according as it is set downe in the truth of God And intreating of these three we shall touch by the way everie one of these points mentioned in doing whereof if we shall insist somewhat more largely then shall seeme expedient to riper iudgements yet we hope that heerein we shall easily be pardoned seeing we take this paynes not for the instruction of those that are of greater iudgement then our selfe but for the helpe and cōfort of the simplest sorte Who in this mayne point of salvation may through the diversitie of opinions be brought in danger of destruction For seeing there is no hope of life to anie but such as are iustified by the righteousnes of God which is by the faith of Christ it must followe that this Iustice being taken away and any other whatsoever put in the place thereof all ground and certeyntie of salvation must needes bee also taken away To come then to the first point there be foure principall different opinions beside the opinion of Osiander which beeing odious to all we need not to speake of The first is of those who devide the worke of Iustification betwixt God and man Christs merit and mans merit faith and works grace debt the Law the Gospell but in divers respects and considerations For in respect of that which they call the first righteousnes which they esteeme nothing but a preparation of a man to iustifie himself by a formall righteousnes infounded in vs by grace they give place to God as the author worker and to his grace as the cause moving him and vnto Christs sufferings as the cause meriting that grace vnto faith as the benefit in founded into vs by grace and vnto the Gospell as the instrument whereby this benefit is wrought in vs. Yet with God his grace they ioyne man in this worke ascribing vnto him freedome of will so that God by his grace man in his will concurre in the worke God by his grace helping mans will to beleeve But in respect of that which they call the second righteousnes wherein they place the merit of eternall life they seclude God from beeing the Iustifier and ascribe iustification to man him selfe they seclude grace and establish workes of free will they seclude Christ and the merit of his obedience and place them selves and the merit of their owne workes they seclude beleeving and establish working and for the Gospell place the Law The second opinion is of those who in iustification make God to be the Iustifier and that of his grace and that by faith but as our worke of our free will yet not of the Law but of the Gospel secluding Christ and his obedience wholy from our righteousnes as likewise the Law and the workes thereof So they give to God the worke of Iustifying but the matter of their righteousnes they wholy ascribe to their owne worke and act in beleeving and place grace in nothing but in Gods gracious accepting of mans imperfect faith in place of the perfect righteousnes of the Law and attribute vnto the merit of Christes obedience this gracious acceptation of our faith as though hee had dyed and suffered not for our Iustification but to merit and obtayne at Gods hande that our owne worke of beleeving should bee graciously accepted as perfect righteousnes albeit in it selfe imperfect and where they may seeme to agree with the papist in asscribing righteousnes to their owne working they thinke that they doe sufficientlie purge them selves from that blott by this subtill evasion that they doe not attribute their righteousnes to a worke of the Lawe but to a worke of the Gospell The third opinion is of those who attribute the worke of Iustification vnto God but place their righteousnes partlie in their faith as their owne worke and partly in the obedience of Christ and make two actions of God in Iustifying In the one whereof they give place vnto grace in the other not The first action is the imputation of our imperfect faith for righteousnes and that by grace The second action is the imputatiō of Christs perfect obedience for the supplying of that which is wanting in our imperfect faith for righteousnes and that by Iustice All these three opinions doe attribute Mans righteousnes either wholy or in parte to his owne working The first and last doe ioyne grace merit together in Iustification Which things are most contrarie to the truth of God whether the workes bee of nature or of grace of the Law or of the Gospell The fourth and last opinion is of those who attribute the worke of Iustification to God alone and placeth our righteousnes onely in Christes obedience and doe acknowledge saith to be nothing but the applying and apprehending instrument of Christes obedience and the Gospell to bee the instrument of faith and all to be of grace because God giveth Christ to bee righteousnes vnto vs by grace and imputes his obedience vnto vs by grace and by grace giveth vs faith and vnto faith the Gospell so that they attribute the whole prayse of the Iustification vnto God and place the whole matter of righteousnes in the obedience of Christ secluding all workes of men eyther of the Lawe or of the Gospell and acknowledge the grace of God to be the onely cause moving God to iustifie vs by Christes obedience as likewise of the giving of vs faith to apprehend it and this opinion only agreeth with the trueth CHAPTER XXI NOw we come to these things wherein especially stands the chiefest controversies whereby the trueth of Iustification is most darkened which we will reduce all to these foure points The first shal be touching the efficient cause of Iustification The second shal be touching the materiall cause of it The third shal be touching the formall cause The fourth shal be touching the subiect that is iustified Vnder these foure are comprehended the chiefe controversies touching this matter For touching the finall cause there is no great disagreement therefore we have no need to speake much of it yet notwithstanding because it serves to cleare that which we have so much insisted in before touching the order of Adoption and Iustification we will speake something thereof after the other foure First then touching the efficient cause of Iustification the controversie is only with the Papistes for in this point albeit they agree with vs in parte or rather in shew yet they disagree from vs in the chiefest substance of this question For wee saye that God onely doeth Iustifie but they albeit they graunt the first Iustification to God in parte yet they asscribe the second Iustification wherein they place the merit of eternall life wholy to man him selfe Now for discussing this controversie wee have three thinges that may sufficientlie cleare our iudgement therein The first is the manner and forme of the Scripture phrase touching the Iustification of a man The second is the testimonie of the Scripture declaring who it is that
be mans owne but Gods because it is not in the power of man by all that hee is according to nature ever to attayne to the possession of it but by that meane instrument supernaturall which is given him of God to the end he may attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God Thus we see that the meane whereby we possesse the righteousnes is faith onely and because faith is not our owne therefore the righteousnes that we posses by it cannot be ours vntill both be made ours and this is only done and performed by the Lords gracious imputation of both that is faith and the righteousnes of Christ possessed by faith But first especially faith must be imputed to vs as our own to the intent that the righteousnes that by it we possesse might be our owne For as a man hath right to that which hee possesseth as his owne in equitie and iustice if by his owne meanes he hath obtayned possession but hath no right in equitie and iustice to it although he have it in his possession if by another mans substance given him to be imployed hee doe acquire the possession even so if we could attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes then should that righteousnes in equitie and iustice be our owne and therefore the Scripture admitteth debt in accompting wages to him that worketh Rom. chap. 4. ver 4. but because wee doe not attayne to the possession of righteousnes by our owne meanes but by the meanes of GOD which hee hath given vs to vse that is by faith therefore this righteousnes in equitie and iustice is not our owne vntill the Lord doe impute it vnto vs and accompt it our owne So by imputinge faith vnto vs as our owne the righteousnesse which wee possesse by faith is made our owne so that faith beeing reckonned and accompted ours the righteousnes of GOD which wee possesse by faith in Christ is also reckonned and accompted ours and this is the cause why the holy Scripture doeth offtner describe the manner and forme of our iustification vnder the phrase of the imputation of faith then vnder the phrase of the imputation of the righteousnes because the right that is made vs vnto faith in Christ maketh vs to have right vnto Christ him selfe as our righteousnes and all blessings in him which by faith we possesse Secondly it is for this cause that in the description of the forme of our iustification that the spirite of God vseth this phrase to wit That to him that beleeveth his faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Which word vnto beeing commonly rendered for doeth much darken the true sense of the wordes and maketh many to fall into dangerous errour thinking that the verie acte of beleevinge is imputed for righteousnes that is as they take it in the verie same place and as the verie matter of our righteousnes whereas the Greeke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this sentence doeth declare the ende wherevnto faith is imputed that is that the obedience of Christ apprehended by faith may bee righteousnes vnto the apprehender For faith and beleeving ever imployeth the possession of Christ and his obedience in our heartes and the imputation of faith vnto righteousnes is the thing that makes Christ possessed by faith to bee our righteousnes I say to be our righteousnes for Christes obedience is righteousnes in it selfe so that it is neyther our faith nor Gods imputation of our faith that maketh his obedience to bee righteousnes but imputation of faith to vs as ours maketh the obedience of Christ possessed by faith beeing righteousnes in it selfe to be our righteousnes for as wee have saide before the making that whereby we obtayne possession to bee ours maketh the thing possessed also to be ours so that imputation of faith maketh Christes obedience to be that vnto vs which it is in it selfe though it were never imputed vnto vs. And that this phrase is so to be vnderstoode it may cleerely bee perceyved by that sentence of the Apostle Rom. chapt 10. ver 10. VVith the heart man beleeveth vnto righteousnes and with the mouth hee confesseth vnto salvation In which sentence the greeke worde which is rendered vnto can not be rendered for without darking and also perverting the true sense and meaning of that place for we are saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes in that same sense and meaning wherein wee are saide to confesse with the mouth vnto salvation But we cannot bee saide properlie at least cleerely without ambiguitie to confesse for salvation because neyther is our confession the efficient cause of our salvation neyther yet the matter or substance of our salvation neither can it bee put in place of our salvation but we confesse to this ende that wee might attayne to salvation knowing that hee that confesseth not Iesus before men shall not be saved For he that is ashamed of him before men he wil be ashamed of him before his heavenly Father Luke chap. 9. ver 26. And hee who shall denie him before men him shall hee denie before his Father which is in heaven And whosoever shall confesse him before men him shall he also confesse before his Father that is in heaven Math. chap. 10. Luke chap. 12. Therefore knowing that without confession there is no salvation seeing confession is the way and meane whereby we attayne vnto the possession of salvation we doe confesse to this ende that we may attayne to salvation And therefore in the same sense wee must bee saide to beleeve with the heart vnto righteousnes that is because there is no meane to attaine vnto righteousnes except wee beleeve For Christ is righteousnes vnto everie one that beleeveth Rom. chap. 10. ver 4. therefore we beleeve to this ende that wee may enioye righteousnes according to the saying of the Apostle Gal. chap. 2. ver 16. VVee also have beleeved in Christ that wee may bee iustified by the faith of Christ In which place that faith is vnderstood onely instrumentally and not materially it is playne by the next verse following where it is saide If then while wee seeke to bee made righteous by Christ c. Which wordes shewe plainly that Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Nowe there is no reason why faith should be said to bee imputed vnto righteousnes in any other sense as concerninge the worde vnto then wee were saide to beleeve vnto righteousnes but in all reason without contradiction the Greeke worde which we render vnto must in both these phrases bee taken in one and the same sense that is that as we beleeve with the hearte to this end that we might by faith as the onely apt and meete instrument and onely convenient and effectuall meane whereby to apprehende and possesse attayne to the possession of the righteousnes of God in Christ even so the Lord our God imputeth faith to vs as our owne to this end that the righteousnes which we possesse
favour Man neyther any wayes deservinge it by his worthines nor paying any thing to God for it and that this is the meaning of the worde it is most evident by this other word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is indifferently put for grace the one being sometimes interpreted by the other as Rom. chap. 3. ver 24. Being iustified freely by his grace where the word which is rendered freely is dorean which word secludeth both price and merit Concerning price it is cleere Math. chap. 10. ver 8. Yee have receyved freely give freely And 2. Thess chap. 3. ver 8. Neither tooke we bread of any man freely Concerning merite it is likewise manifest that this word secludeth it by Ioh. chap. 15. ver 25. They hated me freely that is without cause or deserving so that this word maketh iustification to be a worke of God freely done And this we marke that we may know it secludeth not the merit of Christ although that merit be imputed to vs by grace and by this consideration we shall learne to reconcile two sayings of scripture that seeme to be repugnant The first is Esay chap. 52. ver 3. Yee shal be redeemed without monie The other is 1. Cor. chap. 6. ver 20. For yee are bought for a price The one seemeth to make our redemption free without price the other seemeth to say the contrarie Yet both are true for in respect of man him selfe hee hath paide no price at all to God for his redemption but as concerning Christ he hath given a deare price even his life bloud for our redemption So the word Grace secludeth not the merit of Christ nor the price that he hath payed for vs nor ought els ordayned of God by his grace as causes and meanes subordinate to his grace for our iustification but onely secludeth whatsoever thinge is in man or can proceed from man who hath nothing of him selfe whereby to deserve righteousnes neither hath any thing to give to God to obtayne righteousnes For who hath given to God first that he should recompence him Rom. chap. 11. vers 35. And this third pointe of the forme of our iustification is necessarie to be added to the other two First for the right knowledge both of Gods giving and imputing of faith and Christ to our iustification Secondly for preserving vs from the errours of those who mistake the true meaning of the word grace in our iustification Concerning the first there is a distinctiō of the giftes of God and also of the imputation of God Touching the giftes they be eyther such as are natuall given by God indifferently to al are belōging to our natural life or thē they are gifts supernatural belonging to a supernatural life The first sorte the Lord giveth by naturall meanes as by procreation by naturall generation and by his generall providence extended over all But the second he giveth not but by speciall grace and by a speciall providence and particular love in the Lord IESVS there being no ground nor cause in them to whom hee giveth them why they should have thē nor any meanes in their power to procure them Thus faith and Christ by faith are given vs of God not for any worthines in vs nor for any thing given to God by vs but the Lord giveth vs both faith and Christ vnto iustification freely of his meere grace Secondly touching imputation there is an imputation by debt and an imputation by grace therefore that it may bee knowne that neither faith nor Christes merite is imputed to vs by debt the scripture plainly sheweth that this imputatiō is by grace that is first that faith which is now givē vs secondly that Christ who is givē vs by faith is ours not by any right that we have vnto thē by iustice that accompting of them ours is not by debt but of meere mercy grace so that our whole iustificatiō in al that is either given vs or imputed vnto vs to iustifie vs both in the giving in the imputing is of Gods free grace The secōd vse of the knowledge hereof is to preserve vs from their errors who take the name of grace in our iustification for the gifts of grace inherent in vs be it faith or sanctification or the fruites of our righteousnes And secondly from their error who take the name of grace for a gratious acceptatiō of our imperfect faith whereas grace in iustification is relative to the giving imputing of faith not to the accepting of it For in respect of faith given by grace and imputed by grace wee are said to be iustified by grace not in respect of Gods accepting of it at our handes by grace And thus much concerning the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXIII IT olloweth that we now speake of the obiect of iustification that is the man whom the Lord doeth iustifie who is two maner of wayes to be confidered First as he is in him selfe by nature Secondly what he is by grace before he be iustified As concerning him selfe wee have two places of scriptures which doe manifestly instruct vs what man is in him self when God iustifieth him The first is Rom. 4. 5. where God is said to iustifie the vngodly the other Rom. 5. 10. where God is said to have iustified vs while we were enemies and this sheweth the vanitie of the Papists who wil have a man formalie iust before he be iustified Touching that which he is by grace it is in many parts of the scripture evidently declared that he must beleeve before he be iustified that is must have faith wrought in his heart in that sorte that he may be iustified for like as Acts 14. it is saide that Paul perceyving that the creeple mā had faith to be made whole he did heale him even so the Lord first giveth vs faith to bee made iust and then iustifieth vs. For we are to consider that although faith bee the instrument of Gods power to make vs able to apprehende Christ and all his blessings in him yet in the worke of iustification it is particularly to be restrayned both as it is wrought by God in our heartes and as our heartes worketh by it vnto the particular benefite of righteousnes in Christ like as in all the rest of the benefites faith is alwayes to be particularly restrayned to every one of them in the particular apprehension of them Moreover we see the truth of this same in the order set downe by the Apostle Rom. 8. when he sayth whom he hath called them he also hath iustified whereby it is evident that God iustifieth not a man vntill first he hath obtayned that degree of grace which God bestoweth vpō a man whē he calleth him of which it followeth that he must have Christ reveyled vnto him he must likewise be come to Christ must have embrased him by faith and that not only as the sonne of God for in that point of faith consisteth his
in the same Adoption is distinguished from both The worke of the Father is our Vnion with Christ when he brings vs vnto him and makes vs to receive him by beleeving in his name And this is our comming to the Sonne Which is the proper worke of the Father For none can come vnto the Sonne except the Father drawe him And this is the principall act of our Adoption which most properly is to be called Adoption and as we have said consisteth chiefly in our calling For seeing most properly it is the worke of the Father to adopt certayne it is that our Adoption most properly must consist in the action of the Father For which cause the Fathers worke in making vs to receyve the Sonne that is to beleeve in his name is in this place expounded by way of similitude in a borrowed speech that is to be borne of God For the begetting and working of faith in our hearts is the chiefe and principall part of our spirituall birth beeing the roote ground of all that followeth The worke of the Sonne is next subioyned which stands in giving to those who have receyved him prerogative or as some do render the word dignitie as others authoritie and as others power to bee the Sonnes of God Of all which significations of the word there is none which doth not fitt this place without giving any advantage vnto the Papists in their forged sense of the word power Which benefite proceeding from the Sonne is alwayes to bee distinguished in our Adoption from our Vnion and communion with him by faith which is the worke of the Father vpon which as the cause dependeth the other as the effect for to those whom the Father doth give to the Sonne to be his brethren and in vnitie with him to be the Sonnes of God the sonne doth give the prerogative the dignitie the authoritie and the power belonging to the sonnes of God And this work consisteth in the sonnes bringing vs to the Father For none can come to the Father but by the Sonne for Christ suffred for vs that he might bring vs to God 1. Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. And this is that which is so often spoken of in scriptures by Christ himselfe that to those whom the Father giveth him to those he giveth eternall life and that he giveth the glorie that the Father hath given him vnto those that beleeve in him For whatsoever prerogative dignitie c. the Father hath given vnto the Sonne the same doth the Sonne impart to vs that are his brethren For the prerogatives and priviledges of sonne-ship appertayne onely to Iesus Christ as the onely sonne of God and therefore it belongeth to him alone to communicate those prerogatives to such as the Father doth first by Adoption make his brethren For the prerogative of a sonne is a dignitie depēding not vpon the essence and nature of our Redeemer but vpon his subsisting and personalitie For as the prerogative of a father is proper to the first person so the prerogative of a sonne is proper to the second person and therefore as we doe holde that to adopt is the prerogative of the first person because he onely is the Father so to communicate the prerogatives belonging to those who are adopted to bee children is the prerogative of the second person because he only is the Sonne And therefore is it said if the Sonne make vs free wee shall bee free indeed Iohn chap. 8. ver 36. for freedome is the prerogative of a Sonne and not of a servant And therefore the whole libertie and freedom bee it from ignorance Sathan sinne or death which the saints enioy in Christ is called by the Apostle the libertie of the Sonnes of God in which libertie is comprehended both our wisdome righteousnes sanctification and redemption Which prerogatives when we doe enioy them then may we bouldly esteeme our selves the Sonnes of God And this is that which it seemes the spirit of God doeth meane when he sayeth that Christ doth give vs the prerogative to be the Sonnes of God that is that he bestowes vpon vs such priviledges and blessings or such authoritie and power over all our spirituall enemies as may make vs not only to glorie in God the Father of Christ as our God and our Father but also to carrie our selves in our whole conversation as becommeth the sonnes of God For we do esteeme that to be adopted or made sonnes and to receyve prerogative to be sonnes are two distinct benefites of the two first persons of the Trinitie For a man may bee a Sonne and yet wante the prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a Sonne For as saith the Apostle Gallath chap. 4. vers 1. 2. The heyre while hee is a childe differeth nothing from a seruant though he be Lord of all but is vnder Tutors and Governours vntill the time appointed of the Father Which custome of men the Apostle applyeth to the Church of God to let vs know that it is a thing to be considered in the children of God aswell as in the children of men so the oversight standes in the not distinguishing betwixt the being of a sonne simply which comes by procreation and birth and the being of a sonne in prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a sonne which comes by age and fulnes of time appointed by the Father For every child is a sonne to his Father as soone as he is borne yet longe after he receyveth not the prerogative of a sonne but still is in condition as a servant But when the time appointed for his freedome commeth he who was before a sonne by birth but a servant in condition becōmeth to be a sonne likewise by condition aswell as by birth when as the prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be a sonne in estate is given vnto him And in this sense is this place to be vnderstood if it be rightly taken that is that vnto them who were borne of the Father and so which were sonnes by the Fathers begetting of them Christ the sonne did give prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be sonnes in cōdition and state For as we have said before the benefit of being sonnes simply by begetting or birth or by adoption is the proper worke of the Father but to make vs sonnes in the condition and estate belonging vnto sonnes is the proper worke of the Sonne For we have no boldnes to call the Father our Father nor have wee any accesse vnto him as vnto our Father but through Christ alone Neither have we the libertie of the sonnes of God from sinne either by righteousnes or sanctification nor any part of the glory of the sonnes of God but frō Christ alone in whom doth all fulnes dwell and out of whose fulnes we all receyve and by whom only we come vnto the Father And this distinction of these two works of the Father and of the Sonne shineth cleerly in the wordes of the Evangelist
what faith it selfe is and what is the vse and end of it Concerning the ground and cause of our beleeving if wee carefully marke the scriptures of God it is placed especially in three thinges The first is the will of God and his eternall Decree according to his will as is cleere by Math. chapt 11. vers 26. where Christ attributed vnto the good will and pleasure of the Father that some did beleeve and some did not And Acts chap. 13. ver 48. where it is expreslie said That as many as were ordayned vnto eternall life beeleved And this teacheth vs two things First that faith is no worke depending vpon the will of man nor any power in nature Secondly that it is of the nomber of those blessings not which God did communicate in the first creation but of those which were hid vp in the mysterie of Gods will touchinge the dispensation of life in and through Christ The second thinge wherein the ground and cause of beleeving is placed in Gods free gift accordinge to the sayinge of Christ him selfe Ioh. chap. 6. vers 37. and 65. Which gift of God is there also declared to be two folde The first the giving of our persons vnto Christ according to these wordes All that the Father giveth me shall come to mee The second is the giving vnto vs grace to beleeve According to that other saying No man can come vnto mee except it be given him of my Father For as saieth the Apostle Rom. chap. 11. vers 32. God hath shut vp all men vnder vnbeleefe that he might shewe mercie on all And againe Gallat chap. 3. vers 22. The Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ might be given to them that beleeve And this ground is verified by the saying of Ioh. chap. 12. ver 39. 40. where he giveth a reason why the Iewes for all his miracles not only beleeved not but also why they could not beleeve in Christ saying Therefore could they not beleeve because that Esay saieth Hee hath blinded their eyes c. The third thing wherein the ground and cause of our beleeving is placed is our spirituall birth Therefore saith Iohn 1. Ep. chap. 5. 1. VVhosoever beleeveth that Iesus is the Christ is borne of God Therefore the same Iohn describing who they are that doe beleeve in the Gospell Chap. 1. vers 13. sayeth which ar borne not of bloud nor of the will of flesh nor of the will of man but of God By al these three groundes it is evident that faith is no naturall but a supernaturall gift and therefore the praise of our beleeving is taken from vs and given wholy vnto God as is cleere in the wordes of Christ to Peter Math. chap. 16. ver 17. Flesh and bloud hath not reveiled that vnto thee but my Father which is in heaven Now we come to the propertie that is attributed to faith and which through faith is in every one that beleeveth and this propertie is the power of God according to the saying of the Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. ver 19. Where the Apostle prayeth that they might knowe what was the exceeding greatnes of the power of God in them that beleeve and therefore is it that faith is called the faith of the effectuall working of God Coll. chap. 2. ver 12. and that for two reasons First because no power nor working of any power can ever worke faith in our hearts except the power of God onely and therefore the Prophet Esay doeth put beleeving and the having of the arme of the Lord revealed for one thinge Chapter 53. verse 1. Secondly because the power and the effectuall working of faith in vs is nothing but the very power and the workinge of the power of God him selfe Who as saith Peter by his power through faith keepeth vs 1. Epist chap. 1. ver 5. and for this cause it is not only that faith is compted for the chiefe piece of the armour of God and of the might of his power Ephes chap. 6. but also that to have Christ livinge in vs and to live by the faith of Christ are put for one thinge Gallat chapt 2. ver 20. Thereby shewing vs that the power of faith is not any thinge but the power of GOD and of Christ dwelling by faith in vs. and that faith is the effectuall instrument whereby Christ is powerfull in vs. Vpon which grounde it is that the effectes of Christ him selfe are often attributed vnto faith as in these sayinges of Christ Thy Faith hath made thee whole Thy Faith hath saved thee And when we are saide to bee saved by faith to have our heartes purged by faith to bee iustified by faith c. A cleere example of this wee have Acts chap. 3. ver 16. where the Apostle indifferentlie attributes to the power of Christ and to faith the healing of the Creeple man Which place is carefully to be marked because it giveth a marveillous light in the vse of faith For there it is saide That through faith in his Name his name had made the man sound Which saying doth shew vs expreslie that it was not faith it selfe as it was the worke of that man but the name of Christ in which his faith was that did make him sound so that the power of faith is nothing but the power of Christ embrased by faith and that the worke of faith is nothing but the worke of Christ dwelling in our heartes by faith Which doeth iustifie their opinion who affirme that to be iustified by faith is alwayes to bee vnderstood to bee iustified by Christ For as by faith in his Name his Name made the man sounde even so by faith in his bloud his bloud maketh vs righteous Therefore sayeth the Apostle Rom. chap. 3. vers 25. That God hath set Christ forth a propitiation by faith in his bloud Where reconciling by faith in his bloud is to be vnderstoode in the same sense that making soūd by faith in his name is to be vnderstood in the other place by which it is evident that faith is never rightly taken in our iustification when it is taken for the thing wherein standeth our righteousnes and not for the instrument apprehending that thing which is our righteousnes Thus the power of God working faith and the power of God accompanying faith doeth evidently shewe faith to bee a supernaturall gift being wrought by a supernaturall power and possessing vs with a supernaturall power of God him selfe This is cleerily verified by the third pointe touching these effectes that are attributed vnto faith in the booke of God when it is saide to doe things that are above the strength of all created nature and when Saintes are saide to have done by it such thinges as are supernaturall Of these first sorte are those sayings where in the iustifying of vs the saving of vs miraculous healing of diseases by nature incurable are attributed vnto saith as also the keeping of
by it may make vs righteous before him or be righteousnes vnto vs in his sight Thus this sentence rightly vnderstoode giveth no advanvantage eyther to the Papistes to prove that by workes we are iustified or yet vnto others who doe make the very act of our beleeving to be our righteousnes but rather doeth evidently convince both these opinions of manifest etror The first because faith is no worke of ours neither yet is the matter but the meane only of our righteousnes The second for the same foresaid reason for it is not the act of beleeving but the thing purchased and possessed by the act of beleeving which is our righteousnes before God And thus much concerning imputation CHAPTER XXXII NOW we come to the third pointe touching the forme and manner of our iustification which consisteth in the grace of God for we have said before that God iustifieth by gift by imputation and by grace therefore giving and imputing doth not simply make the full forme of our iustification but it is further required that both gift and imputation bee by grace Therefore are we said to be iustified freely by his grace Rom. chap. 3. ver 24. Tit. chap. 3. ver 7. Now we are first to consider what is meant by the name of grace and secondly to consider how we are iustified by grace Touching the name of grace leaving that generall signification of grace whereby it is extended to all Creatures in respect of the goodnes of God in some measure vnto all we will only treate of these two significations of grace where it is taken in the worke of our salvation The first signification of grace is when it signifieth the free favour love and good will of God in God him self and his good will towards man which from himselfe and of him selfe without any respect of any thing without him selfe moveth him to make man gracious and acceptable to him selfe in which sense it is taken Tit. chap. 2. ver 11. For that grace of God that bringeth salvation to all men hath appeared And Rom. cha 3. ver 24. Being iustified freely by his grace And Ephe. chap. 1. ver 6. To the praise of the glory of his grace c. And chap. 2. ver 5. By whose grace ye are saved Secondly the name of grace is taken for the benefits and gifts which God of his grace doth bestowe vpō vs in Christ in which sense it is takē 1. Pet. cha 4. ver 10. Let every man as he hath receyved the gift minister the same one to another as good disposers of the manifolde graces of God In which sense our righteousnes is called grace Rom. chap. 5. ve 17. much more shall they which receyve that aboundance of grace and of that gift of that righteousnes c. and not onely righteousnes but all the remaynant blessinges which wee receyve from God in Christ and therfore they are all called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is gratious gifts or giftes of grace Rom. chapt 12. ver 6. 1. Cor. chap. 12. ver 4. And as grace is taken in this sense Christ him selfe and his death and mediation c. may iustly be accompted grace Therefore is hee also him selfe called the gift of God moreover faith love hope peace ioye patience perseverance life and salvation are all comprehended vnder the name of grace as it is taken in this sense In which sense the foolish Papistes doe call it gratia gratum faciens that is the grace that maketh vs acceptable or gratious whereas it is cleer by scripture that it is grace taken in the first sense whereof it evidently appeareth that the papists are vtterly ignorant whereby we are made acceptable vnto God as Eph. cha 1. ver 6. To the praise of the glorie of his grace by the which he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloved And this is the grace which onely should bee called the first grace because it goeth before all other grace taken in the seconde sense yea before the gracious Decree or Predestination of God eyther of vs to adoption or of Christ to bee our Redeemer as wee have showen before But the ignorant Papist calleth the very gift of GOD whereby a mans hearte is drawen backe from evill and stirred vp to goodnes the first grace Which opinion were not amisse in respect of the grace that is dispensed to vs if hee did acknowledge the particular love of God and his grace remayninge and resident in him selfe towarde his elect to goe before it as the cause but the reason of his stumblinge is this the foolishe opinion of the vniversalitie of grace when as they esteeme Gods grace generally to bee extendede alike to all and have no light nor iudgement to discerne betwixt the generall and vniversall grace of God to all Whereby hee maketh his Sunne to arise vpon the evill and the good and sendeth raine vpon the iust and vniust Math. chap. 5. ver 45. and that speciall grace and love of God which moveth him to love Iacob when he hated Esau of the same lumpe whereof he maketh all mankind to make certaine vessells vnto honour while as the rest are prepared for dishonour This being shortly spoken of the signification of grace wee have next to consider in what sense wee are said to be iustified by grace First we are to marke that we are not said to be iustified by grace in the second sense wherein grace is taken howsoever the thing whereby we are iustified be a grace for in this phrase grace is not referred to any of the thinges that are given vs and imputed to vs vnto righteousnes but vnto the manner and forme of Gods giving them and imputing them And that we may knowe this more cleerlie we are to vnderstand that grace taken in the first signification hath a three-folde place in the worke of our iustification First it hath place in the efficient cause in which sense it is taken 2. Tim. cha 9. VVho hath saved vs and hath called vs with a holy calling not according to our workes but according to his purpose and grace For the grace of God is the cause moving God to predestinate call iustifie and glorifie and of this wee have spoken of at length before in the cause of Gods Decree Secondly the grace of God hath place in the formall cause in which sense we are said to be iustified by grace Thirdly it hath place in the finall cause in which sense it is taken Ephe. chap. 1. ver 6. 12. where he is saide to doe all to vs Vnto the praise of the glory of his grace When it is referred to the manner of Gods iustifying vs it is opposed specially to two thinges First the word grace secludeth all price given by vs to God for iustifying vs. Secondly it secludeth all merit of ours from the worke of our iustificatiō so that it importeth as much as that in our iustification whatsoever God doeth he doeth it freely of his love and gratious