est animal rationale that to command and to obey is natural And to this does the highest Philosopher give testimony Imperare parere non solum ex numero rerum Pol. lib. 1. cap. necessariarum sunt verumetiam ex utilium statim ab ortu primo nonnulla inter se distiterint alia ut parerent imperio alia ut imperarent And the highest of Roman Orators and Lawyers Cicero who says Sine imperio neque Lib. 1. de legibus domus ulla neque civitas nec hominum universum genus stare nec ipse denique mundus potest Besides we see in all seditious men and assertors of Liberty who will not be subject to rightful Governors that none of them could ever yet attain to make men any where in a parity of condition but by a propense natural disposition when they have cast off the obedience due to others they fall to command and obey among themselves But this not having any foundation but from themselves Men being naturally ambitious of commanding and impatient of subjection it is Gods judgment upon them that they rarely continue long in peace but are obnoxious to continual seditions and confusions 3. All powers being from God and Gods ordinance mediately or immediately To command and to obey is Gods ordinance and from the law of nature Rom. 13. and Power being in relation must refer to something which is subject to it Power therefore and Subjection are the ordinance of God But by the antecedent proposition the offices of commanding and obeying viz. of Power and Subjection are natural To command therefore and to obey is Gods natural ordinance or from the Law of Nature If then to command and obey be no humane artifice or invention but natural Annot. and Gods ordinance then is it most sensless for men to beg it for a principle That all men are by nature in a parity and free condition and that the will of man brought in the Powers and obedience due to them in use now in the world against Gods ordinance and that freedom wherein by nature originally all men were 4. If to command and obey as Supreme powers and Subjects had been To command and obey as Supreme powers and Subjects is no humane artifice or invention an humane artifice or invention then was there a time when men lived out of the offices of commanding and obeying as Supreme powers and Subjects and were introduced by men But there was never any such time recorded in sacred or prophane history or that they were invented or introduced by men To command therefore and obey as Supreme powers and Subjects is no humane artifice or invention It is the silliest thing in the world for men to dream of a Golden age in which Annot. all things were alike and common to all men and that men lived promiscuously in a parity or equal condition and never tell when that time was or who lived therein And to say that thâ—â— Dominion and Subjection now in use Mans will brought in and yet never tâ—â— who any where in the world did ever introduce it And sure if this commanding and obeying were brought in by the wills of men against that natural right and law wherein God hath made man it could not possibly continue at all times and in all places of the world but that somewhere men would return to their own natural liberty 5. a To command and to obey as Supreme powers and Subjects is natural If all things be either artificial or natural and the offices of commanding and obeying as Supreme powers and Subjects be not artificial then these offices of commanding and obeying as Supreme powers and Subjects are natural 6. b To command obey as Supreme powers and Subjects is Gods ordinance and due from the law of nature That Supreme power is Gods ordinance and that Subjects must needs be therefore subject to it the Apostle says expresly Rom. 13. But by the precedent proposition they are natural They are therefore Gods natural ordinance or due from the Law of Nature 7. c To command obey as Husband and Wife is natu-ral This Aristotle in chap. 5. lib. 1. Pol. proves Besides these offices not being topical but universal no where created by any humane Law and due as well where Gods revealed ordinance in the Scriptures is not received as where it is they are natural or due by the law of Nature To command and obey as Parents and Children is from the Law of Nature 8. The mutual offices of commanding and obeying as Parents and Children not being from any Humane law but being due in all places as well where Gods revelation of himself is received as where not are natural or due from the law of Nature 9. God having created Man not only different from other creatures of How many ways the offices of commanding and obeying are caused from the Law of Nature this orb as intellectual and rational but also as sociable viz. living in conversation and subordination for extra societatem vivere neminem He hath given by the law of Nature to some the power or right of commanding and others he hath subjected to such powers But he hath created these powers divers ways viz. either upon supposition of some mutual act of the parties commanding and obeying or upon supposition of some act of the parties commanding or without supposition of any act of either the parties commanding or obeying First I say the Law of Nature creates these offices of commanding and obeying upon supposition of some act of the parties commanding and obeying As Matrimony is the mutual act of the Husband and Wife I A. B. take thee D. E. to be my wedded wife and I D. E. take thee A. B. to be my wedded Husband by this act of the Husband and Wife God by the Law of Nature gives the Husband a power or right of command over the Wife and subjects the Wife to the Husband Or Secondly upon supposition of some act of the parties commanding As the Parents power arising from generation the Parents must be supposed to generate before they can have a power or right of command Or Thirdly upon supposition of no act either of the parties commanding or obeying as in all rightful Hereditary Monarchies these offices are as much due from the Law of Nature before any act of the parties commanding and obeying as after 10. Gods Ordinance to Man being either that Law or Ordinance All commanding and obeying which God hath ordained is not from the Law of Nature which he has ordinarily engraven in the hearts of Men or his gracious goodness extraordinarily revealed in the Scriptures and Gods revelation of himself by Moses and Prophets by our Saviour the Apostles and Evangelists was extraordinarily and supernaturally given to them by Gods especial grace nor could Men by any natural means attain to the belief of it All offices therefore of power and
to instance the Acts of Parliament which give one Jointenant a power to compell the others to sue a Writ of Partition which was denied at Common-Law and right of Entry where they were put to their Cui in vita c. It may suffice that in no Kings reign there have not been Acts of Parliament which have been so far from making declarations of the Common-Law that they have made manifest alterations in it And as the Common-Law hath no force nor reason against an Act of Parliament so hath no particular Custom any force or reason against it for no man can prescribe against an Act of Parliament and all Lands in Gavel-kind were particular Customs but taken away by Act of Parliament And many Acts of Parliament have not declared the Succession of the English Diadem according to the usual custom thereof but made manifest alteration thereof as in the Succession of Hen. 4. 5. 6. Rich. 3. Hen. 7. 8. which being unjust and the cause not depending upon Humane laws ought not to be obeyed Nor secondly is that a less error that Judicial Records are equivalent to Acts of Parliament for they are so far from being equal to Acts of Parliament that in truth they are no Laws but Inferences and Conclusions which are deduced from Laws For there is not any Judicial Record which is not unjust if it cannot truly and ultimately be resolved in some general or particular Custom Act of the Parliament or grant of the King So that Acts of Parliament the Common Law Particular Customs and Prescriptions and Royal Grants are as Axioms Postulata or Principles in Arts or Sciences and Judicial Records Reported Cases and Yearsbooks are Inferences Conclusions or Sciences deduced from Acts of Parliament the Common Law and particular Customs of this Land or Concessions of the King Touching Royal Government Royal Government being the ordinance of God and from the Law of Nature is paramount to all Humane laws and the prime and efficient cause of them they cannot therefore declare the cause so as to create any obligation of what they are but the effects and from whence derived We have thus far treated of the means by which the Kings of this Nation have until 1640. governed and preserved their Subjects internally But because it is the office of Kings to preserve their Subjects as well from foreign force as internal broil there is yet something wanting of which we have not treated viz. The power of making War and Peace and maintaining Alliance and Traffique Of these in regard they refer to Foreign powers and jurisdictions and are not subject to the Laws of the Nation we shall forbear to treat only affirming that it is necessary that at all times this power must be so vested in the King that at all times he may have the aids and assistance of his Subjects in prosecution of the Ends aforesaid The end of the Third Book The Contents of the Fourth Book HAving thus far treated of all created Rights and the causes of all Laws and created Powers and Vertues and these being previous and necessary to all Justice and Obedience We in this Book descend to treat of Justice in the first Chap. as the most eminent and noble of all Humane vertues it being that which not only conserves private Families but all Nations and Kingdoms in unity peace and society and demonstrate it neither to be in Geometrical proportion as Plato would nor Arithmetical proportion as Zenophon held nor in Harmonical proportion as Bodin taught Nor is that corrective and distributive Justice which Aristotle affirmed to be in Arithmetical and in Geometrical proportion The Second Chap. treats of Obedience and shews how that it necessarily proceeds and yet is different from Justice The Third Chap. treats of Judgment and shews how it differs from Law and Justice The Fourth Chap. treats of Equity and shews how it differs from Judgment and how necessary Courts of Equity as well as Judicature are THE FOURTH BOOK CHAP. I. Of Justice 1. JUstitia est habitus animi communi utilitate Cicero's definition of Justice servata suum cuique tribuens Societatem conjunctionis Humanae munifice atque aequè tuens Justice is a habit of the Minde common utility being conserved giving to every one their right and bountifully and equally Cicero lib. 1. de legibus defending the Society of Mankinde Et Justitia est quae suum cuique distribuit Justice is that which does distribute to every man what is his right Where he says That Justitia est obtemperatio scriptis legibus we will shew that is not properly Justice but Obedience onely 2. Justice is the upright doing of an act conserving Society in that Quid sit Justitia formality as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it Justice is the doing of a just action the doing of a just action is the upright doing of any act as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it preserving Peace and Society I say Justice must have these two properties viz. upright doing that is abstraction from all affections of love hate or self-interest and the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act Other actions proceeding from Wisdom Reason Experiment or Discourse c. are prudent profitable c. but none are just or honest actions which cannot be truly and ultimately resolved into the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act So Quotuplex that Justice is twofold either commanded or permitted 3. Injustice is the abuse or falsifying the Law or Command of him What is Injustice who by right commands to the hurt or prejudice of another As a Law preceding and Integrity are inseparable incidents to Justice so Hypocracy seeming just and yet abusing or falsifying a Law and the damage of another or more are incidents inseparable to injustice 4. Let us see who may by right command and who are obliged to do God commands by highest right in conformity to their Laws and Commands I say God by highest right ought to command all the created things in Heaven and Earth and all Creatures are chiefly and absolutely obliged to do whatsoever he commands without any reasoning or disputing why he so commands For the earth is Psal 24. 1. Job 41. 11. Psal 50. 12. the Lords and all that therein is the compass of the World and all that dwell therein And whatsoever is under the whole Heaven is Gods and the World is mine and the fulness thereof All Gods commands therefore have a like and equal influence upon all his Creatures all Creatures as compared to him are alike vile and between him and them is no proportion To abuse then or falsifie any Law of God or Nature to the hurt or prejudice of another is a sin of injustice in all Gods Creatures and
therefore in all men and therefore in all sorts of men As if any man promises another that he will do or give him such a thing although it be to his hinderance he wilfully breaks his promise I say this is a sin of injustice in the promiser for he abuses and falsifies the Law of Nature which obliges every man to the performance of his promise to his hinderance to whom he made his promise And though this be the Law of Nature which does onely oblige in Conscience yet is such a promiser an unjust man nor does he deserve to be trusted as a friend or honest man But this must always be understood of private men and they not pre-engaged Annot. before for the first promise is to be performed Neither must the performance of a private mans promise be to the hurt or damage of another man for by the Law of Nature he was obliged to hurt no man and to give to every man his due before he made such promise A publick person promises to another to do or give him such a thing which will be prejudicial to his trust I say he ought not to perform it for he was obliged to perform his trust before he made such promise What then does preengagement the not injuring of another or publick employment free men and let them loose from all Law of God and Nature I answer nothing less for they sin not less then private freemen in not performing their promise but commit a greater sin in breaking their first promise and betraying their publick trust c. then if they should perform their promise So that in promising they sin but in the performance they commit a greater sin 5. A King promiseth he will not hurt any of his Subjects in their persons How Kings promises are to be interpreted and performed or estates without due Process and after judgment given according to the known Laws He being a King was obliged as King to do to the best of his power all things in order to the good and preservation of his subjects in general and therefore is obliged to this latter promise onely as it is consistent with his former He ought onely to protect his subjects in particular as it does relate to the good and benefit of his subjects in general I say therefore notwithstanding any such subsequent promise is not any King obliged to it but may in case of publick necessity govern by Martial Law and destroy any particular Subjects estate rather then enemies or seditious men should make advantage thereof to the endangering of the publick Nor is this any new thing but always was in all species of Governments since the World began nor does any King sin in making such promise for he may justly do it and thereby secure the mindes of his Subjects who would otherwise be in a continual diffidence nor does he sin in not performing this promise when it becomes inconsistble with the publick good for no King can possibly foresee all the publick necessities and dangers which may happen 6. No mans being greater or lesser does free him from his duty which Injustice in Princes he owes to the Laws of God all men being alike as compared to God Kings therefore being so are not disobliged to the Laws of God and Nature It was therefore a sin of injustice in Ahab to take the possession of Naboth's Vineyard the property and inheritance of the Israelites being given by God and unalienable by the Children of Israel I say this was a sin of injustice in Ahab for his being a King did not free him from Gods Laws but did without any publick necessity abuse the power and command which God had given him as King to the damage and hurt of Naboth and his posterity Davids putting Uriah to death and Ahabs consenting to Naboth's death although after his death were sins of injustice for they were entrusted by God to be Kings for the good of their Subjects Whereas they did abuse and falsifie their trust to the highest wrong of others whom they ought to have protected Princes are Gods Ministers for their Subjects good 7. Man being a reasonable and sociable Creature which being inconsistible Rom 13. 4. Kings by right command next after God with community and parity and mankinde being onely conservable in Society that is in the mutual commanding and obeying of different parties And as God by highest right ought in all things to be obeyed so Kings ought to be obeyed next after God in all things For every Soul ought to be subject to the higher powers for there are no powers but of God and the powers that be are ordained of God And through me Kings reign Rom. 13. 1. Prov. 8. 15. and Princes make just Laws All things therefore which Princes command where God hath not left necessary Laws for the good and governing of their Subjects which he was onely pleased to do to his peculiar people the Israelites are therefore just because they command them they commanding nothing repugnant to the Laws of God 8. A Prince commands a Judge to execute the known Laws uprightly Injustice in Subjects he becomes corrupt and sells or otherwise purloyns judgment I say this is a sin of injustice in the Judge for he abuses the command of his Prince who by right might command him to the damage of another against whom false judgment is given It is an act of injustice in all Subjects in general to abuse the trust committed to them by their Soveraigns for he by right may command and entrust them nor can they abuse their trust but it must be to the damage of the Prince or some other But besides express Obedience of Subjects to their Soveraigns when they are particularly entrusted by them there is a general and implied Obedience which Subjects ow to their Soveraigns and the Laws of their Countrey as Subjects whether they be employed in any place of trust or not For subjection being in the predicament of Relation does imply a right of command and no man can be subject where there is nothing to which he is subject It is therefore a sin of injustice in any Subject to pretend or abuse any of his Countries Laws to the hurt or damage of another 9. Since therefore Kings by highest right next after God may command Highest injustice in Subjects then by consequence is that the highest sin of injustice next after Luciferian pride of Creatures making themselves equal or superior to their Creator for Subjects to tread under foot all Sacred and Civil Laws to make themselves superior to their Soveraigns to whom by all Divine and Humane Laws they ow their obedience to the ruine and destruction of so many thousands of innocent men women and children and families of all sorts which must necessarily come to pass in the attaining their ends And that Subjects do abuse all Humane Laws in pretending them to the advancing of themselves above
all Humane Laws and their rightful Superiors There neither is nor ever was any Government in the World good or bad just or unjust that did ever permit subjects without authority from it to take up arms And by our Countrey-Laws If any man levy war to expulse strangers to deliver men out of prison or against any Statute or any other end pretending Reformation of their own head this is a levying war Nota. against the King because they take upon them the Royal Authority which is against the King Inst 3. p. 9. 10. All Stipulations Oaths Promises c. made by Subjects against All Oaths Promises c. made against Prince or Laws are void Husbands by right may command their Wives their Prince or Laws are void and not to be performed for they were Subjects and obliged to their Prince and Laws before they made such Oath Stipulation Promise c. 11. God is not onely the Author of Government and Obedience of Order and Society in Nations and Kingdoms but also in Man and Wife for being reasonable and sociable Creatures does imply a necessity of mutual commanding and obeying God first created man and by so creating him gave him the power and dominion over the woman It is therefore an act 1 Tim. 2. 13. Justice and injustice in a Wife of Justice in every Wife uprightly to fulfil the Law or Command of her Husband to the benefit of him or another he commanding nothing derogatory to the Laws of God or his Countrey and a sin of injustice in the Wife to falsifie or abuse any Law or Command of her Husband to the hurt or prejudice of her Husband or another 12. God is not less the Author of Power or Right of Command in Of Justice and injustice in Wives and Children Parents then in Husbands As therefore it is an act of Justice for Wives and Children uprightly to do any act which is commanded them by their Husbands and Parents they not commanding contrary to the Laws of God or their Countrey so it is injustice in Children as well as Wives to falsifie any Command or Law of their Parents to the hurt or prejudice of another 13. Suppose the Father and the Husband command the Wife contrary Whether the Wife ought to obey the Father or Husband things whereby it becomes impossible that the Wife should serve both Which ought she to serve I say the Husband For though the Fathers power be from God and so inseparable by any act of Man yet is not God obliged to his own Laws but may give that which he gave the Father to another And Matrimony being an Institution of God in Paradice and the Husbands power from the Law of Nature that is from God the Wife becomes subject to her Husband retaining notwithstanding her piety and observance which is always due to her Father 14. All Societies that is all companies of Men whether of Master Masters of Families by right command their Servants Cicero lib. 1. de leg and Servants of Father and Children of Husband and Wife of King and Subjects are contained in the mutual Offices of commanding and obeying It is true that Cicero says Cum dico legem à me dici nihil aliud intelligi volo quam imperium sine quo nec domus ulla nec civitas nec gens nec hominum universum genus stare nec rerum natura omnis nec ipse mundus potest Where therefore the Laws of Nature are not sufficient there must be a supply of Humane Laws Object We have shewed before that the Power or Right of Command which Kings have over their Subjects which Husbands have over their Wives which Parents have over their Children is from the Law of Nature that is from God immediately I say they command by the Law of Nature For all right of command which is not from any Humane Law is from the Law of Nature but Kings Parents and Husbands have a right of command and not from any Humane Law they have it therefore from the Law of Nature Sol. But though Masters of Families have a right of command over their Servants yet formally they do not command by the same right that Kings Fathers and Husbands do For I deny that ever any Master of a Family had his power from any Law of God I except the Israelites or Nature but that ever since there were Families the Masters or Mistresses of the Families derived and had their power or right of command over their Servants from their Countries Laws If Adams Family be objected I say that Adam commanded not as Master of a Family onely but as a Universal Monarch not onely over all the Creatures irrational that God had made but also over his Wife and Posterity as King and not as Father and Husband onely For no Father or Master of a Family can create any property in his Son or Servant nor had ever any Subject who was not an Israelite property from any Law of God or Nature But it is evident that Cain had property in the Fruit of the Gen. 4. 3 4. Ground and Abel in his Flocks they therefore derived it from Adam as King 15. Since Humane Laws are necessary for the conservation of all Of Justice and injustice in Servants Societies of Men and the Masters power not being contrary to any Law of God or Nature the Master of every Family hath right of command over his Servants by the Laws of his Countrey he commanding nothing repugnant to the Laws of God or his Country It is therefore Justice in every Servant uprightly to execute such commands of their Masters and injustice to falsifie or abuse such commands to the hurt or prejudice of another 16. Suppose the Father makes his Son a Servant for every Father hath Whether the Son ought to prefer the commands of of his Father or Master the same right over his Childes person that a King hath over his Subjects and the Father and Master command the Son contrary things Which shall the Son serve I say the Fathers power being from the Law of Nature and so inseparable by any act of Man the Son ought to serve the Father but the Father being as much in the power of his Soveraign as the Son in his Fathers the Father shall make good to the Master whatsoever he shall be damnified by such command the Laws of the Fathers Countrey obliging Subjects to perform their Contracts 17. Suppose the Master command contrary to the Laws of God or his How far the Servant owes his Master subjection Country and the Servant executes such command shall this excuse the Servant No for being a Servant does not free him from the obligation of the Laws of God or his Country as a Subject Well but if the Master commands upon corporal punishment for the Masters power obligeth to corporal punishment to do something contrary to the Laws I answer That jus vitae necis which Masters had
from the company of Tamar whenas he hated her because he had abused her but it was in Joseph that he refused to accompany his Mistress whenas he might have securely enjoyed her Nor is it any virtue for any man to do or forbear any thing for feare of punishment for so horses dogs and other irrational creatures will do or not do many things for feare of stripes which are commanded or forbidden by their Masters Nor is it any virtue in a Judg to pronounce true judgment if he be hired thereunto by any reward or bribe Where therefore neither worldly pleasure profit love feare hate nor any sublunary thing but it may be loss to all these do not move a man to the doing or not doing of what in conscience he ought to do or forbear there nothing less then Gods grace and power in such a man can be the true and efficient cause of such an action 6. It is a most admirable thing to consider how notwithstanding all Why only Man can do virtuous Actions the various natures dispositions and events of things this one Providence foresees and provides for all created things in the whole universe until she brings them all to their designed end Nor does this providence foresee and provide for all things from an eternal and fatal decree impelling all actions of all creatures For then there could be no such thing as good or bad men but God were the efficient cause of vice as well as virtue in men but by a mean foresight or knowledg does often determin necessary effects from contingent causes Which does not only plainly appear from very many places of Scripture as that the men of Keilah would have delivered David if he 1 Sam. 23. 12. had not escaped thence that God would have destroyed Niniveh within forty daies if the men had not repented that God would have gathered the children of Jerusalem together as a Hen gathereth her Chickens but Matth. 23. 27. they would not that if the mighty works had been done in Tire and Sidon which were done in Chorazin they had repented in dust and ashes c. Matth. 11. 21. but also all Gods promises and cursings upon men do depend upon their obedience or disobedience to what he commands And however this rigid opinion of Fate and the eternal determination of all things be asserted by the Stoicks yet do not I think that the most wicked man that ever was did ever attribute any wicked action to any such cause but pretended conscience pleasure profit or his own will never Gods It is true indeed that God hath made man in flesh and blood and so prone to desire many things which he ought not But though diverse men do naturally affect and desire things they ought not yet God hath so made every man a free Lord of all his actions that there is no man but may chuse whether he will do or not any thing to the attaining of his appetitions and affections And mans excellency above other creatures consists in this that his actions are not determined by his objects as other creatures are but he may freely do this action as it is moved in him from the appetition of pleasure profit pride c. or abstain from it as he apprehends it forbidden by him who may forbid And so may any man freely do or endeavor to do any thing which he ought to do though to his temporal disadvantage but this having no Temporal motive must proceed from Gods grace which no creature upon earth can do but only man only man therefore can do virtuous actions CHAP. III. Of Judgment 1. JUdgment is the definitive of him who by right commands permits What is Judgment or forbids a thing either by himself or instrument whether any thing be done conformable to a Law commanding permitting or forbidding it 2. Herein judgment differs from a Law A Law is the declared will of How it differs from a Law him who by right commands permits or forbids a thing together with a penalty annext for not observance after some reasonable time fixt whereby the obliged may take notice of such declaration Judgment is the sencence of him who so commands forbids or permits whether such an act were an omission or transgression of any Law so declared 3. Justice is the upright doing of any just or legal action conformable to the Law of him who by right commands Judgment is the discerning of How Judgment differs from Justice a good or bad action 4. All judgment must necessarily be the act of three persons at least What persons are necessary in Judgment viz. the Judge the accuser and the party accused or as we say the Judge the Plaintiff and Defendant 5. The end or ratio finalis of Judgment is either to determine differences The end of Judgment or punish offenders CHAP. IV. Of Equity 1. EQuity is twofold either a remission or moderation of the Laws How manifold is Equity when the execution of Laws will rather kill then cure a distemper in the Subject as when many Subjects either upon passion or being seduced have so far transgressed Laws that they have forfeited by Law their lives and estates yet in such case are not supream powers rigidly to exact all which the Law gives them but it is equity so to punish the principal Authors and other Subjects that others may be deterred from the like and the generality offending preserved So where the Law commands upon penalty and it becomes impossible for the Subject to perform as it ever was and will be there it is equity to remit the penalty Where therefore the Law obliges a Tenant to pay his Landlord such a Rent yet if by inundation of waters sterility of the season c. it comes to pass that the Tenant by no fault of his either cannot or it will be the ruine of himself and family to pay it there it is equity in the Landlord to remit or moderate what by Law he might justly exact Or secondly a supplement of the Law in cases wherein things in conscience ought to be done yet for want of some formalities or niceties they cannot in strictness of Law be exacted 2. Equity is when with a sincere intention men although it be to How Equity differs from Judgment their prejudice endeavor to please God Judgment a giving sentence according to Laws 3. In Courts of Judicature the Judges proceed according to the declared The necessity of Courts of Equity Laws and ought not in judgment to vary or swerve from them but proceed as they are impowred by Law and their Commission and Laws are made usually ad terrorem rather to affright men then to punish all offenders which Laws were they not moderated it were impossible for all men to subsist under the burden of them nor is there any man but has need of Gods mercy and the Kings Courts of Equity therefore are as necessary
accounted Abrahams faith St. James 2. 23. That he would have offered up Isaac though by the law of nature Abraham should have preserved his sonne and so God ceased the motion of the Sun and Moon upon Joshua's prayer Jos 10. 12. And caused the same to go retrogade ten degrees upon the prayer of Hezekias and Isaiah 2 Kings 20. 11. It is true that nothing less then that power which made a Law can alter it the Laws therefore of God whether positive or natural have an eternal and immutable obligation upon all the men in the world but whatsoever power may make a Law that power may alter it Divine Laws therefore whether positive or natural cannot have any obligation upon God but he may alter them when he pleases CHAP. VI. The Obligation of Divine and Humane Laws upon the Consciences and Persons of Men. 1. COnscience comes of con and scio to know together with reason Conscience or some law Conscientia est animi quaedam ratio lex quâ de recte factis secus admonemur Conscience is a certain reason or law of the Mind whereby we are well or ill advised of our deeds The laws therefore of Man may not only be violated by doing contrary to them but by consenting to them As he which does contrary to that he thinks though the doing of the thing be just yet 't is unjustly done by him for whatsoever is not of faith is sin Rom. 14. 23. 2. The affirmative precepts of God they do semper obligare yet they The obligation of the laws of God do not oblige ad semper As when he commands us to pray continually it is not to be expected a man should be always in the act of prayer but so to live as he does nothing which may indispose him from praying But Gods negative precepts do not only always oblige but oblige ad semper too for there is no time at all wherein it is lawful for a man to kill to steal to commit adultery c. Deut. 5. 17 18 19 20 21. negative in all instances 3. Ecclesiastical laws do oblige in Conscience If thy brother shall neglect Ecclesiastical laws oblige in conscience to hear thee tell it to the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen man or Publican Mat. 18. 17. And the Scribes and Pharises sit in Moses chair all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe and do but do not after their works for they say and do not Mat. 23. 2 3. If then by the law of our Saviour the Jews were to observe and do whatsoever the Scribes and Pharises commanded them because they sate in Moses seat sure with as much or much more reason ought Christians to observe and do whatsoever the Church which our Saviour Christ himself hath planted doth command them 4. My kingdom is not of this world Joh. 18. 36. God sent not his Son In conscience only into the world to judge the world but that by him he might save the world Joh. 3. 17. And O man who has made me a Judge or divider amongst you If then our Saviours kingdom were not of this world if God sent not his Son to judge the world and if our Saviour were not a Judge among men then cannot the Church of Christ have any power from Christ in the kingdoms of the world nor to judge the world nor to be a Judge or divider among men 5. Ecclesiastical laws according to the usage and custom of England To what things Ecclesiastical laws have reference relate to Blasphemy Apostacie from Christianity Heresies Schisms Holy Orders Admissions Institution of Clerks Celebration of Divine Service Rights of Matrimony Divorces general Bastardy Subtraction and Right of Tythes Oblations Obventions Dilapidations Excommunication Reparation of Churches Probate of Testaments Administrations and Accounts upon the same Simony Incests Fornications Adulteries Sollicitation of Chastity Pensions Procurations Appeals in Ecclesiastical cases Commutation of Penance which are determined by Ecclesiastical Judges 6. So that there is a mixt Conusance in the Ecclesiastical Judicature All things determinable by Ecclesiastical Judges are not meerly spiritual viz. of things meerly Spiritual by which they are impowered to judge and take conusance of and that by no humane power but only as they are impowered and sent by our Saviour and are only his Ministers viz. the taking conusance of Blasphemy Excommunication Heresie Holy Orders Celebration of Divine Service c. And this Ghostly power the Church and Ecclesiastical persons had before ever Temporal powers received the Gospel of Christ or were converted to Christianity And also after it pleased God that Nations and Kingdoms were converted to Christianity and that Kings did become nursing fathers and Queens nursing mothers Isa 49. 23. to Gods Church then did Kings cherish and defend Gods Church and endued it with many Priviledges and Immunities which ere while was persecuted by them or other Powers but yet could not these Immunities or Priviledges divest them of that Ghostly power which our Saviour by divine institution gave his Church It is true no question but that originally not only all Bishopricks and their bounds and the division of all Parishes and the conusance the Church hath of Tythes of Probate of Wills of granting of Letters of Administration and Accounts upon the same the right of Institution and Induction and the erection of all Ecclesiastical Courts c. were all originally of the Kings foundation and donation and that to him only by all divine and humane laws belongs the care and preservation of all his Subjects none excepted in all causes And therefore not only all those things which relate to the extern peace and quiet of the Church although exercised by Ecclesiastical persons but all those priviledges and immunities which the Church or Churchmen have in a Church planted which the Primitive Christians and Apostles had not in the persecution of the Church when planting are originally Grants of Kings and Supreme Powers and so Temporal or Secular Laws but in regard they accidentally have reference to the Church and are exercised by Ecclesiastical persons they are not improperly called the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws And sure either ignorance of this or faction hath made men run into two contrary extremes one That Kings have no right to their Crowns but in ordine ad bonum spirituale and so cannot be Kings or That all power and jurisdiction in all causes is from the King and so cannot there be any such thing as Christian faith Religion or any Ghostly power left by our Saviour with his Church to continue to the end of the world which every Christian man de fide ought to believe and submit to before any Temporal Law or Power in the world Object But beeause Ecclesiastical laws have not infallibility affixed to them if they command any thing repugnant to Divine laws do they then oblige Answer No for God
derived from this begging the question is false Indeed Mr. Hobbs is no question a man of most exquisite parts and learning and possibly might have a peaceable intention in making the Civitas the Judge of all matters of faith as well as manners But sure many things in his generation of it can never consist as his making Jus and Lex contrary one to another his making the Legislator to depend upon the Citizen for without his consent and proper pact either express or understood the Legislative right can be conferred upon none And yet he says Wherefore doest Cap. 12. art 3. thou call him Tyrant whom God hath made King His making the Civitas to receive all power from the pacts and wills of men and making the Civitas Head of the Church and Judge of Faith makes the power of the Church and all Faith to be a thing invented and to receive their beginnings from the wills and pacts of men then which what can be more destructive to Faith and Religion But for our Author Tho. White Gent. he is not worthy the name of a learned rational nor honest man 13. Slaves are born or made so Slaves born are the children of such Slaves as were so Slaves made so happen two ways For being condemned for some crime committed against some humane Law and therefore by the Condemned persons Law condemned to it Where the Law condemns it is the will of the Supreme power which condemns and therefore not the will of the Slave that makes it so I deny therefore that where the Law does not make Slavery any man can make himself a slave to another nor can any man use another as a Slave where he is not made so by Law Or else Slaves are Prisoners taken in War There is no man will affirm Prisoners by War the taking of another man prisoner gives the taker a power over the others life for then all men falling into the hands of Thieves and Pirates the Thieves and Pirates have a power over their lives and so commit no murder in putting them to death But Slaves from being made Prisoners is when there is competition between two Supreme powers and they give their Subjects power over all their Enemies which they shall take Prisoners It is not therefore the taking of another Prisoner which gives a man power over anothers life but a precedent humane Law which gives this power over those Enemies which any Subject shall take Prisoner and sure no man was ever taken Prisoner by an act of his will It is false therefore that Bodin says That a man may make himself a Slave of his own accord lib. 1. c. 5. p. 31. de repub a man may as well offer violence or kill himself and that a man bought for a price of Thieves and Pirates is a Slave to the Buyer for he is not made so by any humane law Nor can any act of force ever give another any power nor can any continuance of time make any thing good which originally was not so and therefore if all commands were originally from force as he affirms then are no commands now any better and so no difference Pag. 46. de rep between the commands of Thieves and Pirates and of Fathers and Kings Although a man lawfully taken prisoner by another be in his power Slavery moderated so as it is in the Takers power to have taken away his life and so an act of grace in granting it yet the Law which originally gave this power may moderate it as here in England the Law hath restrained the Lord from killing or maiming his Vilain Slaves have nothing proper against their Master 14. Apprentices are when the Father or Mother do oblige a Child Apprentices for such a term to serve such a Master and this act is binding because by the Law of Nature the Father hath an absolute power over his Children But because of the impotencie of Children who cannot by reason of their youth and want of art and experience do any thing which may at first compensate their diet and clothes if the poverty or negligence of parents be such that they cannot or will not procure a Master for their Children and where Children are Orphans they may be bound and compelled to serve Apprentiships in such manner as is prescribed by the publique humane Laws of the place 15. Neither naturalis nor delegata potestas can be communicated nor What power is alienable aliened But acquisita potestas as the power of Masters over their servants and slaves may be sold aliened or otherwise given away And therefore Guardian in Chivalry may give or sell to another the Guardianship of his Ward but Guardian in Socage cannot for his is delegata potestas 16. The Master of every family deriving his power from the humane The Masters power restrained to humane laws Caveat laws of every place his power is restrained to the laws of that place therefore ought he not to command his servant any thing which is against the laws of the place When I say by humane laws such a thing is to be done or not done I always except those laws which God did give to the Israelites and peculiar only to them when he pleased immediately to reign over them which laws did supply those humane laws by which his Vicegerents do procure peace among us CHAP. IX Of Ecclesiastical power THat there is a GOD who is the Author of all good past present By the light of nature God is to be worshiped and to come and that He is to be worshiped and adored not only for the present past and future blessings in this world but also in hope of eternal happiness in the world to come is so naturally ingraffed into the minds of all men that not scarce one man compos mentis in an That there is a God and this God to be worshiped and served is innate in the minds of all men Plato Euthyphro requires as the first axiom of all virtue age did ever deny it It is no wonder therefore if men attaining to such a height of impiety as to sell their inheritance in Heaven unjustly to purchase possessions upon Earth do always make the specious pretences of Religion and Reformation as the easiest way to work upon the giddy and inconstant multitude carried hither and thither with every wind of doctrine the Exordium of all their Enterprises for Quoties vis fallere plebem Finge Deum 2. But how they should worship him aright from the imperfect use of The difficulty of pleasing God from the light of nature their reason prejudiced by their appetitions and affections is not to be imagined For to worship and serve God not according to the will and pleasure of God is superstition and not to worship God is atheism It is therefore an impossible thing without the special assistance of Gods grace that men should not fall either into superstition
where the person of the buyer is not to be considered whether greater or lesser richer or poorer but an equal value or price is and to be taken by the vendor for such a commodity be the buyer rich or poor Distributative Justice consists he says in Geometrical proportion and is Distributative referred to the dignities and merits of men so that here men ought to respect the person and the quality of him to whom any thing is attributed or given 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more to him who is more worthy and less to him who is less worthy 37. It is true indeed That if in Promutation a man sets such a value Corrective Justice examined upon such a thing and does not respect the person or quality of any buyer that then such vendor does equally to all sellers and in exchanging observes Arithmetical proportion But if it be true as it is that he says That he is a Eth. l. 5. c. 2 3. just man that keeps the Laws and that there be no Law which sets a price upon what thing the seller exchanges or sells to another then it cannot be a sin of Injustice for any vendor not to observe this Arithmetical Rule which Aristotle propounds in Promutation 38. Nor is it less true That if a Prince in conferring honor or otherwise Distributative Justice examined rewarding a man for any merit or great service done to him or his Countrey gives more honor or reward to such a man then to another deserving less then such a Prince does a prudent action and observes Geometrical proportion in it but what is this to Justice For if there be no Law commanding such a thing then cannot the not doing of it be a sin of Injustice nor is it properly a sin of injustice not to reward or repay benefits but of ingratitude Grotius Lib. 1. Para. 8. disputes against the opinion of Aristotle That Grotius his opinion of Justice Justice is properly distinguished into Arithmetical and Geometrical proportion but Paragraph 9. where he should declare what Justice is he onely confounds Jus Lex Justitia and instead of setting down what Justice is which he neither does here nor any where else that I know of he forsooth divides Jus into Jus naturale voluntarium which may signifie either of them or both together hum drum Community and Property the Law of God immutable by God himself and yet mutable by the will of Man In the Dedication of this Jus Belli Pacis he makes Lewis the Thirteenth to be just because he does by imitating him honor the memory of his Father yet do I think there were scarce ever two men more unlike and just because he does by his example instruct his Brother and just because he gave his Sisters great Portions just because he inflicts no great punishment upon his rebellious Subjects sure never man took Mercy for Justice before and just because he allows his Subjects Liberty of Conscience CHAP. II. Of Obedience 1. OBedience is the accepting of the Law or Command of him who Obedience what by right commands when I by no act of my will put any obsticle whereby such Law or Command may be executed or received 2. Obedience differs from Justice as a part differs from the whole Obedience How Obedience differs from Justice is implyed in Justice Patience is onely necessary to Obedience but Agency to Justice Every just man must be an obedient man but the converse do not always hold That every obedient man is a just man As a Prince commands such a man to be a Justice of Peace c. in such a Town or Division he is received by them of the Town or Division This is an act of Obedience in them of such a Town or Division not of Justice because they are Patients onely and not Agents 3. Disobedience is the refusing to accept the Law or Command of How Disobedience differs from Injustice him who by right commands Injustice is the counterfeiting Obedience to Laws and yet abusing them to the prejudice of another As he who by right commands me to do such a thing if I refuse to do it This is a Sin of Disobedience If I undertake to do it and instead of upright doing of it I abuse it to the prejudice of any man this is a Sin of Injustice 4. Obedience is not only a virtue in it self but also the first and only The Excellency of Obedience Introduction to all virtues Theological and Moral For not only in Moral virtues I must subject my will to the rule and precept of him who by right commands but also in Theological virtues my will must be the patient and admit of Gods grace as the prime and efficient cause before it be possible that I should be qualified to do any virtuous action either Theologicall or Moral and God being all good and a lover of Man and hating nothing Philanthropos that he hath made freely offers this his grace to all men and it is mans fault and stubbornness that he refuses to admit of this grace of God without which nothing can be good nothing can be just or virtuous without which no man can reasonably hope for any Temporal happiness in this world or eternal Beatitude in the world to come 5. It is not alwaies the doing or abstaining from what is commanded Gods Grace only is the true and efficient cause of virtue in men or forbidden which is virtue but only the ingenuous and upright doing or abstaining from that which is commanded or forbidden as it is commanded or forbidden by him who by right may command or forbid I say that Ingenuity integrity and abstraction from all affections of profit pleasure love hate feare c. are essential to all virtues for if the doing or forbearing any action proceeds from any of these causes then is not that action virtuous but profitable pleasant lovely hateful fearful c. Jehu did what God commanded him in executing Gods judgements upon Ahabs posterity but not doing uprightly what God commanded him in that formality as God commanded him but if ye be mine and will hearken to my voice take ye the heads of your Masters Sons and come to me to Jezreel to morrow 2 Kings 10. 6. by this time and then instead of pittying so great a calamity upon so many young Princes insulting over them he in derision saies to the people Ye be righteous behold I conspired against my Master and slew him but who slew all Vers 9. these hence it was that God said I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the Hosea 1. 4. house of Jehu say Interpreters But it was a virtue in David to forbear the killing of Saul whenas he could have done it and was promised by God to be King after him and in Jehodajah to preserve Joash although by danger of his life It was not virtue in Amnon to abstain
suffet imprisonment for six moneths without bail or mainprize And for the second offence shall suffer a years imprisonment and be deprived of all his spiritual promotions and for the third offence shall suffer imprisonment during life It was Enacted that the Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Justices of Assize should have power and authority in the open and general Sessions to hear and determin the offences committed against this Act yet so that every Archbishop and Bishop had liberty to joyn and associate himself to the said Justices of Oyer and Terminer or to the Justices of Assize All books called Antiphoners Missals Grails Portuasses Primers in Latine An. 3. 4. Ed. 6. Cap. 10. or in English and other books used for service in the Church saving such as are set forth by the Kings Authority shall be clearly abolished All Images graven painted or carved taken out of any Church or Chappel and the aforesaid books shall be defaced or openly burnt Such form and manner of making and consecrating of Archbishops and Anno 3 4. Ed. 6. Cap. 12. Bishops Priests and Deacons and other Ministers of the Church as by six Prelates and six other men of this Realm learned in the Law of God by the King to be appointed and assigned or by most of the number of them shall be devised for that purpose and set forth under the Great Seal before the first of April next coming shall be lawfully exercised and used and none other An Act for uniformity of Prayer and administration of the Sacraments An. 5. 6. Ed. 6. Cap. 1. in the English Tongue and that every person upon every Sunday and Holiday having no lawful cause to be absent do resort to his Parish-Church and they which refuse are to be punished by the censure of the Church and that all persons who shall be at any other common prayer or Sacraments shall for the first offence suffer Imprisonment for six moneths without bail or mainprise for the second Imprisonment during a whole year and for the third Imprisonment during life All the Sundays of the year the Feast of our Lord Jesus his Circumcision of the Epiphany of the Purification of the blessed Virgin of St. Matthew An. 5. 6. Ed. 6. Cap. 2. the Apostle of the Annunciation of the blessed Virgin of St. Mark the Evangelist of St. Philip and Jacob the Apostles of the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist of St. Peter the Apostle of St. James the Apostle of St. Barthelomew the Apostle of St. Matthew the Apostle of St. Michael the Archangel of St. Luke the Evangelist of St. Simon and Jude the Apostles of All Saints of St. Andrew the Apostle of St. Thomas the Apostle of the Nativity of our Lord of St. Stephen the Martyr of St. John the Evangelist of the holy Innocents Munday and Tuesday in Easter-week Munday and Tuesday in Whitson-week are to be observed and kept for Holy days and none other And that every even or day next going before any of the aforesaid days of the Feasts of the Nativity of our Lord of Easter of the Ascension of our Lord Pentecost of the Purification of the Annunciation of the blessed Virgin of all Saints and of all the Feasts of the Apostles other then the Feasts of St. John the Evangelist and Philip and Jacob shall be kept for fasting days and none other Archbishops Bishops in their Dioces and all other having Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Jurisdiction may enquire of every person offending in the premises and punish every offender by censures of the Church and enjoyn him such penance as by the spiritual Judge shall be thought meet This Statute does not abrogate abstinence from flesh in Lent and Fridays and Saturdays or any day appointed to be kept by vertue of an Act made the second and third Ed. 6. Cap. 19. When any Holy day happens on the Munday the fast of that day shall be kept upon the Saturday immediately before and not upon the Sunday A view of the Reformation of Ed. 6. and of the lawfulness of it That the Book of commom Prayer Administration of the Sacraments The Reformation made by Ed. 6. was not meerly a civil sanction and other rites and ceremonies of the Church after the use of the Church of England was framed and composed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and certain of the most learned and discreet Bishops of the Land assembled to that purpose by the King is clearly expressed in the Preface to the Act of the 2. 3. Ed. 6. Cap. 1. The right that Christian Kings have to call and assemble Synods It is no new thing for Kings to assemble the Bishops and Church to redress and reform errors Councels and Convocations for the redress and reformation of errors and corruptions in the Church is properly the subject of another Treatise but that the Kings and supream Powers before Christianity under the old Law from Moses to Maccabees did always use it and that the first great Nicene Councel the second general Councel at Constantinople the third at Ephesus the fourth at Calcedon the fifth at Constantinople the sixth at Constantinople the seventh at Ephesus were all called by Christian Emperors is manifested by the Bishop of Winchester Andrews in the Sermon of the Right and Power of calling Assemblies nor were the general Councels convoked by Emperors but the Emperors and Kings did convoke and assemble Provincial and National Assemblies and Synods He shews that the Bishop of Syracuse in Sicily and Restitutus Bishop of London in Britain were summoned to a Synod in France by the Emperor Constantine ' Writ onely this was in the beginning of his Reign in the latter end of it in the thirtieth year of his Reign and the year before his death he called the Councel at Tyre and from thence removed it to Jerusalem and from thence called them to appear before himself at Constantinople After him Constans called one at Sardis Valentinian at Lampsacus Theodosius at Aquileia Gratian at Thessalonica Nay when the Emperors were professed Arrians even then did the Bishops acknowledge their power to call Councels came to them being called sued to them that they might be called came to them as Hosius to that of Arimine Liberius to that of Sirmium and that of Seleucia sued for them as Liberius to Constantius as Leo to Theodosius for the second Ephesine Councel Innocentius to Arcadius and sometime they sped as Leo and sometime not as Liberius and Innocentius and yet when they sped not they held themselves quiet and never presumed to draw themselves together of their own heads After the Empire fell in pieces and the Western Empire fell into the hands of Kings in Italy Theodoric called one at Rome Alaric at Agatha In France Clowis the first Christian King there called one at Orleans Childebert at Auvern Theodebert called another at Orleans and Cherebert at Toures And
convict shall be committed to prison without bail or mainprise untill they conform to come to Church and hear Divine Service according to Law and make such submission and declaration as in this Act is afterward declared and appointed If any person who shall offend as aforesaid shall not within three moneths after they be convicted conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws in comming to Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick confession and submission as in this Act is appointed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocesse or any Justice of Peace where the person shall happen to be or by the Minister or Curate of the Parish that in every such case every such offendor being thereunto warned by any Justice of Peace of the County shall upon his or their corporall oath before the Justices of Peace in the open Quarter-sessions or at the Assises abjure the Realm and all other the Queens Dominions for ever unless her Majesty shall licence the party to return and shall depart out of the Realm at such Port and within such times as shall be appointed by the said Justices before whom the said abjuration was made unlesse the offendor be letted by such lawfull and reasonable means as by the common Lawes are permitted in cases of abjuration of Felony and in such cases of let or stay then within such reasonable time after as the Common Law requires in case of Abjuration for Felony the Justices of Peace before whom any such abjuration shall be made shall cause the same to be presently entred into record before them and shall certifie the same to the Justices of Assizes and Goal-delivery of the said County at the next Assizes If any such offender which by the tenor of this Act is to be abjured shall refuse to make such abjuration and shall not goe to such Haven within such time appointed and depart out of the Realm or after such departure shall return without licence that in such case the party offending shall suffer as in case of Felony without benefit of the Clergy If any person offending against this Act shall before he be required as aforesaid to make such abjuration repair to some Parish Church on some Sunday or Festivall and then and there hear Divine Service and before Sermon or reading of the Gospell make publick and open submission and declaration in conformity to the Lawes according to this Act that then every such penalties inflicted by this Act be discharged The submission to be made is I A. B. doe humbly confess and acknowledge that I have grievously offended God in contemning her Majesties Godly and lawfull Government and Authority by absenting my self from Church and hearing Divine Service contrary to the Godly Lawes and Statutes of this Realm and in using and frequenting disordered and unlawfull Conventicles and Assemblies under pretence and colour of exercise of Religion And I am heartily sorry for the same and do acknowledge and testifie in my conscience that no other person hath or ought to have Authority over her Majesty And I doe promise and protest without any dissimulation or any colour or means of any dispensation That from henceforth I will from time to time obey and perform her Majesties Lawes and Statutes in repairing to the Church and hearing Divine Service and do my uttermost endeavor to perfom the same The Minister of every Parish where such submission and declaration shall be made shall presently enter the same into a book to be kept by every Parish for that purpose and within ten dayes after certifie the same in writing to the Bishop of the Diocess If any such offendor after such submission shall afterwards relapse and obstinately refuse to repair to some Church or usuall place of Divine Service or shall be present at any such Conventicles c. under colour of exercise of Religion contrary to her Majesties Lawes That then every such offendor shall lose the benefit he might have had by virtue of his Submission If any person shall hereafter relieve maintain or keep in his house or otherwise any person which shall obstinately refuse to come to some Church or usuall place of Common-prayer or shall forbear the same by the space of a moneth that then every such person so offending after such notice given him by the Ordinary of the Diocesse or any Justice of Assize of the Circuit or any Justice of Peace of the County or any Minister Curate or Church-warden of the Parish where such person shall be shall forfeit to the Queen for every person so relieved after such notice forty pound for every moneth that he or they shall relieve c. any person so offending This Act shall in no wise extend to punish or impeach any person for relieving or keeping his Father Wife Mother Child Ward Brother or Sister or his Wives Father or Mother not having any certain place of habitation of their own or the Husbands or Wives of any of them or for relieving maintaining or keeping any such person as shall be committed by Authority to the custody of any by whom they shall be so relieved or maintained These two last clauses are repealed by the 3 Jac. 4. All duties forfeitures and payments due to the Queene by virtue of this Act or the Act of the 23 of Eliz. concerning Recusants may be recovered and levyed to her Majesties use by action of debt bill plaint information or otherwise in any of the Courts called the Kings bench Common-pleas or Exchequer in such sort as by the ordinary course of the Common-Law any other debt due by any person in any other Case might be recovered or levyed where no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law bee admitted The third part of the Penalties had or received by virtue of this Act shall be imployed and bestowed to such good and charitable uses in such manner and forme as is limited and appointed in the Statute made in the 29 Eliz. c. 6. concerning Recusants No popish Recusant or feme covert shall be compelled to abjure by this Act. Every person that should abjure by virtue of this Act and refuse being thereunto required as aforesaid shall forfeit to the Queene all his goods and chattels for ever and his Lands and Tenements during life the wife of any such offendor shall not lose her Dowre nor any corruption of blood shall grow or be by reason of any offence mentioned in this Act. Every Person above sixteene yeeres of age borne within any of the Stat. 35 Eliz. cap. 2. Queenes Dominions or made a Denizen being a popish Recusant and before the end of that Session of Parliament convicted for not repairing to some Church or usuall place uf Divine-service but forbearing the same contrary to the Lawes established and having a certain place of abode within the Realme shall within forty dayes next after the Session of Parliament if they be in the Realme and not restrained by imprisonment or by command of