt by Judgment as that Statute requires Moore 523. C. 691. And thus the Opinion of the two Chief Justices Trin. 43 Eliz. is to be understood for they held That if intailed Lands had been seized for non-payment of the 20 l. per month and the Tenant in Tail had died the issue in Tail should not have had the Land out of the Queens hands before the Debt were satisfied but should have been charged with the said Debt Cro. Eliz. 846. At the end of which Case is added a Dubitatur But yet the Opinion there held stands good if it be intended only of a Conviction of the Ancestor by Judgment upon Trial or Confession and not of a Conviction upon Proclamation and default And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 2. None shall go or send any other to a Seminary c. That all and every person and persons under the Kings Obedience which at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall send or cause to be sent any Child or any other person under their or any of their Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent to enter into or be resident in any Colledge Seminary or House of Iesuits Priests or any other Popish Order
all causes where any Bishop or Iustices of the Peace may by force of this Act require and take of any Subject the Oath above mentioned That the Lords of the Privy Counsel for the time being or any six of them whereof the Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer or the principal Secretary for the time being to be one shall have full Power and Authority by force of this Act at any time or times to require and take the said Oaths before mentioned of any Nobleman or Noblewoman then being above the age of Eighteén years And if any such Nobleman or Noblewoman other then Women married shall refuse to take such Oath or Oaths that in every such Case such Nobleman and Noblewoman shall incur the pain and danger of a Praemunire Where any Bishop or Iustices of the Peace The Justices of Peace Justices of Peace have a twofold power given them by this Act in reference to the Oath of Allegiance 1. Out of Sessions and so any two Justices of Peace quorum unus c. may tender the Oath to any person eighteen years old or above other then Noblemen or Noblewomen 2. In their general or Quarter Sessions and there they may tender the Oath to any such person who hath before refused it or to any person whatsoever of or above that age other then Noblemen or Noblewomen Now whether the six Privy Counsellors Six Privy Counsellors here mentioned may require this Oath of Noblemen and Noblewomen in all Cases where the Justices of Peace may require the same of any Subject either in or out of Sessions or only in such Cases where they may require it out of Sessions seems to be a Question For if the power here given to the six Privy Counsellors be the same with that of the Justices of Peace in their Sessions they may by force of this Act tender it to any Nobleman or unmarried Noblewoman whatsoever above eighteen years old For the Justices of Peace in their Sessions may tender it there to any other person whatsover But if it be meant of the power given the Justices of Peace out of Sessions then the six Privy Counsellors can tender it by force of this Act to such Noblemen or unmarried Noblewomen only who stand Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy for not coming to Church or who have not received the Sacrament twice within the year next before or who passing through the Country unknown shall upon examination confess or not deny their Recusancy or that they have not so received the Sacrament To whom they may tender this Oath For the solving of which doubt it is to be considered 1. That the Bishop and not the Justices of Assize are here joyned with the Justices of Peace And these words where any Bishop or Iustices of Peace seem to bear this Construction viz. where any Bishop or Justices of Peace either the one or the other indifferently may require the Oath and that can be intended only of the power given out of Sessions For in Sessions the Bishop hath nothing to do But had the Justices of Assize been here added scilicet in all Causes where the Bishop Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace may require this Oath it had been clear that the Power here given the six Privy Counsellors was as extensive as that which is given the Justices of Assize or Justices of Peace in their Sessions and they might have required the Oath of any Nobleman or unmarried Noblewoman whatsoever of competent age so if the Justices of Peace only had been here named it had been clearly intended of the Justices of Peace in either Capacity either in or out of Sessions But Bishop seems here to be a restrictive word and to give the Privy Counsellors no more power in respect of the Nobility then the Bishop had in reference to any other Subject 2. These words in all causes where c. seem to be restrictive likewise and exclusive of some Causes But the Power of the Justices of Peace in Sessions extends to all Causes and Persons under the Degree of Nobility whatsoever which therefore cannot be here intended but only some particular Causes ejusdem generis which can be no other then the Causes before mentioned wherein the Bishop or two Justices out of Sessions may deal viz. where the party was before Convicted or Indicted or had not received the Sacrament or passed unknown and confessed c. And yet as 't is reported in Bulstrode 1. 197. the Case of the Lord Vaux Pasch 10. Car. 1. is to the contrary For 't is said there he was committed to the Fleet by the Privy Council for refusing this Oath and afterwards Indicted in the Kings Bench of a Praemunire for such his refusal he being then of the age of eighteen years and above And the said Oath being lawfully tendred c. All which was certified to the Court by divers of the Privy Council upon which Indictment he was attainted and no word in the Indictment of his standing Convicted or Indicted of Recusancy or not having received the Sacrament c. and yet the Indictment was grounded upon this Statute and not upon that of 7 Jac. 6. For by that Statute of 7 Jac. he could not have been Indicted of a Praemunire for the first refusal but must have been Committed until the next Assizes or Sessions and if he had there refused it the second time he might have been Indicted of a Praemunire and not otherwise But whether this Indictment were according to Law or only passed sub silentio Quaere Note by the Statute of 7 Jac. cap. 6. any Privy Counsellor Stat. 7 Jac. 6. or the Bishop of the Diocess may now require this Oath of any Baron or Baronesse of or above the age of eighteen years in all Cases And in some Cases three Privy Counsellors Quorum unus c. may require it of persons above the said Degree vide the Statute A Noblewoman by Marriage Noblewoman A Noblewoman who was such by Marriage only becomes a Widow and takes to her second Husband a person under the Degree of Nobility By this her second Marriage she hath lost her Nobility And if she again becomes a Widow the Oath shall not be tendred her by Privy Counsellors But the Bishop or two Justices of Peace quorum unus c. may by force of this Act require her to take it and upon her refusal may proceed against her as is above directed in the Case of a common person see more of this matter Stat. 7 Jac. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Age. Then being above the age of Eightéen years In this Case that day Eighteen years on which the party was born must be wholly elapsed for before this Oath cannot be tendred although the hour of his birth be elapsed For the Law rejects all Fractions and Divisions of a day for the incertainty Fractions of a day rejected which is always the Mother of Contention Co. 5.1 Claytons Case
a farther distance although they inhabited in that which was within London or ten miles for three months next before that Session of Parliament yet if they were not Tradesmen at the time of making of this Act they should have had no benefit by this Proviso but ought within ten days after such Indictment or Conviction for Recusancy to have removed out of the compass of ten miles Stat. Sect. 7. And whereas by a Statute made at Westminster in the Five and thirtieth year of the Reign of Queén Elizabeth Intituled An Act for the restraining of Popish Recusants to some certain place of abode it was amongst other things Ordained and Enacted That every Popish Recusant then or after Convicted for not repairing to Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer A Recusant confined having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm should within the time limited by the said Statute repair to their place of usual dwelling and abode or not having any certain place of dwelling or abode within this Realm should likewise within the time limited by the said Statute repair to the place where such person was born or where the Father or Mother of such person should be dwelling and not at any time remove or pass above five miles from thence under the pains in the said Statute limited and provided Which Statute by reason of sundry Licences given unto such Recusants under colour of a Proviso in the said Statute contained hath not wrought that good effect in the Commonwealth as was hoped Be it therefore Enacted Ordained by this present Parliament and by the Authority of the same That the said Statute made in the said Five and thirtieth year of the said Quéen Elizabeth for and concerning the confining of the said Recusants under the pains and penalties therein contained shall by this Act and by the Authority of the same be confirmed and be hereafter put in due execution according to the tenour true intent and meaning of the said Statute in that behalf made Repeal of a Proviso in 35 Eliz. 2. And that the said Proviso in the said Statute contained giving power to grant Licence or Licences unto the said Recusants to go and Travel from or out of the compass of the said five miles shall be from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament utterly repealed and void Any thing in the said Statute to the contrary notwithstanding Then or after Convicted Vide Sect. 8. infra Giving power to grant Licence or Licences unto the said Recusants The Proviso in the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 2. here repealed is only that which there impowers the Justices of Peace For that is the only Proviso which gives power to grant Licences And the cause here alledged for the Repeal is the giving of sundry Licences to Recusants under colour of a Proviso in 35. which can be construed only of those which were to be given by the Justices of Peace and not of the other Licences given by 35. in several other cases so that the Proviso's there permitting the Popish Recusant to Travel in case of Process or commandment by Privy Counsellors or the Queens Commissioners or Proclamation to render his body to the Sheriff remain still in force and unrepealed and the Recusant may take the benefit thereof at this day Stat. Sect. 8. Provided nevertheless and be it further Enacted by this present Parliament and by the Authority of the same That it shall and may be lawful for the Kings most excellent Majesty his Heirs and Successors or for thrée or more of his Majesties most Honourable Privy Council or for threé or more of the Privy Council of his Heirs or Successors in writing under the hands of the said Privy Counsellors Licence to a Popish Recusant confined to give Licence to every such Recusant to go and Travel out of the compass of the said five miles for such time as in the said Licence shall be contained for their travelling attending and returning and without any other Cause to be expressed within the said Licence And if any of the persons which are so confined by virtue of the said Statute as is aforesaid shall have necessary occasion or business to go and Travel out of the compass of the said five miles That then and in every such Case upon Licence in writing in that behalf to be gotten under the Hands and Seals of four of the Iustices of Peace of the same County Limit Division or place next adjoyning to the place of abode of such Recusant with the privity and assent in writing of the Bishop of the Diocess The effect of a Licence to be granted by four Justices of Peace or of the Lieutenant or of any Deputy Lieutenant of the same County residing within the said County or Liberty under their Hands and Seals In every of which Licence or Licences in writing so to be had and made shall be specified and contained both the particular cause of the said Licence and the time how long the said party licensed shall be absent in travelling attending and returning It shall and may thereupon be lawful for every such person so licenced to go and Travel about such their necessary business and for such time only for their travelling attending and returning as shall be comprized in the said Licence the said party so licenced first taking his corporal Oath before the said Four Iustices of the Peace or any of them who shall have Authority by virtue of this Act to minister the same that he hath truly informed them of the Cause of his Iourney and that he shall not make any causless stays And that all and every Licence hereafter to be made in this behalf contrary to the tenor effect and true meaning of this Statute shall be utterly void frustrate and of none effect Any thing in the said former Act or in this Act to the contrary notwithstanding And every person so confined which shall depart or go above five miles from the place whereunto he is or shall be confined not having such Licence and not having taken such Oath as aforesaid shall incur the pain and penalty and forfeit as a Recusant Convicted and passing or going above five miles from the said place whereunto he is or shall be confined by the said Statute of tricesimo quinto Elizabethae should do For the Kings most Excellent Majesty c. or for thrée or more of his Majesties most Honorable Privy Councel c. to give Licence to every such Recusant What recusants may be Licensed to travel above five miles By such Recusant is intended here such Recusant as is confined by the Statute of 35 Eliz. 2. and not only such as was mentioned in the foregoing Clause of recital For that recital is imperfect in that it mentions only the Popish Recusant Convicted Stat. 35 Eliz. 2 Imperfect recital here whereas 35 Eliz. speaks as well of the Popish
or Books shall be found in their or any of their Custody as in the Opinion of the said Iustices Mayor Bailiff or Chief Officer as aforesaid shall be thought unméet for such Recusant as aforesaid to have or use the same shall be presently defaced and burnt if it be méet to be burned And if it be a Crucifix or other Relique of any price the same to be defaced at the General Quarter Sessions of the Peace in the County where the same shall be found and the same so defaced to be restored to the owner again Shall be thought unmeét for such Recusant So that the Justices of Peace are not bound by this Act to deface all Reliques of price or to burn or deface Not all to be defaced or burnt all other Reliques or Popish Books as Wingate tit Crown numb 144. misleads them in this particular Unmeet sense of it here And although herein much is referred to the discretion of the Justices of Peace yet where the Husband is a Protestant and only the Wife a Popish Recusant it seems by these words that they are not to consider what is unmeet for the Husband but what is unmeet for the Recusant viz. the Wife and that it was not intended that they should seize burn or deface any Books of the Husbands though Popish unless such whereby the Wife might be aided or confirmed in her Superstition so that in this Case Books written in a Language or Stile unintelligible to the Wife are not within the meaning of this Act nor ought by colour thereof to be taken from the Husband who is no Popish Recusant At the General Quarter Sessions Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. General Quarter Sessions Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 24. A Popish Recusants Armour shall be seized That all such Armour Gunpowder and Munition of whatsoever kinds as any Popish Recusant Convict within this Realm of England hath or shall have in his House or Houses or elsewhere or in the hands or possession of any other at his or their disposition shall be taken from such Popish Recusants or others which have or shall have the same to the use of such Popish Recusant by Warrant of four Iustices of Peace at their General or Quarter Sessions to be holden in the same County where such Popish Recusant shall be resident other than such necessary weapons as shall be thought fit by the said four Iustices of Peace to remain and be allowed for the defence of the person or persons of such Recusants or for the defence of his her or their House or Houses and that the said Armour and Munition so taken shall be kept and maintained at the Costs of such Recusants in such places as the said Four Iustices of Peace at their said Sessions of the Peace shall set down and appoint And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid The forfeiture for not delivering it That if any such Recusant having or which shall have any such Armour Gunpowder and Munition or any of them or if any other person or persons which shall have any such Armour Gunpowder and Munition or any of them to the use of any such Recusant shall refuse to declare or manifest unto the said Iustices of Peace or any of them what Armour he she or they have or shall have or shall lett hinder or disturb the delivery thereof to any of the said Iustices or to any other person or persons authorized by their Warrant to take and seize the same then every such person so offending contrary to this Statute in this behalf shall forfeit and lose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors his and their said Armour Gunpowder and Munition and shall also be imprisoned by Warrant of or from any Iustices of Peace of such County by the space of thrée months without Bail or Mainprize General or Quarter Sessions Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Where such Arms cannot be seized At their General or Quarter Sessions Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 7. In the same County where such Popish Recusant shall be resident A Popish Recusant lives in one County and his Arms are kept in another County by one who is no Popish Recusant such Arms cannot be seized by force of this Act by the Justices of Peace of either County not by the Justices of the County where the Arms are kept for the seizure or taking is here limited to be by Warrant at the Sessions in the County where the Recusant resides and the Statute must be strictly pursued in that particular nor by the Justices of the County where the Recusant is resident for the Arms are in another County where they have nothing to do Power of a Justice of Peace out of his County And although in some Cases where a Statute appoints a Justice of Peace to do a thing he may do it out of his County Power of a Justice of Peace out of his County as to take an examination upon the Statute of Winton of a Robbery as was resolved in the Case of Helier and the Hundred of Benhust Pasch 7. Car. 1. B. R. Jones 239. Cro. Car. 213. yet he cannot exercise any coercive power out of his County as was resolved in that Case for his potestas Jurisdictionis is confined to his County as well as that of a Bishop is confined to his Diocess Vide Palmer 473. Ascuithes Case And here the taking of the Recusants Armor is a coercive Act and therefore can be executed by Warrant of the four Justices of Peace in that County only where they are Justices So that this is clearly Casus omissus and not provided for by this Act. Vide postea Four Justices In such places as the said four Iustices of Peace c. shall set down and appoint And not where one Justice shall appoint as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 40. Imprisoned by Warrant of or from any Iustices of Peace Any two Justices may grant their Warrant for Imprisoning the Offender Two sufficient and 't is sufficient in this Case for pluralis numerus est duobus contentus But a Warrant from any one Justice will not serve contrary to Wingate tit Crowne numb 145. Of such County County That is of the County where the Popish Recusant is resident for no other County was named before In what Case the party cannot be imprisoned A Popish Recusant lives in one County and his Arms are kept in another County by one who is no Popish Recusant The Justices of Peace of that other County cannot by force of this Act imprison him that keeps them for they are not named here but the power in this Case is expresly limited to other Justices and no other can intermedle therein neither will the Warrant of the Justices of Peace of the County where the Recusant is resident reach
Marriage may also be lost by Marriage Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur And in such Case she shall not be tried by Noblemen For they are no longer her Peers Co. 2. Inst 50. But if a Woman be Noble by birth By birth or descent whomsoever she marries yet she remaineth Noble For birthright is Character indelebilis vide Co. 4. 118. Actons Case Co. 6. 53. Countess of Rutlands Case Dyer 6 7 E. 6. 79. Bro. Nosme de Dignity 31. 69. Co. 1. Inst 69. And 't is observable that the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 13. Stat. 21 H. 8. 13 provides that a Dutchess Marquess Countess or Baroness Widows which take a second Husband under the Degree of a Baron may notwithstanding such second Marriage take such number of Chaplains as if she were a Widow which she could not have done if it had not been expresly provided for by the Statute and the reason is given in Actons Case because by such Marriage her Dignity is determined But here there being no such provisional Clause she shall not have the priviledge of Nobility but may be tendred the Oath of Allegiance by the Justice of Peace as in the Case of a Common person Shall stand and be Presented Indicted or Convicted Conviction not necessary These words being in the dis-junctive it is not necessary that the party be convicted But if he stand Presented or Indicted for not coming to Church or not receiving the Sacrament and be under the degree of a Baron the Justice of Peace ought to tender him this Oath And the said Iustice shall find Cause of suspition There must be cause of suspicion And not if the party be suspected as Wingate tit Crowne n. 150. mistakes for the bare suspition of the Justice of Peace or any other person is no sufficient ground to require the Oath or commit the party for refusal But there must be some good Cause for that suspition and the same must be alledged in the Justice of Peace his Plea or Justification if he be sued for committing him to Prison for such refusal So if a man be arrested on suspition of Felony and bring his Action for false Imprisonment the Defendant ought to shew some matter in fact to induce his suspition For in these and the like Cases a bare suspition is no sufficient Justification it being a matter secret and not traversable but the Cause of suspition is traversable Bulstrode 3. 284 285. Weale versus Wells 7 E. 4. 20. 17 E. 4. 5. 5 H. 7. 4. It shall be tried by the Justices And whether the suspition be just and lawful shall be tried and determined by the Justices Co. 2. Inst 52. 11 E. 4. 4. That then any one Iustice of Peace What was said by Coke Chief Justice B. R. in the Case of Griffith and others Bulstrode 2. 155. viz. that any one Justice of Peace One Justice of Peace may minister this Oath is to be understood of some Cases only Co. 12. 130. which are no other then those here mentioned as he explains his meaning in his said 12th Part p. 132. where he saith that one Justice of Peace cannot commit any for refusal of this Oath unless they be Prosecuted Indicted or Convicted c. according to this Statute Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 10. 11. Within whose Commission or Power such person or persons shall at any time hereafter be A person complained of and against whom cause of suspition is found by the Justice of Peace flies into another County A person complained of and justly suspected flies into another County Quaere whether a Justice of Peace of that other County can require the Oath of him and commit him upon refusal For he seems to be impowred thereunto by the express words of the Statute for that the party is fallen within his Commission or Power But yet I conceive that by these words any one Iustice of Peace within whose Commission or Power c. is designed or intended no other Justice then a Justice of that County where the party was complained of and suspected The Justices there cannot proceed thereupon And that if he flie into another County no proceedings can be there upon the complaint and suspition in the County whence he came nor any one Justice tender him the Oath or commit him for refusal without a new Complaint and cause of suspition in the County whither he flies For where the party cannot be Indicted of a Praemunire for refusing the Oath upon the second tender at the Assizes or Sessions there the Justice or Justices of Peace out of Sessions cannot tender the Oath or commit for refusal For the Commitment is in Order to a second tender and an Indictment of Praemunire thereupon But in this Case the party cannot be Indicted of a Praemunire in the County where he flies for refusing it upon the second tender For the offence for which the party must be Indicted is a complicated offence consisting of several particulars First In giving just cause of suspition without which the party complained of according to this Act cannot be tendred the Oath by one Justice of Peace then in refusing the Oath before the Justice of Peace who tendred it and lastly in refusing it upon the second tender at the Assizes or Sessions all which must be comprised in the Indictment so that the cause of suspition is pars criminis and that arising in the County where the party dwelt and was complained of cannot be punished in another County unless the Statute had expresly made it examinable there Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap 4. Stat. 5 Jac. 4. Sect. 11. True it is that some Statutes do enable Justices of Peace to punish an offence done in another County but that is where they enable them likewise to examine the truth of the Fact and take proofs and evidence thereof so the Statutes of 1 Jac. cap. 27. and 7 Jac. cap. 11. 1 Jac. 27. 7 Jac. 11. impower the Justices of Peace where the party is apprehended to examine and punish the offence But in our Case the cause of suspition arising in one County is not made examinable and consequently not punishable in another County and if not punishable there no Justice of Peace of that other County can proceed upon that cause of suspition notwithstanding the party happen to be within his Commission or power But yet the party so flying into another County may without any new complaint or cause of suspition be tendred the Oath But yet he may be tendred the Oath there and proceeded against there by two Justices of Peace Quorum unus c. by vertue of the foregoing words of this Clause although he dwell in another County and that for the reason before given viz. because this Oath sequitur personam non locum But Wingate in abridging this Clause tit Crowne numb 150. saves us the labour of this Question for
hurt or prejudice the Péerage of any Péer of this Realm or to take away any Right Power Priviledge or Profit which any person being a Péer of this Realm hath or ought to enjoy by reason of his Péerage either in time of Parliament or otherwise or to take away creation-money or Bills of Impost nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary granted by His Majesty to any person for valuable and sufficient Consideration for Life Lives or Years other then such as relate to any Office or to any Place of Trust under His Majesty and other then Pensions of bounty or voluntary Pensions nor to take away or make void any Estate of Inheritance granted by His Majesty or any His Predecessors to any person or persons of or in any Lands Rents Tithes or Hereditaments not being Offices nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary already granted by His Majesty to any person who was Instrumental in the happy preservation of His Sacred Majesty after the Battel at Worcester in the year One thousand six hundred fifty one until His Majesties arrival beyond the Seas nor to take away or make void the Grant of any Office or Offices of Inheritance or any Fée Salary or Reward for executing such Office or Offices or thereto any way belonging granted by His Majesty or any his Predecessors to or enjoyed or which hereafter shall be enjoyed by any person or persons who shall refuse or neglect to take the said Oaths or either of them or to receive the Sacrament or to subscribe the Declaration mentioned in this Act in manner therein expressed Nevertheless so as such person or persons having or enjoying any such Office or Offices of Inheritance do or shall substitute and appoint his or their sufficient Deputy or Deputies which such Officer or Officers respectively are hereby impowred from time to time to make or change any former Law or Vsage to the contrary notwithstanding to exercise the said Office or Offices until such time as the person or persons having such Office or Offices shall voluntarily in the Court of Chancery before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper for the time being or in the Court of Kings Bench take the said Oaths and receive the Sacrament according to Law and subscribe the said Declaration and so as all and every the Deputy and Deputies so as aforesaid to be appointed take the said Oaths receive the Sacrament and subscribe the said Declaration from time to time as they shall happen to be so appointed in manner as by this Act such Officers whose Deputies they be are appointed to do and so as such Deputies be from time to time approved of by the Kings Majesty under His Privy Signer But that all and every the Péers of this Realm shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid and all and every other person or persons before mentioned denoted or intended within this Proviso shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid notwithstanding any incapacity or disability mentioned in this Act. Provided also That the said Péers and every of them may take the said Oaths and make the said Subscription and deliver the said Certificates before the Péers sitting in Parliament if the Parliament be sitting within the time limited for doing thereof and in the intervals of Parliament in the High Court of Chancery in which respective Courts all the said proceédings are to be recorded in manner aforesaid Provided always That no married Woman or person under the age of Eightéen years or being beyond or upon the Seas or found by the lawful Oaths of Twelve men to be non compos mentis and so being and remaining at the end of Trinity Term in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred seventy thrée having any Office shall by vertue of this Act loose or forfeit any such his or her Office other then such married Woman during the life of her Husband only for any neglect or refusal of taking the Oaths and doing the other things required by this Act to be done by persons having Offices so as such respective persons within Four months after the death of the Husband coming to the age of Eighteen years returning into this Kingdom and becoming of sound mind shall respectively take the said Oaths and perform all other things in manner as by this Act is appointed for persons to do who shall happen to have any Office or Offices to them given or fallen after the end of the said Trinity Term. Provided also That any person who by his or her neglect or refusal according to this Act shall lose or forfeit any Office may be capable by a new Grant of the said Office or of any other and to have and hold the same again such person taking the said Oaths and doing all other things required by this Act so as such Office be not granted to and actually enjoyed by some other person at the time of the regranting thereof Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to make any Forfeiture Disability or Incapacity in by or upon any non-Commission-Officer or Officers in His Majesties Navy if such Officer or Officers shall only subscribe the Declaration therein required in manner as the same is direted Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to prejudice George Earl of Bristol or Anne Countess of Bristol his Wife in the Pension or Pensions granted to them by Patent under the Great Seal of England hearing date the Sixtéenth day of July in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred sixty and nine being in lieu of a just Debt due to the said Earl from His Majesty particularly expressed in the said Patent Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend to the Office of any High Constable Petty Constable Tithingman Headborough Overseer of the Poor Church-wardens Surveyor of the High-ways or any like inferior Civil Office or to any Office of Forester or Kéeper of any Park Chace Warren or Game or of Bailiff of any Manor or Lands or to any like private Offices or to any person or persons having only any the before mentioned or any the like Offices FINIS THE TABLE Abjuration See Baron Feme IN what cases the offender against 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles and the Popish Recusant confined by 35 Eliz. 2. are to abjure the Realm and in what cases not 115. 116. 123. 134 135 136 137 138. 143. Who may require such Abjuration 116. 135. Before whom it must be made 116. 135. Refusing to abjure or staying or returning without licence is Felony 116 117. 139 140. What he who abjures or refuses to abjure forfeits 124. The form of the Oath of Abjuration 138 139. He that abjures yet oweth to the King his ligeance 139. Absolution What Absolution is not within 13 Eliz. 2.50 Where absolving of the Kings Subjects or being absolved is High Treason 57 58. 184
the Reign of our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty Entituled An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience Be it Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every Feoffment Gift Grant Conveyance Alienation Estate Lease Incumbrance and Limitation of use of or out of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whatsoever had or made at any time since the beginning of the Quéens Majesties Reign or at any time hereafter to be had or made by any person which hath not repaired or shall not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but hath forborn or shall forbear the same contrary to the tenor of the said Statute and which is or shall be revocable at the pleasure of such offender or in any wise directly or indirectly meant or intended to or for the behoof relief or maintenance or at the disposition of any such offender or wherewith or whereby or in consideration whereof such Offender or his Family shall be maintained relieved or kept shall be déemed and taken to be utterly frustrate and void as against the Queéns Majesty for or concerning the levying and paying of such sums of money as any such person by the Laws or Statutes of this Realm already made ought to pay or forfeit for not coming or repairing to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer or for saying hearing or being at any Mass and shall also be seized and had to and for her Majesties use and behoof as hereafter in this Act is mentioned Any pretence colour faigned consideration or expressing of any use to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 2. Conviction of Recusancy shall be certified into the Exchequer And further be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Conviction heretofore recorded for any Offence before-mentioned not already estreated or certified into the Quéens Majesties Court of Exchequer shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be estreated and certified into the Queéns Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of Easter Term next coming in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as hath not paid their said forfeitures according to the Laws and Statutes in such Case provided In what Courts Conviction of Recusancy shall be And that every Conviction hereafter for any offence before mentioned shall be in the Court commonly called the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Goal delivery and not elsewhere and shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall remain be estreated and certified into the said Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term next ensuing after every such Conviction in such convenient certainty as is aforementioned Sir Edward Coke in Dr. Fosters Case lib. 11. 61. saith That by this Clause as hath been well observed the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 33 Eliz. 1 In what Courts the Informer Qui tam c. may sue is altered in a material point viz. That whereas by 23. the Informer might sue the Recusant for the penalty in any Court of Record he is now by this Statute of 29. restrained from suing in the Common Pleas or Exchequer But this is utterly denied to be Law as the constant practice and experience ever since the making of this Statute sufficiently testifies And the Lord Chief Justice Hobart in his Report of Pie and Lovells Case saith That that Observation was made as he takes it by Sir Edward Coke himself But however this passage or observation as he calls it came to be inserted by Sir Edward Coke into his Report Sergeant Rolles in his Report of that Case of Dr. Foster lib. 1. 93. C. 41. brings him in speaking in another Language and more consonant to Law viz. That the Conviction here mentioned is intended of Convictions upon Indictments only and that no other sort of Convictions or proceedings upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. are mentioned or intended throughout this whole Act of 29. And if so then the Informer is not concerned in this Act nor restrained thereby as to the Courts wherein he is to sue but that he may sue still in the Common Pleas or Exchequer And so was it resolved in point in that Case of Pie and Lovell Hobart 204 205. where the Opinion of Sir Edward Coke reported by Rolles touching what sort of Conviction is meant here is confirmed and allowed for Law this Statute being made only for the benefit of the Queen in her Suits by Indictment and that other Opinion in the 11 Report exploded And the true reason is there given why those negative words and not elsewhere were added here viz. not to exclude the Informer out of the Common Pleas or Exchequer but to restrain Justices of Peace from proceeding to convict any person upon Indictments for Recusancy or for saying hearing or being at Mass which they were enabled to do by 23 Eliz. but again disenabled by those negative words in this Act and the hearing and determining of those offences committed only to the Justices of the Kings Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery But for Informations by a common Informer they were never intended here and the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery cannot hold Plea of such Informations as was resolved by the Judges Mich. 4 Car. 1. Jones 193. And yet this Statute did not wholly abrogate the power of the Justices of Peace Justices of P. may take Indictments for some offences against 23 El. 1 or of any other Justices to whom Authority was given by the Statute of 23 Eliz. in relation to the Offences of Recusancy or of saying or hearing Mass but that they might after this Statute of 29. take Indictments notwithstanding the negative words here For this Statute restrains them only from proceeding to Conviction but not from taking Indictments as was held in Edward Plowdens Case cited in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11. 63. And now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. And hear and determine the offence of not coming to Church Stat. 3 Jac. 4. The power of Justices of Peace to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is again restored to them Vide that Statute Sect. 5. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 3. At what time the money forfeited for not going to the Church shall be paid That every such Offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute as hath beén heretofore convicted for such Offence and hath not made submission and béen conformable according to the true meaning of the said Statute shall without any other Indictment or Conviction pay into the Receipt of the said Exchequer all such sums of money as according to the Rate of twenty pounds for every month sithence the same
publick and open Submission and Declaration of his and their Conformity to her Majesties Laws and Statutes as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed That then the same Offender shall thereupon be clearly discharged of and from all and every the penalties and punishments inflicted or imposed by this Act for any of the Offences aforesaid The former part of this Statute appoints the Conformity and Submission to be at any Church Submission where to b◠made Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but this limits it to be at some Parish Church the meaning whereof seems to be That if a man be an Offender against this Act and convicted he may within the three months after his Conviction conform and submit in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer where there is Common Prayer and either a Sermon or the Gospel read But if he be required within the three months to Conform and make Submission and he refuses so to do but the three months expire then his Conformity and Submission must be more solemn and publick viz. in some Parish Church where it is presumed there will be the greatest number of People to be Witnesses thereof And by this construction the seeming difference between these two branches of the Statute one whereof limits the Offender to a Parish Church and the other leaves him at large to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer is reconciled And this construction naturally flows from the Order wherein these two branches are placed For the Statute speaks of a Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer before it mentions the parties refusal to conform and submit within three months next after Conviction But when it hath mentioned such refusal then it speaks of the Parish Church only And the second time here limited to the Offender when he may conform and submit viz. before he be warned or required to abjure presupposes his refusal to conform and submit within the three months For otherwise he could not be required to abjure But if the Offender be not required within the three months according to this Act to conform and submit it seems he is not afterwards limited to some Parish Church but may do it according to the former branch of this Act in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer for he is then in no danger of Abjuration and his Conformity and Submission is then to no other end but to free himself from the Imprisonment inflicted on him upon his Conviction And in that Case the Act saith he may conform and submit in any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer Of this difference between the places of Conformity and Submission no notice is taken in the late Additions to Dalton but any Church or Chappel is made to serve the turn in all Cases cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 13. What is a Parish Church By Parish Church is to be understood not only that which hath been always the Mother Church and never belonged to any other but every Church which hath the Administration of Sacraments and Sepulture For that in Law is a Parish Church although it anciently belonged to another Church Co. 2. Inst. 363. where the issue was whether it had Baptisterium Sepulturam And the Church of Stoke Goldenham though the Town was parcel of the Rectory of Hinckley whose Church was anciently the Mother Church yet having all Parochial Rights and Church-wardens was adjudged a Parish Church and within the meaning of the Statute of 43 Eliz. cap. 2. of the Poor Hutton 93. Hilton and Paules Case Stat. Sect. 5. The same Submission to be as hereafter followeth that is to say The form of the Submission I A. B. do humbly confess and acknowledge that I have grievously offended God in contemning her Majesties godly and lawful Government and Authority by absenting my self from Church and from hearing Divine Service contrary to the Godly Laws and Statutes of this Realm and in using and frequenting disordered and unlawful Conventicles and Assemblies under pretence and colour of Exercise of Religion And I am heartily sorry for the same and do acknowledge and testifie in my Conscience that no other person hath or ought to have any Power or Authority over her Majesty And I do promise and protest without any dissimulation or any colour or means of any Dispensation That from henceforth I will from time to time obey and perform her Majesties Laws and Statutes in repairing to the Church and hearing Divine Service and do my uttermost endeavour to maintain and defend the same Or any colour or means of any Dispensation Dispensation These words are omitted by Wingate tit Crown numb 72. And the form there set down faulty in several other particulars and not to be relied upon Her Majesties Laws and Statutes The Queens Laws Stat. 27 Eliz. 2. What is meant by her Majesties Laws Vide Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. Sect. 7. And that every Minister or Curate of every Parish where such Submission and Declaration of Conformity shall hereafter be so made by any such Offender as aforesaid Stat. Sect. 6. The Minister shall enter the Submission into a Book shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose and within ten days next following shall certifie the same in writing to the Bishop of the same Diocess Provided nevertheless The Offender submitting and falling into Relapse That if any such Offender after such Submission made as is aforesaid shall fall into Relapse or eftsoons obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service and shall forbear the same as aforesaid or shall come or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Méetings under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to her Majesties Laws and Statutes That then every such Offender shall lose all such benefit as he or she might otherwise by virtue of this Act have or enjoy by reason of their said Submission And shall thereupon stand and remain in such plight condition and degrée to all intents as though such Submission had never beén made And for that every person having House and Family Stat. Sect. 7. The forfeiture for relieving or keeping a Recusant after notice Rep. 3 Jac. 4. is in duty bounden to have special regard to the good Government and ordering of the same Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That if any person or persons shall at any time hereafter relieve maintain retain or keép in his or their House or otherwise any person which shall obstinately refuse to come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service and shall forbear the same by the space of a mouth together contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm That then every person which shall so relieve maintain retain or keép any such person offending