indued there is no vvarrant for others to prescribe nor for themselues to read over such stinted prayers prescribed by men for the worship of God Neither doeth it onely derogate from the honour and benefit of Christs ascension into heauen but also from the care loue and bountie that he hath and shevveth continually to his church upon earth giving still gifts unto men for the vvork of the ministerie from time to time Ephes 4 8 13. and Psal 68 19. vvith 1 Cor. 12 4 5 6. 1 Tim. 2 1. and 6 13 14. with Matth. 28 20. Els also why doe they not put a book of Homilies in the hands of all the Ministers to be read over dayly for their sermons to the people asvvell as a book of prayers in and for the worship of God And vvhy doe not the ministers use the one aswel as the other in their publick ministration V. The spirit of God is the onely help which he giueth us to help our infirmities in the time of prayer not books or beads or any such thing Rom. 8 26 27. Gal. 4 6. Zach. 12 10. Ephes 6 18. Iude ver 20. And hovv els should blinde men pray that cannot read Besides that Book-prayer quencheth the spirit and abridgeth the work of the holy Ghost suppressing the gifts and graces of God in us and removing the heart far from God hovvever we may seeme with the mouth to come neare unto him inasmuch as our prayers are not dravven and powred out of the heart by the help of the spirit of God according to our present and continuall occasions but are prescribed unto us and read in a book still alike from time to time 1 Thes 5 17 18 19. Esa 29 13. compared with 1 Sam. 1 15. Zach. 12 10. Phil. 4 6. VI. We our selues as living stones are built up a spirituall house an holy Priesthood to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God by Iesus Christ 1 Pet. 2 5. vvith Iohn 4 24. Rev. 1 5 6. Therefore also should we not read our prayers out of a book when we worship God seeing it is not a living or spiritual sacrifice but dead carnal And hovv then is it a vvorship acceptable to God by Iesus Christ as all our prayers and worship of God should be 1 Pet. 4 5. with Rev. 8 3. Rom. 8 26 27. 1 Thes 5 17 18. 1 Tim. 2 1 5. 1 Joh. 5 13 14 15. Iude v. 20 21. VII Prayer is to be made for things that are needfull and lawfull to be asked of God according to the severall occasions estate conditions of people publikely and privately joyntly and severally in churches and common vveales by sea and by land in peace and in warre in prosperitie and adversitie spirituall and bodily c. and thanksgiving againe accordingly to be rendred unto God upon the prayers heard c. as throughout the Scriptures may be seen Phil. 4 6. and 1 Thes 5 17 18. compared with Gen. 32 9 12. Exod. 14 15. and 32 11 12 13. Lev. 16 6 10 21 33 34. Numb 14.13 19. Deut. 3 23 24 25. Iosh 7 6 9. Judg. 16 28. Ruth 4 11 12. 1 Sam. 1 10 â—â— 12 and 23 10 11. 2 Sam. 7 18 29. 1 King 7 22 54. 2 King 13 3 4. and 19 â—â— 19. 1 Chron. 21 8 16 17. 2 Chron. 14 11. and 20 5 13. Ezra 6 10. and 8.21 22 23. and 9 5 15. Neh. 1 4 11. and 4 9. Ester 4 16. Job 42 8 10. Psa 5 2 3. 6 17 and 22 and 28 6. and 32 6. and 41 4 and 50 14 25. and 55 16 17. and 66 17 20. and 86 and 88 and 102 and 107 and 109 4. and 116 1 2 4. and 118 5. and 142. Prov. 30 7 8 9. Eccles 5 1 2. Esa 38 2 3. and 64. Ier. 7 16. and 14 7 8 9 11. 18 1â— 23. and 29 7. and 32 16 25. Ezech. 9 8. and 11 13. Dan. 2 17 23. and 6 10 11. and 9 3 19. Hos 14 2 3. Ioel 2 17. Amos 7 2 5. Ion. 2 ch 4 2 3. Hab. 3 ch Mal. 1 8 11. Mat. 14 23 30. and 26 36 44. Mar. 13 18 33. Luke 6 12.28 and 11 1 13. and 18 1 13. Ioh. 17. ch Act. 1 14 24 25. and 4 24 30 and 6 4 6. and 13 3. and 14 23. and 16 25 and 20 36. and 21 5. and 22 17. 28 8. Rom. 8 26 27. and 15 30.31 32 1 Cor. 14 13 16. 2 Cor. 12 8. and 13 7. Gal. 4 6. Eph. 6 18. Phil. 1 9 11. Col. 1 3 9 12. and 4 2 3 12. 1 Thes 3 10 13. 2 Thes 1 11 12. and 3 1 2. 1 Tim. 2 1 5. Heb. 5 7. and 13 18 21. Iam. 1 5 6 7. 4 3 5. 13 18. 1 Pet. 4 7. 1 Joh. 5 14 15 16. Jude v. 20. Rev. 5 8. and 8 3. Which doth yet the more make against Book prayer that is stil read over thirtie fiftie an hundred yea many hundreds of yeares as if God never heard our prayers or gaue not continually several occasions of prayer to churches and people of all sorts publick and private vvhich none can conceiue much lesse expresse the manifold and unspeakable particulars thereof VIII If Book-prayer vvere the ordinance of God why did not the Prophets and Apostles make such books of prayer leaue them to the church as they did their other vvritings for continuall use publike and private Or shall vve think that they were unfaithfull to the Lord 〈◊〉 unsufficient for this vvork if it had ben committed unto them Or that those which make or prescribe such books are more wise more carefull more sufficient then they were Moses saith Ye shal not adde unto the word which I command you neither shall you diminish ought from it that ye may keep the Commandements of the Lord your God which I command you Deut. 4 2. and 12 32. The Prophet Esay sends all to the Law and to the testimonie affirming that 〈◊〉 men speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Esa 8 2â— The Apostle saith that he delivered to the churches what he received of the Lord and shunned not to declare unto them all the counsell of God Act 20.27 1 Cor. 11.1.2.23 and 14.37 And he straitly chargeth Timothee and in him all the ministers of Christ to keep the commandement giuen in that Epistle of his without spot and unrebukeable untill the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ 1 Tim 6 13 12. Either therefore Book-prayer is none of Gods counsels coÌ„mandements and ordinances or if it were the Prophets and Apostles haue delivered such books to the Churches and ministers of God with commandement accordingly to use them Which if any could bring forth the question were soone ended But if the Prophets Apostles never made nor ever appointed others to make such books of praier for such use as is aforesaid by vvhat right then may any take upon
of wisedome is ascribed 1 Cor. 12 8. As in Israell they had ministers that vvere called Wise men Mat. 23 34. So then in the generall use of the word all the Elders and governours of particular Churches are Pastors and doe feed according to the duetie of their office 1 Pet. 5.1 2. Acts 20 17 28. And thus there were and may be many Pastors in particular churches But shall we therefore conclude that there was no particular office of Pastor in the churches no difference betvveen the teaching and ruling Elders no distinction betvveen the Pastors and Teachers office c. 10. Lastly vvhereas others also alledge this Scripture Act. 20 17 28. M. Bright on Rev. 2.1 c. to shew that by the Angell of the Church of Ephesus Rev. 2 1. is meant the whole Colledge of Pastors Elders and Bishops let these reasons aforesaid be well observed about that point also for the better fynding out and clearing of the truth in this behalf And so I proceed to note somewhat likewise about the other Scriptures before mentioned touching the matter in hand The other Scriptures are these Phil. 1 1. 1 Thes 5 12. 1 Tim. 3 ch and Tit. 1 ch 1 Pet. 5 1 2. Which all of them haue this common unto them that the like collections are made out of them as out of Acts 20.17.28 And therefore the same things may be observed about them as haue ben noted here already about Acts 20.17.28 That so I need not repeat the same things over againe and againe Onely I will briefly annexe some fewe things more concerning these Scriptures in particular 2. With that place of Phi. 1.1 where the Apostle speaketh of the Bishops of that church as being many there may be compared another place in the same epistle where the Apostle saith I intreat thee also true yokefellow c. Phil. 4 3. By which manner of speach may be observed that though there were sundry Elders and Bishops in that church yet there vvas notwithstanding also some speciall man vvhom the Apostle in speciall and more particularly called his true yoke-fellow Whether it were the Pastor or not I will not determine And who it should be rather then the Pastor that by such a peculiar attribute without particular naming of him should be intended by the Apostle and understood by them to whome he vvrote I desire to haue shevved by others The question that is made about the gender is of no vvaight For besides the matter spoken off and other circumstances of the place the Syriak translation putteth the matter out of doubt which hath it thus I entreat thee also O sonne of my yoke c. vvhich shevveth both that he spake of a man of one that was of speciall note and imployment Tremellius Iunius in their notes on the Syriak translation expound it thus The sonne of my yoke that is partaker of the same yoke vvith me vvhich art my helper in the same ministerie A metaphor taken from bulloks who being put under the same yoke are used by men to one and the same ministerie service Also Ignatius writing to the church of Philippi nameth Vitalis Bishop or Pastor of that church And here in the Apostles next Epistle which is to the Colossians he speaketh of Archippus by name touching the fulfilling of his ministerie in the church of Colosse Col. 4 17. 3. The next Scripture 1 Thes 5 12. as it sheweth that there were divers Elders in that church so the vvords there used of labouring ruling or being over them in the Lord informing or admonishing them may notwithstanding imply that there vvas distinction of place and office among them as more plainly appeareth 1 Tim. 5 17. where the like vvords are used in the Apostles speach concerning the Elders and the distinction of their office and duties And as likevvise may be observed in Hezekiahs speach to the priests and Levites and in the termes there used though he spake unto them jointly together 2 Chron. 29 4 5. compared with v. 11. Besides that Origen writeth of Gajus by name reported to haue ben Bishop of the church of Thessalonica Origen l. 10. in cap. 16. epist ad Romanos 4. Both the places in 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1 ch shew likevvise that there vvere sundry Elders in the churches of Ephesus and Crete Yet this hindreth not but that they had also difference of office and function among them as may appeare by comparing 1 Tim. 5.17 Ephes 4 11 12. Rev. 2 1. and Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. with the places aforesaid and may be implyed by the particular properties and dueties required of them besides the estate and practise of the church of Israell vvhich giueth great light in this behalf as hath ben observed If any understand these places in 1 Tim. 3. and Tit. 1 ch to speak of such Elders onely as were ministers yet that vvill be no hinderance neyther For seeing the Priests and Levites in Israell vvere all of the tribe of Levi and lineally descending one from another according to their kinred vvhich novv is not so in the Pastors and Teachers for a lineall descent one of another according to kinred though otherwise they succeed and follovv one another in their place and function and now the Pastors Teachers are by the Lord taken out of the Gentiles and become answerable to the Priests and Levites Esa 66 18 21. and Jer. 33 15 22. therefore vvas it needfull that there should in speciall manner be mention in the Apostles vvritings * The like may be observed about the Deacons â—ho are in diverâ— things much answerable to the Levites in Israel as to the Leviticall Treasurers c. of their offices and of their properties qualities and dueties c. Which needed not so much to be about the ruling Elders chosen out of the people who are answerable to the like Elders in Israell notwithstanding the differences of estate are stil to be endowed with like qualities as those Elders were as may be seen by observing the qualities mentioned in Exod. 18 21. and Deut. 1 13 15 16 17. compared also with 1 Cor. 6 5. and 12 28. Rom. 12.8 1 Tim. 5 17. And here let it be considered vvhether if a Synagogue of the Ievves or many thereof were converted to the Christian faith the rulers of the Synagogue becoming Christians might not novv be taken or kept still to be ruling Elders of the church such as we read off Acts 13 15. and 18 8. and Mar. 5.22 c. whereas the Priests Levites comming to the faith as divers did Acts 6 7. they vvere necessarily to leaue their Leviticall office and then being fit might become ministers of the Gospel and so continevv in that ministration employment as before they did in the other Heb. 9 6 7. and 13 10. with Acts 4 36. and 11 22 26. and 13 1 5. c. Rom. 15 16. 1 Cor. 9 13 14. and with Esa 66 21
as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me 1 Cor. 11 24 25. By which meanes our faith is the more strengthned our hope increased our mutuall loue nourished and vve still stirred up with all thankfulnes to ascribe unto God the praise of our salvation in Iesus Christ In vvhich respect also it may fitly be called the Eucharist or Thankesgiving 1 Cor. 10.16 18. and 11.23 26. compared vvith Mat. 26.26.27.28 Mar. 14.22 25. Luke 22.19.20 Act. 2.41.42 and 20.7 vvith Numb 28.9.10 Ezech. 44.15.16 4. And note here hovv the Papists and Lutherans doe much urge though diversly the having of Images for the better remembrance of Christ and to be in stead of books for the unlearned people c. whereas Christ hath appointed himself to be described and his people to be taught and put in remembrance of him not by Images but by his Gospel and Sacraments Mar. 16.15 Gal. 3.1.8 Mat. 26.28 and 28.18.19.20 1 Cor. 10.16 and 11.23 26. And therewithall let it be observed whether that Images vvere not then most of all brought into the churches and private houses under the pretences aforesaid vvhen the diligent teaching of the Gospell and often celebration of the Lords Supper did by degrees decay and cease more and more in the parishionall churches among the people So as the Ministers becomming themselues dumbe non resident or slothfull the Images though also dumbe vvere made to supply their place being novv set up to be the peoples teachers and remembrancers another way in stead of the liuely preaching of the vvord careful observation of the Lords supper for the continuall shevving forth and memoriall of his death from time to time Which therefore may the more stirre up the churches novv being reformed not onely to abandon the foresaid Images but also diligently to use both the preaching of the Gospel often communicating at the Lords Table the better to meet with the corruptions of later times and to returne to the intier practise of the churches that vvere in former ages 5. Furthermore the Lords supper being rightly considered is answerable not onely to the Passeover but to the other Feasts also and sacrifices had at Ierusalem And the Prophets speaking of the times of the Gospel under the termes of the shadovves of the Lavv foretold that from one Nevv moone to another and from one Sabbath to another all flesh should come to vvorship before the Lord at Jerusalem c. Which by the practise aforesaid carefully observed vve may performe and enjoy in Christ who is the truth body of all those types and shadovves And how othervvise it is or can outwardly be performed aright and ansvverably to the prophecies and shadowes aforesaid should by al churches heedfully be observed Esa 66.23 Ezec. 44.15.16.24 and 45 18 25. and 46 1 11. Zach. 14 16 19. vvith Col. 2.16.17 Act. 2.42 and 20 7. Rev. 1 10. 1 Cor. 10.16 18. and 11.23 26. Besides that the Lords day and the Lords supper at the Lords Table doe fitly agree together both for the termes and for the things themselues thus spoken of Rev. 1.10 compared vvith 1 Cor. 10.16.17.21 and 11.20 and Act. 20.7 Another question there is about the time of the day vvhen the Lords supper should be celebrated vvhether in the morning or euening c. Some think it should be in the euening or after noone because Christ at first with his disciples did eat it at euen after the Passeover vvhereupon it vvas called the Lords supper Touching which on the other hand may these reasons be observed and the like 1. That the having of it then at euen vvas upon speciall occasion because it follovved the celebration of the Passeover which was kept at euen Which occasion ceasing the time is left free Christ having not appointed it or any set time thereunto Mat. 26.17 26. c. 2. So Christ and his disciples eate it then with unleavened bread by the occasion aforesaid and the feast of unleavened bread then also observed Which now being ceased as vve are not therefore bound to the use of unleavened bread so neyther are vve bound to that circumstance of time but may as freely use another time as other common and usuall bread therein Mat. 26 17 26. Mar. 14 12 22. vvith Exod. 12.8.15.18 c Act. 2.42 and 20.7 1 Cor. 10 16. 3. In like manner at the first celebration of the Passeover in Egypt they eat it standing with staues in their hand as ready to depart from thence and sprinkled blood upon the lintell side posts of their doores keeping within not going out of their houses because that night the Lord vvould passe through to smite the Egyptians and seeing the blood on their doore posts would passe over them and not destroy their first borne vvith the other Exod. 12.7.11 13.22.13 Which occasions ceasing vvhen aftervvard they vvere in the land at rest they eat it sitting sprinkled not their doore posts vvith blood neyther vvere bound to keepe vvithin but might goe out of their houses as we read that Christ vvith his disciples sate dovvne to eat it and then aftervvard went out of the house that night to the mount of Oliues c. Mat. 26 19.20.30 This sheweth forth the Lords death already done as those typed out his death then to come 4. Moreover the Lords supper as by other occasion I noted here before is so to be considered as not onely succeeding the Passeover but as ansvvering also to the other Feasts and Sacrifices then had in Israell Which were observed aswell in the morning as at euening Not to speak of the Shevv bread still being on the pure Table before the Lord other the like ordinances had in Israell Which in the perpetuall equitie thereof may haue their use being hereunto fitly and vvisely applyed according to the proportion of faith Ioh. 1 29 36. 1 Cor. 5 7. and 10 16 17 18. Luke 22 7 20. compared vvith Lev. 1 7. and 23 chap. and 24 5 9. Numb 15 1 2 29. and 28 29 chap. Deut. 16 1 17. Heb. 13 8 16. Hos 14.2 Mal. 1 11. Zach. 14 16 19. Esa 66 23. Rev. 13 8. 5. Finally the auncient practise of the churches of Christ ever synce the Apostles times confirmeth the same yet more unto us As when in the Acts of the Apostles it is vvritten that upon the first day of the week the disciples came together to break bread Act. 20 7. Where in that he saith they came together that day to this end we must either think that they met but at euening for it or grant that they had and might haue it at other times besides Which Iustine Martyr makes manifest whose words I noted here before besides the continuall practise of the Church ever since throughout all ages vvhich is carefully to be regarded in all such things as are not repugnant or disagreeing to the vvord of God CHAPTER XV. Touching the having of a Fast and the Lords supper
raunsome for al our sinnes Rhem. Annot. â— Tim. 2 5. and 1 Joh. 2 2. c. They professe also the articles of the Chriâ—â—â—â—â— faith conteyned in the Apostles Creed as it is commonly called 〈◊〉 the Nicene and Athanasius Creed As appeareth also in the Rhemes Testament 〈◊〉 their notes at the end of the Acts of the Apostles and in their service booke c. 〈◊〉 professing this faith they baptize with water in the Name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost Which Christ commanded his disciples to doe Matth. 28 16 19. with Act 8 36 37. Therefore the Baptisme received among them is not to be renounced c. VII And vvho can deny vvith any vvarrant from the vvord of God the Ievves and Pagans whom they bring to the faith of Christ aforesaid and baptize into his name Who can I say with any good reason deny these novv to be Christians or not to haue the Lords ordinance of baptisme vvhich is still to be reteyned and not a nevv to be gotten or repeated agayne Like as the straungers and Proselytes of the Gentiles that came to the faith of Israell in the time of their apostasie and so vvere circumcised reteyned still their circumcision vvere received in Iudah to eat of the Passeover together vvith the Israelites themselues Whereof none might eat that were uncircumcised 2 Chron. 30 1 11 25. with Exod. 12 48 49. VIII The Scripture also teacheth that God hath * Rev. 18 4. 〈◊〉 2 2. and 3 1. and 4 1 2 12 15 16 17. Mich. 1 1 5 13. c. Ier. 2 2 c. Eâ—â—â—â— 16 2 60. and 20 4 44. and 22 and 23 chap. his people in the Romish Babylon under his covenant of grace and vvhen he calleth them out from thence requireth of them not to be partakers of their sinnes but requireth not to leaue whatsoever is had in the church of Rome But as the †Prophets taught dealt with Israel of old the childreÌ„ of that church should plead vvith their mother that shee take away her fornications out of her sight and her adulteries from between her breasts Novv “ Matt. 28 19. Baptisme is not of her adulteries but of Christs ordinances it is not a threshold or post which Antichrist hath brought into the Temple of God but was set therein ‡ Rom. 6 3 â—â—â—h 2 Thes 2 3 4. and Rev. 11 chap. of old by the Lord himself Neyther may vve plead vvith the Church of Rome to take it avvay but that shee put avvay the fornications corruptions that are of her ovvne addition Which are the very things * Ezech. 43 7 8 9. and 16 chap. Iudg. 2 〈◊〉 Psal 106 35 39. Esa 8 11 c. Amos 5 4 5 6 14 15. with Rev. 8 9 〈◊〉 13 6 17 14 chap. c. that cause the abomination of her estate and vvhich vve are bound to leaue put avvay and not all vvhatsoever is had in such Apostaticall Churches IX Els by such like reasons as the baptisme is renounced which is the received men might also urge as some haue done not to reteyne useâ— regard as vve should the articles of faith the learning of the scriptureâ— the translations thereof had and acknovvledged in those Church â—â—ld 〈◊〉 likewise might persvvade to the dissolution of such mariages as haue bâ—â— had by their Ministerie vvith other as strange consequences that by 〈◊〉 maner of reasoning vvould be inferred thereupon Which to admitte 〈◊〉 vvere contrarie to Deut. 5 32 33. and 31 9 13. Prov. 4 25 26 27. and 23 2 Chro. 29 and 30 chap. Esa 8 19 20. and 34 16. Luk. 16 29. Ioh. 5 39. Act. 15. and 15 21. and 17 2 3 11. Rom. 15 4. 16 17. 1 Cor. 4 6. 1 Thess 5 21. 2 Tâ—â— 3 14 17. Heb. 13 4 9. Rev. 1 3. 2 Pet. 3 17 18. OBJECTION I. But †The Anabaptists M. A. c Animad p. 68 72 71 75. the Baptisme had in the Church of Rome is not true baptisme 〈◊〉 an Idol and lying signe a detestable and cursed sacrament a fiction 〈◊〉 true Christian baptisme ‡ M. Cl. no better then when we wash our own face wiâ—â— water dayly Of which sort also the Baptisme of the Church of England 〈◊〉 And Circumcision that was kept in the apostasie of Israell heretofore ANSWER Assertions notably erroneous if not indeed hereticall and blasphâ—mous and such as are not peculiar to the Anabaptists alone but are soâ—â— of them affirmed and some of them also published by others some saâ—ing one thing some another some speaking of one church some of anâ—ther some to one purpose some to another sometimes more plainly directly sometimes vvith shifts pretences more deceiving the simplâ— and bevvraying their ovvne iniquity Which is the more lamentable 〈◊〉 as much as these being maine grounds of Anabaptistrie they shouâ—â— therefore be convinced and resisted not coloured or pleaded for by as meanes For if the former assertions vvere true then would it necessarie follovv that the Baptisme received in the Churches aforesaid is not 〈◊〉 ordinance of God not to be reteyned but utterly to be rejected 〈◊〉 baptisme to be received both for obedience of the commandement 〈◊〉 God and for our ovvne comfort Reasons shewing That if the Baptisme of the Church of Rome England were an Idol and lying signe c. then it ought to be renounced and another to be receyved I. Because Idols and lying signes and fictions are not of God but the Divell who is a lyar and a Father thereof Ioh. 8 44. Rom. 3 4. II. Neyther can an Idoll and lying signe or such a baptisme as is more then a dayly vvashing of our owne faces be the signe and sealeâ— Gods true and everlasting covenant of the righteousnes of faith and â—â—ashing avvay of our sinnes in the blood of Christ 2 Cor. 6 14 15 16. â—â— 2 18. 1 Cor. 8 4. with Rom. 4 11. and 6 3 4. III. The signe in a Sacrament also is that which is outward visible 〈◊〉 â—h in Baptisme is the vvashing with water in the Name of the Lord. 〈◊〉 if this be a fiction and lying signe in the Churches aforesaid then is not the Lords And they which are there baptized haue not then the outvvard visible signe vvhich the Lord hath ordeyned to be had of his people and therefore are bound to gette it unto them where it may be â—ad Rom. 4 11. and 6 3 4. Act. 10 47 48. Matt. 3 11. and 28 18 19. with Gen. 1â— 11 12 13. and 21 4. IV. And that also is to be done without delay and before they may come to the Lords Supper seing the neglect of Baptisme is sinne as was the neglect of circumcision and no unbaptized person may eat of the Lords supper as no uncircumcised person might eate of the passeover Ephes 4 4 5. and Luke 7 29 30. with 1 Cor. 10 16 17 18. Exo. 4 24
22 23. In vvhich respects let it also be observed whether the difference should not now in the church still carefully be kept betvveene the ruling Elders and betvveen the ministers of the Gospell the Pastors and Teachers as there was heretofore in Israell betvveen the Elders of the people and the ministers of the Temple the Priests and Levites Exod. 18 21. with 28 chap. Numb 11 16. vvith 3 and 4 and 8 and 16 and 18 ch Deu. 1 13 18. vvith 10.8 and 33 8 11. 2 Chro. 19 5 8 11. Jer. 19 1. Luke 22 66. Act. 4 5 6. and 5 21 34. and 22 5 30. compared with 1 Tim. 5 17. Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. Ephes 4 11 12 13. Acts 20 17 28. Phil. 1 1. Col 4 17. 1 Thes 5 12 13 14. Hebr. 13 7 17. Rev. 2 1. c. And this both for the difference of the offices themselues of the dueties and ministration thereof and for sundry other points and questions hereabout and namely for the continuance of the ministers in their offices and functions as did the Priests and Levites in the ministerie though there be a yerely or other like chaunge of the ruling Elders as is novv observed among the Ievves touching the rulers of their Synagogues and is very usuall in such policies as are Aristocraticall or Democraticall c. Although some also vvrite that in the church succeeding the Apostles times the Elders and Deacons were chosen to be perpetual and that speach of the Apostle concerning the Deacons purchasing to themselues a good degree if they haue used the office of a Deacon well is duly to be regarded thereabout 1 Tim. 3 13. But having thus by the way noted these things let us novv furthermore touching the places aforesaid the matter in hand obserue herewithall hovv the speaches in those Epistles are by the Apostle directed both unto Timothee and Titus in the singular number as is also by Christ to the Angels of the severall churches Rev. 2 3 chap. And whether this may not imply that in the churches vvhere either of these came and vvere left by the Apostle or vvhere there vvere not Pastors as yet either they themselues albeit Euangelists othervvise did novv for the time supply the Pastors place and office there as Iames is observed to haue done at Ierusalem though he vvas an Apostle othervvise Act. 21 18. or that vvhat they did for a time in the severall Churches where they came being Euangelists the same in al things ordinarie and perpetual should still be done by the Pastors in their particular and peculiar Churches from time to time untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ Whereabout that charge so earnestly giuen to Timothee in special is wel to be observed being expressely giuen to endure untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6 13 14. which could not as I noted here before be done by Timothee in his ovvne person who dyed after he had served his ovvne generation by the vvill of God but was to be performed by his successors from time to time unto the end of the vvorld As may also appeare by comparing 1 Tim. 6 13 14. with Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and Mat. 28 18 19 20. And more particularly touching the church of Ephesus where Timothee abode some time 1 Tim. 1.3 Eusebius giues record of Onesimus the Pastor of that church shevving how Ignatius vvhen he was at Smyrna vvhere Polycarpus vvas vvrote an Epistle to the church of Ephesus making mention of Onesimus the Pastor thereof Euseb l. 3. c. 32. Besides the speciall mention of the Angell of the church of Ephesus like as of the church of Smyrna and the other churches particularly spoken of Rev. 2.1.8.14.18 and 3.1.7.14 and that the contents both of Christs letters directed to the Angels of the churches and of the Apostles to Timothee Titus are of such matters as concern the Pastors office who by his name gift work and duties of his calling hath speciall charge of the flock over vvhich he is set in such things as Christ and the Apostle haue written off in the Epistles aforesaid And for the churches in Crete vvhere Titus was left Tit. 1.5 the like may be mynded as of the other churches aforesaid seeing they vvere so to be established as Paul had appointed Titus and the Apostles wayes vvere alike tovvards all churches as Paul himself witnesseth 1 Cor. 4.17 and 14.33 and 16 1. Col. 4.16.17 and Tit. 1.5 with 1 Tim. 6.13.14 5. There is a place likevvise in Heb. 13.7.17.24 shewing that there vvere divers Elders in the churches of the Ievves Yet neither doth this hinder but that they had also distinction of office among them for teaching and ruling Elders as there the Apostle speaketh of such who spake the word of God unto them and were their guydes and governours vvatching for their soules as they that should giue account c. where moreover the Apostle useth a vvord HEGOUMENOI signifying Guydes Leaders Captaines Rulers Governours chief c. vvhich is attributed to the Overseers Governours both in church and common wealth yea euen unto kings and to Christ himself Gen. 49 10. 1 Sam. 25 30. 2 Sam. 5 2 1 King 14 27. 2 King 20 5. 1 Chron. 26 24. and 27 4 16. Psal 68 27. Dan 3 2. Mat 2 6. Luc. 22 26. Acts 7 10. who is here also in this chapter Heb. 13 20. called the great Shepheard or Pastor of the sheep under vvhom the other Pastors and Guydes aforesaid ministred and guyded the flocks committed unto them And in Israell of old they had among the Iewes both Elders of the Priests and Elders of the people besides other differences of the ministers and Governors among them as vvas noted there before And in the church at Ierusalem since Christ there was Iames together with the Elders overseeing the affaires of that church Act. 21 18 c. And Eusebius vvith other auncient Writers notes the names of sundry Bishops or Pastors who after Iames follovved one another in that church for a long time aftervvard as is aforesaid 6. Concerning the place in 1 Pet. 5 1 4. the same things may be observed as about the other Scriptures before mentioned And this moreover that Peter an Apostle doth here call himself an Elder and a fellow-Elder vvith the rest ver 1. So generall is the word and comprising in it Elders of divers sorts and offices as euen this place undeniably sheweth Where may be noted further how Christ is here called the Archpastor or chief Shepheard ver 4. Which again plainely implyeth other Pastors Bishops that are inferiour and subordinate unto him vvho is the chief and great shepheard of the sheep and Bishop of our soules Heb. 13 20. and 1 Pet. 2 25. and 5 1 4. with Ioh. 21.15 16.17 Act. 20 17 28. Rom. 12.7.8 Ephe. 4.11 12. 1 Tim. 5 17. Rev. 2 1 8. And hitherto of these things concerning
these allegations out of the Scripture Another allegation about the matter aforesaid is taken out of auncient writers Park Polit eccles p. 236. c. shewing that in some churches heretofore there were two Bishops or Pastors in one and the same office in one church at once As namely that there vvas in the church of Ierusalem at once Narcissus and Alexander and in the church of Hippo Valerius and Augustine in Rome Felix Liberius in Nazianzum Gregorie the father Gregorie the sonne c. Euseb l. 6. c. 7.9.10 Sozomen l. 4. c. 14. August epist 110. Gregor Nazianz. epist ad Gregor Nyssenum Whereabout may be considered I. Whether this vvas ordinarie or extraordinarie If ordinarie how is it then that the same other auncient vvriters doe usually still make mention but of one in one church at one time as in their vvritings everie vvhere may be seen If extraordinarie and upon some speciall occasions what then vvas the ordinarie course that vvas otherwise kept and observed usually II. By the instances alledged it appeareth that there were but two of these Bishops in these churches at those times Whereas by the Scriptures alledged and the generall acknovvledgement almost of all there may be many Elders or Bishops in a church and far moe then tvvo Yea if there were but one pastor one teacher one ruling Elder in a church there vvould yet be moe Elders or Bishops then two at once III. The tvvo aforesaid also vvere both of them teaching Elders and Ministers of the vvord and Sacraments vvhereas the Scriptures shevve that there vvere and should be in the Church both teaching and ruling Elders IIII. The vvriters vvhich mention these note some special occasions thereof as that it was in case of old age or sicknes or special good liking and approbation of the parties and returning to the churches and places from which through troubles or otherwise they had some vvhile ben absent or other the like and some difference vvithall observed betvveene some of them Which is also duly to be regarded For vvhich see the â—â—ters and places aforesaid V. The time moreover is to be noted when this vvas done Which by the instances alledged appeareth to be some good vvhile after the Apostles dayes Whereas the question is concerning the primitiue institution and practise from the beginning VI. Also if such examples in later times so recorded by these writers should be respected vvhy should not then the other examples of former times recorded by the same and other Writers likewise VII And finally the onely sure ground of truth and end of controversies in Religion is the word of God vvherevvith so far as the auncient Writers accord their testimonies vvritings may in their place well be regarded According to it therefore I leaue these things vvith the other before alledged out of the Scriptures to be considered discussed And hitherto of the latter braunch of this question Novv furthermore note withall that how ever it be for the matter in hand touching the Pastors and other Elders of particular churches yet still it lyeth on them who receiue or plead for Diocesan and Provinciall churches Pastors or Bishops that they shevv such churches and Pastors planted by the Apostles at the beginning For if it cannot be shevved that the Apostles by vertue of their commission from Christ established such Diocesan and Provincial churches and Bishops who then may establish or submit unto them If they vvho were the Master-builders under Christ did not set them up vvhat povver then is there under heauen that may erect them and what homage is it that a Christian soule can with good conscience yeeld unto them in this behalf 2. The churches must be such and so established as the Lord appointeth and approveth in his vvord Revel 1 12 20. And everie officer in the church must in a due regard be counted a meÌ„ber in the body of Christ Rom. 12 3 8. 1 Cor. 12 12 28. Ephes 4 4 16. And none may set members in the body of Christ but the Lord himself 1 Cor. 12 18 28. c. Euen as on the coÌ„trarie none may keep out despise or abandon those vvhom the Lord hath appointed to be in his church and to continevv therein to the end of the vvorld Rom. 12.6.7.8 Ephe. 4 11 12. with Esa 66 21. 1 Tim. 3.1 15. and 5 3 9 17. with 6 13 14. and with Mat. 28.18.19.20 Luke 10.16 and 12 42 43. Ioh. 13 20. 1 Pet. 5 1 4. Rev. 1 16 20. and 2 1 8 c. 3. Moreover the functions duties of such Prelates if they be members of the body of Christ are to be shewed out of the word of God as vve see done for the Officers of particular churches Rom. 12 6 7 8. Ephes 4.11.12 vvith Esa 66.21 1 Thes 5.12.13.24 1 Tim. 5.17 Rev. 2.1.8 c. and as vvas in Israell for the hy Priest and for the other Priests and Levites besides that vvhich was in their cities and Synagogues Exod. 28. and 29. Lev. 1 16 chap. c. Num. 3 and 4 and 8. Deut. 16 19 chap. Josh 21 chap. 1 Chron. 23 26 ch Luke 4 16 20. Act. 13.14.15 c. 4. The place also and manner vvhere and hovv such Bishops doe and can meet together with the rest of the body whereof they are members that is with their Diocesan and Provinciall churches is to be shewed in their practise agreable to the Scriptures as may be done for the Pastors of particular churches and their assemblies Rev. 1 20. and 2 and 3 ch vvith Acts 20.17.28 Rom. 12.4 8. Col. 4.16.17 1 Thes 5.12.13.14.27 Heb. 13.7.17.24 Jam. 2.2 vvhere the Apostle calleth the assemblies of Christians Synagogues vvhich as I noted before may haue reference to the Synagogues of the Ievves Mat. 4 23. Luke 4 16 20. Acts 13.5.14.15.42 and 14.1 and 17.1.2 and 18.4.7.8 c. As also Ierusalem was the place whither the Iewes were bound to come thrise a yere and where the high Priest and the other Priests and Levites that ministred there were bound to sacrifice and performe the other duties of their callings for the vvhole church from time to time according as the Lord particularly appointed in his word 5. Yea the higher and greater that the members and functions are which the Lord hath set in his church the more undoubted it is that they are specially described in his word and the more needfull both for the church and the Officers themselues to haue certain knowledge and assurance thereof As was for the chief Priests other officers of the church of Israell Necessarie therefore it is that the Diocesan and Provinciall Churches if any such vvere planted by the Apostles and the office entrance administration of Diocesan and Provinciall Bishops vvhich challenge to be chief in the church and distinct from the Pastors and Bishops of particular churches should be shewed out of the Scriptures by such as hold would uphold them if they
divers vvords and the same vvords diversly about these matters Which may wel be observed likewise for the better understanding of Christs speach in Mat. 18 17. 5. As also that by the ordinance of God the deciding of causes and judging of persons is to be by the Rulers and Iudges deputed by God according to his word and not according to the voyces of the people or multitude of them c. Deu. 1 16 17. and 16 18. vvith 1 Cor. 6 4 5. and Deu. 17 8 11. and 19 17. Exod. 18 15 16.21.22 and 20 12. and 23.2 1 Sam. 2.25 2 Chron. 19 5 11. Mat. 5 22. 1 Tim. 5 17. Heb. 13 17. 6. And that the Elders and Governours are dayly to attend hereunto as there is occasion and for this cause among other are to haue maintenance double honour of the Congregation vvhereas the other men haue their other imployment at home and abroad the women are to keep at home and looke to their household affaires c. Exod. 18 13 21 22. Deu. 1 16 17. and 25 4. Prov. 31.23.27 Acts 20 17 28. Rom. 12 8. 1 Thes 5 12 13. 2 Thes 3 10 12. 1 Tim. 5 17 18 19. Tit. 2 4 5 15. and 3 10. 1 Pet. 5 1 4. 7. Also that the Elders sitting publikely at a knovven time and place may heare and judge the causes of their brethren if the parties and witnesses be present though no other of the people be then and there with them Deu. 1.16.17 and 19 16.17 1 Sam. 2 25. 2 Chron. 19 5 11. Mat. 5 22. 1 Tim. 5 17.19.20.21 Hebr. 13.17 Where againe may be considered that which I noted before hovv the Syriack hath BETH DINE the house of judgment where the Greek hath SyNEDRION the Councill or sitting of the Elders Mat. 10 17. And moreover that we read the people were hearing of doctrine in the Temple whiles the Synedrion Governours vvere otherwhere assembled together Act. 5 20 21 22 25 27. c. 8. Besides that as of old so still the Eldership consisteth not onely of Ministers but also of the Elders of the people such as are chosen out of the people by the people and for the people in this behalf And that therefore this doeth no more take avvay any right or povver of the people now then it did of old but doeth rather in deed establish and confirme it still and shevv us how to use it aright as in Israel heretofore notwithstanding any differences between our estate and theirs in other respects Jer. 19 1. 2 Chron. 19 8. Ezech. 44 15 24. Deu. 1 13 15. and 16 18. and 19 17. with 1 Tim. 5 17. Rom. 12 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. 1 Thes 5 12. c. 9. Neyther may we bring or admitte of any other understanding of this Scripture Mat. 18 17. then such as agreeth with Moses and the Prophets Esa 8 20. Mat. 7 22. Luke 16 29 31. Act. 26 22. Hos 8 12. Mal. 4 4. 2 Tim. 3 16 17. For Christ came not to destroy the Lavv and the Prophets but to fulfill them And the Pharisees would haue ben glad if they could haue had any such exception against Christ or his doctrine any way Mat. 5 17 18 19 20. c.. 10. Finally both the things here going before about private dealing with a brother that sinneth against us the taking of one or tvvo more with us that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established Mat. 18 15 16. and the things also following after in this verse where it is said Let him be to thee as an Heathen and Publicane Mat. 18 17. are spoken according to the Iewes phrase understanding And why not then also that which is in the midst betvveen both Considering withall that the speach vvas unto Ievves and spoken by Christ that lived among them and usually applied his doctrine and maner of speaking to their estate II. Of the Christian Presbyterie or assembly of Elders Next applying it to the estate of the Christian church whether then it may not also consequently be understood of the Christian Presbyterie congregation of Elders or fitly applied thereunto for these reasons follovving together with the former 1. That * Luk. 2 32 33. with 2 Sam. 7 16. Esa 16 5. Ier. 23 5. and 33 15 16 25 26. vvith 1 Cor. 12 12 27 28. Dan. 7 14 27. Mica 4 2 8. and 5 2 5. Ephes 4 11 12. 1 Thes 5 12 13. Christ being now set on Davids throne as Christ himself is answerable to David so †Psal 45 16. Esa 32 1. 2 Chron. 19 6 10. with 1 Thes 5 12.13 1 Tim. 5 17. Hebr. 13.17 Mic. 4.2.8 and 5.5 Christs officers may be considered as ansvverable to Davids and Christs people to his notvvithstanding the differences had betweene civill and ecclesiasticall estate or other the like 2. That not onely the universall but every particular church now is as Ierusalem in a due consideration thereof Whereunto therefore all carefull respect is to be had in the Ministerie vvorship order government in all things morall and perpetuall Psal 87 2 3. Esa 66 20 23. Jer. 3. 15 16 17. Ezec. 44 15 24. Mic. 4 1 2 8. vvith Mat. 26 17 29. 1 Cor. 5 6 7 8. 9 13 14. and 10 16 17 18. and 11 23 26. Rom. 12 3 8. and 15 16. Ephes 4 11 12. Heb. 13 8 17. Rev. 2. and 3. and 21 ch c. 3. That an Eldership or Assemblie of Governours for hearing and judging of causes betvveen brother and brother is an ordinance of God once established and never repealed and alway needfull to be had in the church of God For vvhich see the Scriptures here before alledged in this and the former chapter 4. That the Elders or Governours office it self is also morall and perpetuall not first and newly begun in the time of the Gospell but continued and derived from Israell to the churches of the Gospel for the substantiall divine spirituall and perpetual things belonging thereunto For vvhich also see the Scriptures aforesaid 5. That the grounds and duties of justice and good government for righteous dealing and judging betvveen a man and his brother are also morall and perpetuall Ibid. 6. That the very phrases used by the Greek Septuagint about the cases of death in Israell are by the Apostle used and applied to cases of excommunication in the church of Corinth 1 Cor. 5 13. compared with Deut. 17 7. and 19 19. and 21.21 and 22.21 And among the Iewes themselues vvhen they vvere under the heathen and could not put any from among them by death they did it by excommunication c. as M. Broughton observeth in his larger Explication of Rev. 11.1.2 and 13 11.12 pag. 109. and 177. and in some respect may be gathered by that vvhich is written Ioh. 18 31. vvith 9 22. and 12 42. and Luk. 6.22 7. That in Israell also such Elders as before time sate in
19 10. Nor is there in such case anie waight in the exception that is made about the abolition of the ceremonies or about the differences between them and us and betweene their ministration and ours seing we speak â—â—ely of such things as are moral or doe agree in their general properâ—â— and common equitie which abideth for ever Of which I shal speak â—ore hereafter in the answer of the fift objection Now then seing the ministration of the seale of Gods covenant unto â—â—â—ldren was had in Israel and is a morall and perpetuall ordinance of God seing also in the Old Testament there is mention of some children by name that were so circumcised and in the New Testament we are taught that baptisme is now unto us in stead of circumcision Col. 2 11 12 it is therefore evident that there needed not be in the New Testament particular mention of anie children by name that were baptized Yea if the names of some children so baptized had been particularly expressed yet should we notwithstanding looke to the ground whereupon it was done and to the ordinance of God thereabout Which we may now doe aswell as if their names were mentioned in particular And this may be sufficient to satisfie such as are of judgement and indifferencie 2. Besides that the precepts practise reasons which are mentioned in the New Testament about the ministration of Baptisme if they be duely weighed doe as necessarily imply the baptizing of the children of the faithfull together with themselues aswell as if their names had beene particularly set downe Of which see here before pag. 1. c. 3. Yea there is expresse mention of children Act. 2 39. where there is also speach of baptisme for the remission of sinnes in the name of Christ the reason thereof annexed in regard of the promise made also unto children ver 38 39. Whereabout obserue withal whether the precepts of the Scripture are not to reach so farre as the reasons annexed thereunto doe extend As in Deu. 7 1 4. compared with Ezra 9 1 2 11 12. and 2 Chron. 21 6. and manie other the like And so in this place where there is mention of children in the reason that therefore the precept of baptizing here spoken of implyeth them also Act. 2 38 39. Otherwise how wil the Anabaptists proue by the institution or first celebration of the Lords Supper that women should be partakers thereof seing that neither there nor other where in the New Testament there is mention of anie women by name that were present and did partake thereof And yet seing the reasons that are annexed to the precepts thereof doe necessarily implye women as well as men and there is no where any special prohibition to the contrarie who can denie it unto them without great sinne and impietie Matth. 26 17 20.26 27 28. Luke 22 14 19 20. 1 Cor. 11 23 24 25. Not to speak how they were admitted to the Passeover in stead whereof we haue the Lords supper nor of other reasons that might be alledged thereabout 4. Lastly there is expresse mention not onely of baptizing the fathers mothers of families but also of their house or household and al that were theirs Act. 16 15 33. 1 Cor. 1.16 And both the terme of an house familie or houshold implyeth the children therein as the Scripture plainely sheweth Pag. 2. as I shewed before Gen. 30 25 30. compared with 1 Tim. 5 9. Pro. 31 15. Luke 19 9. Iudg. 1 25. and Gen. 45 18 19. with ver 10 11. and 46 5 6 7. Exod. 1 1. Numb 3 15 39. Psal 115 12.13 14. and in other like places where there is not any restreint annexed as sometimes there is as in Gen. 50 7 8. Num. 32 16 17 18 26 27. and the other phrase where it is said the Iaylour was baptized and all that were his compriseth also children therein as â—â—y be seen Numb 16 30 33. compared with ver 27. where the like phrase is â—â—ed and explaned as when in one verse he sayth of Dathan Abiram â—â—â—y their wiues their sonnes and their litle children ver 27. and in other verses â—ayth they and all that apperteined unto them or they and all that were theirs ver â—â— 33. Where it is further to be noted that in the same place speaking concerning Korah he saith not generally as he did of Dathan Abiram 〈◊〉 that apperteined to Korah but he restreyneth it saying all the men that apperteyned to Korah ver 32. so exempting the children of Korah who dyed not with the rest there spoken off Numb 26 11. Which also plainly sheweth how in such cases the children are comprised in the generall phrase of all that were theirs where there is no restraint in the speach or exception to the contrarie as in the place aforesaid OBJECTION II. But it is said of the Iaylour in this place of the Acts that the word of the Lord was preached to him and to all that were in his house and that he rejoyced beleeving vvith all his household Act. 16 32 34. Whereof children say they being not capable therefore there were no children here or if there were anie they were not baptized ANSWER 1. Neyther of these two collections of theirs will followe thereupon It is an usuall thing in the Scripture and in all tongues to use such speaches in generall cases of houses cities and the like wherein yet everie particular person or thing is not either implyed or denyed to be at al as here they would gather For example when it is said The Lord closed up all the vvombs of Abimilecks houshold Gen. 20 17 18. and the house of Pharoah heard Gen. 45 2 16. the citie of Shushan rejoyced Ester 8 15. all Jerusalem was troubled Mat. 2 3. all the citie was moved Matth. 21 10. what a vaine and unreasonable collection were it to gather that either there were no children in these houses and cities or els that they also were so intreated and affected as here is said 2. Neyther can such phrases hinder but that the other speach where it is said he was baptized and all his may imply the children with the father himself Act. 16 33. Like as I shewed here before out of Numb 16 27 30. And as in this same chapter where it is said onely of Lydia the mother of the familie that she heard Paul and the Lord opened her heart so as she attended to the words which he spake yet this hindreth not but that both she was baptized and her householde of whom notwithstanding it is not said that they heard Paul and beleeved but this here is onely spoken of Lydia her self who being by Pauls preaching brought to the fayth of Christ she was baptized and her household with her Act. 16 14 15. 3. And if children should not haue ben baptized as before they had â—â—n circumcised here was both fit place and just occasion for the Apostles themselues for the Scripture
recording their acts to haue made â—â—ception of children expressely and not to haue used such speaches and termes as in other places of the Scripture are used to include and imply children therein as vve haue shevved here before So as euen hereby we may therefore learne Pag. 2. and 4. and be more assured that in the ministration of baptisme the Apostles still reteyned like practise as had ben bsed before in circumcising of children when the fathers of families beleeved had received circumcision themselues Gen. 17 chap. and 21 4. Exod. 12 48 49. OBJECTION III. But Christ commaunded the Apostles first to teach and then to baptize Matth. 28 18 19. And so the Apostles practised Act. 2 14 41. and 8 35 38. and 10 34 48. and 16.14 15 31 32 33 34. and 18 4 8. ANSWER 1. The Word of God is not the bare letter or outward syllables but the intendement and meaning of the holy Ghost by whom it was giuen Which should carefully be observed by the due consideration of the Scriptures vvith the circumstances thereof and by the conference of other places of Scripture and the proportion of fayth layd together Which vvhiles the Anabaptists neglect they look on the Scripture partially and presse the letter extreamely vvithout consideration of the true right meaning thereof neyther observing the time persons of vvhom the Scripture speaketh nor conferring the Scriptures of the old and new Testament together nor regarding the analogie and proportion of fayth as they should Much like as the Papists deale vvhen they presse the letter in other vvords of Christ vvhere it is said This is my bodie Matth. 26 26. others also in those vvords Tell the Church c. Matth. 18 17. So in much like manner doe the Anabaptists in these Teach all nations and baptize them c. Matth. 28 19. Where the Scripture it self being duely weighed and compared together vvith other places according to the proportion of faith it vvill be found necessarily to imply the baptizing of children so to be directly against themselues The vvord here used signifieth to make scholers or disciples and consequently to teach as may be seen in Mat. 27 57. Act. 14 21. Matt. 13 52. Now the thing to be taught the nations that they might become disciples of Christ vvas the Gospell as Mark sheweth vvhen he relateth the same commission saying Goe into all the world preach the Gospell to every creature Mark 16 15. And vvhat Gospell Euen that vvhich vvas preached before unto Abraham As the Apostle teacheth expressely vvhen he sayth that the Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the heathen through faith preached before the Gospell unto Abraham saying In thee shall all nations be blessed Gal. 3 8. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made He saith not And to seeds as of many but as of one And to thy seed which is Christ ver 16. And vvhosoever are Christs they are also Abrahams seed and heires according to the promise ver 29. For if the inheritance be of the law it is no more of promise but God gaue it to Abraham by promise ver 18. Which Gospell and promise giuen unto Abraham the Apostles were by Christ appointed to teach and make knovvne in the world that the Gentiles should 〈◊〉 fellow heires with the Iewes and of the same bodie and joynt partakers of Gods â—â—omise in Christ by the Gospell Ephes 3 6. with Gen. 12 3. and 17 7. and 22 18. â—â—om vvhich Scriptures compared together and understood according to the proportion of faith we learne that the Gospell preached and promise made unto Abraham comprehendeth all that are Christs Psal 47 3 4 8 9. Zac. 2 11. vvhether Iewes or Gentiles and that the Gentiles being by the Gospel made fellovv-heires and of the same body vvith the Ievves and joynt-partakers of Gods promise in Christ it must therefore needes follovve hereupon that their children asvvel as the children of the Ievves are together with their Parents under the covenant of grace and to be made partakers of the seale thereof vvith them Which things the Apostles knovving vvell did therefore accordingly understand the commission of Christ thereupon also publishing the Gospel abroad in the vvorld baptized not onely the Fathers of families but those also that vvere theirs as the Scriptures before alledged doe manifest 2. Neyther in deed could the Apostles any othervvise understand nor might they any othervvise practise the commission aforesaid seeing by this meanes the Gentiles should become the Lords people as the Ievves vvere and the Christian church novv succeeded into the place of the church of Israel under one and the same Lord having one and the same covenant in Christ vvith like benefit and mysterie of the Sacraments unto them both as the Prophets had foretold Esa 49 5 22. and 60 chap. and 66 18 23. Hos 1 10. and 2 23. Amos 9 11 12. Micah 4 1 2. Zach. 2 11. 13 1. with Act. 13 46 47. and 15 14 18. Rom. 9 24 25 26. 1 Cor. 5 7. and 10 1 4. 12 12 13. Ephes 2 11 22. and 3 6. and 4 4 5 6. Phil. 3 3. In so much that the Apostle Paul expressely saith the Israelites of old vvere baptised 1 Cor. 10.2 and the Christians novv are circumcised Col 2 11. though not according to the outvvard ceremonie yet according to the spirituall intendement and mysterie thereof And moreover that the aforesaid promise of the Gospell made unto Abraham includeth the kinreds and families of the earth among the Gentiles vvhich all the vvorld knovves haue children in them as vvell as the families of the Ievves According as the Apostle Peter speaking to the Ievves alledgeth it vvhen he saith Ye are the children of the Prophets and of the covenant which God made vvith our fathers saying unto Abraham And in thy seed shall all the kinreds or families of the earth be blessed Act. 3 25. vvith Gen. 12 3. and 22 18. Where marke that he useth the vvord kinreds or fathers-families so to speake according as the vvord in the originall is derived as it vvere of purpose to imply herein the kinreds of the Gentiles the families and children together vvith their fathers According as the Apostles also observed in their practise baptizing the families together vvith the fathers thereof as appeareth in the Scriptures aforesaid Cleane contrarie to the opinion practise of the Anabaptists vvho haue no regard of the kinreds or families in this behalf but onely of that vvhich such as are of yeres being taught professe for them selues from time to time 3. Neyther doe they as they should consider the time and persons spoken of in the Scriptures alledged by themselues The time was at the first publishing of the Gospell abroad among all nations manifesting that Iesus vvas the Christ novv come in the flesh The persons vvere both Ievves and Gentiles of all the nations of the vvorld beginning at Ierusalem and going