we confesse we were filled with wonderment at that Divine hand that had thus led the judgements without the least mutuall interchange or intimation of thoughts or notions in these particulars of our Brethren there and our selves unworthy to be mentioned with them here Onely we crave leave of the reverend Author and those Brethren that had the view of it to declare that we assent not to all expressions scattered up and down or all every Assertion interwoven in it yea nor to all the grounds or allegations of Scriptures nor should wee in all things perhaps have used the same terms to expresse the same materials by For instance wee humbly conceive Prophecying as the Scripture tearmes it or speaking to the edification of the whole Church may sometimes be performed by Brethren gifted though not in Office as Elders of the Church onely 1 Occasionally not in an ordinary course 2. By men of such abilities as are fit for Office And 3. not assuming this of themselves but judged such by those that have the power and so allowed and designed to it And 4. so as their Doctrine be subjected for the judging of it in an especiall manner to the Teaching Elders of that Church And when it is thus cautioned wee see no more incongruity for such to speake to a point of Divinity in a Congregation then for men of like abilities to speake to and debate of matters of religion in an Assembly of Divines which this reverend Author allows and here with us is practised Againe in all humility we yet see not that Assembly of Apostles Elders and Brethren Acts 15. to have beene a formall Synod of Messengers sent out of a set and combined association from neighbour Churches but an Assembly of the Church of Jerusalem and of the Messengers from the Church of Antioch alone that were farre remote each from other and electively now met Nor are we for the present convinced that the Apostles to the end to make this a Precedent of such a formal Synod did act therein as Ordinary Elders and not out of Apostolicall guidance assistance But we rather conceive if we would simply consider the mutual aspects which these two Churches and their Elders stood in this conjunction abstracting from them that influence and impression which that superior Sphere the Apostles who were then present had in this transaction this to have been a Consultation as the learned Author doth also acknowledge it to have beene in its first originall onely rising up to be a Generall Councell by the Apostles presence they being Elders of all the Churches or if you will a reference by way of Arbitration for deciding of that great controversie risen amongst them at Antioch which they found to bee too difficult for themselves and so to be a warrant indeede for all such waies of communion between all or any especially neighbour Churches and upon like occasions to bee Ordinances furnished with ministeriall power for such ends and purposes Our reasons for this wee are now many waies bound up from giving the accompt of in this way and at this season But however if it should have beene so intended as the learned Author judgeth and the Apostles to have acted therein as ordinary Elders yet the lines of that proportion of power that could bee drawne from that patterne would extend no further then a Ministeriall Doctrinall power c. in such Assemblies which we willingly grant And it may bee observed with what a wary eye and exact ayme hee takes the latitude and elevation of that power there held forth not daring to attribute the least either for kind or degree then what that example warrants which was at utmost but a Doctrinall decernement both of the truth of that controversie they were consulted in as also the matter of fact in those that had taught the contrary as belyers of them and subverters of the faith without so much as brandishing the sword and power of Excommunication against those high and grosse delinquents or others that should not obey them by that Epistle Onely in the last place for the further clearing the difference of the peoples intrest which the reverend Author usually calleth Liberty sometimes Power the Elders rule and authority which makes that first distribution of Church power in particular Congregations as likewise for the illustration of that other allotment of Ministerial doctrinal power in an association or communion of Churches as severed from the power of Excommunication which is the second We take the boldnes to cast a weake beame of our dimne light upon either of these to present how these have layne stated in our thoughts to this end that wee may haply prevent some readers mistake especially about the former For the first we conceive the Elders and Brethren in each Congregation as they are usually in the New Testament thus mentioned distinctly apart and this when their meeting together is spoken of so they make in each congregation two distinct intrests though meeting in one Assembly as the intrest of the Common-Councell or body of the people in some Corporations is distinct from that of the company of Aldermen so as without the consent and concurrence of both nothing is esteemed as a Church act But so as in this company of Elders this power is properly Authority but in the people is a priviledge or power An apparent difference betweene these two is evident to us by this That two or three or more select persons should be put into an Office and betrusted with an intire intrest of power for a multitude to which that multitude ought by a command from Christ to bee subject and obedient as to an ordinance to guide them in their consent and in whose sentence the ultimate formall Ministeriall act of binding or loosing should consist this power must needs bee esteemed and a knowledged in these few to have the proper notion and character of Authority in comparison of that power which must yet concurre with theirs that is in a whole body or multitude of men who have a greater and neerer interest and concernement in those affaires over which these few are set as Rulers This difference of power doth easily appeare in comparing the severall interest of Father and child in his disposement of her in marriage and her concurrence with him therein although we intend not the paralell between the things themselves A virgin daughter hath a power truly and properly so called yea and a power ultimately to dissent upon an unsatisfied dislike yea and it must be an act of her consent that maketh the marriage valid But yet for her Parents to have a power to guide her in her choyce which she ought in duty to obey and a power which must also concurre to bestowe her or the marriage is invalid this comparing her intrest wherein she is more neerly and intimately concerned with theirs doth arise to the notion of an extrinsecall authority whereas that power is in
judge the world even Angels so in the next Chapter the 6. of that 1 Cor. 1.2 3 4 5. And the same Brethren of the same Church as well as the Elders he intreateth to forgive the same incestuous Corinthian upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 8. If it be said to judge is an act of rule and to be Rulers of the Church is not given to all the Brethren but to the Elders only Answ All judgement is not an act of authority or rule for there is a judgement of discretion by way of priviledge as well as of authority by way of sentence That of discretion is common to all the Brethren as well as that of authority belongeth to the Presbytery of that Church In England the Jury by their verdict as well as the Judge by his sentence do both of them judge the same malefactor yet in the Jury their verdict is but an act of their popular liberty In the Judge it is an act of his judiciall authority If it be demanded What difference is there between these two The answer is ready Great is the difference for though the Jury have given up their judgement and verdict yet the malefactor is not thereupon legally condemned much lesse executed but upon the sentence of the Judge In like sort here though the Brethren of the Church do with one accord give up their vote and judgement for the censure of an offender yet he is not thereby censured till upon the sentence of the Presbytery If it be said again Yea but it is an act of authority to binde and loose and the power to bind and loose Christ gave to the whole Church Mat. 18.18 Answ The whole Church may be said to bind and loose in that the Brethren consent and concurre with the Elders both before the Censure in discerning it to be just and equall and in declaring their discernment by lifting up of their hands or by silence and after the censure in rejecting the offender censured from their wonted Communion And yet their discerning or approving of the justice of the censure before-hand is not a preventing of the Elders in their work For the Elders before that have not onely privately examined the offender and his offence and the proofes thereof to prepare the matter and ripen it for the Churches cognizance but doe also publickly revise the heads of all the materiall passages thereof before the Church and doe withall declare to the Church the counsell and will of God therein that they may rightly discerne and approve what censure the Lord requireth to be administred in such a case So that the peoples discerning and approving the justice of the censure before it be administred ariseth from the Elders former instruction and direction of them therein Whereunto the people give consent in obedience to the will and rule of Christ Hence is that speech of the Apostle Wee have in readinesse to revenge all disobedience when your OBEDIENCE IS FVLFILLED 2 Cor. 10.6 The Apostles revenge of disobedience by way of reproofe in preaching doth not follow the peoples obedience but proceedeth whether the people obey it or no. It was therefore their revenge of disobedience by way of censure in discipline which they had in readinesse when the obedience of the Church is fulfilled in discerning and approving the Equitie of the Censure which the Apostles or Elders have declared to them from the Word This power or priviledge of the Church in dealing in this sort with a scandalous offender may not be limited only to a private brother offending but may reach also to an offensive Elder For as hath been touched already it is plaine that the Brethren of the Circumcision supposing Peter to have given an offence in eating with men uncircumcised they openly expostulated with him about his offence and he stood not with them upon termes of his Apostleship much lesse of his Eldership but willingly submitted himselfe to give satisfaction to them all Act. 11.2 to 18. And Paul writeth to the Church of Colosse to deale with Archippus warning him to see to the fulfilling of his Ministery Col. 4.17 And very pregnant is his direction to the Galatians for their proceeding to the utmost with their corrupt and scandalous false Teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you And that upon this very ground of their libertie Gal. 5.12 13. as hath been opened above in Chap. 2. But whether the Church hath power or libertie for proceeding to the utmost censure of their whole Presbytery is a Question of more difficultie For 1. It cannot well be conceived that the whole Presbytery should be proceeded against but that by reason of their strong influence into the hearts of many of the Brethren a strong partie of the Brethren will be ready to side with them and in case of finding dissension and opposition the Church ought not to proceed without consulting with the Synod As when there arose dissension in the Church at Antioch and SIDING or as the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they sent up to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem who in way of Synod determined the businesse Act. 15.2 to 23. A precedent and patterne of due Church proceedings in case of dissension when some take with one side some with another But of that more here after 2. Excommunication is one of the highest acts of Rule in the Church and therefore cannot be performed but by some Rulers Now where all the Elders are culpable there be no Rulers left in that Church to censure them As therefore the Presbytery cannot excommunicate the whole Church though Apostate for they must tell the Church and joyne with the Church in that Censure so neither can the Church excommunicate the whole Presbytery because they have not received from Christ an office of rule without their Officers If it be said the twentie-foure Elders who represent the private members of the Church as the foure living Creatures doe the foure Officers had all of them Crowns upon their heads and sate upon thrones Rev. 4.4 which are signes of regall authoritie The answer is The crowns and thrones argue them to be Kings no more then their white rayments argue them to be Priests ver 4. but neither Priests nor Kings by office but by libertie to performe like spirituall duties by grace which the other doe by grace and office As Priests they offer up spirituall sacrifices and as Kings they rule their lusts passions themselves and their families yea the world and Church also after a sort the world by improving it to spirituall advantage and the Church by appointing their own Officers and likewise in censuring their offenders not onely by their officers which is as much as Kings are wont to doe but also by their own royall assent which Kings are not wont to doe but onely in the execution of Nobles But neverthelesse though the Church want authoritie to excommunicate their Presbytery yet they want not libertie to
Elders with them or direct them where to procure such to come unto them The like course is wont to be taken when sundry Christians coming over from one countrey to another such as are come over first and are themselves full of company direct those that come after them and assist them in like sort in the combination of themselves into Church order according to the rule of the Gospel Though the Apostles be dead whose office it was to plant gather and multiply Churches yet the work is not dead but the same power of the keyes is left with the Churches in common and with each particular church for her part according to their measure to propagate and inlarge the kingdome of Christ as God shall give opportunity throughout all generations CHAP. V. Of the subject to whom the key of Authority is committed THe key of Authoritie or Rule is committed to the Elders of the Church and so the act of Rule is made the proper act of their office The Elders that rule well c. 1 Tim. 5.17 Heb. 13.7.17 The speciall acts of this rule are many The first and principall is that which the Elders who labour in the Word and Doctrine are chiefly to attend unto that is the preaching of the Word with all Authoritie and that which is annexed thereto the administration of the Sacraments or seals Speak rebuke and exhort saith Paul to Titus with all authoritie Tit. 2.15 And that the administration of the seals is annexed thereto is plain from Matth. 28.19 20. Go saith Christ to the Apostles make Disciples and baptize them c. If it be objected private members may all of them prophecie publiquely 1 Cor. 14 31. and therefore also baptize and so this act of Authority is not peculiar to preaching Elders Ans 1. The place in the Corinths doth not speak of ordinarie private members but of men furnished with extraordinary gifts Kings at the time of their first Coronation give many extraordinary large gifts which they do not daily poure out in like sort in their ordinary government Christ soon after his ascenfion poured out a larger measure of his spirit then in times succeeding The members of the Church of Corinth as of many other in those primitive times were inriched with all knowledge and in all utterance I Cor. 1.5 And the same persons that had the gift of prophesie in the Church of Corinth had also the gift of tongues which put upon the Apostle a necessitie to take them off from their frequent speaking with tongues by preferring prophesie before it 1 Cor. 14.2 to 24. So that though all they might prophesie as having extraordinary gifts for it yet the like libertie is not allowed to them that want the like gifts In the Church of Israel none besides the Priests and Levites did ordinarily prophesie either in the Temple or in the Synagogues unlesse they were either furnished with extraordinatie gifts of prophesie as the Prophets of Israel or were set apart and trained up to prepare for such a calling as the sons of the Prophets When Amos was forbidden by the high Priest of Bethel to prophesie at Bethel Amos doth not alledge nor plead the libertie of any Israelite to prophesie in the holy Assemblies but alledgeth onely his extraordinarie calling Amos 7.14 15. It appeareth also that the sons of the Prophets that is men set apart and trained up to prepare for that calling were allowed the like libertie 1 Sam. 19.20 Answ 2. But neither the sons of the Prophets nor the Prophets themselves were wont to offer sacrifices in Israel except Samuel and Eliah by speciall direction nor did the extraordinarie Prophets in Corinth take upon them to administer Sacraments If any reply That if the Prophets in the Church at Corinth had been endued with extraordinarie gists of prophefie they had not been subject to the judgement of the Prophets which these are directed to be 1 Cor. 14.22 Ans It followeth not For the people of God were to examine all prophesies by the Law and testimonie and not to receive them but according to that rule Psal 8.20 Yea and Paul himself referreth all his Doctrine to the Law and Prophets Act. 26.22 And the Bereans are commended for examining Pauls doctrine according to the Scriptures Act. 17.11 12. 2. A second act of Authoritie common to the Elders is they have power as any weighty occasion shall require to call the Church together as the Apostles called the Church together for the election of Deacons Act. 6.2 And in like sort are the Priests of the old Testament stirred up to call a solemne Assembly to gather the Elders and all the inhabitants of the land to sanctifie a Fast Joel 1.13 14. 3. It is an act of their power to examine if Apostles then any others whether officers or members before they be received of the Church Rev. 2.2 A fourth act of their rule is the Ordination of officers whom the people have chosen whether Elders or Deacons 1 Tim. 4.14 Act. 6.6 5. It is an act of the key of Authoritie that the Elders open the doores of speech and silence in the Assembly They were the Rulers of the Synagogue who sent to Paul and Barnabas to open their mouthes in a word of exhortation Act. 13.15 and it is the same power which calleth men to speak to put men to silence when they speak amisse And yet when the Elders themselves do lie under offence or under suspition of it the Brethren have liberty to require satisfaction in a modest manner concerning any publick breach of rule as hath been mentioned above out of Act. 11.2 3 c. 6. It belongeth to the Elders to prepare matters beforehand which are to be transacted by themselves or others in the face of the Congregation as the Apostles and Elders being met at the house of Iames gave direction to Paul how to carry himself that he might prevent the offence of the Church when he should appear before them Act. 21.18 Hence when the offence of a brother is according to the rule in Matth. 18.17 to be brought to the Church they are beforehand to consider and enquire whether the offence be really given or no whether duely proved and orderly proceeded in by the Brethren according to rule and not duly satisfied by the offender lest themselves and the Church be openly cumbred with unnecessary and tedious agitations but that all things transacted before the Church be carried along with most expedition and best edification In which respect they have power to reject causlesse and disorderly complaints as well as to propound and handle just complaints before the Congregation 7. In the handling of an offence before the Church the Elders have authoritie both Jus dicere and Sententiam serre When the offence appeareth truly scandalous the Elders have power from God to informe the Church what the Law or Rule and will of Christ is for the censure of such an offence And when the
and peace to such churches as through want of light and peace lye in error or doubt at least and variance so they have power by the grace of Christ not only to give light and counsell in matter of Truth and Practice but also to command and enjoyn the things to be believed and done The expresse words of the Synodall letter imply no lesse It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and unto us to lay upon you no other burthen Act. 15.27 This burthen therefore to observe those necessary things which they speak of they had power to impose It is an act of the binding power of the keys to bind burthens And this binding power ariseth not only materially from the weight of the matters imposed which are necessary necessitate praecepti from the word but also formally from the authority of the Synod which being an Ordinance of Christ bindeth the more for the Synods sake As a truth of the Gospel taught by a Minister of the Gospel it bindeth to faith an obedience not only because it is Gospel but also because it is taught by a Minister for his callings sake seeing Christ hath said Who so receiveth you receiveth me And seeing also a Synod sometime meeteth to convince and admonish an offending church or Presbyterie they have power therefore if they cannot heal the offenders to determine to withdraw communion from them And further seeing they meet likewise sometimes for generall reformation they have power to decree and publish such Ordinances as may conduce according to God unto such reformation Examples whereof wee read Neh. 10.32 to 39. 2 Chron. 15.12 13. For the second question How far the Fraternity or the Brethren of the church may concurre with the Elders in exercising the power of the Synod The Answer is The power which they have received is a power of liberty As 1. They have liberty to dispute their doubts modestly and Christanly amongst the Elders For in that Synod at Jerusalem as there was much disputation Act. 15.7 so the multitude had a part in the Disputation v. 12. For after Peters speech it is said the whole multitude kept silence and silence from what to wit from the speech last in hand amongst them and that was from Disputation 2. The Brethren of the church had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in approving of the sentence of James and determining the same as the common sentence of them all 3. They had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in choosing and sending messengers and in writing Synodall Letters in the names of all for the publishing of the sentence of the Synod Both these points are expressed in the Text v. 22.23 to 29. Then pleased it the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church to send chosen men and to write Letters by them See the whole church distinguished from the Apostles and Elders and those whom he called the whole Church v. 22. he calleth the Brethren v. 23. The Apostles and Elders and Brethren c. But though it may not be denyed that the Brethren of the church present in the Synod had all this power of liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in all these acts of the Synod yet the authority of the Decrees lay chiefly if not only in the Apostles and Elders And therefore it is said Act. 16.4 That Paul and Silas delivered to the Churches for to keep the Decrees that were ordained of the Apostles and Elders So then it will be most safe to preserve to the Church of Brethren their due liberties and to reserve to the Elders their due authority If it be said The Elders assembled in a Synod have no authority to determine or conclude any act that shall binde the Churches but according to the instructions which before they have received from the Churches Answ Wee do not so apprehend it For what need Churches send to a Synod for light and direction in ways of truth and peace if they be resolved afore-hand how far they will go It is true if the Elders of Churches shall conclude in a Synod any thing prejujudiciall to the truth and peace of the Gospel they may justly expostulate with them at their return and refuse such sanctions as the Lord hath not sancited But if the Elders be gathered in the name of Christ in a Synod and proceed according to the rule the word or Christ they may consider and conclude sundry points expedient for the estate of their Churches which the Churches were either ignorant or doubtfull of before As for the third Question whether the Synod have power to injoyn such things as are both in their nature and their use indifferent We should answer it negatively and our reasons be 1. From the pattern of that precedent of Synods Act. 15.28 They laid upon the Churches no other burthen but those necessary things necessary though not all of them in their own nature yet for present use to avoid the offence both of Jew and Gentile of the Jew by eating things strangled and blood of the Gentile and Jew both by eating things sacrificed to Idols as Paul expoundeth that Article of the Synod 1 Cor. 8.10 11 12. and Chap. 10.28 This ea ing with offence was a murther of a weak brothers soule and a sin against Christ 1 Cor. 8.11 12. and therefore necessary to be forborn necessiâ—ate praecepti by the necessity of Gods Commandement 2. A second reason may be from the latitude of the Apostolicall commission which was given to them Mat. 28.19 20. where the Apâ—stles are commanded to teach the people to observe all things which Christ had commanded If then the Apostles teach the people to observe more then Christ hath commanded they go beyond the bounds of their commission and a larger commission then that given to the Apostles nor Elders nor Synods nor churches can challenge If it be said Christ speaketh only of teaching such things which he had commanded as necessary to salvation Answ If the Apostles or their successors should hereupon usurpe an authority to teach the people things indifferent they must plead this their authority from some other commission given them elsewhere for in this place there is no foot step for any such power That much urged and much abused place in 1 Cor. 14.40 will not reach it For though Paul requiring in that place all the duties of Gods worship whether Prayer or Prophesying or Psalmes or Tongues c. that they should be performed decently and orderly he thereby forbiddeth any performance thereof undecently as for men with long hayre and women to speak in open assemblies especially to pray with their hair loose about them And though he forbiddeth also men speaking two or three at once which to do were not order but confusion yet he doth not at all neither himself injoyn nor allow the Church of Corinth to injoyn such things as decent whose want or whose contrary is not undecent nor such orders whose want or
misconstructions which not the obscurity of the words but the eminency of the gifts and worth of Expositors hath made difficult Let us adde an argument or two more to the same purpose to prove that the Church of a particular Congregation fully furnished with officers and rightly walking in judgement and peace is the first subject of all Church-authority needfull to be exercised within their own body 3. A third argument to prove this is usually and justly taken from the practice and example of the Church of Corinth in the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5.1 to 5. Obj. 1. The excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian was not an act of judiciall authority in the church of Corinth whether Elders or Brethren but rather an act of subjection to the Apostle publishing the sentence which the Apostle had before decreed and judged for saith the Apostle I though absent in body yet present in spirit have judged already concerning him that hath done this deed c. Answ 1. Though Paul as a chiefe Officer of every church judged before-hand the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian yet his judgement was not a judiciall sentence delivering him to Satan but a judicious doctrine and instruction teaching the Church what they ought to do in that case 2. The act of the church in Corinth in censuring the incestuous person was indeed an act of subjection to the Apostles divine doctrine and direction as all church-censures by whomsoever administred ought to be acts of subjection to the word of Christ but yet their act was a compleat act of just power even an act of all that liberty and authority which is to be put forth in any censure For first they delivered him to Satan in the name of the Lord Jesus and with the power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. and that is the highest power in the Church Secondly the spirit of Paul that is his Apostolike spirit was gathered together with them in delivering and publishing the sentence which argueth both his power and theirs was co-incident and concurrent in this sentence Thirdly the holy end and use of this sentence argueth the heavenly power from whence it proceeded They delivered him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that is for the mortifying of his corruption that his soul might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus Fourthly when his soul came to be humble and penitent by the means of this sentence Paul intreateth the church to release and forgive him 2 Cor. 2.6 to 10. Now ejusdem potestatis est ligare solvere claudere aperire Object 2. All this argueth no more but that some in the church of Corinth had this power to wit the Presbytery of the church but not the whole body of the people to excommunicate the offender Answ 1. If the Presbyterie alone had put forth this power yet that sufficeth to make good the Proposition that every church furnished with a presbyterie and proceeding righteously and peaceably they have within themselves so much power as is requisite to be exercised within their own body Answ 2. It is apparent by the Text that the Brethren concurred also in this sentence and that with some act of power to wit such power as the want of putting it forth retarded the sentence and the putting of it forth was requisite to the administration of the sentence For first the reproofe for not proceeding to sentence sooner is directed to the whole church as well as to the Presbyterie They are all blamed for not mourning for not putting him away for being puffed up rather 1 Cor. 5.2 2. The commandment is directed to them all when they are gathered together and what is that but to a Church meeting to proceed against him 1 Cor. 5.4 In like sort in the end of the Chapter he commandeth them all Put away therefore from among you that wieked person v. 13. 3. He declareth this act of theirs in putting him out to be a judiciall act v. 12. Do you not judge them that are within Say that the judgement of authoritie be proper onely to the Presbytery yet the judgement of discretion which as concurring in this act with the Presbytery hath a power in it as was said may not be denyed to the Brethren for here is an act of judgement ascribed to them all which judgement in the Brethren he esteemeth of it so highly that from thence he taketh occasion to advise the members of the Church to refer their differences even in civill matters to the judgement of the Saints or Brethren Know ye not saith he that the Saints shall judge the world yea the Angels 1 Cor. 6.1 2 3. how much more the things of this life Yea rather then they should go to Law and that before Infidels in any case depending betweene Brethren he adviseth them rather to set up the meanest in the Church to hear and judge between them 1 Cor. 6.4 4. When the Apostle directeth them upon the repentance of an offender to forgive him 2 Cor. 2.4 to 10. he speaketh to the Brethren as well as to their elders to forgive him As they were all the Brethren as well as the Elders offended with his sin so it was meet they should all a like be satisfied and being satisfied should forgive him the Brethren in a way of brotherly love and Church-consent as well as the Elders by sentencing his absolution and restitution to the Church 3. Obj. But was not this Church of Corinth who had all this power a metropolis a mother Church of Achaia in which many Presbyteries from many Churches in the villages were assembled to administer this censure Ans No such thing appeareth from the story of the Church of Corinth neither in the Acts Act. 18. nor from either of the Epistles 〈…〉 Corinthians True it is Corinth was a mother-city but not a Mother-Church to all Achaia and yet it is not unlikely that other Churches in that region might borrow much light from their gifts for they abounded and were enriched with variety of all gifts 1 Cor. ◠〈◊〉 But yet that which the Apostle calleth the Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 the whole Church was no larger then was wont to meet together in one place one congregation 1 Conrinth 14.23 A fourth and last Argument to prove the Proposition that every Church so furnished with officers as hath been said and so carried on in truth and peace hath all Church power needfull to be exercised within themselves is taken from the guilt of offence which lieth upon every Church when any offence committed by their members lyeth uncensured and unremoved Christ hath something against the Church of Pergamus for suffering Balaam and the Nicolaitans Revel 2.14 15. and something against the Church of Thyatira for suffering Jezabel Now if these Churches had not either of them sufficient power to purge out their own offenders why are they blamed for toleration of them yea why are not the neighbour Churches blamed for
Church discerns the same and hath no just exception against it but condescendeth thereto it is a further act of the Elders power to give sentence against the offender Both these acts of power in the Ministers of the Gospel are foretold by Ezekiel Chap. 44.23 24. They shall teach my people the difference between holy and prophane and cause them to discerne between the uncleane and the cleane And in controversie they shall stand in judgement and they shall judge it according to my judgement c. 8. The Elders have power to dismisse the Church with a blessing in the name of the Lord Num. 6.23 to 26. Heb. 7.7 9. The Elders have received power to charge any of the people in private that none of them live either inordinately without a calling or idlely in their calling or scandalously in any sort 2 Thes 3.6 ver 8 10 11 12. The Apostles command argueth a power in the Elders to charge these duties upon the people effectually 10. What power belongeth to the Elders in a Synod is more fitly to be spoken to in the Chapter of Synods 11. In case the Church should fall away to blasphemy against Christ and obstinate rejection and persecution of the way of grace and either no Synod to be hoped for or no helpe by a Synod the Elders have power to withdraw or separate the Disciples from them and to carry away the Ordinances with them and therewithall sadly to denounce the just judgement of God against them Act. 19.9 Exod. 33.7 Mark 6.11 Luk. 10 11. Act. 13.46 Obj. But if Elders have all this power to exercise all these acts of Rule partly over the private members partly over the whole Church how are they then called the servants of the Church 2 Cor. 4.5 Answ The Elders to be both servants and Rulers of the Church may both of them stand well together For their rule is not lordly as if they ruled of themselves or for themselves but stewardly and ministeriall as ruling the Church from Christ and also from their call and withall ruling the Church for Christ and for the Church even for their spirituall everlasting good A Queene may call her servants her mariners to pilot and conduct her over the Sea to such an Haven yet they being called by her to such an office shee must not rule them in steering their course but must submit her selfe to be ruled by them till they have brought her to her desired Haven So is the case between the Church and her Elders CHAP. VI. Of the Power and Authoritie given to Synods SYnods wee acknowledge being rightly ordered as an Ordinance of Christ Of their Assembly wee find three just causes in Scripture 1. When a Church wanting light or peace at home desireth the counsell and helpe of other Churches few or moe Thus the Church of Antioch being annoyed with corrupt teachers who darkned the light of the truth and bred no small dissension amongst them in the Church they sent Paul and Barnabas and other messengers unto the Apostles and Elders at Hierusalem for the establishment of Truth and Peace In joyning the Elders to the Apostles and that doubtlesse by the advise of Paul and Barnabas it argueth that they sent not to the Apostles as extraordinary and infallible and authenticall Oracles of God for then what need the advise and helpe of Elders but as wise and holy guides of the Church who might not onely relieve them by some wise counsell and holy order but also set a Precedent to succeeding ages how errours and dissensions in Churches might be removed and healed And the course which the Apostles and Elders tooke for clearing the matter was not by publishing the counsell of God with Apostolick authoritie from immediate revelation but by searching out the truth in an ordinary way of free disputation Act. 15. v. 7. which is as fit a course for imitation in after ages as it was seasonable for practice then 2. Just consequence from Scripture giveth us another ground for the assembly of many churches or of their messengers into a Synod when any church lyeth under scandall through corruption in doctrine and practice and will not be healed by more private advertisements of their own members or of their neighbour Ministers or Brethren For there is a brotherly communion as between the members of the same church so between the churches We have a little sister saith one church to another Cant. 8.8 therefore churches have a brotherly communion amongst themselves Look then as one brother being offended with another and not able to heal him by the mouth of two or three brethren privately it behooveth him to carry it to the whole church so by proportion if one church see matter of offence in another and be not able to heal it in a more private way it will hehove them to procure the Assembly of many churches that the offence may be orderly heard and judged and removed 3. It may so fall out that the state of all the churches in the countrey may be corrupted and beginning to discern their corruption may desire the concurse and counsell of one another for a speedy and safe and generall reformation And then so meeting and conferring together may renew their covenant with God and conclude and determine upon a course that may tend to the publike healing and salvation of them all This was a frequent practice in the old Testament in the time of Asa 2 Cron. 15.10 to 15. in the time of Hezekiah 2 Chron. 29.4 to 19. In the time of Josiah 2 Chron. 34.29 to 33. and in the time of Ezra Ezra 10.1 to 5. These and the like examples were not peculiar to the Israelites as one intire nationall church For in that respect they appealed from every Synagogue and Court in Israel to the nationall high Priest and Court at Jerusalem as being all of them subordinate thereunto and therefore that precedent is usually waved by our best Divines as not appliable to Christian churches but these examples hold forth no superiority in one church or court over another but all of them in an equall manner give advice in common and take one common course for redresse of all And therefore such examples are fit precedents for churches of equall power within themselves to assemble togegether and take order with one accord for the reformation of them all Now a Synod being assembled three questions arise about their power 1. What is that power they have received 2. How far the fraternity concurreth with the Presbyterie in it the brotherhood with the Eldership 3. Whether the power they have recieved reacheth to the injoyning of things both in their nature and in their use indifferent For the first we dare not say that their power reacheth no farther then giving counsell for such as their ends be for which according to God they do assemble such is the power given them of God as may attain those ends As they meet to minister light
5. From this soveraigne power it is that all the spirituall power and efficacie and blessing in the administration of these gifts in these offices and places for the gathering and edifying and perfecting of all the Churches and of all the Saints in them is from him Mat. 28.20 Lo I am with you alwayes c. Col. 1.29 1 Cor. 15.9 The g od pleasure of the Father the personall union of the humane nature with the eternall Son of God His purchase of his Church with his own blood and His deep humiliation of himself unto the death of the Crosse have all of them obtained to him this his highest exaltation to be head over all things unto the Church and to injoy as king thereof this soveraign power Col. 1.19 Col. 2.2 9 10. Act. 20.28 Phil. 2.8 to 11. But of this soveraigne power of Christ there is no question amongst Protestants especially studious of Reformation Now as concerning the Ministeriall power we give these following Propositions I. Propos A particular Church or Congregation of Saints professing the faith TAKEN INDEFINITELY FOR ANY CHVRCH one as well as another is the first subject of all the Church-offices with all their spirituall gifts and power which Christ hath given to be executed amongst them whether it be Paul or Apollos or Cephas all are yours speaking to the Church of Gorinth 1 Cor. 3.22 not as a peculiar priviledge unto them but common to them with any other particular church And theirs was such a Church of whom it is said That they came all together into one place for the communication of their spirituall gifts 1 Cor. 14 23. And Paul telleth the same church that God hath set the officers and their gifts and all variety of members and their functions in his Church 1 Cor. 14.28 where it is not so well translated Some God hath set some in his church for hee hath set all but speaking of the members of the church v. 27. he proceedeth to exemplifie those members in v. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and which God hath set in his Church that is which members Apostles Prophets c. For though the Relative be not of the same gender with the Antecedent before yet it is an usuall thing with the pen-men of the new Testament to respect the sense of the words and so the person intended rather then the gender of their name and to render the Relative of the same gender and case with the Substantive following so here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. In the new Testament it is not a new observation that we never read of any nationall church nor of any nationall officers given to them by Christ In the old Testament indeed we reade of a Nationall church All the tribes of Israel were three times in a yeer to appeare before the Lord in Jerusalem Deut. 16.16 And he appointed them there an high Priest of the whole nation and certain solemne sacrifices by him to be administred Lev. 16.1 to 29. and together with him other Priests and Elders and Judges to whom all appeals should be brought and who should judge all difficult and transcendent cases Deut. 17.8 to 11. but wee reade of no such nationall church or high Priest or court in the new Testament And yet we willingly grant that particular churches of equall power may in some cases appointed by Christ meet together by themselves or by their messengers in a Synod and may perform sundry acts of power there as hath been shewed above But the officers themselves and all the Brethren members of the Synod yea and the Synods themselves and all the power they put forth they are all of them primarily given to the severall churches of particular Congregations either as the first subject in whom they are resident or as the first object about whom they are conversant and for whose sake they are gathered and imployed II. Propos The Apostles of Christ were the first subject of Apostolicall power Apostolicall power stood chiefly in two things First in that each Apostle had in him all ministeriall power of all the officers of the Church They by vertue of their office might exhort as Pastors 1 Tim. 2.1 teach as Teachers 1 Tim. 2.7 rule as Rulers 2 Tim. 4.1 receive and distribute the oblations of the Church as Deacons Act. 4.35 yea any one Apostle or Euangelist carried about with him the liberty and power of the whole Church and therefore might Baptize yea and censure an offender too as if he had the presence and concurrence of the whole Church with him For we reade that Philip baptized the Eunuch without the presence of any Church Act. 8.38 And that Paul himself excommunicated Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 and it is not mentioned that hee took the consent of any Church or Presbyterie in it It is true indeed where he could have the consent and concurse of the Church and Presbyterie in exercise of any act of church-power he willingly took it and joyned with it as in the ordination of Timothy 2 Tim. 1.6 with 1 Tim. 4.14 and in the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5.4 5. But when both himself and the person to be baptized or ordained or excommunicated were absent and distant from all churches the Apostles might proceed to put forth their power in the administration of any church act without them The amplitude and plenitude of power which they received immediately from Christ would beare them out in it As my Father sent me saith Christ to wit with amplitude and plenitude of soveraigne power so send I you with like amplitude and plenitude of ministeriall power Joh. 20.21 2. Apostolicall power extended it self to all churches as much as to any one Their line went out into all the world Psal 19.4 compared with Rom. 10. And as they received commission to preach and baptize in all the world Mat. 28.19 So they received charge to feed the flock of Christs Sheep and Lambs which implyeth all acts of Pastorall government over all the Sheep and Lambs of Christ Joh. 21.15 16 17. Now this Apostolicall power centring all church-power into one man and extending it self forth to the circumference of all churches as the Apostles were the first subject of it so were they also the last Neverthelesse that ample and universall latitude of power which was conjoyned in them is now divided even by themselves amongst all the churches and all the officers of the churches respectively the officers of each church attending the charge of the particular church cōmitted to them by vertue of their office and yet none of them neglecting the good of other churches so far as they may be mutually helpfull to one another in the Lord. III. Propos When the church of a particular congregation walketh together in the truth and peace the Brethren of the church are the first subject of church-liberty and the Elders thereof of church-authority and both of them together are the first subject of all
church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election and ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body Of this Proposition there be three Branches 1. That the Brethren of a particular church of a Congregation are the first subjects of church-liberty 2. That the Elders of a particular church are the first subjects of church-authority 3. That both the Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subjects of all church-power needfull to be exercised in their own body Now that the key of church-priviledge or liberty is given to the Brethren of the church and the key of rule and authority to the Elders of the church hath been declared above in Chapt. 3. But that these are the first subjects of these keys and first the church the first subject of liberty may appeare thus From the removall of any former subject of this power or liberty from whence they might derive it If the Brethren of the congregation were not the first subject of their church-liberty then they derived it either from their own Elders or from other churches But they derived it not from their own Elders for they had power and liberty to choose their own Elders as hath been shewed above and therefore they had this liberty before they had Elders and so could not derive it from them Nor did they derive it from other particular churches For all particular churches are of equall liberty and power within themselves not one of them subordinate to another Wee reade not in Scripture that the Church of Corinth was subject to that of Ephesus nor that of Ephesus to Corinth no nor that of Cenchrea to Corinth though it was a church situate in their vicinity Nor did they derive their liberty from a Synod of churches For we found no foot-step in the pattern of Synods Act. 15. that the Church of Antioch borrowed any of their liberties from the Synod at Jerusalem They borrowed indeed light from them and decrees tending to the establishment of truth and peace For upon the publishing of the decrees of that Synod the Churches were established in the faith or truth Act 16.4 5. and also in consolation and peace Act. 15.31 32. but they did not borrow from them any church-liberty at all 2. Now the second branch of the Proposition was That the Elders of the church of a particular Congregation are the first subject of rule or authority in that church or congregation over which the Holy Ghost hath made them over-seers 1. From the charge of rule over the Church committed to them immediatly from Christ For though the Elders be chosen to their office by the church of Brethren yet the office it self is ordained immediatly by Christ and the rule annexed to the office is limited by Christ only If the Brethren of the church should elect a presbyterie to be called by them in the Lord this will not excuse the Presbyters in their neglect of rule either before the Lord or to their own consciences For thus runneth the Apostles charge to the Elders of Ephesus Act. 20.28 Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you over-seers 2. The same appeareth from the gift of rule required especially in an Elder without which they are not capable of election to that office in the church 1 Tim. 3 4 5. He must be one that is able to rule well his own house or else how shall he order the church of God The like gift of rule is not necessary to the admission of a member into the church as to the election of an Elder If a private brother be not so well able through weaknesse in prudence or courage to rule his own house it will not justly debarre him from entrance into the church but the like defect will justly debar a man from election to the office of an Elder Neither hath God given a spirit of rule and government ordinarily to the greater part of the body of the brethren and therefore neither hath he given them the first Receit of the key of Authoritie to whom he hath not given the gift to employ it If it be objected How can the brethren of the Church invest an Elder with rule over them if they had not power of rule in themselves to communicate to him Ans They invest him with rule partly by chusing him to the office which God hath invested with rule partly by professing their own subjection to him in the Lord we by the rule of Relatives doth necessarily inferre and preferre the authoritie of the Elders over them For in yeelding subjection they either set up or acknowledge Authoritie in him to whom they yeeld subjection Ob. 2. The body of the Church is the Spouse of Christ the Lambs wife and ought not the wife to rule the servants and stewards in the house rather then they her Is it not meet that the keyes of Authoritie should hang at her girdle rather then at theirs Answ There is a difference to be put between Queens Princesses Ladies of great Honor such as the Church is to Christ Psal 45.9 and Countrey huswives poore mens wives Queens and great persons have severall offices and officers for every businesse and service about the house as Chamberlains Stewards Treasurers Comptrollers Vshers Bayliffs Groomes and Porters who have all the authoritie of ordering the affairs of their Lords house in their hands There is not a key left in the Queens hand of any office but onely of power and libertie to call for what she wanteth according to the Kings royall allowance which if she exceed the officers have power to restrain her by order from the King But countrey huswives and poore mens wives whose husbands have no Officers Bayliffs or Stewards to oversee and order their estates they may carry the keyes of any office at their own girdles which the husband keepeth not in his own hand Not because poore huswives have greater authoritie in the house then Queens but because of their poverty and mean estate they are fain to be in stead of many servants to their husbands Obj. 3. The whole body naturall is the first subject of all the naturall power of any member in the body as the facultie of sight is first in the body before in the eye Answ It is not in the mysticall body the Church in all respects alike as in the naturall body In the naturall body there be all the faculties of each part actually inexistent though not exerting or putting forth themselves till each member be articulated and formed But in the body of the Church of Brethren it is not so All the severall functions of Church power are not actually inexistent in the body of Brethren unlesse some of them have the gifts of all the officers which often they have not having neither Presbyters nor men fit to be Presbyters Now if the power of the Presbytery were
given to a particular Church of Brethren as such primo per se then it would be found in every particular Church of Brethren For a Quatenus adomnia valet consequentia Obj. 4. But it is an usuall tenent in many of our best Divines that the government of the Church is mixt of a Monarchy an Aristocracie and a Democracy In regard of Christ the head the government of the Church is soveraigne and monarchicall In regard of the Rule by the Presbytery it is stewardly and Aristocraticall in regard of the peoples power in elections and censures it is Democraticall which argueth the people have some stock of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and authority in the government of the Church Answ In a large sense Authority after a sort may be acknowledged in the people As 1. when a man acteth by counsell according to his own discerning freely he is then said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominus sui actus So the people in all the acts of liberty which they put forth are Domini sui actus Lords of their own action 2. The people by their acts of liberty as in election of officers and concurrency in censure of offenders and in the Determination and Promulgation of Synodall acts they have a great stroke or power in the ordering of Church affairs which may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or potestas a POWER which many times goeth under the name of rule or authoritie but in proper speech it is rather a priviledge or liberty then authoritie as hath been opened above in Chap. 3. For no act of the peoples power or liberty doth properly bind unlesse the authoritie of the Presbytery concur with it 3. A third argument whereby it may appear that the Elders of a particular Church are the first subject of authoritie in that Church is taken from the like removall of other subjects from whence they might be thought to derive their authoritie as was used before to prove the Church of Brethren was the first subject of their own libertie in their own Congregation The Elders of Churches are never found in Scripture to derive their authority which they exercise in their own congregation either from the Elders of other Churches or from any Synod of Churches All particular Churches and all the Elders of them are of equall power each of them respectively in their own Congregations None of them call others their Rabbies or Masters or Fathers in respect of any authoritie over them but all of them own and acknowledge one another as fellow Brethren Matth. 23.8 9 10. And though in a Synod they have received power from Christ and from his presence in the Synod to exercise Authoritie in imposing burthens such as the holy Ghost layeth upon all Churches whose Elders are present with them Act. 15.28 for the Apostles were Elders in all Churches yet the Elders of every particular Church when they walk with the brethren of their own Church in light and peace they need not to derive from the Synod any power to impose the same or the like burthens upon their owne Churches For they have received a power and charge from Christ to teach and command with all authoritie the whole counsell of God unto their people And the people discerning the light of the truth delivered and walking in peace with their Elders they readily yeeld obedience to their Over-seers in whatsoever they see and hear by them commended to them from the Lord. 3. Now we come to the third branch of the third Proposition which was this That the Church of a particular congregation Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election or ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body The truth hereof may appear by these Arguments 1 In point of ordination From the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling oven to the satisfaction of his own and the peoples conscience when both the Brethren and the Elders of the particular Church whereto he is called have put forth the power which belongeth to them about him As when the Brethren of the Church have chosen him to office and the Presbyterie of the Church have laied their hands upon him and both of them in their severall acts have due respect to the inward ministeriall gifts whereunto God hath furnished him he may then look at himself as called by the holy Ghost to exercise his talents in that office amongst them and the people may and ought to receive him as sent of God to them What defect may be found in such a call when the Brethren exercise their lawfull libertie and the Elders their lawfull authority in his ordination and nothing more is required to the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling If it be said there wanted imposition of hands by the Bishop who succeedeth in the place of Timothy and Titus whom the Apostle Paul left the one in Ephesus the other in Crete to ordain Elders in many Churches Tit. 1.5 Ans Touching ordination by Timothy and Titus and upon pretence of them by Bishops enough hath been said by many godly learned heretofore especially of later times The summe cometh to these conclusions 1 That Timothy and Titus did not ordain Elders in many Churches as Bishops but as Evangelists Timothy is expresly termed an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4.5 And Titus is as clearly decyphered to be an Evangelist as Timothy by the characters of an Evangelist which either Scripture holdeth forth or Eusebius noteth in his Ecclesiast histor lib. 3. cap. 37. Gr. cap. 31. Lat. Not to be limited to a certain Church but to follow the Apostles finishing their work in planting and watering Churches where they came They did indeed ordain officers where they wanted and exercised jurisdiction as the Apostles did in severall Churches yet with the rest of the Presbyterie and in the presence of the whole Church 1 Tim. 5. But for the continuance of this office of an Evangelist in the Church there is no direction in the Epistles either to Timothy or Titus or any where else in Scripture 2. Conclusion Those Bishops whose callings or offices in the Church are set forth in those Epistles to be continued they are altogether Synonyma with Presbyters Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Tim. 3.1 to 7. 3. Conclus We read of many Bishops to one Church Phil. 1.1 Act. 14.23 and Chap. 20.17 28. Tit. 1.5.7 but not of many Churches much lesse all the Churches in a large Diocesse to one Bishop 4. Conclus There is no transcendent proper work cut out or reserved for such a transcendent officer as a Diocesan Bishop throughout the New Testament The transcendent acts reserved to him by the Advocates of Episcopacie are Ordination and Iurisdiction Now both these are acts of Rule And Paul to Timothy acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church above Pastors and Teachers who labour in
word and doctrine but rather Pastors and Teachers above them The Elders saith he that rule well are worthy of double honour but especially they that labour in word and doctrine 1. Tim. 5.17 5 Conclus When after the Apostles times one of the Pastors by way of eminencie was called Bishop for order sake yet for many yeers he did no act of power but 1 With consent of the Presbyterie 2 With consent and in the presence of the people As is noted out of Eusebius Ecclesiast Histor lib. 6. ca. 43. Gr. ca. 35. Lat. Cyprian Epist lib. 3. Epist 10. lib. 1. Epist 3. Casanb adversus Baronium exercitat 15. num 28. When it is alledged out of Hiereme to confirm the same that in the primitive times Communi Presbyterorum consilie Ecelesiae gubernabantur It is a weak and poore evasion to put it off with observing that he saith Communi Presbyterorum consilie not authoritate For 1. No authoritie is due to Presbyters over the Bishop or Pastor no more then to the Pastor over them They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Elders and coequall in authoritie And 2. when Hiereme saith The Churches were governed by the common counsell but all with it else it might be said the Bishop governed the Churches with the common counsell of Presbyters to wit asked but not followed And that would imply a contradiction to Hieronus testimonie to say the Churches were governed by the sole authoritie of Bishops and yet not without asking the common counsell of the Presbyters For in asking their counsell and not following it the Bishop should order and govern the Churches against their counsell Now that the Churches were governed by the common counsell of Presbyters and against the common counsell of Presbyters are flat contradictories 2. For a second Argument to prove that the Brethren of the Church of a particular congregation walking with their Elders in truth and peace are the first subject of all that Church power which is needfull to be exercised in their own body It is taken From their indispensable and independent power in Church censures The censure that is ratified in heaven cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on earth Now the censure that is administred by the Church of a particular congregation is ratified in Heaven For so saith the Lord Iesus touching the power of Church censures Matth. 18 17 18. If the offender refuse to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye shall bind onearth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Against this Argument from this Text many objections are wont to be made but none that will hold Object 1. By Church in Mat. 18.17 is not meant the Christian Church for it was not yet extant nor could the Apostles then have understood Christ if he had so meant but the Jewish church and so he delivereth their censure in a Jewish phrase to account a man as an Heathen and a Publican Answ 1. The Christian Church though it was not then extant yet the Apostles knew as well what he meant by Church in Mat. 18.17 as they understood what he meant by building his Church upon the Rock in Mat. 16.18 It was enough the Apostles looked for a Church which Christ would gather and build upon the confession of Peters faith and being built should be indued with heavenly power in their censures which they more fully understood afterwards when having received the Holy Ghost they came to put these things in practice Answ 2. The allusion in the Church-censure to the Jewish custome in accounting a man as an Heathen and Publican doth not argue that Christ directeth his Disciples to complain of scandals to the Jewish Synagogues but only directeth them how to walk towards obstinate offenders excommunicate by the Christian church to wit to walk towards them as the Jews walk towards Heathens to wit denying to them religious communion and as towards Publicans with-holding from them familiar civill communion for so the Iews said to Christs Disciples Why eateth your Master with Publicans and Sinners Answ 3. It is not credible that Christ would send his Disciples to make complaint of their offences to the Iewish Synagogues For first Is it likely he would send his Lambs and Sheep for right and healing unto Wolves and Tigres Both their Sanhedrim and most of their Synogogues were no better And if here and there some Elders of their Synagogues were better affected yet how may it appear that so it was where any of themselves dwelt And if that might appear too yet had not the Iews already agreed That if any man did confesse Christ he should be cast out of the Synagogues Joh. 9.22 Object 2. Against the argument from this Text it is objected That by the Church is meant the Bishop or his Commissary Answ 1. One man is not the Church If it be said one man may represent a church the reply is ready one man cannot represent the Church unlesse he be sent forth by the Church but so is neither the Bishop nor his Commissary They not for them but they come unsent for like water into a Ship chiefly for the terror of the servants of Christ and for the incouragement of the prophane And though some of Christs servants have found some favour from some few of Bishops men of more learning and ingenuity yet those Bishops have found the lesse favour themselves from their fellow-Bishops Answ 2. The Bishop ordinarily is no member of the Church of that congregation where the offence is committed and what is his satisfaction to the removall of the offence given to the Church Answ 3. The new Testament acknowledgeth no such ruler in the Church as claimeth honour above the Elders that labour in word and Doctrine 1 Tim. 5.17 Object 3. To tell the Church is to tell the Presbyterie of the Church Answ 1. We deny not The offence is to be told to the Presbyterie yet not to them as the Church but as the guides of the church who if upon hearing the cause and examining the witnesses they finde it ripe for publike censure they are then to propound it to the Church and to try and cleer the state of the cause before the church that so the church discerning fully the nature and quality of the offence may consent to the judgement and sentence of the Elders against it to the confusion of the offender and the publike edification of them all who hearing and fearing will learn to beware of the like wickednesse Answ 2. The Church is never put for the Presbyterie alone throughout the new Testament though sometime it be put expresly for the Fraternity alone as they are distinguished from the Elders and Officers Act. 15.22 and therefore Tell the Church cannot be meant Tell the Presbyterie alone Object In the old Testament the Congregation is often put for the
another And yet Paul went up to Ierusalem to confer with Peter Iames and Iohn lest he should run in vain in the course of his ministery Galat. 2.2 And though in conference the chief Apostles added nothing to Paul ver 6. yet when they perceived the Gospel of the uncircumcision was committed to Paul and Barnabas as that of the circumcision to Peter Iames and Iohn they gave unto one another the right hand of fellowship ver 9. Now then it will follow by just proportion that if the Apostles who are each of them independent one of another had need to consult and confer together about the work of their ministery to procure the freer passage to their calling and to their doctrine then surely Churches and Elders of Churches though independent one of another had need to communicate their courses and proceedings in such cases one with another to procure the freer passage to the same And if the Apostles giving right hand of fellowship one to another did mutually strengthen their hands in the work of the ministery then the Elders of Churches giving right hand of fellowship to one another in their ordination or upon any fit occasion cannot but much encourage and strengthen the hearts and hands of one another in the Lords work Again something might be added if not for confirmation yet for illustration of this point by comparing the dimensions of the new Ierusalem which is a perfect platform of a pure Church as it shall be constituted in the Iewish Church state at their last conversion The dimensions of this Church as they are described by Ezekiel Chap. 48.30 are according to Iunius twelve furlongs which after the measure of the Sanctuarie which is double to the common is about three miles in length and as much in breadth But the dimensions of the same Church of the Iews in Revel 21.16 is said to be twelve thousand furlongs Now how can these two dimensions of the same Church stand together which are so farre discrepant one from another For there be a thousand times twelve furlongs in twelve thousand furlongs The fittest and fairest reconciliation seemeth plainly to be this that Ezekiel speaketh of the dimensions of any ordinarie Iewish Church of one particular congregation But Iohn speaketh of the dimensions of many particular Iewish Churches combining together in some cases even to the communion of a thousand Churches Not that the Church of the Iews will be constituted in a Nationall and Diocesan frame with Nationall officers and Diocesan Bishops or the like but that sometimes a thousand of them will be gathered into a Synod and all of them will have such mutuall care and yeeld such mutuall brotherly help and communion one to another as if they were all but one body If any man say Theologia symbolica or parabolica non est argumentativa that arguments from such parables and mysticall resemblances in Scripture are not valid let him enjoy his owne apprehension and if he can yeeld a better interpretation of the place let him wave this collection Neverthelesse if there were no argumentative power in parables why did the Lord Iesus so much delight in that kind of teaching and why did Iohn and Daniel and Ezekiel deliver a great part of their prophesies in parables if we must take them for riddles and not for documents nor arguments Surely if they serve not for argument they serve not for document But furthermore touching this great work of communion and consociation of Churches give us leave to adde this caution A Caution To see that this consociation of Churches be not perverted either to the oppression or diminution of the just libertie and authoritie of each particular Church within it self who being well supplied with a faithfull and expert Presbyterie of their own do walk in their integritie according to the truth and peace of the Gospel Let Synods have their just authoritie in all Churches how pure soever in determining such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as are requisite for the edification of all Christs Churches according to God But in the election and ordination of Officers and censure of offenders let it suffice the Churches consociate to assist one another with their counsell and right hand of fellowship when they see a particular Church to use their libertie and power aright But let them not put forth the power of their communitie either to take such Church acts out of their hands or to hinder them in their lawfull course unlesse they see them through ignorance or weaknesse to abuse their libertie and authoritie in the Gospel All the liberties of Churches were purchased to them by the precious blood of the Lord Iesus and therefore neither may the Churches give them away nor many Churches take them out of the hands of one They may indeed prevent the abuse of their liberties and direct in the lawfull use of them but not take them away though themselves should be willing The Lord Iesus having given equall power to all the Apostles it was not lawfull for eleven of them to forbid the twelfth to do any act of his office without their intervention Neither was it lawfull for the nine who were of inferiour gifts to commit the guidance and command of all their Apostolick administrations unto Peter Iames and Iohn who seemed to be pillars And that not onely because they were all one as well as another immediately guided by the holy Ghost but because they were all equall in office and everie one to give account for himself unto God It is the like case in some measure of particular churches yea there is moreover a three-fold further inconvenience which seemeth to us to attend the translation of the power of particular churches in these ordinary admninistraons into the hands of a Synod of Presbyters commonly called a Classis 1. The promise of Binding and Loosing in way of Discipline which Christ gave to every particular church as hath been shewed is by this means not received nor injoyned nor practised by themselves immediately but by their Deputies or Over-seers 2. The same promise which was not given to Synods in acts of that nature as hath been shewed in the Chapter of Synods but in acts of another kinde is hereby received and injoyned and practised by them and by them onely which ought not to be And which is a third inconvenience The practice of this power of the keys only by a Synod of Presbyters still keepeth the Church as under nonage as if they were not grown up to the full fruition of the just liberty of their riper yeers in the dayes of the Gospel For a mother to bear her young daughter in her arms and not to suffer it to go on its own feet whilest it is in the infancie is kindly and comely but when the Damosell is grown up to riper yeers for the mother still to bear her in her arms for fear of stumbling it were an uncecessary burthen to the mother and a reproach to the Virgin Such is the case here The community of churches according to the Hebrew phrase is as the Mother each particular church is as the Daughter In the old Testament while the Church was in her nonage it was not unseasonable to leave the whole guidance and bearing thereof in the hands of their Tutors and Governours the Priests and Levites and in the community of the nationall courts But now in the dayes of the new Testament when the churches are grown up or should be grown at least to more maturity it were meet more to give the Church liberty to stand alone and to walk upon her own legs and yet in any such part of her way as may be more hard to hit right upon as in her Elections and Ordinances and Censures of eminent persons in office it is a safe and holy and faithfull office of the vigilancy of the community of churches to be present with them and helpfull to them in the Lord. And at all times when a particular church shall wander out of the way whether out of the way of truth or of peace the community of churches may by no meanes be excused from reforming them again into their right way according to the authority which the Lord hath given them for the publike edification of all the severall churches within their Covenant Soli Christo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is licensed and entred according to Order FINIS