Selected quad for the lemma: act_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
act_n	aaron_n	consecration_n	son_n	40	3	5.0254	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A36241	A defence of the vindication of the deprived bishops wherein the case of Abiathar is particularly considered, and the invalidity of lay-deprivations is further proved, from the doctrine received under the Old Testament, continued in the first ages of christianity, and from our own fundamental laws, in a reply to Dr. Hody and another author : to which is annexed, the doctrine of the church of England, concerning the independency of the clergy on the lay-power, as to those rights of theirs which are purely spiritual, reconciled with our oath of supremancy, and the lay-deprivations of the popish bishops in the beginning of the reformation / by the author of the Vindication of the deprived bishops.	Dodwell, Henry, 1641-1711.	1695 (1695)	Wing D1805; ESTC R18161	114,840	118

the_o priest_n be_v not_o first_o authorize_v by_o he_o to_o covenant_n for_o he_o and_o to_o oblige_v he_o by_o that_o act_n of_o his_o own_o authority_n thus_o there_o fore_o it_o appear_v that_o the_o priest_n as_o a_o common_a mediator_n in_o a_o covenant_n between_o god_n and_o man_n must_v therefore_o be_v invest_v with_o a_o divine_a as_o well_o a_o humane_a authority_n §_o xxxvi_o and_o that_o also_o according_a to_o the_o opinion_n of_o those_o time_n nor_o be_v this_o reason_v only_o true_a but_o also_o believe_v to_o be_v so_o in_o the_o time_n i_o be_o now_o discourse_v of_o st._n paul_n plain_o suppose_v it_o as_o true_a of_o priest_n in_o general_a in_o his_o reason_n in_o the_o epistle_n to_o the_o hebrew_n that_o priest_n ought_v to_o be_v authorize_v by_o the_o god_n for_o who_o they_o be_v to_o officiate_v every_o high_a priest_n take_v from_o among_o man_n be_v ordain_v for_o man_n in_o thing_n pertain_v to_o god_n that_o he_o may_v offer_v both_o gift_n and_o sacrifice_n for_o sin_n heb._n v._n i._n and_o he_o tell_v we_o by_o who_o they_o be_v so_o take_v and_o ordain_v v_o 4._o no_o man_n take_v this_o honour_n to_o himself_o but_o he_o that_o be_v call_v of_o god_n as_o be_v aaron_n the_o proposition_n be_v universal_a according_o he_o observe_v that_o christ_n also_o glorify_v not_o himself_o to_o be_v make_v a_o high_a priest_n but_o he_o that_o say_v unto_o he_o thou_o be_v my_o son_n to_o day_n have_v i_o beget_v thou_o v_o 5._o and_o that_o he_o also_o be_v call_v of_o god_n a_o high_a priest_n though_o of_o the_o order_n of_o melchisedec_n v_o 10._o the_o duty_n must_v be_v universal_a when_o he_o reason_n thus_o upon_o it_o from_o the_o aaronical_a priesthood_n which_o himself_o count_v of_o another_o order_n chap._n vii_o 11._o to_o that_o of_o melchisedec_n the_o apostle_n here_o speak_v exact_o according_a to_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o old_a testament_n god_n there_o also_o say_v concern_v aaron_n and_o his_o son_n i_o have_v give_v your_o priest_n office_n unto_o you._n numb_a xviii_o 7._o and_o again_o behold_v i_o also_o have_v give_v thou_o the_o charge_n of_o i_o ●eave_v offering_n of_o all_o the_o hallow_a thing_n of_o the_o child_n of_o israel_n unto_o thou_o have_v i_o give_v they_o by_o reason_n of_o the_o anoint_v and_o to_o thy_o son_n by_o a_o ordinance_n for_o ever_o v_o 8._o this_o be_v say_v after_o the_o punishment_n of_o korah_n and_o the_o second_o confirmation_n of_o the_o priesthood_n to_o they_o by_o the_o blossom_a of_o aaron_n rod._n no_o doubt_n with_o a_o design_n to_o intimate_v that_o they_o who_o shall_v come_v in_o otherwise_o shall_v be_v as_o korah_n and_o his_o company_n so_o it_o be_v express_v chap_n xvi_o 40_o though_o not_o in_o the_o miraculousness_n of_o their_o punishment_n yet_o at_o least_o in_o the_o unacceptableness_n of_o their_o ministry_n it_o be_v withal_o observable_a further_o that_o god_n give_v the_o priest_n hood_n be_v say_v to_o have_v be_v by_o reason_n of_o the_o anoint_v that_o be_v by_o the_o rite_n of_o consecration_n it_o be_v certain_a god_n do_v intend_v as_o in_o other_o thing_n so_o particular_o in_o his_o priest_n on_o occasion_n of_o who_o he_o say_v it_o to_o be_v sanctify_v in_o they_o that_o come_v nigh_o he_o leu._n x._o 3._o in_o order_n whereunto_o it_o be_v requisite_a that_o they_o also_o shall_v be_v holy_a as_o he_o be_v holy_a this_o be_v a_o federal_a and_o external_a holiness_n upon_o account_n of_o their_o be_v initiate_v into_o their_o office_n by_o the_o external_a and_o federal_a rite_n of_o consecration_n among_o which_o this_o of_o the_o anoint_v be_v the_o principal_a whosoever_o therefore_o be_v not_o thus_o anoint_v be_v for_o that_o very_a reason_n presume_v not_o to_o be_v holy_a nor_o therefore_o acceptable_a to_o god_n and_o consequent_o uncapable_a of_o the_o priesthood_n but_o this_o anoint_v require_v not_o only_o the_o holiness_n of_o the_o ointment_n but_o of_o the_o person_n also_o that_o administer_v it_o and_o that_o in_o a_o high_a degree_n than_o can_v belong_v to_o the_o civil_a magistrate_n the_o prince_n indeed_o have_v a_o unction_n and_o be_v by_o that_o enable_v to_o perform_v some_o low_a act_n of_o consecration_n so_o solomon_n make_v the_o prayer_n of_o dedication_n of_o the_o temple_n but_o the_o principal_a consecration_n of_o the_o temple_n be_v by_o the_o sacrifice_n in_o which_o the_o forementioned_a example_n of_o saul_n and_o uzziah_n show_v that_o the_o prince_n have_v no_o right_a to_o intermeddle_v what_o moses_n do_v in_o the_o consecrate_v aaron_n and_o his_o son_n be_v by_o special_a direction_n from_o god_n and_o before_o god_n have_v confine_v to_o priest_n hood_n and_o therefore_o can_v not_o be_v make_v a_o precedent_n afterward_o after_o that_o first_o consecration_n be_v perform_v we_o never_o find_v moses_n any_o further_o intermeddle_v but_o he_o leave_v all_o the_o act_n of_o priest_n hood_n afterward_o to_o they_o who_o by_o that_o first_o consecration_n be_v authorize_v for_o they_o the_o unction_n and_o holiness_n of_o the_o priesthood_n do_v so_o far_o exceed_v the_o unction_n and_o holiness_n of_o the_o regal_a power_n that_o the_o prince_n intervention_n in_o the_o consecrate_v of_o a_o priest_n can_v not_o in_o the_o sense_n of_o those_o time_n be_v take_v for_o the_o act_n of_o god_n requisite_a for_o give_v a_o priesthood_n it_o be_v very_o true_a the_o king_n on_o account_n of_o his_o anoint_v be_v count_v holy_a and_o so_o be_v all_o the_o congregation_n holy_a numb_a xvi_o 3._o and_o it_o be_v reckon_v among_o the_o privildege_n of_o the_o peculium_fw-la in_o general_n that_o they_o be_v a_o holy-priest-hood_n yet_o that_o do_v not_o excuse_v they_o from_o a_o great_a piacular_a crime_n whenever_o they_o invade_v any_o office_n of_o their_o own_o priesthood_n every_o low_a degree_n of_o holiness_n be_v count_v profane_a in_o comparison_n of_o that_o which_o be_v above_o it_o as_o therefore_o the_o gentile_n be_v repute_v profane_a in_o comparison_n of_o the_o jew_n who_o be_v equal_a in_o holiness_n to_o the_o gentile_n priest_n hood_n so_o the_o laity_n of_o the_o jew_n be_v reckon_v profane_a in_o comparison_n of_o the_o levite_n as_o the_o levite_n also_o in_o comparison_n of_o the_o ordinary_a priest_n and_o those_o also_o in_o comparison_n of_o the_o high_a priest_n and_o be_v according_o treat_v by_o god_n it_o they_o presume_v on_o office_n high_a than_o those_o commit_v to_o they_o though_o therefore_o the_o prince_n be_v more_o holy_a than_o the_o laity_n yet_o that_o do_v not_o warrant_v his_o invasion_n of_o the_o office_n of_o the_o mean_a levite_n so_o far_o it_o be_v from_o give_v he_o any_o power_n over_o the_o high_a priesthood_n itself_o he_o have_v no_o power_n of_o inaugurate_v and_o therefore_o have_v none_o of_o exaugurate_v to_o speak_v in_o the_o old_a roman_a pontifical_a style_n §_o xxxvii_o solomon_n act_n on_o abiathar_n be_v only_o of_o force_n thus_o it_o appear_v on_o all_o account_n that_o judge_v by_o the_o doctrine_n receive_v in_o that_o age_n solomon_n can_v not_o pretend_v any_o direct_a power_n for_o deprive_v abiathor_n of_o his_o priest_n hood_n hence_o it_o follow_v 3_o that_o all_o that_o solomon_n can_v do_v on_o account_n of_o his_o regal_a power_n be_v only_o to_o exercise_v that_o external_a force_n on_o he_o which_o he_o may_v justify_v on_o consideration_n of_o his_o secular_a crime_n as_o his_o sovereign_n in_o secular_o which_o though_o it_o can_v not_o in_o conscience_n deprive_v abiathar_n of_o his_o right_n yet_o might_n in_o the_o consequence_n make_v all_o the_o exercise_n of_o his_o right_a impracticable_a and_o indeed_o the_o word_n of_o the_o text_n imply_v no_o more_o than_o what_o be_v the_o effect_n of_o pure_a force_n so_o solomon_n thrust_v out_o abia_n thar_z from_o be_v priest_n unto_o the_o lord_n 1_o king_n 11._o 27._o and_o that_o very_o agreeable_o to_o the_o true_a importance_n of_o the_o word_n there_o use_v the_o vulgar_a latin_a render_v it_o ejecit_fw-la the_o lxxii_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d the_o hebrew_n roo_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d which_o the_o lxxii_o render_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d but_o most_o frequent_o as_o in_o this_o very_a place_n by_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d word_n all_o of_o they_o denote_v violence_n nor_o can_v we_o think_v that_o this_o word_n rather_o than_o any_o other_o that_o may_v have_v be_v use_v be_v choose_v without_o a_o particular_a design_n that_o seem_v to_o be_v to_o let_v we_o understand_v what_o i_o have_v now_o be_v prove_v that_o solomon_n can_v not_o make_v abiathar_n cease_v to_o be_v a_o priest_n unto_o the_o lord_n by_o any_o judicial_a determination_n that_o may_v direct_o affect_v his_o right_n but_o by_o