Selected quad for the lemma: act_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
act_n	apostle_n	gospel_n	paul_n	2,610	5	6.3520	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A65888	A sober expostulation with some of the clergy against their pretended convert Francis Bugg his repeated gross abuse of the people called Quakers, in his books and pamphlets, viz., his New Rome arrainged, History of Quakerism, Second summons, Picture of Quakerism, and other pamphlets which may serve to invalidate the authority of the snake in the grass, as it refers to his books.	Whitehead, George, 1636?-1723.	1697 (1697)	Wing W1959; ESTC R20305	65,396	156

further proceeds in Justification of his most gross Forgery and Defamation against us viz. But they say I put up a Mock-Pillory I Grant I did and that to shew what they Actually deserved from their own Proposals to Authority Preface p. 2. Which Mock-Pillory was the form of a Pillory with Twelve Pictures standing with the first Letters of the Names of Certain Citizens of London and other Persons of good Fame and Repute with a Forged Mock-Trial grosly to Defame and Scandalize them as Perjured Persons for denying F. Bugg's False Charge in the first Edition of his New Rome Arraigned And now both his Mock-Trial and Mock-Pillory left out in his Second Edition Yet thus Unjustly Justified therein as what the Quakers Actually Deserved Oh! Abominable Falshood Insolence and Slander But what has he Actually Deserved Nevertheless in Contradiction to this his False Plea for his Mock-Pillory his Friend and Advocate Thomas Crisp in his Counterfeit Discovered p. 2. saith as he is informed That F. Bugg has acknowledged 10 G. Whitehead c. that he was sorry he had done it and that if it were to do again he would not do it that is set up his Feigned or Mock-Pillory But how does his Sorrow for it appear when now he tells us 'T was to shew what they i. e. the Quakers Actually Deserved Where 's then his Sorrow What say you his Watchers Was it a just Course to Convince us of Error that he took against us by his Mock-Trial and Scandalous Mock-Pillory Pray Answer plainly otherwise if you do not yet stop bis Current of Scandalizing and Defaming us your Encouragement and Approbations already given him will the more Affect you and Render you the more Culpable of his gross Abuses as partakers of his great Iniquity which will be no good Expedient to dignifie your Church or promote your Interest or good Fame I hope you 'll yet Consider it And further observe some of F. Bugg's Additional Forgery against us the said People in his own Words Preface p. 3. viz. Methinks I hear them say Come let us say he i. e. F. Bugg is a Pestilent Fellow a Mover of Sedition we must use all the Arts we have to stop him for he seems to follow the Steps of M. Luther that Apostate Adversary of our dear Elder Sister and if he goes on he will so unvail us that all People will know us and our Intreigues come let us Bespa●ter him and Cover him with some Frightful Beast's Skin and th●n set our little Currs to bait and Worry him to Abuse and Bespatter him in City and Country c. This I have found true Thus far F. Bugg Observe here this Piece of Forgery and Romance to Bespatter us and Suggest False Matters against us which he never heard the Quakers say but thinks he hears them so say which we cannot think he does unless he Dreams it But to shew his own Conceited Ambition and Pride how Puft up Swell'd and Bigg he is in his own Conceit as if he were such a Potent Invincible Antagonist when we very well know the Contrary how Feeble Impertinent and False he is And his Comparing himself to M. Luther as one in his Steps and Implying the Church of Rome to be our Dear Elder-Sister In the one appears his Proud Conceit and Vain Fmpty Boasting in the other his Notorious Falshood and Calumny As to his Charge of Blasphemous Pretences of Miracles against G. Fox whom he most Maliciously and Slanderously calls That Imposter Pref. p. 6. And why so But because G. Fox mentioned certain Miracles Wrought by the Power of God Not at all Ascribing them to himself or his own Power but to the Power of God in Answer to the fervent Prayers of his Servants and People among us in certain places But says F. Bugg not one of them i. e. Miracles said to be done in the Name of Jesus of Nazareth as in Acts 3. 6. Which Quoth he is a strong Argument of their Disowning Jesus of Nazareth c. Answ. 1. That Miracles both outward and inward have been wrought among us by the Power of God Consequently by Jesus Christ who is that Power F. Bugg cannot Confute If wrought by the Power of God then they must be in the Name of Jesus Christ for they are Indivisible and Inseparable 3. What Sincere and Faithful Regard and Breathings of Soul those our Friends Concerned had in their servent Prayers to the Name of the same Jesus of Nazareth F. Bugg is now as wholly Ignorant and now Insensible as his Argument and Consequence of their Disowning Jesus of Nazareth c. is utterly False it being by and through him that the Power and Spirit of God hath been made known among us in its Effectual Operations As to his Reciting the Quakers Books which he Falsly says carry two Contrary Faces Contrary Doctrines Contrary Principles c. In two Columns Opposite And then Aspersing their Leaders with the Depth of Hypocrsy Couch'd in them 'T is to none but to such as his own Evil Envious Eye his Dim and False sight that they appear so Contrary for to a Single Eye and Charitable Mind such Pretended or seeming Contrariety is easily Reconcileable As under the Title of The Perfect Quaker he Cites David 's Enemies Discovered p. 7. Thus viz. And these the Quakers do not call the Letter the Rule nor Matthew Mark Luke and John the New Testament and Gospel c. And in Opposition under the Title of The Counterfeit Quaker he Cites The Harmony of the Old and New Testament and the fulfilling of the Prophecies But he has falsly Cited the first to make them seem the more Contradictory for the Words truly Cited are these viz. And these i. e. Who witness the Life which spoke forth Scripture do not call the Letter the Rule and the four Books Matthew Mark Luke and John the New Testament and Gospel c. Here Bugg leaves out and the four Books which he has not Proved to be both the New-Testament and the Gospel being not the Books Abstractly but the New Covenant and the Power of God therein Testified unto which Gospel was before the Books were and before Abraham was Rom. 1. Heb. 8. Jer. 31. Besides we owning the said four Books to be Books of the New Testament or Covenant yet they are not all the Books thereof there are more Books of the New Testament as that of the Blessed Acts of the Apostles and their Evangelical Epistles and the Excellent Apocalips which also belong to the New Testament so that the Harmony of the Old and New Testament relates to the Divine Testimonies or Doctrine of Christ contained in the Books Paul and other Apostles were Ministers of the Gospel not of the Letter but of the Spirit and of the New Testament or New Covenant which are one and the same yet did not thereby Contemn or Slight the Scriptures which Testifie thereof And seeing that I have Confessed that the Spirit or Life

Samuel David Elijah Job and others as no true but false Prophets because sometime mistaken See 1 Sam. 16. 6. 1 Kings 19. 14 15 18. Rom. 11. 4 See also Acts 23. 5. And in the Antient Approved Bibles see what Remark is in the Argument on Job it 's there said That Job maintaineth a Good Cause but handleth it Evil. Again his Adversaries have an ill Matter but they defend it Craftily Moreover he i. e. Job was assured that God had not rejected him yet thro' his great Torments and Affliction he bursteth forth into many inconveniences both of Words and Sentences c. yet Job was a holy and just Man and true Prophet in many things Our Bitter Persecutor would fain fasten Contempt of Holy Scripture upon the Quakers with these odious Assertions viz. That the Scripture is BEASTLY Ware that WHAT the true Prophets spake was false and WHAT the false Prophets spake was true c. Intro p. 13. These are three notorious Falshoods as well as gross Errors maliciously contrived to contradict our sincere Confession viz. That the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are of Divine Authority as being given by Divine Inspiration c. and that we prefer the Holy Scriptures before all other Books extant in the World How sincere we are in such Confession we can refer to him that knows our Hearts to whom we Appeal against our Adversaries contrary unjust Judgment and gross Calumnies falsly representing us insincere even in these weighty Matters wherein the greatest Tenderness and Conscienciousness towards God ought to be exercised by us all Another gross Abuse our Bitter Adversary has committed against many of us who Signed an Epistle from our Yearly Meeting in 1675. which I must give some Account of here 1. He Cites these words out of our said Epistle viz. It is our Sence Advice Admonition and Judgment in the Fear of God and Authority of his Power and Spirit that no such slight and contemptible Names and Expressions as that Faithful Friends Papers which we Testifie have been given out by the Power and Spirit of God are Mens Edicts or Canons with such scornful Sayings be permitted Subscribed saith he by W. Penn G. Whitehead and others Introd p. 11. And what of all this This Advice related to such Papers and Epistles of Faithful Friends as concerned good Order and Discipline in the Church and for promoting pure Religion in Life and Practice and why should they be slighted or contemned as but meer Human Edicts and Canons What use does our Scornful Adversary make of this Observe what he saith p. 13. viz. But as for what G. F. c. wrote their Yearly Meeting Testifies it was given forth by the Eternal Spirit yea THE SAME MEN that charged their Disciples in the Name of the Lord not to call their Papers Edicts or Canons call the Scriptures Death Dust and Serpents Meat And what same Men He has told us before W. Penn G. Whitehead and others who Signed the said Yearly Meetings Epistle that they so called the Scriptures whereby he has greatly abused and shamefully belied the same Men i. e. W. P. G. W. c. for they disown the Expression and own the Divine Authority of the Holy Scriptures as first given by Inspiration from God and truly prefer them before all other Books extant in the World But how can that be in our Adversary's Account when he objects against it and us That G. W. avouches that what is spoken from the Spirit of Truth IN ANY is of as great Authority as the Scriptures and Chapters are and Greater c. He shews himself but very dull and impertinent in this Objection For we may prefer the Scriptures even the Bible before all other Books extant and yet not before the Spirit of Truth or the Immediate Powerful Teachings thereof in Man for that Spirit was before the Scriptures Writings or Bible were and only can give the true understanding thereof and therefore the Spirit of Truth may be preferred to the Scriptures and all other Books without any contempt or slight to them This Objection is more fully Answered elsewhere To our Adversary's saying viz. G. W. tells me I was but a kind of a Quaker and I think 't is the truest word in his Book I think I was not above a third part of one and that too much too p. 13. Thus he would fain winde off from the Reputation he had of a Quaker for 25 Years together he now miserably shifts and minces the Matter but manifestly contrary to his own Confession in his Quakers Detection p. 3 as before quoted to my Question Whether F. Bugg when a Quaker denied Jesus of Nazareth to be the Efficient cause of Man's Salvation He Answers I do believe I then did not hold the worst part of Quakerism c. Yet I do freely Acknowledge that I was in great Errors Particularly touching the Point of Justfication For I then Expected Salvation through my Obedience to the LIGHT which the Quakers taught was Sufficient to Salvation But since it pleased God to open my Eyes I believe that Salvation is attained through the Mercy of God is Christ Jesus by Faith in the Merits of his Passion and Obedience to his Precepts p. 14 15. Observe here 1. He now counts it a great Error to Expect Salvation through Obedience to the Light without Distinction of What Light 2. He Opposeth the the Sufficiency of the Light for Salvation And 3. Attaining Salvation through the Mercy of God in Christ Jesus Faith in his Merits and Passion and Obedience to his Precepts These he Opposeth TO Obedience to his Light and Expecting Salvation through the same These he sets in Opposition as one that expects Salvation through the Mercy of God in Christ Jesus and by Faith in his Merits and Obedience to his Passion without Obedience to his Light For that End Expresly Contrary to Christ's Doctrine and his Apostles Testimonies 1. Christ Commanded Believe in the Light that ye may be the Children of the Light And this Believing in the Light was a necessary Act of Obedience in order to Salvation 2. Christ saith I am the Light of the World he that followeth Me shall not abide in Darkness And the Apostle James Exhorts to a Receiving the Ingrafted Word which is able to save the Soul And this Word is both Light and Life In him was Life and that Life was the Light of Men Therefore the Light is Sufficient to Salvation 3. Salvation through the Mercy of God in Jesus Christ true Faith in his Merits and Suffering for us and Sincere Obedience to his Precepts cannot be attained nor performed without Faith in and Obedience to his Light it was the Mercy of God to us to afford us Light to lead us out of Darkness For Men in Darkness are Blind and as such cannot see the Mercy of God in Christ Jesus nor true Faith in his Merits or Suffering For 't is in Walking in the Light