which notwithstanding may be morall although it be not so immediatly known Thesis 198. If we speak of the law of corrupt nature largely taken for that law which when 't is made known by divine determination and declaration is both sutable and congruous to naturall reason and equity we may then say that the Law of the Sabbath is according to the light of nature even of corrupt nature it self for do but suppose that God is to be worshipped and then these three things appear to be most equall 1. That he is not only to have a time but a speciall time and a fit proportion of time for worship 2. That it 's most meet that he should make this proportion 3. The Lord having given man six daies and taken a Seventh to himself mans reason cannot but confesse that it is most just to dedicate that time to God and for my own part I think that in this respect the law of the Sabbath was as fairly writ on mans heaâ—â— in innocency as many other morall laws which none question the morality of at this day but disputes about this are herein perhaps uselesse Thesis 199. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper may be administred meet circumstances concurring every Lords day nay upon the week daies often as they did in the primitive persecutions and hence our Saviour limits no time for it in the first institution thereof as he did for the Passeover of old but only this As oft as you doe it doe it in remembrance of me Hence it will follow that now under the Gospel there is no set Sabbath as M. Primrose would because our Saviour at the first institution of the Lords Supper limits no particular day for the celebration thereof as once he did for the Passeover for though there is an appointed speciall time as shall hereafter appeare for the publique exercise of all holy duties not being limited to those times but enlarged to other times also hence there is no reason why our Saviour should institute a set Sabbath when he instituted the Lords Supper as the proper time of the celebration thereof as it was in case of the Passeover Thesis 200. It is no argument to prove the Sabbath to be ceremoniall because it is reckoned among ceremonials viz. shew-bread and sacrifices as M. Primrose and Wallaeus urge it out of Mat. 12.1 2 3. for 1. upon the same ground fornication and eating of idolothytes are ceremoniall because they are ranked among ceremonials viz. bloud and things strangled Act. 15.29.2 upon this ground the Sabbath hath no morality at all in it no more then shew-bread and sacrifices which were wholly ceremoniall 3. The Sabbath is in the same place reckoned among things which are morall as pulling a sheep out of a pit upon the Sabbath day an act of humanity why may it not then be as well accounted morall 4. One may as well argue that the not keeping company with Publicanes and sinners was a ceremoniall thing because the Lord Jesus useth the same Proverbiall speech I will have mercy not sacrifice Mat. 9.13 upon which he defends the lawfullnesse of pulling the ears of corn upon the Sabbath day in this Mat. 12.15 the scope therefore of this place is not to shew the nature of the Sabbath day whether it be ceremoniall or morall but the lawfullnesse and morality of his act in eating the ears of corn upon this day and thus the arguments of our Saviour are very strong and convicting to prove the morality of such an act but no way to prove the ceremoniality of the Sabbath for that is the scope of our Saviour that mercy to the hungry is to be preferred before the Sacrifice of bodily resting upon the Sabbath M. Primrose indeed replies hereto and tels us that mercy is to be preferred before sacrifice or ceremoniall duties but not before morall duties and therefore Christ preferring it before the rest on the Sabbath the Sabbath could not be morall but we know that mercy in the second table is sometimes to be preferred before morall duties in the first table a man is bound to neglect solemn praier sometime to attend upon the sick it 's a morall duty to sanctifie some day for a Sabbath saith M. Primrose and yet suppose a fire be kindled in a town upon that day or any sick to be helped must not mercy be prefer'd before hearing the word which himself will acknowledge to be then a morall duty Thesis 201. When Christ is said to be Lord of the Sabbath Mat. 12.8 the meaning is not as if he was such a Lord as had power to break it but rather such a Lord as had power to appoint it and consequently to order the work of it for his own service M. Primrose thinks That he is said to be Lord of it because he had power to dispense with the keeping of it by whom when he would and that Christ did chuse to do such works upon the Sabbath day which were neither works of mercy or necessity nay which were servile which the Law forbade for Christ saith he as mediatour had no power to dispense with things morall but he might with matters ceremoniall and therefore with the Sabbath How far Christ Jesus might and may dispence with morall laws I dispute not now I think Biell comes nearest the truth in this controversie only this is considerable suppose the Sabbath was ceremoniall yet it 's doubtfull whether Christ Jesus who came in the daies of his flesh to fulfill all righteousnesse could abolish or break the law ceremoniall untill his death was past by which this hand-writing of Ordinances was blotted out Colos. 2.14 and this middle wall of partition was broken down Ephes. 2.14 15 16. But let it be yeelded that Christ had power to break ceremoniall laws then before his death yet in this place there is no such matter for the words contain a clear proof for the right observance of the Sabbath against the over-rigid conceptions of the superstitious and proud Pharisees who as they thought it unlawfull for Christ to heal the sick upon the Sabbath so to rub out and eat a few corn ears upon it although hunger and want and perhaps more then ordinary in the Disciples here should force men hereunto which was no servile work as Mr Primrose would but a work of necessity and mercy in this case and our Saviour proves the morality of it from the example of David eating the Shew-bread and those that were with him preferring that act of mercy before sacrifice and abstinence from Shew-bread and hence our Saviour argues That if they attending upon David might eat the Shew-bread much more his hungry Disciples might eat the corn while they attended upon him that day who was Lord of the Sabbath and that they might be the better strengthened hereby to do him service These things being thus where now is there to be found any reall breach of the Sabbath or doing of any
with 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 as it were upon Mount Zion and proclaime by word or writing in so many expresse words That the Iewish Sabbath is abrogated and the first day of the week instituted in its roome to be observed of all Christians to the end of the world For t is not the Lords manner so to speak in many other things which concerne his Kingdome but as it were occasionally or in way of History or Epistle to some particular Church or people and thus he doth concerning the Sabbath and yet Wisdomes mind is plain enough to them that understand Nor do I doubt but that those Scriptures which are sometimes alledged for the Change of the Sabbath although at first blush they may not seeme to heare up the weâ—ght of this cause yet being throughly considered they are not onely sufficent to stablish modest minds but are also such as may 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or stop the mouths even of wranglers themselves Thesis 25. I doe not thinke that the exercise of holy duties on a Day argues that such a Day is the Christian Sabbath Day for the Apostles preached commonly upon the Jewish Sabbath sometime upon the first day of the week also and therefore the bare exercise of holy duâ—ies on a day is no sufficient Argument that either the one or the other is the Christian Sabbath for then there might be two Sabbaths yea many Sabbaths in a week because there may be many holy duties in severall dayes of the week which we know is against the Morality of the fourth Commandment Thesis 26. Yet notwithstanding although holy duties on a Day doe not argue such a Day to be our Sabbath yet that Day which is set apart for Sabbath services rather then any other Day and is honoured above any other Day for that end surely such a day is the Christian Sabbath Now if it may appear that the first Day of the week was thus honoured then certainly it is to be accounted the Christian Sabbath Thesis 27. The Primitive patterne Churches thus honoured the fiâ—st Day of the weeke and what they practised without reproof that the Apostles who planted those Churches enjoyned and preached unto them so to do at least in such weighty matters as the Change of Dayes of preferring one before that other which the Lord had honoured before and what the Apostles preached that the Lord Jesus commanded Matth. 28.20 Go teach all Nations that which I Command you unlesse any shall think that the Apostles sometime went beyond their Commission to teach that to others which Christ never commanded which is blasphemous to imagine for though they might erre in practise as men and as Peter did at Antioch and Paul and Barnabas in their contention yet in in their publike ministry they were infallibly and extraordinarily assisted especially in such things which they hold forth as patterns for after times if therefore the Primitive Churches thus honoured the first day of the week above any other day for Sabbath services then certainly they were instituted and taught thus to do by the Apostles approving of them herein and what the Apostles taught the Churches that the Lord Iesus commanded to the Apostles So that the approved practise of the churches herein shewes what was the Doctrine of the Apostles and the Doctrine of the Apostles shewes what was the command of Christ so that the sanctification of this Fiâ—st Day of the week is no humane tradition but a Divine institution from Christ himselfe Thesis 28. That the Churches honoured this Day above any other shall appeare in its place as also that the Apostles commanded them so to doe Yet Mr. Primrose saith that this latter is doubtful and Mr. Ironside not questioning the matter fals off with another evasion viz. That they acted herein not as Apostles but as ordinary Pastours and consequently as fallible men not only in commanding this Change of the Sabbaâ—h but in all other matters of Church government among which he reckons this of the Sabbath to be one which he thinks were imposed according to their private wisdome as most fit for those times but not by any Apostolicall Commission as concerning all times But to imagine that matters of Church-government in the Apostles dayes wete coats for the Moon in respect of after-times and that the form of it is mutable as he would have it I suppose will be digested by few honest and sober minds in these times unlesse they be byassed for a season by politick ends and therefore herein I will not now contend oneâ—y it may be considered whether any private spirit could abolish that Day which from the beginning of the world God so highly honoured and then honour and advance another Day above it and sanctifie it too as shall be proved for religious services Could any do this justly but by immediate dispensation from the Lord Christ Jesus and if the Apostles did thus receive it immediately from Christ and so teach the observation of it they could not then teach it as fallible men and as private Pastors as he would have it a pernicious conceit enough to undermine the faith of Gods elect in many matters more weighty then this of the Sabbath Thesis 29. To know when and where the Lord Christ instructed his Desciples concerning this Change is needlesse to enquire It is sufficient to beleeve this that what the Primitive Churches exemplarily practised that was taught them by the Apostles who planted them and that whatsoever the Apostles preached the Lord Christ commanded as hath been shewen Yet if the Change of the Sabbath be a matter appertaining to the Kingdome of God why should we doubt but that within the space of his forty dayes abode with them after his Resurrection he then taught it them for 't is expressely said that He then taught them such things Acts 13. Thesis 30. When the Apostles came among the Jewes they preached usually upon the Jewish Sabbaths but this was not because they did thinke or appoint it herein to be the Christian Sabbath but that they might take the fittest opportunity and season of meeting with and so of preaching the Gospel to the Jewes in those times For what power had they to call them together when they saw meet or if they had yet was it meet for them thus to do before they were sufficiently instructed about Gods mind for setting apart some other time and how could they be sufficiently and seasonably instructed herein without watching the advantage of those times which the Jewes yet thought were the only Sabbaths The dayes of Pentecost Passeover and houres of prayer in the Temple are to be observed still as well as the Iewish Sabbath if the Apostles preaching on their Sabbaths argues the continuance of them as Mr. Brabourne argues for we know that they preached also and went up purposely to Ierusalem at such times to preach among them as well as upon the Sabbath dayes look therefore as they laid hold upon the
Sabbath strictly till they were better instructed as they did all other Jewish ceremonies also For Lydia is expressely said to be one who worshipped God befoâ—e Paul came Master Brabourne tels us they were no Iewish Proselytes because they had no Iewish Synagogue and therefore they were faine to goe out of the City into the Fields beside a River to pray I confesse the Text saith that they went out to a River side where prayer was wont to be made but that this was the open Fields and that there was no Oratory house or place of shelter to meet and pray in this is not in the Text but its Master Brabournes comment and glosse on it But suppose it was in the open Fields and that they had no Synagogue yet will it follow that these were not Iewes might not the Iewes be in a Gentile City for a time without any Synagogue especially if their number be but small and this small number consist chiefly of women as it seemes this did whose hearts God touched leaving their husbands to their owne waies If they were not Iewes or rather Iewish Proselyâ—es why did they choose the Sabbath day which the Iewes so much set by rather then any other to pray and worship God together in But verily such answers as these wherewith the poor man abounds in his Treatise make me extreamly fear that he rather stretcht his Conscience then was acted by a plaine deluded Conscience in this point of the Sabbath Thesis 34. It remains therefore to prove that the first Day of the week is the Christian Sabbath by Divine institution and this may appeare from those three texts of Scripture ordinarily alledged for this end I. Acts 20.7 II. 1 Cor. 16.2 III. Revel 1.10 Which being taken joyntly together hold these three things 1. That the first Day of the week was honoured above any other day for Sabbath services in the Primitive Churches practise as is evident Acts 20.7 2. That the Apostles commanded the observation of this Day rather then any other for Sabbath-services as is evident 1 Cor. 16.1 2. 3. That this day is holy and sanctified to be holy to the Lord above any other day and therefore it hath the Lords name upon it an usual signe of things Holy to him and therefore called the Lords Day as is evident Revel 1.10 but these things need more particular explication Thesis 35. In the first of these places Acts 10.7 these particulars are manifest 1. That the Church of Troas called Disciples publikely and generally now met together so that it was no private Church-meeting as some say but generall and open according as those times would give leave 2 That this meeting was upon the first day of the week called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which phrase although Gomarus Primrose Heylin and many others go about to translate thus viz. upon one of the dayes of the week Yet this is sufficient to dash that Dream besides what else might be said viz That this phrase is expounded in other Scriptures to be the first day of the week Luke 24 1. Iohn 20 1. but never to be found throughout all the Scriptures expounded of one day in the week Gomarus indeed tels us of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 5.17 8.22 20.1 which is translated quodam die or a certain day but this will not help him for this is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as 't is in this place 3. That the end of this meeting was Holy Duties viz. to break bread or to receive the Lords Supper as the phrase is expounded Acts 2.43 which was therefore accompanied with preaching the word and prayer Holy preparation and serious meditation about those great mysteries Nor can this breaking of Bread be interpreted of their Love-feasts or common Suppers as Gomarus suspects For their Love-feasts and common Suppers were not of the whole Church together as this was but in several houses as Mr. Cartwright proves from Acts 2.46 And although the Corinthians used their Love-Feasts in publike yet they are sadly reproved for it by the Apostle 1 Cor. 11.12 and therefore he would not allow it here 4. 'T is not said that Paul called them together because he was to depart the next day or that they purposely declined the Lords Supper till that day because then Paul was to depart as Master Primrose urgeth but the text speaks of it as of a time and Day usually observed of them before and therefore it is said that when they came together to break bread and Paul therefore took his opportunity of preaching to them and seemes to stay purposely and wait seven dayes among them that he might communicate with them and preach unto them in this ordinary time of publike meeting and therefore though he might privately instruct and preach to them the other seven dayes yet his preaching now is mentioned in regard of some speciall solemnity of meeting on this Day 5. The first Day was honoured above any other Day for these Holy Duties or else why did they not meet upon the last Day of the week the Iewish Sabbath for these ends For if the Christian Churches were bound to observe the Iewish Sabbath why did they not meet then and honour the seventh Day above the first day considering that it was but the day before and therefore might easily have done it more fitly too had that seventh day been the Christian Sabbath 6. Why is the first Day of the week mentioned which is attributed onely in the New Testament to the Day of Christs resurrection unlesse this day was then usually honoured and sanctified for Holy Duties called here breaking of bread by a Synecdoche of a part for the whole and therefore comprehends all other Sabbath Duties For there is no more reason to exclude prayer preaching singing of Psalmes c. because these are not mentioned then to exclude drinking of Wine in the Sacrament as the blinde Papists do because this neither is here made mention of Master Primrose indeed tels us that it may be the first Day of the week is named in respect of the Miracle done in it upon Euâ—ichus But the Text it plaine the time of the meeting is mentioned and the end of it to break Bread and the Miracle is but brought in as a particularly event which happened on this day which was set apart first for higher ends 7. Nor is it said in the Text that the Church of Troas meâ— every day together to receive the Sacrament as Master Prâ—mrose suggests and that therefore this action of breaking Bread was done without respâ—ct to any particular or special Day it being performed every Day For I do not finde that the Primitive Church received the Lords Supper every day for though it be said Actsâ— â—2 That the Church continued in the Apostles Fellowship and breaking of Bread yet it is not said that they broke Bread every day they are indeed said to be daily in the Temple verse 46.
well as of necessity and piety are Sabbath Duties for which end this Day which Beza finds in an ancient Manuscript to be called the Lords Day was more fit for those Collections then any other day partly because they usually met together publikely on this day and so their Collections might be in greater readinesse against Pauls coming partly also that they might give more liberally at least freely it being supposed that upon this Day mens hearts are more weaned from the world and are warmed by the word and other Ordinances with more lively faith and hope of better things to come and therefore having received spirituall things from the Lord more plentifully on this Day every man will be more free to impart of his temporal good things therein for refreshing of the poore Saints and the very bowels of Christ Iesus And what other reason can be given of Limiting this Collection to this Day I confesse I cannot honestly though I could wickedly imagine And certainly if this was the end and withall the Iewish Day was the Christian Sabbath the Apostle would never have thus limited them to this Day nor honoured and exalted this first Dâ—y before that Iewish seventh which if it had been the Christian Sabbath had been more fit for such a work as this then the first Day if a working day could be 6. Suppose therefore that this Apostolical and Divine Institution is to give their Collections but not to institute the Day as Master Primrose pleads suppose also that they were not every Lords Day or first Day but sometime upon the first day Suppose also that they were extraordinary and for the poor of other Churches and to continue for that time onely of their need Suppose also that no man is injoyned to bring into the publike Treasury of the Church but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 privately to lay it by on this Day by himselfe as Mr. Brabourne urgeth against this Text yet still the question remaines unanswered viz. Why should the Apostle limit them to this Day either for extraordinary or private Collections and such special acts of Mercy unlesse the Lord had honoured this day for acts of mercy and much more of Piety above any other ordinary and common day What then could this Day be but the Christian Sabbath imposed by the Apostles and magnified and honoured by all the Churches in those dayes I know there are some other Replies made to this Scripture by Master Brabourne but they are wind-egges as Plutarch calls That Philosophers notions and have but little in them and therefore I passe them by as I do many other things in that book as not worth the time to name them 7. This Lastly I adde this first Day was thus honoured either by Divine or Humane Institution If by Divine we have what we plead for If by Humane custome and tradition then the Apostle assuredly would never have commended the observation of this Day who elsewhere condemnes the observation of dayes though the dayes were formerly by Divine Institution Ye observe saith he Dayes and Times and would he then have commended the observation of these dayes above any other which are onely by humane but never by Divine Institution It s strange that the Churches of Galatia are forbidden the observation of dayes Galat. 4.10 and yet commanded 1 Cor. 16.1.2 a more sacred and solemne observation of the first Daye of the week rather then any other Surly this could not be unlesse we conclude a Divine Institution hereof For we know how Zealous the holy Apostle is every where to strike at Humane customes and therefore could not lay a stumbling block to occasion the grievous fall of Churches to allow and command them to observe a Humane Tradition and to honour this above the seventh Day for such holy services ar are here made mention of But whether this Day was solemnely sanctified as the Sabbath of the Lord our God we come now to inquire Thesis 37. In the third Text Revel 1.10 Mention is made of the Lords Day which was ever accounted the first day of the week It seems therefore to be the Lords Day and consequently the Sabbath of the Lord our God Two things are needfull here to be considered and cleared 1. That this Day being called the Lords Day it is therefore set apart and sanctified by the Lord Christ as holy 2. That this Day thus sanctified is the first day of the week and therefore that first Day is our Holy or Sabbath Day Thesis 38. The first Difficulty here to prove and cleare up is that This Day which is here called the Lords Day is a day instituted and sanctified for the Lords honour and service above any other Day For as the Sacrament of Bread and Wine is called the Lords Supper and the Lords Table for no other reason but because they were instituted by Christ and sanctified for him and his honour so what other reason can be given by any Scripture-light why this is called the Lords Day but because â—t was in the like manner instituted and sanctified as they were Master Brabourne here shifts away from the light of this Text by affirming that it might be called the Lords Day in respect of God the Creator not Christ the Redeemer and therefore may be meant of the Iewish Sabbath which is called the Lords holy Day Isaiah 58 3. But why might he not as well say that its called the Lords Supper Table in respect of God the Creator considering that in the New Testament since Christ is actually exalted to be Lord of all this phrase is onely applyed to the Lord Christ as Redeemer Look therefore as the Jewish Sabbath being called the Lords Sabbath or the Sabbath of Iehovah is by that title and note certainly known to be a Day sanctified by Iehovah as Creator so this Day being called the Lords Day is by this note as certainly known to be a Day sanctified by our Lord Jesus as Redeemer Nor do I finde any one distinct thing in all the Scripture which hath the Lords superscription or name upon it as the Lords Temple the Lords Offerings the Lords people the Lords Priests c. but it is sanctified of God and holy to him why is not this Day then Holy to the Lord if it equally bears the Lords name Master Primrose indeed puts us off with another shift viz. That this Day being called so by the Churches customs John therefore calls it so in respest of that custome which the church then used without Divine institution But why may he not as well say that he calls it the Lords Table in respect of the Churches Custome also the Designation of a Day and of the first time in the Day for Holy publike services is indeed in the power of each particular Church Suppose it be a Lecture and the houres of Sabbath-meetings but the Sanctification of a Day if it be Divine worship to observe it if God command and appoint it then
surely it is wil-worship for any Humane Custome to institute it Now the Lords name being stamped upon this Day and so set apart for the honour of Christ it cannot be that so it should be called in respect of the Churches customes for surely then they should have been condemned for wil-worship by some of the Apostles and therefore it is in respect of the Lords institution hereof Thesis 39. The second Difficulty now lies in clearing up this particular viz. That this Day thus sanctified was the first Day of the week which is therefore the Holy Day of the Lord our God and consequently the Christian Sabbath for this purpose let these ensuing particulars be laid together 1. That this Day of which Iohn speaks is a known Day and was generally known in those dayes by this glorious name of the Lords Day and therefore the Apostle gives no other title to it but the Lords Day as a known day in those times for the Scope of Iohn in this Vision is as in all other Prophetical Visions when they set down the day and time of it to gain the more credit to the certainâ—y of it when every one sees the truth circumstantiated and they heare of the particular time and it may seem most absurd to set down the day and time for such an end and yet the day is not particularly known 2. If it was a known Day what Day can it be either by evidence of Scripture or any Antiquity but the first Day of the week For 1. There is no other Day on which mention is made of any other work or action of Christ which might occasion a Holy Day but onely this of the Resurrection which is exactly noted of all the Evangelists to be upon the first Day of the week and by which work he is expressely said to have all power given him in heaven and earth Matt. 28.18 and to be actually Lord of dead and living Rom. 14.9 and therefore why should any other Lords Day be dreamed of why should Master Brabourne imagine that this day might be some superstitious Easter Day which happens once a yeer the Holy Ghost on the contrary not setting downe the month or day of the yeer but of the week wherein Christ arose and therefore it must be meant of a weekly Holy Day here called the Lords Day 2. We do not read of any other Day besides this first Day of the week which was observed for Holy Sabbath Duties and honoured above any other day for breaking of Bread for preaching the Word which were acts of piety nor for Collections for the poor the most eminent act of mercy why then should any imagine any other day to be the Lords day but that first day 3. There seems to be much in that which Beza observes out of an ancient Greek Manuscript wherein that first Day of the week 1 Cor. 16.2 is expressely called the Lords Day and the Syriack Translation saith that their meeting together to receive the Sacrament 1 Cor. 11.20 was upon the Lords Day nor is there any antiquity but expounds this Lords Day of the first Day of the week as learned Rivet makes good against Gomarus professing that Quotquot Interpretes hactenus fuerunt haec verba de die Resurrectionis Domini intellexerunt solus quod quidem sciam Cl. D. Gomarus contradixit 4. Look as Iehovahs or the Lords Holy Day Isaiah 58.13 was the seventh Day in the week then in use in the Old Testament so why should not this Lords Day be meant of some seventh Day the first of seven in the week which the Lord appointed and the Church observed under the New Testament and therefore called as that was the Lords Day 5. There can be no other Day imagined but this to be the Lords Day indeeed Gomarus affirms that it s called the Lords Day because of the Lord Jesus apparition in Vision to Iohn and therefore he tell us that in Scripture phrase the Day of the Lord is such a Day wherein the Lord manifests himselfe either in wrath or in favour as here to Iohn But there 's a great difference between those phrases The Lords Day and the Day of the Lord which it is not called here For such an interpretation of the Lords Day as if it was an uncertaine time is directly crosse to the Scope of Iohn in setting downe this Vision who to beget more credit to it tels us First of the person that saw it I Iohn ver 10. Secondly the particular place in Paimo Thirdly the particular time the Lords Day These considerations do utterly subvert Mr. Brabournes discourse to prove the Jewish Sabbath to be the Lords Day which we are still to observe and may be sufficient to answer the scruples of modest and humble minds for if we aske the Time of it It is on the first Day of the week Would we know whether this time was spent in holy Duties and Sabbath services this also hath been proved Would we know whether it was sanctified for that end Yes verily because it s called the Lords Day and consequently all servile work was and is to be laid aside in it Would we know whether 't is the Christian Sabbath Day Verily if it be the Day of the Lord our God the Lords Day why is it not the Sabbath of the Lord our God If it be exalted and honoured by the Apostles of Christ above the Jewish Sabbath for Sabbath duties why should we not beleeve but that it was our Sabbath Day And although the word Sabbath Day or seventh day be not expressely mentioned yet if they be for substance in this Day and by just consequence deduced from Scripture it is all one as if the Lord had expressely called them so Thesis 40. Hence therefore it followes that although this particular seventh day which is the first of seven be not particularly made mention of in the fourth Commandment yet the last of seven being abrogated and this being instituted in its roome it is therefore to be perpetuated and observed in its roome For though it be true as Mr. Brabourne urgeth That New Institutions cannot be founded no not by Analogy of proportion meerly upon Old Institutions as because children were Circumcised it will not follow that they are therefore to be baptized and so because the Iewes kept that seventh day that we may therefore keep the first day Yet this is certaine that when New things are instituted not by humane Analogy but by Divine appointment the Application of these may stand by vertue of old precepts and general Rules from whence the Application even of old Institutions formerly arose For we know that the Cultus institutuâ— in the New Testament in Ministry and Sacraments stands at this day by vertue of the second Commandment as well as the instituted worship under the Old And though Baptisme stands not by vertue of the institution of Circumcision yet it being De novo instituted by Christ as the Seale of
in regard of the bare abstinence from work but that having no work of our own to mind or do we might be wholly taken up with Gods worke being wholly taken off from our own that he may speak with us and reveale himselfe more fully and familiarly to us as friends do when they get alone having called and carried us out of the noyse and crowd of all worldly occasions and things Thesis 14. Holy rest therefore being for holy work it may not be amisse to enquire what this work is and wherein it consists for which end I shall not instance in any the particular severall duties in publique and private of holinesse and mercy because this is to be found in all who write upon this subject I shall onely speake of that kind of holinesse which the Lord requires in all publique and private duties and is to run thorow them and as it were animate them and in truth to finde out this and observe this is one of the greatest difficulties but yet the greatest excellency of a Christian life It consists therefore in these five things Thesis 15. The first The Holinesse upon this day ought to be immediate I doe not meane without the use of publique or private means but in respect of worldly things for we are commanded to be holy in all manner of conversation all the week in our worldly affaires 1 Pet. 1.17 Holinesse is to be writ upon our cups and pots and hors-bridles and ploughs and sickles Zach. 14.20.21 but this holinesse is more immediate we enjoy God by and in the creature and in our weekly occasions and providences but do we think that there is no more holinesse required upon the Sabbath verily every day then should be our Christian Sabbath which is most false and therefore some more immediate holinesse is required now on this day which is not then nor required of us every week day and what can this be but drawing neer to God this day more immediately and as neer as mortall man can do and casting aside the world and getting out of it and so to be neere God in Prayer in hearing the Word in Meditation c Psal. 95.5.6 if it were possible to be with and enjoy Christ in Heaven where there are no meanes we should this day long for it and prize it but because this cannot yet be and that the Lord comes down from Heaven to us in his ordinances and thereby makes himselfe as neer to us as he can in this fraile life hence we are not onely to draw neer to Ordinances but to God and Christ in them upon this day and so be as neere them with greatest immediatenesse that we can Psalm 42.1 2. Psalm 63.1 2 3. Adam did enjoy God in his calling the week day but this was not so immediate as he was to have upon the Sabbath day Thesis 16. The second is this holinesse ought not only to be immediate but also speciall and in our endeavours after the highest degree and with the greatest intention of holinesse for we are bound every day to be holy in more immediate and neere approaches to God some time or other of the day but now we are called to be more specially holy because both the day and our selves are now set apart for it in a more speciall manner we are to love feare delight in God and pray to him and muse on him every day but now in a more speciall manner all these are to be done the Sabbath is not onely called holy but holinesse to the Lord Exod. 31.15 which shewes that the day is exceeding holy and suitably our affections and hearts ought therefore so to be the Sacrifice on this day was to be doubled Numb 28.9 the Lord would have double honour from us this day that as in the weeke time we are sinfully drowned in the cares of this world and affections thereto so upon every Sabbath we should be in a holy manner drowned in the cares and thoughts and affections of the things of God and hence we are commanded to call the Sabbath our delight and not to think our own thoughts or doe our own workes this day Esay 58.13 David said Psalm 43.4 that he would goe to the Altar of God the place of publique worship to God his joy yea his exceeding joy so are we not onely to draw neere to Altar Word Sacraments Prayer but to God in them nay to God in them as our exceeding joy our exceeding love our exceeding feare c. especially upon this day there is scarse any week but we contract soyle from our worldly occasions and by touching worldly things and we suffer many decayes and lose much ground by temptations herein now the Lord pitying us and giving us a Sabbath of Recovery what should we doe now but return recover and renew our strength and like the Eagle cast our bils and stand before our God and King this day of State and Royall Majesty when all his Saints compassâ— his Throne and presence with our most beautifull Garments mourning especially that we fall so farre short of Sabbath acts and services we should not content our selves with working-working-day holinesse joyes feares hopes prayers praises but Sabbath joyes feares praises must be now our ornaments and all within us must be raised up to a higher straine that as God gives us this day speciall grace means of grace seasons of grace speciall occasions of grace by reviewing all our experiences the week past so there is good reason that the Lord should be honoured with speciall holinesse this day Thesis 17. The third is This holinesse ought to be not onely immediate and speciall but constant and continued the whole day together For upon every day of the week we are to take some time for converse with God but our worldly occasion soon call us off and that lawfully but Sabbath holinesse must be constant and continued all the day if the Lord was so strict that he would not lose a moments honour in a ceremoniall day of rest Levtt 23 3â— what shall we thinke the Lord expects upon this day which is morall the Lord would not be honoured this day onely by fits and flashes and sudden pangs which passe away as the early dew but as t is in the Psalme for the Sabbath It s good to sing of his loving kindnesse in the morning and of his faithfulnesse every night Psal. 92.1 2. and though this be a wearisome thing to the flesh to be so long pent in and although we cannot perfectly doe it yet it s a most sweet and glorious work in it selfe to think that the infinite glorious God should call a poor sinfull creature to be with him and attend upon him all the day long to be ever with the Lord is best of all but next to that to be with him a whole day together they that see how fit they are to be for ever banisht from the presence of the most High and how exceeding
unworthy to come into it cannot but infinitely and excessively prize that love of Jesus Christ this day to come and enter into his rest and lie in his very bosome all the day long and as a most loving friend loth to part with them till needs must and that the day is done Thesis 18. The fourth is This holinesse ought not onely to be immediate speciall and constant but all these holy duties are thus to be performed of us as that hereby we may enter into Rest so as that our soules may finde and feele the sweet of the true Rest of the Sabbath and therefore it must be a sweete and quieting holinesse also for the Sabbath is not only called a Sabbath of Rest in respect of our exemption from bodily labour but because it is so to be sanctified as that on this day we enter into Rest or such a fruition of God as gives rest to our soules otherwise we never sanctifie a Sabbath aright because we then fall short of this which is the maine end thereof untill we come so to seeke God as that we finde him and so finde him as that we feele Rest in him in drawing neare to him and standing before him that as God after his six daies labour did Rest and was refreshed in the fruition of himselfe so should we after our six daies labour also be refreshed in the presence of the Lord That in case we want meanes upon the Sabbath yet he may be in lieu of them unto us and in case we have them and finde but little by them conveyed to us yet that by that little we may be carried on the wings of faith beyond all meanes unto that Rest which upon this day we may find in his bosome that as Christ after his labours entred into his Rest Heb 4. so we ought to labour after the same Sabbatisme begun here on earth but perfected in Heaven that after all the weary steps we tread and sinnes and sorrowes we finde all the weeke yet when the Sabbath comes we may say returne unto thy Rest oh my soule The end of all labour is rest so the end of all our bodily and spirituall labour whether on the weeke-daies of Sabbath day it should be this Rest and we should never think that we have reached the end of the day untill we Taste the Rest of the Day nor is this Rest a Meteor in the Ayre and a thing onely to be wisht for but can never be found but assuredly those who are wearied with their sinnes in the weeke and wants on the Sabbath and feele a neede of rest and refreshing shall certainly have the blessing viz. the Rest of these seasons of refreshing and rest and the comforts of the Holy Ghost filling their hearts this day Isa. 10.2 3 4. Isa. 56.5 6 7 8. Isa. 58.13 14. Psal. 36.7 8. Not because of our holinesse which is spotted at the best but because of our great high Priests holinesse who hath it written upon his forehead to take away the iniquity of all our holy Offerings Ex. 28.36.38 and who hath garments of grace and bloud to cover us and to present us spotlesse before the face of that God whom we seeke and serve with much weakenesse and whom at last we shall finde when our short daies worke here is done and our long looked for Sabbath of glory shall begin to dawn Thesis 19. Now when the Lord hath inclined us thus to Rest and sanctifie his Sabbath what should the last act of our holinesse be bvt diffusive and communicative viz. in doing our utmost that others under us or that have relation to us that they sanctifie the Sabbath also according to the Lords expresse particular charg in the Commandement Thou thy Sonne thy Daughter thy Servants the Stranger within thy Gates the excellency of Christs holinesse consists in making us like himsele in holinesse the excellency and glory of a Christians holinesse is to endeavour to be like to the Lord Christ therein our Children Servants Strangers who are within our Gates are apt to prophane the Sabbath we are therefore to improve our power over them for God in restraining them from sinne and in constraining them as farre as we can to the holy observance of the Rest of the Sabbath least God impute their sinnes to us who had power as Eli in the like case to restrain them and did not and so our Families and Consciences be stained with their guilt and bloud Thesis 20. And if superiours in Families are to see their Gates preserved unspotted from such provoking evils can any thinke but that the same bond lies upon Superiours in Common Wealths who are the Fathers of those great Families whose subjects also are within their Gates and the power of their Jurisdictions the Civill Magistrate though he hath no power to impose new Lawes upon the Consciences of his subjects yet he is bound to see that the Lawes of God be kept by all his Subjects provided alwaies that herein he walke according to the Law and Rule of God viz. that 1. Ignorant Consciences in cleare and momentous matters be first instructed 2. Doubting Consciences have sufficient means of being resolved 3. Bold and audacious Consciences be first forewarned hence it is that though he hath no power to make Holy daies and to impose the observation of them upon the Consciences of his subjects because these are his own Lawes yet he may and should see that the Sabbath Day the Lords holy Day that this he observed because he doth but see to the execution of Gods Commandement herein By what Rule did Nehemiah not onely forbid the breach of the Sabbath but did also threaten bodily punishment upon the men of Tyre although they were Heathens yet were they at this time within the Gates and compasse of his Jurisdiction Nehem. 13.21 certainly he thought himselfe bound in conscience to see that the Sabbath should not be prophaned by any that were within his Gates according to this fourth Commandement If Kings and Princes and civill Magistrates have nothing to do in matters of the first Table and consequently must give any man liberty to Prophane the Sabbath that pretends Conscience why then doth Ieremy call upon Princes to see that it be not prophaned with promise of having their Crownes and Kingdomes preserved from wrath if thus they do and with threatning the burning up and consuming of City and Kingdome if this they do not Ieremy 17.19.25.27 If civill Magistrates have nothing to do herein they then have nothing to do to preserve their Crownes Kingdomes Sceptets Subjects from fire and Bloud and utter ruine Nehemiah was no Type of Christ nor were the Kings of Israel bound to see the Sabbath kept as Types of Christ but as nursing Fathers of the Common-Wealth and because their own subjects were within their Gates and under their power and therefore according to this morall Rule of the Commandement they were bound not onely to keepe it themselves but
observe it in respect of the Churches Custome and constitution as some pretend why may not the Chuâ—ches Commandment be a rule of obedience in a thousand things else as well as in this and so introduce Will-Worship and to serve God after the tradition of men which God abhors Thesis 4. The observation of the first day of the weeke for the Christian Sabbath ariseth from the force of the fourth Commandment as strongly as the observation of the media cultus or means of worship now under the New Testament doth from the force of the second Commandment only let this be supposed that the day is now changed as we shall hereafter prove as also that the worship it self is changed by divine institution for Gospel-institutions when they be appointed by divine and soveraign Authority yet they may then be observed and practised by vertue of some morall Law The Gospel appointed new Sacraments but we are to use them by vertue of the second Commandment so here the Gospel appoints a new seventh day for the Sabbath but it stands by vertue of the fourth Commandment and therefore the observation of it is not an Act of Christian Liberty but of Christian duty imposed by divine Authâ—rity and by vertue of the moral Law Thesis 5. For the morality of the fourth Commandment as hath been proved being preserved in observing not that Sabbath only nor yet a Sabbath meerly when man sees meet but in observing the Sabbath i. e. such a Sabbath as is determined and appointed of God which may therefore be either the first or last of the seven dayes Hence it is that the first of the seven if it be determined and instituted of God under the New Testament ariseth equally from the fourth Commandment as the last seventh day did under the old Testament and therefore it is no such piaculum nor delusion of the common People as Mr. Brabourne would make it to put the Title of the Lords Sabbath upon the Lords day and to call it the Sabbath day for if it be borne out of the same wombe the first seventh was if it arise I mean from the same Commandment Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day why may it not bear the name of the Sabbath nâ—w as the first-born did in former times Thesis 6. If the Lord would have man to worke six dayes together according to his own example and the morality of the fourth Commandement that so a seventh day determined by himselfe might be observed Hence it is that neither two Sabbaths in a week can stand with the morality of the fourth Commandement nor yet could the former Sabbath be justly changed into any other day then into the first day of the week the first day could not belong to the week before for then there should be eight days in a week and if it did belong to the week following then if we suppose that the second day had been the Sabbath there must be one working day viz. the first day to go before it and five working dayes after it and so there should not nor could not be six working dayes continued together that the seventh might be the Lords according to the morality of the fourth Commandement And hence it is that no Humane or Ecclesiasticall power can change the Sabbath to what day of the week they please from the first which now is Thesis 7. It should not seem an uncouth Phrase or a hard saying to call the first day of the weeke a seventh or the seventh day for though it be the first absolutely in order of existence from the Creation yet relatively in way of relation and in respect of the number of seven in a week it may be invested with the name and title of a seventh even of such a seventh as may lawfully be câ—owned and annointed to be the Sabbath day for look as Noah though he was the first in order of yeares and dignity of entrance into the Ark yet he is called the eight 2 Pet. 2.5 in that he was one of them as the learned observe qui octonarium numerum perficiebant or who made up the number of eight so it is in respect of the first day which in divers respects may be called the first and yet the seventh also Mr. Brabournes Argument therefore is of no solidity who goes about to prove the Christian Sabbath to be no Sabbath Because That Sabbath which the fourth Commandement injoynes is called the seventh day but all the Evangelists cal the Lords day the first day of the week not the seventh day For he should remember that the same day in divers respects may be called the first day and yet the seventh day for in respect of its naturall existence and being it may be and is called the first day and yet in respect of divine use and application it may be and is called the seventh day even by vertue of the fourth Commandement which is the Lords day which is confessed to be the first day Thesis 8. For although in numero numerante as they call it i. e. in number numâ—â—ing there can be but one seventh which immediately follows the number six yet in numero numerato i. e. in number numbred or things which are numbred as are the dayes of the week any of the seven may be so in way of relation and proportion As suppose seven men stand together take the last man in order from the other six who stand about him and he is the seventh so againe take the first in order and set him apart from the six who stand below him and if the number of them who are taken from him make up the number of six he then may and must necessarily be called the seventh Just thus it is in the dayes of the week the first Sabbath from the Creation might be called the seventh day in respect of the six dayes before it and this first day of the week may be called the seventh day also in respect of the six working dayes together after it That may be called the last seventh this the first seventh without any absurdity of account which some would imagine and if this first day of the week is called the eight day according to Ezekiels Prophesie of Evangelicall times and his reckoning onward from the Creation Ezek. 43.27 why may it not then in other respects put on the name of a seventh day also Thesis 9. The reason why the Lord should depose the last seventh and exalt and crowne the first of seven to be the day of the Christian Sabbath is not so well considered and therefore to be here narrowly examined For as for those Easterne Christians who in the primitive times observed two Sabbaths in a week the Jewish and the Christian doubtlesse their milke sod over and their zeale went beyond the Rule The number of Jewes who were beleevers and yet too too zealous of their old customes we know did fill those places in their dispersion and before more then
dayes of Pentecost and Passeover as the fittest seasons to preach to the Jewes but not thinking that such Feasts should still be continued so it is in their preaching upon the Jewish Sabbaths Thesis 31. Nor did the Apostles sinfully Iudaize by preaching to the Iewes upon their Sabbaths as Mr. Brabourne would inferre supposing that their Sabbaths should not be still observed they should then Iudaiz and after Ceremonies saith he and so build up those things which they laboured to destroy For suppose they did observe such Dayes and Sabbaths as were Ceremonial for a time yet it being done not in conscience of the Day but in conscience of taking so fit a season to preach the Gospel in it could not nor cannot be any sinful Iudaizing especially while then the Iews were not sufficiently instructed about the abolishing of those things For Mr. Brabourne could not but know that all the Iewish Ceremonies being once the appointment of God were to have an honourable burial and that therefore they might be lawfully observed for a time among the Iewes untill they were more fully instructed about them and hence Paul Circumcised Timothy because of the Iewes Acts. 16.3 and did otherwise conforme to them that so he might winne and gaine the more upon them and if Paul observed purposely a Iewish Ceremony of Circumcision which was not necessary nay which was not lawfull to be observed among the Gentiles Galat. 5.2 and yet he observed it to gaine the Iewes why might not Paul much more preach the Gospel which is in it selfe a necessary Duty upon a Iewish Sabbath which fell out occasionally to him and therefore might lawfully be observed for such an end among the Iewes which among the Gentiles might be unlawful Suppose therefore that the Apostles might have taught the Iewes from house to house as Mr. Brabourne argues against the necessity put upon the Apostles to preach upon the Iewish Sabbath yet what Reason or Conscience was there to lose the opportunity of publike preaching for the more plentiful gathering in of soules when many are met together and which may lawfully be done and be contented onely to seek their good in such private waies and what although Paul did assemble the chiefe of the Iewes together at Rome when he was a prisoner to acquant them with Civill matters about his imprisonment Acts. 28.17 yet had he power to do thus in all places where he came or was it meet for him so to do Did not he submit the appointment of a sacred Assembly to heare the word rather unto them then assume it to himself Acts 28 23. It is therefore false and unsound which Master Brabourne affirmes viz. That Paul did preach on the Iewish Sabbath in conscience of the Day not merely with respect of the opportunity he then tooke from their owne publike meetings then to preach to them For saith he Paul had power to assemble them together upon other dayes This I say is both false for he that was so much spoken against among them might not in all places be able to put forth such a power as also 't is unsound for suppose he had such a power yet whether it was so meeâ— for him to puâ—â—t forth in appointing other times may be easily judged of by what hath been said Thesis 32. Nor is there a foundation here laid of making all other actions of the Apostles unwarrantable or unimitable as Mr. Brabourne saith because we are not to imitate the Apostles herein in preaching upon the Iewish Sabbaths For no actions either of Christ or the Apostles which were done meerly in respect of some speciall occasion or speciall reason are eatenus or in that respect binding to others For the example of Christ eating the Lords supper onely with men not women in an upper chamber and towards the dark evening doth not bind us to exclude women or not to celebrate it in other places and times because we know that these actions were meerly occasioned in respect of speciall reasons as the eating of the Passeover with ones own family Christs family not consisting of women so it is here in respect of the Sabbath The Apostles preaching upon the Iewish Sabbaths was meerely occasionall by occasion of the publique meetings their fittest time to doe good in which were upon this and any other day Thesis 33. Now although the Iewes observing this day the Apostles observed it among the Iewes by preaching among them yet we shall finde that among the Christian Gentile Churches and believers where no Iudaisme was to be so much as tolerated for a time not any such day was thus observed nay another day the first day in the weeke is honoured and preferred by the Apostles above any other day in the weeke for religious and Sabbath services For although Holy duties doe not argue alway a Holy day yet when wee shall finde the Holy Ghost single out and nominate one particular day to be observed and honoured rather then any other day and rather then the Iewish seventh day it selfe for Sabbath services and Holy duties this undeniably proves that day to be the Christian Sabbath and this we shall make evident to be the first day of the weeke Which one thing seriously minded if proved doth utterly subvert the whole frame and force of Master Brabournes shady Discourse for the observation of the Jewish Sabbath and most effectually establisheth the Christian Sabbath Master Braburne therefore herein bestirs his wits and tells us on the contrary that Paul preached not onely to the Iewes but even unto the Gentiles upon this Iewish Sabbath rather then any other day and for this end brings double proofâ— one is Acts 13.42 44. where the Gentiles are said to desire Paul to preach to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. the weeke betweene or any Day betweene till the next Sabbath as some translate it or if Master Brabourne will the next Sabbath or Iewish Sabbath when almost all the City came out to heare Paul who were most of them Gentiles not Iewes Be it so they were Gentiles indeed but as yet no Church or Christian Church of Gentiles actually under Christs Government and Ordinances among whom I say the first day of the weeke was so much honoured above any other day for sacred Assemblies For 't is no wonder if the Apostles yield to their desires in preaching any time of the weeke which they thought the best time even upon the Iewish Sabbath among whom the Iewes being mingled they might have the fitter opportunity to preach to them also and so become all things to all men to gaine some His second proofe is Acts 16 12 13. and here he tells us that Paul and Timothy preached not to the Iewes but to the Gentiles upon the Sabbath day I confesse they are not called Iewes no more then 't is said that they were Gentiles but why might not Lydia and her company be Iewes or Iewish Proselytes vvho vve know did observe the Iewish
and the Lord allows it nay it would be sin and idlenesse in many not to doe it besides that sleep and rest which is to be taken in the night it is in ordine or in reâ—erence to Day-labour and is as a whet thereunto and in this respect the whole weekly night as well as the day is for labour as the sleep we take on Sabbath night is in ordine or with respect to spirituall rest and so that whole naturall day is a day of spirituall rest It is therefore a vain thing for any to make the nights of the six working daies to be no part of the six working daies because they say they are given to man to rest and sleep in for upon the same ground they may make the Artificiall daies no daies of labour neither because there must be ordinarily some time taken out of them to eat drink and refresh our weak bodies in Thesis 17. If Nehemiah shut the gates of the City when it began to be dark least that night time should be prophaned by bearing burdens in it then certainly the time of night was sanctified of God as well as the day to say that this act was but a just preparation for the Sabbath is said without proofe for if God allows men six daies and nights to labour in what equity can there be in forbidding all servile worke a whole night together which God hath allowed man for labour and although we ought to make preparation for the Sabbath yet the time and measure of it is left to each mans Christian liberty but for a civill Magistrate to impose twelve houres preparation for the Sabbath is surely both against Christian liberty and Gods allowance also Again Nehemiah did this lest the men of Tyre should occasion the Jews to break the Sabbath day by bringing in wares upon that night so as if that night therefore had not been part of the Sabbath they could not therâ—â—y provoke the Jews to prophane the Sabbath day by which Nehemiah tels them they had provoked the wrath of God Thesis 18. A whole naturall day is called a day though it take in the night also because the day-light is the chiefest and best part of the day and we know that the denomination of things is usually according to the better part but for Mr. Brabourne to affirm that the word Day in Scripture is never taken but for the Artificiall day or time of Light is utterly â—alse as might appeare from sundry instances it may suffice to â—ee a cluster of of seven daies which comprehended their nights also Exod. 12.15 18 19.41 42. Thesis 19. To affirme that the Sabbath day onely comprehends the Day-light because the fiâ—st Day in Gen. 1 began with morning light is not only a bad consequence supposing the ground of it to be true but the ground and foundation of it is as certainly false as to say that Darknesse is Light for its evident that the first day in Genesis began with that darknesse which God calls Night Psal. 4.5 and to affirme that the first Day in Genesis 1. begins with morning Light is as grossely false as it is apparently true that within six Daies the Lord made Heaven and Earth Ex. 20 11. for before the creating of that Light which God calls Day the Heavens and with them the Angels and the Earth or fiâ—st matter called the Deepe which was overspread with Darknesse were created either therefore the Lord did not create the World in six Dayes or t is untrue that the first day in Genesis began with morning Light and I wonder upon what grounds this notion should enter into any mans head for though God calls the light Day and the darkenesse Night as we shall doe when speake of the artificiall Day yet withall he called the Evening of the morning the first day and what was this Evening and Morning Surely it s all that space of time wherein the Lord did his first dayes work now it s evident that part of the first Daies work was before God created the light and what though evening be oftentimes taken for the latter part of the Daylight yet it s too well known to those who have waded the deepe in this controversy that it is oftentimes taken not only for the bound between light and Darkenesse 1. e. the end of light and beginning of darknesse Ios. 10.26 27. Psal. 104.23 but also for the whole time of darknesse as t is here in this first of Genesis and as we shall prove in due place and therefore to affirm that the Hebrew word used by Moses for evening not to be naturally applyable to the Night because it signifies a mixture of light and darknesse in the Notion of it is a grosse mistake for the Hebrew word Gnereb doth not signifie a mixture of light and darknesse but onely a mixture because it is the beginning of darkenesse wherein all things seeme to be mixed and compounded together and cannot be clearly and distinctly discerned in their kinds and colours if Buxtorfius may be believed as is also evident Is. 29.15 and to affirm that the Day is before the Night even in this first of Genesis because Moseâ— sometimes sets the Day before the Night it may seeme 〈…〉 an Argument as to say that the Evening is before the Morning because Moses here sets the Evening before the Morning but this will not seeme rationall to them who make the Evening to comprehend the latter part of the Day-light and the Morning the first part of it Lastly to make the Light to begin the day because the time of light is a certaine principle of compuâ—ation the space of darknesse before that light was created being unknown is all one as if one should affirme that the time of Day-light was not the beginning of the Day because the space of that is also as much unknown For if we know that darknes was before light though we may not know how long it continued yet we do know certainly that the first Day began with darknesse and that this darknesse and light made up the space of 24 houres or of a naturall day as in al other daies works of creation and which is sufficient to break down this principle viz. that the first Day in Genesis began with Morning Light Thesis 20. Some say the Sabbath is significative of Heaven and therefore it onely comprehends the day light which is fit to signifie the lightsome Day of Heaven which darknesse is not but why may not Night-time signifie Heaven as well as Day-time for Heaven is a place of rest and the night is the fittest time for rest after our weary labours in the day Who teacheth men thus to allegorize how easily a thing is it thus to abuse all the Scripture and yet suppose it should signifie Heaven yet why may not the Sabbath continue the space of a naturall as well as of an artificiall Day considering that the naturall Day of the World or of
and which wee ought not to imitate viz. his omnipotency But suppose it did flow from his omnipotency and that wee ought not to imitate his omnipotency and that wee who are weaknesse it selfe cannot imitate omnipotent actions yet its obvious to common sense that such acts which arise from such attributes as cannot be imitated of us in respect of the particular effects which are produced by them yet in the actings of such attributes there may be something morally good which is imitable of us As for example though wee are not to imitate God in his miraculous works as in the burning of Sodome and such like yet there may bee that justice and wisedome of God shining therein which wee ought to imitate for wee ought to see before we censure and condemne as God did in proceeding against Sodome So 't is in this extraordinary worke of making the Word wherein although we are not to goe about to make another world within that time as God did yet therein the labour and rest of God was seene which is imitable of man which labour and rest as they are morall duties so they are confirmed by a morall example and therefore most seemly and comely for man to imitate from such an example And whereas hee affirmes that this example was not morall because it was not it self imitable being grounded onely upon Gods free will The reason is weake for to labour in ones Calling is without controversie a morall duty as idlenesse is a morall sin yet if one would aske why man is to labour here and not rather to lead a contemplative life in the vision and fruition of God immediately I suppose no reason can be given but the good pleasure of God who in his deepe wisdome saw it most meet for man to spend some proportionable time in labour for himselfe and some in rest for God whereunto he gave man such an eminent example from the beginning of the world Master Primrose cannot deny but that a convenient time for labour and rest in generall is morall But saith he if God had not declared his will by a Commandment particularly to labour six dayes and rest the seventh the Jewes would not have thought themselves bound to this observation from Gods example onely which shewes that there is no morality in it to bind the conscience for ever But it may be as well doubted whether acts of bounty and mercy to which hee thinks wee are bound meerely from Gods example in respect of the particular application of these acts to enemies of God and of our selves as well as to friends be of binding vertue meerly by Gods example unlesse we had a commandment thereunto for in morall precepts as the thing is commanded because it is good so 't is not morally good unlesse it be commanded but suppose that Gods example of labour six dayes and rest the seventh should not have been binding as other examples unlesse there had been a commandment for so doing yet this is no argument that this example is not morall at all but onely that it is not so equally morall and knowne to be so as some other duties bee for man may spend too much time in labour and give God too short or too little time for rest if therefore hee wants the light of a commandment or rule to direct and guide him to the fittest and most meet proportion of time for both is hee not apt hereby to break the rule of morality which consists as hath been shewne in that which is most suitable comely and convenient for man to give to God or man The commandment therefore in this case measuring out and declaring such a proportion and what time is most convenient and comely for man to take to himselfe for labour or to give to God for rest it doth not abolish the morality of the example but doth rather establish and make it It sets out the most comely and meet proportion of time for labour and rest and therefore such a time as is most good in it selfe because most comely and proportionable which being therefore commanded is a morall duty in man and the example hereof morally binding in God 3. Such lawes which mans reason may see either by innate light or by any other externall helpe and light to bee just and good and fit for man to observe such lawes are congruous and suitable to humane nature I say by any external helpe as well as by innate light for neither internall nor externall light doe make a thing just and suitable to man no more than the light of the Sun or the light of a Lanthorne doe make the Kings high-way to the City but they onely declare and manifest the way or that which was so in it selfe before Hence it comes to passe that although mans reason cannot see the equity of some lawes antecedenter by innate light before it bee illuminated by some externall light yet if by this externall light the minde sees the equity justice and holinesse of such a law this may sufficiently argue the morality of such a law which was just and good before any light discovered it and is now discovered onely not made to be so whether by internall or externall light And hence Aquinas well observes that morall lawes which hee makes to be such as are congruous to right reason sometimes are such as not onely command such things which reason doth readily see to bee comely and meet but also such lawes about which mans reason may readily and easily erre and go astray from that which is comely and meet And hence it is that although no reason or wit of man could ever have found out the most just and equall proportion of time or what proportion is most comely and suitable or that a seventh part of time should have been universally observed as holy to God yet if any externall light and teaching from above shall reveale this time and the equity and suitableness of it so that reason shall acknowledge it equall and good that if we have sixe dayes for our selves God should have one for himselfe this is a strong argument that such a command is morall because reason thus illuminated cannot but acknowledge it most meet and equall For though reason may not by any naturall or innate light readily see that such a division of time is most suitable and yet may readily erre and misconceive the most suitable and convenient proportion and division of time it 's then a sufficient proof of the morality of such a command if the congruity and equity of it be discerned consequenter only as we lay and by externall light 4. What ever law was once writ upon mans heart in pure nature is still suitable and congruous and convenient to humane nature and consequently good in it selfe and morall For whatever was so writ upon Adams heart was not writ there as upon a private person but as a common person having the common nature of man
respect of mighty and effectuall operation there being a power in it as of a strong law effectually and sweetly compelling to the obedience of the law For as the law of sinne within us which the Apostle calls the law of our members and is contrary to the law of our mindes or the law of the spirit of life within us is not the rule of knowing and judging what sinne is but the law of God without Romans 7.7 and yet it is called a law because it hath a compulsive power to act and encline to sin like a mighty and forcible law so the law of the spirit of life the law of our mindes is called a law not that it is the rule of a Christians life but that it compels the heart and forceth it like a living law to the obedience of that directing rule when it â—s made known to it from without It is therefore a great mistake to thinke that because God translates the law without into a Beleevers heart that therefore this heart-law is his only or principall rule of life or to imagine that the spirit without the externall law is the rule of life the spirit is the principle indeed of our obedience whereby we conforme unto the rule but it is not therefore the rule it selfe It is true indeed 1. That the spirit inclines the heart to the obedience of the rule 2. It illuminates the minde also many times to see it by secret shinings of preventing light as well as brings things to their remembrance which they knew before 3. It acts them also sometime so as that when they know not what to pray it prompts them Romans 8.26 When they know not what to speake before their Adversaries in that day it 's given to them Matth. 10.19 When they know not whither to goe nor how to goe it 's then a voice behinde them and leads them to fountaines of living waters Isaiah 30.21 Revel 7.17 But all these and such like quickning acts of the spirit doe not argue it to be our rule according to which wee ought to walke but only by which or by meanes of which we come to walke and are enclined directed and inabled to walke according to the rule which is the law of God without For the Pilot of the ship is not the compasse of the ship because that by the Pilot the ship is guided nor doth it argue that the Spirit is our rule because he guides us according to the rule It is not essentiall to the rule to give power to conforme unto it but to be that according to which we are to be conformed And therefore it 's a crazy argument to prove the law of the Spirit to be the rule of our life because it chiefly gives us power to conforme unto the rule for if the law be that according to which are to bee guided although it should give us no power yet this is sufficient to make it to be our rule Thesis 87. The Spirit of God which writ the Scriptures and in them this rule of the holy law is in the Scriptures and in that law as well as in a Beleevers heart and therefore to forsake and reject the Scriptures or this written rule is to forsake and reject the holy Spirit speaking in it as their rule nay 't is to forsake that Spirit which is the supreme Judge according to which all private spirits nay all the actings dictates movings speakings of Gods owne Spirit in us are to be tried examined and judged To the law and the testimony was the voice of the Prophets in their dayes Isa. 8.20 The Lord Christ himselfe referres the Jewes to the searching of Scriptures concerning himself Iohn 5.39 The men of Bereah are commended for examining the holy and infallible dictates of Gods Spirit in Pauls Ministery according to what was written in the Scriptures of old It is therefore but a cracking noise of windy words for any to say that they open no gap to licentiousnesse by renouncing the written and externall law as their rule considering that they cleave to a more inward and better rule viz. The law of the spirit within for as hath beene shewne they doe indeed renounce the holy Spirit speaking in the rule viz. the law without which though it be no rule of the Spirit as some object yet it is that rule according to which the Spirit guides us to walke and by which we are to judge whether the guidance bee the spirits guidance or no. Thesis 88. Some say That the difference between the old Testament dispensation and the new or pure Gospel and new Covenant is this to wit That the one or that of Moses was a Ministery from without and that of Christ from within and hence they say that the meer Commandments or letter of Scripture is not a law to a Christian why he should walke in holy duties but the law written on our hearts the law of life But if this bee the difference between the old and new Testament dispensation the ministery of the old and the ministery of the new then let all Beleevers burn their Bibles and cast all the sacred writings of the new Testament old unto spiders and cobwebs in old holes and corners and never be read spoken or meditated on for these externall things are none of Christs Ministery on which now Beleevers are to attend and then I marvaile why the Apostles preached or why they writ the Gospel for after times for that was the chiefe end of their writing as it was of the Prophets in their times Isaiah 30.8 that men might beleeve and beleeving have eternall life and know hereby that they have eternall life Iohn 20.31 1 Iohn 5.13 For either their writing and preaching the Gospell was not an externall and outward Ministry which is crosse to common sense or it was not Christs Ministery which is blasphemous to imagine and it is a vain shift for any to say That although it was Christs Ministery yet it was his Ministery as under the Law and in the flesh and not in meere glory and spirit for its evident that the Apostles preachings and writings were the effect of Christs ascension and glory Ephes. 4.8.11 when hee was most in the spirit and had received the spirit that hee might poure it out by this outward Ministery Acts 2.33 and it is a meer New-nothing and dream of Master Saltmarsh and and others to distinguish between Christ in the flesh and Christ in the Spirit as if the one Christ had a divers Ministery from the other For when the Comforter is come which is Christ in the Spirit what will he doe he will lead it s said unto all truth Iohn 16.13 But what truth will he guide us into Verily no other for substance but what Christ in the flesh had spoken and therefore it 's said that he shall bring all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you John 14.26 and therefore if I may use their
time to be sanctified rather then a fifth a fourth or a ninth not simply because it was this seventh or a seventh but because in his wise determination thereof he knew it to be the most just and equall division of time between man and himself and therefore I know no incongruity to affirm that if God had seen one day in three or four or nine to be as equall a proportion of time as one day in seven that he would then have left it free to man to take and consecrate either the one or the other the Spirit of God not usually restraining where there is a liberty and on the other side if he had seen a third or fifth or ninth or twentieth part of time more equal then a seventh he would have fixed the bounds of labour and rest out of a seventh but having now fixed them to a seventh a seventh day is therefore morall rather then a fourth or sixt or ninth day because it is the most equall and fittest proportion of time all things considered between God and man the appointment therefore of a seventh rather then a sixt or fourth is not an act of Gods meer will only as our adversaries affirm and therefore they think it not morall but it was and is an act of his wisdom also according to a morall rule of justice viz. to give unto God that which is most fit most just and most equall and therefore although there is no naturall justice as Mr Primrose cals it in a seventh simply and abstractly considered rather then in a sixth or tenth yet if the most equall proportion of time for God be lotted out in a seventh there is then something naturall and morall in it rather then in any other partition of time viz. to give God that proportion of time which is most just and most equall and in this respect a seventh part of time is commanded because it is good according to the description of a morall law and not only good because it is commanded Thesis 131. 'T is true that in private duties of worship as to reade the Scriptures meditate pray c. the time for these and the like duties is left to the will and determination of man according to generall rules of conveniency and seasonablenesse set down in the word mans will in this sence is the measure of such times of worship but there is not the like reason here in determining time for a Sabbath as if that should be left to mans liberty also because those private duties are to be done in that time which is necessarily annexed to the duties themselves which time is therefore there commanded where and when the duty is commanded but the time for a Sabbath is not such a time as naturally will and must attend the action but it 's such a time as Counsell not nature sees most meet and especially That counsell which is most able to make the most equall proportions of time which we know is not in the liberty or ability of men or Angels but of God himself for do but once imagine a time required out of the limits of what naturally attends the action and it will be found necessarily to be a time determined by counsell and therefore our adversaries should not think it as free for man to change the Sabbath seasons from the seventh to the fifth or fourth or tenth day c. as to alter and pick our times for pâ—ivate duties Thesis 132. There is a double reason of proposing Gods example in the fourth Command as is evident from the Commandment it self the first was to perswade the second was to direct 1. To perswade man so to labour six daies together as to give the seventh or a seventh appointed for holy rest unto God for so the example speaks God laboured six daies and rested the seventh therefore do you do the like 2. To direct the people of God to That particular Seventh which for that time when the Law was given God would have them then to observe and that was that Seventh which did succeed the six daies labour and therefore for any to make Gods example of rest on That Seventh day an argument that God commanded the observation of that Seventh day only is a groundlesse assertion for there was something more generally aimed at by setting forth this example viz. to perswade men hereby to labour six daies and give God the seventh which he should appoint as well as to direct to that particular day which for that time it 's granted it also pointed unto and therefore let the words in the Commandment be obseâ—ved and we shall finde mans duty 1. More generally set down viz. to labour six daies and dedicate the seventh unto God and then follows Gods perswasion hereunto from his own example who when he had a world to make and worke to doe he did labour six daies together and rested the seventh and thus a man is bound to do still but it doth not follow that he must rest that particular seventh only on which God then rested or that that seventh though we grant it was pointed unto was only aimed at in this example the binding power of all examples whatsoever and therefore of this being ad speciem actus as they call it to that kind of act and not to the individuum actionis only or to every particular accidentall circumstance therein If indeed man was to labour six daies in memoriall only of the six daies of creation and to rest a Seventh day in memoriall only of Gods rest and cessation from creation it might then carry a faire face as if this example pointed at the observation of that particular seventh onely but look as our six daies labour is appointed for other and higher ends then to remember the six daies worke of God it being a morall duty to attend our callings therein so the Seventh day of rest is appointed for higher and larger ends as Didoclavius observes then onely to remember that notable rest of God from all his works it being a morall duty to rest the Seventh day in all holinesse Thesis 133. It was but accidentall and not of the essence of the Sabbath day that that particular Seventh from the creation should be the Sabbath for the Seventh day Sabbath being to be mans rest day it was therefore suitable to Gods wisdom to give man an example of rest from himselfe to encourage him thereunto for we know how strongly examples perswade now rest bâ—ing a cessation from labour it therefore supposes labour to goe before hence God could not appoint the first day of the creation to be the Sabbath because he did then but begin his labour nor could he take any the other daies because in them he had not finished his work nor rested from his labour therefore Gods rest fell out upon the last of seven succeeding six of labour before so that if there could have been any other day as fit then for exemplary
Our Saviour indeed doth not speak particularly about the law of the Sabbath as he doth of killing and adultery c. but if therefore it be not morall because not spoken of here then neither the first second or fift command are morall because they are not expresly opened in this Chapter for the scope of our Saviour was to speak against the Pharisaicall interpretations of the Law in curtalling of it in making grosse murder to be forbidden but not anger adultery to be forbidden but not lust which evil they were not so much guilty of in point of the Sabbath but they rather made the Phylacteries of it too broad by overmuch strictnesse which our Saviour therefore elsewhere condemns but not a word tending to abolish this Law of the Sabbath Thesis 150. If therefore the Commandment is to be accounted morall which the Gospel reinforceth and commends unto us according to Mr. Primrose principles then the fourth Commandment may wel come into the account of such as are morall but the places mentioned and cleared out of the New Testament evince thus much The Lord Jesus comming not to destroy the Law of the Sabbath but to establish it and of the breach of which one Law he that is guilty is guilty of the breach of all Thesis 151. If the observation of the Sabbath had been first imposed upon man since the fall and in speciall upon the people of the Jews at mount Sinai there might be then some colour and reason to cloath the Sabbath with rags and the worn-out garments of ceremonialnesse but if it was imposed upon man in innocency not only before all types and ceremonies but also before all sin and upon Adam as a common person as a Commandement not proper to that estate nor as to a particular person and proper to himselfe then the morality of it is most evident our adversaries therefore lay about them here that they might drive the Sabbath out of Paradise and make it a thing altogether unknown to the state of innocency which if they cannot make good their whole frame against the morality of the Sabbath fals flat to the ground and therefore it is of no small consequence to clear up this truth viz. That Adam in innocency and in him all his posterity were commanded to sanctifie a weekly Sabbath Thesis 152. One would thinke that the words of the Text Gen. 2.2 3. were so plain to prove a Sabbath in that innocent estate that there could be no evasion made from the evidence of them for it is expresly said that the dâ—y the Lord rested the same day the Lord blessed and sanctified but we know he rested the Seventh day immediatly after the Creation and therefore he immediately blessed and sanctified the same day also for the words runne copulatively he rested the Seventh day and he blessed and sanctified that day but its strange to see not only what odde evasions men make from this cleare truth but also what curious Cabilismes and fond interpretations men make of the Hebrew Text the answer to which learned Rivet hath long since made which therefore I mention not Thesis 153. The words are not thus copulative in order of story but in order of time I say not in order of story and discourse for so things far distant in time may â—e coupled together by this copulative particle And as Mr. Primrose truly shews Exod. 16.32 33. 1 Sam. 17.54 but they are coupled and knit together in respect of time for it is the like phrase which Moses immediatly after useth Gen. 5.1 2. where t is said God created man in his Image and blessed them and called their names c. which were together in time so t is here the time God rested that time God blessed for the scope of the words Gen 2.1 2 3. is to shew what the Lord did that seventh day after the finishing of the whole creation in six daiâ—s and that is He blessed and sanctified it For look as the scope of Moses in making mention of the six daies orderly was to shew what God did every particular day so what else should be the scope in making mention of the seventh day unlesse it was to shew what God did then on that day and that is he then rested and blessed and sanctified it even then in that state of innocency Thesis 154. God is said Gen. 2.1 2 3. to blesse the Sabbath as he blessed other creatures but he blessed the creatures at that time they were made Gen. 1.22 28. and therefore he blessed the Sabbath at that time he rested Shall Gods work be presently blessed and shall his rest be then without any Was Gods rest a cause of sanctifying the day many hundred yeers after as our adversaries say and was theâ—e not as much cause then when the memory of the creation was most fresh which was the fittest time to remember Gods work in M. Primrose tels us that the creatures were blessed with a present benediction because they did constantly need it but there was no necessity he saith that man should solemnize the seventh as soon as t is made but as we shall shew that man did then need a speciall day of blessing so t is a sufficient ground of believing that then God blessed the day when there was a full and just and sufficient cause of blessing which is Gods resting it being also such a cause as was not peculiar to the Jews many hundred yeers after but common to all mankinde Thesis 155. The Rest of God which none question to be in innocency immediatly after the creation was either a naturall rest as I may call it that is a bare cessation from labour or a holy rest i. a rest set apart in exemplum or for example and for holy uses but it was not a naturall rest meerly for then it had been enough to have said that at the end of the sixt day God rested but we see God speaks of a day the seventh day God hath rested with a naturall rest or cessation from creation ever since the end of the first sixt day of the world untill now why then is it said that God rested the seventh day Or why is it not rather said that he began his rest on that day but that it is limited to a day Certainly this argues that he speaks not of naturall rest meerly or that which ex natura reâ— follows the finishing of his work for it 's then an unfit and improper speech to limit Gods rest within the ciâ—cle of a day and therefore he speaks of a holy rest then appointed for holy uses as an example for holy rest which may well be limited within the compasse of a day and hence it undeniably follows that if God rested in innocency with such a rest then the seventh day was then sanctified it being the day of holy rest Thesis 156. It cannot be shewn that ever God made himself an example of any act but that in the present
out the rest of three daies in the grave and why may not Christs rest from labour in his sleep be as well the antitype as Christs rest from the actions of this life in his grave Thesis 188. Why may not our labour in the six daies be made a type of our labouâ—ing in sin as well as the Sabbath a type of our sanctification and rest from sin as some would have it Why may not our Libertines make abstinence from adultery forbidden in the seventh Command a type of our spirituall chastity as the Gnosticks did of old as well as the rest from labour on the Sabbath a type of our rest from sin And by this liberty how easie is it for fâ—othy allegorizing wits which my heart abhors to typifie as it were and allegorize all the commandments out of the world Theâ—â—â— 189. The rest on the Sabbath may be considered either in respect of Gods example in himself or his command to man out of himself Now the rest of the Sabbath as it is exemplary in God cannot be a type of any thing because God never made himself an example of any ceremoniall thing Gods own immediate acts cannot without much injury to God be made types and ceremonies if therefore there be any thing of the rest of the Sabbath typicall it is so in respect of mans rest on it commanded unto him of God but whether and what it doth typifie we shall speak to in its proper place Thesis 190. There wants not sufficient proof that the Gentiles generally practised and approved a seventh daies Sabbath and that it was highly honoured among them as very sacred This truth both Tertullian Eusebius Iosephus and Philo have formerly affirmed Aretus also especially learned Rivet have lately vindicated and made good against all the exceptions of Gomarus and others insomuch as that the last refuge both of Gomarus and Primrose is this viz. That all those Heathens who writ about the Sabbath and in honour of it received not their light from nature but from the writings of the Iewish Common-wealth all those heathenish testimonies about the Sabbath being published and writ long after the delivering of the law upon mount Sinai And therefore they think this no argument to prove that this law was practised ever since the world began or that it was known by the light of nature by which it might be evinced to be morall but by this answer we shall scarce know any thing to be according to the light of nature by the writings of the Heathens for all their writings are since Moses time if they be of any credit but suppose they did not know it by the working power of the light of nature yet if they approved of and honoured this day when it was made known by other means so that rhey knew it by the approving light of nature as the authors alleaged make good it s then sufficient to prove the seventh day morall even by the light of nature And although Seneca and some others scoft at the Jewish Sabbaths as if they lost the seventh part of their time thereby yet we know that mens lusts wil give them leave to scoffe at that which yet their consciences chastise them for beside I think those scoffs were not so much at the seventh day as at their â—â—ict and ceremonious observance thereof as also of their seventh yeeres wherein it s no wonder if that the light of nature should not so clearly see Thesis 191. The light of nature in the Gentiles especially in matters of the first Table was very imperfect dim and corrupt Hence it is that we cannot expect to â—inde any perfect light of nature in matters of the Sabbath some glimmerings and dark practices herein are sufficient to prove that this Law is naturall although the exact proportion of time for rest should not or could not by any reasoning of corrupt nature be perfectly found out their observation of holy daies and festivals did argue some imperfect light of nature left concerning the Sabbath which once nature had more perfectly as old walls and rubbish doe argue old and great buildings in former times but suppose they could not finde out exactly the seventh part of time and so dedicate it to God for his Sabbath yet the want of such light argues only the want of perfection of the light of nature which we should not expect to finde in the present light of nature in matters of the first Table and in this of the Sabbath and therefore t is no argument to prove the Sabbath not to be of the Law of nature because the perfect knowled of the exact time thereof is not left in corrupt nature now Thesis 192. Suppose the Gentiles did neither know nor were ever reproved particularly by any of the Prophets for breaking the Sabbath yet this doth not argue that they were not bound to sanctifie a Sabbath and that it was no sin for them to neglect the Sabbath for it was a priviledge of the Jews to have Gods Oracles revealed to them and especially this of the Sabbath Nehem. 9.14 Rom. 3.2 so it was a curse upon the Gentiles to live without Christ and so also without Sabbaths Ephes. 2.12 The times of which ignorance God is said to wink at Acts 17.30 not by excusing them for the breach of Sabbath or other sins but by not reproving them for it as neither he did for many other morall transgressions which notwithstanding were sins The Patriarchs were not condemned expressely till Moses time by Mr. Primrose account for their Polygamie that we read of and yet it was a sin all that time against the very first institution of marriage and why might not the breach of the Sabbath be a sin much more longer among the Gentiles and yet none of the Prophets reprove them particularly for the same And therefore M. Primrose hath no cause to mark this argument with chalke and with all attention as he cals it viz. That the breach of the Sabbath among the Gentiles was no sin because it was not any where particularly reproved by the Prophets of God for we see by what hath been said upon what weake crutches it stands Thesis 193. The Gentiles shall not be condemned only for what they did actually know and did not practice but also for what they did not actually know yet might and should have known The Gentiles did know that that some daies were to be kept holy to God saith M. Primrose and they should have known the fittest proportion and most suitable frequency of such daies which the same author acknowledgeth to be morall therefore they should have known the seventh daies Sabbath and possibly might have known it if they had not held truth in righteousnesse but made improvement thereof for in this sense habenti dabitur to him that hath shall be given to wit more of the same kind of lâ—ght whether naturall morall or Evangelicall if common light in all these more common light
midnight there was a cry verse 30 31. and this night they went from 〈◊〉 to Succoth verse 37. with 46. and this time is expresly called the morrow after the Passeover Numb 33.3 nor is there any inconvenience or rule broken to kill the Passeover upon one day and continue eating of it some part of another the Passeover being a Feast of more dayes then one Thesis 67. Nor doth it follow that because our Saviour tells Peter Mark 14.30 Luke 22.34 that this Day even this Night viz. of the Passeover he should deny him that this Night therefore was any part of the precedent day for it may be as fairly interpreted to belong to the day following that Night Nor is it necessary to determine this word Day always to a determinate time of 24 houres of which the Night was a part but onely of a speciall season of time for so t is frequently figuratively taken without any respect to a day of 24 or 12 hours viz for a speciall season of Time wherein some speciall providence of God doth appeare and is put into execution as Isay 29.18 and 25.9 and 27 1. Exod. 14.13 1 Sam. 4.7 8. 2 Sam. 4.5 7 8. Thesis 68. It answers many objections produced against the beginning of the day in the Evening for the Morning to consider that the word Day is frequently taken in Scripture for an artificiall day and that the word Morrow frequently signifies a new artificiall Day which in respect of and reference unto the artificiall day going before or following after is no part thereof but as the Proverbe is to morrow is a new day and thus t is taken Iohn 12.12 Iohn 6.22 Act. 21.7 8. 1 Sam. 14.24 Acts 23.31.32 2 Sam. 11.12 13. Exod. 10.4.13 Deut. 21.22 23. Iosh. 8.29 and 10.26 Exod. 7.4.11 12 17. with 8 6. to 13. Exod. 14 ult with 34.2 4 28. Deut. 9.9.11 Whence onely let this be noted that to argue from hence that to morrow Morning or to morrow day light is the beginning of the naturall day because it s called a new or another Day is not solid nor also that although the Night following the artificiall day be not so frequently called to morrow yet sometime it is so called 1 Sam. 30.17 where the evening of their morrow stopt David i. that night Thesis 69. There are some who confesse that the Jewish Sabbath began at the evening ever since the Creation unto the time of Christs resurrection but now they tell us that it begins in the morning because of Christs Resurrection the cause of it which began then so that as this makes the change of the day so it makes a change of the beginning of the day from evening till morning when the Resurrection of Christ began but the feeblenesse of this opinion will appear from these ensuing considerations Thesis 70. 1. Consid. That the foundation of this opinion is exceeding rotten viz. That the day must not begin untill that work which occasions the change doth actually exist But we know that the Passeover began before the work which did occasion it did actually exist viz. the Angels passing over the Israelites at midnight Exod. 12.29 with 12 13 14. and 6.8 indeed the Christian Sabbath day is not before the day of Christ Resurrection yet the beginning of this day may be before the beginning of the Resurrection as it was in the Passeover 2. Consid. That if any of the Evangelists had intended a new beginning of the Sabbath at morning that they would then have set down the exact time of the Lords Resurrection but none of them do this they set down the time of other things to prove that Christ was risen but not the exact time of the Resurrection for its wholly uncertain certain it is that it was before Day-light began for Mary came and found him risen while it was yet dark Iohn 20.1 and how long he was risen before who can determine 3. Consid. That if Christs Resurrection began the Sabbath so that in that moment and point of time wherein Christ arose the Christian Sabbath began then Christ could not lie three dayes in the grave for either he lay three dayes according to the Jewish account beginning the day at evening and then the third day on which Christ arose which also was the first day must begin at evening as we plead for or else he must lie three days according to the new account which begins the third day in the morning leaving out the night before as not appertaining to any part of the week before or after but according to this reckoning its impossible that Christ should lie three days in the grave he may be then indeed said to arise the third day but not to lie any part of the third day because lying in the grave implies some time of continuance therein upon the third day but how could this be when they say that the moment of Christs Resurrection began the day of our Christian Sabbath 4. Consi If the Jewish Sabbath was the last day of the week and began and ended at evening then the Christian Sabbath must either begin at evening when the Jewish Sabbath ended or the first day of the week cannot be the Christian Sabbath but onely a part of the first day and part of the second day for the night which goes before the Christian Sabbath either 1. they must make it to belong to the Jewish Sabbath and then that Sabbath must be sanctified 36. hours and so it must be more then a day which is sanctified which is absurd or 2. they must make it belong to the Christian Sabbath and then they cannot make it begin in the morning or ◠they must leave it out from all weekly account and so take in the night following which is part of the second day as part of the Sabbath 5. Consid. That the seventh part of time cannot be orderly given to God but it must be either the first or last seventh as hath been shewn and the morality of the fourth commandment cannot be observed without giving to God either of these if therefore the Jewish Sabbath ended at Even the Christian Sabbath must immediately succeed it and begin it then or else a morall rule is broken 6. If the Jewish Sabbath began and ended at Even and the Christian Sabbath bega◠at morning what must become of that night which is between them both and to what day of the week must it belong If any say that t is no matter whether it belong to any or no so long as time runs on this answer will not suffice for though time runs on yet what orderly time is there here which is running on Time consists of yeers and yeers of moneths and moneths of weeks and weeks of dayes to what day or what week then must this night belong they that maintain this opinion do roundly affirm that it s no absurdity to leave that one Night out from weekly nor as pertaining to any week